WEBVTT - The Lesser of Two Crab Claws, Part 3

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. We are heading

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>down down into the vault for an older episode of

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the show. This one originally published on July seventh, twenty

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, and it's called The Lesser of Two Crab Claws,

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Part three. This is part three of the series we've

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>been running over the past couple of Saturdays. This is

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>about asymmetry in nature.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 4>And I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part three

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 4>in our series on asymmetry in animals. When the left

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 4>and the right side do not match. If you have

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>not listened to parts one and two yet, why not

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 4>go back and do that first, then you'll be all

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 4>caught up. But in the last episode of this series,

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 4>we were talking about asymmetrical development in the clause of

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 4>the American lobster or homarusamericanas and how during larval development,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 4>the lobster's previously symmetrical claus differentiate into one real thick boy.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 4>It's a crusher claw. It's gigantic, it's got like molar

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 4>like teeth on it, and it's got slow muscle fiber.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.919
<v Speaker 4>And then the other one turns into a sharper cutter

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 4>or pincher claw that can close very fast because of

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 4>its fast muscle fiber. And we talked about attempts to

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 4>pin down exactly why and how this happens at these

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 4>early stages in lobster development. But there are other crustaceans

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 4>where the mismatch between left and right is much more

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 4>extreme than it is even in the American lobster. And

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 4>I think we should begin this episode by considering the

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>male of the many species of phil crabs, so fiddler

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 4>crabs comprise. It's not just one species of animal, its

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 4>many species within a family of crustaceans known as oc

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 4>pot day And once again, I think we keep saying

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 4>it during the series, but this is one you should

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>go and look up pictures of because you need to

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 4>have it in your head. In some species, male fiddler

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 4>crabs have one claw that grows not just bigger than

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>the other one, not even just significantly bigger than the

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 4>other one, but hilariously bigger than the other one.

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, going back to lobsters for a second, you'd be

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>forgiven if you were just not aware of the fact

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that lobsters had this different, this difference between one claw

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and the next. Certainly, many illustrations I'm thinking, like restaurant

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>logos and whatnot, may not even bother to make one

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>claw look different from the other. But with a fiddler crab,

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it is very pronounced. It is absurdly different one side

0:02:59.360 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>from the other.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And for a bit of expert summary on what

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>life is like for your average fiddler crab, I wanted

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 4>to quote from a New York Times interview I was

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 4>reading with a researcher named Sophie L. Moles, who is

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 4>a scientist at Anglioruscan University in Cambridge and has done

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>some research on fiddler crabs, including the use of a

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>robotic fiddler crab claw that I want to come back

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 4>to later in this episode, but just in summarizing fiddler

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>crab life, she says, they live in burrows and you

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 4>only see them at low tide. At high tide, they

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 4>go back into the burrow and they seal it up.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>They feed on mudflats by sifting the sediment through their

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 4>mouthparts and eating micro organisms. That's the buffet of life.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 4>You just sift the mud in your mouth and get

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>the microbes out, but moles goes on. The female has

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 4>two little claws, two normal size claws for her which

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 4>she uses to help that feeding, to help pass the

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>sediment up to her mouth. The male has one that

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 4>it uses for feeding, and the other is huge. It's

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>greatly enlarged, to the point that it can be approximately

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 4>half of his body weight. It's often really brightly colored

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>as well. Now, what the males do is they wave

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>this claw in a species specific pattern. So each species

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 4>of fiddler crab has its own kind of wave, and

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 4>they do this to maintain a territory but also to

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 4>attract a female. So for a rough analogy on the

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 4>size and appearance of a fiddler crab claw, just imagine

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>an adult human that had one normal sized right hand,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 4>but then a left hand with a digit span of

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>about four feet, and that hand weighs eighty pounds.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. One example of this was that it was brought

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in a book I'm going to reference in a bit

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Animal Weapons by Douglas j Emmlin. He says, if you're Basically,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're at the store, go pick up the largest

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>bag of dried dog food that you you can find

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and start carrying it around, and that will give you

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>approximately what we might think of as the male fiddler

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>crab experience.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, so imagine the largest sized bag of dog food.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Not just you're carrying it around, but that is one

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 4>of your hands, yes, and again the other one is

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 4>regular sized. So what is going on with having a

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 4>crab claw that big? Well, it turns out that the

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 4>main theory explaining this asymmetric size difference in fiddler crab

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>claus is much like the main theory for explaining the

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 4>narwhal tusk, that this hugely asymmetrically exaggerated feature found in

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 4>males is probably primarily a sexually selected trait, meaning it's

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 4>more important for maximizing reproductive success than it is for

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 4>direct survival value, though it may be in part reproductively

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 4>attractive attractive to mates because of some value it has

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 4>in helping maximize like burrowing. So, for example, things that

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 4>have been cited are that a male that has a

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 4>very big claw can also probably dig a very big burrow,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 4>which is better for a female to go into to

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 4>incubate her eggs and also, like crustaceans, tend to just

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 4>keep getting bigger they as they grow as they grow older.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 4>So a bigger crab with a bigger asymmetric claw is

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 4>also probably an older male, which is good in crab

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 4>mating terms, because that probably means he has survived more

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 4>seasons of life and is just generally fitter, better able

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 4>to survive, and has good genes.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And I mean part of the obvious display

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>here too is like, look at this thing I have grown.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It is so big, and yet I am still alive.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I am able to sustain myself. Plus this massive claw,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>it's like the sports car of the crab anatomy.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's another thing that has often been put up.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 4>There's sort of a theory in some sexually selected traits

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 4>in biology that says, well, they may operate on the

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 4>basis of essentially advertising a handicap. They offer a good

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 4>faith display that even by working at a disadvantage, you're

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>still fit enough to do well within your environment by

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 4>having this ridiculous thing attached to you. So a male

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 4>fiddler crab is running around also basically advertising I mean,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 4>this would be true of all the males with the

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 4>big claw that they have basically have to their capacity

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 4>to eat.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 4>So these crabs eat by shoving mud and debris into

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 4>their mouths, and that's true for males and females, but

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 4>of course you can't do that with that gigantic claw.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 4>So essentially the male fiddler crabs they got them one

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 4>good eat in hand, whereas females have two.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, and this is something that Emlin gets into

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>an animal weapons. Basically you're getting into just the energy

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>costs of having this gigantic claw. So some of this

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a repeatd what we just said,

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>but it all kind of builds together. So, first of all,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>male fiddlers, he says, burn a lot of energy just

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to have these, just to develop them and carry them

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>around resting. Metabolic rates of males with big claws are

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>almost twenty percent higher than females due to the cost

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of the claw. And then of course, on top of this,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to scamper around. We see everyone

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>out there, I think it's probably seen crabs about doing

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>their business on the beach. You've got to scamper around,

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got to run with that giant claw and so

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be energetically demanding as well.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I can how fast can you run holding that

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 4>dog food bag?

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Exactly? Yeah, this is where he originally brought up the

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>dog food bag, but he also cites a study. This

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>one was really fun. This is a two thousand and

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>seven study that was published in Functional Ecology by Alan

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and Levinton, and they were testing this out by putting

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>male fiddler crabs on treadmills, little treadmills inside of air

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>tight box. Now, sadly, I could not find photos of

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this that I brought up the original paper and there

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>were no photos or illustrations, so I only have my

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>imagination to go on here.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 4>This is the shrimp shrimp on a treadmill paper that

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:14.599
<v Speaker 4>you promised in previous.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Parts, right right, Yeah, shrimp on a treadmill For anyone

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not familiar, that frequently brought up as there was an

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>actual shrimp on a treadmill study, and it was used

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as an outrageous example of like, look at what the

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists are doing. They won't cure a cancer, but they'll

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>put a shrimp on a treadmill. And as we've discussed

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the show before, that that's kind of ridiculous. I mean,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>these are not the scientists that would be developing the

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>cure for cancer. These are the ones that would be studying, say,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the metabolic rates of shrimp or in this case, crabs.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Right, they're not mutually exclusive pursuits to begin with. But

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 4>then also sometimes you don't even know what benefits that

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>new knowledge about animal life could lead to down the road.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, And so the study put the crabs on

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the treadmills inside of the air tight boxes. And you

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>might be one, why the air tight box. This sounds

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>like something from a Saw movie. No, it's because it's

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the crabs exert themselves. They burn through oxygen and they

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>produce CO two. And so the researchers are then able

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to measure the gas concentrations inside of the little boxes,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and they use these readings to calculate the exact metabolic

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>costs of running. As one might expect, the males with

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>big claws burned more energy to run compared to smaller males,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>males with the smaller claw, or females that of course

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just have two regularly sized claws. And these big males

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>with the big claws also tired out more quickly. And

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>then there's the impact on feeding, which we have already

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>alluded to. We've all seen crab eat I know, we've

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about it on the show. Crabs disassemble their food.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Their claws and mouth bits work very hard to break

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>everything down, or in the case of fiddler crabs, they

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are often just sifting through and finding those little tiny

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pieces to eat. Anyway, it's what describes as quote delicate

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and tedious, and with the females it means. It often

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>means the feeding claws are just working incessantly.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you can see video of this. So there's just

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 4>like a conveyor belt. They're just machines kind of shoveling

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 4>the sediment into the mouth.

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>But the male, on the other hand, like we've said,

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>only has the one claw that's suitable to eat with anymore.

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>He's got that big claw just setting there, and then

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the other claw, the normal sized claw, is the one

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that he's using to eat. So this cuts their energy

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>intake in half, just as lugging the giant claw around

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>increases their energy output. So they generally have to feed

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>faster and or more often in order to make up

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the difference.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Right again, because you got it, they've divided their body

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>into eating hand and handsome hand, right.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And this complicates things for the crabs even more because

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>remember this is not an apex predator we're talking about here.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The crab, the filler crab especially, they have to concern

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves with predators, especially of the avian variety. So if

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this crab with this big claw that's having to do

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>extra feeding, that means extra exposure to potential predation. In fact,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>studies have proven out that these males are picked off

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>by birds at an enhanced rate.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 4>Right, So you're saying, because it eats slower because it

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 4>can only eat with one of its claws, it has

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 4>to spend more time outside the burrow, and that's got

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 4>to target on its back exactly.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's more time out in the open, more time

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>exposed to predators, and the predators in many cases they

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have advanced tactics for dealing with these These these either

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>tired or distracted or essentially one clawed crab at this

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>point when it comes to the feeding process Inland points

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to a study from Christy Blackwell and Coga regarding fiddler

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>crabs in Panama getting basically taken out by grap fed

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on by grackles, who as a type of bird that

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have devised a diagonal feint attack where they they kind

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of they come in, they kind of fake the crab out,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and apparently this is even more effective on the mail crabs.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Now you might think, well, but wait a minute. Having

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 4>a bigger claw surely also means that that crab can

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 4>pinch with greater force, which you would think could make

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 4>it able to defend itself better.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, I mean you you might you might think that,

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but but then you know, as we'll get into like

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>these claws, this big claw anyway, it doesn't seem to

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>be that useful when you're dealing with something like a

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>hungry grackle that's sweeping in at you. So like the

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>end result is that the big clawed mails they're easier

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to find, they're easier to pick off, they're potentially more tired,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and also they're a better there. They're a better kill

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for the predator because that big old claw has big

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>old meat in it. So there's every reason in the

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>world to kill them and eat them if you were

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>a grackle or some other hungry bird.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Now, from what I've read about fiddler crab clause, it

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 4>seems like what they are most of the time used

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 4>for is probably visual signaling, but they are on occasion

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 4>actually used for fighting or actually used as a weapon.

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. Emlin gets into this in the book as well,

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>highlighting particularly the work of John Christy. I believe he

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was in the second study that was cited there that

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we decided. So basically, yeah, they wave them around to

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>communicate their reproductive fitness. They do fight other male fiddler

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>crabs with them, so they do serve as actual weapons

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in contests for those burrows that we were talking about.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>But Emlin writes that quote, for every few minutes of

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>outright fighting, male spend dozens of hours waving and other

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>words communicating, showing off that claw, saying look, you know,

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>look at this mighty claw. I imagine what I can

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>do with it. That happened. That's what's going on most

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of the time. A very small amount of the time

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>they're actually using it. So it's ultimately more of a

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>deterrence than anything. And this is evolutionarily sound because fighting

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous. The battle itself is dangerous and can certainly

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be fatal to an organism, but fights can also just

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>wound you, making you more susceptible to predation, it may

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>distract you and allow the grackle or some other creature

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to come in and take you out. So even though

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there are hard disadvantages to developing such a deterrence, and

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he compares this to other animals as well, like anytime

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you see something that you might label an elaborate weapon

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of an animal's anatomy, there's a huge

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>payoff there. Nothing is free, nothing is cheap. When it

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to the development of these things. There's an energy

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>cost involved. So even though there are all these disadvantages

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to growing, say a giant crab claw, there are also

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>strong benefits in not having to actually fight all of

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think this goes against our intuition

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 4>because we think of fighting in terms of winning and losing.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 4>So like fight it fight has a winner who wins

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 4>and thus they come out good the effect for them

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 4>is positive, and a loser who loses, and of course

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 4>the effect for them is negative. But in fact, in nature,

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 4>I would argue that most fighting is probably actually lose

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 4>lose because even the winner is probably somewhat injured or

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 4>tired out by the fight, putting them at a later

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 4>disadvantage for survival even if they come out on top

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 4>in that particular struggle.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And all of this makes even more sense

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>when we start looking at the closer to the scenario

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of these fighting and protecting these burrows and trying to

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>move females. Again, the male setup shop in front of

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>key burrows that are offered as brooding burrows to perspective females,

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is where they make their sh and this

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is where they fight if it comes to that. And

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the numbers here are apparently great. They're just tons of

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>crabs out there, and they're just face off after face off.

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>And again, most of these face offs are not going

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to result in a big, drag out fight. A lot

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of them are just going to be displays. But still

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>lifting that crab claw in the air and to signal

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>with it, that's going to have an energy cost, and

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so this is ultimately exhausting too many crabs. Crabs will

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>eventually have to bow out and work their way back

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>up to good burrows. So there's like this whole system

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of communication. Most of these face offs don't rise to

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the level of a full intensity battle, and the display

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the claw allows the male crabs to easily determine

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>who they have a chance against, so they're able to

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>size each other up, like, Okay, this is a battle

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that I definitely can win, and he knows I can

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>win it, So we're done. This is a display only situation. Okay,

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a crab that can definitely beat me, so I'm

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to mess with him. We're just going to

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>carry on our ways. This one, however, we're going to

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>have to communicate a little bit and we might have

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to fight because we seem to be evenly matched.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. That's actually the most dangerous situation is when it's

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 4>not clear which one is stronger. All right, Well, I

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 4>wanted to come back to something which was earlier. I

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 4>mentioned that a New York Times interview with the researcher

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Sophie Moles, who was one of the authors of a

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 4>paper published in twenty eighteen in Biology Letters called Robotic Crabs,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 4>revealed that female fiddler crabs are sensitive to changes in

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 4>male display rate. The other authors here were Michael D.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Jinions and Patricia ur Why Backwell.

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I might have referred to her earlier as Blackwell,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>my apologies.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 4>Oh I didn't catch that.

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You should apologize, Well, I just want to make sure

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I get the names right. Yeah, had a type in

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>my notes.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 4>There, so, But from the crabs perspective, I think it

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 4>is important to realize that this really is a study

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 4>that involved creating crab sex robots, like this is creating

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 4>the It was an attempt to create the hunkiest male

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 4>robot crab claws that have ever been put together with

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 4>the explicit purpose of attracting female fiddler crabs. So I'm

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 4>just going to read directly from their abstract. They write quote,

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Males often produce dynamic, repetitive courtship displays that can be

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 4>demanding to perform and might advertise male quality to females.

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 4>A key feature of demanding displays is that they can

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 4>change in intensity, escalating as a male increases his signaling effort,

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 4>but de escalating as the signaler becomes fatigued. Here we

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>investigated whether female fiddler crabs of the species Uka miyoburgi

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 4>are sensitive to changes in male courtship wave rate how

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 4>fast the arm is waving. We performed playback experiments using

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 4>robotic male crabs that had the same mean wave rate

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 4>but either escalated, de escalated, or remained constant females demonstrated

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 4>a strong preference for escalating robots, but showed mixed responses

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 4>to robots that de escalated fast to slow compared to

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 4>those that waved at a constant medium rate. These findings

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 4>demonstrate that females can discern changes in male display rate

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 4>and prefer males that escalate, but that females are also

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 4>sensitive to pass display rates indicative of prior vigor. So,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 4>if you are a male fiddler crab, it's not just

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 4>important to have a big claw, but it apparently, at

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 4>least with this species, is more attractive to females if

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 4>you start waving it faster and faster as the female

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 4>comes close to you. And from this New York Times

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 4>interview with the lead author, their moles, it was there

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 4>was the question where the females terribly disappointed when they

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 4>realized they'd been tricked. You know what happened once they

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 4>finally got up to the waving robot arm that they

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 4>were so interested in, Well, Mole says quote, once they

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>got to the robot, they would touch the base plate

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 4>of it and realize there's something wrong here, it's not real,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 4>and they would usually at that point stop moving or

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 4>run away. Some of them actually responded as if he

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 4>were a real male crab, which is by tickling him.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 4>What the females do is go up to the male

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 4>and use their legs on one side of their body

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 4>to tickle him. This communicates to him that she's interested

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 4>in him as a mate and not just trying to

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 4>steal his home. So this study did indeed implicate female

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 4>fiddler crabs tickling metal base plates because they thought it

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 4>just that claw is so huge, it's swinging so fast,

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 4>I've got to believe it might be a real crab.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like something that could be factored into, I

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Battlestar Galactica sort of situation.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I go the.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Replicants, the robots. They look just like us, they behave

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>just like us, except tickling them will reveal their true nature.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, in the spirit of our enthusiasm for the shrimp

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 4>on the treadmill, the crab on the treadmill, I want

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 4>more studies with robot crab hunks. We have to build

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the most attractive male crab that has ever been that

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 4>has ever existed on Earth, and but I guess we

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 4>have to be careful with it because we don't want

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>to drive crabs to extinction by like now now the

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 4>real crabs only desire the robot.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's weird how this does line up with the sort

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of trope of the muscle man on the beach attracting

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the women and and the and the nerd that's that's

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 1>also inevitably on the beach as well, and may get

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sand kicked in his face or whatnot. But it also

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>does bring to mind like even with humans, there's sort

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>of there's there's fitness, and there's like visible fitness, but

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>then there's also like fitness to the level where it's

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>no longer purely functional anymore. Like there's like, for instance,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there's the muscle that might aid in the delivery of

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a punch, and then there's like than the muscle build

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>up that say, makes it harder to move around or

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>makes it more difficult to say, touch portions of your back,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 4>I totally know what you're saying, though, I also that

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 4>reminds me. I always want to caution people, you know,

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 4>just don't try to extrapolate too much from animal sex

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 4>and attractiveness studies to humans, because you know, crabs and

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 4>humans are pretty different.

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, and certainly the reasons that humans do things

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and the way they react to things, or generally there's

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more going on. There's this whole level of

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>human complication that's taking place on the surface of whatever

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>else is going on.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 4>All Right, after we've talked about all of these examples

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 4>of animals that broadly have bilateral symmetry but then some

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 4>major deviation from it, I've been thinking about how symmetry

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 4>and asymmetry come about at the cellular level, because you know,

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 4>you can imagine why it would be genetically efficient to

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 4>have bilateral symmetry. You just basically need half of a

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 4>body plan and then you just copy it over on

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 4>the other side. But within that broadly symmetrical framework, you know,

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 4>we get these deviations major and minor. And it's not

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 4>all narwhal tusks and fiddler crab claws things that are

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 4>like huge and noticeable. There are plenty of forms of

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 4>asymmetry that are common but harder to spot, such as

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 4>the orientation of internal organs. You know, your digestive tract

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 4>and its associated organs and your heart and circulatory system

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 4>are all asymmetrical. They have different organs and pathways situated

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 4>on the left and right of the body cavity, and

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 4>there are also minor more invisible variations at the cellular

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 4>level within mostly symmetrical creatures like us. So how do

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 4>these deviations from perfect symmetry come about at the level

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 4>of cell division, which is actually, you know, actively building

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 4>your body's tissues. How do the cells know which side

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 4>is which and how to do something different on the

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 4>left than what they're doing on the right. Well, one

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 4>jumping off point here is I came across an interesting

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 4>article about this in Quantum Magazine from January twenty seventeen

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 4>by Tim Verneman called how Life Turns Asymmetric, which is

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 4>worth a read in its entirety, but I just wanted

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 4>to summarize and jump off from a few things I

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 4>learned from it. And one of the big takeaways is

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 4>that I think we have some good answers about at

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 4>least some strong factors for like mammalian or vertebrate symmetry

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 4>and symmetry breaking something. We know some things about the

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 4>genetic and cellular basis for a symmetry in the body,

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.479
<v Speaker 4>but we still don't know everything yet, and so one

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 4>of the ideas that gets brought up in this article

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 4>is the nodal lefty genetic connection, and it goes like this.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Since the nineteen nineties, scientists have been studying a gene

0:25:54.880 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 4>called nodal in ODL, which appears specifically on the left

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 4>side of the developing embryo of At the time this

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 4>article was written, they said every vertebrate animal yet studied

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 4>and associated with this gene is a somewhat confusingly named

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 4>gene called lefty, which appears to work specifically to suppress

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the nodal gene's activity on the right side of the

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 4>vertebrate embryo. So the purpose of lefty, if I understand correctly,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 4>appears to be something like telling the right side of

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 4>the body not to do left side of the body stuff.

