WEBVTT - Thursday Night Football Preview, Prince to King? & Nick’s Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cibo life is better with options, your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in episode one seventy seven of Watch Right with

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Nick Wright and this episode of What's Right when Nick

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Wright is brought to you by the McDonald's app. I

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>love the McDonald's app. I can order my favorites anytime

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>I want and have them delivered to me whenever and where.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>In fact, ordering on the app is so easy, I'm

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna place an order right now. Got the app open

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 3>right there. And if I know this the local delivery

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 3>in the McDonald's app as well as I think I do,

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I'll have this to me before the end

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>of the show. So hold on. Two Breakfast burritos, Hash

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Brown's orange juice and done Apple pay Done. See it.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 3>It's that literally, that easy. Now I'm focused on the show.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's brings me the food right to my door, which again,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna be a little true. We're gonna we're taking

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a risk here. We've got let's let's

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 3>make let's see when this gets delivered. If we have

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to extend the show, I don't think we will. My

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 3>guess is somewhat at some point during our gambling segment,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>my breakfast burritos come in, and Demons, who I'm gonna

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>introduce right now. I hope you're ready with some good

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>gambling takes, because when the food comes, I'm taking a

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>break and I'm eating. Demonse is smiling because we have

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>not yet discussed last week's gambling show. Yikes for both

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of us. Buddy, not great. We will get to how

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>we're gambling picks in a moment. How are you doing

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>this morning.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Sun, Pretty good man? How about yourself? I'm doing great.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, today is an emotional day for the family.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>We take Diora to college, get on a plane, as

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>we will now have two of our three children living

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>in California while we live in New York City. Doora

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and I had a heart to heart last night about

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 3>not about how she's going to do in school, not

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>about decision making, not about grades, about the fact that

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>you and her have now left me with, objectively speaking,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 3>two of the craziest people who have ever lived in

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 3>your baby sister and your mother, and I am all alone,

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and that I am going to need regular chats with

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>each of you. We will discuss that potentially later in

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the show, but we must get to the news of

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the day. Here's what missed the cut.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 3>The NFL Player Association calls for grass fields, Travis Kelsey

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and Taylor Swift quietly hanging out right after I declare

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 3>myself on team Oh, What's what's my girl's name? The

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 3>one who's in the beef with Tayler Olivia Rodrigo. I

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 3>said I was team Olivia Rodrigo. And now it looks

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>like Kelsey and Taylor Swift might be dating and aliens

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 3>found in Mexico.

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 2>This is what.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Matt Ford wanted us to talk about the entire show.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately it missed the cut. Demons, Let's get into Thursday

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Night football. Tonight's game what are we talking about?

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>All Right?

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 4>So the Vikings traveled to Philly tonight's play the Eagles.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.839
<v Speaker 4>Both teams struggled last week, but Philly managed to pull

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 4>out the dub. Was this just week one, rust or

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 4>do you expect these teams issues to continue?

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay? So for the Vikings, I think their offense will

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>look better than it looked against Tampa.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>But I I picked.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 3>This team, missed the playoffs. I don't think it's a

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>great team. Last year I tried to tell it, I

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 3>listen to be fair, I was far from the only

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 3>person saying they are winning all of these one score games.

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 3>It is not sustainable. And then riddle me that out

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 3>of no, you know, for Week one of this year

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>they lose a one score game. With that said, I

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 3>think they have a very interesting opportunity tonight. That Philly

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 3>secondary last year played five good to very good quarterbacks

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.679
<v Speaker 3>all year, just five. They scored an average of thirty

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 3>three points on that Philly defense. It was golf Trevor

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Rogers Dak Mahomes. This year, Philly, now they only allowed

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty points. But Mac Jones. Mac Jones threw for three

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred plus and three scores. What is it going to

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 3>look like Demonse when it's your Jefferson, justin Jefferson, pardon me,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and rookie Jordan Addison running back there. I think the

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 3>Vikings are gonna be able to score some points tonight,

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and so I it's not me saying that I think

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the Vikings are gonna win necessarily. But I'll tell you

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>this much and we'll talk about Survivor Pools later. I

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>stayed away from Philly and Survivor Pools this week because

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that Philly's secondary can get got and I

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>thought Jalen looked a little shaky in Week one. Demontse

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>go ahead, you looked like you were gonna say something.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, I honestly just think that it's gonna be

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>a good game. I think that given the circumstances, it's

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty pretty evenly matched.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>But that's if it's evenly matched, that's a bit of

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>an indictment, if you will, on where Philly is right

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>now and now, the person to watch on Philly is

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Carter, their rookie d tackle, who a lot of

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>people thought was the single best player in last year's draft.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 3>He fell almost all the way out of the top

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>ten because of some really tough off the field stuff

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 3>when he was at Georgia and people were concerned about him.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 3>He was dominant, absolutely dominant in Week one, but they

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 3>lost to Kobe Dean with an injury, They lost a corner,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 3>the secondary was already shaky. So I think that Cousin,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 3>if Cousins has time tonight, I think the Vikings can

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>score a lot of points. And I think that there's

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 3>a long article on ESPN right now about the number

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>of hits Jalen Hurts has been taking and how often

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 3>he's running. Remember at the end of the Patriots game,

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>he fumbled, which kind of opened the door for the

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Patriots to potentially win. They just couldn't close the deal.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Philly is an interesting one to watch. The Super Bowl

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 3>hangover can be real. They got they escaped with an

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 3>important win in you know, a tough environment on Sunday.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>But I'm very interested in watching them tonight.

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, So I mean, I think you've kind of

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 4>already answered the question, So who do you think?

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Who do you see? It's hurting it? And also actually

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, go ahead.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll just ask.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>You Andrew Orsi's question.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>He says, Kirk Cousins in primetime will do more damage

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 4>than the Eagles secondary.

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well that didn't play. Listen, that didn't play. But

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I do think the Vikings are semi desperate in Week two.

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>If you think about the Vikings, their playoff game ended

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>tragically in a one possession loss. They blow a game

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>to Baker Mayfield in the Bucks. And now last year

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>wasn't Vikings Eagles. I don't know if it was a

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Thursday night or a Monday night game last year, and

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 3>that Kirk was the only I guess you could say

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 3>above average quarterback the Eagles played last year and totally

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>shut him down. I remember that game was like twenty

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>three to seven. So the Vikings just have a lot

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>on the line here and I think the Eagles will win.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I would not lay the six, and now that Eagles

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 3>offense against a very suspect Vikings defense should be able

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 3>to do some damage. With the Vikings brought in Brian

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Flores this offseason, the defense was okay in Week one.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Baker evidently figured out their the signals in that game

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in the second half, which is one of the reasons

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>they had so much success. I'm excited for the night's

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 3>game and I think it's a high scoring one, all right. Next,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>let's go Chiefs Jacks.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So there's no doubt that Patrick Mahomes is the best

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 4>quarterback in football.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 5>There's a little bit of a doubt right now if

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 5>you ask me, though, But.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 4>After a rocky Week one, he plays the second best

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>quarterback in football. The prince that was promised Jamesviller lost

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 4>by a touchdown of the playoffs, but that was on

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 4>the road without Ridley. Is the Prince's first step? Is

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 4>this the Prince's first step to becoming keing? Hey, dude,

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you something.

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 2>He's way better than Jared Goff. But go ahead, Hey.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 3>That's true. But before I even answered that, you said

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 3>something interesting there. You were like, you seem to question

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes's place atop the quarterback hierarchy. Who do you

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>think belongs there? And if you say tua, I'm coming

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 3>through the screen.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 5>Who maybe the guy that beat him last Sunday?

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Jared Goff? Okay, yeah, man, those guys were better in

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Week one. It does not make them better quarterbacks.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm giving I'm I'm giving them giving him

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of bad word but uh, but yeah, he

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 4>obviously didn't have his receivers bulls well.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, listen, so I think that Jags playoff

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 3>game was not going to be close at all. If

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you remember, the Chiefs were moving up and down the

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>field at will. Mahomes got his ankle maimed and that

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously changed the complexion of the game. The Chiefs were

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>still infirmed control throughout. I do think take that everyone

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 3>thought was such a hot take that Trevor is an

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 3>unquestioned top five quarterback in football is now conventional wisdom.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I believe the Chiefs with Chris Jones back, I think

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna have Kelsey back, are gonna win this football game.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I won't panic if they don't, but I would be

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 3>very surprised given that they lost Week one. I mean,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes has never been two games below five hundred in

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>his career. He's only lost back to back games, I believe,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>three times in his career, and I think the Chiefs

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 3>with the extra rest with the mini by are going

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 3>to be sharp. With that said, you mentioned Ridley. Ridley

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>looked awesome, absolutely awesome. Travis Ettien looked good. The rookie

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 3>tank Bigsby, despite I think he was the one that

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 3>had a fumble. He looked good as well. The Jags

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>are legit. This is my projected AFC Championship game. But

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the Jags defense is going to slow

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 3>down the Chiefs offense the way and the Lions defense,

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion, didn't really slow down the Chiefs offense.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs offense slowed down the Chiefs offense. They had

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>guys running open. They just kept dropping passes on that

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 3>last drive, even the fourth and twenty five they sky moore.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Hand.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and obviously Canarios turning in the first play of

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 3>the drive. And the Lions are I don't think they're

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>a great team. They're a good team. And so I

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 3>think Trevor is awesome, absolutely awesome. You guys know that

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I like the Chiefs this week. Go ahead, what are

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>your followings?

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 5>You like Trevor and all that.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 4>But if the Chiefs end up losing this game, is

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 4>it time to break the glass and hit that red

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 4>panic button.

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>No, because they would have lost to two good teams,

0:11:55.280 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and because here are their next half dozen games, Chicago,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>the Jets, the Vikings, Denver, the Chargers Denver before they

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 3>play Miami. By the way, Chiefs Dolphins is about to

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 3>be the greatest international game europe game ever. Chiefs Dolphins

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 3>is going to be at nine to thirty in the

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>morning Eastern in Germany in the first week in November,

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>also known as something Demanse has a zero percent chance

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of watching because that will be on at six thirty

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>in the morning on the West Coast. So even if

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs were to lose, they're not even playing a

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 3>losable game until week nine.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not like they exactly go out there and destroy

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 4>the Broncos every time they see them, I think, and

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 4>they play them twice.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And you said you mentioned the Jets.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Hey, dude, yeah, it's not It's honestly not looking kosher

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Well I'm not worried about the Jets at all. And

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 3>while you can mention the fact that the Chiefs don't

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>blow out the Broncos, the last time Demanse, the Broncos

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>beat the Chiefs, you were a junior in high school.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say that again, the last time the Broncos

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>beat the Chiefs. The Broncos have won a Super Bowl

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>more recently than they have beaten the Chiefs. The last

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 3>time the Broncos beat the Chiefs Barack Obama was president.

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 4>So the last time the Broncos had Sean Payton and

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Russell Wilson as their front runners.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, last year they had Russell Wilson and they were

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 3>down twenty seven to nothing in the first game against

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs and second of all Sean Payton. That looked

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 3>a whole hell of a lot like the NTT Hackett Broncos,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>bad fourth down calls, ten penalties, scored sixteen points and lose.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't see a big station there. One

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 2>last question.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 5>Last last year, last year, you made a.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 4>Lot of money on the same game parlay within the

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs Shags games.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Are you gonna do it again this year? Oh?

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. You know, those are the same game

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 3>parlay stuff. It's kind of like if the mood strikes me.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I'll do that this year. If

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I do, I'll tweet it out, But I'm not certain

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I haven't really dove into the same game parlay waters

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 3>this year just yet?

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Next?

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 4>All right, So Robert Sala apparently has made it clear

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 4>that Zach Wilson is the Jets QB one. But you

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 4>think that they're gonna move on after Wilson gets embarrassed

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 4>by this Cowboys defense. You said on TV they should

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 4>trade for Cooper Rush or Tokoby Versett. What's the point

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 4>in trading for more assets for a mid quarterback if

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 4>they can't win a Super Bowl?

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the point is your season won't be dead

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>on a right. The point is you have a young

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 3>team that has never experienced any type of postseason, well

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 3>any postseason whatsoever, hasn't played any super high leverage games,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and trying to keep your team involved or keep your

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 3>team into it late in the year because the defense

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 3>does look great, because the running game does look excellent,

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>because Garrett Wilson was phenomenal. And the fact of the

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 3>matter is, it's not that they have a bad quarterback demonse,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>because anyone available right now is not going to be great.

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 3>The other the name you didn't mention that I had

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 3>said was the number one called Macus Jameis Winston. But

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>it's not that they have a bad quarterback, demonse, they

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 3>have the worst quarterback in the league. The worst Zach

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Wilson's first year in the league. He finished where do

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 3>you think amongst all quarterbacks? He finished im passer rating.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you debinly, where do you think, Well, no

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>worse than thirty second, because like forty guys qualified, as

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean, because backups player or whatever.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>He finished amongst all qualifying quarterbacks his rookie year, ambassarating

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 3>last amongst all qualifying quarterbacks his rookie year, and completion

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 3>percentage last. All right, what about his second year? His

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 3>second year, he finished last in both those categories. He's

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>been He's had the double double last place finishes in

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 3>both his year's starter go ahead.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 5>He's spent the summer with Aaron Rodgers, though, I think

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 5>that's of note.

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I keep hearing people say this, You're not the

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 3>only one, like, oh, he's gonna be better via osmosis,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>via just being around Aaron. And it's not as if

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Aaron was brought in to make Zach better. Aaron was

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 3>brought into play quarterback. So here's the thing. Everyone knows

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wilson at some point is getting benched. Everyone knows it.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>The sooner the Cowboys admit it, I'm sorry, the Jets

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>admit it the better, which is why I don't think

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>it's terrible. They're playing the Cowboys in Week one or

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>week two, but week one with Zach because he'll light them.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>They'll light Zach up and the Jets will turn the page.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 3>It's what they gotta do. And if they don't, go ahead, Sorry.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 5>No, no, I was just saying, all right, go ahead.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>If they don't, then week three they have the Patriots,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>who Zach Wilson, just to be clear, has played four

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 3>games against the Patriots. Of course he's zero four. He

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 3>completes fifty percent of his passes, has two touchdowns, seven picks,

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>and where's his rating. It's gotta be just her. Oh,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>you know what, that's unbelievable. I looked at I thought

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at his completion percentage when I said fifty.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Now his completion percentage is fifty one. His passer rating

0:17:55.359 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>against the Patriots is fifty fifty five zero. So if

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the if the Cowboys don't get him on the bench,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots will, and then the next week they'll have

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 3>a new quarterback the Sooners. The Jets admit that the

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 3>better because the rest of the team's good. But we're

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>not gonna pretend. The Jets last year turned to Flacco,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Mike White, Chris Streveler. They were so out on Zach

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Wilson demonse. His own teammates were wearing Mike white shirts.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 3>When Zach Wilson was still on the team, they threw

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 3>up half a parade for replacing him with Rogers. Now

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 3>they're pretending, okay, yeah, you know what, we.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Believe tweets saying that he's our guy.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 3>By the way, they got no choice, they got they

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 3>got no choice. All right?

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, the Dolphins electric offense is facing the

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 4>patriots stout.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Defense this weekend.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 4>There's anybody who can slow down Mike McDaniel's offense, it's

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 4>gotta be Belichick. If the Patriots can slow down the Dolphins,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 4>is there any hope for the rest of the league.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, here's the thing. It oddly, even before Tua appeared

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>to be good, the one team he always played well

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>against was New England Tua. It's the opposite of the

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wilson thing. Tua four games against the Patriots, four

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and Zho completes sixty nine percent of his passes. Now,

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 3>his numbers aren't amazing. His passer rating in those games

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 3>is only eighty nine, but he's never lost to the Patriots.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I am interested in this game. But the fact of

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 3>the matter is, Mike McDaniel is a brilliant play designer,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek is the most dangerous player in the league. And

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Tua's when he's been healthy under McDaniel, he's been great.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Like I just have to give him credit. I've got

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to give him credit. And the defense. While the defense

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't look good against the Chargers, it did on that

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>final drive. There's a lot of reasons to take the

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins very seriously. I picked him before the year, if

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>you remember, to win the division when everyone was all

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 3>in on the Jets and people still love the Bills,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 3>and so I for my purposes, I like the Dolphins

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>this weekend. I'm curious see what Belichick, what wrinkles he

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 3>has in play, But that Dolphins ofphense with everyone healthy,

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 3>looks really really good. Go ahead, Does this something you

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 3>want to say about it? No?

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean Tua being Belichick's kryptonite is pretty crazy.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 5>I feel like if a quarterback is.

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Going in there and having Belichick and the Patriots number,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 4>that's that's pretty big, don't I don't think that's a

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 4>crazy simple team.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 3>But it totally agree and it also was true even

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 3>when people didn't believe in Tua. Tua's rookie year when

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 3>he was not good played the Patriots, they won twenty

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>two to twelve, even though who didn't play very well

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 3>his second year, first game of the year, they won

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 3>seventeen to sixteen against the Patriots, and in the final

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>week of the season they won thirty three to twenty four.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 3>And then last year, week one of the season they

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 3>beat the Patriots twenty to seven, and then he was

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 3>injured for their final matchup against them.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 2>So for some.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Reason, Tua plays really really well against the Dolphins, I

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 3>should say when Tua plays, plays really really well against

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 3>New England. All right, last one? All right?

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 4>So Week one we saw Burrow and the Bengals get embarrassed.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 4>The Ravens gotta win, but suffered injuries unfortunately, and didn't

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 4>look much better at offense. Now they're both facing off

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday. Which team are you more concerned about. I'll

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 4>tell you what team I'm not concerned about. It's the Ravens.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 3>But ghead, why are you not concerned about the Ravens?

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Tell me you concerned?

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that the Bengals get off to it's obvious

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 4>that they get off to bad starts through for eighty

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 4>nine yards last week.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>It's yep. I've got much more.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Faith in the Ravens coming out with this game than

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 4>I do then the Bengals turning it around and not

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 4>stand on a cold start.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, for a few things, I'm not certain, but that

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 3>sounds like the Ravens are going to be in Demonse's

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>tease I don't know that that to be true, but

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 3>it sure sounds like they're gonna be one of Demonse's

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>teaser teams. As bad as Joe Burrow was in Week one,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Lamar wasn't way better. Lamar threw for one sixty nine

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>zero touchdowns. A pick Zay Flowers, by the way, was awesome.

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Now that is the silver lining for the Ravens. Odell

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>was nonexistent and the Ravens injuries. Mark Andrews didn't play

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>week one. Their left tackle Ronnie Stanley got dinged again,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 3>their center got dinged, the Dobbins done for the year.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 3>They were missing someone in the secondary. They had another

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>player in the second get hurt. They're worried. I think

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a torn peck or biceps or something similar. So

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the Ravens injuries piled up. They did to me, didn't

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>look that sharp and the Bengals are desperate. I think

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 3>we're opposed on this one. De mon'sy. I like Cincinnati

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 3>in this spot. Cincinnati did look terrible, there's no doubt

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 3>about it. But Cincinnati, you're right, they're used to slow

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 3>starts and digging themselves out of that hole to a degree.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they'll be better. I also think the Ravens

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 3>injuries maybe they're aside from Dobbins, you don't expecting to

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>be season long issues. But for this week, I think

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a tough spot. If this is what I'll tell you,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the Cincinnati is gonna win. If Cincinnati loses,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 3>they could be in real trouble. If Cincinnati loses, I

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 3>understand everyone is like, oh, they you know the last

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 3>few years they were able to pull themselves out of it. Yes,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>But the reason the Arrowhead Invitational is the arrow At

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Invitational is because the Bengal never have a better record

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 3>than the Chiefs. And if you fall to oh and

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>two and you still have games, you know, another game

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 3>against Baltimore, two against Pittsburgh. Will see what Pittsburgh looks like.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Obviously Week one they look terrible. You play against City,

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 3>you play San Francisco, you play Buffalo. Yep. So I

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 3>think this is a very important game for Cincinnati, and

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I think they're gonna get it. We'll see if they

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 3>are involved in my picks. Go ahead? No not, Oh,

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 3>it looked like you were licking your chops getting readybe

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>you're just getting thinking about the teaser. I'm very curious

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to see what the other legs of the teaser are

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 3>because I've sniffed out that the Ravens are getting teased

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 3>in this because their dogs. Wrong. Okay, maybe I'm wrong,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 3>all right, maybe I'm wrong. Also, see if my McDonald's

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 3>gets here, we'll do all that. Take quick break, come back,

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 3>what's right.

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 6>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblast, who defined every expectation

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 6>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 6>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 6>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 6>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 6>including Juell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tania, and

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 6>Bobby Knavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 3>In episode one seventy seven What's Right with Nick Wright,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 3>we will get to our gambling picks for the week

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 3>is Demansay and I try to have a winning week

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 3>after fal during a bit ink to in week one.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Here in just a moment, but let me remind you.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>This episode of What's Right with Nick Wright is brought

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 3>to you by the McDonald's app. How many times you've

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>been in that situation, had a really long day, You're

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 3>really hungry. Last thing you want to do is cook

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 3>a meal or leave your house to go pick something up.

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to exaggerate a I go through that,

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, a half dozen times, a couple times a week,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of times throughout my life. My saving grace is

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the McDelivery option in the McDonald's app. We're talking about

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 3>getting McDonald's delivered right to your door. I ordered my

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 3>breakfast earlier. It's already here, Jake handing it to me. Jake,

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much. The orange juice. Hold on, let

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 3>me let me grab my hash brown perfect today. Have

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 3>a favorite of mine in the morning, the Britle meal,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 3>A couple of burritos, hash browns, and an orange juice.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 3>And now every time you ordering in the McDelivery, pardon me.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>In McDonald's app earns your points where its free food.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And let's be honest, there's basically nothing better than free food.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>So there's always a reason to order in the McDonald's

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 3>in the McDonald's app. Download the McDonald's app today At

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 3>participating McDonald's delivery prices maybe higher than at restaurants. Delivery

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.959
<v Speaker 3>and other fees may apply. Copyright twenty twenty three McDonald's.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 3>De mom'say, where's my McDonald's you were saying during the break. Yeah,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I know you wanted a mcgriddle. This is what happens

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 3>when you are in LA. I'm here in New York.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 3>It is delicious. Why don't you why eat my hash brown?

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 3>All wait through the burritles? Why I eat my hash brown?

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you go over my picks from last week?

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Because I did not have a winning week. Wasn't a disaster,

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 3>but wasn't a winning week. We can show it to

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 3>you on the screen. We have the greens or winners.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 3>The reds are losers. Go ahead, tell America how I did.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, so we went two and three overall season

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 4>record right now is looking at two and three right moves,

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 4>oh when one and our picks from last week would

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 4>be oh am I not no?

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead?

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, go ahead? All right.

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 4>So it was Jagg's minus four and a half at

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Indy was a we won that one. Green Bay plus

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 4>one and a half at Chicago also.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Winner by a mile, never a doubt.

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 4>And then we got New England plus four versus Philly.

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 3>That unfortunate that the side of that bet I got

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 3>a two point conversion waved off due to a BS

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>holding call. I like that pick. I think I was

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 3>on the right side of that.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Next, I don't think the losing side is ever the

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 4>right side. We had Buffalo two and a half at

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 4>the Jets that.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe I lost that bet. Aaron Rodgers goes

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>down four plays in, Josh Allen just can't stop turning

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 3>the ball over. Serves me right for betting on Josh

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Allen disaster.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 4>And then lastly we have the right move. We had

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Pittsburgh plus two and a half versus Buffalo.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Francisco.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Guys, worst bet I ever made in my life, and

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 3>you know what I'm making I'm making an executive decision here,

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 3>No more right move. We're done with it. We're done

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 3>with it. We're just five picks. I'm not picking one

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 3>game more special than the others. I hate it. I'm

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 3>not doing it anymore. Last year I did great in

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the picks, still at a losing record on the right move.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't like it.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Another thing you should do is maybe listen to your

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 4>son on the podcast every once in a while. Maybe

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 4>just don't bet against brock Party.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, oh well, do that.

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you see the picks this week?

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Chief? Okay?

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean yeah, we'll see god I hash Brown all

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 3>over me. All right, So here's the deal, five picks.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 3>We're two and three on the week. We'll get to

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Demanse's teaser in a moment. What's the first one, Demonse?

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 4>All right, So the first one, We've got Cincinnati minus

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 4>three versus Baltimore.

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Yep, love this. I love this spot for the reasons

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I just explained before. I was not impressed by Baltimore's

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 3>passing game in Week one. The injuries are mounting for

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the Ravens. I don't have to lay more than three,

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>so I'm just laying a field goal for Cincinnati at home.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 3>They're better than Baltimore. I'm only laying three points. The

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 3>sharps agree with me forty four percent of the tickets,

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>but seventy two percent of the money so far is

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:13.239
<v Speaker 3>on Cincinnati. Now, what's not good is Joe Burrow's two

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 3>and five against the spread in weeks one and two

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in his career, and Harbaugh is twenty one and ten

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 3>against the spread, pardon me, in his career, which is

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 3>the best in the NFL. But I like Cincinnati in

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the spot. I think they get to one and one.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that as bad as Cincinnati looked in Week one,

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 3>they're not gonna look that bad again. And oddly, Cleveland

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 3>has owned Joe Burrow in his career, Baltimore has not.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I like Cincinnati in the spot. Yeah, all right, well

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 3>next one we can go to the next pace.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 4>We've got Pittsburgh plus two and a half versus Cleveland.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, here's the deal. Just because I Pittsburgh plus

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 3>two and a half ruined me in Week one, does

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>not believe I'm gonna throwaway everything that I saw in

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 3>the preseason and in the offseason and the week two.

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Far too often there are overreactions stick with what you

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 3>believed going into the year, if you had a strong conviction.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I had a strong conviction about the Steelers. And Cleveland

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>has won in Pittsburgh once in the last twenty years.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>That's noteworthy. Kevin Stefanski not a good coach. Mike Tomlin

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 3>an awesome coach. That's a good thing for me. Kevin

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Stefanski against the spread in the AFC North six and thirteen. Tomlin,

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 3>as we said last week, as a home dog, is

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 3>one of the best bets in football. He's gonna all

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden lose back to back games as a

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 3>home dog. I don't buy it. Pittsburgh has won. I

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>did not know this. Pittsburgh's won their last twenty home

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Monday night football games. That's insane. So Tomlin has never

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 3>lost a home Monday night football game. Uh. And So

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>for all those reasons, and because I did not think

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Deshan Watson looked good at all in Week one, and

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the Browns lost their right tackle Jack Conklin for the season,

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>so they're gonna have their rookie out there. All those reasons,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I like Pittsburgh in this spot. Are you convinced demand

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.239
<v Speaker 3>that Pittsburgh stinks or do you think that was more

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 3>of an aberration game.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm not totally sure if I'm convinced Pittsburgh's Pittsburgh's stinks,

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 4>but I am not convinced on that bet.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 5>That wouldn't take them at plus two and a half

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 5>for Cleveland.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, So you don't like either of my first

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>two bets. You don't like Cincinnati minus three or Pittsburgh

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 3>plus two and a half.

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 2>No, the Cincinnati one I like more than this one.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 3>But I feel great. I feel even better. I'm glad

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 3>we're all the opposite side. I don't I don't know

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>if you got your finger on the pulse of the

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 3>league just yet.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I feel like going more heart than head.

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Next all right, next week, I got this one, I

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 4>bet though, yeud. We got Giants minus six at Arizona.

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, listen, I'm laying a big number with a

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 3>team that just got forty to nothing in Week one.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel fine about it. The Cardinals are gonna be terrible.

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>That Giants defense has to be furious. It never really

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 3>got a chance to get off the ground in Week one.

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Brian Dable mortified about what happened against the Cowboys the

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Giants is not an exaggeration. The Giants season is over

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 3>if they lose this game. If you lose forty to

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 3>nothing on national TV to start the year and then

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>you lose to a team everyone believes is tanking with

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Josh Dobbs playing quarterback, your season's over. So the Giants

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>have to win this spot. I'm laying less than a touchdown,

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Joe. It has to bounce back, going from being

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 3>up against maybe the best defense in football to one

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 3>of the five worst defenses in football. It's gonna feel

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 3>them like they're playing a different sport entirely. Now here's

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>what's not good. This is a very square bet. Ninety

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 3>percent of the money is on the Giants as a

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 3>road favorite. Also, I'm not getting a great number. It

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 3>opened at four and a half, it's now six. Where

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel better about that is as Demons knows five,

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>five and a half not exactly key numbers. So yes,

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 3>I am I am not getting great line value here,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 3>but it's not going across any of the key numbers.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 3>And Daniel Jones eighteen and five against the spread in

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 3>his career or after his last twenty three straight up losses,

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I think the Giants. The Giants are gonna be a

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 3>very popular survivor play. I like them to win. I

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 3>like them to win something like twenty four to ten.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 3>The Giants in the spot.

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, Next we got Tampa Bay minus two

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 4>and a half versus Chicago.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, this is a square bet. I'm telling

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 3>you that right now. Everyone likes the Bucks here and

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I went back and forth on it, I think, and

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 3>it was not reassuring, I'll be honest when we saw

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 3>that Baker, I thought it was a good job by

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Baker deciphering the Viking signals, but a bet. But it

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 3>it was not reassuring moving forward because if the only

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 3>reason he had success was because he figured out what

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 3>plays they were running. That's concerning the flip side, is

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 3>this the Bears might just be a disaster. They and

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how much they're going to change course.

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>After one week they did not. I think they called

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 3>one one designed run for justin fields that entire game.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, at my pal Danny Parkins, who does afternoons

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 3>on the score in Chicago, really laid into him fairly

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 3>that they are trying to change the player justin fields

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 3>is DJ Moore, who was one of the big pieces

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 3>they got in the trade for the number one pick.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 3>He only had two targets the entire game. They weren't

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 3>letting justin fields throw the ball down the field. So

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 3>all these reasons, and Tampa is at home with a

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 3>good defense, a healthy team, good weapons, feeling good, and

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm laying less than a field goal. I like the

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 3>bucks here. I also, I also understand that this is

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be a very public bet, and I feel

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 3>nervous about it. But but it is what it is.

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 3>And now a play that Demonse is gonna think I'm

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 3>absolutely insane on and I think the line is actually

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 3>even getting better. Give me the next one, Demonse, All.

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, next one.

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 4>You got the Rams at plus seven, Rams plus seven

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 4>and a half versus San fran and that line is

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 4>but you're now getting eight and a half eight.

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So here's the deal. Divisional road favorites laying seven

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 3>or more points like San Francisco is early in the year,

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 3>like this week, two in the last twenty years own

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 3>five against the spread. This is the reason that there

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of reasons people are gonna be on

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the niners. Okay, people are gonna be on the Niners

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>because Shanahan traditionally has owned McVeigh. He's ten and six

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 3>against the spread against McVay. Brock Purty obviously has been

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 3>a covering machine. The Niners looked perfect in Week one.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I understand all of those things. The Rams everyone thought

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 3>they were dead on arrival. This year they looked really

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 3>good against a Seattle team that I think is good.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the Rams eventually might be dead on arrival,

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 3>but right now they think we're alive. And I don't

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 3>think at home they're going to get blown out by

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the Niners. I also think that we are that it

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to be almost impossible for brock Purdy to

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 3>play as well as he did last week. Eight and

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 3>a half is way too many points when the other

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 3>team has the better quarterback, when the other team has

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Donald that is looking at not like peak Aaron Donald,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 3>but damn good. I do not think the Rams are

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna win. I don't even necessarily think this is going

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 3>to be a game that's gonna be in a lot

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 3>of doubt in the second half. But seven and a

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 3>half and now eight and a half points is just

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 3>too many points. I am taking the Rams plus eight

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 3>and a half against San Francisco. Obviously, demanse, you think

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco is gonna win? Do you do you like

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 3>this pick at all? Because of the points I'm getting.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 5>I do like the pick. Wow, I like it a lot.

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 5>I like it a lot.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Actually that is that is shocking to me. But go ahead.

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I don't like it more than my picks.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I think, oh the I I think that

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 4>the uh, the Rams did play well last week, and

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that I think brock Party is good,

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think that they're going to come out

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 4>there and blow the Rams out. If if it were

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco, I'd have like a totally different difference

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 4>out the line.

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 3>It looks like that San Francisco line would be like thirteen.

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Like it's just too many points for an early season

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 3>road divisional game. So here are the go ahead. I'm sorry.

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Also, the one thing I don't like about this because

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 4>you don't have the Chiefs in here and they're going

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 4>and they're playing that, they're playing the Jags.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 5>They're coming back from being embarrassed getting beaten.

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 4>By the Lions. I feel like you, of all people,

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 4>would hammer the Chiefs in this scenario.

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing. If you were gonna bet the Chiefs,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you needed to do it earlier in the week. The

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs were minus two, they're now minus three and a half.

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 3>That is a huge point and a half difference, the

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 3>fact that it crossed over the three. And now if

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs win, if the Chiefs are up ten like

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 3>the playoff game was, they're up ten and then the

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Jags I think with the playoff game, maybe the Jags

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.399
<v Speaker 3>got late field goal, doesn't matter, but the back door

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 3>cover is just so alive when you're laying three and

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 3>a half, and it would just be such a square

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 3>bet where you could have gotten the Chiefs at minus

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 3>two or two and a half, and now to lay

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the three and a half, I just can't do it.

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>And so that's why at two and a half, I would,

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 3>in fact, in one of my season long picks contests

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 3>where the lines lock, like Wednesday night, they were two

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 3>and a half and I did include them, But at

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 3>three and a half, I'm not doing it. So that's

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the reasoning there. Now to the recap quickly of our

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 3>picks before we get to Demon's teaser. I've got Cincinnati

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 3>minus three, the Giants minus six, Pittsburgh plus two and

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a half, Tampa minus two and a half, and the

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 3>Rams plus eight and a half. Against San Francisco last week,

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 3>I I went two and three, so I'm down one

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 3>point three units now. Demanse last week in his teaser,

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 3>we can show it to you Demonse's teaser and talk.

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk through it for a moment. Tampa plus twelve

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't even need it, Vegas plus ten didn't even need it,

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati plus three and a half needed instead of a

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 3>six point teaser, needed to do a sixty point teaser.

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And I am listen, I am not I I'm not

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 3>doing anything other than trying to be helpful. The reason

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 3>you got from my grade on this a B minus

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 3>was because I told you the Cincinnati leg you were

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 3>not getting adequate value, and then the Cincinnati leg you

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 3>end up losing on. So let's I don't know what

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 3>your teaser is this week. I'm gonna let you take

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 3>it from here. I believe in you. I think you're

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 3>gonna learn your lesson, and I think it's gonna be

0:42:58.320 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a great one. Go ahead.

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 4>It really helped. Yes, I was honestly weary about it.

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 4>The entire time. But let's get into this week's teaser. Yeah,

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 4>we got Rams plus seven and a half to fourteen

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 4>and a half. It's the seventh. It is a three

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 4>team seven point, three team seven point teaser. By the way,

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Rams plus seven plus one, right, and then we got

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Ravens plus three to plus ten, and then we got

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Jags plus three and a half to plus ten and

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 4>a half.

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 2>That's the teaser, ladies and gentlemen, demonse, that's right, a

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 2>good teaser.

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 3>That is a great teaser. Some people, I'm sure would

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 3>be teasing the Rams Niners game in the other direction,

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 3>meaning teasing the Niners from seven and a half down

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 3>to a pick them or from eight and a half

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 3>to plus one and a half. I like your side

0:43:56.719 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 3>of it more. You got the Jags at a good number.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 3>You got Baltimore across key numbers. I I here's here's

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the only question I have. Have you officially placed that

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 3>yet or are you waiting till later either today or

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow to place so.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.720
<v Speaker 5>The Rams number I think has changed is what it sounds.

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yes, so you would get it at you would

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 3>get the Rams at fifteen and a half. And here's

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 3>the other thing, you might Baltimore in some shot, like

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 3>right now, Baltimore plus three is even money and Cincinnati

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 3>minus three is minus one twenty, which means that one

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 3>might move to three and a half, which then would

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.359
<v Speaker 3>give you plus ten and a half. So that so

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the point I'm making is, if you're gonna someone out there,

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 3>you're locked in on this, except we can change the

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 3>rams to fifteen and a half. You're locked in on

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 3>this for our show's purposes. But if someone wants to

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 3>trail Demonse's teaser, maybe way to beat and see if

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 3>you can get Baltimore at plus three and a half.

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 3>So then it goes across the ten to plus ten

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and a half. But demanse as far as process as

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 3>you're getting, you have two home teams catching fifteen and

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 3>a half and ten and a half, and then a

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 3>divisional game against a team that doesn't start the season

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.439
<v Speaker 3>great getting ten points. I think that's a pretty sharp bet.

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that's an A level teaser. Yeah, go ahead.

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 4>No, I felt really good, and honestly, I used Cincinnati

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 4>the teaser that.

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 5>I failed on last week. I obviously used that.

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 4>But Andrew Ortez says, those are such great teasers I'm

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna use the McDonald's app to treat myself to a

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 4>good breakfast because he knows that he's gonna get your

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 4>money off of my teaser. Thank you, Andrew or tease.

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 3>That is very smart. All right, listen, time now for

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the offer and demands. We're doing this a little bit differently.

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Evidently, yes, we are doing it a little bit differently.

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 4>So we've got a special offer for you this week,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 4>and would you like to go to the casino?

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:13.479
<v Speaker 5>Let me let me ask you that question.

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Answer to that's always yes, hypothetic.

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, sweet, So if you accept this offer,

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 4>you'll trigger a gambling mini game.

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Do you accept it? Sounds like you do.

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 3>The answer is yep.

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna We're gonna go to the casino, and

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 4>our game of choice today is the slot machine. The

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 4>slot machine will give you the parameters for a bet

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 4>you need to make. The category is are bet type,

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 4>division and wild card.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's do it. So let's throw up the first

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 3>slot machine and we'll see. Okay, this is great. This

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 3>is really well done by the Blue Duck folks. All right,

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm pulling the lever. Go ahead, come on, all right,

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 3>A money line NFC East parlay. All right, So a

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 3>money line NFC East parlay. All right, So Vikings Eagles

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not including in this. I gotta see, so the

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Giants on the money line, and then it would be

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Commanders Broncos. Oh well, this is an easy one. I

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's gonna pay all that well, but I'll

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 3>find out. Right now, my money line parlay for the

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 3>NFC East would be a Giants Cowboys money line parlay,

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 3>which honestly, is gonna sound so good you might have

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 3>to bet it. The Giants to beat the Cardinals and

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys to beat the Jets. That's only minus one forty.

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 3>I might actually make that bet. I like it, all right,

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 3>it looks like we have more, but that my money

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 3>line parlay is the Giants to win outright and the

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys to win outright at minus one. Do we have

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 3>more from the casino? I think we I think we're

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 3>doing three of these, all right, Next, let me go

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 3>ahead and the yeah, there we go. All right, I'm

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>pulling the lever bank. Let's see what we land on

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 3>against the spread. AFC West alternate line. Oh now, we're

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 3>really being exotic here, but okay, let me see what

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 3>we can get AFC West. So my options are the

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Raiders against the Bills.

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Gosh, chef's money line perhaps, well the oh, this guy's

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 4>sit here.

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 3>The no, I'm trying to figure out the right bet.

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing this on the fly. The Bronco so can

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I I think I can. And the Chargers are so

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos are playing Washington, the Chargers are playing the Vikings.

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, I'm not doing this one that

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:49.959
<v Speaker 3>there's there's no combos that I want to make. There's

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 3>and if I were to make them, it would have

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 3>to be to to convoluted what I think I would do.

0:48:57.480 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, you know what, I don't want to

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 3>actually not do it. Let me just try to put

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 3>one together very quickly for you here. So we would

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 3>do buy sell points, So we would take the Bills

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 3>down to from minus eight and a half their alternate

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 3>line of the Bills minus two and a half. So

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 3>let me get that's minus three point thirty. We then

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 3>are going to take the Chiefs from minus three and

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 3>a half to also minus two and a half where

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:38.840
<v Speaker 3>they once were. So let me give it to you

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 3>real quick again. This is a cowardly bet. But this

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 3>is you know, we're doing the slot machine, the Chiefs

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:47.760
<v Speaker 3>back to where they were at minus two and a half,

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and then we will last one on there. We're gonna

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:59.359
<v Speaker 3>fade the Broncos, so we will take Washington instead of

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 3>plus three three and a half, we'll take Washington on

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:06.440
<v Speaker 3>the money line. So it's the Bills minus two and

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 3>a half against the Raiders, the Chiefs minus two and

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 3>a half against the Jags, and Washington to beat the Broncos. Outright,

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 3>it's plus four sixty. That's the one I created. So

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 3>that's an AFC West because all those games involve the

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 3>AFC West obviously, all right, last one please, all right?

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 3>So we will we will pull the we will pull

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the slot machine, and let's see prop AFC South long shot. Jesus, guys,

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 3>we might have to go back into the lab on

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 3>this slot machine thing. And by back in the lab,

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean I need to pay more diligent attention to

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.760
<v Speaker 3>our pre show prep. Where they did I now realize

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 3>give me all of these beforehand, and I could have

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 3>crafted them, but I didn't do it. So that's on me,

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 3>not on the produces. My apologies an AFC South prop

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 3>bet that's a long shot, all right. So we're not

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.839
<v Speaker 3>gonna do anything with the Jags. We're not gonna do

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:18.760
<v Speaker 3>what are the the who to the Texans? The Texans cults?

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Bet?

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay? All right? So then this is what we're gonna do.

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 3>Touchdown scorer props. Where's first TD first touchdown score? That's

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 3>what I want, not anytime, first touchdown score, Anthony Richardson,

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:36.439
<v Speaker 3>nine to one?

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Do it?

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I actually like that. Bet Anthony Richardson running it in

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:45.439
<v Speaker 3>nine to one first touchdown scorer props. Let's go ahead

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 3>and do that. We don't even need to worry about

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 3>anything else, all right, guys, I'm gonna be honest. The

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 3>slot machine was an excellent idea that I did not

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 3>execute properly because I did not put these bets in beforehand.

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:03.240
<v Speaker 3>That's my apologies. I got distracted with Dan Patrick's show.

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 3>I was a guest on it right before our show

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 3>started today. So I'll take the l on that we

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 3>can do this again next week. I'll do a better

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 3>job on it. Take a quick break to Monsea, come back,

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 3>answer some of your chat questions. What's right? All right?

0:52:20.560 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in What's Right with Nick WRT Episode one,

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 3>seventy seven. Let's get to a few listener questions real quick, demanse.

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.880
<v Speaker 4>This is a really good question. We got Christian Laska

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 4>here at lazo Uh. He asked, Yeah, how different would

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.879
<v Speaker 4>your opinion of brockby if he did exactly what he's

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 4>done except he was drafted number one overall?

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Great question?

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Massively Yeah, massively be massively different because it would mean

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 3>he likely had way more talent, was way better in college,

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 3>had a better pedigree, probably was taller, probably was stronger,

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 3>probably had more reasons to believe in Like, that's not

0:52:56.920 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a controversial thing, Like this is a guys who Yeah,

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.959
<v Speaker 3>can you find great players late in the draft? Yes?

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Can guys drafted early bust? Yes? But are you more

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 3>likely to have be a guy who's been awesome at

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 3>every level than be awesome in the NFL? Of course?

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I would think differently about him and by

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 3>if the team that now loves him so much hadn't

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:27.840
<v Speaker 3>passed on him three times in the sixth round. The

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.479
<v Speaker 3>Niner are like, oh, we've always loved Brock really because

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:33.919
<v Speaker 3>you had three picks in the two hundreds and none

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 3>of them did you deem? Was Brock pretty worthy of.

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, Ethan twenty sixty as if Zach Wilson

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 4>looks good, would that be redemption for not Hackett?

0:53:44.320 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 2>That'd be yes, but yes it would.

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 3>But more likely you're the Jets are about to realize

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the problem with basing your offensive coordinator decision higher on

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 3>who your new quarterback is. Buddies with like they, I

0:53:57.000 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 3>mean they they hired Nat Hackett because Rogers loves him.

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Now Rogers is going all right, next.

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Abashik Abhishik Rana asked, can you please still

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 4>do the right move every week so I can bet

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 4>on the opposite side?

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:19.120
<v Speaker 3>That's abuse, that's uncalled for. I don't appreciate that. I

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 3>had a winning year last year. The right move was

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 3>bad vibes, so I killed it. I cannot do that, Abishakrana,

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 3>and I don't appreciate that. All Right, we gotta go.

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I gotta go to TV, and then I have to

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 3>go to the airport, and then I have to drop

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 3>my daughter off at college, and then I have to

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 3>not cry. All right. I will talk to you guys

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 3>on TV today at three off tomorrow, back on TV Monday,

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 3>and then obviously podcasts on Tuesday. To Monday. Great job today, Pal.

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:49.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll see you guys next week.