WEBVTT - Draft Show: Draft for Need or BPA?

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the Dallascowboys dot Com Draft Show, your war room

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for insider news and craft analysis from deep within the

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>confines of Cowboys headquarters at the.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Star and Frisco.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Forty two days away from the NFL Draft. It is

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be here before we know at Zach will

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Chuck alongside Nick Harris here on the Draft Show. It's

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 3>just the two of us.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, we got everybody else out. We boxed them

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>all out.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 4>Finally, now we can talk about Jalen Wright for sixty

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 4>straight minutes.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Let's excited, do it?

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Wright and Bucky Irving. That is what we're going

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 3>to do for the next hour. Here of the Draft Show,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Brian Brought is taking the day to go fishing with

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>his son Bennett. I hope he enjoys that love that.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully Ayisha starts to feel better soon, of course. Kyle busy,

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 3>busy man. Busy busy man. That Kyle yeomens. But they'll

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>be rejoining us, I'm sure on Tuesday. But we had

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>some big news going down yesterday. I know you have

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>an article up on Dallas Cowboy Cowboys making a signing

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Eric Kendricks, a linebacker. Big question now is that going

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to change things from the draft. But what stands out

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>to you about the Cowboys signing Eric Kendricks, who certainly

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 3>has a good connection and familiarity with Mike Zimmer Cowboys

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 3>new defensive coordinator.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one hundred percent, just kind of walking you through

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 4>the day yesterday we were yesterday morning, we all woke

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 4>up thinking Eric Hendricks would be a San Francisco forty

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>nine or that was who he had agreed to join

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>whenever the legal tampering period was going on earlier in

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 4>the week. And then you know, as the day went on,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.839
<v Speaker 4>Mike Zimmer made a call and Eric Kendricks made a call,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>and sure enough the two were able to agree on

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 4>a deal before last night. And when I walked out

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 4>of the building yesterday, there wasn't any buzz about anything.

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>That's why I left the building.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 4>And when I was on my way home on the road,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>Eric Kendricks news drops. So these things come together fast,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 4>and this was definitely one that I think helps the

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Cowboys in the long run. For sure, we know that

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 4>they needed a presence there in the second level, and

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>not only a presence, but they needed a big, reliable

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 4>tackler and a guy that can stop the run.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Eric Hendricks is on the back half of his career.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I think I think.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Everybody can agree on that his best football is behind him,

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 4>but that doesn't mean that he cannot be productive for

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 4>this defense. And they just need somebody to fill those

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 4>gaps and stop the run. That's all they need a

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>linebacker to do there in the second level. I think

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Eric Kendricks gives them that they didn't have it last year.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 4>I think if you throw a presence like Eric hendrickson

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 4>for the playoff game against Screen Bay, I'm not saying

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 4>it's a different result, but they're having to change some

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 4>things with that running game. Aeron Jones probably doesn't have

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>as productive of a day as he'd had. Eric Hendricks

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 4>comes to the Cowboys eight straight seasons with one hundred

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 4>plus tackles. In that same stretch, the Cowboys have only

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 4>had nine one hundred plus tacklers.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's an amazing STATA think it what?

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, a lot of those are safeties too, which

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>is why half of those are safeties.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>But struggled with injuries, you know, you've had a lot

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of mistime at that position.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think for Eric Hendricks, we're talking about on

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 4>field presence. We're talking about the run stopping, we talk

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 4>about filling the gaps. I'm talking about leadership aspect as well,

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 4>not only having the rapport with Mike Zimmer that he'll

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>be able to kind of bring in and be that

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>symmetry with the defense, to be able to, you know,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 4>kind of a force of smooth transition with those guys.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>He can quarterback that defense. He knows what that defense is.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 4>He played in it for eight seasons under Mike or

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 4>seven seasons under Mike Zimmer in Minnesota. He was drafted

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 4>by Mike Zimmer. Those two have a really good relationship,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think he's going to be an extension of

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 4>what Mike Zimmer can bring to this defense in twenty

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty four.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably the most.

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Important piece that he brings, is that leadership aspect and

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 4>making all eleven guys around him better. He's going to

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 4>be a great locker room guy. The media is going

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 4>to love him. He's a great interview too. I'm excited

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 4>to see what Eric Hendrick brings to this building against

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 4>His best football is behind him, but I think he

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 4>can bring a lot to this team next year.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you mentioned the IQ, the ability to readiagnose react certainly.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe is he a step slower than he was in

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 3>his twenty nineteen All Pro season? Yeah, absolutely, you could

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>look at that. But I think for me, the big

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 3>thing that jumps out is, you know Zim's introductory pressure,

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 3>what did he talk about? He wants to get everybody

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 3>speaking the same language. Eric Kendricks is going to help

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>be a player on the field that outside of the

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>coaching staff, he can get everybody on the same page

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>speaking that same language. Maybe he wears the green dot

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>defensively as well. So now the big question will be,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and I know you mentioned you've gotten that a lot.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 3>I've seen that too, does this end up changing the

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys plans in the NFL draft with linebacker? You got

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 3>de Moone Clark, You've got Eric Kendricks, you got Micah

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you want to play him more off ball?

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 3>You certainly still have Demarvin overshown, but expecting most likely

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Layton Vanderesh not to be a part of this thing.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And then Mark e Spell does he shift back to safety?

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>I think absolutely linebacker is still in play in the draft.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, it is talking about the linebacker room really quick.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned to Marvin Overshown coming back from that ACL injury.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 4>The expectation is that he'll be back in time for

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 4>training camp, so he'll be able to step into that

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 4>second level and not only bring youth, but I think

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 4>he brings a little bit of a creative experience as

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 4>well from his days at Texas because he played in

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 4>the third level, he played in the second level, he

0:04:58.360 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 4>lined up off the edge as a pass rush. I mean,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 4>he has so much knowledge of the of the game

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>on the on the defensive side of the ball. He's

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>already clicking with Mike Zimmer. I think he's going to

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 4>bring an added element to the defense and I think

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 4>some people might forget about not Texas fans, though I

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 4>know they're not.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>And then Demon Clark being able to bring what he

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 4>brought last year bringing that back Layton vanderresh A decision

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 4>is not made yet with with his future. There's still

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of back and forth as far as medical

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 4>opinions and things of the sort going on there. We'll

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 4>see how his future plays out. But with or without

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Layton vander sh I think Eric Kendricks does bring that

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>that that middle linebacker presence that you do need and

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>its reliability. But talking about the draft specifically, they're going

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 4>to go get another linebacker. We look at the depth.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 4>When only one healthy linebacker is left on the fifty

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 4>three man roster at the end of the season, you

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 4>got to go get multiple.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not just going to be Eric Kendricks.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Only two thirty visits have been reported so far, and

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 4>it's Trevin Wallace linebacker out of Kentucky and Edrin Cooper

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 4>linebacker out of Texas A and M. So if both

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 4>of those guys that they're going to be in the building,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 4>they're they are going to be looking at them really hard.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 4>In the draft. They are going to go get another guy.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Does it become less of a priority maybe because you

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 4>look at the tackle position, you look at the center position,

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 4>running back. Those positions need to get addressed. So it

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 4>may not be a Day two position anymore. It could be,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 4>but it may not be anymore. It gives you a

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 4>little bit more flexibility there, but you still have to

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 4>go get another body in that room.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you absolutely do. And I think that's interesting with

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Eddrian Cooper. I think we're both on the same page,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think everybody here on the Draft show, there's

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 3>not a first round linebacker that we look at and say, Okay,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe, you know, if Peyton Wilson were healthy,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>we said that a bunch maybe if Peyton Wilson were healthy,

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 3>he'd be your guy. But I do think that this

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>looks like, okay, how the Cowboys board is falling. It's

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 3>probably offensive line in my opinion. In the first round.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Running back is still definitely a need that maybe you

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>prioritize ahead of linebacker now, but third round you could

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>look at it. Fourth round, I think there's going to

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>be some options. We've talked about it with Tommy Eikenberg

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>from Ohio State. Could be a name, Jalen Ford out

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 3>of Texas. Which range is he going to go? He

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 3>could be in that third fourth round range. Tyron Hopper

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Massoo linebacker, which we could talk a little bit about.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I know you mentioned that was a formal visit, yeah,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>for the Cowboys there at the Combine, and you know,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 3>he's a player. I don't know if we've really brought

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 3>him up and talked about him a ton. I was

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>watching him after you mentioned that he was a formal visit.

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a dude that's got coverage ability, He's got speed,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 3>he's got some instincts. There's a lot to like about

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>his game as well. And then we mentioned a lot

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>during you know, the Shrine Bowl and the Senior Bowl.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Darius Muissow of UCLA is another very instinctive player that

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 3>you could get there at day three. So there's a

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of options to where now you probably don't have

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>to press at the position, but there's players that you

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>still like that could come in and give you some

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 3>added depth and value.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Talking about Tyron Hopper, I compared him to Mike mcfatten

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 4>and of the New York Giants on my notes here.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Really long frame that I think is it really shows

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 4>up in open field tackling, and you need a guy

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 4>that can be reliable and tackling in that second level.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 4>He probably lacks the instincts that you want there in

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 4>the second level. He doesn't feel run lanes correctly every

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 4>single time. But I think having a presence like Eric

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Kendrick or DeMont Clark to Marvin Overshown, that's going to

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>help increase that and get that better for Hopper, that's

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 4>coaching and that can get better as time goes on.

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 4>I bank on those traits. I bank on that length

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 4>and athleticism. Yeah, I think Tyron Hopper would be a

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 4>great addition to this linebacker room. But there's going to

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>be options there on Day three. If they feel like

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 4>they need to wait until Day three to go get

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 4>that linebacker to add in that room, I mean there's

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 4>still gonna be some guys. I mean you mentioned Jalen Ford,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 4>a potential around three round four option. Trevin Wallace, as

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 4>we mentioned, is a top thirty visits. That's a Day

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 4>three guy. John Trey Hunter out of Georgia State, that's

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 4>a guy I've really enjoyed watching. And Nathaniel Watson out

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 4>of Mississippi State was a first team l secer last

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 4>year for the Bulldogs and being able to be there

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 4>in that second level and be really productive. You want

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 4>to get a productive guy who played in a good

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>conference as Nathaniel Watson, and then Tyrese Knight, one of

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 4>the more athletic linebackers in the class out of futen

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 4>So and then one other formal meeting that they had

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of in that Day three range from Washington

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 4>edufuan Ulafohio.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I got thrushed in.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 4>I think I did. So we're just gonna roll with it.

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 4>But that's another guy that they're looking at there in

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 4>that day three range.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's an interesting name as well. I mean you

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 3>mentioned more on Hopper three seasons of Florida transfer there

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to Missou and he trusted it. When you talk about

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 3>athleticism scores at the Combine, he had the third best

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 3>overall athletic score bunk linebackers of the Combine long fast.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 3>I think I agree with what you see there when

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the instincts, there were times I felt

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 3>like he's a little hesitant because he doesn't trust his

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>eyes and what he's seeing. It's like he's got the

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 3>athletic ability to be there, he sees it. He just

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 3>takes a beat a little late to process at times,

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>and he gets a little lost when he's having to

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 3>play in zone. But really good athlete. I think I've

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 3>got a five on him, so you could definitely get

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>him day three. But there's options there. I don't think

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 3>that this changes things at all at linebacker. And again,

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>like in the second round, we'll go through some options here.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I went through and found three different mock draft scenarios.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 3>What would we like, I mean, if somebody's sitting there

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 3>in the second or third round, if it's a junior

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Colton from Michigan or you know, an and Edgrin Cooper

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 3>from Texas A and M. If he's the best player

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>on your board there at fifty six, I don't think

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys you're saying, oh no, Eric Kendricks is not Yeah,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to go ahead and pull the trigger

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 3>if they really like a guy like Edrian Cooper.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>From the day and M I agree.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 4>I think if Cooper's there at fifty six, that's almost

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 4>like a BPA type pick that you would have to

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 4>be able to make impair him in that room. Now,

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 4>it kind of depends on what you do in the

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 4>first round. We've talked about either tackle or center, and

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 4>as free agency plays out, we're starting to get a

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>clear picture of what exactly is going to be upfront

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 4>next season. I still feel like tackle is the more

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 4>bigger priority for me. You know, you have guys at

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>center that can compete with each other and step in

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 4>and get that starting opportunity. I don't feel like you

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 4>have that at left tackle right now. Will it be

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 4>perfect at center, absolutely not, and there's a good chance

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't work out, But I think it's a better

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 4>chance it works out then if you roll out, what's

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 4>there at left tackle? So for me, it's left tackle

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 4>in the first round. Absolutely got to be able to

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 4>have a guy that can plug and play.

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple of options.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I think they're going to have to be really open

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 4>mind as far as swift switching guys from right tackle

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 4>to left tackle. You look at Tyler Gueyton, you look

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>at Marius Mint and what they have brought to their

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 4>respective teams. Do you feel comfortable moving them to left tackle.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 4>That'd be a question that they would have to ask themselves.

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 4>We've talked about Jordan Morgan's short arms. Do it very

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 4>comfortable leaving him out there at left tackle with guys

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 4>that can get on his chest pretty easily?

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 3>A lot of teams. I wonder if the Cowboys look

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>at him as a guard and not a tackle.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's certainly a question, and we talked a

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 4>lot about it on Tuesday on the show. I think

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 4>whatever team does draft him, they're gonna have to be

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 4>okay with guys getting up on his chest, and they're

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 4>gonna have to be okay with his power. If he can,

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 4>if he can be able to mitigate that that deficiency.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 4>But I think with Jordan Morgan, he still does have

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 4>the athleticism if he wanted to play out of tackle.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 2>But for me, he's a guard.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 4>I would rather see him at guard there in that

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 4>phone booth type type range. But going back to priorities

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 4>as far as first round goes, I'd be okay with

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 4>the center if they drafted them, if they drafted one

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 4>in the first round, but get that tackle, especially in

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 4>this tackle class, make sure you get a good one

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 4>that can step in it left tackle. I think you

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 4>can figure out center either as the draft goes on

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 4>or as a preseason goes on.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>With the two guys you got, I'm with you. I

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 3>just feel forty two days away the closer we get

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 3>that pick at twenty four. Unless you just completely get wiped,

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be an offensive tackle. And the two

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 3>guys that I think I'm kind of looking at that

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>they're probably gonna take would be Geidon Tyler Guiden from Oklahoma.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But if Amarus Mims is there out of Georgia, yeah,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the pick. The problem is, I think

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a Marius Mims my Texas tested his way into the

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>top fifteen picks. I think there's a team that is

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 3>looking at Amarus Mims and saying this could be the

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 3>best tackle four years from now in a very rich

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>tackle draft, and they're gonna go ahead and say he's

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 3>too good to pass up. The one that's interesting to

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 3>me if you were to fall is JC Latham out

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 3>of Alabama. Because Latham, to me is a true right tackle.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Do they feel as though you could kick him over

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 3>to the left side. I just wonder if he's athletic enough.

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I love him, I absolutely do super consistent, beautiful kickout

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 3>lateral movement. I think you can play a little high

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 3>at times and depending on hand positioning, can get caught

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>on the outside. But he is nasty. Absolutely love his

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 3>play temperament that I think you can kick inside to

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 3>guard more so than I think he could play left tackle.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a big question with JAYC. Latham. I wonder if

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>he's him and Kingsley shuaim At tiad A Byu I

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 3>think are the two guys I'm looking at and saying, man,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I think they might have to stay on the right side.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a little difficult too, and I think this

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 4>is really where the scouts will be tested as far

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 4>as is there a guy that you see that has

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 4>played right tackle mostly during his college career that you

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 4>can feel comfortable playing on the left side. I mean,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned Kingsley, Sue Mattia, you got Tyler Giden, you

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 4>got let's see Amarus Mims, jayc Latham, I mean Talisi Fuaga,

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean all these guys primarily right tackle during their days.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you can look at Patrick Paul if you

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 4>feel comfortable moving on him in the second round.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I know we've talked about him. There isn't as much

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>comfort there.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Morgan primarily left tackle, but we talked about the

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 4>short arms a little bit. Graham Barton primarily left tackle

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 4>at Duke, but he's an interior guy. We've talked about

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>him as a center option and feeling comfortable with him

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 4>being a center option. So there's going to be a

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 4>lot that's going to be falling on these scouts as

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 4>far as looking at these tackles and seeing what they

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 4>seeing what they do at right tackle that can translate

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 4>to the left side and they can swing one.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Of the other positions that I wonder if for you,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 3>if you're thinking, Okay, we've talked about tackle, We've talked

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>about center. How much of a pressing need is running

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 3>back now becoming. With Tony Pollard gone to the Tennessee

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Titans in free agency, Cowboys still have not made a

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>move at running back right now. Technically, Rico Daubel is

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>still a free agent and out there and available. Is

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 3>running back depending on what happens between now and the

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 3>NFL Draft, becoming more of a pressing need to wear. Hey,

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 3>at fifty six in the second round, there's a trade

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Benson from Florida State. Maybe you love Jonathan Brooks and

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 3>they know more about the medical than any other team

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 3>in the National Football League since their team doctor did

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>that surgery. If they want him, they go ahead and say, hey,

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 3>running back now is becoming more of a priority on

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>our board.

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think so, regardless of what happens here

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 4>in free agency, you're going to have to go get

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 4>one in the draft, you would think. And as these

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 4>days go on and these big running back come off

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the board, and you know, we talked about Zach Moss

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 4>a little bit on the show these last few meet

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 4>He was that dude that that was my guy as

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 4>far as and his price went a little bit higher

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 4>than the Cowboys expected. They were involved in those conversations

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 4>up up until the very end, but eventually ended up

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 4>with the Cincinnati Bengals on a four million dollars a

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 4>year deal.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So now you're looking at guys like JK. Dobbins.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Are you comfortable with him coming off of all those injuries?

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Clyde Edwards, E Lair hasn't really been productive as a

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 4>first round pick out of Kansas City, but it's still

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 4>young at twenty four, Deonta Foreman, Ezekiel Elliott, Return, Alexander Madison.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, so there's still some young guys in the

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 4>free agent market, but regardless, you're gonna have to go

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 4>draft a guy that you can develop around whatever free

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 4>agent pickup that you do make, because you need a

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 4>young guy on a young contract for four years that

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 4>can come in and be ready to bring you explosion

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 4>out of that backfield.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 2>That's what Dak Prescott needs, us, what this offense needs.

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Good thing is and we've mentioned maybe not as good

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 3>of a running back class as last year, but there's

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>guys we like Jalen Wright. We joked about that out

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 3>at Tennessee. Love him in the third round. If he

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 3>were there, I would pull the trigger brayln Allen. Another

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>guy that they talked with ATA Wisconsin big back six '

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to two, Isaac Garndo out of Louisville. I think his

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>gain in steam throughout this process than otdteric estimate, of

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>course had a notre dame. I think he's also a

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>very very intriguing player, A guy that I have seen

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and I know after the combine has got a lot

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 3>of buzz is Tyrone and Tracy Junior from Purdue, and

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure how much we've really given him time

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>and talked about him on the draft show. That's a

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>guy converted wide receiver, just spent his first year at

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 3>running back, sixth year senior, spent his last two years

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>at Purdue. Started his career at Iowa. I believe his

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 3>first year was actually a community college and then he transferred.

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 3>But you see the obviously he's got the wide receiver

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 3>ability to run routes. He's shifting the open field. The

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 3>issue is pass protection. You know, in that scenario where

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 3>we were talking with Brian brought us in the g

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>back Nation yesterday, Brian was arguing for AJ Dillon as

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a free agent addition because of his pass protection ability.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Tracy junior or something. I don't think he can do it.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 3>He's just so raw. He just doesn't know what he's doing, yes,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 3>sliding and picking guys up, But my gosh, you can

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 3>see the traits, the upside, the burst, the natural ability

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in open field. With Tyrone Tracy Junior five eleven to

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 3>two h nine out of Purdue against Michigan. You know

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy that he tough s letting, but eventually

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 3>you know he's gonna pop a big run throughout the game.

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 3>So that's a name that I think teams are looking

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 3>at Day three. If they don't end up taking one

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of their guys, maybe he could be a steal later rounds.

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>The one running back I want to throw out there

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>that I'm not super high on that I know people

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 3>have been asking about is Jawar Jordan out of Louisville.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you feel about Jawar Jordan, but

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I did not love the tape on him. I mean,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy in the red zone certainly, I mean,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>he showed some ability there, and he's also a bigger

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.719
<v Speaker 3>back like Braylan Allen. But I just didn't see a

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>ton of upside compared to some of these other running

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>backs that we've talked about.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you.

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 4>I don't even think he's the best running back on

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 4>his team coming out of this gem Yeah process, here's

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 4>being firing up the highlights.

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's go Beam.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I put in my notes he's a downhill runner with

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 4>intriguing three down ability, although I don't trust it. And

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 4>it's because whenever you see him run out into open

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 4>field outside of the tackles, literally as he's running out

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 4>in the open field here, but whenever you get him

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>outside of the tackles, he doesn't have that consistent production

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 4>that you would see out of Isaac Grindo or one

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 4>of these other even one of these other big backs.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 4>And as I'm saying this, man, Beam's just firing out

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 4>every outside run that he can find in the film

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 4>back there.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>But I'm with you a little bit there. On Jawar Jordan.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 4>The one thing I might disagree with you with is

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I think he does have complimentary back potential. I think

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 4>he can come in and be able to be a

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 4>complimentary back in the system, just kind of depending on

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 4>whatever back that you getting free agency. If you're looking

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 4>at it from a Cowboys perspective, he might be an

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 4>intriguing guy to have in those red zone red zone

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 4>opportunities like you mentioned.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 3>And the receiving ability. You just saw a highlight there

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 3>if you're watching it, he does have that to be

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 3>able to help out. But to me, he's a guy

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 3>that you know, I just I think in an outside

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 3>zone scheme, those type of teams are gonna look at him,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>whether that's in San Francisco and Miami a Green Bay,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 3>they might look at him and be like, Okay, we

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 3>love him, but I don't see a super physical guy

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to get a ton of push and short yardage, lacks

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 3>some power, he's long. Apparently he's a really really good

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>character guy as well, which I think teams are gonna like.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>He's probably gonna crush the meetings. But he's got some

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 3>intriguing traits. But for me, there's just running backs in

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>this draft class that I like a little bit more

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 3>than Juwar Jordan running back into Louisville five ten, one

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 3>eighty five. Okay, let's do some Twitter on the twenty

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 3>coming up on the other side, and then I've got

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 3>three different three round Monck scenarios. We're gonna go through these,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 3>which stack do we like better? Twitter on the twenty

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 3>coming up. Next to the raft show rolls on.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm Dak Prescott, quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys, and they.

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Snapped the press guy who looks right, it's not there.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>He escapes left. He'll love for a first down.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 6>Just like football, when it comes to crypto, it's important

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 6>to have a team you can trust. With Blockchain dot Com,

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 6>I know I'm in good hands. Since twenty eleven, they've

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 6>been trusted by millions around the world to buy, sell,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 6>and trade cryptocurrency.

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Prescott's gonna run this himself. Run it up the middle,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and he scores.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 6>Whether you're new to crypto or an active trader, They've

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 6>got you covered. What are you waiting for? Get started

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 6>at blockchain dot Com.

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm Darren Woodson, former Dallas Cowboy player and Super Bowl champion.

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 5>When I played in the NFL at a high level,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 5>I relied on my vision to see the field. As

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 5>I started getting older, I noticed my vision wasn't as

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 5>good and I was getting frustrated from wearing my glasses

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 5>all day. I went to Lasercare Eye Center and doctor

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 5>G talked about all the options. Thanks to technology and

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 5>Lasercare Eye Center, I can see near far in between.

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Don't fumble your vision any long. Visit them at dfwis

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 5>dot com and tell them Darren Center, they got me

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 5>back on my game.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 7>In a stressful world, Lincoln provides balance and calm amidst

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 7>the chaos by creating sanctuaries that move you through the

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 7>world with ease. Our vehicles make your time richer and

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 7>more lifting with human centric design, intelligent technology, and powerful performance.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 7>As the official luxury vehicle of the Dallas Cowboys, driving

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 7>a Lincoln is just another way to show your team pride.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 7>Experience our full lineup of luxury vehicles, including the Corsair Aviator,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 7>Navigator and Natilists at Lincoln dot com.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 8>Hi, I'm Danny mccraig, Dallas Cowboys alumni player here with

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 8>Smoothie King and Smoothieking wants to ask you, what's that sound.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 8>That's the sound of us magically transforming our smoothe bowls

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 8>into two new decadent flavors. Dig into a cool Issae

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 8>or Pataya bowl handcrafted with crunchy purely Elizabeth Rinola fresh

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 8>strawberries and finished with the velvety chocolate hazel nut drizzle.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 8>Perfect for breakfast, lunch, or anytime you want a munch

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 8>and that's the sound of you making them disappear. Smoothie

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 8>bowls now in two new decadent flavors only as Smoothie King.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 8>The official Smoothie of the Dallas Cowboys is that Dallascowboys

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 8>dot Com Draft Show.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, it is time for one of the best

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 3>segments in the history of the Draft show. Zach Wilchuck

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 3>hanging out with Nick Harris with you on this Thursday,

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and we like to call that some Twitter on the

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty Twitter on. All right, Nick, you have taken on

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the responsibilities today for figuring out these draft questions. I

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 3>hope we got some good ones today. Fire them off.

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah we were.

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 4>We didn't quite have Kyle's you know, presence on Twitter

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 4>on the twenty this time around, but we still got some.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 4>We still got some good good questions here. This one

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 4>comes from Joe Demeyo. Give me your favorite pairing of

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 4>a veteran running back still available in free agency along

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 4>with a draft pick for the Cowboys. His example was

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 4>sign aj Dillon, draft Trey Benson. Take it wherever you

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 4>gentlemen wish. I'm gonna let you start with this one.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Zach Okay well, I do love Trey Benson. I think

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Trey Benson is the top running back in this year's draft.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I am not super big on AJ Dillon. I think

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>he is an injury prone back, but hey, that would

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 3>be a good implement because I think Trey Benson is

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 3>a three down back. For me, you look at his

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 3>ability not only in the passing game. I love his

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>running style. I think he's downhill. He certainly gives you

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 3>some speed burst. I think he's got long speed home

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>running ability, and I think he's actually solid in pass protection.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 3>But that's where A J. Dillon to me, excels. If

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 3>you're looking for a complimentary guy, I think AJ Dillon

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 3>can come in there and be a good pass pro.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 3>And then maybe you're looking at more of a speed player.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm in on that. I mean Trey Benson to me,

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 3>he's the top back if you're drafting him. Eventually, he

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 3>is going to be the workhorse back in your backfield.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 3>AJ Dillon is going to fall back into similar to

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 3>what he was behind Chris Jones there at Green Bay.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Eventually that's going to be Trey Benson's RB one job

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to lose.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and who was the free agent you're parenting with you,

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>said AJ Dillon.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, if I had to pair anybody with a free

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 3>I think Dante Foreman. I think Dante Foreman is the

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 3>one free agent pact that's out there right now that

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I would like to bring in. I think he's used

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 3>to that. He's filled those roles in Carolina, he did

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 3>it last year with Chicago. He's an unselfish player. I

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 3>think he's also a very well rounded back. So I'd

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 3>go Foreman paired with a Benson or a Jalen Wright

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 3>or a Ray Davis out of Kentucky and adri est

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Tom whichever running back that you want to get. But

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Benson's without question. If I had to take any running

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>back in this draft, he'd be my guy.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 4>I'll say this, this is probably the all injury duo

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 4>with JK. Dobbins and Jonathan Brooks, so that probably would

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 4>not work out. I think the ceiling would be incredibly

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 4>high with that duo, but that's not necessarily my pick.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I am going to stick with Jonathan Brooks for this

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 4>scenario though, and going to pair him up with AJ

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Dillon and look at being firing up Jonathan Brooks. I

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 4>love what Jonathan Brooks brings and I think coming off

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 4>of the injury, he will be just fine his recovery.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 4>We've been hearing things about it over and over again

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 4>about how he's gonna be ready for training camp. He's

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 4>going to be ready to step in whenever he's drafted

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 4>and pick up things very quickly.

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Out of Halllettsville, Texas.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 4>There in Central Texas was a really productive runner, a

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 4>top ten Texas high school football all time rusher, and

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 4>then went to Texas, had the one year as a

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>starter this past year and did really well and excelled.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 4>I think if he ended up finishishing the season, he

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 4>would have been a big part of what they did

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 4>in the playoff against Washington, maybe even helps push them

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 4>to a win. But if you pair him with AJ Dillon,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 4>then AJ Dillon he can come to the building, he

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 4>can bring you that veteran presence, and he kind of

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 4>serves as a buffer for Jonathan Brooks to get healthy,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 4>to get one hundred percent back on the field. And

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 4>I think by the time you're looking up week four,

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 4>week five, you have a really talented backfield with Jonathan

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Brooks probably taking on the majority of the carries, and

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 4>then you have a AJ Dillon that can take on

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 4>most of the brute force and it can kind of

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 4>take some take some stuff off of Jonathan Brooks's plate.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be a really fun pairing.

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what's interesting is in my notes I put

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 3>for Jonathan Brooks is DeMarco Murray a crazy comp for him?

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I see, I see where you're going with that.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 4>I see you re goal with that because he can

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 4>get out an open field as the pass protection ability boy. Yeah,

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 4>he's boom or bust. I understand where you're coming from there.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 4>This next one comes from Christian Conte. How likely is

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>it that a center and a tackle are picked in

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 4>the first three rounds? If that is the case, who

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 4>would your ideal duo be? How likely is it? I

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 4>mean I put it at like seventy percent? Man, I

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 4>think you have to get as of right now where

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 4>free agency stands, you have to get those two positions

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 4>early on in the draft. You've got to have guys

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 4>that can kind of come into those scenarios and be

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 4>able to at least compete for a starting job. Who

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 4>my ideal pairing would be, Gosh, it would be getting

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Amarus Mims throwing him out to left tackle, and then

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 4>you're kind of hoping Zach Frazier's there at fifty six.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 4>But if he's not, I'm okay with Cedric Van Prang

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Granger in.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.239
<v Speaker 3>The third man. That is tough. Yeah, I think I

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 3>agree with you. I think it's very, very high. In fact,

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 3>i'd go like eighty percent. I think that they're most

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 3>likely coming away either picks one to two, one three.

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 3>They're going offensive line. I think in the first round.

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>I think, if I had to choose, I don't love

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>this the way that it stretches with tackles as much

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 3>as some others do. I mentioned the Yale offensive tackle

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 3>I do like quite a bit if they had to

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>wait on that. I'm with you on Mims, just to

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 3>be different. If he fell, I don't think he did.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 3>My ideal solution would be Troy font Neu at a Washington,

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 3>the offensive tackle. He's absolutely fantastic. I don't know if

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>he'll fall. I've changed my opinion on him because I

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 3>thought the opposite of Jordan Morgan. I thought font new

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>is a guard and he has that build, But then

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 3>he ended up being much taller at the combine when

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 3>he went ahead and weighed in and he did his

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>height weight, So to me, I think he can play tackle.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 3>He's got the athletic building. That was never a conversation

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 3>for me. At center, I'm with Jon van Prant, the

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 3>other guy, if indeed they get wiped, would be Bowlimber

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 3>at Arkansas. I always come back to bow Limmer. I

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 3>love the way that he competes. Is he a little

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 3>bit smaller. Maybe people will watch what Devandre Sweat did

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to him there at the Senior ball. I don't know

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 3>if you've got to see that rep. But he comes

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 3>right back and he battles his rear off right afterwards.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 3>He's a dude. He's got great bass, strong anchor pad

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 3>leverage is something that is just natural for him. I

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 3>do love me some bow Limmer. If indeed you get

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 3>wiped and you're not able to get some of these

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 3>top centers, so that'd be a tandem that would excite me.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Is fought new and Limmer.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, this is an interesting scenario here from Anthony O'Donnell.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 4>He says, in this scenario, you're trading back in the

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 4>first and picking up a pick or two. Okay, if

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Sweat is still on the board around fifty or so,

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 4>do you trade up and grab him with those extra

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 4>two picks that you kind of have as a buffer

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 4>to be able to do that? Now if you don't

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 4>get extra picks. This is probably not a scenario, but

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 4>a Devandre Sweat is sitting there and you see a

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 4>defensive tackle with his size, with his ability that could

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 4>definitely help you on day one.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you do that in that scenario?

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 8>Oh?

