WEBVTT - P&L: Why Fake News Is A Global Problem

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Well, talking about fake

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>news is David Guarantee, CEO of g v A Research.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you David so much for being here and sort

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>of helping us understand how big of a problem the

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of some of this fake news is on a

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>global level. Certainly, Lisa, my pleasure and thank you pim um.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, in terms of looking at the current election cycle,

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen, we didn't see the rise of

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this sort of unverified content being put out onto the

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>social media, and if we went back to two thousand twelve,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we were in a situation here where social media was

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>really at a point where the size of their audience

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was outstripping that of traditional news organizations. However, four years

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>further down the road, things obviously have massively changed, and

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we're now in a situation where organizations such as the

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Pew Center have said that of their survey respondents recently,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about forty percent of them are roving relying upon social

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>media as being their primary information source. However, social media

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>organizations bend over backwards to say we're not news organizations,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>were technology companies. Well, the fact of the matter is

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the size of their audience is now larger than traditional

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>news organizations. They are in effect news organization because their

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>audience treats them as such. However, given the fact that

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>they're now adults, they don't wish to take on the

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities that would fall traditionally to a news organization, which

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.279
<v Speaker 1>means they don't they would want not enjoy the protections

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of the US Constitution as a news media outlet. And

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they will also say that they would be subject to

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>libel laws. Well, was where I was going to go

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with this, because we all recall the libel uh suit

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that was filed against Vice. Was this That's what I

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>beg Gawker was a director of Facebook. Peter Teal, yes,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>who funded that lawsuit, and its not the only lawsuit

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that Pete that Teal and other billionaires have funded. So clearly,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if people are concerned about a free press, people are

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned about having proper information, and if proper information is

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>what is necessary to have an informed electorate that can

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>make proper and appropriate choices in elections. Liberal democracy needs

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>an informed electorate. Misinformation cuts right at that route. I

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>want to play the devil's advocate because in your comments

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>you're basically saying that the facebooks and the twitters of

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the world really ought to So the implication is that

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they really ought to police what's getting distributed and understood

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>as truth. At the same time, isn't the onus on

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the consumers of this, I mean, isn't it to sort

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of seek out the verified information? And I mean, by

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you make sure that the

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>twitters and facebooks of the world aren't de facto censors

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and becoming you know, uh and viewed frankly as as

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the man or sort of be viewed as in bed

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>with a particular political party in going after you know,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>another side. I mean, this sort of edges into a

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty scary territory. Yes, we we are relying upon an

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>informed electorate to basically exercise their judgment, but at the

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 1>same time, we look at how social media sites have

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>developed their algorithms they're programming is developed in such a

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>way as to show people what it is that they

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>already like. The idea being if the dogs reading the

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>dog food, give them more dog food. And from that standpoint,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the creation of basically filter bubbles in terms

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of people basically sharing information with their friends and they're

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>basically just given more of the same. They're not given

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a contrasting point of view. There is nothing that as

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>individuals requires them to be fair and balanced in terms

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of what media they consume. There is a concern here

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>which I think we have to look were the corporate

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>advertisers who have been looking at using social media as

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a channel increasingly because that's where the audiences migrated. Were

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the advertisers from the standpoint of concerns over their own

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>brand reputations, not wishing to have an ad served next

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to a piece of news that is fake or false

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>or hateful or misleading. You know, there could be a

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>move here by advertisers essentially, Sarah say, yes, social media

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe a lot of noise, but it's not something we

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>used to identify with. Why because we've spent you know,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars building our reputations and We're not going

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to see it sold away for something that basically gives

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the way the truth or debases it. Didn't that already

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>happen with pripe Bart. Wasn't there an a distributor that

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>removed it's uh its services from bright part calling it

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hate speech? It was last week there was there was

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>something like this. I mean it is there are There

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is starting to be some pushback, but it'll be curious

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to see whether it will be. I was actually in

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a meeting recently with a fellow who was in charge

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of WPP Group, very large global advertising agency amongst the largest,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and he was the one who is simply indicating that

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this was a likely response to fake news coming off

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of the selection, that he would basically go out and

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>council the global advertisers that they work with to say, look,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>focus on reliable sources of media and information. You know,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>from that standpoint, social media, like any other organization, has

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay bills, and if they don't get any money

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from advertisers, I think their tune will change. Well, let

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>me just give you the detail here. The bright Bart

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>example that you just offered a Lisa it was app

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>nexus and they deactivated bright Bart News after an audit

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the site's content determined that it violated the Advertising

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Networks Code of Conduct banning hate speech and great hate speech.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't say fake speech. And one David, how

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>long have you been covering the technology industry more technology

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>sector of going back before the change the millennium? Okay,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>so consequences responsibilities? Do technology companies have a great track

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>record when it comes to the social consequences and responsibilities?

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Because if they want those press uh freedoms, then maybe

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to change the way that they charge.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>This is very true. And if we go back and

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>look historically a technology companies, they tend to have a

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>shorter lifespan, if you will, than than other companies. But

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing that people have noted more broadly is that

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the lifespan of corporations has been contracting. But arguably one

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>would say technology companies lead in this regard. Typically there

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>has been a disposition on the part of managements whre

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in early stage investors and technology companies essentially to build

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>them for sale, basically passed the buck on to somebody else,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the acquirer, to have the acquirer solve the problem. Some

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the concerns that they have been in the case

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of social media companies, is being concerned about how fickle

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the demographics of their audience was. Certainly we've seen early

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>age demographics going from say fifteen to twenty four have

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>been migrating away from Facebook, have been migrating more towards

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>things like Napchat. Obviously, we'll see how well that does

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>with its I p O. But nonetheless, the audience is fickle,

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and from that standpoint, one would argue that there is

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a hands off attitude in order to maintain an audience.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And so as a result, you know, this kind of disregard,

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if you will, for the niceties that news organizations need

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to follow have certainly led social media organizations Facebook at

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>al to wander far afield Um. Now I want to

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention to the fate of Italian banks. We

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have Jonathan Tyson is our senior banks analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us from London. Jonathan, there is a referendum scheduled

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for December the fourth. What does the referendum in Italy

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mean not only for the government but for the future

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of Italian banking. That's good, good morning. I think the

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>referendum per se was clearly Mario Renzi um the prime minister,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the prime minister looking to consolidate his position or have

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>an exit strategy. And in terms of what it means

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for the sort of wider economy and the banks, um,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's a no vote and Renzy does walk, then

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>quite clearly all of the things the Italian banks, mostly

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>via UNI Credit and Monty Pachy, where most of the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at the moment they're trying to do,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they get set back. Confidence dwindles. We've already seen, for example,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>a five billion euro fifty year bond that was issued

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>very recently by itaally that's now trading at eighty five

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>cents in the euro. So it's fallen in a very

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. When they issued it, I think it was

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like two point eight three percent or something around there.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And you wonder, who would you know lend their money

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for fifty years. Well, so, I mean we we've seen

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred year bonds in Europe. Certainly, sometimes you do look

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>at it and think, two people believe that the Eurozone

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis has gone away, and if anything, as very little

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is achieved, we're getting further right um politically across Europe

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and there are so many questions unresolved, with so little

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>action and resolution in the banks. Um, it's very hard

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to see this not dragging into two thousands and seventeen

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. Well, okay, so the Italian banks have been

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in trouble for a while that there is are a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>number of them that are looking for some kind of

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>solution that may, if possible, include some kind of government bailout. Again,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily possible under some of the recent rules

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that have been implemented. But can you walk us through

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the direct mechanism by which the banks will suffer in

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a no vote for the referendum? In other words, walk

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>us through kind of Is this a matter of yields

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>on an Italian government bonds, blowing out any of their holdings,

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>losing a lot of value, borrowing costs for them, you know, ballooning.

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that sort of the mechanism by which this will

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to trouble for them? No? Not really, I mean

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that is that's amcillary, that's part of it. Because the

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Italian banks owned several hundred billion of government bonds, So

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly yields blowing out means that the unrealized gains in

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>those bonds are disappearing, and Italian banks include that in

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>regulatary solvency, so it's unhelpful. But that's not the problem.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that the banks have got several hundred

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>billions of non performing loans. They've got two hundred plus

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>billion of the very worst sort of loans, and Monty Pasky,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the poster child for everything that's bad and

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>needs addressing in Italy, they are trying to raise up

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to five billion and are flowed tens of billions of

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>non performing loans. And we need proof that there is

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a secondary market for the sale of non performing loans,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just Monti Paski. Uni Credit is the

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>largest bank in Italy by assets. They've got tens of billions,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:57.119
<v Speaker 1>multiples of what Monty Pasky has. So if we lose confidence,

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if the market takes a step back and doesn't understand

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the direction politically and regulatorily of Italy into two thousands

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen, it's very hard to see how Monty Patsky

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and then Newny Credit, which has, by the way, a

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy day one December where they're going to try and

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>articulate how many billions of new capital they need and

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to get it if we get the

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>no vote, and there is significant fallout even from here

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>because things have already moved. The problem remains, how on

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>earth does Italy address it's bad loans, Jonathan the the

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>introduction of a sort of a bad loan bank. Hasn't

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that been considered? And have US institutions such as Goldman

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Sachs and JP Morgan. They have indicated that something might

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>change if indeed that referendum gets the no vote. As

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you describe, well, the problem is that you can't have

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>state aid, and because Italy has been very very slow

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in applying bailin enforcing its banks to take its medicine

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>um the the bailing rule effectively kicked in for Italy

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of two thousand and sixteen. One of

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the problems they face is that, unlike many other markets,

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the bond or the debt funding that

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the banks have is actually held by retail bond holders.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So the last thing really that you want for the

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Italian bank system is to have a bail in from here,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because suddenly you've got a lot of retail investors and

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>retail deposit holders who will lose significance amount of money.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>At that point you've got a proper liquidity crisis for

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the bank system as well. So unfortunately that the bail

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in should Montypasky struggle to raise its five billion and

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't manage to use the securitization guarantee from

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the government to offload its nonforming leans, I think bailing

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>is what people begin to think. At that point, you're

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a retail bond holder and some of the other small

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Italian banks, what do you do with your money and

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens to liquidity? And as we all know from

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, when you get a significant liquidity problem,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a capital problem very quickly. When we're already

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the solvancy of the Italian banks, Jonathan real

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>quick Is any of this price into the market currently

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that a no vote will be the presiding one? Oh? Absolutely?

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the mark is well aware, um that this

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will be the case. And the fact is that you've

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>got France at the moment, you've got what happens with Brexit.

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So is it priced inadequately? I don't know, But as

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>we just said, um, you've got a five billion, fifty

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>year bond away and it's four and fift cent and

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>two to three weeks. The market is clearly very aware

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, It just doesn't understand what the real number

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to be. Lisa A. Bronwitz. Something else happening today

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>taking place in Dallas, A T and T is said

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to reveal its new online video service. Of course, A

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>T and T the owner of the video streaming service

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>direct Tv. Now it's the country's time pay TV producer,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and we know that they also want to get into

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the content business. We don't know exactly whether A T.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>T will receive a regulatory approval for their pending Uh

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they're pending acquisition, um is it? Uh? This is a

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>good introduction though, for our next guest, because A T.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>T has been behind this this venture. Couldn't go as

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the co founder and the general manager of Crunchy Roll.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, it makes me hungry, though, well okay,

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't you. You've got one, You've got one follower there

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>already already because of the name. Tell us what is

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>what is crunchy role and then maybe just explain the

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship between you and A T and T because they're

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they're part owner. Sure, thank you for having me. Crunchy

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Role is a anime streaming service. We bring the latest

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>shows out of Japan and we stream it to eight

0:14:55.440 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>different languages, including English, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Italian, German, Arabic

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>into a hundred sixty different countries. We have millions of

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>viewers and a lot of paid subscribers. Our relationship with

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>A T and T. They are an investor along with

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the Trending Group into Outer Media, which is a digital

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>media venture UH company, and that is a majority investor

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>into crunchy roll. Um. I want to talk a little

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>bit about the demand for viewing anime or sort of

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese form of hand drawn or computer animation. How

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>much has it sort of gained in popularity away from Japan.

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that it has been popular for

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>years in certain um, in certain circles, but you know,

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is it proliferating more? Absolutely? We think this is just

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the early innings and there's a lot more demand and

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more popularity to be had. What we've seen

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a lot of misconception about what is

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>anime and generally animation. Anime is a medium for a

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>using storytelling, just like live action is a medium and

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>within that medium there's a lot of diversity. There's a

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of different genres within that medium, including romance, horror,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>sci fi, comedy, action, drama, you name it, and there's

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just so much rich storytelling, amazing characters. I think that's

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what draws audience into it as has been very much

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>under the radar for a lot of years, but I

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's because it's mostly the fans who are into

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it were really in the know, And what we're really

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing now is that the fan base has grown and

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there are the millennials today and they're uh figuring out

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>new ways to access this content, to engage with its content,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and making it even more popular. Can you explain the

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>financial background for Crunchy Role in the context of advertisements,

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but also in the context of you can have your

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>own YouTube television channel now and I believe that you

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>can watch a lot of these types of programs in

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>another format. How does crunch your role figure into this?

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you make money? Absolutely? So, we're still really

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>early innings into digital media and we're still learning a lot.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think one thing that we've learned and that's

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>been valuated across other different businesses in this space is

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that it takes a lot of capital to be able

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to make investments to create premium truly premium content, and

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>premium content is what gets people to really engage and

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to get ultimately people to pay and subscribe to your

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>content because you've got general discussion boards and forms about

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>each individual character and episode. That's right. So the difference

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>here is that comparing UH for example, us to other services,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of services that are in the

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>digital space that are basically something for everyone. What we're

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to be is we're trying to be everything for

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>some people, the most passionate fans. And what we've seen

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is that with really passionate fans, for them, it's not

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just let's watch a video and and let's watch a

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>show and let's come back later. Once they engage with

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the show, they're absolutely engaging with everything else. They're going

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>going to the community, they're they're engaging in forums, they're

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>transacting by buying merchandise and figures around the shows they're watching.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>They're going to physical conventions. They're just doing a lot

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 1>more things and and creating a lot more engagement and

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hopefully a lot more opportunities for monetization. How big is

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the online market for viewing anime right now? We have

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>many millions of viewers over the US as well as

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. We think that there's still

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more potential. Ultimately, we think that anime is

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways that millennial audiences really want to

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>engage with digital content, and they really embrace it, and

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and they really can relate to a lot of characters,

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stories are being told, and they

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a lot of fun. You know. I want

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring up something we talked about earlier in the program.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about social media of sites um and

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>whether they ought to be getting involved in some of

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the conversations and preventing speech that might be their hate speech,

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>or you know, if there's something that veers into some

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of inappropriate territory. I mean, do you guys have

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>some kind of approach to that. I think that's an

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>amazing and very relevant topic. So with animation, what we

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do is we we take everything that's on air on

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>TV and we rebroadcasted and we self title it into

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple languages. But what we have seen is that animation

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is amazingly diverse, and there's a lot of storytelling around empowerment,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>around growing up, around a lot of these themes that

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>are anti boling around Uh, really, how do you develop

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself and find your own perspective as a as an individual?

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And how do you do that with friends? So we

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the content is amazingly empowering and not just

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>towards one demographic or one audience. It captures an entire

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>sp a froum of perspective in in terms of not

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>just male, but female, various other gender or sexual orientations,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. So it's it's an amazing diverse

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>medium for storytelling and empowerment. Couldn't you graduated from UC

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley with honors? You've got a Bachelor of Science and

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Electrical engineering computer science, also be an applied mathematics. Does

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone question like, you're working with cartoons? Does that? How

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>does that go down? So I had this, Uh, I

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>had this debatement with myself many many years ago. I think,

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the path was either academia or go into

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>working with animation. And I think the great thing about

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>animation is we're able to bring through crunch real amazing

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>story telling that touches people touches many millions of people

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in meaningful ways, and I think that's ultimately very impacting

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and very very rewarding for me personally as well as

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to be able to reach so many people and and

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.959
<v Speaker 1>we would impact so many lives. Kuno, co founder and

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>general manager of Crunchy Role, coming to us from San

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Francisco talking about UH, the movement of anime to the

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>United States. This is Bloomberg. Wait, Wait is that a

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>black sweater? No? Do I want to get that microwave?

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait we have to be on the radio. Oh, yes,

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I'll stop shopic. But one person who may

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>go back to shop in. Christian mcgoon, CEO of Amplify

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Investments and manager of the Amplify Online Retail et F,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>is here in the studio to talk about what we

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>know so far about how well UH stores did on

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday. Of course, as we just heard from Greg

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Jared in the Bloomberg news room, it's unclear whether we

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>have a better sense from maybe Cyber Monday than we

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>do from Black Friday. But Christian, thank you so much

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. I want to start out with

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>how much do we really know already about Black Friday,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there was that UH National Federation of National Retail Federation

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that came out saying the average spending per person was

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>down slightly dollars per person from more than two last year.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>How accurate is this? Yeah, I think it's fairly accurate.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Big data is now emerging in the retail scene. It's

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>less about opinions and it's more about gathering all these

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>streams of data into quick analytics, and I think that's correct.

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think consumers haven't spent as much so far this year.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably due to the fact that these

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>UH deals have been extended before Black Friday and even

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>after Cyber Monday, so I think there's less urgency to

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>go out and make your purchase on that single day

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>or wait for for for Cyber Monday today, and that's

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>impacting I think some of the swiftness of the sales,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think they're still going to be there, and

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>it's clear the big winner here is online retail versus

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar. Christian, I wonder if you could just

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit of your background, going back

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to claim More and the exchange traded fund industry, and

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>then the creation and the manager of this new amplify

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>online Retail et F symbol I buy. Yeah. So I've

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>been involved in the et F industry since the early

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and done about sixtiesome funds in the United States,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, this particular fund, the online Retail et F,

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I buy. It's kind of it's coming out day, so

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to speak. It's the first time it's been out during

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the holiday shopping season, and you know, it's a way

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to actually take advantage of not only the seasonal trend,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's really kind of a change in the whole

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>retail and environment. Uh, the amount of sales in online

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>retail is growing at about a annualized pace versus brick

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and mortar, and that's a trend many investors don't have

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>exposure to into the in the traditional brick and mortar

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>exchange traded funds out there. So I buy offers that

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>focused exposure and to as like it's a holiday so

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to speak, Well because I was sorry, but just because

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the the companies that are in

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the the e t F D I buy, Okay, etc.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like a major position pet met Express one eight

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred flowers Overstock Neutral Systems hs N. What is the

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>rationale for why some companies go in and why some don't. Yeah,

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's a hard and fast rule. A company has

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to have seventy percent of their revenue coming from online

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>retail sales. So if you don't meet that seventy percent threshold,

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not in the e t F. So Best Buy

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>had a bright spot with online sales. Walmart and their

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Jet got dot dot dot com has had

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a bright spot and online sales, but it's not seventy

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of their revenue. The ETF really wants to have companies

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>that are exposed the majority of their revenue to that

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>online trend. Uh. So, yeah, I believe it or not.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>PIM Amazon is not even in the top ten holdings here.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at these companies like Etsy or

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>pet Meds or eight hundred Flowers, Uh, they've had some

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable performance. A lot of it has been fueled, we believe,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're available online and that segment is just growing markedly.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>How concerned are you about their share falling markedly when

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest retailers figure out how to better sort of

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>uh negotiate their their transactions online. Yeah, it's clear that

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know Walmart, for example, is you know, doing some

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>strategic acquisitions. I think, um where the e t F

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>could benefit is some of the merger and acquisition potential.

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So some of these UH companies will get taken out

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>by these broad based retailers that are brick and mortar

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.959
<v Speaker 1>because they have to. I think these companies will benefit

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the consolidation that's going to happen in the

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>physical space, whether that's in terms of employees or or

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>square footage. But I think these companies not only should

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit kind of this growth. We're only doing eight percent

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of all sales online right now. Estimates are that goes

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to ft by thirty so we're seeing a global trend

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's much more than one single day, and I think

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>this et F and the company should stand to benefit.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for coming in

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and giving us a look under the hood of I

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Buy the new Amplify Online Retail e t F. Chris

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Jim Magoon is the chief executive of Amplify Investments. Thanks

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm out there

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You can

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio