WEBVTT - Arm Surges and Disney Reaches One-Year High

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heider Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York, and

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Chip design firm ARM surgers in the most since it's

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 2>IPO after a bullish outlook on sales, will sit down

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>with the CEO Renee has to discuss.

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Plus the mousehouse spikes as cost cutting benefits and international

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 4>theme park strength boost the company's results.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Full coverage ahead.

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And Amma's limited release of its vision pro fetching as

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>much as five thousand dollars in the resale market.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>This is the story ARM a massive surge in the stock.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>It's to say this is the biggest jump since they

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 4>listed in September, but we are up fifty eight percent

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 4>and it is the outlook for the current period going

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 4>way beyond estimates.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Evidence that this is.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.199
<v Speaker 4>No longer a name offering the building blocks or blueprints

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 4>for semiconductors, with royalties and licensing on the underlying code

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 4>that allows a chip to communicate with the software that

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 4>it runs.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 3>It's not a smartphone story.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 4>There's evidence that the diversification that Rene has has been

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 4>pushing for is now there. We are seeing evidence there

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>are questions around the AI story for sure. Then look

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 4>at parents soft Bank SOFTWAK owns ninety percent of the company, right,

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>but they are saying overnight in their own earnings, we

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 4>are putting ARM front and center, Caroline, in of our

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 4>AI strategy.

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 3>What does that look like? This is a wild.

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Market reaction, but it's vindication for a story this company

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 4>has been trying to tell.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely extraordinary market reaction and on the back of that,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>we want to welcome our Bloomberg TV and radio audiences.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>ARM shares more than fifty percent higher. The bullish outlook

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>is something we can now discuss. For the CEO, Renee

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 2>has joining us, and Renee you must feel vindication.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 5>You are trying to tell this story at the IPO

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 5>and boom your deliver.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, thank you, Carolyn. Yes, we're really happy with the

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 6>results that we posted. Additionally, very very good feelings about

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 6>the forecast going forward. But as you said, this is

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 6>really the results of strategy that were put in place

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 6>a number of years ago that are now just really starting.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 7>To come to fruition.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when we think about the vindication, when we think

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 2>though still about basically more of your technology going into

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>more types of equipment. You managed to see a diversification

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 2>out of phones. Paint us the strategy of ARM going forwards,

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>because many would say, actually, you're not just well the

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>overall designer of chips, you're basically making the chips.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 5>You're fabulous in some way.

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Is how do you see that relationship going forward with Qualcom,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>for example, Well, a lot of folks.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, as you said, didn't really understand the company

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 6>well and where we fit. And obviously we had a

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 6>lot of growth attached to the smartphone market. But ARM

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 6>is in a lot of devices that people may not

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 6>naturally think about.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 7>We're in a Tesla vehicle, We're in a Ford f one.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 6>Fifty, We're in a Ring smart camera, We're in the

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 6>Samsung TV, a Samsung smart appliance. So just about every

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 6>device you can think of has ARM inside, and just

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 6>about every device you can think of needs more and

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 6>more compute, particularly as AI is now driving a whole

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 6>new demand cycle.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about AI. Jeffrey is really singling that

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>out the analyst. They're saying that this really shows your

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 2>beneficiary from AI.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 5>But where does the AI focus come You, of course

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 5>were in video before.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>They are all about AI accelerators and I'm interested as

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to whether or not that would be an area that

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>you get into other than servers.

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, right now, in video is a great partner their

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 6>Gracehopper chip, a super chip uses a lot of arm

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 6>CPUs in combination with their GPU, which is a really

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 6>really great solution for high end AI training in the

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 6>data center as well as inference. But when you start

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 6>moving to smaller devices, say smartphones or PCs, well AI

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 6>is going to run there too. If you look at

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 6>some of the recent announcements by by Samsung and Google

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 6>relative to their smartphones, there's a lot of things such

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 6>as circling and image on a browser and then having

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 6>that browser go off and do search based on the circle.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 6>That's AI that's actually running in a smartphone. And what

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing is really a drive for more and more

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 6>compute capacity to run these AI algorithms, some that people

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 6>don't even know what they are yet. But what designers

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 6>want to do and need to do is future proof

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 6>their designs.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 7>Was more and more.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.679
<v Speaker 6>Compute, and that is really driving a strong licensing cycle

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 6>force in terms of more demand.

