WEBVTT - Putin Faces Historic Threat to Absolute Grip on Power

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, several stories, no surprise, that are among

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the most read on the Bloomberg have to do with

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Russia and the armed rebellion lad over the weekend and

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>then the backing off, And you do wonder where do

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 2>we go from here? So let's get and update some analysis.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>We turn to retired Major General Maston Robson, who is

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a geopolitical intelligence advisor to the advisory board at Academy Securities.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>He is on the Zoom on the Zoom on Zoom

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>in Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina. And then also with US

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg News National security reporter Courtney McBride on the

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>phone in Washington, DC. Both of you, Thank you, Thank you.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Courtney.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I do want to start with you though, where are

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>we in terms of Russia and how US government officials

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>are viewing it and reacting in thinking about it?

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, thanks for having me right now. The US and

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 4>several of its allies and partners in Europe are all

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 4>very much in a wait and see mode, emphasizing that

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 4>they had nothing to do with this and that you know,

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 4>any sort of leadership change or adjustments within Russia are internal.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 4>That being said, they are framing it as a pretty

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 4>big shift and a potential threat to Putin's authority, though

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>he obviously seems to remain in power. That this raises

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 4>some questions about his hold on the forces of the

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>country and the Wagner Group, which has been a very

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 4>potent tool of the of the Kremlin.

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 5>And I assume that Wagner Group will continue to be that,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 5>otherwise they face some real troubles in Ukraine. General Robson,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 5>is is that not the case that you know Russia,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they're military as opposed to the Wagner Group

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 5>hasn't achieved very much down there.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 6>No, you're absolutely right, Matt. If there's anything we've learned

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 6>out of this, that the Russian military, which we traditionally

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 6>have thought is the number two capable military in the world,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 6>is not even the number one capable military in Russia.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 6>That the Bid Group has proved the ability to run

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 6>circles around the Russian military. So it's hard to see

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 6>how who's going to get his way out of this

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 6>where he maintains that military capability that he's going to

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 6>lose if he completely disbands of the Bideny group and

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 6>completely alienates their leader. Because unlike America and in much

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 6>of the of NATO, know, we do everything on a

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 6>constitutional based, democratic public concept. We take an oath of

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 6>office to support and feld the constitution. Not a certain leader,

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 6>not a certain president, not a certain general, not a

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 6>certain ministry of defense. That's not what Russia is built on.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 6>It's an autocratic society and that becomes very problematic when

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 6>it comes to times like this, because then it becomes

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 6>who's the lead I'm going to choose, not going back

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 6>to the grassroots of a constitutional based society.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>So general Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to I

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 2>guess he's just started addressing the nation or addressing Moscow,

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and so we'll look for some headlines. Having said that,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>what are you watching out in terms of what he

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 2>has to say in terms of mood, context, or just specifics.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the big decision he has to make is can

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 6>he's one Does he have to choose between his minister

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Defense and chief staff in the Army and the Boden

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Group number two. Can he sway the Russian people who

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 6>seem to have become very positively supportive of the Voden

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 6>Group because of this cess on the battlefield, and he

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 6>makes statements that will make them say, I'm going to

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 6>ban the Widener group. I'm going to basically hold accountable

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 6>the chief of the Vaden Group, even if it puts

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 6>us to the disadvantage military not only in Ukraine, but

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 6>in Syria and in Africa and other parts of the

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 6>world where they've been very successful as his military army.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 6>That's going to be a hard self for him. So

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 6>how he navigates this, I think is key. I don't

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 6>really think that this has ever been a case where

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 6>it was an anti Putin thing. I think this has

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 6>been a blow his level. This fight that has been going

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 6>on for months between what the group believed was the

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 6>right way to fight a war, the general that putin

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 6>put in charge, that the Vden Group totally supported him,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 6>being removed by the Minister Defense, the chief staff of

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 6>the army, and the group believed that the army is

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 6>inept and then actually makes it more difficult for group

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 6>to be successful and has even turned contentious where they

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 6>believe they've been targeted on the battlefield by the Russian

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 6>Army at the discretion in the order of the Minister

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 6>of Defense the chief staff of the Army. So it's

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 6>pretty messy situation, right, and now the Putin's got to

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 6>try to manufacture's way through Courtney.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 5>What do we know about Pregoshan's claims that Soygu was

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 5>mining escape routes or even planning missile attacks on Wagner camps.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, certainly the US officials are being very very quiet

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 4>and discreet about what they have determined, and you know,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>in terms of intelligence, you know, as the General said,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Pregosion has long been criticizing Shoigu and other Defense ministry officials.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 4>So the real I think the real shift that we

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 4>saw this weekend was his criticism of even the basis

