WEBVTT - Stocks Plunge and Coinbase Slashes 18% of its Workforce

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chain. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Stocks

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are set for the longest losing streaks since January over

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>concerns the feds aggressive policy to combat high inflation will

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>throw the US into a recession. Plus, it is another

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>sign of a worsening crypto downturn, coin Based announcing it'll

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.959
<v Speaker 1>layoff of its workforce, following other crypto companies that are

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>also cutting staff. And my excloulsive interview with Cisco CEO

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Robbins on where he sees the economy headed and

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>how the company is navigating the downturn and supply chain

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>an He'll join me in an exclusive interview later this hour.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I do want to dive deeper now into the markets

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as we wait for the Fed's decision Wednesday. Leo Kelly,

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Verden's Capital Advisors, joining us now to discuss. So,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>what are you expecting from the FED tomorrow, Leo, and

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>how is that impacting your strategy? Well, the FED has

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to be aggressive there's no question about it. They are

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>well behind the curve. They have been for some time.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>We never really brought into the transitory inflation nonsense, and

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this has gotten far beyond anyone's expectations. So our expectation

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is they act aggressively for the first time. While I

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think we all want them to take it carefully and slowly,

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the reality is they will do more damage if they're

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not aggressive then if they don't. So um, we think

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the FED is aggressive. We think the market expects that.

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that tomorrow is going to impact our

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>long term strategy regardless. It's really about the trend, the

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>trend of inflation and prices, the trend of interest rates,

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>which we think are breaking a secular forty year bowl

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>market and starting to turn into a secular long term

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>bear market for bonds. So there's a lot happening right now,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and the FED is just one piece of that puzzle.

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Why don't see the biggest risks in tech specifically, Well,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like specifically. The problem is is there's still a

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of speculation um to wear out speculation in any market,

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in any bubble type market, and when we look around

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at things like crypto or we look at stay at

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>home stocks. Back in the uh COVID years, there was

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>tremendous speculation. There's tremendous stories, and it takes time and

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it takes multiple um let's just say shots at that

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>speculation before you wind it completely out. So more than

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>likely what you see is you see these massive downturns.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You probably get some over sold recoveries, but then you

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>return back and until you get the last bit of

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>hope out of the market, you don't see actual bottoms. Um.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>There was a great there was a great statistic. I

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just heard uh in the in the introduction that these

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>companies have cash flow, and so this may be a

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>little different. I would say, back in the dot com bubble,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had cash flow, Cisco had cash flow. If you

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>look at something like Cisco, um, it was at about

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety dollars at the top of the dot com bubble,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>got to nine, which was well below what its fair

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>value was, and it took decades for it to come

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>back before we started see reasonable prices. So interesting, I

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think tech you have to be careful with interesting that

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you use Cisco as an example, because I'm going to

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>speak to Chuck Robins, the CEO of Cisco later this hour.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I also spoke to Amazon CEO Andy Jassey last week

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about the economy, his thoughts on rising inflation.

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to what he had to say. I

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think the real challenge for us there is on the

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>cost side. And there have been several things that have happened, um,

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>some of which are more controllable than others. You know,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the part that's less controllable is really around inflation.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think we thought that inflation would start to

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>attenuate in two and with the war in Ukraine, it

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>just went the other way and has significantly accelerated. You've

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>got these massive companies like Amazon that have no control

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>over where these numbers are going. You know, what do

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you think the long term impact is going to be

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on a company like Amazon and other companies that you know,

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>rely on the health of the consumer. So history shows

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>us that when the cost of capital exceeds the return

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on invested capital, we go into a recession. And the

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>cost of capital is rising rapidly, and so we're going

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to see a significant profit recession in the marketplace from

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>companies like an Amazon and many others. And so if

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not inflation sensitive. This is going to be serious

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>pressure on earning. So some of these reliable growth companies

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that have steadied growth patterns are going to start to

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>see those patterns get disrupted and that's going to affect

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>PE multiples. The reality is with inflation that um, we

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have it. It's accelerating and one of the reasons is

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not addressing the problem. We have to go to

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the core of the problem of inflation, and until we

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>do that, inflation will continue to surprise us. We cannot

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>answer a supply side inflation event with more demand, and

