WEBVTT - What are quantum glasses?

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Daniel, where are you recording the podcast from these days?

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Today I'm in my office at the university. Kind of disappointed.

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Wanted you to be like at the control center of

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the L C or right next to where the particles collide,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a sportscaster. Nothing so glamorous, but I

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>mean pain a picture for us. What is your office

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>look like? Is it like in a dark dungeon, or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is it at the top of the in the Penthouse,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>at the Corner Office? You know, something in between. I've

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>got a nice window here with a view outside of

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the southern California landscape, but it's not like the biggest

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>office on the floor. We've got some real big shots

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>around here. You're more of a meeting shot, small shot.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm a just right shot, your podcast shot now. Is

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything in your office super organized, or are there like

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>huge stacks of papers everywhere? Well, I'm not the kind

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of person who's at risk for because his desk collapses

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>under a huge tower of papers, but it's not exactly

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>like a well organized museum or anything. It looks lived in.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think lived in his code for missing.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. What do you call something that's like

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>halfway between being neat and missing. Well, I'm a physicist,

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so I would call it a phase transition. It's like

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a melting point. You're kind of like a slush, like

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>a slushy. I'm hoping that if they crank of the

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>A C maybe my office will organize itself into a

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>crystal and you'll freeze to death, also for serve for

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>future generations, but at least I'll look neat doing it

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be pretty cool too. Hi, I'm poor. Hey,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a cartoonists and the CO author frequently asked

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>questions about the universe. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a professor

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at U C Irvine and a particle is this who

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>worked at the large Hadron collider and I like to

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>think of myself as just messy enough, messy enough for what,

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>before not being neat, messy enough to have that lucky

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>stroke of insight, you know, when that pile of notes

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you took three years ago at a seminar just sort

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of falls into your view and provides that crucial piece

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of information to unlock the puzzle you're working on. If

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you're too neat and organized and everything's tucked away and

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you never have that sort of serendipity. I see, and

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I assume that because your scientists, you have this tested right,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>you've a scientificity proven, like you've done the control of

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>studies where you're really neat and more missy. Yeah, I

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of other Daniels in the basement and

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I make them be really neat and messy and I

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>keep track of their careers also, and I guess you're

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the most successful one because you're not at the basement right,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so that proves your theory. I guess I'm the only

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>one with a podcast, which maybe means I'm a failure

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as a scientist. I'm not sure the other ones are

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>actually doing physics. Is that what you're saying? They're still

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>newon research exactly, but anyways, welcome to our PODCAST, Daniel

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge explain the universe, a production of my heart radio,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>in which we try to find order in this messy universe,

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this chaotic swirl of particles going to and fro weaving

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves together into this incredible, beautiful reality that we want

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of. While galaxies smash into each other

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and particles annihilate each other, we step back and try

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to organize all the things that are happening out there

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in the universe into a crystalline set of ideas that

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we can transmit along these audio waves into your brains.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>It's right, because it is a pretty messy universe, full

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of amazing and exciting things happening out there, particles crashing

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>into each other's black holes sucking up things. And yet

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow we have, as humans, figured out that there is

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a order to all of this,

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>even if we aren't very ordered ourselves. And of course

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if that order exists in the universe

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>or if it's just something we have imposed on it.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Does the universe actually makes sense? Are we just telling

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ourselves these stories of UN in the philosophy of physics?

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But so far it works for us. It lets US

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>build airplanes and transistors and all kinds of new materials

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that ruin and save our lives. Are you saying the

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>universe is just messy enough? I'm saying it melts my

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>brain sometimes melts in your mouth. All that knowledge, I wonder,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>what would you like if the universe melted in your

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hand instead of your mouth? Well, first of all, can

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you hold the universe in your hand? Only has a

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thin candy coating, right, but you are in the universe

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>also putting your hand the inside the Eminem two. We

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>are all EMINEM's. That's the philosophy on this show. But

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>are you the chocolate or are you the candy? and

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>which color is your eminem? Knowledge is the chocolate and

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>this show is the candy coating. That helps it go

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>down smooth keeps it from melting in your mouth or

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in your hand exactly as you crunch on through it,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>or in your ears. That would be pretty messy. You

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>know what melt the chocolate in your ears. Are you

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>suggesting people do or do not put Eminem's in their ears?

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of lost track here. I know children do

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and we have kids listening. Are you saying you know

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the results of that experiment, that if you put Eminem's

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in your ears they do not melt? I can guess

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens, but thing it's science is not about guessing.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's about going out there and doing experiments and discovering

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what actually happens when you make new arrangements that nobody

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>has ever thought of before. Sometimes it's adding weird metals

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to other metals, sometimes it's putting eminem's in ears. That's right,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>because we know the universe is made out of particles

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and bits of energy out there. But as it turns out,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of different ways you can put together

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>those bits of matter and energy and which gives you

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different results, and there are people still

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>figuring this out. You know, I'm a particle physicists. Of

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>My natural inclination for understanding how the world works is

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to take it apart, is to reduce it to its smallest,

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>most fundamental elements. But there are other people who work

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in a completely different direction. Their basic question is, how

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>do we make some new kind of Goo? And can

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we make good that can do things that Goo never

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>did before? They combine those fundamental pieces of the universe

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in new ways to try to make him dance and

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Jiggle and do things that no other kinds of Google

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have done before. Yeah, because there are many different ways

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that matter can arrange itself. They're called states of matter. Right,

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>there's liquid and gas and solids and plasma. Right that

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the states of matter that we know of.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are the famous classical states of matter. But as

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we explore the universe and push on these things we

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>discover the matter, can do all sorts of weird kinds

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of things. We talked on the podcast recently about Cork

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>gluon plasma, or you called it Quasma, a great name,

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way. Yes, I'm still waiting for my noble price. Well,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just keep eating Banasma as you wait. Yeah, yeah, that

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>might slip with the Noble Price Committee, but it's amazing