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 4>for the war, suggesting that Ukraine was never a threat

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 4>and that rather than these leaders simply failing to prosecute

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 4>the war correctly, it never should have occurred in the

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 4>first place. And I think that was that was a

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 4>huge rhetorical shift. And then obviously we saw forces on

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 4>the move that was itself a very jarring and disruptive development.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Courtney, are reporting, go ahead, please, General Command.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Those are two great points, Courtney, because that's where I

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 6>think Grosen overplayed his hand. He was attempting, in my opinion,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 6>to ratchet up his rhetoric of it was a Minister

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 6>of Defense who gave bad advice to Putin. It was

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 6>the fifth but that was a bridge too far. And

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 6>then his quote unquote demonstration certainly was a bridge too far.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 6>And I think force is Putin to now as a

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 6>strong man, he has to take a hard stand against that,

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 6>even if it's unpopular. So I'm in total agreement Courtney.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 5>So hard stand meaning he's going to kill pregotion. Is

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 5>that pretty much Putin's only option.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 6>I don't think his only option. I think it's just

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 6>a function of how much slay he thinks. He has

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 6>both of us, his senior military leadership and with his people,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 6>to be able to say, for the good in the nation,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 6>for the good of the war, for the good of

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 6>what we're doing, We've got to find a way to

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 6>pass this back together. I'm not saying that's impossible. Putin

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 6>has certainly proved over the decades to be pretty shrewd

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 6>and how he manufactures somethings wouldn't surprise me if he

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 6>could pull it off, But it's gonna be a tough lift.

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>General Robson, I do wonder, though, has this weakened him?

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Does it force Putin's hand to maybe end this war

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>earlier rather than later.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 6>So weakens a relative term. Does it weaken him in

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 6>the eyes of the Russian people, I'm not sure it does.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 6>It definitely weakens him. I think in the eyes of

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 6>the international community. I'm sure that China is looking at

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 6>this going, this is exactly why we told you not

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 6>to go in Ukraine, because it's gonna be a problem

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 6>for you if it doesn't really go blissfully. And that

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 6>hasn't gone blissfully, and so you're gonna have other partners

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 6>that have been in Russia's camp that will be ruined

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 6>the fact that he's put them all in this position,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 6>and you're gonna have and the rest of the free

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 6>world going, okay, how do we take advantage of this?

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 6>And certainly Ukraine is going to try to take advantage

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 6>of this by up ramp up their kppability, and does

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 6>NATO and does US and do others say we're going

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 6>to pile them with more equipment and airplanes. I think

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 6>we're going to take it pretty cautiously, because the last

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 6>thing we want to do is is become another talking

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 6>point for Putin In an anti American, anti NATO, anti

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 6>free world, taking advantage of Putin's in Russia's weak moment.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Nonetheless, Putin can afford to continue to send troops to Ukraine.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 5>He can afford to keep this war going for years.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 5>And in terms of weakening, I mean, he still has

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 5>his finger near the nuclear launch button, right, so we

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 5>will always have to be wary of his power.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, and the nuclear launch button really is the one

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 6>that's most significant and impactful. Without the bottom of the group,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 6>he can certainly hold some of the positions he has.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 6>I'll have a hard time being offensive in Ukraine without

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 6>the Vagner group. And I think eventually the mothers of

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Russia starting what's going on here?

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Hey Courtney, thirty seconds?

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 7>Here?

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Is there an advantage play here for US officials? What

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 2>are you hearing from the NSA or from the national

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 2>security side of the US government? And GED just got

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 2>about thirty seconds.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 4>Sure, they're certainly hoping that Ukraine can seize an opportunity,

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 4>whether it's nearly you know, taking advantage of a distracted

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 4>weekend Russia. But I think the general's absolutely right about

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the concern about escalating with NATO or US involvement.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 2>We will want to point out that President putin a

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>six minute address to his country it is over. He

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>did say the Wagner troops can join the Russian army

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>or go to Belarus. He said most Wagner troops are

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Russian patriots. They were used the mutiny organizers wanted to

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>divide Russia, and he says that we took all measures

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 2>to neutralize danger. So, Matt, a very quick statement by

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the Russian president. Thank you both.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, We did talk about Scarlett mentioning Kernibal

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 2>as one of the biggest laggards in today's session, shares

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 2>having their biggest one day drop since November sixteenth, down

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>seven point six percent. The company to come out reporting

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>quarterly results and an annual forecast that outperform, but many

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>saying that they failed to keep pace with the high expectations.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>That has fueled a sharp rally in the stock, which

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>is up eighty one percent so far here in twenty

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty three. But let's get to it, because we were

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>delighted to have with us to share some insight on

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the company's business. The Presidency and Chief Climate Officer of Carnival.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 2>He's Josh Weinstein and he joins us on Zoom in

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>New York City. Josh, it's so great to have you

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 2>here with Matt and myself on Bloomberg Business Week. First

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of all, if I may, how do you see the

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>broader macro outlook on a day when we're spending a

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of time talking about Russia and concerns about instability there.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>How do you see it and how do you kind

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of factor it in as you run what is a

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 2>global business?

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, thank you first of all for having me. It's

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 8>a pleasure to be with you. You know, I got

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 8>to be honest with you over the last call it

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 8>nine months, ten months. Our trajectory has only been in

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 8>one direction, and that has been up. And that is

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.359
<v Speaker 8>despite you know, a good amount of geopolitical uncertainty and discord,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 8>and that's you know, we're a global company and so

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 8>that's part of our global trade and we adapt and

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 8>we evolve and we move on. I'd say in the

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 8>last three months it's been pretty fascinating. We usually have

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 8>our peak demand in bookings in the first quarter, and

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 8>our first quarter is December, January February of the year,

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 8>and in fact, we did have a record first quarter

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 8>in bookings, highest bookings in the company's history. We thought

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 8>that was great, and then we got to our second

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 8>quarter and we shattered it.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 9>And so the demand that we see is carrying on.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 8>In the first three weeks of our third quarter, for

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 8>the month of June, it hasn't stopped. And so despite

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 8>the fact that there is geopolitical uncertainty, that is something

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 8>that our consumers, our guests are taking in stride. And

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 8>at the end of the day, they've got a desire

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 8>to travel, they've got a desire for new experiences, and

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 8>they have a lot of pent up demand for experience,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 8>as you know, and that plays very well into our business.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Josh.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>It feels like though investors maybe think it's as good

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>as it gets, considering the bounce back that we've seen

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>in your share price this year. You know how it

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 2>goes as someone who's been at Carnival for a while

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 2>now and looked at it from several different angles. But

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 2>we still have the stock down from about eighty percent

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>from a high back in January of twenty eighteen. Is

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it as good as it gets? Do you think in

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>terms of bookings and visibility right now? Oh?

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 9>Not at all? You know, you know, So the short

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 9>answer is no.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 8>It As a matter of fact, even though we're all

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 8>the way back in our booking curve for our North

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 8>American brands, we're still only about ninety percent back for

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 8>our European brands, and so their trajectory is the same thing,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 8>going in the right direction.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 9>But they've got a ways to run.

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 8>But to show you the strength of our portfolio of

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 8>world class brands, our European brands, in the second quarter,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 8>they actually as compared to twenty nineteen, not only do

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 8>they have double digit increased percentages in the volumes book

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 8>for the rest of this year, for the second half

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 8>of the year it was on double digit price increases.

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 8>And so first quarter seven and a half points up

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 8>in pricing. Second quarter of this year seven and a

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 8>half percent percent up in pricing with that demand. On

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 8>a forward looking basis as wind in our back, we're

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 8>very well booked for the rest of this year into

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 8>the first half of next year. So with all due

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 8>respect to you know, to the market. You know, any

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 8>one day you're gonna have ups, you're gonna have downs.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 9>As you said, we've been on.

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 8>A pretty big tear, about a one hundred percent or

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 8>so since the start of the year. Our job is

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 8>to focus on the business, focus on that demand generation,

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 8>and continue to drive our business forward.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>Josh Matt Miller here with Carol. What needs to happen

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 5>to bring the stock back to pre pandemic levels or

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 5>why hasn't it come back? Is it just that you

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 5>took on a lot of debt that you have a

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 5>lot of investment to do. I mean, you're trading in

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 5>the teams right now, and before the pandemic hit, you

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 5>were trading more like fifties sixty seventy dollars a share.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, our profile has definitely been impacted by

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 8>by what happened in twenty twenty and what we had

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 8>to do to get through it. Frankly, you know, we

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 8>were a company that entered in with probably about you know,

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 8>the market cap and the and the debt. If you

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 8>added it together, it's probably not too dissimilar to exactly

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 8>where we are now if you add it together. It's

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 8>just that our debt, which used to be about thirteen

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars, is thirty three billion dollars and hence the

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 8>value of the of the equity is down and it's

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 8>our job over the next you know, several years to

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 8>effectively transfer that back by generating free cash flow. We

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 8>have a good amount of headroom to do to take

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 8>that and delever and pay down debt. We have the

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 8>lowest order book of new builds in frankly my history.

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 8>I've been here for twenty one years, and when I

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 8>started back in November of two thousand and seven as

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 8>the treasurer as one of the stops along my path

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 8>here at Carnival Corporation, we had twenty four ships on order,

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 8>and so our ability to generate a lot of cash

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 8>and we will continue to do that and use it

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 8>to delever is quite strong, to tell you the truth. Now,

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 8>as far as you know, what are the other factors involved?