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 4>Rene We've been at pains to kind of help the

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 4>audience explain how your business works. You know, the royalty side,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 4>I call it the building blocks of chip design, and

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 4>then the licensing side managing the interaction between the underlying

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 4>design of the chip and the software it's intended to

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 4>interact with. And what you said to the street is

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 4>smartphone isn't everything anymore. It's a third of our business,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 4>but somehow you're also boosting the royalties that are coming

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 4>in on that business. Just explain how that dynamic is working.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Smaller proportion of overall, but you're basically making more money

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 4>per deal.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 6>We've got two things kind of going on in the

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 6>smartphone market. One is we've moved to a higher version

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 6>of our process, or what we call Version nine, and

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 6>the royalties associated with version nine are roughly double than

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 6>that of version eight, and that's growing. Last quarter, about

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 6>ten percent of our royalties came from version eight. Now

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 6>it's Version nine is about fifteen percent and growing. So

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 6>that's happening. But secondarily, people are putting more V nine

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 6>in their smartphones.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 7>And they put V eight.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 6>What does that mean, Well, it means more processors to

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 6>handle these complex tasks to as AI. So what you

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 6>have is a compounding effect. Increased rates from the new version,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 6>but more and more compute because more and more computes

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 6>needed to run these complex devices.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 7>So it's having a real growth effect for.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 4>US, Renee, what happened in China was a surprise. How

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 4>long does that continue?

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 7>For?

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, China follows the rest of the world for

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 6>US said in the sense that where we're very strong

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 6>in the rest of the world visa V data centers

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 6>or evs, China follows that. And the reason is that

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 6>the software ecosystem, which is global that is really predominantly

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 6>ARM based. China partners want to leverage that and one

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 6>thing that China is very unique about is speed. They

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 6>want to go as fast as possible, develop products as

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 6>quickly as possible. Well, the software base allows them to

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 6>develop products very quickly to the market will the dot.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 6>So you know, there's been a lot written about China

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 6>headwinds than the market, et cetera. But for US, China

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 6>has been a great market.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 4>For a Bloomberg television and radio audience for speaking to

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 4>the ARM CEO Renee has overnight rene soft Bank, which

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 4>holds twenty percent of your company, said that they're going

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 4>to put you at the center of their AI strategy.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 3>How much say are you going to have in that?

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 4>If SoftBank is kind of dictating how they see your

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 4>role in the playout of AI infrastructure, well.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 6>I can speak from kind of two hats. One is

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 6>as the CEO of ARM and the other as a

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 6>soft failing board member. I'll speak to the former primarily here.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 6>We believe that AI is the most profound opportunity in

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 6>our lifetimes, and we are only at the beginning. When

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 6>you think about artificial general intelligence and what is required

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 6>to make that happen in terms of compute, power, efficiency, energy,

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 6>those are all great areas for.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 7>Us to be involved in focusing in.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 6>So I think AI is not in any way, shape

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 6>or form a heighth cycle.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 7>I think we're in incredibly early.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 6>Days, and I think it's going to have amazing impact

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 6>on our planet.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean extraordinary.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>We're still just looking at your share price now rocketing

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>up to about sixty percent on the day, up more

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 2>than seventy percent over the last five days. Are there

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>any areas of concern for you were just talking about

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 2>the macro picture, for example, being in China, that actually

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>has played to your strengths, even though the rest of

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the economy we slightly worry about. China still a bright spot.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 2>What about geopolitics, what about the international role that you

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>have as ARM.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a great question, you know.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 6>I think for CEOs, particularly now in the semi nutural world,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 6>the geopolitics, government relations, things of the nature. Five ten

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 6>years ago, that wasn't something that we had to worry

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 6>about a lot. Now it's obviously front and center in

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 6>terms of how we think about the world. I think

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 6>for ARM, I don't know that our issues are concerns

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 6>there any different than my peer group faces we all

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 6>share globally. We think the world is a better place

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 6>when it's an easier global ecosystem, but we're also mindful

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 6>that we are in very different times than we were

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 6>five ten years ago.

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Rene a question from our audience on social media for you,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 4>will you start doing business directly with the software ecosystem

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 4>in the context of AI edge computing.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what they want to know.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 6>We do a lot of business with the software ecosystem

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 6>in the sense of that they're incredibly strong partners to us.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 6>When you think about Android as a software ecosystem, when

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 6>you think about Windows, when you think about everything going

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 6>on with open source software, that is something we are

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 6>incredibly involved in, particularly from a technology side, because at

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, what makes arms so pervasive,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 6>it's a software ecosystem like no other. So software is

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 6>front and center of what we think about in terms

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 6>of all of our engineering engagements.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm CEO Rene has stock Storing. Great to have some

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>time with you, Thank you so.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Much, Thank you so much.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Coming up will break down Disney's earnings with Gerber Kawasaki

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 4>co owned president Ros Gerbert. That's coming up next. This

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg Technology.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 8>The purpose of the venture is purely distribution. It's not

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 8>about procurement of content. So we'll continue to compete with

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 8>each other for sports rights just as we always have.

