WEBVTT - The End of iTunes

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and I heart radio and I love

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>all things tech. And first and foremost, my apologies if

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>my voice starts to give out throughout this episode. Between

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>when I recorded the first part of the iTunes Story,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>which came out before this episode, and this part the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>second part of the iTunes story, I got a terrible

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>summer cold, and so I am on the mend. I was,

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I was just fighting it off when I recorded the

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>first half, and now I'm getting it, you know, getting

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>out the other side on the second half. So my

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>apologies for the particularly grossness of my voice today. But

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the show she must keep going, I think, as the saying.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And in our last episode, I covered the developments and

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>launch of iTunes in two thousand one, when the program

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>first launched, up to the point when Apple would introduce

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes Music store in two thousand three, and I

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>also focused quite a bit on Apple's history leading up

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to that and why it would be such a big

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>deal for iTunes to premiere. The company had managed to

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>convince the music industry to take a chance on selling

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>songs a la carte for cents a pop, and the

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>record labels had little to lose and agreed with some

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>conditions which I talked about. But in two thousand four,

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple expanded the iTunes Music Store internationally. It had started

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>off as only being available in the United States, but

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>next on the list of countries to join iTunes Music

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Store where France, the UK, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Greece, Austria, Finland, Spain, Portugal, Luxembourg,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Netherlands the Great White North. But by which

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of course I mean our buddy Canada had to wait

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a few months later. They got iTunes music store support

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>starting December third, two thousand four, so just at the

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>very tail end of the year. Now over the following

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>year's Apple would continue to expand operations into new markets,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which greatly contributed to the increase in revenue through the

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>iTunes Music Store. Then we have iTunes version five, which

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>debuted on September seven, two thousand five, And it was

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this version of iTunes that would set the stage for

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>my career because it was iTunes five that adds support

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for a young form of media called podcasts. Now, technically

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>podcasts were available on iTunes before version five came out.

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>They had been added to the music store about three

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>months earlier with an update called iTunes four point five.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>But it was really upon the release of iTunes five

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that people started to really hear about it and just

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to let you guys, peek behind the curtain a little bit,

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>where your show appeared on iTunes if you were a podcaster,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge deal back in those days. Arguably

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it still is, but I mean back then it was

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>make or break. There weren't as many podcatching services back then,

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>or at least not many high profile ones, so getting

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your show featured on the podcast page of the iTunes

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>store could mean going from obscure to famous in very

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>short order. To get featured, someone at Apple had to

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>take notice of you, and it really helped if you

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>happen to be really good, which is why my colleagues

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh and Chuck, hosts of Stuff you Should Know, got

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>featured on iTunes pretty early on, just a few months

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>after they had launched Stuff you Should Know, and that

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>propelled them to the spotlight where they flourished. My show

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>has appeared in the top ten technology podcasts frequently over

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the years, sometimes even reaching number one on occasion. I

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>remember taking a screenshot the first time that happened because

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I was chuffed two bits, so to speak. The algorithms

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to determine placement in the top in We're never really

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>entirely apparent, but it became clear that showing up on

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>those pages really helped bring an audience to the show.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Another feature introduced between versions four and five, but really

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>emphasized in five, was Party Shuffle, which does not describe

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the type of dancing I do when I'm at a

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>social gathering, although that would also be accurate. No. A

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>party Shuffle would create a shuffled playlist, so instead of

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>keeping the next song a mystery where you would have

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a song playing and you have no idea what's coming

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>up next, the feature would actually take a list of

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>songs and shuffle the order so that the user could

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>actually still see the full list of songs, and that

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>gave users the option of customizing a shuffled playlist and

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>moving songs or even removing them completely from the queue.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So you might have a nice list of songs and

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>you think I don't even know what order to play

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>these in so you could use party Shuffle. It would

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>automatically randomize the order of that list, and then you

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>can look over and make sure that still, you know,

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like a good party mix. It's pretty handy if

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you're building a playlist for a party and if you

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want six slow jams playing back to back. Eventually,

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this feature would evolve into something else called iTunes DJ,

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's uh slightly more complicated story that I might

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>touch on a little later in this episode. Similarly, Apple

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>had also introduced a service called air Tunes, which allowed

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>users to stream audio from one WiFi connected device running iTunes.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So really we're talking about a Mac computer because this

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is really before the iPhone and iPod touch eras, and

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>then you could stream that to another WiFi connected device.

