1 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:16,960 Speaker 1: we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, 3 00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Never 5 00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:30,760 Speaker 1: a dull moment from yesterday today, with some of these 6 00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:33,479 Speaker 1: surprises in the language of the Bank of England and 7 00:00:33,520 --> 00:00:37,519 Speaker 1: to synthesize it across economics and across the equity markets, 8 00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:40,919 Speaker 1: one m Darta joins us. Michael Darta with MKM Partners, 9 00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:43,600 Speaker 1: thrilled he could be with us this morning. I thought 10 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,920 Speaker 1: the meeting yesterday Michael Darda was absolutely original, I said 11 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: to Michael McKee as I was walking out of the 12 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:54,120 Speaker 1: starship here yesterday. I wonder what Alan Meltzer would have 13 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: thought of this original policy, How original, how off theory 14 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 1: was the FED yesterday? Thanks for having me. Tom Well 15 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 1: Powell described what the Fed did was as very powerful 16 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:13,119 Speaker 1: for forward guidance, but markets looked at what the Fed 17 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:16,840 Speaker 1: did did as more or less a nothing burger. Right, 18 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: so inflation expectations didn't really move, and the FED in 19 00:01:20,959 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 1: its forecasts actually didn't predict that it would succeed in 20 00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: average inflation targeting. Nowhere in that forecast is two p 21 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:34,600 Speaker 1: plus inflation. Uh. Instead it's two percent inflation, but only 22 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:38,440 Speaker 1: after four years. And so you know, as you were 23 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 1: talking and discussing earlier, you know somewhere disappointed in that, 24 00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:46,560 Speaker 1: and and markets didn't really move the immediate response to 25 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 1: to the Fed is what you want to look at. 26 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:51,720 Speaker 1: There were some disappointments with the press conference, but um, 27 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:54,400 Speaker 1: I think you know, the f didn't move the needle 28 00:01:54,480 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: in the way. Maybe they hoped just to drill in. 29 00:01:57,040 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 1: What was the main disappointment that the Fed didn't come 30 00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: out and say that they're going to buy an indefinite 31 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 1: amount of long term debt. Well, I think it's in 32 00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 1: the forecast, right. I mean, average average inflation targeting means 33 00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:09,079 Speaker 1: if you've been below two, then you seek to get 34 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 1: above two. But nowhere in the FEDS forecast is above 35 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 1: two percent inflation. Um. And it's a pretty long horizon. 36 00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 1: You know, four years to fully recover is not a 37 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 1: lost decade, but it's you know, certainly not a speedy 38 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:25,520 Speaker 1: return to full economic health either. Mike, You've got to say, 39 00:02:25,520 --> 00:02:27,720 Speaker 1: it's absolutely ridiculous to be upset in the last twenty 40 00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:30,120 Speaker 1: four hours. Grant said chaman Pass performance wasn't all that 41 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 1: in the news conference, November five is the next mating 42 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:35,880 Speaker 1: for the Federal Reserve. I understand something happens a couple 43 00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:38,799 Speaker 1: of days earlier. Mike. Surely we've got to understand that 44 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:41,639 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve could not fire all its bullets had 45 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 1: of the election in America. Yeah, I mean, you know, 46 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 1: that's an argument for sure. And I am encouraged at 47 00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 1: least that inflation expectations are holding up, they're not sinking, 48 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:58,519 Speaker 1: but the bond market doesn't expect the FED to get 49 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:02,760 Speaker 1: back to two inflay and really over an indefinite horizon. 50 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,520 Speaker 1: And so you do have to ask yourself the question. 51 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:07,920 Speaker 1: If the Fed is telling us they are not out 52 00:03:07,919 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 1: of AMMO, they could do more, but they're not forecasting success, 53 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:15,280 Speaker 1: then why are they not changing policy. I think it's 54 00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:18,680 Speaker 1: a very legitimate question that needs to be asked. That 55 00:03:18,760 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 1: was the question economists we're asking in the news conference 56 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:22,640 Speaker 1: as well. Mike. Forgive me, because I've got to do 57 00:03:22,680 --> 00:03:24,120 Speaker 1: this right now. I've got to turn to cable and 58 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 1: get an intraday chart up and look at pounds sterling 59 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:28,680 Speaker 1: pound sterling is falling off a cliff right now, the 60 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 1: pound against the US dollar at one to break at 61 00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:33,960 Speaker 1: one and down by a half of one percent. We 62 00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 1: mentioned this very briefly just five minutes ago with Bloomberg's 63 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:41,240 Speaker 1: Guy Johnson. Governor Bailey has been flirting with negative interest rates. 64 00:03:41,320 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: This is a Bank of England now actively preparing to 65 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 1: execute negative interest rates. The Bank of England will engage 66 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:52,320 Speaker 1: with regulators on how to implement negative interest rates. Mike, 67 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: I would love your thoughts on negative rates, not just 68 00:03:56,160 --> 00:04:00,040 Speaker 1: in the UK, but across Europe, Japan, Switzerland. What is 69 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 1: your response to these kind of headlines on the Morning 70 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:05,240 Speaker 1: Light this morning? Yeah, well, I mean if the pound 71 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: is moving down on those expectations, then you would have 72 00:04:08,640 --> 00:04:11,680 Speaker 1: to characterize it as an expansionary move, right. I mean, 73 00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 1: I've heard a lot of commentators say that negative rates 74 00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:20,599 Speaker 1: are contractionary, self defeating. But if you signal a policy 75 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:25,920 Speaker 1: move and the currency depreciates, that's actually expansionary all other 76 00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:30,400 Speaker 1: things equal. The US doesn't look like it's headed net direction. 77 00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 1: Powell has thrown cold water on it, and obviously, um 78 00:04:34,760 --> 00:04:37,760 Speaker 1: the experience in the Eurozone in Japan have been disappointing, 79 00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:42,360 Speaker 1: but don't forget that we've had many policy missteps in 80 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 1: those regions where central banks tried to get off the 81 00:04:45,520 --> 00:04:49,479 Speaker 1: zero lower bound prematurely and put business cycles at risk 82 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:53,360 Speaker 1: or fortified deflationary pressures. So you don't end up in 83 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,479 Speaker 1: a zero rate scenario unless things have gone really wrong 84 00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 1: for a long time beforehand. Right, catch up as always, 85 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:06,839 Speaker 1: Marco down to that. M campound is right now, Michael 86 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:09,839 Speaker 1: gap in with us with Barkley's or chief US economists. Michael, 87 00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 1: I want to really get away from Fed policy and 88 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:16,080 Speaker 1: talk about where we are in terms of g d 89 00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:20,160 Speaker 1: P within Q four and then into two thousand twenty one. 90 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:23,880 Speaker 1: I think we've lost sight of the guessing of what 91 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:27,760 Speaker 1: real g d P will be. Good morning, Tom, and 92 00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:30,279 Speaker 1: thank you for that. So I think there's been clear 93 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 1: evidence of deceleration in the data this week, right, so 94 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:36,000 Speaker 1: we know we all came out of lockdown and things 95 00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: bounced quite strongly, and that gave us solemn momentum into July. 96 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:44,559 Speaker 1: The retail sales data yesterday coming in the cord down 97 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:47,560 Speaker 1: on the month, I think tell us that there's a 98 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:50,720 Speaker 1: lot less momentum as we head into into Q four 99 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:53,760 Speaker 1: and I know we're all used to every fiscal deadline 100 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,760 Speaker 1: bringing action, but you know phase four is you know, 101 00:05:56,839 --> 00:05:59,840 Speaker 1: it's on life support for sure. Uh. And if we're 102 00:05:59,839 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 1: not getting any additional benefits for households and replacement of 103 00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:07,200 Speaker 1: loss wage and salary income, it does look like the 104 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,360 Speaker 1: pace of improvement is certainly going to going to slow. 105 00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:13,599 Speaker 1: So somewhere in the load of mid single digits for 106 00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:16,279 Speaker 1: growth rates in in Q four seems to be reasonable, 107 00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 1: which would be a you know, pretty significant deceleration off 108 00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:23,240 Speaker 1: the roughly twent that that consensus is looking for in 109 00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:26,679 Speaker 1: Q three. So I think it is related to two things. 