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 8>It'll actually, I think, be a great benefit to the

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 8>league because it's no different in terms of the way

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 8>we bid for sports rights. But that reduced friction benefits

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 8>all of the leagues as well, So I think the

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 8>leagues will actually be pretty optimistic about this.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 4>That was Disney CFO Hugh Johnson. They're commenting on ESPN,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Fox and Warner Brothers discoveries, earlier sports bundling announcement, and

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Disney shares pushing above a one year high today after

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 4>topping earnings estimates and issuing an upbeat profit outlook for

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 4>the year, citing cost cutting benefits and the strong performance

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 4>of its international theme parks business. Disney Plus subscribers fell

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 4>short of estimates, though, and Dizzey says it will invest

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 4>one point five billion dollars in epic games. I want

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 4>to bring in Bloombers, Chris Palmery out of LA to break.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 3>It all down.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 4>I think we just start with what the streets probably

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 4>focused on, which is Bobbyga delivers and they like it.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 10>I mean, if you think about it was about a

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 10>year ago where I announced these big cost cuts or

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 10>restoration of the dividend. It was all under the context

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 10>of the pressure from activist Nelson Pelts.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 9>Pelts ended up dropping out the next.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 10>Day, and here we are a year later, we seeing

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 10>results of all that cost cutting.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 9>Still a Peltz challenge.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 10>Health says he's sticking with it, but you know, you're

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 10>definitely seeing either deliver on that, and I think he's

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 10>probably feeling pretty happy about the stock price today.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Chris, he's delivering on profitability, on cost cuts,

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately revenue. There are still worries about well, when

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>they really do see growth once again and the subscribers

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>coming back to Disney Plus, when we start to actually

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>see a revenue driver coming from the parks here in

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the US, just internationally and indeed just the media side

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>of the business, the TV legacy still really hurting. Where

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>was there to be excited in some of these new partnerships,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I think particularly Epic Games.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, for sure, there's a lot of negative here.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean no intendants growth in all Disney World in Florida,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 10>basically no growth in Disney Plus. In fact, they're predicting

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 10>a pretty big subscriber gain in the current quarter, six million,

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 10>when early.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 9>All of that are the ones they're giving away essentially to.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 10>Charter, although they are getting, you know, a wholesale fee.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 10>And also, as you mentioned, traditional TV double digit decline.

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 10>Part of that is due to the strikes in Hollywood

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 10>last year. Put again not a really good trend. The

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 10>market did seem to really enjoy this Epic investment. It's

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 10>a big number for a minority stay but you know,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 10>partnering with the Fortnite maker and getting Disney's it's sort

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 10>of a situation where they can license their content and

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 10>enjoy some upside.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 9>Epic Company appreciates.

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Always about the IP.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Chris pol Murray, great to get really a breakdown on

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>what we heard on the earnings after the bell yesterday.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's get an investor take now.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Ros Gerbran pleased to say, joins us president and CEO

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of Gerbert Kawasaki and.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 5>Ross, what were you most thrilled about in instead of numbers?

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Because there was a lot to digest.

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 7>Taylor Swift.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 11>I mean, this is the Bob Iger effect, you know,

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 11>where Nelson Peltz can't get his way around Hollywood to

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 11>save his life. You know, Bob Iger is really the

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 11>key to getting good content back on Disney, which ultimately,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 11>when you talk about all the things that need to

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 11>drive Disney forward, it's all about great IP or great content,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 11>and that's the biggest challenge is making great content in Hollywood.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 11>So to get sort of like the Taylor's cut of

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 11>this version of the movie for Disney Plus will definitely

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 11>move the needle in a huge way. You know, she's

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 11>a phenomenon that's massive, So that's a great start. And

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 11>then their investment in Epic games. You know, the kids

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 11>played for it, you know, consistently in having an alternative

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 11>universe that's all Disney characters and all the ancillary revenue

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 11>that comes with all the purchases on an ongoing basis

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 11>from the way gaming is done today, is not only

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 11>a business Disney needs to be in, but they're smart

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 11>in that they're letting Epic do it. Disney's failed and

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 11>gaming over and over again, but Epic has been a

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 11>wonderful success. So these verticals, along with the way they're

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 11>monetizing ESPN, is exactly what Disney needs.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 7>To be doing.

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 4>That's a pretty good summary ross of about seven different

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 4>stories that came out. Yes, I mean on the video

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 4>game side, I think that's two thousand and two Kingdom Hearts,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 4>which was a JV Disney did with Square NX. I

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 4>don't fully understand though, how the Epic relationship plays out.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's an emphasis on licensing content. I get

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 4>that is Disney saying, Okay, I think we better go

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 4>back big into into video games. Light Netflix is done

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 4>on the mobile app sense.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 11>One hundred percent, so it's more than just gaming, it's

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 11>social gaming, which is really you know, Roadblocks being the

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 11>best example of this.

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 9>My kids don't just play games. They play games with

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 9>their friends.

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 11>They do not play these games by themselves, and most

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 11>of the time now they're connecting through FaceTime on their

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 11>iPads and then playing Fortnite or playing Minecraft, or in

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 11>a lot of cases just Roadblocks. And so this is

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 11>about getting into the zychis of what kids are doing,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 11>having a social element to the gaming aspect, but also

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 11>a way to extend their brands in many different ways

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 11>through this open world platform.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 7>If you've ever played Fortnite.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 11>One of the coolest things about it is it's constantly

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 11>changing the environment, the worlds, and the different characters.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 12>And so by building.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 11>More Disney into this, it seeds the next generation of

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 11>future Disney users, which has always been one of Disney's

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 11>great strengths and something that they've lost with their failure

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 11>to really have any animation hits over the last several years.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Ross Bobby gets delivered on the bottom line with cost cutting,

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 4>and he delivered growth through the park's business. So I

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 4>go back to the question I always ask you, is

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Disney a technology company?

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 11>Well, Disney is what I would consider a pure entertainment

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 11>company that's adopting technology in many aspects of its business,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 11>but in its pure it's about going to the theme

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 11>park and living out your sort of dreams and fantasies,

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 11>whether it be Star Wars or Marvel or Avatar. It's

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 11>about the physical experience, but then augmenting it with the

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 11>digital experience. And that's where Disney Plus and the gaming

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 11>and all the other assets that they're building that are

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 11>digital are so complementary to the physical assets that Disney

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 11>owns that are irreplaceable. You just really can't replace taking

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 11>your kids to Disneyland in any other experience. But then

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 11>when they get home being able to get onto Fortnite

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 11>and play with the characters, or watch Disney Plus and

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 11>watch Taylor Swift, They've got all elements of entertainment covered.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 7>So this is a.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 11>Great first step for Disney on their recovery, and I

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 11>think if they follow through with some great ip over

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 11>the next couple of years, you know Disney will be back.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Because that maybe is where they've missed, certainly in the

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 2>film studios part of it, Wish for example, really not landing.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in the legacy bits of the business ABC,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 2>the TV parts that had seemingly been up for sale

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and then retracted a little bit. What do you see

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 2>as the strategy going forward?

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 7>Ross profitability?

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 11>I mean, they've managed to keep ABC, you know, profitable,

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 11>so it is creating cash for them, even though it's

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 11>on a declining you know, sort of revenue base. They've

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 11>managed to just cut costs and maintain that business. But

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 11>we all know linear TV is dead, and the cable

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 11>bundle is dead, and even Spectrum, which is a cable company,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 11>doesn't actually provide cable anymore, you know, it's a streamer

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 11>now too.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think Disney's making.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 11>The right moves from trying to get their content and

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 11>multiple different platforms, including on Charter as well as Spectrum

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 11>as well as you know this new ESPN bundle which

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 11>is wonderful for sports fans. So I think getting IP

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 11>in the most places possible and having high quality IP

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 11>ultimately is what the entertainment business is all about.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Ross, we just have ten seconds. Do you increase your

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 4>position in Disney from here?

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 13>Well?

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 11>Fortunately I did increase my position in Disney under one

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 11>hundred in my fund GK over the last several months.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 11>I think Disney is worth over one hundred and twenty

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 11>dollars a share, and at the Hiota's worth two hundred

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 11>dollars almost So I think for investors, if you see

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 11>this stock down at this level, I think it's one

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 11>of the few values left in the stock market which

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 11>is fairly richly priced today. So I think Disney is

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 11>a compelling investment and one that we own and one

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 11>that we recommend.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Right Rosco the PRESIDENCYBA Kawasaki, good to catch up.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you time for talking tech.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 4>First start, South Korean prosecutors are appealing a sole court

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 4>ruling that cleared Samsung executive chairman Jayly of all charges,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 4>including stock price manipulation and accounting fraud. The prosecutors in

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 4>November saw a five year prison sentence along with a

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 4>fine f lee but this week the court Acquittedly and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>other Samsung officials. The appeal means the case will be

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 4>heard now by a higher court.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Plus.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 4>German industrial company Zemen saw orders largely stagnate in the

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 4>fiscal first quarter as factory automation purchases in China plummeted

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 4>by fifty five percent. The drop offsets gains in its

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>mobility in industrial units However, the company sees China bouncing

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 4>back in the second half of the year. In AI

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 4>disclosures to the SEC are jumping as the agency warms

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 4>of misleading claims. Just over forty percent of S and

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred companies mentioned AI in their most recent

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 4>annual report with the SEC, according to Bloomberg Law's review

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 4>of the disclosures, That continues an upward trends in twenty eighteen,

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 4>when AI was only mentioned sporadically. SEC officials have repeatedly

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 4>warned companies about making misleading AI related claims, including so

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 4>called AI washing, which could lead to legal action.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Tucker Carlson's interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Well, it's

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>going to go live six pm Eastern Time today and

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 2>it's the first interview with the Russian leader by US

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 2>journalist since Russia invaded Ukraine almost two years ago.

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 5>It's an unedited interview.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 2>It's going to air on his own website, Tucker Carlson's,

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 2>but he also of course said that it will be

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>entering in full on X an ed we want to

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 2>stick on all things.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 3>X yeah X.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 4>The company and platform formerly known as Twitter, Elon Musk's

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 4>acquisition of Twitter in twenty twenty two, was initially heralded

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 4>by co founder Jack Dorsey as quote the singular solution

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 4>he trusted to handle Twitter as a company. A year later,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Dorsey said, quote it all went south. All that and

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 4>so much more is unpacked in Battle for the Bird,

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 4>a book by Bloomberg's own Kurt Wagner, who joins us now.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>And what can I say?

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 4>I had the privilege of living this alongside you, and

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I want our global audience to relive that story through

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 4>your book, summarize the tale that you hope to tell.

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you did ed.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 14>We were in the trenches together on that one. And

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 14>you know, I really think of this book as kind

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 14>of two parts. You know, Part one was Twitter one

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 14>point zero, the Jack Dorsey years, and there was a

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 14>lot of drama there too, if you'll all remember, it

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 14>wasn't necessarily smooth stealing before Elon showed up. And part

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 14>two is really the Elon experiment that we've seen for

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 14>the last eighteen months or so. And what I tried

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 14>to focus on was was really this handoff between these

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 14>two people, right, I mean, it wasn't an accident that

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 14>this deal got done. It was something that Jack Dorsey

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 14>was pushing for behind the scenes, and you know, Elon

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 14>was someone he admired, someone he thought was going to

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 14>be a good steward for this company moving forward. And

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 14>as you pointed out, you know, I think he kind

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 14>of has acknowledged since it didn't go the way that.

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 7>He had hoped it would.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 4>When you were in the reporting phase, what was the

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 4>thing about Twitter's original history or the takeover by mass

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 4>that surprised you the most that you thought, Wow, Yeah.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 14>I think my favorite chapter in the book is actually

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 14>a chapter about Elliott Management, the activist investor shop that

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 14>came in and essentially tried to kick Dorsey out of

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 14>his job. This was in early twenty twenty, right when

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 14>COVID was starting to happen, and you know, it was

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 14>an interesting business story at the time, but there was

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 14>so much happening behind the scenes that folks didn't get

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 14>to see in the moment that gets covered in the book.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 14>And why I think it's so important is that was

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 14>really the moment that Jack Dorsey realized I can't run

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 14>this company anymore, even though he got to keep his job,

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 14>even though from on the surface it looked like he

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 14>had sort of won. I really think that moment, you know,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 14>sent him packing, and as a result, it opened the

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 14>door for Elon to come in, right, And I think

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 14>Elliott sort of created a blueprint that activist investors could

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 14>take over, and Elon was sort of an activist investor

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 14>in his own right, just in a different form.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 5>And Kurt, of course, Elon then tried to walk away

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 5>from the deal, was unable to do.

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 11>So.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>I want to go to almost the play out in

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the here and the now on the Bloomberg terminal today.

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>We've got a great excerpt from your book, and really

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 2>it details how in the very.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 5>Beginning we go back to November twenty twenty two.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Ultimately Elon realizes that him being unfiltered is starting to

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>impact advertisers. Well, certainly a sales team seemed to recognize that.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>And there's a great bit where you'll say one particular

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>key sales rep that well, head of sales, really Robin

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Wheeler says, you don't want to go to war with advertisers, and.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 5>Elol says, oh, I will go to war and I

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 5>win wars. And he's currently at war with them.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 14>I mean, this is the reason I wanted to include that.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 14>Right at the beginning of the story, is it sort

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 14>of sets the stage for everything we've seen from Elon

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 14>since he's taken over, Right, I mean that mindset has

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 14>not changed, Right. It just fast forward a year from

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 14>that when he was on stage at deal Book and

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 14>he told advertisers to go f themselves, Right. I mean,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 14>this is someone who you know, from day one essentially

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 14>didn't fully understand that there's a tension and a trade

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 14>off between his vision for free speech and the fact

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 14>that advertisers need to kind of continue to fund this platform.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 14>And I think it's sort of telling that his mindset

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 14>again that first week is still very much his mindset

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 14>as far as we can tell today. And there's a

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 14>reason that things haven't gotten better for their business.

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 2>And he's currently well financing others to take legal action

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>against Disney.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the fact that this.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Intertwines with today's news and Disney's earnings is fascinating. Kurt

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>push us forward though in the here and the now,

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>advertisers you speak to, we just think about the super

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Bowl about to arrive this weekend, the focus on sports.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he was running around the New York trying

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 2>to persuade the NFL to stick with him, persuade big

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>advertising agencies w to stick with him.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Where do we stand now under Linda Yacarino.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's not very good.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 14>Unfortunately. You know, we talked earlier this week about sort

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 14>of the shows that you know, Tucker Carlson bringing stuff

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 14>a live exclusive stuff, it's not live, but exclusive stuff

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 14>to X and others. And I've been talking to media

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 14>buyers and it's just not moving the needle for them, right,

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 14>And mostly it's because of Elon and the fact that

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 14>he is so unpredictable. You know, he can say things

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 14>to hundreds of millions of people instantly that most brands

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 14>would be very reluctant to be associated with. And so

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 14>for them, you know, Twitter just never provided enough value

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 14>for that to be worth it. And I think unfortunately

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 14>X is in the same boat. They don't necessarily drive

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 14>enough sales for these companies that they're willing to put

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 14>up with the unpredictability of Elon Musk And as so far,

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 14>there has not been a solution to that.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 5>Jack Dawsey's learned it, the market learns it.

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>An extraordinary piece of writing that both both of you

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 2>in the trenches, as he's say, but an amazing book

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>coming from you, Kurt Wagner.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 5>We thank you so much for bringing it to us today.

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, coming up there, let's go back to the other

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 2>world of Jack Drsey. He quite likes bitcoin, hey or

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin tops forty five thousand. As the ETF inflows show

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>all some steadiness at the moment, suddenly the lack of

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 2>outflows coming from GBTC will break it down.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Next, this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Disney up twelve percent after we see profitability being delivered

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>by bob Byger and paypalvo on the downside more than

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 2>eleven percent. Look, even though they're still taking eyes on

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 2>costs and stripping out workers, they are overall still seeing

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>that volumes are not living up to where the anticipation

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>is and there's some worry around competition still. But for

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>more on these markets, we want to go broader with

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Isabelle Lee because there has been some fascinating cash

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 2>being made by these overall tech firms.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 5>The idea that dividends are being given.

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Back, shared buybacks being promised, Disney of Cours being one

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of those.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 5>What are you seeing more borneans too is not to

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 5>get in at these valuations, so that's the thing with tech.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 15>They're very expensive, way more expensive than those in the benchmark.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 15>But then money managers argue that they're quality companies. Yes,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 15>all of them are magnificent seven socks are expensive, maybe

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 15>accept they're expensive, especially Tesla, but they're all quality. Maybe

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 15>accept Tesla. And that's why a lot of money managers

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 15>I talk to are careful not to be too underway

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 15>tech because they don't want to lose on those gains.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 15>But they're also very careful because the unstoppable rally and

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 15>relentless rally that they we've seen last year, it remains

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 15>to be seen where it will happen again.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you can only go up so much.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 15>But then money managers have been telling me that it's

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 15>kind of getting harder to beat the benchmark because the

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 15>benchmark is not anymore such a good measure anymore of

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 15>what the index should because it's so heavy on tech.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 4>The waitings discussion is really important. I go back to

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 4>the story we did a few weeks ago on where

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the net long positions were twelve months ago, and the

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, big funds just weren't as exposed to tech

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>at being a of twenty twenty three as they would

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 4>have liked to have been, they missed out, and so

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 4>now fast forward to present day, they want to keep

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 4>that going. But if we hit SMP five thousand sounds exciting,

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 4>you know how much further can we go?

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty four?

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 15>Five thousand is a really important psychological mark. Traders love

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 15>round numbers and five thousand is a shiny new round number,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 15>and which is why we're seeing that options traders. If

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 15>you look at the weekly Options Expert on Friday, it

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 15>has seen a surge and open interest, and honestly it

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 15>just really shows how bullish traders are and more broadly

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 15>investors in Wall Street. I mean, the economy is stronger

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 15>than expect, that the job market is robust. This fuels

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 15>consumer spending, which intern fuels a good economy. But then

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 15>how much more can the market rise?

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 15>Like, look at the SMP yere today that's up four

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 15>and a half percent, NASTAC is up five and a

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 15>half percent, but the equal with SMP it's flat. In

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 15>twelve months back, we have the equal weight also up

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 15>by just around four percent, whereas an ASSAC is up

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 15>almost forty two percent. So the rally maybe losing seam.

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 15>We're seeing overbought conditions. Traders are probably getting tired. I

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 15>mean you do in the end of the day kind

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 15>of take a step back. You saying to yourself, should

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 15>I keep on joining the momentum or should I really

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 15>look at the quality of the companies? And I think

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 15>traders are being more discerning right now. I've been burned

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 15>by not taking part in the momentum. It's interesting some

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.959
<v Speaker 15>technical levels that we've been hitting on the cues as well,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 15>the ETFs to replicate the NASDAK one hundred tell us

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 15>a little bit in the broader context whether people are

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 15>saying to diversify, because we can get very focused on technology,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 15>pure and simple of the show, as we should, but

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 15>diversification is key all people looking to diversify. People are

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 15>looking to their diversify, but the tech rally isn't really

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 15>helping them. It's funny you mentioned that because yesterday the

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 15>MSCI World Index just hit it's all time high, and

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 15>you're like, great, that's going to be my diversifier.

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 5>But if you look at the top ten stocks of.

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 15>Our constituents of the MSCI World, it's Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia,

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 15>metasc Alphabet. Yes, and this is a gauge that's sixty

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 15>one trillion dollars with fifteen hundred stocks in twenty twenty

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 15>three markets, to be exact. But they sound like the Nassback,

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 15>they sound like the Magnificent seven. So how do you diversify?

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 15>And I read a great note yesterday that when you

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 15>underweight something, it's not your least like stock. You usually

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 15>underweight the stock you like the most because you can

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 15>only have one hundred percent of everything. So it's actually

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 15>a really a hard market. But then stock pickers would

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 15>argue that no, actually, because we can find bargains. So

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 15>it's it's a tough read. But it's really getting tougher

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 15>for man and managers out there.

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg saysabel Lee gets easy. I for you us having

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 4>you on the show, believe me, Thank you so much.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate it. Meanwhile, risk asset a choice bitcoin topping

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 4>forty five thousand for the first time in a month.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Is etf inflows show signs of steadying joining us now,

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 4>James Safer of Bloomberg Intelligence, and this is how we

0:30:58.960 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 4>track it.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 16>Now.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 4>You know that any given movement in XBT is fine.

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 4>But I think I'm right in saying that Through Wednesday,

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 4>nine straight consecutive days of positive net inflows into the

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 4>ETF products.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 3>What does that tell you?

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean part a lot of it is just

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 9>really you.

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 16>Can look at to GBTC, look the other we call

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 16>it a newborn nine, so it's GBDC.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 7>In the Newborn nine.

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 16>GBTC came over with billions of dollars and their outflows

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 16>have slowed. They only saw eighty million out We were

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 16>looking at hundreds of millions every single day coming out

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 16>of GBTC. It was largely expected we had a lot

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 16>of these bankruptcy estates, specifically FTX and other people that

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 16>were kind of trapped in GBTC that were going to

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 16>pour out, and it was remained to be seen how

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 16>much of that was going to find its way back

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 16>into bitcoin type exposure, whether it be the bitcoin ETFs

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 16>or not. But we've seen these other Newborn nine pick

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 16>up the slack. They've they've taken in flows pretty much

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 16>every single day. We have four of these ETFs that

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 16>have taken in flows every nineteen days in a row

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 16>since they listed, or actually four have done eighteen of

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 16>nineteen days and two have done nineteen days of inflows.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 16>So to be doing that, they're basically taking in money

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 16>while GBTC is losing, which is giving us that nine

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 16>days of straight inflows to these bitcoin ETFs.

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 2>There were nine new US spot bitcoin ETFs, and actually

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>there's been some analysis done over I think it's at

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Goldman or JP Morgan in fact, talking about the liquidity

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>that they're seeing within amongst all the different ones just

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 2>link for their space. Who's coming out on top at

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the moment.

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 16>James, Yeah, So, I mean GBTC came out on top

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 16>because for the most part it's had the most liquidity,

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 16>it's had the tightest bits spreads. It was actually trading

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 16>at a discount initially, so that was a little bit

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 16>of a tailwind for its performance because the discount continued

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 16>collapsing for the first few days of trading. But the

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 16>last couple of days, I bit from Blackrock has actually

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 16>out traded GBTC and all these other issuers, those newbern

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 16>nine we just spoke about, their spreads have compressed significantly.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 16>So initially it was GBDC was the only one with

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 16>really tight spreads. Then we had Fidelity in Blackrock catch

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 16>up a little bit, and now we're seeing everyone else

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 16>catch up in their spreads tighten as well. It'll be

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 16>interesting to see how this plays out in the weeks

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 16>and months down the line. But I bet is now

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 16>competing with GBTC as far as trading volume and liquidity.

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Goes James increasingly the folks speaking to Bloomberger talking about

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the harving and they are trying to do the math

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 4>on it.

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 3>How big a factor is it for you in your model?

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean I'm paying attention to it.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 16>Obviously I look at it, but for the most part,

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 16>I'm just looking at the hard data of what's being

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 16>bought and sold, so what we're paying attention to it.

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 16>So these inflows, if it really continues, which there's no

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 16>guarantee it will. I would point out the DCG Gemini Genesis.

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 16>There's a whole bunch of stuff going on with the

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 16>Genesis bankruptcy. They have roughly sixty seven million shares as

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 16>of September that we know they own, so that could

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 16>be another huge selling point for GBTC. I mean selling

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 16>catalysts for GBTC, which would be selling of the underlying bitcoin.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 16>So we need to see what's going to happen there

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 16>or what has happened. We don't have insight to that,

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 16>so I'm more interested in that than necessarily exactly how

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 16>the having is going to impact what's going on here.

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 16>The other thing I would say that I'm watching is

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 16>we're talking about inflows to these spot bitcoin ETFs. In

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 16>the US, we've seen outflows from bitcoin futures ETFs and

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 16>bitcoin futures open interest, and we've seen outflows on a

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 16>net basis in Canada and Europe in these bitcoin and

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 16>crypto ETFs. So there's a little bit of there's a

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 16>lot of money moving around here, and it's kind of

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 16>hard to know exactly like what's what's net new inflow

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 16>when you look at the entire ecosystem of bitcoin type exposure.

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>James Safer of Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Apple's limited release of the Vision Pro headset is well

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 2>forstering a resale market, pricing the device far beyond that

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 2>three thousand, five hundred dollars starting price, and that's overseas

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 2>prices ranging from four thousand dollars to even six thousand

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>dollars for the price shifting on a daily basis.

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's bring in Bloomberg's Mark German for more.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately think does Apple like this sort of occurrence,

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>this this secondary market flavor, you know, I think.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 12>It shows excitement for the product overseas, right.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 17>It gives them sort of a set of data points

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 17>for which markets are particularly interested in the product, so

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 17>that maybe they could fine.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 12>Tune how they're going to allocate supply when they.

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 17>Eventually go to those markets, which markets are they going

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 17>to approach first.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 12>So it's certainly a helpful data point for Apple. Does

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 12>Apple like it? Not necessarily? I think it creates a

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 12>lot of complexity.

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 17>The app Store and some of the features on the

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 17>Vision Pro require a US Apple ID, so having these

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 17>products operate overseas could create some customer service problems and perhaps.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 12>Create a bad experience. But at the same time, it's

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 12>leading to.

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 17>More sales in the US, and Apple doesn't necessarily care

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 17>how they get their money for the Vision Pro as

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 17>long as the units are selling. So I certainly think

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 17>it's a mixed bag for Apple, but maybe a little

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 17>bit more helpful than not.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 7>Mark.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>You've unboxed your own Vision Pro, You've had a few

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 4>days of living with the Vision Pro, You've roamed the streets,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 4>You've been on the bus, I mean, you've been in

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh that thing right there, how tempted you to resell

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 4>that thing for five thousand dollars.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 12>I am not tempted to resell it. I'm going to

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 12>hold on to this thing.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 17>There's going to be software updates, new features, and all

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 17>sorts of stuff.

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 12>I'm going to keep reviewing it, so it's important for

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 12>me at least to hold on to it.

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 17>I've spoken to a few people already who are considering

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 17>returning it, but the vast majority of people that I've

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 17>talked to think it's magical. You'll see my full review

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 17>on the product this weekend on Sunday and my power

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 17>on But you know, so far, I think it's a

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 17>great experience. There are certainly a slew of drawbacks. There's

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 17>a ton of bugs. Like I said, it's one of

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 17>the bugear first generation Apple products. But the fundamentals and

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 17>the foundation is there, and with the right software updates,

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 17>with the right upgrades, with the right harbor changes, I

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 17>think they have a winner on their hands.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 12>It's just it's not winning yet. It will eventually, all right.

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mark German set the reminder Sunday power on full

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Vision Pro review coming very nice. Let's go from VR

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 4>to AI with Google bringing more of its products into

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 4>the Gemini ecosystem, but renaming Bard to Gemini, I want

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 4>to bring in Bloombergs Judia Love, who has been explaining

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 4>how all this works. I think the story here is

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 4>that they want to demonstrate that the product, that the

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 4>tool is higher end, it's competitive. It is one thing

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 4>what's behind the move.

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, I think they want to demonstrate that this is

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 13>a product that's worth paying for. There's a lot of

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 13>excitement about the potential of AI, but it's also a

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 13>cost center for these companies.

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 9>Alphabet CFO Ruth Borat.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 13>Has said that Capet will be up a lot this year,

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 13>and so I think that they're really under pressure to

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 13>demonstrate that there's a business model for this product. And

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 13>so in addition to renaming Bard Gemini, they're also rolling

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 13>out in nineteen ninety night Among the subscription plan in

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 13>which you can pay for access to the latest model.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 9>And so it really feels.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 13>About to move this, you know, showing and showing where

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 13>the money is for these products.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And basically ripping a leaf out of the open ai

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 2>book on how you make a business model out of this.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely there their product is one penny cheaper than open Ai,

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 13>so we'll.

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 2>See competitive I do think though, ultimately, what are the

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 2>reviews like for Ultra one at the moment. How have

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>people been interacting it, how they felt that, Look, this

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 2>can be the area that stops the market share being

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 2>lost to a being that's now of course wrapped into

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 2>it open Ai.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:46.720
<v Speaker 13>Well, Noodle only released the product this morning, so users

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 13>are still doing their hands on it and seeing how

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 13>it stacks up to open Ai. What I'm hearing so

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 13>far is that the product there appears to be parody

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 13>between the models, but it's But Gemini is not necessarily

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 13>blowing GBT for of the water. As Gordle was suggesting

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 13>in some of its press briefings that this model had

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 13>outstored Gemini and key Key methods.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 4>Google played it a bit safe, Let's be honest, for

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 4>quite a long time. Do you think they now are

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 4>showing their full hand of how they commercialize.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 3>All this R and D.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 13>I think this is an important frown in the strategy,

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 13>but more and more will still be needed. I don't

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 13>feel that one nineteen ninety nine a month subscription product

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 13>will be enough to really demonstrate that their years of

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 13>investment have paid off.

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure for many the fact that you can automatically

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 2>use it within your Gmail and your Google Docs might

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 2>well be a winner versus toggling between your chat, GPT

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 2>or not. But Julia Love absolutely brilliant to have you

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>on about the latest iteration and announcements coming from Alphabet in.

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 5>The chatbot wars.

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, well look that does it for this additional BlueBag technology.

0:39:59.000 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 3>What a full edition it?

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Or some CEO interviews to what's happening in terms of

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the investor base when it comes to Disney.

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 5>What's some winners we had on the earnings front.

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's been a wild earning season. Recap the show

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 4>on the podcast Apple, Spotify, iHeart. We're putting in podcasts

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 4>on the Bloomberg platforms that will tune in on your

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 4>way into work.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.