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Around that same time, Apple also introduced a piece of

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>hardware called the Airport Express. It's a wireless access point

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 1>that also had an audio output jack. So you could

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>stream music from your Mac computer to your Airport Express outlet,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and you could have speakers plugged into that outlet and

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you could play music in a different room. So that

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was the basic idea. You also had to have an

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ethernet cable plugged into that airport express. But it was

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a way that you could expand or extend the way

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you could play music through a space, So it was

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting idea. Now. Later Apple would evolve air Tunes

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>into a similar service called Airplay, which eventually could handle

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of media, not just audio streaming. I'll talk

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>about that a bit later too. By the time iTunes

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>five point oh came out, the Apple Music Store played

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>host to more than two million songs, ten times the

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>number that the store had opened with back in two

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand three oh and Steve Jobs had a new type

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of hardware to show off at that particular music event.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It was what he called the iTunes phone, also known

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>as the Rocker E one R O k R, was

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a phone made by Motorola that users could port songs

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>from iTunes onto. But the Rocker would turn into a

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>painful lesson for Jobs and for Apple. First of all,

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the phone was not very impressive to look at, and

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you can tell when Steve Jobs was showing it off

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at this event that he wasn't really feeling it. The

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>phone looked a bit cheap. If I'm going to be honest,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>It was a candy bar style phone format from the

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>old cell phone days, so it was a cell phone,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it was not really a smartphone. It could only hold

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred songs, and you had to transfer music

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from a computer to the phone via a cable, so

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you actually had to put the phone and plug it

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>into your computer and then manually poured over the songs

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred or a fewer songs you wanted onto

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the phone. And it was only available on singular wireless,

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>which meant that users would have to get locked into

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a contract with a specific provider if they wanted to

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>use this technology. Also, during the demonstration itself, the phone

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>simply refused to operate as it was supposed to, and

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Jobs got visibly irritated on stage. This presentation is still

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>available for you to watch on YouTube if you want to.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the Music event from two thousand and five. He

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>tried to show how the phone could pick up right

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>after you left off listening and was failing miserably and

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>made some comment akin too, well, if you can know

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>what buttons to push, you can make it work. The

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>iPod Nano, which Jobs also unveiled at that same event,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fared much better. It was in line with Apple's aesthetic

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>plus it you know, worked, Jobs suspected that phones were

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big threat to the iPod business

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>before long. He was absolutely right. Phones already had cameras

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in them and some rudimentary web browsers, though these were

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>mostly text based, and that was why he had agreed

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to work with another company to create the so called

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>iTunes phone in the first place. It's the only reason

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>he agreed to it. But he saw that when things

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were outside his control, he couldn't expect them to measure

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>up to his standards. So you could argue that the

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>lackluster demonstration of the Rocker in two thousand five is

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what pushed Jobs to create a department within Apple to

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>develop the iPhone in the first place, although surely the

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>development process was already far enough along at that point. Now.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>According to numerous sources and Apple itself, version five point

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>oh had some bugs in it that caused issues for

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>many users. The company issued a patch, but the full

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>version of iTunes six wouldn't be far behind. It would

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>release on October twelve, two thousand five, so essentially a

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>little more than a month after version five came out.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Version five in September, version six in October. So version

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>five added some features and made a few changes to

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the user interface, but version six had a bit more

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>to offer, and that's when video would come to iTunes.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Starting with version six, users would be able to purchase

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>music videos or episodes of certain television shows for the

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>princely sum of a dollar ninety nine. And it was

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a good idea, boosted by the fact that MTV, which

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>had built itself on top of showing music videos, had

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>started to drift away from videos in favor of other programming.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>They had shown a decreasing amount of music video content

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>year over year for several years running by this point,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So now users would be able to watch music videos

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on demand, purchasing them for a pretty low price and

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping them forever. One thing did put a bit of

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a monkey wrench into the works, and that was YouTube.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>So in the early days of YouTube, this is back

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>when YouTube was first launching, users were uploading all sorts

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff to the service. You know, it was meant

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a place where people would put user generated

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>content of whether it was home videos or sketches or

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. But in the early days of YouTube,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it was mostly done by people who had no rights

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>to the videos they were uploading. They were uploading stuff

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that didn't belong to them. It got YouTube and some

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty hot water from various studios out there, music studios,

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>movie studios, TV studios, but that might have hurt music

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>video sales on iTunes because you could find a lot

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff on YouTube, though it wasn't guaranteed to stay

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>up for long. The TV shows, however, we're doing pretty well.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>The videos also included short films by Pixar, which had

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>made several feature length computer animated films for Disney at

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that point but had not yet officially joined with the

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Mouse House yet, and Steve Jobs, by the way, was

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a major shareholder in the company. Jobs had invested in

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Pixar essentially right after it spun off from Lucasfilm years earlier,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so it was a great case of synergy there now.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>According to lifewire, though to be clear, I didn't see

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>their source for where they got the statistic, Apple sold

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>one million videos within the first twenty days of iTunes

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>supporting video sales, which is not a bad start. But

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this is also a good time to note that people

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>were starting to already notice some serious feature creep in iTunes,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>something that would become a real issue as the software

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>would grow over the years. Eat your creep is when

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>product developers keep adding features to something beyond its original

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>intended purpose. In some cases, it might all work out,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>like with the famous Swiss Army knife. You know you've

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>got a toothpick in there. Who thought that a knife

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>would need a toothpick? But it works for Swiss Army knife.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>But in other cases you'll end up with a product

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a total nightmare. It might quote unquote do a

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred things, and maybe it doesn't do any of them

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>very well. That's the bad kind of feature creep. It's

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>part of what sidelined Copeland, which if you listen to

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>my last episode you'll recognize as the code name for

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a version of the Mac operating system that never came

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to be. With videos being added to iTunes, some people

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>begin to ask if, perhaps at the very least, Apple

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>should reconsider the name iTunes. After all, on iTunes you

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>could get music, but you could also get videos, e

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>books and podcasts. It seemed like either Apple should change

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the name of the software to better reflect everything that

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was available in it or break the program up into

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>more manageable applications, something will chat about at the end

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of this episode, because that's ultimately what they have done.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The relatively simple interface of the earlier versions of iTunes

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was beginning to get a little less simple. For some reason,

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the company decided against either rebranding or restructuring iTunes, and

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not for the last time either. Not entirely certain what

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the logic was behind maintaining the iTunes name, because there

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>were other instances where Apple didn't seem particularly reluctant to

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>rebrand the service after they had changed it significantly, So

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what was special about this one. Still

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>beyond a few critics who felt that iTunes was starting

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a bit too bloated and messy, things were

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going really well, and it laid the groundwork for the next,

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>really big revision to the platform. The seventh generation of

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes program would come out in September two thousand six,

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>following in the footsteps of iTunes five, which would come

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out the previous September. From here on out, Apple would

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>establish the fall as the time for announcements about things

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like the iPhone, the iPod, and iTunes, although the iPhone

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would have to wait for a couple more years it

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>had not yet been unveiled. Now you could download movies

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>using iTunes. Earlier it had all been music videos and

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>TV show episodes, but with iTunes seven you could do

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>movies as well. But that also added to the feature creep.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Criticisms people had for the program, but it became a

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>popular option. Now. I've got a lot more to say

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about iTunes, but before I get into it, let's take

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. One thing that iTunes seven would add

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to the experience was a user interface upgrade in the

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>form of cover Flow. And this wasn't actually an Apple invention.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Much like iTunes itself, it was something that they had

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>seen from a different developer and and acquired it. It

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was the work of an artist named Andrew Coulter in Right,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>who came up with the idea of representing files in

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a visual way in which you could flip back and

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>forth through them like a slide show. And Apple would

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>acquire cover Flow and then implemented it in iTunes seven

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>point oh, so that users could browse through their music

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>collection by album cover, sort of as if they were

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>standing at a shelf thumbing through all their record albums.

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So you can kind of get the visual appeal, although

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it, very few um iTunes users typically

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about using it because it could be

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a hassle. UM. I don't know.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>That's anecdotal, Like I don't know if Apple ever gathered

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>any information about it, I do know that it wouldn't

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hold on to cover flow forever. And later on Apple

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would be involved in a patent infringement lawsuit against Mirror

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>World Technologies and later the parent company for the Mirror

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>World Technologies, which was Network One, and it was all

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>about cover Flow. At the heart of the matter was

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a patent that described a system that organized documents in

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a stream chronologically similar to the way that cover flow worked,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but the patent dated all the way back to so

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it definitely predated the iTunes version of cover flow. While

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the court case went back and forth in favor of

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>either one party or the other as it was making

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>its way through the court system, getting appealed and pushed

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to higher and higher courts, the two parties would eventually

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>agree to a settlement that gave Apple a full license

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to use the technology, and eventually Apple would phase out

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to cover flow, because again, while it was really flashy,

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it was not necessarily the most practical user interface. Other

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>features that joined the iTunes family with seven point oh

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>included gapless playback. This is pretty much what the name suggests.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It's playback of multiple tracks with no gaps between the songs. Now,

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that isn't that big a deal between songs that have

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>clear endings and beginnings, but on some albums, one track

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to flow directly into the beginning of the

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>next track, and again at between the two breaks up

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the listening experience. If you want an example of this,

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you should check out the songs this beat goes on

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and switching to Glide by the Kings, which is one

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite transitions between songs. But obviously there are

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>tons of examples out there in music, particularly on concept albums,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where a song will flow directly into the next one,

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So gapless helped out a lot that way. iTunes seven

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would remain the standard version for two years, with iTunes

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>eight premiering in two thousand eight. So this was unusual

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>because typically Apple was updating iTunes at least annually, if

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not more than once a year. Because iTunes five and

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>six both appeared just within a month of each other,

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but between two thousand six and two thousand and eight,

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>when iTunes seven was the standard, Apple would have another

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>big product announcement, which was, of course, the iPhone and

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Macworld two thousand seven, Steve Jobs got up on stage

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to introduce the iPhone, what he called a revolutionary product

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that changes everything, and that's exactly what the iPhone turned

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>out to be. The sleek design, intuitive interface, and Apple's

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>software blew away the admittedly biased crowd of Mac fans

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in the audience. It would be six months before the

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>phone came to market, but Apple clearly already had a

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on its hands before even getting into the stores,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and iTunes would play a big part with the iPhone,

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and the iPhone would play a large part of why

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>iTunes is now going away in twenty At the event,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Jobs explained that iPhone users would sink their phones with

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>their computers through iTunes, just like they would with an iPod.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>He made the case that people were already used to

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea as the company was getting ready to sell

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's one million iPod in two thousand seven. So from

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the start, iTunes and the iPhone were linked, both metaphorically

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and frequently physically. The original iPhone couldn't sync up with

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>a user's account of the air. Users would have to

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>place their phone in a docking station attached to their

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>computer and the phone would sync up using iTunes, so

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you can make easy changes on your computer and then

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sink it to your phone, rather than having to go

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>through your phone settings and change things that way. This

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>added yet more features two iTunes technically inversion seven point three,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the first version of iTunes to have iPhone support.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Version seven point four would add support for another new

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple product, the iPod Touch, which, for those who might

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>not be familiar, was sort of an iPhone without the

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>phone part. The seventh generation of iTunes would go so

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>far as to support the second generation of the iPhones

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>operating system, which we now call iOS, with iTunes version

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>seven point seven, so version seven lasted long enough to

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>go through two different versions of the operating system for

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone. In two thousand and eight, Apple finally released

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a full new version of iTunes with iTunes eight, and

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in this update, the company included a feature called i

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Tunes Genius, which would generate a playlist based off a

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>song the user selected. Genius would actually consult massive amounts

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of data in order to do this, And here's what

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was going on from a very high level. All right,

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you've got your music library there and you

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>want to put together a playlist for a chill party

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of hipsters, but you don't really have the time to

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>dive through your massive music library to curate the perfect playlist. Instead,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you select one song to be the seed for this playlist,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and let's say it's waiting for Superman by the Flaming

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Lips from your perspective. iTunes then pulls together a playlist

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of songs for you based on that selection, and it

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>only takes an instant it's there almost immediately. But what's

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>actually going on is a bit more complicated. Apple would

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>take your data, including the information about all your songs

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>in your library, the genre those songs would belong to,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and how frequently you listen to each of those songs,

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and then would compare your data against the information of

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>other iTunes genius users, and it would look for profiles

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that had a similar library to yours and the sort

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of things that they would tend to like. The Apple

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really revealed how it was weighing different variables, how

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it would assign weight to those variables, like how prevalent

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at particular genre is in any given library. How much

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>does that matter? If my music library is eighty percent

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>country music, then how much importance does the Genius algorithm

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>give to the country genre? Uh? Or how does listening

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>frequency affected? If I've listened to one particular song, let's

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>say Ring of Fire by Johnny Cash, and I've listened

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to it five times as many times as the next

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>closest song, then how much does that determine whether or

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not it shows up on a playlist? Those things were secrets,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but it did use comparisons to draw conclusions about which

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>songs would best match up to create a playlist of

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>your choice. And it could also suggest songs in the

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>iTunes music store that seemed to fit your preferences, but

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that weren't already in your library. So maybe it looks

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at your playlist and it says, oh, well, based on this,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely have this other song, but you don't

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>actually own this one yet. Here's a link if you

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>would like to buy it, and you can listen to

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a preview and decide whether or not you want to

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>add it to your library. In a way it's a

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>little similar to what services like Pandora Radio we're already

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>doing since two thousand five. Pandora Radio's method was to

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>take songs and then break them down by describing them

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in as many different ways as possible. You take a

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of music and you say, all right, what are

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the different qualities of this music? So you might have

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 1>ways of describing it saying there's a female vocalist, it

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>has a complicated rhyme scheme, it's guitar driven, it's got

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a fast tempo, and so on. Then the radio algorithm

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>would search for other songs in this database there were

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>somewhat similar to the seed song you had selected, and

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>then it would feed those extra songs to the user,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>And that gave opportunity for users to discover new music

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that fit their tastes. Maybe they'd hear a song that

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>they've never heard before, but they'll love it because it

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>happens to fall into the same sort of stuff that

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>they already listened to. So Apple wasn't necessarily innovating in

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this space, but rather incorporating a working strategy into the

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>existing iTunes framework, which is something the company is particularly

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>strong at at identifying things that work well and then

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>improving upon them. In addition to the Genius feature, iTunes

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>eight also made available TV shows in HD format in

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes store, and the store continued to contribute a

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>significant percentage of Apple's overall revenue, and it wasn't just

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>affecting Apple. The company announced in April two eight that

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>customers had purchased more than four billion songs from the

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>ituned music store since its launch, making Apple the largest

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>music retailer, beating out Walmart at least according to Apple's

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>own press release. Other reports would state that Apple held

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a strong second place behind Walmart. So your mileage may

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>vary on that particular point. It would eventually replace Walmart

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other. Question is just as when

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>did that really happen and the pace was picking up.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>It was four billion songs when the company made this

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>announcement in April of that year, but then in June,

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just a few months later, the company reported that the

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>number of songs sold now topped more than five billion,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which is incredible that it's it's an amazing achievement to

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>have gone from four to five billion in just a

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. The closest competitor online with Apple in

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the music department at that time was Amazon, which had

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>only been selling digital music downloads for about nine months.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>When Apple hit that five billion songs sold milestone, Amazon

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>sales were about a tenth of Apples, But it is

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>fair to point out that Apple had been in the

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>business for five years at that point and Amazon had

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just gotten started. Business was going really well. In fact,

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it was enough to get discussions going in various state

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>governments in the US about the prospect of taxing iTunes

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>digital downloads. The concept faced a lot of opposition, particularly

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in California, not by not by coincidence that happens to

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>be where Apple has its headquarters. But gradually many states

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>would pass legislation allowing them to collect taxes on digital purchases.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Not all of them would cover iTunes store purchases. It's

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a state by state sort of thing, but New Jersey

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the first to do so. Actually, the Garden

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>State technically had done it in two thousand and seven,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>before any of this other stuff was happening. Version nine

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of iTunes would come out in September two thousand nine.

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Once again, Apple introduced new features with their increasingly gargantuan

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>digital jukebox program. One of those was the iTunes LP feature.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like the bonus features on a DVD.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>For some albums, you could get lots of bonus stuff

0:25:55.160 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like music videos, live concert footage, liner notes, artists, interviews,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and more. So it was kind of like getting a

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of collectors editions stuff with your album purchase.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>For certain albums, not all of them had this. Similarly,

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced iTunes Extras, which had bonus features for some

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>films available on iTunes, so you could get deleted scenes

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and interviews and stuff like that when you downloaded your

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>digital copy of let's say Batman Begins. That was one

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of the first movies to feature these extra things, and

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you would just you buy it from the iTunes store

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and along with the film, you would get access to

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this extra material. Another new feature was home sharing, which

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>would allow iTunes users to share their libraries on up

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>to five computers within a household. Each person in the

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>household with an iTunes library could do the same with

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the others, so the shared library could grow much more quickly,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure it was a popular feature for folks

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>who are living with housemates. Apple discontinued home sharing. Starting

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>with iTunes version twelve point two, Apple also added in

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>app management and sinking features and iTunes nine to let

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>users arrange their app layouts, which then could transfer over

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to their iPhone upon sinking with the computer. One thing

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that Apple would take out of the music on the

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>iTunes Store starting with iTunes nine was DRM, or Digital

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Rights Management. Apple had already negotiated with music label E

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>m I to remove DRM from that labels music on

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the store a couple of years earlier, but everyone else

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>still had DRM attached. In two thousand nine, the company

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was able to remove it from all the music in

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>its store, and Steve Jobs had been an outspoken critic

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of DRM, but it took some time for Apple to

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>actually ditch it. Amazon had already been selling digital music

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>DRM free for some time. That to be fair, Amazon's

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>foul format was MP three, while Apple was using A

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>A C files that were at least marketed as being

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>higher in quality. So you were balancing things out. Did

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you want higher quality music but with DRM, or did

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you want the lower quality arguably recordings but without DRM.

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Now as a concession of music labels, Apple also agreed

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to introducing variable pricing on music tracks, because before all

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>songs cost nine cents. It didn't matter if the song

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>was three minutes long or twelve minutes long, it was

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>all ninety nine cents. But this agreement would allow labels

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to select a price of either sixty nine cents, ninety

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>nine cents or a dollar twenty nine per song. And

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to upgrade your library with DRM free music,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you had to pay for it. In fact, it was

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty cents a song or sixty cents for an album,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine that would get pretty expensive if you

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>had a really big music library. Later, this would be

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>replaced by a service called itune Match, which i'll talk

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>about a little later in this podcast. First, I'm gonna

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>go and drink a nice big cup of tea, and

0:28:54.560 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back after this break. All right, we're

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the home stretch. So iTunes had been criticized for

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a long time for the fact that it was getting

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>too big and unwieldy to be useful, particularly for Windows users.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Now I've used iTunes on both Windows and Mac machines,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and anecdotally, which I realized is not really evidence, I

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that in my experience. Using it on

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a Mac, while not perfect, was way easier than using

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it on Windows, and anyone who has had iTunes installed

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>knows how it can place a really big demand on

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>computer resources. But things were about to get even more

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>messy with iTunes ten, the last version to release during

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Steve jobs lifetime he would pass away in the flagship

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>app from Apple got a bit of a makeover until

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>version ten. The logo for iTunes was a c D

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with a pair of eighth notes on it. After all,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>back when the first version of iTunes came out, that's

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the narrative Apple relied upon. The idea was that users

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would rip music from their store bought c d s

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and create a digital jukebox on their Mac computers. But

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the CD was a bit of an outdated symbol by

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this point, and the updated logo was a simple pair

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of musical eighth notes on a circular blue background. There

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was no more c D in the background. But the

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>feature that got a lot of attention, and most of

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 1>it was not really positive, was the addition of a

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>new social networking element in the iTunes program called Ping.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The purpose of Ping was to make it easier for

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>users to share with one another. You could share information

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about your favorite artists, your favorite albums, You could share

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts about live shows you had attended. You could

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>also view concert listings in your area, and you could

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>indicate which shows you hoped to go see. The idea

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was to extend iTunes out to be a more social

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>experience of my users. That people like to talk about

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>their music collections and find out what their friends are

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to and find out what they're artists that they

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>love what they're listening to, And in fact, you could

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>do that with ping. At least in theory, you could

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>follow artists, and the artists were encouraged to post to

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the social platform and share information about their experiences and

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>what sort of music they enjoyed. So in theory it

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>was all a pretty decent idea. Apple would encourage discover ability,

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it would bring more value to the experience of using iTunes,

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately it would help sell more tracks to users

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because you would encounter new music, or you'd find out

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that your favorite artist happens to be a big fan

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of this obscure artist and you think, well, that's got

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting, and you go out and you buy

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>out all of their stuff. There was one big problem.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobody was using Ping, at least, not enough people to

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>justify continuing the service. So why did Ping fail? One

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>big reason might have to do with another social platform,

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody's favorite monopoly, Facebook. The rumor was that Apple had

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>originally included Facebook interoperability in Paying. Users would be able

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to share their paying activity directly to their Facebook pages,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and that made sense because everybody was already over at Facebook.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That's where all your friends already were, so this would

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>help attract people who weren't using paying, but who were

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, and then they would see this service and

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the notifications and think, oh, I should check that out.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But before Paying could even launch, something changed, and the

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>story I've heard most frequently is that Facebook pulled support

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>from the app, that this was a decision on Facebook's point,

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not on Apples, and that it was possibly in an

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>effort to avoid helping give a boost up to a

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>potential competitor, so you could argue it was an anti

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:54.239
<v Speaker 1>competitive move. Ping failed to gain any real traction and

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't survive to make it to iTunes eleven, which launched

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve. So was it a terror experience? Well,

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't say from a personal perspective, as I actually

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>never used it. I never really heard anyone bash it,

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I never heard anyone say

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>anything positive about it either. It just sort of was

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and then it really wasn't. In addition to paying, iTunes

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ten would introduce Airplay. That's the updated version of the

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier feature called air tunes that I mentioned. With air Tunes,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>users could stream music from their iTunes PC to another

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 1>WiFi connected device on their network. Airplay would work very

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>much the same way, except it would eventually include video media.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple also had more products that were compatible with Airplay

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point, so they were able to sell those

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. The third thing that iTunes tend introduced, though

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it would only be fully implemented in iTunes eleven, was

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>iTunes Match. I also mentioned this earlier. So this service

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was to address the fact that we were shifting away

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>from having a centralized personal comput uter as the hub

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for all our entertainment. You know, back when iTunes launched

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one, that was how things worked. You

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>would have your Mac computer, you probably have just the

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 1>one Mac computer, and you would have it act as

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the home for all your digital media and in those

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.720
<v Speaker 1>early days that was pretty much just music or maybe

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>audio books as well. If you wanted to burn a

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>CD or load songs onto an MP three player, you

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>would do it by using that machine. You would burn CDs,

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and that machines CD burner. You would connect your MP

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>V player to that machine. Everything was centralized to that

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one gadget. But by two thousand eleven things were different.

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Now with cloud services and cloud storage, we could have

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>all our stuff living on computers that are out on

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the internet somewhere. Sure, it wasn't sitting on our computer

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>at home unless we chose to download everything. But the

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>flip side was that if we were using any device

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to access our cloud account, we'd get access to all

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of that content. So if I got a brand new phone,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have to sink it with my home computer

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and slowly poured over my entire music collection or go

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>through and figure out which songs I wanted and which

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>ones I didn't. I could just access my library of

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>music in the cloud anyway. iTunes Match is a sort

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>of a solution to a practical problem. See if you

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>had purchased your music straight from the iTunes music store,

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple knew about it and those songs would automatically be

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in your cloud library because Apple had a record of

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you buying them. But what if you had ripped songs

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>from a CD and then you had them in your

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>library that way, or what if you had downloaded from

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>some other source like band camp or something, And what

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 1>if and I know this is scandalous, but what if

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:49.919
<v Speaker 1>you had pirated music? Well, iTunes Match would scan all

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the music in your iTunes library and it would look

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for matches in the Apple database. When it found matches,

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>it would be the matched version that would join your

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>cloud library. Not only that, the version of the matched

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>songs in the cloud would be encoded to a high

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>quality two six killabits per second a a C file,

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and they would be DRM free. So let's say you

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>had bought a song in the early days of the

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>iTunes music store. It would have been encoded at a

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 1>killabits per second, so lower bit rate, and it would

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have also had DRM on it. Your cloud version would

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>be higher quality and DRM free, so you could end

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up with songs that actually sounded better than the ones

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that were on your physical hard drive when you enabled

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>iTunes match. For those songs that were in your library,

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but we're not in the Apple database. In other words,

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple did not have the rights to that music. They

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>scan their database to say, well, you know, we don't

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>offer this track. You got it some other way. It

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>would then upload those songs, and only those songs from

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>your computer to your cloud library. That would help guarantee

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that users would have access to their full library of music,

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but also cut down on data transfer requirements to make

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it happen. You don't have to upload everything, just the

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>songs that Apple doesn't already have. The services subscription based,

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and it launched at about twenty five dollars per year.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>If your subscription were two lapse, you would lose access

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to those songs, though they would still be on whatever

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>hard drive they were stored on, and Apple would allow

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>users to download their cloud library to a Mac or PC,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>so you could create a backup first before allowing your

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>subscription to LIMP to end, and you would end up

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>with the higher quality versions of your songs, at least

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for the ones that Apple actually had copies of. Steve

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Jobs gave that presentation about iTunes Match, but not long

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>after that he would pass away, and his passing was

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>felt by the entire industry. Not just at Apple, and

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>many people were wondering how the company would carry on

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>without the iconic leader at the home. One thing that

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>shook up the company in two thousand eleven, besides the

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>death of their founder, was a report from the Telegraph

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that a security vulnerability in iTunes had given a British

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>bunny the opportunity to create software that exploited that vulnerability.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The company called Gamma International created what appeared to be

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a software update to iTunes, like a security update, but

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact it was essentially malware that would hack the

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>person's iTunes account. The Telegraph reported that Apple had been

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 1>aware of this vulnerability since two thousand and eight, but

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>had failed to patch it until two thousand eleven, so

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't great news. In two thousand twelve, Apple introduced

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>iTunes eleven. Boy did this stir up a hornet's nest.

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 1>They paired that announcement with announcements about the iPhone five

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and the iOS version six that came out that same year.

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>But this version of iTunes featured a brand new interface,

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>overhauling the way iTunes had looked for ages. It also

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>got rid of a navigation bar that had been part

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of iTunes for years, which frustrated a lot of users.

0:38:55.520 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>People really didn't like the way this change may it

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for them to navigate through their collections and

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to go from things like music to TV two podcasts.

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>The program now allowed for a sink listening or viewing experience,

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>which meant that you could listen to an album or

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>watch a show on one iTunes connected device, You could

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pause it, you could go to a different device connected

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to that same iTunes account, and you could pick up

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>right where you left off. So if you were listening

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>on your phone when you were walking home and you

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>walk through the door, you switch it over so that

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>your computer is using airplay to play it through your

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>WiFi connected speakers. It picks up right where you left

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 1>off when you're listening on your phone. Uh. This version

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of iTunes was also the official end to ping. Ping

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>was done, and it only lasted a little less than

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>two years. Really, UM and Apple kind of abandoned it,

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and it also had iCloud integration built into it. In

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen, the company would release the last

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>major update to iTunes iTunes twelve, and this one got

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty harsh criticism as well. When it came out once again.

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple made big changes to the user interface. Uh, they

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>did not go back to the old user interface. They

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>changed it more. They removed the sidebar again. If you

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>had put it in with iTunes eleven, it was gone again,

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>making it pretty difficult to add back in. You could

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do it manually, but it usually it would require you

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to do a quick search on the internet to figure

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>out the steps you needed to follow. The playback bar

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>has changed as well. In general, a lot of users

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>looked at the changes and said that the control and

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>menu system was actually less intuitive and useful as a result.

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone hated the changes, but the people who did

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>hate them really hated them, and they wrote long, detailed

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>posts on the Internet about why the changes were possibly

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing ever. And I exaggerate a little bit

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with that, but I did come across one article that

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>legit stated categorically that iTunes twelve was the worst soft

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Apple ever released and that it should be recalled. And

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I came across more than a couple that gave instructions

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on how users could roll back their version of iTunes

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to an earlier version. So that's never good to read

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're releasing software. Oh and this is also when

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple gifted every iTunes user with a copy of the

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube album Song of Innocence, whether they wanted a copy

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of it or not. Lots of people complained that the

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>album was taking a valuable storage space on their devices,

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly on iPhones, and also that it wasn't actually easy

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of the album. That eventually prompted Bono

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>from You two to actually apologize publicly for the whole

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>goof them up, and Apple would eventually let users delete

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the album more easily. An update to iTunes twelve integrated

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>support with Apple Music, that is, Apple's music streaming subscription service.

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So here we get to the point where Apple is

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the thing that Steve Jobs said no one wanted

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to do more than a decade earlier, though obviously things

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that changed significantly within those intervening years. So for ten

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, you could sign up and listen to

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>music streaming on demand from Apple's entire database, and you

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>could also listen to music that had been curated for

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you based upon your tastes as defined by your own

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>personal music library in the cloud. And that is how

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it works today. So from two thousand fourteen to two

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen. iTunes twelve would continue to grow and add

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>more support for features like Apple Music, but the behemoth

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was really out of control. It was impossible to deny

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that the software had grown too large, and that trying

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to keep the same aesthetic across multiple windows owned and

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>operated by different teams with an Apple seemed like a

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>fool's Errand in addition, the consumer trend of moving towards

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>streaming services instead of purchasing copies of media meant the

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes store was starting to flag a bit. The

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>sales were starting to drop off, so the writing was

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on the wall. Digital downloads are starting to follow the

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>same trend as CDs and DVDs, so it made more

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>sense for Apple to discontinue iTunes and focus on breaking

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>up those services into three dedicated apps, which is what

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we're getting now. The successors to iTunes are the apps

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Music, Apple TV, and Apple Podcasts, very similar to

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what is already on iOS devices. The company has assured

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>customers that their music libraries will remain intact during this transition.

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>All music purchased or transferred to iTunes will be in

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Music app, including playlists, so none of that

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is going away. Movies and TV shows will similarly be

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>available on the Apple TV app. The podcast you subscribe

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to will be on surprise surprise, the Apple Podcast app,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and Audio books will actually move over to the Apple

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Books apps, so everything is getting split up. To interface

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>between a computer and iOS device like the iPhone or

0:43:56.600 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>iPad will now require you to use the Mac Finder

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that, so you wouldn't use iTunes anymore. Mac

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Finder is now the the overlaying application you use to

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>synchronize between a device and a computer. The next version

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of Mac os Catalina will have no support for iTunes,

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:19.919
<v Speaker 1>so this is Apple getting users prepared for a big

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>change now. Personally, I think this is the right move,

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>though it's got the potential to be really confusing for

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>existing iTunes customers who use Mac computers. There are a

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions being asked, and to Apple's credit, the

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>company is answering them over time, but I think it's

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to defend a piece of software the group so

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>far beyond its original purpose. As for iTunes on Windows,

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there are no specific plans from the company as of

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast to discontinue it I don't

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>know if they'll continue to support it, but there are

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>no plans on it going away. Also, the store element

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 1>will still be there in the individual apps. You'll still

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to shop for stuff and download stuff if

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to. Although a lot more people are now

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just streaming things and not bothering to buy them at all.

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that's how I am. I haven't. I can't

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 1>remember the last album I bought. It might have been

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the soundtrack to Hades Town. I did buy that one

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>because it was so incredible, but beyond that, I mean

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that was like a one off, special thing. I usually

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>end up streaming stuff because that's just convenient, and I'm

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>almost always somewhere where there's an Internet connection. The only

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>times when I regret going that route or when I'm

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on an airplane and I can't connect to WiFi and

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then I regret not having downloaded more stuff to my devices.

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's a rare case. Otherwise, I'm just streaming

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>everything just like everybody else. So Apple was making a

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 1>move that makes a lot of sense. You can't really

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fault the company for doing it. It is weird to

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>see a an app that has been around for half

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>my life now going away, but at the same time,

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not feeling particularly sad about it. iTunes and I

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have always had a love hate relationship. I loved being

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>able to synchronize between a device and a computer and

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>get all that stuff on an m P three player.

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I hated just about everything else with iTunes. I loved

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>getting my show featured on iTunes. That was always wonderful.

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It was very flattering, and it definitely helped bring listeners

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to the show. For that, I'm always thankful. But when

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I used it was using iTunes, I never felt like

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it was the easiest to navigate around, particularly from version

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to version where things would change so dramatically where you

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>have to relearn where everything is in order to get

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff done. Um, it's interesting that the same company that

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>can make such an intuitive user interface with the iOS

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:57.359
<v Speaker 1>devices also made a desktop application that got progressively more

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to use, at least for me. Then again, I'm

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>also old, so new things confuse me more and more

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>every year. All right, Well, that wraps up this set

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of episodes about iTunes. I plan on doing an update

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>about how stuff works in the next episode because I

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>got a listener request for it. And uh, it's been

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years since I talked about how Stuff Works,

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and you guys might be curious to know what's been

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.319
<v Speaker 1>going on and how things have changed. You know, I

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>say that I'm an executive producer with How Stuff Works

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in my Heart Radio, But what does that actually mean. Well,

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain all that. I'll explain what the company is

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>doing now in the next episode. Hopefully you'll you'll find

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that interesting because you know, these are people who are

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.280
<v Speaker 1>near and dear to my heart. Some of them are

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>co workers and some of them are former co workers.

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 1>But I'll explain more in that next episode. If you

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for future episodes, you can send me an

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>email the addresses tech stuff at how stuff Works dot com.

0:47:56.600 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You can drop on by our website that's tech stuff

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. You'll find an archive of all of

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>our past shows. There. You also find links to the

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>social media presence for the show, as well as a

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>link to our online store, where every purchasing make goes

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to help our show and we greatly appreciate it, and

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you again really soon. Ye hext

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is a production of I Heart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from I Heeart Radio, visit the I

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 1>heart radio, app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.