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to me all the things that emerge in our universe.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, one deep answer to the question what is

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the universe made out of is to reveal its fundamental bits.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's equally important to understand what those

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>bits do when they work together, because you can't explain

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the entire universe from the fundamental pieces. Even if you

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>had a complete and unique string theory that described the

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental theory of everything, you couldn't use it to predict

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes or traffic on the four oh five, because these

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>are properties that emerge at a different scale. When you

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>zoom out from the universe from this time, these little bits,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you notice these incredible properties, places where we find these

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting and simple mathematical stories that we can tell about

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe, whether or not they are fundamental. Yeah, so

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>there are these four basic states of matter that most

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>people are familiar with, solid gas, liquid plasma, and we're,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're popular and people know them because we

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>see them in our everyday lives. Right. They're sort of

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>what how matter usually sticks together. But, as you were saying,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there are many other ways that matter can stick together

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>if you go down into the weirder realm of quantum physics. Yeah,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>if you stick things together in weird ways and Zap

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>them with lasers, you can find stuff that does things

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that no other kind of stuff can do. You've probably

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of Bose Einstein condensates, for example, weird collections of

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>particles that act all together as a single quantum state,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a macroscopic blob of stuff with quantum properties. That's another

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>example of how you can squeeze and tweak matter into

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>weird configurations to do new kinds of stuff and new

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stuff. Is What we'll be talking about here today.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So to be on the PODCAST, we'll be asking the question.

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>What are quantum glasses? Now, Daniel, I'm guessing these are

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not just things you wear to see quantum things better.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>When we go to a quantum physics conference, everybody puts

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>these things on. It's not going to a three D movie, right.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It's for cure and quantum myopia. Is that what it's

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there for? Or are they for drinking quantum wine or juice?

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Quantum juice? So you can say I'm not sure if

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I drink that glass of wine or if somebody else did,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>shrouding your drink my glass of wine, I meaning glasses

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of quantum. Have you drunk today? One and zero at

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time. There's a probability distribution that I'm drunk

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>quantum glasses. So these are two words I'm familiar with,

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but I've never seen them together in the same phrase.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>These are really interesting kind of materials. Sometimes they're also

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>called spin glasses, as we'll learn about later, because they

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>involve quantum spin. So it's a really fun topic and

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>something a bunch of listeners have been emailing me about

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because they saw articles about spin glasses and quantum glasses

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to understand. Hey, what are these things anyway?

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Interesting and can you make a spin bottle out of glass?

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that the same thing? I think you're thinking of

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the game spin, the boss Spin right. Well, as usually,

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>we were wondering how many people out there had heard

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of this phrase quantum glasses or had any idea of

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what they are. So thank you very much to those

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of you who are willing to answer these questions. It's

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>really helpful to give us a sense for what people

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are thinking and what they already know. If you'd like

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to participate for future episodes, please don't be shy. Right

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to me two questions at Daniel and Jorge Dot Com

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'll set you up. So think about it for

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a second. What do you think quantum glass this are,

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and what could you see with them? Here's what to

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be glad to say. Quantum glasses, I guess, are not

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>spectacles to view through, but they should be a kind

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of material. In material science, glasses are a class of

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>materials that are characterized by being that it disorganized. So

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum glasses should be a quantum soup that is disorganized.

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. I don't think they're the tiny

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>little reading glasses that some people perched on the end

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of their nose, nor are they the tiny little shot

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>glasses one might use for a very strong drink. Even

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>those are not quite quantum level, and one should use

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>distance glasses, if any, rather than reading glasses and not

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>drink alcohol while driving a Volkswagen Quantum. So I'm going

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 1>to take a wild guess that there's something that refocuses

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>beams of quantum particles, much like how eyeglasses and other

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>such lenses refocusames of light. I have absolutely no idea

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what quantum glasses could be, so this is going to

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be a completely uneducated guest in every way. My mind

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>originally went to glasses, like glasses who wear, but then

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I also thought of glasses as like a container for

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a liquid. So my guess is that it is some

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>type of container through which we can better observe quantum events,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>events on a quantum scale. I think quantum glasses is

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a system physicists use two negotiate quantum theory. Either that

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or it's the glasses I used to use when I

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>was a heavy drinker. But take a guess. Quantum glasses

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>helps you see shrodingerl's cat, exactly what that cat is doing,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's no whereabouts. If I was to reduce, I

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>reckon it's some way of being able to utilize something

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to view or to assess the way the quantum world

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>is behaving, similar to a spectacles on to say the world.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's got something to do with our

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to say or interact with the quantum world. All Right,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting ideas. I love the tiny little

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>reading glasses. They're like little quantum particles you put in

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>your eyeballs. Is that what they're saying? No, I'm imagining

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like literal tiny glasses perched at the very, very tip

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of my nose, and they're there and they're not there

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. But I'm most impressed with this

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>one guest that says glasses are disorganized. So maybe quantum

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>glasses are a disorganized quantum soup. That is so close

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to correct I'm amazed. Yeah, yeah, I feel like maybe

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they cheated or something that. I wonder if they read

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>an article about this. I don't know the rules are.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not allowed to Google. So, you know, maybe they

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just intuited it. Maybe this person just is a physics genius. Wow,

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should be hiring them, or maybe you already

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>hird them. I don't know. Did you ask your Grad Students? Sometimes?

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I do sometimes, but these are all random Internet people,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>although you know, some of our listeners are physics Grad

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>students and some of them aren't. So there's a pretty

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>wide spectrum of backgrounds. Yes, in the end we're all

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>random Internet people, Daniel, but anyways, lots of great ideas,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and so let's dig into it. What is a quantum glass? Daniel,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>break it down for us. So, basically, our listener gave

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>us the answer. A quantum glass is a material where

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the quantum states are disordered in a way that's similar

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>to way like a window glass is a disordered solid

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than like an ordered crystal. You know. That means

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that things on the inside are not like arranged, so

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>everything points in the same direction. It's sort of scrambled

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. MM interesting because I guess bits of matter,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>atoms and quantum particles, they have a specific direction, aren't

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they just like little blobs? They do have specific directions

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>because they have quantum spins, right, and luxurns are not

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>just tiny particles with charred gen mass. They also have

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>other quantum properties, including this weird thing quantum spin, that

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't fundamentally know what it is. We don't think

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that these electrons are actually spinning because we think of

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>them as point particles. And even if you account for

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the width of their wave function, if they were literally spinning,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>then their surfaces would have to go faster than the

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>speed of light to explain all of this energy. It's

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>some other weird property. We have a whole podcast episode

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about what is quantum spin. For today, all we need

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to know is that it can have a direction. Electron

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be like spin up or spin down, and

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this is true for other particles. Protons and neutrons and

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>even for atoms, can have an overall spin. So that

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>gives them a directionality. They're not just points, right. They

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>have a property that somehow points in a certain specific

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>direction in space. And you said it's just sort of

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like normal glass to like maybe let's start with that.

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>What is a normal glass? Yeah, so a normal glass

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is something that feels solid. Like you go to Your

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Window Pane Ene and you touch it, it it feels solid, right.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But most solids out there are not like glass. Most

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>solids are ordered. They're organized like a crystal, you know.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>They're sort of like built out of a bunch of

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>tiny bricks that are all stacked together very nicely and

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>neatly into like a big cubic lattice. You can think

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of them as like a bunch of atoms where the

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>atoms all line up in three directions. You know, if

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you like sort of looked down it, you could line

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>up all the atoms sort of like in front of

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you and then along the surface and this kind of thing.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So most stuff that's out there is fairly well organized,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but a glass is not a glass. It's just sort

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a pile of stuff that's stuck together, but

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not well organized. What do you mean? Mean? Like,

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>my wooden desk is neatly organized, but it looks pretty messy.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Your wooden desk is even more complicated because it has

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of structure in the wood itself. But you know,

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>if you take it like a block of ice, it's

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a single kind of stuff. It's cold and the atoms

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>inside of it are arranged in a lattice. There's like

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the distance between two atoms is pretty much a single number,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's true for most things like metals, et CETERA.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But they're both solid, right, like a piece of glass

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is solid, just like a piece of ice is solid too.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right. A piece of glass is solid because its

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>volume doesn't change and it's shape doesn't change. The build

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just sit there, right. But if you zoomed in with

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a microscope, an amorphous solid like glass would look very

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>different from a crystal solid, a crystal slid. You would

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>zoom in and it would look like it's built out

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of these little pieces that are all arranged very nicely,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like somebody stacked a bunch of legos together, whereas an

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>amorphous solid would look like, you know, the inside of

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>your Lego bin before you built something would be like

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a disorganized pile of stuff that's still somehow stuck together.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, glass is an example of it. And

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>then we call these things glasses. But there are other examples,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of plastics are like this, gels are

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like this. You know, sand is like this. If you

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>zoom in close enough, it's not like stacked up in

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>little bricks, it's just sort of like a big jumble.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, it is solid. It manages to stick

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>together well enough still have the properties of a solid, right,

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>although I've heard glasses actually a liquid, like a really

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>slow liquid, right, isn't it? That is something that is

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>said often, but I don't think it's actually true. I

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>think the people have been misled by old windows, for example,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that are thicker on the bottom than on the top.

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>That's mostly because of the glass making process at the time.

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Glass itself, I don't think, actually flows on a time

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>scale that humans can measure, but on a long time

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>scale it sort of does. Right technically, it's true that

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>these things can flow on very, very long time scales,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but most of the things where you see it's like

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thicker on the bottom than on the top is not

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>because the glasses flowed. It's a little bit unclear exactly

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what the time scale is for glass to flow into

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a puddle, for example. It might be a very, very

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>long time scale. Well, Um, I guess maybe a question

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I have is what's the difference between something that is

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a glass and something that is not a glass? Like

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what makes some materials arrange themselves into crystal structure, lattices,

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and what makes them just stick together morphously? The answer

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is that it is complicated. For some materials it depends

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on how they are cooled. So if you cool things really,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>really fast, they don't have a chance for the crystal

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to organize itself. Other materials just don't fall into a

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>crystal because of the way their interactions work. They can't

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>build a regular lattice it depends a lot on the

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>exact material and also on how you get it to

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>its state. So some things can be crystals or can

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be glasses, and it just depends on how quickly they

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are cooled down. Doesn't a lot of it also depend

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on like the structure of the molecules in the material?

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, you know, like maybe what I think, water

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>falls into crystals because the two H and the o

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of form a kind of a weird shape and

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there there are only so many different ways you can

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of make those shapes stick together. Yeah, that's what

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean by the interactions of the materials. They imagine.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>For example, you have a weird shaped tile, a question

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you can ask is like can I tile this across

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the floor in a regular pattern? And that's basically what

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to do when you build a crystal is

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like fill up a space with a regular pattern with

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a weird shape that you have. So, as you say,

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, water has kind of a weird shape, but

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's capable of building crystal. But actually it can build

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of different kinds of crystals based on the temperature

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and pressure of its formation. There's like ice four and

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ice six and ice. Nine. These are all different crystal

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>arrangements of the same basic thing, based on the temperature

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and the pressure and the conditions in which it was formed.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really complicated question. Yeah, and I think

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it also depends on like what makes the molecules stick

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>together right like an h do. It could be the

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>forces between the OHS, for example, what I'm just giving

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>out random example, or it could be, you know, the

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>forces between the H is and things like that, right exactly,

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and some parts of it are stickier than others, right,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>depending on the energy levels of their electrons. So it's

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>something that's not always easy to predict. Sometimes the best

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>way to figure it out is just to try. It's

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just to go out and see what happens. So we

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have people whose entire careers are just like mapping out

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the phase diagram of various kinds of materials, understanding what

