1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:02,840 Speaker 1: You have to put the blame on the players, blaming 2 00:00:02,880 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: the coaches his escapegoat. The Cubs have done it far 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:17,160 Speaker 1: too often. Welcome into North Side Territory. Foul Territory Networks 4 00:00:17,200 --> 00:00:21,800 Speaker 1: Cubs Podcast. I'm Sahadev Sharma, my co host Patrick Mooney 5 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 1: and I recorded a podcast earlier today. It's listener feedback, 6 00:00:26,960 --> 00:00:31,680 Speaker 1: your questions, your thoughts on the Cubs. Unsurprisingly, you are 7 00:00:31,880 --> 00:00:35,559 Speaker 1: none too happy with the way things are going. Patrick 8 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,559 Speaker 1: is likely on his way back from San Francisco right now. 9 00:00:38,560 --> 00:00:41,519 Speaker 1: Where the Cubs lost three or four, they salvaged that 10 00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:46,559 Speaker 1: fourth one today. You know, it's good. It's good that 11 00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:49,600 Speaker 1: they won a game, right, but I wouldn't take too 12 00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:52,120 Speaker 1: much away from it other than hey, it was nice 13 00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:56,720 Speaker 1: to see Hector, Narris and Porter Hodge look good. Bounce 14 00:00:56,800 --> 00:01:00,000 Speaker 1: back for show to Inmanaga is important. Luke Little was good, 15 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 1: Tyson Miller the bullpen, the pitching was good, right, and 16 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:06,319 Speaker 1: Shoda wasn't dominant, but he was much better than his 17 00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 1: last outing. It's important to see him just have average 18 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:16,559 Speaker 1: outings too, bounce back from tough, tough nights. So you'll 19 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 1: take that win. 20 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:19,600 Speaker 2: It's they have a lot of work to do. 21 00:01:19,760 --> 00:01:22,520 Speaker 1: Right, we're past the halfway point here and the Cubs 22 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:26,040 Speaker 1: are six games under five hundred. They are still a 23 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:29,960 Speaker 1: last place team. They're not playing well enough. I don't 24 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:34,880 Speaker 1: think anybody would disagree with that. That's why we got 25 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,920 Speaker 1: the questions that we did. Why don't we get. 26 00:01:37,760 --> 00:01:38,360 Speaker 2: Right to that? 27 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:42,440 Speaker 1: All right, Patrick, let's hear what the fans have to say. 28 00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:45,120 Speaker 1: Get to some of these questions. What do you what 29 00:01:45,160 --> 00:01:45,840 Speaker 1: do you got for me? 30 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 2: Here? All right? 31 00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:53,320 Speaker 3: We got our guy Evan Altman wondering what beer is 32 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:57,200 Speaker 3: best suited to either drown out or celebrate these games. 33 00:01:56,880 --> 00:02:00,160 Speaker 4: With the way the Cubs are playing. This is you 34 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:00,800 Speaker 4: got any. 35 00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:04,680 Speaker 3: West Coast I Pas season's going down the drain and 36 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:05,800 Speaker 3: in San Francisco? 37 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 4: What What's what are you drinking these days? 38 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:08,600 Speaker 2: Oh? Man? 39 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 1: Okay, first of all, I'm not as much into beer anymore. 40 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:14,840 Speaker 1: Just I mean, I still drink it. I still love beer. 41 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,680 Speaker 1: It's just I'm getting old and it gets heavy on you. 42 00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:20,160 Speaker 1: So it's loggers mostly for me. Got to keep it light. 43 00:02:20,160 --> 00:02:22,880 Speaker 1: It's ninety five degrees out here, but today's a beautiful day, 44 00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 1: but it's been ninety five degrees in Chicago. Listen, this 45 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:30,200 Speaker 1: Cub season is going down the drain quickly. Uh you need, 46 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 1: you need the harder stuff than beer. So I suggest 47 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 1: perusing the bourbon aisle, finding some good bourbon and sipping that, 48 00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 1: especially with these West Coast games. I know they're wrapping 49 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:44,920 Speaker 1: up now, no more West Coast games, but until l 50 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:47,200 Speaker 1: a right and that that the season may be well 51 00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:52,959 Speaker 1: over by then. So uh so, uh, I say, I say, 52 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:57,280 Speaker 1: switched to bourbon and today would be you know, day drinking. 53 00:02:57,400 --> 00:02:59,360 Speaker 2: But you know, just do what you gotta do. 54 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,399 Speaker 3: Another one for you here. I think this has been 55 00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:07,519 Speaker 3: in a couple different spots. William Vogally, what is the 56 00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:09,919 Speaker 3: likelihood that David Ross will get another chance to manage 57 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 3: an MLB team? Was the industry consensus that he'd acquitted 58 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 3: himself well as Cubs manager or that the dismissal after 59 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 3: twenty twenty three was deserved. Do the Cub struggles this 60 00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:22,200 Speaker 3: year make him look better in retrospect? 61 00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 1: I mean, I think Patrick, you and I like, neither 62 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 1: of us like pointed to him at the end of 63 00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:32,799 Speaker 1: the season and said, there's the issue. But I don't 64 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:35,560 Speaker 1: think anybody was like this guy is one of the 65 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:36,240 Speaker 1: top five. 66 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:37,080 Speaker 2: Managers in the game. 67 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 1: I think the industry consensus that I got from scouts 68 00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 1: and executives around the league was was, you know, there 69 00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 1: are a few difference makers in the positive, there are 70 00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:52,880 Speaker 1: a few difference makers in the negative, and a ton 71 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 1: of guys that you just say, Okay, they're not hurting 72 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 1: the team, they're not impacting the team significantly in a 73 00:03:58,600 --> 00:03:59,320 Speaker 1: positive way. 74 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:02,240 Speaker 2: And Ross kind of fell in that category. 75 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:05,480 Speaker 1: That doesn't mean he couldn't go up or down, right, 76 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:08,280 Speaker 1: Like this happens with managers all the time. 77 00:04:08,600 --> 00:04:09,200 Speaker 2: They get better. 78 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:12,280 Speaker 1: Terry Francona wasn't looked at in that way in his 79 00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:16,679 Speaker 1: first go around, and he changed as a manager and grew. 80 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 1: I always liked that about Ross. He was you and 81 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 1: I have had plenty of conversations with him. He was 82 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:26,560 Speaker 1: open minded to making changes. I would even like, even 83 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:28,560 Speaker 1: when we talked off the record, I'd bring up like, 84 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:31,279 Speaker 1: this is what I think, you know, this is why 85 00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:34,640 Speaker 1: I think I would slightly tweak this, or this is 86 00:04:34,640 --> 00:04:37,280 Speaker 1: how I see this, and he'd often say like, oh, 87 00:04:37,320 --> 00:04:39,159 Speaker 1: I see that point of view, this is why I'm 88 00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 1: doing it this way. And it was never like no, 89 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: it's only my way or the highway. It was like 90 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:45,480 Speaker 1: he was open minded to these things. But he had 91 00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 1: reasons for why he was doing things. I think he's 92 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:52,720 Speaker 1: going to end up getting another managerial job at some point, 93 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:56,640 Speaker 1: Like he's well respected as a as a baseball guy 94 00:04:56,839 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 1: in the industry. I don't know if he was like 95 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:03,840 Speaker 1: this hot manager, you know, candidate when the Cubs hired him. 96 00:05:03,839 --> 00:05:07,240 Speaker 1: But you know that they they obviously respect him and 97 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:11,679 Speaker 1: had and had high expectations for his future as a manager. 98 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:14,760 Speaker 1: I just don't think it it, uh. I think this 99 00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:20,320 Speaker 1: was more about opportunity than anything else. Really. You know, 100 00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:22,640 Speaker 1: how often do you get a chance to get one 101 00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:24,800 Speaker 1: of the best managers in the game, And that's how 102 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:30,560 Speaker 1: they viewed Craig Council. All right, Patrick, here's one for 103 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:34,919 Speaker 1: you from Jacob Zanella. This team isn't really in a 104 00:05:34,920 --> 00:05:37,480 Speaker 1: great spot to sell. Do they buy for the future 105 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:41,240 Speaker 1: or just stay put? Is there any worry that Jed 106 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:43,919 Speaker 1: likes his prospects too much and won't trade them for 107 00:05:44,040 --> 00:05:45,360 Speaker 1: major league talent? 108 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:51,039 Speaker 4: I mean Jed traded Anthony Rizzo, you know, so. 109 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:53,919 Speaker 3: I don't think there's a whole lot of attachment to 110 00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:58,839 Speaker 3: any one player. I think there's an obsession with winning 111 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 3: the the deal and extracting that surface surplus value. But yeah, 112 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:12,080 Speaker 3: they're they're kind of stuck here, and I do think 113 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 3: these questions are going to get more frequent, They're going 114 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 3: to get louder of like if they're still like seven 115 00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 3: under in a couple of weeks, and if you look 116 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 3: at the schedule, as we discussed earlier, it gets a 117 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:30,279 Speaker 3: lot harder fast. 118 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 4: We also know that Jed. 119 00:06:35,839 --> 00:06:39,200 Speaker 3: Always wants to pick a lane and be active during 120 00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:44,680 Speaker 3: these cycles, and so it's certainly getting a lot harder 121 00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 3: to see like, oh, well, these are our x number 122 00:06:49,160 --> 00:06:52,359 Speaker 3: of best prospects, our best bets. They were probably already 123 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 3: off the table. They're certainly off the table now, and 124 00:06:55,800 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 3: then it becomes a lot harder to like convince ownership 125 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:05,400 Speaker 3: to put more money into it into this. I mean, 126 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:08,640 Speaker 3: that's just kind of the reality of the situation. I 127 00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 3: know there was a couple other questions about, you know 128 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:17,400 Speaker 3: what about a trade of someone like Nicol Horner or 129 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 3: Justin Steele. I think that's certainly an interesting idea. I 130 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,560 Speaker 3: don't think we've seen this front office to be that 131 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:33,880 Speaker 3: sort of outside the box. I also think as soon 132 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 3: as you do that, you'd probably wind up having to 133 00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:39,960 Speaker 3: look for that exact same guy. 134 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:45,960 Speaker 4: I mean, Nico's hand. I don't know who wants to 135 00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 4: kind of acquire him at this point. He's also a 136 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:51,480 Speaker 4: great clubhouse influence. 137 00:07:51,520 --> 00:07:54,200 Speaker 3: He's a type of guy you want to kind of 138 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 3: build around and send example for all these other guys 139 00:07:57,320 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 3: coming up. And I mean, you know, Justin Steele, sure, 140 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:04,760 Speaker 3: but like who's going to pitch Opening Day next year? 141 00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 4: And you know, I still think like. 142 00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 3: You would have to be blown away with like major 143 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:17,320 Speaker 3: league ready pieces, and teams just don't typically give that up. 144 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:19,440 Speaker 3: Like I don't look at this Cub's organization and they like, 145 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 3: oh man, they really need more like interesting guys in 146 00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 3: a ball Seriously. Yeah, this I'm curious to get your 147 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:34,360 Speaker 3: take on this, says is from Tyler Dershel. H Is 148 00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,600 Speaker 3: it fair to say this franchise is still slow when 149 00:08:37,640 --> 00:08:40,840 Speaker 3: it comes to adjustments things like major league roster moves, 150 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:45,120 Speaker 3: batting order changes, call ups, et cetera. There just seems 151 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 3: to be a lot of weight and see with everything, 152 00:08:48,679 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 3: well said. 153 00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 1: Tyler, Yeah, it's this. Are they too slow to react 154 00:08:56,160 --> 00:09:01,319 Speaker 1: to things? I mean, I I appreciate in baseball patients right, 155 00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:03,920 Speaker 1: Like I've said this before on the podcast, the fans 156 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,720 Speaker 1: are always the first to want to make a change, 157 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:11,840 Speaker 1: whether it's getting Kyle Hendricks out of the rotation, changing 158 00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:17,360 Speaker 1: the lineup order, benching this guy, trading that guy. So like, 159 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:21,599 Speaker 1: you can't be as reactive as some fans want it 160 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 1: to be. It just it's not always the smart move. 161 00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:30,840 Speaker 1: Are they Are they adjusting these specific things quick enough? 162 00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 2: I listen. 163 00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:36,360 Speaker 1: I don't think it's I don't think it's like shifting 164 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:38,960 Speaker 1: the lineup and things like that. I don't think that's 165 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:42,320 Speaker 1: what the problem is. I really think there's a lack 166 00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:46,600 Speaker 1: of aggressiveness and willingness to really go and get like 167 00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:52,840 Speaker 1: some of the the best players available, you know, whether 168 00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:56,199 Speaker 1: it's in free agency, whether it's being more aggressive with 169 00:09:56,280 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 1: trading prospects. 170 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 2: I mean, you just answered the question about trading prospects. 171 00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:04,880 Speaker 1: Jed has done that, and to be fair, like he 172 00:10:04,960 --> 00:10:10,960 Speaker 1: was pretty aggressive moving Dj Hurs for Jamer Candelario last summer. 173 00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:15,240 Speaker 1: You know that was a pretty aggressive move all things considered. Yeah, 174 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:18,560 Speaker 1: I mean, Ross, I think some of the injury stuff. 175 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:20,559 Speaker 2: Really ticks off fans. 176 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,880 Speaker 1: I think pull ups are always something that fans want 177 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:25,559 Speaker 1: to see when a team is struggling. 178 00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:29,400 Speaker 2: I would like to see some aggressiveness right now with 179 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:30,080 Speaker 2: the bullpen. 180 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:35,520 Speaker 1: Although the bullpen was fine on Wednesday, right that the 181 00:10:35,559 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 1: bullpen wasn't the issue. 182 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:39,120 Speaker 2: It continues to be the offense. I don't know. 183 00:10:39,160 --> 00:10:42,280 Speaker 1: Do they need to be more aggressive when it comes 184 00:10:42,360 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 1: to trying different players? 185 00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:46,560 Speaker 2: Yeah? 186 00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:51,320 Speaker 1: Maybe Listen, our buddy Jesse Rogers is all about Alexander Canario. 187 00:10:51,400 --> 00:10:53,480 Speaker 1: He and I debate about it all the time. My 188 00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:57,120 Speaker 1: point is I just don't think that changes much. Maybe 189 00:10:57,120 --> 00:10:59,800 Speaker 1: it's worth trying, though that doesn't mean it's not worth trying. 190 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:01,720 Speaker 1: Do you need to be more aggressive with guys that 191 00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 1: aren't on the forty man? I think that's an interesting question. 192 00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:08,240 Speaker 1: Is it worth pushing someone like Owen Casey? Is it 193 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:11,880 Speaker 1: worth like, okay, call up Matt shot a Triple A now, okay, 194 00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:13,199 Speaker 1: get him a month in Triple A. 195 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:15,640 Speaker 2: If he does well, just bring him up? 196 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:16,160 Speaker 4: Is that? 197 00:11:17,120 --> 00:11:20,480 Speaker 2: I think that can go two way, two different ways. Right. 198 00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:24,000 Speaker 1: The guy can instantly hit, but it can also like 199 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:28,199 Speaker 1: screw up their development. Maybe they instantly hit like Kyle Schwarber, 200 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:30,439 Speaker 1: But you could make the argument that Kyle Schwarber was 201 00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 1: rushed too. He had so much more development that needed 202 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:35,720 Speaker 1: and he got a lot of it in the big leagues. 203 00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:39,839 Speaker 1: Now he's a good ballplayer, and we know what he is, right, 204 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:42,520 Speaker 1: but it took a while to get there, so you 205 00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: can kind of stump the development and make it take 206 00:11:46,400 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 1: make it end up being a longer process, even if 207 00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:49,920 Speaker 1: you get immediate impact. 208 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 2: I mean, Kyle Schwarber helped them win a World Series 209 00:11:52,200 --> 00:11:53,720 Speaker 2: right on one leg. 210 00:11:53,840 --> 00:11:57,240 Speaker 1: Essentially, he was insanely impactful when he came up in 211 00:11:57,240 --> 00:12:00,160 Speaker 1: twenty fifteen. So maybe it all ends up being worth it. 212 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:03,280 Speaker 1: Maybe maybe I'm the one overthinking. Maybe they're the ones 213 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:07,199 Speaker 1: overthinking these things, right, uh, but but I do think 214 00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:10,960 Speaker 1: they I don't think this is a rare thing. Like 215 00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:14,400 Speaker 1: you know, it's not like the Orioles have so many 216 00:12:14,520 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 1: prospects that they waited until they dominated every level before 217 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:21,920 Speaker 1: they came up. I mean, and Jackson Holiday came up, 218 00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:24,280 Speaker 1: and I believe he's still back down, right, he hasn't 219 00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:29,760 Speaker 1: been called back up. So like they're different, they're different. 220 00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:32,560 Speaker 1: There are different ways to go about it. I'd have 221 00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:36,320 Speaker 1: to go look and see who's super aggressive. I don't 222 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:39,720 Speaker 1: think the Cubs are any lesser more aggressive. 223 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:41,280 Speaker 4: Than Angels are pretty aggressive, right. 224 00:12:41,440 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I don't think you want to model the 225 00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:48,600 Speaker 1: Angels batting order changes and things like that. Those are 226 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:52,439 Speaker 1: I think most progressive front offices and managers don't think 227 00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:54,880 Speaker 1: those are that significant of a deal. 228 00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:57,200 Speaker 2: Like and and he has shifted things around. 229 00:12:57,240 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 1: We've had all sorts of different we've seen all sorts 230 00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 1: of different lineups this year because he's just trying to 231 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 1: shake things up. And he even admitted he's like, I 232 00:13:04,040 --> 00:13:05,560 Speaker 1: don't think it's that big of a deal, but I 233 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:07,839 Speaker 1: you know, just trying to make something happen, like when 234 00:13:07,920 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: we add morel leading off and you know, putting different 235 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 1: guys in the top three spots. 236 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:14,920 Speaker 2: He's trying to shake it up. It's I think a 237 00:13:14,920 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 2: lot of. 238 00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:17,480 Speaker 1: This is just like we're gonna have a few more 239 00:13:17,559 --> 00:13:20,720 Speaker 1: questions where my answer is, let's just blame the players, 240 00:13:20,920 --> 00:13:23,840 Speaker 1: stop putting the blame on other people. And if you want, 241 00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:26,480 Speaker 1: you can blame Jed on that too, right, Like, that's 242 00:13:26,520 --> 00:13:29,440 Speaker 1: that's part of it. I don't think I don't think 243 00:13:29,480 --> 00:13:36,280 Speaker 1: you you absolve Jed for any of this because he 244 00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:40,280 Speaker 1: is the one that put the put the put this 245 00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:45,120 Speaker 1: team together. All right, Patrick, let's uh, let's go with 246 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:47,440 Speaker 1: or you know what, like if you do, do you 247 00:13:47,480 --> 00:13:49,240 Speaker 1: have one right here? 248 00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:51,840 Speaker 3: Just to yeah, jump out of order because it's a 249 00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:53,840 Speaker 3: perfect segue after you say. 250 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:56,520 Speaker 4: It's time to blame the players. 251 00:13:56,720 --> 00:14:01,959 Speaker 3: I got Vicky underscore one. I think it's Vicus sing 252 00:14:01,960 --> 00:14:03,360 Speaker 3: I hope I'm pronouncing that's right? 253 00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:04,040 Speaker 4: That right. 254 00:14:05,080 --> 00:14:09,000 Speaker 3: Although it is easy to blame the hitting coach given 255 00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:13,560 Speaker 3: the Wolfl offense for this team for this long, is 256 00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 3: he on the hot seat? 257 00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:20,160 Speaker 4: Geez? You could say, I guess dustn't. Kelly is the 258 00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 4: primary hitting coach. 259 00:14:21,280 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 3: But there's a group, a small army of other assistants 260 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:30,320 Speaker 3: and kind of analysts, and a front office going there 261 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 3: as well. 262 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:33,240 Speaker 4: How do you look at the hitting group at this moment? 263 00:14:34,920 --> 00:14:36,960 Speaker 2: Like, I just think it's such a cop out. 264 00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 1: And if if Jed were to choose to go this route, 265 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:45,120 Speaker 1: I think my route would be to rip Jed like, 266 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,080 Speaker 1: I think that would be an unacceptable answer to these 267 00:14:48,480 --> 00:14:52,720 Speaker 1: this team's issues. Just one quick thing I want to 268 00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:56,360 Speaker 1: I want to point out last year, Cleveland was twenty 269 00:14:56,400 --> 00:15:01,240 Speaker 1: seventh in run scores, run runs scored. Okay, fire Chris Blaka, right, 270 00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:04,280 Speaker 1: fire him, like what is he doing? He's he's terrible. 271 00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:07,440 Speaker 1: He must be awful at his job. That team can't 272 00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:12,840 Speaker 1: score runs. Now they are fifth in runs scored this 273 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:15,840 Speaker 1: year so promote Chris of Alaka greatest hitting coach ever? 274 00:15:16,080 --> 00:15:21,000 Speaker 1: Right for yeah, Like it's just like last year Dustin 275 00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 1: Kelly was the answer. Greg Brown must have been the 276 00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:26,120 Speaker 1: problem in twenty twenty two, Right, the cub scored the 277 00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:28,200 Speaker 1: six most runs, and. 278 00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:30,440 Speaker 2: Now and now. 279 00:15:30,400 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 1: Dustin Kelly is the problem. I know that's not what 280 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:38,000 Speaker 1: he was saying, because was saying I don't I don't 281 00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:39,800 Speaker 1: have the exact question in front of me, but it 282 00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:40,840 Speaker 1: sounded like he was. 283 00:15:40,880 --> 00:15:43,280 Speaker 2: He was just like asking when when does he get 284 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 2: on there? 285 00:15:43,720 --> 00:15:46,120 Speaker 4: It wasn't, It wasn't He just used the word blame. 286 00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 3: It was more kind of presenting the idea against right, 287 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:51,800 Speaker 3: you know, this is professional sports, is kind. 288 00:15:51,640 --> 00:15:55,520 Speaker 1: Of yeah, I listen, you can blame the coaches. Maybe 289 00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 1: they're not maybe they're not doing their job. But Dustin 290 00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:01,120 Speaker 1: Kelly was praised last year. Have like there was a 291 00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:04,400 Speaker 1: lot of praise put his way after they put together 292 00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:06,480 Speaker 1: a really strong offensive campaign. 293 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,920 Speaker 2: I just don't think it's his his issue, like I 294 00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:10,360 Speaker 2: do not. 295 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 1: I think this is roster construction, lack of a superstar, 296 00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:20,560 Speaker 1: and some underperformance and just some abysmal performance with runners 297 00:16:20,560 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: in scoring position. And I don't think he's preaching anything 298 00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:26,240 Speaker 1: that would make me say, like, you can't. 299 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:27,800 Speaker 2: Preach that with runners in scoring position. 300 00:16:27,840 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: You can't tell them to do these things with you know, 301 00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:34,560 Speaker 1: they're not doing anything. They're not being taught anything wrong. 302 00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 1: They're being prepared in a proper manner. Because it worked 303 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,520 Speaker 1: last year and it was praise last year, and now 304 00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:44,200 Speaker 1: it's not working. And I think it's on the players. 305 00:16:44,280 --> 00:16:46,640 Speaker 1: I just think you have to put the blame on 306 00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 1: the players. Blaming the coaches is a scapegoat. The Cubs 307 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:53,520 Speaker 1: have done it far too often. How many hitting coaches 308 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:59,280 Speaker 1: have recovered in our time? Too many really good guys 309 00:16:59,400 --> 00:17:02,280 Speaker 1: in the group, some of them, I mean, go back. Uh, 310 00:17:02,560 --> 00:17:04,360 Speaker 1: isn't they rehired one of them? 311 00:17:05,440 --> 00:17:05,720 Speaker 2: Yeah? 312 00:17:05,720 --> 00:17:08,720 Speaker 1: And and where's where's James Rawson? Who was like there 313 00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:14,240 Speaker 1: when I first started Yankees hitting coach that monster offense 314 00:17:14,640 --> 00:17:17,120 Speaker 1: And he was he was one of the first scapegoats 315 00:17:17,119 --> 00:17:18,680 Speaker 1: of the I believe of the THEO. 316 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:22,320 Speaker 2: Jed era correct or was that. Uh he was, he was. 317 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:26,159 Speaker 3: I think he's probably not the best scapegoat example, but 318 00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:28,760 Speaker 3: he was definitely part of the the churn there. 319 00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 4: And I think that's the point too. I was just 320 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:33,920 Speaker 4: reading about him the other day. 321 00:17:35,320 --> 00:17:38,040 Speaker 3: You know, you get to be a good hitting coach 322 00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:41,359 Speaker 3: you have great hitters, Like if he brought Juan Soto 323 00:17:41,480 --> 00:17:43,440 Speaker 3: into this lineup, I'm sure it would be saying how 324 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:47,200 Speaker 3: great Dustin Kelly is, which is what people were saying 325 00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:50,840 Speaker 3: last year. To your point of that offense really unperformed 326 00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 3: expectations and even even April it looked like, okay, this 327 00:17:55,680 --> 00:17:57,359 Speaker 3: is you know, this could be it. 328 00:17:57,480 --> 00:17:59,680 Speaker 4: They were super high on it in spring training. 329 00:17:59,760 --> 00:18:00,520 Speaker 2: Just have and worked. 330 00:18:00,920 --> 00:18:02,120 Speaker 4: Air Kratz here from FT. 331 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:05,480 Speaker 1: I'm a former athlete that really. 332 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:09,000 Speaker 3: Pays attention to his routine, and AG one every morning 333 00:18:09,040 --> 00:18:11,680 Speaker 3: before my workouts is something that gets my day going. 334 00:18:12,119 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 5: Hey, bron here. Ag One is a foundational nutrition supplement 335 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:18,800 Speaker 5: that delivers daily nutrients and gut health support, and it's 336 00:18:18,800 --> 00:18:21,439 Speaker 5: backed by multiple research studies, so you can trust what 337 00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:22,520 Speaker 5: you're putting in your body. 338 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:26,040 Speaker 3: Unlike other products which only test their ingredients in isolation, 339 00:18:26,280 --> 00:18:29,000 Speaker 3: ag one tests their formula. 340 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:31,440 Speaker 5: As a whole ready for this stat, ninety seven percent 341 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:34,040 Speaker 5: of people in a research study felt more energy after 342 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:36,800 Speaker 5: thirty days of drinking ag one. If I had to 343 00:18:36,800 --> 00:18:40,040 Speaker 5: recommend one product to support whole body health, it's ag 344 00:18:40,160 --> 00:18:42,199 Speaker 5: one and that's why FT is excited to have them 345 00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:44,960 Speaker 5: as a new partner. Starting your journey with ag one 346 00:18:45,080 --> 00:18:47,440 Speaker 5: is a win. Try ag one and get a free 347 00:18:47,440 --> 00:18:50,200 Speaker 5: one year supply of Vitamin D three, K two and 348 00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:53,360 Speaker 5: five free AG one travel packs with your first purchase 349 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:57,400 Speaker 5: at drinkag one dot com slash foul. That's drinkag one 350 00:18:57,400 --> 00:19:01,720 Speaker 5: dot com slash fo ul go check it out ft FAM. 351 00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:03,600 Speaker 1: All right, Patrick, I'm going to ask you a couple 352 00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:05,560 Speaker 1: bullpen related questions. 353 00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:06,960 Speaker 2: And there's a couple here. 354 00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:10,959 Speaker 1: There's Peter Berg, there's someone else had a question about, Uh, 355 00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:14,360 Speaker 1: I lost it, but it's so it's why do why 356 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:17,720 Speaker 1: does it seem the Cubs have trouble developing reliable bullpen arms? 357 00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:22,040 Speaker 1: Someone else asked a question of essentially saying like, uh, 358 00:19:22,359 --> 00:19:25,119 Speaker 1: what's the difference between developing a starting pitcher and a 359 00:19:25,160 --> 00:19:27,480 Speaker 1: relief pitcher at the major league level? Because I think 360 00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:29,879 Speaker 1: we've seen that the Cubs now, all of a sudden 361 00:19:29,920 --> 00:19:32,440 Speaker 1: over the past two years, Okay, we kind of start 362 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,200 Speaker 1: trusting their their development when it comes to starting pitching. 363 00:19:35,560 --> 00:19:39,520 Speaker 1: Why is it we're not seeing relief pitching being developed here? 364 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 1: I think whatever your quote answer is, I think it's 365 00:19:44,080 --> 00:19:44,800 Speaker 1: a complicated. 366 00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 2: One is the reality right. 367 00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:51,200 Speaker 3: Yeah. I think in terms of kind of developing starters, 368 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:53,199 Speaker 3: are guys caught in between. I think we've seen a 369 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:56,480 Speaker 3: little bit of this with Hayden was was an esky 370 00:19:57,200 --> 00:20:00,439 Speaker 3: who has great stuff and it's had a great moments. 371 00:20:00,480 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 3: He looks the part, but has been caught in between 372 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:06,080 Speaker 3: a little bit. I mean, at the same time, Ben 373 00:20:06,119 --> 00:20:11,239 Speaker 3: Brown has certainly looked great when he's been healthy. I 374 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:14,120 Speaker 3: do think if you zoom out, it's kind of part 375 00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:17,520 Speaker 3: of a broader thing that I think Jed has been 376 00:20:17,560 --> 00:20:21,479 Speaker 3: weighing or wrestling with of like how much runway are 377 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:24,399 Speaker 3: these guys going to get? Like Justin Steele had a 378 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:27,760 Speaker 3: lot of time to just kind of like settle in. 379 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:29,679 Speaker 3: I want to say it was after the twenty twenty 380 00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:33,160 Speaker 3: one trade deadline of like, okay, here's like two months, 381 00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:37,399 Speaker 3: and then you know, twenty twenty two was this, you know, 382 00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:43,399 Speaker 3: obvious rebuild year to write off and you know the Cubs. 383 00:20:43,160 --> 00:20:45,040 Speaker 4: Are not in that position. 384 00:20:45,040 --> 00:20:47,680 Speaker 3: Even though they're not, you know, killing it right now, 385 00:20:48,920 --> 00:20:51,679 Speaker 3: there were expectations to make the playoffs this year, and 386 00:20:51,720 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 3: so it's harder to just kind of give. 387 00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:57,840 Speaker 4: Guys a similar runway. 388 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:01,560 Speaker 3: I think, you know, you have a great feel for 389 00:21:01,640 --> 00:21:04,080 Speaker 3: this Cub's pitching infrastructure. I think if we had done 390 00:21:04,119 --> 00:21:08,439 Speaker 3: this mailbag at a different moment, you know, we'd be saying, 391 00:21:10,520 --> 00:21:14,840 Speaker 3: you know, Julian Meriweather's great guy that they found off waivers, 392 00:21:14,880 --> 00:21:18,160 Speaker 3: and look at Mark Leder Junior, and oh yeah, things 393 00:21:18,160 --> 00:21:22,120 Speaker 3: click with Albert Hel's ale. Obviously, all three of those 394 00:21:22,119 --> 00:21:24,760 Speaker 3: guys are injured, and I think that's a huge part 395 00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:29,240 Speaker 3: of this that you can never feel like you have enough. 396 00:21:31,560 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 3: And I do think if the offense was just producing 397 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:39,159 Speaker 3: a little bit more, we might be saying, like, how 398 00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 3: good this bullpen has been under the circumstances. 399 00:21:42,600 --> 00:21:44,879 Speaker 4: I mean even taking Wednesday's game. 400 00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:50,639 Speaker 3: You know, you do a bullpen day, bullpen night, and 401 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:54,639 Speaker 3: you keep the Giants off the board for six of 402 00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:58,119 Speaker 3: the eight innings, give up a couple home runs. It's like, 403 00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:01,200 Speaker 3: if you're the team, you know just that can pop 404 00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:03,640 Speaker 3: a three run homer or put a little more pressure. 405 00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:06,480 Speaker 4: On the other team, like it would look different. And 406 00:22:07,160 --> 00:22:10,480 Speaker 4: there are guys like Tyson Miller. I mean we did 407 00:22:10,520 --> 00:22:12,920 Speaker 4: not when that deal went down. 408 00:22:13,200 --> 00:22:16,120 Speaker 3: We were like, oh, guy got a by how many 409 00:22:16,119 --> 00:22:19,359 Speaker 3: teams in the last you know, year plus or whatever, 410 00:22:19,440 --> 00:22:24,960 Speaker 3: And he looked really really good. And I also think too, 411 00:22:25,040 --> 00:22:30,520 Speaker 3: like the defense has looked better, but it's not as 412 00:22:30,520 --> 00:22:32,920 Speaker 3: good as they thought it would be. And that moment 413 00:22:33,000 --> 00:22:36,040 Speaker 3: the other night when Seya Suzuki kind of jumps in 414 00:22:36,080 --> 00:22:38,440 Speaker 3: the air, thinking the walls there, and the ball just 415 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:44,080 Speaker 3: flies by him and bounces around like that stuff matters. Otherwise, 416 00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:46,959 Speaker 3: like Steel would have gone a little longer. That's kind 417 00:22:47,000 --> 00:22:49,320 Speaker 3: of how they had scripted it. And then all of 418 00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:52,199 Speaker 3: a sudden, you've got a double and it's a pressure, 419 00:22:52,280 --> 00:22:56,760 Speaker 3: high leveraged situation, and you bring in Tyson earlier than 420 00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 3: you would have won it. And if they play a 421 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:03,920 Speaker 3: cleaner game, maybe Steele does go a little bit deeper, 422 00:23:04,119 --> 00:23:08,080 Speaker 3: and maybe it's like Tyson with a clean inning in 423 00:23:08,119 --> 00:23:12,000 Speaker 3: the ninth instead of kind of going a Colton Brewer 424 00:23:12,280 --> 00:23:14,680 Speaker 3: and Drew Smiley and having the game a game you 425 00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:15,760 Speaker 3: had to win, blow up on. 426 00:23:15,760 --> 00:23:19,359 Speaker 1: You, all right, Patrick, I'm gonna I'm gonna answer a 427 00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:23,800 Speaker 1: question here and we can wrap this up. But this 428 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:27,720 Speaker 1: is I think this is an interesting question, uh from Harbes. 429 00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:29,960 Speaker 1: I vaguely remember there being a hit lab, but it's 430 00:23:30,000 --> 00:23:32,720 Speaker 1: not discussed, like the pitch lab. Is that still a thing? 431 00:23:32,880 --> 00:23:34,879 Speaker 1: How do you how do they want to address the 432 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:37,520 Speaker 1: struggles that Triple A players are having at the big 433 00:23:37,600 --> 00:23:40,280 Speaker 1: league level. The lack of impact bats is concerning and 434 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:43,520 Speaker 1: stats from I who don't translate. Okay, so Triple A 435 00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 1: stats in general are not translating offensively. Uh, it's not 436 00:23:48,119 --> 00:23:50,920 Speaker 1: a Cubs thing. It's a baseball thing. There's a lot 437 00:23:50,960 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 1: of talk about the jump from Triple A to the 438 00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:55,760 Speaker 1: big leagues. Is feels like as wide of a gap 439 00:23:55,800 --> 00:23:59,920 Speaker 1: as it's ever been. You know, fewer, there's fewer minor 440 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:02,440 Speaker 1: league affiliates, you don't have the lower levels. You kind 441 00:24:02,480 --> 00:24:05,600 Speaker 1: of have to rush move prospects, maybe a little faster 442 00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:07,000 Speaker 1: than you would have in the past. 443 00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 2: That's one reason. Is there a hit lab? Yeah? So 444 00:24:10,600 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 2: is there a Why do people talk about the pitch 445 00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:15,080 Speaker 2: lab as more? I don't know. 446 00:24:15,280 --> 00:24:17,280 Speaker 1: I think it became kind of a joke type thing 447 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:20,280 Speaker 1: when they were developing pitching and people talk about it more. 448 00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:22,040 Speaker 2: It's not about these labs. 449 00:24:22,160 --> 00:24:26,160 Speaker 1: It's about there's information gathered in there, and there's things 450 00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:28,480 Speaker 1: you can work on. Very specifically. It really is about 451 00:24:28,520 --> 00:24:31,600 Speaker 1: the coaching and how you interpret that that stuff and 452 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:35,920 Speaker 1: how you execute and and like you know, implement these 453 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:38,880 Speaker 1: ideas that are put in place. There are certainly things 454 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:42,840 Speaker 1: that I think are being tweaked. I do believe they have. 455 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:46,720 Speaker 1: So they believe in their hitting infrastructure, why haven't they 456 00:24:46,760 --> 00:24:50,000 Speaker 1: developed a star? I mean that that's hard to answer 457 00:24:50,160 --> 00:24:53,720 Speaker 1: that there really is, Like have the Orioles figured something 458 00:24:53,760 --> 00:24:57,320 Speaker 1: out with hitting? I had a talk like two or 459 00:24:57,320 --> 00:25:01,880 Speaker 1: three years ago with a hitting code about the idea 460 00:25:02,160 --> 00:25:05,960 Speaker 1: of a hitting you know, like coordinator minor league guy, 461 00:25:06,400 --> 00:25:09,040 Speaker 1: about the idea of like where's the next step? But 462 00:25:09,080 --> 00:25:11,760 Speaker 1: like where where are things in player development? We took 463 00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:15,440 Speaker 1: these huge leap leaps in player development over the past decade. Right, 464 00:25:15,960 --> 00:25:19,639 Speaker 1: majority of it has been in pitching, right, that's just 465 00:25:19,800 --> 00:25:22,840 Speaker 1: like it's easier to measure things. They figured out a 466 00:25:22,880 --> 00:25:25,520 Speaker 1: lot of things when it comes to pitching development. So 467 00:25:26,080 --> 00:25:28,879 Speaker 1: that's further ahead as far as like what we know 468 00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:32,480 Speaker 1: about pitching development. The hitting development stuff was the next 469 00:25:32,520 --> 00:25:36,600 Speaker 1: frontier that that coach really believed that was next and 470 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,199 Speaker 1: that they were starting to tap into some things in 471 00:25:39,240 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: the game. Uh, maybe the Orioles were ahead, right. Gunnar 472 00:25:43,320 --> 00:25:46,440 Speaker 1: Henderson was like a second round pick and he's what 473 00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:49,880 Speaker 1: now fighting for an MVP on one of the best 474 00:25:49,920 --> 00:25:50,760 Speaker 1: teams in baseball. 475 00:25:50,840 --> 00:25:52,640 Speaker 2: Right, Like these are. 476 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:57,600 Speaker 1: These are things that are hard to until it becomes public. 477 00:25:57,680 --> 00:26:00,520 Speaker 1: Really it's hard to talk about because they don't they're 478 00:26:00,560 --> 00:26:04,119 Speaker 1: they're really secretive about this stuff until more teams have it, 479 00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:06,080 Speaker 1: and then it kind of like gets leaked out and 480 00:26:06,119 --> 00:26:07,919 Speaker 1: then then it's like, Okay, we don't need to be 481 00:26:07,960 --> 00:26:08,639 Speaker 1: as secretive. 482 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:10,000 Speaker 2: But there there. 483 00:26:09,960 --> 00:26:13,880 Speaker 1: Certainly is uh, there are, there is work being done. 484 00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:17,000 Speaker 1: I did a piece where I went to Justin Stone's 485 00:26:17,680 --> 00:26:21,040 Speaker 1: facility and I went through the stuff that they go through, 486 00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:23,919 Speaker 1: like a modified version of it. It was it was 487 00:26:23,960 --> 00:26:27,320 Speaker 1: fun to do and it was fun to write. They 488 00:26:27,400 --> 00:26:30,119 Speaker 1: certainly do some crazy things. There are aspects of the 489 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:33,600 Speaker 1: game that are very different than there was ten fifteen 490 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:37,400 Speaker 1: years ago. As far as player development goes. Yeah, they 491 00:26:37,440 --> 00:26:39,840 Speaker 1: need to develop, like we don't. Why haven't they developed 492 00:26:39,840 --> 00:26:42,960 Speaker 1: a star? Well, they haven't. None of these guys have 493 00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:46,680 Speaker 1: come up yet. I don't think Owen Case he's going 494 00:26:46,720 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 1: to be an MVP candidate. I've been wrong before. Matt Shaw, 495 00:26:51,960 --> 00:26:54,120 Speaker 1: I could see that, I could see him developing into 496 00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:54,400 Speaker 1: a star. 497 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 2: He's not there yet. He's only a double A, so 498 00:26:56,600 --> 00:26:59,440 Speaker 2: we got to be patient on that. I don't know. 499 00:26:59,560 --> 00:27:02,200 Speaker 1: I can't give you an answer why they haven't outside 500 00:27:02,240 --> 00:27:05,920 Speaker 1: of I'm not sure if they have star talent, so 501 00:27:05,960 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 1: they can't just make a star, like that's not really 502 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:12,920 Speaker 1: how it works, Like they need to get that star 503 00:27:13,160 --> 00:27:15,280 Speaker 1: in the system, and a lot of times you have 504 00:27:15,320 --> 00:27:17,920 Speaker 1: to make sure you develop, like yeah, maybe, like hey, 505 00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:20,600 Speaker 1: if Matt Shaw becomes a star, do they get credit 506 00:27:20,600 --> 00:27:23,280 Speaker 1: for that because he was drafted thirteen? If you get 507 00:27:23,280 --> 00:27:25,680 Speaker 1: like an MVP candidate that draft at thirteen, do you 508 00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:27,720 Speaker 1: get credit for that or do the industry screw up 509 00:27:27,760 --> 00:27:29,640 Speaker 1: any drop too far. 510 00:27:29,840 --> 00:27:30,879 Speaker 2: Or wherever he was drafted. 511 00:27:31,040 --> 00:27:33,520 Speaker 1: I may be wrong on that number, but whatever, my 512 00:27:33,560 --> 00:27:36,119 Speaker 1: point is, I don't think any of these guys are 513 00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:41,280 Speaker 1: projected to be stars, so like to exceed those expectations, 514 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:44,280 Speaker 1: then you have like this elite development, right. 515 00:27:44,960 --> 00:27:47,479 Speaker 2: I think the Cubs have good development. I think they're hoping. 516 00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:50,840 Speaker 1: When I asked around in baseball, I never got them 517 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:53,800 Speaker 1: as an answer of who's best at player development? 518 00:27:54,200 --> 00:27:54,439 Speaker 2: You know. 519 00:27:55,240 --> 00:27:57,520 Speaker 1: I think the Cubs are hoping that they end up 520 00:27:57,640 --> 00:28:01,240 Speaker 1: in that answer someday soon. They're not there yet. And 521 00:28:01,600 --> 00:28:05,359 Speaker 1: I don't think this is a specific problem with them 522 00:28:05,720 --> 00:28:08,520 Speaker 1: as much as it's just like the reality of the situation. 523 00:28:08,600 --> 00:28:11,760 Speaker 1: I think player development is significantly better than it was 524 00:28:12,800 --> 00:28:17,400 Speaker 1: for this team that five years ago. It's not producing 525 00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:20,359 Speaker 1: the results that you want. As far as star talent 526 00:28:21,000 --> 00:28:25,000 Speaker 1: with offensive players. I don't think that has as much 527 00:28:25,040 --> 00:28:27,080 Speaker 1: to do with the player development as it does to 528 00:28:27,160 --> 00:28:30,119 Speaker 1: do with the players. And that's not a knock on 529 00:28:30,160 --> 00:28:31,679 Speaker 1: the players, because I do believe they have a lot 530 00:28:31,720 --> 00:28:34,600 Speaker 1: of good players. Maybe Moises bi Asteros maybe that. I mean, 531 00:28:34,640 --> 00:28:37,399 Speaker 1: that is a pretty good situation there. I mean, you 532 00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:40,280 Speaker 1: got to give player development some credit there. Twenty year 533 00:28:40,320 --> 00:28:44,200 Speaker 1: old already hitting at Triple A. So it's not all bad. 534 00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:47,240 Speaker 1: It's and I get the question about not translating a 535 00:28:47,280 --> 00:28:47,840 Speaker 1: Triple A. 536 00:28:49,560 --> 00:28:51,520 Speaker 4: It's like, yeah, thing right. 537 00:28:51,600 --> 00:28:54,200 Speaker 2: We tried to temper Matt Murvis here. We did. 538 00:28:54,320 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 1: We tried to say, like, I guys, I don't think 539 00:28:56,760 --> 00:29:00,880 Speaker 1: he's the superstar you think he is. So there's stuff 540 00:29:00,960 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 1: like that where it's just like, you know, I'm not 541 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:08,120 Speaker 1: sure who this guy is, but you can wonder like 542 00:29:08,160 --> 00:29:10,560 Speaker 1: why isn't Pca hitting like he was in Triple A? Well, 543 00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:12,840 Speaker 1: he had holes and we know about it, and I 544 00:29:12,880 --> 00:29:15,440 Speaker 1: think this will be valuable, like we talked about last podcast. 545 00:29:15,920 --> 00:29:20,440 Speaker 1: Thanks so much for listening to Northside territory. I'm Sahadiv Sharma. 546 00:29:20,600 --> 00:29:23,280 Speaker 1: That's Patrick Mooney. Make sure to read our work at 547 00:29:23,280 --> 00:29:25,920 Speaker 1: the Athletic. Make sure to subscribe, rate and review all 548 00:29:25,960 --> 00:29:28,600 Speaker 1: that good stuff that you do for this podcast. We'll 549 00:29:28,600 --> 00:29:33,280 Speaker 1: be back at you next week after a big Brewer series. 550 00:29:33,800 --> 00:29:36,000 Speaker 1: We'll see if the Cubs can make it interesting or 551 00:29:36,000 --> 00:29:38,760 Speaker 1: if they continue to flounder and then fall further below 552 00:29:38,800 --> 00:29:42,760 Speaker 1: five hundred. Obviously it's time to turn things around. Otherwise, 553 00:29:44,160 --> 00:29:46,960 Speaker 1: if you don't want to see what happened last summer 554 00:29:47,000 --> 00:29:49,120 Speaker 1: where they have to climb back from ten games under, 555 00:29:49,520 --> 00:29:52,040 Speaker 1: they were able to do so, but they couldn't finish. 556 00:29:51,800 --> 00:29:53,640 Speaker 2: The job obviously gassed. 557 00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:56,920 Speaker 1: In September, Jed Hoyer specifically said he wants to avoid 558 00:29:56,960 --> 00:30:01,920 Speaker 1: that scenios scenario. So clearly it's past well past time 559 00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:03,360 Speaker 1: that the Cubs get going here. 560 00:30:03,680 --> 00:30:05,080 Speaker 2: Thanks again for listening. Take care,