WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: What Makes a One-hit Wonder?

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, it's me Josh and for this week's s

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Y s K Selects, I've chosen how one Hit Wonders Work,

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>which originally published in March of two thousand and This

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is the episode where we help heal the world by

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that professional musicians who cracked the top forty

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>once in their careers still have feelings and don't much

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>appreciate being called one hit wonders. So maybe take that

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of advice and put in your pipe and

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>smoke it and and go for it from that point on. Enjoy.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Say something. Um, yeah, I

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't even say say something funny. I just said say

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>something froze. Yeah, it's all right, man. That's good quality

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in a broadcaster to freeze up on the air and

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a professional talker. Yeah yeah, how you doing? Was? Um?

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm good man, I'm This is a fun, goofy little

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>topic and we haven't done one like that in a while.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a fun article written by a guy named

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Charles W. Bryant, a writer for the site. Yeah, I

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>will go ahead and say one thing I was disappointed

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in in this article, and I would still like to

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>see someone tackle this in documentary style. Maybe is the

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>psychology of being a one hit wonder? Oh? Like what

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it does to your psyche? Yeah? Is it better to

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>have that one hit and fade away and at least

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you had that? Or is it better to have never?

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You know? I just I would be real curious to

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>see a series of interviews with one hit wonders to see,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like how they feel about it. You're saying, is it

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>better to have hit and lost than never to have

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>hit at all? Exactly? And I couldn't really find anything

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>on that. So I'm sure there's one or two who

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>like listen to the podcast and if you do, right

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in let us know how it is we're interested in

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Blue Vega Yeah, um, the fake Loue Vega. So, Chuck,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to commend you for this article because you

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>really like this is a tough one for with how

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff works articles, we typically take a topic that is,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, has a lot of research done on it,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it's very well defined, and then we deconstruct it. This

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>one is, like I looked on the Internet, and if

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you type in one hit Wonder there is like zero

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>scholarly work done on it for good reason. Yeah well,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's interesting though too. Like you brought up

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the psychology of being a one there shouldn't have been

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone ever done a study like that. There is nothing.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It's all just lists. And I actually did find one

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>good website. It's called um one Hit Wonder central dot

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>com and they have everything and you can play like

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>every song they have it by year who the one

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>hit Wonder was from like the sixties to the two thousands,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifties. There are some of the greatest songs to me,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>or some of the one hit Wonders. And I mean

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the points, Like you know, one hit Wonder is

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>just something that everybody liked at one time. We just

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't like whatever else they were making, right Yeah, um,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>at least as a large collective group. Anyway, back to

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>me commending you, Um, you had to take something that

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was really amorphous that everybody knew and we knew if

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you got wrong, and whipping into shape like a definable shape,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and you got it right. I think you did a

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>great job. So, Um. The first thing you pointed out

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was that no one is certain of the origin of

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this phrase, that's right, but we figured out that it

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was it first came in print. N right, Well, that's

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>what phrases dot org says, and I couldn't find anything

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to dispute it. But a writer there wrote the sentence

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in July seventy seven about abba instead of becoming what

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone expected a one hit wonder, they soon had a

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>string of hits behind them. And although the website phrase

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>dot org does say it appears to have already been

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a used phrase, but this is the first time they've

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it in print, right, and and so, and there

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>actually is like a definition for one hit wonder, like

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there's well a hit, I guess you can find a hit,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it's got to be on the because we're

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so American centric, has to be on the billboard top

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one and then specifically in the top forty to be

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>considered a hit. Right, Yeah, technically for like when most

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>people like there have been books written about one hit

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>wonders and that's usually what what they say. Okay, so

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't just you or anything saying. And I thought

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a great definition. No, it's a good definition,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's the generally held definition. But then that's where

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it gets really blurry, as we're about to find out. Right, well,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, I mean, yeah, you make a point

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of one hit wonders by that definition.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Who are legendary musicians like Jimi Hendrix one hit, Janis

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Joplin one hit, Garth Brooks as Chris Gaines. Yeah, that's

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this only Billboard hit. Yeah, this is only Billboard Top

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>forty hit. Yeah, but he had country hits. It just

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>lived on the country top ten. But yeah, as in

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream top forty. His only hit was this Chris

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Kaines with the haircut and the soul patch man that

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was Yeah, I don't know what the song that was

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>even I don't need um Beck Yeah, the Dead, The Dead,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the White Stripes, lou Reid, Iggy Pop Divo, some like

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>iconic bands and musicians that have only had one hit. Um.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got artists who never had that hit

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>but are still considered one hit wonders. Because what you

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>end up realizing is, despite the definition of what a

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>hit is, a one hit wonder is something different. It's

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just an artist and a song who captured something for

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment in time. It doesn't matter if it was

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>a top for forty hit, right like you you say,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>um Wallavoodoo's Mexican Radio. Absolutely it was not a top

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>forty hit. No, but that's definitely a hit in the zeitgeist.

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you put it about? Who else? I'll melt with

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you Modern English, the weather Girls, it's raining men, Like

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you would say, all of these are definitely one hit wonders,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and none of them had top forty hits, right, So,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but sticking to the strict definition, um that I mean

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that still works too, rite like the Penguins, Earth Angel. Yeah,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in the fifties, right, Um, in the sixties you had

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>um Summertime Blues by Blue Cheer, but they really spent

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>blue on like their one there, one thing there, one

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>shot was covered in blue Blue Cheer did Summertime Blues?

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Green Tambourine? Remember that song? No, I didn't mean tambourine.

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It was very like psychedelic No and the Lemon Pipers.

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's one of those songs where sort of

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like in the seventies, argents, hold your head up like

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows that song. But I bet ninety nine people

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>out of a hundred I have never heard of the

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>band Argent. No, they probably think, oh, wasn't that the

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>guests who? Or wasn't that Joe Dirt? Or yes, that

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>was it? Yeah, I really I never saw that movie.

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>What I never saw Joe Dirt? Oh man, such a

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>great like keep your Chin Up movie is so good.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I really can hate David Spade, you can hate

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>all of that kind of comedy, but that movie has

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>such like it's got heart. It's a cute movie. Well,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I had friends. It's on Netflix streaming. Yeah, I had

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>friends that worked on it. And that's where I have

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>my Gary Busey insider story. Oh yeah, yeah, I think

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I told you. You know he was. He was supposed

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to play the father and if you'll notice in the

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>film he does not play the father. No, it's done

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>by one Fred Ward. Yeah, so Gary Busey was on

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>set for a day and it didn't work out. He

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>made it. I could tell the whole story. He made

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it into Black Sheep with Chris Farley and um David Spade. That. Yeah,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he was like the crazy guy who lived in a

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>school bus in the woods. It was the party was

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>born to play exactly. Please don't come to our office guy. Um.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, so that was the fifties, and that's generally

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>when the rock era in the fifties is when you

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>people say you can start talking about things like one

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>hit wonders, like not some guy who had one big

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>band hit in the nine although I'm sure they were there,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know that's true. Uh. There has been one song

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a one hit wonder for two bands, which

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. Oh yeah, let's hear funky Town really yeah,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Lips Incorporated. And then I don't know if you remember

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Pseudo Echo. They did a version of that in it

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was a little more electric and upbeat, and that was

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a bona fiight top forty hit as well. Seems can't

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>people couldn't get enough of Funky Town. I hope whoever

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 1>wrote that like really cast in Yeah, you know. So

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the sixties all right, Now, the sixties was the Green

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Tambourne seventies songs like Spirit in the Sky by Norman Greenbaum.

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's a good song. Uh it was an Apollo

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thirteen one took over the line. I I literally wrote

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>shutter next to that, what like, oh you hate that song?

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty bad. Brewer and Shipley and then Seasons in

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the Sun, great song, Terry Jack's never heard of the Guy,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>No No, No Revy, no ref Um. And you also

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>make the point that the seventies were lousy with disco

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonders, And in our disco episode we talked

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about why because it was all producer driven rather than

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>artists driven. Exactly. I didn't even bother to like list

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>any in here. You know, it's you can just name

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a disco song and there you have. The eighties, of course,

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you had bands like Soft Cells, Tainted Love and Oh Mickey,

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You're So Fine, Tony Basil, Uh, I want Candy by

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bow Ka. Remember what song I don't remember? Is that

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>who that? Yeah? Uh So the eighties was lousy with it,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of those songs are great songs, and

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the artists in the eighties were popular

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in other countries, yeah, and are known as one hit

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>wonders here in the US. Like I was reading an

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>article on I think Cracked maybe about one hit Wonders

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and they were saying, like, Aha had take on Me,

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a hit here in the United States, but

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that was it. But they're like one of the top

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty grossing bands of all time worldwide, yeah. Well, and

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>aha falls into another weird category, which is a band

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's known as a one hit wonder who actually had

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a quieter second hit. Oh really Yeah, they had a

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>song called the Sun Always Shines on TV that was

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>like a top twenty hit. I think, wow, I don't

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>remember that one. Nobody does. They're good though, now they're awesome. Um.

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And then remember right, said Fred, I'm Too Sexy huge

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in England. Yes, like there, I'm Too Sexy was actually

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>only hit number two in England. They had another one

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that hit number one, but here in the States, Yeah,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it hit number one here. I think so too.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And then that was it for right, said Fred. Uh

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the same with Frankie Goes to Hollywood and uh yeah,

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they were really big in Europe. And Gary Newman, Yeah

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that was a good song though. That song holds up

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 1>car back and listen to cars. Yeah, that dude was

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a good musician. Well, and he was hugely popular and

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>still like tours today. Yeah, so he's he's one of

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>those guys that's like, please don't call me a one

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>hit wonder. I've had a long successful career. Look at

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>my house, you know it's a car. No, I think

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like a mansion. He lives in his car. It's

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>pre feels safest, he can lock all his doors. Uh.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Falco and oh yeah Nina were really big in German

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>speaking countries. Yeah yeah, I can see that. But you

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>know had the ninety nine red balloons balloons and then

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Falco's uh rock Me Off My dais Yeah, huge hit here.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like it didn't occur to my young brain that

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't from the Amadeus soundtrack, because remember it came

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>out at about the same time as the movie, and um,

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like I just thought it was part of the soundtrack, yeah,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the movie soundtrack. Well, the point with this though, is

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that one hit wonder it's sort of a sort of

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a derogatory term to throw on unearnest. So a lot

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of these people are like in America, like you jerks,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I was huge in Europe or maybe some other country

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, who cares so much for you? One

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hit the nineties crash test Stummies, remember those dudes. Well

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that was the song. Oh yeah, yeah, that's right, the Macarena,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't even like to count that. Um,

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>what about Faith No More's epic? Yeah, see that's a

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>band that hugely critically popular and had a big cult following.

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, just the one hit, the epic. Yeah right,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you want it all, but you can't have it. That

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was I remember hearing that song on the first time.

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the coolest thing I've ever heard. Yeah, and

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that lead singer, what's his name, Mike something, he's like

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>super respected. He's been another band like Mr. Bungle. Yeah. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a big like has a big cult following and

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>not among cults even like among people who aren't in cults.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>All right, So that's music. That's an overview. Yeah. You

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>make a really good point in this article that, like

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder, that derogatory term isn't just um aimed

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at people only in the music industry, although that's where

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the lion's share of it is. Yeah, but it shows

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>up in spot. You pointed out a couple of them,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of instances. Yeah. Well, if you have one

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>hit in baseball, then you've been a complete and utter failure.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>But a couple of guys have had one hit and

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that one hit was a home run, which is pretty cool,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty interesting. Who was that? There was a

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>guy named um Chris Jellic whose name I recognize for

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>some reason, and I don't follow the Mets or anything,

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I just saw that that bit of

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>trivia before that he had one hit and it was

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a home run. Yeah. Maybe. So there's a guy who

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a hit UM named Eddie Goodell, but he

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>had one plate appearance in a nineteen fifty one game

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Yankees, and he was a little person and

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they put him in against the St. Louis Browns and

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he drew four consecutive um uh balls and got a walk. Yeah,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and his jerseys in the Hall of Fame, and it's

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't see me doing this right now, and I'm

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>rubbing my face. His number was one eight really, but

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he was I guess you could say a one hit

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sports wonder. It was kind of a fun story until then. Yeah. Yeah,

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but I mean that's that was his JM. That's what

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>he got paid for, and that's I mean, he was

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>aware that he was a little person. So money off

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of what about the art world, design world. There's a

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>very famous person, Harvey Belle, who has the perfect name

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for what he did. Why is it the perfect name,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Harvey bell It sounds like the creator of the smiley face. Yeah,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the iconic seventy smiley face. He created that as a

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>marketing campaign, UM kind it sounded like an internal um

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>morale campaign for State UH Mutual Life Assurance company UM

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and it took off. I don't know if the company

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>made the money or what, but he was paid two

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>bucks for it. And he never had another artistic hit.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And I looked to see if there were any other

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>artists who were considered one hit wonder. I found some,

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't recognize any of them. I did recognize

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>one Grant would the painter of American Gothic. Oh, yeah,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>he painted that, and it was He won all sorts

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of prizes, became like this, like caused celeb like all

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>over the art world, and the media started digging into

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>his life and realized that he was a middle aged

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>bachelor who lived at home with his mother and sister

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and like wanted to know more about that, and all

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, he like just really couldn't handle the

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the limelight. And it's it's a pretty sad story. I

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think I read an article about it on Mental Flaws.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>It was worth reading. So he never painted again, or

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he ever kind of went for the

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>gusto if he didn't just stop painting altogether. I don't

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>remember the end of the article. Well, the art world

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly has a lot of people famous, super famous for

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a single painting, but they may have been, you know,

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very revered in other areas like faith. No more to

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the Faith, no more of the art world. I told

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>just all the scream this last trip to New York.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and you're like, man, yeah, this was like

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't see what you're talking. I mean, like you

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>bill something like that up in your head, see it everywhere,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and then just to see the real one. It's either

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go one of two ways. You're gonna be

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>underwhelmed or amazed. You know, I completely agree. And that's

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>been my uh, that's been what's happened to me with art,

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>because you know how I feel about art. I know

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>how you feel about art. I love it. Uh. What

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>about books? Yeah? Um, To Kill a Mockingbird. Yeah, that's

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the one most often cited as the one hit wonder

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>because Harperle wrote one book. That's some one of those

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>rare ones where I actually think the movie is better

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>than the book, and I love the book. It's one

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite books of all time. And I hadn't

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>read it in a while, and I went back and

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>read it, and then I watched the movie shortly after.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, holy cow, the movies better than the book. Yeah,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Gregory Peck, I mean yeah, talk about one of the

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>best casting. But every like, all of those actors were amazing,

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>every single one of them. Yeah, Yeah, that's good stuff.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>She wrote, um the one book, and she worked on

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a second for a while, called The Long Good Vibe,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but shelved it. Than in the nineteen eighties, she started

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>another book and never finished that one either, And I

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>guess she just procrastinated. I think she just I don't know.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if anyone has an answer why she

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>never wrote again. Same with the Sallenger, Yeah, Catching the Rye.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>That was it, except he wrote short stories too, but

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean he never published another novel. Yeah, And I

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>will never know. And John Kennedy tool sure, Confederacy of

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Dunce is how often do you think about that book

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just in your normal life? How, I don't know, almost never, maybe, yeah,

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times a year. Maybe when it's like

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>a movie you'll be in the works. That never happens

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about that movie or that book yesterday

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I hadn't read this article yet. Have you read it? No? Yeah,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's good. It's like I think a lot of people

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>have these expectations because it's known as this like genius

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>work after this guy committed suicide, and it is really good.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But um, I don't think it's like one of the

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>greatest books of all time or anything. Yeah, so what

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>happened to him? Do you know? No? I I just

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I've never read the book. I don't know much about it.

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it's kind of like a wacky Southern gothic Yeah, yeah,

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>um kind of novel I lived with his aunts, I think,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or something like yeah, this crazy character in Louisiana that

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's always grabbed my attention because it's just like a

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>perfect title. And then the guy's name is perfect as well,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>John Kennedy Tool or the character his the author got you. Well,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he killed himself. He was clearly now suffered some sort

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of mental illness and um could not get published, and

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that drove him to eventually commit suicide in nineteen nine,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and his mother made it her life's work to get

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it published and did so. And then his second book

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>was published in the on Bible I think in six

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was made into a movie. So he's not

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a one hit wonder then, well Neon Bible wasn't a

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>huge hit. But but yeah, I would say he's a

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder. Um. And you also bring up movies too, man, Yeah,

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and on books again, Sylvia Plath is on here for

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the bell Jar. I kind of wish I hadn't put

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that in here because she was a well known poet.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why I hadn't mentioned it, you know. But she

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>did write the one book and then would she do

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>stick her head in the oven or something. I don't

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>know how she killed herself. I think Virginia Wolf drowned herself, right,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Sylvia Plath herself on herself? I think did she That

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds right. I can't remember that scene in Wonder Boys

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>where Toby McGuire rattles off the famous celebrity suicides. It

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was really great. That was a great movie. Joseph Heller

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with Catch twenty two. Yeah, that's certainly a one hit wonder. Um.

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, movies, um, I mean there more directors and

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>actors that you could even mention that had one hit.

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But legit, super super hits people like Michael. Is it

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Chimino or Semino? Semino? I think, although if it's if

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you're speaking in the Italian, it would be Chimino. Uh.

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He did The Deer Hunter, of course, one Best Picture

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and four other Academy Awards. Did he huh? Did he maw?

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what they tell him when they were like making

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>him play Russian Roulette? Did he Yeah, except they probably

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>scream it. Yeah. Yeah, that scene was so intense. I

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>saw that very young, really young to be seeing that

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>movie in retrospect, like it made an impression on you. Yeah, huge? Um.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>But yeah. He famously made Heaven's Gate um as his

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>follow up, which was one of the notorious disasters, along

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>with Ishtar. Wasn't like water World? Was skate War in

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Baby Movie too? Or is that Heaven Can Wait? He

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>was in Heaven Can Wait and Ishtar? So what about Heavens?

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>What was that about? Yeah? I think it was a

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Western if I'm not mistaken. Yeah, and it was just

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a notorious failure and a very expensive one. And then

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Tomino never He made a few other movies, but you

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard of many of them. He did Year of

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dragon was like with Mickey Rourke, which the only

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>other like notable movie that was supposed to be a

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>good one. Yeah, but it was far from a hit,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying. And then my favorite, uh,

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve Gordon, one of my favorite movies of all time.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I have not seen it. You didn't see Arthur. Not

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>only have I not seen the original Arthur, I haven't

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>seen the remake that includes our friend Hodgeman as a

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>candy store manager believer. That was terrible, by the way,

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 1>not Hodgman's bit, not Hodgment was great, but the remake

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was really bad. And it was so sad because Arthur

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is one of the movies that I hold very very

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dear to me. And Steve Gordon wrote and directed it

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and then died afterwards. It was the only movie he

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ever made by his own hand. No. I think he

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>had a heart attack or something and died young but

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>young ish. Uh. And it was just so like it

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was a gut wrenching experience watching the remake for me.

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Why did you watch it? Like? For example, I think

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Red Dawn is one of my favorite movies of all time.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>There's not a chance that I will ever see the

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>remaker of Red Dawn. Well, I'm not either, and I

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>learned after Arthur. So that's the one that taught you

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the lesson. Yeah, I'm not gonna watch anything that was

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>really precious to me if they rebooted or remake it again,

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>never again. It sounds like Hodgeman tell you a valuable lesson. Yeah,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And I like Russell Brand, you know, And I thought,

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they made Helen Mire and John Gilgod's character

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and was just enough of a spin when I was like, well,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that's could be interesting. But then everything about the movie

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was just some new little spin to make it different.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was like, hey, let's make the man a woman.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's make the the white guy Puerto Rican, you know,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was like Louis Guzman. It was just it

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was bad, so bad. Yeah, well that's it for Arthur. Yeah. Um,

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>if you want to learn more about Arthur, you can

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>type that word in this service part. Isn't that what

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is about? I forgot Arthur. One hit wonders more,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what it was. You should read this article by Chuck.

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a good one. Um. You can tell one hit

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>wonders in the search bar how stuff works dot Com

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and it will bring up this article. Again. Uh, commendable article,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks sir, uh and I said commendable. So it's time

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>for word from our sponsors. Just start sky so much start.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh now it's time for listener mail. Josh, I'm gonna

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>call this. Uh, we're gonna give this guy's wife a

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>tongue my shoe. Oh jeez, what you do? Let's see, dudes.

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Have been an avid listener since shortly after its inception.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a huge fan, especially enjoy listening to it while

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm stressed out. That always a soues my nerves stack

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>here of your bander. Over the years, I've tried to

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>convince my now wife Elizabeth to listen. Oh I know this. Unfortunately,

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>she's always insists that you two are stoners and that

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you're retty repartee is contrived, this is so far off.

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>She makes me change over to this American Life or

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio Lab great shows. What's your podcast? I download to

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fill the time between stuff you should know releases. I've

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly informed her that you guys are not stoners. You've

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>done frequent podcasts on the l effects of drugs, and

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this is not convinced her. Still listen within the when

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you read letters during listener mail about couples who enjoy

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>listening together. That's so sad. I know, if I'm not mistaken,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one pair even became engaged during a listener mail segment. Yeah,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about that yet. I'm not vouching for that. Um.

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>It recently struck me that perhaps if you were to

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>give Elizabeth a shout out at the end of the show,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>she might be impressed enough to become a fan as well.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>You could say hi to Elizabeth at the end of

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the show, you'd be contributing to my marital blitz. So

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, way second, you realize what's going on here.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>We're being manipulated, Yeah, to to say hey to somebody

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't even like us. I know. I feel like

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>there should be some money exchanged for this. Well, no,

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel instead of saying hi to Elizabeth, she needs

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to get a tongue lashing for these baseless accusations of

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>us sitting around like in a garage, smoking marijuana, marijuana

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and just like talking. Yeah, it's bs. That's someone who's

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>never listened to the show. We have banter. We might

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>go off on tangents and we might say, like five

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>million times in a sentence. But we're not sitting around

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>smoking weed just rambling. Yeah, we're just relaxed. A lot

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of work goes into the show. So Elizabeth mellow out. Dude, Yeah, seriously,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:49.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe you need to go in the garage. Not so anyway,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this guy is a neurologist and he said to alien

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>hand syndrome part struck close to his heart. Awesome, And Devin,

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't do it, then Elizabeth can just listen

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to this American Life and Radio Life. Let her hang

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>out with our glass. And I'm sorry for your marriage

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>because it is clearly, clearly headed in the wrong direction.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we had her until just that last sence

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>right there. No, she's great on Churchill Pill. Tune in. UM,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out. Let us know, Devin, will you if

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>you want us to say something specific to somebody you know? Um,

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>we very well might do it if you ask it.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Might we have before? Um. You can tweet to us

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>at s Y s K podcast. You can join us

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook dot com, so list Stuff you Should Know.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email to Stuff Podcasts at

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Discovery dot com, and you can always find us at

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>our home on the internet. Stuff you Should Know dot

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Com For more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Does it, How stuff works? Dot com