WEBVTT - Chips Stocks Still Down and Tech Earnings Preview

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. The

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>chips are down. Shares of semi conductor companies plunging to

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>start the week after new US curbs on China's access

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>to American technology. Where is the industry's downturn headed We

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>will discuss. Plus, it's not just chip stocks at risk.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Both the I m F and the World Bank are

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>warning of a potential global recession. This as tech earnings

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>kick off next week, We're gonna preview what to expect,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and the markets are spoken about the Twitter deal as well.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Investors seem to see about a six chance that Elon

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Musk still closes by October. What will become the social

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>media platform once that happens. We will explore that this hour.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>All that in a moment, but first I want to

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 1>stick to the chip story. Now, chip stocks down their

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lowest since joining US. Now wugin Hoe Boomberg Intelligence, Senior

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Hardware and Networking, So a disappointing start Wuginhoe

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of you know what could be a potentially difficult

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>earning season. We've already already had these warnings from A

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>m D and from Samsung. Where is this going? Sure?

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I thank thanks simily so so UM. I think the

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>A m D as well as the stamp sub warnings

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>UH is a precursor to what we may potentially see

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for earning season. For the upcoming earning season, I think

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that the risk here is is not on the consumer side.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the consumer concerns on the PC side UM

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>has already been factored in. I think the bigger risk

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>going through into earning season is this going to affect

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise side on this chip side. We haven't seen

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that yet, but if we look at the m D

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>data center numbers, they weren't as strong as people as hoped.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>They were more in line than anything else. And and

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the concern is that it's going to affect more chip

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>makers on the data center in cloud side. So is

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the chip downturn far from over? I mean, is it

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>just starting? But it potentially could be. Right if we

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about enterprise bending going going forward, UH, if

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>there is a downturn going to three, then then there

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is that risk of downward learnings revisions to reflect the

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>weakness on the enterprise side of the ledger. Right, UM,

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I still don't have a good crystal ball on where

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the PC sector is going to bottom out, and I

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna have to start seeing, uh where the

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise side is gonna flesh out as well. Now,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, these you know, new round of of American

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>curves on China's access to US technology. How that, um,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially make a bad situation worse and and

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how does that play out over the longer term. Sure,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be a near term

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>impact if if anything, it's gonna be a longer term impact.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>The band or the curbs on the AI side. Isn't

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>there anything new? This is something that m D as

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>well as in video hinted at at one of the

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a K filings U back in September. And this makes

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it more official than anything else. And I believe I

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>am D as well as in video said the impact

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>will be minimal because they could still sell lesser um

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>lesser powered AI chips to to China. Now, now that

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>being said, I do think that the the U S

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do does want to send in broader curbs UH to

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>slow down China's development of not only the use of

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>AI chips, but also the manufacturer of AI chips. There

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>were some developments by by Smike of introducing seven animator chips.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that put a scare UH and into the

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>US and they want to slow down anything that China

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can do to develop some of these higher powered UH

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>chips going forward. So it doesn't sound like you think

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we're heading towards a total ban, but you know, is

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that a possibility. Well, let's let's use UM. Well, let's

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>use whahwah as an example of as well as et EU.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>There is an entity list that they're on UH and UM.

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, whilwah is a smart

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>phone business. Essentially has UM pretty much died, all right?

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>If if there there is a an entity list that

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the US has started to beef up and we might

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>start seeing H some of these lesser known Chinese memory

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>companies as well as chip manufacturing companies UH fall into

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that entity. If that's going to be the case, then

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>then there might be a dent into the China China's

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:03.119
<v Speaker 1>chip manufacturing UH initiatives going forward. So I mean, we'll case,

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we still have to see where this will go, but

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that still may happen. All right, Well, a lot of

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>rad for chips to start the week. U Jin Hobe,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts, thank you so much for stopping by. Now.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of China, we're following the COVID situation there as well,

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>tally's rising and fears of a potential lockdown returning once again.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The country reported one thousand, eight hight seven cases for Sunday,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the highest since August. In Shanghai posted the most new

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>local infections in almost three months, official saying anyone traveling

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>to Shanghai will need a negative COVID result within twenty

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>four hours of arriving in the city, and we'll have

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to do three tests in three days. Coming up a

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more than a coin tossed Cowan analysts pricing in

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a sixt chance that Ellen Musk's deal with Twitter gets

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>done by the deadline. We're gonna dig into the odds next.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. The glimpses we've had of Elon Mask's

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>vision for Twitter include potentially becoming part of what he

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>calls X the Everything app, which brings to mind the

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese app we Chat. Quick takes out were talked to

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>us about the obstacles Twitter will face if it tries

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to become while like we Chat. Take a listen. Elon

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Musks billion dollar deal to buy Twitter is back on

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and it comes with an interesting wrinkle, turning the social

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>media company into a so called super app. Now, this

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is what the Chinese company we Chat has really pioneered.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a portal in China for everything from dating apps

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to paying your bills, ordering food and getting taxis. But

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't really succeeded in Europe and the US, and

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>there are often three obstacles. Firstly, you need to have

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a payment layer, something that connects all of the apps

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>together and makes it easy to pay in one quick action. Secondly,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to have a lot of developers. Twitter has

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about two million users, but there are about one point

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>eight billion active users of Apple devices and three billion

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>active users of Android devices. If you're a developer or

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a company looking to build a product, it's pretty clear

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>which of those three services you're likely to prioritize. And finally,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there is the regulatory consideration. If you are a company

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that leverages its strength in one service, to build strength

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in a different one. That is not something that regulators,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Europe, look too kindly upon. But it also

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>comes with a slight problem. Either you are not big

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>enough for developers to have the scale that they want

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to build apps and services for your product, or if

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you do have the scale, you're going to attract that

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>regulatory attention. Perhaps Ellen is the person who can make

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this happen, but it does come with a lot of obstacles.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Cutics alex Web, they're sticking with Twitter merger arbitrage strategists

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a cow and say the mark is pricing in just

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit more than the odds of a coin. Tash

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that Ela Musk still with Twitter, will close by the

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>court issued deadline of October. Here tell us more about

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the latest Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner, who has has of course

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>been covering this whole pograah for us. We're gonna get

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to the weach that thing in a moment, Kurt. But

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of this whole six chance thing,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>especially given it has been a short thing to this point. Yeah,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think of something clever about form

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>me once, you know whatever, But to me it feels

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>higher than sixty simply because you know, both sides are

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>showing up. They want the same deal, right, They want

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the same price, at least that's what they say, And

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>now a judges said, okay, you have until to do

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this and a lot of the stuff getting debt financing

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in order, for example, getting shareholder approval, that's all done. Right,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So they say they want the same deal. They say

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that all the stuff that they need to do to

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>get that done is essentially done. So I feel like

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be higher than sixty pc, Emily, But

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>you know what, what do I know? I feel like

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about this for six months and it

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>keeps changing. So right, what do any of us know? Well,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk knows, or at least he has said he

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to make Twitter part of this Everything app vision.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean to you? How do you interpret that?

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Does it sound to you like we chat? It sounds

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot like we chat um. And it's not necessarily

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea because we chat is incredibly popular in

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>China and we've seen other companies, mostly Facebook, try to

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>do this as well. Where I think it's an issue

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is that, as Alex said in kind, of the intro

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you showed, Twitter just doesn't have the scale that's needed

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for for something like this, right. And most of what

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>makes we chat so valuable, I think, is that it's

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>also the place where people do all of their communication. Right.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not just where you get your Uber or you

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>order your food delivery. It's where you're talking with mom

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and dad and grandma and your boss and your cousins.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And like, Twitter is not that place right there. It

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is not a place that people are hanging out. And

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>so for me, the idea of suddenly turning into a

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>place where everyone is hanging out and suddenly doing their shopping,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't really make sense. Again, I like the

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>idea and concept because it's see it clearly works in China.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that this is going to happen

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter now. It is ambitious and if anyone can

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>do it right, you would say, all right, well maybe

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is that person. But Mark Zuckerberg's trying to

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>met a few times and it's not happening there either.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So speaking of scale, how are you thinking about potential

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>staffing changes once Musk presumably takes over the company. You know,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is there going to be a mass exodus. Is there

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be an influx of of you know, Elon

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Musk's fans who want to work for him. You know,

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>clearly the size that the company is can't necessarily handle,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the scale of a social media platform,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the size of wei chat. Well, I can tell you

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what I know, and then I can speculate a little bit.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>What I know is that a lot of people inside

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter are currently worried for their jobs. Right. They expect

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Ellen to come in and do laughs. They expect them

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to essentially kind of clean the executive ranks um you know,

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly Ceo Pragaga Waal, probably the head lawyer Vigionatti and

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is something that happens a lot of

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>times during an acquisition, but I think especially now because

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Ellen has basically said he doesn't have competence or faith

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in those leaders. Right, So this is this is what

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>people are bracing for now. What he does next is

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good question. Is he going to

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>trim the company down and simply keep it sort of

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the engineers bare bones folks who are going to build product,

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>or if he wants to do this kind of super

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>apt thing he's talking about he's gonna need partnerships people,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna need probably content people like moderation people, right,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which is is something that he has kind of shied

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>away from. And so that's where I think things get

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a little tricky, is you know, the financial vision for

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the company seems to be let's cut everything back and

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you know, get healthy, as he likes to say, um,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but the vision is much more ambitious than that, and

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that Surly works with that small of

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>his staff. All Right, lots continue to follow a Kurt,

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you'll be all over it. Thank you for

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the updates. I want to get a quick check on

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>another story that we're following, which is several airport websites

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the US we're knocked offline by a pro Russia

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>activist group. Chicago's O'Hare and l a X among the

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>websites hacked. The group, called kill Net, has been linked

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to a series of cyber attacks against Western targets, including

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>disruptions to some state government websites last week. Curology, the

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>cosmetics company that provides prescription skincare customized to patient skin,

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>has grown at lightning speed over the last few years.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>With revenue projected over two million dollars. The company is

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>now profitable and announcing changes to its c suite to

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>prepare for the next phase. Dr d with Larger, co

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>founder of Curology, stepped down as CEO to pass the

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>torch to Heather Wallace, who was most recently president at Revlon.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>They're both joining me now for more on the transition. So, David,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you give us some background

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on the transition here and who popped the question and

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>how oh thank you Emily. That would be me who

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>popped the question. And the reason is that the skills

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to successfully found the company are just very

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>different than the skills you need to take an established

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>company like cure Ology and grow it to its full potential.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, right now the company is in

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this incredible position for the future because um, like you said,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we became profitable and we really have the ability to invest.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And so my goal is just to find someone to

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>help take us to that next level. And I just

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be more excited to be able to found Heather here. Heather,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>given what you learned recently at Revlon, what's your vision

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for the company and you know what you know about

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in in the beauty world, especially given

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that we are moving into potentially a pretty pronounced down

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to earn. So I mean a couple of things. One

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is I'm so sorry excited to be joining Curology, and

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Carology is actually doing what many baby companies are talking about,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>which is personalization. So it's truly personal personalized skincare. We

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are connecting people with dermatology providers that create custom formulas

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and we can service those consumers and really help them

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>have better skin outcomes. And so people, your face is

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that you face the world, and so how

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you look and how your face looks really has a

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>big impact on your confidence, on how you feel um

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and and truly a big impact in your life. So

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about that with the Ology. Now. You know,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>as terms of what's happening with the economy, I think

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>where we all are concerned about that this is an

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>incredibly resilient category um and I do expect us to

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to do very well during this time period.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to agree that good skincare is vital, but

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>how much do you think people are really going to

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>be spending on themselves right now when they're spending more

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on everything from gas to groceries. I mean, isn't that

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the first thing to go you It's actually not. Um.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>There are many things that go before skincare. So I've

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>actually seen data over time on UM what happens during

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>challenging economic times, and skincare is one of the most

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>resilient categories. The end of the day, as you say,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you're going to work, you're in front of

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>friends and family, You're putting your best face forward, and

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it is very important, and so I do expect consumers

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to still spend in this area. David. The cult of

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the founder is so strong, and especially in Silicon Valley,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering if you've You've been pretty straightforward about

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>why you're doing this in now, do you think too

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>many founders stay too long and that more founders should

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>leave potentially sooner. Every company is different, but but I

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>do believe that you know, the decision to pass the baton,

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>as you say to someone like Heather, should actually be

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>made a lot more commonly, because ultimately what we care

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>about is getting our business to that next level, and

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the same person to successfully found a company isn't necessarily

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the right person to get you to that next level.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So so I do think there's um um there. There's

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of merit in that um Heather, I know

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that Revlon recently filed for bankruptcy. They're talking about supply

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>chain issues. Curious if you're expecting to deal with some

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of those similar issues at cure Ology, especially as it

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>pertains to the supply chain and what you learned there

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can potentially apply here and head off some

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of these challenges. Yeah, so I think when it comes

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to cure Ology, our supply chain is really focused in

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the US, and so it's much more simple. We are

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>providing products end to end, but it's a much more

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>simple supply chain. So the other thing I know is

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that just keeping us focused, so keeping us focused on

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the right and the core of the products and being

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>able to continue to do our personalization and our customized

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>formulas at scale is going to be where the focus is.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit more about that. What's

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>your hope for the next chapter of growth given the

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>rise in direct consumer skincare, the rise in personalization, as

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you say, the rise in subscription services, but also the

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're you know, some people might be paying

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for a few different script subscription services. Um, you know

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>at one time, how do you how do you see

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>balance consumers balancing all of that, and curology winning out.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So the company was founded on the mission of access,

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that consumers should have access to the kind of skincare

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>solutions that the best dermatologists can provide. And so as

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we think about growth in the future, it's all going

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to be about continued awareness and access to those providers.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>And the more access and awareness that we can create,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the more consumers we can bring in. Where the the

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>largest player in the personalized skincare space, but we are

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively small at this point compared to the twenty billion

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>dollar facial skincare market in the US. David, what are

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you hoping to see in this next chapter and how

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>involved will you be? I will be stepping into the

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>position of board chairperson, and you know, ultimately the most

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>important thing is that Chology succeeds, and so I'm going

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to be helping in every way that any way that

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I can. UM But you know, the biggest thing for

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>me is that we have this this really huge opportunity

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in front of us because I think if you talk

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to almost anybody who's used cure Ology, they will tell

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you there's no way I'm going back to using what

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I use before. But when you take a step back

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and look at the market, about plus percent of people

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are still using non personalized, less effective skincare. And so

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what I really do hope to see is just us

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 1>being able to continue to spearhead the market shifting towards

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the more effective, personalized type of skincare that the best

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dermatologists provide. And speaking of the market, Heather, I mean,

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about an I p O. You know,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the next phase of growth? You know,

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>who knows what the future will bring. I think we're

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be focused on profitable growth and reaching more

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>consumers with our fantastic customized solutions UM and the better skin,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the more better skin outcomes, that will just unlock the

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>future possibilities. All right, Heather Wallace, the new CEO of Curology,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and Dr David Lusher, co founder of Curology, moving into

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the role of chair. Thank you both for joining us.

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomer Technology. I'm emily changing San Francisco.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to turn back to the marcus As, heads

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of the I m F and the World Bank warn

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of a rising risk of global recession. This with advanced

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>economy slowing down and faster inflation forcing the Fed to

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>keep raising interest rates. What does it mean for tech

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>stocks and tech earnings coming up? I want to break

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that all down with Michael Casper of Blue Brig Intelligence.

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of the macro environment, what's

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>happening here and what it means for tech stox? Michael, Yeah,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the macro environment is still somewhat strong for what it

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is a technical reception right now. Um, just to give

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you some context around the SMP earnings at large, we

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>were looking at about a two point five percent expansion

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in three Q. It's still an expansion, UM, and that's

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a the trough, or at least looks like

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be the trough, at least according a consensus

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>um for this earning cycle, and specifically with tech stocks,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Tech is looking to have about a seven point five

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>percent earngas contraction. That's only second worst to communications and financials,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>which are tied with the twelve point one percent to

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>client um. And some of the tech stocks are specifically

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the industries look to be under pressure here

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>given the rising dollar and some of the supply chain

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns that linger. Now the World Bank is saying there's

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a real danger of worldwide contraction. You've got Jamie dime

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>In saying market is going to fall another twenty percent.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>What's your own research showing, well, we're seeing much lighter contraction. Right,

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you use our fare value model and use

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>September slow as the price and try to back into

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>what earnings contraction was priced by the market, you're looking

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at about a five to EPs to climb that was

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>priced in by that September. And the varying scenarios have

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to do with the different rates that drive ps, right,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you get a five percent expansion or five

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>percent interest rate, you're looking at about a five percent

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>earning strop to accompany that. And by the way, that

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty much right in line with the narrowest

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>earning strop that we've had across all the recessions historically

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>back to UM, in line with that recession, which coincidentally

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>was a very inflationary period as well. So we've got

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a raft of tech earnings coming out next week. Uh,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Netflix will be kicking us off. Of course, we've got

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the big tech penning's quickly to follow.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at and what are you expecting?

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the outlooks for companies, especially the makencaps.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the makacaps are expected to have about a

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>two earnings increase on medium to the top five tech

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and tech related stocks test slide through Tesla in there

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>um and that would be the worst going back to one.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm watching the outlooks on those make acap stocks

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>within tech. I think Semmy's is particularly interesting given given

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the chip news today. UM limiting exports to China and

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's industry is forecast for about fourteen percent to clients,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>so there's still lingering supply chain issues there. There's the

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure from the latest announcement from the Biden administration, and

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Semmis looks to be under some considerable pressure here. You know,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you think whatever we see from these earnings

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>could set the tone for the rest of the year.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, given what we're seeing in chip stocks good

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so far, if we continue to get some more bad signals,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, does that spell doom and gloom? Yeah?

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't necessarily be good, especially considering if you're looking

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>at the SMP five hunder as a whole tech in

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>discretionary stocks, you're supposed to lead the way out of

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of mild earnings reception that we're having right now. Um.

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if if that doesn't materialize, at least

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on the tech side, which is a huge driver. I mean,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about indexes in those top five stocks. If

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at some weakness and tech stocks, it will

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>translate overall weakness in the SMP five d um. But

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so far, I will say, at least on the earnings front,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>companies have done a pretty good job making the best

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>out of a bad situation with margins. All right, Michael, Well,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for giving us your view, and good to hear

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who's a little bit more optimistic than other Michael

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>cast Bar of Bloomberg Intelligence, appreciate it. Meantime, another story

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that we are watching, shares of Riveant declined after the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>e V makers that at a recall about thirteen thousand

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>vehicles delivered to customers after discovering a minor structural defect

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with a nut that could loosen fully in quote rare circumstances.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The company said it's recalling almost all vehicles delivered to customers,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>even though the issue was discovered only in seven out

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of an abundance of caution. And speaking of evs, Amazon

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>just announced it will spend a billion euros over five

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>years to electrify it's delivery fleet in Europe. That money

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>will be used to double the number of evs in

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Europe to ten tho vans and fift electric heavy goods

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>vehicles or so they call them. Bloomberg. Spencer Soper, who

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>covers Amazon for US, is here with more. So what

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon hoping to accomplish, Spencer with this announcement? Yes,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so basically Amazon sending a message to the market, Uh,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, start producing more EV vehicles because uh, Amazon

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>can't find enough of them. Um and you recently that

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You're segment that you just had about Ribby in particular,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>shows they don't like to be wholly dependent on one

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>particular company as well. So they buy from Ribbian, they

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>buy from Mercedes. They want more people in the market

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>producing these things, and they just want more of these

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles produced. Uh you know. As as a bottom line,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>how do electric cars fit into Amazon's plans to get

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to uh net zero. Yes, so Amasa really hasn't said

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>precisely how it's gonna do. This's a very lofty goal,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, net zero emissions by but the most visible

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>thing has been electric vehicles. They're on the road, you

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>see them, um, And they're going to have to address

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other things in their company like uh,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, airplanes and ocean liners and those sorts of

0:25:55.359 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>things that are still very fuel heavy, but they're electric vehicles.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Is really the predominant part piece of their of their

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>push so far, and so talk to us about the

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the other potential parts of their push.

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>How else are they going to get to that zero? Yeah,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>there there were some interesting things in this announcement in

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Europe where they even talked about making deliveries you know,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on electric bicycles and even by foot. And they also

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about expanding their network in Europe, their warehouse network

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. And I think there's also setting a message

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with that as well that they want to make sure

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that is particularly it's a delivery station, they want to

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it's equipped with charging stations for any

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>type of of you know, non or low emission vehicles

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that they that they might be using. They want to

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the infrastructure that they have, not just

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles they have, but the infrastructure they have is

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>capable of charging these things. And how is what they're

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>doing in Europe compared how does it compare to what

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>they have done so far in the United States? I

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>mean it pretty much is the same is the same model, um,

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, just a big investment in electric vehicles. But

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the biggest announcement they've made by far in Europe.

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're trying to send a message to Europe, say, listen,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what we've been doing in the US, We're going to

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>be doing the same thing, same thing in Europe and

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:15.239
<v Speaker 1>following the same playbook. All right, Spencer, soaper always good

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. Thank you Spencer for those updates.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Thumbs up. All right? Coming up the long crypto winter?

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>How much longer is it going to lask and what

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>do we make of all the recent crypto CEO and

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>other executive departures. Would have talked about that and more

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with Hunter Horsley bit Wise Asset Management CEO. That's next.

0:27:34.880 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg time now for our Crypto report. And

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>as global markets are awaiting US inflation data Thursday, I

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>want to take a look at the global wave of

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>monetary tightening to fight inflation and how it's spurred a

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>near six slide in bitcoin this year. Will bitcoin break

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty dollar mark anytime soon? I want to ask

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Hunter hoares Ley about that and more. He's the CEO

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of bit Wise Asset Management. Hunter. Good to have you back.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>So let's start on markets. What's your read as we

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>head into the fourth quarter, and there seems to be

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just more and more bad news. Yeah, it's been. It's

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>been a tumultuous year in markets broadly, and certainly certainly

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in crypto. I think the current you know, recent numbers

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, the NASDACS down, O smps down, and cryptos

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>down or thereabouts. It's changing every day. So the story

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of this year is definitely a bear market. Uh. Nevertheless,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen increased interest from from our our client base,

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the backdrop for many crypto investors

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>investors is that they're historically have been four year cycles. Uh.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And while there are opportunities to make money in many

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>moments of the crypto market, bear market moments of the

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>moments where fortunes can be made, and so there are

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>some that are positioning themselves in the current bear market

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and UH and coming into the space. Now, So

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you think it'll mean for crypto ultimately? Does

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin break that mark for example? Yeah, you know, I

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>can't say for sure about about twenty UM and certainly

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a space with with quite a bit of allatility.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But the historical pattern of cryptover the data we have

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about twelve years of a journey, is that we get

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>four year cycles. We get three years of bowld markets

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with growing momentum, and then we get a bear market year,

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>so the market down almost, the market down north and

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this year obviously the market down around. The expectation if

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the market you know, continues its historical trend would be

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that we begin a new cycle next year. And so

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever we wind up this year, a lot of investors

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about how that positions them for the next cycle.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You're out with a new Web three fund that will

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>give retail investors exposure to companies across Web three, UH, finance,

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse, the creator economy. As we barrel into a recession,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what makes you think investors are going to jump on board. Yeah.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So at bid wise, we view our role as helping

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>investors understand and access the opportunities in crypto. And certainly

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a wide range of important things going on

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world today outside of this space. It's our

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>job to stay focused on this space. Specifically, we've been

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>doing it for five years. We work with over a

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand financial advisors, branches, UH and institutions. And what we

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>saw with the web was an emerging category of opportunity

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>around the established innovators, established companies who are positioned to

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the rise of Web three, from the environment

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>created by crypto and so we view it as our

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>job to recognize worthwhile opportunities and open up access to

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>those UH and so that's why we we introduced we

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>introduced the Web three product. And in general today there's

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's quite a wide aperture of different areas that investors

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>see opportunity in the crypto markets, quite different from you know,

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>even even when when we started the firm and the

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>story was mostly just about just about bitcoin. Now there's

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>been a number of high high profile crypto executive departures

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>see es. The CFO of open Sea recently left. What

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>do you thinks behind all of this. You know, I

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think zooming out it's a it's a difficult time in

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and crypto is not bigger than that, It's

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not excluded from that. And in fact, you know, crypto

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is more volatile in general, and so I think it's

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>natural to expect that you would see that you would

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>see turnover and that you would see adjustments with the

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>firms in the space. We've been around for five years,

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>UH and in that period of time alone have seen

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>many many of the players change. UM. I think it's

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a healthy part of the progression and the maturation of

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the space. But in thinking about what it means the

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>average UH, the average investor who's interested in the space

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a ton of time to UH to focus

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on on everything that's going on day today. I think

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that the real the real learning OFO is that it's

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to really matter who you work with, or what

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>platform you use, or what app you use, and not

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all of these things are created equal. I think in

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense that if you invested in something, it

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't really matter where you bought it or how you

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>bought it. You had it. You had a shot at

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at a great return. I think this year, what's becoming

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>more clear is that it matters. It matters who you're

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.479
<v Speaker 1>working with or what service you're using to invest. So

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is the implication of this for

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>most investors is paying attention to to who you're working with. Now,

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd love for you to put your social media hat

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on for a moment. You used to work at Facebook

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram earlier in your career. I'm sure you've been

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>following the Twitter Musk saga to a certain extent. Elon

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk and Jack Dorsey we now know from their text. Uh,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know talked about making Twitter and open source protocol. Uh.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about a decentralized vision for Twitter

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and if something like that is really possible? I think

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. I think it's exciting, and I think it's

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>an experiment we're going to see a play out in

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the next in the immediate term future. Uh. In fact,

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a project called Forecaster that's already attempting

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to build a Web three version of Twitter where you

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>can have a similar communication experience. Um, but you don't

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>worry about the sort of corporate policy and the moderation

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>policy because the information is on a blockchain, and then

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the app just pulls information from that blockchain. So I

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>think the game is a foot on this one, and

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think zooming out it's it's sort of indicative of

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the moment we're at in the crypto space and with

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Web three, which is there are now a huge amount

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of developers, there's great funding, UH, there's proven technology, and

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think over the next two years you're gonna see

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a big wave of attempts to build UH in sumer applications,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>to build services that people use UM. And I think

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the Twitter scenario is front and centers as

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those in Web three. So it sounds like

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you see this pretty clearly. Can you explain what this

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>actually looks like and how how do how do things

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>change for the average Twitter user? What happens to Twitter,

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, if everything is decentralized. I think, you know,

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>some people just don't understand, like what are they what

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>do they really mean? Here's here's the mental model i'd offer.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>In the current world, your followers, your your your audience

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is only available on Twitter. So whatever Twitter does is

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>law UH, and sometimes that that is is a downside

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for certain users. The decentralized Web three version. I don't

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what it will look like, but it will

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>look something more like the way you think about your email,

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which is, if you're not happy with Gmail, you can

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>move to a Well. If you're not happy with AO

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>well and you want certain features, you can move to

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Superhuman uh and so on and so forth. You can

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>take your email address, you can take your your your

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>contact book with you, uh, and you can go somewhere

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>else if you don't like the way that the app

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is being built or the policies of the app. And

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's what people are striving for here. When

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you hear people say a Web three version of something

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to the dynamic and power structure that exists with email,

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they want to introduce that to more parts of our life. Uh.

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I think you could use that

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>as an analogy for how uh it might change certain

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>services like Twitter. Interesting. Well, thanks for humoring us there,

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Horseley, CEO. If it wise, Asset Management would love

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>to have you back sooner rather than later. Hunter, thank

0:36:51.840 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you for stopping by. Apple is set to shift from

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the lightning charging port on the iPhone and other devices

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to USBC to abide by a new European law. What

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.439
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for the company's wireless first future. Let's

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>bring in Mark German for more. So, let's let's rewind

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, because when they change that lightning charging port,

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a little traumatic for some people. What exactly

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is Apple doing now and what does it mean for

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>iPhone users? That's right, Emily so for most the two

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand's right, Apple had what was called the thirty pin

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>iPod connector that worked on all their main iPods, and

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it was also the connector that was on the iPhone

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>until the iPhone five. With the five, Apple moved to lightning.

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's much smaller, it's reversible, it's all digital. It made

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 1>sense as things were shifting more wirelessly, right, But now

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to the point where USBC is taking over

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry, and now the European Union is pushing

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>USBC because it's interoperable between Android devices from Samsung, from

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Google as well as Apple to ices. Right now, the

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhone still uses lightning. That means you can't use the

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.479
<v Speaker 1>same charg or to charge your iPhone as you can't

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>even with your iPad pro or your maclopro or your

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Android device. So, because of some prodding from the European

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Union and because it just makes sense for consumers in

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>its ecosystem, Apple will move to USBC next year in

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>three with the iPhone fifteen. They'll also move it to

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>some of their math accessories that still use lightning, some

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of their iPhone accessories like the mag Safe battery that

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 1>use lightning, and probably most critically, the air pods, which

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>also still use lightning. So overall, it's a very good

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>move for consumers. I think what does it mean though,

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>given that Apple really wants us ultimately to not have

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to use any wires at all. Yeah, no, that's a

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>good question. So about five years ago, Apple announced the

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>device called the air Power. What that was was a

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>three device charging matt from the company. It was announced

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in seen was supposed to go on sale and it

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>would allow you to inductively charge an iPhone, air pods,

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Apple Watch at the same time. Many technical

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>issues I won't be labor right now, that never launched,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but Apple still wants to push users towards wireless charging.

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>The latest MacBooks they all use Mac Safe charging, right.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't stick an actual cable into the device, but

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it uses somewhat of a magnetic inductive charger called mag safe.

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>The iPhone has mag Safe charging, the Apple watches mac

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Safe charging, the AirPods have max Safe charging. So while

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the lightning connector and the iPod thirty pin connector before

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that both last at about ten eleven years for the

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>respective ecosystems, I think USBC is going to be the

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple connector for the next five years, and then we'll

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>see a much bigger push to inductive charging, mag safe

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and wireless in tropical boat inter propability. All right, Boomer

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>smart German, always appreciating you keeping us update on all

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>things Apple. Thank you so much for that. And that

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 1>does it for the sedition of Boomberg Technology. Do not forget.

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>You can check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts.

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg