WEBVTT - Meta Expands AI Compute Deal, Nvidia GTC Kicks Off

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and ever though in San Francisco.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Meta shares rise, and

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>reports that the social media giant is planning big layoffs

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and an expanded compute deals with Nebuus plus.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai is in advanced discussions to form a joint

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 3>venture with private equity firms to boost enterprise adoption of

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 3>its AI software.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>And all eyes on Nvidio GtC kicking off today, we'll

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>discuss what investors expect from the Global AI Conference.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>But we return to a global conflict that has markets.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Once again on edge.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Oil prices actually come down a little bit as we

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe see some alleviation of the straight orf Hole moves

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and the supply blockage there an indeed maybe more oil

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>coming into the market is pushing up stocks for up

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 3>one point two percent on the laws that one hundred.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 3>We've got risk assets basically.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 4>More in demand in this current environment.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>We find themselves this Monday, Bitcoin two and a half

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>percent high, but actually above that seventy three thousand level.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 3>In fact, we're at the highest level for bitcoin in

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 3>six weeks said, what are you looking at?

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Meta is our top story, and there are two pieces

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of news moving the shares. First Reuter's reporting that Meta

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>considers layoffs of up to twenty percent more than twenty

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>percent to offset AI spending. And then there is a

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven billion dollar deal with Neo Cloud Nebius over

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a five year period. Both seem to be pushing ches higher.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Nebuus certainly jumping on that deal. Let's get out to

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Blue VIIs Kirk Wagner who covers Meta and Kurt Let's

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 2>start with the report on layoffs, right. That's a big

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>potential number, twenty percent that Reuter's is saying, particularly when

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>you consider that the layoffs have already happened and taken place.

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I believe metahead something like seventy nine

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 5>thousand employees of the last year, so we're talking more

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 5>than fifteen thousand potential jobs at stake here. If they

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 5>do indeed go as hi as twenty percent, it does

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 5>feel very high. But I can say, having spoken with

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 5>people who work at the company over the last couple weeks,

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 5>this has been something that's been kind of making the

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 5>rounds among employees a lot of concern that all of

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 5>this spending on AI is going to ultimately lead to

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 5>job cuts. So even if it is not a twenty

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 5>percent layoff, there is a lot of sort of anxiety

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 5>that there will be some type of cuts or restructuring

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 5>to you know, basically afford all of these big AI

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 5>deals that the company has been announcing.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 3>So Jack Dawsey with Block, many others doing similar at

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 3>Lassian with something we're talking about at the end of

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>last week. Is this a story of though also AI

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 3>delivering in terms of productivity, not just having to restrain

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>spending elsewhere.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that's part of it. Mark Zuckerberg has talked

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 5>on the last several earnings calls about essentially using AI

0:02:55.200 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 5>to replace some of those mid level engineering tasks, and

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, having the engineers sort of oversee AI agents

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 5>instead of necessarily writing all the code themselves, and so

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 5>part of it could be a productivity thing, you know.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 5>And they're not only trying to say money on these

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 5>deals we talked about, but to your point, Caroline, they

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 5>have something else that's that's doing some of the work

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 5>that the employees used to do, So maybe they don't

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 5>need quite as much headcount for that.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>The second piece of news is a deal with Nebeus.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know?

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 5>There is going to be a twelve billion dollar commitment

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 5>from Meta to buy compute from Nebeus. There is potential

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 5>for fifteen billion dollars more. Nebuus is building some clusters

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 5>that they're going to be selling to third party clients,

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 5>but if there is excess capacity there, Meta has agreed

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 5>to acquire it, essentially giving them a little bit of

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 5>a safety net. So in total this could be up

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 5>to twenty seven billion dollars. You know ed, we've talked

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>about the Nvidia deal AMD. Now Nebus Meta is out

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 5>spending aggressively on AI infrastructure. They're pretty mu taking it

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 5>from anyone they can get it from. And this is

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 5>just again a sign of how you know much Mark

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 5>Zuckerberg believes in this AI APF that they're on. They're

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 5>certainly trying to frontload as much of that capacity as.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Possible and trying to take on the competition with VS.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Kurt Wagner, Thank you very much. Indeed, let's talk about

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>that competition. Open Ai is in advanced discussions to form

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>a joint venture AIR with private equity firms likes the

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 3>TPG being capital, it's going to be focusing on a

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>bolstering adoption of its AI software across the portfolio companies. Look,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 3>we kind of saw this start to articulate itself with

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Thrive Holdings and the deal that we saw open Ai

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>and helping certain companies basically get on the AI train.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 3>That perhaps wasn't as adopting as quickly as could be.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>But Anthropic's been talking to PE companies.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>What do we know.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in open AI's case, the overarching goal is to

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>make a sales and distribution org have a way of

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 2>going to all kinds of enterprises and actually get them

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 2>to buy stuff. In the first instance, the private equity

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>firms that you mentioned, they have a portfolio of companies

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>under the p umbrella that they can basically say, hey,

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>you know this would make you a lot better, you

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>guys should do deals with open Ai. The numbers that

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>we reported are ten billion dollar pre money valuation with

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the private equity firms injecting four billion. But for open

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Ai that is off balance sheet capital, which for a

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>company that has a sort of insatiable capital appetite kind

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of interesting.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is interesting, and we just see this hunger

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 3>to satisfy enterprise needs as well as consumer needs at

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>this moment. But all of this comes back to we

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>need for compute, and we can talk about that a

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit more at the moment end because two key

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Democratic lawmakers. In fact, I've been warning that the Trump

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>administration's first approval for exports of in Vidia's H two

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred AI chips to China were they risk calming US

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>national security call for bipartisan legislation to actually keep advanced

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>in American technology out of Chinese hands. Bloomberg's senior Tech editor

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 3>Mike Sheppard joins us some more so talk to us

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>about the names we need to know in this.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 6>There are two key names here, really, Caro. It's Elizabeth Warren,

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 6>the senator from Massachusett, and Gregory Meeks, the representative from

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 6>New York. And they wrote oversee, they are the top

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 6>Democrats on the committees that oversee US export control programs,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 6>and their concerns about allowing China to buy these.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 7>Age two hundred.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 6>Chips from Nvidia. It's not new. But what's new here

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 6>is that they actually got a look at the paperwork itself,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 6>and they can't go into the details of what they

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 6>saw owing to disclosure restrictions, but what they would have

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 6>seen in there possibly would include potential buyers, the numbers

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 6>of chips, and what safeguards might be in place under

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 6>the license to prevent unauthorized use. And they emerge from

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 6>that review of this license with even greater concerns and

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 6>further calls for steps to prevent China from gaining access

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 6>to American technology and using it improperly. And Nvidia has

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 6>pushed back on this, seeing that critics of the Trump

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 6>administration's move to allow these Age two hundred sales simply

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 6>allows America's competitors abroad, and without saying so, pointing toward Huawei,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 6>which is a company that they would like to be

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 6>able to compete against in the Chinese market.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Those steps that Senator Warren and Representative Meeks are cooling

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>for is a bipartisan piece of legislation to block China.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>On the face of it, what does that look like,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>shp and is there real momentum behind such a thing?

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, the legislation would essentially give lawmakers a greater say

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 6>in the export control process, akin to what they have

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 6>over arm sales right now. Typically, administrations have to go

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 6>to Congress for any foreign arm sales, say to Taiwan,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 6>to get you know, in essence a mother may I

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 6>on this, and they would like to have that authority

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 6>over chip sales. Right now, that is run by the

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 6>Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security in conjunction largely

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 6>with the White House and as well the State Department,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 6>which get us say too. But lawmakers would like to

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 6>have a little bit of a veto on that. And

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 6>this measure of the AI Overwatch Bill, which has been

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 6>introduced in the House, we're still waiting a companion version

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 6>in the Senate. Elizabeth Warren has said she would support

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 6>something like that. There does seem to be bipartisan interest

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 6>in it. And yet for Republican lawmakers to go against

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 6>the administration on any piece of legislation heading into an

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 6>election year, midterm election year where they are depending on

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 6>access to not only funding but endorsements from the President

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 6>and his allies, it is very tricky and it may

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 6>come down to whether this gets attached ed to a

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 6>key piece of must pass legislation, such as one of

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 6>the defense bills that would move later this year.

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Thinkbanks. Michael Sheppard, thank you very much. The real market

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>focus for Nvidia right now. GtC in the conference comes

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>on the heels of banner earnings that still fail to

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>impress some investors. So what does the chip maker have

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>to do to us a difficult year at least for

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the start. Let's discussed with Margi Battel, head of the

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 2>capital allocation team at all Spring Global Investments six hundred

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and twenty eight billion dollars in assets under management, and

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>you and I and Car have talked about in video

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot when you've been on the program. In a

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>really simple breakdown of the story. The stock has kind

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 2>of traded sideways for about six months now, and a

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of the work behind the stock was this five

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion dollar figure in data center sales just Blackwell

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and Rubin through the end of this calendar year. And

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>for many it seems like that number is going to

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>have to grow significantly or Jensen's going to have to

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>say something about it to move the needle.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 8>This week, well, I think that just to confirm what

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 8>we already know, what he's already said about the growth playoff,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 8>I think should be sufficient. I think was really a

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 8>bigger thing that really took a lot of the megastocks

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 8>down last far and some started to recover in Video Housard.

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 8>But you know, if you look at Video right now,

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 8>it's at a price earnings ratio of twenty two times earnings,

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 8>and that really puts an average for the whole S

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 8>and P, whereas it has the margins and growth rates

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 8>of revenues and cash flow materially higher than that. So

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 8>I think whatever he says to confirm the outlook that

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 8>we pretty much know should be sufficient. I think it's

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 8>really these other things.

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>I think some people I.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 8>Think were maybe cut the wrong way, and being in

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 8>software and being in private credit relating to software, and

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 8>just looking to take some chips off the table. So

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 8>in Vidia is a very easy liquid target to say

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 8>reduce exposure. But I think that what Invidia says will

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 8>be good enough to keep the stock to keep on

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 8>moving higher.

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Really, it wasn't that long ago that GtC was just

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a developer's conference. In your career, have you ever known

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>something like this to have such a macro level impact

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>on financial markets?

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 8>No, because it's a little similar when Apple was a

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 8>religion stock everyone owned, and it didn't matter what they said,

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 8>they knew Apple would continue to go up. And once

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 8>you introduce these other aspects into in video, whether it's

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, controls on exports or development new products that

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 8>in video maybe losing their edge to competition, then I

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 8>think that's what you have. But I think it's been

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 8>such a widely owned stock, it's natural to see nervousness

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 8>come out of that stock. But when you look at

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 8>it and if all you knew about the company was

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 8>where it's trading at and what its prospects were, even

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 8>if you champ down some of the optimistic expectations, you'd

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 8>have to say, this is still a great long term holding.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 3>Even when we're seeing some of that competition coming to Bay.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 3>You just said, whether we get any size that there

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 3>is competition coming for an Nvidia, and thus far they

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 3>managed to Bay the way the AMD news cycle. But

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 3>there is more and more assets coming, more and more

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>companies wanting to make their own chips.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 4>M's have been one of them.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's right, But you know, when you look at technology,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 8>that's always been the story. There's a market leader, you

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 8>have smaller competitors come in and maybe they take share,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 8>maybe they don't, maybe they're successful, and so it's just

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 8>really the price you pay when you invest in tech

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 8>that sometimes winners become losers. But I think in Vidia.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 8>Having said that, I think Nvidia is still is in

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 8>the number one position, and these other some of the

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 8>marginal companies really won't make much of a difference. I

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 8>think something like AMD, I think is a very strong competitor.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 8>But in a market that's expanding, I think there's really

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 8>room for the leading companies to continue to have these

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 8>very very rapid growth.

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 3>Rates a market that is expanding because people want to

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 3>see productivity games, and the flip side of the productivity

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 3>is that we're losing labor. This news reporting that maybe

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 3>met as the latest company to start making waves of layoffs.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Margie is that's something you just have to brace yourself

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>for in this market.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, again, that's what we've seen. We've seen technology often

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 8>cause companies to reduce their employment. And what happens is

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 8>by using technology, these companies productivity their workers go up,

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 8>and then you increase demands. So we've never had a

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 8>permanent erosion, a light approach to creating a greater people

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 8>losing their jobs because of technology. I don't think that'll

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 8>be the case here, and I think in the case

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 8>of Nvidia. I don't own Invidia, but really it's just

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 8>here one of many companies that expanded their hiring after

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 8>COVID and finally said we really don't need all these

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 8>people to be productive. And it's actually very positive to

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 8>say we're looking at where our marginal costs are. Can

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 8>we reduce those costs and better invest our capital? So

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 8>I think that's really actually positive. I hate to be

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 8>positive about everything, but it's hard to be negative about

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 8>technology advancing, even in the case of a company that

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 8>has big layoffs MARGI.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>This week at GCC, there will be a view of

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the world through Jensen Wong's eyes on supply chains. He

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>will get asked about the war in Iran. He will

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 2>get asked about the memory chip crunch. Is any of

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that useful to you? At a higher level in what

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>he has to say, well, I think.

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 8>The memory crunch is real, and that was the memory

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 8>sector is the Actually, historically it has been extremely cyclical.

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 8>There's a big demand, the companies expand capacity, prices come down,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 8>earnings come down, and then they start and the star

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 8>price comes down, and then they start to cycle over again.

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 2>But it looks as.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 8>If there's a rather long term shortage memory chips. That's

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 8>why prices for memory chips have been relatively high, and

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 8>new supply coming on doesn't look as if it's really

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 8>going to do much damage to the prices or to

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 8>saturate their demand. So we think the memory side is

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 8>still quite positive.

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Malgi Vittal, it's so good catching up with you. Thanks

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 3>for the time today, all Spring Global Investments. Now, let's

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about what Wall Street Banks are up to, because,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>being led by JP Morgan, they've kicked off a five

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 3>point seventy five billion dollar cross border leverage loan sale

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to help finance the buyout of video game Make It

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Electric Electronic Arts, one of the largest transactions of its kind.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>In fact, now EA is being acquired by a consultum

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 3>led by private equity fund Civil Management Saldi, Arabia's public

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 3>investment fund and Affinity Partners, which is managed by President

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Trump's son in law Jared Kushner. That the deal values

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 3>a video game company at about fifty five billion dollars

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 3>and will be a test. This particular loan syndication is

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>going to be a test of appetite amid market turbainance

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 3>driven by the war in Iran concerns around AI disruption

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 3>and all of that has pummeled secondary loan prices.

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Ed Okay coming up. China's Ali Barba reorganizes its AI endeavors.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 4>We have more on that next.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Time now for Talking Tech and first up.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Chinese AI startup Moonshot is aiming to raise one billion

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars in an expanded running round that would value the

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 3>company at about eighteen billion, and the fundraising reflects really

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 3>strong investor appetite for Chinese AI startups and Moonshot's valuation.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>It's more than quadrupled in the past three months after

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 3>it raised more than seven hundred million dollars just earlier

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Plus in Vidio.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Partner Honheim is projecting strong sales growth in twenty twenty

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>six after disappointing in its latest quarterly earnings. Now the

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 3>company is a to ease concerns about demand for its

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Nvidio powered AI servers, but says the war in the

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Middle East is creating some uncertainty and China's open AI

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 3>frenzy is beginning to reveal some really clear winners.

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 4>JB.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Morgan says Minimax Jubu could be from the first leg

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 3>of the trade as model and influenced companies see early gains,

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 3>but the bank expects a later rotation into Ali Baba,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 3>ten Cent Baidu as the market shifts from installation towards monetization.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 6>Edit.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll stay with Ali Baba and AI. The company is

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>setting up a new business unit to bring its sprawling

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>AI services under a single umbrella. For more. We're joined

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>by Bloomberg Executive editor for Global Tech Peter Elstrom, who

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>also leads the team covering Asia and China Tech. The

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>headline is a major revamp and the focus is on

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>AI profits. What do we need to know.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 7>So, Oli Barber has been doing very well in AI

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 7>so far, best known, of course for its e commerce business.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 7>It's moved very aggressive into AI through its GWEN services

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 7>in particular. They've been gaining quite a bit about a

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 7>momentum there, but they did lose the key executive who

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 7>was leading this GWEN effort, Justin Linn, departed. There's some

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 7>questions about why exactly it departed. I think they lost

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of momentum. So what you're seeing is

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 7>you're seeing the company trying to show that it can

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 7>continue to progress with its products continue to kind of

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 7>make progress in the market as we're introducing these new

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 7>AI services, especially the ones who are alluding to the

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 7>agentic services that have been made so popular with open

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 7>Claw in particular. And Tencent is coming on now, the

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 7>big rival to Alibaba. Tencent is coming on quite strong.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 7>They're starting to incorporate their AI services into we Chat,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 7>the messaging service that's so popular. It's dominant in China,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 7>has more than a billion users. So Alibaba is trying

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 7>to show that it can keep pace and maybe even

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 7>stay ahead here. We're also waiting for earnings from both

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 7>of those two big companies later on this week.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Peter, your global man, sat in Europe talking about Asia,

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and I'm thinking about what's happening in the US at

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 3>the same time, because look ed Ludlow writing today all

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 3>about how we're seeing open Ai finding ever more ways

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>to really get into the enterprise, this time by teaming

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 3>potentially with private equity giants. Is this what Ali Baba

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 3>is all about right now as well? It's about trying

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>to do the agentic adoption in enterprise.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 7>Right. Enterprise is a key part of the story, as

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.239
<v Speaker 7>we've seen with Anthropic in particular and now more and

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 7>more with companies like open Ai too. They want to

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 7>go after those corporate customers that they see is a

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 7>bit more stable. At this point, enterprise is really coding services.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 7>So far we've seen some of that develop, but you

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 7>want to also be able to get deeper into the enterprise,

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 7>have these long lasting relationships with corporate customers that are

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 7>going to keep paying their bills. Consumers may be a

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 7>little bit more fickle here. So you're seeing all of

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 7>these companies in China, Alibaba, Tencent, Moonshot as you mentioned before,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 7>and Jipu competing for corporate attention, competing for consumer attention.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 7>I think Tencent and Ali Baba have a leading role

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to the consumer market here, but they

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 7>do want corporate customers.

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 3>To Peter Alstrom, we thank you so much always joining

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the show from wherever we are.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate it.

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about another key Chinese name byd of course,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 3>it's all about electric vehicles. Look at the share move

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the most in thirteen months. In fact, why we're getting

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 3>really signals of overseas sales doing well for this company,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>particularly in Latin America, and that's going to really be

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 3>driving some forward growth.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Export orders.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>We understand about one hundred thousand units from Argentina and Mexico.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>That seems to be what the McCrary analysts are currently

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Big move for bo Idea.

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, coming up on the show, Peloton goes commercial diversifying

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>beyond the home bit. More on that next, this is

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Peloton what is having a new category into its product lineup,

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 3>introducing a series of commercial bites treadmills design for gym's.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Daniel Rlman is here to talk

0:19:58.920 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 4>us through it dinner.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 3>I see them in gyms of hotels, but what we're

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 3>going to suddenly have a myria out of them at

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 3>big gyms of scale.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 11>So I don't think people necessarily realize that Peloton acquired

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 11>pre Corp, the big name in gym exercise equipment, quite

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 11>a few years ago, and it really only integrated them

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 11>formally into a new business unit last year. And so

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 11>this is the byproduct of that Peloton getting into that

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 11>business of gym equipment that really was designed for gyms

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 11>as opposed to the home, which is the CEO Peter

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 11>stern Te's today would mean that the machines are a

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 11>little more durable than what you might be used to.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Right the foot traffic of the gym versus my tread

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 2>at home, which is getting reasonable use, probably not as

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>much as it should. Where does this fit in in

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 2>the big story of Peloton We always talk about them

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in the context of many consecutive turnaround plans.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 11>Yes, so the company is coming off of a really

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 11>lackluster launch. Last fall. It introduced new bike, new treadmills,

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 11>and new rowing machine, really betting big on AI across

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 11>its lineup, and so far the sales have been pretty lackluster,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 11>and so the company is just try trying again it.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 11>In addition to possibly rolling out new products in the

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 11>next year year and a half, which is quite a

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 11>ways away, it is diversifying beyond home fitness into as

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 11>we said, locations like the gym, sort of amping up

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 11>on its existing commercial business and potentially it hopes winning

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 11>over more long term customers by introducing people to the

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 11>equipment in other settings beyond just getting them to invest

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 11>in this really expensive gear for their living rooms.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, once again, this is a company that did

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 3>incredibly well during COVID, and suddenly we thought that what

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>is a pretty luxurious item should be owned by one

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and all.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 4>How is he just trying to re kilta the business.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 11>Yes, absolutely, As you said, the company was really high

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 11>flying during the pandemic when lockdowns really forced people to

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 11>stay at home and do almost everything home, including workout.

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 11>And so lockdowns of course eventually eased and gym's reopened,

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 11>and so Peloton is trying to find people where they are,

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 11>including hotels, gyms, that sort of thing.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Bluebersday in a woman with the Peloton latest, Thank you

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 2>very much. Coming up, we're going to discuss IPO expectations

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>with Matt with Eiler, head of Late Stage Growth and

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Wellington Management. As we often say, we're halfway through the

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 2>program and it is halftime. Stay with us. This is

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. And it comes

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to markets, the war in Iran is still a big factor,

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 2>and this is kind of what the picture looks like.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty simple. We do see technology stocks in particular

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 2>pushing higher without performance and semiconductors. Although there's a story

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg Term of this morning about some of

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the potential disruption to the chip industry from the war

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in Iran and its supply chain, things like helium and

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>sulfur may be impacted. That's worth a read, but the

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>market pretty sanguine and Brent the global benchmark for oil

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and two dollars per barrel kind of off slightly.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 2>We got reduced capacity numbers from a number of the

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>key golf players this morning. We are expecting, of course,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>to hear from the President of the United States in

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the next thirty minutes or so. In the context of

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a news conference.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Carrat an important one to watch.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 3>In the interim, let's turn our attention from those public names,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 3>but also those that are soon to be public as well.

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Matt Whyler is with us.

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>He's the head of late stage growth at Wellington Management,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 3>nearly eleven billion dollars an assets under management on its

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 3>private investing platform.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 4>And Matt, if we didn't have the tensions in Iran.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Are we still liking to be quiet on the IPO

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 3>front until we have the juggernaut come into the market.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>How much are you anticipating SpaceX?

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think things would be slow until the big

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 10>ones go out and we talk about SpaceX a lot.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 10>Obviously you all spent a lot of time on that subject,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 10>but I think you can add into that mix and

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 10>Anthropic potentially a data bricks. I think that's really what

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 10>the market catalyst will be for the IPO.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 4>It's coming forward.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 3>That's so funny because we had Ali Goodci on the

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 3>show last week and he pushes back, he doesn't want

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the money, he doesn't particularly want to be publicly performing

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 3>at this moment.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 4>He likes being a private company.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 3>He's got washed with money coming from the private side.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Why do some of these giants need to be going

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 3>into the public market?

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Why the catalyst?

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think if you just think about the

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 10>capital intensity of some of these businesses, maybe set data

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 10>bricks aside for a second, but you think about SpaceX,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 10>Open AI, and Anthropic, the capital consumption that these businesses

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 10>are going through really necessitates tapping into a bigger pool

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 10>of capital that you can't really get access to on

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 10>the private side. So I do think it's not if

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 10>it's when for those companies for.

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Matt, I have a series of mechanical questions for you.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>If that's okay, I whether right, you're wrongly. I've been

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking about a lot of late. So if you take

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 2>all these names that we've mentioned, SpaceX, anthropic open AI

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 2>data bricks. They have a lot of investors in common

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 2>across their cap tables. Does that make things complicated when

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 2>it comes to who will or won't ipo first and

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 2>in which order?

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 10>I'm not really sure that it impacts the order or

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 10>timing of the IPOs. And I think the reason why

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 10>you have some name overlap in the investor set for

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 10>those names is simply due to the fact that those

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 10>three companies have raised a tremendous amount of money. So

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 10>it's less a reflection of some market dynamic and more

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 10>reflection of the fact that when you're raising ten twenty

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 10>fifty billion dollars in financing on the private side, there's

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 10>only a limited pool of investors you can go to.

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And then similarly, you know there are a group of

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the four big US banks all competing for different parts

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of the brief across names that, if you go through

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 2>the news cycle, are all preparing to go public in

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a similar window.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 10>Is that complicated again, I don't think that's super complicated.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 10>I think that the banks is seeing these companies and

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 10>helping them to list, will figure out ways to solidify

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 10>their position in those books in order to capitalize on

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 10>the opportunity, because we're really talking about the potential for

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 10>some of the biggest listings ever becoming to market this year.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 4>And that's where Wellington's so interesting.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know, you've been on the Midas List however

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 3>many years running.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 4>You understand private markets.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 3>You also understand as a crossover investor and into the

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 3>public markets.

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 4>How much are you growing.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 3>Some anxiety that these companies are finding that their shares

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 3>are being marketed in places they didn't realize that. We've

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 3>done a lot of deep dives on these SPVs that

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 3>claim to own a lot of Android or a load

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 3>of SpaceX, and people aren't actually owning what they thought.

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 3>How are you telling your friends around a dinner party

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, No, I think it's a great question. Obviously, sitting

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 10>inside of Wellington, we have the benefit of seeing the

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 10>full picture of what's going on the public market versus

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 10>what happens in the private market, and there definitely are

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 10>instances where these SPVs may come into the private companies

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 10>and even the companies them selves aren't sure who's actually

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 10>buying pieces of their shares. And I think what an

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 10>interesting trend has been recently is we have seen the

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 10>more in demand companies really clamping down on the number

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 10>of SPVs and the ability for SPVs to come into

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 10>their financings because they know in the private markets they

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 10>get to choose who goes on their cap table, they

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 10>get to decide who's they're going to let invest. When

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 10>they go public, anybody can buy their shares, and so

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 10>the companies on the private side are really starting to

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 10>clamp down on who am I comfortable with coming into

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 10>my cap table VINSPV.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 4>And this is about FOMO.

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>This is about a retail investor or more are an

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 3>accredited investor more broadly, who hasn't had access to the

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 3>whopping markups that they've seen in the private market like

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Wellington has, and doesn't want to just be left having

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 3>to buy it in the public market after it's iPod.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Is there enough juice left on the table for these

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 3>companies once they go public for the shares still to perform.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 10>I definitely think so. I mean, if you think about

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 10>the public market in general, perhaps the return expectations in

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 10>the private market and public market are different, but the

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 10>risk profile is also totally different, and so I believe that,

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 10>you know, if you think about some of the names

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 10>coming out in the growth rate of those names, the

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 10>scale of those names, and the potential market opportunities for

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 10>those names. I think there's still a lot of return

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 10>potential ahead, which opens the door for even the Wellington

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 10>public teams to invest in some of these names ultimately

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 10>when they go public and generate exciting returns for the

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 10>clients hopefully.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Matt, what's Wellington going to do in the late stage

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 2>space for the balance of this year, with the context

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of all that environment that's going on, what's the strategy?

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 9>You know?

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 10>I think there's opportunity to be had in some of

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 10>the larger names that are attracting larger dollars and think

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 10>about some of the bigger financings coming to play. But

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 10>I don't think for us, at least, the right strategy

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 10>is put all of our chips in that basket. For

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 10>us on the late stage private side, we augment the

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 10>opportunities of some of these larger financings with comparatively smaller

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 10>yet still late stage businesses. Because as great as AI is,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 10>as great as some of those names we just talked

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 10>about are, you don't have to be an AI business

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 10>to go public. You can be a great consumer business,

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 10>healthcare business, fintech business and go public, and you don't

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 10>need to be a trillion dollars in market, Cab. There

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 10>are plenty of exciting MidCap names, even small cap names

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 10>in the public market that I know our public teams

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 10>would be excited to add to when those names ultimately

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 10>do enter the public market.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Matthew with hilerhead of late stage growth at Wellington Management.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you back on the program, Thank you

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>very much. Elon Musk's Xai is looking to hire bankers, equity,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>credit and crypto experts. According to job postings on its website.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 2>The recruits will help train the company's Chatbock Grock on

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>financial strategy as it joins rivals pushing software for investing professionals.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Caroen fascinating.

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's just stick in with XAI because Senator Elizabeth Warren's

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 3>been busy sending a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 3>demanding information about Pentagon's reported decision to give XAI access

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 3>to classified networks now. Warren calls grog a quote controversial

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 3>AI model and says it has provided disturbing outputs for users.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 4>According to the latter.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 3>And coming up companies are on high alert from potential

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 3>or Iranian cyber attacks.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 4>We speak with Ali Melon. That's Forester analyst focusing on

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 4>cyber threats. That's next. This is Blue meg Tech.

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 3>As the war in Iran enters its third week, companies

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>are on high alert for potential cyber threats.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Look.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Medical tech maker Striker says its operations remain disrupted after

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a cyber attack hit order processing, manufacturing, even shipping. Now

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 3>a pro Ranian group known as Handella has claimed responsibility,

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 3>but Striker and cybersecurity firms have not confirmed the hacker's identity.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 3>For more on the cyber threats facing global enterprises, please

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to say. We're joined bout Ali menon Forester, anlist covering

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 3>security operations at ANAI. And she's got this great new

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 3>book out Code War, How nations hack, spy and shape

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the digital battlefield. And here is Roan trying to do

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>just that. Adding but from Melba spikes, if when do

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 3>we get a definefitive answet that it was indeed who

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 3>claims to dune the attack.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 9>We really need technical indicators. That's what we're looking for here,

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 9>and unfortunately that could take weeks to months, depending on

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 9>how the recovery process goes. It's ultimately the decision of

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 9>the cybersecurity team that is working with Striker to come

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 9>out with that information, and that process typically does take

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 9>weeks or even months.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>How much should industries, institutions, individuals be worrying about the

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Iranian threat right now?

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 9>They should actively be preparing their systems and they should

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 9>be doing that whether they are large enterprises or even

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 9>smaller companies.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that we've seen over.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 9>The past several years is that many of these attackers

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 9>will target smaller companies that have access to larger companies

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 9>as part of their customer base and use that as

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 9>their vehicle to get.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Into some of these larger companies.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 9>So it's something that everyone needs to be thinking about

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 9>right now.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Pali, this is a war and there's human life involved.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to trivialize it in any sense or fashion,

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but in this environment, how much of a positive is

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 2>it for the cybersecurity sector? You know, if you try

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 2>to look in aggregate about what whether spending on cyber

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>goes up or down, one would imagine that as a

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>result of the conflict, it would go up.

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 9>One of the things that we've seen in one of

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 9>the things that I saw as I was researching and

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 9>writing my book Code War is that at the end

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 9>of the day, during military and wartime scenarios, that's when

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 9>cyber attacks are at their highest and especially most effective,

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.479
<v Speaker 9>And so most organizations are going to be investing more

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 9>in cybersecurity and should and we had previously seen that

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 9>there was a bit of a lull before this where

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 9>they were limiting some of their investment in cybersecurity. I

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 9>absolutely expect that to change and more investment to take

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 9>place in the cybersecurity sector.

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>We've looked very closely at how AI, particularly through a

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 2>swarm of autonomous agents in the cybersecurity context, is changing

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the field. Did you see evidence in researching for your

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>book that the threat actors also are very focused on

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>using AI and AI's capabilities in their attacks, not just

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 2>on the defense side.

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 9>This has been such an evolving situation, as with most

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 9>things related to AI. But yes, we are seeing that attackers,

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 9>especially nation state attackers, are using AI in very effective

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 9>ways in their cyber operations, especially offensively. So they're trying

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 9>to automate as many aspects of the attack as possible,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 9>which is going to make it much more difficult to

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 9>understand exactly who is targeting you, why they're targeting you,

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 9>and to prevent these types of attacks in the future.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 4>They are largely.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 9>Not creating net new zero days and kind of net

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 9>new attacks, but what they are doing is increasing the

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 9>speed of delivery of some of the attacks that they

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 9>had been perpetrating before, and reducing the human load that

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 9>they need and the human resources that they need to

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 9>execute on those attacks.

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 3>The book The Code War already breaks down how in

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 3>a Russia US lead in the field of cyber power,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 3>But when you're looking at a country like Iran, how

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 3>much are they a threat to this particular moment. I

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>think many would have initially at the onset of this conflict,

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 3>was surprised that they didn't do more on that particular event.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 9>Much of what Iran is doing right now is prepositioning

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 9>and identifying the targets that they need to be sitting

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 9>in be prepared to execute an attack when they want to.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 9>One of the things that I found in Code War

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 9>is that much of the attacks that take place are

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 9>coordinated with other military operations, whether that's missile strikes or

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 9>other activity. So of course they're doing espionage operations on

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 9>a regular basis to get access to companies or to

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 9>government organizations that could give them more information. But when

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 9>it comes to wiper attacks like we've seen with Striker,

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 9>ultimately they want to time those with more strikes with

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 9>more effective military operations to get the maximum impact possible.

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 3>And the focus of an Iran isn't just to get

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 3>in anywhere, whether it's a vulnerability. There are a reason

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 3>that Strikeer in particular is a medically focused business that

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 3>had relationships with Israel. What many had anticipated was the reason.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 3>But is there any rym or reason as to when

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 3>they get in and why.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, especially with a threat actor that is this dedicated

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 9>to the supposed cause. They are pushing to get into

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 9>the organizations that make the most sensible from a publicity

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 9>standpoint and an impact standpoint. So the fact that Striker

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 9>had contracts large contracts with the US military, the fact

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 9>that they had a presence in Israel through an acquisition

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 9>in twenty nineteen, and of course that they're a US

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 9>publicly traded large company all factored into why they were

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 9>the perfect target in this situation.

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Ali Melan Forrester, Thank you very much. Coming up on

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the program, The oscars Happened at a time of turmoil

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 2>for the film industry. With the advent of AI. We

0:35:49.960 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 2>have more in that next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Layoffs, consolidation,

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 2>streaming losses, and the rise of the creator economy are

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 2>reshaping Hollywood's future, raising questions about whether the industry is

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 2>simply in decline or on the brink of extinction. Bloomberg

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Originals investigates.

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 12>Hollywood is very much a factory town, and the widget

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 12>that we make is entertainment.

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 9>Across the board, everyone is creative, from the directors to

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 9>the writers' craft service.

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Everyone has a talent.

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 13>Some people come out here sort of on accident and

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 13>find a place inside of the circus.

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 11>And I think that some people are kind.

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 14>Of called pilot season, upfronts, awards, campaigns. Hollywood moves in cycles,

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 14>but now the cycles have slowed a lot. It's a

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 14>reset and no one knows where the new baseline is.

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 12>If you spoke to the average worker in Hollywood, if

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 12>you'd hear existential dread, you've seen a pretty dramatic reduction

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 12>in outputs, a lot of layoffs, fewer jobs. Such has

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 12>been a dark period. Los Angeles has visibly turned into

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 12>what I would call a ghost tone.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 14>Employment in California's motion picture industries peaked in twenty sixteen,

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 14>but was decimated by the pandemic, and despite a surgeons streaming,

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 14>the actors and writers' strikes meant a massive loss of

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 14>jobs that show no sign of coming back. Big tech disruption,

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 14>mega mergers, and a looming thread of AI has left

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 14>Hollywood in shambles.

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I never thought this crop but happened in my lifetime.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 9>We're just in this inflection point right now where everything's converging.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Not great economics, bad business models, and audiences that are

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 3>fragmented because I forgotten what a star.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Looks like a bit of a musswash.

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 3>You can find the full episode on Bloomberg dot com

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 3>or on the Terminal. And this is all the terminal

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Why talk about for the film industry is a context

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 3>in which the Oscars just took place on Sunday.

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Now, one battle after another took home.

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Best Picture Prize at the Academy Awards, delivering a long

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 3>awaited win for the veteran filmmaker Paul Thomas Anderson. Meanwhile,

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Netflix is k Pop Demon Hunters, the most watched film

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 3>ever on the streaming service, one Best Animated Film for

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 3>the Most Entertainment Team leader Chris Palmery joins us for more.

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 3>There were first time awards that we've never seen being given.

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 3>This talk us through the big Winner. It does seem

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to be one battle after another.

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think, yeah, well, the for sure the big

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 15>winner is Warner Brothers. They went into this with two

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 15>favorites and they came out with the most trophies, for sure,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 15>of any studio. I think, in general, too, whig winner

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 15>is Hollywood. I mean, as you set up there, I mean,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 15>there's so much angst in Hollywood right now with mergers

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 15>and AI and job losses, and this was a show

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 15>that really celebrated the best of filmmaking. It didn't go

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 15>too much in a political direction, I think, even though

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 15>I can't imagine one battle after another's on President Trump's

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 15>viewing list, but it could have been much worse for Hollywood,

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 15>and I think it actually it made them look pretty good.

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>AI came up in the form of Conan O'Brien's opening monologue,

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 2>along with some other jokes about those in attendance, But

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the AI thing was present, at least on the stream

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I was watching.

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, you know, as you mentioned, it came up, you know,

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 15>Conan joked that he was going to be the last

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 15>human host of the awards. But again the winners here,

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 15>Paul Thomas Anderson for one battle, Ryan Coogler for sinners.

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 15>These guys are real tours. They are people who tell

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 15>unique stories, and they were big studio movies as well.

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 15>So this was really a celebration of classic Hollywood, not

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 15>not a look forward with dread.

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 2>The most entertainment edits a Chris Palm Mary in La

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much. This term from Hollywood's big show

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 2>to AI's big sh shares of n Vidio actually pushing

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 2>higher in anticipation of GtC GPU Technology Conference. Bloomberg's executive

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 2>editor Senior executive editor Tom Giles is with us here

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco. There's a lot of like, Wow, this

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 2>is the super Bowl of AI, et cetera. But you know,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I think some smart writing on the Bloombay time this

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 2>morning is that actually, this is a stop that's been

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 2>going sideways for quite a long time.

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 13>For six months, it's gone nowhere, and everybody is looking

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 13>to Jensen Wang this week to say some things to

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 13>reassure the market. Three things stand out for me. One

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 13>that long term projection for sales of advanced chips. He's

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 13>talked about five hundred billion through twenty twenty six. Are

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 13>there going to be any updates to that number? Is

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 13>it going to change the timetable? Is it going to

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 13>up the number people are looking for that? Second of

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 13>all concerns about the war, what is the war going

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 13>to do to global demand? Global growth? And specifically the

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 13>supply chain? The closed straits of horror moves mean that

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 13>supply of helium is constricted and and and chip makers

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 13>need that for uh there for production. And then thirdly

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 13>the question is uh, what happens to what about products?

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 13>What about the product pipeline? Will he do anything with

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 13>that grock purchase that he made very quietly when no

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 13>one was looking? And and will he get into CPUs?

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this guy is going to speak for hours,

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 3>hour and a half at least, And then over communicators

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 3>we're all used to what are we anticipating in terms

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.280
<v Speaker 3>of the kinds of questioning around the CPU? For example,

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 3>are we going to get any more details of how

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 3>much he wants to own that side?

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 13>That's right? And and and and eat other chip maker's

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 13>lunch the way he has with so many in so

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 13>many other areas of this industry. So they're going to

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 13>be peppering him with questions about product. They're going to

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:05.240
<v Speaker 13>be questioning questioning him about China and is the Chinese

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 13>government going to say yes to the importation of those

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 13>futuips that the US government has allowed into China. Remember

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 13>right now, his forecasts are removing China from the picture completely.

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 13>So war China product pipeline and long term growth. The

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 13>market needs reassurance and they're going to be looking to

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 13>Jensen throughout this week to give it to them.

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 2>In your career, so I'm leading this newsroom. What's the

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 2>most analogous someone like Jensen Wong who goes on stage

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 2>and is like a rock star at a concert. You

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.919
<v Speaker 2>know who's he akin to in how we cover him?

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, remember, I mean for a long time, Apple products, right,

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 13>an Apple product unveiling was like this high holiday for

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:55.399
<v Speaker 13>Silicon Valley one more thing, remember, and the ways that

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:59.479
<v Speaker 13>that captured and moved stocks around the world. I think

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 13>is in many ways similar to that. And then you

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 13>know there's a reason why they call it jensanity.

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, take us back to the times where he's having

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 3>to sign people's T shirts Bluemos, Tom Jarles, so appreciate you.

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for joining. Now that does it. But this a

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 4>vision Bloomberg Tech. It's a busy week.

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah and jokes aside. You know GtC is a macro

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 2>level event. It will move market and there was a

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 2>great preview to it. So check it out on the podcast.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find out on the terminal and

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 2>online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart from New York City

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 2>and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Tech.