WEBVTT - Intel's Offer from Apollo, Energy Demand on the Rise

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple card Playing and Broud Auto with the

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>YouTube on Stock on the move is definitely Intel up

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>over three percent. It had a big gap hire here

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>on the end of close on Friday on the rumors

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>that maybe Qualcom was looking at a possible deal for Intel.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Then this morning we learn that Apollo was offered to

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>have made a multi billion dollar investment in the company

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>as well. Want to get more on this with Leanna Baker,

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News Managing director of the Deal team. She joins

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 2>us here in studio. Leana, talk us through the Apollo part.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>What does that look like in your reporting? Sure, so

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a potential investment. Apollo has made this offer

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to Intel. It's unclear if Intel is going to take

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 2>them up on this offer. Although Apollo is already a

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 2>partner to Intel. They have a joint venture with them

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>for their Irish plant, which was a really big project.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, we're waiting to see how Intel decides to proceed.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned there is an approach that came from Qualcomm.

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Late last week, so Intel has a lot to think about.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Its board is meeting to decide which way to go.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>This Apollo investment could be an alternative potentially to the

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Qualcom merger, or it could be something that happens before

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>any deal with Qualcomm would take a long time, according

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>to analysts, just due to all the regulatory bodies around

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the world that would have to bless this deal.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, was this expected and you're reporting were there any

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 4>whispers about this prior to this?

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 3>So we've been chasing for a long time what Intel

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>is going to do. Since they are disastrous earnings report

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 3>over the summer, they've kind of put themselves in play.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 3>At Bloomberg, we were the first to report that the

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 3>company was thinking about M and A options, about a

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 3>potential split, and then you might remember that late last week,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, paq Elsinger put out a statement kind of

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>laying out what would happen. We are watching to see

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>what happens with the foundry business.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Intel.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Foundriies is something that Intel has spent a lot of

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 3>money on over the years, and it's not making money.

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't have that many customers, and that is sort

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of sinking the company right now. Even though it's kind

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>of the long term future play that the management is

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>laid out for Intel, what is.

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>In it for Apollo? Like, I know you said they

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>have a doinventor, but like, why so?

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Apollo is a turnaround specialist. They love complicated situations, putting

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 3>money to work where maybe other pockets of Wall Street

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>doesn't go. This is a perfect example. They've already invested

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 3>in Intel. Intel clearly needs some confidence capital. They need

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>someone on Wall Street to say I believe in the

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 3>future of this company under pau Elsinger. This is why,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>because you know, the stock slow. It has been really

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>remarkable to even be at the point where it could

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 3>be considered a takeover target for Qualcom, one of their competitors.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 4>So where does Wall Street think that they should go

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Qualcomm or Apollo?

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>We don't know at this point, and there could also

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>be other suitors or analysts are saying. We report it

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend that Broadcom, which some people speculate it

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>could be interested that they're currently not evaluating an offer

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 3>for Intel. So right now Broadcom's on the sidelines. Could

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that still change? We'll keep an eye on it, but

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Intel has a lot of options to consider. It's going

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 3>to be an interesting few weeks to see where things go.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Hey, can I answer a quick question, how does this

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 5>impact the Chips Act? The investment from the Biden administration?

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Does that change at all in any of these scenarios.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>It's all related because the US government has a long

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 3>term ban on Intel as a manufacturer that's in the

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 3>US of chips, which are so critical. So the US

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>government is watching this all really closely. They want Intel

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to survive, whether that's with Qualcomm, whether that with a

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>capital in fusion from Apollo. So they want to be

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 3>part of the solution. Since Intel it stands to gain

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of cash from the government.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 5>They want them to combine. So they would tell Justice

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 5>and the other regulators hands off this one.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Huh. That would be interesting, wouldn't it right?

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>And it sounds like a conspiracy theory, But you have

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>to understand that any deal that Intel does would need

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>the blessing from the government. So sure, could the US

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 3>government tap qual come on the shoulder and say, hey,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, do a solid for us and make an offer.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea, but there's all these different theories

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>that people are saying, and it's not that crazy to

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>think people in DC might know more about this deal

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 3>than we know right here.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Right what's the most interesting thing that you found while

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 4>you're reporting.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I just love semiconductors. It's always interesting. And just to

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 3>see an American icon like Intel face with these prospects

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>and we're talking this could be the largest tech deal

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of all time if Intel is somehow sold. So it's

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>just amazing to be following this situation because I've been

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>reporting on on semis for you know, over a decade,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and you just you never know how this is going

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 3>to go.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, also, just how fast this all deteriorated, Like I've

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>read so many stories of sort of the decline and Intel

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and how fast it came on. And then we're talking

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 2>about this moment where like Qualcom might need to step in,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Apollo might need to step in, the government might need

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 2>to step in in a particular fashion that to me

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>is really striking.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Is it also striking to you how quickly Nvidia kind

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 3>of caught everyone's imagination. And so it's a semiconductors, it's

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's cyclical, it depends on trends and AI

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>so it's so fast moving and it's just been a

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>spectacular industry to follow.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Lenna, thanks a lot, great reporting. Really

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.559
<v Speaker 2>appreciate Itly on a Baker Bloomberg News and managing editor

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>for the Deal Team and joining us on that.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Auto with a Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 2>We get a bunch of CEO interviews the next two hours,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and I say a bunch because it's nice to get

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 2>perspective kind of on the ground on where the growth is,

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 2>where the worry spots are, how hiring is, what inflation

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>looks like. So let's kick it off now with Signet Jewelers.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So they had earnings on the twelfth, and they did

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>really well. They reported adjusted earnings and comparable sales for

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 2>the second quarter of the top analyst expectations. The stocks

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and sent is up over eleven percent. Management set in

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 2>the earning statement that comp sales are positive so far

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 2>in the third quarter, some of the analysts are also saying, look,

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>this was a better than feared quarter, especially when you

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>look at the reiterated annual guidance. So we wanted to

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 2>get an update from the CEO. Jenna Gudrosos is CEO

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>of Signet, joining us now from Seattle. Jenna walk us

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>through sort of the highlights, like what you think that

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 2>it really impressed investors, and then we can go from there.

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 6>Sure, well, good morning, great to be with you. Our

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 6>team delivered a sequential improvement in same store sales. It

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 6>was the fifth quarter in a row that we've seen

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 6>a sequential improvement. As you said, comp sales have been

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 6>positive in Q three to date. That's encouraging because in

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 6>the jewelry category and especially engagements, COVID is actually just ending.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 6>So while for a lot of businesses COVID was in

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty, people tend to get engaged about three years

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 6>after they meet, and people weren't meeting during lockdown in

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty, so we saw a twenty five percent drop

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 6>in the average number of people getting engaged in twenty

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 6>twenty three, and that's been slowly coming back in twenty

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 6>twenty four, but we saw that turn positive as we've

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 6>entered the third quarter, so that was encouraging.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to know. Of course, a lot of consumer

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 4>companies have talked about house shoppers are watching their spending carefully,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 4>they're being very nitpicky. Is that something that you all

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 4>have noticed at all? What is it look like for

0:07:58.240 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 4>your business?

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes? I think we've seen a cautious customer for most

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 6>of this calendar year. An example of that is that

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 6>we see customers coming to our websites fifteen percent more

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 6>often before they make a purchase than we did a

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 6>year ago. So people are being careful in an environment

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 6>like this, but when it comes to getting engaged, they

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 6>might delay a little bit just make sure they're getting

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 6>the right value, which given our scale, we feel like

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 6>we can very often offer. But they're still deciding to

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 6>get engaged, and we expect that to pick up as

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 6>we go through peak engagement season, which is during the holidays.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Hey, it's John Tucker. Can I ask a quick question.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 5>I can see the price of Goal, by the way,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 5>was a record. How do you track diamonds because that's

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>essentially a cartel that controls the supply and I guess

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 5>the pricing there right? How does that work.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 6>No, Diamonds trade just like gold does. There commodity. Many

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 6>many years ago, it was more of a monopoly situation,

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 6>but that hasn't been true for a couple of decades.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 6>Now there are multiple miners that mind diamonds around the world.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 6>Signet is one of only five retailers in the world

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 6>that are vertically integrated and actually buy diamonds directly from

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 6>the miners. We own our own cutting and polishing facility

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 6>in Botswana, so we have a really good I would say,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 6>a vertically integrated I into what diamonds should cost, what

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 6>metal should cost, how much it should cost to cut

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 6>and polish of stone, and that's how we're able to

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 6>bring great value to our customers.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Now, how do you control the sourcing or nowhere where

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 5>it comes from.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 6>So that's really one of the places where Signet has

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 6>shined and been a leader in the industry. Responsible sourcing

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 6>is very important to our customers and to our company

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 6>and I you know, and to my twenty something children,

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 6>I should add, So we are pristine, we can guarantee

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 6>to all of our customers. We have what's called the

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Signet Promise that we are confident that all of the

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 6>metals and all of the gemstones, including diamonds that we

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 6>source our conflict free and produced in a way that

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 6>they would feel good about. So we trace that back

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 6>to the origin of where the diamonds are, where the

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 6>metals come from, so we can be confident.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 2>There's also the lab grown diamond phenomenon. And when I

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 2>was doing you know, packages on diamonds fifteen years ago,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that was like really taboo. Now I hear of younger

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 2>people and this is what they do. They want to

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>save a little money, but they still wanted to look pretty.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>What kind of market do you know is evolving here

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and kind of what the pricing is and what the

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>demand is.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so lab created diamonds have been broadly available in

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 6>jewelry since twenty nineteen, so about five years now. Of course,

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 6>they've been available for a long time in drill bits

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 6>and you know things like that that needed a hard

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 6>substance to be part of it, but in jewelry about

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 6>five years. Every year since they've been in the market,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 6>the price has fallen about five about fifteen to thirty

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 6>percent actually, so they haven't really maintained their value over time,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 6>and that's because they're made in a machine and you know,

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 6>about three weeks, whereas a natural diamond is precious. It's

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, made in the earth over a billion years,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 6>and so they're chemically the same but quite different. And

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 6>what we've seen is that consumers, if they are on

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 6>a tight budget and want to get a bigger stone,

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 6>lab created can be a great choice for them in

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 6>an engagement ring. But it's particularly a great choice in

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 6>fashion jewelry, where maybe it's not quite as sentimental a piece.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 6>That's where we really see lab Created as having a

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 6>bigger potential on over the long term.

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So just a tootle tootle, tell John Tucker. So a

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>fashion jewelry is like, here's my super cool ring that

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing with my evening gown.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 4>Everyone look at it. It's it's really big.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it has a good shape. That's kind of interesting.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't have to break my bang for it.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Now, Is there some Is there some planned by you

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 5>guys to like trying to get people to get married.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 7>No, not.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 5>That, which is a plan. When you pipe in romantic

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 5>music to you, it's got to be right.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 6>No, No, we don't. We don't plan. But I will

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 6>say that we have a lot of consumer insight around that.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 6>Several years ago, we started tracking the milestones that couples

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 6>typically go through between when they meet and when they

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 6>get engaged. So, for example, they typically go to a

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 6>movie or a concert before they say I love you,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 6>or move in together, or meet the parents or things

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 6>like that. And so we with our partners at Google

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 6>and Meta, have identified forty five trackable signs or milestones

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 6>that couple couples typically go through. Once they've crossed over

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 6>twenty six, they are statistically significantly more likely to get

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 6>engaged in the next twelve months.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I'm learning a lot, i'd be

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>speaking right to north right as I'm thinking about the future.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 6>It's super interesting. And that's one of the things we

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 6>said in our second quarter call is that there's a

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 6>nine hundred basis point increase or twenty percent more couples

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 6>that crossed over that milestone in the second quarter this

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 6>year versus the second quarter last year. So we really

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 6>are seeing this ramp back up to a normalized level

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 6>of engagement.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>All so happy on it ten o'clock on a Tuesday

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>and a Monday. All right, thanks so much, didn't address us.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciate CEO of Signetic.

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence pot Catch us live

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on AFO, Cardplay and enroud

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Oto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 2>So natural gas prices are two dollars and fifty seven

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>cents MMBT you. It's much better than we were before.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>We were under two dollars MMBT you. But still considering

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the amount of demand globally that we need, that price

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit low. So we wanted to check

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>in with the largest independent natural gas producer right here

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 2>in the United States. They have world class assets and

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>appllation basin, and that is Toby Rice, CEO of natural

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>gas producer EQT. He joins us in studio. Hey Toby,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 2>good to see you.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Good morning.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>So do you like prices at two fifty eight?

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, we are unique in the sense that our company

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 8>actually can generate free cash flow at a price as

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 8>low as two dollars, but that is not the case

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 8>for the other producers in the United States. Our view

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 8>is that the marginal producer in the US requires about

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 8>three dollars and fifty cents to justify activity levels and

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 8>rigs up in the air.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>So when you look at prices, say then under three

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>or actually under two, where do you sort of like

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>just say, we're gonna just going to drill them, not

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>complete them, and hang tight and then when you kind

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of release it, and what does your inventory right now

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 2>look like?

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 8>So right now, short term people are looking at curtailments, uh,

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 8>and you have about two bcf a day of natural

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 8>gas that's currently curtailed.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 9>This is as simple as just.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 8>Operators shutting in the chokes. That production could come back

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 8>and you'll see that pressuring prices up until about three

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 8>dollars range. But then after that there's some some short

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 8>cycle activity that would come back requires about three fifty

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 8>and again that's sort of the price that you'll see

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 8>with activity levels. So these shorter price these shorter prices

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing right now are going to ultimately influence activity

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 8>levels that are set. Is part of the twenty twenty

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 8>five budget planning which will influence supply in the future,

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 8>and we think is going to be pretty constructive towards

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 8>the second half of twenty twenty five, where more energy

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 8>demand picks up at some of these activity reductions will

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 8>start hitting the front lines.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's talk a little bit about AI. Natural gas

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 4>is not, of course at top of mind as an

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence trade, but some people are saying that rising

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 4>power demand for more natural gas demand. Are you drilling

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>to meet that demand at all? How would you all

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 4>boost production?

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, natural gas, about a third of it is used

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 8>for power generation, so it is a very important dynamic

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 8>to study and look at. EQT has an asset called

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 8>Mountain Valley Pipeline, which is a very contested pipeline. Fortunately

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 8>that was put in service this summer. That's going to

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 8>send about two Bcfi day of natural gas down to

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 8>the Southeastern markets. And we just announced some deals, one

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 8>of the largest physical supply deals with two very large

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 8>utilities in that market to deliver up to one point

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 8>two Bcfi day of natural gas. Now, where is that

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 8>natural gas going? Sure, it's going to help keep people's

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 8>homes warm in the winter time, but a large portion

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 8>of that is going to power gen and it's going

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 8>to be replacing cold facility. Ye, that would be enough

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 8>natural gas to power about eight gigawatts of power.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, one of the biggest problems in this whole scenario

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is how you move the stuff, and that's a pipeline issue,

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and that's an infrastructure issue. Are where are those conversations

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 2>now in that we're going to have to have data

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>centers built near where you guys pump natural gas or

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>we're actually going to be able to get the pipelines

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 2>in the ground to move it to where those data

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 2>centers can be built.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, it always makes sense if you're an energy intensive

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 8>business to build your facilities close to where the energy is,

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 8>and that would put Appalachia as a really great place

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 8>to be. But you know, just to step back at

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 8>a very high level, what's happened in the United States

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 8>over the last fifteen years, and it really understands the

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 8>natural gas markets. Since twenty ten, demand has grown fifty

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 8>percent for natural gas, but during that period of time,

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 8>natural gas infrastructure pipelines has only grown twenty five percent,

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 8>and most importantly, natural gas storage infrastructure has only grown

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 8>twelve percent. What does that mean? That means we haven't

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 8>built enough pipelines to keep up with demand, and our

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 8>current pipeline system is maxed out. You're going to continue

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 8>to see big disconnects between markets, like we're going to

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 8>be selling our natural gas for four dollars in Appalachia,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 8>and people in Boston and New York are could be

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 8>paying ten to twenty dollars to that natural gas. But

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 8>the storage infrastructure is probably the most important dynamic. Simply put,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 8>natural gas storage is no longer sufficient to bounce supply

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 8>and demand. And what that means is that price is

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 8>going to bounce supply and demand. And so we would

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 8>describe the natural gas markets going forward as being very volatile,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 8>and we think pricing could be as low as two

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 8>dollars you see now, and you see sort of a

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 8>natural floor where operators will actually curtail production volumes. But

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 8>we also think gas price could be significantly higher than that.

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 8>And the last structural piece of the puzzle has been

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 8>the massive retirement of coal has traditionally been a replacement

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 8>fuel when gas prices got high and coal gas to

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 8>coal switching would occur when prices would run in that

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 8>call it three to five dollar range. Well, with call gone,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 8>the lid on gas prices is significantly muted, and that

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 8>means prices could run up closer to the eight to

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 8>nine dollars range. Those are the prices you saw in

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty two. And that is the price where industrial

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 8>demand will start shutting off. That's not a great place

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 8>to be. The solution is get more infrastructure built in

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 8>this country, both pipelines and storage infrastructure. And if you

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 8>have the opportunity, build your manufacturing in Appalachia.

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, I mean, we're right around the corner from the

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 4>winter season. That's when I cry it's going to be

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 4>called is the market oversupplied this winter?

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 8>Right now, we have about three hundred about three hundred

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 8>bcf of extra gas in stores. It's about eight percent

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 8>higher than.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Normal billion keep it feed, Yeah.

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 8>And for perspective, the US market is about one hundred

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 8>bcf a day. That's what the current supply is today.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 8>But this can be corrected very quickly in a winter

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 8>period where natural gas demand in this country goes of

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 8>one hundred and twenty bcf a day. So right now

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 8>storage isn't a is a little bit oversupplied, but that

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 8>goes away with just a normal winter. And when you

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 8>think about the fact that we don't have the necessary

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 8>pipeline infrastructure to deliver natural gas in that just in

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 8>time scenario, it's going to put further pressure on prices. Hence,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 8>you know a lot of volatility towards the upside here.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>We have don't had that that much time. But you

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>have a Southwestern and Chesapeake maybe merging up here, where

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>would you be looking to add M and A. Is

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>it going to be pipelines or is it going to

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 2>be producers?

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 8>So we just completed our transformation at EQT. Over the

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 8>last five years, Alex, since taken over, we've been very

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 8>purpose very purposely designing this business to be the energy

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 8>company of the future for us. That means we wanted

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 8>to create a business with a low cost structure in

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 8>a commodity business that really is your only moat. We're

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 8>really excited to say that EQT over the last five

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 8>years has cut its costs by thirty percent. You now

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 8>are looking at a two dollars cost structure. We've increased

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 8>our productive capacity by fifty percent over that period of time,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 8>and show me the money to our investors. We've increased

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 8>our free cashule per share by two times, so we've

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 8>doubled that over. So we're in a great place right now.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 8>And you know, we're just going to continue harvesting the

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 8>success of the transaction we've done in the past, all.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, to be really good to catch up with you.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>It's been too long. Toby Rice, a CEO of EQT

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 2>joining us. This is Bloomberg Intelligence. Happy Monday.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>One of the tough stories over the last couple of

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>days has been that deal that energy Constellation Energy inked

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>with Microsoft to help restart one of its nuclear power

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 2>plans on three Mile Island, investment about one point six

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. But Constellation Energy is not the only company

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>doing stuff like this and talking to hyper scalers about

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>how to provide energy for this massive demand for data

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>centers and GPU chips. And one of the companies involved

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>is also as it does a lot of different things.

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>It sells renewable power to corporate customers, It deals with

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 2>LERG infrastructure, It has two fast growing utilities. It does

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of stuff, yet the stock has not performed.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Like Constellation Energy and like Vistra, which are sort of

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 2>the power plays on AI. So luckily the CEO of

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>AES is in the studio right now with us Andres

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Gleski dress.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 7>Nice to see you, very nice to see you too.

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 2>So why hasn't your stock gotten the same kind of

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 2>credit that Vista and Constellation Energy have.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 7>Well, our stock recovered a little bit, let's say, in

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 7>the last couple of weeks, yes, but I still think, yeah,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 7>it has long way to go. So we are the

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 7>largest provider of actually renewable energy to hyperscalers in the world.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 9>So we have already eight.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 7>Gigawatts signed over history. So I think that you know,

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 7>the nuclear has gotten a lot of attention. I do

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 7>think nuclear is part of the solution. But we're really

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 7>looking at a market that's short energy to really be

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 7>able to implement the AI revolution and the amount of

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 7>data centers that are needed.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 4>I know, just last month, you're all we're saying that

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 4>you see demand at Midwest utilities rising fifty percent on

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 4>data centers. So of course that's really been the conversation

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 4>about AI. What is your expectation for how much more

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 4>power demand you'll need to produce to meet data center demand?

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, the truth is right now, anything that you can

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 7>get built on the renewable space in the right areas

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 7>you can contract, so there's really a shortage in the

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 7>case of the utilities. This is a very nice story

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 7>because one of them is Dayton, Ohio. We call it

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 7>as Ohio, and it was really a city that had

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 7>suffered a lot, you know, with the the industrialization of

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 7>the US. And what we're seeing is we contract did

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 7>for about two gigawatts of new data centers coming into

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 7>that area. But you also have an EV plant and

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 7>a battery plant coming in. So it's great to see

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 7>this area reindustrializing and you know, growing again. So it's

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 7>an area that you know, it's population is probably half

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 7>of what it was in the seventies, so there's a

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 7>lot of you know, there's water available, there's interconnection, there's

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 7>everything else. So it's it's really it was a it's

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 7>a great spot to locate data centers.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 9>A couple don't.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Questions for you when we talk about renewable power to

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 2>some of the data centers, for example, or the hyperscalers,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 2>what does that actually mean for AEES and what kind

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>of partnerships you currently have and who are you talking

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 2>to h that's three questions, right, now.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, let's see. Sometimes we're not able to say,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 7>you know how who exactly are the different partners. What

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 7>I can say is that it's you know, pretty much

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 7>all of the big ones.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 7>We do have the largest solar plus storage project in

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 7>the country being built right now, and that's with Amazon

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 7>Web Services AWS in California, and that's two gigawatts just

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 7>that one facility. So we have a backlog of about

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 7>twelve gigawatts that we have to build over the next

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 7>maximum three years, all of it. And we're signing of

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 7>about five gigawats a year. So to put it in perspective,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 7>something like let's say putting the unit on three mile

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 7>aland back online, that's probably about eight hundred and fifty megawatts,

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 7>and we were talking about, you know, five gigawatts a

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.239
<v Speaker 7>year that we're signing. So there's you know there. I

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 7>see nuclear as part of the solution, but it's not

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 7>going to displace renewables, certainly not in the next decade.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 4>And when we think about Microsoft striking that contract with

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Consolation Energy, do you feel like that positive sentiment has

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 4>permeated through the market in terms of thinking about renewable

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 4>energy utilities?

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 7>No, I think the market's still thinking of it a

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 7>little bit like a zero sum game, and it's not

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 7>understanding sort of energy markets because what nuclear can do

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 7>is really provide dispatchable energy, which is twenty four to seven.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 7>Renewables are intermittent, you know, clouds passed, sun goes down

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 7>when stops blowing. So you can compliment that with batteries,

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 7>but you can certainly complement it with nuclear, and you

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 7>can complement it with gas. So rather than either or,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 7>it's both because per megawatt hour and actually the energy

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 7>you produce, renewables are the cheapest, they just aren't twenty

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 7>four to seven.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So then to that point, the reliability one argument is

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 2>nuclear and SMR small modular reactors are quote unquote better

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>because they have more reliability, or natural gas has more

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 2>reliability than for wind or solar. And you're mentioned you're

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>building this largest solar plus storage with AWS in California.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>How hard slash easy is the storage world right now?

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 4>For you?

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Storage is a little bit like a hammer. It has

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 7>lots and lots of uses. Okay, the prices of batteries

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 7>are coming down a lot, So as the prices of

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 7>batteries come down, there are more uses that you can

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 7>find for it. What's interesting about batteries is it can

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 7>do stuff that for example, a gas plant or even

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 7>a nuclear plant can too. They can go positive and

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 7>they can go negative. So for example, we have found

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 7>that when you have a hurricane, having batteries is great

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 7>because as transmission lines fall down, they were able to

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 7>suck up that energy and actually allow the fossil plants

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 7>to gear down and not get damaged. So that's that's

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 7>very important. If you compare it to a gas plant,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 7>they're online ninety nine percent of the time. A gas

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.239
<v Speaker 7>plant will be online ten percent of the time. So

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 7>I think when there's a lot of excitement like SMRs,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 7>the great use I see of SMRs is putting them

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 7>into retired coal plants because basically a big coal plant

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 7>is just like a kettle. You just change the flame

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 7>the heat, so instead of burning coal, you would be

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 7>heating up the water with a nuclear so you get

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 7>to reuse the steam, turbine's interconnection, all those things.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 9>The issue I have, you know with.

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 7>SMRs today is tell me what they cost no one

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 7>knows yet, and tell me when they're going to be ready.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 7>So I believe in the concept I think they'll be

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 7>you know, they could be a game changer, but we

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 7>really have to see how much they cost, how many

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 7>we can build before we're going to say that, they're

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 7>going to say significantly displaced renewals.

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 4>Transport us to one of your boardroom meetings. What types

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.719
<v Speaker 4>of conversations are you all having right now, especially as

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 4>we think about power demand.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think I'm very lucky you have a great board.

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 7>We do a lot of scenario planning, and we've been

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 7>doing that for twenty five years, so we do scenario

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 7>planning for regulatory changes, for demand changes. So I think,

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, basically they're quite pleased because about six years

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 7>ago we really said, look, if you look at people's

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 7>decarbonization goals, there's going to be a shortage of zero

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 7>carbon energy. So we built up a pipeline, we bought

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 7>rights to land, we did interconnection. So you know, we

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 7>feel a little bit on the right side of history

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 7>on these things. So I'd say generally the conversation is

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 7>very good. So honestly, nuclear is not a main theme,

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 7>for example, of my board of.

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Directors talking about sort of the different projects. What's the

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 2>hardest part about building stuff right now? Is it labor

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and materials, is it getting the PPAs or the off

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>take agreement. So basically your customer has to sign up

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and say, okay, I'll pay you this much to get

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>this amount of solar from you. So that gives you

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>clarity on then what you have on your books. What's

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the hardest part.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 7>The hardest part is getting permittal end.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So none of the things I said, okay, none of

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the things.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 7>No, you know, the PPA would be simple. And look,

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 7>we haven't postponed, not even forget abandon, not even postponed

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 7>a significant project even during COVID, So I think, you know,

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 7>we have a very robust supply chain and we will

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 7>certainly move up everything that's in the US to domestic

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 7>production by twenty six so that is not worrying me. Labor,

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 7>we've also not had a problem because we've tended to

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 7>work with a strategic contray actors in the sense that

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 7>we don't give them one project, We'll give them a

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 7>series of projects so they can move the crew from

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 7>one spot to another.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 9>I see.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's interesting when you think, do you think permitting

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to get fixed no matter who's in the

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>White House? How do you fix it?

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 7>Look, they say, all politics is local, all permitting is local.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 7>So you know, while they've made I say progress, let's

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 7>say in the way they do interconnections in the states

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 7>of batching it, of new ways of thinking about it.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 7>I do think that's going to be probably the biggest bottling.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 7>I think we have to, you know, move renewables to

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 7>some extent outside of certain areas where there's more resistance.

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 7>So there's definitely going to be a move to putting

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 7>renewables where you know, the permitting is easier.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 9>But that's the most difficult.

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 5>Can I answer you what kind of shape the grid

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 5>is in? From your perspective?

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 4>How much time do you have?

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 7>Look, I think it's a great question, and I'll tell

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 7>you for the following reason. I think there's a lot

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 7>of talk about, you know, the shape of the grid,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 7>but what we're not doing is fully applying the new

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 7>technologies we have. So for example, grids are probably used

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 7>at fifty percent.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 9>Of their real capacity.

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 7>We have a lot of copper sitting around most of

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 7>the time, so we're we have the biggest what's called

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 7>dynamic line reading project in the US. It's in Indiana.

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 7>What is dynamic line ate very simply you put sensors

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 7>on the lines to say what's the actual temperature, what's

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 7>the actual sag in the lines, what's the wind, and

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 7>so in some cases you can actually transmit fifty percent

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 7>more energy over it. The second one is that the

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 7>whole grid is built out for the peak time. The

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 7>peak time could be one hour. The rest of the

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 7>time it's underutilized. So by using batteries we have projects

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 7>called grid Booster, you actually transmit the energy on the

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 7>off peak hours. So that does I'm not saying it

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 7>solves everything, but I think we have to think more

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 7>about these new technologies to make better use of existing grid.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Before I let you go, what's the one thing that

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you hope is that investors take away in terms of

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 2>say your stock price, it's recovery, but for the last

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 2>year it's still flattered down by one percent. What do

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 2>you think it's going to take for you to finally

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 2>get credit like Constellation Energy?

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think what people have liked very much about

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 7>the pure ipp place, they think there's a little investment,

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 7>so it's just using existing plants and just recontracting them.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 7>In our case, I think, look, we have met or

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 7>beaten our guidance eight years in a row. We have

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 7>grown our divid in ten years in a row. So

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 7>I'm by training an economist, and I'm just kind of

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 7>really surprised at some of the correlations in our stock.

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 7>We're not sensitive to interest rates, so I think those

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 7>things tend to work themselves out over time. So look,

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 7>company's never been better. We're cripple investment grade. We have

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 7>three years of construction in our backlog today and a

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 7>lot of very cool new technologies coming on.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, andres really appreciate it. It's always good to

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>see you so thoughtful. Andris Kluski, CEO of AS joining

0:32:58.960 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 2>us there.

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.719
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live on

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just say

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 2>So around this time every day. On Monday, we talked

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg bn EF. They are the leading researchers and

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>everything you need to know about the energy transition. They

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 2>do work on commodities and power and transport industry ads.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 2>They also talk about finance and governments and so everyone

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>can make informed decisions on this. And joining us now

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 2>in studio is David Doherty, head of Oil and Renewable

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Fuels Research for Bloomberg b n EF. David, great to

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 2>see you, Thanks for joining. This is Climate Week, So

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 2>this is climate week, so it's all going to be

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>about climate y friendly green things. Does that include your

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>oil and gas?

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 9>It's us.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you can call oil green things, I suppose if

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 10>you want, I get exciting about it. You know, we've

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 10>been talking about alcoholic free beer, so oil can feature

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 10>in the climate change.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 2>So that was my way of kind of asking of

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>how does oil and gas play in the energy transition

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 2>and what are some of the trends that we've noticed

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 2>over the last year.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 10>I mean, if you think of the players in the

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 10>oil market, they're the energy pros in the world, right

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 10>They've got the balance sheet, they've got the skills, they've

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 10>got the technology, and they're already established, right, so they've

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 10>got interest in seeing how this develops, how fast it goes,

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 10>how it impacts their bottom line.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Basically, what are the main hold ups in terms of

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 4>the transition. What are some of the headwinds.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean, capital is obviously one raising capital. Smart people

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 10>in the right jobs in the right place push back

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 10>both political and from people.

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 10>People love the idea, but as soon as it costs money,

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 10>that's quite a difficult to swallow, especially now in like

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 10>inflationary times.

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, is the conversation that evs will eventually surplant internal

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 2>combustion engines and get rid of gas demand. Is that

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>still something that you guys are working with in modeling

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>or has that conversation evolved?

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 10>It's evolved, I mean that is kind of the trend though. Yeah,

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 10>when you look at things when they're cheaper upfront, right,

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 10>consumers tend to shift towards that.

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 9>If it's cheaper day.

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 10>One for buying an ev versus an internal combustion engine car,

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 10>and all else is equally, you're probably going to see

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 10>a shift towards that.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>So we're really though US centric here and we don't

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 2>see that in the same way. But elsewhere, is that

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 2>truly what's happening?

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you are.

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 10>You're seeing a big uptick in Europe and in China

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 10>for example, and even here in the US California for example,

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 10>behave it's much more like a European economy. When we

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 10>think about the transition to evs, we've seen really high

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 10>rates of penetration there.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>What are some of the main themes in market dynamics

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 4>that your team is focused on right now?

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Like, the rate of this change is interesting. What's

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 10>happening in different markets?

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 9>What the response is.

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 10>If you take the US for example, it's a it's

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 10>a mature market. So when these evs come into the market,

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 10>you're seeing a decline in gasoline sales versus saying in

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 10>China where it's like what could have been doesn't necessarily manifest, right,

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 10>So that turns into then power in your pocket. Right,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 10>You're seeing the cost of gasoline isn't coming down even

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 10>though you're expecting it to a less gasoline being consumed.

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.720
<v Speaker 10>There's so many more dynamics in just a four wheels

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:11.879
<v Speaker 10>on the road situation, right.

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 4>And how are all these things impacting the consumer?

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, if you think about costs in your pocket

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to driving your card, that's a big thing,

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 10>particularly here in the US, particularly in an election year.

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 10>You know, it trickles down into inflation. You get something

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 10>delivered to your house. The cost of diesel impacts all

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 10>of these things. So your consumers are super sensitive of

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 10>anything to a cost at the moment, and probably the

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 10>biggest development here in the US it's been interesting is

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 10>less consumption of gasoline hasn't turned into less prices at

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 10>the you know, a lower price at the pump.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think that is?

