WEBVTT - Sports Illustrated Executive Editor, Senior Writer Jon Wertheim Talks Tennis

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Pretty live tennis, all right, everybody. I got to say,

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>when we think about the US Open, there are players

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, There are players legends that are not

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>here this year. There are also players that are up

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and coming, maybe not household names, but will be someone

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>who knows them all has written about them, continues to

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as John Wertheim. He's executive editor senior writer at Sports

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Illustrated correspondent for the Tennis Channel, so this is a

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>big time working event for him. He is covering the

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>US Open for the Tennis Channel. He's also contributing correspondent

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for sixty Minutes. He's a busy dude, and he found

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>some time once again to join us here on site

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at the US Open.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>How are you good? Pleasure to be here. Nice to

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>see you guys. How are you doing good? Good week

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 2>at tennis?

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's great, got a little cooler. We're kind of

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>loving that coverage. What are you loving about it this year?

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting for you?

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh man? You know kind of s's this weird point

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>where Roger Fetter is retired Titan player, everyone loved him.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Not here, Serida Williams, Titan not here, rough on the doll,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not here. And I think everybody worried, oh man,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>after these legends retire, what does tennis look like? Is

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 2>anyone going to care about the sport? And we've kind

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>of made an uncharacteristically great, you know, graceful pivot for tennis.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 2>And the grounds are more filful than ever. The attendance

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>is through the roof. It's going to set a record,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of strange because we have this deficit

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>of stars compared to what we used to have. So

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>that's that's a story I'm looking at.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 3>So do we have the deficit of stars or are

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>is Cocoa Goff going to be there? Is Shelton going

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 3>to be there? Is Alcaraz there?

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean Alcarez could have been there the last yeah,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>last he's not in the tournament. Yeah, I mean, I

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 2>think they're bright prospects. I think they're fans that they're

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>players that fans are starting to build relationships with. But

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're not talking about guys, you know, twenty majors. Yeah,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Coco Goths wonderful, but just one. And I kind of

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>feel like fans kind of like the unpredictability of it all,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and they don't mind that any of twenty players could win,

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and they don't mind that Carlos Alcarez wins two tournaments

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and then loses in the second round here.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 3>So when its sense is that better for the sport?

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because I think the conventional wisdom is you

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 2>sort of need excellence to the top. But the NFL,

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 2>which is the most successful sports league certainly in the US,

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>how's this any given Sunday theory and parody is great

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and we want all fans to think their team could

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 2>get to the super Bowl. It's kind of worked out

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 2>for them. And I think tennis is sort of pleasantly

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 2>surprised how well things are going in the absence of stars.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think it is that way? You know,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking with various folks from the USTA and

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>they talk about the Zendaya movie Challengers and how much

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>money it made, and you're rolling your eyes.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see it. Actually, I need to.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Das Sindaya's rate is quite high, so I don't know,

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 2>you know how much it I made, But no, I

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>think you're I think tennis is having a bit of

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 2>a moment, and I think instead of tethering itself to

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 2>these stars, to Reena, Williams, Rogers, thattter Rofando. I mean

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of it's about the culture, it's about the fashion,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 2>it's about the international aspects. I mean I think some

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of it too is just you and I could be

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 2>playing and it would still be fun to come to

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the US Open and watch a tennis match. Yeah, I mean,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>this is such a big event. It's almost sort of, actually, John.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And if I was playing, No, it wouldn't be if.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>They would have Honny deuces and they would have music,

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 2>and it's I mean, it's almost sort of that they're

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 2>not player dependent here the way they used to be. No,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot to recommend about tennis. I

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>mean I have pet theories about I think. I think

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>pickleball maybe a bit of a help that all millions

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 2>of millions of people are now sort of understanding what

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>it means to hit a slice, or they have a

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>more appreciation for tennis because they've been bopping around a

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>whiffle ball in their in their yards.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Our producer Sebastian and I were watching a match on

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the side courts here yesterday and we were sitting next

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to somebody and he was talking about his pickleball, playing pickleball.

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a thing. But I think that translates to tennis. Yeah, No,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>it's it's just straight. I mean tennis is sort of

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>having this moment and whether it's exactly Zendaan movies or

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>it's the I mean, I just and I don't think

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>anyone saw this coming. I think there was a lot

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of handwringing about what would the sport look like. It's

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of a happy surprise.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's been. It's been really awesome to watch and

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>least be able to cover it over the last few years,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>and even in those that little bit of times see

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the growth. Any big stories so far this year at

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the US Open that are.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Sticking out to you, well, I mean I think sometimes

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>they're big stories in Week one and that's you know,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>you've got either controversy or you have big upsets, and

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 2>then it kind of leads to a little bit of

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>a fizzle in week two. I mean, this year we've

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>had some upsets. I mean, Carlos Alcarez losing is obviously

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 2>a big story, and I think a lot of people

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 2>are sort of perplexed. This is supposed to be the

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>new star. He won the Front Open, he won, wibledon

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 2>and everyone thought, oh, could he pull the summer triple.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not even Roger Feeder or not even know

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>about Djokovich ever did that. And then he comes out

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>here and he loses in the second round to a

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 2>guy outside fifty. That's been a strange story. I think,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, we've had sort of the usual, the celebrities

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 2>and Aaron Judge was here and Karen Washington. I mean,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>there hasn't been sort of that huge controversy, which I

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 2>suspect the US Tennis of mine. We had the longest

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 2>match in US Open history a few days ago, which

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 2>was which was good fun. But I think, you know,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 2>sometimes week one and excitement and upsets sort of doesn't

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 2>pay off in week two. So I think we're in

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a nice place right now on on first Friday as

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 2>we make this turn.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>How many opens have you covered?

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm not trying, You're doing so well, and that

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>you kind of us really depressing a lot. I mean,

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>like since the nineties. Remember the nineties, I remember it was, but.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>That was a really important era for American men's tennis.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I sort of caught the very very

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>tail end of Sampress Agasy and that I sort of

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>came up, you know, I came up with like I

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 2>think mack and Roe.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And Connors before, and they all looked at me like

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I was eve I know, nineties, Yeah exactly, Oh sorry,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>go ahead.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>No, it's just funny because the game sort of takes

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>on different identities and and it was it was Tampras

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Agassy and then you had the Williams sisters and you

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of had this international. I mean, I was here

0:05:58.240 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>when Andy Ronick won and you said, oh, this is

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>fresh American champion. And then here comes Roger feder Rofnadal

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and Novak Djokovic that basically ate everyone else judge for

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty years, and now we're at this sort of I mean,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>obviously Djokovic is still here, he's a defending champion. He's

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>somehow he's thirty seven years old. I would say, do

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>you guys remember just sidebar, remember when Jimmy Connors had

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that crazy run in nineteen ninety one. He's thirty nine

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.119
<v Speaker 2>years old, and it was sort of, well, it's everybody drinking,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>they're jaratol, and there were a lot of jokes and

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have to go to bed early and someone's

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to chop up his steak into bite sized pieces.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Djokovic is only like eighteen months younger, and we haven't

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>mentioned his age once. He's just a contender to win

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the title. Like, look how far we've come. So look

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 2>how far we've but you knew it exactly.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, just coming off the Olympics. I was

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a gymnast as a young kid, and I mean to

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>look at Simone Biles, right, and normally you have a

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>good season, maybe you're really young, but look at like,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's is there something happening in sports

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>where yeah, people can go the distance and why not?

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I have two theories you want him real quick. One

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of them is just it's that emolution. It's sports science,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 2>so they get appropriate for a Bloomberg audience. Tom Brady,

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 2>it's commerce, it's money, it's I mean, these players have

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, Billy jan King used to come

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>in the back of a station wagon. Now you've got players,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>they've got their own messuses, they've got their own teams.

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not standing in line waiting for the Hurts rental

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>car counter.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 3>To Oh, they're getting private jets.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I think exactly, and I think that has the extension

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a career.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Partly because they have deals with private jet companies.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Well that too. It doesn't doesn't hurt when you have

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>that endorsement.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But if they didn't play well, I mean they're playing

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>well though.

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, science, they can avail themselves to all the cold

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>plunges and the trainers and the physios and I mean

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>all is Tom Brady similar? And I think Lebron James

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>is still going strong and yeah, twenty years into this career,

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's because they can afford career extensis.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>This one's done a cold plunge by the way.

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very popular, They're very popular. I I mean, who

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>knows its scientists, But this might be a good time

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 3>to talk doping might be all right, what's the deal?

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't in the sport. I mean, I.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>You want my honest Yeah. I believe that incentives explained

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>an awful lot of human behavior. And I get why

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>some athletes will dope. I get why some athletes who

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>might be trying to, you know, have this career resurgence

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>laid in their career with dope. I can see how

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>young athletes. I just I don't think I mean obviously

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about Jon Ecenter and number one everyone given

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the tournament, and we have this sort of strange story

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>where he had failed too doping tests from about five

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>months ago, but was essentially exonerated and found no negligence,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>no fault because the trainer essentially was careless and used

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to us the substance that was legal in Italy but

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>it is not is on the bad list. And I

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>just I get the skepticism. I understand sort of whether

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of players who are very suspicious

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>about this. I just I'm I always look at incentives.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Why would a guy with a one hundred and fifty

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 2>million dollars Nike deal starting his career in March when

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>they're no major tournaments for months and months. The amount

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>was so minuscule it wouldn't enhance its performance. It just

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make sense that he would intentionally dope. That may

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>sound naive. I think they're probably means naive to say

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 2>there's no doping in tennis, But I also think it's

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>such a sport that depends on hand eye coordination and

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 2>focus and mental toughness. It's not as though putting on

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>five pounds of muscle is really where the action is.

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the doping probably might help with recovery and

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 2>with some of the cardio. Again, I don't think it's

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent clean. I don't think any sport is.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But in this case, I just the facts of the

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 2>case that the process is disturbing. It's very strange the

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 2>usually you hear about this right away. Usually there's a

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 2>strict liability standard where hey, we don't care what happened.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>It's in your system. You're the CEO of your system, right,

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You're guilty. That wasn't the case. I mean, I think

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of process questions.

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Does that give you pause? The lack of process questions?

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think the way this handled, people

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>are gonna have to go back and really pick this

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>apart and figure out why it was that this guy

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 2>played for five and a half months, which which is

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 2>very rare in tennis. You mentioned why wasn't there the

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>publicity that usually accompanies some of these announcements. There are

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of players saying, boy, I wish you know.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I tested positive too, and I also was eventually exonerated,

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 2>but I had to take the reputational hit, yeah, or

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't play or I couldn't play. So I think

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>the way this was handled raises a lot of questions.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 2>But I just, I mean, I guess everyone's speculating. I

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>just don't think you don't.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Your point about incentives is really interesting because I didn't

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 3>think you were going to go exactly thought the other way.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>And I come from a world of cycling where you

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 3>know doping is and has been rampant for years, and

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 3>you know a tenth of a second or that much

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>more power is what ends up mattering in the end

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 3>of a race. And the idea when you said incentives,

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought, oh, incentives to win. But no, you're saying

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that there's too much to lose for these players.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. I mean you think about how much of

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 2>these players income and networks had nothing to do with

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 2>prize money. It's image, it's reputation, it's what they represent,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that's how they care themselves. You are jeopardizing all of

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>that to win a couple of tennis matches in Indian Wells,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>California in March. I don't, I mean, I get. I

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be naive here. Everyone's one thing that's

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>interesting about this to me is that some very credible,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 2>very knowledgeable, very reasonable former players agree with me and

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of say it doesn't make sense. The amount was

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>so minuscule. Very credible, very reasonable, very educated former players say,

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 2>something's really fishy here. The amount might just be that

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 2>he was cycling off of it. Don't be seduced by

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of the fractional the sort of infinitesimally small amount.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Don't be naive. And the guy got caught twice, what

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>more do you need? So so, even within tennis, even

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>in the sort of inner sanctum there, they're very divergent opinions.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 2>I just think, like, you get to a point with

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>your reputation and your net worth and how much sponsorship

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 2>you have. I mean, these players can make four or

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 2>five million dollars for being a worldwide brand ambassador. That's

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>more than the US Open champion will make. Right, why

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>would you jeopardize that? In March over this infant I

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 2>again is a vanishingly small amount of banned substance.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, but we see in our world very wealthy people,

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>financiers who have tons of money and yet do something

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that breaks the law just to get a little bit

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>more money, right, And you think, really, like, why did

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you do that. But but I hear what you said.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it's a fair point. I mean, the risk

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 2>reward calculus is not always uh you know, so.

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, like could have been the like do you

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>blame the coach?

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean that's sort of where this falls. Is

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>essentially that the trainer and again the substances. It's legal

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 2>in Italy, but on the box it says doping, so

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure where And I mean someone else is Listen,

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>your job as a trainer, what are your big jobs

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 2>that you.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Put it down, move it, actually get it away from me?

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what?

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, aspred works pretty well too. There are alternatives,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>but Bassett tracing will cover that that cut as well.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>It was a really strange set of circumstances and it's

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>almost a look, if you're a trainer, your number one

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 2>job basically is to get anything even potentially illegal or

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>on the band list away from the athlete. And here's

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>a guy putting it on his hand and then giving

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the athlete an ungloved massage. The flip side is, don't

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 2>people do dumb things? I don't. I mean, I don't know.

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>It's it's definitely it's been I mean inside these doors

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 2>where we are now. It's still a weekend of this tournament,

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>very much being discussed.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 3>You talk about that a little bit because what we're

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 3>at the Bud Collins Media Center and you go inside here,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>this is where all the journalists are, right, what's the

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>what's the vibe been like covering this with the other journalists?

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Is the story in particular?

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Well is that? I mean this story is still dominating.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the players his initial press release and

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I you know, whatever we all have, we're all familiar

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>with press releases. I look forward to putting this issue

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>behind me. And you want to say, oh, that's oh

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 2>do you Yeah, that's not really.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>How It's one way to keep the issue front and center.

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly right.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>We know this is what you would like.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I just want to move on.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>But that's you.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>But the other players have been really supportive of him.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like some of them, some of them. Yeah,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd say it's been very guarded. Actually, yeah, I mean

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I think given the range, I mean sometimes sort of

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>my guilty pleasure is UFC is fixed martial arts. There

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>anytime someone there's a doping violation, everybody piles on and

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of says, listen this, I knew this guy was cheating.

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>This is much more guarded. But these are sort of

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>these very sort of meticulously worded sense. Nobody is falling

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 2>on the grenade, and no one's a couple of former players.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Nick Curios is here, and he's made a number of

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>sort of incendiary statements. It's been very I've sort of

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>been surprised at how little support he's gone. There does

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 2>seem to be real questions about the process. And everyone's

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>got a friend, everyone's got a colleague who had a

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 2>similar circumstance and didn't have the luxury of six or

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>seven figures worth of legal representation, and sort of this

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>this cakewalk just sort of get this thing buried five

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and a half months later.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>The money that continues to come into sports, good, bad

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and different, Like how do you feel about it? How

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think about it? Gambling?

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that. I mean, I think that, but

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's it. I think it depends on the sort.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Look any any industry, we like money coming in and

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>we like we like more investment and not less. I mean,

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I think sports are a pretty robust sector. I think

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>it depends what I mean, we can there's a sportswa

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>washing component to this. Do we like money when it

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 2>comes from the golf region, Well, that comes with some

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>strings attached. Do we like money when it comes through

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 2>sports gambling? And that's been a huge infusion of cash

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>for teams and leagues and media, not so much for athletes.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>We can talk about that. That's been a big topic

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 2>among the players and the players lounge is a sports

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>gambling we can we can talk about that. I think

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>media money, you know, great if if ESPN wants to

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>re up here. I mean, very few properties are actually

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>going to come up for renewal anytime soon. But look,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 2>if the NBA can make billion dollars a season from

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>its media rights deal, like that's great, especially when they're

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty split with the players. So right, Yeah,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it depends. I think in the rule of thumb,

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, commerce good h But I think it depends

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 2>on the source.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the conversations that players are that's being

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>talked in terms of gambling, because they don't necessarily get

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a piece of it, do they?

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>No? I mean, in this sport, it's really problematic and

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>team sports. Look, it says fifty to fifty revenue split. Right,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So if the NFL does a billion dollars with DraftKings,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>that's half of that and theory goes to the players.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Tennis does not have revenue sharing like that. They also

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>forbid the athletes from using the product, which is standard

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>for most sports. And what happens to tennis is that

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the play a big gambling sport. I mean, tennis is

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>like the third most gambled on sport. There are millions

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>of matches they're eli inventory all over the world. I mean,

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>it's crazy using there are two guys playing in a

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>parking lot and there are three fans. Wi We're not

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about the US Open here. I mean there are

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 2>all these low level events and they're you know, three

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>fans watching, but they're tens of thousands of dollars being

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 2>wagered on this match. It is ripe for corruption. But

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the what's really problematic to the players is that they

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of abuse from losing. Gambo. You cow,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I just lost one hundred dollars because you can't hold

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>your serve. And the players are saying, wait a second,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 2>we don't get the revenue, we can't even use the product.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a little problematic. I mean, you guys are getting

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 2>all this endorsement money in the problem, you know, the

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 2>product itself we are forbidden from using. You guys can

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 2>sell the signage and you can get the data rights deal,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>which basically just means selling data to bookies. And not

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>only do we not get any revenue, we open up

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>our phone and we have a stream of messages that

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>are just the most vile thing you've ever heard from,

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, from aggrieved gamblers.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, this seems very problematic.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 2>It's really problematic.

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>You've tweeted on this.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's it's really I mean, tennis needs

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot more player representation. It's probably I mean, I

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>think it's problematic across the board for any of a

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred reasons, but at least football players and basketball players

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 2>are seeing some of that money. These players get all

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 2>the downside, you know, they open their phone and they

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 2>get death threats because they missed a forehand. And the

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 2>tournaments are the ones that can put the signage on

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the back wall saying you know, DraftKings and fanduels.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's such a solitary sport too, so it's not

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>like a team is getting the hatred it's this individual

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and everything is riding on this this one individual. So

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>what's the solution there.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's it's naive to say. I mean,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in a perfect world, maybe tennis says listen, not for us.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to give you our data. I mean,

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>there are ways to turn off the spigott. I don't

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>think that's realistic. A bit more revenue to the players

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 2>would at least give them some skin in the game.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>At least they're essentially getting paid for the abuse they're taken.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 2>I also think you have to monitor this. I mean,

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 2>when I can't wrap my brain around with you, guys

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>can help me with this. I can't order an uber

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and say my name is you know, Moscow Mule eleven seventeen.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't. I mean, the anonymity I think would end

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this. Why is it that I can

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>send a player a death threat and bear no consequence

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 2>when they lose a tennis match, but I can't. I

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>can't go on Amazon and use a pseudonym. I mean,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>there might be.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Somebody who launches rockets. You might want to talk to

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 3>you about this. Oh yeah, you exactly. Yeah, that's what

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>No, it's like there's a whole world right now and

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out the responsibility or they.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Verified accounts that are just pay ten bucks a month

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 3>or whatever eight a month. Sweets get surfaced. It doesn't

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>matter who you are.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's probably just gonna make it all worse in

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of you.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Know, an AI, what AI and sports gambling inner Second,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>my issue with sports gamling right now, we are at

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the uh remember when you know, did you have Joe

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Cammell kids magazines? You had vending machines in high school

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 2>selling cigarettes. This is a smoking set, really the smoking

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 2>section plan as if the smoke knew when to stop it? Did?

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I bet we're I think we're at that phase with

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 2>sports gambling. We're gonna look back and we're gonna say,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 2>what you were allowed to do this? The player's got banned?

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>The cat out of the bag now, I mean there's

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 2>no Yeah, I think there's regulation, and I think there's some.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think whatever the cliche, you know, two

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 2>toothpas isn't going back into two. But I think we're

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna look back at this period and say, was there

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 2>no regulation whatsoever?

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would you expect at some point there's going

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to be some big blow up of something.

