WEBVTT - What's Wright - Predicting NFL win totals, Chiefs record + Florida-Houston reaction

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in walch Draight with the great episode three seventeen,

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>fresh off a wild NCAA Tournament championship game and maybe

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>wilder Western Conference playoff bracket as we head into the

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>final five days of the season, and we have right

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>now five teams all with thirty two losses both of

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>those topics. Shortly on the show, and then as promised

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, we will do our annual NFL Over Unders

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL Win Total show. These these are not locked for us.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We will do our preseason gambling show post draft. Obviously

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>it's post free agency, late in training camp where we

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actually make these bets. Now the heads up for the

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>gambling stuff we're doing shortly. There might be a few

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that we like so much that we just say we're

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna bet them right now. We will if we say that,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we will mark those down and count those toward our

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>season long ledger that we you know, do the accounting

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for at the very end of the football season. But

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>some of these are just leans in one direction or another.

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll do all of that, uh, before we get to that.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, Demanse, Demanse, how are you I know this

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is the single most banal topic of any phone call

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or even a podcast. But I am curious. What is

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the weather like in Los Angeles right now?

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty amazing, pretty good, I'd.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Say it is. Still It's April eighth. The Masters starts Thursday.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's forty something degrees in New York. I am. It

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>has gone on long enough that your mother came downstairs

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>today and just said to me, I think I need

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to go away for a month. Not me, her, She's like,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I just need to go somewhere warm for

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a month. She said, the weather is just sapping my energy.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So at some point the way, it's gotta get warm

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York. At that point, deep, it's man. Usually

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>April's like a top tier New York month. Whatever. Nobody cares.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's what missed the cut. Alex Ovechkin breaks

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a record that I did not think was breakable, the

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Gretzky scoring record. Now, let me also say something else

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think it's very important on this show

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to not pretend to be an expert on everything. People

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>get themselves in trouble. You pretend to be an expert

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on everything, you might all of a sudden find yourself

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>talking lebron in the morning, Govetchkin in the afternoons, and

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the Gaza Strip at night. No one would do that

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and then seriously say they're gonna run for president and

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>then be wrong about all three. I try not to,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretend that I know to mix some tariff

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff in there as well be an expert on everything.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm a diehard sports fan, and I'm enough of

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a diehard sports fan to know Wayne Gretzky is the

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>only athlete I've ever seen that if you go to

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>his Wikipedia page, even though the Internet is endless and

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>a page can just scroll forever, and you're like, hey,

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>what records does Wayne Gretzky have, you have to go

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to a separate Wikipedia page where it's like, actually, all

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of Wayne Gretzky's records are here. So I just assumed

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this was unbreakable. And then when I heard Ovechkin broke it,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>or when I obviously I knew he was going to

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>break it the last month or so it's been in

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the news, and I just said, again, folks can say

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>bad sports fan, Nick for not knowing this. I assumed

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Ovechkin must be like a Bobby Ors style guy that

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>played until his mid forties, and then I saw alex

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Ovechkin after he broke the record, and I was like, oh, confirmed,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy played until his late forties. Turns out alex

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Ovechkin is thirty nine years old. That is a hard

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine for alex Ovechkin. He's younger than me now

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and and incredibly wealthy. Say it again, No, it's not

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just the it's not just the greay. It just like

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's the you know, the the that coming

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>up you know in Russia is tough. I don't know, man,

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but alex Ovechkin, for a guy that rich and that successful,

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a hard thirty nine. But unbelievable. He

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>breaks s Gretzky's record. Everyone thought it was unbreakable. Here's

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>something almost as unbelievable. Gino Wriama Demonse has coached in

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>thirteen National Championship Games. That in and of itself is remarkable.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>He's twelve and one in those games. Twelve and one

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in the National Championship Games. I'm so happy for Paige.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>I think she you know that her recruiting class, the

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>top five for her high school class page, Angel Caitlin,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh the Bank, Cameron Brink Yes. And then Cardosa. Those five,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all of them champions, oddly except for Caitlyn and Page

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>had to stick around a year longer because she blew

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>out her knee. She got her title. Hopefully Juju can

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have the same trajectory gets delayed because you blew out

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the knee, goes and win the title. And then the

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>other big game this weekend that didn't miss the couple.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it quickly and then we'll get to it more.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>In the West playoff push segment was the Lakers dog

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>walking the Thunder and my what, what's your little woe?

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Thunder?

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They weren't in that game. I mean, they played all

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>their guys and the I said on the TV show

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Friday that the perfect weekend for the Lakers was beating

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder. I'm sorry, beating the Pelicans, beating the Thunder

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and then sitting everyone Tuesday and when they play the

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Thunder again tonight. And I don't know if you've seen

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the points spread in that game, but it's okay see

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>minus fifteen because Vegas thinks that's exactly what the Lakers

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>are gonna do, and basically denying the Thunder the opportunity

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for any get back, leaving in the back of their head.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, Luca knocked us out of the playoffs

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>last year. They just crushed us this year. Luca's team,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we still have no one to guard him. That to

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>me is absolutely ideal, particularly when the other reason I

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>said they should rest guys is they play they being

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers the MAVs tomorrow. So the Lakers since Saturday

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>will have played the Thunder the Thunder again and then

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the MAVs. The MAVs have not played since Saturday, so

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers it would be their third game in four nights.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>The MAVs would be their first game in four nights.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So now they're letting their guys rest and be ready

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for that game knowing and again more on this in

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Western Rammicks playoff bracket stuff, if the Lakers go

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>two and two in their final four, they lock up

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the three seed. If we just chalk tonight up as

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a loss, what it means is MAVs Rockets Tanking Blazers

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>final game of the year. If you win two of

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>those games, you lock up the three seed, which is

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gold for the Western Conference. My other takeaway for thunder

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Lakers before we get to last night's championship game. The Thunder,

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>more so than any team the Western Conference, have so

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>much depth defensively, and even the Thunder found themselves in

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a spot where it's like, hold on, if my best

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>wing defender is on Luca and my second best wing

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>defender is on Lebron, then who the hell is guarding

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves. And when you look at the Western Conference

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and you look across every team the Lakers could

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>play and say power rank their wing defenders, all of

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>these teams have at least one really good one, a

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>couple have two pretty good ones. Only the Thunder have

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>three really good ones. Everyone else, Austin Reeves is just

0:08:55.880 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be feasting on a meeting bad defensive player.

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And the Rockets have two awesome ones in Amen Thompson

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and Dylan Brooks, But who's the third? And so that's

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be a sneaky, huge edge for the Lakers

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in any series. As far as I am not going

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>to act as if because of that game, oh there's

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, systemic issues with the Thunder, and Thunder gonna

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>win sixty seven games, they're awesome. The concerns, however, would

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>be as follows. The youth is just never seeing a

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>team this young make the finals, much less win it.

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has said that is your second best guy good enough?

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a Jalen Williams chet Holmgren question. We'll see how

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>will the playoff whistle impact Shay? He seemed to get

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it this weekend against the Rockets and the Lakers and

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it impacted them a bit. And then this is the

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>last piece of it that I have not heard enough

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>people make the point of when it comes to handicapping

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder for this championship. One of the reasons the

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Thunder have this insane point differential is they are legit

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve quality NBA players deep, and so even when they

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have guys out, and certainly when they go to their bench,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>their bench is so much better than the other team's

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bench in the playoffs. How good your ninth, tenth, eleventh,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and twelve guys are is mostly irrelevant because you're really

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just playing seven or eight guys, So will that edge

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be muted a bit? Those are all legitimate questions. Remember,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like rate subscribe review, We're just this close to two

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand on YouTube. That'd be awesome to get there

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>during you know, maybe the play in of the or

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Playoffs, certainly in the first round so and

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you can watch us live on YouTube. Will also, by

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, be doing these emergency kind of reaction shows

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>throughout the NBA Playoffs. You can get those not just

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, where we'd love for you to like, rate, subscribe,

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and review. It helps us a ton, but also on iTunes, Spotify, everything.

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But now to the championship game last night Demon Day.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I was pulling for Houston because of our ties to Houston.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I also like Kelvin Sampson, tell us what happened?

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean Houston went from winning that crazy

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>one against Duke on Saturday. I mean we have I've

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 2>been pulling for Houston, but that rep should be investigated

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 2>from that game on Saturday. Okay, but yeah, so they

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 2>lost the crazy one to Florida yesterday off of the

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 2>potential double drib or whatever. What are your thoughts on

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the tournament and how it ended.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have a lot of thoughts here. Houston

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>did not get a shot up, not on the final possession,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>on their final four possessions. They didn't hit the rim

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seemingly for the last two minutes of that game. And

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody had a tweet that I wish I could give

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>them credit because I thought it was really funny and

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty kind of profound almost talking about Houston's style

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because they're just such a ferocious, relentless, tough defensive team.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Where they said, I imagine Houston's practices are just three

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hours of suicides and punching each other in the face,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of is how they played. But there's

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>downside to that, which is they never you never felt

0:12:55.240 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like they were against a great team going to be

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>able to definitively put them away. And they had opportunities

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>against Florida to put them away when that defense was

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just giving Florida fits, and Florida's you know, stuck around,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>just like Houston did against Duke, just long enough to

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>where you see the college kids tighten up and Houston's

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>kids tightened up. Walter Clayton Junior, you know, had a

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>great final flourish in this game after you know, with

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>five minutes left in this game, it looked like this

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be the first game in two years he

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>had a sixty one game streak of hitting a three.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>He didn't hit one until late in the game. He

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously didn't score his first basket until late late in

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the first half or was it early second half, I

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even remember, but Florida was able to stick around

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and then steal it at the end. Not getting a

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>shot off in that spot is just the stuff of

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>apps nightmares for a coach. But they didn't get a

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>shot off like it was if you just look at

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what Houston did over the final two minutes, because one

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the possessions they did get a shot up, it

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was essentially an air balled layup. They were getting no

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>good looks. And when you go to the waning moments

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the game, after LJ. Cryer made missed a layup

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and then tipped in his own miss with two thirty left,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>here were Houston's possessions. Made a free throw, then missed

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a free throw, badly missed the three offensive rebound miss jumper,

0:14:48.120 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive rebound, turnover, turnover, turnover, turnover. To not get a

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>shot on the rim in the final two minutes of

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the ninety seconds of the game is just so crushing

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and you feel so sick for Kelvin Samson.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but my I mean.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Because again, yeah, seventy say it again that Oh yeah, well, no,

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the coach LJ. Cryer. LJ. Cryer the

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>back to back turnovers and then Emmanuel Sharp had the

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>back to back turnovers late. I mean both there. But

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for Kelvin who was a great coach, got a show

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>cause penalty and got run out of college basketball for

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a while, came back and what he's done at Houston

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is remarkable since he's been there. It's our buddy. Buddy's

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>probably too strong. But the kid we root for, Quinton Grimes,

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, was there and they were a legitimate contender

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>since he's been there. So Calvin Sampson took over a

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>mediocre team. His first year, they're thirteen to nineteen. His

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>next two years they're in the NIC and then since then,

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what they've done. Twenty seven wins, and they

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>won a tournament game, thirty three wins, and get popped

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Sweet sixteen, then COVID year, then twenty eight wins,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Final four, thirty two wins, Elite eight, thirty three wins,

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Sweet sixteen, thirty two wins, Sweet sixteen, thirty five wins,

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>lose the championship game by two, and you know, you

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you hope he has another great shot. You don't know

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.239
<v Speaker 1>if he's gonna have another great shot. He turned seventy

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>next season, he'll keep coaching. But man, oh man, it

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as they stole one from Duke, they absolutely

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>let one get away. And so I had two recurring

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>thoughts in that game. One was Duke had to be

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>watching this game, like, you gotta be fucking kidding me,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Like the we we should be in this game. And

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know they they their collapse was different than Houston's. There.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I know you put it on that you hate. I mean,

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad call. Bad college drafts are bad, and

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the review process in college basketball is truly truly awful.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And what nobody ever acknowledges when they're like, oh they

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>have to get it right and oh, we've got the

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tenths of a second could matter. And I bring up

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>every time, you know what also matters fatigue and these

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea that being the better conditioned team should you

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>should lose all edge from that in the final two

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>minutes of these games, because every out of bounds call

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a one to four minute break

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to review it. I hate it so much, But set

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that aside. My other takeaway from really this entire tournament,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but certainly the final four. We had four number one seats.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We had by kin Palm rankings, four of the best

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>college basketball teams of the last decade all playing. And

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>despite that, you've never seen a better illustration for the

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>glaring and massive gap between the talent and skill level

0:18:54.640 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>between guys who are good enough to be starters and

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>big time players for the best college basketball teams in

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the country and guys who are good enough to play

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA. Like college basketball in the modern era,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>where guys don't stick around typically for that long, the

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>best players never do, and teams don't stick together. The

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>gap between that and the skill and talent and ability

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it takes to play in the NBA is the widest

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's ever been, and it's why a guy like Walter

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Clayton junior, who is going to be goes into the

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tournament a fringe first round pick, can just dominate and

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>when most outstanding player like it is. I know there

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are some people, particularly where I'm from in the Midwest,

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that swear and I always thought this was an odd

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>stance to hold love college basketball hate the NBA. Now

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you have to like the NBA more

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>than college basketball. Again, they're different sports to teach their own.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But that was always felt to me a more than

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a little racially charged opinion. The love college basketball hate

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the NBA take because you simply never hear that in

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>college football. Certainly have people that like college football more

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>than the NFL, but I've never once met a single

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>person who's, like, I love college football, can't stand the NFL.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But you do hear that sometimes College basketballt least where

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I grew up, used to all the time, and I

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>always thought that was a little quizzical. But they're they're

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>just so vastly different products. Throughout this tournament, when guys

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>made open shots, you were impressed. In the NBA, if

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy misses an open shot, you are shocked. And

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>this game, being stuck in the forties late into the

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>second half, just a vivid reminder of how incredibly difficult

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>it is for the guys who actually can make it

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>to the league. But congrats of Florida. Walter Clayton junior

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going into this year, Demonse on most mock drafts was

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>not even a second rounder going into this tournament. In

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>most mock drafts, was a fringe first second rounder. And

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>now he's probably gonna be a late lottery pick. He's

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>a little older. He's not that athletic man, old man

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that say it.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Again, late lottery pick.

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>No, it's awesome, it's great. What he has working against

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>him is he doesn't have the great athleticism and he's

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>played for five years and so or four years. So

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>people are always, you know, twenty two to twenty three,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>how high is the ceiling? But I wonder if he

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>could have a Dalton Connects style draft day where when

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>he gets he gets drafted by a decent team or

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a good team and people are like, oh man, he

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>can maybe help you immediately, even if he doesn't have

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>like all star potential. All right, let's go to the

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>NBA before we get to our NFL over unders.

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>So things are gonna come down to the wire. On

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the West side, everyone from the three to eight seed

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>are separated by max of two games, and then everybody

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>from the four to eight are basically tied and losses.

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 2>So how do you think it's gonna go?

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So, first of all, credit to the Rockets for removing

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>themselves from this group. The Rockets are I I thought

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets were about to get punched in the face

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>by the schedule because and I think we talked about

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it last week, their final five games were Thunder Warriors,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and then and they played those two already and won them.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>And then it goes Clippers Lakers, Nuggets. But it doesn't

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>matter now because and this actually could work in the

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Lakers favor. I don't know if what the Rockets will do,

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but the Rockets just need to either win one or

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have the Lakers lose one and they lock up the

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>two seed. So because the Lakers max out at fifty

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>two wins, the Rockets already at fifty two wins, so

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>if the Lakers. So here's why I say this could

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>work out in the Lakers favor. If the Lakers lose

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>tonight to the Thunder, which they will, the Rockets lock

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the two seed. No matter what. Will that make the

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Rockets in Game eighty one against the Lakers rest some

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>people I don't know now, maybe they would feel like

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to. But set that aside. Credit to

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets for handling their business. Now to the three

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>through eight, and we can throw it on the screen

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. The reason that Lakers two game lead is

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>actually a three game lead is this. They have the

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tiebreaker over literally every single team on the screen. There,

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets are the four, Clippers, of the five, Warriors, of

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the six, Timbrelves of the seven, Grizzlies of the eight,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Lakers forty eight and thirty, Nuggets forty seven and thirty two,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and then Clippers, Warriors, Timberlves, Grizzlies all forty six and

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. The Lakers have the tiebreaker with every one

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of those teams. That is a symptom of the fact.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>In one of the craziest stats of the season, the

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City Thunder this year the Western Conference are thirty

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>five and thirteen. The Los Angeles Lakers against the Western

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Conference are thirty four and fourteen. So why are the

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Thunder gonna win sixty seven and the Lakers are right

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>now sitting at forty eight. Well, the Thunder are twenty

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>nine to one against the East and the Lakers are

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>They are fourteen and sixteen against the East. So I

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the difference in the standings, but that is

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>given the Lakers the tiebreaker over everyone. So I think

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go like this. The Lakers lose tonight, they

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>beat Dallas and then maybe they beat Houston. If they

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>don't beat Houston, they certainly beat Portland and they are

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the three. And now the interesting piece of it, Denver,

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>which is falling apart, has not recovered from the Westbrook debacle.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Joker can just put up four, forty five, fifteen and

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen every night, it doesn't matter. And I don't know

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if you heard what Michael Malone said the other day,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>when Michael Malone said, yeah, Jamal Murray, we hope he's

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ready for the playoffs. That's concerning. I think Denver is

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>going to lose to Memphis. Let's assume they beat Houston,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because that'll be game eighty two for Houston, and Houston

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>likely is not gonna, you know, be playing their people.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not Denver falls to the play d will

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>likely be determined by how they do against Sacramento in

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Denver when they play on what do they play tonight

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>or Wednesday? I should have had that up in front

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of me. I apologize Denver plays tomorrow when they play

0:26:53.840 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Sacramento tomorrow, the Clippers again, so much of this is

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>predicated by what the Rockets do as far as resting guys,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>cause the Clippers play the Spurs tonight, so the Clippers

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>will win tonight, and then the Clippers play Houston next.

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But the question is is Houston, assuming the Lakers lose tonight,

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be playing their guys. If they are, then that

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>should be a great game. The Clippers after that are

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at Sacramento at Golden State. Golden State has an absolute

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>three consecutive layups at Phoenix. I saw Phoenix in person

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Garden Friday night that they are cooked, so

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>pix Golden State will beat Phoenix, then the Spurs, who

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to win, then the Blazers. So Golden State

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be forty nine and thirty two going

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>into the final game against the Clippers, which the Clippers

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to need to win potentially to avoid the

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>play in, potentially for seeding. So Warriors Clippers game eighty

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>two massive. Right. The Grizzlies are at Milwaukee, at Memphis,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and then home for Brooklyn in Utah. So Minnesota, Brooklyn,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and Utah are auto wins. Those teams are not trying.

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>If they beat Milwaukee tonight, then Minnesota has a real

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>chance of not only climbing out of the play in,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but climbing all the way to the four to five line.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And then Memphis it likely comes they're at Charlotte. That's

0:28:54.440 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to win home for Minnesota at Denver, home for Dallas.

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's do it like this. What are the

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed victories on teams schedule for the Lakers Just one

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>game eighty two against Portland. The Lakers will then need

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to win one other game to lock up the three

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Oka se Dallas, Houston. They're gonna lose Okay sees. They've

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>beat Dallas or Houston for Denver, zero guaranteed victories Sacramento, Memphis, Houston,

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So no guaranteed victories for the Clippers. One game the

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Clippers put them at forty seven wins. They have the

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Spurs game, then Houston, Sacramento, Golden State for Golden State,

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>three guaranteed victories Phoenix, Spurs, Portland, and then that Clipper

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>game for Minnesota. So put Golden State at forty nine wins.

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do this in the so I can just

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:07.719
<v Speaker 1>see it. So Denver forty seven with three questions, the

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Clippers forty seven with three questions. As far as the games,

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors forty nine, one question game Minnesota at Milwaukee,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 1>at Memphis tof home for Brooklyn and Utah they're at

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>forty eight with two questions, and then Memphis at Charlotte

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>three questions. Yeah, forty exactly forty seven. So the games

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that are going to determine the Western Conference playoff bracket

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is all of Denver's games against Sacramento, Memphis in Houston,

0:30:55.320 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers games against Houston, Sacramento, and Golden State. For

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Golden State that one game against the Clippers, and

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for Minnesota, they're games at Milwaukee and at Memphis. That's it.

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And so right now I would think the most likely

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>seeding is as follows. One Oklahoma City locked, two Houston

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially locked, three Lakers close to essentially locked for Golden State, five, Minnesota,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>six the Clippers, Lakers, Clippers around won't be fun. Seven

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Denver eight, Memphis. That's how I think it's gonna fall out.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that ideal for you? Are there any matchups things? Well?

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>The ideal for the Lakers well, and by the way,

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's set the seven eight obviously, then there's a play

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in situation. The ideal for the Lakers. Everybody wants Memphis.

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>The ideal for the Lakers is Memphis getting to the

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>three line. I don't think that's happening. I would would

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I rather play Minnesota or would I rather play the Clippers.

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I would rather play Clipper's been really tough since Kawhi

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>came back, since Kawai has been playing like this, I'd

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>probably rather play Minnesota now later in the playoffs, I'd

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>take my chances with sadly Kawhi not holding up, but

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in round one with him playing like this, they're dangerous.

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, everybody's dangerous. But if you're the Lakers,

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't worry about round one. If it were to

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>play out to where you are on the opposite side

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the bracket of OKC and round two looks like

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Golden State OKC, you sign up for that if

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you you know, if you if you're the Lakers, and

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you're only gonna have to be one of Golden State

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>or Oklahoma City, and they have to they play each

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>other in a war in round two, while with respect,

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you're probably playing the Rockets. That is the ideal situation,

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's what they've set themselves up.

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rockets are going to be dangerous in

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. I know you say, and they're young and

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 2>all that. I think they have a great championships.

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. They have and they have a great coach.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Brook's gonna see Lebron in a playoff series and

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>once again be like it's Dylan Brook's time, and I

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>don't trust Jaialen Green. Now, Amen Thompson is a monster

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>as a young player, and Shingoon's great. Shingoon's great. But

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I again, the West is brutal. None of these are easy,

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>but it's you.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Know it easy. I'm not saying like they can win, Okay,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I said, I know, I said defense wins championships. But

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they can mess somebody's road up, think knock

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 2>a team out early.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>But you but you're kind of treating them demonte like

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not the two seed. They're like the two seed

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>playing to their seed means they're in the conference finals.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that happening. Like now, listen, maybe they

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe somebody clips clips the Lakers and they beat them,

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they can beat the Lakers. But I I

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>think Houston, Houston has earned enough for me to wear

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I will almost assuredly be picking them

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>in their Round one series. I don't I don't know,

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what I say that I don't know if

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>i'd pick them against Minnesota. I think Minnesota could be tough.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I could see.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, they could win. I just but I think

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably pick Minnesota. This is always fun. So we

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>are going to go division by division all thirty Now

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I am not I will address all thirty two teams

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>win totals, but there's what I've already looked at this

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously quite a bit. Some of these I'm just like, oh, okay,

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that line is right, Like I you know, usually Vegas

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good at these, And anybody that's gonna give

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you at this point in the year a lean on

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>all thirty two, that's too much for me. Shout out,

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, double shout outs. Actually, shout out to

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Zach Lowe for bringing his podcast back, The Zach Lowe

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Show signed on with Bill Simmons and The Ringer, And

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Bill who last year in his preseason

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Over Unders podcast went twenty seven and five with preseason

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 1>win totals, which is just remarkable. So double shout outs

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to those guys. All right, this is the way too

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Early Over Unders. Start with the AFC East. We'll do

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>each division basically from highest projected win total to lowest.

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Demon's a give me each team and then I'll tell

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you if I have a lien or not.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 2>First we've got the Buffalo Bills other over unders set

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 2>at eleven and a half.

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Over under set eleven and a half, heavy juice minus

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>won forty five on the over, and this, to me

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is that number is just right, and I'll stay away

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from it like that. If I had to pick one,

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I would go over. However, minus won forty five's too much,

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and I mean they're smart people expect the Bills at

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this point, with healthy Josh Allen, you're gonna win double

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>digit games. It'd be a hard under to go with,

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'll stay away from that.

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Next, you got the Dolphins over under at eight and

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly that's the end, with a little bit of

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>juice on the under minus one thirty. That is to

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>me a exactly right line. I think the Dolphins will

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>win eight or nine games. That is perfect. Last year,

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the preseason total was ten and a half.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But I am that to me is a stay away.

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Next one, we got the Patriots. They're over unders eight

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and a half, all.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, So this is juice to the under as it

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>should be. It's minus one forty to the under. This is,

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, an outrageous total. So now I should

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>note and I should have done this earlier on it all,

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you always have to look at what divisions each division's

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So everyone has their three strength of schedule games a year,

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 1>but then you also play your own division, and then

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what are the other divisions you play? For the AFC East,

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they draw one of the toughest divisions in the AFC

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>North and probably the weakest division in the NFC South.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So that to me, you basically that's a wash. And

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>so the reason I'm saying this is, whenever you're doing

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>these preseason win totals, check and see what divisions the

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>other uh you know that those teams are playing, and

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of power rank the divisions in your own head

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and then figure out, you know, are they do they

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>get two of the easier ones two of the harder

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>ones or is it like this where you get one

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>tough one in the AFC North, one easy one in

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFC South and it evens out. So what the

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Patriots have going for them is the last play schedule,

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they're extra games.

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Well maybe side of the Bills.

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. They're really bad and I just

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they have done enough to have a

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>competent offense. They upgraded it, coach Drake may should be

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>better in year two, that offensive line will still be

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. They for the third consecutive year, maybe fourth,

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:39.760
<v Speaker 1>do not have a single draftable fantasy football skill player.

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>There is not a single wide receiver, running back, or

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end on that team that you would want on

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy football team. I don't think Stefan Diggs is

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a big impact. I think the Patriots would

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>be thrilled to win eight games. I'm sorry to win

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>six games. The fact that this team could win eight

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>games and the underhits is outrageous. I love the under

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>for the New England Patriots. I will take under eight

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half, and that's a bet we can put

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on my season long. I think that thing drops to

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half before the year, especially when the

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>draft plays out and they aren't able to get Abdulla

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Carter or Travis Hunter. Not that a rookie should really

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>move a win total. I will take under for the Patriots.

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Last AFC's team, Demantsey.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh We got the Jets. They're over unders five and

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I will take the over here. So they got

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so much better in from a culture, stability, maturity standpoint

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the coaching staff. They are not gonna be under

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the spotlight like they were like last year. I think

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that it will be refreshing for that team to not

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have this For everyone on that team who spent their

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 1>whole career with the Jets, every year of their career,

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the only story, the only thing people were focused on

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>was the quarterback, whether it was Zach Wilson going to

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>get it together, Aaron Rodgers coming to save us, Aaron

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers Tours Achilles, Aaron Rodgers last year. This year, it's

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>just going to be about Aaron Glenn trying to set

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a culture, running the damn ball, playing good defense. They

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that they won five games last year, and

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this year they should be better, not necessarily

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>better at quarterback, but not worse at quarterback, and better

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better everywhere else and not have the

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>energy constantly sucked out of the room. And I think

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>staying out of the spotlight because they are not going

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>to be a disgusted team, will be good for them.

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I could absolutely see Aaron Glenn getting there, that team

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>finding its way to seven wins. I like the Jets over.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>So for the AFC East, the Bills, I am staying

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 1>away from the Dolphins, I am staying away from I

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>am on the Patriots under, and I am on the

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets over. Let's go Demons to the AFC North.

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 2>We got the Ravens at the over unders eleven and

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>This is a tentative over for Baltimore. Now, I would

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>not bet the under on any year you have a

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>healthy Lamar Jackson. Okay, he's an all time regular season

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>player and just guarantees you, if he's healthy, double digit wins.

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'm saying tentative is not because I might

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>go under, but I'm not sure if that's a bet

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>all actually make, but I do. It does feel like

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>last year was kind of a worst case scenario regular

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>season for them and they still won twelve games, and

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so that to me is I lean over. You feel

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like they're always gonna be well coached. The defense came

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>around by the end of last year. Lamar is unbelievable,

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and you anticipate that they can win twelve thirteen games

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>almost every season. The juice is dead even essentially on

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the over of the under. The Lamar injury stuff does

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>worry you a bit, so I would just want to

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>see him get through the preseason and offseason everything totally healthy.

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I also, before I make any better on the Ravens, Demonse,

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to make sure that Health and Human Services,

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if that department still exists, isn't projecting like a bad

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>cold and flu season, because that absolutely can cost the

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Ravens a game, because Lamar has the immune system of

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a small Victorian child. As a funny tweet said once, yeah,

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>well of course, and so but I lean over for Baltimore.

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Next Bengals over under nine and a half.

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>This number is just right. I would stay away from it.

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The juice is heavily heavily on the over and at

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifty. And I don't know why we would

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be a much different team than

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. A great offense, a bad defense, score a

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:59.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of points, lose a lot of games they shouldn't

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>because defense is bad. And so I that to me

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is a stayaway. Next team, demanse.

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we got the Steelers. They're over unders eight and

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:11.240
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the under to me, this is now that

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>means I'm betting Tomlin to not continue as well. You

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>know what, that's not true. I could win this bet

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and have Tomlin's record extend because it's never at a

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>losing season, So eight eight and one keeps that thing going. Uh,

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>not that because the tie doesn't count as half a win. Sorry,

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>drop some tie doesn't count as half a win when

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this. But I will go under because

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one of two things is going to happen, Demnsey, one

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of three things. Pardon me. Either Aaron Rodgers is not

0:45:55.400 --> 0:46:01.720
<v Speaker 1>going there and they are starting Mason Rudolph, or Aaron

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is not going there and they are starting rookie

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>either Shadoor Sanders or Jackson Dark or Aaron Rodgers is

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna announce tomorrow on McAfee or sometime in a month

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he is going there and bring that entire circus with him.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think nothing would be more poetic than us

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>finding out what's the only thing that can end Mike

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>tomlin streak of above five hundred or better years, And

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer is bringing in forty two year old diva

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. So I will go under for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Now,

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>remember last year I was heavy on them, missing the

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and going under and all of that, and they

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>cost me a ton of futures. So I could be wrong,

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>but I will go under on Aaron Rodgers or the

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Steelers without Aaron Rodgers. Either way, I think it's time

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>for a bit of a reset in Pittsburgh. I'll go

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:01.240
<v Speaker 1>under there next.

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, Uh, you got the Browns. They're over unders

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 2>four and a half.

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't know who's gonna be playing quarterback

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for them, we don't know what they're doing in the draft.

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:14.240
<v Speaker 1>That number is just really a slap in their face.

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>A number that low four and a half. You just

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>don't see that very often. I'm gonna stay away. I

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>can't bet under four and a half. But I also

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously A'm not gonna bet on the Cleveland Browns. So

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>thus far, through two divisions, I lean Patriot or I'm

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>heavy on Patriots under. I like the Jets over. I

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>lean Steelers or Ravens over, and I like the Steelers under.

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the AFC South.

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we got the Texans. They're over unders set at

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half.

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's just right. I worry about their injuries at wide receiver,

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you know they will. Nico is a guy who's an

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>excellent player. He's dealt with injuries in his career. Obviously,

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Tank Dell is going to be out all year. They

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't bring back Digs, they traded away Tonsil, so you worry,

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or they just changed offensive coordinators. But the defense should

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be really good and Demiko's excellent. CJ's really good. So

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like a nine or ten win team. Will

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>stay away from it.

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Next we got the Colts. They're over under seven and

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I you know what, I I don't have a ton

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of Colts opinions this year. I don't really want to

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time thinking about the Colts. I'm

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>not that interested in the Colts. Seven and a half

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>sounds right. We'll stay away from it. You don't have

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to bet everything shit to.

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Who My co worker he's he's a big fan of

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the Colts, and he always says that everybody says the

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Colts is just like nobody.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>He correct, Yeah, there's there's there. I mean, basically, that's

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this whole division. Both of the Souths just get totally

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Distrigard.

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:02.239
<v Speaker 2>But next uh got the Jags. They're over under seven

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm back, baby Jags. All right over better head, new

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>head coach Trevor Healthy, Brian Thomas Junior in year two,

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these things.

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the right way is definitely go over here.

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 2>But if they finished with less than that, what happens

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 2>with Trevor Lawrence after this season.

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Is not great?

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? No, no, then people start they start talking about,

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, how can we get out of the contract

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>like all that stuff. It's not great, which is why

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna happen. Trevor Lawrence's returned to glory this season.

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>He's listen, I know people don't you know, we're sick

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of me saying this, but it is true. Trevor Lawrence.

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>He's just twenty five man, twenty five years old. He's

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>been saying, age's bo Nick's basically like. He had a

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>brutal rookie year his second year, led them to win

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the division and a great playoff comeback. His third year,

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they were eight and three until he suffered injuries to

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>three different parts of his body in three consecutive weeks

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and had to miss time in their season fell apart

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and last year season from hell, I'm not quitting you,

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Trevor over Jaggs put it in pen. I'm betting that one.

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 1>They are getting back in the playoff mix. That's all

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. Just in the playoff mix and Liam going,

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if you said Duval weird, you got

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the best out of Baker. I like you. I am

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Jacksonville Jaguars over seven and a half.

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Next with you there, you got the Titans. They're over

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 2>unders five and a half.

0:50:54.719 --> 0:51:00.040
<v Speaker 1>See with plus one twenty five on the under, and

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be starting a rookie quarterback from day one.

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Give me the under, Like, give me the under with

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>cam Ward even if he's good. I think that that

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of growing pains. I don't

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>know that I trust Brian Callahan. It's and I'm getting

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 1>plus money on it. Like now this one, I will

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>admit I am going to bet this, but I am

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going to wait to bet this because since it's minus

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one point fifty on the over all these lines. Obviously,

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, courtesy of our friends at DraftKings, I

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 1>should have been saying that earlier. Uh plus one twenty

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five on the under. This might move to six and

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a half, and I love it at six and a half.

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I like it a lot at five and a half.

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I will bet this at some point, just not this moment,

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:58.239
<v Speaker 1>but starting a rookie quarterback, shakey head coach, and oh,

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, line is an odd subject to change.

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I need to tell you guys, but you guys all

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>know that you're Titans.

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Get six wins, can war you mean he said, I

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 2>mean they can was going to go to the super

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Bowl last year. He's a rookie quarterback.

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but the so a couple things. The Bears were

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>coming off a seven win season, not three and fourteen.

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong about the Bears coach. The Bears ended

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>up having a dufus coach and Calb's way way, way,

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>way way better.

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Than cam Ward.

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not even close. All right, finish it off

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on the AFC West.

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 2>So we got the Chiefs. They're over runners eleven and

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 2>a half. This is insulting, insulting. The highest win total

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>projected wind total.

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it should be twelve and a half. They won

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen games last year. They won fifteen in the regular season,

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and everyone told me they weren't that good. They they

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 1>they could. They went fifteen and one last year in

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 1>games mahomes play because they sat out Week seventeen. The oh,

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been giving you guys the division stuff. Darn it.

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's the other thing that I really like for the

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:12.839
<v Speaker 1>whole AFC West. They're division games, as they get all

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>four teams in the AFC South awesome, and they get

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East, which is only as in my opinion,

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one great team in the Eagles. Now, obviously the chief

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule games are brutal their strength of schedule,

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So they get their own division plus the AFC South

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and the AFCAS and then the strength of schedule games

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are Baltimore, Buffalo, Detroit. So that's the strength of schedule

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is you know, outrageous. But the Chiefs have games against

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Texans called Jags Titans, and then four more games against

0:53:53.200 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or two more games I should say, Cowboys Giant. There's

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>six games they win. They go five and one in

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the division. Every year, there's your eleven games. And so

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>then let's say they only go four and two in

0:54:11.239 --> 0:54:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the division this year, so now you're at ten. That

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>would mean of the following games, Detroit Baltimore, Buffalo, Philly, Washington.

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got to win two of them, and so I

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the betting the Chiefs over every year since Mahomes has

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 1>been there, hell, since Andy's been there. But it's been

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 1>super profitable since Malomes have been there. They've hit it

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>six of seven years. The only year they didn't hit

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it was two years ago and they made up for

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that by winning the Super Bowl. So yeah, I'm not

0:54:52.920 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs stats an over.

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs faced the Eagles next year and it's going

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to be in Kansas City winning the season. Would you

0:54:59.840 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 2>want to see that game?

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>When?

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Would you want that?

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Great question?

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 2>First game of the season.

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:14.879
<v Speaker 1>No, because it's just like no, because the Chiefs don't

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:19.440
<v Speaker 1>get to Well, first of all, that can't happen because

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are the defending champs. They get to host

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the you know, a season opener on Thursday, so it

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be the first game of the year. Here's what

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't care when it is. I just want both

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>teams to be on regular rest. I don't want one

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 1>team to be coming off a weird schedule. I you

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, the whatever it is. There are some rumors,

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>uh the the that the Chiefs could start the year

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>in Brazil, but I so I don't know, but just

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want both teams on regular rest, all right,

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But by the way, you know what, let's do this

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:01.280
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the rest of the AFC West,

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you guys about our friends

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings. Who's scoring big in the NBA this season?

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>You are with all the new ways to get on

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the action at DraftKings sportsbook and official sports betting partner

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the NBA Monster Slams dish in the rock to

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>clean the glass, get behind your favorite players and the

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>prop bets you can make on DraftKings, the home of

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>NBA player props. Ready to place your first bet, try

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 1>betting on something simple like picking how many points your

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:33.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite player will have. Go to the DraftKings sportsbook app

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and make your pick. So some of the lines that

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>are available tonight. Jason Tatum's total twenty five and a

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:47.920
<v Speaker 1>half against the Knicks. Assuming Tatum plays, I you know,

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I would be leaning Tatum over twenty five and a

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>half points, and then also another one. Jimmy Butler. His

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>total is at seventeen and a half against Phoenix. Jimmy

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 1>has not been popping off for big point totals thus far. However,

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I just saw the Suns in person, and I they

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>don't seem that interested in defense, So you know I

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would me personally, I would be going, I would be

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking Butler over seventeen and a half points. Again, it's

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.919
<v Speaker 1>not betting advice. It's just how I look at those

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:28.520
<v Speaker 1>two lines. Lines and odds subject to change first time.

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's something special just for you. New DraftKings customers bet

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>five dollars, get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Instantly take it to the rack. With DraftKings sports Book,

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>every point counts and this one helps me out a lot, guys.

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:44.520
<v Speaker 1>If you guys can do this, download the DraftKings Sportsbook app.

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Use code right Wright, that's code right for new customers

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to get one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets when

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown

0:57:55.720 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is yours. Gambling problem call one eight hundred gam In

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:04.479
<v Speaker 1>New York call eight seven seven eight hope in why

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>or text hope in why, which is four six seven

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>three six nine. In Connecticut. Help is available for problem gambling.

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven,

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of Boothill, casino and resort in Kansas twenty one plus

0:58:27.520 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>age in eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario. Bonus

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance.

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 1>For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>co slash b ball. All right, demonse, let's go back

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to the AFC West. We just did the Chiefs over

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven and a half. Give me the last few.

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we got the charges that are over UNDERDS nine

0:58:56.280 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 2>and a half, so and I'm gonna.

0:58:59.640 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Lump the Ronco's in with them as well. They're also

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at nine and a half. To me, both of these

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are stay aways. I think both of these are gonna

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be very trendy bets. I think a lot of people

0:59:12.880 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to like either or both of these teams

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to hit double digit wins. They both hit it last year,

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they both made the playoffs last year. I now they

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have the same benefit the Chiefs have, which is the

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 1>AFC South and the NFC East. But I think people

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are a little too high on the Chargers, who I

0:59:36.680 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think are going to have the turnover numbers they

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 1>had last year. And I think people are a little

0:59:41.760 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>too high on bon Knicks. Now again, if I thought

0:59:45.640 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>people were way way off, I'd be saying go under.

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think both. I think both those teams are

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hovering around at the end of the year

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>eight nine to ten wins, so I would stay away,

0:59:56.480 --> 0:59:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and then that gives us the Raiders Demons.

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 2>And they're over under six malf.

1:00:05.120 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I love the over for the Las Vegas Raiders. I

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>know that probably shocks people, but when you combine the

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>following things. They had a bottom three coach last year,

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they replaced him with a top ten coach in Pete Carroll.

1:00:21.440 --> 1:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They had a bottom three quarterback situation. They replace him

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with top twelve quarterback and Gino Smith. They have a

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>last place schedule. They are going to be able to

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>draft an impact player at number six. Pete, I think

1:00:39.960 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe Ashton Genty. Pete Carroll wants to win. Right now,

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone is gonna be all over the Broncos of the Chargers.

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the Raiders that could finish second in

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the AFC West. I think Pete Carroll has the Raiders

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>fighting for the final wild card spot in the AFC

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in year one. I like the Raiders over six and

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a half. So my AFC bets that I like Patriots

1:01:13.520 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>under eight and a half, Jets over five and a half,

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Steelers under eight and a half, Ravens over eleven and

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a half, Jags over seven and a half, Titans under

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>five and a half, Chiefs over eleven and a half,

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Las Vegas Raiders under six and a half.

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>In the least surprising news ever, Demon's a I went

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>way too long, and we're gonna do the NFC on Thursday,

1:01:44.000 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to rush through the NFC. But uh,

1:01:49.120 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Yeah, yeah, we have a

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>ton more to go. So well, I liked how we

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>did this. Do some NBA news and everything Thursday to

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>start the show, do the over unders for the second

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>half of the show. I thought that worked well, and

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>so AFC we just gave them to you. NFC we

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>will do on Thursday. Let's ask some listener questions demands.

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You have a question?

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean I saw on Twitter that they

1:02:23.680 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 2>were bringing back dire Wolves. I hit Daniel up about

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>this and said that should go somewhere else in the show.

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 2>It was really bad take, But I think it's what's

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 2>going on.

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Know what's the take? Let me hear your take.

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's insane that they're that they're messing with

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. I don't know what reason we would

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>have for it, unless it's like beneficial for the I

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

1:02:47.160 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a bad it's not a bad take.

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's first of all. Second of all, hand up, not

1:02:55.240 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>afraid to admit things. I thought dire wolves were always

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>make believe. I didn't know that was a thing. I

1:03:03.360 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>knew they were in Game of Thrones, but I thought

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they were make believe like dragons, like I thought it

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>was just something from fantasy. I didn't know, like I

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously knew. Well, that's a separate discussion there is did

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>dragons ever exist? Is not as dumb of a question

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as some people think. I will say that, but set

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that aside. I obviously knew, like you know, like wooly

1:03:31.640 --> 1:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mammoths existed and the Megalodon existed. I didn't know that

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>horse sized wolves existed. I thought that was purely from

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones. So I know that this is a

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>little Jurassic Park ish, and that didn't go well, but

1:03:54.160 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be sick man if we could

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>reanimate some of the giant animal life from world history

1:04:08.440 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and put it on an island somewhere and let them

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and like see it. As long as they can't fly, man,

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as they can't fly and can't swim, I

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think i'd be I'd love to see a dire wolf.

1:04:23.240 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be awesome. I don't know they existed.

1:04:26.360 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it's a little scary. I understand, yeah, And

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not necessarily for the dinosaurs coming back.

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean I just saw, like, I don't think it

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>was a terrordacty. There was a specific name for it,

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 2>but the beak was probably about as long as this room,

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and like just to imagine that thing was in the air,

1:04:44.040 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 2>like people have not grown up.

1:04:46.480 --> 1:04:49.439
<v Speaker 1>The producer asking that I was stop watching Jurassic Park

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>after forty minutes. They made a lot of grievous errors

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>there and creating the ones that can fly obvious the

1:04:56.240 --> 1:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>fly and swim ones are. To me, that's a big mistake.

1:05:01.080 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But we if we had I keep reading about these

1:05:05.400 --> 1:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>islands that no people live on that we just added

1:05:08.280 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>tariffs to I didn't even know about these islands Head Island,

1:05:11.680 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in the place all the penguins live or whatever. There's

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>these islands that no one lives on. What if we

1:05:16.680 --> 1:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>reanimated them there? I'm not against it. Hayes asks the

1:05:21.800 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>question that you know people have been wondering.

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:28.919
<v Speaker 2>So going, Hey, Nick, are you still training for the triathlon?

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>And if so, what is it scheduled for? That's over?

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not yet scheduled. It's not over. It's not over.

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>My training has hit a hiccup, I will admit, but

1:05:44.200 --> 1:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of time. I've got a lot

1:05:46.920 --> 1:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of time. And so am i as gung ho as

1:05:52.920 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I was not quite? But all your mom has been

1:05:56.400 --> 1:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bullying me because we have this family trip scheduled for

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:04.959
<v Speaker 1>early July. Yeah, and she's been going to the gym

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>every single day and she just comes home and body

1:06:08.040 --> 1:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>shames me. And her latest thing is she is just

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>convinced that she is stronger than me, like we were.

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know. So like yesterday we just bought

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a new couch and it's getting delivered today. So yesterday

1:06:27.520 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we reorganized the living room and so I had to

1:06:31.200 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like move around the chairs and everything, and every chance

1:06:35.160 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>she got, she was just like, oh, do you need

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>me to move? That is that for you? Like just

1:06:41.720 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>constant bullying right.

1:06:44.120 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>For the manhood? That that is all blow the belt.

1:06:46.520 --> 1:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know what's what's new with with my mother?

1:06:49.760 --> 1:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh? Yeah, all right, go to Chris's question.

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Chris is how do you predict win totals of the

1:06:56.080 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 2>schedules ain't even out yet. You got a factor in

1:06:58.680 --> 1:07:01.360
<v Speaker 2>weeknight games, can say in a road ships, et cetera.

1:07:01.960 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>No, so that's fair, Like we know who people are playing,

1:07:05.240 --> 1:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't know when they're playing. So that's why I

1:07:08.120 --> 1:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>said these are I think there were only two that

1:07:11.840 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I said I'm betting right now. One is the Patriots.

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if the Patriots got seventeen home games,

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not winning nine, and so I like the Patriots

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>under But you're right, you do have the factor like

1:07:22.480 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>rest advantage things like that. But we do know who

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone's playing, we just don't know when those games are,

1:07:29.560 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think, but it's you know, so it's a

1:07:33.120 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fair point. But I think NFL has done a really

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>good job of making schedule release feel like a huge

1:07:39.760 --> 1:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>event even though we already know who everyone's playing. All right,

1:07:43.160 --> 1:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody like great? Subscribe review. Please do that helps us out.

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We will see you guys on Thursday. Great job demands

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a great job. Everyone at Blue Duck, everyone at DraftKings,

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone at the Volume. We appreciate you all. Talk to

1:07:56.480 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys soon. What's right