WEBVTT - Why do moving objects look shorter?

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, how long does it take you to do

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the research for one of these episodes?

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, it used to take me quite a while,

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but I'm getting quicker at it.

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Mmmm. Is that because time passes more quickly as you

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>get older, like a special relativity thing?

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe? Or I guess I've just gotten more efficient at

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the preparation.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah, like you can read faster, or you can

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>process information better.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I think I just developed a better mental whorehe

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>simulator that can predict what you might be interested in

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>or what you might not be interested in.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it sounds like you just need like an AI

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>version of me. Then I don't even need to be here.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not artificial intelligence. It's natural.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a cartoonist intelligence. Well, I guess you know. It

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of depends. You know, what's interesting is kind of relative,

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't it.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. What's especially interesting is kind of relative,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>So I guess it kind of it is all special relativity.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I definitely have some special relatives. Did you predict

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say that.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I predicted you were going to say something hilarious. Hi.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jorge mc cartoonist and the author of Oliver's great,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>big Universe.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 2>at UC Irvine, and I'm still training my brain to

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>understand the universe.

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Wait, don't you need to know how the universe works

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>before you can train your brain to understand it.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 2>We can do two things at once. We can try

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how the universe works, and we can

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 2>try to wrap our minds around the bits that we

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>have figured out and try to gain some intuition for

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>all this craziness.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this podcast is a little bit of

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>training into like how to think about the universe, how

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to explore it, how to ask questions about it. Should

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we be charging tuition?

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 2>We're just sharing the love, you know. But you're right

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>because most of our modern theories or physics are expressed

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>in a kind of inaccessible language mathematical equations that do

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 2>show us the relationship between bits and pieces and allow

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>us to make predictions and stuff. But it's not always

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the way our brains work. So one of the goals

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>on this podcast is to break it down and give

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you an intuitive understanding, to try to make it all

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>make sense to you.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess. We offer free intuition, but not at

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a cost of free tuition.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 2>No tuition intuition. That should have been the title of

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the podcast.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hopefully it all comes to fruition.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, you're welcome to pay tuition if you like,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 2>send us gold coins or dollars if the inspiration strikes you.

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You take tips. You have a tip jar in your classroom.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a tip jar, but I did once

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>walk into a classroom and find an envelope with thousands

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>of dollars in it.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, WHOA, where is your university.

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 2>It's a public university, man, So it's not like some

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>students just like dropped a pile of cash. I think

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 2>it must have been some club organizing in the room

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>before us or something. Hmmmm.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like maybe they were trying to bribe you.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I think somebody must have panicked

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>when they realized they left it behind.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Or could have been a tip. I don't know. You

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>could have just assumed it was a tip.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not so cheaply bought.

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, welcome to our podcast. Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 2>In which we use our inspiration to improve your intuition

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>for absolutely no tuition, whether or not the jokes come

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to any fruition.

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right, because it is an amazing universe for us

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask questions about and to explore and to learn

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>about how it all works.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And part of the process of doing physics is not

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>just writing down on some sheet of paper a bunch

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>of math and then gesturing at and saying, trust us,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 2>this works. It's about understanding. In the end, physics and

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 2>all of science is motivated by our curiosity, our desire

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>to understand, and that means translating all of this stuff,

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>everything we've learned, back into something that makes sense to us,

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that clicks together in our minds, and we go, oh, well,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of weird, but I guess it does make sense. Yeah.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Plus, I don't know if I trust you anymore. I mean,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>now that I know you're open to bribery.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I did say I was opening bribery. You said I

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 2>was opening bribery, and I said I.

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't it sounds like you're open to tips quote unquote tips.

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 2>People are welcome to send us donations to the podcast,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's not going to affect how I grade in

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>my class. Now I turned that stack of cash over

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to the campus police.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, are saying you tip the police.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what they did with it, but I

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>can only assume that they did something responsible.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this university needs to depend on your point

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of view and also how fast you're.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Going, because something we've learned over the last hundred years

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>is that our ancient intuition for how things work doesn't

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 2>always work. It only works in the special cases that

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 2>us and our ancestors got to see things moving pretty slowly.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>And when you take those rules and try to extrapolate

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>them up to things moving really, really quickly, you find

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 2>they just don't work anymore. You need a new set

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 2>of rules, and those rules give us weird new insights

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>into the actual nature of space and time.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, over eight hundred years ago, Einstein discovered something called

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>special relativity.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Einstein developed special and general relativity. That's absolutely true. I

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know if he invented it or discovered it, he

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>certainly uses it to describe the universe that we see

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>around us.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Over a one hundred years hegol Einstein discovered something

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>called relativity special in general, in which he discovered that

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>things don't always look the same in this universe. Sometimes

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it sort of depends on your relative point of view.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Einstein really shook the foundations of our understanding of reality.

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Newton gave us this idea of space and time as

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>being absolute, like the fixed backdrop of the universe, but

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 2>Einstein showed us that space is relative and so is time,

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and it leads to all sorts of bizarre effects. Clock sprunning, slower,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 2>meter sticks looking shorter, and information disappearing into black holes.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it kind of seems sometimes that the universe has

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>these paradoxes and these contradictions, but actually it all sort

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of works if you dig into the math, right, It

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>all does actually make sense in the end. It's just

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of sense. So today on the podcast,

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll be tackling the question why do moving objects look shorter?

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess moving objects look shorter.

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>This is not like how your bank account seems to

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 2>shrink when you're on a trip, you know, or on vacation.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the effect commonly known as length contraction, that

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 2>things going super duper fast relative to you seem to

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 2>look shorter than they do when they're at rest.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the consequences of having a speed limit

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, isn't it.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. It's one of the consequences of special relativity, which

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>starts from the postulates if there's a speed limit to

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the universe and that light always moves at the speed

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 2>of life for everybody, regardless of who they are and

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 2>how fast they're going. Out of that comes all sorts

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 2>of weird changes we have to make to space and

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>time and velocity in order to make things still make sense.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And so On the podcast here we've talked about how

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as you're moving at close to the speed of lighter

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>moving near really massive objects, time slows down. We've talked

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>about that quite a bit, right, Yeah, moving clocks run slow.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you see a clock moving past you at

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>half the speed of light, then you will see a

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>tick slower than a clock you are holding. That's time dilation,

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a concept we've talked about lots and lots of times, right.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the idea that it's not only time

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that can sort of stretch and change, it's also distances

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>or the lengths of things.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you are traveling really really fast, then distances

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in front of you seem shorter, like if you're flying

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>between here and Jupiter, and you're moving really really fast,

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>then the distance between here and Jupiter seems to shrink.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So like, if there was a giant meter stick between

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>here and Jupiter, and I was moving towards Jupiter really

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>really fast, then that meter stick would look shorter than

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it actually is to me.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>It would look shorter to you, but there is no

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.559
<v Speaker 2>what it actually is. There's just a lot of different

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>viewpoints on it. It's all relative.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess what it would look like if you

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>were not moving relative to the stick exactly.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's what we call the proper length.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>In that case, I'm moving really fast, it's not the

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>meter stick, or is it the same thing.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's exactly the same thing. The meter stick would say

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 2>you look shorter, and you would say the meter stick

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>looks shorter. The whole effect is symmetric, same way the

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>time valation is symmetric. If I think you're moving fast,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I see your clock running slow, but you also see

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 2>me moving quickly, so you see my clock running slow.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But I guess, doesn't it depend on which direction this

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>ruler is flying. Like if the ruler is flying let's

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>say away for me really fast, it would look shorter.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But what if it's moving, like from I see, moving

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>from my left to my right, would it still look shorter?

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>It would look thinner. In that case, the direction it's

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>moving relative to you is the direction that gets contracted.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>If it's always moving along its length, then it's going

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>to look shorter, even if that length is point. Did

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>it along X or along y or along zo or

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 2>in any direction? If it's moving along its length, it's

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>going to look shorter.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I see. So like if someone launched a ruler really

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>really fast from my left and my right, it would

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>seem shorter than it would if I just held it

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in my hand.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so then the question for today is why does

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that happen? All right? Well, as usual, we were wondering

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>how many people out there had thought about this question

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or wonder why things look shorter when they're moving really fast.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much to everybody who answers these questions. We

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>love hearing your voices, and we'd love to hear more

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>of your voices, So please don't be shy and write

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to us two questions at Danielandhorge dot com.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So think about it for a second. Why do you

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think moving objects look shorter. Here's what people have to say.

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>The Doppler effect is that what it's called the red

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>shifting thing.

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So like, basically when the object, the object comes closer

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to you, like I guess, like, it looks like the

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:55.359
<v Speaker 2>wavelengths wavelengths shorten, right, they get shorter. So like all objects,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, they get a little louder, the colors are a

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 2>little brighter, the wavelengths shorten, and so the object look

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 2>shorter because the wavelengths of the colors of the object

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>is shorter.

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's why.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I think they look shorter, just due to the fact

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 4>that it's more for our brain to process, you know,

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to if an object was sitting still, and

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 4>then obviously when there's more to interpret, that obviously creates

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 4>more of a margin of error with our perception.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I would assume that the reason that objects appear shorter,

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 5>especially as they approach light speed, is time and space dilation.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 5>So as it approaches light speed, it would just appear

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 5>to shrink. Not really sure.

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that for a human eye optics, moving objects

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 3>look actually longer because of motion blur, but special relative

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 3>to states that moving objects get shorter, don't exactly remember why.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Moving objects look shorter because the back has gotten closer

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>to where the front was when you saw it by

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 4>the time you see the back.

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lots of interesting answers.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 2>Here, very creative answers today, but.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They also sound very sciensy talking about Doppler effects and

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>red shifting and space dilation.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, motion blur. Some of these answers are way off

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and some of them are pretty close.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Pretty cool. These are people that you found in your

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>department or people on the internet.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 2>These are just folks from the internet listeners to this podcast.

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Nice, Well, let's dig into it. Daniel, how what is

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the physicist definition of length dilation?

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So we usually call it length contraction.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Wait is there a difference? Can you also have that

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>length dilation or is it only contract.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>You can only have length contraction. The longest something can

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 2>be is if it's at rest relative to you. So

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you're holding a meter stick, that's the longest you're ever

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>going to measure that meter stick to be that meterstick

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>is moving past you at a certain speed, then you're

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 2>going to see it shorter. And the way I like

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to phrase it to be very clear to make sure

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>it's relative, is that moving objects look shorter.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>And if they're moving like away from you or towards you,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it still gets shorter.

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 2>They still get shorter. Yeah, that doesn't make any difference.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>In the same way that like moving clocks run slow

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>tells you that you are seeing that clock run slow

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>because you see it moving and it sees you moving,

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 2>so it sees you running slow. In the same way

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you see a meter stick moving, you see it looking shorter.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 2>It also sees you looking shorter because it sees you moving.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a symmetric effect.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, I was wrong. Well is the This is

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the definition of the length contraction.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's just that moving objects look shorter. You define

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 2>the proper length of something to be its length when

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 2>it's not moving. So you're holding the meterstick, you call

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 2>that the proper length. Then you zoom that meterstick by

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>you at like ten percent of the speed of light,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>which doesn't sound impressive, but it's super duper crazy fast.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Then you'll see it a little bit shorter. You'll see

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>it like a half a percent shorter. You speed it

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>up to like half the speed of light, and you'll

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>see it be like only eighty five percent of its

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>proper length length. And as you get up to like

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine percent of the speed of light, it'll shrink

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>down to like fifteen percent of its proper length. If

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 2>you get to like ninety nine point ninety nine percent

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of the speed of light, it'll be just over one

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>percent of its proper length. So you can see things

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>getting like super duper short as they get super duper

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 2>fast relative to you.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm wondering what it means to see something

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like that moving that fast. You mean, like if I

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>take a picture of it, Like, let's say a ruler

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is zooming by really quickly, buy me from my left

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to my right, and I take a picture of it

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>as it's going in front of me. In the picture,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to seem shorter than it would if I

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>held the ruler in my hand.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 2>It's great that you asked that question, because we have

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to be very specific about what we mean here by

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 2>these measurements, because it makes a difference. And actually, if

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you take a picture, you would see the ruler looking

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>weirdly longer because the picture captures all the photons that

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 2>are arriving at you at one moment, and that includes

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 2>another effect, which is that it takes time for the

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 2>infram to get to you, and part of the ruler

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 2>is further from you, and part of the rulers closer

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 2>to you. So that combines two different effects. One is

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>that the ruler looks shorter because it's moving faster, and

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the other one at the back of the ruler is

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>further from you, so it takes light longer to get

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>No, now, but if the ruler is moving from my

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>left to my right, like it's zooming past me like

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a train would like if I'm standing then next to

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some train tracks and I see the train going from

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>my left to my right, and I take a picture

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of the train as it's passing by in front of me.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that draining It seemed shorter in the picture or

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the same length or longer.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Again, the picture combines two different effects. One is a

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 2>special relativity effect and the other is the very normal

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>light takes time to travel effect. And so usually what

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>we do is not use the idea of a mental picture,

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 2>but imagine that we have like a bunch of assistants

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>all spread out to our left and to our right,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and they mark like when the train front or when

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the train back passes them, and then we can use

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the distance between the train front and the train back

0:14:58.440 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to say how long.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It is h what happens in the picture case, like

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>what if I take a picture of the train or

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the ruler moving from my left and my right, Like,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't all those photons leaving the stick at the same time,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and so then it would arrive at the camera or

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>my eye at the same time.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>They're leaving the train or the stick at the same time.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>The stick has length, so it takes longer for the

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 2>back end photons to reach you than the front end photons.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>And I think combining photon travel time and actual length

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>combines two different complicated things which are kind of hard

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>to hold in your head at the same time. So

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>usually when we talk about special relativity, we assume that

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>we can take care of the photon travel time and

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>say that we have a bunch of assistants all through

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the universe, all making measurements and take local data, and

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 2>then we combine that information later to figure out what happened.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>So we take away this effect of photons take time

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to get somewhere because it adds another confusing layer.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I mean we're saying that things look shorter, right,

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and your eye sort of look acts like a camera.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying that, like, maybe what you mean by

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at something it's not quite the same, but as

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what everyday person might mean by looking at something.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's fair. When we do physics experiments,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>we're very careful about how we make those measurements. So really,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 2>what we mean here is if we take a very

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>careful measurement of the length of the object, we will

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>measure it to be shorter than if it was stationary.

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, I think we just should just be

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of clear about what we mean by things looking shorter.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>What we mean is that we make a careful measurement

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>of the length of this thing involving us and a

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>bunch of assistants all along, like the track of a

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>train and noting when it passes by. And then later

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>we get together and we compare our measurements and we say,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, Juan measured the back of the train at

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 2>this time, and Sally measured the front of the train

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 2>at that time, and then we can use that to

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>figure out how long the train was.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, it sounds like we need to dig into

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this scenario of you and all of your assistance and

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how they're measuring the length of this ruler and or

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this train. Maybe really understand what we mean by things

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>looking shorter or not. So let's dig into these details.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break. All right, we're

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about length contraction due to special relativity, and that

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to do with how long this podcast is,

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>right or how much my questions dilate the length of

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the running time of this episode.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I was going to say. Yeah, no,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's good. It's important we explain exactly what we

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>mean and we not use jargon. So let's hash it

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 2>out because there's some really interesting, like apparent paradoxes that

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>come up when we try to measure these lengths really carefully.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we're asking the question why the moving objects

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>look shorter, and it seems like we're not really asking

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the question why they look shorter. It's more like why

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when a bunch of physicists try to measure something moving fast,

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they measure things to be shorter. Not really because the

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of looking at it you're saying, convolutes several things.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say, I guess that's how physicists look

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 2>at something. Right, don't just take a picture. We think

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>about what that picture is actually measuring and realizing pictures

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>are not the best way to measure the length of

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 2>something moving really really fast. And said, we hire a

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 2>bunch of assistants and lay them out in a line

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>so we can take measurements and figure out how long

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 2>that thing really is.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so then let's maybe paint that scenario. I'm sitting

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>by some train tracks, and the train tracks go from

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my left to my right in front of me, and

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>now there's going to be a train passing by. I

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>want to measure how long the train is. Yeah, and

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, don't take a picture of it because the

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>picture might lie to you. You're saying, hire a bunch

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of people, and then, now what's your scenario.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>What's your setup here with your assistance. So I have

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of people to my left and a bunch

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of people to my right.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you space them out every ten meters.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Or something, and we all have a bunch of clocks,

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 2>and we synchronize our clocks. So they all started zero

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>at the same moment, and they all read ten seconds

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 2>at the same moment. They all read one hundred seconds

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 2>at the same moment. So we have a bunch of

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>people now a different locationations with synchronized clocks.

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you synchronize a clock. Wouldn't you run into

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>special relativity problems sinking those clocks?

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>It's complicated, but you can sink clocks using flashes of light.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 2>If you assume you know how long it takes light

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to get somewhere, you can synchronize clocks that are distanced.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Mm.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So then each of these systet has a clock

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that's synchronized to yours.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly, now the train is passing by us, and

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>ask people to write down what time the front or

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the back of the train passed them.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Which one the front or the back.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 2>You can have them write down both. And then in

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 2>order to measure the length of the train, what you

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>need to do is get a measurement of where the

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>back of the train was and where the front of

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.479
<v Speaker 2>the train was at the same time. You combine those

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 2>two numbers and that's your length.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>See it again, You measure where the front and the

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>back were at the same time.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you want to know how long something is, Then

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>you want to know where's the front and where's the back.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 2>And you want to take those measurements at the same moment.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 2>If you don't take those measurements at the same moment,

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to get the length of the train.

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Like if a parade is passing by you, it's moving, right,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 2>If you measure the front and the back at different moments,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to get the actual length of the parade.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I see, all right, So then you ask your assistance

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to write down when they saw the front of the train,

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>when they saw the back of the train. And then

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>what do you do. You get together and you have

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a picnic, You.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Get together, you spend some of that tip money on

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, ice sculptures and chocolates for your picnic and whatever.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 2>And then you look at the numbers and you say,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 2>all right, one measured the back of the train to

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 2>be negative half a kilometer at the same time Sally

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 2>measured the front of the train to be at a

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>location plus half a kilometer, And so, okay, the train

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 2>is one kilometer long because the front and the back

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>were one kilometer apart at the same time.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, yeah, yeah, I'm following. I'm following. So now

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like you sort of ask, okay, t equals one minute.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Where did your assistants measure the front of the train

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and where did they measure the back of the train,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and then that should tell you the length of the train.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 2>That should tell you the length of train. And if

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 2>you measure them at different times, like if one's clock

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 2>was out of sync, or one was lazy, or one

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>made a mistake or something in a measure of the

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>back of the train earlier or later, then we'd get

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the wrong answer for the length of the train. It's

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>crucial that you measure the front in the back at

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the same time. It seems sort of obvious to even

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 2>spell that out, sort of dumb, like, duh, that's what

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>length really is. But it's going to turn out to

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 2>be really important part of understanding length contraction.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I guess that's one way to measure it,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>or is that the only way to measure the train?

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's sort of the standard setup. It allows you

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 2>to avoid things like how longs they take informations, travel

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>from here to there, and all that sort of stuff.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I suppose you could come up with other techniques as well.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, so now you get together and you measure

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the train, and you're saying the number you get from

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this setup is not the same as if the train

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was not moving at all.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, if the train was not moving at all, you

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>were set upon work with.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, if the train is parked in front of you,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 2>your setup would work.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 2>You have somebody standing at the back of the train

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and somebody standing at the front of the train. They

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>know where they are and it doesn't really matter when

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>they make the measurement if the train isn't moving.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I see, Because you know you can measure the road

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, you can measure the train tracks.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. Like if I line the train up with

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>my two assistants and I know how far apart they are,

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 2>then I know how long the train is.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So with you're set up on your assistance, which

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you're tipping generously, you measure the train to be

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>one kilometer long, And now you're saying that's not really

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>how long the train is.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's say I measured the train to be one

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>kilometer long when it's at rest, when it's not moving,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and then the train makes a run past me at

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>half the speed of light. You know then what I'm

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>going to measure this time, is that the train is shorter,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>that it's only eight hundred and fifty meters long instead

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of one kilometer.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Mmm. Interesting, Now we're going to explain why that happens.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Where does speasure where tivity come in that makes you

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>measure it to be eight hundred and fifty meters. You're

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>telling me that the assistance would measure the train to

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be shorter than a kilometer. But I guess my intuition

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is like, what, how can that be? Because like, your

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>setup seem perfectly you know, logical and sensical, and it

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>should measure my tuition. It should measure the train to

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be a kilometer because you know, Juan measured the front

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of the train moving at this point at this time,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and Sally measured the back of the train moving a

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>kilometer away at the same time. Why would it look

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>shorter than a kilometer.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's unpack what that question really means, the why question.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>You're saying that the train was one length at rest,

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and so you expect it to still be that length later.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>That sounds reasonable, but it actually contains a big assumption,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 2>the assumption that lengths are absolute rather than relative to velocity.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 2>The lengths are always the same no matter how fast

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>you're going. I could ask you, why do you expect

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the train to always have the same length. That's just

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 2>actually an assumption we're making about the world, and it

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>turns out it's not how the world actually works. The

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>world actually works differently. Lengths are relative. They depend on velocity.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 2>You just never noticed before because it's a subtle effect.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 2>So you, like everyone before Einstein, made the wrong assumption

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 2>based on your limited experience, the assumption that length is fixed,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 2>that it's universal and doesn't depend on velocity. But it

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>turns out it's not. It's relative. So that's the experimental observation.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what we see in the world. And on top

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 2>of that, it has to be relative in order to

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 2>make sense, to be consistent with the constant speed of light.

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>So A, we can now tell that the world works

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 2>this way. Lengths are relative, not absolute. And B it's

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 2>a natural theoretical consequence of the speed of light being

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the same for everyone, which has important consequences for time

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and then eventually for length. I want to walk you

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>through it, but the short version of the story is

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 2>that number one, the speed of light, is constant for everyone,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>which means that number two time is not universal that

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 2>people can disagree about whether things happen at the same time.

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And remember that measuring the front and back of the

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>train at the same time was crucial to our measurement.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 2>So disagreeing about simultaneity when to measure the front and

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>back of the train means number three, we're going to

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>disagree about the length of the train. Okay, that was

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the short version, so let's back up. Something we know

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 2>is true is that the speed of light is the

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 2>same for everyone. If you're on the train and you

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>shine a flashlight from the back of the train towards

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the front, you see it move at the speed of

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 2>light relative to the train and to you on the ground.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I see it move at the speed of light relative

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 2>to me, which means it's not moving at the speed

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of light relative to the train according to me. That's

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 2>number one, the basic fact from which all special relativity derives.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 2>That everyone measures the speed of light relative to them

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 2>to be the same. So how does that mess up

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 2>our concept of time? Well, if you stand in the

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 2>middle of the train and shine two flashlights, one forwards

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and one backwards, then you'll see them reach the front

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and the back at the same time. Right makes sense,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 2>same distance, same speed. But on the ground, I also

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.239
<v Speaker 2>see those beams moving at the speed of light. But

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 2>now I see the back of the train rushing forward

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>towards the beam, so it reaches the beam first, compared

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to the front of the train, which is racing away

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>from the beam. So you and I disagree about whether

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the beams hit the front and back at the same time.

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 2>That was point number two. It all comes down to

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>the end to time. It's because the way Einstein changed

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 2>our understanding of the universe required us to understand that

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 2>time depends on the observer. That's not just location that

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 2>depends on the observer, but also time depends on the observer.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 2>And because time depends on the observer, whether two things

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 2>happen at the same time depends on the observer. We've

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 2>talked about this a few times, this concept of simultanedy,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>like do two things happen at the same time depends

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>on your velocity. And because measurements of length require two

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>measurements at the same time, then your measurement of length

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>ends on your notion of simultaneity. Do a Juan and

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Sally measure the train front and back at the same time,

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 2>They think so, but the person on the train thinks

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>they don't, which is why they have different measurements of

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the length of.

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>The train between us and the observers on the train.

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But like, all of your assistants are not moving relative

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to each other, that's right, and they all have synchronized clocks.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You told me they were synchronized. So what do you

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>mean that their measurements are not happening at the same time,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or like if they measure Jan measures in front of

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the train, Sally measures the back of the train, and

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they write down on a piece of paper what their

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>measurements and then they bring the papers to you. Aren't

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>those things synchronized. I'm not saying how what you're saying

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about time and how that's changing your assistance measurement.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that those measurements are synchronized, and I

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 2>think my measurement of eight hundred and fifty meters is

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 2>totally right. But if you're on the train, then you

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 2>think that those measurements are not synchronized. You're like, No,

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Jan and Sally made those measurements at different times. That's

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 2>why they got a shorter length. From your point of you,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 2>those two measurements were not made at the same time.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Why not we synchronized our clocks.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm synchronized with everybody on the ground, but I'm not

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>synchronized with people on the train because those people are

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 2>moving relative to me, and moving clocks cannot stay synchronized.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so forget the people on the train. Let's just

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>focus on Huang and Sally.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Huan and Sally on the ground, they.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Have synchronized clocks to mine. They're synchronized to each other.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And you're saying they would measure the train to be

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and fifty meters.

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, whereas somebody on the train says.

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>That, no, forget, forget the person on the train. Now

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the train stops, turns around, comes back, and parts in

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>front of me. Mm hmm. Now I would measure the

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>train to be a kilometer yes, So what happened there?

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Like did space contract or I guess I'm not seeing

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the connection with time or or at least I feel

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like we're not explaining that.

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Velocity and time are very closely related, right, We're not

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about a single point. We're talking about two points.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about the front of the train and we're

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about the back of the train, and we're talking

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>about the distances between them, and we're talking about measuring

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 2>them at a certain time, and so of course time

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is going to be involved here, right.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You say we synchronize our clocks, So isn't it sort

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of like a universal time?

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can only synchronize clocks in one frame. Okay,

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 2>So we've established that we can synchronize our clocks on

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the ground, but that doesn't mean they're synchronized for other people,

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 2>like the people on the train.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is maybe confusing more to think

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about the people on the train. Like let's say I

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the people on the train, Like I

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just care about what Seally and Juan measure now when

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the train is moving, and then later when the train

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>stops and comes back and they measure the distance again.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Why are those two measurements different?

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, your question is if the train is one kilometer

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>long when it's sitting in front of me, or equivalently,

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 2>if the people on the train measured to be one

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 2>kilometer because it's not moving relative to them, then why

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>do we measure it to be shorter on the ground

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 2>when it's moving past us? How does our disagreement about

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 2>synchronized clocks get translated who is disagreement about the length? Well,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the most direct way to say it is that to

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>measure the length of the train, you have to measure

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the front and back at the same time. But if

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you disagree about what at the same time means, then

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you're going to disagree about the length of the train.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So what's going on here exactly? How do the UNSYNCD

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 2>clocks make people measure different times. I know you don't

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>want to think about the people on the train, but

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you kind of have to, because when we say the

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>train is one kilometer in length, what that means is

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 2>that it's one kilometer for people on the train, for

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 2>people not moving relative to the train, by their definition

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of at the same time, the front and back are

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 2>one kilometer apart. That's kind of what it means. But

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 2>for people on the ground, they have a different definition

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of at the same time. They think that the people

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>on the train's measurement is wrong. The people on the

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>ground think that the people on the train measure in

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the back of the train first and later measure the

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>front of the train. The people on the ground think

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that people on the train are not measuring the front

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and back at the same time, which is why they

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>get a longer measurement. They get a full kilometer. Like

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>imagine if you took a one meter long stick moving

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 2>past you, and you measured the back of it now

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and the front of it later in ten seconds or whatever,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you get a measurement that was way too long. That's

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>what the people on the ground think that people on

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the train are doing to get one kilometer instead of

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and fifty meters. The people on the ground

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 2>think that their own measurements are synchronized, and they get

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and fifty meters. The people on the train

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>think that the measurements on the ground are not at

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>the same time. The people on the train think that

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the people on the ground are measuring the front before

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they're measuring the back, and that's why the people on

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the ground are getting a measurement that's too short. So

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 2>there's no like, what is the real length of the train,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.479
<v Speaker 2>or why does a train look shorter when it's moving faster?

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Its length depends on your velocity. We just never noticed.

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It before, all right, So let's dig into me this

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of that. It has to do with time and

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about how time changes due to special relativity

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and see if that maybe explains why the train. We

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>measure the train to meet different lengths here and then

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>later when it stops. So we'll dig into that, but

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break. All right, we're asking

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the question why do moving objects look shorter, and Daniel

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you're saying it really depends on the idea of time

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>being variable at this time being variable affect sally and

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>why your assistance measurements of the train.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I think time is crucial to resolving this sort of

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 2>apparent paradox. One of the reasons it's hard to imagine

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a stick getting shorter or a train getting shorter is

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 2>because you think of it as a rigid object which

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>throws you off. Instead, just think of three train cars

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>moving and sync. One in the back, one in the middle,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 2>and one in the front. Now, what if the middle

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 2>car tells the other two to speed up? From your

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 2>point of view, the message arrives at the rear car first,

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>which speeds up before the lead car can, effectively shrinking

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the distance between them. From their point of view, However,

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the message arrives at the lead and the rear car

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, and the distance hasn't changed. When

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>they decelerate again, the reverse happens and the cars come

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>to rest with the same original distance. So you can

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>see how different senses of time lead to different measurements

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of distance. But how is it possible for the train

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 2>cars to get closer together and like not? Notice what

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>if you exaggerated the effect so they would bump into

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 2>each other. Well, the answer is they also shrink because

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>space itself is shrinking. The atoms are like little cars.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>So think of the train as the front of the

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 2>train and the back of the train, not as one object.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Thinking of it as one long train tricks you into

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>using your intuition thinking of it as a rigid object,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>which actually can't exist in our universe. Like when people

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 2>ask what happens if you stick a light year long?

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Does one end move instantly, sending information faster than light

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to the other end. No, there's no rigid stick. You

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 2>push on one end and the pressure wave takes time

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 2>to reach the other end and to move it. It's the

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 2>same with the train. It's linked together, but it's not

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>a rigid object of fixed length. So think about the

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 2>front and the back separately. Now, The super confusing thing

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 2>about this whole length contraction thing is that it's relative,

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 2>just the way time dilation is. People on the ground

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 2>think the train has shrunk, but people on the train,

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>and I know you don't want to talk about them,

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 2>they think that distances on the ground have shrunk because

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the ground is moving relative to them. Like let's say

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>they're about to enter a one kilometer long tunnel. I

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 2>see the trains moving, and so I see it's going

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to be shorter than the tunnel, whereas the train sees

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel is shorter. So who's right, Like is the

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 2>train actually going to be in the tunnel or not?

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 2>And we construct these situations to like confront the universe

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and say, like, what's really happening because we imagine that

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 2>the concept of length is absolute, that the train has

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>an actual length, right, that something has to happen in

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the universe, and only one thing can happen. You can't

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 2>have like two people seeing conflicting events. So understanding how

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 2>time flows and how time is relative is crucial to

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>understanding how both of those things can seem true. That

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 2>somebody on the ground can see the train as shorter

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and fitting in the tunnel, and somebody else on the

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>train can see the tunnel as shorter, so the train

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 2>always sticks out.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's this inner and we'll go with your tunnel idea. Okay,

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So I have a train that when it's standing still

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in front of me, I measure it to be a kilometer.

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Now I build a tunnel that and the tunnel is

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not moving, and I measure, and I make the tunnel

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>to be one kilometer long, exactly the same length as

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the train. Now I put in at one end of

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the tunnel and Sally at the back of the tunnel. Okay,

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and we synchronize our clocks. Okay. Now I move the

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>train and I put it inside the tunnel so that

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just it fits perfectly inside the tunnel. Sally and

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Juan measure the train to be a kilometer long.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, everybody with OCD out there is like, oooh, that's

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 2>so satisfying. It fits.

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think by everybody you mean all of our

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>listeners if they like the Physics podcast. Now the train

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>leaves the tunnel, goes away a few kilometers, and then

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes back at half of the speed of light.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>That's say and Sally, Juan and I have our clock synchronized.

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>The tunnel is zooming pass and we ask want to

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>measure when the front of the train passes his spot,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And we ask Sally when the back of the train

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>passes her spot at the other side of the tunnel.

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying they're not going to report the same time,

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because if they report the same time, then I have

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to conclude that the train was a kilometer long.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 2>No, that's right. They will not measure the same time.

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 2>One and at the back of the tunnel will measure

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a time earlier than Sally at the front of the tunnel.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 2>So quarantine you, Juan and Sally, who are in the

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 2>tunnel's frame of reference. You will see the whole train

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 2>inside the tunnel that when the back end disappears into

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel, the front nose has not yet emerged from

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel and still one hundred and fifty meters from

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the exit of the tunnel.

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 1>So Sally at the back is going to write down

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>her number, and they're going to both numbers are not

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>going to come back the same.

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain why like nobody is moving like Sally Huang,

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they were both staying the same. They're the same observer

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in the same frame. Their time was synced. The train

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was physically moving past them. Why do they measure a

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>different time.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and Huan and Sali are synchronized according to themselves

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and people on the ground, so they think their measurement

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 2>makes sense and it does. In their frame. Eight hundred

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and fifty meters is the length of the train, and

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 2>they see the people on the train who are measuring

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the train to be a full kilometer longer than the

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 2>people on the ground are measuring. The people on the

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 2>ground see the people on the train making their measurements

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 2>not at the same time, and the reverse is true.

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>On the train, people take measurements at what they think

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 2>is the same time, and they get one kilometer, and

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 2>the people on the train think that people on the

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 2>ground are not syncd. That's why it's all about the

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 2>relativity of simultaneity, whether you think two things happen at

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the same time or not. And that's what sets up

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 2>this fun apparent paradox of whether the train will fit

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 2>into a one kilometer tunnel one in Sally and the

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 2>tunnel when they see it moving through, they see it

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 2>at eight hundred and fifty meters long, and so they say, yes,

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the train fit in the tunnel, but you have people

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 2>on the train. They see the tunnel as shorter. They say, no,

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>my train is still a kilometer long because the train

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 2>is not moving for them, and so it's still at

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 2>its same original length. But the tunnel is moving, so

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel is shorter. So they see the train sticking

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 2>out of the tunnel. And in order for special relativity

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to make sense, you have to somehow reconcile these two things,

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 2>like what really happened. Did the train fit in the

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>tunnel or not?

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So how do you reconcile?

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 2>So it all comes down to time, right, Remember how

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 2>we talked about earlier in the episode. The time is relative,

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 2>not just how time flows, but whether two things happen

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. That came from the observation that

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light is the same for everyone, which

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 2>means people have to disagree about whether events happen at

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the same time. The example of the beams of light

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 2>shooting along the train, people see them reaching the front

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 2>and the back of the same time. People off the

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 2>train see the light hitting the back of the train first.

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 2>And the way to reconcile that is to have different

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 2>times for all those people for time to flow differently,

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And that's why it's crucial that we understand the clocks

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 2>and the synchronization, and that the front of the back

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of the train be measured at the same time. And

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the crucial thing is that at the same time is

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 2>different for people on the train and for people on

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the ground because moving clocks flow differently. Right, So on

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the ground, Jan and Sally are synchronized and they measure

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the train to be eight hundred and fifty meters long.

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 2>But to the people on the train, Wan and Sally

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 2>are not synchronized. Wan and Sally are measuring the front

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 2>in the back of the train at different times, which

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 2>is why Wan and Sally think the train is shorter,

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and the people on the train think that it's not shorter.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Because the people on the train think that One and

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Sally made a mistake. They're like, no, you guys measure

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 2>the front and back at different times, which is why

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you're telling me it's eight hundred and fifty meters long

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 2>when really it's a kilometer. How can it make sense

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 2>for length to be contracted because it seems to violate

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 2>our intuition, like things have a length and they should

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>just have a length. And how is it possible for

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 2>things to get shorter as they get faster, because that

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 2>would lead to all sorts of weird paradoxes. It actually

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 2>can kind of make sense, and these paradoxes aren't paradoxes.

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 2>They just show you that the world works differently than

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 2>you imagined. Can it make sense that things moving quickly

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 2>get shorter? Like why doesn't that lead to contradictions?

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Not like why does it make sense? But like,

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't it lead to contradictions about the universe? Because

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I think we'd establish it's very hard to make it

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>make sense.

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>But it is possible to make it make sense, and

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense to me, And I want to share

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 2>that connection with everybody because it's a wonderful moment when

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>it all clicks together in your head and you realize, oh,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.399
<v Speaker 2>it is possible for both people to think the other

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 2>one is shorter, for the people on the train to

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 2>think the tunnel is shorter, and for the people in

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel to think the train is shorter. Here's the

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 2>detailed breakdown of what's going on with the train and

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel. Here's how it's possible for the team on

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the ground to see the train totally inside the tunnel,

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and for the team on the train to see that

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the train is too long to ever all be in

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel at the same time. From the ground point

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 2>of view, the train is shorter than the tunnel, so

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 2>when the back end is inside the tunnel, the nose

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 2>has not yet left the tunnel. Remember that we are

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 2>comparing two events front and back of the train at

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 2>what we consider to be at the same time. But

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 2>the people on the train think that the ground team

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 2>is making a mistake and that those events are not

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 2>actually at the same time. For the people on the train,

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 2>they think the ground team is comparing the front of

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 2>the train at an earlier moment to the back of

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the train at a later moment, which is how the

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>ground team sees the train inside the tunnel. From the

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 2>point of view of the people on the train, the

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 2>train is sticking out both ends of the tunnel at

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the same time because the tunnel is shorter. The people

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.879
<v Speaker 2>on the ground think that's wrong. They think the train

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 2>team came to that conclusion by comparing an earlier back

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 2>end measurement when the train tail was still sticking out

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to a later front end measurement when the train knows

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 2>is now sticking out. And the key is that they're

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 2>measuring the fronts and the backs at different times. And

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 2>it's all because time is relative and simultaneity is different

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and for people moving at different speeds. And you know,

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 2>to me this comes down to like trying to see

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 2>can special relativity makes sense because it fundamentally changes your

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 2>understanding of the world. It tells you the world really

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 2>works in a different way than you imagined, and we

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 2>want the world to make sense. Like I think back

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 2>to the first time I ever heard this example of

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 2>like somebody in a car turning on a flashlight and

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 2>then hearing that those photons move at the same speed

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 2>relative to the car as they do relative to the ground,

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And immediately my brain was like, hold on red flag.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>That can't possibly make sense because then like when do

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 2>those photons hit wall or some obstacle. People in the

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 2>car and people on the ground would disagree about that

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 2>because they all say the photons are moving at the

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.919
<v Speaker 2>same speed, but there's different distances involved and all sorts

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. And so for me, it's about disentangling these

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 2>feelings of contradiction, these ways that special relativity violates our intuition.

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, how can it possibly be that both these

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 2>people make honest measurements which conflict with each other. One

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 2>of the things I love about special relativity is that

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 2>it tells you that, like, people can disagree and'll both

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 2>be correct.

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 2>That's like the fundamental conclusion of you know simultaneity, that

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, two people can see different orders of events

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and both be honest and both be reporting what they see,

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>because the order of events depends on your relative velocity

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and your location, and there is no single absolute clock

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.760
<v Speaker 2>or single sense of space and time in the universe.

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:51.479
<v Speaker 2>And so people on the ground can see the train

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>fitting in the tunnel, and people on the train can

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 2>see the train not fitting in the tunnel, and both

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 2>be correct.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Like, it's correct that if I measure the train when

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's standing still, it'll fit in the tunnel, And if

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I measure when it's moving fast, I'm going to measure

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it being shorter than the tunnel.

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. And the people can see the train fitting

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 2>in the tunnel because according to them, they're measuring the

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 2>front and the back of the train at the same time.

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>The people on the train don't see that happening because

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 2>they think that the people in the tunnel are not

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 2>measuring it at the same time, because their concept of

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 2>what the same time means is different than the people

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 2>on the tunnel. And the end, that's why it all

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>comes down to time. Understanding relative time is crucial because

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about a big extended object. It's a kilometer long,

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 2>so the front in the back are separated by space

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 2>and separated by time, and how time flows then have

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 2>to affect your measurement of the length of it, because

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 2>in the end, measuring length means measuring the front in

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the back at the same time.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, again, you're answering the different question than, maybe than

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the one we started with.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess the most direct answer to the question

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of the episode why do things look shorter is that

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 2>they always have. We just never noticed. The fact that

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 2>we ask why is because we've been led astray by

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 2>our intuition, our unfounded assumption that the world has this

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 2>property that lengths are absolute and are always the same

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 2>at any speed. It turns out that's not true, and

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 2>we can see that it's not true by doing experiments

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 2>at various speeds, including very high speeds. Things really do shrink.

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 2>So that explains why we ask the question. Because the

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 2>way the world works is in contrast with the way

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 2>our intuition works. Why does the world work that way

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 2>is the follow up philosophical question. It turns out it

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 2>has to in order to be consistent with this other thing.

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:39.240
<v Speaker 2>We see that the speed of light is constant for everyone.

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 2>First consequence of the speed of light being constant for

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>everyone is that simultaneity is not universal. People at different

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 2>speeds disagree about what at the same time means. I

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 2>think Juan and Sally measure the front and back at

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the same time, but people on the train don't, so

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 2>we measure different lengths. And the beauty part, the really

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 2>gorgeous part, is that this is what makes it all

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 2>click together. You can have some kind of global understanding

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:08.439
<v Speaker 2>of how everyone is seeing things differently because you can see,

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>as we just explained, that people are measuring the train

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 2>at different times and getting different answers. Eight hundred and

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 2>fifty meters or one kilometer, they all get different answers,

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and they're all right because they are measuring different things.

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Length at rest means something different than length in motion

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 2>because it depends on sinking measurements at the front and

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the back of the train. Length is not absolute and

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>it can't be from the world too, makes sense at

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 2>high speeds, it has to be relative for everything to

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be coherent.

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Like to us du Juan and Sally, the train really

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>did shrink, I think, is what you're saying. Like the

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>space that comprises the train, that the space that the

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>train sits in that is moving with the train, it contracted,

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It got.

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Smaller, It got smaller for one in Sally, for Juan.

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And Sali, And that's just the way it is. Space

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is contracted, and it's all due to the speed limit

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the interest because if it didn't, that space didn't contract,

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>then things would sort of break down.

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if length doesn't contract, then you break all the

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 2>rules of special relativity. Another way to think about it

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 2>is that length contraction is sort of the same thing

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 2>as time dilation. For a completely separate example that helps

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 2>people understand the link between length contraction, which we've been

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about today and time dilation. Think about what happens

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 2>if you try to travel to a distant star at

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 2>a really high speed, Say you need to get ten

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 2>light years away, and you travel at ninety eight percent

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of the speed of light. From the point of view

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 2>of people on Earth you left behind, it takes you

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.399
<v Speaker 2>almost ten years to get there. But they also see

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 2>your clock running slowly. They see that for you, it's

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 2>only been two years. That's time dilation, right, But look

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:46.720
<v Speaker 2>at it from the other point of view, from the ship,

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 2>from the pilot's point of view, the distant star is

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 2>moving towards her at ninety eight percent of the speed

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 2>of light, So the distance to the star is shorter

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 2>than ten light years, and it only takes her about

0:47:57.239 --> 0:47:59.359
<v Speaker 2>two years to get there because it's only about two

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 2>light years for her, So she experiences two years to

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 2>get there because the length was shortened. What's really happening, Well,

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 2>length contraction is just really another way to look at

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.800
<v Speaker 2>time dilation, and in the end, it's all about time.

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think. Basically you're saying that the train track to Sally.

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 2>And perspective, Yeah, and it's all connected to time. And

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>in the end, time dilation and length contraction are really

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 2>just two different ways to see the same effect.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, again, especially relativity is hard.

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Especially in an audio format. For those of you who

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 2>like learning visually. I don't know why you're listening to

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a podcast.

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.839
<v Speaker 1>But we're glad that you are. Let's make that clear.

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying go watch YouTube.

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you do want to learn more about this stuff,

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.320
<v Speaker 2>look up space time diagrams. They're really helpful.

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, though, to think about how valuable the universe is, Right,

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that the train would shrink just because

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going fast. It's kind of weird.

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.400
<v Speaker 2>It is very weird. Yeah, And it's weird that it

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 2>makes sense in the end that the universe is just

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 2>so different from the way we imagined it. But you know,

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 2>that's the project of physics is not to just accept

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 2>our intuitions, but to confront them with data and information

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and say, how can we make sense of all this?

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 2>What story can we tell about the universe that ties

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 2>it all together? All?

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Right, the next time I take a train, I'm gonna

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about this, like, am I thinner or am

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I shorter?

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Depends if you're lying down or standing up?

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Exactly right, So I should stand up on the

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 1>train the whole time.

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to buy tickets for Juan and Sally.

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and don't forget to tip the conductor too, with

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a big, fat envelope of money.

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 2>No tip contractions here please.

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us, see you next time.

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:53.479
<v Speaker 2>the Universe is a production of iHeart Radio. For more

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 2>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 2>wherever you listen to your face. Richells h