WEBVTT - Big Tech Selloff and AMD Earnings

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power colli

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Market meltdown, stocks, SINC,

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>yields surge, investors getting jennery about whether the Fed can

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>fight inflation without plunging the economy into recession, plus a

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>m D getting caught in the sell off after surging

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>post earnings. We're gonna talk to a MDC at least

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to sue about how she is still driving massive growth

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>amidst forty year inflation, lockdowns in China and an ongoing

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>chip crisis. And Uber shares down now multiple days in

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a row despite releasing earnings early to avoid lists market

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>wipe out. Our conversation with Uber CEO Dara Kazra Shay

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>later this hour why he's confident about demands and consumers

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road ahead. We will get to all of

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that in a moment. Be first to look at the market.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Stocks plunge with bonds in a violent reversal from Wednesday.

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The Fed's decision to raise rates initially boosted markets, but

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks have since had one of their sharpest U

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>turns ever. Bloombergs at Ludlow here to break it all down,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, you're completely right. Only and the long list

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of superlatives. Right then, has that one very tech heavy

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>index having its worst day since September twenty n y

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>s Fang plus index, Megacaps the US listed shares of

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese techcos having its worst day since September twenty twenty.

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.919
<v Speaker 1>You look on that screen US tenure yield, the benchmark

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ten year treasury with the yield about three percent for

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the first time since November two thousand and eighteen. That's

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>just a snapshot in time. That's just Thursday session. It's

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a complete U turn, as you say, reversal from what

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw on Wednesday following that FED decision to raise

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>rates by fifty basis points in the commentary from FED

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>pal around that. In fact, you look at the NASA

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred over the course of two days, right, we

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>bring that up on the screen and just think about

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the overnight change in psychology. We went to bed Wednesday

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>night thinking the Fed's got this fifty basis points in

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>line for the next few meetings. No discussion of a

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis point hike. The FED has this, they

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>can fight inflation without bringing us into recession. We wake

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>up and its complete different story. We're worried about stagflation.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>We're worried about the FED doing enough to combat what

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing with the inflation picture. But also there was

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fighting talk from Power. Write Emily. He's

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the strength of the economy, the tight labor market.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>And then we have earning season corporate America hearing some

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>really positive noises. Hard to get my head around, indeed,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know there are a number of former FED

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>officials who didn't agree that this was enough and that

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this would be plunging the economy into a recession. I

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Uber CEO dar Kazra Shahi earlier today about

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>their earnings results. We've seen their stock slide now multiple

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>days in a row, despite a different picture from lift.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to his reaction. We're focused on what

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we can control. Can we build a great service UH

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and can we ride the reopening, both in terms of growth,

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>bookings growth, profit growth, ultimately free cashul growth and the

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>answer based on a results and based on what we

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>see going forward as a resounding yes. And what do

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you make of that? Yeah, well, the share performance speaks

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for itself. You know, they gave a pretty bullish outlook

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the demand is coming, you know, and echoed what Lift

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>was saying, and yet they had their worst two day

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>drop on uber stock since March. They were kind of

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>caught up in the contagion we've lift. There's no hiding

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>place here, right, Let's look at the megacaps and how

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest names in the world of technology

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>performed on Thursday. Some of the worst performers on then

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>as that one hundred. I had to look twice on

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>my Bloomberg, but this was the worst day for Apple

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft since October. You know, they're not just sensitive

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to what we're saying with higher rates, rising yields, but

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there's also now a discussion about well, what's going on

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with supply chains globally and the situation we're trying to lockdowns.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got a pretty good guest come up next to you,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>has a strong view of ninety strong indeed ed, thank

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you well. It was a nightmare on Elm Street day

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for the nastack. That's how my next guest is framing

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>today's sell off, Dan i'ves, managing director of Rubbush Securities,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>joins me. Now, so Dan, what's your take on just

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>how bad this nightmare is gonna get and how long

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna last. I mean, look today, if you look

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at I'll call you the declines relative to the advances

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>over I mean just to sell off. I view it

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>almost we're nearing some sort of capitulation stage. I mean,

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>my conversations with tech investors were so negative today it's

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>almost bullish, and I think I just continue to point

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to this is just a white knuckle period post fed

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that I believe we're going to look back and some

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>of these quality tech is way over sold. You know,

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to hold it through this roller coaster,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>why is it hitting tech harder than other sectors. I

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a few things. I think. First off, I

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>mean you're seeing a de leveraging degressing across the board,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and obviously a lot of institutions really wellevert to tach.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing is that with all these