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 8>For us, it's about getting back to not only full capacity,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 8>full occupancy, but really leveraging our brands. Our brands are phenomenal.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, they are world class. We have Carnival Cruise

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 8>Line as America's cruise line. Ada in Germany created modern

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 8>day cruising. They own Germany Piano Cruises. In the UK

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 8>they are synonymous with cruising. They have a Union Jack

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 8>as their livery. We own those markets. They are very

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 8>good markets for us, and they're rebounding and so the

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 8>as far as I'm concerned, there's only one way that

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 8>we're going, and it's up.

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 5>Can I just ask about your debt? You have a

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 5>weighted average fixed coupon of six point nine to four percent,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 5>which is not bad considering where we are right now,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 5>and we're I guess, and about.

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Two point nine billion maturing in twenty twenty.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Four, which is where it would be, which is much

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 5>lower than it would be if you had to refinance. Now,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 5>is my point right? You guys got in on this

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 5>early and filled your coffers first. Do you think that

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 5>puts you at an advantage relative to your competitors.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 9>I think we're in good shape.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 8>You know, we've we've basically gotten to a point where

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 8>We ended the quarter at about seven point two billion

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 8>seven point three billion of liquidity, and we've already started

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 8>to de lever. As far as we're concerned, we can

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.959
<v Speaker 8>always be opportunistic, we can refinance, we can look at

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 8>what's available, but we as far as we see the future,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 8>we have no need to go out to the markets

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 8>at this point. We can delever with the liquidity buffer

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 8>that we have and starting to generate again all of

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 8>that cash flow. We do have export credits as well,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 8>so for the new bills that we do have on order,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 8>we've got about three billion dollars of very competitively priced

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 8>export credit facilities ready and waiting for us if we

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 8>choose to use them between now and two years from.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 9>Now, in the middle of twenty twenty five, when our

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 9>last ship is ordered.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 8>So we're in a very strong position when it comes

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 8>to our ability to manage our debt down and manage

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 8>our interest expense down over time. You know, as a

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 8>matter of fact, one of the one of the drivers

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 8>that we had for being able to add two hundred

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 8>and seventy million dollars to the bottom line in our

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 8>guidance change from March to June was in fact interest

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 8>expends savings from starting that process of delevering.

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 9>So we're very we're very pleased with that. With that trajectory, Well, talk.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>To us about you know, Matt and I are going

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 2>back and forth. We're looking at different functions here, so

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 2>tell us. We want to make sure we have this right.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it two point nine billion? Is that correct? Maturing

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four, I was looking at some of

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 2>our research.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 9>You know what, I don't want to give you the

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 9>wrong number in a live program. That's fair. We don't

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 9>get back to you and we'll make sure we get

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>it squared away for you. Well.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is is you talked about, you know,

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 2>operating good cash flow, and forgive me, we just want

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 2>to make sure we're we're hitting it right too. You

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 2>know the amount that the ships are not inexpensive. You

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>guys have did a lot of replacement during the pandemic

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 2>and getting rid of some of the older ships and

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 2>so on. But I do wonder, Josh, can you I

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know, what's the capex that you're looking for that

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 2>you can continue to spend, which is really important, you know,

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>certainly to your business, and can you do it with

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the debt load the car right detload.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean the short answer is yes, I think we can,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, And as far as we have new build

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 8>CAPEX and we have non new build CAPEX, our new

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 8>build order pipeline, as I said, is the smallest we

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 8>have had in anyone's memory, and so we are very

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 8>well placed to be able to manage that type of

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 8>CAPEX spend.

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 9>And as I mentioned, it does come with export credits packaged.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 8>With it, should we choose to use them, as export

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 8>credits are rolling off because we're paying them down every

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 8>year in the normal course. On top of that new

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 8>build CAPEX we've got, we've got maintenance cappex, we've got

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 8>you know, making sure our ships are in good condition.

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 8>That you know, we're forecasting it's going to be you know,

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 8>give or take about one point five billion for this

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 8>year in twenty twenty three, and about one point seven

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 8>billion on an annual basis thereafter for the foreseeable future.

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 8>That profile, that entire CAPEX profile is significantly less than

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 8>what we were living with how we were operating pre pause.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 8>And so that's why we're so bullish that the amount

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 8>of cash flow that will be able to generate and

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 8>then utilized a d lever is not insignificant.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 9>You know, we're basically.

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 8>Planning between twenty four, twenty five and twenty six something

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 8>in the magnitude of about five billion of cash from operations,

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 8>where if you net out all these with the capex,

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 8>with the debt, export credits coming in, export credits getting

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 8>paid off, we anticipate over over eight billion dollars will

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 8>be available for us to be able to de lever.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 8>And that's on top of it, you know, a couple

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 8>a couple billion.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 9>We're doing this year.

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Josh. One thing I want to ask you, and you

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 2>mentioned this too, that you know, among the different hats

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>that you've worn at Carnival, and you've been there, I

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 2>think almost twenty years. I think I'm right.

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 9>If I'm looking at it, twenty one one.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Is treasure and so you you understand the importance of

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the financial side of that. Having said that, I am

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 2>also curious when you, you know, look at what really moves

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the bottom line. You know, when people come on board, Yep,

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>it's the tickets, but it's also excursions and other things.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Are they upping the spend ahead of time that gives

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you even greater visibility and that's where you make a

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of money.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 9>Oh, it absolutely is. You know.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 8>We've made a concerted effort over you know, since since

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 8>getting back in our restart to really augment the onboard

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 8>spend profile.

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 9>And we can do that through several mechanisms. You know.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 9>One of them is the fact is the inflationary environment.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 10>If you think about twenty nineteen to twenty twenty three,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 10>people are used to paying more when they go into

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 10>their local restaurant, their local bar, local entertainment, and so

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 10>we have adjusted our pricing accordingly for similar experiences and

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 10>that's taken just fine with the consumer.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 8>We're not being out of the ordinary. As a matter

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 8>of fact, our service levels are so much better than

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 8>what you can find on land based alternatives that it's

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 8>a great value. On top of that, we're finding different

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 8>ways to forward that spend, as you were referring to,

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 8>and we can do that by bundled ticket prices with

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 8>onboard packages. We can sell people specific packages, whether that's

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 8>beverage or spa packaging, and.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 2>They're buying it, and they're buying it ahead of time.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh they are, they are. It's you know, we've made

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 8>about a step change for us. But a remarkable opportunities

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 8>to do more. I want to say that it's about

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 8>sixty percent increase per person per day the amount of

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 8>our onboard spend that's being purchased before you get on

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 8>the ship.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 9>Now, that's great, but it is.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 8>Still a minority of our overall onboard spend revenue. So

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 8>we've got a tremendous opportunity to keep that momentum going

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 8>by finding different ways to get people to want to

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 8>put down money for those experiences in advance.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, don't kill me, Josh, But thirty seconds left here,

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>do you guys think about recession? Are you factoring the

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 2>possibility of a recession?

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 3>Just quickly?

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? We do, you know we that's part of our job.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 8>The great thing about our business and our company is

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 8>number one, we are well booked. We're about at any

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 8>one time about fifty percent book for the next twelve months,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 8>and obviously that's much more weighted in the first half.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 8>On top of that, we are an outrageous value when

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 8>you compare us to land anywhere from twenty five to

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 8>fifty percent, and that boats very well when people are

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 8>thinking about how do I maintain commuication?

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Forgive me, I got to run because the computer is

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 2>going to take me out. Josh, come back soon. Josh Weinstein,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>President and CEO and chief Climate Officer at Carnival Corporation.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 2>On Zoom in New York City. This is Bloomberg Radio.

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 2>You do want to get into a little bit more

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 2>in terms of China, India, Russia. David Riedal is president

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of Retal Research Group, which has analysts on the ground

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 2>around the globe in some fifteen countries covering companies in

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>those areas, and he is just back from India. So, David,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 2>great to have you here with Matt and myself. You're

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 2>joining us on Zoom in San Francisco. So where to begin?

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Where to begin?

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 6>Russia?

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 9>Begin?

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Not begin in Russia?

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I am curious when your clients call you, where

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 2>do they begin.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, they usually begin with China, and more recently they'll

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 7>talk a little bit about India, but they will talk

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 7>about the impact of Russia on those countries. You know,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 7>Indias and China both have tried to tried a pretty

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 7>fine line, China a little bit more in support of Russia,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 7>India kind of trying to play both sides.

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 9>Both of them are big oil.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 7>Importers, so it's important for them to maintain a relationship

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 7>with Russia.

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Does the mutiny though, that we witnessed over the weekend,

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 5>and I guess the solution into that problem have any

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 5>impact on your markets?

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 9>I don't think so at this point.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 7>You know, it all wrapped up over the weekend, so

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 7>we didn't really see its impact on trading. I think,

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, a lot of people were surprised overnight when

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 7>that protest or that rebellion or whatever it was took place,

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 7>but it seemed like it was people were pretty satisfied

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 7>by Monday morning.

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is interesting too that you did have China's

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Ministry saying it supports Russia's actions to maintain national stability.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 2>A brief statement by a ministry spokesperson who said, it's

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Russi's internal affairs, but it's just like China saying, wait,

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>we got stuff going on too, and it's our internal affairs.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 7>That's one of their favorite favorite phrases. As you know,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 7>they think that the Taiwan straight is their domestic waters.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 7>They think that the Taiwan issue is a domestic issue.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 7>Of course, they think the Weager issue and the Tibet

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 7>issue and the Hong Kong issue are all internal affairs.

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 7>So they don't like the idea of people being involved

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 7>in other people's domestic activities.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>But I guess, just to follow internal they don't have.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 5>A problem with China being involved in Ukraine's domestic activities.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 7>I know, but these people always pick and choose when

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 7>it's wrong and when it's right when they're doing it,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 7>I guess.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>It's okay, well pick and choose for us. I mean,

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>in terms of I guess we're all trying to as

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 2>international investors, trying to understand which internal affairs become global

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 2>affairs become global investment stories. So how do you kind

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of play that out?

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 7>One of the things that I think we've seen over

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 7>the last five years is really people questioning the sensibleness,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 7>the reasonableness of having so many supply chains linked back

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 7>to one country, China. I think COVID and the breakdown

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 7>and supply chains really reminded people how much risk we

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 7>were taking on having so much of our economy connected

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 7>back to one economy. So I think you've got a

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 7>lot of people looking around the world for alternative places

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 7>to manufacture, whether that's Indonesia or Brazil or Mexico a

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 7>country that we really like, or increasingly India. India has

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 7>made some really major fundamental changes in their policies and

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 7>the way that they run their country that I think

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 7>are changing the growth trajectory for that country, and they

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 7>are definitely set to benefit from people diversifying away from China.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 7>They've got the large population that one point four billion people,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 7>they've got the right demographics, a lot more young people

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 7>in India, and they are a positioned to perhaps take

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 7>some of that manufacturing activity and some of those supply

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 7>chains from China.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 2>But still issues tell us about you just back, what

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 2>were you doing, who were you visiting, What did you

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 2>want to see? Specifically? There's stuff you can get on

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the ground that you cannot get from afar.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 7>It was fascinating. I was mostly in Bombay and the

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 7>area around Mumbai, and it was amazing to see how

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 7>much infrastructure they're building. One of the frustrations with India

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 7>for a long time was that the national government couldn't

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 7>mobilize enough tax resources across the country to build the

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure that they needed in the big cities. India's, of course,

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 7>are very lowlarge democracy, largest democracy in the world, but

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.719
<v Speaker 7>that meant that some of those voters expected to have

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure projects in their provinces, in their cities, in their villages,

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 7>and so that really left the capital cities Delhi and

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 7>the big city like Mumbai without a lot of money

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 7>for infrastructure. Boy, has that changed. They really changed their

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 7>tax basis a few years ago, looking at goods and

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 7>services tax that's much simplified. And they are on a

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 7>building spree, building a huge elevated train through huge parts

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 7>of Bombay and really spending a lot of money on infrastructure,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 7>which is sorely needed.

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 5>What about the middle class? What's the trajectory looked like there?

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 5>You know China, obviously that was a massive part of

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 5>the story over the past twenty years. So is it

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 5>going to look the same way in India?

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think it's going to You almost always

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 7>have a situation where rising wages drive the development of

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 7>a middle class. If you've got enough deployment for those people,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 7>that'll drive demand for motorcycles and then eventually cars, it'll

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 7>drive for apartments and eventually houses, life insurance and other

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 7>sort of products that come with that rising wealth. So

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 7>I think you'll see pretty much the same trajectory in

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 7>India that we saw in China, perhaps not as smooth

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 7>a road. China, having a very centrally planned and organized economy,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 7>had the advantage of really driving through a lot of

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 7>the changes that they wanted to make without worrying too

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 7>much about voters and the getting other people involved in

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 7>the decision making. So India as a democracy, perhaps stronger institutions,

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 7>but maybe a little bit a few more fits and

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 7>starts on their road to prosperity.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>David, I'm going to probably sound pretty naive, but yeah,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to just go for it. India, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Money trumps all. Investment opportunities trump all even if we

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>have some problem about our concerns about internal affairs in

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 2>a part of the country or in part of the world.

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 7>It does you know, people investors are looking for opportunities

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 7>around the world and I think they're looking for opportunities

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 7>for something to surprise to the upside. I think if

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 7>you look at a Saudi or something like that, that's

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 7>a country that's pretty much a one trick pony in

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 7>most ways. It's really a hydrocarbons play. It's a country

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 7>like an Indonesia or a Brazil or in this case, India,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:36.479
<v Speaker 7>has a diverse and deep and developing economy that has

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 7>the ability to really create a cycle of value when

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 7>money comes into the system. It has things that it

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 7>can invest in, and has a domestic market that can

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 7>be growing. And so that's the kind of environment you're

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 7>looking for, the large population with relatively stable government that's

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 7>on a new trajectory of growth. And I think that's

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 7>what people are starting to see in India today.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 2>But I guess my point is that if there's an

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to make money, I'm thinking about, you know, I'm

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>going to go back to Saudi Arabia that we all

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of forgot about, you know, or many have you know,

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the killing of Jamal Koshogi. And yet you know, we're

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>seeing you know, the PGA tour and live golf, like

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>it's just when there's money to be made or opportunities

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>that we kind of turn and look the.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Other way it.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 7>Unfortunately, I think that's true, and I think that's been

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 7>true with regard to our enthusiasm for China for many years,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 7>really thinking that changing in involving them more in the

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 7>global fabric and the global business fabric was going to

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 7>change their behavior, and it really didn't. So I think

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 7>that people do need to be careful who they're investing with,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 7>who they're investing alongside. But in a growing environment, maybe

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 7>you could pick some winners that don't have as much

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 7>downside or as much baggage.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 5>All right, very interesting stuff. India must be the best

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 5>of those options that Carol listed, right, and they happen

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 5>to have the best growth trajectory as far as we

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 5>can see from this point.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 9>They really do. It's amazing.

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 7>A lot of people haven't followed this story, but over

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 7>the last ten years they did iris scans and fingerprints

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 7>of every single citizen, which created an environment where they

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 7>could open four hundred million new bank accounts, and it

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 7>created a system where the government can distribute all their benefits,

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 7>payments and things like that electronically directly to the consumer,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 7>not through other governments, which tend to foster a lot

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 7>of corruption, so they've really stitched together a digitized and

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 7>mostly cash list economy that's much more efficient for taxation

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 7>and for growth.

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>David, Yes or nos? Is a point that maybe five

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>ten years from now, we look back and we're going

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to say this has been the world turn from China

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>to India very quickly.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 7>Yes or no, it's going to happen. It's already happening today.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 7>It's bound to happen.

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, listen, so good to check in with you

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 2>as always. David Redal, He's present and founder of Retal

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.239
<v Speaker 2>Research Group on zoom from San Francisco. I do think

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>about this, Matt, these turning points in our world.

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it does potentially feel like we've hit that. As

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 5>David said, from his perspective, we already have.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, catch

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Business App, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>It does seem like everywhere we're talking about what's going

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>on in Russia. So we wanted to get to Angela

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Stent who really understands President Putin. She's written a book.

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It was published in twenty nineteen, Putin's World, Russia Against

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the West and with the Rest. She's a senior fellow

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>at the Brookings Institution and a former National intelligence officer

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 2>for Russian Eurasia at the National Intelligence Council. She also

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 2>served in the Office of Policy Planning at the US

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Department of State. She has been a go to I

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 2>say it a million times throughout the Russian invasion and

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 2>war in Ukraine. So I'm so delighted that we could

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 2>actually get some time with her today. You've been so

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 2>generous to Bloomberg today, So Angela, thank you, thank you

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 2>for finding time from me in me as well. Where

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>are we now with this and his President Putin?

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 9>Weekend?

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 3>So I just watched a short clip of Putin meeting

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess just very recently, with his top officials, including

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 3>the Defense Minister. So that answered questions about whether the

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Defense minister still had his job. And Putin just told

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 3>his assembled colleagues there, we need to get down to work,

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and then of course they cut away and we didn't

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 3>see the rest of it, and he put out a

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>statement earlier today six minutes.

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh, oh, statement, Okay, this isn't his comments, go ahead, sorry.

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 3>No, this is a statement where he said, you know,

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 3>he thanked the Russian people for standing by the constitution

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 3>and they're all great patriots and this is how they

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 3>managed to weather this threat. But then he did, you know,

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 3>he condemned the people in Wagner who had carried out

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 3>this mutiny. And so I'm not completely you sure that

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 3>the deal we were told about on Saturday, where you've

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 3>got any Progosion, the head of Wagner would not be prosecuted,

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 3>and that the Wagner fighters could all join the you know,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the Russian military now the regular military. I'm not sure

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 3>whether that deal will hold. So all we know is

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 3>that Putin is back, he's met with officials. We're over

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 3>the mutiny. Now, we don't know where Progosion is. He

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 3>put out a statement he Progosion earlier on you know,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 3>saying that it was never his intention to overthrow the

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 3>government and so, but we have no proof that he's

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 3>in Bielarus, although that's allegedly where he is.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he seems to be walking back his mutiny, and

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 5>Putin seems to be walking back the deal. He reportedly

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 5>made because he says, these organizers the rebellion, they betrayed

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 5>their country and their people. They betrayed those who were

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 5>dragged into the crime, lied to them, pushed them to

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 5>death under fire. You can't say that about some unless

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 5>you're going to prosecute them. And of course, according to

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Russian news media, they are still officially investigating these people.

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Who is one person Progosian?

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 5>I also wonder is Progosian in a powerful place? Because

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, you and I were talking earlier, he does

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 5>have a pretty serious military force behind him. He's the

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 5>only thing that's gone right in the Russian invasion of

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine for Putin. If you get rid of the Wagner group,

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 5>you just have these losers left.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, certainly his fighters did the bulk of the

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 3>fighting in Ukraine, particularly around Bathmoot for the last almost year,

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 3>which they finally took. But he doesn't seem to be

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 3>in a very strong position now, because you know, he

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 3>did turn back. I think there is some question about

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 3>how he and his troops managed to get within one

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty miles of Moscow without there was as

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 3>he put on this statement today, there was a little

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 3>bit of firing on them from helicopters, but basically they

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 3>made it through without any resistance. So that would indicate

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 3>that you know, there's some support there, or at least

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 3>not the will or the ability to stop them. But

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 3>because we don't know where he is, and because Putin

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 3>has now signaled again that you know he's going to

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 3>go after the leaders of this insurrection, of this mutiny,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 3>I would say it's quite questionable still what's going to

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 3>happen to him. And I think we have to wait

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 3>and see whether we actually see Precussion resurface in person

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 3>and whether he's around in a few weeks.

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think it's interesting, and we don't know

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 5>why yet he turned around. That's the big question mark

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 5>over this right. But what we've learned over the last

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 5>few days is that Russia has a seemingly weak army,

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 5>much weaker than we may have thought previously, because some

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 5>private faction can get all the way up to Moscow

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 5>without problems. We were talking a little bit earlier with

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Major General Roberson Robson, who said he thinks that Progosion

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 5>should stay in Rostov, should go back to Rostov and

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 5>hold that spot because it's so important militarily, what do

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 5>you think, well, I mean.

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 3>And he managed to take over the garrison there. But

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 3>clearly the issue is that because Pregossion for months has

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 3>been criticizing the Ministry of Defense and particularly the Minister

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>of Defense and the Chief of the General Staff for

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 3>their incompetence, this is why they wanted to dissolve at

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 3>least parts of Wagner and make those Vadner troops that

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 3>were fighting in Ukraine joined the regular Russian Army. And

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 3>that of course is why pregaussion that was the I

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 3>think the occasion of his kind of march on Moscow

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 3>was to stop that from happening. So, I mean, we've

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 3>seen the Russian armed forces have not performed well in Ukraine,

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 3>much worse than we thought they had, so that, you know,

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 3>we've known that for some time. But I think maybe

0:38:56.000 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 3>this mutiny, this failed mutiny, has rein force the fact

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the weakness of the Russian Army.

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, if you were back at the National Intelligence Council

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and advising the President and his team, what would you

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 2>do be telling them about Russia specifically and where what

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the US needs to be doing? And do you think

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 2>that this will ultimately lead to a quicker end of

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the war in Ukraine.

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think certainly the Biden administration was right to

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 3>say that, you know, this is a domestic Russian affair,

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 3>to make that clear. Even though today the Russian Foreign

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Minister lover Of accused the US somehow of having spies

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.280
<v Speaker 3>them in the Vadner Group, I think that was correct.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I think showing up the allies, and I think that

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 3>they've been doing that the last few days. And I

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>think redoubling our efforts, the US efforts to help the

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainians win this war, because with all of the uncertainty

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 3>in Russia, you know, this is a top priority. I

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 3>personally would have advised them in the next month's some

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 3>at native some in willing US that more should be

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 3>done to offer Ukraine a perspective for membership in NATO,

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 3>even if it's not going to happen now. Those discussions,

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 3>I think is still going on. But I think we

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 3>need to redouble our efforts, and we need to supply

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the Ukrainians with the weapons that they need and that

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 3>they've been asking for.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes or no. Bottom line is President putin weaker Yes.

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Love you, Thank you so much, angelas stant You're amazing.

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Can't wait for the next book. Senior fellow at the

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Brookings Institution, former national intelligence officer from Russia and Eurasia.

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 2>As we said our twenty nineteen book Putin's World, Russia

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 2>against the West and with the rest joining us via

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 2>zoom from Washington, DC. What a great lineup. Yeah, like

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting the full picture when it comes to what's

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 2>going on.

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast, a little on Apple, Spotify,

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:40:57.960 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 7>Ano