WEBVTT - Oil, EVs, Arm IPO, and a Government Shutdown (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's head down to Washington, DC. Nathan Dean. It's his

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>task to follow and analyze all the shenanigans coming from

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>our good friends in the halls of Congress. He's a

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>senior analysts for US government for Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Nathan,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you're joining us by zoom We appreciate that. My question

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is is this government going to be able to fund

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>itself or we're going to get a shutdown at the

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>end of this month. Can you give us a timeline

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and kind of where we are here?

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you know, the government's only back for you know,

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>eight to ten days, you know, working days until this

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>deadline of September thirtieth. And like you said, you know,

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>we it's highly likely that we're going to end up

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 3>with a government shutdown. Now, whether this is a thirty

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 3>day shutdown. Look, under President Trump's administration probably not be

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>the case.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>The Speaker McCarthy says that he wants to kick the

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>can to early December to give more time over negotiations.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>But the note that we just put out on the

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>terminal this morning essentially states that if you do have

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>a shutdown, both markets and defense contractors shouldn't be all

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 3>that concerned. You know, during that thirty days shutdown under

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 3>President Trump, the markets didn't react all that well in

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the first couple of days. But then once realized, once

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 3>people realize the economic you know, impact isn't all that great,

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 3>markets pretty much just moved beyond. Same thing with defense contractors.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>If you're Boeing or you know, raytheon and so forth

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 3>like that, you know your contracts are already funded in.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>They're funded in on a long term basis. So the

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 3>real big impact for a government shutdown, if it lasts

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>more than a week or two, is that folks like

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>me in Washington, DC can't take their kids to the zoo.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Well what about federal employees? Will they still get paychecks

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>every two weeks or however that works. I mean, if

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you work at the euro of Labor, and statistics putting

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>together the CPI, for example, are you still going to

0:01:59.280 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>get paid?

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>So what they do is they deem employees to be

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>essential and non essential. If you're an essential play it's

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>about fifteen percent of the US workforce.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Obviously, that's right, people.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Only fifteen percent of the people that we employ are essential.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Everybody else we could do without exactly.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 3>But you know, what's what's happened in the past is

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>when the shutdown is over, the Congress will actually pass

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 3>a resolution or pass a bill that provides retroactive back pay.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>So if you're shut down for a couple of weeks,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>obviously that's not going to be good if you're living

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 3>paycheck to paycheck, but you will get that pay back.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 5>That is not the case for smaller contractors.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 3>So if you work for a contracting agency and your agency,

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, decides to shut down all of a sudden,

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to get that pay back unless the

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 3>contractor and self pays you back.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 5>You're not going to get any recourse from the government.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I should also note that, you know, even though I

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>took light of the situation with the Zoo, certain things

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>like economic releases BLS, you know, so forth like that

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 3>those eventually could be delayed, which and then also could

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>cause some you know, can fusion and disruption to the

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>traders that are relying on that information.

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, what about these things you guys, don't Washington DC

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>called continuing resolutions or cr can't we use one of

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>those thing that jigs?

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And that's what I think is gonna happen here.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Approachriate appropriations process is a twelve bill process,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and they've only got an agreement on one. They have

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to pass eleven essentially in the next month. So what

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna do is they're gonna hit this continuing resolution.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>The challenge is is that Speaker McCarthy has had several

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 3>people in the House Freedom Caucus just say, look, I'm

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>not gonna vote for any continuing resolution unless you do

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 3>fund the FBI or you you know, implement any of

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>these policies. That has no chance whatsoever with President Biden

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>in the Senate under Democratic control. So what's gonna happen

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 3>here is Speaker McCarthy's in a hard place. He's got

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 3>to figure out a way to pass up continuing resolution

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 3>probably to early December, maybe next year. But probably early

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 3>December using Democratic support, and that's just something that he's

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be able to get to until the last moment.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So you're looking at either a shutdown will occur, you know,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing less than five days, but you know, negotiations

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>are gonna go way up to the high wire and

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna see constant headlines over the next two to

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>three weeks of shutdown inncs, shutdown angst, and more shutdown ancs.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just kooky to me how much the far right

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and the far left have in common. You know, the

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>lefties wanted to defund the police and now the Freedom

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Caucus wants to defund the FBI exactly. I mean, do

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>we not need law enforcement in this country?

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought the FBI were the good guys, all right?

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>What else besides the shutdown is Congress focused on here

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we go. They're gonna actually work for a solid eight days.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Good for them, But what else do they have to

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>get done here?

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.239
<v Speaker 3>So you know, you're gonna see a lot of negotiations

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>or at least you know, we've heard the House Financial

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Services Chairman Patrick man Henry say that he wants to

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 3>try and schedule a vote on crypto legislation, I'm not sure,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and many of that's gonna get there in September. I mean,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you have to reauthorize the FAA. The Farm Bill expiration

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 3>is also in September thirtieth, So for the rest of

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the month, you're gonna see a lot of people try.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Things, but it's going to be focused on this government shutdown.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 3>One thing that came out last week that was interesting

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>is that Bloomberg News reported that the Department of Health

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 3>and Human Services is going to recommend changing marijuana from

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Schedule one to Schedule three.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 5>We are good, you know.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>That is a big deal for the marijuana industry, and

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>so we're gonna be looking to see what steps come

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>from the DEEA. They are the ones that are gonna

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 3>have to make this decision, and really we're looking to

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 3>see if they get this done in twenty twenty four

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 3>or is this going to be a multi year process.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 3>That's really key for the marijuana stocks.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Schedule one drugs include like heroin and Fenton myl and

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that's where marijuana is, and that's that's where they have

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 2>had weed for decades now, you know, because you know

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Item nine, all right, So that's something that's probably not

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen salt, any any movement on salt at all. Nathan,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I got to always ask ask you the state and

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>local tax deduction question.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I hit my phone always before these

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>hits to see what's gonna happen with the salt folks

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 3>around town.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 5>But this is laying the work.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Look, the salt deduction is going to expire when the

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 3>Trump tax cuts expire. That's not going to be that's

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 3>actually coming up fairly soon. But this is one of

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>those situations where you have lawmakers from New New York

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 3>and New Jersey going out there and saying, look, we're

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 3>going to fight tooth and nail to try and get

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 3>salt back. I mean they're even saying we would just

