WEBVTT - Selects: How Auto-Tune Works

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>M Hey, everybody, it's your old pal Josh. And for

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this week's S Y s K Selects, I've chosen How

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Auto Tune Works came out in August of two thousand fifteen,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of my under the radar favorites because

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it looks at something that's worked its way into every

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>crevice of popular culture, but that none of us really

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>has any idea about how it works or where it

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>came from. And this episode is a special listener Male

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>roundtable with us and Holly and Tracy from Stuff You

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Missed in History Class all about sexism. It's super interesting

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and really kind of out of left field after the

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Auto Tune episode, so it's a nice combination and I

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoy it. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a production of My Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, There's Charles

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>W Chuck Bryant, There's Jerry And this is Stuff you

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Should Know. That was great? Thanks man. Do I sound

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>like Share? Do you sound like T pay T, Josh

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>T Josh or Snoop Dogg? Does he do auto tune?

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>He factors into this big time later on Oh Well,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know about that, so I've got something

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>of my sleeve. This is kind of fun. I don't

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>know how much we're gonna do that because people are

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>probably like, stop it right now. Oh, chuck, I think

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we should do it a lot. Are you done? Yeah,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm done? All right? Um, we could have just auto

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>tuned this whole thing. Yeah, you know, maybe we should.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should maybe from this moment fore, we should

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>just auto tune the rest of the episode starting now.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's sabotage our careers. Uh, you got an intro for

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this fancy intro. I think we just did it, buddy.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay up, let's get in the way back machine then,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>my friend, Okay, we don't have to go back that

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>far because I know where we're going. It's gonna be

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a short trip. Let's go back to Oh summer Boom.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm you and I are in the club. We're hanging out.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We're drinking rum and coke. You can find us in

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the club and uh, we're we're dancing. We're getting down

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and grooving too. Uh. To share his latest jam, Believe

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Believe It's a hot jam, A hot, hot, hot jam

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that's released in the summer it's summertime. As you can tell,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's hot in the club, cheat, and I've got on

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>my my my short pants, I'm dressed like I'm out

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for a night at the rocks. Beary, that's right, I'm

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>wearing a cross shirt, so I've noticed. Actually, how did

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you not? Well? Yeah, the third nipple really stands out.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're in the club, we're jamming and share his

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>song is on, and uh, something happens at about thirty

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>five seconds into the song, and you and I are

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just like, whoa daddy? Did you just hear that? It

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>changes everything? It changed the whole tone of the club,

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Like the club was like okay, and now it's banging

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>because of a little something called auto tune. Uh what

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>sounded like a little electronic glitch. Was very purposeful, and

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it was the first time the auto tune had been

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>used in this way. So what, Josh is auto tune?

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That was quite a setup. Uh, can we do the

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of the episode in the club? Yeah? Why not? Okay,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>just keep those rum and coats coming, Okay, that's cool. Um,

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So Chuck, let me let me stop you for a second. Right,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because the way you described it, you made it sound

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>like everybody was like, oh, Shure just used auto tune. No, no,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody said, what was that? That was awesome, although some

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>people were like, what was that? Don't ever do that again,

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But most people were like, wow, Share just released her

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest hit of her entire career, and it was a

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty long career. She just came back like that just

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>established her comeback was this track, and it actually became

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest best selling singles of all time. Yeah,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think, I mean, it would have been a

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>probably a big song anyway, but I think most definitely

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Auto Tune kicked it into the stratagy gave it just

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the extra something. It became part of the talking but

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone was talking about it. So everybody went to her

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>producer and said, dude, how did you do that? We

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>want to know how to do that? And he was like, vocoder. Yeah.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>He lied. He lied, He lied big time. He lied

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in person to other producers, he lied in interviews, he lied, lied,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lied about how he made that track because he wanted

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep it to himself because it was so huge,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and it became so huge Chuck that at first Auto

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Tune was called the Sheriffect. Even the company that produced

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>auto Tune, and Terry's which we'll talk about in a minute,

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>called it in their instructional book, the share Effect. They

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>probably still do, don't. They don't mention it any longer,

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>yea um. But the so it was, it was a

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>huge deal, and this guy lied and kept it under

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wraps and for many years it was very mysterious. Yeah,

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>let's actually if you live under a rock, well, let's

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and play that clip of the very first

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty five seconds into that song where shaf says I

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>can't break through. There's no yeah right there, boom right there.

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Music changed from that point forward. Okay, so what what

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy, what her producer was saying was vocoder. Vocoder

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is something that's been around for a very long time.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever listened to any Pete Frampton, Peter Frampton, anythings,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like we do that whole long guitar

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>solo or whatever, he's breathing into a tube connected to

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>his guitar, which is electrifying his voice. Vote coder had

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>been around for a very long time, but there's different

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>ways of doing it that That was definitely the tube

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>effect through the guitar, but you can also just use

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it to you know, make your voice robotic like Beck

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to turntables in a microphone or Mr Roboto with sticks,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but all different ways to use it. This thing, this

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>sounded different to share effect. It was a little different, sure,

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder how this guy talked his way out

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of like Yeah, I mean like if if if a

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>producer was like, okay, well show me how you did

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it on vote coder, if he was like over here

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and then just like ran out of the room. I don't.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he talked out of it. I think

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he was just another line music producer and he was

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just like okay, well busted. Okay. So um, Apparently along