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>high multiple names and even ones that that that are

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not even expensive names like Apple, Microsoft, in my opinion,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you're just seeing right now the street being like Okay,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe numbers into the next year. What am

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I gonna pay? I'm totally uncertain. I'm just gonna sell

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>these names. And I could just tell you cover in

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech twenty two years. The only time I've seen times

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like this in O eight, o nine and even going

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the early days of COVID. So I think

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to get that panic stage. And then it's

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>like I talked about, mean you look at earning season,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's to have and have nots but enterprise, cloud, cybersecurity, strong,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>SEMIS because we as obvious at leasas who will talk

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>about strong, So of course the other side hugely we

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>e commerce and other names. But I think we are

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to get to what I've view is in this

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>horror show opportunities. We saw Lift lose a third of

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>its market value yesterday and another gem from you you

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>called their spending guidance a nighties rock star like disaster.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh Uber shares also getting caught up in that here

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>despite a very different outlook. What do you make of

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that look? I think if you look at Lift, I mean,

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>something just doesn't connect in terms of that conference college

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I probably is probably one of the top three worst

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>conference calls I've heard in twenty plus years of Wow

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this, and I think part of it is just

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't explain why they're spending. The driver's shortage is there,

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but even as you were talked about like, it's not

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>where it was six months ago, even nine months ago,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>So spending so far ahead of this it was a

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>head scratcher. And you know, I when I look at

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>what Uber's doing, I think that obviously in sympathy because

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>these stocks trade almost starts being huts, you know, they're

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>almost combined in terms of how they trade and pandem.

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Uber's way over so with clearly in the

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>investment penalty box and need to prove themselves. But I

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>think this was just way too aggressive spending that I'd

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if they ultimately spend that when it's all

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>said done. Uh. In other news, I want to ask

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you about this long list of unusual names that have

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>joined Elon Musk in his deal for Twitter. Larry Ellison,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>who's of course on the Tesla board, Andreas and Horowitz, Sequoia,

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Qutar Investment Authority and Finance. What do you make

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of how this is coming together. Look, I think in

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this poker game, Musk obviously got Twitter and then ultimately

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it was about the financing component to ultimately undo a

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of his burden in terms of whoeveraging his Tesla stock,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>both in the debt and the equity. Look, this is

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a who's who in terms of who he got, you know,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>from both coasts and even globally. Ellison obviously you know,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge confident. It is not a shock, but you

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>go through from injuries in a sequoia, the fidelity and others.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it also just shows Musk is not just

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this aloon. He's going to have a team strategically,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>even though you know in theory could be temporary CEO,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think over time he moves more of a chairman role,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's something that even on an overreaction today,

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>his golden child continues to be Tesla. All Right, Dannas

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>web Bush As always appreciate you joining us and your metaphors.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>After surging post earnings to its best day in months,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>A and D also getting pulled into the cell off

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the chip maker posting more than five billion dollars for

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the quarter and raising it's full of your forecast I

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in a m D CEO, Lisa, so

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>now to talk more about her outlook. Lisa, thank you

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as always for joining us. Look, we're seeing the highest

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>inflation in forty years, lockdowns in China, which is a

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>huge production hub for the chip industry, and a major

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>ongoing war. How is it that you are managing to

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>post se growth and raising your full yer forecast. Well,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Emily, it's great to be here with

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you as always, and UM. As you said, there are

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that are going on UM, a

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of differ disturbances around the world. But you know,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for us, it's really about focusing on our long term strategy,

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>delivering for customers and our partners, UM ensuring that we're

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>getting new products coming out. And you know, we have

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a great strategy. We have a very very strong product

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>portfolio for this year, and we're excited about the growth

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that we saw both in the first quarter and then

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>more importantly what we see going forward. You know, it's

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a it's a really great time to be in UM.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, the high performance computing market and this is

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>where our focus is. So yeah, we were very unhappy

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>with the growth that we're seeing big tech is underwater.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>A m D got caught up in the sell off today.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you preparing for in terms of how you

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>plan to navigate a very uncertain macro environment. Well, you know, Emily,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the important thing is for us to focus on,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big picture. I mean, you know, a

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>m D today is such a different company than we

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>were even just a few years ago. You know, we

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>completed our acquisition of zy Links, which has you know, um,

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, a set of markets that are a diverse

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>set of markets. And then when you add that to

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>our data center strategy and the progress that we've made

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>in the data center, I think, you know, what we're

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>really doing is trying to navigate. Yes, there are um

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a set of macro issues and and also geographic issues

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>that we're dealing with, but fundamentally, people need more high