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so far that has been the method of replacing and

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>repairing inflation. So the Fed has to get aggressive and

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we cannot afford policy hours coming out of Washington that

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>stimulate more demand. I mean, that's the bottom line for inflation.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lots to continue to watch Leo Kelly Verdon's

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Capital Advisers, thank you for giving us your input there. Well.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>For the first time since agreeing to buy Twitter, Elon

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Musk will address Twitter employees on Thursday. He'll speak virtually

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at a company wide meeting and to take questions. Twitter

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>has been in a chaotic state since the deal came

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>together in April. While Musk has a passionate contingent of

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>employees who support to take over, another contingent is openly critical.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Some employees frustrated by Musk's ongoing questions about spam bots

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's Musk's attempt to renegotiate his forty

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollar deal. Twitter executives, however, have told employees

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they plan to enforce the agreement. Coming up is the

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>future of streaming sports. We're gonna talk Apple, Disney, Netflix,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>and the future of streaming with Rich Greenfield. Up next,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. As Netflix looks to turn around an

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>already rough year, it is hoping Squid Game will be

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>its savior. Just days after announcing the second season of

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>its most popular series of all times, Netflix is now

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>turning it into a reality competition. It is called Old

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>squid Game. The Challenge and the streaming service boasts that

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>will have not only the largest cast in reality TV history,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but also the biggest lumpsome cash prize four dred fifties.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Six real players will hope to win four point five

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>six million dollars. If you've seen the show, you know

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the significance of that number. But unlike the original series.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>There won't be any gore, they say. With the worst fate,

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone will face going home empty handed. While Apple is

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>betting big on sports, the company just signed a ten

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>year deal to exclusively stream Major League Soccer on Apple

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>TV beginning Back in March, Apple reach a deal with

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball to air Friday night games also on

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV. This deal coming just one day after Disney

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>lost out on a bidding war for the streaming rights

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to the popular Indian Premier League. Rich Greenfield of Light

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Shed partners with us now to discuss it all. And

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're a baseball fan, you know having those Friday

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sports rights are pretty important. Sport's gonna be the next

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>big streaming differentiator or z big streaming differentiator now. I

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think the reality is all of these streaming platforms are

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>realizing just how difficult it is not just to attract subscribers,

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but to re engage them and to make sure they

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>don't turn emily. And it's it's hard, right. There's a

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>reason why Netflix spends seventeen billion dollars a year on content.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not like they do it because they want to

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>spend too much money and they just toss and burn capital.

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>The reality is the difference between the old cable days

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that you and I grew up on. Remember you wanted

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to cancel your cable service like you had a literally

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>call up Comcast or back in the daytime winner cable,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you probably spent the better part of your day on

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>hold being transferred around to departments. If you actually got

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>through the retention department and tried to quit or cancel,

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>then you had to go return your equipment and stand

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in line like it was being tortured. Now, if you

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>want to cancel a service, it's point and click and cancel,

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can sign right back up a few days later.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think in many way, sports is being used

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as a tool that all of these companies are looking

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>at to bring in new subscribers and to retain existing subscribers.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think any of these will be all sports.

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very hard business model, and I

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's one of the reasons ESPN hasn't converted to

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>over the top yet. But I do think that they're

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>all looking at sports as yet another tool to drive

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>subscribers and retain existing ones. How big a deal is

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple picking up Major League Soccer or Disney losing out

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>on cricket. Do you see these wins and losses as

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know more um you know, you know, not necessarily

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>big deals. I think Apple is a huge deal. I

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think every single person that invests in looks at the

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>media space or runs a media company should be thinking

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about what Apple is doing. Because you know, the only

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thing holding the traditional media bundle, big video bundles, cable

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and broadcast networks. The only thing holding these bundles together, Emily,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>is sports. All the best entertainment programming. Think about it.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Name one big own new show that's aired on linear

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>TV in years. Like everything is now starting its life

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on streaming. I don't care whether we're talking about squid Games,

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which you just talked about, or Mandalorian on Disney or

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Murderers in the Building on Who. Like, everything is happening

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>on streaming. So the only thing sort of left has

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been sports. And yet look what's just happened. Amazon has