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 4>According to the Harvard biologist Cliff Tabin, the nodal lefty

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 4>gene combination seems to be the main genetic factor guiding

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 4>asymmetry in animals, or at least invertebrates. So how does

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 4>this difference get expressed? Well, another biologist named Nobotaka Hirokawa

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 4>has offered an explanation that has to do with sillia.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Cillia are little hair like or thread like projections. Technically,

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 4>they're a type of organelle which stick up from cell

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 4>membranes within the cells or of eukaryotes, and they serve

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 4>various functions like gathering sensory information four cells or facilitating

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 4>the movement of cells through fluid. So you might read

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 4>about as sillia motility. These things often move back and forth,

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 4>though actually they're divided into motile and nonmotile cilia. So

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 4>how would tiny hairs sticking up off of cell membranes

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 4>have anything to do with the body of a vertebrate

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 4>splitting from perfect symmetry into a differentiated left and right half. Well.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 4>One fascinating clue came in the form of a rare

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 4>genetic disorder found in humans known as Cartagener's syndrome. Actually,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure if I'm saying that right, but it's

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 4>spelled k A R T A G E N E

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 4>R Cartagener syndrome, which presents most often in patients as

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 4>patients with continued respiratory problems such as recurrent lung infections

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and sinus problems, and also sometimes infertility. It turns out

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 4>this condition is caused by a congenital defect that prevents

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 4>the body's scillia from functioning as needed, so these little

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 4>hair like projections on cells don't function as they normally would. Now,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 4>why would that affect respiration? Well, of course, the inside

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 4>of our breathing passages are lined with cilia, and the

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 4>cilia need to move in synchronization for I think multiple purposes,

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 4>but one of them is to help clear breathing passages

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 4>of mucus. And this disorder causes the cilia to have

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 4>trouble again with motility, with movement, and so they can't

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 4>really synchronize. They can't really work together to get the

0:28:55.880 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 4>mucus out of the lungs and out to the throat

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 4>to prevent infections. Now, strangely, this disorder affecting cilia also

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 4>frequently coincides with a seemingly totally unrelated issue. About half

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 4>of people diagnosed with cartagen or syndrome also have their

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 4>internal organs flipped. Their body is a mirror image of

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 4>what a thoracic surgeon would expect to see if they

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 4>open you up. So you know, the heart on the

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 4>right and the liver on the left and so forth.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, if we're looking to spy literature, of course,

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>if we look at Ian Fleming's doctor know we might

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>remember doctor No has this where his heart is on

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the other side of his body. Oh, it survives. I

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>think he survives an assassination attempt at some point because

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of this anatomical quirk.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I say, somebody shoots him on the wrong side. Yeah,

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 4>that's a good twist. Well, anyway, so you have that

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 4>association people who have this, who have this congenital condition

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 4>affecting proteins that in turn affect sillia. They also half

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 4>of the time their organs are flipped opposite of what

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 4>you normally see. On top of that, there was a

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifteen paper in Nature by Lee at All, which

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Vernemon in the article points to called global Genetic Analysis

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 4>in mice unveils central role for ccilia in congenital heart disease.

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 4>And this paper apparently found multiple instances of genes where

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 4>if the gene was defective, the mouse presented with some

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of unusual issue related to symmetry and asymmetry in

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 4>the body, some issue with the haves left and right,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 4>And in those instances the gene was somehow also related

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to scillia. So these clues indicate that somehow scillia may

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 4>play a role in symmetry breaking during mammalian development. So

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 4>how could this be Well, A leading explanation has to

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 4>do with something called dorsal flow and a little patch

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 4>on the surface of mammalian embryos called the ventral node. So,

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 4>if you're looking at like a mammalian embryo, the ventral

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 4>node is a little pit or depression on the underside

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 4>or the bottom surface, and the pit is ciliated, meaning

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 4>it's covered in cilia, these little hair like or thread

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 4>like projections. And the explanation goes that the waving of

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:32.239
<v Speaker 4>cilia in this little pit create a consistent direction of

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 4>flow in the fluid around the ventral node. So the

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.239
<v Speaker 4>cilia rotate to get the fluid moving, and then they

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 4>keep it moving in a consistent direction. The fluid is

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 4>always moving to the left along with the with the

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 4>way the cilia are waving, and the direction of this

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 4>flow seems to cause a chain reaction that results in

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 4>changes in gene expression, specifically in the asymmetry genes coming

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 4>back to again no and lefty. So apparently, if the

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 4>cilia are having trouble with motility, the unidirectional leftward current

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 4>of fluid is not established and the symmetry breaking genes

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 4>aren't expressed as they would normally be, which can lead

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 4>to deviations from the type of mammalian asymmetry we would

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 4>see in most members of that species, such as creating

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 4>a condition where the body fifty percent of the time

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 4>can have its internal organs flipped. However, this can't be

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 4>the only factor leading to standard symmetry breaking in animal bodies.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Vernemon's article also cites a Tufts University biologist named Michael

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Levin who points out that some animals, even some mammals,

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 4>don't have that ciliated dorsal node we were just talking about,

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 4>and Levin believes there's some involvement of a factor called

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 4>the cellular skeleton or the cytoskeleton. Did you know that

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 4>your cells have a skeleton of their own? I don't know.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I guess i'd heard the word cytoskeleton, but I hadn't

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 4>quite put it together. It's not exactly like your bigger skeleton.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's not like bones. The cytoskeleton is a

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 4>system of protein filaments that are, at least in a

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 4>metaphorical sense, sort of like the bones of a cell.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 4>To describe them, I own a quote from a twenty

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 4>ten review in nature by Fletcher and Mullins quote. The

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 4>ability of a eukaryotic cell to resist deformation, to transport

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 4>intracellular cargo, and to change shape during movement depends on

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 4>the cytoskeleton, an interconnected network of filamentous polymers and regulatory proteins.

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Recent work has demonstrated that both internal and external physical

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 4>forces can act through the cytoskeleton to affect local mechanical

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 4>properties and cellular behavior. Attention is now focused on how

0:33:55.320 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 4>cytoskeletal networks generate, transmit, and respond to mechanical cellar over

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 4>both short and long time scales. An important insight emerging

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 4>from this work is that long lived cytoskeletal structures may

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 4>act as epigenetic determinants of cell shape, function, and fate.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 4>And it's exactly this last comment that I think is

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 4>most relevant here, because in the case of symmetry breaking,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 4>it may be that features of this cellular skeleton, this

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 4>system of sort of strands of polymers and proteins that

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 4>help give a cell its shape and help it resist

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 4>deformation when it's under pressure and things like that, that

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 4>this system may ultimately epigenetically determine the development of cells

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 4>and ultimately the handedness or asymmetry of the whole body.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow, this was so This next part was also

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 4>a surprise to me. I don't think I knew this.

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Apparently cells themselves have a kind of handedness or asymmetry.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 4>Some cells are sort of left oriented and some are

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 4>right oriented, and you can and see this in their

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 4>behavior when they're moving through fluid and they come up

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 4>against an obstacle. So you can have experiments where you

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 4>show that cells are flowing along in a controlled environment

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 4>and then they bump up against something, bump a surface.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 4>When that happens, the cell will tend to turn in

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 4>one direction or the other, and that preference for a

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 4>particular way of turning tends to remain consistent for each cell.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 4>You have sort of left turning cells and right turning cells,

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 4>and experiments in fruit flies demonstrate that these small differences

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 4>at the cellular level can snowball into major morphological differences

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 4>at the body level. Vernamon's article mentions researchers named Leo

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Ian and Kinji Matsuno, who each identify proteins within the

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 4>cellular skeleton, specifically the actin and myosins, as having an

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 4>influence on whether a cell becomes left handed or right handed.

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 4>And there may also be some interplay between proteins in

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 4>the sidoskeleton and the asymmetrical expression of the nodle gene,

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 4>each playing a role. But then there's one more thing

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 4>that gets mentioned toward the end of this article, the

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Quanta article that I thought was interesting, which is that

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 4>other factors leading to asymmetry. Of course, there might be

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 4>some that haven't been discovered yet, but one candidate has

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 4>to do with communication between cells, for instance, based on

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 4>the relative prevalence of proteins on a cell surface, which

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 4>would in turn determine how cells trade electrical charges back

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 4>and forth between each other. And the Quanta article cites

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Michael Levin again saying quote, if we block the communication channels,

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 4>asymmetrical development always goes awry. And by manipulating this system,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 4>we've been able to guide development in surprising butt predictable directions,

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 4>creating six legged frogs, four headed worms, or froglets with

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 4>an eye for a gut without changing their genomes at all.

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 4>And in a final twist, bringing this back to medicine,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting that all of this knowledge might one day

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 4>be useful in finding treatments for pathological growth and development

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 4>patterns and somatic cells by sort of harnessing these systems,

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 4>by harnessing the bodies existing mechanisms for detecting and directing

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 4>its own shape, you know, the way the cells come

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 4>together to form larger structures that might be harnessed for

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 4>treating cases where cell development is going wrong.

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's fascinating, you know, coming back to what you

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, I don't know if prior to this, if

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>someone had just stopped me on the street, like a

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 1>man on the street reporter situation asked me if cells

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>have a skeleton, if I would have been able to

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>correctly answer regarding the site of skeleton. Here, this is

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty fascinating. And then to get into its sort of

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the ramifications of that and how that ends up being

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>reflect elected in the left handedness of the overall system

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or the right handedness, whichever the case may be. You know,

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I have to think back once more to the cock

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>eyed squid Histiotoothus that we discussed in Oh, this was

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the first episode. Yeah, one of the reasons to marvel

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this amazing creature is that its eyes have evolved to

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>look in different directions to different realms of the ocean.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Light and dark, and this seems understandably strange and alien

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to us, but perhaps less so when we remember things

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>like left handed and right handedness. When we think about

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>neural asymmetry that defines us on the inside, and of

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>course it's not just us. Asymmetries between left and right

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>side of the nervous system are present throughout the animal kingdom,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>from invertebrates to mammals. And as one source I was

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at this is by Conca, Bianco and Wilson in

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Encoding Asymmetry within Neural Circuits, published in twenty twelve in

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Nature of Views Neuroscience. The theoretical advantages of brain asymmetry

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and include the capacity for parallel processing, the specialization of

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>left and right sides for distinct computations, and the restriction

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of information processing within local circuits with short, fast connections.

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But while there are obvious advantages to brain asymmetry, are

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>there advantages to brain symmetry. So I was looking into

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit and I read some thoughts from

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a Marco Data of the University of Padua who experimented

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with the often lateralized fish species the gold belly top

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>mino in two thousand and nine. Basically, what this experiment

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>consisted of was dividing these top minnows, these gold belly

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>top minnows, into groups of left lateralized, right lateralized, and

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>non lateralized specimens. So the seeming advantage to the non

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lateralized came when judging stimuli to either side of the

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>creature through either eye. Experiments involved judging advantageous shoals of

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>fish to join on either side. Remember, you're a small

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>fish in the ocean. There's a lot of survival advantage

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of being able to determine which shoal of fish you

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>should take refuge in their strength in numbers, and so

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems that in these fish having a lateral tendency,

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>most often they just joined the shoal that they saw

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>with their dominant eye. So I guess the take home

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>here is that in some cases, yeah, it's going to

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it may come down to your dominant side is just

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be the tendency that you go in, and

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe going to potentially get in the way of

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>properly evaluating in this case, two different shoals of fish.

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 4>I don't have evidence of this in front of me,

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 4>but it makes me think that surely things like this

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 4>must also be true even with you know, brains we

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 4>would think of as more complex. I mean, I'm sure

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 4>even with humans, handedness probably plays a role in like

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 4>directional reactions to fast you know, something pops up and

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 4>scares you, which direction do you bolt in? I would

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 4>be surprised if there is not some kind of tendency

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 4>there that's not purely dictated by where the stimulus is,

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 4>but also has to do with like body side dominance.

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and body side dominance and left handedness and right

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>handedness and human beings. This is something I think we'll

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.479
<v Speaker 1>have to come back to in a future episode. There's

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great research out there, particularly when again

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to what we were saying earlier about

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.399
<v Speaker 1>how you have whatever's going on on the animal level

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the human complications involved there. Because yeah,

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>when you start getting into whole situations of okay, you

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>have a right handed dominant society and then you have

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>left handed individuals within that society, you know, what is

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the impact? And of course there's a lot of There

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have been a number of interesting studies over the years

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that have looked at this, how it plays into sports,

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>how it plays to conflict and combat. How it just

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>plays into thinking about the world around you. So that

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>would be a fun one to come back and do.

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 1>And I know that the lefties especially will love it.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, but.

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Righty's your most of our audience, so don't worry. You'll

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:20.919
<v Speaker 1>like it too, You're just less special. Sorry, Okay, should

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we wrap it up there? I suppose we should. So

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we hope that you've enjoyed this partial journey through asymmetry.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Like we said, there are plenty of other examples of

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 1>asymmetry in the animal world. We tried to focus on

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the examples that illustrated the topic the best.

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps you're thinking of something we didn't mention that

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>bears mentioning, right in, let us know. Let us know

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in an episode in the future about

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>left handedness and right handedness in humans, anyway you look

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at it, just right in. We'd love to hear from

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you past episodes, future episodes, and episodes. It's all fair game.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>We read those on Mondays on listener Mail and the

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed. We have our

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Short Form Artifact or

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Monster Fact episode on Wednesdays and on Fridays, we put

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>aside most serious concerns and we just watch a weird

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 1>film on Weird House Cinema.

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.919
<v Speaker 4>Huge thanks, as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:23.479
<v Speaker 4>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 4>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 4>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 4>say hello, you can email us at contact at stuff

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 4>to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>At the U