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>performance processors and more technology and that's what we do.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And so it is very much about you know, having

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a long term strategy, a very diversified set of markets,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>and ensuring that we're focus on execution every single day

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to deliver to our customers. So the biggest problem in

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the chip industry has continued to be supply, not matching

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>up with demand, and you made a decision to outsource

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to t SMC, which has been widely credited for some

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a MD's recent success. You know, when

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>you look ahead, do you see being able to have

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>enough supply to support all this growth, all of this

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>demand that you're seeing. Well, I have to say, Emily,

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been working on you know, sort of ramping up

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>supply for the last eighteen months. I think, you know,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>even pre pandemic. Uh. You know, we knew that our

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy meant that we would grow um, you know, very

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>substantially over the next few years. We've been working with

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>our partners, UM, not just on the wafer side, of course,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>on the wafer side, but also um, you know, the

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>back end side, substrate capacity, back in capacity, all the

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>components that you need and UM, yes, we've been able

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to bring on a significant amount of capacity and that's

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>what helped us grow you know so much. You're last year,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>UM as well as this first quarter, and you know

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year, we're forecast six annual growth.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So we are bringing on a lot of capacity and

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it is something that is very strategic for us, not

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>just this year, but into and beyond. The data center

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>has been a huge success story for you. How much

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of this demand is coming from big cloud providers like

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>AWS and Microsoft versus increasing demand from other companies building

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>out their own data centers. Yeah, so the data center

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>has been our big strategic bet Emily over the last

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>few years, and we've done extremely well with the largest

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>hyper scale ers. You know, ten of the largest hyper

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>scalers UM are using a m D in very significant way,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.479
<v Speaker 1>both on internal workloads as well as their external facing workloads.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We're also making a lot of progress with enterprise customers

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>and customers who are looking at building out a hybrid environment.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So you know that you know, we grew UM. You know,

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we've basically doubled UM in the first quarter in the

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>overall data center, but we doubled in each of cloud

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and enterprise. And what you're seeing there is there's just

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a demand from more computing UM when you think about

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>digital transformation, business transformation, UM, all of the AI that's

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. So there's continues to be very high demand

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in the data center. Now, there's been speculation about the

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>PC market and whether it's hit a pandemic peak in

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>tel CEO, pat Gaalsinger very bullish on this. Are you

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>as bullish? Where do you think the PC market is

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>really headed? Sure? So, Emily, you know, in the context, um,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the PC market had its best year, um.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, really last year. I mean it was a

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>very strong year for PCs. As you know, there was

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of need for you know, updated PCs and

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the updated infrastructure, as you know, we were in in

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the pandemic. When you look at this year,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we are taking a little bit more conservative of view

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the PC market. You know, we we believe that

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>will probably be down let's call it high single digits.

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But even with that, we're talking about a market that's

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be over three hundred million units UM this year.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So my view of the PC market it's about which

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>segments that you're in, you know, sir. Only some of

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the low end and some of the more consumer facing

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>UM areas of the PC market have taken a little

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a soft spot here in the first half

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>of the year. UM. I will say though, if you

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>think about commercial PCs, people are investing a lot in

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I t UM still because they want the productivity. If

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at high end premium UM PCs as well

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as gaming PCs. There's actually good demand for those. So

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I do the PC market as a very good market,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but one where you know, we do have to watch

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the volatility that's that that is in there. Okay,

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I have to ask about your reaction to the

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court's leaked draft opinion, which shows that Row versus

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Wade could very well be overturned and soon. A MD

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>has a good portion of its workforce in Texas, where

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, more aggressive anti abortion legislation has already been passed.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got companies like Salesforce that have offered to pay

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for their employees to leave Texas if they want to.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about all of this as a

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>business leader? Well, Emily, look, we're certainly watching the developments

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>very closely. I don't want to get ahead of the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>actual ruling. I think they're there's still um, you know,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still some clarity to be brought. But you know,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>our priorities always going to be first and foremost with

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>our employees and ensuring the health and safety of our employees.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're certainly watching the situation very carefully, and we'll

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you know we're We're focused on our

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>employees and d CEO Lisa Sue. Thank you as always

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time to join us. Thank you, good

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to see you again. All right. Coming up, he helped

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>unionize the first Amazon warehouse in the United States. Christian

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Smalls joins us next from Washington, fresh off his meeting

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with President Biden. He's next. This is Bloomerk Amazon that

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>labor union president Christian Smalls test to find before members

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of Congress today about his efforts to unionize workers across Amazon. He,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>along with other union leaders, also just met at the

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>White House with President Biden, Vice President Harris, and Labor

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Marty Walsh. He helped workers at an Amazon facility

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>on Staten Island become the first in the country to unionize. However, Monday,

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a nearby Amazon facility voted against unionitation. He joins us

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>now live from Washington. Chris, great to have you back

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>here on the show. You tweeted that you met the

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>President earlier today and that he told you you got

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>him into trouble. Tell me a little bit about that

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>meeting and what you think he meant by that. Yeah,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe when he came out a couple of weeks

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>ago and said Amazon would coming for you. I think he,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>uh he just overstepped it a little bit, and uh

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he was svised he's sitting here and but you know,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's great to see that. Uh he still recognizes that.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had to have some regulations with the

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>company as far as unionizing. So you also spoke with

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>President Harry By, President Harris Labor Secretary Marty Walsh. Should

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they indicate if they're planning to get more actively involved

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in Yes, absolutely, you know, Uh, well, we had a

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>great conversation. Uh. They spoke to not just myself, but

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>other leaders and organizers in other industries like Starbucks and

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>are e I and uh uh what else, Uh, artistic

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>industry as well. We had a librarian as there as well.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give recognition to all of them. Um. And

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we definitely think that there's going to be some more

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>support coming from the political realm. Um. I know that

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>they have been mentioned that they have um implemented some

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some things in the administration that they're willing to roll

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>out over the next couple of months. And that's going

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to help us out on the ground. And I'm I'm

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>excited to be a part of that conversation. Now you're

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>testified before a Senate committee today, and I have a

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>portion of that testimony. This is your response to a

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>question from Senator Lindsey Graham. That's the reason why I'm

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>here to represent the workers who make these companies go.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it's in your best interest to

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>realize that it's not a a left or right thing.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not a Democrat or a Republican thing. So workers

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>things to workers issue, and we're the ones that are suffering.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>What's your sense of whether the senators were speaking to

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>today understood that in a Congress that is often so

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>divided by partisanship. Yeah, I mean, well, I just had

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate that, you know, I wanted to make them

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>understand that, you know, uh, our voices matter. You know,

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the corporations get the UM have the first say and everything.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>They get to control everything, whether it's the market, whether

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's uh the laws, lobbying whoever, it's uh, even the

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>government is some aspect. You know, we don't have a

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>say at the bottom as workers. UM. The only way

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a say in the voices when we collectively

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>come together and when we collectively say we want the union,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>UM that that right should be given to us, and UM,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what I want to make sure that that message

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was clear cut that the workers are the ones who

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>generate the revenue for these corporations. And you know, I

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>think he uh he got the message because he didn't

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last long. He left halfway through. But you know, I understand,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is uh something that has to be said,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 1>It has to be spoken about. Now. You won at

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the Staten Island warehouses. The union one Amazon though,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is appealing that decision and they said they were disappointed

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with the outcome of the election there. They believe having

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a direct relationship with the company the company employees, having

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a direct relationship with the company is best for the employees.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You lost at a warehouse across the street. And I'm

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>curious where you plan to do this next, given that

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's not necessarily a done deal. Yeah, we're we're

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>prepared on our side, UM to go to the core

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>hearing and hear out the evidence if uh there is some,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and we will take our actions from there. UM. Definitely

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>talking to our legal representation on our side to get

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the best advice as far as our first election. But

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. You know, Amazon should recognize the

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Amazon workers at that facility voted for

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the union in favor of the union over five hundred workers, um,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>over five hundred ballots. Uh work where um the difference?

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And as far as the second election, you know, we uh,

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we definitely you know, overshotted a little bit. You know,

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we we took on a huge task. We've been campaigning

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while, over a year. Um. We had

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a new facility, new workers, new organizers in that building, UM,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and they just didn't enough time to convince enough of

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>their co workers, which is understandable. So for us, we

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just have to reassess and get back to work and

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get back to organizing. So are we going to see

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you filing union positions petitions outside Staten Island soon? And

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if so, where quickly? Oh? Well, I can tell you

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going nationwide. You know, every building in the country

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has contacted us already, and we want to continue with

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>that plan to get everybody in the country set up.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, every Amazon warehouse in the country has contacted

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you about the project of unionizing every Amazon facility in

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the country, um, and then some has contacted the Amazon

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>LA reunion and we will have a conference that will

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>address everybody nationwide. All Right, Christian Smallst, President of the

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Labor Union, Fresh Office meeting with President Biden. Thank

0:21:53.640 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you Chris for trying to thank you. Welcome back to

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Blomberg Technology, Emily check in San Francisco. I want to

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>get back to the market and volatility and starts spreading

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to crypto. To our at Ludlow, been taking a look

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there and what do you see, just another long list

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of superlatives for bitcoin. This was the single biggest intra

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>day drop since January. And again it's a two day story, right,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a violent u turn because we saw bitcoin pushed towards

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>forty dollars per token following that FED decision to raise

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>rates by fifty basis points the commentary from FED chair

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>j Pale, and then we just drop off and we're

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>down back towards thirty six thousand dollars per token. In

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this higher rate environment, bitcoins traded in a very narrow range.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's struggled to break out of that range. We've never

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>really got back to the highs that we had at

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year, and we saw other old

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>coins like Salana, for example, selling off during and ether

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as well during the session on Thursday. Earning season continues though,

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and there are some after hours movies that I want

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at. Lucid reaffirming it scary idents to build

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>between twelve thousand and fourteen thousand vehicles this year, but

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's raising prices because supply chain issues are ongoing. The

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>stock trading water in after our zero really interesting, big

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>set off in zero down nine and a half percent,

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>tepid outlook, and the worry here is that higher rates

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the Fed impacts mortgage rates and that could impact will

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>cool off the housing market. And look Block End. We

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>haven't spoken about Block in a while, right, formerly known

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as Square up ten percent, and after hours they're talking

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>about strength in their traditional payments processing business. And very

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>quickly during the session Thursday, there were just two stocks

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>on the NASA in the green, one of them Booking

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Holdings up three point three percent, earnings, bullish outlook, a

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>summer of travels coming Emily. But just a few day

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>days ago Expedia said exactly the same thing. They're down

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>six point seven percent on Thursday. M A lot of

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>narrative of Expedia recession fears might hit them, A lot

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of love for booking, not really sure what's going on that?

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well I got someone who might have an

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion about that thing. You as ed said. Expedia shares

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>tumbling since their earnings report earlier this week. This is

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>rising inflation and a potential recession looms over the summer

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>travel season ahead. Joining me now, Peter Kurrent, Vice harre

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of the Expedia group to talk about that

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and more so. Look, Peter, you saw the chart. What's

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>your reaction to that. Yeah, I mean we weren't expecting it.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think people are overreacting to, uh, some of the

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation worries, some of the other travel players and concerns.

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't seen any of any of the inflation

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>worries affecting the booking so far going into you know,

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the summer season and in other and longer stays. So

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>we were a little surprised. We thought it was a

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>good quarter and uh, you know, I think I think

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we expect a continued good travel season despite inflation concerns.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>So there's no question that people want to travel, aken,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but at what point does inflation sap that demand? Yeah,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think what we saw through COVID that you know,

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>on a macro basis, was a lot of savings in

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>most households. Uh and also and overspending consumer goods. And

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're starting to what we've expected to see and

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>what we've been starting to see is a sort of

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a fall back to norms and probably an overspend on services,

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>including travel and hospitality. So we've been expecting that, and

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be playing out. Obviously long long term,

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>who knows on inflation, but in the near term, inflation

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>worries don't seem to be canceling people's ambition to travel,

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>whether they might maybe rewrite down what they're hoping to do,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe not Paris but San Diego. You know,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we might see some of that. But again, we expect

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>people to travel regardless, and you know, we participate in

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>all segments of travel, and if if people travel a

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>little more modestly, you know, we'll pick that up. So

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we we expected to be strong, at least for the

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future. So you saw a steep rise in bookings

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>compared to last year, but you're still not back to levels.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Airbnb CEO Brian Chansky just yesterday. Somehow

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he always comes on the day before you, so I

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>have to get your reaction to it. Uh. You know,

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he talked about how they are now ahead of pre

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic levels even in cities. Take a listen to what

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he had to say. Well, it's already fully I mean,

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's already above at this very moment with Airbnb. I

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>can't say it's above for everyone. I don't know if

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hotels are back to planting levels, but we are next time, Peter,

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to come on twenty four hours before hiking.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But either way, Look, what's you're reacting? You know, how

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>do you explain some of the differences that we're seeing. Sure, well,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. One is, you know, we saw

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>very robust growth in our alternative commenta Inverbo during COVID,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>as did Airbnb in segments, and as cities have come

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>back for them. Uh more. You know, cities aren't fully back,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but cities have done better in the last quarter. Uh

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and so they're getting the benefit that Verbo for us

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really participate in urban markets. So we've both been

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>strong throughout COVID, and I think the extra lift of

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>cities coming back put them into positive territory. But what

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian referred to, which is true. Hotels are not fully

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>back across the globe. Not all geographies are back across

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the globe. So our mix of business, which you know,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 1>we have markets like in North America where we are

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>fully back and more, and we have markets like a

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Pack that are still way under where they've been because

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they're still largely closed down. So it's a mix of business.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's what the story has been really throughout most

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of COVID, which is depending on where you were strong.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>If you were in a strong place and the business

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was there because of COVID, you did well. And as

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>COVID unravels and we start to see cities come back,

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>long haul international come back, you know, all the corridors

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>open geographically, that business will be back. We are definitely

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>back and more than back in many markets. You've got

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>some other news today unveiling your Expedia group Open World

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>ECONMMER platform. What is this and how is it going

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to augment the broader business? Yeah, So, as you know,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>we've talked before about how we've been re platforming our

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>technology to drive our own B two C business faster.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>But what we realized in doing that was that if

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We built our platform to be externalizable, essentially in micro services,

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that we could provide the underpinnings for travel commerce for

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>really any players. We have a very robust B two

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>B business. We power lots of airlines selling rental cars

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>or packages. We power rewards programs, we power a RPS

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>travel program, many things, but these are big enterprise level deals.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>What we're building now is an ability to sort of

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>take our whole stack and turn it into micro services.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So if if a partner just wants to use our

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>service capabilities or payment capabilities, or any parts of our

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>e commerce stack or the whole thing, or sell cars

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or just activities or anything to augment their business, we

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can provide that capability so that we think it's going

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to dramatically expand the number of partners we can have

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in our B two B universe, which ultimately expands how

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>much travel we can sell for our partners and how

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>many travelers we can serve. All right, Peter Kerr, Vice

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Sharon CEO of the Expedia Group. Always good to have

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>your view of the future here on the show. Peter,

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thanks Emily. Coming up Bitcoin plunging the most

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in January, what's going on? There. We'll have all the

0:29:27.560 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>details next, Mrs Bloomberg. Let's get to our crypto report now.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>With Bitcoin dropping the most into January, this is the

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>market route deepens and its concerns about a recession. Bloom

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with Katie Greifeld here for more. Katie, take it away. Well, Emily, first,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to start big and just walk through what

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a horrible day in markets this was. If you look

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at the SMP five hundred, the biggest stock benchmark in

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the world, it was down three point six percent today. Somehow,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that's only the worst day in a week. A lot

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of that pain came in tech stocks, so the NAZAC

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred, that was its worst stay since September twenty.

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that selling came in the biotech sector.

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw a great stat today that if you look

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at that sector, a fifth of it is worth less

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>than the cash it holds. But a lot of that

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>pain came in those speculative tech areas. You're looking at

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Arc Innovation a t F down eight point nine percent.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>That's after it's it's biggest inflow in about a year

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week. That's got to hurt. But yeah, a

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the action was in Bitcoin, the world's largest cryptocurrency,

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>down eight point four percent today. If you zoom out

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and look over, you know, a five a period, it's

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>down eight point six per cent. So a lot of

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that pain just came today and again. But if you

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>go back to the stock market, really really painful consumer discretionary,

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of selling in that sector, a lot of

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>selling in the e commerce names in particular. I'm thinking

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon, I'm thinking about eBay and Tesla of course

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>also selling off in a big way with that text

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>sell off, So it wasn't just Bitcoin. To be clear,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just how broad based was this sell off, it was

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty remarkable, Emily, really the space, the whole cryptocurrency ecosystem,

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it tends to move as one. But most of the

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>losses came in Bitcoin, which I thought was interesting. If

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you compare that to ethereum, for example, that's the second

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>largest cryptocurrency, it was only down six point four percent,

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>only being a relative term there. So yeah, Bitcoin sort

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the underperformer among the big coins. But if you've

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>broughten out and look at some of the old coins,

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about Avalanche, I'm thinking about so Lana. Those

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were down as much as fifteen percent at one point

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at the worst of it. And again this is all

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about the FED, the macro environment, liquidity

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out of that syst the system. What does that

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mean for cryptocurrencies? And it seems so far it's not

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>too good. And you know, let's talk a little bit

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.959
<v Speaker 1>about some of the companies that have made bitcoin crypto

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a part of their business in ways large and small.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>How did this impact them? Well, I mean, we gotta

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 1>go straight to micro Strategy for that, right, I mean,

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in what was interesting about the earnings report obviously Bitcoin,

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they took a hit on their Bitcoin holdings. We know

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that Bitcoin has had a rough couple of months. But

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting was on the earnings call you heard

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>micro Strategy CFO line out that if Bitcoin falls to

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty one dollars per coin, micro Strategy would face a

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>margin call at that point and probably have to sell

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>some of their Bitcoin holdings. Of course, Bitcoin it's not

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>close to their yet, it's still hovering around thirty six

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a coin. But if this trend continues, and

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the trend has been lower, we could get there conceivably.

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, lots to watch ahead. Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld, thank

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you for that update. When I get back to the

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>markets in a minute. But earlier I spoke with Uber

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO dar kas Rasha. He asked for his reaction to

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Uber shares taking a leg down even after releasing earnings

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>early to avoid comparisons to Lift, take a listen. I

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think the reaction to Lift was significantly more negative than

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>than Uber. So maybe we're not in the same boat,

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>but it definitely affected us, and I do think we're

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just in completely different places. You know. You see with

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Uber is the benefit of scale, the benefit of globalization,

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of diversification, and the benefit of discipline in

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>these in these markets. You know, we are by far

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the number one player in the US have been for

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>some period of time. So when earners looked to come

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the marketplace and start earning in a flexible way,

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they're coming to Uber feet and that's a real advantage.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>When they come to Uber, they're busy all the time,

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not only driving people around, but also delivering or shopping, etcetera.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The opportunities to earn on the platform are greater than

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ever and in a reopening scenario, a lot of advantage

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>comes to the number one player and the number two

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>player in this case left maybe having a hard time.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>From a globalization standpoint, everyone knows that the reopening outside

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of the US has happened much faster. So we have

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with reopening dynamics bringing drivers back onto the platform.

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>We made big investments last year. For some period of time,

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>we've been used to this. We built muscles to do it,

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're much more diversified so that we can you know,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>lead into the West Coast which is reopening fast, while

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the East Coast has lots of profitability. UK

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>all over the world, we have lots of profits to

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>pull from so that we can lean into reopenings. But

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not too dependent on one place. We're just a

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>very different global player. And then from a different cecifically standpoint,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we've had delivered be a very very big part of

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>our business. And as with reopening, delivery growth rates, while

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they're healthy, um, they're not growing quite as fast. So

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we're able to take careers who used to be drivers.

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of our courage used to be drivers. They're

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>not driving people because of safety concerns. Now the COVID

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>safety concerns are largely behind us. We can bring them

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>back to drive, or we can hire, or we can

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bring owners onto the platform, both to deliver things and

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to drive people. We just have a very fundamental business

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>advantage over any monolone player out there. So you're saying

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>when drivers come back, they're going to come back to

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Uber first. And you did say you don't plan to

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>significantly increase incentive investments to get those drivers back. Lift

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is planning to increase those investments. And I talked to

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>John zim Or, the president of Lift, about why take

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a listen to what he had to say. I'm not concerned. Uh.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the message we're saying is that we

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>see the demand coming back and therefore we want to

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>invest in supply. So this is part of the reason

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>their stock one off a cliff. Are you saying you

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>won't have to increase incentives and that this won't lead

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to a subsidy war, because that's what we've seen in

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the past. We have already invested in incentives. Remember Europe

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>opened up last year, Latin America has has already opened,

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so we have been through this exercise before last year.

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Lift is a year behind us in some aspects as

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>far as the reopening goes. So we're very very confident

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of demand coming back. We're very confident in

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of supply. Remember we have a structural advantage and

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can bring on couriers which are easier to

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bring on, we can upsell them into driving because the

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>earnings opportunities now are very very significant. Uh. And as

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a result of this fundamental structural advantage, we're confident not

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>only in top line growth, but also in margins. Remember

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we guided lift, you know, I think there are numbers

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one from seventy five million and even DA to fifty

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and a guide at ten to twenty. During that same period,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we've gone from eighty six million to a hundred sixty

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>eight million to two hundred forty two seventy millions. So

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>we've been headed in opposite directions for some period of time,

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think based on what we heard from them,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we're headed up. We're headed into pre cash fuow territory.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You did report a massive loss five point nine billion

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars in part tied to your other investments, Aurora D.

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>D Grab Are you reassessing your strategy at all? Here?

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>We're not reassessing your strategy. You know, those investments were

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>part of mergers and acquisitions, different activities, and I think

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we made the right moves, as you can see based

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on the operating results that were displaying, which are absolutely

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>industry leading. We're going to take a careful look at

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>those equity UH stakes. We have plenty of liquidity. We're

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>moving towards free casual profitability, so we will look to

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>monetize those stakes in return capital. When we're two the

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>one way the other tour shareholders over a period of time.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But we're caught in the same down draft that everybody

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>else is caught in right now, uber CEO dar Causa

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>shot he there. You can catch that full interview at

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. I want to get back to today's

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>market meltdown and bring in Robert Kentwell Upholdings portfolio manager.

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert just how many companies are gonna get caught in

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this down draft and how long does it last? Family.

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>It's been pretty ugly, but we are almost at the

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>end of earning season here, and your your team has

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>done a great job of reporting a lot of the

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>bad numbers out there. Um e Commerce has had its

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>first negative quarter year every year and just about as

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>far back as most folks can remember, even in the

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>first half of commerce was still up over the last year,

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and that has a lot of repercussions to other industries, software, rides, sharing, advertising, Well,

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>with these so awful to be frank, we think there's

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>something big going on here, and we think investors are

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>reevaluating whether or not these are actually technology companies with

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>limitless scale and low hot pretty costs. Well, you have

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Netflix is now being valued like a cable station. Other

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>investors are looking at Facebook's meta's capital intensity and saying

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is this does their future look more like a T

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and T S than it does Google? And you've seen

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>multiples re rate faster than we've seen in a really

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 1>long time across these assets because investors not, in our opinion,

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they've likely moved too far in that direction. But you know,

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got to do our jobs and pass through it

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and find the good deals here. Meantime, you've had a

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>flood of retail investors coming into this market over the

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years thanks to companies like robin Hood.

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What happens to them, well, a lot of them might

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not exist. You saw something very similar in the in

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the late nineties, Internet boom. If you remember

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the explosion of the trades and the merriage trades, and

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those businesses ultimately had to merge to

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>stay alive. Someone out of business, uh, someone private. And

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, this Twitter deal very well could be the

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>first big transaction that we're seeing, but far from the last.

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So we expect a lot of consolidation. We expect some shutdowns. Uh.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>We we expect the I p O window to remain

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn't shut So we don't think over the next

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, you're you're more likely to see a shrink

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in the total number of companies available for investment, uh,

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>than you are to see new companies available for investment.

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Where do you expect to see consolidation? Who do you

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>expect to see shut down? Well, the worst the business model,

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the more likely to consolidation. So you could you've had

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the right sharing books on here in

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours. That space is just desperate for,

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, continued consolidation. Just Eat Takeaway and door Dash

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have been big consolidators. Uber's tried to be now they're

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>now they're investing. So we think that space is just

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.399
<v Speaker 1>going to continually have to do deals amongst its until

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they get to a small enough under a number of

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>players to be profitable. Um, what should buy lift? Ah?

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen two businesses more in need of

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a merger? But like the right sharing space is really

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>challenging because they're they're competing for the same thing ultimately,

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>which is they thought these You know, I was in

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco with you for the last ten years while

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>these businesses were quickly being built up, and they were

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>parading themselves as these as these complicated, fast growing software platforms,

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and they were treating humans like commodities. And if we've

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>learned anything over the past two years here, humans are

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>actually a very precious input cost into the function of

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>these businesses, and those business models are more dependent on humans.

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's just about any business you've seen come out

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of Silicon Value in the last decade. And that is

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a really competitive place to be and it's a really

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>hard place for investors to sit around and be patient

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for them to find ways of scaling those business models.

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>So how long does this drag out? How long are

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we in the red here? Well? Amazon told us that

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>starting on May fifteen, growth rates relative to last year

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>would start to look better and better, um, and we

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>tend to believe them. If you remember last year, the

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>first half was incredibly strong, the fastest growth you've seen

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US and last fifty years. The second half

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>totally different story, one of the worst holiday seasons that

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the US has experienced in twenty years. So the comps

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 1>relative to last year are going to keep improving. That

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>likely investors tend to have existential crisis when growth rates

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>are slowing down and management teams are surprised at how

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>poorly their businesses are performing. But it's gonna get a

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>lot easier as the year goes on. And it's very

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>possible that as you see some of these growth rates

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>start to stabilize glat into last year's numbers, you might

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>see some of these multiples come back to more middling ranges. Well,

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like somewhat of a silver lining. Upholdings Portfolio

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Manager Robert Knt, Well, thanks for giving it to us

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>straight of prey shade it. That does it for this

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. Were going to continue to follow

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the sell off right here on the show and on

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television over the next twenty four hours. And guess

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>who's coming on tomorrow Doortos CEO Tony Shoe will ask

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>him if consolidation is in the future. And don't forget

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast anywhere you get your podcasts.