WEBVTT - Tech's Ad Problem and Airbnb's Disappointing Outlook

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I remember the check in San Francisco, and

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hours.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of the world's most recognizable brands, from Apple to

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola, are being worn to pull advertising from Twitter,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on how Elon Musk moderates content or not. But

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Twitter that has an ad problem. All

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>major social networks are re link from fewer AD dollars

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>will even go to social media in the future or

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fleet to streaming we'll discuss. Plus Airbnb gets a reality

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>check as consumers shift away from higher cost rentals that

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>thrived in the pandemic. CEO Brian Chesky joins us to

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about his outlook on travel and address those high

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>cleaning fees, and as tensions between the US and trying

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to persist, how do businesses change their strategy? Plus where

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is Jack mob? A former Ali Baba Exact will join us,

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but first a little bit more about Twitter and advertising.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk taking over Twitter at one of the most

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>precarious moments for big tech companies that have built massive

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>businesses based on ad revenue. Platforms we've taken for granted,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 1>like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram have been free to users thanks

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to those ads. But that I'm beginning to change and

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>could continue to change fast from where I want to

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner. Kurt, before we go any farther,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening with Twitter's ad products right now? We've

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>there's been talk about a potential advertiser boycott elon musks,

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but some ideas out there about a subscription. Where do

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we stand right now? Yeah, I mean right now everything

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is sort of where was, you know, last week, But

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned there's some looming things that could be

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly impactful. The first is this potential boycott, right like

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this idea that advertisers are going to say, hey, we're

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to spend money on this platform and unless

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you do certain things around speech or or policing of speech.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that with Facebook a few years ago,

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily you probably remember, and it was a big deal.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But Facebook was able to weather that storm um for

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of reasons, and one of them was that,

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, they had Cheryl Stamberg out there talking to

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>advertisers and other senior leaders. Now all the senior leaders

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that Twitter who would be having those conversations are gone.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why I feel like an advertising boycott

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter could be kind of dicey um. If indeed

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the route that some people go, which you know,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen they'd be willing to do it before,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if that something like that happens again. Meantime,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter is grappling with the fact that advertisers

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are potentially going elsewhere in general, and also facing a

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>massive econom mic slowdown. How our advertisers thinking about whether

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to spend their dollars on social media or look to

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>things like streaming. I mean, this sounds so obvious, but

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're an advertiser, especially right now, when budgets are

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tighter, when there's this massive inflation issue

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, You're only going to spend money where

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you can see a return on that investment, Right. So

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that historically has been places like Google and Facebook, places

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with really strong direct response businesses. Right. So I put

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a dollar in and I know, with some you know, consistency,

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get a dollar fifty and sales out now.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is always been different than that. They've always specialized

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in what's called brand advertising, right. It's the kind of

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff you see around the super Bowl or on a

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>billboard or whatever that is not necessarily something that is

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>easy to measure for r O. I, it's not the

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that I think when uh, you know,

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>times are tough and money is that you want to

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>go spend a bunch of money on that. So I

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>do think, regardless of what's going on with Ellen, I

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just think aending money on Twitter right now is probably

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a tough you know, sell, just given the environment that

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we're in economically. We heard a little bit from Kathy Would,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>who seems excited about Elon Musk's plans per usual. Let's

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>take a quick listen to what she had to say

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg earlier today. This subscription advertising model is a

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>very smart move if he goes in that direction. The

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>verification that little check is very important to people and

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>could help clean up the platform considerably. You know, it's

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>not surprising that someone like Kathy Would would be excited

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>about Elon Musk's plans, But you know, what do you

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>make of her support and whether you know there will

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be a wave of advertisers and and people out there

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>who like what Ellen is doing. Yeah, I'm smiling, not

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I I necessarily disagree that the blue

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>check has value. I'm just not sure that this idea

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to clean up the service of FO

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really makes a whole lot of sense. We've seen Elon

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about this as well, right that, well, once I

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>start charging for the blue check, you know, bots won't

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>pay for the blue check, and then we'll know who's

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>real and who's not. Well, that implies, emily that regular

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>people are going to pay for a blue check mark

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>two and eight dollars a month. Uh, is not, you know,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily something that people are willing to fork over for

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, proven to Elon Muskata that they are a

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>human being. And so I'm curious to see how this works.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>To me, it feels relatively rushed. Um, maybe there's more

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>nuanced to it that we just haven't learned yet, right

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of this he's just conveying via his

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>own tweets. So perhaps there's a much broader plan that

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>we're just not seen. But at least on the surface,

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this idea of you know, we're suddenly

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna know who the humans are and who the bots

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are because the humans are the ones who are gonna pay.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't feel realistic when you have, you know,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions people on the service, Not that many

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna want to pay for this? All right?

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh so much more, tv D, Blueworks, Kart Wariner, thank you.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Of course, all of your reporting on Twitter will continue

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to follow. Uh your stuff. Let's get back to earnings now,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with Airbnb reporting big revenue and net income numbers, but

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>shares falling after the company gave a disappointing outlook for

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>bookings in the fourth quarter, closing down more than I

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in see O Brian Chesky to address

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it all now, Brian, thank you as always for joining us.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So one point to billion in net income, two point

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>nine billion in revenue. These are big numbers, um, but

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>investors still pretty disappointed. What's your response to this big

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stock plunge. I believe it's the biggest stock market job

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>for Airbnb since going public. Well, you know, I've tried

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we focus on what we can

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>deliver in your ami, we delivered a record quarter a

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>billion and a half of ibada, nearly a billion dollars

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in freak ash flow, three point three billion dollars in

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the trailing twelve months. I think that you know, people

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world, this is a very uncertain time and

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone's really looking for indications of what the future holds.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Um We've tried to make very clear on the call

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're actually feeling very confident about Q four. So

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>people are traveling, that's why results were really good in

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Q three, and we're actually feeling really confident. I don't

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure people know that. So let's hold

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on in on this moderating of booking growth that you see.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>If we are heading into a long term recession, who's

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to say that that consumers aren't going to cut back

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>on travel or aren't going to choose to stay in cheaper,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>closer places rather than splurge on that trip abroad, and

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to add up for Airbnb. Well, this

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is a great point, Emily. One of the things I

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>just say, though, is that one of the things we

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>learn in the pandemic is that we have a very

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>adaptable business model. For example, member recall in air bing

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>b was the first company to rebound in all of travel.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>That's partly why we had such a six sus y

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>p O. And the reason why is we are a

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>more affordable option. We have never nearly every type of

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>space in nearly every community, so if people cut back

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>cross border travel, they might start working more from Airbnb.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So we found a very brasilient model and that's something

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling really confident about. Chris Bryant, are Bloomberg opinion columnist,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>had an interesting take. He suggested, if Airbnb has a

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>problem is that you're making too much money, how do

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you respond to that? No one whatever told us that

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years ago we were losing two

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>d fifty million dollars a year in Evada, And of

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>course now we delivered a billion and a half dollars

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in Evada in the quarter. You know, we are increasingly

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>investing more in the customer experience every year. The reason

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>we're getting more profitable is we're more efficient. We're incredibly disciplined.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>We only have six thousand employees. We spent a lot

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>less on marketing than any other travel company of our

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>size in the online space. But you know, with air cover,

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we're investing a lot more in the customer experience this year.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to continue to be more efficient, but

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to deliver more more for customers.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>And I also understand that people really care about value.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>They want to make sure that Airbnb is still a

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>brand you can come to get a great value. We're

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>known for affordable travel, and I know that people are

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>really concerned about whether or not our our aerbans will

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to be affordable, and they will be. We're going

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to continue to focus and making sure our prices are competitive,

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and so that's what we're focused on. So let's talk

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>about the transparency around pricing that you hinted at. I

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.599
<v Speaker 1>think we've all had that feeling of looking at a

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>rental on Airbnb. Then we click all the way through

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and and the price change is given, all the fees,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the cleaning fee, et cetera. What can we expect that

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>transparency to look like? Well, yeah, and I think there's

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>two things going on. The first is people, we want

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people to understand our pricing not be surprised. The second

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>is we want to make sure that when they do

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>see the final price, they feel really good about the

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.599
<v Speaker 1>final price and it's still a great value. So we

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are working on updating some of the designs for our

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>platform to make everything even more intuitive, and we're gonna

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>have some updates very very soon, so stay tuned. Let's

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about average daily rates. There's an

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>expectation those are going to come under pressure in the

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>next quarter given the strong dollar, if the bookings mix

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>shifts to potentially cheaper rentals. Can you give us some

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>insight on consumer preferences right now? What do consumers want

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that you're seeing through the holiday season and we're not

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing a major change. I mean, what I would say

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is the reason that price per night on abomy has

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>gone up in the last couple of years is before

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, most people were using Airbnb to cross the

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.599
<v Speaker 1>border and stay in a city and stay in a

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>one bedroom, two bedroom a place. Now a lot of

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people are booking three, four or five bedroom homes and

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it because they're going with their friends, their families,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>their coworkers, or they're living in the house. And so

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>now the average duol rates higher because the homes are bigger.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>What we think is when Asia recovers, that could moderate

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>price per night a little bit. But that's a good

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thing because that will actually lead to a lot more

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>volume because you get an entire continent to be traveling

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. And I do think you're gonna see

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that grow. So we actually are expecting a pretty stable

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>average daily rate. We're not seeing major shifts and the

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>way people use air VnB just yet. Long term stays

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>still hugely popular. About of nights book give us some

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>insight on that trend, because I wonder, is it plateau

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>ing at all? Is it slowing down? I mean, is

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the growth that you saw there over No? No, I

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>mean honestly, long term stays is still the fastest growing

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>segment by length of state on Airbnb. Now because the

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>short term states have recovered, it's now been stable at

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I do expect in the coming years ahead, though, long

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>term stage will probably increasingly grow as a percentage of

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a business. And the reason why is because increasingly, I

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think more people are gonna be flexible, fewer people have leases.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying no one will, I'm just saying enough

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for this market to continue to grow. So this is

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a huge new grows owth opportunity for us

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>in the coming years to come. It's so fascinating just

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how much how people use Airbnb has changed just in

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. Do you have any concern

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that Airbnb is over reliant potentially on long term stays. No, because, um,

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we just got to make sure that each

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>segment is growing and the long term stays aren't really

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>coming at the cost of short term stays. So as

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>long as short term stays continue to grow, think of

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it as another layer. It's kind of like Amazon sales

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>books and now they sell electronics, now they sell another category.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't think these categories will necessarily cannibalize. These are

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>really different use cases, and a lot of people are

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>coming Airbnb just to list monthly stays, so this I

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>think can open up a lot. I actually think monthly

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>stays can make short term stays more popular because some

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>people might book an air be for a long term

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>stay and say, hey, that wasn't so bad staying at

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>someone else's home. Maybe I'll do it for a short

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>term stay. So may actually have a way of bringing

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>more customers into Airbnb. That's at least what we what

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>our theory is interesting. You do have some analysts out

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>there who seem to be thinking Airbnb is priced too

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>high compared to some of your travel peers, especially if

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the bookings mixes changing. What are your thoughts on that.

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, our gusts still tell us that Aaron b

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is the best value. That being said, we do want

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that as the economy slows down, our

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>value is even better. And we do know that hotels

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are starting to lower prices, and we want to make

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that our pricing is as dynamic. So what are

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>things we're doing is we're investing a lot more in

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>pricing tools for hosts so that they can have more

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>dynamic pricing. And if hotels lower rates and they want

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to lower rates more competitive, they can do that. So

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I still think we'll offer a great value, but there

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is no question that there's a lot more we can

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing on value, and that's something we're gonna be

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>really focused on over the next six months in time

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for next travel season. So longer term, I don't you know,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously you've launched categories which I know you're really excited about.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Supply is going to be key. How do you see

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>growth in supply over the next two years compared to

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the growth you saw on supply over the last two years,

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And how do you convince all of these new would

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>be hosts to choose Airbnb first and only potentially. I

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great question. Um well, let me say this.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Number One, I expect a lot more new supply over

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the next two years than the last two years. Um.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The last two years actually been pretty hard because of

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Not everyone wanted other people in their homes.

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the next two years they're gonna be a

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more interested for two reasons. Number One, the further

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is behind us, the less resident they are.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, Emily, as you recall, we started during

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight Airbnb during the Great Recession, and during

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Great Recession a lot of people needed to make

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>extra money and they turned to Airbnb to host for

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time. I think that's going to happen again.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And the final thing I'll say, I'm gonna give a

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>plug on November six at a a m. Eastern time.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna enveil a whole new, super easy way to

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>list your home on Airbnb, and I think that is

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big driver of a lot. More so,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we have some really cool new products. They're going to

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be launching in fewer than two weeks, and I think

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's going to add an acceleration. Alright, November sixteenth, we

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>will be watching. Last question. Airbnb was started in the

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of the financial crisis. You obviously survived and thrived

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately in the pandemic. What's your strategy on costs through

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this downturn? Are you considering M and A given all

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that cash and potentially opportunistic or advantageous valuations out there,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, how are you mapping this out? Given we

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could be in this for a couple of years. That's

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a great question to um. Let me tell you a

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really important lesson I learned in the pandemic. You know,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in between a February in in April of two thousand

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and twenty, we were one of the first companies hit

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic. We lost eighty percent of our business

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in eight weeks, and a thousand of us gone to

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>foxhol and we rebuilt the company fair ground up. And

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the company we rebuilt was a much smaller, much leaner,

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>much more discipline company. The reason we did three billion

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in free cash the last twelve months is because

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of that discipline and what I told the team is,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>no matter how good the economy is, no matter how

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>bad the economy is, we are going to try to

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>not ever run the company differently because of the economy.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But you can only do that if you stay disciplined, right,

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't ever want to have to get more disciplined.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So I said, we should be prepared for a storm.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Whenever it comes. We're not going to change the way

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we're on the company. And because of that, beginning this year,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we were only, for example, forecasting hiring seven percent more

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>employees this year. When other tech comes, we're gonna hire.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Now they have to pull back. We're not pulling back.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we're not pulling on the brakes. We're gonna

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>step on the gas. But stepping the gas doesn't mean

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we to spend a lot more money. It's just a

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more velocity to be a speed innovation and taking

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>more market share. All right, Brian Chesky, we'll keep that

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in mind. CEO of Airbnb, thanks for making the time today, Brian,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Thank you very much. We're gonna be right

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>back with more of Bloomberg Technology after this quick break.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. China is making moves that will severely

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>curtailed shipments in and out of the world's largest iPhone factory.

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Beijing is imposing a seven day lockdown on the area

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in Jung Joe, this after the number of COVID cases

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the city almost quadrupled from Monday to Tuesday. And

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a profit in sales miss for Paramount Global, the

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>parent company of CBS, Nickelodeon, and MTV Networks, reporting earnings

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and the big problem continuing weakness in advertising. Still, there's

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>been a turnaround in Paramounts Film Studio, with revenue up

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for in the third quarter and Top Gun Maverick is

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the highest grossing film so far this year. Meantime, Amazon

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>also feeling the heat on its ad business and it's

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>now taking more drastic measures to align expenses with a

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in sales. So it's just telling Bloomberg that the

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>world's largest e commerce company is freezing staff level in

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>its profitable ads business. Amazon will continue to fill vacancies

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>in this unit, but won't create any new jobs. Welcome

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>back to bloomber Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>The banking sector says people and businesses are paying more

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and more in the wake of ransomware attacks. Banks reported

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one point to billion dollars in ransomware payments last year alone,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>nearly five times as much as and that is just

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a taste of what Jeff Stone will explore with Bloomberg's

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>weekly cyber Bulletin newsletter, including exclusive coverage inside the world

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of hackers and cyber espionage and how businesses are playing defense.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Jeff tell us more about cyber Bulletin and what your

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>goals are here. The goal here is to help people

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>understand emily that cybersecurity is a lot more than ones

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and zeros in the latest big data breach, There's all

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>kinds of characters involved in this world now, cryptocurrency fraud

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>as part of this, disinformation as part of this, all

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>kinds of influence operations, and everyone trying to monetize data.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we're trying to explore here and really

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>help people understand how they can protect themselves more urgently. Now.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Cyber threats have been on the rise for a while.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Why now are you launching this? We're busier than ever.

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Mostly we figured we'd take on one more project, but

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>basically since since the invasion of Ukraine really has highlighted Uh,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this big explosion of ransomware as you as you just

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, UM, it is urgent for people to get

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a better sense of really what these threats look like

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and how to respond in cyberspace. Again, I think people

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>are used to this world of email scams and different

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fraud through your apps that you're still trying

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to get a handle on. But we're really going to

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>dig in and help people, um straighten out how to

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>protect themselves at a more urgent time than ever. All right, Bloomberg,

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Stone. You can sign up for that weekly Bloomberg

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>cyber Bulletin newsletter at Bloomberg dot com. Thanks, Jeff. We'll

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned well for more on the state of cybersecurity.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Christopher Alberg, the CEO of

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the cybersecurity firm Recorded Future, which is actively tracking the

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity threat level in Ukraine. Uh, Chris, give us the

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>latest there. You've been involved for for several months. Now,

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us what you're most worried about at this time,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's really interesting. We started basically we

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>had worked a little bit with one particular part of

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian government, their national search on the morning of

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the four February, we sort of stood up publicly can

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>check out our nice tweet on that, and said, look,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>we would get behind these guys and and help them

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in every every in any way we can. And so

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>now our our intelligence platform is in the hands of

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>seven agencies over there, and look, it's it's been interesting,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>uh AT. In the lead up of the war, there

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>was a whole bunch of Russian activity at the very

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of crossover into the war. They killed a bunch

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of communications and infrastructure. The Russians has taken a part

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of systems. They have certainly been running a

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of destructive malware campaigns against uh called Ukrainian power,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and the like ongoingly. What's actually been very impressive

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>is how the Ukrainians, together with foreign firms and foreign

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence agencies and help people helping them, have been able

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to withstand this. That's actually the most impressive. But the

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>dear Russians are ongoingly going at it, and we may

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not hear too much about it because office is as

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>much as when bullets and the like fly in the air,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other things may go to the back.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's full full speed head there. For sure.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You've been donating software g political intelligence to Ukrainian agencies.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>How long are you prepared to do this for no

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>no ending, no ending to that. We we came out

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and said we would go in all in and and

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>try to help them in every way we could. We

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>announced the big hiring initiative or hiring another hundred people

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. We're sort of to your point. We've given

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>them software and access to our intelligence cloud in seven

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>different agencies and they're using it to to go at

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>cyber attacks, disinformation and helping on the battlefield. We think

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been quite impactful. You know, obviously we can only

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do our little part, but we will do it as

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>long as it can, as we as we can and

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>help them in every way they can. They need to

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to help them basically crush the Russians,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>because that's I think what this is all about. If

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm slightly blunt, are We've got some big midterm elections

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up in the United States? How would you rate

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the cyber threat level more broadly and what are you

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>most concerned about when it comes to these upcoming elections?

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that it's interesting that there's sort

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of the broad sort of set of disinformation activity around

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that is ongoing, and it's sort of at the same

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>level as we saw in I think there's been a

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of good work done by the U. S. Government

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as a lot of other sort of of firms, whether

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the social media firms and people sort of on

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>top of that in terms of sort of fighting back

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on some of this. The Russians are still there by

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>no no question. I lay the Internet Research Agency in

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Saint Petersburg. They're still trying to go at it, targeting

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit sort of very targeted audiences that

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they can come at. They obviously are quite busy on

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the home front. The Iranians have also been pretty busy

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>on the home front, so maybe not not as much

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we we could all have read over the last couple

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of days about some interesting things with the Chinese are

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>going at it. So there are threats there, but I

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think we're will be in good shape. The election is

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be safe. It's gonna be a good election. And

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and even though these guys are trying, I think we're

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>doing better. So what's keeping you up at night right now?

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That we're not talking about enough. So I think it's

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you because obviously you know you've heard it in Jeff

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of point here just now. There's plenty of cyber

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>activity and it's not great. But I think we haven't

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>been really sorted yet. I like to say that over

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty five years, the world of sort of

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>slowly migrated onto the Internet. Uh, next twenty five years,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet is sort of where it starts and the

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>world ends up being a reflection of the Internet. Whether

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's world power or business, or currency or money or identity,

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it all is going to emerge out of the Internet.

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>And in that world, we better have our act together.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 1>We think that is an incredible opportunity to build an

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligence company. We want to be the Bloomberg of cyber

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want. But in that but the world better

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>habits act together because the this Internet centric world is

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be quite wild, and so we better all

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>be all be ready for a ride. I wonder how

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you think about, you know, Elon Musk taking over at

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter potentially having a more open minded approach to to

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>content moderation. Does the world to have its act together?

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So so dangerous subject to get into. I think he'll

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>do good with it. I'm sort of a very positive person,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>even though I maybe sound a little bit scared there before.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I think he will have new smart ways to go

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>out condom moderation. Uh you know so, so I'm an

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>optimist about that. But you know, and if he screws

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it up, the dangerous part or not dangerous dangerous part

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for him is that these are pretty fleeting sort of audiences.

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>They'll go anywhere else. And and you know, actually maybe

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>one danger here is that if he doesn't handle this

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one well, we might see too much of this audience

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>going over in the hands of TikTok. And to be honest,

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd much rather have Ill and Musk run a great

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>platform or even maybe not such a great platform here

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States than having our sort of upcoming

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>generations living their social life on TikTok. I take to

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>take take Twitter over that any day. And why is that?

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I think if our dear Chinese friends are controlling

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the information flow on TikTok, when they're that sort of

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>controlling the news flow, being able to intercept communications on

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that in that sort of you know, much too too

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>much control in the hands of the Chinese government to

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>be Frank or Chinese intelligence, and he said, not a

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>good thing. All right, Well, appreciate you navigating waiting into

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>some tricky territory with ask Christopher Allberg, CEO of Recorded Future,

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for sharing your thoughts here. We'll have to

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have you back soon. Coming up the line between traditional

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>finance and de centralized finance, getting blurb, We're going to

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about how next this is Bloomberg.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I think some people have avoided this asset class. It's

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>very risky. It's not appropriate for everyone. In fact, when

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>you buy cryptocurrency on so far we say this is

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a risky asset, it's unproven and you could lose all

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of your money. So um what prices down at this level,

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing people take an opportunity to um, you know,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>experiment with this type of investment and get to know

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the asset better. So if it's Anthony Noto there earlier

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg. As the worlds of traditional finance and defy

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to collide, Bloomberg Shonnali Bossik here to explain more.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>What is happening? Should I take it away? Emily, I

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important to listen to what Anthony Noo

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>over it. So far I had to say about crypto

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>because there are a traditional financial technology firm that successfully

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>acquired a bank and that has helped it really rain

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of deposit or money from clients, which

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>then can potentially be used to do things like by

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a little crypto in a downturn or invest elsewhere. The

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>real reality is options here to borrow, to buy asset,

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and to to deposit your money for safekeeping at uh

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, so far a higher interest rate than many

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>other large banks. That is the choice that you're faced

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with at the end of the day. So that rolls

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>us forward too soon after that interview we did with

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the SOFI CEO to comments that were made by the

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Binance, we know that Finance had considered making

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>up as much of a billion dollars or more worth

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of acquisitions, and you have c Z now talking about

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of buying a bank. There are people who

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>hold certain types of local licenses, traditional banking, payment service providers,

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>even banks, and we're looking at those things, he says,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>And we want to be the bridge between crypto and

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the traditional financial world, he says, So what does that

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really look like? At the end of the day, when

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about, you know, Binance getting more into traditional finance,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can they do it successfully similar to how we've seen

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>FinTechs like Sophi do it. They did it by buying

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a bank for less than a billion dollars and getting

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that banking license. I want to show you here what

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks like in terms of multiples though, because if

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at what it means to be a bank

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>or buy a bank. Even coin Base, with that huge

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>draw down you've seen in the stock this year, you're

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>still seeing them trade at a higher price to earnings

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>than you are seeing the biggest banks of the United States,

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>both regional and large investment banks trade at that is,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>between nine and eleven times earnings, and you're seeing coin

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>based trade at a higher multiple. And when you look

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>back again at what cz had said is that when

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>traditional crypto firms do pair with finance firms, you do

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>see the stock tend to jump of those finance firms.

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And he says by partnering with those companies, maybe taking

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a stake or buying out right, what you can get

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially is a higher multiple both for finance and that

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>financial firm. So it will be interesting to see what

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of deals come out of finance and others as

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we move along, not just through partnership like we've seen

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for the last year or so, but by pure money

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>put into traditional financial firms by firms that have gotten

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so large in the cryptospased like finance. All right, Shnali,

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so much more to come there, I know, Shnally boss,

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Let's take a look now at the behind

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the scenes of one of the world's most influential tech

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>companies in China and the world, and that is Ali Baba.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the topic of a new book from a former

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba executive called The Tao of Ali Baba. Inside

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese digital Giant that is changing the world. So

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>how did Ali Baba take on the world and what's

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it got coming? Next? Let's bring in author Brian Wong

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for more, a former top Ali Baba executives. So, Brian,

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you were the first American that worked at Ali Baba,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the fifty second employee and a special assistant to Jack Ma.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So you've seen some things. We should say. What do

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you think is Ali Baba and Jack Ma's secret sauce? Well,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Emily I, I wrote this book because I

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to share what my understanding and perception was

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>from the nearly twe years I was with the company

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>about you know, the essence of sort of Jack Ma

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and Ali Baba, And I think, you know, to put

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it in very um basic terms is uh, Jack really

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>um was able to build a company around a very

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>deep purpose of solving the world's problems. He uh, he

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>created a culture that was very um, optimistic and positive,

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was able to align an organization to all

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on that that mission, but at the same time

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>give them the flexibility to adapt to the constantly changing

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>world in the industry that it's operating in order to

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for to become successful. So I've seen the company recreate

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>itself over and over over these last twenty years, and

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I think really at the essence of it was what

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I called the Tao. But it's really this kind of um,

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>really strong, mission driven and purpose driven organization and culture

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that Jack helped to create. So the question is, can

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba reinvent itself again? When the company tried to

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>globalize a few years back, it didn't quite work. Should

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba revive those ambitions now? And will it work

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>when there's others pushing for d globalization. Well, you know,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the amazing things about the company throughout its

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>history is how resilient it's been. You know, when it

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>was very small, it faced some existential crises. UM. Before COVID,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there was something called Stars and it was a very

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>small company, and the company actually mobilized itself without even

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the leaders. But the staff came together

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and figured out ways to keep the company operating in

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>its early years, but also to launch what we now

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know as one of the major retail businesses called Talbao

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>during a lockdown period when you didn't have the conveniences

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have today in terms of mobile connectivity in devices.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So I believe that the company, with its d n

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>A and the culture that's been really established in uh

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, institutionalized with Ali Baba, it does have great

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>potential to continue to grow. But also, as you ask globalized, yes,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that UM, the world now really needs some

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, positive forces UM that utilize you know, things

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>like technology to actually improve society and frankly, to solve

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the problems that we're facing. UM, not

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not just in the developed world, but in the emerging markets.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>That said, China's COVID zero policies have had a myriad

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of potentially negative impacts when you're talking about the supply

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>chain and you know, basic consumer demand and execution. Some

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>people say Ali Baba's glory days are over. What do

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you think, sure, Well, look, I think the challenges of

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>zero COVID and the supply chain are more of a

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>larger national issue that needs to be resolved, and I

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think the country is trying to work through that. You know,

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we may agree or disagree with how they're handling it,

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but really this is something that needs to take place

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on a national level and then eventually, you know, the

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>companies can get back on their feet and do the

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>things they need to do. I do think, though, this

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>experience has really built up really strong capacity in terms

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of with uncertainty, and if you look at how companies

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like Ali Baba, you know, we're able to adapt to

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the situation over the years. I think they're going to

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>come out stronger once this is all done. The question is, though,

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>how does big tech survive in President She's China. When

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Beijing crackdown on the ant I p O, it basically

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>put a scarlet letter on Ali Baba and jack Ma himself,

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the way out. Well, look, I think the anti

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I p O situation was one of of of a

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>string of events that happened, and probably uh, you know,

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it was so high profile because it was at the

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>start of this kind of change in policy. But also yes,

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a very major decision and quite sudden. But

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think that, you know, what this really indicates

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>is a shift in terms of government policy, one that

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was previously kind of a late touch sort of governance

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>model where it allowed for room for innovation, to one

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>where it's more heavily regulated. But this is a global issue.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>If you think about what we're deal with now in

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming Supreme Court decisions in terms of anti trust

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and privacy in these issues, this is America, in Europe

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with this, and also China, and this is

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>where big tech has become, you know, big and influential

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>um and governments are trying to figure out how to

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>how to manage this. So I do think that each

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>respective country and it's it's governments will figure out the

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>solution of the policy for that. But I do think

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're asking about opportunities down the road. UM,

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>there are definitely new opportunities in the market. UM, you know,

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in higher quality sort of UM you know industries or

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>or or or you know areas. UM. Chinese soundary trying

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade its industrial capacity and how companies can play

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in those spaces is really going to be the secret

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to their future growth and success if they can really

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>tap into that. Jack mass still hasn't been seen publicly

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in some time. When is the last time you spoke

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with him? Where do you think he is and how

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>is he doing well? You know, I've been in touch

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with Jack, you know, throughout the last two years and

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and and um in communication and you know he's been

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he's been free to move around. He's been laying low obviously. UM.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You know he's traveled abroad. UM. You know people have

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned they've seen him in Europe and other places in Asia.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's really um Emily, he's gearing up

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for his next act, which is really around philanthropy, education,

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, helping uh those areas uh that really need assistance. UM.

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's a passion of his is to really help

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>those who are kind of the more marginalized parts of

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>society to really get on their feet rural communities. Um

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 1>but also learning. You know, I think he was doing

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of learning tours, uh in his last two years.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>UM So, so I think he's okay, but I think

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people have been wondering. And hopefully

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>at some point, you know, he will have his next

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh, you know, big thing to come out

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what he wants to do in philanthropy

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and people will know. Brian Wong, former Ali Baba, executive

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>author of the Tao of Ali Baba Inside the Chinese

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Digital Giant that's changing the world. Thanks so much Brian

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. And that does it. For this edition

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology Thursday, we've got the CEO of Aurora,

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Urmson, talking about big changes and challenges ahead for

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>self driving technology. I'm Emily Sharing in San Francisco. This

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg