1 00:00:15,356 --> 00:00:21,356 Speaker 1: Pushkin. Hey, it's Jacob. As you may recall, I interviewed 2 00:00:21,396 --> 00:00:24,836 Speaker 1: Sam Bankman Freed on this show back in twenty twenty two. 3 00:00:25,316 --> 00:00:28,676 Speaker 1: Sam was a crypto mega billionaire when I interviewed him. 4 00:00:29,356 --> 00:00:32,476 Speaker 1: Several months later, his company blew up and he was 5 00:00:32,556 --> 00:00:36,956 Speaker 1: indicted on fraud charges. Right now, Sam is on trial 6 00:00:37,196 --> 00:00:41,116 Speaker 1: in federal court in New York City. Michael Lewis, who 7 00:00:41,196 --> 00:00:44,436 Speaker 1: hosts another podcast here at Pushkin, just wrote a book 8 00:00:44,556 --> 00:00:48,116 Speaker 1: about Sam Bankman Freed, and his podcast is covering the 9 00:00:48,156 --> 00:00:51,796 Speaker 1: trial really closely. On Tuesday of this week, I sat 10 00:00:51,836 --> 00:00:54,276 Speaker 1: in as a guest host for Michael Lewis and I 11 00:00:54,356 --> 00:00:57,836 Speaker 1: interviewed Lydia jeen Kott, who has been covering the trial 12 00:00:57,996 --> 00:01:01,676 Speaker 1: for Pushkin. I found the conversation really interesting and it 13 00:01:01,716 --> 00:01:04,316 Speaker 1: brought back some of the key themes I talked about 14 00:01:04,316 --> 00:01:07,036 Speaker 1: with Sam Bankman Freed when he came on this show. 15 00:01:07,156 --> 00:01:09,796 Speaker 1: So for this week's episode of What's Your prob we 16 00:01:09,836 --> 00:01:13,876 Speaker 1: are bringing you my conversation with Lydia Jean Coott about 17 00:01:13,916 --> 00:01:16,796 Speaker 1: the trial of Sam Bankman Freed. I hope you like it. 18 00:01:24,716 --> 00:01:28,236 Speaker 1: So I am delighted to be here today. It's week 19 00:01:28,316 --> 00:01:31,556 Speaker 1: two of the Sam Bankman freed trial, and today was 20 00:01:31,596 --> 00:01:35,836 Speaker 1: a very big day. Caroline Ellison, who of course was 21 00:01:35,916 --> 00:01:39,676 Speaker 1: the co CEO of Alameda Research and SBF's former girlfriend, 22 00:01:40,036 --> 00:01:42,956 Speaker 1: she took the stand today and Lydia Jean you of 23 00:01:42,996 --> 00:01:43,956 Speaker 1: course were there. 24 00:01:44,956 --> 00:01:47,716 Speaker 2: Yes, I came to the courthouse bright and early, and 25 00:01:47,756 --> 00:01:50,756 Speaker 2: it was a day that reporters were particularly excited for. 26 00:01:51,156 --> 00:01:53,876 Speaker 2: There are a lot of us, and I interviewed a 27 00:01:53,876 --> 00:01:56,116 Speaker 2: few as we were waiting for the court doors to open, 28 00:01:56,316 --> 00:01:57,516 Speaker 2: And I'm going to play some of that tape for 29 00:01:57,556 --> 00:01:58,076 Speaker 2: you right now. 30 00:02:00,036 --> 00:02:02,676 Speaker 3: I'm Sam Kessler, I'm an editor at Coindesker. 31 00:02:03,036 --> 00:02:06,636 Speaker 2: What are you looking forward to learning from Caroline Ellison's testimony? 32 00:02:06,716 --> 00:02:08,916 Speaker 3: Aside from the testimony itself, it's going to be really 33 00:02:08,956 --> 00:02:12,316 Speaker 3: interesting to see the line of questioning that, particularly the 34 00:02:12,356 --> 00:02:16,276 Speaker 3: defense decides to follow, and they're also going to maybe 35 00:02:16,356 --> 00:02:19,156 Speaker 3: touch on things around drug use and whether that makes 36 00:02:19,156 --> 00:02:21,756 Speaker 3: her an unreliable narrator. All that is going to be 37 00:02:21,796 --> 00:02:23,636 Speaker 3: really fascinating to see. 38 00:02:23,836 --> 00:02:26,076 Speaker 4: I'm Lose Lopato. I'm a senior reporter at the Verge. 39 00:02:26,436 --> 00:02:30,316 Speaker 4: I am super curious about why she did this, Like, 40 00:02:30,396 --> 00:02:32,036 Speaker 4: I don't know that she's going to talk about that, 41 00:02:32,436 --> 00:02:37,316 Speaker 4: but she didn't have equity and the boys did. I've 42 00:02:37,356 --> 00:02:40,156 Speaker 4: had some like lousy ex boyfriends in my time, but 43 00:02:40,236 --> 00:02:41,636 Speaker 4: nothing on the scale. 44 00:02:41,876 --> 00:02:44,556 Speaker 3: What's your name, I'm Kevin Dugan with New York magazine 45 00:02:44,876 --> 00:02:45,396 Speaker 3: The Sex. 46 00:02:48,356 --> 00:02:49,956 Speaker 1: I want all the details. 47 00:02:50,636 --> 00:02:54,756 Speaker 3: I want all the stories, all the spine tingling kind 48 00:02:54,836 --> 00:02:57,596 Speaker 3: of sensation of all the sex that happened in the Bahamas. Yeah, 49 00:02:57,596 --> 00:02:58,916 Speaker 3: that's really what I'm looking forward to. 50 00:02:58,916 --> 00:03:02,956 Speaker 1: Most, Lady Jean, I don't want the details of the sex. 51 00:03:04,276 --> 00:03:07,316 Speaker 2: Well, good news for you. There wasn't a lot of sex, 52 00:03:07,356 --> 00:03:10,436 Speaker 2: and there was a lot of spreadsheets what happened. 53 00:03:10,436 --> 00:03:13,996 Speaker 1: I mean, this is like truly a high drama moment, right, 54 00:03:14,116 --> 00:03:17,756 Speaker 1: Like you have this romantic history, you have this executive history, 55 00:03:17,796 --> 00:03:20,076 Speaker 1: and you have this alleged crime. So like, what's the 56 00:03:20,196 --> 00:03:22,356 Speaker 1: like Caroline walking into the courtroom moment. 57 00:03:23,196 --> 00:03:26,676 Speaker 2: Yeah, so the courtroom was packed and the prosecutor said 58 00:03:26,716 --> 00:03:29,196 Speaker 2: that they were going to call their next witness, Caroline Allison. 59 00:03:29,836 --> 00:03:32,116 Speaker 2: You could tell the reporters are all really excited. You know, 60 00:03:32,196 --> 00:03:34,516 Speaker 2: usually when there's an intermission, people start to talk, but 61 00:03:35,036 --> 00:03:37,476 Speaker 2: no one was talking. Everyone was looking at the door. 62 00:03:37,956 --> 00:03:40,476 Speaker 2: Someone whispered that it was a bit like a weird 63 00:03:40,516 --> 00:03:42,876 Speaker 2: wedding since we were waiting for her, walked down the aisle. 64 00:03:42,916 --> 00:03:43,716 Speaker 1: Oh, very good. 65 00:03:44,076 --> 00:03:46,676 Speaker 2: Someone went like, don don done, And then the door 66 00:03:46,716 --> 00:03:49,596 Speaker 2: opened and she walked through. She was wearing like a 67 00:03:49,636 --> 00:03:53,076 Speaker 2: reddish pinkish dress. She had on a blazer. She's really small, 68 00:03:53,196 --> 00:03:55,436 Speaker 2: she's even shorter than I am. She was holding a 69 00:03:55,436 --> 00:03:58,596 Speaker 2: water bottle and she walked really confidently down the aisle 70 00:03:58,596 --> 00:04:02,476 Speaker 2: as everyone was watching, to the witness stand and then 71 00:04:02,516 --> 00:04:07,916 Speaker 2: she sat down. The prosecutor immediately had her admit that 72 00:04:08,036 --> 00:04:10,956 Speaker 2: she had committed Finngel crimes, and she said that she 73 00:04:10,996 --> 00:04:12,356 Speaker 2: had committed them with Sam. 74 00:04:13,036 --> 00:04:16,076 Speaker 1: And just to be clear, she's already previously pleaded guilty 75 00:04:16,156 --> 00:04:17,916 Speaker 1: to these crimes. 76 00:04:17,636 --> 00:04:22,156 Speaker 2: Right exactly, she has. And then the prosecutor had her 77 00:04:22,396 --> 00:04:25,636 Speaker 2: point out Sam. She was sitting down, and then she 78 00:04:25,716 --> 00:04:28,636 Speaker 2: kind of stood up and she looked all over the 79 00:04:28,676 --> 00:04:30,996 Speaker 2: courtroom for him. She was looking in the jury box, 80 00:04:31,036 --> 00:04:33,276 Speaker 2: she was looking in the where the reporters were sitting. 81 00:04:33,676 --> 00:04:36,956 Speaker 2: It was a full thirty seconds, and it was the 82 00:04:36,996 --> 00:04:41,796 Speaker 2: longest thirty seconds ever. And then finally she found him 83 00:04:42,156 --> 00:04:44,316 Speaker 2: and she pointed at him when she finally saw him, 84 00:04:44,836 --> 00:04:46,836 Speaker 2: and I couldn't see his face, but people in the 85 00:04:46,876 --> 00:04:49,236 Speaker 2: overflow room said that they kind of smiled at each other, 86 00:04:49,876 --> 00:04:53,276 Speaker 2: and then the prosecutor said, can you say what Sam 87 00:04:53,356 --> 00:04:56,196 Speaker 2: was wearing? And she said he was wearing a suit? 88 00:04:56,236 --> 00:04:57,956 Speaker 2: And she laughed a little bit and sat down. 89 00:04:58,596 --> 00:05:04,116 Speaker 1: So I have a couple questions about that, one like, 90 00:05:04,756 --> 00:05:06,996 Speaker 1: wasn't he just sitting at the defense table or whatever? Like, 91 00:05:07,116 --> 00:05:09,396 Speaker 1: was she putting on a show? Did she act actually 92 00:05:09,476 --> 00:05:10,996 Speaker 1: not know where he was? What was going on there? 93 00:05:11,396 --> 00:05:13,756 Speaker 2: I don't think she was putting on a show. I 94 00:05:13,796 --> 00:05:17,396 Speaker 2: think it must be really overwhelming. Was probably her first 95 00:05:17,396 --> 00:05:21,276 Speaker 2: time in this courtroom. It was really packed. There are 96 00:05:21,316 --> 00:05:23,396 Speaker 2: a lot of people there. I'm assuming that that walk 97 00:05:23,476 --> 00:05:25,396 Speaker 2: down the aisle when we're all staring at her was 98 00:05:25,396 --> 00:05:28,316 Speaker 2: pretty terrifying, and I'm thinking it probably took her a 99 00:05:28,316 --> 00:05:31,556 Speaker 2: few seconds to orient herself. People have also speculated that 100 00:05:31,596 --> 00:05:33,316 Speaker 2: she hasn't seen him since he got his hair cut, 101 00:05:33,796 --> 00:05:35,116 Speaker 2: and she's never seen him in a suit. 102 00:05:36,596 --> 00:05:41,396 Speaker 1: Okay, I have another question about that. Why do prosecutors 103 00:05:41,476 --> 00:05:42,836 Speaker 1: do this? I mean I've seen it in like the 104 00:05:42,876 --> 00:05:44,876 Speaker 1: movies or whatever. You know, is he in the courtroom 105 00:05:44,876 --> 00:05:47,236 Speaker 1: with us? Can you point him out? But like Sam 106 00:05:47,236 --> 00:05:49,956 Speaker 1: Agrinfried was like there were pictures of him on TV 107 00:05:50,076 --> 00:05:51,836 Speaker 1: and in magazine, like, we all know who he is 108 00:05:51,876 --> 00:05:53,796 Speaker 1: and what he looks like. Is there some legal reason 109 00:05:53,836 --> 00:05:56,556 Speaker 1: they do it? Is it theater? I don't know. 110 00:05:56,596 --> 00:05:59,036 Speaker 2: There's a lot of pointing in court. Also, I learned 111 00:05:59,036 --> 00:06:01,236 Speaker 2: that our opening statements, it's really common to point at 112 00:06:01,276 --> 00:06:02,276 Speaker 2: the defendant. 113 00:06:02,516 --> 00:06:06,476 Speaker 1: Okay, so she's there, she's identified, Sam Bankman freed. We 114 00:06:06,556 --> 00:06:09,076 Speaker 1: got our drama. Like, are there a few key moments, 115 00:06:09,236 --> 00:06:12,476 Speaker 1: whether they are emotional moments or kind of substantive moments 116 00:06:12,516 --> 00:06:15,036 Speaker 1: in terms of, you know, the case itself that stand 117 00:06:15,076 --> 00:06:16,796 Speaker 1: out to you of what happened today? Like what are 118 00:06:16,796 --> 00:06:18,036 Speaker 1: the most important things that happen? 119 00:06:18,836 --> 00:06:23,196 Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, the prosecution started pretty early by having Caroline 120 00:06:23,236 --> 00:06:27,596 Speaker 2: talk about her romantic relationship with Sam and to characterize 121 00:06:27,636 --> 00:06:31,156 Speaker 2: a little bit what it was like. And she said that, 122 00:06:31,516 --> 00:06:34,676 Speaker 2: and I'm quoting from my notes that there is a 123 00:06:34,716 --> 00:06:37,756 Speaker 2: general theme where I would want more, but he was 124 00:06:37,796 --> 00:06:40,716 Speaker 2: being distant and not paying attention. So she kind of 125 00:06:40,796 --> 00:06:43,876 Speaker 2: characterized their on and off again romantic relationship as one 126 00:06:43,956 --> 00:06:46,916 Speaker 2: where Sam kind of had an upper hand. She also 127 00:06:47,036 --> 00:06:49,436 Speaker 2: said that Sam was her boss and that at times 128 00:06:49,516 --> 00:06:50,676 Speaker 2: made things awkward. 129 00:06:51,556 --> 00:06:54,836 Speaker 1: And what do you think is going on there? I mean, 130 00:06:54,876 --> 00:06:56,996 Speaker 1: I kind of get it, but like, what's the point 131 00:06:57,036 --> 00:06:57,756 Speaker 1: of that part of it? 132 00:06:58,516 --> 00:07:01,596 Speaker 2: Well, there's something that lawyers do called taking this sting out, 133 00:07:01,996 --> 00:07:04,036 Speaker 2: where they bring up things that they think the defense 134 00:07:04,116 --> 00:07:06,596 Speaker 2: is going to bring out on Cross and they say 135 00:07:06,636 --> 00:07:10,036 Speaker 2: it during direct So that way it kind of makes 136 00:07:10,076 --> 00:07:12,716 Speaker 2: it seem less bad because I'm sure that on Cross 137 00:07:12,796 --> 00:07:15,076 Speaker 2: the defense is going to say something like you dated 138 00:07:15,116 --> 00:07:16,916 Speaker 2: Sam and it didn't go that loud. 139 00:07:17,836 --> 00:07:20,996 Speaker 1: So the prosecution is just preempting the you're just the 140 00:07:20,996 --> 00:07:23,916 Speaker 1: bitter ex girlfriend kind of defense. 141 00:07:24,636 --> 00:07:27,876 Speaker 2: And they're also setting something else up, I think where 142 00:07:27,996 --> 00:07:32,556 Speaker 2: they talked about Sam and Caroline's professional relationship and they 143 00:07:32,556 --> 00:07:35,676 Speaker 2: talked about how in that relationship, Sam also had the 144 00:07:35,756 --> 00:07:39,116 Speaker 2: upper hand. Caroline talked about how her job at Alameda 145 00:07:39,156 --> 00:07:41,716 Speaker 2: was really the second job she's ever had before that 146 00:07:41,756 --> 00:07:44,636 Speaker 2: she worked at Jane Street with Sam, and she felt 147 00:07:44,676 --> 00:07:49,476 Speaker 2: really insecure and not prepared for that job, and she 148 00:07:49,596 --> 00:07:51,876 Speaker 2: checked in with Sam about all of the important decisions 149 00:07:51,916 --> 00:07:53,996 Speaker 2: that she made, and they made it sound like he 150 00:07:54,116 --> 00:07:58,796 Speaker 2: was very involved and he was overseeing what was happening 151 00:07:58,796 --> 00:08:02,036 Speaker 2: at Alameda, so any crimes that were happening at Alameda, 152 00:08:02,076 --> 00:08:05,756 Speaker 2: by extension, Sam would also know about uh huh, and 153 00:08:05,796 --> 00:08:08,396 Speaker 2: sign off on. They really emphasized that he was signed 154 00:08:08,436 --> 00:08:09,916 Speaker 2: off on everything that Caroline did. 155 00:08:10,236 --> 00:08:13,596 Speaker 1: That makes sense because I mean, clearly, very bad things 156 00:08:13,636 --> 00:08:16,676 Speaker 1: happened with FTX and Alameda, and the key question is 157 00:08:16,956 --> 00:08:19,596 Speaker 1: did Sam do them? Everybody else has admitted to doing them. 158 00:08:19,596 --> 00:08:21,436 Speaker 1: Did Sam do them? And the prosecution is trying to 159 00:08:21,476 --> 00:08:24,116 Speaker 1: prove that yes, he did. Okay, so they got there, 160 00:08:24,156 --> 00:08:27,196 Speaker 1: both their personal and their professional relationship. What else? 161 00:08:28,156 --> 00:08:31,156 Speaker 2: She also give us some interesting insight into Sam as 162 00:08:31,156 --> 00:08:35,476 Speaker 2: a person. They asked her about what his goals were 163 00:08:35,676 --> 00:08:39,356 Speaker 2: for himself for FTX, and she said that he was 164 00:08:39,476 --> 00:08:42,436 Speaker 2: very ambitious and that actually he told her one time 165 00:08:42,596 --> 00:08:44,636 Speaker 2: that there was a five percent chance that he believed 166 00:08:44,636 --> 00:08:45,916 Speaker 2: that he might be president one day. 167 00:08:47,876 --> 00:08:49,996 Speaker 1: You know, I'll say, when I interviewed him, like the 168 00:08:50,076 --> 00:08:52,796 Speaker 1: hubris was striking, which I mean, I guess that's probably 169 00:08:52,836 --> 00:08:54,916 Speaker 1: true for everybody. It's not like, oh my insight, but 170 00:08:55,476 --> 00:08:58,156 Speaker 1: it really is striking. When I interviewed him is when 171 00:08:58,156 --> 00:09:01,356 Speaker 1: he talked about helping trillions of people, not just the 172 00:09:01,396 --> 00:09:03,636 Speaker 1: billions of people who are alive today, but he said 173 00:09:03,676 --> 00:09:07,556 Speaker 1: the trillions or even hundreds of trillions who might someday live. 174 00:09:07,916 --> 00:09:09,516 Speaker 1: But then it was like, look, therapy, who have had 175 00:09:09,556 --> 00:09:11,196 Speaker 1: a huge impact on the world, why shouldn't it be me? 176 00:09:11,276 --> 00:09:14,356 Speaker 1: And like similarly, like rich people get to be president, 177 00:09:14,516 --> 00:09:17,236 Speaker 1: like it was super rich, maybe it could have been Yeah. 178 00:09:17,156 --> 00:09:19,316 Speaker 2: Yeah, I talked to some reporters who were like, there 179 00:09:19,436 --> 00:09:22,116 Speaker 2: was a time where it wasn't that crazy to think 180 00:09:22,116 --> 00:09:23,676 Speaker 2: that there is a five percent chance that he would 181 00:09:23,676 --> 00:09:27,156 Speaker 2: become president. The prosecutors also asked her about Sam's approach 182 00:09:27,276 --> 00:09:30,796 Speaker 2: to risk, and she said something that I found really interesting, 183 00:09:31,356 --> 00:09:36,116 Speaker 2: which is, imagine if you flipped a coin, and if 184 00:09:36,196 --> 00:09:39,436 Speaker 2: the coin landed on tails, the world would be destroyed, 185 00:09:40,036 --> 00:09:42,596 Speaker 2: and if the coin landed on heads, the world would 186 00:09:42,596 --> 00:09:44,996 Speaker 2: be twice as good as it is now. Sam would 187 00:09:45,036 --> 00:09:46,316 Speaker 2: believe in flipping the coin. 188 00:09:47,036 --> 00:09:50,276 Speaker 1: You know, it's funny you should mention that because again, 189 00:09:50,356 --> 00:09:53,116 Speaker 1: before he got indicted, he was on this podcast that 190 00:09:53,156 --> 00:09:55,676 Speaker 1: I like called Conversations with Tyler, with this kind of 191 00:09:55,796 --> 00:09:59,316 Speaker 1: economist public intellectual, Tyler Cowen, and there was a similar 192 00:09:59,756 --> 00:10:04,676 Speaker 1: thing in that interview where Tyler Cowan said said, if 193 00:10:04,676 --> 00:10:07,156 Speaker 1: there was a fifty one to forty nine percent chance 194 00:10:07,516 --> 00:10:09,876 Speaker 1: of a similar thing, either the universe twice as good 195 00:10:09,916 --> 00:10:12,836 Speaker 1: as the universe gets destroyed, do you take the bet? 196 00:10:12,876 --> 00:10:16,236 Speaker 1: And Sam said every time? And Tyler kwn was like, yeah, 197 00:10:16,276 --> 00:10:19,436 Speaker 1: but if you keep taking it every time, you're clearly 198 00:10:19,476 --> 00:10:23,196 Speaker 1: going to end with the destroyed universe. And Sam was like, 199 00:10:23,596 --> 00:10:26,076 Speaker 1: or a really awesome universe And I. 200 00:10:26,036 --> 00:10:26,476 Speaker 2: Was like what. 201 00:10:26,876 --> 00:10:29,676 Speaker 1: And then when everything blew up, that was what I 202 00:10:29,716 --> 00:10:33,556 Speaker 1: thought back to. There was another interview where this other 203 00:10:33,756 --> 00:10:36,276 Speaker 1: smart person, Matt Levine, sort of gets Sam to say 204 00:10:36,316 --> 00:10:38,636 Speaker 1: that what he was doing was kind of a Ponzi scheme. 205 00:10:38,756 --> 00:10:41,476 Speaker 1: Was basically a Ponzi scheme. But to me, the more 206 00:10:41,596 --> 00:10:45,716 Speaker 1: Sam thing was that I'll keep taking the bet. And 207 00:10:45,796 --> 00:10:48,436 Speaker 1: it seems like that is a sort of perfect metaphor 208 00:10:48,516 --> 00:10:50,476 Speaker 1: for what he did, or at least a very good 209 00:10:50,556 --> 00:10:51,996 Speaker 1: metaphor for what he seems. 210 00:10:51,716 --> 00:10:52,236 Speaker 3: To have done. 211 00:10:52,796 --> 00:10:54,756 Speaker 2: Yeah, I underlined in my notebook, like this is the 212 00:10:54,756 --> 00:10:56,996 Speaker 2: crux of the story is he flipped a coin and 213 00:10:57,036 --> 00:10:58,236 Speaker 2: it landed the wrong way. 214 00:10:58,756 --> 00:11:00,916 Speaker 1: For a while, it landed the right way right. That's 215 00:11:00,916 --> 00:11:03,556 Speaker 1: how you get to be worth many tens of billion 216 00:11:03,596 --> 00:11:04,276 Speaker 1: dollars when. 217 00:11:04,116 --> 00:11:04,796 Speaker 3: You're not thirty. 218 00:11:05,236 --> 00:11:07,596 Speaker 2: I would never flip that coin. I would not only 219 00:11:07,596 --> 00:11:09,596 Speaker 2: not flip that coin, I would leave the I would 220 00:11:09,636 --> 00:11:10,196 Speaker 2: leave the house. 221 00:11:11,436 --> 00:11:16,876 Speaker 1: That's why we're making podcasts, low risk, low return. Presumably 222 00:11:16,916 --> 00:11:20,116 Speaker 1: the prosecutors called Caroline Ellison because you know, they're trying 223 00:11:20,156 --> 00:11:22,996 Speaker 1: to convict Sam of a bunch of crime. So so 224 00:11:23,116 --> 00:11:24,916 Speaker 1: you know what was sort of the crime part of 225 00:11:24,916 --> 00:11:25,676 Speaker 1: her testimony? 226 00:11:26,596 --> 00:11:31,636 Speaker 2: Yes, okay, So remember that the crime that Sam is 227 00:11:31,676 --> 00:11:36,636 Speaker 2: accused of is using money that FTX customers thought that 228 00:11:36,676 --> 00:11:41,436 Speaker 2: they had safely deposited onto the FTX cryptocurrency exchange and 229 00:11:41,556 --> 00:11:47,396 Speaker 2: instead investing it through his investment firm, Alameda. Caroline is 230 00:11:47,516 --> 00:11:52,716 Speaker 2: the head of Alameda, and she said that when Alameda 231 00:11:53,156 --> 00:11:56,436 Speaker 2: used FTX customer funds, it was at Sam's direction. 232 00:11:57,076 --> 00:12:00,276 Speaker 1: Uh huh. So like that's the core, that's it, Like, 233 00:12:00,396 --> 00:12:00,956 Speaker 1: that's the. 234 00:12:00,836 --> 00:12:02,156 Speaker 2: Thing, that's the thing. 235 00:12:02,276 --> 00:12:05,836 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's like a good portrait of the day. One 236 00:12:05,876 --> 00:12:08,516 Speaker 1: of the things I've been interested in listening to the 237 00:12:08,556 --> 00:12:11,796 Speaker 1: other episode episodes you did with Michael and with Jacob Weisberg, 238 00:12:11,956 --> 00:12:15,436 Speaker 1: was what's the jury doing? Who was asleep today? I 239 00:12:15,476 --> 00:12:18,676 Speaker 1: find it striking that jurors are asleep, Like, were there 240 00:12:18,756 --> 00:12:21,196 Speaker 1: jurors asleep today? How many? Was it the same? Was 241 00:12:21,196 --> 00:12:22,796 Speaker 1: it the juror who works the overnight shift? 242 00:12:23,876 --> 00:12:26,796 Speaker 2: I think the jurors just like the journalists were actually 243 00:12:26,836 --> 00:12:30,396 Speaker 2: really interested in what Caroline had to say. And she 244 00:12:30,716 --> 00:12:34,596 Speaker 2: also sounded I had heard her on an interviews before, 245 00:12:34,756 --> 00:12:37,876 Speaker 2: and she sounded much more confident. I think her voice 246 00:12:37,916 --> 00:12:40,516 Speaker 2: was deeper, So I wondered whether she got some voice coaching, 247 00:12:41,116 --> 00:12:42,956 Speaker 2: and I wonder if that was part of why she 248 00:12:43,076 --> 00:12:45,996 Speaker 2: was able to keep the juror's attention. It was honestly 249 00:12:46,036 --> 00:12:49,796 Speaker 2: a very technical testimony. They showed a lot of spreadsheets 250 00:12:49,796 --> 00:12:52,876 Speaker 2: and balance sheets, and I was surprised. I kept looking 251 00:12:52,876 --> 00:12:55,916 Speaker 2: over at the jury, but I personally did not witness 252 00:12:55,916 --> 00:12:57,396 Speaker 2: a single sleeping jury today. 253 00:12:57,956 --> 00:13:01,116 Speaker 1: That is a real testament to how Compella and Caroline 254 00:13:01,116 --> 00:13:03,676 Speaker 1: Ellison must have been. So how did the day end? 255 00:13:04,556 --> 00:13:06,436 Speaker 1: Where did you get to in the trial? Today? 256 00:13:06,556 --> 00:13:10,116 Speaker 2: The prosecution didn't finish asking Carol questions, so they're going 257 00:13:10,196 --> 00:13:13,076 Speaker 2: to continue with that, and then I think we're all 258 00:13:13,116 --> 00:13:15,276 Speaker 2: really interested to see what's going to come out on 259 00:13:15,356 --> 00:13:16,276 Speaker 2: cross examination. 260 00:13:17,556 --> 00:13:20,916 Speaker 1: I'm very curious to hear what comes out in cross examination. 261 00:13:21,196 --> 00:13:30,316 Speaker 1: We'll be back in a minute with one last thing. Ladya, Gene, 262 00:13:30,316 --> 00:13:32,836 Speaker 1: we're back. Can you please give me one last thing? 263 00:13:33,276 --> 00:13:35,796 Speaker 2: Our one last thing today is about Gary Wong's testimony. 264 00:13:36,196 --> 00:13:39,036 Speaker 1: Okay, you and Michael talked about Gary Wong. He's the 265 00:13:39,076 --> 00:13:41,756 Speaker 1: guy who doesn't talk right. If there's one thing to remember, 266 00:13:41,796 --> 00:13:44,076 Speaker 1: he's co founder, but mainly is the really quiet guy. 267 00:13:44,636 --> 00:13:46,676 Speaker 1: And then when he talked, apparently said on the show, 268 00:13:46,676 --> 00:13:47,516 Speaker 1: we talked really fast. 269 00:13:47,596 --> 00:13:48,236 Speaker 5: It's kind of interest. 270 00:13:48,356 --> 00:13:50,916 Speaker 2: Yes, the guy get it over with once he took 271 00:13:50,956 --> 00:13:55,156 Speaker 2: the stand, did actually talk. And today was cross examination, okay, 272 00:13:55,236 --> 00:13:59,116 Speaker 2: and everyone was really impressed with how the defense lawyers did. 273 00:13:59,676 --> 00:14:02,836 Speaker 2: I think up until now they seemed really nervous. I think, 274 00:14:02,876 --> 00:14:05,116 Speaker 2: I said earlier one of their hands seemed to be shaking, 275 00:14:05,676 --> 00:14:09,996 Speaker 2: and today they moved very quickly. They hardly got interrupted 276 00:14:09,996 --> 00:14:14,596 Speaker 2: by the prosecution. They seemed very confident, and they did 277 00:14:15,636 --> 00:14:18,716 Speaker 2: kind of leave me feeling a little bit different about 278 00:14:18,796 --> 00:14:20,636 Speaker 2: Gary's testimony than I did earlier. 279 00:14:20,796 --> 00:14:23,636 Speaker 1: Interesting, So those are like the vibes, which is interesting. 280 00:14:23,676 --> 00:14:26,076 Speaker 1: What was the substance of the cross examination? 281 00:14:26,276 --> 00:14:28,116 Speaker 2: So to me, one of the most interesting things in 282 00:14:28,116 --> 00:14:32,476 Speaker 2: this trial is Sam tweeted shortly before FTX declared bankruptcy 283 00:14:33,076 --> 00:14:36,396 Speaker 2: FTX is fine. Assets are fine, And this has been 284 00:14:36,396 --> 00:14:39,516 Speaker 2: pointed over and over again to an example of Sam lying, 285 00:14:40,116 --> 00:14:42,876 Speaker 2: and on direct Gary said this was a lie because 286 00:14:43,036 --> 00:14:46,676 Speaker 2: FTX was not fine. Assets were not fine, right, But 287 00:14:46,876 --> 00:14:51,516 Speaker 2: the lawyers pointed out how Gary, in earlier conversations with 288 00:14:51,636 --> 00:14:55,996 Speaker 2: the prosecution, did not characterize this as a lie because 289 00:14:56,436 --> 00:14:58,836 Speaker 2: he said that depending on how you looked at it, 290 00:14:59,596 --> 00:15:03,316 Speaker 2: FTX maybe was fine and assets were fine. It just 291 00:15:03,356 --> 00:15:06,836 Speaker 2: depends whether you were talking about liquid or ill liquid assets, 292 00:15:06,916 --> 00:15:07,676 Speaker 2: uh huh. 293 00:15:07,436 --> 00:15:12,236 Speaker 1: Which is in fact a classic hard problem in financial crises. 294 00:15:12,316 --> 00:15:14,756 Speaker 1: Right liquid assets basically means assets you can turn into 295 00:15:14,796 --> 00:15:17,876 Speaker 1: cash right now, and ill liquid assets means, yes, we 296 00:15:17,996 --> 00:15:20,516 Speaker 1: have the money. Whatever I own a house, say, but 297 00:15:20,596 --> 00:15:22,476 Speaker 1: I just can't sell it and turn it into money 298 00:15:22,516 --> 00:15:25,476 Speaker 1: this minute. And so did he say on cross that, like, 299 00:15:25,796 --> 00:15:28,636 Speaker 1: maybe if you're considering I liquid assets, it would have 300 00:15:28,636 --> 00:15:31,156 Speaker 1: been reasonable to think that that FTX was fine. 301 00:15:31,676 --> 00:15:35,236 Speaker 2: He did seem to say that he said that Sam's 302 00:15:35,836 --> 00:15:39,156 Speaker 2: tweet was misleading since he was talking about ill liquid assets, 303 00:15:39,756 --> 00:15:42,876 Speaker 2: but he admitted that in early conversations with prosecutors he 304 00:15:42,916 --> 00:15:45,516 Speaker 2: did not call this tweet a lie. And I found 305 00:15:45,516 --> 00:15:47,436 Speaker 2: that cross examination to be really compelling. 306 00:15:48,716 --> 00:15:51,716 Speaker 1: Makes me only more interested to hear what happens when 307 00:15:51,796 --> 00:15:57,156 Speaker 1: Caroline Ellison undergoes cross examination. Thanks for having me, Lydia, Jen. 308 00:15:57,316 --> 00:15:58,676 Speaker 2: Bye Jacob talk to you soon. 309 00:16:01,116 --> 00:16:04,076 Speaker 5: This episode of Judging Sam was hosted by Jacob Goldstein. 310 00:16:04,476 --> 00:16:07,436 Speaker 5: Lydia gen Caught is our court reporter. Catherine Girardeau and 311 00:16:07,516 --> 00:16:11,276 Speaker 5: Nisha Venken produced this show. Sophie Crane is our editor. 312 00:16:11,636 --> 00:16:14,996 Speaker 5: Our music was composed by Matthias Bossi and John Evans 313 00:16:15,116 --> 00:16:18,556 Speaker 5: of stell Wagons Symphonette. Judging Sam is a production of 314 00:16:18,596 --> 00:16:22,036 Speaker 5: Pushkin Industries. Got a question or comment for me, There's 315 00:16:22,036 --> 00:16:26,676 Speaker 5: a website for that atr podcast dot com. That's atr 316 00:16:26,876 --> 00:16:31,876 Speaker 5: podcast dot com. To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen on 317 00:16:31,876 --> 00:16:35,676 Speaker 5: the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to 318 00:16:35,716 --> 00:16:39,516 Speaker 5: your podcasts. If you'd like to access bonus episodes and 319 00:16:39,596 --> 00:16:42,196 Speaker 5: listen ad free, don't forget to sign up for a 320 00:16:42,236 --> 00:16:46,636 Speaker 5: Pushkin Plus subscription at pushkin dot fm, slash Plus, or 321 00:16:46,676 --> 00:16:49,356 Speaker 5: on our Apple show page