Speaker 1: Mr garbutsch Off teared down this wall. Either you're with
Speaker 1: us or you were with the terrorists. If you get
Speaker 1: healthcare already, then you can keep your plan. If you're
Speaker 1: satisfied with Trump is not in the president, take it
Speaker 1: to a bank. Together, we will make America great again.
Speaker 1: It's what you've been waiting for all day. The Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. Join the conversation called Buck Toll free at
Speaker 1: eight four four nine hundred Buck that's eight four four
Speaker 1: nine hundred to eight to five, the Future of talk radio.
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, coming
Speaker 1: to you live from the great state of Indiana, visiting
Speaker 1: one of our affiliates out here, getting to know the country,
Speaker 1: getting to the folks a little bit better. Buck takes America,
Speaker 1: you know, just bouncing around as I can. I was
Speaker 1: in Georgia, but a few weeks ago, I'm in Indiana.
Speaker 1: Now I'll be in California in a couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: Like to make my way down to Austin, Texas a
Speaker 1: few weeks after that. Oh, I've got a busy schedule.
Speaker 1: We've got a lot to talk about today. Thank you
Speaker 1: very much for joining, Thank you for being here. Later,
Speaker 1: on in the show, I will discuss with you a
Speaker 1: slander about my favorite beverage, coffee, well, coffee and tequila.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure which one is number one, but probably
Speaker 1: coffee because I drink it a lot more. A slander
Speaker 1: that is making its way around the assigned or so
Speaker 1: called scientific community. Will also discuss uh some of the
Speaker 1: latest gun control measures. FBI former, i should say FBI
Speaker 1: official McCabe is in the headlines. Once again. I will
Speaker 1: note that everything that I've told you would happen with
Speaker 1: McCabe is happening with McCabe. He's so it's just so aggrieved.
Speaker 1: But he's also somehow managing to raise hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of dollars with his go fund me account for his
Speaker 1: legal defense. We will discuss that, to be sure. Also,
Speaker 1: a standoff on the Israel Gaza border right now, it's
Speaker 1: already resulted and about a dozen people killed, hundreds injured.
Speaker 1: A mass protest movement that is trying to just effectively
Speaker 1: walk across the security fence the border in Israel. Perhaps
Speaker 1: the time to note that fences, walls, they do work.
Speaker 1: Otherwise this protest movement of thousands of people would just
Speaker 1: walk into Israel so we will get into that as
Speaker 1: well in just a few minutes. But first I I
Speaker 1: want to spend some time with you today talking about
Speaker 1: an issue that that is particularly troubling to me because
Speaker 1: I'm I make a living sharing my thought with you.
Speaker 1: I write, I do TV. But my my first love
Speaker 1: in this business, as you all know who have been
Speaker 1: with me for a while, is radio. I love radio,
Speaker 1: and in radio in particular because you're going extemporaneously. I've
Speaker 1: always I always think it's so sweet when people say,
Speaker 1: you know where who writes all your notes or where
Speaker 1: do you get all this? Like, well, it just kind
Speaker 1: of happens. There's no there's not really notes, and certainly
Speaker 1: no one's scripting anything out. But that means that I'm
Speaker 1: going to occasionally stumble on words. I might say something
Speaker 1: that isn't really exactly what I was trying to say,
Speaker 1: But that's part of the of the beauty and the
Speaker 1: excitement of live radio. But I would always like to think,
Speaker 1: and this isn't just about me and this show, but
Speaker 1: on any show that people that are discussing ideas and
Speaker 1: that are operating from a place of trying to tackle
Speaker 1: what matters should get some leeway in what they are
Speaker 1: able to say without fear of reprisal, without fear of
Speaker 1: perhaps even losing their job. And this is now an
Speaker 1: issue that we can't ignore because the boycott machinery is
Speaker 1: once again in full swing. Laura ingram Over at Fox
Speaker 1: News is a is a big news story right now,
Speaker 1: not for having the I think the fourth highest rated
Speaker 1: show on cable news or maybe on cable actually pardon me,
Speaker 1: but because sponsors are pulling out from her show, not
Speaker 1: all of them, but about a dozen at last count.
Speaker 1: Why you might ask, well, this is something that I
Speaker 1: mentioned to you, I think on yesterday's show. David Hogg,
Speaker 1: who is an absolutely a public figure at this point,
Speaker 1: is making political pronouncements as if from on high, as
Speaker 1: if from a place of great knowledge and wisdom, and
Speaker 1: is being celebrated by the media in a way that
Speaker 1: should be embarrassing for those who call themselves journalists. It's
Speaker 1: one thing to show respect to somebody on your show.
Speaker 1: It's another thing, too, fanboy or fan girl, when you
Speaker 1: have a guest on your show. And oh, you want
Speaker 1: to kind of know what I'm talking about here. This
Speaker 1: is Alison Camarada over at CNN, when she has David
Speaker 1: Hogg on her show, This is the kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: She says, play I am stunned that four colleges rejected you.
Speaker 1: What kind of dumbass colleges don't want you? I mean,
Speaker 1: you've taken the country by storm. How do you explain this?
Speaker 1: Did they reject you before the Parkland massacre or or
Speaker 1: how do you explain this? They rejected me about lenything
Speaker 1: about two weeks ago. Most of them it was U, C,
Speaker 1: l A, and UCSD. I The way I explain it
Speaker 1: is we have a heavily impacted university system in America,
Speaker 1: and I think there's a lot of really candidates that
Speaker 1: don't get into college. And I think it goes to
Speaker 1: show that regardless of whether or not you get into college,
Speaker 1: you can still change the world. The hardest part is
Speaker 1: just believing that you can and continuing that effort to
Speaker 1: change the world because you eventually will. So, before I
Speaker 1: get back into the discussion about Boycott's here, which are
Speaker 1: corrosive and destructive and should should really only be used
Speaker 1: as a last resort, Before I get to that, how
Speaker 1: is it that this young man's college acceptances or in
Speaker 1: this case, UH rejections is a national news story. Oh
Speaker 1: that's right, because he went on an interview I forget
Speaker 1: where with whom and was bemoaning that he had not
Speaker 1: gotten into these schools. And and the implication is that
Speaker 1: because he was rejected after he became a national figure,
Speaker 1: which he is right now, right, the guy's got hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands and Twitter followers. He's calling people blood soaked
Speaker 1: murderers and child murderers on a regular basis, not in
Speaker 1: any way challenged by many of the media outlets that
Speaker 1: put them on TV. And now you see what they're
Speaker 1: what they're really hoping for is that he becomes essentially
Speaker 1: radioactive for anyone to try and tangle with. If you
Speaker 1: say anything to him that is uh, that is overly critical,
Speaker 1: or if you, in the judgment of the left and
Speaker 1: the Democrat media that has created this situation, if you
Speaker 1: go a little too far, you might have all your
Speaker 1: sponsors flee. You might be in a situation where there's
Speaker 1: a form of economic economic warfare if you are being
Speaker 1: waged against you as as an individual. Alison Cameron, what
Speaker 1: kind of what kind of Dumas college? What kind of
Speaker 1: Dumas college? Would not say you? She doesn't mean, you know,
Speaker 1: do we really have to go there. I have friends
Speaker 1: who worked in A couple of close friends of mine
Speaker 1: worked at admissions committees of elite colleges for a number
Speaker 1: of years. Is she gonna ask him what is what
Speaker 1: his SAT scores are? Oh? The college is supposed to
Speaker 1: care that the media has elevated him into being a
Speaker 1: figure for their own purposes in the national discussion about
Speaker 1: gun control. She has no idea what this guy's record.
Speaker 1: But yet again here we are. I'm talking about it.
Speaker 1: Why am I talking about CNN is talking about it?
Speaker 1: Why I see ann talking about it? Because this is
Speaker 1: a tactic, This is a tool. This has been the
Speaker 1: plan all along. They don't discuss gun control and good faith.
Speaker 1: They're not talking about this because they think it's going
Speaker 1: to save lives. This is just political warfare through culture warfare,
Speaker 1: through the lens of kids. That's it. It's not going
Speaker 1: to be sweeping policy changes. Is changes that resolve from this.
Speaker 1: This is not going to uh shed new light on
Speaker 1: the gun control discussion. And I would note, and it's
Speaker 1: very important, I don't want you to forget about this,
Speaker 1: that in the aftermath of the park Land shooting, there
Speaker 1: were a lot of Republicans who are saying, you know what,
Speaker 1: we actually should we should do something here, we should
Speaker 1: take some kind of an action. And now you've got
Speaker 1: the people banning bump stocks. But there was a willingness
Speaker 1: to approach this issue from good faith. Have the people
Speaker 1: at the forefront of that effort to have a good
Speaker 1: faith discussion with the uh, you know what, never Again
Speaker 1: or March for Our Lives movement, whatever they're going to
Speaker 1: call themselves. Have they been rewarded for that. No, they've
Speaker 1: actually been shunned and attacked and denigrated very publicly. What
Speaker 1: was Marco Rubio treated with more respect or less for
Speaker 1: showing up at that town hall, that sham that televised
Speaker 1: show trial put on by CNN. Oh, that's right, we
Speaker 1: all know. But this is a particularly outrageous situation. You
Speaker 1: have the national media being wildly hypocritical about David Hogg
Speaker 1: and some of the other survivors, Gonzalez and those the
Speaker 1: only ones whose names that I know off the top
Speaker 1: of my head, Emma Gonzalez. They call for a complete
Speaker 1: blackout of any criticism of them. If you criticize these
Speaker 1: people who are are trying to push a national policy discussion,
Speaker 1: you could lose your sponsor, You could lose your liveloy
Speaker 1: lose your job, lose your reputation. Kyle Cash of though,
Speaker 1: on the other side, because he is just pushing what
Speaker 1: he believes to be sensible responses to what happened in Parkland,
Speaker 1: he get he can get trashed by journalist. There's no consequences.
Speaker 1: What is the Kurt iken Wald from Vanity Fair. You
Speaker 1: can go check this out if you want. Is one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why I would like a lot of
Speaker 1: you start getting on Twitter, because you'll see this is
Speaker 1: Twitter is now how journalists yelled at each other, which
Speaker 1: can sometimes be actually quite amusing, but it is also
Speaker 1: illuminating for what's really going on in the media discussion.
Speaker 1: Do you think that there's any consequences for people who
Speaker 1: are public figures with large platforms who say nasty things too,
Speaker 1: and I mean actually nasty things, not someone quote whining
Speaker 1: about their college rejections, which but that is all that
Speaker 1: Laura Ingram got in trouble for, and she apologized very
Speaker 1: very graciously. It was a very gracious apology. I read
Speaker 1: at you on air. And she has sponsors including Office Depot,
Speaker 1: Jenny Craig, Hulu, Nutrition Trip, advisor, Expedia, Wayfair, Nestley and Johnson,
Speaker 1: and Johnson pulling ads from the show. If that's transgressing beyond,
Speaker 1: and by the way, beyond the realm of what an
Speaker 1: apology can make up for, any one of us could
Speaker 1: be gone at any point in time. And don't think
Speaker 1: this doesn't affect you. If this is now the new
Speaker 1: standard for conduct for media figures, it's just a matter
Speaker 1: of time. He fort filters down to your standard office workplace.
Speaker 1: It's just a matter of time before all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: anyone who said something that falls a foul of this
Speaker 1: political correct and politically correct dogma could be fired. Oh
Speaker 1: you've been We don't want anyone here who's insensitive to
Speaker 1: the survivors of the Parkland massacre. First of all, this
Speaker 1: is one person who has been very not just public
Speaker 1: about this, and I've said it here on the show,
Speaker 1: and I back up what I've said about this. What
Speaker 1: he's saying is is nasty and destructive and wrong, and
Speaker 1: that the media gives him a pass is just yet
Speaker 1: another data point for why we can't trust them, why
Speaker 1: they're dishonest, why they're not journalists. I mean, CNN is
Speaker 1: an embarrassment on this issue an embarrassment. You'll notice that
Speaker 1: they don't put any of their anchors or their pundits
Speaker 1: one on one against any of our best on this issue.
Speaker 1: They won't do it because they will get rhetorically speaking,
Speaker 1: sliced and diced. And they know it, so they hide
Speaker 1: or they hide behind victims, which is now the preferred strategy.
Speaker 1: The left weaponizes boycotts so much more frequently than you
Speaker 1: will ever see on the right. The left boycotts. It's
Speaker 1: just and then I know this from talking to people
Speaker 1: who are just dealing with it on the on the
Speaker 1: corporate side, on the sponsor side, you know, if you
Speaker 1: upset the left, you could lose your sponsors. You could
Speaker 1: be they call it deep platforming. Now you can say
Speaker 1: anything you want about the right, though this is still
Speaker 1: where the media has unfortunately too much power. This is
Speaker 1: where we have to break this down. And this is
Speaker 1: also you gotta show where you gotta show where your
Speaker 1: heart is and what counts for you. You pay attention
Speaker 1: to who these sponsors are. Speak up. Don't think for
Speaker 1: a second that you know your emails, your Facebook messages,
Speaker 1: your support of people that are telling the truth of
Speaker 1: shows that are doing the right thing. Don't think that
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. It's all that matters in this environment,
Speaker 1: because if you don't stand up for the shows that
Speaker 1: you believe in the people that are telling the truth
Speaker 1: and it is right in public discourse, it's just gonna
Speaker 1: become dominated by the very progressives who are doing exactly
Speaker 1: what we see happening here. To Laura Ingram, you know
Speaker 1: that this is we we go through this time and again,
Speaker 1: and you know eventually it passes. But it's also I
Speaker 1: don't think it's just companies that are cowardly. I don't
Speaker 1: think it's just companies that are scared. I think that
Speaker 1: there's a lot of ideological sympathy from some of the
Speaker 1: corporations that decide they're going to go along with this,
Speaker 1: that they don't want to stand for free speech, they
Speaker 1: don't want to stand for open discourse. They want to
Speaker 1: punish wrong think in a very orwelly in sense. And
Speaker 1: this I will know it has been the plan all
Speaker 1: along with using victims of Parkland to be the spokespersons
Speaker 1: for an anti gun movement. They were just waiting for
Speaker 1: a prominent enough person. Laura Ingram fits the bill, a
Speaker 1: prominent enough figure. You're on the right to come along
Speaker 1: and then but like I say, it's all about mobilizing.
Speaker 1: They're mobilized, and now they're weaponized, and now they're tearing
Speaker 1: down someone and trying to put a real dent in
Speaker 1: her career. I mean, Laura's gonna be fine, I'm sure,
Speaker 1: but it's distressing to see this and that people who
Speaker 1: make a living in the media don't understand what's going
Speaker 1: on here or too much, too much a bunch of
Speaker 1: whimps to speak out is just utterly disgraceful, all right.
Speaker 1: Eight four four nine to five. John hit me with
Speaker 1: some action movie quote movie. People keep asking it back,
Speaker 1: and I haven't really had an answer, but now yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm thinking not back. Quote you ever? Right to be dead?
Speaker 1: Fight eight four four to five. Buck, we talked about
Speaker 1: whatever you want, Live from Indiana. The Buck's Actions show
Speaker 1: can continues right after the break. The Black Live Matter
Speaker 1: movement has been addressing this topic since the murder of
Speaker 1: Trayvon Martin in two thousand twelve. Yet we have never
Speaker 1: seen this kind of support for our cause, and we
Speaker 1: surely do not feel that the lives or voices of
Speaker 1: minorities are valued as much as those of our white counterparts.
Speaker 1: I am here today with my classmates because we have
Speaker 1: been sorely underrepresented and in some cases misrepresented. We are
Speaker 1: proud to say that we're from Douglas. We are proud
Speaker 1: to say that those who are in the front are
Speaker 1: doing a great job. But we also, as you can see,
Speaker 1: have so much to say the racial component of there.
Speaker 1: So that was more of the students who are are
Speaker 1: constantly on TV. Now this is the political movement and
Speaker 1: the left loves it because if you criticize them, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe you get fired, maybe you lose your sponsors,
Speaker 1: maybe they shut down. Let me also say the thing
Speaker 1: about boycott's is that companies that do it, they're usually
Speaker 1: just being reactionary. Doesn't last, you know, nobody nobody cares
Speaker 1: what so and so said in a vast majority of
Speaker 1: cases one time, if they like the product, it doesn't
Speaker 1: really matter. Right, It's just a pressure tactic that works
Speaker 1: if you can get people to panic, and that's where
Speaker 1: the media comes in. They create the echo chamber effect.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, people, the whole country has turned. No,
Speaker 1: the whole country has not turned on anybody because of
Speaker 1: anything that has happened last week or two. Right, the
Speaker 1: country is very politically polarized. The most obvious statement on
Speaker 1: the planet. But you'll notice that all these other progressive
Speaker 1: issues get folded into the discussion too. They were just
Speaker 1: talking about uh, racial in inequities when talking about violence,
Speaker 1: And I'm like, well, school shootings are not about racial equity.
Speaker 1: School shootings just about protecting kids who are in school,
Speaker 1: meaning that if you're in the school, my understanding is
Speaker 1: in this case, for example, in Parkland, the shooter here
Speaker 1: was just trying to kill as many innocent people as possible.
Speaker 1: So that to to bring a racial angle into it
Speaker 1: is to just use the platform that these kids have
Speaker 1: now to talk about other issues that affect progresses. Because
Speaker 1: what I'm trying to say is just give it time,
Speaker 1: and you're going to hear some of the Parkland students,
Speaker 1: uh pushing for name a social justice issue. Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: gonna have the Parkland students by the time the midterms
Speaker 1: come around on TV talking to us about the need
Speaker 1: for amnesty for legal immigrants. And if you criticize them
Speaker 1: for not knowing what they're talking about, you're such a monster.
Speaker 1: They're just children. That's the game of Left's gonna play.
Speaker 1: He's holding the line for a men Buck Sexton, his
Speaker 1: back favor chef in the second well, he's saying repeal.
Speaker 1: Is that repealing? Right? And do you think something? It's
Speaker 1: poorly can't we just so you'd like to just run
Speaker 1: right by a militia? Right? You don't saw the sering
Speaker 1: number the Southern senators so they could walk off slaves? Really?
Speaker 1: Is that true history? I don't have time right now.
Speaker 1: Can you just give me a brief back? Was started?
Speaker 1: Eventually they want in other areas, but Southern senators started
Speaker 1: so they could repel slave uprises. Okay, So Larry King
Speaker 1: there with complete historical fallacy. Uh, ignorant of the history
Speaker 1: of the facts, and uh, call on your next your
Speaker 1: next dot please. Unbelievable. Oh it's it's some of the
Speaker 1: people of media. I gotta say. I'm I'm astonished they
Speaker 1: had the careers that they did that they have no
Speaker 1: idea how lucky they are. Uh, And I got it,
Speaker 1: Larry Kick of that category poorly, poorly written, the second
Speaker 1: amendments poorly written. What what do you mean? What do
Speaker 1: you mean by militia? I think the framers, Larry, I
Speaker 1: think the framers probably had a better sense what they're
Speaker 1: trying to say than than you do. I'm just just
Speaker 1: put that bring me back kick that on the guy
Speaker 1: off CNN. They can't do it without me. Oh boy,
Speaker 1: oh no, this this makes this is a bummer. Alright, alright, alright,
Speaker 1: this is a bummer. Matthew McConaughey was out in Austin
Speaker 1: the Austin March for Our Lives supporting gun control. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't know the guy. I heard. He's nice actually
Speaker 1: from like fifth hand, you know, six six degrees of
Speaker 1: buck sex whatever instead of sixt re gews that Kevin Bacon,
Speaker 1: like I know somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody
Speaker 1: who knows him. It's supposed to be nice, dude, gun
Speaker 1: control in Austin. You know, he's a good actor. It's
Speaker 1: a shame. The first season of True Detective is is incredible.
Speaker 1: I think, I really the second season was pure trash
Speaker 1: and he wasn't in it, so who cares um? But
Speaker 1: the first season was really really good. But man, Matthew
Speaker 1: mcconiughey and Austin for gun control. Uh, Austin, I'm kind
Speaker 1: don't worry, Austin. I'll be on the way down there soon.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna come. I'm gonna come help out, come, save
Speaker 1: save the day. We got a lot of calls up
Speaker 1: because it's Friday, so let's get into it. Dean in Boston,
Speaker 1: what's up, Dean, brother Buck, how you doing today? I'm
Speaker 1: all right, Mann, thank you for your call. So let's
Speaker 1: just go down this little rabbit hole. Where are these
Speaker 1: kids that are being led by the progressives? And let's
Speaker 1: just take all the gun, every gun, every gun in
Speaker 1: the country. So we've solved that problem that they can
Speaker 1: so easily grasp the concept of. And so to protect
Speaker 1: ourselves because we haven't dealt with the underlying issue of
Speaker 1: mental health or anybody who's a criminal element who will
Speaker 1: get a gun illegally. So let's add more police. You
Speaker 1: can't do that because the police are bad. The police
Speaker 1: of brutal and they go against civil rights and they
Speaker 1: target minorities. So where we go from there? And then
Speaker 1: we've got to get rid of the NRA because the
Speaker 1: n r A. Oh wait a minute, the n r
Speaker 1: A is all single members of society that pay to
Speaker 1: be members, whether you own a gun or not. They
Speaker 1: just believe in protecting our rights. I guarantee these kids
Speaker 1: not one of them understand the complexity of this whole issue.
Speaker 1: It's just guns bad n a bad guns. Is that
Speaker 1: in my saying that, right, guns bad, nira bad. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Yeah, I think I think you're actually that
Speaker 1: that's a perfect sign. That's a perfect sign for the
Speaker 1: March for Our Lives. I saw signs very similar to
Speaker 1: that when I went and saw them. I saw what
Speaker 1: they were writing. They don't have the capacity to understand
Speaker 1: that it's a right, a god given right to protect yourself,
Speaker 1: and so they just look at it as it's the gun.
Speaker 1: The gun has to be the issue. Well, nothing they've
Speaker 1: talked about has ever dealt with. Is there a mental
Speaker 1: health issue? A guy goes out and he stabs people,
Speaker 1: he drives down a sidewalk with his car. Still the
Speaker 1: same issue, mental health issue, But they didn't use a gun.
Speaker 1: Should we ban automobiles, Let's get rid of all the sidewalks. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the policy prescriptions that aren't really the point. That's what
Speaker 1: I keep trying to come back to and make sure
Speaker 1: everyone's everyone's seeing why why I view it that way.
Speaker 1: This is just about the culture war and about political power.
Speaker 1: It's really not about guns. Are just the prison through
Speaker 1: which this fight is had. Uh, I mean I mean
Speaker 1: gun control. I mean is the is the prison through
Speaker 1: which this fight happens. But it's it's not about actually
Speaker 1: changing gun control as a prime That's not the primary
Speaker 1: motivation behind this. It's mobilization, it's getting the left together,
Speaker 1: it's it's donations, it's media coverage, it's the narrative. Let
Speaker 1: me look it up. What I'm important, narrative on Russia
Speaker 1: has been to the media for last year about Trump
Speaker 1: despite all of the evidence that they've been running around
Speaker 1: just talking crazy talk on it, right, that they're on
Speaker 1: a mission. Uh, and they're not gonna find out anything
Speaker 1: about Russia in the end. Right, So it's really not
Speaker 1: about Russia. It's about bringing Trump down. This is also
Speaker 1: part of the anti Trump resistance, this movement of of
Speaker 1: gun control. Thanks for calling in, Dean from Boston, my friend.
Speaker 1: Always good to have you on the show. Um. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's by the way, I just want to put this
Speaker 1: out there as a thought experiment. So, the Parkland Marjorie
Speaker 1: Stoneman Douglas High School has obviously at least four I
Speaker 1: don't know if it had a primary schools well, at
Speaker 1: least four different grade levels in it, you know, nine
Speaker 1: through twelfth grade standard US high school. So some of
Speaker 1: the people that are on TV are seniors who are
Speaker 1: seventeen or eighteen, and so at eighteen they're adults. I
Speaker 1: think Hogg is seventeen, but I don't really know. At
Speaker 1: some point is is the person? Are you able to
Speaker 1: discount their opinion because they're actually too young? I mean,
Speaker 1: I really want to know. I want to know if
Speaker 1: if they had a what are you if you're a
Speaker 1: freshman in high school, you're fifteen. If there's a fifteen
Speaker 1: year old who has really strong opinions on gun control,
Speaker 1: is CNN going to give that fifth? And was a
Speaker 1: student at the school? Maybe? Wasn't you know nearby? When
Speaker 1: this The school is very large, a few thousand students,
Speaker 1: But do we have to listen to fifteen year old
Speaker 1: talk about it too? And I really mean, I just
Speaker 1: want to know where the line is because there's there
Speaker 1: are shootings that happen at schools where there are there
Speaker 1: are primary schools, So we'll see an end put thirteen
Speaker 1: year olds on TV to tell us about the Second
Speaker 1: Amendment and the Constitution and constitutional rights. You see it,
Speaker 1: there is a point at which we can I think
Speaker 1: all agree it's irresponsible and exploitative. So now it's just
Speaker 1: a question of figuring out where is that line. And
Speaker 1: I think anybody with any sense and any any basic
Speaker 1: decency understands at CNN and MSNBC and the rest crossed
Speaker 1: it a long time ago by not just giving these
Speaker 1: kids a platform, but giving them a platform specifically to
Speaker 1: attack the political enemies of those networks, to attack the
Speaker 1: political opposition, and to do so for because of the
Speaker 1: perceived in vulnerability of those students on the public stage,
Speaker 1: because of exactly what's going on with what you can
Speaker 1: call the Ingram effect right now, right there, they're gonna
Speaker 1: go after people. Um so this look, this is not
Speaker 1: going away anytime soon. All Right, we got more calls
Speaker 1: coming to Casey in North Carolina. Hate Casey. How are you?
Speaker 1: I'm good, sir, Thank you for your call. I'm I
Speaker 1: remember this department, Casey, Casey. We're gonna have to we'll
Speaker 1: have to get you back, my friend. It sounds like
Speaker 1: you're doing a lunar landing right now and I can't
Speaker 1: really hear you, and certainly nobody else will be able to. So, guys,
Speaker 1: we've got a better connection with Casey, let's bring him back.
Speaker 1: But one small step for Aaron. It's a little bit
Speaker 1: like that, except that was way too clear. You know
Speaker 1: what I'm saying? Uh, Justin in Iowa. I'm in Indiana.
Speaker 1: That's not far away. What's up Justin? Hey Buck? I
Speaker 1: love your show. I'm an avid podcast listener and I
Speaker 1: finally had the chance to get to call you. Thank
Speaker 1: you talking to I have an action movie quote for
Speaker 1: it for you. It is a HBO television movie and
Speaker 1: it's set in World War two. Well, hold hold on,
Speaker 1: hold on. I want to say, do you really think
Speaker 1: I need hints? My friend? Do you walk into the
Speaker 1: master's do jo and say that you're going to give
Speaker 1: him the week wooden board to smash? No? But go ahead,
Speaker 1: go ahead? Man. I wish I brought my water colors. Man,
Speaker 1: I wish I brought my water What my watercolors? Is
Speaker 1: an action This is an action movie. Quote sounds like
Speaker 1: a Bob Ross episode. It's it's an action movie. Alright,
Speaker 1: hit the buzzer. He's got me. Apparently, apparently we'll see
Speaker 1: I might throw a flag on this. What do you
Speaker 1: got the Tuskegee airmen? Oh? I have not seen it
Speaker 1: and it was. I've heard of it. Yeah, it's based
Speaker 1: on a true story. Yeah, it's based on a true story.
