WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Christian Watson

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now, here's

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Chargian. Welcome to today's edition a Fantasy Football

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Micro edition. I am Paul Charchie and my co

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>host as he has been for all of the Fantasy

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly micros. Tyler Cannabily.

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Hello, I'm trying to hold off Brian and the rest

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of their crew for as long.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>As I know they're getting Nancy. I'll tell you that much.

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Feedback's been all good. We appreciate everybody who's reached out

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with players suggestions on Twitter at Paul Charchi. In an

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>at Tyler canby k n A e b l E

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>k n A e b l E. If there are

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>players you'd like to hear us break down do a

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on, let us know, Tyler, who are we

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>starting with today?

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Star little wide receiver for the Green Bay Packers, Christian Watson, rookie,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of really good rookie. Last year he finishes the

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver thirty three, but it was kind of the

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>last half of the season, which you're really were kind

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>of in tune with his ADP right now is wide

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 2>receiver twenty three, and much like the player we had

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>last week. He's kind of a tale of two halves.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 2>He's got. Weeks one through nine, he averaged one catch

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>for nine point seven yards and one touchdown.

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a rushing touchdown, and then he dropped that

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>opening that opening season bomb touchdown. That was that I

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>think haunted haunted Packer fans for quite a while. But

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, he could have had another touchdown.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he started this season off really rough,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>and you hear Rogers talk about it, and because some

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of those Pat McAfee interviews, he's like he kind of struggling.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Then after that Cowboy game, the kind of the floodgates

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>really opened for him. He averaged after that game, which

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>was in Week ten, he averaged three point seven catches

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>sixty yards, but he had eight total touchdowns, which is crazy.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>All those came. Those eight total touchdowns came in a

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>four game span.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wasn't it two to two to two and two?

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it was three to two. Something like one

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to one I think is what it was. Yeah, but

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>still insane because he was the wide receiver nine in that.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Span to carry the one divide vices.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he had three in the Dallas game for sure.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, all right, Yeah, Now, in fairness to Watson,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt through most of that first half of

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the season. Yes, so you know, it wasn't like he

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was out there and just not performing. Mostly he wasn't

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>even on the field in the first half of the season.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, I'm a little weary because I mean,

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the injury. But when he was healthy, like

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>we saw the touchdowns. Everyone knows that he was scoring touchdowns.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 2>But outside of that, he didn't give you a lot

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>of kind of the volume you hope to see in

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the passing game. He only had two games with five

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>plus receptions throughout the whole season. He never had a

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 2>game with more than six, zero games with double digit targets,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and he had a eleven point seventeen target share. Romeo

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Dobbs and Robert Tunnian were at eleven point nine percent,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>So they saw.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert Tunyan and Romeo dubbed Dobbs, who did like nothing

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>all season, Yes, had a higher percentage team target share.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>M That doesn't make you feel great.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't make you feel great at all, and especially

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and it would be one thing if maybe you saw

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the production in college or kind of you've seen it

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>before it because right wide receiver twenty three is a

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 2>steep price to pay for. You're like, that's a quality receiver,

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>probably a fourth or fifth round pick for you. So

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>he only had like the most targets he ever had

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in college or the pros NDSU has high was forty three,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 2>and that gets targets, yes, targets target or no catch starr.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It was it was receptions that no, yeah, and NDCU

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the most he was forty three. And that's not that's

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 2>not like he's playing the SEC or the Big ten.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 2>He's playing an NDSU.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>NBSU is a really good Division two program, but they're.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Not in the No. Yeah, that fbs correct.

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's let's talk about where he can

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>go from rookie season to sophomore season because obviously, at

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty three, people are counting on him to

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have more production. The touchdowns are great, but if you're

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>only gonna have three four receptions a game, no way

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>does that touchdown productivity hold.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So he's gonna definitely have to step up just

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>from a pure volume, because we've seen the touchdowns. We

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>know what he is in the red zone. We know

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>what he can be used, kind of a as a

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>down the field sort of option super fast. I just

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>have questions whether or not he's going to be because

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>he's being drafted like he is the one in this

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 2>offense right now. And to say that he is, to

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>say the Packers don't draft a Smith and Jigba or

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>like one of those elite pass catching tit ends like

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>a Mayor or a Dalton Kincaid. That's really going to

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>cut into his already low team targets. Yeare I mean

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>he was fighting with anybody for targets last season? Oh?

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, nobody right was running unopposed. Basically, yes, Alan Lazard

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>did nothing. The team let him walk this year.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 2>You also have to think about the whole Jordan Love

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>aspects of this too, because we truly have just zero

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>idea how good or how bad Jordan Love will.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we think we know a little bit about Jordan Love,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but not a lot. So I thought it would be

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>worth He's to go back to his one career start,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's had one. It was against the Chiefs, it

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was two seasons ago, and so I went back and

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rewatched every one of his passes. From that game. What

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a freaking disaster. I did not remember it being so bad.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So the team got they got shut out through the

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>first fifty five minutes of the game, and wow, Jordan

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Love was awful. His technique looked so shaky. Now again,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this is two years ago, right, so you know, take

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>over a grain of salt. He improvised when he didn't

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to. His passes were not accurate. He threw

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>into coverage constantly. I mean, just really bad decision making.

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>He was mostly a one read passer. He would stare

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>down a guy and then covered or not. Here comes

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Now. A lot of times those guys were

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Demonta Adams, who bailed out some bad passes. And that

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>dude battled for some balls in that game, and that

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>turned out okay. When he got blitzed, Jordan Love just folded.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was way worse than I remember. Oh,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he is a little bit more mobile too,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so we did see some scrambling from him. You know,

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he's tall, he's kind of lanky, and he's got some

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he does have some running ability. He got forced out

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the pocket a lot sometimes of his own accord.

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.559
<v Speaker 1>But you know, for whatever it's worth, that one full

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>game that we got out of Jordan Love was not

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>at all promising.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I also went we re watched the end of

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles game from last season when the Eagles blew

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>out the Packers and they put in Jordan Love at

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the end, which I mean, you can say it was

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a blowout, so maybe the defense wasn't trying. It's hard,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 2>but I meant, I think he had a couple of

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>good passes in there. I remember a long touchdown to

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Christian Watson actually, so maybe that can play

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 2>off something. But I'm just not entirely. Like I said,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>we just don't know, because you mentioned the game from

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>two years ago. Two years is kind of a long time.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>You can't hopefully improved it that time.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's better.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 2>He had three years to sit behind Aaron Rodgers. Hopefully

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>he's better.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but this, if you're the Packers and you know

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this Aaron Rodgers drama is not new. If Jordan Love

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like an above average NFL quarterback to the Packers,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they'd already cut that sing with Aaron Rodgers. Would have

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>happened last year, you know, not this year. The separation

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>would have already happened, I think.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>But I think Rogers one back to back MVP is

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 2>when he when they draft Jordan Love and then it's

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>MVP MVP. You can't want You cannot cut an MVP

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>quarterback just.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Because traded him at higher value though, right.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I just don't know, because I think

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 2>at that time, the Packers like, Okay, we still we

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 2>just went to the NFT champion or we got the

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>back to back one seed. I think two times we're

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to make a run. Rogers are our best chance

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to do that. We still have a Super Bowl winning

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>roster probably in their minds, so they're not like they're

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>not just gonna, We're gonna like this is probably the

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>worst case narrow for the Packers, that Rogers is bad

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>and then the whole, the whole thing s blows them

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>there force it a it's a monsoon down there in

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Green Bounty, know what to call it. But I think

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>that's I just back to Jordan Love. I don't know.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>That's That's the only thing I can land on is

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, and I'm willing to take a chance

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>that I don't know, because that's how you kind of

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 2>get some of these really good values at ADP.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I would rather pay Jordan Loves ADP than Christian Watson's ADP. Oh,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure loves. Probably I don't have him in front

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of me, probably going off the board his quarterback thirty. Yeah,

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so I would rather pay that than gamble on Christian Watson.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And obviously Christian Watson can only be as good as

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love lets him be.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's play the ADP game. Let's play the game. Okay,

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>First one, DJ Moore? Why does he for twenty one?

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I will take to prove in Dj Moore, Not not

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>that he's ever been flashy, but this is the best

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>downfield passer that he's ever going to get paired with

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>now in justin fields?

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Jerry Judy, why does hever? Twenty two?

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You know for the moment, I'm gonna stick with again.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy is a really good receiver and that offense

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>gets better in Denver. I'll stick with Jerry Judy.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. Drake London, why is hever? Twenty four?

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust Atlanta's quarterbacks?

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, here we go, I'm right, Drake, Drake, it

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 2>might be my most drafted wid all right, because I

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the year with Ritters, he had

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>an ungodly amount of targets and receptions. Like he he

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 2>proved that he was a volume guy and he was

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a wae guy in college too. This guy put up

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>over I think like twelve touchdowns over a thousand yards

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>at college, eighty receptions.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Super productive.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with Drake.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You kind of selling me, actually, Andrake Christal Watson.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Keenan Allen, why does he for twenty five?

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>This seems too low. People are just bored of Keenan Allen.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's still a good player. Health, the injuries and stuff,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I get that. I mean that's you know, that is

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a that's a that's a real area of concern for him.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>So I would, but I'd still take Keenan Allen.

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of criminally under ranked Christian Kirk, why does he

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 2>for twenty six.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>When he finishes wide receiver nine last year and Trevor

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence is just gonna get better? Yeah, that is a

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a terrible ranking for him.

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Are you Are you in agreement that Calvin.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Ridley's gonna come back? Yeah, it's going to eat into someone.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>What Christian Kirk got last year, but still so.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 2>We're pretty much in agreement that Christian Watson's.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got I think there are all these players

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>who are going right around Christian Watson. I'd take all

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of them. Yeah, yes, what Christian Watson and I just

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>don't believe. You gotta have productivity. The touchdowns are great,

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but you can't sustain those kinds of touchdowns on three

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and four receptions a game. I'll do it. And then

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Jordan Love question mark. So yeah, too much, too

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>much risk for my blood, particularly in a format like Guillotine,

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>where you know, any any bad game could be your last.

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't advocate for Christian Watson any format.

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>What do you think in Dynasty? Are you more intrigued

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>about Christian Watson in Dynasty because the age and the

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>upside trajectory that he could have.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I shot on him in Dynasty just

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 2>because he's he's young, and he's you see the talent,

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 2>like you see the frame. You just gotta hope he

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of improves on some of those.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Frames of picket fence. I mean, the dude is tiny.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson, well, he's tall, but he's just so thin

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and lanky.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that true? I think I've seen him. He looks

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of big, if.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You think so, I see a track I see a

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>track star playing in pads.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's fair. But he's tall. Though it's tall. I

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 2>feel like he's bigger than t Higgins though I mean

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I is tall, but I feel like he's more built

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 2>to Bill Nagan.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm misremembering, but I don't. I don't see it

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that way. Yeah, it's two bad because you know, I

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just watched that whole Jordan Love game, but that was

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, so I can get to see Christian Watson.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll put it this way. I'm not going out there

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and training for Christian Watson, Like he's not a buye

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>for me. But if if I like stumbled my way

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>into him, wouldn't be in Dynasty.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yeah, okay, all right, thank you for listening to

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Fantasy Football Weekly Micro edition. This was

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson. We've got a new player coming up tomorrow.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what we're supposed to say, should we

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>say who's coming up next? It's one of my favorite players.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I loved him. I was banging the drum for him

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at this time. Last year. Loved him all off season

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and then all he did was wow me during the

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>season last year. We'll talk about Damien Pierce on tomorrow's

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football weekly micro