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just taken the number two TV series on linear TV

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>broadcast TV in Thursday Night Football this fall only on

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Crime. And then you see this deal with MLS today,

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like you're just every day the last pieces that are

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>holding together the TV bundle are being stripped away, and

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that means two things. One more and more chord cutting,

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>less and less viewership for these TV programs. And all

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>of that means, you know, the bottom line is that

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>these legacy media companies are facing more and more pressure

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>because most of them are built around broadcasting cable networks.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be very hard. How much M and A

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think we're gonna see? I know you you

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think good in the Netflix Roku deal is going

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen? Do you say there's a zero percent chance? Look,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I hate zeros um. You know I've learned never to

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I've learned never to say never. I mean, I think

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if we had been on here six or you know,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if you said eight weeks ago, is Netflix gonna do advertising?

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I would have said there's no chance. So you should

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>never say never. Everything is up for debate. I think

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the odds of Netflix buying roke wu are very hard

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to imagine. Why would you want to be in the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>device business? I think, you know, Netflix benefits from being

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a voweble on every device and not competing. Buying Roku

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>would put them into you know, battling against companies like

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Samsung in video and that's just very hard for me

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to believe. And I think Netflix is very focused on

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of an asset light approach, initially advertising outsourcing. There

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was a story out today that they may be doing

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this as the information reported they may be looking at

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>using comcasts freewheel product. We think that makes a tremendous

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of sense. And look, they're going to connect into

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of platforms and use lots of players. They'll work

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>with Roku's, they'll work with trade desks. But I'd be

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>very surprised if Netflix was going to go out and

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>make a very significant acquisition. That's just not their style

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. They are turning this squid game success into

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a reality competition. What are your thoughts on that? I

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>mean is right now the cultural is now, culturally the

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>right time for a competition like this, with the world

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>melting down. If you if you watch sweed games, the

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the depressive nature of the world, it sort

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of feels like the right time for a squid game

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>reality series, to be honest. But but leave that aside,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you're bringing up a greater issue. Netflix isn't broken.

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>None of the streaming services are broken, per se. That

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the reality is it's all about content. Consumers are going

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to gravitate to the services where they spend the most

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>time and where they have the most content that keeps

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>them entertained. And you know, the reality is Netflix still

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is by far and away the biggest service of all

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>time spent on connected TVs is on Netflix. But I

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>do think they need more iconic shows, and Stranger Things

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>has been huge coming back. All four seasons were the

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>top four most watch shows on Netflix a couple of

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, So there's no doubt that franchise zeitgeist content

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is critical, and I think that's why you're seeing Netflix

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lean into doing more, not just a second season of

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Squid Games, but how can they build this franchise even broader.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes a lot of sense, and I

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see Netflix pivot from having instead of

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>just volume of series, really making sure that they have

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a good number of series that really are zeitgeist and

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>really water cooler conversation that create the buzz that they need.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they haven't had enough of that, and that's

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why they've suffered over the course

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of the last couple of quarters. We've seen a few

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Disney stories over the last week, you know, more sort

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of Game of Thrones, Chapec firing Peter Rice has head

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>of Content. Apparently it only took seven minutes. How optimistic

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>right now are you about SPEX leadership and the culture

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he is trying to create given the channel in is

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that he's faced. Look, Shape came in at a very

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>hard time, right right right in the middle of the pandemic.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Was no easy task. The theme park business was just

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of he was very much behind before

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>he became CEO. Is obviously having an incredible resurgence. They

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>literally can't keep up with demand and they're raising price.

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think the real question for for Schapeck is

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what is his plan? You know, is ESPN and sports

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. Clearly they just bowed out of sports on

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>streaming in India as you brought up the I p

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>L rights went to Viacom, a team which is owned

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>by Reliance Geo and James Murdoch and others. But you know,

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly bowing out of digital or streaming in India is

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, and it sort of points at this

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>larger existential question for Shape of like what is the

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>future of Disney is it about Disney Studios, the meaning

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the film studio and the TV studio, the theme parks

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and Sumer product which all really worked well together. Do

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to be in the ABC broadcast TV business?

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Do they need to be in the ESPN and f

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>X business? Like, I think there's some very big decisions

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for Shaping, and I think we're all waiting. I mean,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is there a future for Hulu or

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>do they just put more and more of that content

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>onto Disney Plus. Like there are some really big structural decisions.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's what the board is waiting for, to sort

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of see what the ultimate what Disney ultimately looks like.

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I will say I was surprised the board came out

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with a comment sort of endorsing um Shaping, but didn't

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just renew his contracts. His contract expires in February. I'm

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not sure what they're waiting for, like either renewest contract

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>or tell us they're bringing in a new CEO. It

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>does seem strange that we're sort of sitting here waiting

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what happens next. The stocks obviously suffered,

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but the whole group is down substantially. I think investors

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>really want to know what is the structural future of Disney,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what are the assets that are they keeping, what assets

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>are they getting rid of? And we really haven't gotten

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that sense from Disney over the last six months. Yeah,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it was certainly interesting to hear from the board, but

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you make a very good point, like rich Greenfield always

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have your rich thank you stopping by Investor

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>without Coast. Leve believes we will have a techno economic

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>war over the next twenty years, most likely between the

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>US and China. He talked about tech valuations and what

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it takes to be a VC on this week's episode

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Wealth with David Rubenstein. Well, we high look

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at it is what is the underlying innovation that's going on,

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and how large a market is it addressing. If it's large,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>then the valuations will look large. If you look at

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it Google, it's it's a great valuation. I'm I would

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think it'd come back, but it's a twenty some percent

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>growth company, not a fifty percent growth company. The early

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>stages of much most venture would be considered low growth.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>When you in that world and you're addressing large markets,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a proprietary advantage, then the valuation metrics are very,

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>very different and traditional valuation approaches don't really work, but

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>continuing to apply them as companies mature is a mistake

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and is the deal valuation so high that it's gonna

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be hard for people to get the returns that they

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>want at a venture investing. So I do think given

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the hype we've seen the last five years, we will

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>see a decline and returns. Uh not for everybody. The

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>good firms continue to be disciplined about valuations, but I

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do think in general for the industry will see a decline.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>The best firms will still do well. So coastal ventures

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>will do okay, I hope. So we have to earn

0:17:51.080 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>our keep the coastala there. With David Rubinstein, Welcomeack to

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology and Emily changing San Francisco stocks, Folly even

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>further on fears that the FEDS aggressive policies to fight

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation will throw the US into a recession. Is this

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>rightful cause for alarm? Where are we headed for the

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>next half of the year. I want to get into

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>all of this and more with Chuck Robin, CEO of Cisco,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>who is joining us now from Cisco Live two in

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, the company's first in person conference in two years. Chuck,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you back here on the show.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>How's it going bring us the atmosphere from the floor.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>How does it feel to be back in person? Well, Emily,

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. And you know, we we're saying

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this week we're putting the live back in Cisco Live.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>We've got sixteen thousand of our closest friends here, we

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of our partners back here that are demonstrating.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of education going on. We had a slew

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of great product announcements this week, and so I think

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody is just as you would expect, excited to be

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>together in person. I think everybody's been longing for it.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And a joke today that we're so glad that we're

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not doing this over video and it's still room somewhere

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>where we're getting no feedback. So it's a lot of energy. Now.

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Cisco has always been considered a bell weather for the economy,

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and I have to wonder what your customers are telling

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you and how inflation and what's happening in the markets

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>is impacting how they're spending. You know, we talked today

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>with our customers and partners here about the fact that

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>over the last five or six years, we've dealt with

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a global trade war and terrorists, We've dealt with a pandemic,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>We've dealt with social justice issues, We've dealt with supply

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>chain issues, we have a war in Ukraine, we have inflation.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>So our our customers, while it's not the new normal,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're dealing with the reality that there's always

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>something going on in the world, and technology has proven

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to be so effective during the pandemic at keeping the

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>global economy and the global productivity at a great level

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that I think technology is going to remain strategic for

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>our customers. And to them say they're they're powering ahead.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. Elon Musk says he has a super

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bad feeling about the economy. Jamie Diamond said he's preparing

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for an economic hurricane. How does Chuck Robbins feel, Well,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I remain optimistic, but I'm thinking specifically about the importance

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of technology to our customers and how looks like we

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>lost Chuck Robbins. They're joining us from Cisco Live two

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>will work to get his shot back up. We're seeing

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>sentiment at pretty much an all time low. I don't

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever seen people, uh, you know, feeling this

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>negative about the industry. All of that said, there are

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>still plenty of crypto firms that are hiring. Um you

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>know that we're seeing layoffs for sure, but the sort

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of or ideology that powers this movement is intact. That

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was Nick Carter, founding partner at Castle Line Adventures earlier

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg. Now, the dual crisis of Terra and Celsius

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>shaking up defy in ways that may have very serious

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>repercussions for the crypto markets. I want to talk about

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>all that and more with our crypto contributor Shinali Bossic

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and with Sheila Lawren, CEO of the Crypto Council for Innovation. Sheila,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>great to have you here in person. So, look, there's

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>chaos in crypto markets, in markets more broadly, but especially

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto markets. Just how how low are we

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go here? Where's the bottom? Well, it's it's

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>hard to know, it's impossible to know. But we are

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing real world consequences. We're seeing real job loss affecting

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>real people. We're seeing real people losing real money. And

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that's in the context, of course of record high inflation,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>erosion of purchasing power for families. So all at all,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's not a great picture. That being said,

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as you noted, it's hardly were hardly immune. It's hardly

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>just the crypto market being affected here. It's really a

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>much broader global economy melt down. So we you see

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>coin based first to hiring, freeze, now slashing of its workforce.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>This on the back of the stock plummeting. What's your reaction,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>our reactions that were in a contraction phase. There are

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>other firms who are hiring. There's a lot going on

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>in the market that's adjacent to crypto as well, And

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're seeing is a pivot towards core

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>principles and ideologies. Building a brand new financial and technology

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem is not easy. It takes stamina, and I think

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>if I were new to this industry, I would be nervous.

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But over the six and seven years i've been here,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a bunch of these cycles come and go,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that what we're just seeing is

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>again and refocusing on street priorities. And my hope is

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to come out of this the way

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we have before. You know, you had mentioned real people

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>losing real money, and I want to steal your former

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lawyer hat for a second. I mean, how does the

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>SEC look at something like this and want to protect

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>investors after so much money has already been lost. Well, Frank,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that's source of frustration I think for the industry is

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that we really have been looking to agencies. The industry

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>has been been calling this for this for quite some time,

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, we do need the ability to distinguish some

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the scams that do exist us in this space

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>from the very legitimate projects that also exist. And instead,

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is intense litigation enforcement actions against legitimate

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.239
<v Speaker 1>actors for relatively minor kinds of infractions rather than some

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of clarity, which is what the industry really needs.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So I have to say, wearing a lawyer hat, I'm

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not super thrilled about what what the engagement we're getting

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>from the agencies that are here to really support and

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>help all of us. We needed that lack of clarity.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>How much of a hangover does that give the ecosystem

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>when you don't know what you can build? How do

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>you then invest in projects when when you don't know

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what's possible. Well, I think that's exactly right. And what

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of seeing a response to you right now

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is where there is this high degree of uncertainty on

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>what is going to eventually be kosher, you know, to

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have built and to have engaged with with people aren't

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sure what to do. And we've been again, we've been

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>asking for many years for guard rails, for guidelines on

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>how to engage. We want to work collaborately with regulation

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and with policymakers, and you know, in some cases that's happening.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing a lot of support from the legislative

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>side of the house. We are seeing an approach a

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>center to run and Lumus had their recent bill that

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to clarify c FCC SEC jurisdiction. A

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of engagement abroad from the Europeans, from from APAC

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>countries seeing this, but here, you know, the SEC maybe

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>not taking quite the same approach. Well, I'm sure there's

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers who are looking at what's happened with Tera and

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's happened with Celsius and are like, I

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know about any of this anymore. I mean, you know,

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>these are companies that and and and you know, um,

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, structures that seem to be very legitimate but

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are having major issues. What do you say to reassure them? Well,

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not actually not that hard to differentiate

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>some of these things from other things. Right, there's a

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 1>reason Celsius has a particular lending platform they were engaged

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with unclear to me and maybe to others. Maybe others

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>know whether they are what kind of insolvency we're seeing

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>here is this cash flow insolvency is and balance sheet insolvency.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's a reason that coin Based, for example,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>scrapped it's lending right kind of said it's not the

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>right time. We don't have regulatory clarity that we need

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to see around some of that engagement. As far as Tara,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty highly dif for initiated algorithmic stable coin.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It does not flect the broader crypto ecosystem in any

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of meaningful way. So I do think the thing

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to note is that education is really important here. Crypto

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>is not a monolith. Every crypto l one learn one

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>platform has a very different approach to what it's thinking

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about doing. Every stable coin is different. The reserves are

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>held differently, and all of that nuance is critically important

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>for us to understand as we move towards more of

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a regulation and policy environment. So what crypto projects are

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you most excited about? You know, where do you see legitimate,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>high potential. So I'm really excited about the ones that

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>are focusing on real problems, solving real problems for real people.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not a surprise We've seen crowdfunding of

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a wartime defense of Ukraine right in this environment. We've

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>seen massive amounts of outlays to India during COVID relief.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen examples where this institutions are we're really focusing

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>on real problems. We also know that we've got one

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion people in the world without access to

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>basic financial services. It's a massive gap the legacy institutions

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have not solved. So projects that are focusing in those

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>places and understand that there's a gianic market there that

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to be at these basic baseline checking account kinds

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of services. Those are the projects that I personally think

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see longevity and stamina, and you're gonna see

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>those emerge from this particular moment that we're in stronger

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>than ever. All right, Crypto Council for Innovation CEO Sheila Warren,

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks for sharing your view on the landscape we are

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>facing our own Chinali Bossi, Shinali, thank you for joining

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>us as well. Coming back up, Chuck Robin, Cisco CEO

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>once more from Cisco Live for more of that exclusive conversation.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll be with me next. This is Bloomberg. We're back

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>now with Chuck Robbins, EO of Cisco and this week's Teconomics. Chuck,

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the economy Elon Musk. Of course,

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Hassetti has a super bad feeling about it. Jamie Diamond

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is preparing for an economic hurricane. How do you feel?

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>How would you phrase it? Well, I I remain optimistic,

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>but I also understand there's a lot of complexity in

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. And uh, I think that you know, we're

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>focused on delivering the technology to our customers, to focused

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on delivering for our shareholders, and we'll have to see

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 1>how things play out. There's certainly a lot of complexities.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED is gonna move tomorrow. The question

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is how far do they move and what does that mean?

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, we're just preparing for what

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we can control, and then we'll respond accordingly to things

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that we can't. So are you preparing for a possible recession?

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to be planning for different scenarios.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We are always planning for different scenarios. But we've been

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>around long enough and been through enough downturns that we

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have playbooks and we know how to we know how

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with those appropriately. So we'll see. I'm trying

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>not to borrow any trouble right now, even though I

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>understand it's a very complex environment that we're operating in.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the supply chain. What do you

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>see that's still being impacted, especially when it comes to

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>say SCO, What problems are starting to unwind and how

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>long will these problems in general be with us? Yeah,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think on the supply chain front right now, we're

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously still seeing capacity issues around semiconductors, because every product

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on the planet now seems to have one or more

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors in it, and that's probably in the time where

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we start to see some capacity come online. We've seen

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously the PC demand is kind of slowed, which we

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think is freed up some components in the marketplace, and

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see inventories at brokers increase a bit,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>which they build their inventories from oversupply that that suppliers

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have acquired that they don't need. So that's actually a

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>positive sign. So starting to see some good signs. But

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I still think we're we're three six, nine months to

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>where we really get this thing resolved in a way

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's acceptable to our customers. Honestly, we're now in a

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>period where the big big debate is do you go

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 1>back to work full time or not. WebEx of course,

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one of Cisco top products helps enable remote work. What

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is Cisco's policy at this point on remote work? How

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about it? And what it means the

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 1>company and your investors. So there's two things. Number One,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we've opened our offices and we actually are leaving it

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with the management. The manager and their team to determine

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>how many days a week do you need to be

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in the office as a team to drive your productivity.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And then if you say that's two days, then which

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>days do you want to come in as a team.

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't think in our case, we don't think it

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to mandate days where people are come in

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the office before the pandemic. We have almost fifteen percent

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of our employees work from home full time anyway, and

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a great majority of our teams have distributed team members,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna be interacting over video anyway, and so

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we're leaving it up to the teams. But we're also

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>building a whole set of products and a solution portfolio

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for our customers who are trying to solve this hybrid

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>work issue, because every customer has a different approach that

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they're taking, and we believe we have a lot of

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>technology that can help them. So do you think Elon

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Musk calling workers back to the office, is he going

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to be on the wrong side of history. Well, every company,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is different in what they need, and they're

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 1>like groups within our company that have decided they need

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to be in the office more often. So our engineering

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that want to collaborate in whiteboard and build products together,

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they're spending more time in the office than perhaps some

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of our other teams. So it would be very difficult

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.719
<v Speaker 1>for me to critique another CEO's decision about what they

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>believe they need their employees to do. But for us,

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we think this strategy is working. So far, and we've

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>seen the innovation continue to to pour out of the organization.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>The teams are doing a phenomenal job, so we're quite

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with where we are. If the future of work

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is hybrid, you know, security is even more important. I

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>know that's one of the focuses of Cisco Live. You know,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the threat landscape you see out

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there for businesses and the vulnerabilities they still face in

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of shoring up their defensions, getting their systems ready

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and able to enable this kind of work for the

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:08.959
<v Speaker 1>long term future. Well, the complexity that's been created over

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. Every customer we have now is

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>dealing with employees that are massively distributed. Their applications are

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>running in multiple places public clouds, private cloud sas applications

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as data is now being distributed. And now

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we have IoT really becoming real sort of bringing new

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>devices onto the network, and so it really creates a

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>new paradigm around how our customers need to defend in security,

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>which is why we announced our strategy around Cisco Security

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Cloud this week, continued Trusted Access, Secure Connect Plus. So

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing out technologies that help for this new environment

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time, I think it's just imperative

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for all of us that we have to stay focused

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on employee hygiene because the people and the passwords and

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>all those things that we count on everyone to do

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>properly every day continues to be one of the biggest

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>risks in the system. What's your view on M and

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>A right now? With valuations coming down, are there any

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>areas you're interested in potential targets you could share? Well?

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We have. Uh. I've been asked a few times if

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>our M and A strategy has changed because of the valuations,

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and I've said, our strategy hasn't changed. The openness to

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to us might have changed on the other side,

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, we remain interested in the same

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>area as we have been interested. Uh you know, we're

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>always on the lookout for security. They're emerging areas around

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>observe ability. But uh, you know, we we start with

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is it a strategic fit for our technology portfolio? Is

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it a cultural fit? And is it good for our

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>shareholders long term? And as long as those three work,

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the valuations certainly make a lot more assets actually fit

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 1>in that criteria, a lot more so than perhaps six

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>months ago. Any chance Cisco would make a competing bid

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for vm Ware. I'm not going to comment on that,

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're we we we we're constantly looking

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at all of our our potential targets out there. And uh,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had we build partnerships with companies we acquire,

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and we do lots of our own innovation and internal

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>research and development. We're gonna continue to focus on all

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of those. So look, check you've been in this industry

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. You've been working at Cisco for

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time. One of our guests earlier in the

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>show pointed to Cisco stock and what happened in the

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com bust and how it's taken decades to get

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>back to where it was from a historical perspective. How

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>do you see this downturn fitting into the you know,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>longer term picture. I'm just so curious how you're evaluating it.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you say I've been around for a long time.

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You actually were one of my first interviews when I

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.719
<v Speaker 1>became CEO. Uh, and um, I think, look, what's happened

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is there's now a higher value put on being profitable.

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Clearly there's there's there's a lot of similarities in some

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that had great ideas, uh, you know,

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>similarities with the dot um bus. And I think i've

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>heard people talk about it today and over the last

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>few days, is that there were certainly quality companies that emerge.

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think what what will be realized out of

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>this is that what are the real, valid business models

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that are going to emerge that have the ability to

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>make money over the short term and over the long term.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>But it's clear right now the market is going to

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>reward real companies that build real things and make real earnings.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And our current quarter, the low end of our guide

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we gave it the last earnings call is a record

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>EPs year for Cisco, So we're pretty happy with where

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we are. So look, you know, if as you're mapping

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>out your plans, what's your own what's your sort of

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>strategic advice to yourself in terms of how you get

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>how you get from you know this point to the

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the year dealing with all of these unpredictable forces. Well,

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>my advice is look back at what you've done over

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the last two and a half years, because they've just

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>been different crises and we're just dealing with it yet

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>another one now. And you know, we focus a lot

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of it sounds clichetic, but we focus a tunnelness stuff

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we really can control. And I've been at way almost

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all my life. The things that I can control our

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>monitor and we plan for, but we don't worry about them.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And so we're going to continue to do what we

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>can do, continue to execute, and continue to deliver technology

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that we think our customers really need right now as

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to modernize and really build their architectures for

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the new world, and candidly to deal with the next

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>crisis and be ready because so many of our customers

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>were not ready when we went into the pandemic. All right,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Cisco CEO, Chuck Robbins, I remember that first interview you

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>did with me as CEO. Appreciated the time then, and

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>now thank you for joining us. We'll let you get

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>back to Cisco Live, all right. I want to get

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>now to another big enterprise company, and that is Oracle.

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>After it's sank to a sixteen months low in Monday

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 1>markets fall, but now having the best day in six

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>months after fourth quarter cloud sales topped estimates. Our ed

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>letlow has been taken a deep dive on that at

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you see how quickly things change? I mean,

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Oracle is interesting because they set their stool out right there,

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>like we want to move into cloud and cloud is

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>less than a quarter of revenue, and they performed, you know,

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 1>cloud grew in the quarter. They're giving a really bullish

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>outlook about growth in the current quarter of the year

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>at a time where everyone's worried about recession. It's kind

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of similar to Cisco. You know, they're not the sexiest

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>companies with respect to if he's just listening and he's

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>still listening, But they're really important as a read on

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy because this is where businesses also also has

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend their money. Well, so you read what Chuck

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Robin said there. He's optimistic, but it's complicated. There are

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that they can't control. What is

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Oracle saying about the economy. There are macroeconomic headwinds. But

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I think what's really interesting for them is that they,

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just like Cisco did, they're kind of maintaining the idea

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that the demand is there that even smaller businesses are

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to spend on moving to cloud infrastructure. Why because

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the pandemic. They learned that investing

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>in moving to cloud is cost efficient. You know, it

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>might be an upfront cost, or it might be a

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>brave decision, but when the world is changing, you're not

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>labored with a lot of hardware or a lot of

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>servers that there will be obviously in a few years time,

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like the smart choice. You still need

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>technology to keep remote workforce is connected. For the example,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as Chuck was pointing out, you know Larry Allison. Of course,

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you know we we don't talk about him enough. Last

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about his plans for when I, um,

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, to talk to us about the significance here

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a guy and a company that we

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>don't actually talk about very much. But it's still a

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>giant industry. You know, it's interesting we talk about him more.

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Is a is a Silicon Valley kind of name than

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we do. Is the CEO of a really big company,

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and he owns a really big chunk of Oracle, which

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is worth remembering. He has a vested interest in its success.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know he is participating in these earnings calls.

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He's stepped down from the board of Tesla, which is

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a news item of the last week is an ally

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Elon Masque. He's a reported backer of Mosques bid to

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>buy Twitter. He's on his island in Hawaii, but he's

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>also running a really critically important tech company in Oracle. Yeah.

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Interesting to see how his career has involved at Bloodlow.

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thanks for that quick update, and that does

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. We're gonna continue

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to stay on top of all of this market mayhem.

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Full coverage right here on Wednesday of the FED meeting,

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we are expecting those rates to rise seventy five basis points.

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Coverage starts live one thirty pm Eastern time, ten thirty

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>am Pacific. Also, we're gonna be joined by Victoria Green

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of g squared for market reaction tomorrow and Melton two Mirrors,

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>chief strategy officer of coin Shares talking crypto. That's all

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>coming up tomorrow. I'm Emily Changed in San Francisco. This

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg