WEBVTT - Episode 89: i540 Irons

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>The guys from paying.

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 2>They've kind of showed me how much the equipment matters.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I just love that I can hit any shot.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I kind of want.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna be able to tell some fun stories about

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 3>what goes on here to help golfers play better golf.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>What's up, everybody? Welcome back to the Ping proven Grounds podcast.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Shane Bacon, alongside Marty Jerts and Travis Millman is with us. Travis,

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I gotta start with this. I was looking through some

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>of your notes and you've caddied for Marty.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I did. I had the pleasure of doing that one time,

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>just once.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>What was that at?

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a Shiner's event, right twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>time frames.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 3>Either fifteen or sixteen or sixteen ye TPC summer line.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Travis give us. Can we get a little breakdown of

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Marty in between the ropes?

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>How was he well? I very vividly remember he said,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>never let me beat you to the ball. Right, So

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>if I had the bag on my back, I had

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to be there first.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Like did he say that with a smile or was

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>it more like a demand?

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 1>A polite, polite demand. I also said, like I can

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>help read putts. I play right, He's like, nope, I'm good.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Just carry the bag.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Grab So you were you you just carry the bag.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>You were you were a push cart with actual arms.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And very terrified of doing a bad rape job. Yes,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember you. You have to sign as a caddy,

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to sign a waiver saying hey, you're not

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a bad rape job, or else he would

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>get fined. Yeah, and so I was terrified. Marty doesn't

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>hit him any bunkers. But I feel like you did

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>when I was with you, And I vividly remember sixteenth

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hole at t PC Summerlin, the back left bunker on

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that par five that I was. I was scrambling, to

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>say the least, And so the other caddy stepped in

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>like they knew was my first time. So it was fun.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 3>I just remember looking back in Travis's let's just say

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>he can be a perfectionist. He likes things kind of

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 3>neat and tidy. Yeah, and he's over there just just

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 3>feathering the bunker. Right, I'm over there. I need my

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>ball cleaned. You have to play fast on the PG. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you can't play slowly like that. As much as we

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>talk about slow play, they want you to kind of be.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Up there, especially if you're a newbie. Yeah and ready

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to go. I remember I caddied on the LPGA tour

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times, and I remember being just hairri

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>fi to the bunker raking like the first couple of rounds,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>being nervous. The other thing that threw me off was

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the caddies finding the spots for the next day's whole location.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea what they were doing for about

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>two days, and then it took me about till the

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>third round to realize that they were stepping off like

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the next rounds all location. So that was not my

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>greatest moment.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Did you make it to the third and fourth round?

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 2>We made the time, so I was pretty happy about it.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>But obviously you're not here to talk about about caddy

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>and but I appreciate the insight your guy. That's been

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a ping for a long time. You've been involved in

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of different stuff. Obviously, as we kind of

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>look ahead at twenty twenty six, the new lines coming out,

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 2>what are you most excited about when you look at

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>at at what's coming for the for the golfer out there.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we have a lot of really good

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>options in twenty twenty six. So the G four forty

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>K driver is gonna be a great addition to our family.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously here today today to talk to you about

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>I FI forty. I think it's a really cool product

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for very discerning golfer, that player's distance category. It's kind

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of our off g launch here, and so we have

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other products to talk about.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>So Marty, I'll look at I five and I can't

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>help but see IDI involved in this. I mean, when

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>you think about my obsession with the IDI line and

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>putting those immediately in the bag, it looks very similar,

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>if you.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Will, yep, yep, yep. Definitely. And I think, Travis, I

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 3>would love to know from your standpoint, our design approach,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>our thinking, because if you back up, Shane, let's talk

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>about I five thirty and we had the I crossover,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>they started to get a little close together in size performance, right,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>and so now we have the IDI wider soul. What

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 3>is that interplay of IDI in I five forty here? Travis.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the ID I we think is a great

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>replacement for that I crossover. We took a really fresh

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>look at who is playing the product, how do they

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>use it right? So I Crossover had an adjustable hozzle.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty long heel to toe, tall face, and

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so we took a look, where do people use this product?

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Where do they want it to be? We ended up

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>going back to a fixed halls design, made the soul

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot wider. Like you're mentioning, yep, I think I

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like to go back to when we're talking about IDI

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>looking back at rapture driving Iron, which everyone loves back

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in the day, and that was kind of the inspiration was.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Still got it. I still got it in the closet.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>The I over there more of a driving iron, right,

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>rapture driving Iron. So id I is the I driving Iron,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas I Crossover lived in this tweener it could be

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid long iron replacement. I cross over to IDE

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I was very much a we're going to be a

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a driving iron. So we have the two,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the three, and the four. Going from that. That was

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of the test bed for a lot of the

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>technologies we put into I five forty. The inner air insert,

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the covered cavity design with a really nice chrome plated

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>badging over the top was really it was a really

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>good test bed to make sure the construction method worked.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It provided the right CG positioning, the right feel and sound,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a huge improvement on IDI and

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>also is here in present as well in I FI forty.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Travis, when we're working on iron designs iron strategy,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>we we kind of try not to bucket irons into

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>certain names or what have you. Supergame improvement or distance

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 3>or players distance precision. What happened, But this is in

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the sweet spot of a player's what's called in the

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>marketplace a player's distance iron. Let's just go talk about

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 3>what how did this category come to be? What golfer

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>do you have in mind? Like who is the target

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>customer for this product?

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, So we first got into this kind of

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>this class of clubs with the I five hundred Iron.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>This is back in the twenty seventeen, twenty eight time

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen time frame. We were working on it in

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, and we're really trying to

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>target that player that is a better player. It's a

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a player's club, but is someone who is lacking

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>distance wants to get a little bit distance more distance

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>back in their game. They might have been someone that

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have been a great candidate for a power spec option.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>We have power spec retrospect available on all of our clubs,

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and they might have been seeking, Hey, I wanted that

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>extra five ten yards on their irons, and so I

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred series. Now we're at the I five forty,

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth gen of that is really doubling down on that,

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>making sure it is the player's look. It's that size

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and proportion that fits the mass majority of the market.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's bit bigger than an I two forty, not quite

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as big as a G four to forty, so it's

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of a tweener in there, but trying to pack

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in as much technology the fastest face we can possibly

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>put in there. It's metal wood like construction. We're trying

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to make an iron that bends and flexes as much

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>as we possibly can ultimately to give them distance. And

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's been how we've constructed this and the essence

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of it is creating the thinnest transitions we possibly can,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the fastest materials, the strongest materials to promote the most

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>flexing for the most resultant ball speed.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Travis we says over sound, I mean in terms of

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 2>golf clubs, and I know that's something you guys always

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 2>think about in terms of improving the sound. I feel

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 2>like every time a new product comes out, the hope

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 2>is that the sound gets improved. I've heard I five

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 2>forty sound is as good as you guys have come across.

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>How do you make it sound better? It's as simple

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 2>as that is.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sound is massive. Like you mentioned, I think we

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>always like to think the first thing you experienced with

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the golf club as you set it down, Well, first

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you see it on the rack and see what it

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like, right, I Fi forty clean, looking clean. It's

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for that player who wants to look at that. And

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>then when you set it down, it has to look

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the right part. And then your first actual experience with

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a golf club when you hit it is what you hear. Right,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see that. You're gonna hear that way before

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you see any numbers about how far I went, how

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>high I went, how much stopping power it had. And

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>so with I Fi forty, we really wanted to look

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at how do we create a more muted, dampened sound

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in a way so not as harsher, as loud or

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as clack. And so what we did was the inner

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>air insert. It helps to attenuate some of those vibrations,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>helps to yep, that's the inner air insert, So it

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>helps to essentially take a lot of vibration. We want

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the club to flex and bend. That's the beauty of

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>having a distance iron is it bends a ton, and

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>so when it is bending, we want to make sure

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>all the little small vibrations the club is giving off

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that were able to basically mute those out, and so

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the inner air insert is in there. It's kind of

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>pressing off on all the side walls inside the cavity

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to help essentially mute some of those vibrations out. The

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>vibrations that you'd hear is high pitched or ringing, and

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's definitely trying to create more of a muted

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>experience for the for the golfer, and that was born

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the idea. Once again, we launched IDI. I mean,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as we're sitting here today, probably six to eight months

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ago as a test bed for how is this technology

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna work? Is it gonna provide that feel for that consumer?

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And we're pretty happy with it.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>So this is a pretty big rethink over the I

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>five hundred series chassis. Then right, because I think folks

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 3>are used to classic quote unquote hollow body type of design.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>So how is this put together? Travis? Like, we see

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 3>this kind of bar on the back, this badge in

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the back, I mean, how do all these pieces come

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>together during the manufacturing process.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like to call this not so much a hollobody,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but more of a covered cavity design. So we have

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we've created really thin transitions. We have a welded C

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>three hundred face material, so that's a miraging steel. It's

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the same material we put on our ferrywood on our hybrids,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>on our iron, on our I five forty iron, So

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a welded face forged face that we put weld

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in on the back. We leave the back open and

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>actually it's a really cool way on how we're able

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to assemble this. We wanted to have an option a

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>way to put this insert in place, the inner air

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>insert in place, so we actually had to open up

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the back of the iron to be able to kind

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of slip that insert in there, get it to fit

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>appropriately within the head, and then cap it off with

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>our really nice chrome plated super durable ABS badge. And

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>so the function there is a whole cohesive unit is

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of close off that cavity. It works in

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>harmony with the ibeam that we have across the opening

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>of that cavity. All of the structures that we put

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>into place, all the materials we have helped to provide

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>an overall better feel and sound experience in addition to

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially trying to lower the CG. And I will get

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>into how the CG is better on this iron and

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>how that does help people play better. But yeah, is

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a construction technique that is a lot different than I

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>five hundred of years past.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>So two pieces in there. C three hundred What exactly

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 3>makes that material unique? And then you mentioned the ibeam,

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 3>What does that do in the structure?

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So C three hundred is our face material. It

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is a material that has an extremely high yield strength.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So essentially what you can do is you can thin

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it out a ton, you can make it really thin

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and flexible, and it'll bend and flex a lot before

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it breaks. And so we like to think that we

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>want to have the strongest materials we possibly can put

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in our clubs because it allows us to make them

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>really thin. When you make it really thin, you get

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>two things more flexing and you save mass and in

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>any metal wood calling this a metal wood, right, any

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>metal wood, any iron design, any wedge, any putter. You

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>want to save as much mass as you can to

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>put it in places that you want it. Low low

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>low is kind of the premise. So miraging the C

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>three hundred maraging steel is very very good for that

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>such that we were able to save enough mass from

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the face material. It's thinner than I five thirty, the

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>perimeters around nine percent thinner than I five thirty, and

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we're able to save mass there to put mass into

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>our tungsten. We have tungsten inserts inside the long irons here.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately that what that does there is help drive down CG.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And your second question was the IBAM. Yeah, so the IBAM.

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Nice job, you remember both questions. Proud of you.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on it. So the I beam. When we

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>opened up the cover cavity design, right, I talked about

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we have this face insert on there. We want to

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>find a way to get that insert inside the head.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>The insert, the inner air insert doesn't work if it's

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not inside the head. So we actually had to open

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>up the back of the iron to push that component

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in there. But what we found is that when you

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>open up the back of the iron, we took a

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>previously steel surface, that the entire back of that iron

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with steel, and we just took it all away, right,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to make sure we're putting structure back

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in there to help reinforce it, give it a little

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more rigidity. So the ibeam effectively in the engineering world,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>think about an ibeam on a bridge, right, we were

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to function in that same way to create structure

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to span across an opening, and that does work in

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>harmony with our covered cavity badge as well to help

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>essentially make a really rigid, durable product.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Travis, when you talk about face material, are you guys,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>are you finding new material like with new golf clubs.

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, are you finding new material that works better

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>than past materials? Or has everything been found at this point?

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>There's still a lot out there to be found. I

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>think the secrets for what we're always looking for is

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is super strong and light. If you can

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have a really good strength to wait ratio, you're gonna

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to make it thinner, make it lighter, and

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that does a lot of really good things.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is found material in theory, I guess for

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you guys, we've.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Been using this material on the I five hundred series

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>iron since twenty eighteen. We've been using in our metal

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>woods since probably around the same time twenty eighteen. We

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>found the first time we were introduced was in that

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.599
<v Speaker 1>time framework like this is great, we should put it

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>everywhere we possibly can. And so I think definitely the

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>wave of the future structure design. We've gone a long

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>ways on this, but as new materials come out, it

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>unlocks better and better structures, Like.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>You'll test something out and say maybe not for this iron,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>but potentially for the future.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>All the time.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>OK, yes, it's very interesting. What about I mean you

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>think about a hot iron. Obviously, one that's a distance

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>iron that goes far. I had irons. I had these

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 2>set of irons in high school and they were hot irons,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and occasionally I'd catch a wedge, you know, it would

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 2>go twenty over the green. How do you avoid a

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 2>hot iron that doesn't have those hot spots where the

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>ball just all of a sudden you fly the green

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 2>and there's a water over the green. All of a

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>sudden you made.

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Seven, right, I think there's two ways that we try

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to combat that. We have come a long way since

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the I five hundred iron. One is try to lower

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the CG as low as we possibly can. I think

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're experiencing with that hot wedge that you hit,

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you might have hit a little bit higher on the face,

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>totally flyer out of the rough right when that ball

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is sitting up, Potentially a little bit more as we

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to lower the CG down. Essentially, what we're doing

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is we're aligning the CG of the impact of the

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>iron with where you always hit it right off the turf.

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>This is beautiful turf out here, freshly overseated, beautiful turf,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>when the ball sitting down. We want to lower the

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>CG to where you're going to hit that ball in

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the face. Previous irons I five hundred there was our

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>first time doing it back in twenty eighteen. Seed Jew's

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a little high, MOI was fantastic, but cg's a little

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bit high. So you'd end up hitting shots low on

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the face quote unquote low on the face, which were

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just normal hits that might have come out a little

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bit slower. You'd get one in the rough every now

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and then it would just be a right. And so

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>when we can lower the CG down to where you

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>hit average on average, we can reduce some of the

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>variants front to back you get. So you'll see on

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I five forty we've made really a very purposeful mission

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to lower the CG so that we can get more

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent impact locations relative to the CG. When we're cg's

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>closer to the impact location, it's just going to be

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>more consistent. So that's one way this chassis, this kind

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of metal would like. Construction with the really thin transitions,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>does a lot of face flexing we call it's not

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the face itself doesn't just bend in. The entire iron

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>flexes back. And so when we have the entire system flexing,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that top rail coming back and impact, we can create

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the entire system. The entire iron itself is flexing, so

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get a local hot or slow

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>spot because the entire thing is moving, right Marty.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah. I like to think about lowering the

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 3>CG Shane, as as if you are teeing the ball

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 3>up for the player a little bit, right, be another

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 3>way to look at it, right like, instead of the

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>CG being lower, which is kind of abstract. Just imagine

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>you just teeing the ball up a little bit.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Got a part three.

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's great. And then Travis tell us

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 3>about one thing I noticed you talked about The first

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 3>thing you notice when you set these down is you

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 3>know the shaping. Obviously beautiful shaping, nice offset top railed geometry,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 3>but these do appear to have our micro Max grooves.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Chanees talked about hotspots. What role does the Micromax groove play.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Love that, Yeah, the Micromax groove, The Micromax a name

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from. We're trying to put a lot of micro

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Max out the number of micro grooves we can put

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on our iron. So you'll notice this iron compared to

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>our blueprint SSR I two forty, we actually will have

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>more grooves on the face. And the reason for having

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:45.239
<v Speaker 1>more grooves, we're having maximum number of smaller grooves Micromax

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is to create more friction. When we can create more friction,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we get more consistent. If you're gonna hit off the

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>beautiful fairway lie or the rough, we're going to get

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>more consistent results for you. So that flyer where you

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>used to hit it high on the face with non

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>micromax grooves, you just get this missile right, And so

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to create that more friction to help maintain

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>spin across a variety of surfaces. So in a lot

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of our testing, we found that micromax essentially helps to

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>neutralize or normalize a little bit of the difference you

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would get in spin from the different situation. So yeah,

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good observation.

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 3>That would be arguably more important on an iron that's

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a little lower spin, a little lower lofted, right.

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to keep as much spin on there as

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Ye.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And we put this on our iron because we

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like a lot of the players that are going

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to play this player's distance iron, they're going to hit

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it in the rough, right, So we want to give

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>them every advantage they possibly can when they do play

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with that eye.

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Is there a maximum or minimum amount of grooves that

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>an iron has to have?

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Maximum? Yes, minimum, No, no, No. We can do completely

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>grooveless iron if you wanted to, And actually we can,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean we can go into this kind of a

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>fun story to tell. Ye, there is a maximum. USGA

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>has a very regulated it's essentially a calculation of the

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>area of groof right, It's like you can only have

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so much volume of groove on your iron or in

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain area. But we actually have done a lot

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of testing on grooveless wedges, which grooveless wedges right, Marty,

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm butchering this, please don't grooveless wedges. We've

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>done a ton of testing off of a perfectly dry

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>fairway lie a wedge with our current s two fifty

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>nine grooves or no grooves, perfectly polished flat has. They

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>have pretty similar launch conditions, launch, spin, ball speed, everything

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is really similar. If you get one blade of grass

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or one drop of water, it goes haywire.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 2>That thing is going to the moon, chaos, it just

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 2>all over the place.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>When you lower the friction of the surface that you're

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to hit, the ball off of, grooves matter a ton.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's why the analogy of going from a tight

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fairway lie to a rough when we're putting the most

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>grooves we possibly can on, that's a really good way

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to preserve spin and friction out of every surface.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's like drag racing. They get the big tires,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 3>no treads, you're just maximizing maximizing surface area, but they don't.

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>They don't compete when it's raining. And then you got

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the all weather tires which have tread's designed for shedding material, junk, debris, dirt,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>sand everything out of the way. So yeah, and I

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 3>think it's fun Travis that our groove designs are different

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>depending on the iron, you know, because their tour players

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>have given us some pretty nuanced feedback that they're looking

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 3>for slightly different things than this customer might be looking for.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The tour player says, they never hit in the rough, right,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>so they want it to be out of the fairway.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>They want to match the spin.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 2>When you caddy with Marty, did he hit in the

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 2>rof ever?

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Never?

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Never? Yeah, No, that's it. It'd be silly. You've worked on

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of products in your time at Ping. Do

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>you have a product that was the most fun to

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>work on or one maybe that you're the most proud of.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the ones, I mean we

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>worked on a long time, just well putter, Yeah, it

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was really fun. Ye, commercial execution. I didn't feel like

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it was the greatest challenging, but fun.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Was that the one that the shaft adjusted?

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I had one of those. For a long time,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I had a Scott Still I used for years.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Marty, Marty, when I first started up paying, he was

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a director of productvelpment. I remember he gave me, I think,

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>just an extra credit project when you're thinking about it,

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>just go thinking about it. And I remember I had

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>my commute home was about twenty minutes each day, and

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I had a full load of other work to do

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at work. And then I remember getting into my car

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>every single day and thinking, I'm gonna work on that

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>extra credit project. And so I remember for months, truly months,

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I would drive my commute home just thinking about it.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I get home message Marty what I thought about and

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it came to it ended up coming to FIR and

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it worked pretty well. So that was a really fun

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>one for me. I think I'm still intimately involved in

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>product development and product design, so I've worked. I'm working

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>currently on next products for next year and beyond. So

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>really excited about him. Can't talk about him right now, Yeah.

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean I almost feel like you know you hear

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>about I mean somebody like you and you as well, Marty.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>You hear about these actors that make a movie and

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 2>they finish it and they never want the movie, right

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>because they were involved in the you know, in the

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 2>background work, and it was months of their time. Are

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>you allowed to enjoy something like this that's coming out

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>to market while you're working on what the next iteration

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 2>is like? Are you allowing yourself to enjoy to go

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>out and plane with the new product or is your

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 2>mind always a product or two ahead?

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say My personal answer is it's it's

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to sit here and think about this iron when

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I know what's coming and I know what we have,

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and our mantra is always to we will never release

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a product unless it's better than the previous, right, So

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I already know what we're working on in the in

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>our pipeline. And to think here, sitting here today like

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this product is fantastic. I love it like it is.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It's truly fun to sit down, slow down, think about

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff because it's really a testament to what we've

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>been doing. But I already know what we.

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Have coming too, so I know it's kind of a

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>yes and yes, yes and yes, yes and yes yes, Marty.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, as somebody that still plays a

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 2>ton of competitive golf, how does your mind work when

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 2>maybe something's coming that you know you're gonna want to

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 2>game when it comes out, but obviously you know it's

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 2>not gonna come out for six months, eight months a year.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. No, it is challenging. I mean, like, for example,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 3>before for the IDI came out, I was playing the

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I five thirty four Iron is my IDI club, you know,

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, Oh, I can't wait to get

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that one in the bag. So but that's what keeps

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 3>that's what keeps the machine running, is that there's always

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>problems to solve. I think what's fun about talking to

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Travis is you can sense the excitement about that We're

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>not done. We're not even close to done, right. It's

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 3>like the amount of innovation we have going across different spectrums,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>whether it's materials, manufacturing, design, what have you. It's just

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 3>super exciting time, right, not even close to done.

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Travis. Do we miss anything on I five forty anything

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 2>else you got for us?

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to know how they fly. We talked all

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 3>about the tech Travis, Hey sow over their Hey, when

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 3>golfers go out and hit this club, what's it going

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 3>to do?

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Our goal with this product is delivered distance, but with

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>stopping power. We wanted to go high, and we think

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that really good proxy for stopping power. It's a distance

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>iron right, That is the number one thing is that

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bal needs to go far. But at ping we want

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you can play with it. It's great

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to win in the fitting bay, but if you're gonna

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>go play on the course and it can't hold a green,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you're doing a disservice to our consumer. So all the

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>technologies covered cavity, the inner air, the tungsten waiting, kind

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the size and shaping refinements really to drive CG down,

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about, but why are you doing that

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to lower CG gets the ball in the air, and

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so we've made some length changes. We've made CG improvements

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to get that ball in the air and CG height

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>or sorry max height of how high a ball can

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>fly is a really good proxy for how soft it

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>will wink. Absolutely right, the higher you can get the

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ball in the air, the softer is gonna land. So

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing is we want to get distance here.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But we also wanted a big metric for us, working

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>with Marty and the fitting team, was how do we

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>get more height?

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>We know people need to gap these and need to

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to play these. So yeah, it's gonna be

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>distance with with stopping power.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 3>And the long irons are a little longer length, little

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 3>nuanced piece. But let's talk a little bit about that drama.

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So Arcostata is a really good resource for us to

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>go look at insights, how is our product performing. You

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of really cool gapping analyses from Marcos,

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see, Hey, the people that play the I

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>five point thirty, for example, they're struggling to gap their

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>long irons. If they're going to play a four or

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>five of six going into their seven, we can see

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the gaps that they have. And so you'd say, like

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a typical gap would be like twelve yards per club

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fifteen yards per club, depending on how fast

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you are, And we'll see if those gaps start to

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>shrink down to eight six four. We need to find

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a way to get those long irons to go a

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher, a little bit farther, stay in the

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>air a little bit longer, and so ceg improvements have

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>been great for that. Tungsten has been great for that,

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but also making the irons a little bit longer. If

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we can add a little bit of length, knowing we're

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in a really stable position for MOI, these are really

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>forgiving irons. At the same time that if we can

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>add a little bit of length, you get a little

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>bit more clubhead speed. Therefore a little bit more ball speed,

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher launch angle. It'll go a little

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>bit higher overall to help the ball stay in the air.

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>And what that gives the consumer if it says it

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer, it goes a little bit farther

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>into gapping is a little bit.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 3>So the seven irons the same length, same length, and

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 3>then what is the change from there.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>To the So traditionally on our players irons, we've gone

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>a half inch between each club. So seven iron is

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven, your six irons thirty seven and a half.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>We go half an inch longer. On these we go

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>five eighths of an inch longer. So it doesn't sound

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like a lot an eighth of an inch more, yep,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So this seven iron is still thirty seven. Then we

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>go thirty seven and five eighths, okay, and then thirty

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half, and so you at the end

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of the set you end up getting, yeah, three eighths

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>of an inch more length, but we do it progressively

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't seem like it's going to hit you

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>in the face. Nice. This iron's no out of nowhere,

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot longer than the previous.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 2>So, Travis, we see so many mixed bags across the

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 2>board now, especially on tour these days. We you see

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 2>five forty in the bag of a PGA Tour player

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 2>this year, you think.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so. I think it's going to compete

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>with Idi. IDI so far has been extremely popular for

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>us as those long iron kind of the replacement or

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>bridging to their their longest Ferrey would. I think we're

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>going to see some LPGA tours. Speaking to your days

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out there, Uh, it's been a really popular iron out

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>there because it is a distance folks iron that those

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>ladies out there, a lot of them need a little

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more help with distance. I think on PGA Tour

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you might see some long irons, but I think that's

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of having Idi in that space as well

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as that it hits the bill for exactly what they want.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>This is just going to be a great offering for

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the entire set.

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it looks it looks awesome. We started talking about

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Caddy and so Marty, I'm gonna give you the floor

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 2>as we close, just a little. You can say both

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>positives and critiques of Travis when he was looping.

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 3>He kept up super fast, didn't risk getting me any

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 3>You didn't have to pay any money or no fines,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 3>because when when you're not on the tour and I

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>haven't made a lot of cuts out there, I didn't

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 3>want to get fined and not make the cut that

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 3>would have That would have been.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>A big plus. Maybe maybe on the bag once again.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Plus we had a fantastic again Travis always appreciate the

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>time of man. Thanks so much. This is the Ping

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Proving Grounds podcast