Speaker 1: I know. Is it good? Should I see it? I
Speaker 1: thought it was good. I watched it when I was
Speaker 1: younger with my grandfather back in the nineties, so I
Speaker 1: mean it's it's an older movie. Thank you version of
Speaker 1: it for red called Red Tails, right, I saw that
Speaker 1: one too. Yeah, alright, well, justin thank you for the movie.
Speaker 1: Quote my friend. Great to talk to you. And how
Speaker 1: far away are you from Indiana? Uh, it's it's about
Speaker 1: four hours for me. I want to say, on a
Speaker 1: good day and if i'm but unfortunately I gotta work tomorrow,
Speaker 1: so I wouldn't be able to come out to in
Speaker 1: the NNC sadly all right, but no, I know, but
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm just wondering. I'm trying to get a
Speaker 1: sense of my distances here. I'm in the heartland. It's fun.
Speaker 1: Thanks for calling in justin appreciate it. Uh. You know,
Speaker 1: it's a great World War two movie that's kind of falling,
Speaker 1: falling down the memory hole a little bit, I think
Speaker 1: for people. I always thought Memphis Bell was a really
Speaker 1: good movie for what it was. That's about gosh, I
Speaker 1: musta be two bombers wrong plane? Um right, oh gosh, no,
Speaker 1: I might even getting that one wrong. I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what the plan was. It's a big
Speaker 1: bomber though, all right, it's about a big bomber. It's
Speaker 1: a good movie though it was well. I thought it
Speaker 1: was well done. Um and I feel like it doesn't
Speaker 1: really get much in the much of the replay stuff
Speaker 1: going on. So there's that. Who else do we have here?
Speaker 1: We've got um John? Who else is on the lines?
Speaker 1: I can't see here on my screen. I'm Doug in
Speaker 1: North Carolina. Hey, what's going on? Doug? Ug? Are you there?
Speaker 1: Going once? It's not fun when it sounds like I'm
Speaker 1: talking to myself. Doug, are you getting Doug? Or it
Speaker 1: sounds like you got you got a little shy, Doug.
Speaker 1: Doug disappeared, Doug had to take up. I'm hi, there
Speaker 1: is hello. Yeah, we're here. Men. We could hear you. No,
Speaker 1: I'm Bobby. I'm not Doug. But that's what's throwing me.
Speaker 1: Oh Bobby, Yeah, okay, well your Bobby? Then what you call?
Speaker 1: I'll call you whatever you want. I'm glad to get
Speaker 1: through because I was about to give up, but it's
Speaker 1: it's all good. I love you, but a fairly recent listener,
Speaker 1: but I love it. Um, thank you, sir. You know
Speaker 1: you're welcome. I've got a quit oh in that dusky gee.
Speaker 1: I mean that's okay. I don't want to putty might now,
Speaker 1: but I want that. That's an action movie, but whatever,
Speaker 1: But I've got one for you. I think it's easy
Speaker 1: for you. I won't even have to give you a clue.
Speaker 1: It's brief and quick and it is you bet your ass.
Speaker 1: I wish to proceed, yeah, uh now when I tell you,
Speaker 1: oh man, okay, No, I don't have to repeat it.
Speaker 1: You got you got? Yeah, No, we all heard it.
Speaker 1: I hit the buzzer. What is that? Who are the
Speaker 1: first one? That's the black guy? You bet your ask
Speaker 1: I wish to proceed. Uh oh yeah, okay, the the
Speaker 1: the the the computer guy, the computer tech guy. I
Speaker 1: don't remember. Man got okay. Well, look, I appreciate you
Speaker 1: calling in, but we're we're getting a little I need
Speaker 1: to re establish some of the thank you my friend,
Speaker 1: shield Tide. You need to re establish some of the
Speaker 1: rules for actual quote Friday. It has to be kind
Speaker 1: of a quote that you know, has a resident like
Speaker 1: residence like a one liner. Folks. It can't be like
Speaker 1: would you like wine with dinner? Like, No, it has
Speaker 1: to be you know, I'll be back like, it has
Speaker 1: to be something like that. Uh. And I kind of
Speaker 1: think there's also if we're gonna really this is not
Speaker 1: non there are rules. So I think I gotta throw
Speaker 1: a flag when someone says that Tusky Yearman's an action movie.
Speaker 1: It's a war movie for sure, action movie. It's it's close,
Speaker 1: close call. I'll give it a close call. We'll see.
Speaker 1: I'll hit the replay on that. We got a lot
Speaker 1: more coming up, including an update on McCabe and why
Speaker 1: he was fired from the FBI and where all that
Speaker 1: is going. And also, you know, we should see if
Speaker 1: Comy will come on the radio show talk about his book,
Speaker 1: because Comy is the last honest man in America. We
Speaker 1: should see if he'll come on. If you can take
Speaker 1: the heat and the freedom hunt, all right, we'll be
Speaker 1: right back. I didn't plan this. I just want to
Speaker 1: be very clear about that. I I wasn't asking a
Speaker 1: rhetorical question and then setting up the next segment when
Speaker 1: I was musing aloud about what's too young for us
Speaker 1: to get a national lecture about gun control in terms
Speaker 1: of the age of the of the lecturer. At what
Speaker 1: point can we discount someone's opinion from serious political discussion
Speaker 1: based on age fourteen. I didn't even know about this
Speaker 1: and it just got sent to me in the break,
Speaker 1: CNN No Surprise has a piece up about somebody who
Speaker 1: wants to run for governor of Vermont to state we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about later in the show in the context
Speaker 1: of gun control legislation. Who wants to guess how old
Speaker 1: this would be governor of Vermont? Is that that CNN
Speaker 1: Politics has written a piece on today profiling him thirteen
Speaker 1: thirteen years old. Now this isn't CNN writing about this
Speaker 1: in a humorous way. They're not saying always in't this cute?
Speaker 1: Pinch his cheeks? He's such an eas any precious. No,
Speaker 1: they're they're they're writing about this like it's a real thing.
Speaker 1: Ethan son of Born is an eighth grader who loves basketball, fishing,
Speaker 1: and writing. He also wants to be governor of Vermont,
Speaker 1: not when he grows up, but now. And thanks to
Speaker 1: the fact that there are no state laws that require
Speaker 1: gubernatorial candidates to be a certain age. Ethan is officially
Speaker 1: the youngest candidate to run for that office in Vermont history.
Speaker 1: Based on the way they act around the Parkland kids, Uh,
Speaker 1: seems to me like they're saying, yeah, maybe maybe he's
Speaker 1: got a shot. Oh, by the way, any of you listen,
Speaker 1: do you want to take a guess what the centerpiece
Speaker 1: of young Ethan's platform is? And he, by the way,
Speaker 1: he might be a fantastic young man, and I you
Speaker 1: know it is it's pretty amazing that he thinks he
Speaker 1: should be governing at thirteen. I'll say that. So I'm
Speaker 1: not criticizing the kid. He is a kid. He's not
Speaker 1: a young adult. He's a kid. I'm not criticizing the kid.
Speaker 1: I'm criticizing CNN for covering him. But thirteen is a kid, right,
Speaker 1: it's a young young guy. What do you think the
Speaker 1: centerpiece of his entire effort? Oh, that's right, gun control? Now.
Speaker 1: Can I just can I just out of hand discount
Speaker 1: seeing and writing about this as some kind of a curiosity. No,
Speaker 1: do I think that there's a pretty decent chance that
Speaker 1: they will put a thirteen year old on TV to
Speaker 1: talk about the Second Amendment and gun control. Who's who?
Speaker 1: Happens to be running for the governor of Vermont. Yes,
Speaker 1: I do, which now means that I have an answer
Speaker 1: to my question before, which is does CNN have any
Speaker 1: age standards whatsoever for who they'll put on TV for
Speaker 1: the purposes of discussing politics and also attacking their political enemies.
Speaker 1: I think the answers no. I think if the if
Speaker 1: the circumstances are advantageous for the left and for CNN
Speaker 1: for others, you know that they'll put a ten year
Speaker 1: old on TV to tell us about how if you
Speaker 1: don't agree with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer on guns,
Speaker 1: you don't care about dead kids, and what are you
Speaker 1: gonna do? You're going to criticize a ten year old?
Speaker 1: You monster. This is why these people have no ethics,
Speaker 1: no integrity. The media, the journalists that are putting this
Speaker 1: out there, they have no shame. And that's why from
Speaker 1: the beginning I was saying, don't think that your good
Speaker 1: faith in this discussion will ever be rewarded. It will
Speaker 1: be used against you. He's back with you now, because
Speaker 1: when it comes to the fight for truth, the buck
Speaker 1: never stops. Welcome buck, welcome, excuse me, welcome back, Welcome,
Speaker 1: Buck to the Buck Sexton Show. Welcome back to the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Us great to have you with me.
Speaker 1: I know we're heading into a holiday weekend, so I'm
Speaker 1: looking forward to spending some time with family, at least
Speaker 1: on on Sunday. Currently I'm in Indiana, but I'll be
Speaker 1: back Sunday for Easter with family, and I'm hoping you
Speaker 1: all have a very good holiday weekend as well. I
Speaker 1: know it's pass over, it's good Friday. We've got Easter
Speaker 1: coming up. We also have a bunch of news to
Speaker 1: get through today though, so you know, I was thinking
Speaker 1: in the last hour about my theory is on gun
Speaker 1: control and how it's mostly about the political fight. It's
Speaker 1: really gun control is the vessel, but it's not the
Speaker 1: it's not really the ultimate end purpose of a lot
Speaker 1: of the stuff that you see happening in the streets.
Speaker 1: And the reason that CNN and others cover this so
Speaker 1: much is because it is part of a broader narrative
Speaker 1: and it's about political mobilization. And it goes back to
Speaker 1: a lynskey. You know, once you get people mobilized for
Speaker 1: one issue, you once you get the mobilized for for pollution,
Speaker 1: you can get the mobilized for corruption once they're for corruption,
Speaker 1: for inequality, for inequality for you know, and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth. You just gotta get people energized and activated.
Speaker 1: That's what activists do. And left is very fond of
Speaker 1: activists and and community organizers, even UM. And I've been
Speaker 1: thinking for a while that there's probably going to be
Speaker 1: a convergence of some of the different leftist activist groups
Speaker 1: out there in preparation for a uh, a large scale
Speaker 1: media assisted, social media enabled leftist progressive political movement to
Speaker 1: help with the midterm elections. And when you go back
Speaker 1: and you look at how these protests tend to be,
Speaker 1: whether it's Occupy Wall Street, black Lives Matter, you know,
Speaker 1: not my president with Trump, UM, and now oh the
Speaker 1: Women's March of course, and now the March for Our Lives,
Speaker 1: these other protest movements will also be there. These other groups,
Speaker 1: these other agendas come into play. And one that I
Speaker 1: have had, I've been wondering when are we going to
Speaker 1: see the return of the movement. And it's interesting case
Speaker 1: we just I've had some sound bites here on the
Speaker 1: show of Parkland students saying, you know that there's a
Speaker 1: racial inequality in school violence and another camera the clip
Speaker 1: was earlier in the week, we played someone saying that
Speaker 1: if you arm teachers because of institutional racism, we'll be
Speaker 1: putting black students at greater risk. And oh and the
Speaker 1: school to prison pipeline. Remember seeing that had that panel
Speaker 1: of students talking with the school the prison pipeline. And
Speaker 1: so I'm starting to see some of the the racial
Speaker 1: protest movement agenda infused into this anti gun or this
Speaker 1: gun control movement. And I think now we we have
Speaker 1: the case that will most likely lead to a return
Speaker 1: of the Black Lives Matter movement, which you remember was
Speaker 1: against police, not really not against the administration. It wasn't
Speaker 1: used against the administration because Barack Obama was president at
Speaker 1: the time. It was not politically about going after the
Speaker 1: White House. But it was a means of getting the
Speaker 1: left organized, mobilized, and enthusiastic about its political activity. And
Speaker 1: the media love, I mean the media loved covering all
Speaker 1: the marches and remember the burning, the burning of parts
Speaker 1: of St. Louis and then Baltimore and and all of it. Right,
Speaker 1: this was a uh, will you go back and think
Speaker 1: about it? Is it wasn't an amazing when you when
Speaker 1: you think back to when the riots were happening in
Speaker 1: Ferguson and in Baltimore, how it was covered as though
Speaker 1: this was normal political activity. From from the perspective of
Speaker 1: the media, They're like, yeah, you know, Aimes, you gotta
Speaker 1: burned down a few buildings and some times you gotta
Speaker 1: load a lot of CBS. Is I mean just gonna happen?
Speaker 1: Look at look at the footage we have here. Oh,
Speaker 1: look at the police with their tear gas. The police
Speaker 1: are so mean, They're so bad. It was really an
Speaker 1: anti police movement in many ways. It was about anger
Speaker 1: against the cops. I also always thought that the Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter movement during the obaministration was a way for
Speaker 1: the Democrats to a defray or to deflect responsibility for
Speaker 1: not particularly improving the economic situation of disadvantaged minorities in
Speaker 1: the country, particularly African Americans, as promised under the administration. Right, so, hey, sorry,
Speaker 1: we're not you know, sorry, we're not making the unemployment
Speaker 1: numbers get much better in the in in black community. Sorry,
Speaker 1: we're not doing enough to bring down crime in neighborhoods
Speaker 1: like Chicago. But hey, let's all get really angry at
Speaker 1: the at the cops and institutional racism. I think there were.
Speaker 1: I think that was part of it, that was part
Speaker 1: of why you saw that happening, and they they seized
Speaker 1: on these specific cases. I think we have perhaps and
Speaker 1: we'll see over the course of this weekend, but we
Speaker 1: may have the case that will spark the return of
Speaker 1: the Black Lives Matter movement, and it has to do
Speaker 1: with uh Stefan Clark. Stefan Clark was an unarmed twenty
Speaker 1: two year old who was shot in Sacramento earlier this month.
Speaker 1: He was shot eight times and now the autopsy report
Speaker 1: has come out saying that most of the bullets hit
Speaker 1: him in the back. And this was an autopsy requested
Speaker 1: by the Clark family's attorneys, and he only had an
Speaker 1: iPhone on him at the time, and there's footage of this.
Speaker 1: There is footage of this, and they're saying that he
Speaker 1: was not facing the officers when he was killed, and
Speaker 1: that the autopsy contradicts the police narrative of of of
Speaker 1: Clark's death, and Sacramento has the sacrament Police Department has
Speaker 1: a has an issue on its hands right now, a
Speaker 1: big one um this. I want to dig a little
Speaker 1: more into the specifics of the event. I really was
Speaker 1: just seeing this today before I came on, because that's critical,
Speaker 1: that's everything. I am very uh favorable towards law enforcement,
Speaker 1: as you know, I have law enforcement in my family
Speaker 1: and I have worked with law enforcement in the past.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that every time there's a police involved shooting,
Speaker 1: I'll go, yeah, you know, stuff happens. No, those who
Speaker 1: are entrusted with public safety have a particular responsibility to
Speaker 1: uphold certain standards of conduct and behavior, and if they
Speaker 1: failed to meet those, they have to be held responsible
Speaker 1: like any other citizen would, like any other person would.
Speaker 1: That said, the media, as you know, loves to misrepresent.
Speaker 1: The most glaring example that comes to mind is the
Speaker 1: whole Mike Brown gentle giant situation. Right, he was the
Speaker 1: gentle giant, um. But they do this in other in
Speaker 1: other instances. To The Washington Post tried this, I want
Speaker 1: to say, six maybe nine months ago, when there was
Speaker 1: a case it was just outside of Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: Of somebody who was in a car and the police.
Speaker 1: I remember watching the video of it and the way
Speaker 1: that the Post was describing it. It was an unarmed
Speaker 1: men shot to death in his car by police for
Speaker 1: no good reason. And when I watched the video which
Speaker 1: you had, was a guy who was pulled over and
Speaker 1: when law enforcement got out of their cars. You've seen
Speaker 1: this before, right, It's on a lot of those like
Speaker 1: hey like crazy chase videos. Uh. But law enforcement gets
Speaker 1: out of the car to just do a routine traffic stop,
Speaker 1: I think, and the guy takes off and then they
Speaker 1: chase him, and then he keeps he keeps trying to
Speaker 1: evade them, and then you and then you have the
Speaker 1: cops are able to get him off the road and
Speaker 1: the car gets kind of thrown into it in akment.
Speaker 1: But when the cops then stand in front of the
Speaker 1: vehicle and yelling to get out, he tries to hit
Speaker 1: the accelerator and run them, you know, and tries to
Speaker 1: bump them with his car. You know, if if you've
Speaker 1: got if you got your foot on the accelerator and
Speaker 1: I'm standing in front of your vehicle and I'm law enforcement.
Speaker 1: I've told you to, you know, to get out of
Speaker 1: the car and put your hands up, and you think
Speaker 1: you're gonna run me down, I'm gonna shoot. Right. So
Speaker 1: there were no charges brought ugainst the officers there because
Speaker 1: they didn't anything wrong. But I could tell the way
Speaker 1: that Washington Post was writing about it. They were trying
Speaker 1: to position it like, Oh, unarmed man shot in vehicle
Speaker 1: for no reason, well other than trying to run the
Speaker 1: cops down with this car. Yeah, there was no reason,
Speaker 1: no reason at all. Uh. In this case, I have
Speaker 1: to dig because when you when you read the initial
Speaker 1: news articles there, there will be a lot of focus
Speaker 1: on unarmed, unarmed, unarmed, And as anyone in law enforcement
Speaker 1: knows listening to this, well, there's unarmed and there's not
Speaker 1: a threat. And that's not the same thing in this case.
Speaker 1: Based on what I've read so far, it sounds like
Speaker 1: they uh, sounds like it was a case where officers overreacted.
Speaker 1: But I don't know. I'm gonna dig in. It's a
Speaker 1: dig into it some more because I wanna really take
Speaker 1: a look and see if there's a possibility here of
Speaker 1: officers said, you know, stop and he has an iPhone
Speaker 1: in his hand and it's dark and he turns and
Speaker 1: they shoot him. Now, that could be a terrible accident.
Speaker 1: That's a terrible accident. But that's not manslaughter, right, that's
Speaker 1: not officer misconduct. But I'm seeing it right now based
Speaker 1: on some of the social media chatter and some of
Speaker 1: the other Yeah, some of the news outlets that I
Speaker 1: know are preparing for pro major protest this weekend. And
Speaker 1: wouldn't that all fit within the narrative. You'll have the
Speaker 1: March for Our Lives, you know, the anti gun movement
Speaker 1: out there with these students. You will have the return
Speaker 1: of Black Lives Matter. You will have the continued mobilization
Speaker 1: of the Women in His March, which is largely an
Speaker 1: anti Trump slash pro abortion march. But you'll have to continued,
Speaker 1: you know, the Women's March. I think the Climate Change
Speaker 1: March kind of fizzled out. No one took that all
Speaker 1: that here, but maybe that will come back. But you
Speaker 1: see that they're they're bringing all these movements together, and
Speaker 1: it is political. It's an effort to construct media narratives
Speaker 1: that will push turn out in the mid terms, that
Speaker 1: will force the Republicans or push the Democrats, I should say,
Speaker 1: to to win the House back and start the impeachment
Speaker 1: proceedings against Trump. That we all know. The moment you
Speaker 1: have a Democrat majority in the House, it's going to start.
Speaker 1: So I think you may see this here. I think
Speaker 1: Stefan Clark's this incident, and like I said, I'm withholding
Speaker 1: judgment on this, not because I'm unwilling to come to
Speaker 1: a judgment whether I think it was a good shoot
Speaker 1: or not. I just need to dig into the details,
Speaker 1: and I want to read the police report. I want
Speaker 1: to read as much as we can of the autopsy report,
Speaker 1: because the way media reports on these things and the
Speaker 1: way it actually ends up happening is very disparate, and
Speaker 1: you have to go to the as much as you
Speaker 1: can the original source material. If there's video, that's obviously
Speaker 1: quite helpful, but even just the specific written descriptions of
Speaker 1: the event, regardless of whether it's a good shoot or not.
Speaker 1: This may be the resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement,
Speaker 1: which as you know, is very much supported by the
Speaker 1: mainstream media, and would breed some renewed life into the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party right now, which is flailing for a reason
Speaker 1: to exist other than hatred of Trump, abortion and illegal immigration,
Speaker 1: other and Russia and Russia fearmongering. Beyond that, it's not
Speaker 1: really clear what the Democrats stand for at this point.
Speaker 1: So that's where I think this is. I think this
Speaker 1: is all heading there. We'll see if I'm right eight
Speaker 1: four four Night two five. You want to chat this
Speaker 1: hour eight four four nine Buck coming up. We we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about the standoff at the Israel Gaza border.
Speaker 1: You've got twelve people killed their big, massive, multi thousand
Speaker 1: person protest and it's really more of an occupation even
Speaker 1: than a protest. We'll discuss that. Also, Hillary, Hello, she's
Speaker 1: back in the news. We'll talk about her because as
Speaker 1: long as she's gonna make herself a news store, we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about Alright. I'm not trying to be mean
Speaker 1: if she if she wants to, you know, just wander off,
Speaker 1: hang out, do some finger painting and drink a lot
Speaker 1: of chardonnay like that's cool. I won't talk about her
Speaker 1: on the show. But if she's gonna make herself a
Speaker 1: news story, I don't have to talk about Hillary. So
Speaker 1: here we are. Um. You know, she could be doing
Speaker 1: yoga instead. She wants to remember yoga schedules and uh,
Speaker 1: wedding plans. That was all that was all that was
Speaker 1: in her emails. Remember that those are good times. Those
Speaker 1: are good times. Um. And then some some kind of
Speaker 1: grab bag fun stuff. In the third hour, people people
Speaker 1: are talking smack about coffee. You know, we can't allow that. Here,
Speaker 1: we can allow that. And I've got some other stuff
Speaker 1: planned for you eight four to five. We will be
Speaker 1: right back. I want to circle back for a second
Speaker 1: because I've been talking to you about the the Parkland
Speaker 1: political activists and the backlash against Laura Ingram, specifically from
Speaker 1: advertisers because of what was really a a minor comment.
Speaker 1: And I didn't even I should have seen the refusal
Speaker 1: to accept the apology from Ingram, and I knew that
Speaker 1: that hog David Hogg had refused to accept the apology. Um,
Speaker 1: but I should have known better than to just think
Speaker 1: that it was not not important to see what was written.
Speaker 1: Here's what he wrote. So Laura Ingram writes that very
Speaker 1: nice apology David Hogg, which I read you on here yesterday.
Speaker 1: Here's what he writes in response. I agree, and apology
Speaker 1: in an effort just to save your advertisers is not enough.
Speaker 1: I will only accept your apology only if you denounce
Speaker 1: the way your network has treated my friends and I
Speaker 1: in this fight. It's time to love thy neighbor, not
Speaker 1: mud sling at children. By the way, my friends and
Speaker 1: me anyway, Uh not mud sling at children? Are they
Speaker 1: Are they children or they wise political activists who are
Speaker 1: going to shake up the nation and change the world.
Speaker 1: I just woult I want to know which one is it,
Speaker 1: because he's he's referring to children here. So if his
Speaker 1: friends who were speaking out are children, then are we
Speaker 1: elevating children into a national political discussion that they have
Speaker 1: no business dictating without at least the right of response
Speaker 1: from the rest of the country, Or no, we're are
Speaker 1: we on this? Media loves this game. They love to
Speaker 1: play dirty. You'll notice that they won't invite any they
Speaker 1: want to have any conservatives on these networks that are
Speaker 1: having these interviews with these these children. As he says
Speaker 1: all the time, two to just ask some of these
Speaker 1: so called journalists what they think they're doing here, and
Speaker 1: what what ethics they think they're supporting, and what this
Speaker 1: is really all about. They won't because they are well
Speaker 1: the journalists involver cowards. And that's nothing new, but it's
Speaker 1: always annoying. Do we still have Kenny and Boston on
Speaker 1: the line. I'm in I'm in Indiana now, folks, So
Speaker 1: I can't I can't say is that Kenny in Boston? Yes,
Speaker 1: it is good evening. Hey, how are you doing? Hi?
Speaker 1: How are you doing. I'd like to let all this
Speaker 1: talk of the Salolinsky style methodology of crowd motivation and activism.
Speaker 1: I want to know your humble opinion. Where do you
Speaker 1: think Antifa Antifa has been. I haven't seen them lately.
Speaker 1: They've been like in high they're gonna come out now
Speaker 1: because of the gun stuff, you know there, they've been
Speaker 1: a little more low profile. I agree. I've been kind
Speaker 1: of wondering that too. Antifa, there we go. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: I've been wondering where they are. I think that they
Speaker 1: got they they were creating more heat for the left,
Speaker 1: and they were worth for a while. So I kind
Speaker 1: of think they wore out there welcome for a little bit.
Speaker 1: They'll be back, I mean to be sure. Remember they
Speaker 1: think of themselves as the shock troops of progressive protest
Speaker 1: movements really, so they're not a completely separate movement. And
Speaker 1: the black Block, which is what Antifa does, the black
Speaker 1: block will be around in some of these other if
Speaker 1: you get Black Lives Matter going again, black block, which
Speaker 1: is just a reference to the clothing of the tactics used,
Speaker 1: will be back as part of the Black Lives matter
Speaker 1: movement protests, you know what I'm saying. So I think
Speaker 1: that they'll be around. But yeah, there was a there
Speaker 1: was a time when they were trying to shut down
Speaker 1: all these college campus speeches, and I think the press
Speaker 1: was having a tough time offending them, because when you're
Speaker 1: when you're being thugs who beat up like Charles Murray
Speaker 1: at Middlebury or uh, you know, attack a female professor
Speaker 1: at Middlebury for a speech, you know, when you're acting
Speaker 1: like that. And that wasn't even Antifa, that was just
Speaker 1: Middlebury students, um, but the whole campus free speech fight.
Speaker 1: Antifa was a liability in that. So I think they've
Speaker 1: they've mellowed out. And I shouldn't say they haven't mellowed out.
Speaker 1: They've gone to ground for now. But you know, I'm
Speaker 1: always keep my as for them. I follow some of
Speaker 1: the Twitter accounts of things. I'm looking to see where
Speaker 1: they are fair enough. I mean, yeah, my friend, yeah,
Speaker 1: I have to wonder more thing. Do you think that
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions has been effectively put into a box or
Speaker 1: do you think he's lying in the weeds and maneuvering
Speaker 1: behind the scenes. Well I'm biased here because Jeff's obviously
Speaker 1: my buddy. But uh, you know, we'll see. I can't.
Speaker 1: I'm not refusing to answer. I don't have a good answer.
Speaker 1: I think that. Uh, let me think about that one
Speaker 1: a little bit. How about that we gotta roll into
Speaker 1: a break here. That was such a buck you just
Speaker 1: whipped out. No, no, I'll address that. I just need
Speaker 1: to think about it. Um, maybe we'll talking about macab
Speaker 1: for a second, and then Israel he's holding the line
Speaker 1: for America. Buck Sexton his back. There's some relatively new
Speaker 1: breaking news for you. Um Nor Salmon, the wife of
Speaker 1: the Pulse nightclub shooter Omar Matteen, has been acquitted. Ah,
Speaker 1: It's been acquitted by a federal jury. She was charged
Speaker 1: with the material support to a terrorist organization and obstruction.
Speaker 1: She faced life in prison if I found guilty. Um,
Speaker 1: and the prosecutors were saying that she had a role
Speaker 1: in her husband's murder spirit at the Pulse nightclub that
Speaker 1: killed forty nine people wounded fifty three others. But um, yeah, wow,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, this is interesting. Late Friday, the
Speaker 1: jury foreman sentat a statement to the Orlando Sentinel that
Speaker 1: the verdict did not mean jurors thought miss Salomon was
Speaker 1: unaware of Mr Mateen's plans. Quote on the contrary, we
Speaker 1: were convinced she did know, the foreman told the Sentinel.
Speaker 1: She may not have known what day or what location,
Speaker 1: but she knew. However, we were not decide, We were
Speaker 1: not tasked with deciding if she was aware of a
Speaker 1: potential attack. The charges were aiding and embetting and obstruction
Speaker 1: of justice, and on those charges, he said, the jury
Speaker 1: was presented with no option but to acquit. Wow. So
Speaker 1: she knew, according to this juror, that her husband was
Speaker 1: planning a matter murder spree did nothing about it. But
Speaker 1: knowing and doing nothing in this context, they're saying is
Speaker 1: not a crime. Unbelievably heinous and immoral, but somehow not
Speaker 1: a crime. What a What a kick in the face
Speaker 1: that is. Alright, let's let's get into more calls here
Speaker 1: because it's a Friday, and I love hearing from all
Speaker 1: of you. Janis in Boston, Hey Jannis, but um, I
Speaker 1: just wanted to tell you Anti file wasn't Boston last
Speaker 1: weekend at the rally? Oh first? So wait, so they
Speaker 1: were there for the March for Our Lives. Well, someone
Speaker 1: called it to get out of the boat rally but
Speaker 1: they so my theory about how they're present at these
Speaker 1: rallies is of course correct once again, but go ahead.
Speaker 1: They there was a radio personality who was there interviewing people,
Speaker 1: and there was a small counter protest and they showed
Speaker 1: up and they were throwing dirty feminine products at the
Speaker 1: protesters and the police. They showed up. The police said this,
Speaker 1: this woman told her it wasn't safe and that she
Speaker 1: should leave, so she did. But I don't think the
Speaker 1: the news people want to cover them for some reason.
Speaker 1: They just Yeah, I don't think. I don't think they
Speaker 1: do either. Yeah, this is like whenever there's a violent protest, Janie.
Speaker 1: You know, we hear about the mostly peaceful protesters and
Speaker 1: we tend not We only see the things get crazy
Speaker 1: violent when police start having to use tear gas and
Speaker 1: pepper spray and stuff, and then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: it's like, oh my gosh, it was a mostly peaceful protest,
Speaker 1: but we all know they're stacking the deck, and the
Speaker 1: stacking the deck against the cops. That's interesting about Boston.
Speaker 1: Thank you for bringing that to my attention. If you
Speaker 1: see anything like that, you know, take photos, putut on
Speaker 1: social media. So folks like me, you know what's going on? Okay,
Speaker 1: all right, thanks, thank you so much, Jennis, have a
Speaker 1: great weekend, have a happy Easter. Uh Casey in North Carolina. Hey,
Speaker 1: case Casey's back. He's not calling from twenty thousand leagues
Speaker 1: under the sea this time. How are you, sir? Great?
Speaker 1: How are you? I'm good? Yeah, I've just had one question.
Speaker 1: Uh these uh, these tops that CNN and uh Time
Speaker 1: magazine is using for the Park One school shooting. They
Speaker 1: want to talk about how it's uh they want to
Speaker 1: blame the n R A S n R A S fault.
Speaker 1: It's a conservative fault. Why don't they mention the fact
Speaker 1: that these students that they're propping up admitted to being
Speaker 1: some of the people that was bullying the shooter. I didn't.
Speaker 1: I actually never saw that. Was that reported in Where
Speaker 1: is that reported by the what's the main the Miami
Speaker 1: Herald or who reported on that? I can't remember. I've
Speaker 1: seen a story online. Um, I don't remember seeing that story,
Speaker 1: so and that that would strike me as something that
Speaker 1: I would recall. But let me just let me dig
Speaker 1: into that some more. That that may have been There
Speaker 1: was a lot of of rumor and stuff being printed
Speaker 1: about the shooting in the aftermath that turned out in
Speaker 1: to be true. So let me let me try to
Speaker 1: track down. My sense is that that wasn't what happened,
Speaker 1: or that that that wasn't really the way that it
Speaker 1: was recorded. But let me let me take a look
Speaker 1: at it. I look, I don't remember everything, so um,
Speaker 1: I'll check it out. Casey, anything else in your mind? Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I mean judgment by the way he's acting now, I
Speaker 1: mean it seems kind of believable to me. M hmm.
Speaker 1: Well I don't I didn't see that reported anywhere, but
Speaker 1: I will definitely check it out. And I appreciate you
Speaker 1: calling in Eric in West Virginia. You're up next to
Speaker 1: my friend. What's up in Bark? Happy Easter, Hey, Happy
Speaker 1: Easter to you. I just want to be in high
Speaker 1: school to be able to debate this David home kid.
Speaker 1: I know ten times more about economics and logic than
Speaker 1: this could even dream of. Well, you know that the
Speaker 1: Kyle Kasha of who is and also a Parkland student,
Speaker 1: has been I think I even retweet retweeted it from
Speaker 1: my account. He's been saying for days now, you know,
Speaker 1: I I really would like to have an open debate
Speaker 1: with David Hogg on this issue, and the media is
Speaker 1: ducking it. And you know, if this were about never
Speaker 1: mind getting to the truth, if it were just about ratings,
Speaker 1: don't you think that they would want to put the
Speaker 1: most prominent uh anti gun Parkland spokesperson up against the
Speaker 1: not as prominent because the media doesn't put them on
Speaker 1: TV a hundred times a day pro Second Amendment Parkland
Speaker 1: uh survivor Right. I mean, wouldn't you think that's a
Speaker 1: natural for any TV station or producer. But you know,
Speaker 1: there it's it's somehow not cash is put the invitation
Speaker 1: out there. It's been very public and no taker, no
Speaker 1: takers in the media, no taker from David Hogg. From
Speaker 1: what I understand quite yet this is about But I
Speaker 1: do have the music quote for you. Oh we got
Speaker 1: time for that? Go ahead? How's this worry? Like you
Speaker 1: have to guess that? Does that? How it works? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Like you tell me, you'd say what the quote is
Speaker 1: to try to guess the movie. It's a game that
Speaker 1: I played with my brothers growing up, my whole life,
Speaker 1: so now we do it with all of you. Oh
Speaker 1: my god. The quarterback is toast. Oh dude, that's from
Speaker 1: die hard when they shoot the armored vehicle as it
Speaker 1: tries to enter the building in what is one of
Speaker 1: the most ill fated swat missions in all of TV
Speaker 1: and movie history. Thank you very much, my friend for
Speaker 1: calling in. It's great to talk to you, and I
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Shields high and have a eric, have a
Speaker 1: very good, very good Easter. I didn't say Thanksgiving a second?
Speaker 1: Or did I? Did I say Thanksgiving? John? Okay? For second,
Speaker 1: I almost thought I said have I thought I said
Speaker 1: a happy Thanksgiving. I'm like buck you needed taking nap um,
Speaker 1: all right? Team UH Live from Indiana. Bucks Section show
Speaker 1: continues in just a couple of minutes. Here we are
Speaker 1: gonna be joined by our friend David if Fun. Why
Speaker 1: is there violence on the border with Israel and Gaza
Speaker 1: right now? What is going on? Thousands of people gathering
Speaker 1: there over twelve twelve killed and hundreds wounded so far.
Speaker 1: What's happening? I'll tell you right after the break. You
Speaker 1: are now entering the Freedom Tachnical Operations Center. All sitive
Speaker 1: programs must be kept strictly. Need to know. Team Bucket
Speaker 1: is cleared and ready for the buck brief. Twelve killed
Speaker 1: and three seventy injured. That's the headline about the protests
Speaker 1: going on in Gaza right now at the border of
Speaker 1: Gaza and Israel. What is happening here? Why are Palestinians
Speaker 1: swarming the border area burning photos of Trump and in
Speaker 1: the midst of what could be a protest that carries
Speaker 1: on four weeks. We have Dovid I fun with us now.
Speaker 1: He is the editor chief of the album Miner Dvin.
Speaker 1: Great to have you back. Always a pleasure, buck, Dovin.
Speaker 1: What's happening here? Well, I think we can see what's
Speaker 1: what's actually happening is all over the headlines. You have
Speaker 1: thousands of towns I think it was survey thousand according
Speaker 1: to the the I d S count of Palestinians from
Speaker 1: the Garden Strip trying to rush the Israeli border. Of course,
Speaker 1: this is not a situation that would be tolerated by
Speaker 1: any sovereign government. So Israel, seeing the preparations that were
Speaker 1: in place in the lead up to this march as
Speaker 1: as it's being called, has set up security services and
Speaker 1: snipers across the border and are using riot, dispressal and
Speaker 1: other methods in order to keep these rioters from crossing
Speaker 1: into the state of Israel. The question I think that's
Speaker 1: very interesting is what's behind it? Why? Now? Uh? It
Speaker 1: is these protests always tend to appear spontaneous, but they
Speaker 1: never are. They're orchestrat that, they're prepared, they have an attention,
Speaker 1: they have a purpose, and that's what we're seeing unfold
Speaker 1: right now, David. The timing of it though, it's it's
Speaker 1: because it's pass over, it's because the Palestinians are also
Speaker 1: saying that this is a right of return protesting. This
Speaker 1: is just for maximum media exposure. Right. Look, the media
Speaker 1: exposure is a big part of it, but we're also
Speaker 1: seeing but it's also a distraction from the real question
Speaker 1: over here. And and we've seen this as a cycle
Speaker 1: by the way, in the in the history of the
Speaker 1: way that Palestinians have approached their relationship with Israel, Right
Speaker 1: we sure this with yes A. Basically, whenever they don't
Speaker 1: want to come to the table and talk with the
Speaker 1: other side so they meet that there's an immediate turns
Speaker 1: to violence. And this achieves a couple of things. First
Speaker 1: of all, it increases international attention on the issue, so
Speaker 1: there's a lot more pressure on Israelius to make further concessions, etcetera.
Speaker 1: And also distracts from the real question, which is why
Speaker 1: are the peace talks not happen? If why why is
Speaker 1: it getting to this? So, you know, we saw this,
Speaker 1: for example with yasa Arafat in the nineties when the
Speaker 1: first inter father broke out. That was immediately following the
Speaker 1: breakdown and peace talks, when when ya Araba famously turned
Speaker 1: down the offer of a Palestinian state, and then within
Speaker 1: weeks we were seeing bombings and buses in Jerusalem and
Speaker 1: the carnage that came with that. So now we're facing
Speaker 1: a very very similar situation. Here. You have an administration
Speaker 1: that is more even handed and certainly sees the as
Speaker 1: ready perspective than the previous administration. They're not forcing Israel
Speaker 1: to make concrete professions in exchange for the promise of peace,
Speaker 1: and the Palestinians have climbed all the way back up
Speaker 1: the tree. Uh. Now the Trump administration and the Israelis
Speaker 1: are saying, listen, we want to sit down and talk.
Speaker 1: You've got a peace plan, etcetera. And the Palestinian responses
Speaker 1: violence is the peace process. You think under the Trump
Speaker 1: administration making more headway at this point than in a
Speaker 1: comparable period under the Obama's I know it's very early, Dovid,
Speaker 1: but are we are we seeing uh, the the beginnings,
Speaker 1: the the early signs of what could lead to some
Speaker 1: kind of a discussion. Where are we in all that? Look,
Speaker 1: the truth is the peace process that has been called
Speaker 1: has never made any headway, not under Trump and not
Speaker 1: under Obama. And there's there's a simple, straightforward reason for that.
Speaker 1: And this has been the fear and the concern that
Speaker 1: Israels have had for so long, and that is that
Speaker 1: there is no Palestinian intention to reach any sort of
Speaker 1: peace agreement, and that peace and the peace process is
Speaker 1: just used as as a as a as a tool,
Speaker 1: as a as a faith what what became known as
Speaker 1: the Phase plan in the seventies. This was very publicly
Speaker 1: orchestrated the Arab lead where they say, look out goal
Speaker 1: is to take the entire Israel. We don't believe that
Speaker 1: the Jews have any right to self determination in this land,
Speaker 1: the town land, Darab land, etcetera. Um and the idea
Speaker 1: is basically to use the peace mechanism in order to
Speaker 1: gain as much territory as possible and then launch further
Speaker 1: attacks from the expanded territory. That's been the fear of
Speaker 1: Israelis all along, and Israel in in you know, has
Speaker 1: tried through the Oslo Accords, through two thousand and five
Speaker 1: disengagement from Gaza to give to this approach, giving a
Speaker 1: little bit of land and seeing what the result is.
Speaker 1: And in every single territory that Israel has was drawn from,
Speaker 1: there has been a terror state established, and god knows
Speaker 1: what what amount of bloodshed that we've seen follows. So
Speaker 1: really what we're seeing here is that the worst fears
Speaker 1: of the Israelis are actually being proven correct. And this
Speaker 1: approach whereby if we can't have it all, will have nothing,
Speaker 1: which is basically the approach that the bus is taking.
Speaker 1: If you're not going to commit to doing X, Y
Speaker 1: and Z, then I'm not even going to come to
Speaker 1: the table. That confirms the worst fears of the Israelis
Speaker 1: that there isn't a real intention for peace to peace
Speaker 1: talks are a tactic. Uh, they're not. They're not a
Speaker 1: gold in and of themselves. We're speaking of David A. Foon,
Speaker 1: who's the editor in chief of the Alga Minor. Uh, David,
Speaker 1: they're the plans, as I've read about today are for
Speaker 1: these protesters to set up camps, set up tents and
Speaker 1: stay four weeks. Is this kind of turning into a
Speaker 1: you know, occupy the border? Is that? Is that the
Speaker 1: idea kind of like the Occupy Wall Street movement here
Speaker 1: in America? And what is this all about? Yes, I mean, look,
Speaker 1: the longer this goes on and and and the more
Speaker 1: headlines that this tracks, the more is gained from the
Speaker 1: Palestinian side. So they're going to do everything that they
Speaker 1: can to not just elongated, but to inflict the maximum
Speaker 1: amount of damage on their own citizens. Because the pr
Speaker 1: win from them is when, as supposed to, the innocent
Speaker 1: uh Palestinian is killed by an Israeli that that's the goal,
Speaker 1: that's the victory. And we've seen reports, we've seen this
Speaker 1: from the Israelis, the i d F pointing out how
Speaker 1: they're sending children to the borders and they're taking on
Speaker 1: belligerent actions. I mean there's there there are attempts at
Speaker 1: at harming soldiers and and at targeting civilians in that
Speaker 1: vitility from the Palestinian side, right, So they're looking to
Speaker 1: to to entice the inflection of damage. They're using the
Speaker 1: civilians human shield. The more death, the better for the
Speaker 1: Palestinian cause that's how they're framing it, and that's how
Speaker 1: that's what they're looking to achieve their dava. Just any
Speaker 1: any predictions or anything you want to let us know
Speaker 1: about what to expect going forward with this, Well that
Speaker 1: that's a very good question. I think it will depend
Speaker 1: a lot on the Israeli security forces. So so there's
Speaker 1: got to be the shimbat. Who are the key players
Speaker 1: over here, that Israel's version of the FBI, the the
Speaker 1: the or the m I five, the the internal security
Speaker 1: services who have sources and have assets, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: all across the understanding communities. How are they going to
Speaker 1: be able to clamp down on the orchestrators of this
Speaker 1: and to take out from the equation some of the
Speaker 1: more aggressive elements in this campaign. The other thing that's
Speaker 1: going to be important is what the price is going
Speaker 1: to be for Hamas. We've seen already that Israel has
Speaker 1: started going after targets in Hamas, targets in the Gaza
Speaker 1: strip and there's a reason for that. You know, this
Speaker 1: territory is completely controlled by Hamas, which is of course
Speaker 1: internationally recognized as a terrorist organization, and nothing happens there
Speaker 1: without not only Hamasa's blessing, but Hamas's orchestration. So Hamas
Speaker 1: is behind this, this, this whole event. So the question
Speaker 1: is what's the cost going to be to Hamas. So
Speaker 1: we started to the israel now specifically targeting Hamas's weapons
Speaker 1: deeper and and and uh and hotspots in the Gaza strip.
Speaker 1: And if I must feels that that there's a risk
Speaker 1: that there's a lot to lose, and the Israelis will
Speaker 1: keep going after how much's interest in the strip, they
Speaker 1: might decide, well, this isn't really worth the cost of
Speaker 1: this stage. David if fun is the editor in chief
Speaker 1: of the Alga Minor. Go to the Alga Minor uh
Speaker 1: dot com to check out all of the latest they're
Speaker 1: doing over there. Dovid, thank you so much for joining us. Men.
Speaker 1: Always appreciate it. Always it pleasure. But all right, team,
Speaker 1: we'll be back with our three coming up here in
Speaker 1: just a few We're gonna talk about Hillary and coffee
Speaker 1: and Vermont. Oh my, stay with me. He's holding the
Speaker 1: line for America. Buck Sexton his back and right now
Speaker 1: people saying, um, get off the public stage and shut up,
Speaker 1: which is something we're hearing all the time. How do
Speaker 1: you well, you know, um that that began to happen
Speaker 1: after the election, and you know, the election was pretty traumatic.
Speaker 1: I was really struck by, um, how people said that
Speaker 1: to me, you know, mostly people in the press, um
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, like oh, you know, go away, go away.
Speaker 1: And I had a one of the young people works
Speaker 1: for me, go back and do a bit of research.
Speaker 1: They never said that to any man who was not elected.
Speaker 1: Oh Hillary, do not shut up, welcome back to the
Speaker 1: buck sex and show everyone. But that's Hillary. I actually
Speaker 1: thought it was Hillary at first, but it was her interviewer.
Speaker 1: I couldn't really tell the difference. It was like, Hillary,
Speaker 1: what do you think? Wow, I'm Hillary And I don't know,
Speaker 1: but I've noticed that there's there's a bitterness, a bitterness
Speaker 1: that creeps into her voice there along with the dulcet
Speaker 1: and just soothing tones. I'm the best. Hillary doesn't want
Speaker 1: to go away because, as I have said to those
Speaker 1: of you who have been listening to me for a while,
Speaker 1: many times, there's a hole in her soul. Think about
Speaker 1: what this woman was willing to do to get where
Speaker 1: she is. Think about all of her complicity with Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton's just serial grotesque behavior of all kinds. Think about
Speaker 1: the depths of the corruption, and just the willingness to
Speaker 1: sell one's beliefs to the and and beliefs and actions
Speaker 1: to the highest bidder all the time. It must be
Speaker 1: somewhat exhausting. And I think it's also soul crushing. And
Speaker 1: Hillary has allowed her soul to be crushed for so
Speaker 1: long that I feel like she doesn't even remember what
Speaker 1: it's like to have problems with corruption, narrated, to have
Speaker 1: scruples that you don't want to violate. But just more
Speaker 1: to the point about her not going away, it's a
Speaker 1: great reminder for all of us there who sometimes and
Speaker 1: I put I put myself in this category in last
Speaker 1: week or two, who are like, come on, Trump, you
Speaker 1: set a wall, Come on, you know it's he still
Speaker 1: could do it. I'm not saying it's not happening, but
Speaker 1: it put myself in this category of you know, I
Speaker 1: I have high standard start it, and I want the
Speaker 1: president to follow through on the promises that he made.
Speaker 1: It is important for me to sometimes be reminded, though,
Speaker 1: that it could have been a Hillary. Hello, what happened?
Speaker 1: It could have been her? In fact, it was not
Speaker 1: just likely, it was almost definitively said it would be her,
Speaker 1: and we avoided that somehow we avoided because of of Trump.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know we can we That doesn't mean
Speaker 1: we can't criticize what's going on right now, but we
Speaker 1: very much could have had Hillary. But she still can't
Speaker 1: help but play the aggrieved victim. Here. Um that it's
Speaker 1: about how a man who lost an election was never
Speaker 1: told to shut up. That's just nonsense, right. I can't
Speaker 1: say enough times we don't need to hear from John
Speaker 1: Carry ever again about anything. I can say this with
Speaker 1: all in all truth, I have never heard John Carry
Speaker 1: say a single thing that I thought was insightful or profound.
Speaker 1: And I've been forced to because I pay attention and
Speaker 1: cover politics. Here a lot of John Carry Um. Yes,
Speaker 1: oh this is um the way too. He always kind
Speaker 1: of reminded me of the the Trees from the Lord
Speaker 1: of the Rings trilogy. They move very very slowly, and
Speaker 1: Carry even kind of visually reminds me of the Nts
Speaker 1: the Trees from Lord of the Rings. But he's just
Speaker 1: not an interesting or insightful guy. Nonetheless, whenever he pops
Speaker 1: up again, he's like I'm doing a fundraiser. I'm like, no,
Speaker 1: we don't need to hear from John Carey. We've had enough.
Speaker 1: But with Hillary, I kind of want to hear more
Speaker 1: from her. I think a lot of Republics feel the
Speaker 1: same way, because she is a reminder of what the
Speaker 1: other side not just offered up, but was willing to
Speaker 1: debase themselves to support. You know, if you're looking to
Speaker 1: just kind of have a little bit of a reassurance
Speaker 1: going to this weekend, We've got some some tough political
Speaker 1: headwinds right now, got something that the midterms is gonna
Speaker 1: get real nasty, real fast. Just remember that it could
Speaker 1: very well have been Hillary and the left, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: the media. There there was nothing that they were unwilling
Speaker 1: to do, the government itself, the deep state, the swamp,
Speaker 1: the swamp dwellers right, all covered in vines and Spanish
Speaker 1: mass or whatever. Right, I'm trying to think of, what
Speaker 1: was the thank you John swamp thing? That's what I
Speaker 1: was trying to think of. I feel like I watched
Speaker 1: a swamp things show on USA when I was a
Speaker 1: kid for a while. Does that sound right? I can
Speaker 1: barely remember it, but there was a guy and it yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it was on Usa. I remember swamp thing. Uh. I
Speaker 1: also remember a long time ago watching a like a
Speaker 1: Beauty and the Beast version on TV that the beast
Speaker 1: was like running around in the sewers and he was
Speaker 1: real scary looking. You know, I did not he was
Speaker 1: not like it didn't look like a cuddly a cuddly
Speaker 1: bear that happened to be a human being. He actually
Speaker 1: looked pretty scary anyway. So back to Hillary, she says
Speaker 1: lots of things, including this black clip ted, but I
Speaker 1: do worry that what's happened to the Republican Party is
Speaker 1: that it's being held captive by a very small group
Speaker 1: of powerful forces. We have seen the power of the
Speaker 1: n r A, for example. Some of the very wealthy
Speaker 1: uh patrons of the Republican Party are so demanding if
Speaker 1: you if you deviate from their stated requests, they will
Speaker 1: fund somebody to run against you in a Republican primary.
Speaker 1: They will dry up your money, They will make it
Speaker 1: really difficult. So she said that it's held captive, held
Speaker 1: captive by a small group of powerful forces. What does
Speaker 1: she think the Democrat Party is really all about? What
Speaker 1: are we to make of of the Democrat Party? They're
Speaker 1: not held captive. I mean, the Democrats have two agenda
Speaker 1: items that are absolute that you cannot waiver from them.
Speaker 1: You cannot. One is abortion, so planned parenthood. Another is
Speaker 1: illegal immigration. But when you look at their the people
Speaker 1: that are calling the shots, very large donors who in
Speaker 1: some cases are environmentalist wackos, make all kinds of decisions
Speaker 1: for the rest of the Democrat Party. I mean, we
Speaker 1: it's so funny. I mean, how much more we hear about,
Speaker 1: for example, of funders on the right, and you'll ever
Speaker 1: hear about Sauros SoRs. He wants to spread out of it,
Speaker 1: so he right checks, he finds these things. People don't
Speaker 1: really like my sorrows as much as I feel like
Speaker 1: they should. That sounds a lot like sorrows. Everybody, all right,
Speaker 1: do it audio check you'll see what I mean. Why
Speaker 1: does this puffy haired kid think that he could make
Speaker 1: fun of me? I'm worth billions? What is he worth?
Speaker 1: Like three hundred dollars maybe four hundred. Maybe Soros is
Speaker 1: right about that. I just had to pay my pay
Speaker 1: my tax bill. It's not it's not a lot left,
Speaker 1: not a lot left in the tank. At this point,
Speaker 1: he is poor, but he is rich in hair that
Speaker 1: is true. I've got a lot of a lot of
Speaker 1: hair up top still, so that's good news. Alright. So Hillary,
Speaker 1: she's the worst, could have been a lot worse than
Speaker 1: anything we're seeing right now. And I want her to
Speaker 1: keep talking. I want her to keep talking. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: by the way, Kelly and Conway, I want to point
Speaker 1: this out. She got in on the Hillary speech bashing
Speaker 1: play clip to please its publicly imported. She got about
Speaker 1: twenty five dollars for that speech. She used to get
Speaker 1: ten times at folks, ten times that she was giving
Speaker 1: speeches before she lost her second presidential election. There five
Speaker 1: thousand people, that's about five dollars a person. And so
Speaker 1: I think if she wants to be part of the
Speaker 1: national conversation, she should call us about infrastructure, opioids, healthcare,
Speaker 1: at taxes. There are many conversations to be had. I
Speaker 1: don't see her out there doing talking much about anything
Speaker 1: beyond herself. I by the way, I don't put her
Speaker 1: down for I would love to if anyone wants to
Speaker 1: pay me twenty five grade for a speech. I mean,
Speaker 1: if anyone just wants to take me out for like
Speaker 1: a really good steak. It doesn't even have to be
Speaker 1: rib I will will speak for flat iron, right, will
Speaker 1: speak for butcher cut steak, you name it. There's any
Speaker 1: number that I'm willing to speak for. Um but grand.
Speaker 1: It's not that it's not a lot of money, because
Speaker 1: it is. It's that what it says is that she
Speaker 1: was selling influence before and now she's not. Vermont change
Speaker 1: his gun laws, and coffee is now being called the
Speaker 1: car car Sinogen. I'm gonna tackle this stuff right after
Speaker 1: the break. Vermont is a funky place, my friends. I
Speaker 1: have no idea how many of our our wonderful listeners
Speaker 1: who live in the great state of Vermont. I know
Speaker 1: we've got some podcast listeners in Vermont, but it's it's funky.
Speaker 1: You think of it as the home of Ben and
Speaker 1: Jerry's great skiing. I used to go to camp. I
Speaker 1: used to go to summer camp in Vermont. Actually very
Speaker 1: fond memories of being in Vermont. Vermont and July is wonderful, right,
Speaker 1: It's a great place up in the hills there, and
Speaker 1: uh really really enjoyed it. But it's incredibly liberal. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean it's there's I think Fish the the band
Speaker 1: with all the tyed ee and weed smoking, and also
Speaker 1: Ben and Jerry's ice cream again, tied eye and weed smoking.
Speaker 1: He see ice cream and this need to seem live music.
Speaker 1: They sound the same in California and Vermont, apparently according
Speaker 1: to me. But Vermont is a state that has the
Speaker 1: lowest per capita violent crime rate in the country. So
Speaker 1: you gotta tip your hat to it there, right, Vermont
Speaker 1: is very, very safe. But and this is if you
Speaker 1: can go back in the archives, Professor Dershowitz and Young
Speaker 1: Buck here had this debate on CNN about gun control
Speaker 1: years ago. This was after Newtown, and Professor dersh Witz
Speaker 1: said states with stricter gun laws have less violent crime
Speaker 1: and states with more lax gun laws have more violent crime.
Speaker 1: And I said, well, Professor Dershuitz, that's a tough one,
Speaker 1: because Vermont has the lowest violent crime rate in the country,
Speaker 1: and who wants to guess very lacks gun laws relatively speaking,
Speaker 1: you can go in and buy buy stuff. I think
Speaker 1: it's also no permitting necessary. I'd have to check. Every
Speaker 1: state's laws are different, so don't don't take my word
Speaker 1: for it. Okay, you gotta check on this, But I
Speaker 1: think the lawn Vermont is that you could open carry
Speaker 1: without a either open or concealed if I don't remember,
Speaker 1: but without a permit, as long as you're lawfully allowed
Speaker 1: to have a gun, you can open carry it or
Speaker 1: concealed carry. I'm not sure which one it is without
Speaker 1: a permit anyway, So it's very loose gun laws. You
Speaker 1: know how many murders there were in Vermont? I think
Speaker 1: it was last year ten in the state. There were
Speaker 1: ten murders. There are ten murders in a bad three
Speaker 1: hour stretch of a weekend in Chicago sometimes, and nobody
Speaker 1: even notices the entire state of vermonts and murders. This
Speaker 1: is important because of what it says about gun policy
Speaker 1: across the country. That the position that Dershwitz took on
Speaker 1: air against me and CNN years ago. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Dershwitz has been good on some stuff. He's got on
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff, but he's bad on guns. Uh.
Speaker 1: And I won that debate, by the way, I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: buck brush your shoulder off. Oh that's right. He's a
Speaker 1: he's a world famous law professor at Harvard. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: a poofy haired, preppy former CIA ninja. So I won
Speaker 1: that debate anyway, I'm gonna stop saying that, and that's
Speaker 1: like a kid, I win. Uh. But Vermont is a
Speaker 1: place that is very different than what you would expect
Speaker 1: based on the gun laws. If you believe that gun
Speaker 1: laws correlate with either higher or lower crime, as I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not the case. And Vermont, despite all of this,
Speaker 1: and this is why I'm thinking about this right now,
Speaker 1: the Vermont legislature has just passed a gun control bill.
Speaker 1: This is in the aftermath of what happened in Parkland,
Speaker 1: so online it's fascinating. You had a a Democrat in
Speaker 1: office during Newtown, Barack Obama, and there was very little,
Speaker 1: if any change in legislation anywhere in the country. Very little.
Speaker 1: I think New York changed some stuff, Connecticut with US
Speaker 1: all rifles, but very minimal. And post Parkland, with a
Speaker 1: Republican administration, you have had much more widespread, real legislative
Speaker 1: efforts and some legislation has passed limiting guns. So I
Speaker 1: can get into why that is, I think in just
Speaker 1: a second. But the Vermont legislature is raising the buying
Speaker 1: age and limiting high capacity magazines. Um, this is unlikely
Speaker 1: to stop anything, and it certainly is coming in a
Speaker 1: place where there are there are very few murders, very
Speaker 1: few homicides to worry about to begin with. Now, I
Speaker 1: know people will say, well, what about people who buy
Speaker 1: guns in Vermont and go across state lines with them?
Speaker 1: And my answer to that is always, well, now we're
Speaker 1: just saying that state gun laws don't really matter. Right.
Speaker 1: If you can see that, then you're also then why
Speaker 1: even change these laws of the state. You should only
Speaker 1: be worried about it at the federal level because it's
Speaker 1: obviously a failed a failed approach. If you think that
Speaker 1: you're just gonna have illegal guns from Pennsylvania flooding in
Speaker 1: the streets of New York work, why change the gun
Speaker 1: laws in New York and make them so draconian. And
Speaker 1: I'll say, oh, well, it's better than doing nothing. But
Speaker 1: to that, I say, you're there, there's a concession. They're
Speaker 1: they're conceding in this whole process that it's completely insufficient
Speaker 1: and unlikely to stop anything. But it's about taking action.
Speaker 1: It's just about doing something. That's what the politics dictate
Speaker 1: right now. That's why Vermont is passing a gun control bill.
Speaker 1: Doesn't have any violence, really, ten murders folks in the
Speaker 1: whole state. Okay, that's and and I know those murders,
Speaker 1: how many of them were domestic disputes, are involved drug dealing,
Speaker 1: I would guess all of them. So it's not something
Speaker 1: that is a is a big public safety risk. Um.
Speaker 1: But the reason that different states across the country, and
Speaker 1: you know, Florida is obviously the epicenter of all this.
Speaker 1: But the people point out to me because you guys
Speaker 1: are all you guys are very strict on the words.
Speaker 1: I want to misuse any words. Ep center technically means
Speaker 1: to be above the center of something. Yeah, I know
Speaker 1: people use it as just the center of something, and
Speaker 1: I think through common usage that's now accepted. But the
Speaker 1: more correct definition of epicenters in fact, to be above
Speaker 1: the center of something. Right, So if you were like hovering, uh,
Speaker 1: if you are hovering above an explosion, let's say, in
Speaker 1: a helicopter and looking at the aftermath, you'd be at
Speaker 1: the epicenter of the explosion. See what I'm saying, Um,
Speaker 1: I definitely digress there. They're doing this though, with these
Speaker 1: different states, with political taking these political actions, because in
Speaker 1: part you have a republican administration and this is just
Speaker 1: about mobilization. I might have to do a little more
Speaker 1: o Lynsky, a little more Olynsky on this show, just
Speaker 1: to revive that. You see all this all this organizing,
Speaker 1: you see this March for Our Lives. They've they've really
Speaker 1: been branding these different political movements from the left for
Speaker 1: a while. But the tactics and they have different names,
Speaker 1: but the tactics are all straight out of a Lensky
Speaker 1: and the tactics are first and foremost concerned with the
Speaker 1: mobilization of the opposition, in this case the left, the
Speaker 1: anti Trump forces of this country. Just get them moving,
Speaker 1: get them organized, get them together, get them out there,
Speaker 1: get them loud, and then as it gets closer to
Speaker 1: the mid terms, refine the message live or you have
Speaker 1: to to pick up democrats seats, you know, double down
Speaker 1: on crazy progressive ism where it will get based turnout
Speaker 1: going for you. And that's the plan. So we're seeing
Speaker 1: the playbook here, but it just kind of h it
Speaker 1: shouldn't even say frustrating. And Vermont can do whatever it wants,
Speaker 1: but it's such a waste um and it's in response
Speaker 1: to political pressure, not in response to stopping violence. That
Speaker 1: they're raising the the age limit and limiting High Pascity
Speaker 1: Magazine By the way, I make you this prediction right now,
Speaker 1: it's just a matter of time before they try to
Speaker 1: raise the age limit even more. They'll say that you
Speaker 1: should be twenty five. Some state will come up with that,
Speaker 1: and then what you realize is that this is just
Speaker 1: slow motion, a slow motion ban. This is incremental incremental
Speaker 1: um seizure of weapons and banning of the buying of
Speaker 1: new weapons. That's all it is. That's that's what it
Speaker 1: will become in some states. In other states like those
Speaker 1: are listening in Texas, are like book. I'm not worried
Speaker 1: about it, and I know very different in Texas. But
Speaker 1: in places like Vermont, you're going to see more and
Speaker 1: more of us UM and we don't have to see
Speaker 1: if maybe the Republican Congress can get its act together
Speaker 1: and pass National Concealed Care reciprocity, they can do it.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe we should start to abuse the Interstate
Speaker 1: Commerce Clause a little bit to defend some constitutional rights.
Speaker 1: How about that. The Left abuses the interstate Commerce Clause
Speaker 1: for everything it wants all the time. You know, you
Speaker 1: can't prohibit the transfer of of or you can't about
Speaker 1: the transportation of concealed firearms across state lines because it
Speaker 1: interferes with the market in firearms in certain states. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Come up with whatever you want. People that
Speaker 1: the left justifications to abuse interstate commerce are endless. So
Speaker 1: maybe some Republicans actually passed something here. How about that?
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that be a great idea? Is coffee dangerous? I'm
Speaker 1: dangerous when I haven't had any coffee, But is coffee dangerous?
Speaker 1: I will answer that question. He's back with you now,
Speaker 1: because when it comes to the fight for truth, the
Speaker 1: fuck never stops. So there are some things that we
Speaker 1: can all agree to disagree on. This is not one
Speaker 1: of them. There's some areas of life where I can
Speaker 1: I can brook some aggression. This is not one of them.
Speaker 1: There are some things that are sacred, my friends, when
Speaker 1: it comes to your daily routine. Coffee is one of them.
Speaker 1: I am a big time coffee drinker. I love coffee.
Speaker 1: I don't know how it functioned without it. Maybe you
Speaker 1: could tell me that I have a caffeine addiction. I
Speaker 1: don't even care. I love coffee. California has decided to
Speaker 1: try and mess with our heads, or at least a
Speaker 1: judge in California who has ruled that Starbucks and other
Speaker 1: coffee companies have to post warnings that coffee may cause cancer.
Speaker 1: Now there's a lot going on here. Okay, First of all,
Speaker 1: if you look back at media warnings about about cancer,
Speaker 1: everything causes cancer and but and they particularly like to
Speaker 1: make it things that you and I like. Right, if
Speaker 1: somebody sat there and they're like, oh, buck, sweetbreads causes cancer,
Speaker 1: you'd be like, who eats sweetbreads? Right? But if some
Speaker 1: but he tells you that bacon, for example, is a carcinogen,
Speaker 1: and people have said that, by the way, you'd be like,
Speaker 1: why do you have to be such a hater? What?
Speaker 1: What's what is it about life that you are are
Speaker 1: so angry about that you want to tell me that
Speaker 1: bacon causes cancer when we all know that bacon is
Speaker 1: amazing and if there is such a thing as a
Speaker 1: super food, bacon is in fact a super food. But
Speaker 1: you go back and look at a history of foods
Speaker 1: and just things in the environment that they say cause cancer,
Speaker 1: and they can't ever really tell, you know, they kind
Speaker 1: of think so they don't really know. You know, do
Speaker 1: I think that's smoking dramatically raises cancer rate risks? Yes,
Speaker 1: it does, But no one disputes that with different kinds
Speaker 1: of food, it's always some tangential. You know, maybe we
Speaker 1: looked at a study, but I mean, come on, coffee.
Speaker 1: If coffee calls cancer, all of us would be counting
Speaker 1: our days at this point before we had some terrible
Speaker 1: die ignosis. And this goes to show you where where
Speaker 1: the nanny state inevitably heads. It did it in New
Speaker 1: York City where they were trying to ban sugary drinks.
Speaker 1: It's the same mentality. You see this propping up time
Speaker 1: and again. The same people who want to ban sugary
Speaker 1: drinks tend to be the same people who want to
Speaker 1: ban high capacity magazines, who are the same people who
Speaker 1: won't let you use plastic bags in California or some
Speaker 1: other states now, even though paper bags are probably worse
Speaker 1: for the environment. Who are now the same people who
Speaker 1: tell you that coffee causes cancer, which I'm just telling
Speaker 1: you right now. I'm not a scientist, nor do I
Speaker 1: play on our radio COVI. It doesn't cause cancer. That's
Speaker 1: a lie or it's a falsehood. It's wildly exaggerated. But
Speaker 1: the nanny state mentality is pervasive. It's not because it
Speaker 1: is a mindset. It's really a philosophy of everyday life,
Speaker 1: and you can make up I think I do make
Speaker 1: a clear case on a daily basis, really on this
Speaker 1: show that what is central to the Democrat philosophy of
Speaker 1: government is that the government is there to fix all things.
Speaker 1: And if the government can fix all things, then there's
Speaker 1: nothing that is outside the reach of the government. And
Speaker 1: once you concede that, then what you eat, whether you're recycling,
Speaker 1: and you guys know how much I hate recycling. I
Speaker 1: hate recycling, but it's all coming from the same mentality,
Speaker 1: same thing. And now people are gonna push back on this.
Speaker 1: You've had experts coming out to say that no, no, no,
Speaker 1: it's it's too much to claim that coffee causes cancer.
Speaker 1: But this is just a long line of scare tactics
Speaker 1: you see in an effort to you know, one, increase
Speaker 1: the government's power to regulate and tell us what to do.
Speaker 1: And two it just goes to show you that in
Speaker 1: a very liberal place where there's the the elevation really
Speaker 1: a deification of science, deification of science that goes on right,
Speaker 1: science can get this, which also then ties into the
Speaker 1: whole Stephen Hawking thing and why is he the greatest
Speaker 1: scientists of all time. Oh, because he gives us an
Speaker 1: explanation for life that does not involve God. That's the
Speaker 1: short version. Meanwhile, the scientists at the center of the
Speaker 1: human genome project is a devout Christian. The whole conversation
Speaker 1: for another time. Uh. But that's why when you look
Speaker 1: at this, you see once again that science is something
Speaker 1: that the left adopts as a posture, but they abuse
Speaker 1: it for political reasons all the time, and they take
Speaker 1: positions that are just not even common sense. I mean,
Speaker 1: coffee causes cancer. What are they gonna sit next? Chocolate
Speaker 1: causes I'm sure that actually there are studies if I
Speaker 1: you know what, I just just for giggles right now,
Speaker 1: chocolate causes cancer. Let's see, let's see what happens. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm actually good. Um let me see no, okay, yep, sorry,
Speaker 1: there's there's the articles pop up. Yep, lots of stuff.
Speaker 1: Chocolate cause good. So there you go. People, right, people
Speaker 1: have said that to studies have said that to also
Speaker 1: a lie. What's next, freedom causes cancer? I mean, really,
Speaker 1: this is getting completely They did say that French fries
Speaker 1: at one point from the oil in them and the process.
Speaker 1: I mean this is why when people say, why don't
Speaker 1: we just have experts and scientists to sawing everything for us? No,
Speaker 1: why don't we have the free exchange of ideas and
Speaker 1: let the market decide everything that is not explicitly laid
Speaker 1: out for the government to do in the constitution. How
Speaker 1: about that? That's a much a much better way to go,
Speaker 1: I would think, man, But there's nothing that you By
Speaker 1: the way, coffee also is it has antioxidant properties. It's
Speaker 1: not just because it gives me a boost of energy
Speaker 1: makes me a little chattier. It's obviously good for radios. Man.
Speaker 1: I used to iron right. Actually, uh, one time before
Speaker 1: I filled in for Glenn beck Um, I was sitting
Speaker 1: at his Glenn had a gorgeous radio studio New York.
Speaker 1: I mean it was really it was incredible. And it
Speaker 1: was like getting to ride in like your dad's Mercedes
Speaker 1: or something, you know, I was getting, or your rich
Speaker 1: uncle's Maserati. And and I sat down and I had
Speaker 1: a venty Starbucks coffee there. And this is before I
Speaker 1: knew about black rifle, obviously, and I knocked that thing
Speaker 1: all over, and I remember engineers swooping in the because
Speaker 1: it was just the huge thing of coffee. If I
Speaker 1: got on the equipment, it might have shorted it out.
Speaker 1: It could have cost thousands of dollars of damages. But
Speaker 1: you know what didn't stop me from bringing coffee into
Speaker 1: the radio studio because I needed because it's delicious and
Speaker 1: it's amazing. So don't listen to the liars out there, folks.
Speaker 1: Coffee is good for you. We'll be back with the
Speaker 1: roll call in just a minute. Stay with me. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm coming to you all from Indiana, my friends. I'm
Speaker 1: actually visiting our affiliate out here, w O w O
Speaker 1: also known as Whoa Whoa. So I am in the
Speaker 1: great state of Indiana, and I am hanging out in
Speaker 1: the wonderful city of Fort Wayne, which I must say,
Speaker 1: for a city of this size, has better than anticipated
Speaker 1: food options. They're they're they've got some foodies out here
Speaker 1: in Fort Wayne. I'm kind of excited about it. All
Speaker 1: kinds of uh excellent restaurants that I plan on storming
Speaker 1: downtown Fort Wayne to check out later on tonight. So
Speaker 1: that'll be a lot of fun. But yeah, first first
Speaker 1: time in Indiana, very exciting stuff. And I'll be at
Speaker 1: talk Tank for those of you who are in the
Speaker 1: Fort Wayne area tomorrow, so I think, I mean, it
Speaker 1: might be sold out, but you know, just show up
Speaker 1: at the door and we'll figure something out, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. So don't worry about it. Even if
Speaker 1: it's hold out, just show up and say. You know me, Gosh,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be causing problems now, I know book, well
Speaker 1: you do. If you listen to the show, you do
Speaker 1: know me, darn it, and you know the secret password.
Speaker 1: You know. It's it's like knowing the guy at the
Speaker 1: door of the nightclub. Be like I listened to Buck
Speaker 1: on radio. I want to hang out at Talk Tank
Speaker 1: tomorrow and Fort Wayne, so do come by and check
Speaker 1: it out. Now. With that, uh, it is time for guys.
Speaker 1: Is the last time we're gonna hang out for a
Speaker 1: couple of days because we're about to go into the weekend. Well,
Speaker 1: it's time for us to get into some roll call though,
Speaker 1: Team Buck. It's time for roll call al right. First
Speaker 1: up here we have Brian who writes for our role
Speaker 1: call and by the way, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of roll call Facebook dot com, slash Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton and also official Team Buck at gmail dot com.
Speaker 1: That reminds me. Producer Mike make sure we we bring
Speaker 1: the emails, and Facebook is so easy, so I tend
Speaker 1: to go with more of those, but I want to
Speaker 1: make sure we get to all of the emails that
Speaker 1: are piling up in the box too. But it's Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com, slash buck sex if you want to send
Speaker 1: me thoughts. I read everything that goes into that box,
Speaker 1: even the mean stuff. Why are people means? Sometimes? The
Speaker 1: good news is that of the folks who listened to
Speaker 1: the show, of those fellow patriots that I affectionately referred
Speaker 1: to as Team Buck are highly intelligent, principled, ethical, wonderful people.
Speaker 1: But there's like point one percent of angry lib that
Speaker 1: listens to the show, and occasionally they send me me
Speaker 1: and emails, which I'm okay with them when they're a
Speaker 1: little bit funny. When they're just mean and lots of
Speaker 1: capitalized curses, that's not cool. But when they're actually saying
Speaker 1: something like I will never forget I will never forget
Speaker 1: some of the of the meaner emails that I've gotten
Speaker 1: that we're entertaining anyway, But I don't want those. I
Speaker 1: want nice emails, alright, So don't now. People who are
Speaker 1: actually my friends within Teambok are gonna start being like, well,
Speaker 1: since you wanted no, no, no, only nice emails please
Speaker 1: or constructive criticism also welcomed. We have Brian first up
Speaker 1: here Buck Greetings from fly Over Country, Oklahoma. Well, Brian,
Speaker 1: I'm in Indiana, so I don't know which one is
Speaker 1: You know which one wins the Flyover battle, But I'm
Speaker 1: just saying thanks for all that you do. I love
Speaker 1: your show and don't miss a broadcast. Your sense of humor,
Speaker 1: pop culture references knowledge and disdain for everything Green Day
Speaker 1: slays me. You recently criticize yourself by saying that I
Speaker 1: didn't read the fine print or any print for that matter,
Speaker 1: and I could totally relate. Keep up the good fight
Speaker 1: and know there are others out there who are thankful
Speaker 1: for your voice in the world. Original Saturday Squad oss
Speaker 1: and Shields high from Brian in Oklahoma. Thank you so much, Brian,
Speaker 1: A great note and a great way to start off
Speaker 1: our Friday roll call session here um. Next up, Daniel,
Speaker 1: who rights Buck gaslighting. Thank you for putting a word
Speaker 1: to something I've been experiencing. I've had arguments with people
Speaker 1: who openly say they want an assault weapon ban. Would
Speaker 1: also like to ban semi auto handguns and support repealing
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment. But when I try to engage them
Speaker 1: in debate, the response I've gotten is literally, no one
Speaker 1: is coming for your guns. You're just being paranoid. Go
Speaker 1: hug your guns, you crazy gun nut. Super annoying, the
Speaker 1: last refuge of someone who can't make an intellectual counter
Speaker 1: argument from Daniel O S S. Yeah, Daniel, if you
Speaker 1: let people get away with it, they'll keep moving the
Speaker 1: goal posts on the issue of gun control. So you've
Speaker 1: just got to pin them down if you want to
Speaker 1: even have the discussion. There's nothing wrong with saying, you
Speaker 1: know what, this is not going to be productive because
Speaker 1: what I'm telling you about the gun control debate is central.
Speaker 1: It is true that gun control is actually just a
Speaker 1: proxy battleground for the culture war. The gun control argument
Speaker 1: has very little to do with violence in terms of
Speaker 1: why people are uh mobilized and why they hold the
Speaker 1: opinions that they do, which is why when you present
Speaker 1: them with facts that shoot down pardon the phrase, uh,
Speaker 1: the opinions that they come up with, they become angry
Speaker 1: because they don't see it as oh, you're disproving my
Speaker 1: gun control theory. Maybe we can come up with something
Speaker 1: else that would save lives. They see it as well.
Speaker 1: I thought that by holding this position, I was one
Speaker 1: of the good people, and now you're telling me that
Speaker 1: that's not true. I was one of the smart people,
Speaker 1: and you're telling me that that's not true. That is
Speaker 1: why Aries writes that Laura Ingram pronounces her name Ingram.
Speaker 1: I know I will never get it wrong again. I
Speaker 1: got lit up by lots of messages for that one
Speaker 1: last last night. Uh. And there's that um Patrick, right buck.
Speaker 1: I love that your show are placed the previous host
Speaker 1: on my local radio. I've been a loyal listener since then.
Speaker 1: But there is one chink in your armor. We are
Speaker 1: approximately the same age. You've got a year on me,
Speaker 1: but you're you're just staying for Springsteen. It's bothersome. Try
Speaker 1: listening to the album Nebraska start to finish. I think
Speaker 1: you would have a change of heart. If a song
Speaker 1: is good enough for cash to cover, it's worth to listen. Patrick.
Speaker 1: I really support I really appreciate your support of the show,
Speaker 1: and support your support of the show. That's what I
Speaker 1: was about to say, so I figured why not just
Speaker 1: lean into it and say it. Uh. I will never
Speaker 1: budge on Springsteen, my friend. I hope we can get
Speaker 1: past this. I hope we can still be friends. I
Speaker 1: will never budge on Springsteen. You know, the First of all,
Speaker 1: the guy basically wears a costume all the time. No,
Speaker 1: no one wears a leather vest over a chambre shirt
Speaker 1: or whatever it is all the time. It's just ridiculous.
Speaker 1: But I don't even care about the costume the music,
Speaker 1: see Brian, And I mean, I'm sorry that was previously Patrick.
Speaker 1: We're still gonna be friends, though. I will for you, Patrick,
Speaker 1: for you because you wrote me a nice note. I
Speaker 1: will listen to the album Nebraska if it is on Spotify,
Speaker 1: which is how the cool kids listen to music now,
Speaker 1: So I'll make that concession. But I think we're gonna
Speaker 1: have to agree to disagree on this one. But shields
Speaker 1: high and thank you for your note. Next up, we
Speaker 1: got another Brian love your show. I've been listening for
Speaker 1: about a year. I listened to it on the I
Speaker 1: Heart radio app. We have a suggestion, since we do
Speaker 1: not have to listen to commercials on the app, could
Speaker 1: you list the sponsors that help support your radio show
Speaker 1: on your website? UH for that? That way, we can
Speaker 1: help out your radio show. Well, thank you very much, Brian.
Speaker 1: I really do appreciate that. And that's a good idea. Uh,
Speaker 1: that is a good idea. I think that we should
Speaker 1: we should do that. So I will talk to folks
Speaker 1: here about it. Um and there you go, and hopefully
Speaker 1: we can get that going again. Uh. Now I'm just rambling,
Speaker 1: which is I got? I don't have enough time for
Speaker 1: the it's already have here, but we have another, Brian.
Speaker 1: I swear I'm not just picking out guy's name. Brian.
Speaker 1: It did seem for a little while like I would
Speaker 1: only date girls name Katherine. But that's a whole other story.
Speaker 1: I went through a series of Katherine's in my life.
Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know what happened, but sometimes
Speaker 1: it just lines up that way. Brian writes book great
Speaker 1: show is always I haven't seen any Roseanne episode ever,
Speaker 1: and I'm not sure I'm going to because her laugh
Speaker 1: makes me want to claw my face off. But you
Speaker 1: should give Last Man Standing a shot. It's a feel
Speaker 1: good sitcom starring Tim Allen as an old fashioned, hard
Speaker 1: working hunting father raising three daughters in today's progressive world.
Speaker 1: It's great because he rolls with everything and he never
Speaker 1: gives up his beliefs. It's a resurrection of the classic
Speaker 1: sitcoms where the star can also be a role model.
Speaker 1: I think you'd like it, well, Brian, I gotta tell
Speaker 1: you that sounds awesome, and I think I would like it,
Speaker 1: so I will check it out, and I absolutely is.
Speaker 1: I'm hoping it's on Netflix or Hulu or something, and
Speaker 1: that would make it easy for me to give it
Speaker 1: a shot. Marcella. Next up, I completely agree with you
Speaker 1: regarding the new Roseanne Show. I was actually a regular
Speaker 1: viewer of the original Roseanne Show, and I enjoyed it
Speaker 1: quite a bit. Roseanne was sharp, snarky, and anything but
Speaker 1: politically correct. There was no political agenda. The reboot is boring,
Speaker 1: not funny, and the actors, including Roseanne bar are being
Speaker 1: used as mere prompts to introduce social engineering into a
Speaker 1: show or that was previously never a part. Well, Marcella,
Speaker 1: I can't speak to the old show, but I'm glad
Speaker 1: you agree with me on the new show because that
Speaker 1: means we're both right, So high five for us. It's
Speaker 1: just not as good as it should be. I am disappointed,
Speaker 1: disappointed with the way the new show has laid laid
Speaker 1: itself out. It's not been good. All right, my friends,
Speaker 1: That's gonna be it for this episode of The Bucks
Speaker 1: Exton Show. Please do subscribe to the podcast on iTunes,
Speaker 1: The Bucks Exton Show You Know what it is. Also
Speaker 1: want to say to all of yous won't get a
Speaker 1: chance before Monday, have a happy Easter. And of course
Speaker 1: Shields High