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the way people figure gured out here there what this

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>guy did believe, and they started using it themselves, but

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>very very sparsely. Alright, So, Josh, what is auto tune? Alright,

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll answer your question because I'm gonna keep asking it.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So auto tune is a plug in originally

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>released in for the audio editing software pro Tools. Yeah,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a software piece that allows you and the original

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>um intent and how it's still mostly used is to

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pitch correct um singer's voice. Right, So when you when

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you or I go into the studio to record those

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>albums that will never release, but we just record for fun. Um.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>We hit flat notes here there, Oh, not me a

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>perfect pitch. I hit flat notes here there perfect um,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and everybody does. It's a normal thing, sure for most

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of eternity. UM music producers would say, blue Eyes chairman,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I need another take. That was a great take, but

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you had a couple of flight. Now give me another

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>take just like that one. And Frank would finish his scotch,

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>put out a cigarette and say, you get one more,

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>shine head. What was the Joe? Oh you didn't even

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>see spinal tap, did you? Yeah, you finally saw it, finally, Okay,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't remember any Frank Sinatra. Yeah there was

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>when Bruno Kirby is the Limo Drivers. He's talks about

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Davis's book, Yes I can, and he says what

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they should have called it is, yes I can. As

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>long as Frank says, it's okay because Frank called the shots.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>For all those guys, I do remember that. Um. So

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank would sing one more take, and this could be

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like take twelve or fifteen or twenty, depending on like

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>how how much how much the person was feeling at

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the singer was feeling it at the time, and would

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>be happy to hang around the studio whatever was keeping

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the singer there at the studio. As long as that

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was around the singer, the singer was happy to give

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it one more try, one more try, right, like drugs maybe,

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>um or if they had like a really good candy bowl,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>who knows, I gotta stay for the skittles. Um. So

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the editor then or the music producer would then take

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>all of these different tracks and would go through and

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine how awful this would be. Take the

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>best part of this track and edited together with the

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>best part of that track, and like we're talking like

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>pre digital air, so like they're spicing together tape sure

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, right, to get the best possible

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>complete take piece together from many different takes. Right. So okay,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what they did. All of a sudden, there's

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this new software that just runs through a take and says, oh, well,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I see what note or what key the singers singing in,

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But this this particular notes just a little out, so

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to nudge it into the key that the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>singer was going for. And now all of a sudden,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>One take is all it takes. Yeah. I mean what

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>it did was it cut down on studio time, which

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is super expensive, which was very appealing because now you

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>could churn out songs that are more rapid rate and

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper rate. And uh, it was it was a

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>little sort of a secret tool that they didn't intend

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to like get out to the public. I don't think

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they wanted everyone to know this stuff. No, it was

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>meant for professionals. Yeah, And basically it was just it

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was the musical audio equivalent of cosmetics. Yeah. Doctor. It

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was invented by Dr Harold Andy Hilda Brand, and he

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>likened it to make up and the New Yorker likened

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it to um, like getting rid of a red eye

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and a photograph. It was just you use it just

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>enough so that you can't tell it's there, but it

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>makes for a more pleasant um overall composite. Right. Yeah.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>What Share had done, or what Shares producers had done,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is take this thing and used it to the nth degree. Yes,

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>supposedly it was just a joke and Share was like,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I love that, but that's like, I don't know if

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an urban legender, if that's fact. Well, from what

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I read that her producer, she was she wanted like UM,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>she had heard like some telephone effect that she was

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in using, like she wanted something and I guess

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the producer had stumbled upon that and UM played it

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for but it was like you're not gonna like this,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but listen to this weirdness, and she was like that

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I want that nice That's what I read. Well, I

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think that it's due to her giving it the green light.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Then that was truly like uh, foresight, like a masterful

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>move by Share. You know, well, Share has a lot

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of ForSight. You know, they say, don't don't doubt share

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and Share has a lot of foresight. Never bet against share. UM.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So when she did make that decision, it changed, Like

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you said, it changed everything. And well, well I I

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>we can't talk enough about this, but we're going to

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>take a break and then come back and talk more

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>about it right after this. You stop, all right, Josh.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>What I found most interesting about this while researching what

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>um was what Andy Hildebrand did before he did this.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>He was a musician. He was played flute professionally since

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>he was a young teenager, even went to University of Illinois,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>go fighting a line, I on a music scholarship. Yet

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>he chose to work for Exxon Mobile for seventeen years

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>looking for oil. Yeah, he's crazy. The two weren't too

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>terribly far apart well, as we will find out. So

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a professional floutist, classically trained flout. It is a

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>good one from what I understanding. His flute, yes, um,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>And he went to college to get an electrical engineering degree,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think. And basically when when he went to work

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for the oil companies, it was an oil exploration and

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>he figured out a programmer he designed to software um

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that when you set off an explosive charge underground, it

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>measured the pitch of stuff of the sound waves that

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that were created. Right, So as they traveled through rock,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>different types of rock adjust the pitch basically, and this

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>software like analyzed the pitch that was coming through and

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>could create a subsurface map of the rock below. And

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>oil companies have long known that this type of rock

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is associated with oil, and this type of rock is

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>not maybe a'll financial gas and this type of rock.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So with this guy creating an audio visual map of

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the subsurface area, oil companies no longer had to just

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>drill and drill and hope that they found UM oil.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>He would say, this is a pretty pretty great place

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to drill because this kind of rock is there. That's right.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's called auto correlation. And it saved Exxon a lot

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of money, and he somehow made a lot of money.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was gonna be one of those things

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>where like x Son was just like, thanks, you work

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>for us, here's your forty dollars a year. But apparently

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he UM earned enough money to retire by the age

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of forty thanks to this innovation and UM in the

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>early he got out of the oil business and found

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it like it's just a popularity content. Yeah. Uh. He

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>founded UH in Terrorists Audio Technologies and UH kind of

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>near Silicon Valley in Scott's Valley, California, and I think

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>still they only have about ten employees. I think it's

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty small operation. It's all centered around him and

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>his ideas and in he is the main inventor UM.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the first things he invented was something called Infinity,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a program that where you could loop samples

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>UM over and over and over like seamlessly. Apparently that

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was a necessary thing. I didn't know that. Oh yeah,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think about it. We're talking like early nineties. That was

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>like the eight acid house revolution. Yeah, but I just

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize. I guess he made it easier, probably is

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my guess. Yes, I think he enabled it. He enabled

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>technos the impression I have, Oh really yeah, interesting looping

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>samples together seamlessly. Well, but you could already do that.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying is is he clearly found a way

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it better and more efficiently. He didn't invent looping, No, no,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he made it better, Yeah, exactly. Another thing he did

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was invented the microphone modeler. Modeling is a big thing

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in music. You can get um guitar amplifiers that model,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>uh basically means imitate other amps. I have a modeling

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>amp which I don't use anymore because it's uh, not

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>very good, but it models. There's like twelve different classic amps.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It models, supposedly. But he invented the modeling microphone, which

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>means you could mimic like classic microphones, or like a

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>harmonica Mike and vintage Mike's, like the Elvis Presley, that

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>cool looking Mike I'm sure that was on there. Oh

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the silver kind of rounded rectangular one. Noel's

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>got one on his desk. I yeah, yeah, that's associated

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with Elvis Presley. Well, I mean just the music of

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that time. But I always picture Elvish. Yeah you know

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, I can see that. Yeah. Have you

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ever seen his grandson, by the way, quick sidebar. No,

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>his name is quick sidebar yea quick Sidebar Presley. It's

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>weird name, but you know, Lisa Marie was his mom.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, um, that was very funny. By the way,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he uh, just look him up. I think what's his name?

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember his name. His last name is the

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>father's name for Lisa Marie's first husband, is who she

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>had him with. Uh yeah, just look at Elvis Presley's grandson.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It is creepy. Dude looks exactly like Elvis at that age,

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like scary, scary, eerily similar. Can he sing that? I

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Does he use auto tune? That? I do know?

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>If he sings, he probably use his auto tune, probably

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>because of singers. Apparently his auto tune it seemed even

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>higher than that. Really, how about that? Admit it? M

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, there's the thing about auto tune where,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>um you deny that you use it even though you're

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>totally aware that everyone uses it. UM. I read an

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>article where apparently this one producer said that he's worked

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with two artists that have haven't used it everyone else has,

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was Nico Case and Nellie for Tato. And

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>then apparently later after that, Nellie for Tato released a

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>single that had tongue of auto tune on it solid

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>she may be the only artist in the world who

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't used auto tune, either subtly or um to the

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>nth degree. Well, that's certainly not true. I think there

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of indie artists. But if you're talking, you

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>should read this Verge article. It basically lays it out like, no,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone uses this even if so. Apparently producers don't even

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily tell the band that it's being used right then,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>because there's a live function, so that the monitors or

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the headphones that UM the band is hearing is being

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>run through auto tune, so what they're hearing is already corrected,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>so they think they just did a perfect take. Yeah,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wary of anytime someone says, out of twenty

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>million singers, one person doesn't that's just very dubious claim.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We're talking music industry here, especially when

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are making their own music in

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>their own homes. Well, that's another thing they're not was

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>part of the pop machine. They don't have stats on that,

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, I'm just I'm just saying that's that

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a load of garbage to me. I'm sure

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>more than one person doesn't either. It's just one. Um.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So auto tune came about, apparently this is the tail

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because of a dinner that Hilda Brand was at. He

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>was having lunch with a sales rep and the wife

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>said something funny like, hey, Andy, can you once you

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>invent something to make me sing in tune? And he went, no,

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>great idea, that's a great hilder Brand. We should have

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>auto tuned that. Maybe we could maybe maybe it was

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe it just happened. Uh. And so he said, you

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, Uh, if I can tell Jed Clampitt where

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the oil is, then I can make you sing on

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in tune. And he did, and he did he created

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>auto tune, and um, we've kind of mentioned how it works. Basically,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it takes a it takes that take of a singer's song.

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It takes the vocals of a song and you select

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what key you're singing in, and then auto Tune goes

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>through and makes this map of this of the audio

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the vocal track, and it goes through and says, oh,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this one's a little flat, this one's a little low

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, um and it just nudges these things into

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>tune into into the key that it's supposed to be in.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So all all of the notes that the singer hits

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and that take are within the correct key, meaning that

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they all sound great. It's a perfect take, right. Well, yeah,

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and the the key there is it's in the original

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>tone and inflection of the artist, right, So you can't

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>tell it's happening. No, And there's actually if you look,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the UMU Auto Tune product demo videos,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. So there's a there's an um an automatic

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>version where like it just you select the key and

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>like a tune, do its thing, and it does a

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty great job. One of the one of the ways

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that it does this is um it adds like millisecond

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>pauses in between notes. There's little spaces between notes, which

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>gives it a natural feel. Um If there's other selections

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that you can make like throat length, you can select

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>how long the singer's throat is uh, and you can

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>do that note by note, um, so you can make

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing even more natural. Until basically, what you've

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>done is taught auto tune how to simulate a particular

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>singers singing style and voice so that when it when

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it adjusts that note, it does it within the same

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>exact range that the singer would have done had they

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>hit it correctly. It's pretty amazing and advanced stuff. What

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>when when normal people think of auto tune, like you

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and me who are not in the music biz, um,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we we think of this, that's called the zero function. Yes,

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, let's take a break and we

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>will explain what the zero function is right after this.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, stop all right, the suspense is kidling me.

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna kid that's kid alright. Zero function. That was

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially what the share effect was. Okay, right, yes, go ahead,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>no no, no go ahead, no, no go ahead. You

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just sat up in your chair like you were about

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to arm rest. I've been do you go ahead? Do

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you talk about it? Well, what auto tune does, in

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the in terms of the zero function is is it

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>gets rid of all of that space, and when shares

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>voice changes, it's immediate. Yeah, all of those notes go

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right up against each other, and it creates this robotic

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>sounding voice. Yeah, there's no like rise. It's there's it's

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>not like a what's the word I'm looking for? It's uh.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a normal vibrato that you would get

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because in a normal vibrato, there's there's pauses, there's space

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>in between the notes. With this, it's not not all

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>pressed up against each other in the compressed way, and

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that zero function um is what what. It takes any

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>spaces out between the notes and creates that robot sound. Yeah,

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because I think auto tune has has a range of

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>numbers to make it flow more seamlessly. And when they

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>took it all the way down to zero, which means

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing there, it created that weird effect that they're like, nah,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>share your listen to this. It's weird. Yeah, And she's like,

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I like weird. It's great, baby, I hear number one

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>hit in my future. No, you got it wrong. It's

0:23:54.480 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it's great baby. No. That was uh, that was Jack

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from Will and Grace. Oh do you remember when he

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thought he was talking to a share impersonator. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, no, if I could turn back to

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>turn he was teaching her how to say it, sing

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>it correctly. I thoroughly enjoyed will and grace. Oh it

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>was great. Agreed, All right, where are we? Well? You

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the share effect, right, and that's what

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>it was called again. Antari has called this zero function

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the share effect for many years and um and over time,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>remember her producer just kept lying and lying and lying.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Over time, other producers independently figured out what he had done.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That he had used the zero function, which was a

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really obscure tool on a software suite that not everybody

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>knew about. Right, So it took some some brainpower and

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>some experimentation, but little by little, some produce just figured

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it out. This one producer um did a remix of

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a j Lo song and used it, and he I

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>think was the second person to use it, um publicly

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh for a brief time, it became known as

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the jal effect. Of course, anybody who used this without

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>fessing up to it. At first, in the early two thousands,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it was called the whatever effect. And there's this producer

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Rapper down in Florida named T. Paine, and T Paine

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>heard this jal effect. He went on a mission to

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>figure out what this was, and he finally apparently took

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>him years to figure it out. He finally figured out

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was the zero effect on this pro tools

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>plug in UM and he started using it and just

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>went crazy with it. Like up to this point it

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was used to like tweak or it would maybe make

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>UM a track of just a little weird over here,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>something like that. He used it as often as he

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly could. Yeah. He basically the zero function and tea

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>pain are one and the same. Yeah, And it became

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>known as the tea Pain effect really because when people

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>asked him how he did it, guess what he said,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>folk coder? Did he really? Yes, yes he did, And

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for years he managed to make a mint because the

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>whole thing was in hip hop or in pop. If

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you wanted this tea pain effect, te pain needed to

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>console at least if not produce your record. That was

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like ten years after the Share effect. People not know

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that I I he managed to pull it off for

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>crazing years and years. Good for tea pain is what

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I say? Yes you know, yeah, I mean he apparently

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, um, I guess on a plane ride. Usher

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was on the same plane and asked to speak to him,

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and she was like, I've got to get something off

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>my chest. You really screwed up music, like big time

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>t Pain was like, I made a bunch of money

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this and people seem to like it, so I'm

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna stop. Hildebrand has been vilified by many, and

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know what, I just make the car.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't drive it down the wrong side of the road. Yeah,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a great quote because a lot of people hate

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>auto tune and thinks that's the worst thing that happened

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to music. A lot of people like it and say,

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>when you use it for what it's supposed to be

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>used for, it can really help out. Because you know,

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not like everyone uses it all the time. I'm

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sure some people need it way more than others. Well,

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you're using it as a like cosmetic touch,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like kill the brand originally designed it for a lot

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>of people say no, we shouldn't even be doing that, because, um,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and listen to things like Bob

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Dylan or The Beach Boards or um, just a lot

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of these original artists that didn't use these kind of

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>effects on their voice. Um, when they sang and their

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>recordings made it through the studio, there were still flat

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>notes here there, but it was their music, it was

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>their voice, it was their vocals in these tracks, and

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone came to know and love them. But now, because

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>everything is auto tuned perfectly, even the stuff that you

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>don't you can't hear it's auto tune because they're not

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>using zero function, but just the fact that it's been

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>running through the auto tune, this stuff sounds really rough

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>by comparison. So a lot of people are like, auto

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>tune is ruined music. It ruined music that people love

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for decades because now by comparison it seems rough. Well.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But it also, like a good ear can tell if

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>something's auto tune, it has this weird tin equality that, um,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sound natural. So I think it they will

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>be blowback and a reversion back to older methods. Okay,

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I bet you Jack White has an auto tune that's

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the most purest of pure guys. No, he uses all

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>sorts of weird vocal effects on his stuff. No, but

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as far as like I bet he has ask him,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't admit it. Apparently that's part for the course. Um,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>so te Pain. If we can get back to the

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>history of this by you a drink so t Pain right, hit.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He's huge, like he's just everything he drops is just

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>blowing up all over the place. He's getting invited to

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>consult and produce on uh Kanye's album, which ultimately had

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>every track had auto tune on it by the time

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Tea Pain got done with that, right. Um, have you

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>heard his queen Bohemian raps that he live? No? Is

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it good? Oh? No, oh no, it's there's a video

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.959
<v Speaker 1>that someone spliced of him and he and Freddie Mercury.

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the worst things I've ever heard on

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a on the stage. I've got to check it out.

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible. Okay, all right, Um, I gotta see that.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It's good. So um the tea Pain effect. Yeah, and

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted this effect, you had to have tea pain.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Well Snoop Dogg says, that's enough of that. Oh finally,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and he releases something called Sensual Seduction and it's one

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of the better rap videos you've ever seen. It's pretty good.

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a star wipe in it, so you know, I

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>love it Um. So Snoop releases this using the T

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>pain effect to great degree, but he didn't consult with

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>T Pain. T Paint had nothing to do with this record.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So Snoop kind of opened the floodgates saying, if you

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>guys want to use this, go use it. But what's

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting if you watch that video when Snoop is um

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>doing like the the T pain effector of the auto

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>tune stuff, he's actually got a tube going to a

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>synthesizer to make it look like he's using a vocoder.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting, is that weird? Like in his video? But anyway,

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he's sure that wasn't a marijuana smoking divide. It may

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have been, it may have been thing about it um,

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but Snoop changed everything in in that he took tea

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Pain out of the equation and really opened the floodgates

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for anybody and everybody to use this stuff. Simultaneously, jay

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>z was trying to close those floodgates and push all

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of it back in. Yeah, I think jay z Um

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly jumped the shark at a certain point. You know

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>when major ad brand are making ads using the latest

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and greatest that it's years late, first of all, and

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that means that has definitely jumped the shark. And in

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, Windy's had a Frosty Posse commercial where

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a gang of office workers built it out auto tuned

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>rhymes while searching for Frosty's. I don't remember that, I know,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but I went and watched it. Of course, how is

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it pretty great? It's what you think it is pretty great.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome. Okay, now it's terrible. And Jay Z apparently

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>saw this and was enraged, and so he wrote a

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>song called d O a Death of auto Tune. I

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>know we're facing a recession, but the music y'all making

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it the great depression. Get back to wrap

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you t pain into much. That's calling that's calling someone

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>out hard. Yeah, but other auto tune, um, auto tune.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>The news was a big YouTube pit. Oh yeah man,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that um the bed intruders song. Yeah, let's um, let's

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>play a clip from that. For two thousand ten, it

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was a local news footage from Huntsville, Alabama, of Antoine

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Dodson delivering more awesome human being. Yeah about a neighborhood

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>intruder and someone auto tune that the Gregory Brothers did.

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, let's hear that real quick. We got your

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>bigger pution. No, you are so good, you are really good.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>The man got away, leaving behind evidence. I was okay

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>by some PI and the pie. So don't so don't soul,

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>don't song. He climbing your windows, you're snatching your people

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are trying to write from magic. Have you listened that recently? No,

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty great. Yeah. Yeah, but again that was in

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand ten, and I think that even kind of

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty short shelf life. Unless they're still doing it.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it was. What you say, The

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Gregory Brothers, the Brooklyn Soul band. Yeah, they started out

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>doing auto tune the news. Yeah, and they would take

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the news and just auto tune it and turn it

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and like just produce it over use it um. And

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they did that with the Bed and Trooder song, and

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that actually became the number one video on YouTube of

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>all of two thousand ten. I look the original the

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>original video has a dwight million views right now. Yeah. Yeah,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty impressive stuff. At at the same point, like

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>now auto tune has become a parody of itself. Yes,

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's being used in ads. Here's the progression. Something

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>starts out, someone uses it artistically, someone comes along and

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>overuses it, then everybody starts to overuse it. Then Wendy's

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>makes a commercial using it. Newsweek finally gets around to

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>writing an article about it, and then years after we

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>record a podcast on it, and then the thing finally dies. Yeah,

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and then fifteen or twenty years after that it becomes

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hip again. Yes, you know, that's the progression. So the

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>point that we're at though, now, Chuck, it's not so

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>cut and dry, man. It's not as cut and dry

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as jay Z would like to have you think. Because

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he came out with this death of auto tune track

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in like two thousand nine. Auto tune is still around

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>very much. And now it's getting the point where if

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like um the Verge and uh, I can't remember the

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>other article I read, they're both on this podcast page.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>If they're to be believed, they're credible sources, and they

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly seemed like it from these articles. There's a there's

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this growing question of um, is auto tune here to stay?

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>People are starting to compare it to the initial reaction

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that people had to the electric guitar. It was a

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>lot different from the original guitar and people it took

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of getting used to, or like when Bob

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Dylan went electric, a lot of people didn't like that,

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>But then look at what happened now with the electric guitar.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people tried different stuff with it and

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it became a standard. Some people are wondering if auto

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tune is going to fulfill the same destiny. I think

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>most people are hoping that it does not. Yeah, well,

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sweetening vote coals is nothing new, Like reverb

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>is a tried and true thing for years and embraced.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 1>H does that sweetened vocals? I thought that was always

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>used to like make it weird. Now it's it's sort

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of like it gives it an echo, a like you're

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>singing in a big empty church hall or something. But

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it makes it sweetens it. It doesn't like correct anything,

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but when I say sweetens it, it just makes it

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sound a little better. Reverbs a great tool, right. The

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>point is it's artificial. Yeah, it's not natural. Yeah, they

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it's they tried to replicate like singing in a big

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>empty echo e hallway, uh, with an effect and it worked, right.

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And another argument in favor of auto tune that I've

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>seen is simply taking a human voice and recording it

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>automatically makes it artificial, like if they're not there in

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the room with you singing to you at that moment.

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Anything else is artificial, So what's the problem. So just

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to let people know, I put out two text during

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the episode to musician friends Jack why no. I texted

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Lucy Wayne Wright our buddy Jerry from our TV. She

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>has not answered, which means she's used auto tune kidding

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and our buddy Joey c Are from the Henry Clay

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>People formerly of Henry Clay People, now with fakers, and

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, I think there were a few harmonized US

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and OZ on one of our old records where we

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>did some pitch correcting, but that's it, I think maybe,

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so definitely he's probably gonna be mad that I said that.

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being fourth, right, Joey? Yeah, good guy.

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you got anything else about audit? Yeah? Just a

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really quick um. This is from a great website. Uh

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>tin artists that are essentially computer programs. They just have

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the most auto tuned people. They have Tea Pain Kesha,

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Brown, Maroon Five, Black Eyed Peas, Deaf Punk, Paris Hilton,

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>who I forgot actually had a song the cast of

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Glee Katy Perry, and number one was owl City, who

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what that is. There's a huge

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>outcry apparently among Glee fans for Glee to stop using

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>so much auto tune. I think the deal is. They're like, well,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>these are actors, Like yeah, And there's another there's a

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>big scandal with u K's got talent or something weird

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>like that, um where they were using a lot of

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 1>auto tune for the auditions. It's like, come on, well anyway, man,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that's not a very surprising list. So this has been

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>grumpy old men. I don't feel like we've been grumpy.

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We haven't like condemned it out right. No. Nico Case's

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my lady, she condemns it out right. Yeah, Emily, I

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>have an agreement about Nico Case, but we could both

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>marry her if she was ever available to us. She's

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>right behind you. Oh my god. Uh so we have

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a very well known finish up here a deal. Sorry,

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I just jumped the gun. Okay, thank you. Uh you

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything else about No, I was just teasing.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We have a special listener mail with guests well, hold on,

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>let me finish first. Okay, okay, Well, since Chuck doesn't

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have anything, it's the end. And if you want to

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>know more about auto tune, you can type those words

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>into the search par at how stuff works dot com.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And this article, I have to say, by the way,

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>was the most definitive article about auto tune on the internet.

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>How about that. It's a good one. Uh so you

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>can go look that up. And since I said definitive,

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a listener mail, and it's a special one,

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like Chuck says, that's right, h Today, we um got

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a joint listener mail to ourselves into Holly and Tracy

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>from stuff you missed in History class. Yep, So we're

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring them in right. Yeah, we're gonna read the

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 1>email and we're gonna talk about its implications. But let's

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>start now. So, without further ado, we actually have Holly

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy of stuff you miss in history class with

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Hi and Tracy. We have actually not with us, she's

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>with us in spirit and voice from Boston. I know

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty it's pretty interesting when it comes in through

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>your headphones, but the other person somewhere else, it's kind

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>of awesome. And this is how you guys do the

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>show now right. Yes, we also have like an online

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have a Google hangout where we both

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are so we can see each other as well's we

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.479
<v Speaker 1>should have done that Tracy in here with her video

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>image or like um hologram of or they'd be pretty

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>cool too. That's true, all right. So I think the

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>first thing I should do we could have a picture

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of me like our old boss. Oh well, I do

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have a picture of you. I have the wallet side

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that you gave out. So um, I think the first

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>thing we should do is just read. I'll read the

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>email here and then we will discuss like adults. How

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about that? What? So, like I said, already set it

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>up that we both got an email from a listener

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and she says the following, and this is from Amanda

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Lae ends Hey guys and gals. She didn't say that,

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, I just did. Well, you should read it, okay, Josh, Chuckers,

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Holly and Tracy, and of course a hello to Jerry

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and Nol. Yeah. I'm a social worker from Portland, Oregon

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with a passion for human equity and respect. One of

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the original members of the s Y s K Army

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and a more recent listener to missed in History. I

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>binged for about five months before I got all caught up.

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So how about that. I'm concerned about something I've heard

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a few times on the History podcast, and I was

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you guys would be willing to get together

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>we are and look into something to fulfill my curiosity.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>When Josh and Chuck received corrections, they thank people for

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>being nice and frequently ask people not to be jerks

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>when correcting them. When Holly and Tracy talk about corrections

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>they receive, they ask people to be nice and have

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>referred to corrections on several occasions as hate mail. My

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>concern is that listeners may be more disrespectful Howly and

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Tracy because they are women, and even if listeners are

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>rude to Josh and Chuck, they may rein it in

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>when making corrections because there are men. Could be completely

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>off base. But if I'm right, I feel like the

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy should be addressed on the podcast to raise awareness

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>about how people treat men and women differently, and even

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to address people's tendency to feel protected by the anonymity

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet and say things online they wouldn't say

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to someone's face. And uh so, Manda, we did talk

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>about it via email, and now we're going to talk

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.919
<v Speaker 1>about it like regular human folks. And Tracy really has

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the wealth of information because of her job and what

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you know she's been responsible for in the past. Oh yeah,

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that sounds serious. Yeah. I was part of the management

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>team of a website for several years before I started

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>actually being on a podcast, and for a chunk of

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that time, most of the podcasters reported to me. So

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>even though I wasn't managing the podcast program, I was

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of keeping tabs on the iTunes reviews for everybody.

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And there was a definite, definite try and in that

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that had women on them got disproportionately more

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>vicious comments about what their voices sounded like versus the

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast with men on them, which got less of that.

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is news to me. Misogyny on the internet.

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I wasn't aware that that was the thing.

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Just had the most beautiful blind spot of all time. No,

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine. And I know Tracy, you've like pointed

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these out before. Um, for us, it's it's like, yeah,

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll get hate mail every once in a while, Um,

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of easy to dismiss because even if

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>it is directed at us, it's not necessarily directed at

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>our gender or whatever it's or even if it is personal,

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's dumb. It's just it's just dumb stuff. It's

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>easy to not take personally, even when it's meant to

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>be personal. But um, that's me speaking as like a

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>white male age eight team to forty nine, you know,

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>so I can imagine that like when someone attacks you

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>just just based on your gender, or even worse, if

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they're coming after you and they don't even realize that

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they're being driven by this, um, this disdain for your gender,

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that has to make it a lot harder to just dismiss. Yeah,

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, how you can go. I was gonna say,

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for me, I mean I am lucky and that I

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>really give very few damns about what most people think,

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like unless you're sitting in my lap or paying my paycheck,

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it's great if you like me, but if you don't,

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that's cool too. Like everybody do your thing. But eventually,

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>like the landslide builds up and it's not it's not

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so much that I'm like heartbroken or traumatized, but it

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>just wears you down after a while, where you're like,

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>why am I doing this just to get more of

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this crap? Yeah? Well, and we definitely have, like we

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have been called slurs based on our gender before. We

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have been called the C word over the po unbelievable.

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah well, and then the I told you about that

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when we were discussing the email in our email conversation,

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I told you about the person who wrote to us

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and said they didn't understand how I could be in

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the same room with Holly without strangling her. Like that's

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the kind of stuff that people will write to us

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and be really awful, But we do get a whole

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of them that I don't think people are consciously

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>being misogynistic, but they're talking to us and about us

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in a very gendered way. So people tell us that

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we sound shrill or that we sound bossy, and those

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't words that people would use to describe men most

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time. First, the um and all of the

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>articles that had come out lately about especially vocal fry

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and other things that people criticize about women's voices that

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't generally criticize about men's voices. Every single time

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I read it and I'm like, I could have written

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that about my job and my experience being a woman

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>talking on the internet. So which one, Um, which one

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hits home the most? Like one that's a just a

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>direct personal attack are the ones that or the person

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is just being unconsciously misogynistic, which to me would seem

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>more entrenched. Yeah, to me, the second one is worse.

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's especially worse because a lot of the implicitly

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gendered criticism that we get is also from women. The

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>hardest part, Yeah, that's the hardest part for me to

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with. Yeah, when they're real specific, for example, like

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the person who wants me to be strangled. Um, at

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, I'm like, he's working through

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>his own stuff. Like I have really have very little

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to do with this. So I may have been the

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>trigger that you know, caused this little outrage bomb, but

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>really it has very little to do with me that

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think almost a percent of the time that is

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the case. These are people who have their own gripes

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in life and are probably angry, unhappy people. Yes, But

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>then as Tracy said, when you get those ones that

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are like they they're not unconscious of how it's playing

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>out you realize how much it is a bigger, sort

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of systemic social problem because most of those people are

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not evil, they don't intend to be misogynistic. They're not

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>conscious that they're separating the two genders and judging them

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>differently on different criteria. So yeah, those are, as Tracy said,

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a little more disturbing because you realize that it's kind

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of like the silent creep that underlays everything. Well, we

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>do get a lot of emails that are great from

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are great, and the majority of the email

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that we get is great, so we like, I don't

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>want to make it sound like every person who writes

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to us is awful. Um, And we talk about corrections

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on the episode a lot of times from people who

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>write it the end and everything is fine and everything

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is very respectful. So to me, a correction is you

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>said this person died in nineteen and eighteen, but really

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it was nineteen seven. That's a correction, and that's fine.

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But then we'll also get ones that are like, I

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>can't believe you didn't even bother to this up. You

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>completely butchered it. I don't know why you don't even

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>put more thought into what you're doing. Because it's really

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 1>important that you represent yourselves as well. And that's why

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, that's hate mail we get, Yeah, we get those. Yeah,

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we get a lot of those, but I never feel

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like those are like, uh, have anything to do with

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>my gender. Yeah, in those cases, absolutely, I mean we

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>get the same exact emails where it's just like you,

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys are total idiots, like how how could you

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>drop the ball this badly? And it's like we basically

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 1>said exactly what you're saying, we just said it slightly differently.

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It definitely doesn't warrant this kind of reaction, you know.

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, I I why do you think there is

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a gender bias or a gender Why is it worse

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for you guys being women? Do you think not just

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in comments I find the history of the world, but

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, like how how long do you have this thing?

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.399
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like even even beyond comments like why

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is the internet so geared towards hating women? I mean,

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the deal with that? Do you guys? Is

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.880
<v Speaker 1>there is there a general understanding or idea behind it

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lonely angry men is my guests? Well, I think it's

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's super complex, right, there's no one simple answer. Like

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>some of it is that we have reached an age

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>where the disparity in terms of UH gender equality has

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>shrunk at the same time that a lot of people

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have this outlet readily available to them. So there's progress

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:32.879
<v Speaker 1>being made, but there are also the people who are

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>still kicking and screaming as they get dragged into a

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>future they're not comfortable with. But then there's also just

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a thing that again I don't think people are even

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:44.280
<v Speaker 1>conscious of it where it is new for many people,

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and even people that are younger and have maybe grown

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>up in a more kind of old school traditional environment

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be at household or community, where they're not even conscious

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of why they're more upset at women. There's just something

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about women, you know, sharing knowledge or being assertive or

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>being confident that just rankles them. And they don't even

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>register that it's because it's a woman. They just know

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:11.959
<v Speaker 1>there's something about that person I hate, and it's something

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 1>they're just not used to and they haven't kind of

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>made the the mental accustomization to Oh. Sometimes people that

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't dudes have stuff to say as well. Do you

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 1>think the same experiences extrapolatable under race as well as

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>gender and well, I mean I know it is, but

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it almost like a step for step

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think I think it's probably pretty similar models. Yeah, well,

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking like as the as as a white person in

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a room of white people who are on the phone

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. The worst days I have ever had managing

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook page, our days when we talk about something

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with systemic racism and we'll we'll

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get a flood of similarly implic racist comments from people

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>who really don't know that the view that they just

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 1>put out there is racist. Like that's sort of the

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Like a lot of people do things that

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>are misogynists, not really consciously being misogynist. That just comes

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>out and they're not consciously aware of it. And it's

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>we see the same thing on our Facebook posts in

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>subjects that are related to race really pretty often. So

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, when you guys get

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these say on a just a particularly

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>bad day, what you what? What do you do? I mean,

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>do you battle this? Do you just brush it off

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and be like these guys are idiots, And whether they

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like it or not, they are going to be dragged

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 1>into the future against their will you know what, do

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.879
<v Speaker 1>you do a combination of both, or do you look

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>at your status as a perennial top twenty podcast and

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:52.439
<v Speaker 1>say they clearly who cares what they say? Because we're

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>really good at what we do, because we're very successful.

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I do a combination of things. I have kind of

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a library of links about vocal fry and whatever. Anyone

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 1>writes directly to us to complain about vocal fry, I

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of send them, Hey, why don't you listen to this,

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>uh this American Life segment all about vocal fry in

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>which Ira Glass has vocal fry the entire segment, but

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody complains at him about it. Um. So, I like,

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I specifically will address that. I will specifically address things

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that people say on our Facebook page in public, because

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like our role as a podcast about history

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>does not include allowing people free rain to be racist

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in public and and have that not be challenged. Um

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to the like the email that

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Holly and I got that was that was so bad

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty recently, that was the person who was basically advocating

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 1>me murdering Holly. Um, I was actually traveling. I went

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>down to the hotel bar and how to drink, read

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a book and tried to chill. Yeah, I tried chill

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>out about it. There's the answer. Booze tail fixes everything. Well, Um,

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you both for addressing this. Yeah, I'm sorry we

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't solve this problem here in this this listener mail segment.

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having us on the show. Of course. Um,

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>if anyone out there and stuff, you should know Land

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>has not checked out stuff he missed in history class,

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you definitely should because it is super awesome and as

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are both of you. And I don't want to strangle you,

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but I want to hug your necks. Nope, you've better

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have it. And now she don't move no more. Nope.

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But thanks for coming in. And uh, we should do

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this more often, you know, we should. We should have

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole show where we just get together and do

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:47.959
<v Speaker 1>roundtable stuff. We can have yappy pow wow party time.

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That would be Yeah. Well, if you have something to

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>say about all this, I'm we're sure you will. We

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from you. You can tweet to us

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast. You can tweet this

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if you missed in history class at at missed in

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>History you can join us on Facebook dot com slash

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff you Should Know. You can join stuff you Missed

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>in History class at missed in History Facebook dot com

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:15.280
<v Speaker 1>slash miss in History make it easy? What about email?

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 1>How do they get in touch with you? History podcast

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com? And you can hit

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 1>us up at stuff podcast at how stuff works dot

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 1>com and at all has always joined us at our

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>home on the web, Stuff you Should Know dot com

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and missed in History dot com. Stuff you Should Know

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeart Radios. How stuff Works. For

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my Heart Radio is at the iHeart

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows