WEBVTT - Surprisingly Soaring Saturday

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hull that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for a dake Edo state?

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that? Woof? Woof? And them and Tie, Welcome back

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to the solid verbal boys and girls. My name is

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Ty Hildenbrandton, joining me as always over there in beautiful Chicago, Illinois.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>You know miss Dan Rubinstein. He said he had some

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>raisin bread and a diet coke before hitting the record

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>button today, Sir, how are you feeling good?

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I had some centrum silver. I put on a mess

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>card again, you know all my pre show rituals that

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>really keep the juice flowing. Tie, I'm pretty good. I

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 2>hit a wall. I sort of had the uh you

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>know that the high school highlight the players say, I'm

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>not gonna lie. They had us in the first half,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>right right. I was feeling off in the beginning of

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon. It's one of those times when you go

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to WebM and you're like my jaw kind of hurts

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and like, oh, you might be having a heart attack.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, well, it doesn't sound right. So

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I decided to take a shower in a twenty minute

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>nap and do some work. And here we are. I'm

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>all right. I have bounced back thanks to the good

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>people at diet Coke and Raisin Bread. I think it

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 2>was what is it, the sun made sun Made raisin Bread.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>There's not a corporate, not a sponsor. But it also

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>got me to thinking, Ty, we have to start, especially

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>with as we know it right now, because we don't

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>know what the Big ten or Pac twelve's plan is.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 2>A time of recording as we know it. It's going

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to be a slightly condensed season right correct, which means

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>we probably need to start coming up with Saturday nicknames now,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 2>if not soon.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's a really good point, Dan.

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And yesterday I went from my very first run in

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>a long long time, and I'm right here with sore

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>but soaring Saturday. I don't know if that's too long.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I know, we love the alliteration. I am, I'm sore,

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, I feel like the circulation's

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>coming back, and there's something about that. With week I

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 2>suppose three of the college football season, even though we're

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>a little sore coming off of two very strange weeks,

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>and we saw certain things that we weren't expecting. But still,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it's college football.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>See I think still, I think you've got some games

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>bearing the lead here. It's sore because frankly, it sucks.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>There's one good game this weekend, one good high profile

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>game this weekend. Miami.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess now that Arkansas State Central Arkansas.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Exactly Miami at Louisville is the big one, but potentially

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>soaring because of the news that the big ten in

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve maybe on the verge of announcing a comeback,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly soaring, surprisingly soaring. I like that. I think Stephen

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>F sowing Steve F. Sorry, no, why don't we get

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to news here before we do? Solidverbal at gmail dot

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>com is the email four eight verbal one is the reverbline.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>If you want to dial in and be part of

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the reverb segment that Ryan cuts for us every Sunday morning.

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Also follow along on all of our social channels, those

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>being Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. You can also join the subreddit.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It's Soliverbal dot reddit dot com. And if you haven't already,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>go on out to soliverbal dot com and sign up

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>for our newsletter. We're going to try to send that

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>out once a week and a lot.

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>To say, ty, and you're busy with the day job.

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>So in Commandeering, Dan is commandeering. UFO got it got

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fun stuff in the queues, So we

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>would urge you as strongly as possible to sign up

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>for that newsletter. Okay, can I can? I also? Can?

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I also just take care by the way, some more housekeeping.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 2>We do a Friday show and that's sort of like

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>our twos cruise with the theme of space right the frontier,

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>if I'm not mistaken correct, and that the format at

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>that show. We did the twos Cruise, it was slightly

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>shorter than a regular recap or preview show. But the

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>UFO show, the format is going to be one big

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>central topic and we're also adding a Q and A

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>element to it. And because we're recording it near the

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 2>end of the week, I think we might crack a

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:18.559
<v Speaker 2>couple of cold ones.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Tie we kicked around.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>The working title is bruin a So if you want

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>one point to drink Dan and you want smooth tie,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest submitting questions via Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, or

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>solid verbal at gmail dot com because we've never really

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>done this before and I really want to coast into

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the weekend a sort of a flight, both with the

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>UFO and with my blood alcohol level. So let's make

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>those questions happen so we can transform the show into

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 2>something that we've never done in a very good way.

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>How about that we.

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Had a very acute gentleman and write in and say

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that we should use the word undulating for one of

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>our hues. And I say, well, now that the Patriot

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>League drum and fife is is off limits for the

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>word undulating. It's looking for work.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 2>Hmm, such a good word.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Get you to continue. Now we have breaking news or

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps breaking news soon before the end of the show. Dan,

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>please monitor.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to keep monitoring. Just promise me this. If

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 2>something happens and we need to suddenly start researching and reading,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 2>will you drop in like a like elevator music, as like, Okay,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 2>we've took a pause to sort of study up, and

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>we're back. I would love a little just like a

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 2>dot weather channel. That's all I want.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So here's where we're at, folks. We are recording this

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>about five PM on Tuesday evening. There has been a

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of smoke over the last I would say three

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to four days that the Big ten is on the

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>verge of announcing a comeback, that some testing protocols were

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>being implemented, perhaps that member institutions were getting to a

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>place where they were a lot more comfortable with the

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs. Purportedly, at time of recording, a vote

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>has been cast and the Big Ten is on the

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>verge of announcing some sort of comeback for mid to

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>late October. There was a group of meetings this weekend

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>among the Big Ten's council of Presidents and chancellors. They

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>were supposedly moving forward toward this decision. They would let

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>schools have the possibility of eight games, which would potentially

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>qualify them for the College Football Playoff.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>A lot of work there with that word yeah.

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, the college Football Playoff already has been somewhat push back,

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's like there's a whole bunch of nuance there.

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of ifs doing heavy lifting. But

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the I think central theme here is that the Big

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Ten is probably on the verge of announcing some sort

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of abbreviated fall college football season. Now, with that being said,

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the PAC twelve, what are they doing? Well? Mid to

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>late November is the quote most aggressive return date for

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pac twelve. According to a source, schools in the

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>state of California and Oregon have not yet been cleared

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>by public health officials to resume contact practices, let alone games.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>The league's presidents and chancellors wouldn't consider a vote to

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>return until that status changes. Ideally, the PAC twelve would

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like its teams to have six weeks to practice and

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>physically prepare for the season. That again, according to a source.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe I pulled that from ESPN dot com, So

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of smoke here. It's hard for me to believe

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point that there is no fire. I do

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>believe we're going to see both of those conferences back

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in some way, shape or form before the end of

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>before the middle of let's say November at the latest,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and that obviously is going to make things very interesting

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>from a podcasting and just from a college football fans perspective, like,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>how the hell do we compare teams that aren't playing

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the same number of games that are probably land locked

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>into playing their own conferences at this point, Dan a

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lot for us to consider here moving forward, but agreed disagree.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Abstain from offering comment on whether or not you think

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 2>It has been interesting watching the dynamic of the various

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>conferences and some of the talking points, And it'd be

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>impossible for us to corral everything that's been said regarding

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the Big ten's return and why and how and precautions

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and steps being taken in terms of rapid testing and

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the thresholds whatever. It's impossible to sort of corral all

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of that information. But it is interesting to watch the

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 2>PAC twelve in a very different mode at the same time,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>where the Big ten is furiously trying to get an

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>extension on their dissertation to be able to graduate. Magnekum

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 2>loud in the PAC twelves like sez get degrees. Brother,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 2>let's just get to that. Let's just walk and that's

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>good by us. Yeah, it's fascinating. We'll see what kind

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 2>of vote happens or has already happened, and what the

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>threshold is. I know there've been numbers thrown out about

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>how many they need to go, and that they're sort

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 2>of targeting and all for one because there were some

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>stories about well, you know, the teams that want to play,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>we're going to figure it out. The teams that don't,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that's cool too. It seems like they're trying to rally

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 2>everybody on one platform, right, that's what you've seen.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and answering the questions around, well, if this vote happened,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and why haven't they come out and announced it yet.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>My hunch is that the Big ten flubbed its first

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>announcement so badly, yeah, that they want to make sure

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got everything buttoned up this time around, So totally,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that if and when they do announce,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have a working schedule, They're going to

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have timelines, they're going to have everything that anyone could

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>possibly ask about ironed out and ready to send off

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in like a tidy little packet. Because the first announcement

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was no boinno Dan. That did not work out well

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>from the conference, What is.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Your ideal game total at this point, knowing that the

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 2>other power conferences that have already begun player are already

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>planned with a date to begin the SEC Big twelve

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and ACC have that ten game situation nine obviously for

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve plus one, But what would qualify as

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>a base number to get Ohio State into the playoff,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Because that's not all of this bootooed. Some of it

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>what's that base number TI seven seven to seven, qualify

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State seven and zero or whatever it is, six

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and one, but winning the Big Ten championship, whatever that

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 2>looks like, is that good enough to make an argument

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that they deserve a birth But say, I don't know

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>undefeated UCF or one loss Alabama. You know what is

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>if we're going to start inventing arguments, which I guess

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have to do this year, what qualifies

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 2>as a suitable enough season that they've played enough games?

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is under the assumption that there have been

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a minimum number of bangers on the schedule, I e.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>You know Michigan Penn State Law six. Six is a minimum.

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know six.

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I would say this is there's no wrong answer, because

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 2>this is literally your opinion.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a definite royal rumble quality to this

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>where we're just going to have teams coming in at

0:11:55.480 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>different points in time. I guess six. I don't know

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how many they can get in. And that's part of

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem, right, Like if they start, let's say October seventeenth,

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the dates I've seen, can they realistically fit

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>eight games in before a playoff? I don't know. I

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>know that conferences like the Big Twelve, the ACC. I

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think the SEC to some degree have built in bye

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks cushions that they could use to flex and move

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>games to if need be. Baylors already had to deal

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with that, right, So, like, I don't know, I don't

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think you could run eight consecutive weeks and expect it

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to work in this current climate. I'm comfortable with six

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as a qualifier for Ohio State. Frankly, you could probably

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>get away with three for them, given how loaded they are.

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That wouldn't fly.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you imagine if Ohio State lost twice and just

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>weren't in the playoff conversation basically at all? After the

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten restarted partially to have a team there because

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't seem like Michigan's of that quality, doesn't fully

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 2>seem like Penn State is. But maybe, you know, I

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>could definitely be wrong. There's a lot of talent and

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Happy Valley. But wouldn't that be something after all of

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>these like Ryan Day quotes saying, well, Alabama's playing, Clemson's playing,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and then Ohio State goes and loses a couple of games.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 2>That'd be wild.

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>It will be wild more to come on this front.

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm my number seven, by the way, my number seven,

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>lucky seven. Yeah, we already we already take six to

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>be half a season. Seven at least gets me over

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that line, more of a more of a mental block

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for you. There for sure, one hundred percent. It also

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>says a lot. And then I promise I'll move on

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the PAC twelve. Given the fact

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that virtually nobody's talked about the PAC twelve. It's all

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>been about the Big ten getting those schools back. And

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether there's a financial or a political or

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever component to it, who knows. No one's been talking

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>about the PAC twelve. It came up on ESPN, it

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it almost didn't even register.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>It's tough. It's tough because there's not a national interesting

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>thing that we have been bemoaning of, you know, sort

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of losing with the conference not playing, you know, you

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 2>lose Big twelve football. There's like the Oklahoma's been in

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the playoff recently and has been you know, Lincoln Riley

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>has been a big name and outspoken in twenty twenty,

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know Heisman finalists and winners recently, and you know,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the AEC obviously has Clemson and Trevor Lawrence. The SEC

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>has their wall to wall pr machine, and the Big

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Ten has you know, Jim Harbaugh and Justin Fields, and

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>there isn't that shining star, like, oh man, it's going

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>to be strange not have football without Keaton Slovas, Tyler Shuck,

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Lake, Davis Mills, Chase Garber's, like I mean, Herm

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Edwards and all of these things. Though I know you're

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>google for Garber's, but there is not that thing that's

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>that's going to move the needle right now, like you know,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Chip Kelly or Pete Carroll, like in recent years even

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Chris Peterson to a lesser extent for somebody in Nashville

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>or Louisville or Cleveland, you know what. So it's I

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>understand why people are looking at the pack'll be like, well,

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>that's fun to watch late, I guess, but you know,

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 2>we got plenty early.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It's bad in Kansas, it is better.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I miss it. Ty Oregon has lost its best player

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>on offense, both of its starting corners, and they haven't

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>even practiced in the fall. It's great, Well, maybe come back.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's like a whole open enrollment quality to this.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>We've got right schools and conferences. Opting out now, there

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>may be opting back in. I saw Neil Farrell from LSU.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He opted out now he's expected to opt back in

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and M had a big time receiver in

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamon Osbon decide that he's gonna opt out for the season.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Sean Wade for Ohio State, potential top ten pick in

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty one draft, he has opted out of

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>his senior season. May look, you know, I don't know.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>These are weird times here twenty two.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna let I'm gonna let you in on a

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a secret. Sometimes they take cash advances

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>from agents once they declare for the league, and coming

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>back becomes less of an option.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, good for them if they should get it. But yeah,

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>oh totally, if not, whatever whatever, whatever makes you happy, Dan,

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So okay, I think that's the news. The news is

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have two conferences, if not by

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the time you listen to this show, most likely by

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the time we record our next show. Opting back right,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll do our best cover. I don't know what

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>else to say.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 2>It was very strange. I will say on Sunday morning,

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>when I'm usually prepping for our recap show by watching

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>what I missed and reading up and seeing, you know,

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>if there's any any developing things we should know about

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>that happened overnight, stuff like that. There wasn't much, full on,

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 2>wasn't much. It was I usually prep on Sunday mornings

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>for what three three and a half hours, and it

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>was like a it was a two hour ish prep.

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Very texted.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>We texted each other, this is a much lighter lift

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>than usual.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh, way lighter. I'm ready to preview games though, Ty,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for sure, let's preview games.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's do it. Let's dive in again time the week.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>It's week three. I've not been titling the show like

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>week three or week whatever preview because I don't really

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>know what the concept, what the construct of a week

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is anymore. It doesn't really matter.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>We took a full twenty seconds to try and figure

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 2>out what today's date was before the show started, speaking

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of washed, that's that's where we are now as a show.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So I'm totally with you. So what do we call

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:43.239
<v Speaker 2>in this?

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly? I keep wanting to say, suddenly, Susan, it's suddenly soar,

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly soaring.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Surprisingly surprisingly soaring Saturday.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let me ask you an important question, then

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>put your money where your mouth is. Outside of that

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Miami Louisville game, what game are you most excited about?

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Other than the arkansass that got postponed?

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested to see how Georgia Tech follows up their

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 2>win against Florida State hosting UCF because it appears Georgia

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Tech kind of has a feisty defense at the moment.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's an interesting matchup. BC Duke could be your guy,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Filled Jrkovich.

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't steal my face. Do not steal my thunder, you said, Duke.

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Team ty you liked, You seem to like and respect

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Chase Bryce and the Duke defense, right correct. So that

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that's sort of interesting. I mean there's I think there's

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 2>individual stories more than there is. There are individual matchups,

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 2>like what does Baylor's offense look like against not a

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 2>great defense in Houston? We don't think, but a team

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>with some talent is how does Navy bounce back after

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>just getting demolished and they were just completely run over

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>by BYU. There are they're individual things, and you know what,

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 2>even without primetime matchups that we're getting Power five versus

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Power five for a second consecutive week, where we have

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>wake NC State, we've got BC Duke just in the

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 2>acc Syracuse Pitt that that registers to me as a thing,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 2>and I'm good with that.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the deal, folks. The action picks up next weekend.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's fine.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>If you were to decide, Hey, I'm gonna do some

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>home projects or I'm gonna spend the day outside and

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I just won't be able to watch. I think you

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>make that trade.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, I don't.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you make that trade for the old time.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, for the overwhelming majority of our fans, it

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>will be good enough to enjoy your Saturday, to listen

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to the recap episode, and to preemptively knowing that all

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff is coming up. We got crazy. The

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>royal rumble of college football is happening this year. Make

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 1>this week, the whole week, your window of opportunity, so

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole week. Just do it, band Aid, right off,

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. You get two weeks of football and

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Ty says that's enough. No, I'm saying that's enough. I am.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I am showing some foresight here, mister Rubinstein.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I disagree. Why there is a chance, a non

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 2>zero chance that things turn right. We're hoping they don't.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>It could be a seven week season, it could be

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 2>a four week season, it could be a nine week season.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>So knowing that things are up in the air, I

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 2>am I am going to recommend you watch Syracuse Pitt

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>like it's the super Bowl week of the world.

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Move your week around so you can watch Austin p

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>against Cincinnati. No, Dan, come on.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean you're the one in love with desmon rit

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>or not. I do, So that's something that you can

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>hold between you and Austin p I suppose.

0:20:58.080 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Mean they're just in interesting things to me that even

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 2>if you're watching it in the background while doing other things,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>keep your eyes on college football because like we saw

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>last week, there are weird games that are going to

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>be happening that we're not anticipating. The Texas State UTSA

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 2>game going to double ot and just going out of

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>its mind bonkers. It's worth being in the vicinity of

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a TV if you find out something like that is happening.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's a full on disagree from the Dan man.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>How about that disagree from the dan Man. Okay, yeah, well,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>just we'll roll with that, Daniel.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we well, in terms of this week in

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the sleep, why don't we say this, the biggest game

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>is definitely Miami Lousville. I think we agree on that.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's at seven thirty. My plan of attack, I've got

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a socially distanced birthday party earlier in the day, So

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>my plan not close. My plan of attack is going

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to be to be home for that seven thirty game.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>If you're in a similar spot and you got to

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>go out and do stuff, try to be back for

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>seven thirty.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, all right, let's talk about games.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about games. You mentioned Baylor. Baylor is squaring

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>off against Houston at high noon on Fox. Is it

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the big noonon I guess it would be the big noon,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 2>I think so?

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Houston at Baylor. I'm seeing the line all the

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>way down to four and a half now touchdown before Yeah,

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Baylor Bears. This game came about because both

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Houston and Baylor had postponements and they were just looking

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>for warm bodies on September the nineteenth, so lo and behold,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>here we are. We've got the Koog's We've got the Bears.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I would never bet this game in a million years.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen anything from either team. Baylor's whole staff,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>their entire defense, it's new. I love Chas Brewer, always have.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be watching that old line, though there were

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>too many moving pieces. Last year. They gave up the

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>most sacks in the Big Twelve. They got to keep

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Chaz healthier. The whole thing's going to collapse like a

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>house cards. I'm taking points here, whether it's seven, whether

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it's four and a half, I don't care. Give me

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the points Houston plus the points.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Houston had a defense last year only because they put

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 2>eleven guys on the field on defense. That was the

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 2>extent of it. They were truly awful, especially with how

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 2>they finished out the year. I think they lost four

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>or five. They gave up forty five to Memphis, fifty

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 2>six to Navy. They gave up a ton of points.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it was UCF. They gave up a bunch.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>The Houston defense is not good, and even if it

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>improves this year, it's going to improve to not horrible,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 2>but still pretty rough. So I'm inclined. Even though the

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>spread came down to what you said about four four

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and a half points.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I see it on fandle of three and a half.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, maybe somebody knows something that we don't in terms

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of Baylor players not playing. That's always the weird, awkward

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>element of the spreads this year, I don't know when

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it comes down by half. So well, I'm going to

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>roll with Baylor just because the Houston defense appears to

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 2>be the worst thing in this game. But we have

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 2>no concept for Baylor right now after a cancelation, and

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 2>we have no concept for Houston at all. So yeah,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to take the team playing at home

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>with even and not starting a ton of transfers like

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Houston is. So yeah, give me Baylor.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Also at high noon, this one on ESPN, not the

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Big Noon but high noon ESPN Tulsa at Oklahoma State.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State's about twenty one and a half twenty two

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>point favorite here at home. I don't really have further

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>analysis on this game, Dan, I'd say go back listen

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Big twelve preview for the deep dive of

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the Pokes. They should be really good this year. They

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of guys back. As we said then,

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it truly does come down to Spencer Sanders

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>because the weapons are there in offense. The defense might

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be one of the best that Mike Gundy's had in

0:24:56.080 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>his time in Stillwater. So it is going to be

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State's game here. They're going to win this game.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a question of by how much. And even

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't watch this game, you should watch other

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State games because they should be pretty dog gone good.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>They played last year in Tulsa and it was actually

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 2>pretty competitive for a while. And Tulsa finishes last in

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>their division in the American, but they played some really

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 2>good teams tightly SMU and Memphis. Namely, Tulsa was one

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of those teams, not fully as bad as their record.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they were two and six in the American

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 2>last year. As bad as the record indicates, still a

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 2>number of issues Oklahoma State, you know, we have not

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>seen in any sort of important way. So I think, man,

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I had a pick for this, now I'm going back

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>on it. I think I'm gonna go with Tulsa actually

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>really to cover, not to win. Their defense was actually

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 2>fine last year and I do like the offensive minds there.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 2>They had a really rough schedule in the middle of

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 2>last year, but they were still They scored forty one

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>against Memphis. They scored thirty seven against SMU. These aren't

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 2>great def fences. They beat UCF score thirty four in

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the process. They beat ECU in their bowl game, so

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 2>you know what, not in their bowl game. Excuse me

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 2>just to end the year, I just I'm gonna go

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 2>with Tulsa to Hang. I think that their competence floor

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 2>is pretty high. So with the weird start of the

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Big twelve season, yeah, let's go Tulsa to Hang and

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>lose by thirteen or fourteen.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Some other noon games, we'll move quickly through these. We'll

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>list them all, but just talk about the ones, as

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we did last week that we think are intriguing. You

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Syracuse and Pit on ACC Network. Pits about a

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty one to twenty two point favorite. They are coming

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>off a game in which they won so badly that

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they shortened the whole thing by ten minutes played ten

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>minute quarters in the second half against Austin p Cues.

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, they were in that ugly game

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>kicking in a gouge and dan in the mud and

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the blood and the beer against North Carolina. I like

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>pitt to win. Very good defense, one of the best

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>defenses in all the ACC I'm still uncomfortable laying three

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns though with the pit Panthers, Like there's a pat

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>nar Dows equality that I can't quite put my finger

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on where they could end up winning this game thirteen

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to ten, Right, So I gotta go Syracuse plus whatever.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna go with Syracuse as well. This is

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a friendly reminder that for a lot of these teams,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 2>this is especially the Power five ones, this is their

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 2>second game of the year. What do I always like

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to say going into the second game of the year

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 2>at this is where major major improvement from a week

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 2>to week basis will occur the worst. If you have

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a truly almost uncharacteristic level of incompetence in week one. Generally,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not that you are just a fully incompetent team,

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it's just that fall camp didn't go your way and

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>you weren't ready for live action. You had a bunch

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of new coaches or new players, in the case of Syracuse,

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 2>new coordinators on both sides. There's gonna be a jump

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>between week two and week one, just in figuring out

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>what to diagnose and what to adjust. And so I

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think Syracuse is better than Pitt. They were a

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>touchdown worse last year. Do I think Pitt is suddenly

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>fourteen points better at home? And because it's twenty twenty,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think necessarily no. So I think that's too

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 2>many points. The fact that we're looking at Pitt as

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 2>a three touchdown favorite in the ACC just doesn't feel

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>based in reality. So give me Syracuse with at times

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>of promising defense, to keep it a little closer than that.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say it'll end up being something like

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight to seventeen.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Pitt also at hihnuon this one on ESPN three. You

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>teased it earlier. It is Boston College at Duke, the

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Blue Devilty six and a half point home favorite. Bc

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>DAN one of four ACC teams along with I guess

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>NC State and the two Virginia schools that did not

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>play last week this week, it is not a moment

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>too soon. We've been struggling through the pandemic DAN and

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wildfires emotionally and mentally not physically, let's be clear, and

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>social and political unrest correct and amid all that filled

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yourkovi's herky jerky delivery could be the one thing that

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>unites humanity.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Like in favor of, or in recognition of, or in

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 2>warship of, in what way.

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Well for me, in worship of, but in recognition of,

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to say the very least, he transferred over former four star.

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 2>We do love herky jerky deliveries, especially when the name

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>has jerk in it. But yeah, all hailed. Taylor Martinez

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>is shot putting for sure.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Filled your kovic. Former four star kid from PA was

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>behind Ian book. I used to be really high on him,

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>transferred over from Notre Dame because it didn't work out,

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>which happens.

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Who is your favorite former Notre Dame quarterback transfer that

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>you were unusually high on because you were I was

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 2>getting messages from you about Malik Zayr's junior high school tape.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You's got to be Malik Zayer Okay from Zionsville, Ohio. Yeah,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I was on him when he was a sophomore.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>You love Brandon brand, Brandon Wimbush's arm. There was something.

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 2>There's something about you and fully overrating quarterbacks who don't

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 2>know not only don't cut it at Notre Dame, but

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>transfer out because they got to cut it somewhere.

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Runner Keel, What up, Gunner Keel? Yeah, Yeah, I've got

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a storied history of this. Dan.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're like the George Whitfield of not evaluating quarterbacks.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. Okay, continue, So Drkovic.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>His mechanics are a little wonky, and the announcers are

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about it. They are.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he hasn't been named the starter yet, right. I

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 2>think it's like a game time. It's him and Dennis Grossel.

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Grossel who's going to start a quarterback?

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think so, But you got to give it to field.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Coovic. Man, if you're forced to watch this game,

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I have as a center space my filed your Covic

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>awkward mechanics, bing go card, the word unorthodox. Drink every

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>time they say the word unorthodox to talk about filed

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>your Kovic's throwing motion.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the two teams did not play last year. Duke,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>what did you say about five and a half six

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 2>point favorite in this Yeah?

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I see it about six six and a half now, Okay.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Duke a good amount for a couple different reasons. Mostly,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they've already played, so they know where the rust is,

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>they know where the grease is. I don't know where

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with this analogy. But also BC hasn't played

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>an ACC team. BC doesn't know what to expect out

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of two new coordinators and a new head coach and

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly a new starting quarterback and traveling on the road

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>during these uncertain times. So yeah, I'm gonna take Duke

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>just more sure of itself right now to win by

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight points.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, give me the Blue Devil here.

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually thought Duke looked pretty good last week.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>But totally I don't have a lean.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going BC plus six and a half, give me

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Jerky Boys plus the plus the number Dan.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>What if he doesn't even play Ty.

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>He'll play Dan. He's filling for Codec.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Just making sure. That's all I got.

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, next we disagree, I guess let's rifle

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>through these other ones pretty quickly. At high noon on ABC,

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Navy at Tulane seven and a half is your point spread?

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We had the come from behind victory for Tulane last week.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>They're at home. Meanwhile, Navy got demolished by BYU. I

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>am gonna go points here as well. I thought about

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>locking up Navy. I still might because same come from

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>behind you want to go double barrel? Should we do it?

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm why not?

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't care.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not held accountable.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Look of the week. I believe that the game against

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>BYU was an aberration. It helps to have that one

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>game under their belt. They still run a tight ship

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with a quirky offense to triumph oh.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Put a Navy pun unintentional but well done, well.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Struck, and Tulane coming off that come from behind win.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Now coming back home, this seems like a really good

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Navy to, if not win, certainly take the

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>air out of the ball, keep it closed. Tou Lane's

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a defensive minded team to begin with. I just I

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's like a three point four point game

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>So Navy's been doing this thing even it wasn't new

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 2>to this year, but the degree to which they do

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it was because of the circumstances around the world. But

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe didn't tackle in fall camp like essentially at all right,

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and Ken Neomodalolo after the loss of BYU said, all right,

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>touch football's over. We are going to go practice tackling

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 2>because that is apparent that after the BYU game, it's

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>something that we need to work on maybe tackled in

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 2>practice and has been tackling in practice. Tulane with the

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 2>potential letdown spot after their tit win last week. Like

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, Navy, you're not as bad as you are

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 2>on your worst day when you lose by fifty two

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 2>to BYU, and you're an FBS team and you have

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 2>a history of competence. If not good football, that's your

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 2>worst day. Navy's not going to repeat that sort of performance.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 2>So even though it could be a bad matchup, if

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Navy truly can't stop the run and we know Tulane

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>should be able to run it all year long, I'm

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 2>still going to go with the midshipman to at least

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 2>keep it closer than what it's seven and seven and

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 2>a half something in that range. Give me the give

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>me those Navy points. I'm happy to take them.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, double barrel lock. Let's go Navy and give me

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the bid shipman. All right, Okay, two other games at

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>high noon, not going to go through these. We've got

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Austin p at Cincinnati. Cincinnati's about a thirty five point favorite,

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we've got a Liberty on the road at

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Western Kentucky. That line is up to fourteen and one half.

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Though, yeah, I'm gonna take the toppers, you know how

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel about them.

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>At three point thirty on ABC. I think the headlining

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>game in this mid afternoon slot would probably be UCF

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.479
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia. Tech line is about seven and a half

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in favorite UCFTER on the road. At one point, I

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't looked lately, it looked to me like it was

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>probably going to come down to seven. I am taking

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>UCF here. Tech's off the really big win over Florida State, right,

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's a letdown effect here against UCF.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there has to be right.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I would think there would have to be right. UCF

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is fresh, the down, a bunch of guys, and you know,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>who knows what it's going to look like coming out

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of the shoot for them in game number one. But

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's too much offense for Tech. Even

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if UCF is rusty, they've got enough back on offense.

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They play good enough on offense. There's a number of

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>players though, I know, but I just I still think

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.959
<v Speaker 1>they're too good. It's something like thirty eight to twenty four.

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Give me UCF minus in number.

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna go with UCF here as well, and

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 2>it does. It doesn't go against my rule of oh

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a team of a good defense at home as an underdog.

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>We don't know if Georgia Tech has a good defense.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 2>We know Florida State has offensive issues and that Georgia

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Tech put themselves in a really good position defensively to

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 2>take advantage. UCF should win this game by a couple touchdowns.

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a bit of an overreaction to Georgia

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Tech's win against Florida State. So this would in a

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 2>normal like if this were Week five this year and

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech largely looks similar to how they looked against

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Florida State, but we had more data. It feels like

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>eleven or twelve point spread for UCF, even on the road. Agreed,

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna take the Knights here.

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of other games here that you know, I

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think are of much consequence, So I'll just rattle

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>through them here and feel free to interject if anything

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>jumps out at you. Dan Charlotte at North Carolina. North

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Carolina a twenty eight point favorite. This one's at three

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty on ESPN.

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Three nice ending to their year last season, not a

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 2>great start to their twenty twenty for Charlotte, so I

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 2>think this is going to be a nice jump from

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina week one to week two. So I feel

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 2>comfortable in the heels giving four touchdowns for sure.

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>On the Notre Dame side of the ACC, we've got

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a matchup against USF. This is a game that they

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>added to the slate a little bit later on after

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they knew they had an open date. They are a

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty six point home favorite here, mister Rubinstein. I you know,

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I always take points against Notre Dame. It's just sort

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of my shtick. But I would say that I am

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>looking to see if they can improve upon what they

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>did in the passing game. What we saw out of

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Kien Williams on the ground was really impressive. I think

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>this is another opportunity for Iaan Book to build some

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>rapport with his wide receivers, to throw down the field

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, make some more chances. Looking at

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame schedule, they've got this game this week against USF.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>They're on the road at Wake the following week before

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a bye, and that's when they start getting into the

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>nitty gritty of the schedule. That's when they get to

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a game against Florida State, maybe not quite as gritty

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>as we thought at the start of the year. But

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a game against Louisville as you get to October seventeenth.

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>After that, a road tilt against pitt which is not

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be an easy game for Notre Dame. It

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>never is. Then there's a road tilt against Georgia Tech

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>before coming back home first weekend of November to square

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>off against Clemson. So it gets tougher in a hurry.

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Here for the Irish, I would like to see some

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>progress on offense to start feeling a little bit more

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>confident about where this season is headed.

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 2>There is an emotional component to this game tie that

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:49.879
<v Speaker 2>you have conveniently skipped over.

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to talk about USF. Don't make me

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about the USF game.

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not talking about twenty ten. I promise you

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about that was Brian Kelly's first season,

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 2>right twenty ten. I was not a great moment for

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame football. No, an emotional component as it relates

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 2>to something just before then. USF's offensive coordinator is Charlie

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Weist Junior and there's a major revenge play here, tie

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 2>major other than the fact that USFS offense was pretty

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 2>terrible last year without him, and I don't think they're

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 2>going to improve to really good. USF started out twenty

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen losing by fifty in a shutout forty nine. I

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>guess to Wisconsin. They finished the year terribly. They exclusively

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 2>beat up on truly awful teams, and I guess BYU

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 2>last year, and with so many new faces on the sideline,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 2>on the coaching staff, and so much work to do

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.959
<v Speaker 2>on offense, I just don't see them hanging with Notre

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Dame anywhere near what Notre Dame should be capable of,

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 2>even with a decent USF defense. So yeah, I think

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame wins is by thirty five.

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Let me rattle off five other games that kick off

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>between one thirty and four o'clock in that mid afternoon slate.

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>App State minus four and a half at Marshall. We've

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>got Stephen F. Austin at UTSA, Florida Atlantic at Georgia Southern.

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got Troy three point road favorite against Middle Tennessee

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>State looked awful, just awful in their first game, and

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>finally the Citadel a forty four and a half point

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>dog on the road at Clemson at four o'clock on

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the ACC Network. Any thoughts on any of those games?

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think app State should be a touchdown favorite.

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to actually double up double lock this week,

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 2>keeping the Mountaineers here on the road.

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Of the week.

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Mars offense. I like that play, Yeah, thank you very much.

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 2>So Marshall had a postpone. Their their rhythm I think

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be a little off. They had a postpone

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 2>matchup against I think it was East Carolina. Last week

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 2>they laid waste to Eastern Kentucky and week whatever that

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 2>was zero one and a half. I don't know. But

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.399
<v Speaker 2>with the weird a rhythmic season that Marshall's having, and

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I still really do like app State in the experience

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that they have On offense, they generate a lot of big,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 2>exciting run plays. And I don't fully think I trust

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Marshall's defense. I mean, it's a pretty good defense for sure,

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 2>but I think you need better to hang with app

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 2>State and app State got a nice little scare last week.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Give me app State by ten or thirteen points here, not.

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Gonna lock it. Up, but I agree. Okay, let's get

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to the headliner. Dan seven point thirty ABC, Miami the

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>swagger is.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Back touchdown rings. Did you see those? The touchdown rings?

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I liked it.

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Miami on the road at Louisville. Louisville two, two

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorite is a night cap, Dan,

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I know you've got a thing. I've got a thing

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 1>for Louisville and her boy McHale Cunningham. Okay, now they're

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>going to score points. How do you feel about this game?

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I watched this game last year, and I watched

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Miami beat them by twenty five unexpectedly in the midst

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 2>of a very strange season. I think I like Miami here.

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I like Miami because their defense should travel

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 2>well enough. And I didn't love what I saw from

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the Louisville offensive line at times, and what Michaal Cunningham

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 2>looked under pressure, if I'm nitpicking, and the combination combination

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of Quincy Roche the Temple transfer and Jalen Phillips the

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 2>UCLA transfer, and what their corners look like. And granted

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 2>it was against UAB, I actually like Miami here. I

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 2>think what we saw out of the Louisville defense against

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Western Kentucky was an indication of some improvement, but it's

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>still mostly the same players who gave up a ton

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 2>on the ground all of last year, and that's where

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Miami is thriving right now. And Miami gave up big

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 2>plays through the air last year to a lot of teams.

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>But still a good defense. I think Miami's combination of

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 2>controlling the ball, they should be able to control the

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 2>ball somewhat on the ground and get after Michael Cunningham,

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 2>who we obviously both are crushing on mall. Yeah, I

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 2>think I'm giving the edge right now to that combination

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 2>over Louisville and a still large question mark in their defense.

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So yep, I'm taking the Canes.

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We are once again very like minded here, Dan, Yes

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or no, no, no, I don't want you don't want that.

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I know my hesitation is the same as yours. The

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>defense was really bad for Louisville a year ago, and

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you know, first year everything right, That's sort.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Of good against Western though they did a good job

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.760
<v Speaker 2>against PIGGYT on the ground and that that rushing attack

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 2>they did. They were very good against the run.

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Last week for sure, absolutely, and they're going to be

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.399
<v Speaker 1>better this year. There's enough backs out going to be better.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going to take a stride forward. But Miami's offense

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>showed something a week ago, especially on the ground. They

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>looked really solid. You know, say what you want about

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a win over UA B, but UAB should have a

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty good defense they did a year ago. So this

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>whole like renaissance now that we're seeing in Miami is

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>intriguing to me, especially if they can really develop that

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 1>rushing attack, and due to Louisville what we saw them

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do to UAB, I'm with you. I'm doing the unthinkable here.

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Miami outright. I think Miami is bringing the

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>swagger back and up to Louisville. Here. I'm gonna go Canes.

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's say thirty one to twenty seven.

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Weirdly enough, yeah, I'm good with that. Weirdly enough, if

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 2>you look at Miami's last season, which put as much

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 2>stock as you'd like in twenty nineteen results, but Miami

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more impressive I think on the road.

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 2>So it was Yeah, they won against pitt they beat

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Florida State. They're embarrassments. I guess they lost at Duke,

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 2>but they lost FIU at home. It was a bowl

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.839
<v Speaker 2>game against Louisiana Attack, but the Georgia Tack loss came

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 2>at home, and they did beat Virginia at home, but

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 2>they lost to Virginia Tack at home, giving up forty

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 2>two in the process. So I think there may be

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.919
<v Speaker 2>something about this many Diaz squad on the road. They

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.359
<v Speaker 2>just might be coming together a little bit more, might

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:05.760
<v Speaker 2>be able to block out. I don't know who knows,

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but give me, give me the canes here.

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that Manny Diaz's father was once the

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mayor of Miami?

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, tell me more, Please tell me more.

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>All right? Also in the nightcap eight pm ACC Network,

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got Wake, We've got NC State. We haven't seen

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>NC State yet. We will get our first look at

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 1>them here. I was not high on the wolf Pack

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at all after the preview. They're only a two and

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite here against a Wake team that

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:41.720
<v Speaker 1>got destroyed against Clemson. I'm gonna wait to reserve judgment.

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Just don't know enough about this NC State squad yet.

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But as I'm looking across the slate of other games

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be played after dark, outside of

0:45:56.160 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what SMU or maybe La Tech. There isn't a whole

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of meat on that nightcap. You really got slim

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>pickets for which game you want to watch?

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're correct. I like Wake here. I like Wake

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 2>because they've played a game. I know they're beat up

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 2>at quarterback. N C State hasn't, and so there is

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that the lack of rust grease factor. Is that what

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna call it for Wake Forest? I like Wake here.

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 2>N C State was the most overrated team against the

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.720
<v Speaker 2>spread last season among Power five schools, like we mentioned

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 2>on our ACC preview two and ten against the spread

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 2>last season. It's a new team, there are new coaches,

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:32.959
<v Speaker 2>for sure. The game is in Raleigh. But I'm gonna

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 2>go with Wake here. I think Wake is a little

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:38.359
<v Speaker 2>more solid, a little bit more proven, and everybody's going

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 2>to look like what Wake did against Clemson this year

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:46.240
<v Speaker 2>in the ACC. If you are not, I don't know, Louisville, Miami,

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 2>whoever they end up playing, I'm gonna I'm gonna happily

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 2>take way care against n C State. Give me, give

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>me the.

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Decks, some other action. In the latter half of your Saturday.

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>We've got to you a fourteen point Favorite at North Texas.

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>That one's at six pm. We've got games Texas State

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at Louisiana Monroe, Louisiana Tech at Southern Miss. We've got

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Abilene Christian at You Tip Dan, and then there was

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a game Central Arkansas against Arkansas State

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:25.439
<v Speaker 1>that's been subsequently postponed because they weren't sure they could

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 1>feel the team due to you guessed it, ongoing coronavirus

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>type scenarios. So, like I said, not a lot there

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>any of those games jump out at you.

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to see SMU separate from North Texas after

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Texas State might have some fight in them

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 2>this year. But I'd like to see the Stangs. Do

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 2>they call themselves the Stangs? I don't know. I'd like

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 2>to see some separation there. Southern Miss curious to see

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 2>what they look like with the new coach after firing

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Jay Hopson and Louisiana tack having. I think they were

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.839
<v Speaker 2>the reason why the Baylor game got canceled, So maybe

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Southern Miss has some new life with a new coach. Otherwise, no,

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 2>but I do tie have some Colonial League action coming

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 2>up in.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You won't do it a full week in advance. Well,

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's our preview. Oh, our preview.

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You were talking about the frauds at Catasauqua.

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you a bunch of frauds? We have?

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So it's Northwestern Lehigh at Bangor. Banger was just Banger,

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Banger because it's Bangor, Maine. But it's just Banger, Okay.

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Bangor is where Julie the Kat's from. Banger is in

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the Colonial League.

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Salisbury and Notre Dame. You know, anybody went to either

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 2>one of those.

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a Notre Dame Green Pond. Just to make sure

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that everyone is clear. And I do know folks who

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>have been to both schools.

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Palisades at Northern Lehigh is there's a Northern and

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Northwestern Lehigh here.

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 1>There's also a Southern Lehigh. Bunch of Lehighs in this

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>area's Lehigh Valley. After all, Do.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 2>You have a do you have a team in the

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Colonial League? Do you want to drop the drum and

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 2>fife for Are you looking for the sound as we speak?

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 2>You know? But I'm going to go Northwestern Lehigh. Northwestern

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 2>lived not far away from Northwestern University, and I went

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>to college in the northwest of the United States. So

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the Northwestern Lehigh whatever panthers, I don't know what they are.

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 2>That's my squad. I'm rolling deep with them.

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go Southern Lehigh. Why not? Okay, I

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>played against a kid who had a hell of a

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>curve ball from Lee Heighten and he just made fools

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the entire Northampton varsity baseball team back in the day.

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's certainly not them. But let's go south.

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 2>What is what is your plan? You mentioned you're going

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to a party. What is your plan food wise? What

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:37.800
<v Speaker 2>is your plan? Watch wise? Have you set up the

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 2>outside situation for Saturday game watching? What is Saturday going

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to look like football wise for you? Knowing that I

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 2>guess you're only watching Louisville Miami.

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean it's a good question because I am

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not hosting the party, so I don't have much control

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>over the watch party, the watch setting, or the food

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or anything for that matter. So short of suiting up

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with your mask and trying to keep your distance and

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>launchairs and hopefully it's a nice day, I guess maybe

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bring the extra battery pack for the phone and stream

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>whatever I can. But I'll keep you posted. I don't

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>know I honestly don't know.

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, nothing new for me. I don't know what I'm

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be eating. I know where I'll be watching it

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 2>in my living room. And I'm damn excited. Ty, I

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 2>am damn excited. And I'm also excited to do the

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 2>UFO Show on Friday.

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I am as well.

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the newsletter of intent, send us questions via Twitter,

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 2>via Instagram, via Reddit via soliverbo at gmail dot com,

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and the UFO shows go into a new place this week. Ty,

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited.

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I am as well.

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, fun show, don't for Western Lehigh as one.

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And oh shout out to the Tigers and head coach

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Josh Snyder. They took down palisades in Kindersville, PA thirty

0:50:55.000 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 2>six to twenty eight September eleventh. Oh man, Ty's the

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 2>mark here. It was a great sug I am hitched

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to the right wagon here, so we can do that now,

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I promise.

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm all new.

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Triple EPA neutripoli, nutripolic.

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you guys pronounce.

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Anything out there?

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Triply? That's in Libya?

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Dan, Come on, you see t R I p O

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 2>l I. That's how you pronounce it.

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Ty, So as Dan said, don't forget to subscribe to

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the newsletter to subscribe to the podcast. If you like

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what we do, a five star review is appreciated, though yep,

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not required. Every little bit helps here. We are building

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>into this weird college football season. Perhaps by the time

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we speak next there will be more teams slated to

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>play college football games this fall. If news breaks, please

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do check into our social media feeds. We'll do our

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>best to keep you as up to date as we

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>can in this on demand vehicle that we call podcasts.

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll do our best, we promise, but it doesn't always

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>work out. In the meantime, Poor my good friend Dan

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Rubinstein all the way over there in Chicago, Illinois. For myself,

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Ty Hildenbrandt here in East turn Pennsylvania, thank you so

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>much for downloading, for listening. We'll catch you all on Friday.

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, Stay solid.

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Peace you think your squad's taken down. Justin Holmes and

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Nick Henry, the Pride of Northwestern Lehigh and the Tigers

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 2>cat Town