Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Mark Moss
Speaker 1: Show where we talk about the decentralized revolution. That's right,
Speaker 1: we are talking about the way the world is changing
Speaker 1: right before our very eyes. I don't have to tell
Speaker 1: you that. Come on, you see that everywhere you look.
Speaker 1: You can't believe this is happening. You can't believe this
Speaker 1: is the world that we're in today. That's not how
Speaker 1: things used to be. And while a lot of people
Speaker 1: are expecting things to go back to normal, what is normal?
Speaker 1: And so we talk about that, the decentralized revolution. Of
Speaker 1: course we look at it through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology. Technology is always what changes the world, and
Speaker 1: of course we have the technology of decentralization, which is bitcoin,
Speaker 1: and it is changing the way the world works and organizes.
Speaker 1: Now we know that on a two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: year time frame, like a pendulum swinging back and forth,
Speaker 1: the world swings from centralization back to decentralization. It's the
Speaker 1: theme that we talk about here. And the reason why
Speaker 1: we talk about that theme is because if you don't
Speaker 1: understand how we got here, what's happening, but most importantly,
Speaker 1: where things are going, it's going to be very difficult
Speaker 1: for you to make sense of what's happening, but more importantly,
Speaker 1: to position yourself properly to profit, to not just survive,
Speaker 1: but to thrive off of these changes. And so we
Speaker 1: dissect them, we understand them, and so we can see
Speaker 1: where they're at. I've actually I've been at this conference
Speaker 1: up in Vancouver called the VRIIIC, which is the Vancouver
Speaker 1: Resource Investors Conference, and it's for natural resource investors, and
Speaker 1: mostly that is gold and silver, but it's also other
Speaker 1: commodities that go into evs and things like that, so silver, copper,
Speaker 1: or lithium, you know, even uranium, etc. You know. And
Speaker 1: one of the things that I see here and then
Speaker 1: I see everywhere where when I go around and speak
Speaker 1: at these different conferences and I get a talk to people,
Speaker 1: is that they don't really understand the nuance of things.
Speaker 1: And it's actually one of the big things that I
Speaker 1: see being a problem just in the world today period.
Speaker 1: I get about five thousand comments a week across all
Speaker 1: my social media platforms, and I try to read through them.
Speaker 1: I try to skim through them. I want to keep
Speaker 1: a pulse of what's going on. Of course, coming and
Speaker 1: speaking these events and talking to literally hundreds and hundreds
Speaker 1: of people trying to get a sense of what's going on.
Speaker 1: And one thing that I see here at this conference
Speaker 1: and what I see just across the commons and ofcross
Speaker 1: of us. And by the way, if if you're not
Speaker 1: following me on social media, you should at one Mark Moss.
Speaker 1: Just at one Mark Moss and shoot me a message.
Speaker 1: Like I said, I see most of them. I try
Speaker 1: to and I try to reply the ones I can,
Speaker 1: But what I see is that there's this lack of
Speaker 1: nuance and so they think that they have to be
Speaker 1: all in. And so if it's you know, the dollars dying, right,
Speaker 1: that's a big theme here and something I talk about
Speaker 1: all the time, the demise of the dollar. The days
Speaker 1: are here, the world's breaking apart, and so what is
Speaker 1: that next currency that we're going to have. And a
Speaker 1: lot of people think we're going back to gold, and
Speaker 1: of course there's a good reason for that. You know,
Speaker 1: China and Rush are are adding massive amounts of gold.
Speaker 1: Central banks are riding more gold than they have anytime
Speaker 1: since the last fifty five years, which was before we've
Speaker 1: got off the gold standard, and so there's reason to
Speaker 1: believe that, you know, I believe that maybe we'll go
Speaker 1: to something more decentralizeable like bitcoin. But the point that
Speaker 1: I'm making is that people think this is happening now,
Speaker 1: I need to get all of my money out of
Speaker 1: dollars and put it all into gold, and that's just
Speaker 1: not how it works, right, So there's nuance to this,
Speaker 1: and so these things take time. I like to say
Speaker 1: that they are a process and not an event. A
Speaker 1: process and non event, and this process takes time over decades,
Speaker 1: and so that's what's happening. It's happening, but it's happening
Speaker 1: in decades, and so a lot of times the questions
Speaker 1: are the comment say, Mark, Mark, when is this going
Speaker 1: to happen. I'm like, it's it's happening right now. That's
Speaker 1: what we talk about each and every week. And so
Speaker 1: we watch the signpost so you can see this is
Speaker 1: happening now. Some big, big signposts have been coming out
Speaker 1: and I want to point to them, and so I
Speaker 1: got a big show today. I want to talk about
Speaker 1: some of the biggest things, the biggest talking points of
Speaker 1: the globe. What's happening globally that you need to be
Speaker 1: aware of. If you're not paying attention. I'm going to
Speaker 1: break them down. You know that I like to try
Speaker 1: to break these subjects styles. You can understand what's really
Speaker 1: going on behind the headline. And then it's going to
Speaker 1: help illustrate the battle that we're facing and where we're going.
Speaker 1: And so what am I talking about, Well, I'm talking
Speaker 1: in circles now, I'm talking about the World Economic Forum.
Speaker 1: Are our good old buddy Cloud Schwab over there. You know,
Speaker 1: if you if you try to invent a supervillain for
Speaker 1: Austin Bowerzer or James Bond, it seems to be this
Speaker 1: exact fellow Cloud Schwab, and he runs this world that
Speaker 1: coming for him. And every year the world's so called
Speaker 1: the world want to be elites get together, they fly
Speaker 1: their private jets over there. They all get together to
Speaker 1: talk about what actually Cloud Schwab calls quote mastering the
Speaker 1: future end quote. So that's his call. His call to
Speaker 1: action this year was for everyone to master the future.
Speaker 1: We must we must be the masters of the future.
Speaker 1: We must build the future the way we wanted and
Speaker 1: force everybody to live in our world of utopia. Now
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as utopia. And the reason why
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as utopia is because your idea
Speaker 1: of utopia's different in my idea of utopia, and my
Speaker 1: idea of utopia is certainly different than Cloud Schwab's idea
Speaker 1: of utopia, which is why there's no such thing as
Speaker 1: utopia for everybody. The utopias for me to leave you
Speaker 1: alone and let you live your life as you see fit,
Speaker 1: so you can have your own utopia. And then I
Speaker 1: would ask back that you allow me to live my
Speaker 1: life as I see fit, so I can have my
Speaker 1: version of utopia. So that's utopia. But the world, like
Speaker 1: Comic Forum, wants to master our future, tell us how
Speaker 1: we live. And one of the big themes out of
Speaker 1: the World Chemic Forum is the same big theme that
Speaker 1: you've been hearing over and over and over and over
Speaker 1: for the last five, six, seven years. Now, notice about
Speaker 1: the last seven years when it came out, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about that. But what is that. Well, the
Speaker 1: thing that the worldma Forum continues to pound the table
Speaker 1: on pound the table on pound the table is disinformation, disinformation, misinformation, malinvasion, information,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it. They call it mostly disinformation.
Speaker 1: And that is the theme that they continue to pound
Speaker 1: the table on well, they also pound the table on
Speaker 1: this potential cyber pandemic that's coming and we need to
Speaker 1: take action or else we're gonna have this massive cyber
Speaker 1: pandemic and it's going to cause a lots of problems.
Speaker 1: Of course, the cyber pandemic leads into the misinformation thing.
Speaker 1: They both have the same potential cure, or at least
Speaker 1: the WEFT puts it as a cure, which is, if
Speaker 1: we can only just control everybody's activity online, then we
Speaker 1: can save the world. We can protect the world from
Speaker 1: all these bad things like misinformation and cyber attacks. We're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about that, but I want to go into
Speaker 1: what they're talking about, and you need to know. Okay, look,
Speaker 1: I had somebody on this radio show I don't know
Speaker 1: a month ago, Ryan Daniel Rand. We went around and
Speaker 1: round around up at the WEFT and he says, look,
Speaker 1: you know, these guys don't really have the power that
Speaker 1: you think they do. And I said, well, I mean
Speaker 1: they do. They're the most influential people in the world.
Speaker 1: They've written down what they want to do and they're
Speaker 1: actively working towards that. He said, well, I'll deal with
Speaker 1: it when I see it. Well, we're seeing it, Okay.
Speaker 1: They just had the meaning we just heard directly from
Speaker 1: their mouths. They put it down in papers. I want
Speaker 1: to read directly. I'm going to read quotes directly to you.
Speaker 1: I want to read directly from their website. But they
Speaker 1: told us what's happening, what's coming, and so we need
Speaker 1: to be prepared. But more importantly, this illustrates that we
Speaker 1: are going through this decentralization process, which then helps us
Speaker 1: set our investments and helps us can decide where we
Speaker 1: want to live or where we should think about living,
Speaker 1: how we want to take care of our families, like
Speaker 1: I said, our money, how we want to protect our
Speaker 1: money so we can increase our money, we can increase
Speaker 1: our purchasing power in the future. So all of these
Speaker 1: things really hinge off getting this right. And if you
Speaker 1: don't have the right information, you're not gonna get it right.
Speaker 1: And of course the government wants to make sure you
Speaker 1: don't get the right information, and then they want to
Speaker 1: call anybody giving you the right information as disinformation. They
Speaker 1: would want to call me disinformation most likely. And so
Speaker 1: I want to talk about that. I don't explain to
Speaker 1: you that I want to explain to you potentially the
Speaker 1: laws they're trying to put into place, which you do
Speaker 1: know about. I think they're really, really bad. And then again,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna teach you some ways that you
Speaker 1: can defend yourself from this, not from them, but from disinformation,
Speaker 1: because it's real, it's real, mostly coming from the government.
Speaker 1: So what do I mean by that? That's a big statement, right, Mark,
Speaker 1: Let me just give you one example, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: keep going. But one example is inflation. Inflation is a
Speaker 1: big problem. The government, the Treasury said that we don't
Speaker 1: have a problem with inflation, and then they said, well,
Speaker 1: inflation is just transitory, it's going to go away. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: people are like myself, were pounding on the table, say no,
Speaker 1: it's it's a big problem. And then they said, okay,
Speaker 1: now now it's a big problem. So now they say
Speaker 1: they're committed to fixing inflation, but they can't really fix it.
Speaker 1: So they announced a few weeks ago that they're just
Speaker 1: going to change the way they calculated so it doesn't
Speaker 1: fix inflation, but they're going to give us a new number.
Speaker 1: That's a lie. Okay, that's misinformation anyway, if you're just
Speaker 1: tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, and
Speaker 1: we're talking about the decentralized revolution, talking about the way
Speaker 1: the world is changing, and we're looking at through the
Speaker 1: lens of politics, finance, and technology, which of course is bitcoin,
Speaker 1: and we're looking at how it changes the world. And
Speaker 1: we're talking about the number one problem in the world
Speaker 1: per the World doc Coomic Forum, which is disinformation. So
Speaker 1: I'm gonna explain to you what that means, what they're
Speaker 1: gonna do, how you can protect yourself and more so,
Speaker 1: I'll be back with that in moren a minute. Don't
Speaker 1: go away, all right, welcome back. If you're just tuning in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. We're talking about
Speaker 1: the decentralized revolution. We're talking about the number one talking
Speaker 1: point coming out of the World Economic Forum, which is disinformation.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, on their website they have
Speaker 1: a video. They have a panel that was held by
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter. Now you might recognize that name, Brian Stelter.
Speaker 1: If he saw his face, you'd probably recognize him. He
Speaker 1: was the host of the once great media companies called CNN.
Speaker 1: Now I say once great because they have completely destroyed
Speaker 1: trust and their ratings have gone into the toilet. And
Speaker 1: I'm gonna come back to that in a minute, but
Speaker 1: it's just I want to throw that out before I
Speaker 1: tell you that Brian Stelter was the host of that
Speaker 1: lost his job. The network has lost its viewers because
Speaker 1: all they do is spew lies and misinformation and the
Speaker 1: people have found out about it. We're going to come
Speaker 1: back to that, but it's just rich that it's ironic
Speaker 1: that it's this guy, Brian Stelter, the guy who helped
Speaker 1: drive that network into the ground because he continues to
Speaker 1: peddle these lies, is the one hosting a panel called
Speaker 1: the Clear and Present Danger of Disinformation. Funny, isn't it rich?
Speaker 1: I think so? Yeah, it's it's interesting, And like I said,
Speaker 1: you can see this disinformation team all over the World
Speaker 1: Economic Forum website. Just go to their website. Here's another
Speaker 1: headline tackling disinformation. How can we combat the lies that
Speaker 1: go viral? How do we stop this misinformation, this disinformation?
Speaker 1: How do we stop these lies from going viral? This
Speaker 1: is the big theme and we can see it's it's
Speaker 1: really been kind of dominating the headlines this week. We
Speaker 1: see even good old Ron Paul shout out to Ron
Speaker 1: Paul in the FED. He wrote an article titled the
Speaker 1: real disinformation was the disinformation hoax. That's the real misinformation
Speaker 1: that we have. But Brian Stelter, he's out there having this,
Speaker 1: hosting these interviews, I should say, and asking him what
Speaker 1: should we do about this? And we have European leaders,
Speaker 1: politicians like Vera Jorova going on there and saying we
Speaker 1: need to create laws to stop this, and she even
Speaker 1: went so far as to say that in the United States,
Speaker 1: you're going to have laws like this as well to
Speaker 1: stop hate speech. Now, who is she to tell us
Speaker 1: that in the United States. She's a European leader, but
Speaker 1: who is she to tell us as Americans what laws
Speaker 1: we're going to have. Nobody, She's nobody. She has no
Speaker 1: power to tells what the laws are. Except for going
Speaker 1: back to the point the World Document form, the power
Speaker 1: of the globalists have power over us. So that's why
Speaker 1: it's important to look at this. So if you're, like
Speaker 1: I said my previous guest Ryan danon Rand, with your
Speaker 1: head in the sand, they're like, well, you know, I
Speaker 1: don't think they really have influence. Well, they certainly do,
Speaker 1: which is why she's telling us that these laws are
Speaker 1: going to be coming over. Now, if Brian Stelter was
Speaker 1: a good, you know, investigative journalist, if he was a
Speaker 1: good journalist at all, he would have asked questions to
Speaker 1: push back on this. But of course he didn't. Of
Speaker 1: course he just let them go on. And so the disinformation,
Speaker 1: they can't prove it, and all they can do is
Speaker 1: scare us in order to try and get us to move.
Speaker 1: So we will give them the ability to censor. But
Speaker 1: the problem is, like I said, all of the misinformation
Speaker 1: is coming from them. So let's talk about this. So
Speaker 1: Ron Paul puts this piece out titled the real disinformation
Speaker 1: was the quote Russian disinformation hoax. So what we know?
Speaker 1: And this is from this article that Ron Paul wrote
Speaker 1: on the Ron Paul Institute. He says that thanks to
Speaker 1: the latest release of the Twitter files, we now know
Speaker 1: without a doubt that the entire Russia disinformation racket was
Speaker 1: a massive disinformation campaign to undermine US elections and perhaps
Speaker 1: even push quote regime change inside the United States after
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was elected president in twenty sixteen. That is
Speaker 1: directly from Ron Paul, former congressman and just champion of
Speaker 1: freedom and capitalism, and so what are they talking about, Well,
Speaker 1: the latest release of the Twitter files. I've been talking
Speaker 1: about this for a while, and so what we know
Speaker 1: is that Elon Musk bought Twitter. Of course, I've been
Speaker 1: talking about this for a long time, and he bought
Speaker 1: it because he says that it was the greatest need,
Speaker 1: It was the greatest danger that we had that were
Speaker 1: losing free speech, and he wanted to restore that. He
Speaker 1: thought it was the most important thing in the world
Speaker 1: is to restore free speech. And I would agree. We're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about this a little bit more and how
Speaker 1: I'm going to help you understand how you can combat
Speaker 1: this misinformation. But anyway, so he bought Twitter, and he
Speaker 1: started to open up the floodgates and allow people to
Speaker 1: say what they want. But more importantly, what he did
Speaker 1: is he released all the documentation of inside Twitter, like
Speaker 1: emails and direct messages and all this communication showing how
Speaker 1: Twitter was working with the FBI and the federal government
Speaker 1: to silence critics and even worse, spread lies, silence critics
Speaker 1: and spread lies knowingly intentionally purposely. And so these Twitter
Speaker 1: files have been coming out and it's been showing all
Speaker 1: types of collusions from vaccine manufacturers to politicians, etc. You know,
Speaker 1: silencing of opponents, silencing of you know, all types of things,
Speaker 1: including the Biden family, etc. And so this is fact. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is fact. These are the smoking guns, as you
Speaker 1: would say, right, I mean, these are the actual emails
Speaker 1: and messages that we can see directly from them. Now,
Speaker 1: most mainstream media outlets have been completely silent on this.
Speaker 1: Only news reporters on Twitter are reporting this. Matt Taibey
Speaker 1: is one of these great ones. Barry White has done
Speaker 1: a great job with that. Of course Fox News Tucker
Speaker 1: Carlson has been crushing it with this as well, but
Speaker 1: every other platform is silent. So that's what he's talking about.
Speaker 1: And we know this is not misinformation. We have the facts,
Speaker 1: We have the smoking guns. Now to what Ron Paul
Speaker 1: is talking about, this is where we need to go
Speaker 1: back to. He said the real disinformation was Russia disinformation hoax.
Speaker 1: That was perhaps he said he said perhaps he said
Speaker 1: it was. It was a disinformation campaign to undermine US
Speaker 1: elections and perhaps even push regime change. So this is
Speaker 1: where it started. Twenty sixteen, just after the election, the
Speaker 1: Washington Post published an article titled quote Russian propaganda effort
Speaker 1: helped spread fake news during election, experts say, end quote.
Speaker 1: So the Washington Post started with this disinformation experts. The
Speaker 1: experts say, what experts. We're gonna get into the one experts.
Speaker 1: But it's the purpose of the article was to delegitimize
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency, saying that he didn't actually win, he
Speaker 1: only got the job as a product of Russian disinformation.
Speaker 1: Now have you ever heard of a color revolution? Look
Speaker 1: it up hopefully. What I'm doing doing here is I'm
Speaker 1: expanding your mind. I'm creating curiosity, and I'm inspiring you
Speaker 1: to go do more research on your own. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: help you fight disinformation. But let me just tell you
Speaker 1: right off the bat, do not trust verify Okay, verify me.
Speaker 1: Don't trust me, verify me. So when I say these things,
Speaker 1: go do your own research on them. So, well, I'm
Speaker 1: going to talk to you about a color revolution, and
Speaker 1: I'm hoping that you'll go do your own research on
Speaker 1: this because I'm going to say some things that might
Speaker 1: be I'm hard to understand and hard to believe, but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell too, and it's factual, and again, go
Speaker 1: verify it for yourself. Always go verify this information that
Speaker 1: you get, and I'm gonna give you more steps. If
Speaker 1: you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Markmas Show.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the way the world is changing through
Speaker 1: the decentralized revolution, which is politics, finance, and technology. Of course,
Speaker 1: the decentralized technology of bitcoin is the catalyst that's driving change.
Speaker 1: I got a whole lot to cover when I come back,
Speaker 1: so don't go away. I'll be right back, all right,
Speaker 1: Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to
Speaker 1: the Markmas Show. We're talking about the decentralized revolution each
Speaker 1: and every week, and we document it as we look
Speaker 1: at it through the lens of politics, finance, and technology.
Speaker 1: Now we're talking about the big news coming out of
Speaker 1: the World Economic Forums meeting and Davos. I've been talking
Speaker 1: about it for a while because there's so much news
Speaker 1: that came out. But the big thing they pound the
Speaker 1: table on is disinformation or misinformation, and they want to
Speaker 1: scare us and how big of a problem is. So
Speaker 1: of course we'll beg for a solution, which is to
Speaker 1: give up all of our privacy and not allow us
Speaker 1: to use the internet anymore, or not allow us to
Speaker 1: use the Internet freely. But I was reading from this
Speaker 1: article that good old former Congressman Ron Paul wrote titled
Speaker 1: the real disinformation was the Russia disinformation OCAs that's the
Speaker 1: real one, and it was spread intentionally, as he said,
Speaker 1: to delegitimize the Trump presidency. Then it says, quote, there
Speaker 1: is no way to know whether the Russia campaign proved
Speaker 1: decisive in electing Trump, but researchers portrayed as part of
Speaker 1: a broadly effective strategy of sewing distrust and US democracy
Speaker 1: and its leaders end quote, wrote Craig Timberg. So they're
Speaker 1: saying that they're trying to cast doubt. Now that's what
Speaker 1: a color revolution is. Let me tell you what a
Speaker 1: color revolution is. A color revolution is a way that
Speaker 1: the intelligence community, like the CIA, has continued to overthrow
Speaker 1: governments and organize coups all over the world. And there's
Speaker 1: two main tools of this, and let me let me
Speaker 1: see if they sound familiar. The first step that they
Speaker 1: would do is they would go into a country like Belarus,
Speaker 1: or in Syria or in Ukraine in twenty fourteen, and
Speaker 1: they'd go into this country. And the first step they
Speaker 1: do is they'd try to delegitimize the elected leader. Oh,
Speaker 1: they didn't win by or look at Bolsonaro in Brazil.
Speaker 1: We can go on it them. They didn't win by
Speaker 1: true voting. They lie, they manipulated, They control the polls.
Speaker 1: They're a dictator. They don't allow free voting. Anything they
Speaker 1: can do to delegitimize. So start casting doubt, casting shade,
Speaker 1: we call it right casting doubt. And they want to
Speaker 1: they want to get that deceit, that lie, that doubt
Speaker 1: in there. Okay, that's step number one. Step number two
Speaker 1: is then you create agitation from the bottom up. So
Speaker 1: that's um. You start creating protests, and you start creating riots,
Speaker 1: and you start creating damage and destruction. Sound familiar, sort
Speaker 1: of like delegitimizing Trump in this way, sort of like
Speaker 1: the rise of BLM and Antifa, two different groups agit, hating, destroying,
Speaker 1: sort of like that, sort of like you've seen in Belarus,
Speaker 1: sort of like you've seen in Serious, sort of like
Speaker 1: you've seen in Egypt, sort of like you've seen in Brazil,
Speaker 1: sort of like you've seen all over the world, sort
Speaker 1: of like you've seen in every single one of the
Speaker 1: CIA's coups that they've done. The color revolution sort of
Speaker 1: like exactly what happened in the United States. And that's
Speaker 1: what they're saying here, that's what we're on Paul saying.
Speaker 1: They started throwing out they meaning the liberal left leaning
Speaker 1: news sources, the CNNs, etc. Started throwing out this information. Quote,
Speaker 1: Russian propaganda helped elect Donald Trump, That's what they're saying.
Speaker 1: And what was the purpose of that? To delegitimize the
Speaker 1: Trump presidency? And then what came after that the protests
Speaker 1: on the riots. Okay, keep going. The Washington the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen Washington Post article featured experts, Remember experts backed it
Speaker 1: up Clint Watts, who was a former FBI counter intelligence
Speaker 1: officer who went on to found another outfit claiming to
Speaker 1: be hunting Rusian disinformation in the United States. So Clint Watts,
Speaker 1: this is the key piece here, and this is what
Speaker 1: the Twitter files uncovered. So this expert, Clint Watts, who
Speaker 1: worked for the FBI, he's an intelligence officer, remember its intelligence.
Speaker 1: Keep going back to that the intelligence agencies are the problem.
Speaker 1: He went on to found another outfit claiming to be
Speaker 1: hunting Russian disinformation in the US called the Hamilton sixty
Speaker 1: eight Project, and the project was launched by the Alliance
Speaker 1: for Securing Democracy. Securing democracy. Now, democracy means that everybody
Speaker 1: has a voice. Democracy means that everybody can get the
Speaker 1: correct information to educate them properly, and then everyone gets
Speaker 1: to have a voice as to what they want. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm not a huge fan of democracy. Just to be clear,
Speaker 1: the United States is not a democracy. They want you
Speaker 1: to believe it is, but it's not. The United States
Speaker 1: is a republic, which means we have represented the government,
Speaker 1: all right, But what they want you to do is
Speaker 1: they want you to think that it is a democracy,
Speaker 1: so they can change the constitution and change the way
Speaker 1: this country is governed. However, in this democracy, then the
Speaker 1: people are supposed to vote for what they want. Now,
Speaker 1: it only works if the people have the right information,
Speaker 1: if the people are educated. If the people are a
Speaker 1: bunch of idiots who don't know what they're doing, or
Speaker 1: don't know anything about anything, or all they know is lies,
Speaker 1: how can they have the correct voice? And of course
Speaker 1: the answers they can't of course, right, So again, this
Speaker 1: project was launched by the Alliance for Securing Democracy. So
Speaker 1: if they really wanted what they mean, so, what they
Speaker 1: typically do is they create something with a different name,
Speaker 1: and so they'll call it like the Saving the Puppies Act.
Speaker 1: Who could go against the Saving the Puppies Act or
Speaker 1: the Biden administrations Inflation Reduction Act. So to reduce inflation,
Speaker 1: they want to print trillions of dollars. But wait a minute, Mark,
Speaker 1: isn't it the printing of trillions of dollars that creates inflation? Yeah,
Speaker 1: but they name it the Inflation Reduction Act. And so
Speaker 1: typically whatever they name it, it's the opposite. So in
Speaker 1: this case, it was launched by the Alliance for Securing Democracy,
Speaker 1: but it's not for securing democracy. It's for undermining democracy. Okay,
Speaker 1: so that's kind of what's going on. Now let's dig
Speaker 1: into this a little bit so you understand exactly what
Speaker 1: happened inside of this. And so again the Twitter files
Speaker 1: blew this wide open because of course, like I said,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk gave them all the files. So Hamilton's sixty eight,
Speaker 1: the new King of Media fraud is what they're calling this.
Speaker 1: And basically you have these frauds, ambitious media frauds, Stephen
Speaker 1: Glass and Jason Blair. And what they've done is, over
Speaker 1: the last couple of years they've been slipping or inserting
Speaker 1: invented news stories into all the pages of these mainstream outlets. Okay,
Speaker 1: and we know this thanks to the Twitter files. Thanks
Speaker 1: to them, we can see what's inside this Hamilton sixty eight.
Speaker 1: We see the bodies that are buried, etc. And so basically,
Speaker 1: this Hamilton sixty eight, this neoliberal think tank, and spawned
Speaker 1: hundreds and hundreds of fraudulent headlines and TV news segments,
Speaker 1: and it is possibly going down as the single greatest
Speaker 1: case of disinformation in American history. And every major news
Speaker 1: organization in America is implicated in taking part, including NBCCBS, ABC, PBS, CNN,
Speaker 1: and MSNBC, including the New York Times and the Washington Post. Okay,
Speaker 1: they're all implicated of pushing this fake news, this fake propaganda,
Speaker 1: and even research and facts checking sites including PolitiFact and Snopes.
Speaker 1: They cited Hamilton sixty eight as a source over and
Speaker 1: over and over, and so basically, Hamilton's sixty eight is this.
Speaker 1: It's a computerized dashboard, and it was designed to be
Speaker 1: used as reporters and academics to go pull headlines and
Speaker 1: to measure the rush and disinformation. So it's like a resource.
Speaker 1: So I'm supposedly I'm this investigative reporter and I want
Speaker 1: to go research my story. But all I would do
Speaker 1: is I would go to this website Hamilton sixteen, and
Speaker 1: I would find out what Russian disinformation is doing. And
Speaker 1: of course, as I already said, it's it's the brain child.
Speaker 1: It was created by a disinformation expert, a former intelligence
Speaker 1: officer with the FBI, Clint Watts. Currently he works for
Speaker 1: MSNBC as quote a disinformation expert, Clint Watts. Okay, so
Speaker 1: he is a disinformation expert, but he is the one
Speaker 1: that created this to spread the disinformation. So this is
Speaker 1: what do they call a projection? Right? I project unto
Speaker 1: you what I have a problem with. I sat on
Speaker 1: a plane next to some guy last week and he said,
Speaker 1: you know, but if the government doesn't take our money
Speaker 1: and help the poor, who will? I said, let me
Speaker 1: ask you a question, a personal question. I'm sorry if
Speaker 1: it's too personal, but how much of your money did
Speaker 1: you give last year? What percentage of your money did
Speaker 1: you last year or to help the less fortunate, the needy?
Speaker 1: And he kind of looked embarrassed and he said none.
Speaker 1: And I said, the reason why I asked that question
Speaker 1: is because what I find is the people who think
Speaker 1: that who will help the poor people if not for
Speaker 1: the government are the ones who don't help the poor people.
Speaker 1: I said, I donate a large percentage of my money
Speaker 1: every single year, and I travel with my family to
Speaker 1: do these serving projects. And so he has this projection, well,
Speaker 1: since I don't help, nobody else will help. And so
Speaker 1: we need the government to do that. And in this case,
Speaker 1: they're projecting this disinformation. They're the ones providing disinformation. But
Speaker 1: what they do in order to spread the disinformation to
Speaker 1: say it's you. Now, if you're just tuning in, you're
Speaker 1: listening to the Mark Moss Show. And I know I'm
Speaker 1: talking fast because I am excited today and we are
Speaker 1: breaking down this disinformation. I'm going to explain to you
Speaker 1: what just came out this bombshell, and then we'll talk
Speaker 1: about how to protect ourselves from the dangerous causing I'll
Speaker 1: be right back with more in a minute. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: all right, welcome back. You are listening to the Mark
Speaker 1: Moas Show. We're talking about disinformation, misinformation, malinformation. It's the
Speaker 1: number umber one problem that's going to ruin the world.
Speaker 1: It's going to ruin the democracy at least, that's what
Speaker 1: the world a kind of MAIC forum, and all the
Speaker 1: leaders tell us. Now I'm breaking down how they tell
Speaker 1: us the single biggest problem that we face that we
Speaker 1: should all be scared of is disinformation and it's a
Speaker 1: threat to our democracy. But the reality is not just
Speaker 1: the reality the fact. The fact is that they are
Speaker 1: the ones that are spreading the disinformation. And we know
Speaker 1: this factually because we have the emails, we have the
Speaker 1: text messages, we have the smoking guns, and that's what
Speaker 1: I'm reading through. And so this has mainly been propagated
Speaker 1: by MSNBC's disinformation expert, former FBI intelligence officer Clinton Watts.
Speaker 1: He created a dashboard, a computer dashboard called Hamilton's sixty
Speaker 1: eight and where he put all this information together which
Speaker 1: all the new sources would pull from. And of course
Speaker 1: Clinton Watts didn't do it on his own. He was
Speaker 1: backed by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, which is Before's
Speaker 1: trying to do the opposite. It's backed by the German
Speaker 1: Marshal Fund. They have advisors on their including former acting
Speaker 1: CIA chief Michael Morrel. Of course, it's always the intelligence community.
Speaker 1: Former Ambassador to Russia, of course, Michael McFall, former Hillary
Speaker 1: for America chair John Podesta. Of course, who's the one
Speaker 1: that started this whole Russian hoax. So let's keep going.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the smoking gun. So basically, what Hamilton's
Speaker 1: sixty eight did is they had this analytic method, supposedly
Speaker 1: and they kept a list of six hundred and forty
Speaker 1: four accounts that were supposedly linked to Russian influence activities online. Okay,
Speaker 1: supposedly this is their secret ingredient. Now this was hidden
Speaker 1: from the public, but Twitter, of course they had access
Speaker 1: to this, They knew this. They're in this position to
Speaker 1: recreate Hamilton's samples by analyzing its Application program interface or
Speaker 1: what we call an API, and API is where you
Speaker 1: get one software to talk to another. And this is
Speaker 1: how they were able to reverse engineer Hamilton's list and
Speaker 1: see what was happening. Now, the company was concerned enough
Speaker 1: about the proliferation of news stories linked to Hamilton sixty
Speaker 1: eight that it ordered forensic analysis of this. All right,
Speaker 1: so if we look into this, and of course all
Speaker 1: this is released and you can look at all this
Speaker 1: for yourself. You don't have to take my word for it.
Speaker 1: Don't trust, but verify. And when they started examining the
Speaker 1: executives a Twitter were shocked, so they account to Hamilton's
Speaker 1: sixty eight claims were linked to Russian influence activities online
Speaker 1: were not only overwhelmingly English language eighty six percent of them,
Speaker 1: but we're mostly legitimate people, mostly living in the United States.
Speaker 1: They weren't Russian bots, they were people living in the US.
Speaker 1: Now we can see inside the internal emails of the company,
Speaker 1: it says, quote, these accounts are neither strongly Russian nor
Speaker 1: strongly bots. No evidence to support the statement that the
Speaker 1: dashboard is a finger on the pulse of Russian information opts,
Speaker 1: hardly evidence of a massive influence campaign end quote. So
Speaker 1: that's directly from Twitter. So Hamilton's six state build this
Speaker 1: dashboard saying all these accounts are fake Russian information, and
Speaker 1: all the news outlets, not all the mouthpieces of them, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, etc. ABC, CBS,
Speaker 1: they ran with this. But Twitter says right here, there
Speaker 1: is no evidence these are all people. Okay, So this
Speaker 1: was not faulty science, This was not an accident. It
Speaker 1: was a scam. Instead of tracking how quote Russia influenced
Speaker 1: American attitudes, Instead of doing that, what Hamilton Sixtate did
Speaker 1: was collect a handful of real American accounts and describe
Speaker 1: their conversations and saying that they were Russia scheming. But remember,
Speaker 1: in a democracy, everybody gets a vote. If the majority
Speaker 1: of people don't like a certain policy, is they're constitutionally
Speaker 1: protected right to talk about that. And supposedly the government
Speaker 1: works for the people, for the will of the people,
Speaker 1: and if the will of the people don't want that,
Speaker 1: then the government supposed to take note of that. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's a democrats supposedly. Again, it's not a democracy, but
Speaker 1: in a democracy that would be the case. But what
Speaker 1: they're doing is saying no, no, no, these people aren't real.
Speaker 1: These people are supporting Russian interests. Well, even if they were,
Speaker 1: and I'm not saying they are, but even if they
Speaker 1: were one in the same things that Russia wanted, even
Speaker 1: if they were, well, if that's what the majority of
Speaker 1: Americans want, well, I guess that's the democracy now, if
Speaker 1: we keep going. It says here that even Twitter execs
Speaker 1: were stunned. Even the Twitter execs were stunned to read
Speaker 1: who was on the list. The names range from well
Speaker 1: known media figures like David Horowitz to conservatives like Dennis
Speaker 1: Michael Lynch and even progressives like Consortium editor Joe Laurea.
Speaker 1: It's crucial to understand that the list captured not just
Speaker 1: Trump supporters, but a whole range of political dissidents, including
Speaker 1: some leftists. Okay, so not just the right, including leftist
Speaker 1: anarchists and even humors. So anyone who wouldn't tow their line,
Speaker 1: anybody who wouldn't go with their narrative is an extremist,
Speaker 1: is a disinformation spreader, Okay, on both sides of the aisle. Now,
Speaker 1: this says that organizations like Hamilton sixty eight are in
Speaker 1: business to enforce an in official narrative, which means excising
Speaker 1: inconvenient facts, which they call misinformation. They call this guy.
Speaker 1: Chicago based lawyer Dave Shashtoka said, quote, I've written a
Speaker 1: book about the US Constitution. He said, quote how I
Speaker 1: made this list is incredible to me as a real guy.
Speaker 1: They said, he's rushing disinformation, but he's written books on
Speaker 1: these constitution Lynch says, quote, I'm listed as a foreign bot.
Speaker 1: I'm a proud tax paying citizen with a charitable family man,
Speaker 1: an honest son of a US marine with a purple heart.
Speaker 1: I'm hurt. I deserve better, So they labeled him as
Speaker 1: a Russian bot. And here Sonia Monsoor lived through Civil
Speaker 1: War in Lebanon in a town that was taken over
Speaker 1: by militias. Her father counsel her to dispose of some
Speaker 1: leftist books so that she wouldn't be singled out for
Speaker 1: her political beliefs. And now after she was told that
Speaker 1: she's on Hamilton's sixty eight list, she recalled that the
Speaker 1: childhood story how she moved west to get away from
Speaker 1: this problem. What they're doing is they're taking people with
Speaker 1: dissent or unconventional opinions away from the main stream, and
Speaker 1: they try to discredit them as being disinformation, as accusing
Speaker 1: them Unamerican activities, and they take all these legitimate people
Speaker 1: in false it's a lie, it's a scam. And then
Speaker 1: these academic scandal was continued and perpetrated by Harvard, by Princeton,
Speaker 1: by Temple, NYUGW and other universities as they all promoted
Speaker 1: Hamilton's sixty as this source, including elected officials, including Diane
Speaker 1: Feinstein Schiff. Of course all of these were the offenders.
Speaker 1: This is big, right. There was massive damage done to
Speaker 1: society as a whole. We had every single day these
Speaker 1: news outlets were pounding these news stories into our head saying,
Speaker 1: the Russian bots are coming, the Russian bots are changing,
Speaker 1: the Russian bots control it. Donald Trump isn't legitimate. None
Speaker 1: of these people really want this. They delegitimized everything, and
Speaker 1: they have a huge impact on American culture and politics.
Speaker 1: They played significant roles in both the twenty eighteen and
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty election cycles. They placed massive downward pressure
Speaker 1: on Trump and Tulsie Gabbard saying that they were Russian bots,
Speaker 1: while boosting the likes of Joe Biden. This was done intentionally,
Speaker 1: on purpose, by the highest levels of government, by the FBI,
Speaker 1: and by MSNBC and by CNN on purpose knowingly. And
Speaker 1: we know this because we have all the information. The
Speaker 1: scam needed three elements and needed credentials of someone like
Speaker 1: I'M experts like a former FBI agent Watts. It needs
Speaker 1: the missing of any fact checking. So we need the
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter from CNN just to repair it. These headlines
Speaker 1: out without even doing one shred of research, and then
Speaker 1: we need the companies like Twitter to silence any opposition
Speaker 1: and then they can push their narrative. Now this is
Speaker 1: the fact. We have the data we have the conversations.
Speaker 1: This is not speculation, but this war is only getting starts.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you what's coming next, and then i'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you how to protect yourself. All Right, if
Speaker 1: you're just tuning in, you're listening to the markmash Show.
Speaker 1: And I've been fired up today because this is the
Speaker 1: single biggest problem that we faced right now today, and
Speaker 1: I'm trying to help you understand this and see through it.
Speaker 1: Hopefully that makes sense, and thanks for listening.