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>love to take a pinch of salt. But ultimately what's

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna happen here is if you're going to you know,

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the salt deduction brought a lot of money back to

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 3>the government, or getting rid of the salt deduction brought

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money back to the government.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 5>That is money that can be used elsewhere.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>And there are a lot of lawmakers like, ooh, we

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>like this New York New Jersey money.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 5>We can use this for something else.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 3>So we're just I think the New York and New

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Jersey lawmakers, the Salt Caucus, if you will, are just

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>planting the seeds so that when these negotiations come back

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>closer to the expiration date, you know, they can fight

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>tooth and nail at that point to get some relief

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>back to the you know, the the homeowners of the

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>New York City area.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 2>Is this is this yet another issue on which AOC

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 2>and Marjorie Taylor Green or in agreement.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is going to be one of those

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 3>issues where it's essentially New York, New Jersey, California, and

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Illinois against the world against everybody.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, I understand we've got some generals

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and some admirals that need to be approved for senior

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>leadership positions. I thought this stuff just gets done like

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>rubber stamp. What's going on?

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 3>So this is coming out of Alabama. This is Senator Tubberville,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, coach, you know, of Auburn. He's actually holding

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>up these promotions in response to a federal policy related

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 3>to abortion. And this is a classic standoff between the

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>White House and one senator. And so you know, we've

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>seen statements from Bloomberg News, you know, their interviews with

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>other Republican senators. They wish that Senator Tuberville wasn't doing this.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>But this is just a standoff that's going to continue.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>And you know, we've seen other statements from both the

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.239
<v Speaker 3>Department of Defense and so forth that you know, American

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>security could be harmed.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 5>But I don't think we've seen any end in sight.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Both sides are pretty ducked in and so this is

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>just one of those is where I'm not exactly sure

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>if there's a resolution anytime soon.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, poor Nathan Dean's got to analyze and focus

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on Congress like for a living.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is, and a lot of other stuff, right,

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Washington DC. The weed decision doesn't come

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>from Congress. That's first gonna come from. Who's the weed

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>decision come from? If they push it back to schedule

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>three d DA?

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Right, the DA? Yeah, all right, he's got.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 4>To watch all those agencies. He's gotta be careful.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, the FBI might be defunded, yep, exactly.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? All right, Nathan, it's your you got to

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>deal with this stuff. We appreciate it. You're demand Nathan Dean,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>senior policy analysts. He covers all the US government stuff

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. He is our go to person for

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>all you know, kind of how the sausage is made

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>down there.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 7>With you're listening to the team.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Ken's are Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 6>Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Business app, or listen on demand wherever you get

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 6>your podcasts.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk global economics year. We're gonna got it from China,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>might head over to Europe. Who knows where else?

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 6>Will go?

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Eddie vnderwaldt you can go anywhere. He is a deputy

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Managing Deputy Managing editor of Market's Live team from Bloomberg News.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to as him about bitcoin first.

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So Eddie is an expert on crypto as well. And Eddie,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was off last week, but I still

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>read the news and I thought it was so exciting

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>for crypto when we found the Grayscale SEC decision overturned

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>by an appeals court. So I thought, man, this is

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>great news. Bitcoin spot, bitcoin ETFs are happening. I'm sure

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that the underlying ASCID is surgeon. I come back in

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 2>this morning to see it under twenty six thousand.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 5>What gives Bigcore.

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 8>Really is struggling, And it's really fascinating to see this happen,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 8>right because not only did you have that, you're also

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 8>coming towards the harving of supply next year. Every four

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 8>years or so, they have the amount of output in

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 8>the amount of coin. And if you see that, you

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 8>also see an ETF launch bringing in more retail investors,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 8>making it easier for people to invest. Bitcoin really should

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 8>be garnering some momentum going into next year, but it

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 8>just isn't. And I think part of the reason is

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 8>that we are seeing higher real interest rates, right, We

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 8>are seeing interest rates pushing higher, and therefore, you know,

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 8>people probably don't have as much speculative money lying around

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 8>yet are there speculative assets like you know, your your

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 8>bids on Nvidia and so on are really doing well.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 8>So maybe it's a case of not so much that

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 8>you know that that people don't have the money, but

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 8>but perhaps a little bit more that they that the

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 8>AI story has taken the shine off of cryptocurrencies. I

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 8>think AI is the new shiny thing, and that's where

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 8>investor money is going.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting take and thought about that, but that probably

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. All right, Eddie, let's I

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>want to just go to China here. How concerned are you?

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>How concerned should the global economy be about just it

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like day after day, you know, kind of disappointing

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>economic data coming out of China, weakening data coming out

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of China. How do you put that in prospective?

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 9>Wait?

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought they were finally giving a stimulus, were now

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>stick giving money to parents of kids and kids of parents?

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 10>Yep?

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, And look it's it's been this machine gun of

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 8>stimulus literally the way you know, day after day you're

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 8>coming in and you're hearing more and more more stimulus

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 8>coming towards the Chinese economy. And yet today when the

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 8>moment we got in a little bit of bad data,

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 8>we got that pm I numbers showing that the services

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 8>sector is slowing down, which we would think would be

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 8>something that would would lead to further stimulus in China.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 8>What do we see We see the market actually reacting,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, to the downside and saying, well, this is

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 8>bad news in China? Is everything that is bad?

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 8>You ask how, you know, how does it play for

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 8>the world economy. It's bad for the world economy. It

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 8>says something bad about the world economy. It says that

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 8>we are not buying Chinese stuff and we're not exporting

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 8>it elsewhere. But it is very bad for Europe, right

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 8>because it's it's you know, and I think that's why

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 8>we saw Mercedes Benz perhaps you know, reacting to the

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 8>downside today, even though they've got this fairly positive story

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 8>vis A Vitesla. And the reason is that a lot

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 8>of their cars go to China. A lot of the

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 8>high end equipment that's manufactured manufactured in Germany, and a

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 8>lot of the French luxury goods go to China. So

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 8>if they are not spending, if their services sectors lows down,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 8>that's real trouble for Europe.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I will say Ola Hellenius is now a little bit more.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>He's not as bullish on China as he wants. They

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 2>have a great story, the CEO of Mercedes Benz on

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the terminal, even though they have you know, a concept

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 2>car that has long range. Any takeaways I mean you well,

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 2>my takeaway is that GM already has that kind of range,

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Cadillac Escalade IQ or the Silverado ev

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 2>they already have.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Four h fifteen miles of range.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>It's great to see it in a smaller package. And

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's cool that Mercedes is doing it, but

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>they're not as bullish on as they once were. Also,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the pm I data on China, this is backwards. If

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 2>they come out on Sunday or Monday and say, hey,

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>we're going to give money to everybody with kids under

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>three and everybody with parents over three, you know, and

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>we're going to cut the foreign reserve requirements at banks

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 2>from six percent to four percent. So that's all spec

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 2>this will stimulut of going forward. Why do we care

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 2>so much about the backward looking data release?

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely? And and you know, so the PMI number being

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 8>focused on the services sector, which is more important for

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 8>the Chinese economy than the manufacturing, is because they want

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 8>to put it away a little bit towards the services sector, right,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 8>So I think as long as we that should be

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 8>a net positive because it should mean that they are

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 8>more likely to deliver even more stimulus if more.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 5>Is needed down the road.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 8>Right, it shows that this this hurts the part of

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 8>the the part of the economy that they're most concerned

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 8>about is under pressure, and as long as that's the case,

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, stimulus will keep coming.

0:13:59.440 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 5>But I think that.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Drap the machine gun, eddie and grab a bazooka.

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, right, absolutely, But but but this, And you

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 8>know what, if they did bring the bazuka, if they

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 8>did say, hey, here's this massive stimulus package, all of

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 8>these things that we've talked about over the last few

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 8>weeks and they delivered all of that in one day,

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 8>the markets would have said wow, shock and awe, and

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 8>would have responded accordingly. But because it's a kind of

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 8>drip feed, it just doesn't have that momentous feel to it.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 8>But I do think that this is more of what

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing today is more about reading what the market

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 8>sentiment on China is than about what the outlook is,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 8>because I don't think the outlook has changed today. What

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 8>you're saying is true, right, The PMI data is slightly

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 8>more backward looking than the than than the fresh stimulus.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 8>But we are we asked, we are seeing something about

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 8>the market wants to be negative because the market doesn't

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 8>buy the China story.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, one of the things that I think

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to get a grip of is how bad

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is the real estate issue and the financing and of

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the real estate economy and China? How bad is it?

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>How bad could it get?

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 8>And it is really bad? Right, And I think most

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 8>of the stimulus has been targeted at that sector. Now,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 8>we had a Country Garden, which is one of their

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 8>big property developers, who was very much distressed and still

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 8>owes something like one hundred and eighty seven billion dollars

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 8>worth of outstanding bonds. Now they met payment on a

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 8>part two of their outstanding bonds today, but still you know,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 8>several billion are coming due in the next few months,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 8>and it's unclear whether they'll be able to meet most

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 8>or any of that. The market currently pricing their bonds

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 8>at something like, you know, nine cents to the dollar

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 8>or fourteen cents of the dollar, depending, But you know,

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 8>so this is but the authorities have targeted a lot

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 8>of stimulus at that sector. What is interesting that they've

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 8>done of late is that they pivoted also to things

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 8>like the stock market. Right, So clearly stimulating the stock

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 8>market by removing some of the costs and some of

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 8>the taxes a social with that, and if you see

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>the authorities really targeting the stock market. It tells you

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 8>something about what they want to do to sentiment. It

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 8>tells you something that they you know, when they're targeting

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 8>the building sector, that tells you something about what they

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 8>want to do to the economy when they when they're

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 8>targeting the stock market, it tells you that they really

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 8>worried about sentiment too.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Eddie, you know everybody, I know, it seems like

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with a notable excession of John Tucker vacationed in Europe

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this summer, what's the economy like in Europe these days?

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's mixed, right, I mean, Europe is slowing down,

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 8>no doubt. Europe is struggling.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>At the moment.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing our manufacturing you know, deep below below fifty

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 8>and on the PMIS, and we're seeing now with the

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 8>latest revisions that we got in today, numbers in Europe

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 8>have all been below fifty. Europe has really been struggling

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 8>and it just hasn't been able to get gain that traction. Now,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 8>the situation in Europe is a little bit a little

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 8>bit different from the from the from the US. Whereas

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 8>the FED has a dual mandate growth and and inflation,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 8>in Europe, the central banks are supposed to be. The

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 8>ECB is supposed to be focused on inflation, and that

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 8>means that that that that you know, they're probably putting

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 8>more pressure on the economy than they would have otherwise. Now,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 8>whether they will keep that line if they, you know,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 8>coming to see real trouble, real structural trouble.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 5>In the Eurozone.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 8>None of that we're seeing yet. But if that's the case,

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 8>I think, I think the ECB will will start to

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 8>rethink their policy despite inflation.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't know. I mean all those us I

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>mean vacation dollars being spent in.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>The y Well, hotel prices are very high. You know,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>restaurants have been able to get a high ticket price.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, I stayed on the Jersey shore. Did just

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>find Eddie vanderwallt wut Managing Editor of Markets Life Team

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News. Next so much.

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 6>in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 7>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 6>flag Ship New York station just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>In September's we head towards the end of the year.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is the IPO space, and there is

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>one of note that recently hit the tape. ARM is

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>coming up with a big IPO, so let's get the

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>latest on that. Bailey Lipschal Tease covers all the markets,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>including IPOs and spin offs and all that kind of

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>fun stuff, and for a time they're even SPACs. He

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>does that stuff for Bloomberg News. I'm psyched about this conversation.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, well, I've got a lot of questions heare me.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>First of all, ARM, what is ARM? And tell us

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>about the deal.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 4>ARM is a chip designer, so they essentially sell chip

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 4>blueprints to customers like Nvidia, AMD, Apple, you name it, Samsung.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>So when they sell a chip, they pay a royalty

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 4>fee to ARMS. So ARM they can just pulls together

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 4>those royalties. It'll be it's expected to be, based on

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the term they laid out this morning, the largest IPO

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 4>on a US exchange since Rivian in late twenty twenty one,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 4>so large than ken View, which was the consumer health

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 4>spinoff split off from J and J earlier this year,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 4>which raised about four point four billion dollars. So ARM

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 4>expected now to raise his up to four point eight

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 4>seven billion, But we know, uh, that'll probably get higher,

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 4>just based on how most of these ipeos go.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, you got to add in the green shoe eventually.

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know where I say that.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, we have to. We didn't.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 4>We weren't used to be able to write that. Oh

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 4>really it was too jargoning.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, it doesn't matter. I've been hearing a lot of

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>people today say ARM wanted to raise more. Now Arm's

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna raise this And the fact is, I imagine ARM

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>isn't gonna be getting any of this money, right.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 4>ARM doesn't care. ARM is just a pawn for soft Bank.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Is that right? That's one way to put it.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 2>ARM is any is any are any of these proceeds

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna be invested by ARM?

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 8>No, it is.

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Soft Bank is selling about a ten percent.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>None of the shares are primary shares, they are secondary shares.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Is kind of so and and and and soft Bank

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>recently bought twenty five per percent of ARM from the

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Vision Funds, which Sauce Bank owns. So soft Bank, at

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a higher valuation, took out a quarter of this company

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 2>from a fund that it owns why.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 4>The view from the street and the view from soft

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Bank is that they wanted to have this all under

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 4>one umbrella. When you look at the terms laid out

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 4>in the filing as it detailed, that sixteen billion dollar

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 4>deal buying back that twenty five percent stake held by

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 4>its Vision fund was part of a bigger switch up,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 4>so not really clear kind of what was real.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, they were like, we'd like to hold this all

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>under one asset that we own rather than spread out,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna punish ourselves by paying a price much

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 2>higher than it's worth. I don't buy that, Bailey. Are

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 2>there other people who have stakes in the Vision Fund?

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Because it sounds to me like soft Bank is trying

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to pacify some of these other shareholders that have been

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 2>walloped by huge losses.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's the way that you could. The Cynic or

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 4>the Matt Miller view is that you're basically satisfying those LPs. Okay,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 4>because it's just never explained, right.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 2>We always say, oh, SoftBank bought twenty five percent of

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>ARM from its own Vision fund, and then we move

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>on and the rest of the story and never say why,

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 2>which is like what I will say that My favorite

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>thing on social media was the spider Man meme where

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 2>was pointing at each other and it was kind of

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>like arm Vision Fund one and Masa Son basically like

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 2>where this money is moving from one fund to the

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 2>other fund to satisfy the underlying investors. But nonetheless it

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>still will be a massive IPO key for the overall

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 2>IPO sentiment, all things aside, which I know there are

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>a number of skeptics as it relates to SoftBank, given

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the history of investing Big Road, the Big Wave with

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Ali Baba, but had more underwhelming IPOs, the likes of

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Uber obviously we work as one that comes to mind,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>and a number of other investments that went public Viaspac

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 2>that I wrote about quite.

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 4>A bit when the well and not just soft Bank.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean you said yourself, this is the first IPOs

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and Drivian how'd that go for investors?

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean it's from the office question, No exactly Rivian.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 4>Rivian looked quite a bit like Vinfest where just pulling

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 4>up the chart on the old terminal priced at where

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 4>did the price at? I mean, was trading up got

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 4>up to?

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now?

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 4>It's at twenty three bucks?

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 6>All right?

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 7>All right?

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So here we are with arm Every underwriter based on

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is on this deal.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 8>What's that?

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>What's up with that?

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much everyone except for Morgan stands okay?

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Which liable exception.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 4>A notable exception. It's interesting, a lot of that being

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.239
<v Speaker 4>kind of the view in my colleague game you will

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 4>report on this. The view kind of is that if

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 4>you've done business with soft Bank in the past, whether

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 4>it was related to loans or other kind of your basis,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 4>you're getting cut in on the deal. So when you

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 4>look at those big four banks that are leading the IPO,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 4>you've got Goldman, JP, Morgan, Barclays, and Mazoo home Zoo

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 4>obviously a little bit surprising, but based in Asia relationship

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 4>with soft Bank, that's all kind of where the comes.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's look at ARMED company and the fundamentals of

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the company.

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not growing, no, it's actually slowing. It is more

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 4>and we wrote about it in.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 9>A few weeks.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Chip company aren't chips and AI kind of the thing.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 4>This year, but they're so heavily based in smartphones, so

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 4>smartphone sales have been weaked.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is not an AI play.

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 4>They're pitching it as an AI play, but it's still

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 4>a question of how that fits in and what kind

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 4>of premium will be baked in. Analysts from New Street

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of laid out their expectations that this thing could

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 4>be worth, you know, eighty two billion dollars in three years,

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 4>which is quite the pie and the sky view. But

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 4>when you look at kind of as you mentioned, the

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 4>underlying growth has slowed. It's pretty much flat year over

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 4>year based on their last annual sales, pointing to the

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 4>global semiconductor kind of glut that we've been working through.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 4>They are exposed us to smartphones and home devices and

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 4>not quite yet really penetrating that AI.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>So the pitch when they go on the road, the

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>pitches we're a chip company for the phones, but we

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to be an AI chip company in the

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>future and that's what you should be buying today exactly.

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And they're pitching it as we're getting into data centers,

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 4>which we know with Nvidia has been so lucrative and

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 4>is where a lot of that money comes from. So

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of the view of yes, we've done smartphones,

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 4>but this is where it.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Was not a clean deal. I mean, they got to

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>do some heavy lifting here, which it just feels like

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cause I got slow in growth. I've got to buy

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>off on this leap towards AI, which I don't really

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>have much in the in the numbers right now, you know,

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't really look at the as Matt was pointing out,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the soft Bank valuation, because that's probably not a good

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>comp even though it just happened. So there's some headlines

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it just happened.

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>The soft Bank valuation was for like sixty four billion,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 2>right yep, And they're going to come to market at

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 2>what kind of valuation.

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Fifty four and a half right now as the current

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 4>high end.

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's crazy.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, the other risk that a lot of investors have

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 4>pointed out is China. They generate about a quarter of

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 4>their revenue from China through a ARM called ARM Technology,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 4>which isn't actually controlled by ARM or soft Bank, so

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of this standalone subsidiary with arms shareh So

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 4>there is kind of a bit of a headwind not

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 4>only with pitching that future vision, but also exposure to.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so what's the timing of this thing is

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>There're gonna be a traditional road show and September thirteenth, right,

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>road shows kicked off, Okay.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna see about a week long road show

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 4>pricing expected post So.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing any virtual stuff. They're going the rubber

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Chicken in New York and London and so on.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 4>So what we're hearing, we're hearing there hitting the road,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 4>no more, no more zoom calls. So interesting to me.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>The more interesting IPO talk is around a Ramco, even

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 2>though it kind of comes and goes. They could do

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 2>not an IPO, but they could raise I guess in

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the secondary another fifty billion dollars.

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Wait, So a Ramco's talking about doing more stock.

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I saw a story in the Journal, sorry Bailly,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days ago that said A Ramco may

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>come back to market now. To be fair, they in

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the Journal, I think, cited another story from Bloomberg back

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>in March. Well bred story comes and goes, but it

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>could be a massive.

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Capital race with brinkrud at ninety bucks a bottle I

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>issue more stock, wouldn't you?

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 4>They really want to.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is they can't do it on other

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>exchanges because they don't want that regulations.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>They have to do it in riod.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's definitely an interesting, interesting company and kind of

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 4>that the prospects of raising cash. Obviously there is kind

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of the push. Broadly speaking, for Saudi you're able to diversify,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's why we've seen.

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>All big numbers that would be the biggest amount of

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 2>money ever raised selling shares, right, I mean stock is

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the biggest IPO is like ant Group or something, right, Yeah,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 2>like thirty four billion.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, we got so, we got so from

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, we've got ARM. How's the rest of the

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>calendar look In the next four or five six weeks.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>We've got Instacart. Expectations will be bubbling. They filed their

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 4>S one a few days after ARM, as did Clavio,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 4>which is another tech company. So these are two real

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 4>tests of what IPO demand will look like. When I

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 4>talk to a lot of investors in bankers, they kind

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 4>of see ARM as a one off, just given it's

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a big company, it's profitable, it's was public at one song,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 4>whereas now you have Instacart hasn't been public, was really

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 4>expected to go during the pandemic, but has taken quite

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 4>some time. In Claviyow, which is another one which will

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 4>be closely watched just to see how investors are valuing

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>some of these technology companies, especially those that are primarily

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 4>owned by venture capitalists, again as opposed to SoftBank, take private,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 4>bring back public.

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Yep, all right, lots of stuff. Bailly, thanks so much.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 4>Just stop it in.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Billy Lipsholt season markets reporter for Bloomberg News, bringing us

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the latest on the deal calendar. One of the notable

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>names is a Ramca is arm arm so that that

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>chip maker, so be inchating to see how that plays

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in this market.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Team ken'shur Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 6>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 6>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, we were talking about oil again, Brent. I'll

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just quote the Brent stuff, ninety one dollars per barrel.

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>It's up two and a quarter percent. I don't know

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. I guess it's supply and demand. But

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>let's bring on Fernando Valley. He knows what's going on

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>because we pay him to know what's going on. He

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is the energy analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Fernando, is it

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>just the SADIS and OPEC buddies talking tough. Is is that

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what's driving this crewe to oil higher.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's been a little bit of a better demand improvement,

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 11>and then people like you, Paul, who think we're going

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 11>to have a soft lending and lower interest rates creating

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 11>some momentum behind oil, which frankly, I think is a

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 11>little misplaced considering that the Chinese real estate market continues

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 11>to deteriorate. And I'm with Matt, I think that the

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 11>higher interest rates are here to stack.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese did start a little bit of stimulus, a

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, I.

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Should say, right with.

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Foreign reserves cut at their banks, and they're giving money

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to people to pay for their kids and for their parents.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 2>And it's been this, as Eddie Vanderwold said, kind of

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a drip drip drip of stimulus. But is this part

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of part of the run up in the oil price?

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 2>People think China's going to come back?

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely China. I mean China has come back, and in

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 11>a lot of ways. If you look at just their imports,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 11>they are much stronger than they were during the COVID

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 11>zero policy in twenty twenty two. But even then, we're

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 11>seeing some declines in the US inventories and global inventories,

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 11>but we're not seeing the pace of demand that you

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 11>would expect in an oil bull market, especially in the

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 11>Western hemisphere. And then you know, we can talk about

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 11>how higher rates are going to affect investments elsewhere, and

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 11>then the employment picture. All of those will be the

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 11>ultimate determinant of oil for the remainder of the year,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 11>and we see cracks in that window.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 10>But I think in the short term it's.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 11>Been as you mentioned this, Muli, the supply cuts, Saudi

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 11>extending supply cuts to September, and then some positive momentum

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 11>on the US inventory sign.

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So, Fernando, how about our buddies in the fracking space.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>How come they're not out there drilling or fracking whatever

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they do to If I if I saw Wtech Crudel

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with eighty bucks eighty seven dollars a bottle, I'd be

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>pumping more out.

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think it's one thing you mentioned interest rates.

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 11>Yes, you're higher, so your cost to drill is significantly higher,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 11>especially for the private players. Data availability is much smaller

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 11>as well. And then we've talked about this, but the

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 11>efficiency and shale has really peaked. You know, our colleagues

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 11>at Bloomberg, and you have just put out a report

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 11>with the productivity per well and they're down versus twenty

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 11>twenty two levels.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Why is that, Well, it's.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 11>A combination of a drilled some of your best acredge b.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 11>You are not making the same advances if you go

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 11>back just you know, over ten years, we've been drilling

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 11>longer and longer wells. We've been increasing how many fracts

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 11>stages as we call them, are placed in each well,

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 11>and we kind of peaked because we've realized that the

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 11>cost benefit of adding more going longer is not worth

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 11>the price anymore.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 10>We kind of hit that sweet spot and then we're

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 10>drilling out.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 11>We're going to further and further out regions that don't

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 11>have the same positive geology as the core of the place.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 2>By the way, in terms of the spr which we

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 2>ran down, I guess to save Americans from higher gas prices,

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe to win the midterm elections, whatever, are we gonna

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 2>build that back up because it seems like we certainly

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>missed the chance in terms of price.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 11>Well, there could be more chances. One thing that's certainly

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 11>in oil is the cyclicality, So there will be chances,

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 11>but we don't really need to consuming. We are, you know,

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 11>thirteen million barrels a day of oil output. Our neighbors

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 11>to North and Canada four million barrels. That all gives

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 11>you a significant cushion that when we started growing the

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 11>SPR to the levels that they were now, we didn't

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 11>have the US was not the biggest oil producer in

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 11>the world. When we built the SPR to those levels.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 11>They're also commercial inventory, so we have available crew to Still,

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 11>the bigger concern is really some regions like the Northeast

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 11>and their lack of diesel inventory, rather than crude itself.

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, does it surprise you or is it surprising

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to the market that OPEC plus, I guess has this

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>level of impact on the market. I kind of there's

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a time when I thought OPEQ would maybe I had

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>lost some of its power. OPEC plus I don't.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 10>Think that they are having that big impact.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 11>I think it's really China right now and the expectations

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 11>of a soft landing that are driving. Of course they

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 11>can in a market that is so teetering on supply

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 11>in balances, cutting as much supply as they have will

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 11>have a significant impact, but over the long term they

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 11>can't fight the FED. They don't have the balance sheet

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 11>and they don't have the unity required for them to

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 11>fight the FED. If rates remain higher for a long

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 11>period and drives lower investment.

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, If I'm an investor here, I kind of

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thought that the energy game was played out. I had

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>my run in twenty twenty one, twenty two, kind of

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thought the game was played out. But no, the stocture

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>rolling here. How do I play it? Do I just

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>go out and buy Exxon Mobile or what are you know?

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Energy investors that you talked to, how are they playing this?

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Did this run up here?

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's one way there.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 11>You can also look at oil services because as we

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 11>said that we are a bit more bearish in the

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 11>short term because of the demand picture, but in the

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 11>long term this underinvestment and the high rates are leading

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 11>to further on their investment. You can't find that more

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 11>areas will become commercial. So oil services and exploration might

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 11>start coming back in twenty twenty four to twenty twenty five,

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 11>And it might even be as your earlier conversations on

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 11>Man United, it might be why the glaziers are waiting

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 11>till twenty twenty five. If oil prices get to one hundred.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 11>Maybe the Saudi's will give him a better offer.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good point, Yep, Saudi's are everywhere these days.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 5>Mo money.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 11>Also, they lost in my arsenal this weekend, so that's

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 11>probably why they're down.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Wait, what's arsenal?

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 7>Is that?

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Are you a gunner?

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 10>Yes, okay, see look at you.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Well I've been listening to surveillance, so you know, I'm

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 2>learning more and more about British soccer from Tom Keane.

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, so what's what's kind of the bear case here?

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I know if I talked to Mike mcgloon, your

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>your colleague of Bloomberg Intelligence, he follows all commodities, including oil.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>He's bearish on oil. He thinks we go to fifty.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>What is the fundamental bear case for global energy?

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 11>I think the fundament case is bearish for the global economy.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 11>And that's Mike's point, is that the Chinese real estate

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 11>market could collapse and that would drag along a lot

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 11>of different industries, from petrochemicals to oil. I still think

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 11>that at the end of the day, the oil chain

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 11>looks very attractive in a long term basis, But I

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 11>agree with Mike the short term, demand will be the

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 11>biggest driver. And you know, you just can't raise rates

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 11>as quickly and as sharply as we did without an

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 11>impact on consumption. And we're starting to see that. You know,

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 11>it's just a matter of how if China gets the

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 11>soft landing, that's the biggest variables. Not even the US

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 11>is because we're already not having that grade of a

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 11>soft landing. As far as gasoline consumption, diesel consumption, those

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 11>numbers are already kind of dismal.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Wow, yeah, all right, not for us, like for you

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>and me and Tucker right right, we're still buying as

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 2>much gas as we can.

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Yep, regular unleaded. That's a role for an end of value,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys a little bit more. Yeah, all right, Fernando,

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it for an end of all. Senior analyst

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>covers all the energy space for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape can's our live program Bloomberg

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 7>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Now we've been promising to talk to you about more

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>about cars. Nice all, but from chips perspective. Nicole Dougal

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 2>joins US senior VP and General manager for Automotive over

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 2>at Qualcomm, and Nicole, thanks so much for your time.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing that Qualcom is one of the biggest automotive

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 2>chip suppliers in the world.

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Lay out the market for us.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 12>You know, the card is going through a tremendous amount

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 12>of disruption. It is becoming a software defined platform.

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 9>And a big shift that is happening in.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 12>In the car, especially as it become electric, is the

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 12>entire electrical architecture of the vehicle is changing. Bigger chips,

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 12>more complicated chips, all software driven, and that has created

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 12>a significant opportunity for us to be able to bring

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 12>our technology, our differentiation.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Into the space.

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been going to go ahead and Nicole.

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 12>We are an autonomous driving we are driving the cockpit

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 12>of the vehicle.

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.240
<v Speaker 9>We connect the car to the cloud. Big opportunity.

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So I was just saying to Matt, you know, I've

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>been going to the Consumer Electronics show for about thirty

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.720
<v Speaker 1>years and it's really not even that anymore. It's basically

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>an auto show in Vegas in Vegas with some electronics

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>around it. That's really the auto industry is really take

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it over and it shows how technology is coming into

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the automobile. So, Nicole, from your perspective, from the Chips perspective,

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is the industry capable to meet the demand that this industry,

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that auto industry is going to really drive over the

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>next five to ten years.

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely.

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 12>I think, you know, the the pandemic definitely highlighted gap

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 12>in the resilience of the supply chain, but I think

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 12>every automaker and their suppliers.

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 9>Have understood how to go deal with that.

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 12>We now have direct relationships with pretty much all of

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 12>our major automotive customers, and you know, supply chain is

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 12>a very complex part of the automaker's overall business, so

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 12>a deep understanding of that part of the.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 9>Business is needed.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 12>It has actually allowed us to build very intimate, very

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 12>approximate relationship with our automaker customers.

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>So talk to us about the products that you make,

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 2>what they actually enable in a vehicle. You know, I've

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 2>been seeing I go to all the auto shows r

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I did before I moved back here. To the US

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and I have been seeing Qualcomm at every one What

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 2>do you make possible that we enjoy doing in cars?

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 9>So we've been connecting the car to the cloud for

0:38:57.960 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 9>over twenty years.

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 12>That's been our core business, you know, wireless communications, and

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 12>we entered the telematics market back.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 9>In two thousand and two.

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 12>Most cars that are connected to the cloud today use

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 12>a lot of Fi wireless technology. We have everything from

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 12>five G Wi Fi navigation systems, powerline communication, Bluetooth. We

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.959
<v Speaker 12>entered the in car experience market.

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 9>As we like to call it, which is the cockpit,

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:24.479
<v Speaker 9>which is the in car.

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:28.479
<v Speaker 12>Navigation, and this is a big business that has grown

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 12>over the last decade or so. That's about creating an

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 12>experience for the consumer that is owned by the automaker.

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 12>So automakers are always looking to find a way to

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 12>connect to their consumers, to be able to find differentiators

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 12>that pull the consumers in. As cars have gone electric,

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 12>you know, you can see all of the new vehicles

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 12>being launched. There is a complete change in terms of

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 12>how the in car experiences evolved.

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 9>Ray at I here in Munich, we announced a partnership.

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 12>We have cars now with BMW that are running our

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 12>technologies for both the cockpit and connectivity.

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 9>Same with Mercedes.

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 12>Their latest E class is running our cockpit technology and chips.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 12>So this is a trend that has started to really

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 12>take off globally. In a market like China, we are

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 12>one of the largest suppliers of cockpit chips just because

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 12>of the pace at which we can move the technology.

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 12>And then we entered the air ass business driver assistance

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 12>and automated driving about five years ago. We announced a

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 12>partnership with the BMW theres a few years ago we

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:29.479
<v Speaker 12>were going.

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 9>To go commercial with them in twenty five.

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 12>So the amount of silicon and semiconductor tech that is

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 12>going into vehicles that is really expanding, and we are

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 12>the partner part of all of that growth.

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 1>All Right, You have to ask you about, just because

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems like we have to everywhere artificial intelligence AI.

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 1>How does that kind of weave into your business and

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the products you're providing to the auto industry.

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 12>You know, AI is very much part of everything that

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 12>we do in driver assistance.

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 9>That is underlying technology.

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 12>But the big opportunity that we are seeing as generative

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 12>AI starts to become very relevant is how cockpits become

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 12>more intelligent. Something that we are showing here at the

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 12>show is how is an automaker as they make their

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 12>enterprise much more intelligent. How do they define products that

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 12>are natively intelligent? For example, if you were to design

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 12>the next generation cockpit, would you be able to bring

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 12>the user manual, which is typically something that you have

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 12>as a physical copy in your vehicle. Can they just

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 12>be downloaded into the vehicle. Is that something that the

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 12>user can interact with. We started to have those conversations

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 12>really fascinating how many different things an automaker can actually do.

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 9>If they're able to go embrace AI across the board.

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 12>The consumer experience inside the car is extremely different as

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 12>you think about AI, because the car is used not

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 12>just going not just to go from A to B,

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 12>but also the experience that the.

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 9>Consumer wants within the vehicle.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 12>What are they trying to do, What is the context

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 12>around which they're trying to do that specific thing.

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 9>You have camera input, you have voice input that it

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 9>can provide with the vehicle.

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 12>That lends to the possible to create a wide variety

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 12>of experiences.

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 9>And the silicon that we put into.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 12>Vehicles is already defined to actually have enough AI capability

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 12>that customers can just start to go build on top

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 12>of that and k and these experiences.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 2>So who are your competitors and where do you stand

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>in this market? I mean, there are a lot of

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 2>other uses for chips besides connecting to the cloud and

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 2>talking on your phone and watching TV. I think of

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, throttle by wire, electronic steering, all the advanced

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 2>driving assistance systems.

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you do that stuff as well?

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 12>There is a wide variety of opportunity inside the automotive space,

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:53.240
<v Speaker 12>and we compete across, you know, So our primary focus

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 12>areas are connectivity, cockpit system and driver assistant systems. That's

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 12>where we see more most of our competitors. Outside of that,

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 12>we are not participating in the powertrain space or in

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, the domain controller space today. So our focus

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 12>area are basically those three areas that I described.

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>How about you know, driverless driving? I mean, yeah, I

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:15.919
<v Speaker 1>was gonna ask the same thing.

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 2>When are we going to Actually I know that in

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco right there are you know, autonomous vehicles operating

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 2>as like.

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Ubers or whatever.

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 4>But when are we going to start seeing this everywhere?

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it like ten years out or is it like

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 4>two years out to look.

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 12>The technology around robot taxis I think is well prog

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 12>and waymore and crews have had this deployed for many

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 12>years in San Francisco and also in many other parts

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 12>of the world.

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 9>I think it's really a combination of the business case

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 9>and I think it's.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 12>A conversation around societal adoption off of rover taxi. I think,

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, this is something that is definitely going to

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 12>take a little bit of time. There is a cultural

0:43:56.719 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 12>adjustment that people have to get used to. Cities have

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 12>to be able to understand what it means for robotaxi,

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 12>something that is driverless to apply in terms of the

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 12>utility value, in terms of the benefit, there are certainly

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 12>many use cases where I could see a robotaxi making

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 12>a huge difference in terms of its mass deployment in

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 12>all of our cities. I think it is going to

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 12>be a slower journey because there is really going to

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 12>be a question of consumer adoption, city adoption.

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 9>How do you get the.

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 12>Changes that you have to make to infrastructure, changes that

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 12>you have to make to regulation to be able to

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 12>make this technology takeaway. But the great thing is that

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 12>the underlying technology is actually quite mature, and now it

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 12>is at a stage where as you start to go

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 12>deploy it, you have to be able to figure out

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 12>what the kings are and keep controlling so that journey

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:50.720
<v Speaker 12>is started, and I think the pace will vary depending

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 12>upon which part of the world you're in.

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right, fascinating stuff, Nicole, Thank you so much for

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Nicole DeGale, Senior VP and general manager in

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the automotive business for all Calm the chip Maker.

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 7>And the Bloomberg Business app.

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you're the big media companies out there in Hollywood,

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of big issues ahead of you,

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>most notably the transition from the traditional distribution system of

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>cable TV and satellites to now that this new technology

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>called streaming, and that has a lot of long term

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>challenges for the industry. More near term is you got

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 1>some strikes on your hands.

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 7>You got your.

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Writers striking, some actors striking, big, big challenge for Hollywood

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, Let's see kind of what the legal issues

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>are and how they might be resolved. Katie Charleston joins us.

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>She's a founder of Katie Charleston Law. Katie, thanks so

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. Can you just frame out

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what the big issues there are between the writers in

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the big then the studios absolutely thank you.

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 13>For having me. The main issues that we're looking at

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.760
<v Speaker 13>between the writers and the actors and the production companies

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:15.760
<v Speaker 13>are AI. For one, the writers and actors are concerned

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 13>with the use of artificial intelligence, which could potentially replace them,

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 13>at least that's the fear. They are also concerned with residuals,

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 13>which is a payment structure where typically they would receive

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 13>residual payments every time a rerun was shown on broadcast television,

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 13>which is different than what we have today in streaming.

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 13>And the last main issue is that of compensation. They're

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 13>looking for complete, a better and complete compensation package with

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 13>higher salaries and health benefits included.

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So I can see I can understand both sides here.

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly from the creator's perspective, the actors, the

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>writers this AI risk is just really you could paint

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it as existential. Here be that as I made though,

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I would think this is something that smart lawyers like

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.839
<v Speaker 1>yourself could create some language to protect them, no matter

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>how the technology.

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 13>Changes exactly, and that is really what should be happening.

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 13>Artificial intelligence and its use in copying or duplicating the

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.319
<v Speaker 13>likeness of an individual will generally not fly. State law

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 13>prohibits using the likeness of someone without their permission in general,

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:26.399
<v Speaker 13>But there are contract provisions right Each one of these

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 13>writers and actors are able to negotiate their contracts and

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 13>make sure that terms are in the contract that protects

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 13>them from the use of their voice or likeness without

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 13>their consent.

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about copyright because I thought copyright is

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>really for something to get copyright protection, I thought it

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>has to be created by a human. Is that the

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:50.760
<v Speaker 1>case and how's AI fit into that?

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 13>That is correct, and in fact, there was a recent federal

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 13>court ruling that upheld a copyright the Copyright Office registration

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 13>rejection and a piece of art that was generated by AI.

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 13>And basically the general rule is that you can only

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 13>get copyright registration if a work is created by a

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:15.319
<v Speaker 13>human and the production companies themselves are not going to

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 13>want to use artificial intelligence like chat GPT or chasp

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 13>dot AI or any of these other tools to basically

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 13>replace the actors or writers themselves, because if there is

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 13>not human authorship of these works, then the studios will

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 13>not be able to make any money, right because they

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.479
<v Speaker 13>will not be able to get a copyright, which would

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 13>then allow them to protect any kind of duplication or

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 13>derivatives of their works, which brings them profit.

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So how about get the stuff that I mean writers

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and actors. They care about the compensation, of course, but

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they also care about awards, oscars and think things like that.

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Can artificial intelligence? You can't? You know, something written by

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>AI is not eligible for any awards?

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 7>Is it not?

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 13>As of today? However, I suppose that could change in

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 13>the future. But as of now, I mean, it is

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 13>these actual writers and actors, the humans involved, that are

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 13>nominated and given the awards.

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So again, it just seems to this outsider that this

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is also something that can be negotiated. Why do you

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think we got to this point where a they went

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on strike on strike for such a getting to be

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time.

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 13>Now, well, there's some things that have happened over the

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 13>last several months. I think that basically emotionally charged several

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:39.280
<v Speaker 13>groups of people. One being that there were some background

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 13>actors that have come forward and said that they've been

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 13>asked to be scanned completely so that they can be

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 13>really duplicated and used without permission in perpetuity, meaning these actors,

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 13>their identities will be used without any kind of compensation

0:49:57.680 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 13>or terms involved. And so I think that's an emotion

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 13>charge trigger point. And I think, well, it's it's a

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 13>real fear for these people. You can see the genuine

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:08.799
<v Speaker 13>nature of the fear. It's unlikely that that will ever

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 13>be something that's upheld, especially without the consent of the individual.

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 13>And again it goes back to contract terms. But there

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 13>there's also you know, these unions have tend to strike

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 13>regularly over the years, and I think we're at a

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:29.399
<v Speaker 13>point where overall the nation's been touched by inflation, right,

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 13>and these actors, group of actors that are sort of

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 13>at the beginning stages of their career, really are being

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:40.879
<v Speaker 13>hit with the emotional charge and the lack of resources

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 13>and the inflation all at one time. And they are

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 13>being brought together by a larger group of individuals who

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 13>are more established in the industry, if you will, these

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 13>big name actors that are out there that really they're

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 13>sort of out of touch what compensation with what compensation

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.399
<v Speaker 13>should look like. And so when you have these two

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 13>forces together, along with the emotional triggers, it really will

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:06.360
<v Speaker 13>create something like we're facing today with this strike.

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there I mean, again, we're multiple weeks into the

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 1>strike here. Is there any sense in Hollywood how long

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this will go when it can be resolved? Because now

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you're getting to the point where you know, shooting schedules

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:20.360
<v Speaker 1>are being materially adjusted here and it's real money for

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>both sides.

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.320
<v Speaker 13>Sure, I mean, it could go on for quite a while.

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 13>Warner Brothers Discovery announced this morning that their outlook for

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 13>profits for the year are down by a projected five

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 13>hundred million based on the strikes, and that sort of

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 13>would assume that they're predicting that this will go through

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 13>the end of the year, so you know, this could

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 13>continue on. Really the two sides need to come together

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 13>and talk. There are viable and reasonable arguments on both

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 13>sides to be made. You've got these movie studios and

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.319
<v Speaker 13>production companies on one side, where you know, this is

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 13>a business that's changing. It's an evolving industry where we're

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 13>no longer looking at broadcast television where ads are generating

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 13>these residual payments. We're looking at streaming services like Netflix

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 13>and Hulu that allow subscription low payment subscription options without commercials,

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 13>so they are not generating that ad revenue to pay

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:22.800
<v Speaker 13>these residual payments. And you know that overall, the industry

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 13>just needs to come up with a better type of

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 13>contract and that could take a while to negotiate.

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll have to stay on top of this

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.800
<v Speaker 1>story again, major major news for the media companies and

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>all the folks that work with them, all the stakeholders

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly involved in entertainment and content creation. Katie Charleston,

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>she is the founder of Katie Charleston Law, getting us

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>up to speed on some of the legal issues here.

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Again it's we saw as Katie was mentioning Warner Brothers,

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Discovery warns of five hundred million dollars hit to profit.

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews in Apple podcasts or whatever

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 2>podcast plans form you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, and.

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Radio