WEBVTT - CoreWeave Tumbles on Data Center Delay

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>live from Coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>York and Eva low in sentrancs.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Go, This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Soft Bank sells

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>its entire stake in Nvidia for close to six billion dollars.

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>This to help bankroll it's other AI investments.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 3>As we sit down with core Wee've CEO Michael and

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Trader to talk about the company's earnings and that data

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>center delay and.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>More earnings with paramount skide answer as the company reports

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>its first results since David Ellison's takeover.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Much to digest when it comes to the fundamentals of

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>businesses today, and but overall we've got a bit of

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>risk aversion here. We've got some of the biggest players

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>in technology. On the downside, you're going to drill into

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the individual movers. But there is a question of AI infrastructure.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a question of pressure or some of these market

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>capitalizations of eight ten percent after yesterday's bounce back on

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 3>hopes that the government shutdown might.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 4>Be reaching some sort of end.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>But then take us to the individual movers.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, cor Weave is where we start stock down about

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 2>thirteen percent, on track for its biggest drop since mid August.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>The stock trading in its lowest level since early September.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>In a few minutes time, we're going to speak to

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the CEO, Michael and traitor.

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 5>The company cut its revenue.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Outlook for fiscal twenty five or trimmed it really because

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 2>of a delay to a specific project. The other thing

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that's weighing on the markets right now is in Vidio

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>in video down around two percentage points when last I checked.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>The issue is right now three percent now that soft

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Bank sold its remaining stake in Vidio in its entirety,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not unprecedented. Soft Bank has sold out of Nvidia before.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd also remind our audience yesterday Vidia jumped almost six percent,

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>on track for its biggest jump, or was its biggest

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>jump since April.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 5>But the market's a little nervous. Hire. There's a lot

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 5>to unpack.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Car there is, and let's unpack it with our executive

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Global Tech editor, Peter Elstrom. Peter talk us through what

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 3>is happening, because, as Ed says, this is not unheard of,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 3>and in many ways what they use the money for

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 3>could end up being a benefit to Invidia longer term.

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's exactly right, Caroline. So SoftBank reported earnings for

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 6>the quarter, they were really blow out earnings. They reported

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 6>about sixteen billion dollars in that income. That's roughly six

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 6>times what had been expected. A lot of that came

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 6>from some of their investments in AI, including their stake

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 6>in open Ai in particular. But as as you mentioned,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 6>they decided that they were going to sell their entire

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 6>stake in Nvidia and take take the six billion dollars

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 6>so that they can make other investments with it. Now,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 6>a big part of where they're going to put that

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 6>money is into their Stargate venture, where they're building these

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 6>AI data centers in the US, and they're going to

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 6>buy in Vidia chips to put into those data centers.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 6>So partly Masioshi son is getting this cash so it

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 6>can make investments in AI. Some people may be reading

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 6>it as a negative sign for AI and for Nvidia

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 6>in particular, but in fact he's going to use that

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 6>need to make investments.

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Again, not unprecedented in Nvidia was a stock that Softbanks

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>sold out of in twenty nineteen, and then in twenty

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty they started building up his stake again in some

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of those paper games have been to SoftBank's benefit. The

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>issue is that management faced a lot of questions both

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>about what.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 5>They're doing here.

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 2>They're rationale what they're going to use the cash forward,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 2>but also are we in an AI bubble?

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Peter? What did they say?

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there was one of the questions that came up.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 6>So Marcoshi Son doesn't do their earnings calls anymore. He

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 6>stopped doing those a few years ago when he was

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 6>taken arm public. But he has said a number of

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 6>times that he regrets selling in video shares in twenty nineteen,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 6>as you referred to, those shares would have been worth

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 6>more than two hundred billion dollars now, which is more

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 6>than the market cap for a SoftBank at this point.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 6>But so the person who stubs in for him as

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 6>the CFO, Yoshimisi Goto, and he talked through these issues.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 6>He did get some questions about the Invidia shares. He said,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 6>it's not that they don't believe in Nvidia anymore. He

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 6>also got the question you're referring to are we in

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 6>an AI bubble? And he said it's hard to tell

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 6>at this point. Not quite the same kind of conviction

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 6>you would hear from Sam Altman or from Jensen Wong,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 6>but he's realistic about we're not really sure where we

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 6>are in this cycle. But to be clear, Masieo Sheson

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 6>is going to keep making investments.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Peter Elstrom breaking it down, We thank you so much.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about where we are in this cycle. Because

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 3>Core Weave shares, as Ed pointed out earlier, under pressure.

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>That's after it lowered its annual revenue forecast due to

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 3>delay it a third party developing a data center really

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 3>overshadowed impressive growth in revenue in order backlog. Let's get

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>straight to it with Core Weave CEO Michael and Trader.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 3>How frustrating is it that you don't own your entire

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>supply chain? How much of an issue is some power

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>you have to give to third parties?

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 7>Oh so, look, look, I think it's important to understand

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 7>that every single part of this ecosystem is dependent upon

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 7>other parts of the ecosystem. Nobody controls the entire supply chain,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 7>and that's just the nature of doing business at this

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 7>scale on projects that are as complicated as whether it's

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, you know, the the design and architecture of

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 7>the chips, through the fabrication of the chips, through the

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 7>building of the data center, through the concrete that has

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 7>to go into the data center. Like it's just, you know,

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 7>like it's really hard to even contemplate a world in

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 7>which you have true control over every aspect of it.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 7>And so you're going to work with partners, and you're

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 7>going to work with good partners that are able to

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 7>help you.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 8>Drive your business forward.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 3>Is this a good partner who's had issues at this

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>PowerShell level?

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Look, they are a good partner, right, Like, we've

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 7>been working with these guys since twenty and eighteen.

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 8>There there has been a stumble.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 7>There's an issue. The issue is going to be cleaned

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 7>up rapidly. But I wouldn't say that they're not a

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 7>good partner. I think that, you know, we are. You know,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 7>we've gone back and contracted with them again and again,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 7>and you know they've contracted with us again and again

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 7>because you know, we do work well together. It's just

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, occasionally you hit a bump in the road.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 7>You know, what we're talking about here is a contract

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 7>that gets pushed back by you know, uh one quarter,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 7>let's say, and that the impact of that on our

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 7>revenue is a delay of revenue, not a loss of revenue.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 7>And uh, you know, I think that is the definition

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 7>of working with.

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 8>An ecosystem of good partners.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 5>Michael, good morning.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Which customer was it pleased that was impacted by this delay?

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 7>We don't speak to specific customers within the data centers.

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 8>That's that's not how we look at it.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 7>But you know, we we we really are working with

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 7>the whole you know, or a material part of the broader.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 8>Kind of.

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 7>Ecosystem that consumes compute at this scale. So you know

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 7>that that that's you know, there's a large project, it's

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 7>from a large counterpart, and you know, like I said,

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 7>you know they they understand, uh, the the impact of

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 7>this delay and that they are.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 8>Shifting with us.

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 7>The contract back to ensure that the total contract value

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 7>that was being contemplated is going to be captured at

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 7>this reilm.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I thought you might say that, but I wanted to

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>offer you the opportunity to explain who the customer was.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 5>Anyway.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate this is going to sound a little bit

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>like I work in your internal audit team or in

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>your risk team, but there is a bigger issue here

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of managing third party risk as much as you can.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So if your supply is tight today, what procedures are

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you putting in place for the event that your backlog

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 2>doubles and supply is even tighter down the road.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 7>Listen, that's a that's a that's that is the question

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 7>that we work on across our company continuously, right And

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 7>if you, if you, if you think about the messages

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 7>that I was trying to communicate.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 8>During the earning.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 7>Scroll yesterday, I talked about the incredible impact of the

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 7>effort that we've had to diversify our clients. We started

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 7>the year with you know, eighty five percent of our

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 7>revenue to a single client, and we are coming out

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 7>of the year with our back log with you know,

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 7>which has reached you know, all time highs where no

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 7>specific client is more than thirty five percent of it.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 7>And that is down from fifty percent even last quarter.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 7>So you're seeing tremendous progress on the contracting side, on

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 7>the supply side, when you're looking at the powershells the

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 7>data center providers, you know, there is no single provider

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 7>of data centers that represents in excess of twenty percent

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 7>of our two point nine gigawatts of power that we

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 7>will be delivering to the market over the next twenty

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 7>four months.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 7>So you're seeing a real focus by our company to

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 7>diversify on both sides of the you know, the ledger,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 7>the clients that we are delivering infrastructure to as well

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 7>as the suppliers that are delivering us the components that

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 7>we need to be successful.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>What can be done Because we hear about power issues,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 3>we hear about how much.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.119
<v Speaker 4>People maybe need government to help speed.

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Up contracts, supply chain headaches. What is it in this

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 3>particular data center issue that won't be replicated down the road.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>How are you making sure or is it just something

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 3>we are going to see time and time again do

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 3>you think so?

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Look the way that we are handling this is we

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 7>are doing several discrete things to ensure that we are

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 7>future proofing ourselves against these type of delays.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 7>So, we have our team that has been built out

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 7>over the past year that builds and delivers data center

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 7>and so we have self build organization to be able

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 7>to deliver our own data centers for instance, Kenilworth in

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 7>New Jersey or Lancaster in Pennsylvania, where we are building

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 7>from the ground up.

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 8>Those skill sets.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 7>Being able to deploy those individuals with those talents down

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 7>to the data centers as they're being constructed by third parties.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 7>If they encounter problems where we can be useful, helpful

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 7>thinking through ways of solving and driving the process forward

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 7>is really important to being able to mitigate these type

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 7>of delays.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 8>We have massively.

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 7>Diversified our data center providers so we're not exposed to

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.359
<v Speaker 7>any specific they say to data center provider.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 8>In too large of a component.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 7>And then the third piece of it is it's important

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 7>to understand that as we get larger, as our delivered

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 7>power gets larger, the relative impact of a delay at

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 7>any one given site becomes less and less meaningful and

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 7>less and less impactful on our.

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 8>Run rate. And that's really important.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:09.119
<v Speaker 7>Like you're encountering scaling issues within a company, that's encountering

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 7>scaling issues.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 8>Within a supply chain, both of those will get better.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 8>Time solves that scale solves that we.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Are currently seeing that time isn't particularly helping the share price.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>As we speak, it's now down fourteen point three percent,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>worst day since August.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>We are here with Michael and Trader across radio and TV, and.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to sort of ask whether you think more broadly,

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>the US is stunted by the supply chain headache, or

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 3>do you think there is something that can be done

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>from a federal perspective here to ensure that you can

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>build at the rate you want to build you're not

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 3>having these sorts of headaches.

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 7>So we've been we and many others have been, you know,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 7>quite forceful in making the case that there is a

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 7>role for government in helping us with some of the

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 7>permitting issues, speed to which you can get our infrastructure

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 7>and others can get their infrastructure attached to the grid.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 7>You know, all of those type of things where there's

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 7>there's there's a great role for for for the government

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 7>to help in that. They are the they are the

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 7>organization or government entity that is correctly positioned to help

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 7>facilitate that. And I think that's a great role where

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 7>where government can lean in and make an impact across

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 7>the space.

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Broble Michael, you have an agreement within NVIDIA that lots

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of people find very interesting that down the road, if

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 2>there is spare capacity, there's some flexibility for you to

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>deploy it elsewhere. That's a simple summation of it. But

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering how you're thinking about serving some of the

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 2>smaller AI labs and casting that net even wider in

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 2>your customer base if indeed that capacity gets freed up

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>down the line.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a it's a contract. I'm actually incredibly excited about, right.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 7>It's a contract that we did within VideA where we

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 7>will deliver them compute for the next six years. But

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 7>in the contract is the capacity to interrupt the flow

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 7>of compute to them, and that will allow us to

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 7>repurpose that compute to new companies, startups, companies that have

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 7>struggled to get access to the compute that they require

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 7>to bring new companies, organizations, ideas into existence. And I

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 7>think it's just an incredibly important component of how the

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure is so important to allowing the ecosystem itself, of

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 7>these startups, of these new companies, of these new ideas

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 7>to become more resilient, to become more scaled, And it's

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 7>just a great contract for us to be.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 8>Able to position ourselves.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 7>It also provides this wonderful on ramp for us to

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 7>be able to work with the new amazing companies that

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 7>are coming into existence so that they integrate into our

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 7>solution and get to make use of the best alternative

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 7>that exists in the market as they're scaling their companies.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Michael, it's finished to what extent is in Vidious still

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the gold standard in videous GPUs for your customer base

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 2>and what data are you tracking on demand for those

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of more inferenced specific chips that are offered by others.

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 7>So look, we have always been client led, right. Our

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 7>clients come to market and tell us, hey, we would

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 7>like you guys to help us build a cluster. We

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 7>needed to be this size and this location and this

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 7>type of network, and we work with them in a

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 7>very kind of interactive way to ensure that the infrastructure

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 7>that we're building is the best infrastructure for them, is

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 7>fungible for us, like all of these type of requirements

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 7>to make for successful delivery of infrastructure. Right now, the

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 7>reality of the situation is the buy signals from our

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 7>clients overwhelm our capacity to deliver infrastructure to the market.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 7>As a matter of fact, they overwhelmed the entire market's

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 7>capacity to deliver infrastructure to the market. You have a

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 7>systemic shortage of ability to deliver the GPU's the computing

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure for the buildout of artificial intelligence and we have

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 7>never wavered from that position. We have been very very

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 7>clear that you know, when we look at the demand

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 7>signals coming into core Weave, the totality of that overwhelms

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 7>the capacity of the market to deliver that, and will

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 7>continue to do that for quite a while.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Michael Intradeser, Core Weave CEO, thank you for coming back

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg tet. Okay, I'm also taking a look at

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>shares of Nebus. This is the Neo Clouds spun out

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>of Russia's Yandex A year ago. The USS shares down

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>more than three percent, but in the quarter soul growth

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>of three hundred percent year on year and has added

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a major contract with Meta. That's positive upside. Maybe this

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 2>was a high bar kind of quarter where the market

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>saw it coming in, But you know, Cara, I think

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you'd agree. Nebus name that's coming up more often in

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the context of hyperscalers and this case Meta using them

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>for off ramped compute.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 4>All about the supply of AI infrastructure.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 3>But coming up, we steered towards earnings again, paramount s

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>guidance raising its target though for job cuts and for

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>cost saving measures we'll dig in next.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 4>This is a Blueberg Tech.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Back to earnings with paramount Skuidance, which reported it's financial

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>results for the first time since a new investor group

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>took over in August. The company raised its target for

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 2>job cuts and cost saving measures, and it's forecasting thirty

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in revenue next year. Let's break it all

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 2>down with Laura Martin's senior entertainment analyst at Needham. I

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know, like, hello, what's being cheered here? You know,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>sometimes cutting your way to profit and cutting your way

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>into a good financial positions not the most exciting story.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 2>What is the Laura Martin main takeaway?

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, the Laura Martin main takeaway was I thought they

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 10>left more questions unanswered than they answered. So I think

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 10>one of the big questions is they just did an

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 10>affiliated transaction with Oracle, which for Enterprise Software, which is

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 10>the dad's company. So now you can, through pricing, move

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 10>money between these two public companies. That sort of was weird.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 10>And then also they said they're going to spend a

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 10>billion five on content and double their film slate from

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 10>seven films a year to fifteen films a year starting

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty six. And the problem with that is

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 10>the sky Dance track record is one theatrical release a year,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 10>so so going to five fifteen means not only are

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 10>you spending the money on the negative cost, but now

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 10>you're going to spend about one hundred million each marketing,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 10>which all just sounds like an awful lot of money

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 10>that you're spending in the near term, which is a

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 10>tax on public shareholders before you get the return. It

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 10>takes about three years to release a movie between green

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 10>lining and release, which means you have a couple of

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 10>investment years ahead of you, which doesn't sound like you know,

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 10>so we're going to stay on the sidelines here. In

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 10>terms of the shares.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to that relationship between Oracle

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and the affiliated transaction that you mention, implying that the

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 3>value can be transferred between the two public companies. How

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>much is that help if we're thinking about the shar

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 3>scale of money David Ellison needs perhaps from Larry Edison

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>to keep on buying in WBD assets, or how much

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 3>is it a concern just in what are you actually

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 3>buying an entertainment company here or a tech an AI

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure bet so.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 10>I think that is one of the differentiated things they're

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 10>saying is they're saying that our content storytelling is complementary

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 10>to our tech stack, and our tech stack needs investment

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 10>because Paramount, the old Paramount sort of starved it. So

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 10>we p Sky are going to invest in the tech stack.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 10>So from a fundamental point of view, they're going to

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 10>try to marry storytelling with Jenai tech, which is sort

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 10>of a cool messaging although expensive in the near term.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 10>I would say the oracle point was just a new

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 10>piece of information we got, having nothing to do with

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 10>the Warner Brothers. Like if the dad writes a seventy

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 10>billion dollar check to Warner Brothers, like you know, that's

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 10>a bigger deal than a contract might be several million

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 10>a year. So it was just an affiliated transaction that

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 10>I just would really like to see the pricing on

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 10>when they have to disclose it in a ten K.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 10>But this's just a new piece of information. I think

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 10>the big issue is you don't know what you're buying here.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 10>Are you buying a sixteen billion dollar subscale Paramount sky

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 10>Dance or are you buying a Are they going to

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 10>use money to make a seventy billion dollar acquisition of

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 10>all of Warner Brothers and then that's a hundred that's

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 10>round numbers, one hundred billion dollars scaled player with bigger

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 10>everything including studios. So then you wouldn't have to double

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 10>the films because Warner Brothers got fifteen by itself already.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 10>So I think they might be justifying of warn Brother's

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 10>bid in some ways with some of their cost estimates.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 5>Here, Laura, very quick pivot here.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 2>You just heard the cool weave interview, you published your

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>research on hyperscale capex.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Just a quick reaction to what you heard.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So, I mean, I think one of the big

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 10>biggest question we get is are the hyperscaler spending too

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 10>much money on infrastructure? And we published a note this

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 10>morning showing that the JENAI implementations at Amazon, Meta, and

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 10>Alphabet are accelerating their revenue growth and cutting their operating costs.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 10>So they're getting margin expansion by using generative AI tools,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 10>which gives them the confidence to invest in these infrastructure

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 10>plays to then sell to third parties those same capabilities

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 10>to lower costs and drive faster product innovation for the

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 10>rest of the US economy. So I actually think that

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 10>the biggest funders of generative AI infrastructure are seeing the

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 10>biggest benefits already in their own businesses.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Laur Martin on optimistic mode for the end.

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 3>We really appreciate it always from Needham, keep coming back,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 11>The valuations don't look crazy, but they do if there's nervousness.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 11>Are on the growth story in and that's why I

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 11>think the AI story, of which we do remain bullish,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 11>and we do think that there is a lot further

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 11>to go, it is likely to be a volatile ride.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>That was Black Rocks Helen Jewels discussing the nervousness we're

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 2>seeing in AI stocks right now.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 5>You can see that in nvideo and you can see

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 5>it in core Wave.

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 2>As we've been discussing all morning, the risks aren't only

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 2>about lack of growth. Bloomberg opinion columnist Chris Bryant, writing

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 2>about that there's a quote a danger of depreciation tsunami,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>links to the short lifespan of AI chips. His piece

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 2>focuses on AI investors ignoring warnings from short seller Michael Berry.

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 2>You can check that out on the Bloomberg terminal or

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>dot com carac.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, though, ed, it's time for talking tech, and first up,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft is planning to build a ten billion dollar AI

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>data center the Portuguese coast.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 4>He's working with start.

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Campus, the Portuguese developer, and British startup Ndscale, one of

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft's biggest European investments this year. Plus, Intel's chief technology

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 3>and AI officer Sajin Kati has left to join Open Ai,

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 3>where he'll be working on the.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Startups infrastructure efforts.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Back in Intel, well CEO Lit Tan will take over

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 3>Catty's role and reports on another major departure, Meta is

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 3>set to lose its chief AI scientist, Jan Kuhn.

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>According to Financial Times.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Lacun is reportedly leaving to launch his own style up,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 3>focusing on what he calls world models, as in early

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 3>talks with investors to raise funds.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech if you're just joining us.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Our top stories are coll Weave and Nvidio. In video

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>down three percent, SoftBank is selling out of the entirety

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of it's almost six billion dollar steak in the company

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 2>because it needs cash to finance his other AI ventures.

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>The street not really seeing this as a concern about

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>in video itself, but in aggregate taken with cor Weave's

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 2>almost fourteen percent drop, there are some jitters in the market.

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Corweave is down after just slightly trimming it's outlook for

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 2>sales in twenty twenty five because of a delay on

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 2>a specific data center project that delayed trimbutable to a

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>third party. And in an interview of the CEO earlier

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 2>in the program, we didn't really get any answers on

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 2>who the customer impact it is. But with time and

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>with scale, such supply issues will go away. The market

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 2>right now not buying it.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Kra they're not, and let's stick in with the fact

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>that the market's not buying it. Bloomberg Gecrity's reporter comm

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and Rhyinikey is here with us and it's interesting the

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 3>jitters around AI of late have been around an AI

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>bubble and demand concern but ultimately these are supply side issues.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Constraints for cor Weave, maybe the cash constraints for Softbag

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 3>and needings sell off in video.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's really interesting how this has shifted really from

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 12>the dip buying that we saw yesterday the drove and

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 12>video up Corey we think was also up before the

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 12>Bell before it reported its results, and now we're seeing

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 12>really any concern on I their side, AI bubble or

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 12>supply here is really weighing on these shares. I think

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 12>as the AI theme just continues to get stretched, investors

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 12>are nervous and they're really really ready to sell at

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 12>kind of any moment, this especially coming before in video

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 12>results next week. Obviously the whole market really looks ahead

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 12>to that, but shares going down into in video results

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 12>is a little bit different than what we usually.

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 2>See, right Covin, you made a really good point, and

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to bring up a chart to illustrate it.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday and Vidia jumped almost six percent, which was its

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 2>biggest jump since early April.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 5>So a drop off of.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.959
<v Speaker 2>Three percent or more in the session taken into account

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>with the newsflow, give that context. Generally speaking, though, what

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is the sentiment of the investors that we're speaking to

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>right now? Are they still like mega bullish on this

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>long term trend that they think will just carry on

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and keep going.

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's a really great question. I think people are

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 12>very split. But I hear a lot of people that

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 12>are still very bullish on the long term trend and

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 12>even say that some selling now or a little shakeout

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.719
<v Speaker 12>in the market would be pretty healthy. I mean, valuations

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 12>are very stretched. We've we're three years into a bull run.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 12>These are some of the biggest stocks in the overall markets.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 12>That makes sense that they've drag down the entire index,

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 12>so a little bit of a shakeout here wouldn't be

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 12>a huge concern. Obviously, this is really overlaid though, with

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 12>the fact that people are really talking about an AI bubble,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 12>and so I think any selling in any of these stocks,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 12>even you know, at the end of the year when

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 12>people are sort of looking to lock in performance lock

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 12>in gains it, you know, sparks more conversation around this

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 12>entire debate about an AI bubble.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloombos come and rhyanikay, thank you very much. Meanwhile, shares

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of Nokia and Ericsson close higher in European trading. Sources

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>say the European Commission is weighing steps to push EU

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>members to phase out Huawei and Zte gear from telecom

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>networks amid security concerns. More let's get out to Bloomberg's

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 2>Illn Deutsch who joins us with the reporting. This is

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 2>timely and this is very interesting. What do we learn

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in the course of reporting about how serious this move

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 2>is to push Huawei out of the market, That it

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 2>is very strong in in Europe.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think it's actually really important to note. People

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 13>do not realize that there's still so much Huawei Kit

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 13>in various EU countries infrastructures, and the European Commission for

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 13>years has wanted to push U countries to stop using

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 13>this technology across their networks.

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 4>They have really failed to do so.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 13>And the new Commission that came in two years ago,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 13>they're doing a new push. They're going to try to

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 13>get different EU countries to push out force out Huawei

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 13>and ZTE. Now I cannot orderstate how difficult this is

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 13>going to be. Like I said, the previous Commission tried

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 13>to do this and they did not have the political backing.

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 13>Things like critical infrastructure, are things like national security. These

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 13>are left up to the member states of the EU.

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 13>So essentially what has to happen is these countries will

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 13>have to come together and say yes, actually we're going

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 13>to hand over that power to Brussels, to the European

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 13>Commission to make that reality. That is a tough pill

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 13>for a lot of countries to swallow.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Countries such as in your piecing make clear Spain, Greece,

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 3>which have remained relatively dependent interestingly UK. We know that

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they've been pulling away for long time, banned any Huawei infrastructure,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>similar with Sweden, so it can be done. It's interesting

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 3>that Chinas sort of tried to point out that it

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 3>slowed those nations down there.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's a great point, Kawlin, because you know a

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 13>lot of the operators and independent analysis has been done

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 13>to show that actually by forcing a strip out of

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 13>Huawei from the UK networks, that delayed.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 4>Five year roll by up to two years.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 13>This is a very costly ambition from certain countries if

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 13>they want to go ahead with this kind of push.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 13>Not only does it delay possible you know, technology development,

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 13>it also comes at a great cost to the operators.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 13>So if you look at Germany, for example, some people

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 13>in the government are examining ways that. Okay, if they

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 13>were to try to force Huawei and ct out of

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 13>their networks, could they compensate operators not Obviously would soften

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 13>the blow for a lot of these operators, but this

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 13>would commit a great cost then to governments.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 4>If not readers.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Jinaen Deutsch's great read, we urge people to go take

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 3>a read of it, thank you very much. Indeed, let's

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 3>take a look at crypto more broadly right now, because

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 3>we want to put it into the world a bitcoin.

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 3>It's too seeing some risk a version selling. Today we're

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>off by two percent one hundred and three thousand. Remember

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 3>it remains below its moving average targets, so one hundred

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 3>day moving average for example, at one hundred and ten thousand.

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 3>It remains trading below that. People fearful they won't be

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 3>seeing any sort of breakout. We're seeing Gemini space station

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 3>though Gemini, of course crypto Exchange went public recently off

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 3>by fifteen percent. That's after its earnings just showed that

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 3>perhaps they're not managing to ramp into any sort of

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>profitability as soon as people have maybe hoped. Let's bring

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>in Blomberg senior crypto rewarter Olga Karaf, who can dig

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 3>into the Gemini story because they were a beneficiary of

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the changes in regulation in the United States.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 4>But why did it underwhelm on the quart of just reporting.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 14>So, like you said, the Winkle West twins that founded Gemini,

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 14>they have been very strong supporters of President Trump and

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 14>a lot of crypto companies with public this year as

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 14>we've seen sort of deregulation and more favorable regulatory environment

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 14>towards the industry. But the fact of the matter is

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 14>that the company, Gemini, is unprofitable and some analysts basically

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 14>don't expect it to become profitable until two or three

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 14>years from now. And what we've seen in this quarter

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:35.959
<v Speaker 14>is that the losses widened partially because of this ideolic

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 14>related expenses and marketing expenses. But people are wondering, sort of,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 14>what about profitability, when is that going to come?

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Alger It's good to see Dan Chen, the CFO, talked

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>about this the expenses issue and it being strategic for

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 2>those that have never come across Gemini. What's the business

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 2>model on paper? Just explain the basics of how it

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 2>supposed to function, because then that will make the loss

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 2>probably more digestible.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 14>Sure, so it's a crypto exchange, So their biggest rival

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 14>is coinbase here in the US, and essentially they make

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 14>their money about half of the money off of trading

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 14>fees as people trade bitcoin, ether and other cryptocurrencies. And

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.719
<v Speaker 14>then they also have other businesses such as you know,

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 14>their credit cards have actually been on a roll and

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 14>they've been able to grab a lot of new users

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 14>through credit cards that essentially allow you to earn crypto

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 14>rewards as you spend money. They also have a custody

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 14>business and some other.

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Businesses looms, Olga grief, Thank you very much. Now coming

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>up on the program, Ali Barber's Singles Day is underway

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 2>and this year AI isn't an option for shopping.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 5>We got more on that. Next, this is Bloodbag Tech.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 4>China Singles Day.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 3>It is underway now in its seventeenth year, but shifting

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>consumer habits and he fears price war. They've dourned the

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 3>one day shopping blitz into a weeks long campaign. Bloomberg

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 3>TV's chief North Asia correspondent Stephen Engel really examines China's

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 3>involving consumption trends amid a tougher economy.

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 15>Influencer peddling is all the rage in China online, of course,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 15>but now more than ever before on the actual trade

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 15>fair floor as well, where rapid fire hawking of product

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 15>over multiple mobile phones direct to China's billion plus consumers

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 15>has never been this well in your face.

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I don't know how they talk so much.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 15>Everything you possibly need to know about Vietnamese and other

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 15>products from overseas doesn't matter if it's New Zealand milk

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 15>powder and ice cream, or Italian cleaning supplies complete with

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 15>a Mandarin speaking European oh your bow mouth. They're all

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 15>competing for Chinese cyber shoppers. In a market where around

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 15>forty percent of all retail sales are now done online.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 8>A single days eleven eleven is huge.

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 14>We have a strong presence on online platform and we

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 14>have a strong focus on gen Z.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I know think as they had another few more weeks Togo,

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 3>but so far the result has been very, very encouraging.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 15>Online shopping in China is growing at three times the

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 15>pace of traditional retail, with many brick and mortar outlets

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 15>feeling that pain. CPI did pick up slightly in October,

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 15>but overall retail spending is expected to have slowed again

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 15>as households hold on to savings amid economic uncertainty. Add

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 15>to that are lingering worries importers and exporters here feel

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 15>about the fragile trade trups with the United States.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 16>High terriffs are hurting everybody, hurting both sides. One of

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 16>the things that as businesses we do hope is that

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 16>there is longer than a fourteen month detent, shall we say,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 16>but that there is some general baseline of the relationship.

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 16>These are areas we're going to trade in. These are

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 16>areas that are no go. This is kind of a

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 16>gray area where we'll keep negotiating on because that would

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 16>help us all to your point, really understand what we

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 16>can move forward. And if I do want to have

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 16>a five year contract with an American supplier, I know,

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 16>no matter what, I'm going to get that product.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 9>I think it's been critically important that we have clarity.

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 15>US wine experts to China this year were down seventy

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 15>seven percent in the seven months through July from a

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 15>year ago, with Chinese tariffs and taxes combined amounting to

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 15>about seventy five percent on American wine, and yet Barrows

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 15>is cautiously optimistic for recovery as the truce has kept

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 15>tariffs from escalating further.

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 9>It was a very very positive development that they came

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 9>up with an actual number that's going to be in

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 9>place for the next fourteen months, because before that, I

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 9>think a lot of importers weren't so upset about the tariff.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 9>It's they didn't know what it was going to be,

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 9>and so now we know what it's going to be,

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 9>at least through the end of December of twenty twenty six,

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 9>and I'm hoping that that brings some normalcyback into the process.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 15>It's an endurance game shared in some respect by the

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 15>many influencers in nearby booths to keep talking, to keep

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 15>the parties on the other end engaged. Steven Angel, Bloomberg

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 15>News Gender.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 2>We stay with Single's Day this year if Ali Barber

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence takes center stage as the company pushes out

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>AI driven search results. Deborah wind Swig, Coresite Research CEO says,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 2>quote winners going forward up brands investing in AI driven personalization.

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 2>The retail playbook now blends tech trust and instant gratification commerce.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Deborah whine six joins us now Deborah, that report from

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Steven Adam Mainland China fascinating learning about sort of the

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 2>scale of the event. But will zero in on Ali

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Barber and where AI is or isn't making the difference.

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 2>What's your assessment about where they stand in that market,

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>which he just outlined is pretty chaotic at the moment.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 17>Well, first, thanks for having me on. Second, as we

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 17>look at Ali Baba specifically, I would say that last

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 17>year they were dipping their tone in the water and

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 17>this year, they're in kind of up to their thigh

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 17>as it relates to AI and the shopping experience. So

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 17>starting at the very beginning all the way through there

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 17>or kind of the PDPs or the information behind all

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 17>of the images on the website to what you've bought previously,

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 17>is that they serve up products you are more likely

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 17>to purchase. But it's all EI driven and it's highly

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 17>personalized in a very short period of time, so that

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 17>return rates are dropping, which is a positive because you're

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 17>buying more of what you want, and it's also much

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 17>easier to do the research you need and that you

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 17>want to do in order to find the perfect gift

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 17>for others or for yourself.

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Debra, we actually had some headlines how to China Cross

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 2>since we came on air. Shao Me's single day sales

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 2>exceed twenty nine billion yu want, which if my maths correct,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 2>is just slightly above four billion US dollars. That show me,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 2>what do you make of that number and put show

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Me's success in singles day into context or what you

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 2>just told us about Ali Baba.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, we've continued to hear from a lot of Western

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 17>brands that their sales are exceeding expectations, and I think

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 17>what they're learning from that is to think about how

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 17>to bring some of those learnings back to the US.

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 17>But this idea that the consumer can find and buy,

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 17>and when you think about like show me right, this

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 17>idea that the consumer and this was actually one of

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 17>the probably key areas of interest is that they call

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 17>them like AI toys, but like AI toys have been

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 17>one of the hottest categories, that and beauty, and so

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 17>the Shami numbers I would say probably are a little

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 17>higher than we would have expected, but that's the trend

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 17>that we're seeing, and you know, we believe that'll continue

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 17>to strengthen.

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Chaomi makes AI toys on wheels, cars, but also ones

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 3>that you have in your hand. How much you seeing

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 3>at the moment the luxury perspective though, because Shami has

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 3>been on the hills of a tesla and everyone's thinking

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 3>about the amount of market share that these local domestic

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 3>players are now taking the world of ev and of

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 3>course phones, but relatively luxurious products to be spending on.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Where do you see just general consumer appetite right now?

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 17>That's a great question and we've done a lot of

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 17>research on this. So what we're starting to see is

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 17>a I would say, a strengthening at the high end,

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 17>But when it comes to let's say basic essentials. Going

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 17>back to this idea of research and how much easier

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 17>it is to find product. Consumers are i would say,

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 17>being increasingly frugal on everyday necessities and then looking to

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 17>treat themselves. So I would say AI is helping them

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 17>get smarter. But we are i'd say, probably earlier than

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 17>many people expected. We are starting to see a strengthening

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 17>in the high end.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 3>What are they buying in terms of AI wearables? And

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 3>they're like, I'm seeing oring and ordering. There's lots of

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 3>new cove competises on the market here in the United States,

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 3>but I can only imagine the raft of options you

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 3>got to purchase over in China right now.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 17>I mean, we're seeing really interesting things on the wearable side,

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 17>like bracelets and pins and whatnot. Other kind of like

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 17>even health sensing, body sensing. Can you find your your

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 17>mate depending on right the you know you're you're kind

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 17>of the electromagnetic field that you're like. It's it's really

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 17>really interesting in terms of how it really is. They're

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 17>toys to make your life more fun. But also better

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 17>and I think going back to this idea around data

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 17>from a healthcare perspective, that's it increasingly important and we're

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 17>seeing it drive improved results for consumers as well.

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 2>The data sets that you're tracking, even from this this

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 2>year's event and prior years, if you've got any assessment

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>of like the investment these companies have to make to

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 2>get a payoff, like how committed they are to winning,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 2>what you've outlined very clearly is a bit of a

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 2>scramble to get consumers who are making very conscious, proactive

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 2>spending choices.

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 17>So therein lies the that is like the question of

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 17>the day, and one of the biggest differences between the

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 17>Western consumer and the Chinese consumer is you know this

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 17>isn't like you know you're clipping coupons, Well, I guess

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 17>you're clipping them, but digital And as we're seeing it

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 17>go into the end of the double even shopping season,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 17>how the couponing, right, it goes back to it's adjusting

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 17>in real time. So if retailers and brands aren't seeing

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 17>the desired outcomes, they're able to change it in real time. Right.

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 17>These aren't like marketing plans built out six twelve eighteen

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 17>weeks ahead of time, and therein is why I think

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 17>we're going to see a much stronger double eleven season

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 17>than we have in the past. And those retailers like

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.800
<v Speaker 17>Lululemon is in you know, the minds of the Chinese consumers.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 17>That's the local brand because they've really embraced this and

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 17>they did have to invest of course early on, but

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 17>now they're reaping the rewards of that investment. And so

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 17>that's like Lululna and Loreal. Those are some just great

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 17>examples of brands right, so European brand and US brand

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 17>or Nadian brand technically North American brand of companies who

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 17>have invested and as a result they're seeing outsize rewards.

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Instant gratification. Commerce is the line on your note. We

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 3>really appreciate it. Thank you, Debrah Weinswig for joining us.

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Of course, like research coming up, Oracle co founder Larry

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Ellison gets more employees on his supervision off to the

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 3>company CEO swap.

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss what that entails next. This is Broom, the

0:40:59.320 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 4>tech