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it does under certain configurations. Think maybe the takeaway is

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that stuff sticks together in general and there are there

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>are many different ways for it to stick together and

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they stick together in regular patterns, like in a grid,

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they just kind of bundle up like randomly, right,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's what a class is and classes is an

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>example of this category. You also have like plastics and

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>polymers and Thoms and gels. These all follow the same

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of structure as glasses. They are amorphous rather than crystalline, right,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and those are the in the macro scale there are

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>morphous materials, kind of like the atom level, right. We're

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>not yet at the quantum level. Yeah, these are things

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>at the atom level exactly. So then you're saying a

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum glass is a material in which stuff is stuck together,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but Um, it's a morphous in its quantum states. Yeah,

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and I predict you're gonna be pretty unhappy with this

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>distinction about what's a quantum state or not, because in

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the end all of these interactions are quantum, like when

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>two water molecules touch each other and form part of

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a crystal. That is a quantum interaction between quantum particle.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But when we talk about quantum glasses, we mean that

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we're adding a new dimension to it, that we're considering

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>another quantum property, in this case quantum spin, because we're

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>not interested in how the objects ordered themselves in space.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We're interested in the distribution of these spins. Are the

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>spins ordered or are the spins disordered. Well, I guess

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe a distinction is that like, for example, for Water

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and ice? I mean you're talking about atoms being in

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a lattice, right, and atoms themselves don't

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have spin, or you know, don't. Isn't it like the

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>electrons and the atoms and the corks and the atoms

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that have spin, not the atom itself? The atoms themselves

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>do have an overall spin. It comes from adding up

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the spin of all the bits, the nuclear spin, the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>electron spin, and that's what's important for forming magnets, for example,

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is the spin of the whole atom. It adds up.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So we do think about the spin of the atom itself,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>not just the electrons inside of it. All right, well,

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get more into it and explain what exactly is

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a quantum glass and whether or not we've actually seen

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>them and can touch them and maybe use them to

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>read quantum books. So let's get into that, but first

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. All right, we're talking about

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum glasses. Are these like x Ray glasses that let

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>me see through things? They'll let you see immediately to

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the next big discovery in physics. I wish isn't I

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>just called working. What if I could just put on

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quantum glasses and look at my calendar and be like

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the day you're gonna make a big discovery, what

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would you do? Would you work harder or less if

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you need you're gonna make a big discovery next week. Well,

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I know that napping is a crucial part of making

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>big discovery, so make sure to get that out of

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the way first. Right, right, but would you have more

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or less if you knew your feature? Well, future Daniel

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>would have already have seen his future using quantum glasses,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so that would be accounted for, sort of like Harry

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Potter time travel. Right, right, I guess that you're saying

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any free will. That's right, I'm completely

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>determined by my calendar. I just do whatever it says.

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Your naps are determined by your future self.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not your fault. If I put make huge discovering

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to the calendar, then I have no choice. I have

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a huge discovery that day. Right. Yeah, that's

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, but I'm saying like, how would it

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>affect your presence choices? I would type that into my calendar.

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times. But anyways, we're talking about quantum

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>glasses and what they are, and we talked about how

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a glass is a material in which all of the

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>bits in it are kind of disordered, amorphous, not in

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>any kind of grid or structure, and the same can

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be said for quantum materials. That's right. And traditionally, when

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>we talk about glasses we talk about disorder in the

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>location of the atoms, so if you zoomed in with

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a microscope you would see like a big pile of

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff rather than a nice, crisp, organized lattice. And now

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about something else. We're talking about quantum properties

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of these objects. So you can have something which is

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>a nice organized lattice in space, like a grid of

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>atoms that are perfectly organized, but it can be a

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>quantum glass if their quantum properties are disorganized, if their spin,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>for example, so their magnetic moment is not organized in

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a very nice way. WHOA. So it's almost like something

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you layer on top of other materials. This idea. It's like,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have this traditional distinction between glasses and crystals,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but that is sort of irrelevant here. Right what counts

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not the quantum states are aligned in

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a pattern or not. Exactly whether it's a quantum glass

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>depends on its quantum states, not the spatial locations. And

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>here mostly we're talking about things which are physical crystals.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, their atoms are nicely arranged in a grid,

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but the quantum states of those atoms in the grid

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>are sort of scrambled. And you know traditionally if you

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have stuff in a grid, the magnetic fields can be

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>nicely aligned. So the ferro magnets, for example, is something

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>where all the atoms have their spins in the same direction,

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>which is what controls their little magnetic moments and all

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>adds up to be a big magnet. So if you

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have a fridge magnet for example, like a nice piece

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of iron that's been magnetized, has all of its spins

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction, they all add up together they

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>make like a permanent magnet. That's a ferro magnet. That's

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>not a quantum glass because the spins are all nicely

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>organized nicely right. That's what a magnet is. Right. Our

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>magnet is usually metal crystal where all of the atoms

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in it have the same spin direction, which kind of like,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, synchronizes them. And makes them add up to

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a giant kind of spin or magnetic pole. Right. And

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one reason that's possible is because the spins like to

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>align with each other. In a ferromagnetic material, that's the

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>relaxed state, that's the lowest energy states, when the spins

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>are pointing in the same direction. It likes to be

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that way. There are other kinds of material, like anti ferromagnets,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>where they prefer the spins to be the opposite directions,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>where you want your neighbor to have the opposite spin

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is you, and because of the way these molecules interact

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in their funny shapes and all of their forces between them,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be the lowest energy state. That's the

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>opposite anti ferromagnet where you have a crystal, but it's

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like spin up, down, up, down, up, down, up, down.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Both of these are examples of well organized magnetic lattices. Interesting.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And does that apply only to metals, like magnet metals?

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Like can I take a block of ice and align

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the magnetic spins in the atoms of water

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in a block of ice to make it magnetic? You

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>can't do that with a block of ice. Now, a

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>block of ice is not ferromagnetic and it's also not paramagnetic.

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>paramagnetic ar materials that are sort of weakly magnetic and

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if you put them in a magnetic field they will

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually align, but then when you take the magnetic field

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>away they might lose it. But ice is neither of those.

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Why can't I just, you know, somehow arrange

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>my water molecule so that all the spins are aligned?

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>It depends on how the bits of the atom are organized.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So it depends sort of like on the overall spin

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the atom. We were talking earlier about having spins

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>on the electrons and spins on the Nuclei. If those

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of all add up to an overall small amount

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of spin, then there's not really much to play with there.

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>But if they come together in a way that makes

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like a large magnetic dipole for the individual atom, then

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you have spins that can get aligned, and so that's

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what sort of what's different between some materials which are

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like ferromagnetic because they can be aligned, and other materials

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that are not. M You're saying like in something like

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a water atom or molecule, all of the electrons and

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>all the corks in it are not easily or readily aligned.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>They like to kind of being random positions, which sort

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of castles. There's spin out. Yeah, and some of these materials,

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>for example, the electrons want to be opposite spins so

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that they cancel out, and other materials they're set up

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in a way that electrons can all be in the

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>same spins. You have an overall spin to the atom

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>M and so that's the difference between a material that

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>can form a magnet and one that cannot. That's one

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the differences. This whole thing is very complicated. It's

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to make like broad generalizations, but that's sort of

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>like the cartoon picture. Why some things can be magnetic

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and some things cannot. All right, so maybe tell me

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>more about these anti ferromagnetic materials. So the anti ferromagnetic

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>materials are the ones where they like to be opposite,

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>where every neighbor prefers to be the opposite of the other,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and it just depends on their interactions. Whether that's the

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>lowest energy states, so they like to be up against

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 1>each other or whether they like to be aligned with

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>each other. They like to be aligned with each other.

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a ferromagnet. They like to be opposite with each other.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It's an anti ferromagnet imagine like a big sheet of

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>these atoms. If you want them to be all aligned,

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>there's an easy way to do that. You spin them

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>all up or spin them all down. Right, you want

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>them to be all anti line, there's still a pretty

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>easy way to do that. On a square lattice, like

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>every other one is up and every other one is down.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So up, down, up, down, up, down. And you can

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine covering an entire plane or even a three d grid,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.479
<v Speaker 1>where every atom's neighbor has the opposite spin as it

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>does right. So if you're up, then you see down

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>everywhere around you in the Lattice, and if you're down,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you see up everywhere around to do in the lattice.

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's a way there to make an overall relaxation

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>where everybody's in their lowest state and everybody's happy. I

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>guess I got a little confused because I think basically,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.479
<v Speaker 1>like all materials, is kind of a quantum glass, right,

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like isis sort of a quantum glass because it's quantum

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>spins are in all kinds of directions. Right, like my

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>hand is a quantum glass in that sense of the

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>definition of it, I suppose. So ice and an example,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>has sort of negligible quantum spins compared to the kind

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of things we're talking about here. So it's not really

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in the category of things that we're discussing. We're talking

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>about materials that do have quantum spins. Do they like

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to be aligned or do they like to be anti aligned?

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And can you make the material in such a way

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that the whole thing is happy overall? The whole thing

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is relaxed into its lowest energy state, either inferro magnets,

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>by lining up all the spins or anti ferro magnets

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>by flipping all of the spins right. But I think

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you're talking now about like let's post a little challenge

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves. Let's let's see if we can find material

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can arrange in a crystal, in the lattice

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in like a grid, but somehow also make all these

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>spins differently or randomly directed. Yeah, so a spin glass

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of material where the spins can't all relax,

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>when you can't find a configuration where everybody's happy. We

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>talked a minute ago about anti ferromagnets, where things like

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the opposite spin of their neighbor. And that

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>works in a square lattice right, where you have like

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a neighbor to both sides and above you and behind

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you and in front of you. What if, for example,

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you have like a triangular lattice instead of a square lattice,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you have like two neighbors? Imagine just points

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on a triangle. You Label one point up, the next

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>one down. What's the third point going to be? It

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to be down because has one up neighbor and

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it wants to be up because it has one down neighbor.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't know where to go right. It can't

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>satisfy both of its neighbors at the same time. Well,

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, I guess that these anti ferromagnetic I guess

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>atoms or molecules. They're sort of like contrarians, like if

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their neighbor is up, they want to go down right

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and if they have two neighbors that are up, then

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to go down. I guess two questions. First

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of all, why are they so continuing? Hey, some people

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>just can be grumpy and you shouldn't ask too many questions.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it depends on the complicated interactions between the atoms.

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Atoms are not simple objects. Have a spatial extent and

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they're slashing around. They have all their internal forces. You're

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to some bits of it than other bits of it,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and the spins of these objects interact right and some

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of them like to be spin up and some of

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>them like to be spinned down. I guess the short

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>answer is that it's really complicated and sometimes it even

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>depends on distance. Like if you're close up, then they

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like to have the same spin and as you get

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>further away, they like to have the opposite spin, and

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then as you gave them further away, they like to

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be the same spin again. It's really complicated and depends

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of the details of that exactly. The

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>internal arrangements of each atom or molecule, I see. But

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is it, I guess, kind of like a magnet, right,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like if I have two magnets and they're both, you know,

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>have the same North Pole pointed in the same direction,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like bring them together, like one of them will want

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to flip over so that it's opposite the other one.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of like the good analogy, or maybe

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>even the same thing? That's the same thing for the

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Anti Ferro magnets right, except here we're talking about spins,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's very similar. You know, the minimum energy state

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there is for one North Pole to be aligned with

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the other magnets South Pole, and if you try to

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>push in the other direction, it's going to take some

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>energy to keep it there and if you let go

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it will relax into the configuration where they have the

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>opposite directions, where the North Pole and one magnet is

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>aligned with the South Pole of other magnets. Okay, so

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>now I think what you're saying is, you know, we

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have these materials, these atoms, that are contrarian. They like

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to be opposite the spin of the its neighbors. So

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>now what happens? And if I put two up spins

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>next to it, it's gonna want to be down spin.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But what happens if I put an upspin and a

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>down spin next to it? It gets you a little confused, right,

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or frustrated? Yeah, exactly, and that's what physicists call it.

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>They call it a frustration when you can't arrange the

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>spins in a way so the whole thing has minimum

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>energy right in a square lattice. Imagine four points on

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a square could have like the top left to be up,

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom right be up and the other two

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 1>points be down and everybody's happy because all the downs

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have only up neighbors and all the ups have only

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>down neighbors. But in a triangular lattice you can't do that. Right.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The third point has one up neighbor and one down

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>neighbor and it can't decide which way to go. There's

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>two possible states there that have the same energy and

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>neither of them are like the minimum energy right. It's

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>like having a conversation between three people and one of

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>them is the contrarian. What happens that? When are the

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>other people agrees with them, but the only one does not?

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>What does the contrarian do? Exactly who to disagree with?

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And so this is what a spin glass is, because

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the spins end up sort of like disorganized. It's not

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like a Pharo magnet where they're all pointing in the

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>same way, or an anti Faro Mac in a square

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>crystal where they're all pointing opposite directions. It's kind of

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, right. So like tense, it's frustrated, it can't

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>quite relax, and so where the spins end up is

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit random. Interesting. So you're saying the part

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of the definition of what a quantum glass is is

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of frust rate Shan built it into it.

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Like if I build the lattice with contrarian atoms and

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone's contrary to their neighbor, then it's and everyone's happy.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Then that's not a quantum glass. Right, exactly. That's just

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a normal anti ferromagnetic crystal. But if you can somehow

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>frustrate the atoms, then you have a quantum glass, because

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess everyone's frustrated and what constantly flipping back and forth?

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of what happens? Yeah, everyone's frustrated, it

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>can't find the minimum and it has new weird properties.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk about a phase transition, there has

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to be like a change and how the material operates

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>in one of its properties. Right, we don't say that

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>cold water and hot water are different phases, even though

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they are chemically different, because there's no like large change

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in its macroscopic behavior. So for years or even decades,

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>there was an argument about whether spin glasses really are

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>their own phase of matter. And the people who say

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that it is its own phase of matter. They argue

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's unique because it has weird relaxation times. Like

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if you take a ferromagnet or an anti ferromagnet and

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you apply really strong magnetic field and you sort of

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>mess up the spins, it will relax pretty quickly when

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you take away the magnetic field. But a spin glass,

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>if you do that, it will react really differently. It

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>will take like forever to relax and it will never

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>come back to its original position. So people argue that

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that's enough of a different macro's copic property to be

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>its own kind of thing. What do you mean? It

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>takes a while, like the items keep switching back and

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>forth or what? There's like turmoil inside of the material. Yeah,

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they have like decision paralysis. You know, it's like if

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to the cookie aisle and there's like a

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand cookies and your shopping list just says cookie. You're like, Oh,

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>do I get Oreos? Do I get chips of oil?

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Look at those fudge ones. Oh No, I can't decide

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>what I want and they all seem equally good. You

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>could spend hours there wandering around switching, you know, taking

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff in and out of your basket, not sure what

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to actually buy, and so spin glasses are sort of

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like this. If you perturb them, you give them magnetic energy,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you put them in the magnetic field and then you

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>take it away, they take a long time sort of

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>slashing back and forth spins, flipping and then flipping other spins.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>They can't find a comfortable situation to relax in M

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>but I guess it isn't spin a quantum property, meaning

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like each atom has a spin that's both up and down,

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>like they went in a particular direction? Wouldn't that sort

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of collapse the wave function of that quantum state? Yeah,

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question. It's true that spin is a quantum property,

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>which means both that it can either be up or down,

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>but not like in between. Right when you measure these

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>things either get up or down, but it means that

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>until you measure it, it's not necessarily determined. So what

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that means is that the whole thing has like a

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>few different quantum states that are all possible. We're talking

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about is what happens when you measure it right. So

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you probe this thing. You ask like what's the spin

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>over here? What's the spin over here? What's the spin

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>over here? And you're right, that will collapse the wave

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>function so that everybody's going to make a decision, but

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you come back another minute later and it's made a

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>different decision. You come back another minute later it's made

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>another decision. So you never really see it settle and

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>relax into a fixed state. Right. So when you're talking

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about like this termoil, all the all the contrarians can

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not being able to decide which way they're being contrring about.

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>It's more of like a quantum turmol right, like it's

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>not actually flipping back and forth and it's not like

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you're at the cookie as'le trying to decide. It's like

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of in this state where you're you're decided

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and not decided. No, I think it really is decided

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>or not decided. I mean you can take pictures of

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>these things essentially using like skinning, tunneling, microscopy or otherways

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to probe the magnetic field. So you can collapse these

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>wave functions and you can see them evolve over time.

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So you can see these things really are flipping or

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not like once you've collapsed the way function, then

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's happy and it's going to stay there. You can

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>collapse the way function, you can come back and collapse

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it again and then again and again, you can see

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're flipping their spins. So that's the interesting property

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about spin glasses is that they have these really long

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>relaxation times. They're basically never in equilibrium. You know, another

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>way to think about it is like say you sit

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.479
<v Speaker 1>down at a really long banquet table and there's silvil

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>ware to your left and to your right. Do you

0:37:58.360 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>take the one to your left or do you take

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the one to your right? You know, if everybody takes

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>through to the left, everybody is happy. If everybody takes

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>their right, everybody's happy. People are arguing. You know, no,

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that one's mine, that one's mine. Then you know you

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can't really settle into a comfortable state. So spin glasses

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>are situations where, like, people can't agree about what the

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rules are and so everybody's just taking whatever silverware. Well then,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you say, eventually it settles down. And so what is

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it settled down into? Salad forks or main course for

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the interesting thing about spin glasses is that it's

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>very hard to predict. You know, when we try to

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>understand the macroscopic properties of these things, we do so

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>by starting from the microscopic we say, okay, crystal is

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>made of these little bits, and then we expand our

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>understanding from that basis, stacking them together to make the

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>macroscopic properties. That's really hard to do with spin glasses

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're so crazy and unpredictable. They're basically never in equilibrium.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the mathematical tricks that we use

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to understand crystals don't really work for spin glasses, which

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>lad to like invention of whole new categories of mathematics.

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>M interesting. All right. Well, let's get into those new

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>categories of maths and what these materials are good for

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and what we can learn from them. But first let's

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. All right, we're talking about quantum glasses,

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>which is one of our listeners said, is where you

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>take shots of quantum whiskey or Tequila, one electron at

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a time. Man, it's quantized. I'll take forever to get drunk. Danny.

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the point, man, moderation in all things. Let See,

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>one atom at a time. Alright. So it sounds like

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>there are materials you can put together in a crystal

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that are unhappy basically at their core, because all of

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the atoms can't find a good arrangement of their want

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>them spin the everyone is sort of in this state

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.919
<v Speaker 1>where they don't know whether to go up or down

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in their spin, and so you create a material with

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of frustration in it exactly. And a lot

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of these spin glasses are not just like one kind

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of material and a lattice where they're all contrarians and

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it's arranged in a way where they can't be happy.

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the Times it's a few examples of

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is magnetic inside a larger crystal. So you'll

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have like a non magnetic material like gold or silver copper,

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and you sprinkle into it a few percent of magnetic atoms,

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>iron or something else, and because of their interactions depend

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>on the distance, whether they like they have the same

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>spin or the opposite spin depends on how far apart

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they are. You can end up with these disordered spins.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You're saying. That's how you make a quantum glass. You

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>embed magnetic atoms into a regular metal exactly, and then

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you cool it down and you see, like how are

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they frozen in interesting you like you bake in the

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>frustration of the magnetic atoms. You freeze it in. Yeah, exactly.

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, I guess a good question for me

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is what are these materials good for or why are

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>we interested in them? So these things don't have like

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>an immediate practical application, if not, like with spin glasses,

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you can make quantum computers or you can build a

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>better transistor or you can take tiny shots of hot

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>cocoa or something like that. There's no immediate application, but

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting and tricky problem and so people have

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about it and, you know, sweating over it

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and trying to figure out like can we describe these

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>things mathematically? Is there some way to figure this out?

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>To me, this is one of the deep questions of

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 1>physics itself, you know, because again, since we don't have

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental theory of everything, all of the theories that

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we develop are what we call effective theories. They're like

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>mathematical stories that we tell that describe the things that

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we see, but they're not like written into the fundamental

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>firmament of the universe. You know, aliens, for example, might

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not come up with these same effective theories. They're just

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of useful descriptions, but it's incredible we can find them,

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes they're harder to find than others. You know,

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for Solids and for liquids we have found mathematical descriptions

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that are useful. For Spin glasses, it's been much, much

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>harder because their interactions are more complicated and less regular,

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's inspired people to come up with all sorts

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of new mathematical tricks, one of which people think is

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we discovered the Higgs Boson. I guess

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:22.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe a step us through that a little bit more.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Like we have an effective theory

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to describe like a regular magnet. Is that what you're saying?

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We have like a mathematical way to study the model

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>how regular magnet works, but you're saying we don't have

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>one yet for these crazy, frustrated materials. We've been working

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>on we've been making progress. I mean by we I

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>mean all the other physicists. We're not goofing off making podcasts. We,

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the general group of humans thinking about

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things, have been working on this for

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time and I think it's always interesting when

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it requires a new kind of math. And so there's

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>an Italian physicist Parisi who won the Nobel Prize for

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this in twenty one, because he came up with a

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>new sort of math, thematical strategy for dealing with this complication.

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the real problems is that these

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>things can arrange themselves in lots of different ways and

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when you poke them, you know, you give them a

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more magnetic energy. So you scramble all the

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>spins and you watch them relax. You wonder, like why

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 1>does it land in this configuration and not that one?

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Can we predict this kind of thing? Can we come

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>up with some sort of mathematical way to grapple with

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this and predict what's going to happen? You can't be

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>completely random. And I guess what do you mean by

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of math, like a new kind of

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like adding quantum to old math, or what does that mean?

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>The Way Mathematics bakes progress is that sometimes they need

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>to develop like a new kind of tool, you know,

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like they find differential equations and here's strategies for solving

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of problem, or here's Algebra, you know, like

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the people who figured out how to write equations down

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 1>and solve them to get understanding. We're able to solve

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>certain problems that other people couldn't. And, for example, descartes

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of advances in geometry because he would

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>able to figure out how to use Algebra to tackle geometry.

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if you could write down the equation of a circle,

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>then you could solve systems of equations and understand geometric patterns.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>So here they've done something similar. They've invented to like

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>new mathematical tools, and these mathematical tools are really thinking

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>about the symmetry of the problem. Like you have this huge,

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>complex tree of options that a spin glass can do.

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We can splip this way, you can flip that way,

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you can flip the other way. So what Paris he

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>did was come up with a way to think about

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this in sort of the larger context, like don't just

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>think about the one spin glass you have, think about

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>all the other spin glasses and you don't have like

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>replicas of that system and try to organize them into

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like branches. So like, Oh, these guys are all similar

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in this way, those guys are all similar in these

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>other way. Think about like the choices that were made

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to get to this spin glass from the higher energy

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>spin glass, and he found these ways to like organize

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>these and use symmetries to like break down the problem

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>into smaller pieces, to organize this complexity, and that helped

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to make sort of like approximate statements about which kinds

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of spin glass final states were more likely than others,

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>like if you started here, you're likely to get to

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>neighboring final states where you weren't going to make a

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>big jump to something all the way on the other

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>side of the sort of symmetry organized set of states.

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And you're talking about math that sort of analyzes one

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of these grids right like you're looking at a grid

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 1>of these atoms, these frustrated atoms, together, and you're trying

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, like, you know, are they all gonna

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 1>go up or down, or is they are they going

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to alternate or are they gonna you know, how often

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are you going to run into an up spin atom?

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And you're wondering, if I poke this thing, how likely

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is it to change to another configuration, or how likely

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is it, after I've poked it, to come back to

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>this configuration? or how many spins are going to be

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>flipped after I poke it? Is it going to be

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>every single thing is flipped, or just a fraction of

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you or flipped. So those the kind of questions people

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>are interested in, just like what are the behaviors of

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>these things? So press math gave us sort of like

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a map for all those different configurations. He said like okay,

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this configuration of the spin glass, you can put it

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>here on the map, and he was able to sort

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of organize and create this idea of a distance between

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one spin configuration and another. This distance is sort of

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical way to calculate like how many spins are

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>similar or not, and he was able to organize it

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that he showed that if you

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>poke this thing was more likely to end up in

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a nearby configuration than a distant one, where the distance

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>here is something that he defined his strategy for organizing

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>these different configurations. So there is a pretty interesting kind

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of material. I guess kind of to go back a

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit to my earlier question is, you know, like

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say I make a piece of quantum glass and

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>it has these interesting mathematical properties. What could I do

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.239
<v Speaker 1>with it? Can I like make actual glasses out of

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>this glass? What would happen if I see through it?

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Only if you can see through solid gold or silver

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or copper. You know, there's not anything that I'm aware

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that you can like do with it in your life

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 1>other than impress your physicist friends, which you know, has

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 1>its own inherent value. I mean it is sort of

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a quantum object, isn't it? At the end of the day,

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this glass is a quantum object. Could you do quantum

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 1>things with it? Or computation for a bit? Possibly? I'm

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not aware of any applications for quantum computing. But I

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 1>think with the most interesting thing is just the math

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that it makes us think about. It made these guys

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think about symmetries and patterns in new ways and come

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>up with new mathematical tools. And whenever we develop new

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>mathematical tools we always find out that they're useful in

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.479
<v Speaker 1>other places. So people have been thinking about these kinds

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of symmetries and crystals for decades and decades in the

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>field we called condensed matter, the study of, you know,

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>dense objects like crystals, and because of that Mathematical Foundation

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>laying in condensed matter there's a lot of work on symmetries,

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of which informed Peter Higgs when he was

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about why particles get mass. He came up with

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea of another field in the universe that imparts

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the mass. But this field has to be really weird

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and different from any other field he had seen before.

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It would have to settle and relax into an on

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>minimum energy state. As we've talked about in the program

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times. The Higgs field has some weird

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>energy bound into it. It can't relax to its lowest

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>energy state. It relaxed to this weird intermediate state, and

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so thinking about the symmetry of that problem helped him

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think about the symmetries and the broken symmetries of the

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field and really inspired that Whole Direction of mathematics

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and particle physics. And that kind of worked out right

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>for Peter Higgs and the press of humanity. But Peter

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Higgs didn't know about these quantum glass is right. You're

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just saying that they sort of use the same kind

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>of math and that's why it could be important. That's right.

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Quantum glasses weren't well understood when he was talking about

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff and he was thinking about it.

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But the mathematics that underlie condensed matter and understanding these

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>symmetries led to both a deeper understanding of quantum glasses

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and of symmetry breaking and the Higgs field. Well, it's

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting that there is a connection, right. I mean there's

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a connection between the such a fundamental particle in the

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.399
<v Speaker 1>universe and maybe all particles and what happens at these

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of microscopic levels. Right, maybe the idea that the

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.400
<v Speaker 1>universe is there's a lot about symmetry in the universe.

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot about symmetry in the universe and

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>also about these emergent phenomena. We've talked several times in

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast about things we call quasi particles. These are

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 1>weird materials that have states in them that looks sort

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of like particles that act sort of like particles, you know,

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like phonons, are waves that pass through a lattice in

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the crystal and they're sort of similar to photons, but

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of moving through the fundamental electromagnetic field of the universe,

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're moving through a crystal lattice. So we see these

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>same kind of properties emerging in condensed matter that we

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>often see also in the quantum fields of the universe,

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of connections between the mathematics

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of solid objects and the mathematics of Space Time itself.

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Does that inspire you to make your office more symmetric,

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>or do work in at causant state of frustration as well? No,

0:49:57.960 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm always asking my department here. I'm like, can I

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 1>get a bunch of gold bricks? I'd like to build

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a really strict, nice lattice to study their symmetry, but

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>so far having gotten a single delivery of a single

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>gold brick. And you just need to let him your

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:11.399
<v Speaker 1>quantum glasses so he can see the future as well.

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe he's just gonna Send Me Microscopic Quantum gold bricks,

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>whether either here nor there. Here's one atom of gold.

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Good luck in this economy. I'd be very happy for

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>even one atom. All right, well, this is an interesting

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>new kind of material and with interesting properties that we're

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.760
<v Speaker 1>learning more about, and it sounds like it's just another

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>example of the weird things we can find and in

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this messy universe. You know, like maybe thirty years ago

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>we would never have imagined that we can make a

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>material that is magnetically frustrated. Yeah, and despite all the

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>mess that we find around us, we can still seek

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 1>order and find patterns and mathematical tricks to analyze it,

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>which turned out to not just help us understand the

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff around us, but also reveal the mathematical patterns that

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>seem to be inherent in the universe itself. Well, we

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hope you aoid dad. Thanks for joining us. Go have

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a shot of some quantum drink. have an electron on me.

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>See you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge explain the universe is a production of

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I heart radio. For more podcast from my heart radio,

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>visit the I heart radio APP, apple podcasts or wherever

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. Yeah,