WEBVTT - The U.S. Anti-Renewables Movement, Explained

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is brought to you by earth Breeze. Earth

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Breeze is an amazing replacement for those big plastic jugs

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the laundry detergent. They're like dryer sheets, except their

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>concentrated laundry detergent. You just fold them up, stick them

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in the washer and that's it, no mess, and your

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>clothes come out super clean and smelling.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 2>Grate.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Now onto the show.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in the US

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 3>has spurred a huge amount of investment and progress in

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 3>the renewable energy space, and at the same time a

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 3>big uptick in anti renewables activism, especially when it comes

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>to offshore wind projects. In a lot of cases, the

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 3>people showing up to fight wind farms, both on land

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and offshore, are the same piece people who were fighting

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>them over a decade ago. But there are some new

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 3>groups too, and they're deploying some new tactics, especially around

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>conservation and the idea that wind turbines are bad for

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>birds and whales. There's no science backing up these claims,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>but that hasn't stopped them from taking hold. Still, it's

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 3>a tricky situation. We're not just talking about fossil fuel

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 3>backed resistance. Here, the groups opposing these projects are not

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>just AstroTurf groups. Some of them are real grassroots groups

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 3>comprised of citizens who are genuinely concerned about, for example,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the fate of the endangered right whale and how offshore

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>wind farms might impact it. Many of those groups are

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>being co opted and weaponized though, by organizations that have

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>spent the past twenty years working to block climate policy.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>And then the whole issue is complicated even further by

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the fact that some of the companies building these wind

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 3>farms either are today or used to be, fossil fuel companies.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It's complicated, which is why a report out of Brown

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 3>University late last year mapping the groups that are active

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 3>on the east coast of the US was especially helpful.

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 3>That report is called Against the Wind, and it digs

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>into the people and organizations who are actively fighting wind energy.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It looks at how they connect to each other, who's

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 3>funding what, and which talking points seem to be spreading.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 3>To unpack it all, I've got Isaac Slevin, the lead

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>author on the report, with me today. I'm Mimi Westerbilt,

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and this is drilled after the break a deep dive

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 3>on the Fight over Wind. Stay with us.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Our exclusive sponsor today is earth Breeze Eco Sheets. Sheets

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>look just like a dryer sheet, but they're ultra concentrated

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>liquidless laundry detergent. It's the best of all worlds. Earth

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Breeze is tough on stains and odors while also being

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind to the planet and your skin. These tiny sheets

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>can stop millions of detergent jugs from entering our ecosystems.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, five hundred million detergent jugs end up in

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>landfills and oceans every single year. Ninety one percent of

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>single use plastic does not get recycled, including the stuff

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we put in our recycling bins. Sometimes it's hard to

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>avoid single use plastic, but earth Breeze makes it really

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>easy to rid your laundry room of this stuff and

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no sacrifice involved. My clothes or clean. They smell

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>great and I feel like I did something good just

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>by doing my laundry. Eco sheets are also dermatologists tested.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>They're hypoallergenic, they're free of bleach and dyes and parabins,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and they even have a fragrance free option. I love them.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>They make doing laundry just slightly easier too, which is

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>always a plus. Right now, my listeners can receive forty

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>percent off earth Breeze just by going to earthbreeze dot

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>com slash drilled. That's e A R T H B

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>R e e ze earthbreeze dot com slash drilled to

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>cut out single use plastic in your laundry room and

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>claim forty percent off your subscription earthbreeze dot com slash drilled.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 3>What were you hoping to find when you set out

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>for this research?

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>So over the last couple years, we've witnessed a huge

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>rise in opposition to offshore wind across the East Coast.

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>And this isn't the first time that's happened. There was

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>a wave of opposition to offshore wind a decade ago.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 2>There's always been the skeptics about it. But what was

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 2>really interesting about this recent wave is their focus on conservation.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 2>This isn't your run of the mill climate denial movement

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>or climate denial disinformation tactics being employed. These are self

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>proclaimed conservationists who are fighting against offshore wind because they

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>say that it endangers bird populations and especially that offshore

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>wind endangers the right whale which is this rare species

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>of whale. Scientific literature says that it does not endanger

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the right whale. And so when we started on this project,

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to know where all of this is coming from.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 2>How are these disparate local anti offshore wind groups developing

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>such sophisticated political attacks pushing out so much rhetoric and

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>information at a time. This projects started looking at specifically

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>one group in Little Compton, Rhode Island, called Green Oceans.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>It was a rhetorical analysis of their information and misinformation

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 2>about everything from right whales to the fishing industry, to

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the reliability of the turbines to impacts on national defense.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 2>And what we found when we were analyzing these rhetorical

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>tactics was that they were shared across the movement, and

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>not just shared by other anti offshore wind groups in

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Massachusetts and New Jersey, but also shared by climate denial

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>groups like the Heartland Institute, like the Committee for a

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Constructive Tomorrow or Sea fact and that was pretty interesting

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>and pretty peculiar. So as an aside to that project,

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>I began looking at different connections between these grassroots groups

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and those national think tanks, and of course the fossil

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>fuel companies and the fossil fuel interests that fund those

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 2>think tanks, And what we ended up with was an

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 2>expansive web of anti offshore wind groups on the ground,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>working with backing from climate denial and right wing think tanks,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>many of which were bankrolled by classic fossil fuel industry

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>donors like the Charles Koch Foundation, like the State Policy Network,

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>like the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers Association. So we

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what we were going to find. We were

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>just looking into where all this opposition came from, and

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 2>what we found was a reasonably well organized and extraordinarily

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>well connected group of people in think tanks opposing offshore wind.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>We've been tracking these groups a little bit too, and

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>one thing that really jumps out is just how much

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>these what I like to call lone wolf climate denayer dudes,

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>folks like Mark Morano at Sea Fact or Steve molloy

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>who works not just for Heartland but also the Competitive

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Enterprise Institute and CATO and really a whole host of

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>organizations working against climate policy over the last couple of decades.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 3>How much guys like that have really jumped into this fight.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Here's a clip from a little boat ride famed whale

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 3>conservationist Mark Morano took with an anti wind group in

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Rhode Island just to give you a little taste.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Where same whoa stop?

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>When same well?

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Where way well dock w same whoa horsed there this

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 5>message we are here the same the whale. If you

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 5>were a focal fuel project, you would have been shut

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 5>down long ago, as the mortality of wales piling up

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 5>on both pages would have shut you down. For some reason,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 5>you are politically protected wind mails off shore. I'm protected

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 5>for some reason by the politics of our country. Well

0:08:58.040 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 5>go war rock.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Tell me who slash. What is the Caesar Rodney Institute,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and then what is their relationship with the Texas Public

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Policy Foundation.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>So the Caesar Rodney Institute is a State Policy Network

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 2>affiliate based in Delaware. The State Policy Network is this

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>sprawling collection of libertarian right wing think tanks. There's at

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 2>least one in all fifty states, and the State Policy

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Network serves to back these think tanks lobbying efforts and

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 2>political efforts on the state level. That has to do

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>with climate and it also has to do with just

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 2>about everything else relating to education. For example, a lot

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of these state policy network groups have been active in

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the critical race theory panic recently and working against trans

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 2>rights and trans healthcare. And in Delaware, the season Rodney

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Institute has become particularly interested in blocking offshore wind and

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 2>our research found that they're extraordinarily well connected there. So

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the Sesar Rodney Institute and one of their directors of policy,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>a man named David Stevenson, created an astro turf of

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>fake grassroots appearing anti offshore wind group called Save our

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Beach Views, and this group blasted out tens of thousands

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 2>of mailers containing misinformation about a proposed local offshore wind

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>project and raised a substantial amount of money off of it. Now,

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the Seesar Rodney Institute has graduated a bit from Save

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 2>our Beach Views and put that group in a coalition

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 2>with itself and four other state policy Network affiliates in

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 2>for other states, as well as four other anti offshore

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>wind groups across the East Coast. So this is a

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Rodney Institute has emerged as a major player in this movement,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>and you'll see David Stevenson pop up in congressional hearings

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about offshore wind and fundraisers for some of these

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>local anti offshore wind groups. The Texas Public Policy Foundation

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>is a climate villain in all regards. Way beyond the

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 2>context of offshore wind, they have been working to advance,

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>particularly natural gas nationwide. This is particularly odd considering how

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 2>reliant Texas is comparatively on wind power. But still, the

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Texas Public Policy Foundation is heavily opportunistic and jumps at

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>every chance it can get to disparage renewable energy of

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 2>all kinds. A great example was during the freeze in

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Texas a couple of years ago, when they ran with

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the false narrative that wind power was collapsing and causing

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 2>unreliability in the grid and causing people to freeze, when

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>in fact it was due to natural gas and the

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel industry not being able to cope with the

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>low temperatures. And so the Texas Public Policy Foundation found

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a way to oppose an offshore wind project called fine

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Ear to Wind by funding a lawsuit to attack it.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 2>But the Texas Public Policy Foundation didn't sue themselves. They

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>sued on behalf of six plaintiffs, all of which are

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>fishing industry groups on the East Coast. All six of

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 2>these groups are also members of the Responsible Offshore Development

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Association or RODA, which does a lot of research and

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 2>coalition building in opposition to offshore wind So from thousands

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>of miles away, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, also a

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 2>State Policy Network affiliate, has found itself embedded, I should say,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:03.359
<v Speaker 2>has embedded itself in this fight that frankly only concerns

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>it because of its ties to the fossil fuel industry.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm curious about sort of the relationship between Texas

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Public Policy Foundation and Caesar Rodney and what you found there.

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Our map did not connect them other than having people

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in common. So they're both State Policy Network affiliates, but

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that's about it. I mean, they have similar supporters. Well,

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean the fact that they're both the premier State

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Policy Network affiliates in their states is really substantial. There's

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>this phenomenal Jane Mayer article from I believe twenty thirteen

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>about how the State Policy Network works, like ikea straight

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>from the mouth of the State Policy Network CEO or

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 2>president at the time, who's still the State Policy Networks

0:13:55.320 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>CEO or president, that SPN works to equip all of

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 2>these local think tanks with the information and the strategies

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 2>that they need to fight prescribes battles in their state legislatures,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and TPPF and CRI are both doing that in their

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 2>respective states. So it's always going to look a little

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 2>bit different whether you're talking about direct lobbying of legislators

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>or filing lawsuits or setting up AstroTurf groups. That's where

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the IKEA assemblages look a little bit different from state

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>to state, but it's all coming from the same catalog.

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think that remembering that is incredibly important when

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at how this seemingly disparate network of offshore

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>wind opponents, but also disparate network of public education opponents,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>of public healthcare opponents actually share a lot of tactics

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and share a lot of strategies because it's no accident

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 2>that they are coming from the same playbook sponsored by

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the State Policy Network.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>That's super interesting. I want to talk about all these

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>little local operatives in these fights, right, and all of

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>these people who get involved in this for one reason

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 3>or another. And I feel like it starts to get

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>complicated when we talk about these people, because some of

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 3>them are themselves, you know, just don't like the idea

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>of offshore wind for some reason or another. Some of

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 3>them have like their own, you know, legitimate to them

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 3>at least reasons for not wanting these projects, but then

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 3>they get sort of like co opted into this whole effort.

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'd love to have you talk about that, because

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 3>it's complicated, and that complexity gets flattened out when we

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:43.479
<v Speaker 3>talk about.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>This stuff a lot, for sure. Yeah, thank you for

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 2>asking that question, because I do agree that it's something

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>that gets lost. A good place to start would be

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Mary Chalk. She's a co founder of a Save Right

0:15:55.920 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Whales coalition and co director of Nantucket Residence for Whales,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>which was formerly known as Nantucket Residents Against Turbines, and

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>she was particularly interesting in our early research because of

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>her conservation based rhetoric talking about whales and pollution about

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>pristine views in Nantucket. She's appeared at events hosted by

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Green Oceans, which is the offshore wind group anti offshore

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>wind group. In Little Compton, Rhode Island. She was wearing

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a whale costume at a public hearing that Green Oceans disrupted,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and Green Oceans also has used a lot of that

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>same rhetoric in terms of legitimate claims. It's important to remember,

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important to remember first that there are

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>valid reasons to be worried about industrialization of natural resources,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of these massive imported steel turbines popping up in protected

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>waters or waters that are essential to certain endangered species.

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>The conservationists have gotten really good at blocking projects in general,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel projects on those grounds, and I think you

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 2>see an extension of that here. I don't believe that

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>people like Mary Chalk are lying about their love for

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>whales or lying about their love for environmental conservation, and

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>you can see that firsthand in a lot of their

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Facebook groups. There's a ton of information and misinformation that's

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 2>communicated through antiofshow in Facebook groups, and it's sometimes dozens

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 2>of articles and photos every single day of whales that

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 2>have washed up on coastlines across New England. So I

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>think that's the more legitimate side of at least legitimate worry.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 2>It's always important to note here that there actually isn't

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a connection, has proven scientific connection between offshore wind construction

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>and environmental conservation. That is something that I think is

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 2>important to note because this isn't an AstroTurf movement, This

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't people like Mary Chalk haven't been placed by the

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel industry to stir up something big. Another aspect

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that I think is important is property values. A lot

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of the people in Green Ocean's leadership have extremely expensive

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>ocean front properties and would be seeing the turbines often

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>dozens of miles out. If you look at the renderings

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>in a recent lawsuit from the Newport Preservation Society about

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>offshore wind, you can see actually how stunningly far out

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they would be and how they'd be really difficult to see.

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So even though that doesn't translate, it translates pretty rarely

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 2>into rhetoric about actual property values. I think that's where

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that legitimate concern comes from, of like, hey,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>hired to the coasts, or I wanted to live in

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 2>a space and see certain things that are important to

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 2>me spiritually, important to me culturally, and massive offshore wind

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 2>turbines are not those. And yeah, so that's that for

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I can talk about the fishing industry if you want to.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they're super interesting in all of this.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 3>But yes, I would love to hear that, because the

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's interesting to me about the fishing stuff

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 3>is like they've also been getting impacted by climate change

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 3>forever so like, yeah, so, yeah, I would love to

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 3>have you about that totally.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>So these self proclaimed conservationists have ended up in an

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>alliance with a lot of players in the fishing industry,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 2>both opposing offshore wind. The conservationists for claims about whale conservation,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 2>and the fishing industry for worries that offshore wind can

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>struc aduction will disrupt where fish are and what kinds

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 2>of fish are in which places, as well as fish

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 2>migratory patterns. Those concerns are a lot more founded than

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>those about whales. It's still a really weird alliance because,

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 2>according to Noah, fishing gear entanglement has caused sixty five

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 2>percent of documented right whale deaths, injuries, and morbidity since

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen. In other words, the biggest enemy to those

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 2>who proclaim to love right whales is the fishing industry,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 2>who they've struck an alliance with and opposition to offshore wind.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 2>But there are legitimate reasons for fishing communities to be concerned.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a first strictly financial reason of needing

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a livelihood and relying on fisheries and relying on fishing

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>grounds to produce certain kinds of fish at certain times

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of year, and also the cultural aspect of things. I mean,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>some of these fishing communities and fishing leaders are third

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 2>fourth generation, potentially going back even farther. And so the

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 2>idea of simply switching industries because a Danish energy company

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>wants to put up wind turbines is unfathomable and fundamentally disrespectful.

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 2>But we've seen some of these grassroots conservation style groups

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>pick up that fishing rhetoric and forge those fishing alliances

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 2>after making a lot of less maybe politically relevant arguments

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 2>or certainly true arguments. So the fishing industry has become

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 2>a very helpful tool. You could even call them a

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 2>front for people who want to block offshore wind for

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>other reasons, and that's everyone from those conservationists to the

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel interests. I have no reason to think that

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 2>the Texas Public Policy Foundation particularly cares about New England

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>fishing communities. But if the fishing communities are going to

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 2>get up in arms about offshore wind, than the Texas

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Public Policy Foundation can swoop in and fund a lawsuit

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 3>I actually saw something recently from Steve Mulloy.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>His articles have popped up everywhere.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Under of the whales. Steve Mulloy seriously right, No, And

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 3>that's why it's so preposterous.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Like people at you know, See Fact and the Heartland Institute,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 2>who have been blocking climate policy and conservation policy for decades,

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>We've made a whole career out of it, are now

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 2>being used as defenders of the wales in the face

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>of industrialization. And it's kind of preposterous when you think

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 2>about it. But also, you know, and I want, as

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>much as I want to be cynical about it, I

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 2>think it's also worth remembering that this is how dire

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 2>these anti offshore wind advocates feel. That their situation is

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that the strangest of bedfellows can be made, can come

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>together so that these projects can be shot down, even

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>when it's people who are responsible for hurting and killing whales.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Whatever it takes to get these turbines out.

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>Of there, was there anyone working on conservation solutions that

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 3>didn't rule out offshore wind.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's hard to know what to do. We

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 2>are trying a few different things. So there was a

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 2>hearing in Little Compton in March or April that included

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Professor Timmins Roberts talking about the role of the fossil

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>fuel industry. That included a marine biologist from the University

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of Rhode Island who talked about Wales. It was put

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>on by a local state representative to give it a

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>sense of you know, legitimacy and place for dialogue, and

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Green Oceans was and having it, you know, they protested.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>They got up and handed out leaflets at the door

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>to make sure everyone knew the truth about offshore.

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 3>When do you feel like it's become just really combatd

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>in that way where people just are like not super

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 3>open to conversation.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 2>So do I feel like people are combative?

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Or just like people are just dug into their

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 3>sides and not really even that interested in solving the

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 3>issue anymore.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do. I mean the Climate and Development Lab

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>published a report about the misinformation tactics that Green Oceans

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 2>has used in its literature, and they attacked the CDL

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter. We put out this report and we're getting

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>attacked on Twitter for us being the ones sponsored by

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>the fossil fuel industry.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>A funny note on that is like they cited this

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>is save LBI, Save on Beach Island. They cited a

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Brown Daily Herald article saying that Brown takes twenty million

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 2>from the fossil fuel industry myself and will catch up.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 2>My co author in this co wrote that report too,

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and like, we know that this is the whole issue,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 2>that fossil fuel money is everywhere and we need to

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 2>combat it everywhere, and just saying nah, no you is

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 2>actually really counterproductive and not about actually creating the systems

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>we need to be sustainable and as an academic institution

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 2>to spread truth and facilitate free inquiry, but it's just

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 2>about scoring points. But to go back to your I

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>think this also relates to your earlier point about Steve

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>molloy and people just wanting to win. They're in their

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>entire There's such a media ecosystem, a standalone media ecosystem

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 2>around anti offshore wind. They have at least a dozen

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Facebook groups with thousands of members each where you can

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 2>just scroll through and read about wales dying, about turbines leaking.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>There'll be the occasional win. You know, a lawsuit in

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>France that mandates that turbines have to be taken down

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to protect whales, or instead giving up on a couple

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 2>of its projects in New Jersey and so you can

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 2>celebrate alongside people and I don't know if you need

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.479
<v Speaker 2>to know what you're celebrating for. Then there's of course

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Fox News and the Murdoch media empire, and so people

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>like Mike Dean, who appears in our map, go on

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Fox News and are put on national television talking about

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 2>the impacts on Wales. This has also been happening with

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Sky News in Australia. There's this whole international element with

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Australia that we haven't even begun to analyze yet, where

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing a lot of the same tactics and a

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of the same media GoSystem happen. And once you're

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 2>in this mindset that you can only trust a small

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 2>subset of people who are speaking truth to power, it's

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>really hard to get in and wrestle that idea away.

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's so not unique to Offshore Wind. Combating the

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 2>right wing media ecosystem is often a very personal issue,

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and we just read these heartbreaking articles about people's parents

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 2>and grandparents completely falling victim to it. That's so persuasive

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 2>because it teaches you that you can't trust anybody else.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 2>So even when you have your elected officials, your university scientists,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 2>your scholars, your journalists coming out and saying that right

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>whales are going to be okay and that we need

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>wind turbines for a just transition. They don't seem to

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 2>trust them, or at the very least they don't seem

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to find their articles they're persuasive enough to sort of

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 2>lay down their arms. I don't know. We have this

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 2>website called like realofshore wind dot com or something that

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>like that that's like looks like kind of wary that. Yeah,

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it's awesome, Like it's a designed like one of these

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of scammy yes. Yes, yeah, so we're going to see.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>But it's like, I feel like the solution, other than

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, winning political battles, you know, in terms of

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>like changing hearts and minds, it might just be the

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 2>same tactics that we need to bring a lot of

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>our people back.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 3>That's super interesting. The Australia connection makes me wonder if,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 3>because you know, State Policy Network and Heartland and whatever

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 3>part of the Atlas network too. So, yeah, have you

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 3>seen any ideas just sort of floating through that whole

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of conservative think tank ecosystem.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, yes, the research on usherwind opposition and at

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>LISS is really really new, like in the last few months,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and so there's a lot we don't know yet. What

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 2>we do know is that members of at LISS, just

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>like members of SPN, are using i mean almost identical rhetoric.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't confirm that there are talking points being passed around,

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>but you can clearly see in for example, the white

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 2>paper put out by Green Oceans that they are citing

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Steve Molloy and they are citing sea Fact and so

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>whether or not somebody is hand delivering that misinformation and

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>those polished talking points to them, we're still getting there.

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So when our report came out and I saw in

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the Green Oceans Facebook group something that a comment like,

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>oh looks like we're in this network of fossil fuel

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>industry interests and climate deniers who knew, I was thinking, well, yeah,

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sure you don't think of yourself as

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 2>being in that indus tree, but you are plainly borrowing

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>from their talking points because you find them persuasive and

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>they've made their way to you. So absolutely there's there's

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 2>tons of shared rhetoric and shared talking points. It just

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>remains to be seen how explicit this network is, how

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 2>much people in it know that they're in it.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's so interesting.

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>But some of these conservations totally see themselves fighting the

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel industry. The difference, of course, being that the

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel industry is spending single digit percentages of its

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>annual expenditures on renewable energy and then even then lying

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>about it, Shell spending what one point five percent annually

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>on renewables after they got caught for calling natural gas

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>expenditures renewables. So I think that's the difference, and maybe

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 2>that's a way to break through the media ecosystem.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, but that's interesting that there's this idea that

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 3>we're also fighting oil majors because not only are they

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 3>not spending that much, but their presence in the renewable

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 3>energy space is creating opposition too.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I hadn't thought about that of like,

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I mean, because there's all all of

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the discourse about like to what degree do we allow

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel the fossil fuel industry to pivot, right, Like

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 2>we can't trust them as actors, but you know they

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 2>are as reliable, honest actors, but also they have all

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 2>of this capital.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and technical expertise like that always gets slumped into it.

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we should just go completely invest in these startups

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 2>or in particular transition to oil majors like or Steed

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know, but I don't know. I think

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't buy that because you'd still have all of

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the arguments about fishing and about where regardless of which

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 2>company is setting.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Up the turbines, right, Like the fishermen are they don't

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 3>really care that it's BP.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I just pulled up one of the tweets I've gotten

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 2>In response Mike Dean, who was on Fox News that

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 2>offer wind said, Wow, give them a few more semesters

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and they might find out the fossil fuel industry BP, Shell,

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 2>equinor Orsted edf are the ones actually building the offshore

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 2>wind projects. These grassroots groups are opposing genius.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it's just so interesting, but it also just makes

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>this problem really hard to solve. Right, last question, I

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 3>just I would love to hear from you. What were

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 3>some of the things that you found in the course

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of doing this research that were surprising to you? What

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of jumped out to you as being like WHOA

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 3>was not expecting that? Or that You're like I really

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 3>don't people pay attention to this?

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Sure? I think it's really important. I mean what we've

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 2>just been talking about, how earnest A lot of these

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 2>groups are seeing themselves as conservationists, seeing themselves as defending

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 2>their fishing communities and fighting against these fossil fuel majors.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 2>This isn't like the AstroTurf climate denial movements of the past.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot of this actually is organic and finding allies

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>not because they love right wing climate denial think tanks,

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>but because nobody else is coming to their aid. Megan Lapp,

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 2>who's big in fishing policy on the East Coast. She's

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a fisheries liaison for a company called Sea Freeze in

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Rhode Island, even said this when she was asked about

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 2>how she feels about the Texas Public Policy Foundation backing

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 2>her lawsuit, and she said something along the lines of

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>we need all the help that we can get. So

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>it's not exactly a plea for plead to be gentle,

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 2>but to get people credit for backing their communities again

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of reasons that actually aren't based in science.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 2>For you know, there's a lot going on there that

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't particularly savory. But we shouldn't just write this off

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and treat it like a bunch of misinformed old people

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 2>with way too much time on their hands. They are

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 2>responding to prievances that are real and imagined, but ultimately

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 2>are powerful motivators for political action. I spend a lot

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 2>of time in climate activist circles, and I think constantly

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>about how dire climate change is, and how evil the

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel industry is, and about how nobody is going

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to protect us but us. And I'm seeing a lot

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 2>of these sentiments shared in this network against offshore wind,

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 2>and disentangling that is going to be really difficult. Lea.

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 2>Stokes put out a phenomenal article this fall about the

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 2>term energy privilege, which showed how the communities that are

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 2>blocking offshore wind are disproportionately white and wealthy, and they

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 2>have energy privilege in that they're perceived harms which are

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 2>potentially decreased property values, which are polluted quote view sheds,

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 2>in other words, visibly seeing offshore wind turbines from their homes.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Those harms are such small potatoes, honestly, almost embarrassingly small

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 2>potatoes compared to the day to day experience of the

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 2>predominantly black Latine and indigenous communities that foot the bill

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of the fossil fuel industry, those communities that experience oil

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>refineries that lower life expectancies and give children debilitating asthma

0:35:55.040 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that results in extraordinary hospital bills that are given communities

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>rare cancers through polluted air and water. So it's also

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>important to not lose sight of what we're fighting this for,

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and there's balance there. We don't want to be sacrificing

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>fishing communities like that's not fair to anybody. And that's

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 2>what a just transition means. It means protecting and making

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 2>safe and communities that are going to have to foot

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the bill of a renewable transition, But it also doesn't

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 2>mean entirely caving to them so that we preserve a

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally racist and lethal status quo. So that's one thing

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know, when I was wrapping up this project

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and trying to make sense of this all, and you know,

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 2>balance certain sympathy that I feel with also an unshakable

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 2>belief in the power of renewable energy, in the urgency

0:36:53.760 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of renewable energy, to remember what's happening, what has to happen,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 2>so that these predominantly white and wealthy communities can avoid

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>offshore wind and it's debilitating.

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, that's the thing is getting that message

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 3>to land with people in a way that doesn't put

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 3>them on the defensive. It's just tough. The entire history

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 3>of America is not one in which we have incentivized

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 3>or rewarded people for doing anything for the common good.

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 3>And we kind of need people to get there for

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the renewable transision to happen. But we haven't done that

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>culture work. We haven't actually fixed the social contract in

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 3>a way that would lay the groundwork for people to

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 3>do that.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 6>And now we've got to do all that work really fast.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 6>What I want to do is lead by example. Like

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 6>it's clear that we need a politics of pluralism that

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 6>we don't have, right, I Mean, all of this movement

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 6>is you know, fishing, like the fishing industry versus the

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 6>offshore wind projects, the community groups versus the university professors.

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 6>You know, we also see them as enemies of progress sometimes, right,

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 6>I Mean, And that's not entirely fair either, because we're

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 6>all looking out for our self interests in different ways,

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 6>and we just make different decisions to decide what that

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 6>self interest is right, and steamrolling them is not good

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 6>for our democracy or good for our discourse. I mean,

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 6>a great way to unleash a national or international lion

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 6>of anti offshore wind opposition would be to call them

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 6>climate deniers over and over again, or say that they

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 6>don't have free will, or say that this is all

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 6>some AstroTurf project of Charles Kochan friends.

0:38:55.640 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, or accuse them as being like white least, you know,

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 3>especially when you have this weird coalition there right of

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 3>like working class fishermen and then people who have ocean

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 3>front estates.

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I know, and you know it's but also leaves difficult decisions, right,

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Like we do need to build these things really quickly.

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.959
<v Speaker 2>We do have scientists on one side of the debate.

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Like, there are going to be some trade offs. That's

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the thing I really believe we're really allergic to being like, yeah,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 3>there are some trade offs. Let's talk about it and

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 3>figure out what are the impacts that we can live with, right,

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 3>and how do we equitably distribute them as opposed to

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 3>what we've been doing, which is just ignoring the impacts

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and letting them fall on the most marginalized people in

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 3>our society, you know, it's not like energy hasn't had

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 3>impacts before.

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just hard, I guess, having spent so much

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 2>time in their face groups and media ecosystem, Yeah, it's

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 2>hard for them to not feel like they are being

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 2>targeted and policy is being imposed on them, social harms

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 2>are being imposed on them without their consent.

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's something that a lot you know, I mean,

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that's that's Nimbeism at its core for surely.

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Have you looked at any comparisons between this and

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 3>what happened with fracking, because I feel like the thing

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>they have in common is it's like the first time

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:38.919
<v Speaker 3>energy externalities were foisted upon white communities basically, I mean

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 3>with fracking, it was mostly not wealthy communities, but it

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 3>was certainly communities that were like not totally used to

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 3>having the refinery down the street kind of problem. There's

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 3>all these really interesting use cases where like, like in Pennsylvania,

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 3>for example, a bunch of conservative communities ended up coming

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 3>around to the idea of rice of nature and like

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 3>embedding that in their town charters because all of a

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 3>sudden they were like, wait a minute, Like so if

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 3>my neighbor decides to go for a lease, but I

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 3>don't and my water gets fouled, like I can't do

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 3>anything about it, and I don't benefit from the lease.

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 3>That's not fair.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:26.839
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 2>What can I read about that? That sounds super interesting?

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to send it to you because yeah, to me,

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I see so many parallels between that and

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 3>this stuff where it's like we're basically i mean, let's

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 3>face it, people don't really think about this stuff until

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 3>it shows up in their backyard, right, and then all

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden they think very differently about it they

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 3>did before. Like I'm sure none of these people were

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 3>like protesting against refineries being built in cancer ally, or

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the role.

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Of the fishing industry in you know, right whales, right,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Like it's only once they are materially impacted or proclaimed

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to be materially impacted by seeing offshore wind turbines do

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 2>all of these arguments about things that have actually been

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 2>happening the whole time come out.

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 3>That's right? Yeah, yeah exactly, And.

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 2>We're going to see how it's going to turn out,

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, on one hand, like the offshore wind

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 2>industry is going through significant hardship right now.

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I know that there was like a chart recently that

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 3>showed this massive drop off in offshore wind installations in

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 2>It was like, no, of course the anti offshore wind

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 2>groups are claiming victory. It doesn't seem like it's at

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 2>all related to them, like this is about supply chain

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 2>issues and inflation. But that sort of brought I guess

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 2>all that up as like a caveat to remembering that

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 2>they are losing like they've especially in New Jersey. They've

0:42:54.320 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 2>found right wing politicians to be champions of the fire

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 2>against offshore wind, no surprise there, and they are not winning.

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 2>There was a special election a couple months ago. There's

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 2>a good E and E news article about it. But

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that is not playing well overall. And so it also

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to be interesting to see what happens when

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 2>they lose. I mean, you know, they can keep suing

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 2>to death, but are they going to move on? Like

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 2>is this going to be a new anti wind conspiracy group?

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Like is this going to be like a sustained movement?

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Are they going to kind of go home? A lot

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of them are really old and retired. Are you familiar

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 2>with Gordon g He's the president of West Virginia University,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the one gutting them right now. Yes, yes, So his

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>ex wife is one of the major players in green

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 2>oceans in Rhode Island, Constance g She's in our map.

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of, you know, apropos of nothing. But

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 2>it's like, Okay, people who are substantially wealthy and have

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 2>been their whole lives, it seems, and are now living in

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 2>these beautiful places. What's their real long term political game here?

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is interesting.

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so far, they haven't shown to have influence where

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 2>it matters. There was a congressional hearing where David Stephenson

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 2>was there, Bob Stern was there, Megan Lapp was there.

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 2>They have successfully convinced certain municipalities to pass resolutions opposing

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>offshore wind, like Little Compton, Rhode Island, but when it

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 2>comes to Boham, for example, they're not winning because while

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 2>agencies like Boham take into account community input, there's a

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 2>whole host of other factors that the anti offshore wind

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 2>movement can't address and hasn't been able to address. So

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're not an inconsequential in numbers. I mean

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>you can there are these photos of all these protests

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 2>with the hold hands along the beaches in New Jersey,

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and there's not not a lot of them. But I

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 2>don't think they have their hands and the right levers

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 2>of power. I mean, they have this one kind of

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 2>random Congressman Jeff Andrew in New Jersey. They've gotten through

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 2>a little bit to Jared Golden, who's a Democrat from Maine.

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of actual decision making capability, it's pretty weak.

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's pretty weak. So right now, I'm not

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 2>super worried, but with offshore wind industry on the back foot,

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and with all of these lawsuits in the works, I

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 2>wonder if the industry and advocates will get beaten down.

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I just don't entirely see that happening.

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 5>LifeLock, how can I help?

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.240
<v Speaker 3>The irs? Said, I filed my return, but I haven't.

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 4>One in four tax paying Americans has paid the price

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 4>of identity fraud?

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 3>What do I do my refront?

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Though I'm freaking out, don't worry. I can fix this.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 4>LifeLock fixes identity theft guaranteed and gets your money back

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 4>with up to three million dollars in coverage.

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm so relieved, no problem.

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 2>I'll be with you every step of the way.

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 4>One in four was a fraud paying American not anymore.

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Save up to forty percent your first year. Visit LifeLock

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 4>dot com. Slash podcast terms apply.