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Whether that's a great point because I think I think

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the way the leagues and again this is one of

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>the great about faces and sports. I mean ten years ago,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 2>the leagues would say that this is the most sinister thing.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 2>They all, you know, every everybody went into Capitol Hill

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to say, why passed BA the you know, the legislation

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>should be overturned and why And then they ever in

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the league essentially did it about face and said, yeah,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>you know what, you know, this is a lot of

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>revenue we're passing up and we need sunlight. We need

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 2>legal legal gambling is better than illegal gambling. And the

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>one thing the league said was that the threat of

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 2>corruption is going to be lessened when it's public, right,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have all this data, we have all this access.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>It's like marijuana. It's sort of gonna decriminalize. And I

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think in a very short amount of time this started out.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 2>There were a couple of college scandals, and there was

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a baseball coach you tip someone off, and then now

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, we have the sho Heo Tani,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the MVP of reigning MVP. Well he wasn't. Yeah,

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it looks pretty clear he wasn't corrupt,

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 2>but someone very close to him was siphoning money out

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of his account to pay his detce. We have them.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Someone on the Toronto Raptors is now banned from basketball

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>globally because I think the water level is getting very high,

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like we're we are one Black Sox

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>type scandal away from this thing really imploding. I think

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 2>right now there are a lot of people who are

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 2>bringing their hands and it's it's great. We love this

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>infusion of revenue. And some stadiums have sports books, you know,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm you know, Sports Illustrated, Tennis Channel, CBS, ESPN.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean ESPN in Vegas does it?

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean every sports media exactly.

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Mickey is not into this.

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>You don't think no.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, like on ESPN, you couldn't mention points.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Spreads a few years ago. That my favorite, my favorite

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 2>story of all these is that the Vegas Chamber of

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Commerce wanted to buy a Super Bowl ad about twenty

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and the NFL said no because it's too

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 2>adjacent to gambling. And it was just Las Vegas and

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl. Yeah, it was in the Chamber of

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Commerce exactly. And now the Super Bowl is in Las Vegas.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>The announcers are telling you what the points spread is,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and pretty soon we're just gonna go to NFL dot

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>com and bet on football games on the NFL's website.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the the about face on this is, uh,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 2>it's everybody in the.

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Pool, like it's totally I feel like we've been remiss

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>because I you earlier this year, you did something on

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>CBS Sunday Morning and it was about defending Sports Illustrated

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>its relevance. And you know, our producer Paul Brennan, faithful

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>reader for forty five years, starting when he was a kid,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>loved the magazine version, you know, and we were confused.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>If there is a print version there still is, right,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what does the world lose by not having print versions?

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I've said that they're surprisingly and against

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 2>all odds, there seems to be a very happy resolution here.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I did that piece for I don't know when that was,

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe February. I did that piece for CBS Sunday Morning,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and it was really a problematic time for Sports Illustrating.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>We sort of had this white night, this company Minute

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Media stepped up and you know, we're knocking on plywood,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and so far, so good. It's sort of a miraculous

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>happy media story. I mean to me, it's not so

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>much that the print versus digital. I mean, you know, candidly,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 2>print is a lot. You know, it's a smaller part

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of our life than it was just a few years ago.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 2>To me, it's just sort of that the independence of

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>it all and the fact that you don't have to

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's it's fear and favor, and it's writing

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 2>about things without a partnership with the league, and there's

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 2>no conflict of interest. I mean to me, that's what's

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>lost with this changing media landscape. And my attitude is like,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if it's TV or digital or the

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>phone or print or whatever it is, as long as

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>it's getting to consumer. To me, it's just the independence,

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's that's that's sort of what my

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 2>great fear was at the time, that this is just

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>another media entity that's going to be swallowed up. And

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 2>now everything's sort of mediated through a league, a team,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>an athlete themselves, which is great, but you also need

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 2>some sort of objectivity and agreed happily Sports Illustrated UH,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of sort of a comeback story in twenty twenty four.

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy to tell you good, very cool.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to hear that. I also, I love that

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you love Trader Joe's.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 2>But you hear that I love Trader Jet. I know, Oh,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I love Trader Jet. Love to say that he's not

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a conflict of interest. I'm an unpaid folks.

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It's out there. It's good stuff. Thank you, thank you

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so much.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, pleasure, this is a pleasure.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We always feel like it's just such a smart.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Dive and he's in the flesh. This year isn't a flash.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>He's here, speed zoom.

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The Tennis jo is going to be calling like, hey.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, get back to Santa Monica now, pleasure.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>No, no, don't, don't don't. John Worthiam, of course, as

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we said, he is covering the US Open for the

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Tennis Channel. He's executive editor senior writer at Sports Illustrated UH,

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course correspondent for sixty Minutes