WEBVTT - Michael Pollan on the Mind-Blowing Idea of Consciousness

0:00:14.956 --> 0:00:32.156
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin in retrospect, it seems absolutely crazy that I thought

0:00:32.156 --> 0:00:35.036
<v Speaker 1>I had any qualification to write a book about consciousness.

0:00:35.356 --> 0:00:38.516
<v Speaker 1>It's a really difficult topic. People have been cracking their

0:00:38.516 --> 0:00:41.436
<v Speaker 1>head on it for thousands of years. But I figured, well,

0:00:41.636 --> 0:00:44.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a curious human who happens to be conscious,

0:00:45.076 --> 0:00:47.636
<v Speaker 1>and I'm pretty good at explaining things, So I went

0:00:47.676 --> 0:00:49.156
<v Speaker 1>ahead and took the plunge.

0:00:49.636 --> 0:00:53.516
<v Speaker 2>That's renowned author Michael Pollan, not quite giving himself the

0:00:53.516 --> 0:00:57.396
<v Speaker 2>credit he deserves. Michael's written half a dozen bestsellers that

0:00:57.436 --> 0:01:01.716
<v Speaker 2>have reshaped our understanding of everything from food to psychedelics.

0:01:02.116 --> 0:01:06.276
<v Speaker 2>His latest book is called A World Appears. It tackles

0:01:06.316 --> 0:01:10.956
<v Speaker 2>the complex subject of consciousness, which he defines simply as

0:01:10.996 --> 0:01:12.476
<v Speaker 2>subjective experience.

0:01:12.996 --> 0:01:15.876
<v Speaker 1>It is kind of a mind blowing idea, Wow, there's

0:01:15.916 --> 0:01:20.356
<v Speaker 1>something mediating my relationship to reality. What is it? And

0:01:20.396 --> 0:01:22.316
<v Speaker 1>why is it that way and not this way?

0:01:24.596 --> 0:01:29.676
<v Speaker 2>On today's show, an awe inspiring, brain tickling exploration of

0:01:29.796 --> 0:01:36.676
<v Speaker 2>human consciousness. I'm maya Schunker, a scientist who studies human behavior,

0:01:37.156 --> 0:01:39.916
<v Speaker 2>and this is a slight change of plans, a show

0:01:39.956 --> 0:01:42.676
<v Speaker 2>about who we are and who we become in the

0:01:42.676 --> 0:01:53.276
<v Speaker 2>face of a big change when Michael and I last

0:01:53.316 --> 0:01:55.636
<v Speaker 2>spoke on a slight change of plans, he had just

0:01:55.716 --> 0:01:58.716
<v Speaker 2>written a book about the science of psychedelics and how

0:01:58.716 --> 0:02:01.516
<v Speaker 2>they can change our minds. It was a delightful and

0:02:01.596 --> 0:02:05.476
<v Speaker 2>philosophically rich conversation, and so when he asked me to

0:02:05.516 --> 0:02:08.876
<v Speaker 2>moderate a live event celebrating his new book, A World

0:02:08.876 --> 0:02:13.556
<v Speaker 2>of I was thrilled. Michael, I wanted to just share

0:02:13.636 --> 0:02:16.876
<v Speaker 2>a quick story to kick this off. So back in

0:02:16.956 --> 0:02:20.356
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, I had just met this guy named Jimmy,

0:02:20.596 --> 0:02:23.236
<v Speaker 2>and I had a pretty big crush on him. And

0:02:23.276 --> 0:02:26.196
<v Speaker 2>I remember we were walking in DC and we were

0:02:26.196 --> 0:02:28.876
<v Speaker 2>on our way to dinner and I was weighing the

0:02:28.876 --> 0:02:29.836
<v Speaker 2>menu options in my head.

0:02:29.836 --> 0:02:32.636
<v Speaker 3>I was like, should I get poster or the sue

0:02:32.676 --> 0:02:33.276
<v Speaker 3>for the salad?

0:02:33.396 --> 0:02:35.396
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe both, And all of a sudden,

0:02:35.476 --> 0:02:38.596
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy suddenly stops in his tracks and he looks at

0:02:38.636 --> 0:02:42.796
<v Speaker 2>me and he goes, man, MAYA, isn't consciousness so great?

0:02:46.116 --> 0:02:49.236
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I don't know what's up with this guy,

0:02:49.396 --> 0:02:51.396
<v Speaker 2>but he seems to be a life lover, and so

0:02:52.116 --> 0:02:54.516
<v Speaker 2>maybe I hitched myself to his wagon. Life's gonna be

0:02:54.556 --> 0:02:56.716
<v Speaker 2>great forever. Anyway, We're married, he's in the front row.

0:02:56.756 --> 0:03:03.316
<v Speaker 2>It all worked out. But needless to say, it is

0:03:03.356 --> 0:03:05.796
<v Speaker 2>such an honor for me to be in conversation with

0:03:05.836 --> 0:03:08.356
<v Speaker 2>you about a world appears. But I am getting so

0:03:08.516 --> 0:03:12.076
<v Speaker 2>many brownie points from Jimmy to do this with you tonight,

0:03:12.116 --> 0:03:16.156
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for that marital gift. The last time

0:03:16.316 --> 0:03:19.716
<v Speaker 2>I interviewed you for my podcast, The Slight Change of Plans,

0:03:20.236 --> 0:03:23.836
<v Speaker 2>you had just written a book on psychedelics and your

0:03:23.876 --> 0:03:27.596
<v Speaker 2>personal experience with psychedelics, and I know that that was

0:03:27.756 --> 0:03:31.876
<v Speaker 2>one of the big inspirations for you to explore consciousness.

0:03:32.356 --> 0:03:33.796
<v Speaker 3>Can you tell me about that experience.

0:03:33.916 --> 0:03:36.556
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So there's a funny way in which one book

0:03:36.676 --> 0:03:39.396
<v Speaker 1>kind of has the sour dough starter you carry through

0:03:39.476 --> 0:03:42.876
<v Speaker 1>to the next one. And I very often we'll look

0:03:42.916 --> 0:03:46.036
<v Speaker 1>at a book and see whether it or along the

0:03:46.076 --> 0:03:48.276
<v Speaker 1>way of writing it that there's some germ that needs

0:03:48.316 --> 0:03:51.956
<v Speaker 1>to be or seed that needs to grow. And with psychedelics,

0:03:51.996 --> 0:03:54.676
<v Speaker 1>there were two things that happened that stuck with me

0:03:54.756 --> 0:03:58.156
<v Speaker 1>after I'd finished the book, and one was this experience

0:03:58.196 --> 0:04:01.916
<v Speaker 1>I had in my garden on psilocybin and getting the

0:04:02.116 --> 0:04:05.716
<v Speaker 1>distinct impression, overwhelming impression that the plants in my garden

0:04:05.756 --> 0:04:12.596
<v Speaker 1>were conscious. I know it was. I was tripping and

0:04:12.636 --> 0:04:15.636
<v Speaker 1>they were kind of like returning my gaze, and they

0:04:16.396 --> 0:04:20.316
<v Speaker 1>they were very benevolent. They seem to like me. I

0:04:20.356 --> 0:04:23.276
<v Speaker 1>was their gardener, of course, and you know, you come

0:04:23.316 --> 0:04:25.196
<v Speaker 1>out of an experience like that, it's like, well, what's

0:04:25.276 --> 0:04:28.276
<v Speaker 1>the truth value of an insight you have on psychedelics.

0:04:28.276 --> 0:04:31.876
<v Speaker 1>It's really questionable. So that was one data point, and

0:04:31.956 --> 0:04:35.636
<v Speaker 1>the other data point was more generally about consciousness and

0:04:35.676 --> 0:04:37.996
<v Speaker 1>that psychedelics have. And I'm not the first person this

0:04:38.036 --> 0:04:40.796
<v Speaker 1>has happened to by any means, but they have a

0:04:40.796 --> 0:04:42.516
<v Speaker 1>way of kind of, as I put in the book,

0:04:42.596 --> 0:04:46.236
<v Speaker 1>smudging the windshield through which we experience reality. And most

0:04:46.276 --> 0:04:50.036
<v Speaker 1>of the time that windshield is like perfectly transparent. But

0:04:50.276 --> 0:04:55.476
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics and meditation has a way of calling attention to

0:04:55.596 --> 0:04:59.316
<v Speaker 1>the pane of glass and you're suddenly like, wow, there's

0:04:59.356 --> 0:05:03.836
<v Speaker 1>something mediating my relationship to reality. What is it? And

0:05:03.876 --> 0:05:06.516
<v Speaker 1>why is it that way and not this way? Yeah,

0:05:06.556 --> 0:05:09.356
<v Speaker 1>So these two thoughts just kind of stuck with me

0:05:09.396 --> 0:05:12.396
<v Speaker 1>for a while and I realized, well, yeah, I should

0:05:12.396 --> 0:05:15.676
<v Speaker 1>look into that. In retrospect, it seems absolutely crazy that

0:05:15.756 --> 0:05:18.036
<v Speaker 1>I thought I had any qualification to write a book

0:05:18.076 --> 0:05:21.916
<v Speaker 1>about consciousness. It's a really difficult topic. People have been

0:05:21.916 --> 0:05:24.596
<v Speaker 1>cracking their head on it for thousands of years. But

0:05:24.716 --> 0:05:27.556
<v Speaker 1>I figured, well, you know, I'm a curious human who

0:05:27.716 --> 0:05:31.916
<v Speaker 1>happens to be conscious, and I'm pretty good at explaining things.

0:05:32.196 --> 0:05:34.476
<v Speaker 1>So I went ahead and took the plunge.

0:05:35.276 --> 0:05:38.516
<v Speaker 2>I was so moved by the metaphor of the smudge

0:05:38.596 --> 0:05:41.716
<v Speaker 2>on the windshield and the recognition that there is a

0:05:41.716 --> 0:05:44.516
<v Speaker 2>windshield at all, right, that there's some mediator between us

0:05:44.516 --> 0:05:48.316
<v Speaker 2>and our perception of reality. And I still remember. I

0:05:48.316 --> 0:05:50.676
<v Speaker 2>think I had two kind of similar moments. The first

0:05:50.716 --> 0:05:53.556
<v Speaker 2>is when I was in undergrad studying cognitive science, and

0:05:53.956 --> 0:05:56.676
<v Speaker 2>I first learned that there's a blind spot on our

0:05:56.716 --> 0:05:58.756
<v Speaker 2>eyes where all the nerves kind of there's like a

0:05:58.756 --> 0:06:01.516
<v Speaker 2>little bundling right right, and we just fill in that

0:06:02.276 --> 0:06:04.716
<v Speaker 2>blind spot effortlessly all the time. I'm looking now, there's

0:06:04.756 --> 0:06:06.436
<v Speaker 2>no I don't see a little black spot when I'm

0:06:06.436 --> 0:06:08.116
<v Speaker 2>looking here, I'm not, Oh my god, I'm trying to trick.

0:06:08.196 --> 0:06:10.476
<v Speaker 2>My brain figures it out no matter where I look,

0:06:10.516 --> 0:06:11.436
<v Speaker 2>however quickly I look.

0:06:11.476 --> 0:06:12.676
<v Speaker 3>It's truly extraordinary.

0:06:13.276 --> 0:06:15.876
<v Speaker 2>And another moment was when I just had a regular

0:06:15.916 --> 0:06:20.316
<v Speaker 2>eye exam, and the doctor said, oh, wow, you kind

0:06:20.316 --> 0:06:23.116
<v Speaker 2>of see things in sepia And I was like, whoa,

0:06:23.156 --> 0:06:24.716
<v Speaker 2>I'm an og Instagram filter.

0:06:24.956 --> 0:06:28.076
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but I had no idea that was a thing.

0:06:28.116 --> 0:06:30.956
<v Speaker 2>He's like, yeah, typically we see this in older populations,

0:06:30.956 --> 0:06:32.516
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like you were just born with this

0:06:32.636 --> 0:06:37.356
<v Speaker 2>sepia lens. And that was another recognition. Wow, it didn't

0:06:37.396 --> 0:06:40.316
<v Speaker 2>have to be this way. The way that I see

0:06:40.356 --> 0:06:44.556
<v Speaker 2>it is not a vertical representation necessarily of the world

0:06:44.556 --> 0:06:48.476
<v Speaker 2>around me, right, And I sort of had that all inspiring.

0:06:48.836 --> 0:06:51.276
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a mind blowing idea. I mean, the

0:06:51.356 --> 0:06:54.516
<v Speaker 1>extent to which what we perceive is actually a prediction,

0:06:55.436 --> 0:06:59.356
<v Speaker 1>not a literal transcription or taking in of the world,

0:06:59.636 --> 0:07:04.316
<v Speaker 1>and that the brain is guessing and then using senses

0:07:04.476 --> 0:07:08.556
<v Speaker 1>to error correct essentially. Yeah, it's not like we're creating

0:07:08.596 --> 0:07:11.396
<v Speaker 1>a whole new picture of reality from all our senses

0:07:11.436 --> 0:07:11.996
<v Speaker 1>all the time.

0:07:13.236 --> 0:07:16.156
<v Speaker 2>I want to start by establishing some of the basics,

0:07:16.196 --> 0:07:19.156
<v Speaker 2>because lots of things come to mind when we hear

0:07:19.276 --> 0:07:23.116
<v Speaker 2>the word consciousness. Right, what is the working definition that

0:07:23.156 --> 0:07:25.236
<v Speaker 2>you had when writing A world appears?

0:07:26.116 --> 0:07:29.076
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny. It's a universal phenomenon that people still

0:07:29.116 --> 0:07:32.116
<v Speaker 1>struggle to define, and I think it's because they're different.

0:07:32.196 --> 0:07:34.716
<v Speaker 1>Layers of consciousness is part of it, but at the

0:07:34.756 --> 0:07:39.156
<v Speaker 1>most simple level, it's subjective experience. You have subjective experience

0:07:39.156 --> 0:07:42.756
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and your appliances don't have that. They

0:07:42.756 --> 0:07:46.796
<v Speaker 1>don't have any experience. So that's one definition. Another is

0:07:46.996 --> 0:07:50.076
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Nagel, the philosopher wrote a famous essay called what

0:07:50.156 --> 0:07:52.436
<v Speaker 1>Is It Like to Be a Bat? So bats are

0:07:52.516 --> 0:07:54.716
<v Speaker 1>very different than we are. They don't have a visual system,

0:07:54.756 --> 0:07:58.116
<v Speaker 1>they have zonar. Basically they navigate the world through echolocation.

0:07:59.116 --> 0:08:02.036
<v Speaker 1>And he said, I if it is like something to

0:08:02.116 --> 0:08:05.156
<v Speaker 1>be a bat, then about is conscious? And we can

0:08:05.276 --> 0:08:08.436
<v Speaker 1>kind of guess using our imagination and there's no other

0:08:08.476 --> 0:08:10.916
<v Speaker 1>way to do it. What it would be like to

0:08:11.036 --> 0:08:15.716
<v Speaker 1>go through life using echoes rather than reflections of light

0:08:15.876 --> 0:08:18.996
<v Speaker 1>to see where we are? So is it like something?

0:08:19.036 --> 0:08:22.756
<v Speaker 1>Does it feel like something to be any animal or

0:08:22.756 --> 0:08:26.396
<v Speaker 1>a plant? And then if that's true, then it is conscious.

0:08:26.636 --> 0:08:28.756
<v Speaker 1>And that's been a pretty handy I don't know if

0:08:28.796 --> 0:08:31.156
<v Speaker 1>it's a definition exactly, but kind of framing of the

0:08:31.196 --> 0:08:34.436
<v Speaker 1>problem that has been accepted by a lot of the

0:08:34.436 --> 0:08:37.036
<v Speaker 1>scientists who are working on it. There are other levels

0:08:37.076 --> 0:08:40.276
<v Speaker 1>to consciousness though in humans, I mean, there is the

0:08:40.316 --> 0:08:42.716
<v Speaker 1>fact that we are not just aware, but we're aware.

0:08:42.756 --> 0:08:46.196
<v Speaker 1>We're aware, and that's pretty wild. We have you know,

0:08:46.516 --> 0:08:49.396
<v Speaker 1>meta consciousness. That's when it gets a little complicated, and

0:08:49.436 --> 0:08:51.876
<v Speaker 1>we have voices in our head which you know, you

0:08:51.916 --> 0:08:54.396
<v Speaker 1>don't need to be conscious, but that's the way we

0:08:54.436 --> 0:08:54.756
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:08:55.116 --> 0:08:57.796
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would love to take a moment to just

0:08:58.596 --> 0:09:02.196
<v Speaker 2>marvel at the fact that we do have consciousness, because

0:09:02.196 --> 0:09:05.276
<v Speaker 2>it is something that many of us take for granted.

0:09:05.876 --> 0:09:10.716
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the first time I thought about consciousness

0:09:10.756 --> 0:09:13.916
<v Speaker 2>was when I was literally just in a class called

0:09:13.996 --> 0:09:16.356
<v Speaker 2>intro to cognitive science, and that was when I was

0:09:16.396 --> 0:09:18.756
<v Speaker 2>a college student. I'd kind of gone the whole rest

0:09:18.756 --> 0:09:22.516
<v Speaker 2>of my life taking this incredible thing for granted. And

0:09:24.556 --> 0:09:27.076
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a counterfactual world that's easy to conjure

0:09:27.156 --> 0:09:30.036
<v Speaker 2>up in which we humans engaged in all the behaviors

0:09:30.036 --> 0:09:32.876
<v Speaker 2>that we engage in, have all the intelligence that we have,

0:09:33.036 --> 0:09:36.356
<v Speaker 2>and yet we do lack this inner experience, right the

0:09:36.476 --> 0:09:37.436
<v Speaker 2>lights aren't on.

0:09:37.676 --> 0:09:39.956
<v Speaker 1>So to speak, zombie thought experience.

0:09:39.676 --> 0:09:41.476
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, the philosophical zombie.

0:09:41.716 --> 0:09:43.956
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's one of the interesting phenomena

0:09:44.236 --> 0:09:47.276
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness that most of what your brain does you're

0:09:47.316 --> 0:09:50.396
<v Speaker 1>not aware of. Right, your brain is regulating your body

0:09:50.676 --> 0:09:54.116
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven heart rate, blood pressure, all this

0:09:54.196 --> 0:09:57.916
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, plus processing lots of information from the environment,

0:09:58.716 --> 0:10:01.316
<v Speaker 1>and it's all automatic. So the question is, why is

0:10:01.516 --> 0:10:05.356
<v Speaker 1>any of it not automatic? Why don't we automate everything?

0:10:05.636 --> 0:10:09.916
<v Speaker 1>And the best theory I think explain this, and it's

0:10:09.956 --> 0:10:15.836
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary theory, is that for social beings, navigating social

0:10:15.876 --> 0:10:20.676
<v Speaker 1>reality is key, and what other people are going to

0:10:20.756 --> 0:10:24.396
<v Speaker 1>do is very unpredictable. So you need consciousness to be

0:10:24.436 --> 0:10:27.836
<v Speaker 1>able to imagine your way into other people's heads. You

0:10:27.876 --> 0:10:32.396
<v Speaker 1>could imagine two different types of people, one who doesn't

0:10:32.436 --> 0:10:34.876
<v Speaker 1>really think that you have consciousness or you have a

0:10:34.916 --> 0:10:39.676
<v Speaker 1>point of view, versus someone who has that ability to

0:10:39.716 --> 0:10:42.036
<v Speaker 1>create a space in their head where they can imagine

0:10:42.076 --> 0:10:44.316
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in your head. That that would be

0:10:44.556 --> 0:10:47.636
<v Speaker 1>a big survival advantage, that you would be more likely

0:10:47.636 --> 0:10:49.956
<v Speaker 1>to be able to form bonds with other people because

0:10:49.996 --> 0:10:53.836
<v Speaker 1>of that. So consciousness creates a space for decision making

0:10:53.876 --> 0:10:57.716
<v Speaker 1>a space for imagination, and I think that that has

0:10:57.756 --> 0:11:01.116
<v Speaker 1>a real evolutionary utility for a social species like us.

0:11:01.636 --> 0:11:06.556
<v Speaker 2>Another thing that's astonishing is just that when physical stuff.

0:11:06.596 --> 0:11:08.436
<v Speaker 2>You know, in this case, the neurons in our brains

0:11:08.436 --> 0:11:12.676
<v Speaker 2>get organized a certain way in inner experience emerges at all.

0:11:13.876 --> 0:11:14.956
<v Speaker 1>That is the hard problem.

0:11:15.036 --> 0:11:17.236
<v Speaker 2>This is the hard problem of consciousness. So can you

0:11:17.316 --> 0:11:22.716
<v Speaker 2>define the hard problem and then share what theories are

0:11:22.756 --> 0:11:25.396
<v Speaker 2>floating around that have helped to explain the hard problem?

0:11:26.036 --> 0:11:27.596
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are two hundred theories.

0:11:27.956 --> 0:11:30.276
<v Speaker 2>If you could just name each of them, Michael, that

0:11:30.316 --> 0:11:32.196
<v Speaker 2>would be really please be comprehensive.

0:11:32.476 --> 0:11:36.756
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, the hard problem is basically, how do you

0:11:36.796 --> 0:11:39.356
<v Speaker 1>get from matter to mind? How do you get from

0:11:39.516 --> 0:11:44.596
<v Speaker 1>a certain organization of neurons presumably because we don't know

0:11:44.636 --> 0:11:48.756
<v Speaker 1>that for a fact, and how does consciousness emerge from that?

0:11:49.036 --> 0:11:51.956
<v Speaker 1>So that's the hard problem. Why isn't it all automated?

0:11:51.996 --> 0:11:56.036
<v Speaker 1>Also as part of the hard problem, and David Chalmers

0:11:56.156 --> 0:11:58.996
<v Speaker 1>is the philosopher who came up with that term for it,

0:11:59.276 --> 0:12:01.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to give you an example of a

0:12:01.196 --> 0:12:05.156
<v Speaker 1>theory or two, there's something called global neuronal workspace theory.

0:12:05.676 --> 0:12:08.276
<v Speaker 1>And that's the idea that you have all these modules

0:12:08.316 --> 0:12:10.636
<v Speaker 1>in your brain that are competing for the attention of

0:12:10.676 --> 0:12:14.996
<v Speaker 1>the whole and when the most salient information gets into

0:12:15.036 --> 0:12:20.076
<v Speaker 1>the workspace, it's broadcast to the whole brain and becomes conscious,

0:12:20.196 --> 0:12:22.156
<v Speaker 1>so the whole brain can work on it and deal

0:12:22.196 --> 0:12:26.076
<v Speaker 1>with it. So that's interesting. I mean, it still doesn't

0:12:26.116 --> 0:12:29.756
<v Speaker 1>answer like, well, who's the conscious subject that is receiving

0:12:29.796 --> 0:12:34.196
<v Speaker 1>that broadcast? And that's where everybody falls down and starts

0:12:34.196 --> 0:12:36.596
<v Speaker 1>waving their hands. And part of that is the problem

0:12:36.636 --> 0:12:41.436
<v Speaker 1>that our science is based on third person, objective, quantifiable

0:12:41.796 --> 0:12:44.996
<v Speaker 1>you know, ever since Galileo. That's what science is, physical

0:12:45.036 --> 0:12:48.516
<v Speaker 1>science anyway, and we're talking about a subjective phenomenon, so

0:12:48.556 --> 0:12:52.116
<v Speaker 1>there's no traction. How do you get how do you

0:12:52.156 --> 0:12:55.436
<v Speaker 1>get in? How do you and you know Galileo left

0:12:55.556 --> 0:12:58.756
<v Speaker 1>all that to the church, you know, that was the soul, subjectivity,

0:12:58.916 --> 0:13:01.876
<v Speaker 1>qualitative experience, and he knew what he was doing. He

0:13:02.076 --> 0:13:05.316
<v Speaker 1>was protecting science from the church, which otherwise would have

0:13:05.316 --> 0:13:08.156
<v Speaker 1>crushed it, and did try to crush it. You know,

0:13:08.276 --> 0:13:11.796
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you take a complex phenomenon and you

0:13:11.876 --> 0:13:14.916
<v Speaker 1>reduce it to you know, matter and energy, it just

0:13:14.956 --> 0:13:18.556
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work for consciousness, and it may never work for consciousness.

0:13:18.796 --> 0:13:22.556
<v Speaker 1>We may need a different kind of science. So that's

0:13:22.556 --> 0:13:24.836
<v Speaker 1>a brain based theory. But there are others that are

0:13:24.836 --> 0:13:28.476
<v Speaker 1>not brain based, and they strike us as really out there,

0:13:28.516 --> 0:13:32.196
<v Speaker 1>but there's no reason to dismiss them. I don't think.

0:13:32.516 --> 0:13:37.436
<v Speaker 1>One is panpsychism, which is that everything that consciousness didn't

0:13:37.476 --> 0:13:41.356
<v Speaker 1>have to evolve, It was always here. Every every particle

0:13:41.396 --> 0:13:46.516
<v Speaker 1>in this table has some weensy little bit of psyche

0:13:46.596 --> 0:13:52.276
<v Speaker 1>and somehow it gets combined to form larger consciousnesses like

0:13:52.316 --> 0:13:55.236
<v Speaker 1>our own. That's a high price to pay, you know.

0:13:55.716 --> 0:13:59.196
<v Speaker 1>I mean to change the nature of matter, you know,

0:13:59.396 --> 0:14:03.556
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate your theory. But we've done that before. You know,

0:14:03.716 --> 0:14:08.476
<v Speaker 1>two hundred years ago Faraday discovered that they are electromagnetic

0:14:08.476 --> 0:14:10.956
<v Speaker 1>waves all over this room right now, and we didn't

0:14:10.956 --> 0:14:11.596
<v Speaker 1>know about that.

0:14:12.316 --> 0:14:15.396
<v Speaker 2>So you're telling me you believe in panpsychism.

0:14:15.476 --> 0:14:16.356
<v Speaker 3>I know you don't.

0:14:16.476 --> 0:14:20.156
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't, but I don't not believe in it either.

0:14:21.636 --> 0:14:23.436
<v Speaker 3>Okay, just because we don't know, I don't.

0:14:23.516 --> 0:14:25.316
<v Speaker 2>Can I just just quibble with one piece of it,

0:14:25.356 --> 0:14:27.356
<v Speaker 2>which is and then I understand. I'll have said all

0:14:27.356 --> 0:14:30.596
<v Speaker 2>the pan psychist supporters out there, but it's not just

0:14:30.676 --> 0:14:31.836
<v Speaker 2>it feels it's probably a.

0:14:31.876 --> 0:14:32.916
<v Speaker 3>Very small constituency.

0:14:32.956 --> 0:14:37.156
<v Speaker 2>But it feels like with panpsychism that yes, you've eliminated

0:14:37.196 --> 0:14:39.676
<v Speaker 2>one hard problem, but in doing so, you created it.

0:14:39.796 --> 0:14:42.156
<v Speaker 3>At least two new ones, like one, what.

0:14:42.236 --> 0:14:44.956
<v Speaker 2>Imbued those entities like the atom that makes up this

0:14:44.996 --> 0:14:46.276
<v Speaker 2>table with consciousness?

0:14:46.276 --> 0:14:48.516
<v Speaker 3>Where did that come from? Who's the initiator of that?

0:14:49.116 --> 0:14:52.916
<v Speaker 2>And then how do those individual conscious units merge?

0:14:53.276 --> 0:14:56.996
<v Speaker 1>Well, the combination problem, which is the hard problem of panpsychism.

0:14:57.276 --> 0:15:00.756
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they answered it with another I know, I know,

0:15:00.796 --> 0:15:03.436
<v Speaker 2>but it's sort of like physics, you know, deciding that

0:15:03.676 --> 0:15:05.716
<v Speaker 2>you know, well, we have this problem, but if we

0:15:05.756 --> 0:15:07.276
<v Speaker 2>stipulate a multiverse, the.

0:15:07.236 --> 0:15:11.556
<v Speaker 1>Problem solved, so so you know, it works at some

0:15:11.676 --> 0:15:15.596
<v Speaker 1>theoretical level. The other idea is that consciousness is a

0:15:15.636 --> 0:15:20.636
<v Speaker 1>field all around us like electro magnetic waves, and we

0:15:20.836 --> 0:15:23.956
<v Speaker 1>channel consciousness so that we should think of the brain.

0:15:23.996 --> 0:15:27.596
<v Speaker 1>The brain is still intimately involved, and you know, if

0:15:27.636 --> 0:15:30.036
<v Speaker 1>you damage the brain, you damage consciousness, and if you

0:15:30.116 --> 0:15:33.716
<v Speaker 1>change the brain, you change consciousness. But the brain is

0:15:33.756 --> 0:15:38.436
<v Speaker 1>a receiver. These are transmission theories of consciousness, and that

0:15:38.516 --> 0:15:42.236
<v Speaker 1>the brain is like a radio or television receiver. And

0:15:42.276 --> 0:15:44.476
<v Speaker 1>in the same way you wouldn't look for the weather

0:15:44.596 --> 0:15:48.316
<v Speaker 1>lady or guy in the in your TV set. That's

0:15:48.316 --> 0:15:50.396
<v Speaker 1>not where you're going to find him. That's not where

0:15:50.436 --> 0:15:52.676
<v Speaker 1>you're going to find consciousness either. So it's coming in.

0:15:53.276 --> 0:15:57.276
<v Speaker 1>Alvius Huxley believe this theory. Omri Berrickson was a philosopher

0:15:57.276 --> 0:16:00.796
<v Speaker 1>who believed it. And you know, how do you prove

0:16:00.836 --> 0:16:03.556
<v Speaker 1>these theories? They're not they're not provable.

0:16:04.756 --> 0:16:05.916
<v Speaker 3>Is there one that you find?

0:16:06.076 --> 0:16:07.836
<v Speaker 2>I you know, you said there's over two hundred one

0:16:07.876 --> 0:16:11.436
<v Speaker 2>that you find particularly compelling. Something new, a new version

0:16:11.476 --> 0:16:12.516
<v Speaker 2>you learned of that you were like.

0:16:12.516 --> 0:16:15.156
<v Speaker 1>I didn't finally like come out and argue one theory

0:16:15.196 --> 0:16:18.036
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness, But there was a line of research that

0:16:18.196 --> 0:16:22.636
<v Speaker 1>I found the most helpful in understanding consciousness. And that

0:16:22.716 --> 0:16:27.996
<v Speaker 1>goes back to a neurologist, Antonio Dimasio. For a long time,

0:16:28.036 --> 0:16:30.636
<v Speaker 1>we thought that consciousness had to be a product of

0:16:30.676 --> 0:16:33.476
<v Speaker 1>the cortex, this you know, new part of the most

0:16:33.556 --> 0:16:37.356
<v Speaker 1>advanced human part of the brain. Surely, you know consciousness,

0:16:37.436 --> 0:16:42.756
<v Speaker 1>this great achievement of humans, must originate there. But he

0:16:42.876 --> 0:16:48.316
<v Speaker 1>suggests it starts with feelings, not with thoughts, hunger and

0:16:48.436 --> 0:16:52.836
<v Speaker 1>thirst and warmth and itch, and that these are the

0:16:52.876 --> 0:16:56.956
<v Speaker 1>inaugural acts of consciousness. Basically, you know, we forget that

0:16:56.996 --> 0:17:00.916
<v Speaker 1>the brain exists to support the body, keep the body alive,

0:17:01.036 --> 0:17:04.276
<v Speaker 1>not the other way around. And feelings are the language

0:17:04.316 --> 0:17:08.156
<v Speaker 1>that the body uses to communicate with the brain and

0:17:08.436 --> 0:17:11.956
<v Speaker 1>tell it when homeostasis is not working right, when you're

0:17:11.956 --> 0:17:17.476
<v Speaker 1>too hot to cold, hungry, you know whatever. And these feelings,

0:17:17.516 --> 0:17:20.036
<v Speaker 1>some of them are dealt with automatically, but some of

0:17:20.076 --> 0:17:23.796
<v Speaker 1>them have to be dealt with consciously. So it begins

0:17:23.836 --> 0:17:26.876
<v Speaker 1>in the brain stem, not in the cortex, the upper

0:17:26.876 --> 0:17:30.156
<v Speaker 1>brain stem. And indeed, if you have a leisure in

0:17:30.196 --> 0:17:33.036
<v Speaker 1>the upper brainstem, you lose consciousness, whereas if you lack

0:17:33.076 --> 0:17:38.356
<v Speaker 1>a cortex completely, there's evidence that you are conscious. So

0:17:38.436 --> 0:17:41.516
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the evidence they're working with. There still

0:17:41.596 --> 0:17:47.316
<v Speaker 1>is the question of who's doing the feeling, and saying

0:17:47.356 --> 0:17:52.596
<v Speaker 1>that feelings by definition are felt doesn't quite answer that problem.

0:17:52.876 --> 0:17:56.916
<v Speaker 1>But I found that line of reasoning really compelling, and

0:17:56.956 --> 0:17:59.796
<v Speaker 1>I think that we need to pay more attention to

0:17:59.876 --> 0:18:03.076
<v Speaker 1>feelings as an originator of consciousness.

0:18:03.196 --> 0:18:06.356
<v Speaker 2>He mentioned, there's some evidence to show that there is consciousness.

0:18:06.876 --> 0:18:11.036
<v Speaker 2>How is it that researchers have found ways to evaluate

0:18:11.196 --> 0:18:14.676
<v Speaker 2>consciousness and other entities given that we can never fully know,

0:18:15.236 --> 0:18:19.156
<v Speaker 2>So we're like tris for consciousness.

0:18:18.356 --> 0:18:19.636
<v Speaker 1>In other creatures.

0:18:19.716 --> 0:18:21.716
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or in the person with the brain damage as

0:18:21.716 --> 0:18:22.396
<v Speaker 2>you were describing.

0:18:22.516 --> 0:18:25.436
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, there's a horrible form of brain damage.

0:18:25.916 --> 0:18:29.756
<v Speaker 1>Certain kids are born without a cortex, and nevertheless they

0:18:29.756 --> 0:18:34.316
<v Speaker 1>appear to have appropriate emotional reactions to things, to various stimuli,

0:18:34.836 --> 0:18:39.716
<v Speaker 1>and animals can be decorticated, which sounds pretty awful, and

0:18:39.756 --> 0:18:43.916
<v Speaker 1>that they too show evidence of consciousness. Again, though you

0:18:43.916 --> 0:18:47.636
<v Speaker 1>know you have to impute consciousness. You can't even I

0:18:47.836 --> 0:18:50.996
<v Speaker 1>have to impute it to you. I can't be sure

0:18:51.036 --> 0:18:53.596
<v Speaker 1>you're conscious. There's no way to prove someone is conscious

0:18:53.636 --> 0:18:56.636
<v Speaker 1>except oh, you've got the behaviors of a conscious being

0:18:56.876 --> 0:18:59.356
<v Speaker 1>and you're you know, you're my species, and you know

0:19:00.796 --> 0:19:04.876
<v Speaker 1>they don't take this personal.

0:19:04.996 --> 0:19:13.916
<v Speaker 2>Yes, talk about breaking emotional intimacy, man. So one question

0:19:13.956 --> 0:19:19.076
<v Speaker 2>I have is what the necessary ingredients are for creating

0:19:19.076 --> 0:19:22.196
<v Speaker 2>a conscious entity? And again, in this whole space, it's

0:19:22.196 --> 0:19:24.556
<v Speaker 2>always just about theories, right, I Mean, one of the

0:19:24.556 --> 0:19:27.556
<v Speaker 2>things you open the book by saying is like, you

0:19:27.636 --> 0:19:31.116
<v Speaker 2>went on this quest, and there's even more things to

0:19:31.156 --> 0:19:35.116
<v Speaker 2>be confused about post the quest than before. But how

0:19:35.156 --> 0:19:37.996
<v Speaker 2>do people think about the necessary ingredients? And obviously this

0:19:38.036 --> 0:19:40.556
<v Speaker 2>is particularly pertinent right now in the era of AI,

0:19:41.036 --> 0:19:45.516
<v Speaker 2>and whether scientists ever deem AI to be conscious, it's.

0:19:45.436 --> 0:19:48.756
<v Speaker 1>Going to be really hard to tell. Already. You know,

0:19:48.876 --> 0:19:52.236
<v Speaker 1>ais that are clearly not conscious are convincing people they

0:19:52.316 --> 0:19:55.916
<v Speaker 1>are conscious. People are falling in love with chatbots. People

0:19:55.996 --> 0:19:59.676
<v Speaker 1>are convinced they've solved important problems of math and physics

0:19:59.676 --> 0:20:03.796
<v Speaker 1>who aren't even mathematicians or physicists. People are being convinced

0:20:03.836 --> 0:20:07.716
<v Speaker 1>they're gods. There's AI psychosis is a real thing right now.

0:20:07.996 --> 0:20:11.756
<v Speaker 1>It's really frightening. I don't think AIS can be conscious.

0:20:11.796 --> 0:20:13.996
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can, you know, make that argument for

0:20:14.076 --> 0:20:16.396
<v Speaker 1>you if you want, But the point is it's not

0:20:16.436 --> 0:20:19.556
<v Speaker 1>going to matter, because people are going to think they're conscious.

0:20:19.916 --> 0:20:22.596
<v Speaker 1>The usual test, so we had this Turing test right

0:20:22.716 --> 0:20:26.316
<v Speaker 1>to determine if a computer is intelligent, and if he

0:20:26.356 --> 0:20:29.636
<v Speaker 1>could fool someone an intelligent human who didn't know he

0:20:29.716 --> 0:20:31.556
<v Speaker 1>was talking to a computer or she was talking to

0:20:31.556 --> 0:20:34.316
<v Speaker 1>a computer, then it was intelligent. But that doesn't work

0:20:34.356 --> 0:20:37.756
<v Speaker 1>for consciousness because consciousness is pretty easy to fake. We

0:20:38.076 --> 0:20:41.836
<v Speaker 1>anthropomorphize everything. It's just a human bias, I think, to

0:20:41.916 --> 0:20:50.076
<v Speaker 1>anthropomorphized thing, and it's safer to anthropomortize. And so I

0:20:50.116 --> 0:20:52.996
<v Speaker 1>think the only test, and I'm saying this is someone

0:20:53.036 --> 0:20:58.396
<v Speaker 1>with very little computer sophistication, would be to build an

0:20:58.396 --> 0:21:04.716
<v Speaker 1>AI from which you never included any of the human

0:21:04.756 --> 0:21:10.796
<v Speaker 1>conversation about consciousness or feelings, and you don't give it

0:21:10.876 --> 0:21:15.436
<v Speaker 1>any novels to read, no poetry, and then have a

0:21:15.476 --> 0:21:19.876
<v Speaker 1>conversation with it about consciousness. And I'm guessing it won't

0:21:19.876 --> 0:21:23.236
<v Speaker 1>do very well. Yeah, but I don't know. I hope

0:21:23.316 --> 0:21:26.556
<v Speaker 1>someone who you know works for Google will undertake this.

0:21:28.316 --> 0:21:29.156
<v Speaker 3>It makes a lot of sense.

0:21:29.196 --> 0:21:32.756
<v Speaker 2>I think, brilliant instincts that that would be how we

0:21:32.756 --> 0:21:34.996
<v Speaker 2>could at least get some sort of signal, right at

0:21:34.996 --> 0:21:37.116
<v Speaker 2>a meaningful, reliable signal out of the machine.

0:21:37.156 --> 0:21:39.716
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And you know, I think the feeling issue.

0:21:39.716 --> 0:21:42.956
<v Speaker 1>If it is true that consciousness depends on feelings, which

0:21:42.996 --> 0:21:46.516
<v Speaker 1>is to say, on a body, Yeah, then that's a

0:21:46.556 --> 0:21:49.276
<v Speaker 1>real problem for ais. They lack bodies. If you think

0:21:49.316 --> 0:21:51.996
<v Speaker 1>about what a feeling is, it's very much tied to

0:21:52.596 --> 0:21:56.596
<v Speaker 1>having a body that is vulnerable, that can suffer, and

0:21:56.676 --> 0:22:00.196
<v Speaker 1>probably that it's mortal. And I don't see that working

0:22:00.276 --> 0:22:00.956
<v Speaker 1>for machines.

0:22:01.356 --> 0:22:05.636
<v Speaker 2>How should we think about the constituent parts of consciousness?

0:22:05.996 --> 0:22:08.916
<v Speaker 2>Does it require a nervous system? People used to think, Oh,

0:22:08.956 --> 0:22:11.596
<v Speaker 2>it's intelligence, that's all the needed. If the thing becomes

0:22:11.636 --> 0:22:13.636
<v Speaker 2>intelligent enough, consciousness.

0:22:13.156 --> 0:22:17.316
<v Speaker 1>Will enron but they're actually very different ideas intelligence and consciousness.

0:22:17.356 --> 0:22:19.996
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they're kind of orthogonal. I don't

0:22:19.996 --> 0:22:21.916
<v Speaker 1>think one. I mean, we all know people that are

0:22:22.716 --> 0:22:26.716
<v Speaker 1>conscious but not that intelligent, and the other way around.

0:22:26.716 --> 0:22:27.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure.

0:22:28.356 --> 0:22:32.396
<v Speaker 2>You is your instinct then that consciousness requires a nervous

0:22:32.436 --> 0:22:33.996
<v Speaker 2>system of some kind.

0:22:34.436 --> 0:22:36.876
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, the plants are doing pretty well without

0:22:36.876 --> 0:22:42.756
<v Speaker 1>a nervous system. You know, first chapters about what science

0:22:42.796 --> 0:22:46.476
<v Speaker 1>has to say about plant consciousness or sentience, which is

0:22:46.476 --> 0:22:48.876
<v Speaker 1>a much more appropriate word I think when it comes

0:22:48.916 --> 0:22:53.716
<v Speaker 1>to plants. And I learned all this incredible research. There's

0:22:53.756 --> 0:22:57.476
<v Speaker 1>a group of kind of renegade botanists. They call themselves

0:22:57.516 --> 0:23:02.516
<v Speaker 1>plant neurobiologists, even though they are no neurons involved. They're

0:23:02.636 --> 0:23:07.116
<v Speaker 1>trolling more conventional botanists by calling themselves that. And they

0:23:07.116 --> 0:23:09.076
<v Speaker 1>do things like, you know, see if they can tea

0:23:09.476 --> 0:23:13.436
<v Speaker 1>plant and see how long it'll remember a lesson. And yes,

0:23:13.596 --> 0:23:16.036
<v Speaker 1>you can teach a plant and it will remember for

0:23:16.156 --> 0:23:19.836
<v Speaker 1>like twenty eight days, which is twenty seven more than

0:23:19.876 --> 0:23:23.636
<v Speaker 1>a fruitfly. I can remember anything. Oh what else can

0:23:23.676 --> 0:23:26.076
<v Speaker 1>they do? I mean, there's a vine that changes its

0:23:26.156 --> 0:23:31.076
<v Speaker 1>leaf shape depending on what plant it's colonizing. Yeah, how

0:23:31.076 --> 0:23:33.236
<v Speaker 1>does it see the leaf shape to imitate it? How

0:23:33.276 --> 0:23:37.796
<v Speaker 1>does it do that? We don't really know. They can hear.

0:23:38.556 --> 0:23:42.236
<v Speaker 1>If you play a recording of caterpillars munching on leaves,

0:23:42.356 --> 0:23:46.196
<v Speaker 1>they will react and send toxins to their own leaves

0:23:46.236 --> 0:23:51.196
<v Speaker 1>and alert other plants. They recognize self and kin. If

0:23:51.236 --> 0:23:53.836
<v Speaker 1>you put them in a pot to compete, if they're

0:23:53.876 --> 0:23:58.156
<v Speaker 1>with a related plant, they won't compete. They'll share, incredible,

0:23:58.396 --> 0:24:01.116
<v Speaker 1>but they'll compete otherwise. So they have some sense of

0:24:01.116 --> 0:24:04.596
<v Speaker 1>self and other anyway, and the same anesthetics that will

0:24:04.596 --> 0:24:08.316
<v Speaker 1>put out a human put out plants. Now you might think, well,

0:24:08.316 --> 0:24:11.156
<v Speaker 1>they're already kind of out, aren't they, But no, they're not.

0:24:11.356 --> 0:24:14.276
<v Speaker 1>They have behaviors, they're just very slow. So they have

0:24:14.316 --> 0:24:18.636
<v Speaker 1>two modes of being. That's really curious anyway. So I

0:24:18.676 --> 0:24:21.756
<v Speaker 1>went deep and finally concluded that I wouldn't use the

0:24:21.756 --> 0:24:26.036
<v Speaker 1>word conscious for them, in that they don't have interiority,

0:24:26.156 --> 0:24:28.436
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a voice in their heads, they don't

0:24:28.436 --> 0:24:35.036
<v Speaker 1>have heads. But they're sentient, and sensient is kind of

0:24:35.036 --> 0:24:39.516
<v Speaker 1>a more basic form of consciousness, more elemental, and it

0:24:39.636 --> 0:24:43.316
<v Speaker 1>really just connotes they have senses, they feel and they

0:24:43.356 --> 0:24:46.196
<v Speaker 1>can recognize good and bad changes in their environment and

0:24:46.236 --> 0:24:48.956
<v Speaker 1>respond appropriately, and that may be a property of life.

0:24:49.316 --> 0:24:52.716
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not prepared to say you need a nervous

0:24:52.716 --> 0:24:54.316
<v Speaker 1>system to have consciousness.

0:24:56.636 --> 0:25:00.996
<v Speaker 2>After the break, Michael's exploration of consciousness takes a personal turn,

0:25:01.756 --> 0:25:05.596
<v Speaker 2>and he's quite surprised by what he finds. That's in

0:25:05.636 --> 0:25:30.956
<v Speaker 2>a moment on a slight change of plans. As the

0:25:30.996 --> 0:25:33.876
<v Speaker 2>book advances, things get more personal, right, So you get

0:25:33.876 --> 0:25:37.356
<v Speaker 2>to the feeling and thinking in self chapters and you

0:25:37.636 --> 0:25:41.276
<v Speaker 2>end up interrogating your own consciousness. You're like, let me

0:25:41.316 --> 0:25:45.796
<v Speaker 2>do some firsthand experimenting and observation here, and you conduct

0:25:45.796 --> 0:25:50.356
<v Speaker 2>this fun little experiment in which you are quite surprised

0:25:50.436 --> 0:25:52.236
<v Speaker 2>by the findings. Do you mind sharing that?

0:25:53.316 --> 0:25:56.116
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So this isn't a book all about science. It's

0:25:56.156 --> 0:25:58.276
<v Speaker 1>a book that kind of starts with science but ends

0:25:58.316 --> 0:26:04.796
<v Speaker 1>up somewhere different. And as I was talking to these

0:26:04.836 --> 0:26:08.556
<v Speaker 1>scientists who work on consciousness, I realized what they were

0:26:08.596 --> 0:26:10.716
<v Speaker 1>talking about and what was going on in my head.

0:26:10.716 --> 0:26:13.596
<v Speaker 1>We're not quite the same thing. And it's not because

0:26:13.636 --> 0:26:16.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm so idiosyncratic. It's that they focused on things like

0:26:16.676 --> 0:26:19.316
<v Speaker 1>visual perception, because that's what we know the most about

0:26:19.356 --> 0:26:22.076
<v Speaker 1>in the brain. But when I think of consciousness, I

0:26:22.076 --> 0:26:24.996
<v Speaker 1>think of thoughts, I think of interiority, I think of

0:26:25.236 --> 0:26:27.316
<v Speaker 1>all these other things, and they don't want to go

0:26:27.476 --> 0:26:30.076
<v Speaker 1>near that. It's hard enough to figure out how a

0:26:30.156 --> 0:26:34.116
<v Speaker 1>world appears to our perceptions. So I went looking for

0:26:34.196 --> 0:26:37.596
<v Speaker 1>scientists who were looking at thought and I met this

0:26:37.676 --> 0:26:41.356
<v Speaker 1>guy named Russell Hurlbert who teaches at the University of

0:26:41.436 --> 0:26:44.396
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, and he has been doing one experiment for

0:26:44.436 --> 0:26:49.676
<v Speaker 1>fifty years of his life, and that is sampling people's

0:26:49.676 --> 0:26:53.076
<v Speaker 1>inner experience. And he does this with this He has

0:26:53.076 --> 0:26:57.316
<v Speaker 1>a beeper device that you carry around, and fifty years

0:26:57.316 --> 0:27:00.796
<v Speaker 1>ago there were no beepers, there were no personal electronic devices.

0:27:00.836 --> 0:27:02.876
<v Speaker 1>He had to design and build it, and it has

0:27:02.916 --> 0:27:05.956
<v Speaker 1>a little ear piece and you keep the thing in

0:27:05.996 --> 0:27:09.916
<v Speaker 1>your pocket and at random times of day, the sharp

0:27:10.076 --> 0:27:13.996
<v Speaker 1>beep goes into your ear and you know immediately what

0:27:14.036 --> 0:27:16.196
<v Speaker 1>it is, and you take out a pad and you

0:27:16.236 --> 0:27:18.836
<v Speaker 1>write down what you were thinking, and then you do

0:27:18.916 --> 0:27:21.516
<v Speaker 1>about five beeps in a day, and then you have

0:27:21.556 --> 0:27:23.516
<v Speaker 1>a session with him on zoom where he kind of

0:27:23.516 --> 0:27:27.156
<v Speaker 1>interrogates you. So, for example, I would have a beep

0:27:27.436 --> 0:27:29.636
<v Speaker 1>and I have to warn you my beeps were very

0:27:29.636 --> 0:27:37.116
<v Speaker 1>banal and often involved food. So I had this beat.

0:27:37.436 --> 0:27:40.796
<v Speaker 1>I had seasoned a filet of salmon, and I was

0:27:40.836 --> 0:27:42.796
<v Speaker 1>walking to the fridge to put it in the fridge

0:27:42.836 --> 0:27:45.996
<v Speaker 1>and then beep, And at that moment I was thinking, shit,

0:27:46.076 --> 0:27:49.836
<v Speaker 1>I forgot the pepper, and that seemed like a good,

0:27:49.956 --> 0:27:52.956
<v Speaker 1>clear beep. But when I went to talk to Russell

0:27:52.956 --> 0:27:56.516
<v Speaker 1>about him, he would say, well, did you hear that?

0:27:57.436 --> 0:27:59.716
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear the word pepper or did you say

0:27:59.756 --> 0:28:02.556
<v Speaker 1>the word pepper? So when you have that voice in

0:28:02.596 --> 0:28:04.436
<v Speaker 1>your head, are you listening to it or are you

0:28:04.556 --> 0:28:07.556
<v Speaker 1>speaking it? And that's very hard to determine. I had

0:28:07.636 --> 0:28:12.956
<v Speaker 1>no idea, and it was really a hard experiment. Part

0:28:12.996 --> 0:28:15.916
<v Speaker 1>of it is you're constantly wondering, what if the beep

0:28:15.996 --> 0:28:22.036
<v Speaker 1>goes off now? And you're allowed to erase a couple

0:28:22.076 --> 0:28:28.316
<v Speaker 1>beeps if it's like too embarrassing. Anyway, it was an

0:28:28.356 --> 0:28:31.556
<v Speaker 1>interesting experiment. But fifty years later I said, so, what

0:28:31.596 --> 0:28:34.076
<v Speaker 1>have you learned? He's a funny guy. He's like totally

0:28:34.156 --> 0:28:38.316
<v Speaker 1>allergic to theory. He's drawn no theoretical conclusions from this work.

0:28:38.596 --> 0:28:43.196
<v Speaker 1>He's got fifty years of data and he doesn't believe

0:28:43.236 --> 0:28:45.876
<v Speaker 1>in theory, and you know, when I told him I

0:28:45.956 --> 0:28:48.316
<v Speaker 1>was writing a book on consciousness, he was like, good

0:28:48.396 --> 0:28:54.876
<v Speaker 1>luck with that anyway. The finding, though, which I think

0:28:54.916 --> 0:28:57.716
<v Speaker 1>is really significant, is that, you know, most of us

0:28:57.756 --> 0:29:01.796
<v Speaker 1>assume our thoughts are in the form of language, and

0:29:01.996 --> 0:29:04.996
<v Speaker 1>he says that's actually a minority. There are lots of

0:29:05.036 --> 0:29:08.476
<v Speaker 1>people who have their thoughts are visual, They see and

0:29:08.756 --> 0:29:11.196
<v Speaker 1>they think in images. Then there are people who think

0:29:11.236 --> 0:29:15.596
<v Speaker 1>an unsymbolized thought. And the word thought, which we all

0:29:15.636 --> 0:29:18.156
<v Speaker 1>think we know what it means, like what are you thinking,

0:29:18.756 --> 0:29:21.756
<v Speaker 1>means very different things to different people. And that was

0:29:21.916 --> 0:29:25.036
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting to me because I assume that, you know,

0:29:25.156 --> 0:29:27.956
<v Speaker 1>language is at the heart of it, but he has

0:29:28.036 --> 0:29:30.676
<v Speaker 1>found that not to be the case. We resort to

0:29:30.756 --> 0:29:33.796
<v Speaker 1>language obviously to tell our thoughts to other people, but

0:29:33.836 --> 0:29:35.916
<v Speaker 1>they don't start there. And we had a lot of

0:29:36.036 --> 0:29:40.516
<v Speaker 1>arguments because I just didn't believe you could disaggregate a

0:29:40.556 --> 0:29:44.396
<v Speaker 1>thought that in my experience, there were multiple things going

0:29:44.396 --> 0:29:46.956
<v Speaker 1>on at the same time that I was like that

0:29:47.036 --> 0:29:49.476
<v Speaker 1>the cheeseboard deciding whether to buy a roll or not,

0:29:49.716 --> 0:29:54.236
<v Speaker 1>this was another big thought I had, But I was

0:29:54.276 --> 0:29:56.676
<v Speaker 1>also looking at the plaid skirt on the woman in

0:29:56.676 --> 0:29:58.396
<v Speaker 1>front of me that was really unflattering.

0:29:58.596 --> 0:29:59.436
<v Speaker 4>And I was.

0:30:01.036 --> 0:30:03.716
<v Speaker 1>Smelling the cheeses and the cheeseboard and the smell of

0:30:03.796 --> 0:30:05.876
<v Speaker 1>bake goods, and there were all these things going on.

0:30:06.196 --> 0:30:09.436
<v Speaker 1>And I had also just read William James's s say

0:30:09.956 --> 0:30:13.476
<v Speaker 1>on the Stream of Thought, and he's just so granular

0:30:13.596 --> 0:30:16.276
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of our thoughts. And he said, you know,

0:30:16.356 --> 0:30:20.276
<v Speaker 1>no thought, no two thoughts are alike, even your own thoughts.

0:30:20.276 --> 0:30:22.916
<v Speaker 1>Whenever you come back to a thought, it has been

0:30:23.236 --> 0:30:29.556
<v Speaker 1>colored or tinted by the thought that came before. And

0:30:29.636 --> 0:30:33.356
<v Speaker 1>so Hurlbert was making me dissect my thoughts and separate them.

0:30:33.396 --> 0:30:36.596
<v Speaker 1>So finally, at our final debrief, I said, so, what

0:30:36.676 --> 0:30:39.076
<v Speaker 1>kind of thinker do you think I am? And he said, well,

0:30:39.076 --> 0:30:41.036
<v Speaker 1>there's a fourth category, and these are people who have

0:30:41.156 --> 0:30:49.836
<v Speaker 1>very little inner life. So there you have it.

0:30:54.036 --> 0:30:56.956
<v Speaker 3>We have here an impoverished in your mind.

0:30:57.956 --> 0:30:59.556
<v Speaker 1>Talk about the zombie problem.

0:31:00.036 --> 0:31:02.476
<v Speaker 2>That's the kind of mind that produces this. I think

0:31:02.476 --> 0:31:06.116
<v Speaker 2>we're in good shape, Michael. The rest of us are hopeless.

0:31:07.276 --> 0:31:11.196
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming that, given your profession, the fact that you

0:31:11.356 --> 0:31:14.956
<v Speaker 2>write for a living, you assumed, as I think you

0:31:14.996 --> 0:31:16.756
<v Speaker 2>were nodding to this right, you kind of assumed that

0:31:16.836 --> 0:31:20.996
<v Speaker 2>you thought in words of some kind, right, and then

0:31:21.036 --> 0:31:24.036
<v Speaker 2>what did you observe? So, for example, when you said, oh,

0:31:24.036 --> 0:31:27.556
<v Speaker 2>should I forgot the pepper? When you tried to dissect that,

0:31:27.796 --> 0:31:30.076
<v Speaker 2>did you notice that an image had come to mind

0:31:30.156 --> 0:31:30.796
<v Speaker 2>of the pepper?

0:31:31.556 --> 0:31:34.756
<v Speaker 1>And it was clearly a word pepper? It was just

0:31:34.836 --> 0:31:37.756
<v Speaker 1>so clear. But I realized a lot of my thoughts

0:31:38.356 --> 0:31:42.516
<v Speaker 1>are what James called promontory thoughts, thoughts on the verge

0:31:42.516 --> 0:31:45.996
<v Speaker 1>of becoming words, and that there's a gap between the

0:31:46.076 --> 0:31:49.316
<v Speaker 1>thought and the word. And I definitely have that. I mean,

0:31:49.516 --> 0:31:51.516
<v Speaker 1>I'll have thought and I have to think a little

0:31:51.516 --> 0:31:54.876
<v Speaker 1>more to put it into words. So I don't think

0:31:55.476 --> 0:31:58.516
<v Speaker 1>I think in words I would have assumed I did,

0:31:59.156 --> 0:32:03.676
<v Speaker 1>But I think in something just a little bit. Yeah,

0:32:03.916 --> 0:32:04.756
<v Speaker 1>pre linguistic.

0:32:05.596 --> 0:32:09.996
<v Speaker 2>And do you find that or when you're thinking, when

0:32:10.076 --> 0:32:13.396
<v Speaker 2>you think about your thoughts in the context of an

0:32:13.396 --> 0:32:16.276
<v Speaker 2>experiment in which you know you're going to be judged, Oh,

0:32:16.316 --> 0:32:16.596
<v Speaker 2>there's a.

0:32:16.636 --> 0:32:18.956
<v Speaker 1>Huge observer of your thoughts without questions.

0:32:19.036 --> 0:32:22.516
<v Speaker 2>Yes, like the what kinds of artifacts did you notice emerge?

0:32:22.636 --> 0:32:25.676
<v Speaker 2>Like were you you maybe rounded out of thought a

0:32:25.716 --> 0:32:28.276
<v Speaker 2>little bit? Or the skirt wasn't that bad?

0:32:28.676 --> 0:32:28.996
<v Speaker 5>Was it?

0:32:30.836 --> 0:32:33.796
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? No, it does make you self conscious, Yeah, meditation

0:32:33.956 --> 0:32:36.596
<v Speaker 1>does that too. You know. Meditation is one of these

0:32:36.636 --> 0:32:39.356
<v Speaker 1>places we can go to watch our thoughts and it's

0:32:39.756 --> 0:32:43.356
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting how weird they are. And we don't

0:32:43.476 --> 0:32:49.756
<v Speaker 1>really think about that very often, but I'm always struck by, like,

0:32:49.836 --> 0:32:51.796
<v Speaker 1>where did that thought come from? I go to a

0:32:51.836 --> 0:32:55.276
<v Speaker 1>meditation class and the teacher will often do this exercise

0:32:55.316 --> 0:32:59.236
<v Speaker 1>of like go into your mind, and you know, you've

0:32:59.276 --> 0:33:03.156
<v Speaker 1>observed your thoughts and your feelings, and now look for

0:33:03.276 --> 0:33:04.236
<v Speaker 1>who's thinking them.

0:33:04.396 --> 0:33:05.716
<v Speaker 3>Yes, oh my gosh, who's the.

0:33:05.636 --> 0:33:07.996
<v Speaker 1>Thinker of your thoughts? Who's the feeler of your feelings?

0:33:08.316 --> 0:33:14.636
<v Speaker 1>And there's nobody home, I mean, in my case to

0:33:14.636 --> 0:33:18.996
<v Speaker 1>speak for you already established that. So I mean and

0:33:19.116 --> 0:33:22.036
<v Speaker 1>David Yume did this experiment in the seventeen forties. You know,

0:33:22.116 --> 0:33:25.596
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to understand the self, and he went

0:33:25.676 --> 0:33:30.196
<v Speaker 1>looking for it in his own, you know, by introspecting,

0:33:30.236 --> 0:33:32.796
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I found plenty of perceptions and ideas

0:33:32.796 --> 0:33:38.276
<v Speaker 1>and feelings, but I didn't find any perceiver. And the

0:33:38.356 --> 0:33:41.556
<v Speaker 1>self is a very elusive concept and it's one of

0:33:41.556 --> 0:33:47.356
<v Speaker 1>the more interesting creations or manifestations of consciousness. And so yeah, so,

0:33:47.516 --> 0:33:49.276
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, I looked at the Zena or

0:33:49.316 --> 0:33:51.796
<v Speaker 1>Buddhist ideas of self too, and you know, they believe

0:33:51.836 --> 0:33:55.596
<v Speaker 1>self is an illusion, and I get where they come out.

0:33:55.876 --> 0:33:59.236
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but I also think that there is I mean,

0:33:59.276 --> 0:34:02.036
<v Speaker 1>there's a conventional self right there's the self that you

0:34:02.076 --> 0:34:07.476
<v Speaker 1>and I are experiencing right now, and there may be

0:34:07.556 --> 0:34:11.996
<v Speaker 1>no basis for it, but it's nevertheless conventionally useful. But

0:34:12.076 --> 0:34:14.476
<v Speaker 1>it's also very interesting. And I explored this in this

0:34:14.556 --> 0:34:19.876
<v Speaker 1>chapter on the Self, that consciousness can survive the disappearance

0:34:19.916 --> 0:34:22.316
<v Speaker 1>of the self. I was surprised by that.

0:34:22.476 --> 0:34:24.596
<v Speaker 3>You're telling in the context of a psychedelic trip.

0:34:24.716 --> 0:34:27.316
<v Speaker 1>That's one context, but there are other context too. I mean,

0:34:28.036 --> 0:34:31.916
<v Speaker 1>experienced meditators get to a point of complete selflessness, yet

0:34:31.916 --> 0:34:35.396
<v Speaker 1>there's still conscious. There's a philosopher I interviewed named Thomas

0:34:35.396 --> 0:34:39.156
<v Speaker 1>Metzinger who's collected like a fifteen hundred case studies of

0:34:39.236 --> 0:34:42.756
<v Speaker 1>people having consciousness without a self only, some of which

0:34:42.796 --> 0:34:45.876
<v Speaker 1>are psychedelic. And he points out that we all have

0:34:46.036 --> 0:34:49.916
<v Speaker 1>this experience every morning when we wake up and there

0:34:49.996 --> 0:34:54.156
<v Speaker 1>is that five hundred millisecond gap between like until you

0:34:54.236 --> 0:34:57.716
<v Speaker 1>realize where you are and who you are, and if

0:34:57.716 --> 0:34:59.556
<v Speaker 1>you're in a hotel room, it's like seven hundred and

0:34:59.596 --> 0:35:04.476
<v Speaker 1>fifty milliseconds. No, because it's very disorienting. Yeah, and so

0:35:05.156 --> 0:35:09.196
<v Speaker 1>we've all been there. So yeah, the self is a

0:35:09.396 --> 0:35:10.316
<v Speaker 1>challenging concept.

0:35:10.396 --> 0:35:13.796
<v Speaker 2>I feel like one of the fastest ways to challenge

0:35:13.836 --> 0:35:16.236
<v Speaker 2>my personal belief that I have any free will at

0:35:16.236 --> 0:35:18.796
<v Speaker 2>all is to ask myself where a thought came from?

0:35:19.036 --> 0:35:20.956
<v Speaker 3>And then where where where did that? Who did that?

0:35:20.996 --> 0:35:23.756
<v Speaker 2>Who generated that thought? And then who generated that other thought?

0:35:23.796 --> 0:35:26.316
<v Speaker 2>And oh my god, Okay, yeah I don't I'm not

0:35:26.356 --> 0:35:29.396
<v Speaker 2>in control of any of it. Yeah, They're all just happening.

0:35:29.716 --> 0:35:30.636
<v Speaker 3>There's no conductor.

0:35:31.716 --> 0:35:36.076
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very it's very interesting, and you defamiliarize these

0:35:36.076 --> 0:35:38.556
<v Speaker 1>things that you just take for granted, and so you

0:35:38.596 --> 0:35:40.076
<v Speaker 1>may not want to go down that whole past.

0:35:40.196 --> 0:35:44.036
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I want to get to questions. So I have

0:35:44.036 --> 0:35:47.436
<v Speaker 2>one final, one final question for you. I feel like,

0:35:47.436 --> 0:35:48.996
<v Speaker 2>by the way, if my beeper went off right now,

0:35:49.036 --> 0:35:52.836
<v Speaker 2>it would be is cheeseboard going to be open after

0:35:53.036 --> 0:35:55.916
<v Speaker 2>this event and so that I can grab a slice?

0:35:56.076 --> 0:35:56.756
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for that.

0:35:57.116 --> 0:36:01.196
<v Speaker 2>We do share the food obsession in commons. This is great, Okay, Uh.

0:36:01.916 --> 0:36:02.596
<v Speaker 3>I want to know.

0:36:05.036 --> 0:36:07.676
<v Speaker 2>How has writing this book changed the way that you

0:36:07.756 --> 0:36:11.556
<v Speaker 2>live your life?

0:36:12.756 --> 0:36:13.676
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question.

0:36:15.996 --> 0:36:16.196
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:36:16.436 --> 0:36:23.276
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely made me more aware of my thought processes.

0:36:23.516 --> 0:36:26.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm more definitely more aware of the windshield as I

0:36:26.636 --> 0:36:30.276
<v Speaker 1>go through life. I'm a little I have a little

0:36:30.276 --> 0:36:33.116
<v Speaker 1>more perspective on my ego, which is another word for

0:36:33.156 --> 0:36:36.956
<v Speaker 1>the self, and don't feel quite as identified with it

0:36:37.636 --> 0:36:40.676
<v Speaker 1>that I can like point at it and say, Okay,

0:36:40.716 --> 0:36:43.156
<v Speaker 1>that's one voice in my head, you know, but I

0:36:43.156 --> 0:36:46.636
<v Speaker 1>don't have to listen to it. And who is I

0:36:46.036 --> 0:36:50.516
<v Speaker 1>that in that sentence? I don't know. You know. I'm

0:36:50.516 --> 0:36:56.596
<v Speaker 1>a meditator also, and I really like entering that space.

0:36:57.036 --> 0:37:02.036
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the space of our conscious selves

0:37:02.116 --> 0:37:06.116
<v Speaker 1>are this this interiority is very precious and I've become

0:37:06.156 --> 0:37:10.116
<v Speaker 1>more appreciative of it and also worried about it because

0:37:10.156 --> 0:37:12.836
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that we're squandering it in various ways

0:37:12.876 --> 0:37:18.956
<v Speaker 1>and that we're just filling our minds with just you know, bullshit.

0:37:19.196 --> 0:37:21.476
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not to put too finn a term on it,

0:37:21.516 --> 0:37:25.036
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we have social media, you know, with

0:37:25.236 --> 0:37:29.596
<v Speaker 1>very sophisticated algorithms that give us these little dopamine hits.

0:37:29.916 --> 0:37:32.916
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you have to be conscious to scroll on

0:37:32.956 --> 0:37:38.316
<v Speaker 1>your phone, but minimally so, and now, you know, as

0:37:38.476 --> 0:37:42.236
<v Speaker 1>we form relationships with chatbots, you know, these are synthetic

0:37:42.316 --> 0:37:46.556
<v Speaker 1>relationships that offer none of the generative friction that comes

0:37:46.556 --> 0:37:50.436
<v Speaker 1>from real relationships. So I guess what I've come out

0:37:50.436 --> 0:37:52.716
<v Speaker 1>of it with is the sense that there's something very

0:37:52.756 --> 0:37:57.836
<v Speaker 1>precious here that's endangered and that we need to reclaim,

0:37:57.956 --> 0:37:59.956
<v Speaker 1>and we can reclaim. I mean, there are things you

0:37:59.956 --> 0:38:02.516
<v Speaker 1>can do. You can put down your phone and sit

0:38:02.636 --> 0:38:05.796
<v Speaker 1>with the boredom. Boredom is generative. Also if you just

0:38:05.876 --> 0:38:08.716
<v Speaker 1>sit there, you know, if you start watching people, you

0:38:08.756 --> 0:38:12.316
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about them, you overhear them, you mind wander.

0:38:12.476 --> 0:38:15.476
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's this. I learned a lot about what's

0:38:15.516 --> 0:38:19.756
<v Speaker 1>called spontaneous thought from a really interesting psychologist in the

0:38:19.836 --> 0:38:24.476
<v Speaker 1>thought section who and she studies mind wandering and daydreaming

0:38:24.596 --> 0:38:28.036
<v Speaker 1>and intuitions or you know, bolts from the blue, and

0:38:28.076 --> 0:38:32.036
<v Speaker 1>she says, we have less spontaneous thought in our lives

0:38:32.036 --> 0:38:34.876
<v Speaker 1>than we did ten or twenty years ago because we're

0:38:34.876 --> 0:38:37.596
<v Speaker 1>filling our heads with these distractions. And of course these

0:38:37.636 --> 0:38:41.516
<v Speaker 1>distractions have corporations behind them that want to monetize our attention,

0:38:41.956 --> 0:38:44.756
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, our consciousness. So I think we,

0:38:44.956 --> 0:38:46.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to take it back.

0:38:47.316 --> 0:38:50.716
<v Speaker 3>It's beautiful questions.

0:38:50.876 --> 0:38:53.396
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have microphones. If anybody wants to ask a question,

0:38:54.676 --> 0:38:56.196
<v Speaker 1>you want to come out and ask it there so

0:38:56.276 --> 0:38:57.156
<v Speaker 1>everybody can hear you.

0:38:57.236 --> 0:39:00.516
<v Speaker 6>I'll beat you to it too slow. Michael, thank you

0:39:00.716 --> 0:39:04.756
<v Speaker 6>fantastic book, really and for inspiring one thing. I think

0:39:04.756 --> 0:39:08.036
<v Speaker 6>it was in the section about Alison Gopnik. We talked

0:39:08.036 --> 0:39:12.356
<v Speaker 6>about how the selfless forms socially, you know, by the

0:39:12.396 --> 0:39:16.196
<v Speaker 6>engagement of parents with children encourage them to kind of

0:39:16.196 --> 0:39:20.196
<v Speaker 6>develop a self. So I'm curious about the kind of this,

0:39:20.996 --> 0:39:25.196
<v Speaker 6>you know, the meta consciousness, I guess, the social construct

0:39:25.236 --> 0:39:30.356
<v Speaker 6>of consciousness, and how society is in large constructs consciousness,

0:39:30.356 --> 0:39:35.076
<v Speaker 6>and whether you can hypothesize a kind of societal consciousness

0:39:35.116 --> 0:39:37.196
<v Speaker 6>as well.

0:39:37.436 --> 0:39:42.116
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good question. I mean, there are how

0:39:42.316 --> 0:39:46.476
<v Speaker 1>the way our consciousness is shaped by our social life.

0:39:47.116 --> 0:39:49.796
<v Speaker 1>I think is probably I mean, I think it's probably

0:39:49.836 --> 0:39:53.076
<v Speaker 1>critical and would be very different, and it's probably different

0:39:53.116 --> 0:39:57.156
<v Speaker 1>in different societies. You know, I think consciousness is I mean,

0:39:57.196 --> 0:40:00.316
<v Speaker 1>it probably is a biological phenomenon, but like a lot

0:40:00.356 --> 0:40:04.996
<v Speaker 1>of biological phenomenon, it has a social or even historical component.

0:40:05.596 --> 0:40:07.916
<v Speaker 1>My guess is that people who lived you know, five

0:40:07.996 --> 0:40:12.276
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago have a different consciousness than we do.

0:40:12.356 --> 0:40:17.156
<v Speaker 1>And my guess is we learn ways of being conscious.

0:40:17.236 --> 0:40:21.076
<v Speaker 1>I think great artists and possibly great philosophers may change

0:40:21.316 --> 0:40:25.756
<v Speaker 1>our sense of what consciousness is. So I think it probably.

0:40:25.796 --> 0:40:27.276
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know how to prove this, but

0:40:27.356 --> 0:40:31.836
<v Speaker 1>I think it is subject to the usual historical forces,

0:40:32.556 --> 0:40:35.476
<v Speaker 1>and it would be great. I mean, we have some

0:40:35.516 --> 0:40:37.956
<v Speaker 1>sense of this from literature, right, I mean, the mind

0:40:38.076 --> 0:40:41.796
<v Speaker 1>that conceived of the Odyssey and the Iliad was a

0:40:41.836 --> 0:40:44.716
<v Speaker 1>different mind. So yeah, I would say it does have

0:40:44.756 --> 0:40:46.836
<v Speaker 1>a social component.

0:40:46.636 --> 0:40:49.276
<v Speaker 6>And the fact that we can reference that. I love

0:40:49.636 --> 0:40:51.876
<v Speaker 6>the quote some literature and how you brought us through

0:40:51.916 --> 0:40:52.636
<v Speaker 6>that as well, And.

0:40:52.716 --> 0:40:55.236
<v Speaker 1>Well, literature was very important to me. I mean, you know,

0:40:56.596 --> 0:40:59.236
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point I realized, you know, novelists know

0:40:59.276 --> 0:41:03.756
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot about consciousness, and poets too, and in

0:41:03.796 --> 0:41:06.796
<v Speaker 1>some ways they're ahead of the scientists, and they've been

0:41:06.836 --> 0:41:09.036
<v Speaker 1>working on the problem longer than the scientists have to.

0:41:09.796 --> 0:41:14.876
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, thank you, thanks for your question. Hello, Hello,

0:41:14.916 --> 0:41:15.516
<v Speaker 1>good evening.

0:41:16.876 --> 0:41:20.196
<v Speaker 4>The young lady mentioned free will, and I think it

0:41:20.316 --> 0:41:23.876
<v Speaker 4>was a Bob Hope who was asked, do you believe

0:41:23.916 --> 0:41:27.036
<v Speaker 4>in free will? And he shrugged his shoulders and.

0:41:27.076 --> 0:41:33.836
<v Speaker 1>Said, I have no choice. Thank you for that.

0:41:35.596 --> 0:41:38.436
<v Speaker 4>So I recall.

0:41:38.196 --> 0:41:40.156
<v Speaker 3>Reading, oh and thanks for calling me young.

0:41:44.356 --> 0:41:54.956
<v Speaker 4>Everything's relative. I recall reading a book where Blaize Pascal

0:41:56.596 --> 0:42:02.516
<v Speaker 4>was talking about behavior and if there's a tug of war,

0:42:03.476 --> 0:42:08.156
<v Speaker 4>a battle between the heart and the brain, it's no contest.

0:42:09.356 --> 0:42:14.356
<v Speaker 4>The heart is going to dominate. And I'm wondering, in

0:42:14.436 --> 0:42:19.356
<v Speaker 4>this book or in some of your previous books, do

0:42:19.396 --> 0:42:25.116
<v Speaker 4>you talk about how the thought affects our behaviors?

0:42:27.036 --> 0:42:31.396
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do, And you know, I think one of

0:42:31.436 --> 0:42:35.116
<v Speaker 1>the lessons of this work that I was describing about

0:42:35.196 --> 0:42:39.476
<v Speaker 1>feelings is about the importance of feelings to decision making.

0:42:39.556 --> 0:42:42.996
<v Speaker 1>That's really what Demasio's book was about. And he found

0:42:42.996 --> 0:42:47.036
<v Speaker 1>that people who felt their way through decisions made better

0:42:47.116 --> 0:42:51.076
<v Speaker 1>decisions than people who say since the ability to feel

0:42:51.156 --> 0:42:54.956
<v Speaker 1>was impaired, and that there's a process in which we

0:42:55.756 --> 0:42:59.956
<v Speaker 1>pass our body does kind of a gut check on

0:43:00.036 --> 0:43:03.196
<v Speaker 1>when we're making decisions, and that when we do that,

0:43:03.276 --> 0:43:06.676
<v Speaker 1>we make better decisions. And so that's really the argument

0:43:06.716 --> 0:43:11.516
<v Speaker 1>of Descartes error. It's a really interesting book. And you know,

0:43:11.756 --> 0:43:14.796
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, if you think of the emotion of disgust,

0:43:15.596 --> 0:43:17.756
<v Speaker 1>which is a really interesting emotion, because it's a really

0:43:17.756 --> 0:43:21.476
<v Speaker 1>embodied emotion. There was an experiment I allude to in

0:43:21.516 --> 0:43:24.156
<v Speaker 1>the book where they had a control group and one

0:43:24.196 --> 0:43:28.116
<v Speaker 1>group got ginger and ate a bunch of ginger, and

0:43:28.436 --> 0:43:33.676
<v Speaker 1>then they were presented with a morally repellent scenario about

0:43:33.756 --> 0:43:36.876
<v Speaker 1>incest or something like that, and the people who had

0:43:36.876 --> 0:43:44.116
<v Speaker 1>eaten ginger were less judgmental because their stomachs had settled. So,

0:43:46.196 --> 0:43:51.596
<v Speaker 1>you know, embodiment is more important than I think we've realized.

0:43:52.596 --> 0:43:55.356
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's kind of a very interesting trend

0:43:55.436 --> 0:43:58.556
<v Speaker 1>in neuroscience to pay more attention to the body than

0:43:58.596 --> 0:44:00.196
<v Speaker 1>we once did. We used, you know, the brain in

0:44:00.236 --> 0:44:03.356
<v Speaker 1>the vat was a kind of like meme, and that

0:44:03.556 --> 0:44:08.556
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't work. Thank you, I thank you very much.

0:44:09.356 --> 0:44:14.036
<v Speaker 5>I can think of three examples of where language is

0:44:14.156 --> 0:44:20.156
<v Speaker 5>not connected consciousness. I used to work with very developmentally

0:44:20.236 --> 0:44:25.236
<v Speaker 5>delayed children who had no language, and they definitely were

0:44:25.316 --> 0:44:30.076
<v Speaker 5>able to communicate in other sensory ways. The second one

0:44:30.116 --> 0:44:32.196
<v Speaker 5>was I used to work with Coco of the gorilla,

0:44:32.956 --> 0:44:37.916
<v Speaker 5>and how the gorilla had such a presence and a

0:44:37.996 --> 0:44:43.236
<v Speaker 5>connection and looking in the gorilla's eyes and talking with

0:44:43.276 --> 0:44:47.556
<v Speaker 5>the gorilla who had apparently some language that was a

0:44:47.556 --> 0:44:50.676
<v Speaker 5>good example. And the third one that I feel is

0:44:50.796 --> 0:44:54.276
<v Speaker 5>very important to recognize is that I know deaf people

0:44:54.636 --> 0:44:59.796
<v Speaker 5>who were born deaf, who were profoundly deaf, had no language,

0:45:00.316 --> 0:45:04.636
<v Speaker 5>who didn't acquire language until they were five, six, seven

0:45:04.716 --> 0:45:09.476
<v Speaker 5>years old. And how do you think without words? How

0:45:09.476 --> 0:45:13.596
<v Speaker 5>do you think? How do you get concepts? And what

0:45:13.716 --> 0:45:16.676
<v Speaker 5>is your world like? Looking at the world from that,

0:45:16.916 --> 0:45:19.596
<v Speaker 5>So I would say that shows that those.

0:45:19.476 --> 0:45:20.316
<v Speaker 1>Are great examples.

0:45:20.396 --> 0:45:24.716
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, you don't need to have a language in

0:45:24.836 --> 0:45:26.676
<v Speaker 5>order to have a thought.

0:45:26.996 --> 0:45:27.756
<v Speaker 3>That's how I feel.

0:45:28.116 --> 0:45:30.956
<v Speaker 1>And if you read fiction, they are novelists who clearly

0:45:31.116 --> 0:45:35.196
<v Speaker 1>improvesd believe that, whereas Joyce thought consciousness was made out

0:45:35.236 --> 0:45:38.916
<v Speaker 1>of words, And yeah, that's a great example. Another one

0:45:39.276 --> 0:45:43.116
<v Speaker 1>is there was an experiment that recently happened where they

0:45:43.156 --> 0:45:46.996
<v Speaker 1>found that chimps have imagination, and they were able to

0:45:47.076 --> 0:45:49.596
<v Speaker 1>sit down with a chimp and have you know the

0:45:49.716 --> 0:45:51.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of imaginary tea party you might have with a

0:45:51.796 --> 0:45:54.516
<v Speaker 1>four year old where you're pouring and there's no liquid

0:45:54.556 --> 0:45:56.116
<v Speaker 1>and you're sipping and there's no liqu.

0:45:55.996 --> 0:45:58.396
<v Speaker 5>Cloco used to do things like that too, And when

0:45:58.396 --> 0:46:01.836
<v Speaker 5>she had a kitten who died, she would express her

0:46:01.996 --> 0:46:05.316
<v Speaker 5>sorrow and how sad she was and talk about the

0:46:05.396 --> 0:46:08.916
<v Speaker 5>past and the future, and that was something they thought

0:46:08.956 --> 0:46:09.796
<v Speaker 5>of the humans.

0:46:10.036 --> 0:46:13.116
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good do Well, we're losing our sense of exclusivity.

0:46:13.436 --> 0:46:15.356
<v Speaker 1>I think the only thing I'll be left is where

0:46:15.356 --> 0:46:21.396
<v Speaker 1>the species that worries about what consciousness is. Thank you

0:46:21.436 --> 0:46:22.636
<v Speaker 1>all for your wonderful question.

0:46:22.636 --> 0:46:24.716
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, Thank you, and thank you Maya,

0:46:25.316 --> 0:46:29.956
<v Speaker 3>thank you, thank.

0:46:29.716 --> 0:47:03.956
<v Speaker 2>You, hey, thanks so much for listening. You can find

0:47:03.956 --> 0:47:06.796
<v Speaker 2>more information about a world appears at the link in

0:47:06.836 --> 0:47:10.316
<v Speaker 2>the show notes. Next week, were visiting my conversation with

0:47:10.356 --> 0:47:13.796
<v Speaker 2>Michael on the topic that started it all, psychedelics.

0:47:14.156 --> 0:47:16.516
<v Speaker 1>One of the things psychedelics does is it takes all

0:47:16.636 --> 0:47:19.956
<v Speaker 1>that ironic crust we cover the world with and it

0:47:20.276 --> 0:47:24.356
<v Speaker 1>scrapes it off really effectively, and suddenly things appear with

0:47:24.556 --> 0:47:27.996
<v Speaker 1>the profundity and beauty of first sight. I mean, awe

0:47:28.436 --> 0:47:31.876
<v Speaker 1>at the ordinary. You know, a piece of music, a flower,

0:47:32.116 --> 0:47:35.876
<v Speaker 1>and that's a wonderful aspect of psychedelic experience.

0:47:36.716 --> 0:47:39.436
<v Speaker 2>Oh and one more thing, Thank you so much to

0:47:39.516 --> 0:47:41.636
<v Speaker 2>each and every one of you who's read my book,

0:47:41.676 --> 0:47:44.476
<v Speaker 2>The Other Side of Change. I've loved hearing about how

0:47:44.516 --> 0:47:47.436
<v Speaker 2>the stories have affected you or made you think differently

0:47:47.516 --> 0:47:49.996
<v Speaker 2>about the changes in your own life. I'd be so

0:47:50.156 --> 0:47:52.676
<v Speaker 2>grateful if you could share your experience of the book

0:47:52.796 --> 0:47:56.476
<v Speaker 2>on Goodreads. It really helps read the word. We've shared

0:47:56.476 --> 0:47:59.196
<v Speaker 2>the link in the episode notes. Thanks so much and

0:47:59.196 --> 0:48:11.756
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you next week. A Slight Change of Plans

0:48:11.876 --> 0:48:15.396
<v Speaker 2>is created, written, and executive produced by me Maya Shunker.

0:48:16.036 --> 0:48:20.356
<v Speaker 2>The Slight Change family includes our showrunner Alexander Garatin, our

0:48:20.476 --> 0:48:25.236
<v Speaker 2>editor Daphne Chen, our lead producer Megan Lubin, our associate

0:48:25.276 --> 0:48:30.516
<v Speaker 2>producer Sonia Gerwitt, and our sound engineer Erica Huang. Louis

0:48:30.556 --> 0:48:33.956
<v Speaker 2>Scara wrote our delightful theme song, and Ginger Smith helped

0:48:34.036 --> 0:48:34.916
<v Speaker 2>arrange the vocals.

0:48:35.756 --> 0:48:37.276
<v Speaker 3>A Slight Change of Plans is.

0:48:37.196 --> 0:48:40.996
<v Speaker 2>A production of Pushkin Industries, So big thanks to everyone there,

0:48:41.716 --> 0:49:03.076
<v Speaker 2>and of course, of very special thanks to Jimmy Lee

0:49:09.316 --> 0:49:09.356
<v Speaker 6>M