110 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:29,239 Speaker 1: The shift where hey, we've we bought all the goods 111 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 1: we're going to buy, and so further growth has to 112 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:35,480 Speaker 1: come from services and we know those are COVID affected areas, 113 00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:38,520 Speaker 1: and fiscal stimulus keeps getting pushed out. So those are 114 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:40,240 Speaker 1: the two forces I think that I mean, things are 115 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,920 Speaker 1: really going to decelerate now, and as we move into 116 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:45,800 Speaker 1: Q four, Michael, it's all about jobs, And as Mike 117 00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 1: McKee was saying, there is increasing concern that the job's 118 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:52,240 Speaker 1: data is really messy. How much integrity does this data have? 119 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:57,160 Speaker 1: It still has? I would say some useful integrity. Um, 120 00:06:57,320 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 1: I agree with the need to downplay the signal from 121 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:05,120 Speaker 1: the pandemic numbers, and even the initial claims data is 122 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 1: something that that we're paying less attention to. Continuing claims 123 00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 1: still seem to have a pretty good signal to them. 124 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 1: So the direction seems to be one of more modest improvement. Look, 125 00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:18,440 Speaker 1: this is just one of those periods where it's it's 126 00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 1: a data point that has lost some of its relevance. 127 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 1: Over time, it will become more relevant again. So we 128 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,800 Speaker 1: we just downweight some of the signal that that's coming 129 00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 1: out of it, but we don't ignore it entirely. Michael, 130 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:32,400 Speaker 1: you've got your finger on the pulse of the conversation 131 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 1: that we had through the summer with pretty much everybody. 132 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:38,880 Speaker 1: So many people expected that late summer slowed down, it 133 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:41,720 Speaker 1: didn't develop, and they capitulated and embrace the idea that 134 00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 1: what we're seeing is a self sustaining recovery. Are you 135 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 1: saying we're not on What we really need now is 136 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 1: more fiscal juice. So I think we've been I've tried 137 00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:54,600 Speaker 1: to be consistent in saying we we do think another 138 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:58,200 Speaker 1: round of of assistance for households, like a three to 139 00:07:58,280 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 1: four months, maybe five month kind of period would would 140 00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 1: be critical in terms of providing a greater bridge and 141 00:08:05,320 --> 00:08:08,640 Speaker 1: underpinning that virtuous cycle. Right, it worked coming out of 142 00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 1: lockdown because households had resources to spend. Personal income in 143 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:16,960 Speaker 1: July was about seven percent above where it was in 144 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:20,880 Speaker 1: February wage and salary and was about five percent below 145 00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:24,200 Speaker 1: where we were in February. So it was the federal 146 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:27,600 Speaker 1: assistance that was key in helping to underpin that initial 147 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:32,319 Speaker 1: rehiring and therefore improvement in production. And I do think 148 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:35,440 Speaker 1: a little more to bridge us into your end would 149 00:08:35,480 --> 00:08:37,880 Speaker 1: be useful. It doesn't mean the economy can't continue to 150 00:08:37,880 --> 00:08:40,440 Speaker 1: recover without it, but I think it will be slower 151 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:44,200 Speaker 1: and I think it will be more uneven. Is that 152 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:47,880 Speaker 1: what shaman Paus's whitey full? I think so? I mean, 153 00:08:47,960 --> 00:08:50,199 Speaker 1: I think it sounds to me like the message he 154 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 1: sent yesterday was we we've done what we're going to 155 00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:58,960 Speaker 1: do uh and and we've implemented flexible average inflation targeting 156 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,840 Speaker 1: where since we're going to be at zero for the 157 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:04,920 Speaker 1: next three to six years, we'll be buying assets for 158 00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:09,440 Speaker 1: the foreseeable future. The outlook from here is heavily dependent 159 00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:12,680 Speaker 1: on fiscal policy, and whether or not we get a vaccine, 160 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:15,079 Speaker 1: what happens. We'll have to see how those developed. Well. 161 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:18,720 Speaker 1: Of course, the President tweeting out here vaccines coming very shortly, 162 00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:22,520 Speaker 1: literally matter of weeks. I believe the science community would 163 00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:25,640 Speaker 1: beg to disagree with that. Michael gabon what if we 164 00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: don't get fiscal policy, what does that do in terms 165 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:32,560 Speaker 1: of tenths of a percentage point to anybody's GDP guests, 166 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:35,520 Speaker 1: I mean, it's probably more than than tents of a 167 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:39,880 Speaker 1: of a percent. I think at least what most forecasters 168 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:43,440 Speaker 1: have been penciling in a trillion or more in fiscal stimulus, 169 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 1: So those are they would be bringing down growth forecast fairly, 170 00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 1: fairly markedly. The vaccine obviously would push things in in 171 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:56,000 Speaker 1: the other direction. So we we actually put in just 172 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 1: a relatively small Phase four package. We put it in 173 00:09:59,080 --> 00:10:02,679 Speaker 1: on our forecast March. It was like billion. You know, 174 00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:06,600 Speaker 1: billions are are not trillions, of course, um, and so 175 00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 1: I would say we have less s adjusting to do 176 00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 1: on that front. But I think you're talking more percentage points, 177 00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 1: not tens of a percent if if we're not getting 178 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: getting Phase four spending or something beyond the election, for sure. Michael, 179 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 1: how worried are you about scarring on the labor market, 180 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:25,400 Speaker 1: particularly with younger workers who have some of the highest 181 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:28,920 Speaker 1: unemployment rates. Ever, I would say there at the at 182 00:10:28,920 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 1: the moment, I'd say I'm I have mild worry to 183 00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:34,679 Speaker 1: medium worry. And by that I mean when, yes, the 184 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:38,200 Speaker 1: unemployment rates come down and the level of unemployment has 185 00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 1: come down, but underneath that, the number of unemployed workers 186 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: that are being classified as permanently out of work, that 187 00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:47,680 Speaker 1: number is rising. It's it's It was a little over 188 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:50,920 Speaker 1: four million in the last employment reports. So the bad 189 00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:53,760 Speaker 1: news is it's rising. The reason I wouldn't say I'm 190 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:56,839 Speaker 1: extremely concerned is after O eight oh nine that number 191 00:10:56,920 --> 00:11:00,319 Speaker 1: was over eight million. So there is some evidence that's 192 00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:03,080 Speaker 1: scarring and labor markets is happening, but on a relative 193 00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:06,199 Speaker 1: basis at present, it's only about half as bad as 194 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 1: we saw after O eight oh nine, and we'll see 195 00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:12,360 Speaker 1: where that number goes. No vaccine likely means that number 196 00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:15,199 Speaker 1: is going to get higher. If we do get a vaccine, 197 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 1: that's why we available sometime around the middle of next year. 198 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:22,080 Speaker 1: That should limit the degree of labor market scarring. Michael 199 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:24,880 Speaker 1: Kaype and always Left catching up with you time this morning, 200 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 1: and we appreciated Michael. Thank you Michael Cape and that 201 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 1: of Barcley. You can go back to a girl have 202 00:11:33,640 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 1: showed up, I mean literally showed up in New York 203 00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:38,960 Speaker 1: and said hello, I'm here when she was eighteen years old. 204 00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 1: She stopped traffic years ago with a T shirt on 205 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:47,680 Speaker 1: the Tonight Show and that latch Rebecca Minkoff, after pursues 206 00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:50,240 Speaker 1: in the rest, she joins us now on the state 207 00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:54,000 Speaker 1: of her collapsing fashion industry. Rebecca Minkoff, wonderful I have 208 00:11:54,080 --> 00:11:55,520 Speaker 1: you with us. How are you going to make it 209 00:11:55,559 --> 00:11:58,640 Speaker 1: to the other side. You've been resilient more than anybody 210 00:11:58,679 --> 00:12:01,480 Speaker 1: I know. How do you get to two thousand twenty two? 211 00:12:02,679 --> 00:12:05,439 Speaker 1: I think we get that. We get there by being resilient, 212 00:12:05,520 --> 00:12:08,280 Speaker 1: by being innovative, and you know, you really get to 213 00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:11,440 Speaker 1: go back and flex your entrepreneurial skills. This is the 214 00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:14,600 Speaker 1: test for any entrepreneur. Can you do it? You cannot 215 00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:17,240 Speaker 1: rest on your laurels right now. And my co founder 216 00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:19,760 Speaker 1: and I have done nothing short of a miracle by 217 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:23,760 Speaker 1: keeping our company together. I can't imagine when you first 218 00:12:23,760 --> 00:12:26,960 Speaker 1: walked into Robert bergs Bergdorf, Goodman and saw your product 219 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: on the second floor or the fifth floor or whatever. 220 00:12:30,160 --> 00:12:32,959 Speaker 1: In two or three years, are people like you gonna 221 00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:37,320 Speaker 1: have product and department stores or are they done? You know, 222 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:41,120 Speaker 1: we're not done. Obviously, the pandemic has changed everything and 223 00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:44,400 Speaker 1: overnight seventy percent of our business was shut down due 224 00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:47,880 Speaker 1: the due to the pandemic. But we're seeing a resurgency. 225 00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:50,400 Speaker 1: Stores are coming back. It's going to be slower, it's 226 00:12:50,440 --> 00:12:54,160 Speaker 1: going to be different. The relationship will certainly change, but um, 227 00:12:54,240 --> 00:12:57,160 Speaker 1: we're getting requests for orders that currently we can't build 228 00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:00,400 Speaker 1: from these stores. Where are these store or is are 229 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 1: they in big cities or is the location changing? You know, 230 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:07,439 Speaker 1: we've had requests from our past stores, whether it's the 231 00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:10,640 Speaker 1: Nords from opening back up or you know the slow 232 00:13:10,760 --> 00:13:14,240 Speaker 1: sort of as these cities get allowances. Um, they are 233 00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:16,480 Speaker 1: in the bigger cities, and I don't know that you'll 234 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:20,000 Speaker 1: see a huge resurgence with department stores and smaller cities. 235 00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:22,640 Speaker 1: But we are seeing that specialty stores that are allowed 236 00:13:22,679 --> 00:13:25,680 Speaker 1: to reopen are also requesting product. And because of that, 237 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:29,360 Speaker 1: we're actually bring back certain staff that we're wholesale related 238 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:32,560 Speaker 1: only because we can't uh service these clients as well 239 00:13:32,600 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 1: as we need, and so we're bringing back staff we 240 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:37,720 Speaker 1: had furloughed in order to service those clients. Rebecca, how 241 00:13:37,760 --> 00:13:40,240 Speaker 1: do you compete with sweatpants and an arrow of working 242 00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:43,480 Speaker 1: from home? Here's the beautiful thing. We have a really 243 00:13:43,559 --> 00:13:46,560 Speaker 1: popular Janine sweatshirt that we've had for several months that 244 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:49,199 Speaker 1: we cannot keep in stock. It has the perfect zoom shoulder, 245 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 1: and now we're getting in a sweatsuit coming this holiday season. 246 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:55,480 Speaker 1: You're gonna get her invaluor you get her in a hoodie, 247 00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: you get an address. So we are listening to our 248 00:13:57,880 --> 00:14:00,240 Speaker 1: customer and we're giving her fashion, but a big, very 249 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:04,400 Speaker 1: very comfortable way. Rebecca, I want you to talk about 250 00:14:04,440 --> 00:14:06,440 Speaker 1: how you got a branch out. You've done a great 251 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: job of that. I mean it was one story of person. 252 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,960 Speaker 1: You've gone so far beyond that. I mean, Lisa A. Bramo, 253 00:14:12,080 --> 00:14:16,120 Speaker 1: it's needs little min cough, There's no question about that. 254 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:19,080 Speaker 1: But you know that the creative survival, where is all 255 00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:23,360 Speaker 1: that product discrimination going? What's your vision of how you're 256 00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:27,800 Speaker 1: gonna parse brands over the next twenty four months. So 257 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:30,040 Speaker 1: I think that we're are seeing and it needed to happen, 258 00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: a complete fashion reset. I think we were all in 259 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:35,360 Speaker 1: a hamster wheel. We were designing too much, we were 260 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 1: clogged with inventory. So one of the things we did 261 00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:41,280 Speaker 1: with launching Little min Cough is partnered with a platform 262 00:14:41,280 --> 00:14:45,880 Speaker 1: called Residents. It's inventory lists by a degradable and made 263 00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 1: with earth friendly chemicals, and there's almost zero waste because 264 00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:52,040 Speaker 1: they literally print the pattern on fabric and cut around it. 265 00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:54,800 Speaker 1: And we're expanding that to women's because we see that 266 00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:58,840 Speaker 1: a woman is actually becoming more conscious about waste, about 267 00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:02,320 Speaker 1: fast fashion and it's harm to the environment and workers, 268 00:15:02,760 --> 00:15:06,520 Speaker 1: and so we're embracing that and fully utilizing everything we 269 00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 1: can to grow that segment. Um. It's called r M 270 00:15:10,080 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 1: Green but with any after our store on Green Street, 271 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:15,560 Speaker 1: and so that launches in the next few weeks um, 272 00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:18,360 Speaker 1: in addition to the Little Minkoff which is already there. Rebecca, 273 00:15:18,560 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 1: as an entrepreneur and as a mentor to a lot 274 00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:27,120 Speaker 1: of entrepreneurs, is Amazon the enemy you know today? Uh, 275 00:15:27,160 --> 00:15:30,480 Speaker 1: you know there is a big divide, many divides actually, 276 00:15:30,560 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 1: but I think that right now we're selling on Amazon. 277 00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:37,640 Speaker 1: When our entire business, you know, uh, with the exception 278 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:40,560 Speaker 1: of our own site, went offline, we needed to be 279 00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:42,680 Speaker 1: able to find partners that were nimble and quick and 280 00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:45,480 Speaker 1: would work with us. And so we've had an incredible partnership. 281 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 1: And I think as long as you can set those 282 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:52,320 Speaker 1: rules and they are followed, and they're fantastic place to be. Rebecca, 283 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:54,360 Speaker 1: I look at the tech structure that you have to 284 00:15:54,400 --> 00:15:56,960 Speaker 1: deal with. You've got politicians looking for the rich people 285 00:15:57,000 --> 00:16:00,320 Speaker 1: buying fancy Rebecca Minkoff stuff to crush you in New 286 00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:04,000 Speaker 1: Jersey and other states. Is well, what kind of support 287 00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:09,040 Speaker 1: do you need from fiscally beleaguered politicians. I think they 288 00:16:09,040 --> 00:16:11,400 Speaker 1: need to turn their fight elsewhere. They should probably worry 289 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:15,200 Speaker 1: more about equality. They should probably worry more about, you know, 290 00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:18,920 Speaker 1: making sure that people who are not with jobs and 291 00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 1: who need more financial help get that support. You know, 292 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 1: we elect these politicians and they should be worrying about 293 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:27,800 Speaker 1: the people that need help the most, versus you know, 294 00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:31,360 Speaker 1: crushing businesses that are trying to survive and really contribute 295 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 1: to the economy. Very good, Rebecca Mankoff. Too short of visit. 296 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:40,760 Speaker 1: This is a joy, as we had Joyce chatting with 297 00:16:40,840 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 1: us of JP Morgan in the last tour Ian Bremer 298 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 1: joins us now with Euraise your group and somebody asked 299 00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:47,920 Speaker 1: me yesterday, are you doing that New Year's kick off? 300 00:16:47,960 --> 00:16:51,160 Speaker 1: And I'm thrilled to say we're planning that right now 301 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 1: with the wonderful people at Eurise. Your group, Ian Bremer, 302 00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:58,120 Speaker 1: a new book scheduled here. Maybe it will adapt an 303 00:16:58,160 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: adjust to the presidential election. Let's start with Ian Bremer 304 00:17:01,760 --> 00:17:05,920 Speaker 1: on our international relations and our next president and what 305 00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:11,440 Speaker 1: does second term presidents do on international relations? If President 306 00:17:11,520 --> 00:17:16,200 Speaker 1: Trump takes the trophy this time, how do presidents adapt 307 00:17:16,359 --> 00:17:19,840 Speaker 1: in a second term? Well, I mean, I think one 308 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:23,240 Speaker 1: thing to say is that when you have a change 309 00:17:23,520 --> 00:17:28,240 Speaker 1: in president and a changing party, the idea that foreign 310 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:32,200 Speaker 1: policy is going to be dramatically different is usually oversold 311 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:36,640 Speaker 1: by the analyst. Is usually more continuity, there's usually more 312 00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:40,720 Speaker 1: constraint um. In the case of Trump, of course, so 313 00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:44,320 Speaker 1: much of what he focuses on his brand building and 314 00:17:44,400 --> 00:17:49,200 Speaker 1: his electioneering that the dangerous period for US foreign policy 315 00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 1: is much more in the run up um to November 316 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:57,760 Speaker 1: and perhaps right after when votes are still being counted 317 00:17:57,800 --> 00:18:02,560 Speaker 1: and we don't have a solution, than what happens after January. 318 00:18:03,119 --> 00:18:07,480 Speaker 1: For me, the foreign policy differences for Trump if he 319 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:12,359 Speaker 1: gets the second term um have more to do with 320 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:16,760 Speaker 1: the constraints on his ability to run if the election 321 00:18:16,840 --> 00:18:21,480 Speaker 1: itself is seen as a legitimate by half of the country. 322 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:26,320 Speaker 1: And I think, frankly, we're in that situation no matter 323 00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:31,080 Speaker 1: who wins, coming up in November. So there's a lot 324 00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:34,320 Speaker 1: that's unprecedented here. But it doesn't have as much to 325 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:37,480 Speaker 1: do with second term or not. It has more to 326 00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 1: do with the nature of this election, the nature of 327 00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:44,160 Speaker 1: this backdrop, um and and the nature of President Trump himself. 328 00:18:44,200 --> 00:18:47,560 Speaker 1: There's a derby for the Nobel Peace Prize Senator around 329 00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:51,920 Speaker 1: our foreign policy with the Persian golf, the Arabian Sea, 330 00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:54,159 Speaker 1: or whatever you want to call it. And depending on 331 00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:57,840 Speaker 1: which side of the shore you're, Mr net you know 332 00:18:57,920 --> 00:19:01,280 Speaker 1: who's involved in that as well as our president deserve 333 00:19:01,520 --> 00:19:04,320 Speaker 1: the Nobel Peace Price. I mean, if you want me 334 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:08,600 Speaker 1: to say something UH really controversial, I can say he 335 00:19:08,680 --> 00:19:12,720 Speaker 1: deserves one more than Obama did. At the time that 336 00:19:12,800 --> 00:19:16,200 Speaker 1: Obama received it, of course, that was a symbolic UH 337 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:19,480 Speaker 1: prize at that point. It was a hopeful prize. It 338 00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:22,240 Speaker 1: was aspirational, and it was overtly political, which is why 339 00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:24,439 Speaker 1: everyone thought it was kind of a mistake, sort of 340 00:19:24,480 --> 00:19:28,600 Speaker 1: including Obama himself at the time. Of course, Trump's had 341 00:19:28,600 --> 00:19:32,679 Speaker 1: a lot of foreign policy missteps on his on his watch, 342 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:35,200 Speaker 1: but he's also had some successes. And I'll tell you 343 00:19:35,560 --> 00:19:38,960 Speaker 1: nothing will drive out the trolls more than when I 344 00:19:39,040 --> 00:19:42,879 Speaker 1: give the president credit um for things he's done on 345 00:19:42,960 --> 00:19:45,040 Speaker 1: foreign policy when he's gotten in right. One of those 346 00:19:45,080 --> 00:19:51,119 Speaker 1: things has been uh normalization of relations between Israel and 347 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:56,119 Speaker 1: the UAE, Israel, UM and Bahrain. Uh. You know, with 348 00:19:56,720 --> 00:20:00,920 Speaker 1: every president for decades now had has tried to cut 349 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:03,560 Speaker 1: their teeth in the Middle East on being an honest 350 00:20:03,600 --> 00:20:07,919 Speaker 1: broker between Israel and the Palestinians. We're not an honest broker. 351 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:10,800 Speaker 1: Israel is our best ally in the region, and the 352 00:20:10,840 --> 00:20:14,719 Speaker 1: Palestinians we have at best poor relations. Um that that 353 00:20:14,760 --> 00:20:18,560 Speaker 1: band aid has been ripped off. Our best relations are 354 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:23,679 Speaker 1: with the Israelis and the Gulf monarchies. And Trump embraced 355 00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:25,879 Speaker 1: that from day one. He knew that the first trip 356 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:28,240 Speaker 1: he made outside the U S as president, first to 357 00:20:28,359 --> 00:20:32,359 Speaker 1: Riad and then to Israel went very well. And and meanwhile, 358 00:20:32,840 --> 00:20:36,560 Speaker 1: our biggest adversary in the region is Iran, and we 359 00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:39,400 Speaker 1: share that adversary with the Israelis and the Gulf State. 360 00:20:39,440 --> 00:20:41,959 Speaker 1: So the fact that you've had an administration that's not 361 00:20:42,040 --> 00:20:45,959 Speaker 1: been in a sense constrained by or burdened by American 362 00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:49,560 Speaker 1: history in the region made it much more possible to 363 00:20:49,720 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 1: effect this breakthrough. And it's a real breakthrough. And by 364 00:20:52,320 --> 00:20:55,840 Speaker 1: the way, if Biden wins, it's actually gonna be there's 365 00:20:55,880 --> 00:21:00,800 Speaker 1: a shot that he could actually move on Israeli Palestinian 366 00:21:01,200 --> 00:21:04,920 Speaker 1: peace because of what Trump has done here is now 367 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:09,200 Speaker 1: obvious to the Palestinians that they actually don't have friends 368 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:11,560 Speaker 1: in the region, so they're under a lot more pressure 369 00:21:11,600 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 1: to get something done than they were before. What are 370 00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:18,600 Speaker 1: the chances he in that that Joe Biden wind Um 371 00:21:18,640 --> 00:21:22,480 Speaker 1: I would say today, I think they're about six thirty five, 372 00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:25,760 Speaker 1: but it's tightening over the next seven weeks. I suspect 373 00:21:25,800 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: that we'll get closer than that. I've got high confidence 374 00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:33,400 Speaker 1: that the U. S economy continues to improve, about moderate 375 00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:37,800 Speaker 1: confidence that numbers around coronavirus cases and hospitalizations and debts 376 00:21:37,800 --> 00:21:41,760 Speaker 1: will continue to flatten somewhat. And I've got moderate confidence 377 00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:47,399 Speaker 1: that social instability and violence um in overwhelmingly blue urban 378 00:21:47,520 --> 00:21:50,760 Speaker 1: centers in the US will continue to increase. All three 379 00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:54,680 Speaker 1: of those at the margins helps Trump in a race 380 00:21:54,720 --> 00:21:57,399 Speaker 1: where the overwhelming majority of Americans have already decided how 381 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:01,159 Speaker 1: they're going to vote, So it's gonna be close. But 382 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:04,480 Speaker 1: I think more importantly, I think it is almost certain 383 00:22:04,520 --> 00:22:06,320 Speaker 1: that it's going to be contested. We're not going to 384 00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:08,920 Speaker 1: find out who has won the election on the day, 385 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:12,720 Speaker 1: and President Trump will probably have announced that he's one, 386 00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:15,040 Speaker 1: and how we deal with that it's gonna be a 387 00:22:15,040 --> 00:22:17,879 Speaker 1: lot more challenging than Bush Gore had two thousand. Let's poway. 388 00:22:19,160 --> 00:22:22,040 Speaker 1: You know, is there something that Joe Biden can do 389 00:22:22,600 --> 00:22:24,280 Speaker 1: to get ahead in the polls, or is there something 390 00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:27,000 Speaker 1: that you know President Trump can do, or no matter what, 391 00:22:27,400 --> 00:22:30,080 Speaker 1: is it going to be close? Well, this election is 392 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:34,879 Speaker 1: going to be overwhelmingly a referendum on Trump. Biden is 393 00:22:34,920 --> 00:22:38,720 Speaker 1: not offensive to most Americans, but they don't have the 394 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:41,240 Speaker 1: same level of enthusiasm. You're not going to get vote 395 00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:44,639 Speaker 1: parades out there for Biden the way you do for Trump. 396 00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:48,840 Speaker 1: Having said that Trump's support base is narrower than Biden's, 397 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:51,439 Speaker 1: what do you do in that environment? I mean, you know, 398 00:22:51,480 --> 00:22:55,120 Speaker 1: it's almost impossible for Biden to make it about him 399 00:22:55,200 --> 00:22:58,159 Speaker 1: unless he makes really significant gaps. I think his choice 400 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:01,880 Speaker 1: of running mate Kamala Harris was a very smart one. Um. 401 00:23:01,880 --> 00:23:05,840 Speaker 1: It won some votes indeed, Americans for example, UM. And 402 00:23:05,840 --> 00:23:08,120 Speaker 1: it also helped them with some independence in a way 403 00:23:08,119 --> 00:23:10,840 Speaker 1: that others that were being considered would not have. So 404 00:23:10,880 --> 00:23:14,000 Speaker 1: that was a win. I worry about the debate. UM, 405 00:23:14,240 --> 00:23:17,800 Speaker 1: you know you. I think Biden has to get Um. 406 00:23:17,920 --> 00:23:21,680 Speaker 1: He can't. He can't try to hit Trump. One for one, 407 00:23:22,040 --> 00:23:24,639 Speaker 1: he has to play the character card. He has to 408 00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:28,600 Speaker 1: talk directly to the American people. He has to sort 409 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:31,480 Speaker 1: of with Trump say oh there you go again. Donald. 410 00:23:31,680 --> 00:23:34,639 Speaker 1: There has to be the subtext of this is insane 411 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:38,280 Speaker 1: and I'm the real presidential character. But he also has 412 00:23:38,320 --> 00:23:42,840 Speaker 1: to come across as strong and as capable, because you know, 413 00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 1: we all know that if Biden looks like he's missing 414 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:47,879 Speaker 1: a step or two, that's a vulnerability for him. And 415 00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:50,520 Speaker 1: the Republicans are doing a better job going after and 416 00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 1: playing dirty than Project Lincoln and the Democrats are against Trump. 417 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:57,239 Speaker 1: That's just a reality. And we've got so much more 418 00:23:57,280 --> 00:23:59,159 Speaker 1: to talk about. I want to ask you one question. 419 00:23:59,200 --> 00:24:02,400 Speaker 1: I want you to play domestic political guy. Here. I 420 00:24:02,440 --> 00:24:06,680 Speaker 1: was standing four years ago watching a TV attend something 421 00:24:06,800 --> 00:24:10,760 Speaker 1: PM when I realized President Trump was gonna win, and 422 00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:14,200 Speaker 1: he one in the suburbs of Philadelphia and the other 423 00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:18,879 Speaker 1: suburbs across this nation. What are those suburbs gonna do? 424 00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:22,119 Speaker 1: What is your sense, is an outsider to the domestic 425 00:24:22,400 --> 00:24:25,520 Speaker 1: political game, what is your sense of what the vaunted 426 00:24:25,600 --> 00:24:29,080 Speaker 1: suburbs are going to do? Yeah, I suspect they're going 427 00:24:29,160 --> 00:24:33,280 Speaker 1: to swing a little bit more for Biden. But let's 428 00:24:33,320 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 1: be clear, Republicans in those suburbs are more concerned about 429 00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:40,320 Speaker 1: law and order. Democrats in those suburbs are more concerned 430 00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:44,119 Speaker 1: about the pandemic. Republicans in those suburbs are overwhelmingly going 431 00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:47,400 Speaker 1: to vote in person on the day. Democrats in those 432 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:52,040 Speaker 1: suburbs are going to vote overwhelmingly by mail. The pandemic 433 00:24:52,119 --> 00:24:56,000 Speaker 1: matters here, and the fact that the president has decided, 434 00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:58,240 Speaker 1: with a lot of help from the Attorney General, the 435 00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:00,600 Speaker 1: voting by mail is I legitimate it and so you 436 00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:04,000 Speaker 1: shouldn't count those votes. Those votes are gonna be stolen, 437 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:08,200 Speaker 1: Those votes are gonna be rigged. That's enormously important, And 438 00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:12,120 Speaker 1: what plays out in the two weeks after election day 439 00:25:12,480 --> 00:25:16,240 Speaker 1: in terms of those ballots is really much more about 440 00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:20,080 Speaker 1: what we're gonna play for than than just how the 441 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:24,520 Speaker 1: members of those suburbs end up deciding themselves. This is 442 00:25:24,840 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 1: this is an election, Tom Francine, where afterwards, I think 443 00:25:29,800 --> 00:25:32,560 Speaker 1: almost no matter how it plays out, unless it's a landslide, 444 00:25:32,560 --> 00:25:34,840 Speaker 1: and I don't think it's gonna be a landslide. I 445 00:25:34,880 --> 00:25:38,119 Speaker 1: think a decent piece of the American public is gonna 446 00:25:38,160 --> 00:25:42,280 Speaker 1: believe that the election is unfree and unfair, and by 447 00:25:42,320 --> 00:25:44,520 Speaker 1: the way, I think there's a decent chance that will 448 00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:47,920 Speaker 1: indeed turn out to be the case. I've never said 449 00:25:47,960 --> 00:25:50,560 Speaker 1: that in the US election performer. I'll say that about 450 00:25:50,560 --> 00:25:54,359 Speaker 1: elections in developing countries, I'll say that about authoritarian states, 451 00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 1: never said about the United States before. It's gonna be 452 00:25:56,760 --> 00:25:59,000 Speaker 1: a very ugly few months. There's no question about that, 453 00:26:00,240 --> 00:26:01,840 Speaker 1: all right, even thanks so much Inny Bremmer there if 454 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:05,119 Speaker 1: you're Ratio, some pretty strong words. Thanks for listening to 455 00:26:05,160 --> 00:26:09,679 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on 456 00:26:09,760 --> 00:26:15,600 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm 457 00:26:15,640 --> 00:26:18,920 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You can 458 00:26:18,960 --> 00:26:22,160 Speaker 1: always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio