Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom Hunt. It is the last
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton show of the decade, my friends. Exciting stuff
Speaker 1: to get to you today, and obviously the way to
Speaker 1: kick off your holiday season is right here in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hub. We will talk about Pelosi holding back impeachment articles.
Speaker 1: Is this in fact the best decade in human history? JK.
Speaker 1: Rowling is in the middle of the social justice mess?
Speaker 1: And also, oh that's right, there was a Democrat debate
Speaker 1: last night. Coming up. This is the Buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake America. Here a
Speaker 1: great American again the Buck Sexton Show begins. Remember he's
Speaker 1: a great guy. Now you're like, well, I don't feel
Speaker 1: like I'm being impeached because it's a hoax. It's a setup.
Speaker 1: It's a horrible thing they did. They happened to have
Speaker 1: a small majority, and they took that small majority and
Speaker 1: they forced people and you know they said, oh, I
Speaker 1: watched Pelosi out there saying, oh no, we don't want
Speaker 1: to talk to anybody. They put the arm on everybody.
Speaker 1: They tried to get them to do what they had
Speaker 1: to do. Many of those people were like Jeff were,
Speaker 1: they didn't want to vote that way. But it doesn't
Speaker 1: feel to me. It doesn't feel like impeachment. Last night,
Speaker 1: I said it. We had a great time last night.
Speaker 1: The room was packed, thousands of people couldn't get in
Speaker 1: a section that really is a pretty much fifty fifty
Speaker 1: section in terms of Democrat Republican We had. Every one
Speaker 1: of those people is voting for Trump Pence, every one
Speaker 1: of them. And it's Michigan, an important state. We brought
Speaker 1: back tremendous amounts of business, tremendous car companies coming in,
Speaker 1: everything else. And I'll tell you up there, and I
Speaker 1: was thinking about I actually said it, it doesn't feel
Speaker 1: like impeachment. Doesn't feel like impeachment to me either, And
Speaker 1: now there's a real question as to whether it technically
Speaker 1: is even impeachment. Welcome to the buck Sexton Showman last
Speaker 1: show the decade. It's crazy. It's pretty amazing too, to
Speaker 1: come full circle here. We started I started doing the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. I believe it was in twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: although some of you who are original Saturday Squad may
Speaker 1: tell me it was twenty thirteen, but pretty much the
Speaker 1: start of the decade. And now we're coming into the
Speaker 1: end of the decade, and there's actual news this week.
Speaker 1: You know, usually this time of year we would do
Speaker 1: a show on like the history of the real Santa
Speaker 1: Clause or Christmas celebrations around the world. I gotta bring
Speaker 1: back the Dracula show for next year, by the way,
Speaker 1: for Halloween, really and really do it up, like really
Speaker 1: go to the next level. People missed that one this year,
Speaker 1: and maybe even do a reprise of the La Panto show.
Speaker 1: It's been so many years now, I feel like we
Speaker 1: go back and redo it and you know, kick it
Speaker 1: up a notch. Isn't that what Emerald Legassi used to say? Right?
Speaker 1: And also bam right? Isn't that his thing? Wasn't that his?
Speaker 1: I think it was back up a yeah, So that's
Speaker 1: what we might do with that. Anyway we did, and
Speaker 1: I remember one year we did a Battle of the
Speaker 1: Bold show, which was just really interesting. I got to
Speaker 1: interview a bunch of Battle of the bul veterans, including
Speaker 1: one guy who was captured. I mean, just harrowing stuff.
Speaker 1: But today we have news to get into, including the
Speaker 1: latest year. I mean, Pelosi has managed to box herself
Speaker 1: into a corner. There are people who are pointing out
Speaker 1: now the Democrat's own expert witness on their side. The guy,
Speaker 1: I mean, he looked kind of like, you know, like
Speaker 1: Professor Snape's cousin from Harry Potter. Jk. Rowling, also in
Speaker 1: the news for other reasons. We'll get to that. But
Speaker 1: the guy who was the their main sort of dapper
Speaker 1: constitutional witness who was also saying that President Trump should
Speaker 1: be impeached, it's no surprise, no surprise there. He's been
Speaker 1: hand picked for exactly that reason. But Harvard Law professor
Speaker 1: whatever his name is, I don't remember this guy's name now,
Speaker 1: a Feldman, Noah Feldman. There we go. He said that
Speaker 1: if the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate,
Speaker 1: it hasn't actually impeached the president. If the articles are
Speaker 1: not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say he wasn't truly impeached
Speaker 1: at all. This is beautiful, I mean, this is perfect.
Speaker 1: This is a nice gift for Buck, the Freedom Hunt
Speaker 1: and all of America for a Christmas and of course
Speaker 1: for my birthday, which is December twenty eighth. And let
Speaker 1: me tell you right now that for those of you
Speaker 1: that only listen on our wonderful affiliate stations on radio
Speaker 1: across the country. If you want to hear the special
Speaker 1: birthday message I have and it's a real it's a show. Basically,
Speaker 1: it's a short podcast we've done. But if you want
Speaker 1: to hear the special birthday podcast, you got to subscribe.
Speaker 1: And so all I want for my birthday is everybody
Speaker 1: listening to this is subscribe. Even if I'm your first
Speaker 1: ever podcast. In fact, I should be here first ever.
Speaker 1: If you don't listen to podcast on the iHeart app
Speaker 1: or on iTunes, subscribe to the Buck Sexton Show. We
Speaker 1: even have a new what do we call that? A
Speaker 1: new thing with a photo on my face that goes
Speaker 1: up with the podcast. What's that called the logo? Logo?
Speaker 1: Is it a logo? Got to be a cooler word.
Speaker 1: It's got to be a cooler name than new branding, producer, producer.
Speaker 1: I was about to call you producer brand And that's
Speaker 1: the kind of moon I'm in today. Yeah, so at
Speaker 1: least it wasn't producer John. Though, whom we miss, will
Speaker 1: we miss? It'll come back. You just looked at me
Speaker 1: and called me John the other day, That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: At least we didn't do that today. But here's here's
Speaker 1: so you got to download the subscribe forget about down,
Speaker 1: subscribe to the Buck Sexton Show podcast and you'll hear
Speaker 1: a special birthday message, a special birthday show, I should say,
Speaker 1: the I Heeart app. It's free, download it, please check
Speaker 1: it out. That is my pitch all of you listening
Speaker 1: on stations across the country. If you don't download or
Speaker 1: subscribe to the podcast of the Buck Sexton Show, you're
Speaker 1: not going to hear the special birthday message. And it's
Speaker 1: worth it. I think some of the producers are heard it,
Speaker 1: We're like, oh, that's actually really interesting. So Pelosi has
Speaker 1: made this much more complicated for herself than she intended,
Speaker 1: I suppose. But then again, she's just been making it
Speaker 1: up as she goes along with this whole fiasco. Remember
Speaker 1: the Mueller probe was supposed to be the sign sealed
Speaker 1: and delivered impeachment roadmap. And then Mueller went on the air,
Speaker 1: or rather went what was on the air and as sense.
Speaker 1: But did get his testimony, and it was clear that
Speaker 1: he did not in fact know that much about the
Speaker 1: report that he was supposedly he was. At that point,
Speaker 1: it was obvious he was just the frontman for it.
Speaker 1: He was the facade. Oh, Mueller is an honest, good guy,
Speaker 1: although there's even some questions about his FBI past when
Speaker 1: he was director. You look at the Anthrax case how
Speaker 1: that was handled. But you know, Muller's marine, you know,
Speaker 1: service country, ethical guy. Seems like a straight, straight edge,
Speaker 1: straight and narrow kind of dude. Weisman, everybody knows, is
Speaker 1: like you might as well put you know, Lawrence O'Donnell,
Speaker 1: Rachel Maddow and you know Don Lemon in charge of
Speaker 1: the investigation of Trump under the Special Council problem. And
Speaker 1: Weisman's just a far left Democrat partisan and we knew that.
Speaker 1: After Mueller gave his testimony, it was clear that Weisman
Speaker 1: was the guy really running the show. So he was
Speaker 1: supposed to, and he laid it out in that way
Speaker 1: with the ten articles of impeachment, that was okay, here
Speaker 1: you go. That was the alley oop. How was the
Speaker 1: throw it up and let somebody else jam it down
Speaker 1: the net? Two points. See, I know some sports producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: I know some sports and unfortunately it didn't work for them,
Speaker 1: and fortunately for the country and for the rest of us.
Speaker 1: So then they had to come up with this whole
Speaker 1: whistleblower and a new round of impeachment theorizing. But they've
Speaker 1: had to scramble. Clearly, this was not the The plan
Speaker 1: was not this. I mean when I mean the plan
Speaker 1: I'm talking about stretching back a year or two or
Speaker 1: three ago. It was not to use this whistleblower complaint
Speaker 1: in this way. This is a desperation way. And so
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi now has to do this or it has
Speaker 1: decided to. I shouldn't say has to this game where
Speaker 1: the Senate shall have the sole responsibility for trying impeachments,
Speaker 1: and Pelosi saying, well, we're not going to let the
Speaker 1: Senate do its constitutional duty unless the Senate tries the
Speaker 1: impeachment the way we say it should. It's not how
Speaker 1: this works, Nancy. It's not. It's not how this works.
Speaker 1: I mean, I imagine for a second if the House said,
Speaker 1: well we'll hold on. You know, you, you and the Senate.
Speaker 1: You don't get to determine. You don't get to determine
Speaker 1: what goes on with a treaty. You know you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to ratify a treaty. We're going to tell you
Speaker 1: we'll defund the government unless you do the treaty the
Speaker 1: way we say the way that we say you should.
Speaker 1: This is again an a Lynskyite approach. This is messing
Speaker 1: up the process when it doesn't work for you, and
Speaker 1: abusing the process when it does. And this is what
Speaker 1: Democrats do all the time. How could anyone claim that
Speaker 1: there's even the slightest bit of good faith in any
Speaker 1: of this. It was a rush. We must impeach. National
Speaker 1: security is at stake because of Eastern Ukraine. Forget about
Speaker 1: how many Americans, how many members of Congress could have
Speaker 1: asked find without names put on the Eurasian countries, find
Speaker 1: where dun Boss is. If we just had the outlines
Speaker 1: of the countries, just showed where that is on the
Speaker 1: Eurasian landmass, do you think any of them could find
Speaker 1: were the dun Boss region of Ukraine? It's bill, have
Speaker 1: no idea. And by the way, how many of them
Speaker 1: even know that there is this breakaway problem? Could they
Speaker 1: name it? Do they know what Luhansk and Donet's gar?
Speaker 1: I mean, they talk about this as though they have
Speaker 1: some great care for it, but as we know, many
Speaker 1: of them would probably pull a what is a Leppo moment?
Speaker 1: Those of you who recall that from the last presidential cycle.
Speaker 1: What is a Leppo? That was the great libertarian hope. Whoops?
Speaker 1: So Pelosi now is telling the Senate that you have
Speaker 1: to do it the way that we say you should
Speaker 1: do it, or else we're not going to push through
Speaker 1: the articles of impeachment to you, which then raises a
Speaker 1: question has the president really been if it's never handed
Speaker 1: to the Senate as the president impeached? And how long
Speaker 1: can Pelosi delay this while still claiming that there was
Speaker 1: an urgency, there was a national security imperative to transfer
Speaker 1: this to the Senate as quickly as possible. Oh, now
Speaker 1: it doesn't have to be as quickly as possible. Now
Speaker 1: it's something else, because it changes every day. Their case
Speaker 1: changes depending on what they need for that day. You know,
Speaker 1: whatever whatever stage of their attack on President Trump they're in,
Speaker 1: that is what their analysis will dictate. That is what
Speaker 1: their constitutional obligations, as they say, we'll force upon them.
Speaker 1: Isn't it amazing to hear Democrats who never really talk
Speaker 1: about the Constitution, and they don't talk about the founding
Speaker 1: fathers until now, until they're desperate to cloak themselves in
Speaker 1: this very high minded sounding language of governance and the
Speaker 1: Republic and the founding and so American. These are the
Speaker 1: people that believe in open borders and that effectively anybody
Speaker 1: from anywhere in the world is just as much an
Speaker 1: American citizen as you. They just have to show up
Speaker 1: and stay. Oh but they're they're so American. These Democrats
Speaker 1: in Congress, they really represent the best of this country.
Speaker 1: It's it's both hilarious and terrifying to hear them make
Speaker 1: the case in such a disingenuous and dishonest way. It's
Speaker 1: something that should unsettle everybody, I think. But you know,
Speaker 1: it's even more unsettling than that when Nancy Pelosi is
Speaker 1: blabbering on and making absolutely no sense whatsoever on substance
Speaker 1: or on style. I have questions here about what this
Speaker 1: means for Pelosi. Please play clip sixteen. The Republicans have said,
Speaker 1: looking like you're playing games with hold on these articles
Speaker 1: for too long, said Nancy. We are. We when we
Speaker 1: bring the bill, which is just so you know, there's
Speaker 1: a bill made in order by the Rules Committee that
Speaker 1: we can call up at an each time in order
Speaker 1: to send it over to the Senate and to have
Speaker 1: the provisions in there to pay for the impeachment and
Speaker 1: then the next step, whatever you want to call it,
Speaker 1: the trial, that is where you've put the managers. I
Speaker 1: was not prepared to put the managers and that bill yet,
Speaker 1: because we don't know the arena that we are in. Frankly,
Speaker 1: I don't care what the Republicans saying any other when
Speaker 1: I own this sentege, I've said this is it. I
Speaker 1: undered Nancy that alessily wants to move on pretty quickly
Speaker 1: past that doesn't want to have to answer any real
Speaker 1: questions about what happens now at this phase, they've had
Speaker 1: their impeachment vote, strict party line vote. Democrats once again
Speaker 1: abandoning a principle of the Democratic Party pretended to care
Speaker 1: about until all of a sudden it was inconvenient, and
Speaker 1: then the principle disappears. Here you have Pelosi saying, I
Speaker 1: don't care what the Republicans say any other questions, not
Speaker 1: on this subject. I've said, this is it. Notice how
Speaker 1: the reporter is also a lot on go oh whatever.
Speaker 1: Queen Nancy says no when a politician is doing a
Speaker 1: press conference and there's one issue more important than any other,
Speaker 1: and it looks like she's in a tough spot, to
Speaker 1: answer the questions because she's being dishonest, because she's lying
Speaker 1: to the American people. That's when you would if you
Speaker 1: had a real press corps, they would pounce. But they
Speaker 1: said another question last night, you suggest you you'd proceed
Speaker 1: with a fair process in the Senate. She responded, well,
Speaker 1: we'd like to see a fair process, but we'll see
Speaker 1: what they have and we'll be ready for whatever it is.
Speaker 1: Is that a requirement for you to see a fair
Speaker 1: process before sending over the articles, Speaker Pelosi, we would
Speaker 1: hope there would be a fair process, just as we
Speaker 1: would hope they would honor the Constitution. By the way,
Speaker 1: I saw some of it, Pelosi said, I didn't see it,
Speaker 1: but I heard some of which McConnell said today. It
Speaker 1: reminded me that our founders when they wrote the Constitution,
Speaker 1: they suspected there could be a rogue president. I don't
Speaker 1: think that they could have suspected a rogue president and
Speaker 1: a rogue leader in the Senate at the same time. Well,
Speaker 1: what kind of insane smear is that? A rogue Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell's a rogue Senate leader? How is he a rogue
Speaker 1: Senate leader? Nancy Pelosi is the one who's doing what
Speaker 1: everybody agrees is at least really weird. Oh, you're not
Speaker 1: going to just hand over the articles of impeachment to
Speaker 1: the Senate. You're not going to transmit them. You're just
Speaker 1: gonna hold onto them. This is a game, folks. She's
Speaker 1: playing games. It's supposed to be somber and serious, but
Speaker 1: she's playing games. There's there's no honest, good faith to
Speaker 1: bate to be had here. People that try to disagree
Speaker 1: with this or hacks, they're clowns, they're liars. I don't
Speaker 1: care what degree they have or what network they're on,
Speaker 1: even CNN, which is my friend. Charles writes, today is
Speaker 1: not a news network. Boom, What have I been telling
Speaker 1: you all along? Of course it's not. But it's a joke.
Speaker 1: Put out a challenge right now, Tapper, Lemon, Cuomo, Burnett,
Speaker 1: any of them want to debate whether seeing as a
Speaker 1: news network, I'm happy to come on their show and
Speaker 1: have that debate with them anytime. They won't. They get smoked,
Speaker 1: but still I'm happy to do it. I put it
Speaker 1: out there. Any of their primetime anchors, any single one
Speaker 1: of them is seeing na news network. Put out that challenge.
Speaker 1: Right now. Okay, Speaker Pelosi. To that end, you've talked
Speaker 1: and criticized Sentator McConnell. Today Pelosi says, any other questions,
Speaker 1: she wants to move past this, move past it. Doesn't
Speaker 1: want to answer any more questions. Anybody want to talk
Speaker 1: about the Mexico Free Trade Agreement, anybody care about that,
Speaker 1: jobs for the American people, progress and addressing globalism and
Speaker 1: the issues. Anybody want to talk about the salt tax
Speaker 1: that we're passing today, important issues related to the economic
Speaker 1: vitality of our communities. Any other questions, because I'm not
Speaker 1: going to answer any more questions on this as Pelosi
Speaker 1: gets to dictate to our little scribes in the journo class,
Speaker 1: gets to dictate to them what they are allowed to ask,
Speaker 1: what they're allowed to do, And they go, Okay, Nancy,
Speaker 1: whatever you say. Because they speak truth to power. They
Speaker 1: grovel at the feet of power as long as it
Speaker 1: is democrat power, as long as leftist socialist power. They're
Speaker 1: absolutely fine with that. In fact, they know that that's
Speaker 1: career enhancing and ideologically in line with what all these
Speaker 1: journals believe. With the exception of some people at conservative
Speaker 1: outlets and Fox News, everybody else, it's like, oh, yes,
Speaker 1: we pray at the feet of Pelosi. It's pathetic. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is absurd. She's completely gone back on the entire
Speaker 1: case that she's been making for the urgency here, and
Speaker 1: now she's shown that whole that was all a lie.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the equivalent of you know, if
Speaker 1: you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it. No,
Speaker 1: it was all a lie. Obama NUA was alive when
Speaker 1: he said it. Pelosi has known all along that the
Speaker 1: urgency here has nothing to do with national security. Only
Speaker 1: a moron believes that the urgency is strictly a function
Speaker 1: of Democrats need to get this done within a certain
Speaker 1: timetable because they have people that are running for president
Speaker 1: against Trump. That's all this is. It's it. Pelosi doesn't
Speaker 1: have any good answers, and so that's why she gets
Speaker 1: to stare down all these different journals to go zip it,
Speaker 1: just like she did to her Democrats when they were
Speaker 1: somber and serious voting for impeachment. That now we sit
Speaker 1: here and ask democrats. You know, sometimes people ask the
Speaker 1: question that you know, they'll say, that's that's the guy
Speaker 1: that can't shoot straight. Democrats can't just get an impeachment
Speaker 1: through as it should. Stunning, isn't it? But I guess
Speaker 1: not surprising. You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Isn't this exciting? Everybody on on
Speaker 1: radio and podcasts you can, but those on watching Pluto
Speaker 1: watching on Pluto TV see this is why it's fun
Speaker 1: to be able to watch and the Freedom Hud. I
Speaker 1: have a Jamaica No Problem memento here which looks like
Speaker 1: the top of a beer bottle that has been severed
Speaker 1: to form a shot glass. It is a memento from
Speaker 1: producer Mark. Producer Mark, thank you. I feel like I
Speaker 1: was basically there with you on the beach. I would
Speaker 1: have brought you the rum, but you know gluten. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: rum doesn't have glu. Yeah, sugar. Okay, next time, I
Speaker 1: thought Tequila was the only one that did tequila and
Speaker 1: ram and actually it distilled spirits usually are gluten free
Speaker 1: in general. Just beer I can't have, so when you
Speaker 1: want to poison me, just pour beer in my in
Speaker 1: my milkshake and we'll do there. We go. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The bus Sexton Show podcast. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcast The iHeart radio app or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. I got a special treat for you
Speaker 1: all as our end of the decade Buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: show happens. We have our friend Jesse Kelly in the mix.
Speaker 1: He is, of course the host of the Jesse Kelly Show,
Speaker 1: also on the first, joining me and Mike Slater and
Speaker 1: some other fabulous people who will be announced in the
Speaker 1: relatively near future in the weeks ahead, the probably in
Speaker 1: the new year. Jesse Kelly, sir, how are you of
Speaker 1: the Jesse Kelly Show. We are coming up on Christmas
Speaker 1: break where my kids will be home all the time
Speaker 1: and I have to go visit my in laws, so
Speaker 1: I'll be better all right, Wow, I want to get
Speaker 1: into a little bit of a very Jesse Kelly Christmas
Speaker 1: in a couple of minutes. But first, because this is
Speaker 1: a news show, of course, and we talk about what's
Speaker 1: going on in the world, as you do on your
Speaker 1: fantastic show, which is also here on Pluto channel two
Speaker 1: forty eight, the first on Pluto TV. Tell me what's
Speaker 1: your reaction to this Nancy Pelosi gambit of I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna like maybe not pass on the impeachment stuff until
Speaker 1: they do what I tell them as if she has
Speaker 1: leverage here, I don't understand where she thinks this leverage
Speaker 1: comes from. Disagree. I think it's the most brilliant political
Speaker 1: move I've seen in a long time. I think she
Speaker 1: should flat. I'll come out today and say we are
Speaker 1: not sending it to the Senate ever. Consider it dead
Speaker 1: on arrival, because we live in the nuclear news cycle now,
Speaker 1: where everything burns super hot, but it's only gone. But
Speaker 1: it's gone in her day. She would get crushed for
Speaker 1: a day. But it's a Friday, she could will be
Speaker 1: gone by Monday. By the time everyone I'd breakfast on
Speaker 1: and I made, people would have forgotten all about the impeachment.
Speaker 1: Then she never has She never has to endure the
Speaker 1: Senate trial. She gets to have her little piece of
Speaker 1: cake and then let it go. Wait, wait, hold hold on,
Speaker 1: hold on, hold on. I mean maybe if you're saying
Speaker 1: the delay for a day or two, but Jesse's there's
Speaker 1: there's talk of her delaying it for weeks, perhaps even months,
Speaker 1: so they can get more information to try and leverage
Speaker 1: that against the president along the way. How does this
Speaker 1: not make the whole case crumble for the urgency of
Speaker 1: impeachment yes, but you're missing the point. The whole case
Speaker 1: has crumbled. Fancy fancy Pelosi, even though she's not entirely
Speaker 1: lucid anymore, there's no spring chicken. She's been around, She's
Speaker 1: been around this game a long time. This has been
Speaker 1: a humongous political disaster for Democrats. She wants this thing
Speaker 1: to go away. She wants it to go away fast.
Speaker 1: I think she should bury it right now in her
Speaker 1: backyard and tell everybody I'm not sending it to the Senate,
Speaker 1: screw you all, and everyone will get mad at her
Speaker 1: for a couple of days. Wait, but that doesn't hold
Speaker 1: on ho, my man, Jesse, that doesn't bury it. It
Speaker 1: just that just means that there's always this When is
Speaker 1: she gonna you know, you're saying she indefinitely holds it,
Speaker 1: and that's better than because Biden. There's also the argument
Speaker 1: that the president hasn't even been impeached, which is the
Speaker 1: whole point for the left wing base and the lunatics
Speaker 1: out there that at least now he's impeached and that's
Speaker 1: supposed to be some kind of staying on his presidency.
Speaker 1: She wouldn't even accomplish that. Yes, yes, she would. In
Speaker 1: their minds, and that's all she ever had to do
Speaker 1: for her Your war gaming this from the position of crazy,
Speaker 1: and I respect that about you, but Jesse, I don't
Speaker 1: know if you're crazy enough. Listen, Listen, it's brilliant. They
Speaker 1: went through their own part. They went through the part
Speaker 1: of this impeachment that they controlled, the part in the house.
Speaker 1: They saw all the pool numbers in the twenty state.
Speaker 1: They took an absolute feeding on it. She wants this
Speaker 1: thing to die now. She wants this thing to end now.
Speaker 1: She does not want to send this over to the
Speaker 1: United States Senate, where Mitch McConnell will have control of it,
Speaker 1: and we all know he will abuse Democrats with that
Speaker 1: control of it. Just say I'm not sending it to him.
Speaker 1: Screw y'all and bury it. Everyone will get mad, We'll
Speaker 1: all have forgotten by him about impeachment by Monday morning.
Speaker 1: I mean this, look it's bold. I will say right now, Jesse,
Speaker 1: you would have to have a gentleman's bet for which
Speaker 1: one of us will buy the other a very overpriced
Speaker 1: steak in New York City. She's gonna transmit these articles
Speaker 1: of impeachment. There's no way she holds it. Are you
Speaker 1: gonna tell me right now we're on there, are you
Speaker 1: gonna tell me you think she might actually bury this
Speaker 1: in the backyard? Never actually transmit. I think she buries it. Yep, Wow,
Speaker 1: all right, Jesse and I have a bet now. I
Speaker 1: think she passes it along, Jesse. Think she buries in
Speaker 1: the backyard. And there's a steak hanging in the balance here.
Speaker 1: Either way, it won't be as good as your steak's
Speaker 1: down in Houston, Jesse. But we try up here in
Speaker 1: this frigid Northeastern corridor of liberal insanity. I also have
Speaker 1: to ask you about the by the way, I mean,
Speaker 1: I'll be honest. I read the transcript. I woke up
Speaker 1: this morning, drank my coffee, read the transcript in saucing clip.
Speaker 1: I didn't watch the whole debate last night. I took
Speaker 1: a night off. Oh yeah, as you should. If nobody
Speaker 1: should watch this anymore, and it'd be totally honest with you,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's team has done him a tremendous disservice by
Speaker 1: still making him debate. His numbers have not moved. He
Speaker 1: is by far the far away front runner, and he's
Speaker 1: only killing his general election chances even more that little
Speaker 1: stem bight he had last night when asked if you
Speaker 1: would wipe out Hunter the thousands of Midwest the construction
Speaker 1: job and he responded, yes, oh wait, wait, I think
Speaker 1: I think we actually I want it, because that was
Speaker 1: my favorite moment of the debate and we didn't even
Speaker 1: coordinate this beforehand. Do you have that one producer mark
Speaker 1: the knocking out the jobs Joe Biden talking about, Yes,
Speaker 1: here we go seventeen seventeen. Vice President Biden like to
Speaker 1: ask you, three consecutive American presidents have enjoyed stints of
Speaker 1: explosive economic growth due to a booming oil and natural
Speaker 1: gas productions. As president, would you be willing to sacrifice
Speaker 1: some of that growth, even knowing potentially that it could
Speaker 1: displace thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of blue collar workers,
Speaker 1: in the interest of transitioning to that greener economy. The
Speaker 1: answers yes, the answers yes. I don't know how you
Speaker 1: can walk away from that the same way that Democrats
Speaker 1: are eventually Jesse and I will tell you I even
Speaker 1: said this on the Bill Maher show, and Bill was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that was bad. When you've got Democrats on stage who
Speaker 1: were all like free healthcare for illegals who wants to
Speaker 1: do it, and everybody on the stage. It was granted
Speaker 1: one of two debates stages. You know, they had to
Speaker 1: split it up. But everybody on stage and yeah, let's
Speaker 1: give free healthcare to anybody who's here illegally. That's gonna
Speaker 1: be a problem for them. This could be an even
Speaker 1: bigger problem because this is Joe Biden saying I'm so
Speaker 1: down with the Green New Deal and all that other
Speaker 1: nonsense that I don't care if you get fired. Oh
Speaker 1: it's death buck. And think about this. I mean, everybody
Speaker 1: knows this. You don't decide elections. I don't decide elections
Speaker 1: here in Texas. It's the Russ Belt swing states, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Speaker 1: everybody knows, the Wisconsin. These are the states that decide elections.
Speaker 1: Do you have any idea how many times Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is going to play that clip you just played for
Speaker 1: those people in those roots belt swing states. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is going to get slaughtered in the Midwest just for
Speaker 1: that clip alone. He should not do a single debate.
Speaker 1: They a single other debate. They should announce it today.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has debated enough. Lee, I said, debates he's
Speaker 1: a far away front runner. He's just going to go campaign.
Speaker 1: I think that one of the worst moments, and this
Speaker 1: is saying a lot, by the way, in the last
Speaker 1: election cycle for Democrats, was when you had Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Do you remember this talking about coal miners. Yep. But
Speaker 1: because all of a sudden, you know, it became clear
Speaker 1: that they really do. You know, this is where the
Speaker 1: socialist mask slips a little too much, and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, you see and the central planning impulse from
Speaker 1: the Democrats where they're like, yeah, we promise you all
Speaker 1: this good stuff. Some of you are going to get
Speaker 1: completely you know, screwed over in this process. And that's
Speaker 1: just the cost of doing business. That's the problem with
Speaker 1: the buckets. Not necessarily do you believe in climate change
Speaker 1: or don't. It's when he says things like that, when
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton said that about the coal when Joe Biden
Speaker 1: said it last night, they sound so coal they sound
Speaker 1: so callous. They just don't sound like they give a
Speaker 1: crap about working people. And there's nothing worse you can
Speaker 1: be in politics than obviously cold and uncarried. Can I
Speaker 1: just give you I mean, I want to pull the
Speaker 1: exact quote back in March of twenty sixteen, and this was,
Speaker 1: remember people, where are this what matters in what states?
Speaker 1: You know? It's not about what people in San Francisco
Speaker 1: and New York or you know, red parts of Texas think.
Speaker 1: It's what are people in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, you know,
Speaker 1: the VSA, the states that really matter that are in play,
Speaker 1: and you know, at the presidential level. And Hillary said
Speaker 1: in March of twenty sixteen, as part of an answer
Speaker 1: answer on energy, quote, we're going to put a lot
Speaker 1: of coal miners and coal companies out of business and
Speaker 1: quote and that's the things She could have even skipped
Speaker 1: the miners part. I mean, you could have just stuck
Speaker 1: with coal companies. Not that that's any better, but when
Speaker 1: you when you specify the miners. When Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: asked last night, what about those hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: blue collar workers? Oh yeah, that can be displaced, you
Speaker 1: sound like a Washington elite's terms. Never had to work
Speaker 1: at day in your life, but you don't understand how
Speaker 1: people put food on the table. Yeah, that was I
Speaker 1: think that was a very a very bad moment for
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. That will. I mean, that's a that's an ad.
Speaker 1: That's an ad right there for Trump that they should
Speaker 1: just run I mean, just run that out of Joe
Speaker 1: Biden saying that over and over and over again, because
Speaker 1: it's it's completely off base and insane. But I also
Speaker 1: wanted to get you. I feel like you'd have a
Speaker 1: fun take on this. Were you up on the war
Speaker 1: in versus mayor eat wine cave ruckus? No, I actually
Speaker 1: was not. I saw that trending online, but I didn't
Speaker 1: watch the debate. I caught the highlights. What is this
Speaker 1: wine cave thing? Well, we can, actually we can play
Speaker 1: it for you. We can play the exchange and then
Speaker 1: we can get your reaction to it in real time
Speaker 1: play twenty. So the mayor just recently had a fundraiser
Speaker 1: that was held in a wine cave full of crystals
Speaker 1: and served nine hundred dollars a bottle wine. Think about
Speaker 1: who comes to that. He had promised that every fundraiser
Speaker 1: he would do would be open door, but this one
Speaker 1: was closed door. We made the decision many years ago
Speaker 1: that rich people in smoke filled rooms would not pick
Speaker 1: the next president of the United States. Billionaires and wine
Speaker 1: caves should not pick the next president of the United
Speaker 1: states response. You know, according to Forest Magazine, I'm literally
Speaker 1: the only person on this stage who's not a millionaire
Speaker 1: or a billionaire. So if this is important, this is
Speaker 1: the problem with issuing purity tests. You cannot yourself pass.
Speaker 1: If I fleshed, if I fledged never to be in
Speaker 1: the company of a progressive Democratic donor, I couldn't be
Speaker 1: up here. Senator, You're not worth this one hundred times mine. Now,
Speaker 1: supposing that you went home feeling the holiday spirit, I
Speaker 1: know this isn't likely, but stay with me and decided
Speaker 1: to go on to Pete for America dot Com and
Speaker 1: give the maximum allowable by law twenty eight. Yoh, so sorry, Jed,
Speaker 1: I wanted to give you the full context there. I
Speaker 1: gotta say. I think I think Mayor Pete through some
Speaker 1: of that cave line in Warren's face there. I think
Speaker 1: he decided to go for it. Oh, he destroyed her.
Speaker 1: And that's the thing. Elizabeth Warren and wants to play
Speaker 1: the socialist class warfare game. Until Mike blew or a
Speaker 1: gut in the race, Elizabeth Warren was the richest candidate
Speaker 1: in the field. I think she's worth like three point
Speaker 1: eight million dollars, which again I don't for grudge anybody
Speaker 1: there will, but she has gone all in. I think
Speaker 1: she's worth like six to twelve million dollars. Well oh yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: well yeah, but see if this is the problem with Democrats,
Speaker 1: and I don't understand what they're doing during these debates,
Speaker 1: Why is Elizabeth Warren going after going after mayor Pete Mayor?
Speaker 1: Pete is Polly at five percent or under everywhere and
Speaker 1: she's currently falling two. Either you're going after Biden or
Speaker 1: you have no purpose on the debate stage up there?
Speaker 1: What are they doing? One thing that evolves I think
Speaker 1: as we go through this process of watching the Democratic primary,
Speaker 1: is is best and best option worst option for you
Speaker 1: on that stage if one of them, if you could
Speaker 1: just take one of them out of the running meeting,
Speaker 1: like it's just too scary for America, forget about who
Speaker 1: would win against Trump. Put that aside. If a Democrat
Speaker 1: is going to win the election, but you could, like,
Speaker 1: you know, vdo one from that stage, who would it
Speaker 1: be Pete Mayor? Wow, I'm actually surprised about that. I
Speaker 1: mean for me, I mean for me, it's actually it's
Speaker 1: actually Bernie. I mean, I think he's actually scary to me.
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy honeymoon in the Soviet Union and
Speaker 1: nothing has changed. Well, they're all frightening, they're all calmies,
Speaker 1: and you're I'm not gonna say you're wrong about Bernie,
Speaker 1: but I've seen a couple of little flashes of it
Speaker 1: from Mayor Pete. And I don't know where the poems from.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm not educated enough about what his
Speaker 1: background is, but he has had a couple of little
Speaker 1: flashes of just seeming like somebody was a real hate on,
Speaker 1: at least for Christians in the United States of America.
Speaker 1: And I'll tell you what. The last president we had
Speaker 1: like that was Obama, and he did some serious damage.
Speaker 1: He just always felt like, behind those soaring speeches and whatnot,
Speaker 1: he had a real hate on for a lot of
Speaker 1: people in this country and he did some damage. Have
Speaker 1: to pick one you had to vote for. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm your your life hangs in the balance. You have
Speaker 1: to actually past a vote for Democrat. On that stage,
Speaker 1: who was it going to be, Oh, Tulsea Gabert. I
Speaker 1: mean she was on the stand, but she wasn't on
Speaker 1: the stage last night. I would agree with you on that,
Speaker 1: but she wasn't there. So you got Yang Buddha, Judge
Speaker 1: klobashar Standers, Warren Biden. You know what I'm actually I
Speaker 1: was gonna say Yang, but I'm actually gonna go with
Speaker 1: because she seems like such a genuinely hostile human being
Speaker 1: in that story about her throwing binders at her staff
Speaker 1: and making staffers shave their legs at work and stuff
Speaker 1: like that. I think we get some hilarious stories out
Speaker 1: of my life Sha her legs, her legs. So I
Speaker 1: think I had some great stories out of the White
Speaker 1: House of her ripping off paintings off the wall and
Speaker 1: stuff like that at the office. All right, A fair point, Wen,
Speaker 1: We're gonna ask Jesse Kelly a little bit about some
Speaker 1: Christmas cheer in a second. Here you're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All we're talking
Speaker 1: to my man Jesse Kelly, host of the Jesse Kelly
Speaker 1: Show Down on KPRC Houston six to nine. You can, also,
Speaker 1: of course, and should, subscribe to the Jesse Kelly Show
Speaker 1: and watch him here on plutot V channel two forty eight.
Speaker 1: The first Jesse WELLO got a couple of minutes. But
Speaker 1: I want to ask, so what is then the Christmas
Speaker 1: wisdom as a married father of two, What are some
Speaker 1: of the Christmas traditions? What are some of the dudes?
Speaker 1: And don't bring us into the Kelly household a little
Speaker 1: bit for the Christmas season. Now this year is an
Speaker 1: exception because I actually am traveling this year. But for
Speaker 1: all you young parents out there, you're going to be
Speaker 1: torn on Christmas Day and they're gonna want to go
Speaker 1: to his parents house and then her parents house. So
Speaker 1: maybe you'll go this year, that year, the alternate years,
Speaker 1: rip that band aid off, Rip it off very early,
Speaker 1: and when the kids are four or five, six years old,
Speaker 1: so all the in laws they can come to you
Speaker 1: start your own family traditions. Otherwise Christmas sucks for you.
Speaker 1: And that's not the way life's supposed to be. You're
Speaker 1: not sus that kids didn't like a good plane travel
Speaker 1: and all these other things. You wake up on Christmas
Speaker 1: morning with a cup of coffee, We'll read a little
Speaker 1: Bible story to your little one, watch them opens to president,
Speaker 1: and enjoy your day. It's Christmas. What are you thinking
Speaker 1: about this movie? Nineteen seventeen, the all one shot World
Speaker 1: War One movie that's coming out on Christmas day over
Speaker 1: the holiday, You're gonna check it out. I am the
Speaker 1: biggest World War War history man kind of. I read
Speaker 1: everything I can read on it. I consume every podcast
Speaker 1: I can on it. I have never been this excited
Speaker 1: for a movie in my life. World War One is
Speaker 1: the most underrated conflict. People do not realize how fascinating
Speaker 1: that the oh yeah, and also just the the concentration
Speaker 1: of carnage during some of those battles. What I mean,
Speaker 1: humanity does not would not have the stomach to handle
Speaker 1: a week of that anymore. I mean it's a it's
Speaker 1: a coo. Wouldn't we wouldn't I have said, Argal, you
Speaker 1: can do though the wars with swords and stairs or
Speaker 1: luclear warld, whatever you want to say. If you had
Speaker 1: to take one a conflict in the history mankind, I
Speaker 1: would not want to fight in. It would be World
Speaker 1: War One. I mean we had guys in fladers drowning
Speaker 1: in the mud over a period of two or three
Speaker 1: days because they couldn't be pulled out. People will get
Speaker 1: gas to death. I mean that is so ugly. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it's I agree with you, So you know what, Jesse, Actually,
Speaker 1: I think this is a good thing. For us to
Speaker 1: set up in the new year. I'm gonna see the
Speaker 1: nineteen because I actually like to learn about the First
Speaker 1: World War Two. We should do a I sit down
Speaker 1: and chat maybe over one of our podcasts after we've
Speaker 1: both seen nineteen seventeen and do a sort of just
Speaker 1: a hot wash of the whole thing. Let's do it.
Speaker 1: It's fantastic. Jesse Kelly, everybody, the man himself. If you
Speaker 1: have not already, please subscribe to The Jesse Kelly Show.
Speaker 1: Also check him out on Channel two forty eight Pluto TVs.
Speaker 1: The first just down with the Pluto TV app. You
Speaker 1: should be watching The Buck Saxon Show, The Jesse Kelly Show,
Speaker 1: and The Mike's Later Show and the Oh Jesse. We
Speaker 1: can't tell them me other shows yet, can We can't
Speaker 1: tell them yet. We're not yet. But they're gonna be good.
Speaker 1: They're gonna be excited. Jesse, you and your family have
Speaker 1: a very blessed and joyful Christmas and we'll talk to you. Sue.
Speaker 1: My men, see you, my men. See that's the nineteen
Speaker 1: seventeen Mens producer Mark, you might have to see it too.
Speaker 1: And by the way, you also have to find the
Speaker 1: date that you want me to take you. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: take you on producer Randing out to a game. Whatever
Speaker 1: the cheaper team is. We'll go see that Islanders. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the Islanders. We'll take you an island. I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: you'll get you guys Jerseys. I don't want an island.
Speaker 1: Come on, No, we only go to the game if
Speaker 1: I get a photo of both of you in islands Jersey.
Speaker 1: I'm not wearing an islander. See, they'll get hard for me.
Speaker 1: Oh the sun night Canty. We can't even get this done.
Speaker 1: All right, we'll see, we'll see. I don't know, let's
Speaker 1: think it's might get a hotdog thrown in there too.
Speaker 1: You don't want any food at the NASA causeum, I'm
Speaker 1: learning so much today. Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: sets and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: We've been hearing from people all over the country and
Speaker 1: the last since last night and this morning. Seems like
Speaker 1: people have a spring in their steps because the president
Speaker 1: was held accountable for his reckless behavior. No one is
Speaker 1: above the law, and the Constitution is the stream law
Speaker 1: of the land. No one is about the law and
Speaker 1: the president has been held accountable. It really is interesting
Speaker 1: to see the response that we are getting by partisan
Speaker 1: across party lines. I myself want to say, I have
Speaker 1: a spring in my step because of the moral courage
Speaker 1: of our caucus, a spring in her step, she says,
Speaker 1: because the president has been held accountable. But has he really?
Speaker 1: I think this is a fun, a fun part to
Speaker 1: dig into for a moment here, how exactly the president
Speaker 1: is still the president. Nothing has changed. Democrats all just
Speaker 1: cast a vote to say that they hate the president.
Speaker 1: I mean, they can call it whatever they want. But
Speaker 1: when no one except for Democrats in the House of
Speaker 1: Representatives vote against the sitting president who is a Republican,
Speaker 1: guess what. It's a It's just a partisan swipe. Nobody
Speaker 1: really cares. Doesn't matter, It doesn't make it dead, doesn't
Speaker 1: make a difference. But it's also not even clear that
Speaker 1: he has been peached yet, because Pelosi is playing games.
Speaker 1: And we will see by the way, I'm gonna hold
Speaker 1: my man Jesse Kelly to that steak because we shall see.
Speaker 1: I mean, if she ends up withholding this the whole time,
Speaker 1: that would be that would be stunning, fascinating, And I
Speaker 1: think crazy all at the same time. But you never know.
Speaker 1: With Pelosi, she says, they've got a spring in their step.
Speaker 1: Pelosi and Schumer are both engaged in all kinds of
Speaker 1: efforts to make this seem like whatever they want to
Speaker 1: make it seem like. Here's Senator Mitch McConnell, who is
Speaker 1: pointing out that she can do all the spinning that
Speaker 1: she wants, she can do all of the narrative creation
Speaker 1: and reforming. But there's a fundamental problem here is that
Speaker 1: she's just negating much of what she was saying for
Speaker 1: the last few weeks. Play twelve, Speaker Pelosi said, this
Speaker 1: impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there
Speaker 1: is something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don't
Speaker 1: think we should go down to that path because it
Speaker 1: divides the country. And quote, by the Speaker's own standards,
Speaker 1: the standards she said, she has failed the country. Does
Speaker 1: anyone really think that this is bipartisan that is the
Speaker 1: standard of the Democrats had set up in the past.
Speaker 1: Does anyone really believe does anyone really think that what's
Speaker 1: going on here is anything other than a one party
Speaker 1: lashing out against the president of the United States. I
Speaker 1: would love to see that person out there making the
Speaker 1: case publicly that this is bipartisan, that this is not
Speaker 1: just Democrats acting as one against the duly elected President
Speaker 1: of the United States, Donald John Trump instant. You never
Speaker 1: really hear people say the John part in the middle. Recently,
Speaker 1: someone said, and I was like, oh, wow, why are
Speaker 1: you looking at me? Like what are you looking like?
Speaker 1: I'm crazy? It's always do I'm gonna admit something. What
Speaker 1: had no idea with the Jay stood for? Really, I
Speaker 1: had no clue until you know, I'm gonna say this.
Speaker 1: I've had a lot of people, a lot of people
Speaker 1: think that, I mean, we're in that situation, Yeah, because
Speaker 1: why Donald Jay exactly. Yeah. But it's like, hey, I'm gonna,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna lay my card at the table
Speaker 1: right now. Producer Mark Michael J. Fox, great actor from
Speaker 1: the eighties. No, I don't know what that Jay stands for.
Speaker 1: Could be John, could be James, could be Jebediah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I got no idea. I just knew he was Michael J.
Speaker 1: Fox exactly. Yeah. Well, so people know Donald John Trump.
Speaker 1: Usually I feel like you would have the shorter name
Speaker 1: as the first name. That just feels like it makes
Speaker 1: more sense to me. John Donald Trump seemed weird though,
Speaker 1: John Donald Trump, Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, we know
Speaker 1: him as Donald now. Yeah, now he's the Donald of course,
Speaker 1: but yeah, he's that. That is in fact his name.
Speaker 1: Remember when it was when Brock who's saying Obama was president?
Speaker 1: If you said his full name, people had a problem
Speaker 1: with that. Sometimes they'd be like, why why are you
Speaker 1: doing that? Why why are you saying his full name?
Speaker 1: Why why are you gotta do that. I was like,
Speaker 1: his name Usain Obama, that was his name. And they
Speaker 1: can act like you're not supposed to say it as
Speaker 1: much as they want, but the fact of the matter
Speaker 1: is that you're just saying the guy's name. So and look,
Speaker 1: I might wanting to make fun of names. I get
Speaker 1: my name. I get made fun of all the time
Speaker 1: for it. I would think it's so funny though, because
Speaker 1: people love to do the whole sexton, Oh, Sexy's all.
Speaker 1: I will tell you fun story. I was at a
Speaker 1: holiday party last night for some young Republicans and it
Speaker 1: was a young Republican club. I'm at a holiday party
Speaker 1: and someone came up to me a nice, a nice
Speaker 1: young lady and she said, I gotta tell you something.
Speaker 1: I said. What she said, well, my grandma loves your
Speaker 1: radio show and you and loves you on TV. And
Speaker 1: I said, oh, wow, that's so nice. You know, I was,
Speaker 1: and I legitimately do appreciate that. Because I'm in New York,
Speaker 1: I'm surrounded by commies and enemies, and so whenever someone
Speaker 1: comes up me into something nice to say, it like
Speaker 1: makes my day, makes me feel appreciated, and it really
Speaker 1: is nice. I do like it. So, by the way,
Speaker 1: anytime anyone from Tea Buck you see me anywhere, don't
Speaker 1: ever be shy, like come up, say hi. I'm always
Speaker 1: happy to talk to you, always happy to speak with
Speaker 1: a member that I don't really mean that member of
Speaker 1: the team. And I know right away because the people
Speaker 1: that know me from radio they know that they kind
Speaker 1: of already know me, so they just come up and
Speaker 1: talk to me. People that maybe saw me sometime on
Speaker 1: TV they kind of like, look at me a little
Speaker 1: weird and they're like, wait a second, he's got a
Speaker 1: beard now is it the same guy? But anyway, the
Speaker 1: nice young lady last night, and I think she's like
Speaker 1: five years younger than me, I'm calling her a young
Speaker 1: lady like, oh, the young lady last night that I saw,
Speaker 1: But the night you seeing young nady colub me. She
Speaker 1: said her grandma really liked me, and and she said,
Speaker 1: my grandma has a nickname for you. And you know
Speaker 1: what the nickname is, producer branded extra points. You can
Speaker 1: guess this one. I really hope you did that by accident.
Speaker 1: What you just called me producer branded? Oh my god,
Speaker 1: it's so late in this season. I'm sorry I did
Speaker 1: do that, but I'm like the double the size of
Speaker 1: him and producer Brandon or nothing tattoos, but for a
Speaker 1: whole two weeks because you left me. You left me
Speaker 1: behind the trenches taking grenades here in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: You know, I had to say Brandon a lot every day.
Speaker 1: You know now I've had to set the engines back
Speaker 1: to neutral Recooper act like I made you do the
Speaker 1: show outside in the middle of winter. Might as well
Speaker 1: have all right, the producer mark security blanket? Was youoinked
Speaker 1: off yanked off the anyway? But I was going to
Speaker 1: name the nickname. What do you butt? Sex? Buck sexy? Okay,
Speaker 1: buck sexy, that's what grandma. That's what Grandma ethel in
Speaker 1: the Midwest calls me to her granddaughter, who came up
Speaker 1: to me and explained that they call me Buck Sexy.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell I was like, hey, I was like,
Speaker 1: Grandma Ethel. I mean, it's you know, it's Grandpa Ethel
Speaker 1: still in the game or they're still married. I'm just kidding.
Speaker 1: I'm kid my gosh, I'm kitty, it's Christmas time. I'm kidding.
Speaker 1: I would like to point half though, I just teased
Speaker 1: your birthday podcast with my guest. I did, oh, well done. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so listen to that next week. I'll have I We'll
Speaker 1: have to check that out for sure. So anyway, buck
Speaker 1: Sexy was my I it was. I've also I've had
Speaker 1: other people say it was Buck Sexington and then what
Speaker 1: was one of the other ones saw? There was a
Speaker 1: really fun one for one of my One of my
Speaker 1: listeners used to listen to all that I haven't heard
Speaker 1: from in a while, which I don't know why that is,
Speaker 1: but he said his wife English wasn't her first language.
Speaker 1: She had a hilarious a hilarious nickname for me. That
Speaker 1: was just my name, but it was the wrong version
Speaker 1: of mine. Anyway, Sexton for those who don't know a
Speaker 1: sexton even though it sounds like, oh, is actually the
Speaker 1: person who takes care of a church. It's the person
Speaker 1: who collects. It's the lay person who works in a church,
Speaker 1: who collects alms, who collects offerings, and also is often
Speaker 1: the grave digger. So perhaps sexton, you know, or buck
Speaker 1: buck grave digger is another way of thinking about it.
Speaker 1: So it's the guy who digs the grave. And then
Speaker 1: there was that thing I don't know if that's true
Speaker 1: or not, where they used to say that they would
Speaker 1: have a little bell that they would tie to the
Speaker 1: toe of a person so that if they do you
Speaker 1: know what I'm talking about when they used to put
Speaker 1: people in the grave in the MIDI times, they were
Speaker 1: scared they're going to bury somebody alive, am I? Yeah,
Speaker 1: they put a little bell on him, right, that's a
Speaker 1: thing or maybe like a tube down there. Yeah, So
Speaker 1: I like the sexton would have been the guy that
Speaker 1: if the bell rang, you got to run out there
Speaker 1: and obviously dig that person out from the grave. That
Speaker 1: how terrifying of an experience would that have to be?
Speaker 1: That would be that would be rough stuff. Yeah. I
Speaker 1: did see an a an advertisement for a show that
Speaker 1: I want to it's got the I don't know how
Speaker 1: to say. It's a super handsome Superman guy. You know
Speaker 1: what I'm talking about. I don't remember his name, the
Speaker 1: most recent one, the most recent Superman Superman guy. Remember
Speaker 1: he's in some show, The Witcher. It's called the Witcher,
Speaker 1: I believe anyway. There's so many shows. I mean, there's two.
Speaker 1: The problem is there's so many shows. I can't even
Speaker 1: keep up with all the shows days. There's so many
Speaker 1: I want to watch, but I know I'm never gonna
Speaker 1: get to them. Yeah, and I actually have a list
Speaker 1: now and I have gotten through like non of makeles.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to do this show bull shows you want
Speaker 1: to watch again because they were so good. The problem
Speaker 1: is I end up just wanted to like turn my
Speaker 1: brain off and I throw the Office on all the time,
Speaker 1: and I'll throw the Office on. Scrubs is a big
Speaker 1: one for me. Sign Fells Scrubs. Scrubs really a sub caliber.
Speaker 1: Oh it's so good. Interesting. It's very underrated by most people,
Speaker 1: but it's one of it's People have said it's the
Speaker 1: best medical show ever. Really, it's most realistic and it's hilarious.
Speaker 1: I'll have to check that out. I was I was
Speaker 1: unaware of that. Oh, we were talking about impeachment and
Speaker 1: Pelosi and stuff. Let's get back to that. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Miss said im patron was so urgent that it could
Speaker 1: not even wait for due process. But now they're content
Speaker 1: to sit on their heads. This is really comical. Democrats
Speaker 1: all actions can side that their allegations are unproven. Anyone
Speaker 1: want to try to argue that point against cocaine. Mitch,
Speaker 1: he knows what's up. He understands what's going on here.
Speaker 1: Every The good thing is, you know Mitch McConnell. I
Speaker 1: know he's established man and people have even called him
Speaker 1: a rhino. Let's let's give credit where it's due. Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell held the line on Merrick Garland, and he was
Speaker 1: It was a brilliant parliamentary maneuver. He was absolutely right.
Speaker 1: It was a gamble of paid off Trump one. That's
Speaker 1: a big deal and Democrats are still seething about it,
Speaker 1: which makes it even more amazing. Mitch McConnell is a mean,
Speaker 1: lean judicial conservative judicial confirmation machine which will remake the
Speaker 1: judiciary for decades to come. Mitch McConnell's doing a fantastic
Speaker 1: job in that regard. I mean, is he good on
Speaker 1: immigration not really? Are there some other issues where Mitch
Speaker 1: and I would you know, have an sure But overall,
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell is a very adept and powerful Senate Majority
Speaker 1: leader and has done a lot of good thing. You
Speaker 1: will not be almost say this now and this I
Speaker 1: know this doesn't excite the conservative base and people like
Speaker 1: to call Mitch McConnell rhino and all that stuff. And
Speaker 1: I'm not negating any of the places where I think
Speaker 1: he's come up short or he hasn't you know, he's obviously,
Speaker 1: but he's made amends. Trump and McConnell have a working relationship.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's But when you look at the record,
Speaker 1: the judicial confirmation record, while Mitch McConnell has been Senate
Speaker 1: Majority leader, it will probably be the single best period
Speaker 1: for those who believe in the Constitution and a judiciary
Speaker 1: that really does uphold and defend the Constitution. It would
Speaker 1: be the best period perhaps ever, I mean, certainly in
Speaker 1: modern times for judicial confirmation. Mitch McConnell sent a majority
Speaker 1: and that's nothing. You can't take that away from him.
Speaker 1: And also, by the way, you can't take away from
Speaker 1: people that supported Trump largely because they understood how important
Speaker 1: judges were not just for this presidential term and then
Speaker 1: the possible next term of Trump, which I think is
Speaker 1: looking very likely, but also for decades to come, because
Speaker 1: these are lifetime appointments. It's a lifetime appointment the Federal Bench,
Speaker 1: the Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court. He staying around
Speaker 1: for as long as they want until they decide to retire,
Speaker 1: until you know it's time to go. So I do
Speaker 1: think that that's that's noteworthy here in this whole process.
Speaker 1: You are going to have to hear a lot of
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer just saying things that he knows to be untrue.
Speaker 1: But again, he assumes that much of the left wing
Speaker 1: base is full of idiots. So that's not going to
Speaker 1: change anything. Play clip seven if you would, producer Mark.
Speaker 1: If the Republicans proceed with the Majority leader's scheme to
Speaker 1: sweep these charges under the rug and permit the President
Speaker 1: to ignore Congress, they will be creating a new precedent
Speaker 1: that will long be remembered as one of the Senate's
Speaker 1: darkest chapters. The Majority Leader's scheme to sweep these charges
Speaker 1: under the rug what is the scheme exactly. He doesn't
Speaker 1: even know. They haven't even agreed, they haven't even said
Speaker 1: anything up yet. But this is what the Democrats do.
Speaker 1: When they're concerned that a process will not give the
Speaker 1: outcome that they want, they in advance undermine that process
Speaker 1: to hedge their bets because I'll say, oh, all along,
Speaker 1: we told you that the fix was in here, all along,
Speaker 1: we told you that this is the way. They're already
Speaker 1: doing this, by the way, with the twenty twenty election
Speaker 1: and you know, Russia interference, Ukraine interference, all this stuff,
Speaker 1: they're already trying to say that the next election is
Speaker 1: probably already, you know, already under assault by outside forces.
Speaker 1: So if they lose, the childishness of the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: will come out once again. You'll see it, and they'll
Speaker 1: just say, we don't we don't accept the result. We
Speaker 1: think that this was this was the way. This is
Speaker 1: what happened because of all of the cheating. Senator Lindsay
Speaker 1: Graham an interesting point here about Jim Clyburne and what
Speaker 1: was said to him. I want to show this, Lindsay
Speaker 1: Graham has been pretty good on this issue in particular.
Speaker 1: I like Lindsey Graham when when Lindsay Graham's in fight mode,
Speaker 1: I like it. Here's what he said on a clip
Speaker 1: ten if you would producer Mark not to be confused
Speaker 1: with Jim Cliburn, a very good friend, a good man,
Speaker 1: just said moments ago, if we're up to him, they
Speaker 1: would never send the articles an impeachment to the Senate.
Speaker 1: That tells me that they're embarrassed about what they did,
Speaker 1: that the product that they generated in the House is
Speaker 1: not worthy of coming to the Senate. We know how
Speaker 1: this ends in the Senate. Maybe maybe we'll see, well,
Speaker 1: we'll definitely see, but maybe I'm I'm all on this.
Speaker 1: If they don't, I just don't see how they can
Speaker 1: avoid sending the impeachment to the Senate and then pretend
Speaker 1: that they've really impeached the president. That's that's absurd, right.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine if the Republicans that try this after
Speaker 1: they impeach Clinton and then said, oh, we're not you know,
Speaker 1: because we don't have the votes, We're not going to
Speaker 1: go through the rest of the process. Because it is
Speaker 1: all about the optics, It is all about the perception
Speaker 1: of this. It really has nothing to do with what
Speaker 1: is constitutional, what is fair that's that's not what's motivating
Speaker 1: the people involved in any of this. Senator Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: has pointed out that they want Mitch McConnell to do
Speaker 1: things based on their whim in the House. That's not
Speaker 1: how this works. They don't They don't get to hold
Speaker 1: the process hostage until they can predetermine what the outcome
Speaker 1: of the process will be. But that seems to be
Speaker 1: the Democrat claim. Here play a clip nine producer, Mark, Please,
Speaker 1: he's puzzled, and I've tried the best I could to
Speaker 1: explain it. And I'm a bit puzzled too. I don't
Speaker 1: know who came up with the idea less hold the
Speaker 1: articles back until Mitch McConnell does things that we like
Speaker 1: in terms of the trial. Let's hold the articles back
Speaker 1: maybe forever. And that's that's just that's constitutional extortion that
Speaker 1: that just cannot stand. You know, at what point is
Speaker 1: this just Democrats doing what they've done in other places
Speaker 1: where to prevent legislative business, they'll do a sit in
Speaker 1: in the capital, you know, they'll shut the building down.
Speaker 1: At what point is this just obstruction of the process. Oh,
Speaker 1: Democrats love to talk about obstruction, but aren't they now
Speaker 1: obstructing constitutional duties that the sun it has to now
Speaker 1: follow through. Do we even have a ruling on whether
Speaker 1: this is an impeachment or not. It seems like it's
Speaker 1: an open question, and it's only an open question because
Speaker 1: everybody would have assumed that once you hold the vote,
Speaker 1: of course, then you pass it to the Senate. There's
Speaker 1: not this delay procedure here. But it then just goes
Speaker 1: to how the whole thing has been a scam and
Speaker 1: a sham all along. Nancy Pelosi knows that these are
Speaker 1: incredibly weak articles of impeachment that no Trump supporter is
Speaker 1: going to look at this and say, oh wow, I
Speaker 1: guess now finally, after all the stuff they've said about
Speaker 1: the president, I'm going to back away from this. I
Speaker 1: want nothing to do with this. No, no one's going
Speaker 1: to take that approach. So what really is the purpose here?
Speaker 1: What is she trying to accomplish the stain of impeachment
Speaker 1: on the Trump presidency? And which I think is greatly overstated.
Speaker 1: I don't think people really care. I mean, i'd put
Speaker 1: this to you, what do you do think that Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton might have won a third term if you had run?
Speaker 1: It'd be an interesting question to look at now if
Speaker 1: he had run against George W. Bush. I mean, who knows.
Speaker 1: Certainly Bill Clinton is a more compelling persona than Al Gore.
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton's obviously got a whole bunch of massive skeletons
Speaker 1: in this closet. The media was covering up for him
Speaker 1: for a long time on But we will have to
Speaker 1: find out, I suppose. But just when you thought that
Speaker 1: this was finally going to return to some realm of normalcy,
Speaker 1: the Senate would be able to look at this, they
Speaker 1: would vote, and then we'd be we'd be able to
Speaker 1: stop talking about this whole impeachment Preceding this impeachment process,
Speaker 1: it looks like Democrats have found a way to make
Speaker 1: this even crazier because Trump has made them lose their minds.
Speaker 1: That much is for sure. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, team,
Speaker 1: I just wanted to note that I think it was yesterday.
Speaker 1: I was musing out loud to you, as I tend
Speaker 1: to do here on the show, that if the election
Speaker 1: were held today, because it was yesterday, that I'm entirely
Speaker 1: confident that Trump would win, which is pretty remarkable considering
Speaker 1: that he just got impeached or did he get impeached
Speaker 1: problems sort of, We're still figuring this out. They voted
Speaker 1: to impeach him in the House, that's for sure. And
Speaker 1: you've had the Democrats making their case in all these
Speaker 1: different debates and getting all the media coverage they do
Speaker 1: for months and months without one person taking the full
Speaker 1: brunt of Trump's criticisms. And here we are now looking
Speaker 1: at the latest polling from CNN, and I would just
Speaker 1: note that, you know, I know some pollsters and some
Speaker 1: polls are a little bit skewed, but Fox polls aren't
Speaker 1: polls of people who watch Fox News, and CNN polls
Speaker 1: aren't poles of people who watch then NIM at least
Speaker 1: they're not supposed to be so, I at least think
Speaker 1: that's funny when people they hear an MSNBCNB SEE news
Speaker 1: poll and they assume it's like, well, are we asking
Speaker 1: all the libs. It's like no, it's it's supposed to
Speaker 1: be more than that Trump. This is a head to
Speaker 1: head in battleground states Trump, and it was all eight
Speaker 1: states that were determined by less than six percent of
Speaker 1: the vote last time, so essentially the eight states that
Speaker 1: will matter according to last election for the upcoming election.
Speaker 1: And here's what they found. Trump forty nine, Bernie forty five,
Speaker 1: Trump forty seven, Biden forty seven, Trump forty eight, Warren
Speaker 1: forty six, Trump forty eight, Buddha Judge forty three. He
Speaker 1: beats everybody except for Biden, whom he's tied with. And
Speaker 1: remember that this is before Trump has been able to
Speaker 1: really weigh in and go after Biden, debate him, make
Speaker 1: the case against Biden specifically, and what you see is
Speaker 1: that Biden is effectively just taking the Hillary machinery from
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen goes right behind Biden and Biden though to
Speaker 1: be fair, he may have a bit of an advantage
Speaker 1: over Hillary and that he is less scandal plague than
Speaker 1: she is. That doesn't mean he's not scandal plague. It
Speaker 1: just means he has less scandal plague than she is
Speaker 1: at this point, although that could change. And also, he
Speaker 1: is associated with Obama because he was a vice president
Speaker 1: for eight years, and so the African American community seems
Speaker 1: to be more thoroughly and more more energized in its
Speaker 1: support of Biden than it would have been than it
Speaker 1: is rather in its support for other other candidates, including
Speaker 1: perhaps Hillary, including Hillary Clinton. So but that's how it
Speaker 1: breaks down right now. So they're impeaching a president who
Speaker 1: would probably be president again tomorrow if the election overwhelming favored,
Speaker 1: if the election held tomorrow, to be president again. So
Speaker 1: whenever they talk about how they need to do the
Speaker 1: bidding of the American people, here and this is all
Speaker 1: about what's constitutional, and this is about what the people want. No,
Speaker 1: it is not this whole impeachment sham and all the
Speaker 1: stuff they're doing against President Trump. This is about what
Speaker 1: the left wing base, the media, the federal bureaucracy, the academy,
Speaker 1: college campuses, and universities, Hollywood. It's what they want. And
Speaker 1: you know who even has some understanding of this. I
Speaker 1: give him some credit. I could, because I always want
Speaker 1: to be I have to be honest with all of you.
Speaker 1: I couldn't do a show that wasn't rooted in honesty
Speaker 1: day in and day out. It would feel too much
Speaker 1: like a multiple personality disorder. So I try to give
Speaker 1: credit where it's doing it. Among Democrats. You know, Andrew
Speaker 1: Yang has some very bad ideas. Universal basic income is
Speaker 1: never what they say it will be. Because what happens
Speaker 1: is once you give people universal basic income, then what
Speaker 1: do you think comes after that? All it needs to
Speaker 1: be more. It needs to be more. You need to
Speaker 1: raise taxes, needs you more. It's just another mechanism for
Speaker 1: the redistribution of wealth. The only benefit is that there's
Speaker 1: not as much of a bureaucracy to administer it. But
Speaker 1: trust me, they could find a way, the federal government
Speaker 1: could find a way to have a lot of people
Speaker 1: who are in charge of taking the money that has
Speaker 1: been taken from you tax bear and given to other people,
Speaker 1: in this case, given to everybody, which is an interesting
Speaker 1: addition to the plan here. Everybody's going to be getting
Speaker 1: a thousand dollars a month. It wouldn't be means tested.
Speaker 1: I mean, this just seems so very strange in that regard.
Speaker 1: But the number will never be You'll always have fifty
Speaker 1: one percent of the population that's saying all the universal
Speaker 1: basic income should be higher, Give me more money, give
Speaker 1: me more money. And I don't think Enry Yangerly has
Speaker 1: an answer for that. That's one of the many criticisms
Speaker 1: of UBI, But he does understand that the left wing
Speaker 1: base has radicalized, has gone pretty crazy, and the media
Speaker 1: in particular has become a dishonest a dishonest organism. And
Speaker 1: here's what he says about the lies or the misdirections
Speaker 1: of the media. Said this last night in the debate,
Speaker 1: play nineteen. Please, it's clear why Americans can't agree on impeachment.
Speaker 1: We're getting our news from different sources, and it's making
Speaker 1: it hard for us even to agree on basic facts.
Speaker 1: Congressional approval rating last night check was something like seventeen percent.
Speaker 1: And Americans don't trust the media networks to tell them
Speaker 1: the truth. The media networks didn't do us any favors
Speaker 1: by missing the reason why Donald Trump became our president
Speaker 1: in the first place. If you turn on cable network
Speaker 1: News today, you would sink he's our president because of
Speaker 1: some combination of Russia, racism, Facebook, Hillary Clinton, and emails
Speaker 1: all mixed together. But americans around the country no different.
Speaker 1: We blasted away four million manufacturing jobs that were primarily
Speaker 1: based in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Missouri. I just left Iowa.
Speaker 1: We blasted forty thousand manufacturing jobs there. The more we
Speaker 1: act like Donald Trump is the cause of all of
Speaker 1: our problems the more America lose trust that we can
Speaker 1: actually see what's going on in our communities and solve
Speaker 1: those problems. What we have to do is we have
Speaker 1: to stop being obsessed over impeachment, which unfortunately strikes many
Speaker 1: Americans like a ballgame where you know what the score
Speaker 1: is going to be, and start actually digging in and
Speaker 1: solving the problems that God Donald Trump elected in the
Speaker 1: first place. We have to take every opportunity to present
Speaker 1: a new positive vision for the country, a new way forward,
Speaker 1: to help beat him in twenty twenty, because, make no mistake,
Speaker 1: he'll be there at the ballot box for us to defeat.
Speaker 1: There's some truth in what Yang is saying. She's certainly
Speaker 1: going to be there the ballot box. Trump is going
Speaker 1: to be very much running in the in the in
Speaker 1: the fall. That's the Despite what Democrats have been praying
Speaker 1: for or not praying, but you know, whatever they do
Speaker 1: hoping for, despite just kidding, I know they're Democrats. Who
Speaker 1: are you pray too? Sure? Who do they pray to?
Speaker 1: I don't know. That's a whole other conversation. But the
Speaker 1: Democrats have convinced themselves that at least the Democrat establishment
Speaker 1: has convinced itself that this impeachment mess is somehow going
Speaker 1: to change minds, is going to be a really useful tool.
Speaker 1: I think the backlash against this is going to be
Speaker 1: far far more powerful than the benefit the Democrats have
Speaker 1: gotten from ramming this whole thing through. Also, just another note,
Speaker 1: people love to talk about the loss of manufacturing jobs
Speaker 1: and how we need more manufacturing jobs all the time.
Speaker 1: It depends a large part of the loss of manufacturing
Speaker 1: jobs comes from there's offshoring, to be sure, but there's
Speaker 1: also automation. There's increased efficiency. You don't need I mean,
Speaker 1: just think of this in very basic terms. You don't
Speaker 1: need one hundred people all standing alongside an assembly line
Speaker 1: now and doing one little thing. You might have one
Speaker 1: or two people who are overseeing mechanized processes on that
Speaker 1: assembly line, and yes, perhaps they're paid well, but there
Speaker 1: aren't white as many jobs. There's increased efficiency in this process. Also,
Speaker 1: we love to be told we were always told about
Speaker 1: the glory days of unions and manufacturing jobs, but technology
Speaker 1: has been changing the nature of those jobs in a
Speaker 1: lot of cases. And honestly, I don't think that all
Speaker 1: human beings. Look some people depends on what we mean
Speaker 1: by manufacturing job. But any process that can be automated
Speaker 1: by machines in manufacturing is something that you'd have to
Speaker 1: ask the question how great of a job would this
Speaker 1: really be for a person to do. I think it's
Speaker 1: overstated how much everybody wants to be on an assembly
Speaker 1: line plant. There are other jobs that people would like.
Speaker 1: People like to work virtually, they like to work remotely,
Speaker 1: they like to be in engaging with other human beings.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's a lot out there, you know that.
Speaker 1: You know, there's a lot of people think, oh, the
Speaker 1: service industry. I don't want to. I mean, the service
Speaker 1: industry is sales, and the service industry is anything that's
Speaker 1: interacting with human beings and selling them on something. But
Speaker 1: I just think there's this glorifying of manufacturing jobs. Not
Speaker 1: that manufacturing jobs are great. I mean, you know, if
Speaker 1: you like it that you like it, right, But we
Speaker 1: shouldn't be thinking that what we really need is bring
Speaker 1: back ten million manufacturing jobs to America. Well, if they're
Speaker 1: if they've been off shored, it's because they're not skilled
Speaker 1: labor positions, right, And if they're off short and you
Speaker 1: actually have a leveling of the tariffs, and some of
Speaker 1: the other trade bearers that are in place. Well, then
Speaker 1: you say to yourself, how much are the people really
Speaker 1: going to get paid to do these things? Right? Is that?
Speaker 1: I mean with China they're cheating. But in other countries,
Speaker 1: do we really think we're gonna have a massive tech
Speaker 1: a massive textile industry in this country again that displaces
Speaker 1: the textile industry and a lot of developing countries where
Speaker 1: people are just gonna be paid less. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: some economic realities we have to deal with you. Anyway.
Speaker 1: I didn't mean to get too off the track on
Speaker 1: this one, but I liked it. He's hitting at the media.
Speaker 1: My other media thing for today media stories my old
Speaker 1: friend Childs Cook, who has the most fantastic British accent
Speaker 1: you've ever heard in your life, because it's very it's
Speaker 1: somewhat laid back but also so fancy at the same time.
Speaker 1: It's not quite like my friend Raheem has got a
Speaker 1: little more like he's from London, you know. Raheem's got
Speaker 1: a little more. Charles Cook is a little more in here.
Speaker 1: It's like he's reading you a bedtime story. He's like,
Speaker 1: oh and then and then Peter and Wendy went to
Speaker 1: never never Land and there was a magic dog in
Speaker 1: a dragon. And you know, he's kind of like Charles
Speaker 1: Cook could be a Harry Potter character, you know, as
Speaker 1: Raheem is like the guy you want next to you
Speaker 1: in the football stadium. He was like, oh, you want ahead,
Speaker 1: but me, they're a little they have a little bit
Speaker 1: of a different, little bit different rob Raheem's accents actually
Speaker 1: pretty fancy too. He doesn't really have a Cockney accent
Speaker 1: or anything. But Charles has written a great piece and
Speaker 1: it's CNN is not a news network. And I this
Speaker 1: is for the National Review magazine and I really enjoyed
Speaker 1: this where let me give you a little bit of
Speaker 1: what Charles rights here just because I love this one.
Speaker 1: But he makes the core argument he makes is what
Speaker 1: I've been telling you, or part of the argument he
Speaker 1: makes what I've been telling for a long time. Because
Speaker 1: people ask, how could you have worked there? If you
Speaker 1: if you think CNS are terrible, why would you go there?
Speaker 1: And what I say to them is CNN has changed people.
Speaker 1: Forget MSNBC originally was a, if not a conservative network
Speaker 1: at home for a lot of conservatives. The only network
Speaker 1: this has kind of a fun fact where an culter
Speaker 1: who is fantastic. The only network where an culter is
Speaker 1: a was ever a paid contributor was MSNBC. In fact,
Speaker 1: you know MSNB. It's changed. These places can change over time.
Speaker 1: CNN used to be the closest thing you could point
Speaker 1: to to a and a neutral cable news network. Now
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean it was neutral. Ever. It was always
Speaker 1: center left. It's alway reskewed liberal, no question about that.
Speaker 1: But it has gone from the network of you know,
Speaker 1: Schumer and Pelosi if you will, which liberal, to the
Speaker 1: network of AOC and Rashida Tali been you know, Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just way left in its politics. Now
Speaker 1: it's still establishment. So they were Hillary over Bernie. You
Speaker 1: don't get me wrong on that, But I mean, in
Speaker 1: terms of how far how hard left CNN has become,
Speaker 1: it has changed. It has changed in recent years. Here's
Speaker 1: what to Charles Rights. When Think Progress announced that it
Speaker 1: was going out of business, a few observers wondered, aloud,
Speaker 1: why didn't anybody buy it? But why would they when
Speaker 1: we have CNN? He writes, As a child, I was
Speaker 1: aware of CNN in part because of its introductory bumper
Speaker 1: featured the sinister voice of Darth Vader he means James
Speaker 1: Earl Jones, and in part because it was both the
Speaker 1: prototype and the stereotype of the twenty four hour news channel.
Speaker 1: When things would happen, you'd say, turn on CNN. CNN
Speaker 1: was careful and self consciously nonpartisan. At least it was
Speaker 1: keen or its viewers to believe it was. In short,
Speaker 1: it was what it says. It was a news network.
Speaker 1: It is no longer that. These days, CNN is a
Speaker 1: peculiar and unlovely hybrid of progressive propaganda outlet only, aginist
Speaker 1: media apologist, sexless cultural scold, and frenzied Donald Trumps Stoker blog.
Speaker 1: When news breaks, it is no longer useful or appropriate
Speaker 1: to tell someone turn on CNN, because if he did,
Speaker 1: he would be as likely to be presented with a
Speaker 1: wall of advocacy and obsession as with the headlines of
Speaker 1: the hour. Today. CNN does not broadcast the news. It
Speaker 1: broadcasts what it wants you to think. The news is, wow,
Speaker 1: there you have it, there you have it. Troubling stuff,
Speaker 1: my friends. But the reality of what CNN has become
Speaker 1: it is no longer a news network. It is not
Speaker 1: about advocacy. I mean, sorry, it's not about honesty. It
Speaker 1: is about advocacy, and I think it's long since time
Speaker 1: people recognize that. I think it's long since time people
Speaker 1: understand exactly what is going on here. We should have
Speaker 1: honesty in media now. I will say I disagree with
Speaker 1: Charles on one point, and this is an important one.
Speaker 1: He says CNN has become Fox. That is unfair. I
Speaker 1: think Charles is wrong on that point. And let me
Speaker 1: say why the Fox News lineup that is the one
Speaker 1: that bothers the lib so much. The evening lineup of hosts.
Speaker 1: All of those hosts are opinion host The primetime hosts
Speaker 1: of Tucker, Sean, Laura they are They are opinion hosts,
Speaker 1: and a lot of other shows are also opinion hosts. Right,
Speaker 1: I mean The Five is an opinion show. There's honesty
Speaker 1: in the presentation of that. You can agree or disagree.
Speaker 1: CNN lives a lie every day. They do not think
Speaker 1: Anderson Cooper, they do not think Jake Tapper, they do
Speaker 1: not think Don Lemon are opinion shows. They will not
Speaker 1: say they are opinion shows. This is a fundamental dishonesty
Speaker 1: and it's preposterous that they still cling to this. So
Speaker 1: I disagree with Charles and that it is not fair
Speaker 1: to say that CNN has become Fox because CNN Live,
Speaker 1: MSNBC and Fox are similar, and that they're both known
Speaker 1: to be leaning certain directions with their opinion. That's why
Speaker 1: I say MSNBC I have less You notice, I criticize
Speaker 1: it less as a as a foundational fundamental issue of
Speaker 1: their fairness or lack thereof. I just think they're crazy
Speaker 1: and wrong about everything. But CNN is crazy and wrong
Speaker 1: and lies about what it is. That's different. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Man.
Speaker 1: We are getting into the last part of the last
Speaker 1: show of the second decade of the twenty first century
Speaker 1: of the Bucks Exton Show. This is this is momentous
Speaker 1: stuff here. I mean, I'm hoping producer Mark doesn't get
Speaker 1: a little weepy. I don't know. I was the last
Speaker 1: time producer Mark, you probably have my wedding. Oh really
Speaker 1: a little bit. A bunch of people said that. They
Speaker 1: called that's nice, that's nice. I was gonna I mean weddings,
Speaker 1: except I was gonna say, you're probably wedding funeral. And
Speaker 1: if you watch a movie where something bad happens to
Speaker 1: a beloved pet, right, that's what it's okay to cry. Ever,
Speaker 1: I don't think I've ever cried, and I've never seen
Speaker 1: an old yeller. No, man, that's something we got a remedy.
Speaker 1: What about at the end of Lady in the Tramp
Speaker 1: when you think Tramp is gonna die after he kills
Speaker 1: the rat. I was a kid, I probably cry, That's
Speaker 1: what I was ying. But that's acceptable. Real man cry
Speaker 1: when bad things happened to beloved canaan companions. Yes see,
Speaker 1: maybe when a child is born. That's I wouldn't know
Speaker 1: about that, but I wouldn't either, but I would imagine
Speaker 1: that's a very emotional moments, not that I'm aware of.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. I got a little breaking news
Speaker 1: story actually here late in the game about a game
Speaker 1: might get everybody ready for the holiday season. Here you
Speaker 1: will recall that there was in fact a scandal, according
Speaker 1: to the media, over a bunch of West Point cadets
Speaker 1: at the Army Navy game, a hallowed American collegiate and
Speaker 1: Military Service academy tradition, and there were people that were
Speaker 1: claiming some of the cadets were doing white power symbols,
Speaker 1: all the white power symbols. Everyone has to get so scared.
Speaker 1: That's terrifying because the media has been telling people that
Speaker 1: there's a huge rise in white power nationalism. All this
Speaker 1: stuff with the media has been telling everybody because it's
Speaker 1: Trump's president, that's what they've all been saying. By the way,
Speaker 1: how many of you have seen like big white nationalist
Speaker 1: rallies out in the town square. How many of you
Speaker 1: have seen an actual rise in white nationalism in any
Speaker 1: meaningful way anywhere anywhere in America? You've seen anything. I'm
Speaker 1: sure the Southern Property Law Center has crunched some numbers
Speaker 1: that are trying to claim that there's been a huge spike.
Speaker 1: But they always say this, right, this is the Southern
Speaker 1: Probably Law Center is a left wing attack, a left
Speaker 1: wing group meant to attack conservatives. Now it doesn't actually
Speaker 1: really monitor hate. It manufactures the manufactures the belief that
Speaker 1: there's a surge in hate so they can get a
Speaker 1: lot of donations and then they can attack conservatives on
Speaker 1: behalf of lives. I mean, that's really what they do.
Speaker 1: But there hasn't been the surgeon white nationalism, but people
Speaker 1: have been conditioned to think that that is what is
Speaker 1: going on in this country. It is very unfortunate. It's
Speaker 1: very troubling that we are told this, that this lie
Speaker 1: continues to get credibility from the media. But they said
Speaker 1: that these cadets were doing white power symbols, and a
Speaker 1: lot of people said, no, these aren't white power symbols.
Speaker 1: This is something called the circle game. Well, they did
Speaker 1: an actual West Point investigation of the hand gestures at
Speaker 1: the Army Navy game, and it turns out the school
Speaker 1: says the cadets were playing the circle game, which is
Speaker 1: the equivalent of made you look. But news outlets ran
Speaker 1: with this as white power gestures because it would they
Speaker 1: would prefer, really, they would prefer the validation of their hysterical,
Speaker 1: non evidence based belief that the country is having a
Speaker 1: surge of white nationalism, a surge of neo Nazism and
Speaker 1: all this the media wants people. They'd rather have evidence
Speaker 1: for that, even if it meant that we have members
Speaker 1: of our service academy who had adopted a disgraceful and
Speaker 1: an evil ideology. They'd prefer that circumstance. It's quite clear
Speaker 1: they leap to believe this, even though there was a
Speaker 1: far more innocent and far more plausible explanation which now
Speaker 1: based on the true the in depth investigation of this,
Speaker 1: the innocent explanation was the explanation which is what here
Speaker 1: here we are once again? How many times I have
Speaker 1: to come on the show and say, guys, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I was really wrong on this one. O the watch.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to buy Jesse Kelly a state because
Speaker 1: Pelosi is going to hold back the articles of impeachment forever.
Speaker 1: But that would be It's all right, I'd give me
Speaker 1: an excuse to hang out with a man, Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 1: But you know, I mean, it's just, why is it?
Speaker 1: Why is it that I Why is it that I
Speaker 1: knew the Commington kids weren't the bad guys? How How
Speaker 1: did I know that? You know? Why is it that
Speaker 1: I knew the West Point guys here weren't doing white
Speaker 1: power symbol? How did I know that? You know, Jesse
Speaker 1: Smollette was lying? How do I know that Trump wasn't
Speaker 1: actually a Russian student huge and a traitor to his country?
Speaker 1: And the Russia collusion was the mainstream media gets this
Speaker 1: stuff wrong over and over and over again. I'm just
Speaker 1: a guy sitting here at Producer Mark doing our thing.
Speaker 1: How often do I have to come out? Have I
Speaker 1: ever had to come on this show and say, wow,
Speaker 1: I missed this one by a mile? I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: like a little political prediction here that who's gonna win
Speaker 1: a race. But I'm talking about where judgment is involved,
Speaker 1: because nobody really knows who's gonna win a given you know,
Speaker 1: senate race or who knows. But I'm talking about on
Speaker 1: these issues where you can look at it and you
Speaker 1: should understand right away which narrative is overwhelmingly likely to
Speaker 1: be right and which is overwhelmingly likely to be wrong.
Speaker 1: And the Libs get it wrong over and they've got
Speaker 1: thousands of reporters and all these people they're just trying
Speaker 1: to they say, they're just trying to present the facts
Speaker 1: all the time, but they can help the essential fact
Speaker 1: that they have certain narratives like a tape that keeps
Speaker 1: playing in their head, and they look for affirmation. They
Speaker 1: look at it's confirmation bias in reporting, really, but they
Speaker 1: look for affirmation of these narratives and whatever they put
Speaker 1: forward day in and day out. That's what they want.
Speaker 1: I look at these things like a person that tries
Speaker 1: to weigh facts, probabilities, history, motivation, all these different things
Speaker 1: and come up with, Yeah, I don't think that there
Speaker 1: were a couple of guys, for example, on the South
Speaker 1: side of Chicago, carrying a noose around, spraying whatever it was,
Speaker 1: like lighter fluid on somebody and yelling you know this
Speaker 1: is or it was bleached, not lighter, yelling this is
Speaker 1: maga country at three o'clock in the morning, and just
Speaker 1: happened to like lightly bruise Jesse Smollett's face. By the way,
Speaker 1: they're thinking about bringing Jesse Smollett back on the show Empire.
Speaker 1: Give you a sense of the consequences that guy faces
Speaker 1: for that national sham. But how did I just I
Speaker 1: didn't believe that. I didn't believe it sure enough, and
Speaker 1: know the Cummington kids, I didn't believe it. Yeah, Brett Kavanaugh,
Speaker 1: I didn't believe it. Why? Right, over and over and
Speaker 1: over again. Why? Well, because I approached this from the
Speaker 1: perspective the advantage that conservatives have is we try to
Speaker 1: see the world as it is, and we try to
Speaker 1: apply facts, logic, and reason to our judgment, and we
Speaker 1: also embrace the humility of the fact that we are
Speaker 1: inherently as individuals flawed. Our judgment can be flawed. We
Speaker 1: have biases. We try to counter those biases. Liberals believe
Speaker 1: and this is a major psychological separation. This is going
Speaker 1: to be true as we continue to do the show.
Speaker 1: Liberals belief in the infallibility of their belief system. They think,
Speaker 1: and it's really a political system in place of a
Speaker 1: religious belief for many of them. But they think that
Speaker 1: what they have been told is righteous and good and true,
Speaker 1: is unassailable, that it is true without any proof, without
Speaker 1: any understanding of the foundations of why it is true.
Speaker 1: And they have these narratives about social justice and about
Speaker 1: economic justice and about the need to to counter whether
Speaker 1: you know colonialism or a history of racism or there
Speaker 1: you know the uh, the centrality of abortion to women's freedom,
Speaker 1: and they're there are the storylines, these nerves that they've
Speaker 1: been told that they cannot deviate from, because it really
Speaker 1: does feel like it has taken much more as a
Speaker 1: religious belief. The the word made true through leftism. You
Speaker 1: know that that is that is what they view, or
Speaker 1: that that is how they approach their politics. I approach
Speaker 1: everything every day with could I be wrong? Might I
Speaker 1: Might I have missed this one? Is there something? And
Speaker 1: I'm sure many of you feel exactly the same way.
Speaker 1: Is there a Is there this gaping wealth inequality problem
Speaker 1: that is the result of donations from high dollar donors?
Speaker 1: And is the chamber of commerce really just the chamber
Speaker 1: of a chamber of you know, chronyism within our capitalist system?
Speaker 1: And you know, I try to retest these assumptions and
Speaker 1: look at them, and I always leave open the possibility
Speaker 1: that maybe I am wrong. I mean, I even said
Speaker 1: maybe with Jesse Kelley my Man talking about that we
Speaker 1: got a stake riding on this one. But is Pelosi
Speaker 1: You're going to hold onto those impeachment articles forever? I
Speaker 1: don't think so. But I could be wrong, and so
Speaker 1: I leave open that possibility. Liberals have, unfortunately, and this
Speaker 1: has been the course of their belief system, I think,
Speaker 1: really all along. But now we just we see it
Speaker 1: more clearly in certain ways than we did in the
Speaker 1: past because they've been able to gain power, enough power
Speaker 1: to implement some of these things. Liberals believe in an absolutism,
Speaker 1: there can be no moderation deviation. There can be no
Speaker 1: finding a middle ground. It has to be their way
Speaker 1: or else something or else injustice, travesty has resulted from it.
Speaker 1: You see this with the way they approach LBGTQ issues,
Speaker 1: For example, with jk Rowling. Jk Rowling is now in
Speaker 1: trouble because she says that men are not women. There
Speaker 1: are people who will yell at you. There are people
Speaker 1: who will challenge you on the statement that men are
Speaker 1: not women. They have been brainwashed. This is as clear
Speaker 1: a test of brainwashing as you could find for anything.
Speaker 1: If I tell you that two plus two equals four
Speaker 1: and you yell at me because you have been told
Speaker 1: that is not true, you've been brainwashed. There's not really
Speaker 1: an argument to be had here. This is just a
Speaker 1: question of facts in reality. But they don't see it
Speaker 1: as such. You know, this is where you get the
Speaker 1: Menstrual Equality Act. We're going to have now tampons and
Speaker 1: sanitary and actins put in men's bathrooms. I mean, all
Speaker 1: these are And when you start to ask questions about this,
Speaker 1: they react with rage. They react with rage because they
Speaker 1: haven't been told the philosophical underpinnings of why this is true.
Speaker 1: They've just been told this is what the good smart
Speaker 1: people believe, the good liberals believe, and they're very emotionally
Speaker 1: intertwined with these beliefs about themselves, about the people around them.
Speaker 1: And they haven't had to because they usually live in,
Speaker 1: you know, a political monoculture. They live in a place
Speaker 1: that's an echo chamber for their beliefs. They've gone to
Speaker 1: schools that do that, they watch media that does that,
Speaker 1: they read papers, if read papers that do that. They've
Speaker 1: never had to wrestle with or challenge their own assumptions.
Speaker 1: And that's how you get to this place. And that's
Speaker 1: also why the news media is so pathetic when it
Speaker 1: comes to falling for hoax after hoax after hoax, because
Speaker 1: they always they sit there and they say, here's what
Speaker 1: I believe to be true. America is a racist society.
Speaker 1: America is a classist society. You know, the white patriarchy
Speaker 1: is the root of most social evils in America. And
Speaker 1: so every news story that they see, for example, they
Speaker 1: pull and they put into that framework. That framework is
Speaker 1: unfortunately false, and so that's why they just keep getting
Speaker 1: these things wrong because they see it through the lens
Speaker 1: of somebody who believes that the biggest problem. No, we
Speaker 1: do face you know. We face problems of addiction, face
Speaker 1: problems of people turning away from God, we face the
Speaker 1: breakdown of the family, We face major problems of society.
Speaker 1: The white patriarchy is not the root of all the
Speaker 1: social ills that we should be concerned about, but the
Speaker 1: left takes that as an oracle of faith, and so
Speaker 1: the moment that you try to get away from that,
Speaker 1: they cannot compute. It's like you've tried to override the
Speaker 1: whole system, and the screen freezes and they freak out.
Speaker 1: The West Point kids were not engaged in white power signaling.
Speaker 1: They were engaged in the circle game. They were just
Speaker 1: having some fun, and the news media leapt to smear them,
Speaker 1: to slander them, to perhaps ruin their lives. Fortunately, in
Speaker 1: this instance, the truth came out soon enough and early
Speaker 1: enough that everything seems like it will be okay. But
Speaker 1: they have. The media has learned nothing since Covington. They've
Speaker 1: learned nothing since the Duke Lacrosse rape hoax. They've learned
Speaker 1: nothing since the UVA fraternity rape hooks. They've learned nothing
Speaker 1: since the Cavanaugh gang rapist hoax. They've learned nothing from
Speaker 1: any of this. And in fact, all they try to
Speaker 1: do is learn more effective and dishonest tactics of the
Speaker 1: propagandists so that they can get around facts that are
Speaker 1: inconvenient to the narrative more effectively next time. And this
Speaker 1: is why, unfortunately, we have only one choice, and that
Speaker 1: is to defeat them on the battlefield of ideas. Convert
Speaker 1: them if we can. But if we can't convert them,
Speaker 1: we have to defeat their ideas because their ideas are
Speaker 1: destructive and wrong. There's a Christmas message for you. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Since gender community has been marginalized in every
Speaker 1: way possible, and one thing that the President of the
Speaker 1: United States can do is lift up attention, lift up
Speaker 1: their voices, lift up their lives. Here's a promise I make.
Speaker 1: I will go to the Rose Garden once every year
Speaker 1: to read the names of transgender women of people of
Speaker 1: color who have been killed in the past year. I
Speaker 1: will make sure that we read their names so that
Speaker 1: as a nation we are forced to address the particular
Speaker 1: vulnerability on homelessness. I will change the rules now that
Speaker 1: put people in prison based on their birth sex identification
Speaker 1: rather than their current identification. I will do everything I
Speaker 1: can to make sure that we are in America that
Speaker 1: leaves no one behind. Here's what she's I was really
Speaker 1: trying to follow this. This was from the debate last night.
Speaker 1: I just it felt like a good follow on what
Speaker 1: we're just talking about about the framework that liberals put
Speaker 1: everything into this country and the way they approach it.
Speaker 1: And you know, Elizabeth Warren is a doctrine air leftist.
Speaker 1: I mean she she you know, the doctrine is strong
Speaker 1: with her on the left. You could say she knows
Speaker 1: the lingo, she knows the approach, she knows the arguments,
Speaker 1: and I do think that she's a true believer. Keep
Speaker 1: in mind that liberals. One of the benefits of being
Speaker 1: a leftist is that you get to embrace hypocrisy as
Speaker 1: part of the package. You can be a hypocrite as
Speaker 1: long as you are advocating for certain things that left
Speaker 1: just want, and you get a pass, which is why
Speaker 1: hypocrisy is really the Achilles heel of so much left
Speaker 1: isn't because they espouse ideas that they themselves would not
Speaker 1: adhere to. They want policies that they don't want to
Speaker 1: be subject to. But she says he here's a promise
Speaker 1: I will make. I will go to the Rose Garden
Speaker 1: once every year to read the names of transgender women
Speaker 1: of people of color who have been killed in the
Speaker 1: past year. What is that? What is that supposed to accomplish?
Speaker 1: That read the names of people of color who have
Speaker 1: been killed in the past year. Is it only And
Speaker 1: I asked this, I don't know only transgender people of
Speaker 1: color or just people of color in general who have
Speaker 1: been killed and killed under what circumstances she going to
Speaker 1: go read the names of everyone who is an innocent
Speaker 1: who is killed. Is it going to be just people
Speaker 1: that are killed in an exchange with law enforce I'd
Speaker 1: want to know what the what the specifics are here,
Speaker 1: because I also would want to know what does she
Speaker 1: hope to accomplish by doing this. One thing that you
Speaker 1: will constantly hear from the left is that there is
Speaker 1: a particularly high rate of people of color who are
Speaker 1: transgender in addition to their ethnicity, who are are killed,
Speaker 1: and this just shows that there's a national emergency around this.
Speaker 1: Then you look at the numbers, and by the way,
Speaker 1: Andy No got in trouble for this for just sharing
Speaker 1: that it's actually a very small number of the overall
Speaker 1: population that when you look at it on a per
Speaker 1: capita basis, just step back from this for a second.
Speaker 1: There is no surge or there is no greater threat
Speaker 1: of people who are people of color, who are transgender
Speaker 1: being killed, and there are on the general American population.
Speaker 1: So you ask, well, what are we I mean, Yes,
Speaker 1: it's terrible when any human being is murdered, it's a
Speaker 1: it's a horrible crime and always has been. But what's
Speaker 1: with the focus on this. Well, because when you add
Speaker 1: people of color and transend people who are transgender, you
Speaker 1: have two protected groups to victimize and marginalize groups and
Speaker 1: leftist leftist parlance, and to add those two things together,
Speaker 1: you have a great You have effectively the perfect case
Speaker 1: of a kind of political martyrdom, right because if someone's
Speaker 1: transgender and their person of color, you add those two
Speaker 1: things together. The intersectional belief here is that there really
Speaker 1: is a hierarchy. It's almost like you get victim points
Speaker 1: for different places where you are on the scale. So
Speaker 1: if you're transgender and a person of color and something
Speaker 1: bad happens to you, that is a much more compelling
Speaker 1: case for action, regardless of the circumstances of what happened
Speaker 1: to the person, then if it just happened to a
Speaker 1: person who wasn't transgender and a person of color. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: when you look at the statistics on this, it does
Speaker 1: not bear out at all that there is some surge
Speaker 1: in attacking or hurting those people killing people who fall
Speaker 1: into that category. But it's still a talking point you'll
Speaker 1: hear on the left, and it's largely because people like
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren who live in fancy neighborhoods are worth millions
Speaker 1: of dollars and don't spend any time with people who
Speaker 1: are of color, transgender, and particularly in some cases are
Speaker 1: some of these murder cases that get raised. There are
Speaker 1: people who are working in the sex trade who are
Speaker 1: people of color, who are transgender, and they also happen
Speaker 1: to be prostitutes who have suffered violence. Elizabeth Warren pretends
Speaker 1: to have a great affinity for and connection to these individuals.
Speaker 1: This is classic Left is virtue signaling. And as she's
Speaker 1: going to go and just read off the names, she says,
Speaker 1: to what end and for what purpose to raise awareness
Speaker 1: about a spike in hate crimes against these individuals. That's
Speaker 1: not a spike, and then in some cases is not
Speaker 1: even necessarily a hate crime. It's just a crime. But
Speaker 1: this is who you're dealing with, Elizabeth Warren. It's just
Speaker 1: she is, in many ways the distillation of left wing
Speaker 1: orthodoxy put forward for the American people to see without
Speaker 1: all of the distractions. Say of Bernie Sanders peculiarities, That's
Speaker 1: one way I think we could describe it. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to
Speaker 1: spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: It is indeed time for roll call. But I just
Speaker 1: want to say one thing I left out of the
Speaker 1: rest of the show. There was this interview with Bar
Speaker 1: where he talked about Attorney General Bar is kind of
Speaker 1: a late I guess as a mulligan for the show. Here,
Speaker 1: Attorney General Bar talked about the scope of the investigation
Speaker 1: that Durham, the attorney, the attorney for the State of
Speaker 1: the US, attorney to the State of Connecticut, is engaged in,
Speaker 1: and it is wider in scope than just FISA. It
Speaker 1: is wider in scope than just the FBI. And they're
Speaker 1: going to be looking at John Brennon. Here's a I
Speaker 1: like to make fun predictions, or not fun predictions. I
Speaker 1: like to make predictions. You're we're going to find out
Speaker 1: that John Brennan was His fingerprints were all over this
Speaker 1: Russia collusion hoax. John Brennan, Obama point to a close
Speaker 1: friend of Obama's, worked with Obama in the White House
Speaker 1: and was Obama's go to person on counter terrorism. They're
Speaker 1: gonna you're gonna find out that John Brennan. This is
Speaker 1: my prediction. I can't prove this quite yet, but Brennan
Speaker 1: was deeply involved in the Russia collusion hoax from the
Speaker 1: earliest stages and worked with foreign governments to try to
Speaker 1: get this thing going. That's what you're going to find out.
Speaker 1: So remember how how many times I had to come
Speaker 1: on the show and say I'm wrong, sorry I missed
Speaker 1: it to hear my friends. John Brennan. That's going to
Speaker 1: be a name that's going to get a lot more.
Speaker 1: It's been kind of focused on Coomy for a while here,
Speaker 1: because Comy was the implementary of the hoax at the FBI,
Speaker 1: but the originator of the hoax. I think you're going
Speaker 1: to see and you're going to see through them. The
Speaker 1: Derm Investigation. When it's over, it is John Brennan and
Speaker 1: Clapper with kind of an assist, but Clapper was too
Speaker 1: dumb to come up with the stuff in the first place.
Speaker 1: Early on. All right, all right, roll call, I know,
Speaker 1: I know, I just want to throw that and producer Mark,
Speaker 1: Let's let's mark this one down because I want to know,
Speaker 1: you know, let's let's have this ready so when the
Speaker 1: DRM thing comes out, we'll be like, here we were,
Speaker 1: last show of the year, and this is what I said.
Speaker 1: I want this pretty because this is a prediction. I
Speaker 1: feel for at least this one's easy to remember. Usually
Speaker 1: you say that and I'm like, there's like fifteen of
Speaker 1: these in every show, right, I know, so, but this
Speaker 1: one I'll remember. There we go. So let's just have
Speaker 1: this one so we know when the DRM report comes out.
Speaker 1: Last show of twenty nineteen, I said, this is what
Speaker 1: you're going to see out three months. Okay, they say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm sure we'll both remember that. Whatever. Somebody listening the
Speaker 1: team room, Sure, the team, that's what the team is.
Speaker 1: Fourteen team have always ReBs. They're like, actually Buck the
Speaker 1: North remembers this Game of Thrones reference man, Game of Thrones.
Speaker 1: What a what a sad finale, that whole thing. It
Speaker 1: was really just I knew I never got into it.
Speaker 1: We never never got into the throne. I think I'm
Speaker 1: the only American that didn't. I feel like I should
Speaker 1: change my Twitter name to Bucks Sexy for a few days,
Speaker 1: just in honor of you. Can't, you know, lose your verification?
Speaker 1: Oh really, if you change your hand, if you just
Speaker 1: change your name, you're fine. Oh yeah, yeah, exactly. No,
Speaker 1: I can't. I can't lose the blue check. I'd be scary.
Speaker 1: I don't know what I would do with myself. All right,
Speaker 1: last roll call of twenty nineteen. But before I get
Speaker 1: to it, one more, one more proviso, one more preface.
Speaker 1: Those of you who listen to the show on radio.
Speaker 1: You will miss Bucks. Spur Bucks should learn to speak English.
Speaker 1: You will miss bucks special birthday message on December twenty eighth.
Speaker 1: And it's a real thing. I really recorded, even Producer
Speaker 1: market that I recorded a little special mini show. Birthday
Speaker 1: is the twentyeight, but it will be coming out of
Speaker 1: the twenty seven. Thank You'll come out the twenty seventh
Speaker 1: of December, we have a little special show that all
Speaker 1: of you are going to want to hear. But you
Speaker 1: have to subscribe on the iHeart app or the podcast
Speaker 1: or iTunes Apple podcasts. I keep saying iTunes, Apple podcasts.
Speaker 1: That's what the cool kids say. You have to subscribe
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show. So that's that's the way,
Speaker 1: my friends, that's how you got to You gotta get
Speaker 1: it done. So those of you, and if you've never
Speaker 1: listened to podcasts before, I am hoping that this Christmas season,
Speaker 1: what do I want for my birthday and for Christmas?
Speaker 1: From the team new podcast subscribers. That's all I want
Speaker 1: tell people about it. Pass the Buck check. It's so easy.
Speaker 1: You'll be on your smartphone. You can listen anytime you want.
Speaker 1: Listen to the car, Listen while you're folding laundry, Listen
Speaker 1: while you're doing whatever you gotta do, putting some presents
Speaker 1: under the tree, all that good stuff. All right, Um,
Speaker 1: we have Cindy right, Buck, don't listen to the person
Speaker 1: who said, stop your impressions. You're so funny and yours
Speaker 1: are far better than other beloved conservative talk show hosts
Speaker 1: who will go unnamed. You somehow capture the person's personality
Speaker 1: and character. Go Buck, Well, thank you, Cindy, and I
Speaker 1: will I will agree with you. My impersonations compared to
Speaker 1: like the top if you if you look the top
Speaker 1: ten conservative radio hosts out there, very few of them
Speaker 1: can go toe to toe with me on the impersonations.
Speaker 1: There's like one or two who might even be in
Speaker 1: the conversation. A lot of them are pretty great people.
Speaker 1: I love them, pretty weak on the impersonation. Well, Buck,
Speaker 1: I do know a couple of conservative hosts that do
Speaker 1: great Muppet impersonations. Really yeah, Oh, I think I think
Speaker 1: producer I think Producer Marcus being sassy. So let's see,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna leave that one. We have erin who right, Buck.
Speaker 1: I grew up in a small town in Orange County,
Speaker 1: New York. I had family and friends who worked in
Speaker 1: the city. My father's best friend was the electoral union
Speaker 1: in the eighties, and he was just saying to my
Speaker 1: mother that Trump would come and talk to the workers
Speaker 1: all the time. He often found himself in the elevator
Speaker 1: with Trump. He said, Trump was really nice. He always
Speaker 1: asked how he was doing and showed a genuine interest
Speaker 1: like that to all the workers. The thing that leftist
Speaker 1: don't get is that Trump isn't an elitist. He's not
Speaker 1: a phony. I believe Trump truly cares about this country.
Speaker 1: He didn't need to do this. I am merely didn't
Speaker 1: get around that in the first time around, but I
Speaker 1: do now, and I cannot wait to vote for him
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty. I can't wait to chant four more years,
Speaker 1: four more years. PS. Producer Mark sounds just like my
Speaker 1: father's friend. I love his sarcastic sense of humor. It
Speaker 1: reminds me of home. Make sure you keep him around.
Speaker 1: Happy Hanaka Mark, Merry Christmas, Buck, and happy Birthday. That's
Speaker 1: a really nice note. If yeah, thank you sir or ma'am.
Speaker 1: I didn't get the name Aaron with an e R,
Speaker 1: so it's a lady, ladies, thank you eron. Yeah exactly, Yeah,
Speaker 1: because Aaron can go either way, but it's usually spelling
Speaker 1: based R I N is ladies, usually a R O N. Dude,
Speaker 1: it's Aaron or Aaron. You don't say it the same, really, yeah,
Speaker 1: I say Aaron Aaron or Aaron aber. I don't know
Speaker 1: it's the A or the E. Sound like that. I'm
Speaker 1: not pretentious, but that that is that is true. I
Speaker 1: don't know anyone named Aaron though, like with the a alright, alright, cool,
Speaker 1: fair enough, um buck, I'd really be at this from
Speaker 1: David it' light be interested to her thoughts on this. Uh,
Speaker 1: from the Conservative Treehouse. Thanks for the work you put
Speaker 1: out there. I don't know what the Conservative Treehouse is,
Speaker 1: so I'll have to take a look at this. I
Speaker 1: do not know John, right. Part of me feels grateful
Speaker 1: to Obama. I think without him the left wouldn't have
Speaker 1: been exposed. And I don't think we would have ever
Speaker 1: been able to elect Trump without having first elected Obama.
Speaker 1: What are your thoughts on this? Was Obama worth it
Speaker 1: to Trump? Hashtag team Mark? Dude? People are just throwing
Speaker 1: in hashtag team Mark sometimes now in a little solidarity
Speaker 1: with our with our producer over here. See, I'll say
Speaker 1: to everyone that's team Brandon. You're out numbered. There was
Speaker 1: an election I'd be Trump when if this were sharks
Speaker 1: and jets, we got to see Oh. Nick writes the
Speaker 1: Conservative Treehouse was the kids show on the Blaze. Producer, Nick,
Speaker 1: I didn't and that's right. No, that's no, it isn't Nick,
Speaker 1: that's Liberty Treehouse. Don't bring just because we work together
Speaker 1: at the Blaze. Don't bring your your weak sauce Blaze
Speaker 1: knowledge up in here, you know. I remember that's the
Speaker 1: Liberty Treehouse, not conservative Treehouse. Got a call out producer Happy, Happy,
Speaker 1: Merry Christmas to even producer Mick. Producer Nick by the way, um,
Speaker 1: let's see Mike rites. Hey Buck, it's Mike from New Zealand. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I was a little meaning about producer Mark in my
Speaker 1: previous message Shields high ps. I love the Hans Grouper
Speaker 1: imitation you did a few months ago, the oh god,
Speaker 1: you're one of them, seeing where he pretended to be
Speaker 1: a hostage caught by John mccannon gets a cigarette from him. Hilarious,
Speaker 1: you are one of them. You're one of them. I
Speaker 1: remember that. Yeah, that was good, those good times. It's
Speaker 1: like I can tell they're European by their clothing and
Speaker 1: their cigarettes. And see if Mike from New Zealand likes you,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, so he's just being a little salty. See
Speaker 1: now you've even got some people that are that are
Speaker 1: apologized that a welcome anyone to Team Producer. There we go.
Speaker 1: The door is always open for Team Producer Mark. I'm
Speaker 1: not as grumpy as everyone thinks that's very friendly. That's right,
Speaker 1: he is. He is friendly. Um let's see here next,
Speaker 1: uh do do? Robert shame on Obama he did not
Speaker 1: send any javelins when Russia was invading and stealing CRIMEA
Speaker 1: good thing. Donald forty five walked in the door on
Speaker 1: day one with total flexibility standing against China. Leave Hong
Speaker 1: Kong free from Robert Robert shields high. Good message. Good
Speaker 1: to talk to you, my man. I appreciate it, um,
Speaker 1: Greg writes, Hey buck. I was listening tonight and was
Speaker 1: reminded that producer Brandon likes ketch up with grilled cheese.
Speaker 1: I do as well. I'm fifty five and discovered it
Speaker 1: at around twelve or thirteen. Have them able to eat
Speaker 1: a grilled cheese without it? Go? Producer Brandon fairly new
Speaker 1: listener about two months. Love the show? Thank you, Greg?
Speaker 1: Where are we having gotten you? The way? And I
Speaker 1: love ketch up on grilled cheese? Oh wow? Can you
Speaker 1: eat one without it? Oh my gosh? I mean I
Speaker 1: would use your tomato soup that I can that I
Speaker 1: can roll with. I like bottle soup with grilled cheese.
Speaker 1: But ketchup? Are you barbarians. What's wrong with that? I
Speaker 1: don't know, man, that's like not that's just not done.
Speaker 1: All right. Say you have a hamburger, Yeah, you put
Speaker 1: ketch up on that, right, Yeah, it's like a cheeseburger
Speaker 1: without the burn meat in there. So you're allowed to
Speaker 1: put ketchup on meat, but not on cheese. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'll even go as far as say, if you were
Speaker 1: having a a grilled cheese with like grilled chicken in
Speaker 1: the middle or you know some at that point, it's
Speaker 1: basically a panini, which is a fancy name for grilled cheese.
Speaker 1: Is grilled cheese, bacon, and tomato. Interesting you put it?
Speaker 1: Would you put ketchup on that one? Really? Yeah? I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you. I become a Mayo guy in my
Speaker 1: old day. I love mayo. I look for excuses to
Speaker 1: put mayo on things. Two things I that will make
Speaker 1: me vomit even at the smell mayonnaise and peanut butter.
Speaker 1: That's the weird. I don't even know where. I don't
Speaker 1: know why, how that's possible. That's crazy to me, man.
Speaker 1: I love peanut butter. I actually prefer almond butter because
Speaker 1: I'm bougie, like that. But yeah, of course that doesn't
Speaker 1: surprise you. I've told you about the cookie butter. I'll
Speaker 1: even have a little cashew butter sometimes. Yeah, I know, seriously,
Speaker 1: I look at cashew butter though when I'm wearing my
Speaker 1: top hat and my monocle. So anyway, David, first, thank
Speaker 1: you for your service to our country. I've been watching
Speaker 1: your show on Pluto for about a well, thank you
Speaker 1: so much David for watching. Appreciate that Pluto TV channel
Speaker 1: two forty eight. The first. Secondly, ensuring that Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: did not take her husband's our second husband's name, it
Speaker 1: would reveal her nature Warren Man. She is promoting the
Speaker 1: war on men um. Also, I don't know if any
Speaker 1: journalists or media talk about how on fairly sided many
Speaker 1: of the Democrat wiki pages are compared to Republican Thanks again,
Speaker 1: David from Philadelphia got blessed. Well, maybe the team can
Speaker 1: restore my Wikipedia page because the Lib activists keep tearing
Speaker 1: it down. Someone decided that they were going to keep
Speaker 1: deleting my Wikipedia page. So team, if you want to
Speaker 1: build one for me, that'd be great, and that takingly
Speaker 1: my job. No, And I think that people just can
Speaker 1: anyone can do it. Yeah, but we had fans create
Speaker 1: a Wikipedia page and then the libs tore it down.
Speaker 1: They said that it was, you know, not it didn't
Speaker 1: counter something. There was some lack of sourcing. I'm like,
Speaker 1: famous enough. I mean, it's like there's but there's people
Speaker 1: on there that you've never heard of, anyone's ever heard of.
Speaker 1: You just use the sources the bucksexon dot com and
Speaker 1: then it should work. Yeah, I mean there's the buck
Speaker 1: sex and show Wikipedia, but should just be Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: damn it all right, But I don't got Maddy for
Speaker 1: thing damn as a curse. I don't think that counts
Speaker 1: as a curse. I think we gotta like had the radio. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it definitely not cursesn't like I can't say it, but
Speaker 1: like I don't even think it's impolite to say, no,
Speaker 1: g D, I won't say, but but just damn, I
Speaker 1: think you're allowed to say. Yeah, I mean, what do
Speaker 1: you I mean, didn't wouldn't Jesus be like, you know,
Speaker 1: people would damn v unto hell? It's obviously they talked.
Speaker 1: They spoke a lot different. Yeah. Yeah, well I was aramaic.
Speaker 1: I mean there's or actually yeah, it was Aramaic, right,
Speaker 1: you know the Aramaic. It was probably Hebrew actually right,
Speaker 1: because he was Jewish, a little bit of both. All right, cool,
Speaker 1: good talk. Um, let's see here Eric right. First of all,
Speaker 1: you look like a program manager in w KRP Cincinnati
Speaker 1: without the blonde hair. Second, you can still play CDs
Speaker 1: in any DVD blue right player or PC laptop with
Speaker 1: a drive shield sigh? Is that true? You can play
Speaker 1: an old school CD in a yeah, DVD plays just
Speaker 1: finding a laptop a DVD player? Yeah, but finding I
Speaker 1: think talking about like a laptop, I don't I done.
Speaker 1: Finding a laptop with a CD drive is impossible, you
Speaker 1: know what. Also, I've learned that this has happened to
Speaker 1: me a a few times at recent holiday parties, when people
Speaker 1: come up to you and they I always appreciate, as
Speaker 1: I said, when people come from me and they want
Speaker 1: to talk about my work. But sometimes people come up
Speaker 1: if they ever say I just have a question for you,
Speaker 1: They don't have a question. They want to give me
Speaker 1: a speech, yes, for somewhere in the five to ten
Speaker 1: minute range at a crowded event, And I always want
Speaker 1: to tell them, Look, if you want to ask a question,
Speaker 1: that's great. If you want to have a quick chat,
Speaker 1: that's great. But if you want to say I have
Speaker 1: a question, and then I get to hear your version
Speaker 1: of Castro's speech about the latest sugar harvest, which lasted
Speaker 1: about four to six hours depending on the day. I
Speaker 1: do have things I have to get to sometimes. Was
Speaker 1: this at our company holiday? Poe? No, No, of course
Speaker 1: are people though, I'm talking about some social ones that
Speaker 1: I've been to, or people say, but whenever they start
Speaker 1: with I want I just have it. If someone come
Speaker 1: up they just want to talk, that's always fun. It's
Speaker 1: when they say I just have a question for you
Speaker 1: that turns into like, so when I look at what
Speaker 1: Newt Gingrich did back in nineteen ninety eight, and I've
Speaker 1: blah blah blah blah blaha, it has never actually acquim
Speaker 1: That must be the worst part about being a public
Speaker 1: political figure for you right now, I mean, I'm down
Speaker 1: to talk to you. Anybody like to talk to people.
Speaker 1: But the random people who just want to drone on
Speaker 1: and on and onto you and waste your time, it
Speaker 1: can be a bit of a challenge. And social settings,
Speaker 1: it can be a challenge because I'm like, I'm there
Speaker 1: to say hi to everybody and talk to people. I'm
Speaker 1: not talking about a radio event or something that's different.
Speaker 1: I mean when I'm at like a normal cocktail party
Speaker 1: where I'm just a visitor trying to get us tequila on,
Speaker 1: where you're not radio host. Bucks. That correct exactly anyway,
Speaker 1: it is what it is, oh man. The last segment
Speaker 1: of the last show of the second decade of the
Speaker 1: twenty first century of the Buck Sexton Show. Wayne Rights, heyback.
Speaker 1: I'm a regular podcast listener, never miss an episode. I
Speaker 1: have a new name for the Drive by Media. Do
Speaker 1: you remember the tasks? It was the press agency of
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union totalitarian activists supporting status and we could
Speaker 1: call it an apt acronym to bunch them all together. Indeed, sir,
Speaker 1: that's clever, and thank you for listening on the podcast.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it very very much. Leo who was the
Speaker 1: author on tonight about the long history of progressivism. His
Speaker 1: first name was Michael. Very interesting discussion, Michael Malice. We'll
Speaker 1: have Michael back. In fact, I think I'm doing his
Speaker 1: show sometime soon, so that'll be a fun things. He's
Speaker 1: a feisty little fellow, but we do enjoy we do
Speaker 1: enjoy chatting with each other. Karen R. Buck heard you
Speaker 1: talking about Chick fil A and how you only get
Speaker 1: the chicken nuggets. I too have Celiac and was thrilled
Speaker 1: to learn that in Massachusetts they have gluten free buns
Speaker 1: from a real bakery at Chick fil A. Wow. I
Speaker 1: want to try it out. The bum is pretty good.
Speaker 1: I wasn't too impressed with the chicken. However, my best
Speaker 1: experience was that UNO's Pizzaia. The gluten free pizza is
Speaker 1: so good. I had to ask four times it was
Speaker 1: actually gluten free. Well, anybody from the Celiac community, I
Speaker 1: for ever in New York City. The best gluten free
Speaker 1: pizza in New York City is Keste k Eeste Pizza.
Speaker 1: It's amazing. It is like you will eat the entire pie.
Speaker 1: Don't think about the fact that you've eaten fifteen hundred
Speaker 1: calories or something. It's legitimate question. Is Collie Flower Across
Speaker 1: gluten free? Yes it is, indeed. I've had some very one.
Speaker 1: Yeah there's a very good one. Oh no, yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 1: but that's a very that's a very good option for folks.
Speaker 1: Callie Flower Across is delicious and it definitely gets it done.
Speaker 1: Speaking to get it done. The show is done. You
Speaker 1: do have, though, a special birthday message coming out December
Speaker 1: twenty seventh, for my birthday on the twenty eighth. If
Speaker 1: you want to hear it, you have to subscribe on
Speaker 1: the iHeart app or Apple podcast to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: And my request to all of you is, for my
Speaker 1: birthday present and for my Christmas present, get one person
Speaker 1: to start listening to this show who hasn't before. With that,
Speaker 1: it's been a wonderful year. Everybody, have a great Christmas,
Speaker 1: a great New Year. Happy Hanka, Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for being a part of what we do every day.
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty is going to be our best year ever.
Speaker 1: I can assure you of that. Until then, Shield Tie