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Man, I think that I need my picks. Yeah, so

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say no. I like T. Sweat, but to me,

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 3>he's not a player that I'm going to be aggressive

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 3>to move up and get. To be honest, the defensive

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 3>tackle that would get me a little bit more fired

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>up that I'm saying. Goodness, gracious, I can't deny how

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 3>delicious his tape is. Is Braydon Fisk from Florida State

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 3>that guy. I mean, he's got some of the most

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 3>eye popping, wowing tape that you will see in the

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>entire class. I love T. Sweat. He's got a really

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 3>really rare combination of size and speed. But his beamer's

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>doing an excellent job going back and forth. Brydon Fisk

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>is just a playmaker. I think you add an ability

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to come in wide, strong build inside the middle to

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 3>help against the run, but he's got way more upside

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 3>as a pass rusher. To me, he's violent, he's dominant,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 3>high character guy. Leader of that defense there at Florida

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>State that was absolutely exceptional. I love Braydon Fisk. I'd

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>consider moving up to go and get him. I don't

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 3>think I would for Defandre Sweat. But the big thing is,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I just think you need those picks and you could

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 3>address defensive tackle if you wanted to a little bit later.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 3>And they look like that's where they're going to go

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 3>because I know you did an excellent job hustle and

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out some names. They were talking to,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Mason Smith out of LSU being one of those guys,

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 3>McKinley Jackson in a Texas A and m to me,

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>those are early day three guys. I think that's where

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 3>they're going to address defensive tackle. Yeah.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Complete defensive tackle list that they interviewed at the combine

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 4>formally Christiankin's out of Michigan, Brandon Dorles out of Oregon,

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 4>to Andandre Sweat out of Texas, Rooque or Ro out

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 4>of Clemson, McKinley Jackson out of Texas A and m

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Mason Smith out of La Shoe and Michael Hall Junior

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 4>out of Ohio State, so they spend a lot of

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 4>time at that position in Indianapolis. This next one comes

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 4>from Anthony Gibbs. With the lack of free agent signings

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 4>and missing the fourth fifth round pick, Granty, you get

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 4>the fifth back in the comp but I see where

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 4>you're going. Would you consider trading back from both your

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 4>first and your second to gain extra picks? He says

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 4>he feels like it's a must this year. I don't

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 4>think it's a must. I think trading back in your

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 4>in the first round, yeah, it's a high possibility. I

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 4>think if you're looking there at pick twenty one and

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these tackles are flying off the board,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Jackson Powers, Johnson's off the board, and you see an

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to move back three or four spots to still

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 4>pick up a Graham Barton or still pick up a

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Morgan. I think that's a very very realistic option

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 4>as we look up on April twenty fifth. But doing

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 4>it in the second round, I don't necessarily feel that

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 4>because whenever you look at the second round value and

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 4>the guys that they can get at that pick at

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 4>fifty six every single time, whether it be a Zach

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Frazier or a Eddrian Cooper to Andre Sweat, it's like, gosh,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 4>I wish we were about six picks earlier. And I

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 4>don't feel like you're going to have that luxury whenever

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 4>you're sitting there at fifty six, because if you move

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 4>back three or four spots, you're probably going to miss

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 4>out on three or four guys you.

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Would have drafted.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think you can move back in the

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 3>second round. I agree with your first round. I get it.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 3>There is a scenario where you can move back. Maybe

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 3>you're still able to get a Tyler Guyton out of Oklahoma.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 3>You know another name in the second round that I

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 3>think would be in play if he's there and you're

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>not able to address center would be Christian Haines from Yukon. Yes,

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 3>love me some Christian Haynes. I know you've been high

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 3>on him as well. You know I do love Bebe

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 3>as well. But I think Christian Haynes athletically would be

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>able to kick over and play center better than Cooper

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Beebe would when you compare the two of them. So

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you can move back in the second round.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm okay with sliding back a couple of picks. I've

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 3>seen some mock trades that I do like with the Cowboys,

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 3>specifically flipping maybe it's Buffalo there at twenty eight because

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where maybe you can still get Graham

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Barton in play and sign me up for that. I

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 3>love me some Graham Barton. He's still the apple of

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 3>my eye among these offensive linemen. So yeah, I mean

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm in on sliding back on day one. I think

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>that's ultimately going to give you enough draft capital so

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to worry about that on day two.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Being firing up Christian Haynes here out of Ukon, we

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 4>talked about his versatility as a guard but also playing

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 4>at center, and he got some center reps at the

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Senior Bowl and shined in those in those reps. If

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 4>y'all recall the Senior Bowl rep where Jordan Jefferson and

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 4>him kind of got into it and Jordan Jefferson threw

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 4>his helmet around. That was Christian Haynes, but a really

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 4>high character.

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Dude as well. He'd be awesome off the field.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Our next question here comes from my guy Brandon Lourie,

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 4>He said, looking at a potential trade back scenario. As

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about trade back scenarios, you're on the clock.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 4>I picked number twenty four in your phone rings. It's

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 4>to Baltimore Ravens. They lost the starting guard and traded

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 4>their right tackle in free agency. Graham Barton and Amarius

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Men's are on the board, and you feel like they're

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>going to take them. But Baltimore offers you picks thirty,

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 4>so they have thirty in the first round and two fourths,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 4>which is one thirteen and one thirty five to trade back.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you do it?

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Risking both offensive linemen not being their six and if

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 4>you miss out it's an out of conference team. You

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 4>might not feel so bad losing those players, but potential

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 4>of losing Graham Barton and Amarius Mems picking up pick

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 4>thirty and two fourth round picks.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm not doing that one. It's Baltimore and you

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 3>know that just good foot players always follow them every

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 3>year we're doing this, we're looking well. Of course, of

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 3>course that ends up being a Baltimore Raven. No, if

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Mary's Mems is there at twenty four, I'm running the

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 3>card in I'm not hesitating. To me, He's probably the

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 3>best case scenario if you want one of these offensive tackles,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 3>just because you look at the talent. The upside, if

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys evaluate him and say, hey, that's our dude

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 3>in the first round, they know what they're doing. They

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 3>clearly hit on first round offensive linemen all the time.

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 3>And his tape I get it. You know, that's a

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>question I've been asking a lot the eight games. Does

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 3>that make you nervous? Know, it doesn't, because when you

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 3>look at the games that he played and you see

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the talent is there. Against Ohio State in that playoff matchup,

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 3>he was absolutely outstanding. There's times where he gets out

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 3>there in space and he's so darn big and athletic.

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I think he's just with the lack of awareness, in

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the lack of playing time where he's not sure who

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 3>do I need a blog? But I think with coaching

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the upside, Amarus Mims has everything that you could possibly

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 3>want in an offensive tackle skill set. I am not

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>passing on him. If he's there at twenty four.

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going to lean no on this scenario as well.

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 4>I'd probably maybe lean into it a little bit more

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 4>if it was a third and a fourth or a

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 4>second and a third.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>But what if either way?

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 3>Is it which player is that's making you say I

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>can't I can't get off of this? Is it Mems?

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:30.959
<v Speaker 2>It's Memes? Yeah? So it because I feel like Barton

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 2>could be there at thirty.

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I do too. I do too. If it's Mems

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 3>sub him out with Geiton, are you willing to make

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the trade? Duh, Yeah, Mims is gone. It's Geiton or Barton.

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 2>I still don't feel great about it. Gosh, that's tough.

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 2>That was tough because I go back.

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 3>I'll make the trade. Then I go back, and I'm

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 3>not sold on Guiden as much as as some others,

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and I like him, but I feel much better if

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I were able to get an extra pick slide back.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the risk on Mems because I think that

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the trades are rare with him. With Geyiton, I see

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 3>definitely a player that played a lot more transferd from

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 3>TCU to Oklahoma for those that don't know. But I'm

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 3>not as optimistic and confident in his ability. I certainly

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 3>would not be upset if he was to pick at

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. There's traits and things that I like about

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Guiden's game, but I'd feel much better about adding those

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 3>picks and moving back in that scenario, it's Memes that

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not wanting to get off of.

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Then I'll fall on the trust of my trusted mid

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 4>south A scout A Zach walchok Am, I right, and

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll trade back.

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's do it dating, Let's do that.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 4>Let's let's get on the phone, Baltimore. We're gonna go

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 4>ahead and make that trade. Rank Memes is off the board.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 3>We have any others? One more?

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we could throw it in one more. I'm going

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 4>to kind of alter this question a little bit. This

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 4>one comes from Mike Crimmins. He said, with the current

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 4>contract situation, is there any chance had a quarterback in

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 4>round one a round two?

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 2>However, Day three Caleb Williams false.

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Maybe maybe I've been seeing mock drafts that like see

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 4>jayde and Daniels slide. I don't know if it's like

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 4>a pff air or what, but he keeps showing up

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 4>there twenty four. He's not gonna be there at twenty four, guys,

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm so sorry. If he's there at ten, I will

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 4>do what Kyle did a few years back, whenever Ceede

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Lamb got drafted. I mean it's he's whatever he did. Yeah,

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 4>actually I would die. I'm not gonna do that. I'm

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 4>not shaking on that. Uh, kudos to Kyle. He's a

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 4>better man than me. But I do want to talk

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 4>about Day three quarterback options because I think there could.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Be an opportunity to do that.

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Looking at Michael Pratt out of Tulane, that is someone

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 4>that this the scouting department is taking a look at.

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 4>He's productive in his years there in Uptown, New Orleans.

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 4>He's productive, he's clean, he doesn't make any mistakes. He

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 4>you look at all of the weapons that have come

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 4>out of that offense, Ti J. Spears, Jakwan Jackson. He's

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 4>a game manager, impressive pocket presence. He's gonna be on

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 4>a fifty three man roster for whatever team drafts him.

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm a I'm a firm believer in that, and I

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 4>think he's a fourth fifth round option that I think

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 4>if he's sitting there and the Cowboys have addressed their needs,

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 4>they're looking at looking around at the quarterback room, won

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more of a competition there. Go get

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 4>a guy, a trusted guy like Michael Pratt, high floor

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 4>guy that I think will start some games in the NFL.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Agreed with you. I think if you they said on

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 3>any of these top guys, Pratt is the dude for me.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Another name, just just to throw out there that you

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 3>might want to keep an eye on. Carter Bradley, quarterback

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 3>from South Alabama. Just a small school player.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 2>I have a funny story about him. Go ahead.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I like his moxie. I like the way he plays

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the game. I mean, he's a dude that the velocity.

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 3>At times I'm like, Okay, how did that ball just

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 3>get there? But he's able to make all the throws.

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 3>He's got a little bit of mobility. I like the

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 3>way he navigates the pocket. Carter Bradley, if you're just

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 3>looking for a flyer, that would be a Day three pick.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 3>But there's no way Cowboys are taking somebody in the

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 3>first or second round at the quarterback position in my opinion,

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 3>unless there's just a rare scenario where somebody does have

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 3>an Aaron Rodgers like slide. I don't see that happening

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 3>in this year's draft.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 4>The at the Senior Bowl, which is at the University

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 4>of South Alabama, where Carter Bradley played. He I was

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 4>talking with one of my scout friends kind of as

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 4>we were walking in and we were watching the quarterbacks

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of warm up, and we're kind of like, Okay,

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 4>that's that's so, and so, that's so, and so that's

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 4>who's that?

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah is that?

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh he's got a South Alabama hat on? So this

0:37:58.560 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 4>is like to make a wish kid like, that's the

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 4>That's what we were talking about. And then once they

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 4>get going in practice and you see.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 3>This you can play six three.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 4>Minute and I kind of looked to it. I was like,

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 4>hey man, this is not this is not that at

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 4>all like this this kid can throw it. So yeah,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 4>I like Carter Bradley as well. I think he gets drafted.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm also surprised Sam Hartman with the hair. You know,

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 3>he's just not getting more ve Sam Hartboard far quad

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 3>what what a crazy scenario. He was mocked to go

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 3>in the first round a lot of the time when

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 3>you were looking preseason, and now he's looking like maybe

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 3>he's a six to seventh round pick. That's also a

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 3>name that maybe a team, it'd probably be a solid

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 3>backup throughout his entire career.

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 2>I said that he won't win you a game, but

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 2>he won't lose you on either.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Just a steady guy. You know what you're kind

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 3>of going to get from him? All Right, there's another

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 3>edition of Twitter on the twenty coming up next on

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the Draft Show. I'm excited about this. I went ahead,

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I did some work. I've got three different mock draft scenarios. Picket,

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 3>which one do you want out of these stacks of

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 3>three players? Will do that? Next year's The Draft Show

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 3>rolls on.

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 8>All right.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 9>Drew Pearston, former Dallas Cowboy and now Pro Football Hall

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 9>of Famery. If you're struggling with your vision and tired

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 9>of those contacts and glasses, don't throw ahell Mary, go

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 9>where I went. Lasercare Eye Center, the official laser partner

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 9>of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 8>Drew, thank you so much for trusting us with your

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 8>vision correction procedure. At Lasercare I Center, we offer six

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 8>different vision correction procedures to help patient see.

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 9>Check them out at dfwis dot com. Tell them Drew

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 9>sent you. Hood Hout.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 7>In a stressful world, Lincoln provides balance and calm amidst

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 7>the chaos by creating sanctuaries that move you through the

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 7>world with ease. Our vehicles make your time richer and

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 7>more uplifting with human centric design, intelligent technology, and powerful performance.

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 7>As the official luxury vehicle of the Dallas Cowboys, driving

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 7>a Lincoln is just another way to show your team pride.

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 7>Experience our full lineup of luxury vehicles, including the Corsair Aviator,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 7>Navigator and Natilists at Lincoln dot com.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm Dak Prescott, quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys, and they.

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Snapped the presscout of Look right, it's not there, pe

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 3>escape flap. He'll look for a punch down.

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Just like football. When it comes to crypto, it's important

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 6>to have a team you can trust. With blockchain dot com,

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 6>I know I'm in good hands. Since twenty eleven, they've

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 6>been trusted by millions around the world to buy, sell,

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 6>and trade cryptocurrency.

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Runs.

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Scott's gonna run this ship. Shelf run it up the middle,

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and he scores.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 6>Whether you're new to crypto or an active trader, They've

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 6>got you covered. What are you waiting for? Get started

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 6>at blockchain dot com.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 8>Hi, I'm Danny mccraig, Dallas Cowboys alumni player here with

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 8>Smoothie King and Smoothieking wants to ask you, what's that sound.

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:34.879
<v Speaker 8>That's the sound of us magically transforming our smoothe bowls

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 8>into two new decadent flavors. Dig into a cool Issae

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 8>or pataya bowl handcrafted with crunchy purely Elizabeth Rinola fresh

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 8>strawberries and finished with the velvety chocolate hazel nut drizzle,

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 8>perfect for breakfast, lunch, or anytime you want a munch.

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 8>And that's the sound of you making them disappear. Smoothie

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 8>bowls now in two new decadent flavors, only at Smoothie King.

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 8>The official Smoothie of the Dallas Cowboys is the Dallascowboys

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 8>dot Com Draft Show.

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's have some fun with this. We've got

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 3>three different three round mock draft scenarios. I've put this together.

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 3>I've even put some of the other options for each

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 3>pick that we're still on the board. But first let's

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 3>go through witch stack of three. Do you prefer here?

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Nick Harris mock Draft number one, twenty fourth pick, Cowboys

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 3>take Tyler Geiton, offensive tackle out of Oklahoma. They circle

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 3>back in the second round at fifty six, they take

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Junior Colson, linebacker out of Michigan and then in the

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 3>third round, pick eighty seven, Trey Benson, running back out

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of Florida. So they get Geiton Colson Benson. That is

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a pretty nice stack of three players right there.

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't love Guiden, as we mentioned, but I like

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 2>this pairing of players. Let's keep going here.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, number two scenario pick twenty four.

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Really quick? Do you think Benson's there in the third No,

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Benson makes to the third round. I

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 3>think that's wishful thing. You can't get that. Mock draft

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 3>pick twenty four, Brian Thomas, junior wide receiver out of LSU.

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys decide, Hey, maybe this is a scenario they're wiped

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 3>out on tackle. We're gonna go with the wide receiver,

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 3>the playmaker to stretch the field pick fifty six. Then

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 3>they go with Trey Benson, running back at a Florida state.

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Think that's more likely. And in the third round, pick

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven, they address linebacker Cedric Gray, linebacker at North Carolina,

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 3>which I know you like. You worry about his fit.

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you feel better about the fit now that they've

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 3>addressed with the Rick Hendricks, we got Thomas Benson Gray.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 4>That was a question that was in the twitter on

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 4>the twenty replies, I want to address that really quick.

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 4>I do feel a little bit better with that. Okay,

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you. I do feel a little bit. I

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 4>don't feel great still, but I feel a little bit

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 4>better with that.

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I kind of love the idea of him learning under Kendricks. Yeah,

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that excites me a lot. Mock Draft three Troy Fotten

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 3>New offensive tackle that old Washington at twenty four does

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 3>slide to the Cowboys. Okay, fifty six they address center

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Cedric van Pranz center out of Georgia, and then at

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 3>pick eighty seven Jonathan Brooks, running back in Texas. So

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 3>your three sets here, You've got Geyiton, Colson, Benson, Bryan

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Thomas junior, Trey Benson, Cedric Gray, and then the offensive

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.959
<v Speaker 3>tackle font New, the center Van Pran and the running

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 3>back Jonathan Brooks. All three fun scenarios. Then we can

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 3>go through in debate, would we have still taken these

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 3>players based on who else was available?

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay? With with scenario one here with Geyton Colson Benson,

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:30.439
<v Speaker 2>you're you're addressing some needs.

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 4>You don't necessarily get your center. With the second one,

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 4>with Thomas Junior, Benson Gray. You're not addressing a lot

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 4>of needs at all. The offensive line is still very

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 4>very much a big concern. You're gonna have to go

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 4>into Day two, Day three with just straight offensive line

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and hope you hit on one or two of those.

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 4>The third one you address both offensive line needs and

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 4>you get a running back. Oh man, this one's tough.

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna lean towards. I'm gonna lead towards this third one.

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Font New Van Pran Brooks, and I think if you

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 4>gave me a better tackle than Guidon in that first scenario,

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:06.240
<v Speaker 4>then I'll probably roll with that one. But I trust Fontineau.

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 4>I think he can come in and be a dog

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 4>at left tackle. I also think he can kind of

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 4>work with Tyler Smith to figure out who is the

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 4>best left tackle slash left guard.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Van Prant.

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I think with a year or two under his belt,

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 4>he's going to be a really good starting center in

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 4>this league. And then Jonathan Brooks, y'all know how I

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:21.439
<v Speaker 4>feel about him.

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 2>So you address some needs, you get some high impact

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:27.919
<v Speaker 2>guys as far as year one, I will say though

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 2>that that scenario too, I'm looking at it and I'm

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 2>looking my chops a little bit, but you have to

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 2>be okay with the fact that you probably don't make

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs next year if you draft those three gaps.

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because those three players are really really good. Yeah,

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you. I think that the best tackle,

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the best first round pick out of the bunch is

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Troy fott New the OFFENSEI tackle from Washington. I'm in

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 3>on Van Pran to me. I mean, he's a guy

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 3>that won back to back national championships and he anchored

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the center of that line. You've seen him go against

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 3>some big body defensive tackles during the as you see

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 3>holds his own. I think he's got some strength, maybe

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the athleticism, something you're not grading as high as Jackson

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:05.280
<v Speaker 3>power shots. Maybe even a Zach Frasier in this draft.

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 3>But I like Van Prayn. I think he would be

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 3>a solid option there at fifty six. I prefer him

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 3>in the third round at eighty seven. Make fifty six

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 3>might be a little high, I agree, but you might.

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're looking at a situation where, look,

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 3>all the centers are gone, I want to make sure

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 3>I get one that's a solid option. Then Jonathan Brooks

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 3>at eighty seven. I love. I think that's the sweet

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 3>spot for him, if I don't have to reach and

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 3>take him in the second because there's a run on

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.479
<v Speaker 3>running backs. If I can get Jonathan Brooks at eighty seven,

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 3>I feel really really good about it.

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you don't feel like he's the first one off

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 2>the board.

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be Benson.

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, but I think he's first three at least.

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think they're the first two. But I think

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a debate. I think some teams might have Jonathan

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Brooks as their number one running back. I think a

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 3>lot would if it weren't for the injury. I just wonder,

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and look, if he's going to be available for training

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 3>camp and the medicals clear out, teams aren't worried about it.

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 3>He very well could be the first one off the board.

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree.

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the running back run there in the second round,

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 4>wherever it begins, I think it's going to kick off

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 4>around forty to forty five. That's when you're going to

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 4>see where these running backs are valued as far as

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 4>the draft process and kind of how they play out.

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 4>But Brooks being there at eighty seven, Yeah, that would

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 4>be too good to pass up.

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Which one of those scenarios do you want to talk about?

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Who else was available? See if we agree with these picks.

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's go. Let's go with that first one, the first one. Okay,

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 2>what tackle was available there at twenty four?

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 3>So Geyton was the only tackle, but you did have

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Zach Frazier available the center from Western Michigan or West Virginia.

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me, Graham Barton was available from Duke and like

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 3>to lot to Hedge from UCLA.

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't It doesn't make me bite, but that's fascinating.

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Which I wondered wonderfully.

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Sue a Matilla available.

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Kingsley, Sue Matia was available. Would you go Sue Matia

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 3>over Geyton?

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 4>But I think that's an opportunity where you could potentially

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:46.720
<v Speaker 4>trade back, pick up a couple of spots.

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Jordan Morgan was he available?

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think that's an.

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Opportunity where you could trade back, pick a couple of picks,

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 4>and and kind of plug.

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 2>In Sue Matia as you as you feel necessary.

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 4>But I like Guiden, I do would take I don't

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 4>want to say that I'm out on Guiden. I just

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 4>think he's going to take a little bit of development.

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 4>He's going to really piss off some fans wherever he

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 4>goes and in his rookie year. But I think as

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 4>he develops and as he gets better, I think he's

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:12.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be an All pro And.

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 3>In what way is he going to be ticking fans on?

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's it's a lack of development.

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 4>It's a lack of experience there at the tackle position,

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 4>especially if you're moving him to the left side. You

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 4>just got to be able to account for those things.

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a little bit of all that he plays with.

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 4>The high pad level guys are going to get under him,

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 4>He's going to struggle against athletic pass rushers, and he's

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 4>just gonna have to be able to kind of account

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 4>for that.

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting. My highest graded player out of those is

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot too. So if I'm not window address on

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.879
<v Speaker 3>the board, Ryan Rodis would say, I'm taking light two

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot too. In that scenario, that doesn't make you

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 3>bite at all.

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 2>It does. You just don't need that in the first round, don't.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 2>But I mean don't. Yeah.

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's see we're doing VPA, and we're doing VPA.

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you take a lots too.

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I've also got Barton ahead of Guiden, so I think

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 3>it'd be between Bartner a lot too for me. And

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 3>that's what you know in that scenario.

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's say you take a lot to a lot two

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Colson Benson. You have no offensive line that you know there,

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 3>You're you're pretty screwed. Yeah, okay, so here here's how

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 3>this falls. All right. So let's let's say we took

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot too for fun, pick fifty six, they go

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 3>junior Colson. You'll also have Kean Coleman wide receiver Florida

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 3>State on the board.

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 2>At fifty six.

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 3>At fifty six, I know, shocking uh to Andre Sweat,

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Texas defensive tackle and Mike Sanders still the cornerback from

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Michigan hopefully I said his last name, right.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm taking uh oh Man. I think I'm still

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 2>taking Colson there. But Sweat is making the sweat is

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 2>making me go back and forth.

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Sw what's making Sweat.

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Is what's making me sweat a little bit. Yeah, yeah, Yeah,

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take Colson. I think he's more of the

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 2>sure thing.

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 3>If I'm going. Based on my board again, it's Coleman,

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 3>and I know we're an addressed all needs. It's you know,

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 3>if I'm if I'm not window drest and I'm going BPA.

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot too. It's Coleman that those would be

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:53.919
<v Speaker 3>my two picks for a Cowboys perspective, if I'm taking

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 3>all things considered, Yeah, I'd be interested in Sweat to

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 3>be honest, out of these three players, Sweat's my third. Yeah,

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 3>which stinks, But I think for me, I'm going I

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 3>gotta I gotta stay true, gotta stay true to the board.

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 3>Here we look up four years from now, how are

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 3>we feeling? This isn't about right now? I'm trying to

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 3>draft some all pros law too, Coleman number three at

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 3>when they take Benson, Patrick Paul tackle from Houston's available,

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Cedric van Prant center from George's available, Chris Abrams drain

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 3>cornerback from Missoo.

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you could talk me into anything other

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 2>than Benson here.

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Now, even if we don't have any linemen, we've

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 3>gone law to, We've gone you go tea Sweat.

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go.

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 4>You kind of already given into the fact you just

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 4>said you may as well just go ahead and take

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 4>your running back you be able to run through the

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 4>between the tackles, but he might in a couple of years.

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, Yeah, I think in this scenario, you're right,

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Benson's my top guy, and I don't. I'm looking at

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 3>this and I'm thinking, who the heck am I gonna

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 3>have to block? But I guess we're gonna rock with TJ.

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Bass and Brock. Yeah, and we're just gonna line up

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.720
<v Speaker 3>and say, let's party. But I do love the players

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:04.439
<v Speaker 3>that we've got here.

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 4>You touched on something a little bit, and I kind

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 4>of want to make it a deeper conversation. Let's do it,

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 4>because I think some fans are kind of looking at

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.840
<v Speaker 4>it a similar way. You look at how they've addressed

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 4>free agency, You look at the needs around the around

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 4>the building going into the draft that you would you

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 4>there's still a lot to play out in free agency

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 4>in the next couple of weeks. But let's say that

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 4>they enter the draft with what we know right now.

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 4>Do you plan for the future? Do you plan for

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 4>this year? I think you plan more for the future,

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:31.839
<v Speaker 4>and that's the case.

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 2>You look at a scenario too, with Brian Thomas Junior,

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 2>trade Benson and Cedric Gray. You just say, hey man,

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:36.879
<v Speaker 2>we're just not.

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:40.479
<v Speaker 4>Gonna block this year because what's what's what's the point there?

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:42.320
<v Speaker 4>You go pick up your offensive line next year, but

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.800
<v Speaker 4>you have really good weapons and Brian Thomas Junior and Trade.

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 2>Benson the bill for the future. I think it's a thought.

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying I'm I'm going in on that, but

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 4>fans have addressed that on Twitter with me a little bit,

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 4>and we've had some back and forth there. If you

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 4>don't feel comfortable about, you know, the potential of the

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Cowboys going into twenty twenty four, and you don't feel

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 4>like the needs can help get them to a super

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Bowl or wherever else they feel like they can reach,

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:06.760
<v Speaker 4>do you just start building for the future then. Granted,

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Jerry Jones did say that his definition of all in

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 4>is drafting for this year. That was part of his

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:15.720
<v Speaker 4>definition is drafting for this year, not drafting for the future,

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 4>not making.

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Moves for the future.

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 4>So the likeliness of this happening probably not high, but

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 4>I think I think it's something you think about.

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I am future. I think that's how you have

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 3>to address when you get caught into I am drafting

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 3>for need in this year, and I think when this

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 3>team has run into troubles where their drafts aren't as

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:35.279
<v Speaker 3>good as some others. Maybe last year you look at that,

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe they're saying, man, we got to get better against

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 3>the run. Mazzie Smith's our pick, Man, we really need

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 3>we lost Dalton Schultz, We've got to go out there.

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 3>We will need a better blocking tight end. Luke schoon

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Maker's our pick. Right when you're starting to draft for

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 3>need over trusting, good point, the evaluation and who we've

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 3>got on our stack here, that's where you start to

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 3>run into trouble. So, yeah, am I worried about how

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.080
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna line up? Maybe? But I know that that

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I've got football players that we've graded highly that I

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 3>think we're going to look up and have the potential

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to be Pro Bowl, maybe all pros if we hit

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 3>on them, and we're gonna feel really good because the

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 3>needs that I have right now are not the same

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 3>needs I'm gonna have next year. You're telling me you

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 3>couldn't use another receiver? Is edge not a sneaky need

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:15.799
<v Speaker 3>for this football team?

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 8>You know?

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 3>So you're still addressing your needs, You're just not maybe

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 3>addressing your biggest glaring red flag weaknesses right now. But

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 3>I think what the draft is all about, especially for

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 3>this team, when it's drafting, developing, and then re signing

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:32.320
<v Speaker 3>your own that is a premium. Here with the Dallas Cowboys,

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 3>we want to get to a second contract. You might

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 3>not get that if you're going to reach for a

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 3>player just because hey we really need a center. Oh,

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 3>we really need an offensive tackle. If I've got like

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 3>too lid to who I think is the best edge

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:47.399
<v Speaker 3>in this class fall to me at twenty four, I'm

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:48.239
<v Speaker 3>not passing them up.

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you make some good points, Sarah. I think that's

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 2>very valid to about law too. Specifically.

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 4>You look around the bill, You look around the room,

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Dorrin's armstrong, Dante Fowler out with the out going to Washington,

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 4>DeMarcus Lawrence is on the back end of his career.

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, you would like to have a guy that

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 4>could be that primary edge rusher opposite of Michael Parsons

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 4>as time goes on.

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I wouldn't be upset with Lats.

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I think what I what I struggle with going any

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 4>anywhere other than tackle in the first round is the

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 4>fact that this tackle class is so deep, and I

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 4>just I feel like you can get a guy there

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 4>at twenty four, then in years past you would have

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 4>to get it nineteen or eighteen.

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 2>And I just feel like the value is really there,

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 2>neat or not.

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it's and it just happens to be in

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 4>need it works out for the team, But I think

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 4>need or not going to get a tackle, especially if

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 4>a good one like a Marius Mims, JC Latham. I'll

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 4>throw in Tyler Guy and Jordan Morgan, Troy Fontnu. If

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 4>one of those guys is there, take them, take.

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 3>Them, and ultimately I think that's where it's going to be.

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.439
<v Speaker 3>And I lean taking an offensive lineman there at twenty

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 3>four more than anything, but man, it just depends. It

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 3>depends your slides there. The one I want to do

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 3>with you real quick for we boggie out of here,

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 3>that pick eighty seven in the second Mox scenario where

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 3>they go Cedric Ray. The other three options Braylan Trice,

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay Edge, Ada Washington, Johnny Wilson Florida State receiver, and

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Blake korm running back from Michigan. Now obviously that would

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 3>be Hey, you don't take Trey Benson in fifty six

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:13.840
<v Speaker 3>in that scenario and you take Cooper Bebee at an I, Mitchell,

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Johnny Newton, the defensive tackle from Illinois was sitting there.

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 3>You go with one of those other options, and then

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 3>you'd consider Blake Korm. But out of that stack of four,

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 3>let's say you don't have a running back yet, so

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Korum's more in play. You didn't take Benson there in

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the second round. Out of those four guys, Gray, Trice, Wilson, Korum,

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 3>who would you take?

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:33.320
<v Speaker 2>This is factoring in that Benson was not taken in

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:33.879
<v Speaker 2>the second round.

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's say you went Cooper bebe out a case.

0:54:36.600 --> 0:54:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, running through the four names again.

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Cedric Gray linebacker, North Carolina, Brayln Trice, Edge Washington, Johnny

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Wilson wide receiver Florida State, and Blake Korm running back Michigan.

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm between Gray and Koram here. I think I go

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Gray because I feel more comfortable about the running back

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 4>depth on day three than I do a linebacker depth. Gosh,

0:54:57.880 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 4>although I do feel like there's some good options there

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 4>on day three as well. I'm okay with either pick.

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 4>I really am. I think Grey gives you more longevity

0:55:05.880 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 4>than Korm. We've talked about Korm. I love Korm, I do.

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I think there are concerns about how much, how many

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 4>hits he can take, can't he get to a second contract?

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 4>And if you're looking for a guy to get to

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 4>a second contract, I think Cedric Gray is probably your

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 4>better option.

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:19.439
<v Speaker 2>So in that case, i'd probably take Gray.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 4>But if you're looking for a guy then come in

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:23.680
<v Speaker 4>and immediately produce year one, then you take Korm. I

0:55:23.719 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 4>think it's just kind of the The answer to that

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 4>question kind of answers what it is for.

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 3>The war room, right, I agree, I'm gonna go Cedric Gray.

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I've got him graded higher. Honestly, Brailan Trice

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 3>would be in the conversation for me. I do like,

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 3>right there, you don't love him. I know a lot

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 3>of people that feel the same way as you do.

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:40.839
<v Speaker 3>I think in the third round of eighty seven, that's

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 3>good value. He doesn't have a lot of bend, but

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:47.359
<v Speaker 3>Braylan Trice, I mean the motor that I like him

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.360
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more. I see more upside and potential

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the pass rushing there than some others.

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately I think i'd still go to Cedric Gray.

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:55.879
<v Speaker 3>So I agree with you there there's been fun man,

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:56.799
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for hanging out with.

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we gotta do this every show. We got to

0:55:58.280 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 2>every out, Get out of boy.

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the crew will be back on Tuesday.

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much to Chris Beam as always, of

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 3>course U, Nick Harris, myself, Zach Walchuck, keep partying, keep

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:11.399
<v Speaker 3>mock drafting, hit us up on the socials. Appreciate you helping.

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 3>That's a wrap for this edition of The Draft Show.

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:17.400
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallascowboys dot Com and

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.