Speaker 1: Let me tell you about our friends and Augusta Precise
Speaker 1: Medals real quick. If you are close to retirement or
Speaker 1: you are in retirement, you know how important it is
Speaker 1: to protect your hard earned dollars. You know how important
Speaker 1: it is to protect your four O one K your ira.
Speaker 1: And that is where Augusta Precious Medals can come in.
Speaker 1: A lot of people have had losses over the last
Speaker 1: several years and there is no time to make up
Speaker 1: those losses if you are close to retirement or in retirement.
Speaker 1: And that is why Gusta Precious Medals wants to talk
Speaker 1: to you so that they can talk to you about
Speaker 1: how gold can be used to help diversify your portfolio.
Speaker 2: Now a gust is a little bit different.
Speaker 1: They will actually not only send you the free investors
Speaker 1: guy on gold right now, but they will do a
Speaker 1: one on one web conference with you as well. They'll
Speaker 1: talk to you about your needs, They'll talk to you
Speaker 1: about what your goals are and about protecting and preserving
Speaker 1: your heard earned dollars.
Speaker 2: Call them.
Speaker 1: Not only they send you that Investor's got on gold
Speaker 1: right now, but again they'll do the web conference with
Speaker 1: you as well. Age seven seven the number four Gold
Speaker 1: I r A eight seven seven, the number four gold
Speaker 1: Ira eight seven seven, number four gold Ira, or visit
Speaker 1: them online Augusta Precious Medals dot com. That's Augusta Precious
Speaker 1: Metals dot Com center.
Speaker 2: We're here part two in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: It's a lot later than it was when we started
Speaker 1: Part one with Congresson James Comer, and we are talking
Speaker 1: about the Biden crime family.
Speaker 2: You and I are stilling shocked by the way. And
Speaker 2: let me say to folks who didn't listen to yesterday's pod,
Speaker 2: you need to go back.
Speaker 3: You need to listen to part one.
Speaker 2: Hit pause right now. So all of y'all have you've
Speaker 2: seen it on TV. James Comer, who's our guest, my
Speaker 2: friend from Kentucky, Congressman, chairman of the House Oversight Committee.
Speaker 2: You've seen him on TV. He's on head of the
Speaker 2: every week. But he goes on Sean and he's got
Speaker 2: five six minutes and he says a point, he says
Speaker 2: a headline.
Speaker 3: It's good.
Speaker 2: I watch it, it's good, But five six minutes it's
Speaker 2: hard to understand anything, especially this. The value of this
Speaker 2: podcast is that we have We'll go as long as
Speaker 2: we need. We're going to get into the substance and
Speaker 2: ask about it. And part one we did a deep dive.
Speaker 2: We discussed one hundred and seventy suspicious activity reports stars
Speaker 2: that came from Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and the Biden
Speaker 2: crime family.
Speaker 3: I mean, that's really stunning.
Speaker 2: And where we ended part one is you said all
Speaker 2: of this, in your judgment, was directed to covering up
Speaker 2: what was happening with Joe Biden. And this is a
Speaker 2: point that I made on this podcast for many months,
Speaker 2: which is the focus. The reason this is a matter
Speaker 2: of public concern is because it concerns is the president
Speaker 2: of the United States corrupt? Did he receive bribes from
Speaker 2: foreign nationals? Was he on the take? Is he compromised?
Speaker 2: And I got to say, the evidence is growing and
Speaker 2: growing and growing. What in your investigation has shed light
Speaker 2: on that question?
Speaker 4: Well, the emails and text messages in the laptop confirmed
Speaker 4: that Joe Biden met regularly with all of these people
Speaker 4: who were involved in receiving the wires from the foreign nationals,
Speaker 4: who were meeting with the foreign nationals. You know, there
Speaker 4: are obviously something happened to trigger the million plus dollar
Speaker 4: wires that went into these fake companies.
Speaker 2: So and let me ask you something. So one of
Speaker 2: the things we've talked about a lot is the WhatsApp
Speaker 2: message that Hunter Biden sent to his Chinese business.
Speaker 3: Associate, and the text of it.
Speaker 2: Says, quote, I'm sitting here with my father and we
Speaker 2: would like to understand why the commitment made has not
Speaker 2: been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to
Speaker 2: resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and
Speaker 2: now means tonight and ze if I get a call
Speaker 2: or text from anyone involved in this other than you,
Speaker 2: Zang or the chairman, I will make certain that between
Speaker 2: the man sitting next to me and every person he knows,
Speaker 2: and my ability to forever hold a grudge, that you
Speaker 2: will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here
Speaker 2: waiting for the call with my father now. Number one
Speaker 2: we've talked about. There are really only two defenses that
Speaker 2: Hunter and Joe Biden could put up to this WhatsApp message. One,
Speaker 2: they can claim it's fake and fraudulent, that it didn't
Speaker 2: actually get sent. Is anyone claiming that, No, So no
Speaker 2: one's disputing that this is accurate in person. The second
Speaker 2: thing they could claim as Hunter was lying, that Hunter
Speaker 2: was saying Dad was here and dad wasn't really there,
Speaker 2: so he was puffing, he was bragging, but he wasn't
Speaker 2: actually threatening the retaliation from Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: Have they claimed that they have it. No.
Speaker 4: All they've said is, well, he was on drugs and
Speaker 4: he was going through a hard period in his life.
Speaker 2: And am I right that the investigators won to use
Speaker 2: GPS information to determine was Joe Biden sitting next to Hunter?
Speaker 2: Because if he's typing this, I'm sitting next to my dad,
Speaker 2: the fact that his dad was sitting next to him
Speaker 2: at that moment would be pretty irrelevant.
Speaker 4: They said that could have been easily proven, and so
Speaker 4: why did they were not allowed to do.
Speaker 2: That and who was they?
Speaker 4: Just so everybody as s whistleblower, the IRS employees testified
Speaker 4: that they were not allowed to do that by the department.
Speaker 1: So, going back to Yessay's pod, they weren't allowed to
Speaker 1: go question Hunter Biden, that Hunter Biden was tipped off
Speaker 1: when they were trying to question him. His lawyers were
Speaker 1: gotten involved before they were able to question him. Then
Speaker 1: they weren't allowed to even see if the two men
Speaker 1: weren't sitting next to each other when they could have
Speaker 1: easily done that as well.
Speaker 3: And there's another thing.
Speaker 4: They interviewed some of these former associates like Rob Walker, yep,
Speaker 4: like Eric Sherwin, like Tony Bobolinski, and through the course
Speaker 4: of those interviews, somebody told him there was a storage
Speaker 4: building that had a bunch of documents, a bunch of
Speaker 4: old laptops and things, papers and things like that that.
Speaker 2: Would prove they were telling the truth.
Speaker 4: They were telling the truth, and that Joe was involved.
Speaker 4: And they were never allowed to go into that storage building.
Speaker 3: They were tipped off when they Widen.
Speaker 2: Say today, you mean the Department of Justice tipped Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden off that the invigators and wanted to search that
Speaker 2: storage building.
Speaker 4: They tipped him off that they wanted to talk to
Speaker 4: him at his house in California and they wanted to,
Speaker 4: uh search his storage.
Speaker 2: Unit and look, if someone is guilty, if someone's a criminal.
Speaker 2: If you are investigating a drug dealer and you tell
Speaker 2: a drug dealer, hey, we want to search this warehouse
Speaker 2: at this location to see if you have drugs, what
Speaker 2: does drug dealer do?
Speaker 3: Yeah, he gets rid of the oven?
Speaker 2: Sure, Scots Sigano. Is there any law enforcement justification for
Speaker 2: telling the target of an investigation who you've got massive
Speaker 2: evidence of criminality. Hey, here's where we want to search
Speaker 2: to see if there's evidence of your criminality. And has
Speaker 2: anyone given you one you're investigating? Do they say, oh, yeah,
Speaker 2: we did this because like, what's there? Just let's play
Speaker 2: Devil's advocate. So they're saying, we were trying to what
Speaker 2: I mean, is there an argument?
Speaker 4: The one argument that they disclosed in the testimony to
Speaker 4: the Overset Committee was that the Deputy US Attorney Wolf
Speaker 4: said that the reason she wouldn't allow them to talk
Speaker 4: to Hunter Biden's grand Joe Biden's grandchildren, Hunter Biden's children
Speaker 4: who received wires and who were also subjects, they were
Speaker 4: righting And.
Speaker 2: Let me stop you there, Javis, because look, I can
Speaker 2: understand someone saying, Okay, maybe it's a little shady, a
Speaker 2: little problematic talk to kids, like talking to kids. I
Speaker 2: get it. But wait, these kids were getting money from
Speaker 2: the Chinese communists and Romanian foreign national All right, you've
Speaker 2: got little kids. Yeah, I'm going to ask you right
Speaker 2: now on the record on verdict time, right, your children
Speaker 2: received any money from the Chinese Communists? No, James, No, okay,
Speaker 2: Ukraine No. By the way, James, you have kids. Have
Speaker 2: your kids gotten any never?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 2: Seriously, who the hell does nobody unless you're money wandering
Speaker 2: right And by the way, these kids are little kids, yep,
Speaker 2: so they're not working for it. Is it fair to
Speaker 2: say these kids, in all likelihood have not done a
Speaker 2: meaningful service to the government of China.
Speaker 4: I doubt that the grandchild, who was in college at
Speaker 4: the time, did anything near of any value to receive
Speaker 4: a wire from a Romanian foreign national.
Speaker 3: I'd be willing to bet.
Speaker 2: Look, knowing most college kids, I'm not sure most college
Speaker 2: kids could find Romania that much less do something that
Speaker 2: they get paid for it. Can I ask you a question.
Speaker 1: I want to go back to when all this started,
Speaker 1: and I say this from the standpoint of Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: or Joe Bid made it clear over and over again
Speaker 1: when he was asked, I never talked to my son,
Speaker 1: I never talked to my other And then he said
Speaker 1: even doubled, I never talked to any family member by
Speaker 1: any business dealings period.
Speaker 2: Is that true? Is that true?
Speaker 3: That is not true. That's another lie.
Speaker 2: But so explain to every one that's a lie.
Speaker 4: Well Goldman representing Goldman from York inadvertently got the whistleblowers
Speaker 4: to admit. Today on the record, Jonathan Turley talked about
Speaker 4: this on Fox that they did have evidence that Joe
Speaker 4: had communicated with his son about at least one business dealing.
Speaker 4: But in the laptop there are pictures with all of
Speaker 4: his associates, several of them flew on Air Force two
Speaker 4: with Tim to the very countries where they right after
Speaker 4: they left, they started receiving wires.
Speaker 3: I mean, there's a.
Speaker 4: I said, This whole investigation is like tracking a bleeding
Speaker 4: bear through a snowstorm. There's so much evidence laying around
Speaker 4: along the way and every you know, there's a pattern
Speaker 4: here that would suggest that while Joe Biden was Vice president,
Speaker 4: he would go in and dangle foreign aid and foreign
Speaker 4: policy in front of these countries, and then when he left,
Speaker 4: weeks later or days later in some instances, his family
Speaker 4: would start receiving wires from foreign national.
Speaker 2: Well, and we've seen now it's broken recently that there
Speaker 2: was an email from a senior official at Barisma signing
Speaker 2: off on the contract with Hunter Biden that said the
Speaker 2: ultimate objective of this contract is to stop any investigation
Speaker 2: of the oligarch who owned Barisma. Just months after that email,
Speaker 2: Joe Biden flies to Ukraine, holds a billion dollars in
Speaker 2: American aid hostage, demands that the prosecutor investigating that oligark
Speaker 2: be fired. And as Joe Biden said on TV, yeah,
Speaker 2: son of a bitch, they fired him. He confessed on
Speaker 2: TV that he did that, brogged about it. That's the
Speaker 2: quid pro quo in Ukraine. It was Joe Biden, not
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. And there's zero dispute that Biden got him fired,
Speaker 2: and that he got him fired by holding a billion
Speaker 2: dollars in hostage.
Speaker 3: Biden's old words.
Speaker 2: So Biden's defense to this, as they say, well, the
Speaker 2: prosecutor wasn't investigating enough corruption, so he wasn't trying to
Speaker 2: protect the oligark. He wanted someone tougher. And yet just
Speaker 2: this week it's broken that the email and hunter Biden
Speaker 2: said we are paying you eighty three thousand dollars a
Speaker 2: month a million dollars a year to stop the investigations
Speaker 2: into the oligarch, which is precisely what Joe Biden did
Speaker 2: a couple of months later.
Speaker 3: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 2: How shocked were you when you found that out?
Speaker 3: I'm not shocked about anything.
Speaker 4: I think that Joe Biden has been selling access to our.
Speaker 3: Enemies for decades.
Speaker 2: I think that so long before Hunter was involved. So
Speaker 2: let me stop you on that. You said he's been
Speaker 2: selling access to our enemies for decades, that that, on
Speaker 2: the face of it, is an extraordinary statement.
Speaker 3: What's your basis for that basis is?
Speaker 4: You know, if you study Joe Biden like I have, Uh,
Speaker 4: he's always been cash strapped. Uh, he's never had a
Speaker 4: successful career in investing or anything like that. Then you
Speaker 4: look at the assets he's accumulated on a Senate salary,
Speaker 4: it's pretty pretty impressive.
Speaker 3: And you look at the upkeep to those assets. I
Speaker 3: believe that.
Speaker 2: If we you know, you're saying a classic corvette doesn't
Speaker 2: by itself.
Speaker 4: No, And you know the delare we're finding where many
Speaker 4: of these toys that at least Hunter had were purchased
Speaker 4: by foreign nationals. So that's a whole nother element of
Speaker 4: things of value received by the Bidens and the diamonds. Diamonds,
Speaker 4: a Porsche, vacations, free stays at hotels, travel women, all
Speaker 4: gifts from foreig national adversaries.
Speaker 2: I mean, is it a Costa Rica, This is China,
Speaker 2: that's right, But like these are in Russia.
Speaker 4: Soviets hate countries that we don't trade with. You know,
Speaker 4: the only thing we do is give them four and eight,
Speaker 4: that's you know. I mean, And look, I think that
Speaker 4: Obama knew this was going on towards the end. And
Speaker 4: I think that's why Obama didn't want Biden run for president.
Speaker 3: I don't think it had anything to do with his age.
Speaker 3: I don't think anything to do that with the gaff.
Speaker 1: I think he's never underestimated the ability for Joe bid
Speaker 1: daffod up.
Speaker 3: That's true.
Speaker 4: And look, they had to know what was going on
Speaker 4: with Ukraine. I mean that stinks to high heaven what
Speaker 4: was going on there? And Joe then then Bragg, he
Speaker 4: admitted he fired that prosecutor. The whistle blower has testified today.
Speaker 4: We're just now getting the Ukrainian money. But yes, Hunter
Speaker 4: Biden supposedly was getting paid fifty sixty thousand dollars a
Speaker 4: month as a director, but apparently they received millions of dollars,
Speaker 4: which goes back to that fee ten twenty three.
Speaker 2: Where they said they were Now what is it ten
Speaker 2: twenty three? We heard a lot of discussion about that,
Speaker 2: but what is.
Speaker 4: It A ten twenty three is A is a form
Speaker 4: where the FBI has a paid informant who comes in
Speaker 4: reports information that he's received.
Speaker 3: So the paid informant's like a spy.
Speaker 2: So the informant called or spoke to the FBI and said,
Speaker 2: we I have evidence that Joe Biden personally received a
Speaker 2: multimillion dollar bribe from the foreign national. Yes, and that
Speaker 2: got recorded in an FBI form.
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 2: Did that get investigated?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 4: And that's why Grassley has been upset about that. You're
Speaker 4: about to learn more from Senator Grassley and I about
Speaker 4: that ten twenty three form very soon.
Speaker 2: But the ten twenty three also alleges that there are
Speaker 2: seventeen voice recordings yes, between the Ukrainian oligarch, fifteen of
Speaker 2: them with Hunter Biden and two of them with Joe Bidens.
Speaker 2: Have you been able to figure out to those recordings
Speaker 2: exist as DJ or the FBI have them?
Speaker 3: All know, they don't know.
Speaker 4: You don't know they don't have them because they never investigated.
Speaker 4: And that's from sources within the FBI.
Speaker 2: Okay, because I've asked the FBI and they've under that
Speaker 2: they don't know what you're talking. They've refused to answer
Speaker 2: my question. They've said they never investigated it, so so
Speaker 2: you believe they didn't want to know.
Speaker 3: They just.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you about Chalk.
Speaker 1: If you are a guy dealing with a real medical
Speaker 1: condition that accountless other men are dealing with, and that
Speaker 1: is a drop in tasosterrum, you don't have to just
Speaker 1: sit there and feel weak and feel complacent. You can
Speaker 1: actually get up to a twenty percent boost in your
Speaker 1: testosterrum levels over ninety days. Yeah, all you got to
Speaker 1: do is see my friends at Chalk choq dot com.
Speaker 1: If you are sick and tired of feeling like you're
Speaker 1: losing your edge and you're ready to get back that
Speaker 1: strength and that focus and the energy that you used
Speaker 1: to have, then go to Chalk c choq dot com
Speaker 1: right now. Use the promo code Ben, and you're gonna
Speaker 1: get thirty five percent off all of your purchases for life. Yeah,
Speaker 1: thirty five percent off, So check them out. Chalk uses
Speaker 1: natural herbal supplements that are clinically proven to have game
Speaker 1: changing effects, like I said, on your energy, your focus,
Speaker 1: your mood, and that is why I've been taking them
Speaker 1: now and it works. Choq dot com. Use a promo
Speaker 1: code Ben, You'll get thirty five percent off your subscription
Speaker 1: for life. Check out the mail Vitality stack. That's what
Speaker 1: I've been taking. It works great. Chalk choq dot com.
Speaker 1: This goes back to Tony Biblinski for a second. If
Speaker 1: we go back in time, Tony Bobolinski went and sat
Speaker 1: down with the FBI right after he became public in
Speaker 1: the winning days of the presidential campaign. He did that
Speaker 1: press conference, the FBI finally met with him. What happened
Speaker 1: to Tony Bobolinski afterwards and all the intel he gave
Speaker 1: to the FBI If we got into the bottom of
Speaker 1: that yet or they do the same thing, I don't
Speaker 1: want to hear it. We don't want to know, because
Speaker 1: he said they never contact him again.
Speaker 3: Never did, never did.
Speaker 2: And by the way, David Wise, so the US attorney
Speaker 2: who the press says over and over and over again,
Speaker 2: was appointed by Donald Trump. So look, you know, well,
Speaker 2: I know, well the way US attorneys get appointed.
Speaker 4: The sad So well, in Kentucky, how US attorneys get appointed.
Speaker 2: Let's be clear, no US attorney gets appointed without the
Speaker 2: approval of both home state senators, at least one in
Speaker 2: Kentucky and in Delaware. There were two Home states senators,
Speaker 2: Tom Carper and Chris Coons. They're both Democrats. Joe Biden
Speaker 2: is the godfather of all Democrats in Delaware. So what
Speaker 2: it means is David Weiss had the sign off from
Speaker 2: both Democrat senators who are deeply, deeply loyal to Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: and so claiming, let's be clear, there's nothing in David
Speaker 2: Weiss's background that suggests he's a Republican. He's a Trump partisan.
Speaker 2: He voted for Trump, he supports Republicans, is all that right?
Speaker 3: That's right? And look, I mean this is a fact.
Speaker 4: McConnell has a big say and who gets appointed US
Speaker 4: Attorney Kentucky when you have Democrat presidents, whether it be
Speaker 4: Biden or Obama.
Speaker 3: I mean, that's just the way it works.
Speaker 2: And let me be clear, let me be clear in Texas,
Speaker 2: there are not US attorneys appointed without John Corny and
Speaker 2: me signing off. That's the way the Senate operates, That's exactly.
Speaker 2: And we have the ability to kill any US Attorney nominee.
Speaker 2: That's just the way the Senate operates. And so I
Speaker 2: want to read a few quotes from today that the
Speaker 2: whistleblowers testified to so Irs. Whistleblower Garris Shapley said, quote,
Speaker 2: the Delaware US Attorney's Office and DOJ handling the Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden tax investigation was very different from any other case
Speaker 2: in my fourteen years at the IRS. At every stage,
Speaker 2: decisions were made that benefited the subject of this investigation.
Speaker 2: How unusual is that?
Speaker 4: It's unprecedented? Unprecedented. I mean, we create an RS Tax
Speaker 4: Crime Division to go after tax chiefs, and you're not
Speaker 4: supposed to turn a blind eye to politically connect the
Speaker 4: tax cheat. But yet that's what happened here, and that's
Speaker 4: what the whistleblowers have testified. And I can tell you
Speaker 4: in the six months I've been investigating, we've been blocked
Speaker 4: from Treasury, We've been blocked by the FBI, We've been
Speaker 4: blocked by the Secret Service.
Speaker 2: By the way, is there a Democrat in the House
Speaker 2: that gives a damn about any of this, even off
Speaker 2: the recorders, whether the President of the United States received
Speaker 2: a bribe from a foreignational There's not I can tell you.
Speaker 2: In the Senate on Senate Judiciary, not a single Democrat
Speaker 2: has asked a single question about anyone. They do not
Speaker 2: care if Biden is guilty. Is that true in the
Speaker 2: House too, That's.
Speaker 1: True congressays, has anybody even like walking you behind the scenes, like, hey,
Speaker 1: I think this smells the high heaven.
Speaker 2: This is corruption. I'm a Democrat.
Speaker 1: I can't take the political risk because an have you
Speaker 1: send it to you behind the scenes.
Speaker 4: Behind the scenes, most Democrats wish Joe Biden would go home.
Speaker 2: Okay, so they understand the liability.
Speaker 4: Publicly question anything they've done pertaining to wrongdoing.
Speaker 2: All right, let me give you another quote again from
Speaker 2: Gary Shapley. Quote, investigators were not allowed to follow up
Speaker 2: on WhatsApp messages from Hudder Biden where he suggested he
Speaker 2: was sitting next to his father.
Speaker 4: And they could have proven that with GPS technology, it's
Speaker 4: not hard to determine.
Speaker 2: So there's an objective right answer, but they didn't want
Speaker 2: to know. Then, let me give another quote. IRS whistleblower
Speaker 2: Joseph Ziegler testified. Quote the US attorney in Delaware in
Speaker 2: our investigation was constantly hamstrung, limited, and marginalized by DOJ officials.
Speaker 2: Gary Shapley added, quote, the Justice Department allowed the president's
Speaker 2: political appointees to weigh in on whether to charge the
Speaker 2: president's son.
Speaker 3: Right, is that accurate? That is accurate?
Speaker 4: And what he was talking about were the US attorneys
Speaker 4: And there were other jurisdictions beside Delaware where they wanted
Speaker 4: to so DC in the Central Coast of California, d
Speaker 4: C in California, and those were US attorneys appointed by
Speaker 4: Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: And am I right that the attorney was personally a
Speaker 2: donor to Joe Biden and the Central District California US
Speaker 2: attorney was personally a donor to Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure, but you would probably know that. So
Speaker 3: that's been publicly reported.
Speaker 2: That's both accurate and in both instances, Weiss wanted to
Speaker 2: bring charges in DC and the Central District of California.
Speaker 2: The reason that matters is the most egregious tax crimes
Speaker 2: that he committed were occurred in DC and Central dist California,
Speaker 2: and both of these political donors to Biden. Harris said, no,
Speaker 2: we won't bring those claims.
Speaker 3: That's right now.
Speaker 2: Look, one of the consequences of this testimony. Merrick Garland,
Speaker 2: Biden's Attorney General, testified under oath and from the United
Speaker 2: States Senate. Actually, in response to questioning from me, he said,
Speaker 2: there's no political interference whatsoever. And David Weiss, the US
Speaker 2: attorney is allowed to bring whatever charges he wants with
Speaker 2: zero interference. He lied to you, Senator, and lying under
Speaker 2: oath is a felon. And also the testimony the DOJ
Speaker 2: informed Hunter Biden when they were gonna interview him, and
Speaker 2: form Hunter Biden when they're gonna search the warehouse. All
Speaker 2: of that is obstruction of justice.
Speaker 3: That's true.
Speaker 2: As I view it. I want to see if you
Speaker 2: view it the same way. There are two and only
Speaker 2: two scenarios. Either the whistleblowers are telling the truth, in
Speaker 2: which case Merrick Garland has committed multiple felonies, or the
Speaker 2: whistleblowers are not telling the truth. And so Merrick Garland's
Speaker 2: entitled to defend themselves and maybe he can demonstrate what
Speaker 2: they're saying is false. But if what they're saying is true,
Speaker 2: we have an attorney general as a FELA.
Speaker 4: I think you're exactly right, and I think that more
Speaker 4: and more people in the House, are representatives, are realizing that.
Speaker 4: I think today was a pivotal moment. I think a
Speaker 4: lot of the moderate Republicans that get nervous when you
Speaker 4: talk about impeachment because honestly, a lot of our guys
Speaker 4: don't want to impeach because they don't have confidence it's
Speaker 4: a Senate will convict.
Speaker 2: Well, and the Senate won't. To be clear, the chances
Speaker 2: of the Senate convicting are zero. Why because there's not
Speaker 2: a single Democrat who will vote to convict, and it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter what the evidence is. So to impeach in
Speaker 2: the House takes a majority. If Republicans stand together, they'll
Speaker 2: do so. Though I'll predict if y'all impeach, whether it
Speaker 2: is Merrick Garland or Alajandro Mayorkas or Joe Biden, I'll
Speaker 2: predict you will not get a single Democrat who votes
Speaker 2: to impeach in the House. And when it goes to
Speaker 2: the Senate, I am certain it will not matter what
Speaker 2: evidence there is of Joe Biden personally receiving bribes from
Speaker 2: communists China. There's not a single Democrat who will vote
Speaker 2: to convict. But I think there is value nonetheless systematically
Speaker 2: putting this evidence in front of the American people. And
Speaker 2: I will say Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy is
Speaker 2: said with regard to this information that if the evidence
Speaker 2: proves true, he believes the House will go down the
Speaker 2: road to impeachment.
Speaker 4: Did do you think that's right. Yes, we had that
Speaker 4: conversation today. So McCarthy watched our hearing great closely. He's
Speaker 4: given Jim Jordan and myself complete permission to do whatever
Speaker 4: we want. You know, when I do a subpoena, he
Speaker 4: has to sign off on the subpoena. I'm talking about
Speaker 4: Kevin McCarthy. Really yes, because.
Speaker 2: So that's did you know that person not see? This
Speaker 2: is this is what's the problem. And this is also
Speaker 2: why I love right yeah, because if there are ten
Speaker 2: people listening to this podcast who knew that, I'll be shocked.
Speaker 2: This is so for you to do a subpoena, can
Speaker 2: you do it yourself? Do you need all the members
Speaker 2: of your committee to vote for it or do you
Speaker 2: need How does that work? I have full subpoena authority. Okay, however,
Speaker 2: so Kevin can overrule you.
Speaker 4: Well, he has to sign His general counsel has to
Speaker 4: sign off on it because the subpoena will go to
Speaker 4: court and they're the ones that represent So.
Speaker 2: Every subpoena you've issued, Kevin signed off.
Speaker 3: Yes.
Speaker 4: He has never said no, and that's been the problem
Speaker 4: in the past. If you go back to darryl Isa
Speaker 4: Day's if you go back to Jason Chafit days. The
Speaker 4: problem they had in pursuing people via subpoena is the
Speaker 4: speaker at the time didn't want to sign off on
Speaker 4: their subpoena. So I will say this, Kevin McCarthy has
Speaker 4: never told me. No, he's never told him.
Speaker 2: George Ball all right, so let me say I got
Speaker 2: at least two more questions. Number One, you and I
Speaker 2: talked about we had lunch last week together, and you
Speaker 2: and I talked about at the time you weren't sure
Speaker 2: these whistleblowers were going to testify that. You said they
Speaker 2: were being pressured ferociously by Hunter Biden's legal teams, they
Speaker 2: were being threatened personally. Why do you think these whistleblowers
Speaker 2: testified and what does it say? What kind of risk
Speaker 2: are they taking by doing this?
Speaker 4: They have risked their careers, They have endured unimaginable criticism
Speaker 4: on social media and from you know, Democrat activists.
Speaker 2: Maybe they called a traitor to Democrats, even though they're
Speaker 2: both crats and career ir sid.
Speaker 3: They're proof that there are good federal employees.
Speaker 4: They're proof that there are people that work for the government,
Speaker 4: that that that stand for the Constitution and want to
Speaker 4: do what's right, and they obviously wanted to do that,
Speaker 4: or they wouldn't have blown the whistle. Initially, when they
Speaker 4: blew the whistle, they only planned on doing the transcribed interview,
Speaker 4: and whistleblower x Richter Ziegler never wanted to disclose his
Speaker 4: name because he knew that, you know.
Speaker 2: Like he really is risking his entire career going up and.
Speaker 4: Both of them, but they got so furious at the
Speaker 4: fact that that Abby Loyle, the lawyer for for Hunter
Speaker 4: Biden and Joe Biden, the attacks that he he leveled
Speaker 4: at them, the threats. The Biden legal team works with
Speaker 4: this group called Congressional Integrity Project, which is a dark
Speaker 4: money group that attacks me all the time they attacked
Speaker 4: Jim Jordan, they started attacking the whistleblowers, they started attacking
Speaker 4: the credit that pushed them. I said, you know what,
Speaker 4: we want to go public. We want the American people
Speaker 4: to hear it from us.
Speaker 2: And is there a single Democrat who's defended the whistleblowers
Speaker 2: who said, don't attack them for coming forward.
Speaker 4: No, there were some that were nicer than others, but
Speaker 4: there were some like Goldman in New York, who were just.
Speaker 3: Rearians.
Speaker 4: To those people, and it's it's it was sad to
Speaker 4: see because the Democrats claim they're the ones that get
Speaker 4: the backs of the federal employees.
Speaker 2: They're the ones that only if the federal employees stay
Speaker 2: partisan Democrats, you dare, okay, wrong.
Speaker 3: Whistle blawyers if they blow the whistle on.
Speaker 2: Republican Yeah, so let me ask you another question. All right,
Speaker 2: we're at mid July. What's next? Right, there's someone someone
Speaker 2: at home right now, someone driving to work, someone listening
Speaker 2: to this podcast, someone watching on YouTube. What's next in
Speaker 2: the next week, two weeks, three weeks, months, two months,
Speaker 2: three months? What should they expect? We're entering the deposition face.
Speaker 2: We want to depose some of these associates. We want
Speaker 2: to depose.
Speaker 4: Devid Archer Biden associates to be the associates, the ones
Speaker 4: that remember when I said the Robinson Walker account, they
Speaker 4: split that three million dollar wires three ways. We want
Speaker 4: to depose the people who were in on the splits
Speaker 4: with all these wires. Because none of the wires, not
Speaker 4: a single wire from a foreign country, went directly to Abiden,
Speaker 4: they will always funnel them through a fake company.
Speaker 2: So she went to a shell company and they want
Speaker 2: to go to another shell company.
Speaker 3: T sometimes two or three, sometimes just.
Speaker 2: One, and then eventually two end up with the Biden
Speaker 2: including grandkids, including Grant. But who was it the dog
Speaker 2: ever get any money?
Speaker 3: Haven't found that.
Speaker 2: I haven't found the dog yet. Who was it that said?
Speaker 1: To refresh everybody's memory that they knew they were sitting
Speaker 1: up all these show comings to the point where they
Speaker 1: said it take them to decade even figured out that.
Speaker 4: Was in the form ten twenty three, the FBI form
Speaker 4: where the Ukrainian oligarch bragged and said investigate it would
Speaker 4: take investigators ten years to find all the money that
Speaker 4: I wired the Bidenes because I did it through so
Speaker 4: many different bank accounts.
Speaker 1: In other words, they thought they were so good at this,
Speaker 1: professionals so smart. Even if you thought this happened, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't be able to figure out for a decade.
Speaker 4: And remember that was in twenty twenty, before anyone knew
Speaker 4: gout the shell companies, and before anyone knew about the
Speaker 4: money laundering. No one knew about that really until we
Speaker 4: brought it out.
Speaker 2: And by the way, if the Democrats had won five
Speaker 2: more house seats, no one would none of this. And
Speaker 2: you had a Democrat Speaker of the House, they'd still
Speaker 2: be investigating Trump. Nobody would know any of this. It'd
Speaker 2: be all Trump all the time. We wouldn't know about
Speaker 2: the suspicious actaty reports. We wouldn't know about the money laundering,
Speaker 2: we wouldn't know about the shell companies, none of this.
Speaker 2: The only reason we know anything is that we have
Speaker 2: an excruciatingly narrow majority of the House and you had
Speaker 2: subpoena power could start investigating this, and Jim Jordan could
Speaker 2: two the two of you together.
Speaker 3: That's true.
Speaker 2: I have a question.
Speaker 1: I got to ask because I want to know what
Speaker 1: countries so far you can name for sure. And there's
Speaker 1: one country that hasn't and talked about a lot, and
Speaker 1: that's Russia, say tuned, and there's money that came from Russia,
Speaker 1: Russian oligark.
Speaker 2: That the former yeah, yeah, yeah, a little yes. But
Speaker 2: you want to break news with this a podcast, you
Speaker 2: gotta you gotta show a little leg here, James.
Speaker 4: We have more bank records that we've received. We're working
Speaker 4: on a third memorandum. Uh they will show transactions from
Speaker 4: Ukraine and Russia.
Speaker 1: So my question on Russia's this Okay, hold on a
Speaker 1: second do you hear what you just said?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Russia, that's news. Yeah, Russia, Russia, Russia. We heard
Speaker 2: the name Russia. We heard the word Russia a gazillion times. Yes,
Speaker 2: all right, now it's true Russia.
Speaker 4: And there are other countries too, but I'll say that
Speaker 4: for us, for our friend on the Big Fox Show
Speaker 4: at nine o'clock.
Speaker 1: So there was Yeah, there was a question that I
Speaker 1: was asked the other day and when we were in Florida,
Speaker 1: and it was why is no one talking about the
Speaker 1: millions coming from Russia from the Russian oligarch, the former
Speaker 1: mayor of Moscow's wife. And the second question that I
Speaker 1: was asked, and I said, I would ask you this week,
Speaker 1: is why have those oligarchs not been sanctioned when other
Speaker 1: Russian ogarks have been sanctioned. That's because the war between
Speaker 1: Russia and Ukraine. These sanctions in the US, but they've
Speaker 1: been admitted from that list every time.
Speaker 2: Can you explain a little bit more about that?
Speaker 4: I think there are certain policy decisions that Joe Biden's
Speaker 4: made since he's been president that the only explanation can
Speaker 4: be because of the money as family received and the
Speaker 4: fact that those oligarchs sent the money to the Bidens,
Speaker 4: and they were the two oligarchs left off the sanctions list.
Speaker 2: Multiple times, right, because they keep updating.
Speaker 4: We would lead one to believe that the reason they
Speaker 4: were left off the sanctions list is because they had
Speaker 4: paid the Biden family in the past.
Speaker 2: So, James, how much does it cost to buy a
Speaker 2: US president?
Speaker 4: I would say at this point probably twenty million dollars?
Speaker 1: Wow, And what's the total amount that you guess based
Speaker 1: on what you're seeing? And this is I think a
Speaker 1: really important way to kind of in this and frame
Speaker 1: it moving forward. What is the total number of dollars
Speaker 1: over the decades that you think you guys can piece
Speaker 1: together Because you said, this has been going on with
Speaker 1: James Biden, the brother four decades.
Speaker 2: That has gone to the extended Biden family from foreig nationals.
Speaker 4: I mean, I feel like we'll be able to get
Speaker 4: to hit the twenty five million.
Speaker 2: Martin twenty five million dollars from foreign nations to Joe
Speaker 2: Biden and his family for nothing.
Speaker 3: Okay, you know the Democrats want.
Speaker 4: To throw up Jared Kushner and Donald Trump and Evanka
Speaker 4: Trump and look, I'm not defending the Trump at all,
Speaker 4: but here's what I know about Jared Kushner, Avoca Trump.
Speaker 4: Don't they had legitimate businesses?
Speaker 2: I know, own golf courses? I mean they actually do
Speaker 2: say they actually do things. Does Joe Biden Hunter Biden?
Speaker 2: Do they own a hotel anywhere they don't own? Do
Speaker 2: they own a golf course? Do they make a car?
Speaker 2: Do they manufacture widgets?
Speaker 3: Nothing?
Speaker 2: Have they ever had a business at a front door
Speaker 2: to it?
Speaker 3: Nothing? No, not that I faild.
Speaker 2: So their business is access. Well there is no artists
Speaker 2: now that's true, but it is on our gallery. But
Speaker 2: the only identifiable good or service they were selling is
Speaker 2: access in special favors from the big guy, right, and
Speaker 2: if you look at the WhatsApp, they were also selling
Speaker 2: protection from vindication punishment from the big Guy.
Speaker 4: One thing that I think is fascinating is the money
Speaker 4: they took from CEFC, the Chinese the Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 4: owned energy company. Yeah, it wasn't even energy company they were.
Speaker 4: They were just a holding company for the for the
Speaker 4: Chinese companiest Party. China has all this cash they want
Speaker 4: to invest in the United States. They want to invest
Speaker 4: in anything that they can get their hands on, whether
Speaker 4: it be manufacturing, whether it be energy, whether it be farmland,
Speaker 4: it doesn't matter. They they want to invest your money
Speaker 4: in the United State, but there are barriers to entry.
Speaker 4: So what CEO, and you're gonna hear some of these
Speaker 4: associates say that if we ever can drag them in
Speaker 4: and get them deposed. Is the purpose of CEFC was
Speaker 4: simply to use the Biden name to eliminate the barriers
Speaker 4: to entry. So the Chinese Commanist Party could buy farmland,
Speaker 4: could buy interest in energy drillers, to buy interest in
Speaker 4: Louisiane bents manufacturers.
Speaker 3: That's what they wanted to do. And the one thing
Speaker 3: that we have.
Speaker 4: By partisan agreement on in the House of Representatives is
Speaker 4: we want to block China from investing in the United States.
Speaker 4: But the Bidens they were willing to datafate. That's what
Speaker 4: Joe's business plan, That's what his retirement plan was. That's
Speaker 4: the thing that he was going to be ten percent
Speaker 4: owner and the big guy they were going to partner with. CEFC,
Speaker 4: by the way, helped them buy interest into everything that
Speaker 4: the Chinese put one hundred million dollars into Pen University's
Speaker 4: Biden said the truck where he that's where Joe Biden
Speaker 4: drew a salar for the four years he was It's.
Speaker 2: Also went in one of the many places he left
Speaker 2: classified doctor you know who else through a salary.
Speaker 3: There Tony Blincoln, really Blincoln.
Speaker 1: And Joe that again and reminder by who Tony Blinkon
Speaker 1: is and what he was doing before.
Speaker 4: Lincoln is the Secretary of State now and Joe Biden,
Speaker 4: we're both working for the PIE, the Biden Pen Center
Speaker 4: for Diplomacy.
Speaker 2: So being paid effectively by communists China.
Speaker 4: We think we've requested from the University of Pennsylvania where
Speaker 4: their money came from, and they haven't complied with our
Speaker 4: request yet.
Speaker 2: Wow, well you did that.
Speaker 4: Answer to the sports have shown they received forty to
Speaker 4: sixty million dollars in anonymous donations from China, and both
Speaker 4: Blincoln and Joe Biden were on the payroll there for
Speaker 4: the four years during the Trump presidency when Biden was
Speaker 4: in the private So.
Speaker 2: James, let me just say something, thank you for doing this,
Speaker 2: Thank you for being a bulldog on a bone, because look,
Speaker 2: you may think you're doing for the people of Kentucky,
Speaker 2: and you are, but you're doing this for people of Texas.
Speaker 2: You're doing this for the whole country, because the American
Speaker 2: people deserve answers to these questions. We deserve to know
Speaker 2: if our president is bought and paid for, if he
Speaker 2: is on the payroll of foreign nations, if he is
Speaker 2: selling favors to enemies of America. And I have to say,
Speaker 2: the evidence that's coming out every day suggests number one,
Speaker 2: that Merrick Garland, the Attorney General of the United States,
Speaker 2: committed multiple felonies. I believe the House of Representative should
Speaker 2: impeach him. I believe the Department of Justice should appoint
Speaker 2: a special counsel and begin investigating him, to prosecute him
Speaker 2: for lying under oath and obstruction of justice. And number two,
Speaker 2: the evidence you're developing suggest more and more that Joe
Speaker 2: Biden is personally corrupt in a way that undermines the
Speaker 2: rule of law fundamentally. And I hope we reach a point.
Speaker 2: Is there one Democrat in the House or Senate who
Speaker 2: cares if the President of the United States has been
Speaker 2: purchased by enemies of America? If there is, I haven't
Speaker 2: seen him or her yet. Maybe there will be. But
Speaker 2: your work laying out these facts. And let me say
Speaker 2: also to these whistleblowers, God bless them. I thank them.
Speaker 2: They showed courage. They risked their lives, their livelihood, their
Speaker 2: future employment. They put everything on the line that matters.
Speaker 3: They're great Americans.
Speaker 1: Congresson, thank you so much for everybody that's watching listening.
Speaker 1: We say this every time, but this is so important.
Speaker 1: Make sure you share this podcast with your family and friends.
Speaker 1: Make sure everyone sees this, everyone hears it. Please share
Speaker 1: it on social media.
Speaker 2: Wherever you are.
Speaker 1: Subscribe subscribe it that follow button as well.
Speaker 2: By the way, subscribe to YouTube and subscribe on audio
Speaker 2: as well. Because we do YouTube typically once a week,
Speaker 2: we do audio three days a week.
Speaker 1: Congresson, I have a feeling you're probably gonna have to
Speaker 1: do this again with us down the road if all
Speaker 1: this so, we'll do that as well. But again, thank
Speaker 1: you guys for watching, listening, and we'll see you back
Speaker 1: here in a couple of days. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: about our good friends of her, Patriot Mobile. If you've
Speaker 1: got to sell phone, and virtually everyone does, now, how
Speaker 1: would you like to be with a company that actually
Speaker 1: supports causes that you believe in with every single bill
Speaker 1: you pay and no extra cost to you. That's exactly
Speaker 1: what Patriot Mobile, the only conservative Christian cell phone provider
Speaker 1: in the country does. They take a portion of your
Speaker 1: bill every month when you pay your bill at no
Speaker 1: extra cost to you, and they support causes things like
Speaker 1: free speech and religious freedom. They protect the unborn children
Speaker 1: and protect the sanctity of life. They advocate and support
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment in our military, our veterans, our first responders.
Speaker 1: They do this with your dollars every month now. For years,
Speaker 1: big mobile companies have been dumping millions into leftist causes,
Speaker 1: including planned parenthood. If you don't want your money going there,
Speaker 1: then switch to Patriot Mobile. They also give you great,
Speaker 1: dependable nationwide coverage on all three major networks, so you
Speaker 1: get the best possible service in your area without the
Speaker 1: woke propaganda push by leftists working to destroy this country.
Speaker 1: So check out Patriot Mobile, Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict
Speaker 1: that's Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict or eight seven eight
Speaker 1: Patriot that's eight seven eight Patriot. Use the promo code Verdict.
Speaker 1: You'll get free activation and the best deals of the year. Question,
Speaker 1: keep your same cell phone number you have right now
Speaker 1: if you want to eight seven eight Patriot or Patriotmobile
Speaker 1: dot com slash verdict