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 9>Well, this is key.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 10>This is something we have to think about as we

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 10>go towards transition. If you pull supply in any scenario,

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:46.479
<v Speaker 10>you're going to see a price spike. In the US,

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing less refinery production than we have a few

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 10>years ago. So you're seeing over a million barrools per

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 10>day cut in the last two three years alone. And

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 10>when you have a less supply of something, even if

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 10>you have less demand, it really depends on which one

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 10>goes first, on how speedy that changes.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 4>And so what are people thinking when will this all

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 4>shake out?

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean it's shaking out already. It's already shaking out

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 10>in the four court when people are buying the car.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 10>You're seeing the response from refiners. For example, some big

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 10>refineries like P sixty six are switching some of their

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 10>facilities to make things like renewable diesel or sustainable aviation

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 10>fuel so people are posturing. Companies are postering for the

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 10>next five, six, seven years, right.

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Which is such a great point because I guess the

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 2>question then becomes, if we're posturing for the seven or

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 2>eight years, what does the landscape in your world look

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 2>like then? I mean everyone seems to say it's a yes,

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 2>and we need everything above all And is that how

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you model it?

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 9>That is how we model it.

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 10>In our sort of standard out look twenty twenty nine,

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 10>we see peak oil consumption globally.

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 9>So that's still pretty far out. There's still a lot

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:46.919
<v Speaker 9>of growth left.

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Also, peak doesn't mean the then it goes to zero.

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's something we need to also wrap

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>ourmind around, Like just because it's not increasing, it doesn't

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>mean it's rapidly decreasing.

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you're totally right.

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 10>Even in like a net zero world, in our modeling,

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 10>you get about twenty five million boos per day of oil,

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 10>so you net zero doesn't mean zero oil.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 4>So what does the growth outlook here?

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 10>You're looking at about four or five million barrels per

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 10>day upside in our inner base case scenario. But lots

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 10>of things can change that, right. Policies are the main

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 10>thing to look at particularly in big markets like the US.

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.479
<v Speaker 9>Right, the US consumers is about one.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.879
<v Speaker 10>In every five barrels globally, so if something changes here,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 10>the whole market can change.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 9>The dynamic is really upended.

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 2>When we take a look at say China and India,

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 2>large consumers of energy, obviously, are they jumping from coal

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to what.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 10>You know, gases and transition fuel. We're seeing them shift

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 10>towards I was just in Beijing last weekend. There's a

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 10>very different way of looking at the oil market versus

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 10>if you're down in Texas, Right, it's what's the displacement?

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 10>Because they need more and more energy, right, they don't

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 10>want to import that energy, So what can you do

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 10>domestically In the case of power, that's coal. But we're

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 10>also seeing in the case of evs, right, LNG trucks,

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 10>even electric trucks. So we have a lot we can

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 10>learn from them. But they're just different, very different markets.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 2>And how do they get there? How do they get there?

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Is it because of subsidies? Is it because they were

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 2>so dependent on coal? Like what leads that transition there

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 2>differently than say in the US.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think it's dependency on imports. For

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 10>one example, they've got a lot of national champions, and

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 10>to be honest, when they say they're going to do something,

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 10>they do it in Europe and in the US you

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 10>got to get it through parliament, you got.

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 9>To get it through votes. It's a lot slow.

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:24.439
<v Speaker 10>Over process, and there's less domestic manufacturers like Tesla's a big,

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 10>big player here.

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:26.720
<v Speaker 9>But it's kind of it in China.

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 10>You've got a lot of big producers, a lot of

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 10>big industrial champions, right, and they're encouraged by.

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 9>The States and by the city and by incentives.

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 4>So how do we fit into the bigger international ecosystem.

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 10>Well, for the US, one of the most important things

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 10>is it's sort of gasoline production. Machines send a lot

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 10>of gasoline abroad South America, Europe, even so there's a

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 10>change coming along for your US refiners basically, and you're

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 10>starting to see how they just they're positioning in a

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 10>sort of a market leading way.

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I think, all right, David, we appreciate it.

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 2>David Doherty joining US head of Oil and Renewables Fuels Research.

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 5>Before you go for you, have you ever had a

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 5>non alcoholic beer?

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 10>Oh, bring the Irish guy in. I like this and

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 10>I have yet, and I'm also not a verse exhumation. Yeah,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 10>I think it's pretty good, especially if you're driving, you know, yeah, or.

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Just like because some of them you actually can feel

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the taste, like non alcoholic wine is basically like fruit juice,

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 2>but not alcoholic beer does taste somewhat like beer.

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 10>I agree, And you know what, it's stuffed people asking you, like,

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 10>why ain't you drinking today because they have no idea.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 10>It looks exact same.

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well and the more you know, John Tucker.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 5>You just all disappointment.

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 4>So sorry.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>The alcohol removed wine though, that's that's I try to

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>get into that.

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 4>And it was like, I have the hot wine. What's

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 4>the word for that? Warm wine?

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 2>But stuff? What mold stuff? But that's not wine?

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 9>What is it?

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now we're going to research.

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 4>This is what I back away.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the Ihard Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal