WEBVTT - Top 10 NFL Week 4 Player Prop Picks & Predictions + TD Calls (Ep. 532)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros.

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 2>It's time to place your bets to this met Joey

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>p joe Pisapia and this is BP NFL joining me

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 2>for the props for Week four in the NFL. The

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.159
<v Speaker 2>Welsh and the Undertaker Andrew Erickson. Strong week from the

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>boys last week. We're gonna try to capitalize on this

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>and also another strong performance on the Thursday Night Football Show.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 2>In case you missed it, Ceedee Lamb over check, Ceede

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Lamb touchdown check. You go home happy. I told you

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>avoid the spread. It's it's a tragedy. Nothing but field goals, baby,

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 2>nothing but field goals. But that's why you're with us,

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and that's why you subscribe to the Betting Pros YouTube

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>channel to hang out with us and talk some ball.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Gentlemen.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>We have a big week ahead of us here, some

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>fun and exciting matchups. A lot of matchups too where

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 2>teams are kind of up against it. We're gonna see

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>how they respond. Some teams that are not quite proven,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna see how they respond. And these are the

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>players that we have our eyes on and hopefully can

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>bring us some cash. Before we get to the names

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>on the list. Don't forget every to make sure that

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>you download the Betting Pros app and use the tools

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>just like the prop bet cheat sheet. I assemble a

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>weekly television show. I go through the prop bet cheat

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>sheet to find the best lines. The boys go through it.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>We all use it.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>You should use it to because it's the best way

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>to compare all the different sportsbook lines with the expert

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.639
<v Speaker 2>projections and then find the value. That's what it's about.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>So use the prop bet cheat sheet right now. You

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 2>can get it over at betting pros or go to

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>betting pros dot com slash props. That's the way to

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 2>find it, and you're gonna find the most profitable opportunities

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and tailored recommendations. And then also you could track all

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the winning trends as well. So Betting Pros is the

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 2>app to help to get you into the black. All right,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 2>let's start here. Leaderboard overall you guys nine and six

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>for ericson eight and seven for Welsh, so both above

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>five hundred. That's where we want to be. Joey p

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>is nine and two over his last eleven. Follow me

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>betting pros dot com slash Joe. All right, let's get

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to your first pick of the week here, Welsh, and

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>we're going with somebody who was the one oh one

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>in many fans, League's Tyreek Hill. What are your feelings

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>about Tyreek the freak in week four.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I am doing this just to double down. I'm doing

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>this for the boys. I'm doing this for me and

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Ericson here, even when there are things that are telling

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>us not too Like is week three data with Skyler Thompson.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I just want to repoint out, like Scott Thomas is

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 3>not great, but it was also a week difference between

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Tua and Skyler Thompson and what they were able to

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 3>cater the playbook too. And then he gets hurt and

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Tim Boyle comes in. It was a disaster for Tyreek

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 3>last week. He had a fifteen percent target share. Not good,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 3>six point eight a dot.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Not good.

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 3>People freaking out Ericson and I this week talking about

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the bye because if this team is going to win,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>it has to go through Tyreek Hill, and I believe

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>it will go back through Tyreek Hill. So some stuff

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>that you can still sit on for the season. Even

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>though that Week three was so bad, he still has

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 3>an over eleven A dot. He still has a thirty

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>four percent target sh share, and he's still averaging fourteen

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 3>point nine four yards per reception, so he's also fourth

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 3>in yards after reception in the NFL at nine yards.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>And obviously the last week two weeks have been kind

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of messy, so he's only hit this in one of

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 3>his last three games. But if you look over his

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 3>last ten using the betting pros betting pages, which are

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>awesome which you can go and do some analysis on

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>all your picks when you're on the betting pro side,

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 3>he's hit eight of these last ten. So it has

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>just been these last two weeks. This is one of

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the lowest numbers on Tyreek Hill receiving yards that we've

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>seen in quite some time. I don't even know if

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>I actually said it. As we were coming in here,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I told you it was the receiving yards fifty two

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>and a half. It's fifty two and a half yards.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Four catches based off of his yards per reception gets

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 3>us there. But again, my big thesis I wish could

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 3>be about, you know, this crazy, big underlying thing that's

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 3>gone on, but here's what it really sits around. It

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>sets around this player that has been established for years

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and years and years, forty four touchdowns in the last

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>two years, hasn't had less than twelve hundred receiving yards

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 3>over the last four years, And we've had one week

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of messy, weird quarterback play that kind of screwed up.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>You have Tyler Huntley likely coming back in there. You

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>got to get Tyreek kill the ball. That's my thesis.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 3>It's a super low receiving yard prop. I'm smashing it

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 3>for the boys, and I'm taking it just to try

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>to hit home this by narrative of Tyreek Hill and

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 3>just a really great bet to cash. So fifty two

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and a half receiving yards, when do you think that

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>low number was out there for Tyreek Hill over the

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>last three years?

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 2>You can get this on one play, I mean exactly.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 2>And Tyler Huntley apparently is picking up the Dolphins offense.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Quote like riding a bike, So there you go, end quote.

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>So it depends on how good of a bike rider

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>you are.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, do we know finally knows how to ride a bike.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>That was not part of the article, but we can

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>only assume he does.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Here's a big show Tyler Huntly riding a bike. It's

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 4>him on wheel.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like trading will do on this. Ericson, No, no,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>We're not gonna be a.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Bat you you want to, No, No, I love it.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's be Tyreek kill everywhere in fantasy leagues too. Ericson,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about the Jets. I've already bet Brayln Allen

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>to score a touchdown a plus one ninety this week

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's all hands on deck in the backfield.

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 2>But you've got feelings about another RB with Garrett Wilson

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in a tough matchup. It seems like the running backs

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 2>are gona get used heavily. So let's talk about your

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Breece Hall in Week four.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I love Breese Hall the over on his receiving

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 4>yards twenty seven and a half. You look at the

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Broncos on defense, what have they done this season? They've

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 4>blitzed at the NFL's highest rate at forty five percent.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 4>So what does that mean, Aaron Rodgers, I'm not gonna

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 4>wait and get hit from these guys. I'm old. I

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 4>don't want that, So I'm gonna get the ball quick.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>And who's that going to be to the running backs

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 4>out of the backfield. So you look at Breese Hall.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 4>What he's done through three games. He's already been over

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 4>this number three straight games. So even though Braylen Allen

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 4>is getting more involved, they want to feature Breese Hall

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 4>still as the primary receiver out of the back. We

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 4>talked about Garrett Wilson gonna be matching up with Patrick

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 4>ten not a good matchup for him. So I think

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Breese Hall is going to be Aaron Rodgers go to

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 4>guy in this particular matchup. So that's why I love

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 4>the over and're receiving again another player that he can

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 4>get this on one play. Breese Hall is that explosive

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 4>out of the backfield and he's already done it. So

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 4>when you look at two how involved he is as

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a first red target per Fantasy Points data, Hall in's

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 4>the third highest first red target chair among running backs

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 4>at eighteen percent this season.

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to Welsh for your second pick

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>this week. Let's talk about DK Metcalf. Huge game here

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>for the Seahawks proving Now all right, here we go.

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>We've won three games. Defense has played really well, competition

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>has been below average. Now you're getting the Detroit Lions

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 2>on the road. I'm fascinated by this game. I do

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>think the Seahawks cover. But I was in yesterday's show

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>with trealand Ericson. I want to talk about DK Metcalf

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is actually like the Tyreek Hill one. It's

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 3>super fun. It's kind of my narrative play and I

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 3>have it bet on the Betting Pros app right now.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 3>This is my favorite one. It's like my absolute favorite

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 3>one is DK Metcalf. VP projections have him over this

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 3>number at sixty two and a half, which you can

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>find as the lowest number. Consensus number is sixty four

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>and a half, so this is going to fly around,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>but sixty two and a half on the receiving yards

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 3>is what we're playing with with DK Metcalf. He is

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>projected over this. I cross referenced it to PFF seventy

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>two point five on his projections and then some of

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the things to kind of sit with Lions giving up

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>the most passing yards in the NFL wide receivers. DK

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>is eleventh in air yards in the NFL sixteen in

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>air yard share, and the Betting Pros prop page when

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>you go and check out DK Metcalf shows that he

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 3>has hit this obviously in two of his last three games.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>But this is a really cool tool as well. They've

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>got the comparable tool which is kind of at the

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 3>bottom if you're looking on the website, and it'll show

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>you comparable wide receivers versus the defense. And guess what,

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>all three wide receivers in the comparable front that have

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>gone up against the Lions have crossed this prop. DK

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Metcalf has been a target monster, a big air guy.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 3>They do get Ken Walker back, it's looking like so

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>they can establish some run. But with this Lions offense,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>this has the makings of one of those shootout type

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 3>of situations. And Gino has been passing the crap out

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>of the ball. So I love DK Metcalf in this

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 3>situation with whatever comes with JSN. Tyler Lockett Like, I

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 3>don't want to say this on sixty two and a half,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>but I'll do it for a third time. He could

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>do this in one play. This is what DK Metcalf

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>does as well. So this is a big air yards guy.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 3>This is kind of a low ish number. Projections like it,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Betting pros likes it, and I like it all right.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I like it too.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Again, I love that you could see on the site too,

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the comparisons with the fantasy averages and where the defenses

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 2>have given up to I think telling me, I think

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Seattle actually overperforms. I don't know they're gona win this game,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 2>but I think they're going to overperform in it to

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>least people's expectations. Next up, Andrew Erickson. If you've been

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 2>fading the backfield of the Chicago Bears, well, you've been

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>making money this year, so it's week four. What do

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you want to do with the Bears backfield this week?

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 4>Fade the backfield, specifically with DeAndre Swift. We're going to

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 4>go under on his rushing yards thirty five and a half.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 4>This line has moves significantly since opening it to get

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 4>open a round forty three and a half. That's the

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 4>number I was able to get on early in the week.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 4>But like we learned last week about the Dwan Jennings,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 4>if you're right, it doesn't matter what the number is

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 4>going to be, because I'm going to be right about

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 4>DeAndre Swift. He's not getting anywhere near thirty five and

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 4>a half rushing yards because I don't even know if

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 4>he's the primary ball carrier anymore in the Bears back

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 4>But we've seen reports come out talking about how the

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Bears want to feature Roshan Johnson more in these upcoming matchups,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 4>and why not because last week he got Swift thirteen

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 4>carries for twenty yards. Again, he's been under thirty five

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 4>and a half rushing yards the first three weeks of

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 4>the season already, and that was when he was the

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 4>starting running back for the Chicago Bears. So I think

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.599
<v Speaker 4>that we could see him fall to third in the

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 4>pecking order. He's following in the footsteps of Miles Sanders

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 4>last year, where oh, I'm the highest paid running back

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 4>in free agency and then you lose your job to

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 4>one of the backups on the team. So again, as

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.599
<v Speaker 4>a Roshawn Johnson truther all off season, this is a

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 4>big moment for us. I don't know how effective he's

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 4>going to be, but we're not betting his rushing props.

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 4>We're just betting against DeAndre Swift. So again, it doesn't

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 4>matter what the matchup is because the Bears just can't

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 4>run the ball, and I think the Rams strengths quote

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 4>unquote strengths on defense are actually probably on their defensive

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 4>line rather than their secondary, which is absolutely atrocious. So

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm just going to fade Deander Swift into the sun.

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually, you know one thing too. We were talking earlier

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 3>in the week about the Ezekiel Elliott under rushing yard

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 3>number and how low it was and how scary it is.

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>But this is it.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 4>But this you're not playing, you don't get any yards.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of the thing. It's like this number has

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>been going down, has been going down for a reason.

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of scary because Swift is one of those

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 3>breakaway players, but he.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 4>Hasn't been breaking down.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>He's one.

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't think, hey, yeah, he hasn't been that guy anymore. Yeah,

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 4>so he can't. Unlike the three guys we talked about

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 4>before they can get on one play, Swift cannot. I

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 4>don't think Swift can do it on Wane to play anymore.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>By the way, last couple weeks for Zeke, and this

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>was the first of all good practice because we've been

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>talking about Rico Dawell in the Fantasy Pro channel for

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple of weeks. Now people drop them, go pick

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 2>him up. Hopefully listened. But Zeke, last couple weeks here

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.599
<v Speaker 2>we go against the Saints six for sixteen, against the

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Ravens three for six and then last night against the Giants,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>five for nineteen, so it's over, folks.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So he actually did get more than a FREEK one.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 4>He did have one nice first down run. I was like, oh,

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 4>there he goes.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>He had one against one everybody get it was against

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the Giants, by the way, and.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Then he ran into the big pot and came out

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 3>and was like five yards.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, let's get to the third pick here

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 2>that we have. Let's talk about Josh Allen right now,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of co front runner for MVP.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good narrative.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I'd be putting some money on it right now, especially

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 2>if he wins this game. Now, if he loses it,

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna see this kind of bounce back a little bit.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>But even if that happens, I still think that narrative

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 2>for Josh Allen is fascinating. It's Josh Allen and the

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.599
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo Pills. He's got this little supporting cast of characters.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just an ensemble, no stars. He's the only star.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And that, my friends, leads to a really good narrative.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But let's talk about the passing yards. The numbers two

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty and a half Welsh, what do you want to

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>do with it.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 3>I want to play it over of course I do.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Betting pro shows that Josh Allen has hit this two

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 3>of the last three games so far this year. The

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>projections are over two thirty, kind of across the board. Again,

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 3>I'll take VP projections and sometimes back them up. PFF

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 3>projections are pushing this as well, over two forty five

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 3>and more importantly, you know, like I talked about, and

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>this is like a fun narrative to play sometimes with

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the DK Metcalf one. As far as receivers go, the

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Lions giving up the most yards to wide receivers and

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a great play for DK Metcalf. The Ravens have

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 3>given up the most overall passing yards in the NFL

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 3>over nine hundred, so this is a great spot for

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen where you're not gonna really run the ball

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>a whole bunch. I mean, Cook has obviously been doing

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>his thing and Josh Allen can move, but the secondary

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>has been a disaster for them. So this is an

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 3>opportunity if Kean Colmenio shows up on time that maybe

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 3>he can have a few snaps that he can go

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 3>along Khalil Shakir. Just bang bang, bang, kinkaid it's a

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 3>pretty good spot. But either way, this is two thirty.

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 3>This is a low number that he's hitting two last

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>three weeks. This has shootout potential, close game potential, and

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen's gonna slang the ball. So I really love

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I'd love this one like one b to the DK

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 3>metcalf side. I took a passing prop last week and

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 3>Brock pretty smashed Cana. Kind of keep paying attention. This

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 3>is usually not my market too on like targeting and

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 3>honing in on a lot of quarterback passing props, but

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 3>we're finding some really good ones early on, and I

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 3>think this one is the best of the week as

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 3>far as like passing yards or touchdowns right now.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, he's getting the job done.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I love the comment too after the game the other

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>day where he's like, yeah, it's you know, nobody cares

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>about their stats, wink wink talking to you, Steffon. I mean,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if that wasn't like loud and clear.

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what was.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he was talking about Gave Davis.

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was must be. Gave Davis was the guy

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who was just Steve.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Gave Davis's team, So clearly gave Davis.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Was Ercks definitely way off on that one. Old Ericson

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>totally gave Davis all.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, undertaker, let's find an under for week four?

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Where do you have another running back that's, you know,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 4>we don't know how his job security is anymore, Rashad

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 4>White under thirty eight and a half rushing yards. Look,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 4>last week, we saw Bucky Irving take a much larger

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 4>role in this backfield, and the coach has noticed that

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 4>because we can't just keep putting Shod White out there

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 4>to average two yards per carry and say that's an

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 4>offensive success, right, So they're gonna lean on Bucky Irving

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Moore as a rusher. Rashad White still has a role

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 4>as a pass catcher in this Buccaneers offense. But I

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 4>just don't see scenario where Rashad White is ripping off

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 4>these massive runs against a really stout Philadelphia Eagles defense. Again,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't even really matter. Again, it's not really about

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 4>the matchup, honestly, it's just about how ineffective Rashad White

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 4>has been and he's not going to see enough volume

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>to get tim to thirty eight and a half rushing yards.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 4>He's been the starting running back for the Timp Bay

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Buccaneers the last three weeks, and he's been under thirty

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 4>eight and a half rushing yards the last three weeks.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 4>So now if you're taking away more volume from him,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't see a scenario where similar to Swift, I

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 4>don't think this guy's gonna beat me. So I'm gonna

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 4>take the under on Rashod White under three eight and

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 4>a half rushing yards. I feel good about betting on

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 4>these dusty, inefficient running backs so far after taking the

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 4>under on Zeke. So let's keep it rolling.

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I want to see an under parlay from you. Eric,

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 3>you give me, I'll Swift White and give me like

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>one more.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Give me.

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 4>You know I got the guy, got Swift White, Javante.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I'm gonna play that. That's gonna be like I.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Will put it.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're talking about the next one here, so is

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it Swift? It's Taylor and Javonte Williams. That's where we're going.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 4>There, Smift, be Swift, White and Javonte Williams.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all under the totals will all like not even

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>combine one hundred yards between three running backs. That's amazing,

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 3>all right, I'm gonna put that together.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 2>While I do that Welsh, why don't you talk about

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>another prop four week four here in the NFL and

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna go where the Patriots are?

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so they're not all sexy, Josh a sexy name.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 3>DK Metcalf was a sexy name. I'm gonna get into

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the mud a little bit because this one's gonna be gross.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 3>We're going with de Mario Douglass over receiving yards. And

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 3>it's even gross because this number moved a little bit.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I took it on Tuesday at thirty three and a

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 3>half and it moved down, So you know that could

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe put in some of the fear. But I'll tell

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 3>you I love this from so many factors. One of

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the things Ericson and I talked about last week. He

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 3>talked about it on the Fantasy Pro show we do

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>on the podcast side called Extra Point, where it was

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 3>like tomorrow, Douglas was complaining, wanted to get the ball.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>They got him the ball in that second series and

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>he ended up getting like whatever it was, six catches,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>So the complaining has worked out. But he's also hit this.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's six of his last ten games. I

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 3>left out my number here according to the betting pro

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>pages prop pages, but you guys will be able to

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>see it. He's projected over thirty six. But more importantly,

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 3>the Niners got exposed last week from two to two

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>at well out of the slot. And that's what I

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>think is going to happen here. You saw two to

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>going in motion moving out of the slot, and the

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers were just giving that up in that

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 3>middle of the field. Well, guess what they lost Hargrave,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>who is on that interior line. That's gonna equate the

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers to this matchup's a little bit weird,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 3>but like the Patriots are gonna try to smash the

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>ball in and that's gonna give someone to have to cheat,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 3>whether it's gonna be a linebacker or it's gonna be

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 3>like a Houfunga at safety. And that opens up that

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 3>middle of the field a little bit. And what happens

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 3>the slot receiver tomorrow? Douglas pop Douglas eighty three percent

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 3>out of the slot right now, I think he is

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 3>going to pull off another two to two at Well.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>They're not gonna get beat on the outside. They're not

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna get beat a whole bunch on the passing game.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 3>But down the middle, Pop Douglas gets his targets. It

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 3>was six or seven targets last week. We have a

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty two point five over receiving yard marker. Yes, because

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 3>that is the weakness of the forty nine ers. So

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 3>let's pick on them, ugly Pop Douglas thirty two point

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 3>five over receiving yards. Boy, I love it.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 2>It was my first bet of the week, all right now,

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 2>right now, you can't get the individual stuff I see

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers right now

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 2>because of all the stuff going on post weather issues

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 2>in Florida. But but I did put Javante and Swift

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>unders together and that'll get you plus two fifty two.

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So I can only assume here's one.

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Thing you could do. Just put someone else's under, like

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be like minus one fifteen. Just add one

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>more minus fifteen to it real quick, and tell us

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 3>what that number will be when it's ready, all right,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>when it's just anybody, just it doesn't even matter. Just

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>it'll be like a minus one fifteen.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The oven, baby in the oven, all right, rushing props here,

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>let's see, let's put an under here for Chase Brown.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>How about that?

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it doesn't matter.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Even Chase Brown, you.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Would never been the under. Okay, five sixty one.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's you're gonna get like five and a half

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to one to go under on all three of those.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm one exact person, same thing, five sixty one.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 3>There, it doesn't matter. That's why the number is gonna

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>look the same. Bettingpros dot com slash what is it

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Ericson or and it's last name.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, Ericson for him? Oh yeah for me, Welsh for you,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>go follow all of.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Those and look at this underprop as we are going

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to put it on there and tail with us and

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>gloriously live the punishment of under thirty yard rushers and

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 3>take the cash home and just be happy about it.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 2>It's wild, all right. Let's get to your next one here.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 2>It's an over, folks, so let's talk about it here.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Brian Thomas Junior. Look, I've taken a bunch of overs

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 2>on him this year already, and I've listened to you, Erickson,

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and I've made money on it because he is that

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>big splash guy and he's been able to do that.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Kenny do it again in week four?

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's done it for the three street weeks in

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 4>a row since he's been in the NFL. Over the

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 4>five and a half receiving yards. I like him to

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 4>go over again because when you're looking at Jacksonville, they're

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to kind of find their identity on offense. They're

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 4>owing three coming off obviously that the horrible game against

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 4>the Buffalo Bills. But you look at how you beat

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 4>the Houston Texans and how they've been attacked is actually

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 4>been downfield. They've given up a lot of big plays.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Back to that Vikings game, where was Sam Donald. It

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>wasn't dank and dunk, it was Sam Donald Aeriel assault

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 4>down the field against it's the Houston Texans. So Trevor

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence again, they are attacking aggressively downfield. It hasn't really

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 4>been working that great, but when their offense has been

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 4>actually functioning, basically the first half of that Miami game,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 4>it was downfield strikes to guys like Brian Thomas Junior.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 4>So I think again, going back to our basically our

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 4>mantra of the show, he can get it on one play.

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Brian Thomas Junior can get this on one play. And

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 4>also Gabe Davis is dealing with a shoulder injury as well.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 4>So while they're putting together this game plan, I think

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a lot of Brian Thomas Junior.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 4>So I like him to go over in this spot

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 4>in the Dome against the Texans, which could be I

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 4>think is going to be a sneaky shootout.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I like this while you were talking. I just bet

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>all three of those unders that we were talking about.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Follow us on betting pros, folks. All right, next one here.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>And final one.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to the touchdown calls, let's get to

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a little fun bet that Welsh's put together for everybody

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>out there. So Welsh, let's talk about your last of

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the props for week four.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a receptions prop. I actually ran this last

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 3>week and we didn't hit it. Unfortunate. We destroyed the

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Deontay Johnson one. He was three and a half, but

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 3>it was majorly juiced up. I paired it with Kelsey,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 3>good logic. He had four receptions, didn't get the fifth one,

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>so we didn't.

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey breakout this week. I'm calling it Welsh.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Then you can maybe you can put him a rear one.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Hundred receptions against the Chargers, eight touchdowns at his career.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>This is it is now or never, and it might

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 2>be never, but this is it, folks, This is it,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>especially with Derwin James out, with them having injuries everywhere.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>If this isn't the Kelsey breakout week and you're getting

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>great numbers on dfs, you get great numbers everywhere across

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the board on him, just just do it.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>If it fails, it fails, but then we know it's dover.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think if it's not this week, it's over good.

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it was like mineus, like one thirty five

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. Maybe you can put him together something.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>So I found two reception props that I love that

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 3>are massively juiced again. So we're gonna try to see

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 3>if we can play this out, and we are going

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 3>to get plus one fifty five on Greg Dortch two

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 3>and a half receptions over, paired with brock Bowers three

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 3>and a half or seven over. I thought we were

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 3>done with ever having brock Boers under four and a

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 3>half receptions. The books said no, no, no, after last week.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 3>So we're going to tell both of these these guys

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 3>have hit this reception prop each in two of their

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>last three weeks. We know there's some question marks with

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders right now as far as like even DeVante Adams.

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>But also this is the force of the offense and

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Brock Bowers and George is going up against Washington, the

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>worst secondary in the NFL. This is a great touchdown

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 3>play as well. Craig Dorsch safety net sure, Marvin Harrison

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 3>props are super fun. But do you ever bet on

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Greg Dortch and experienced a weekend two and a half

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 3>receptions for him, three and a half for Bowers, get

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 3>plus one fifty five. That's my fun reception parlay.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Of the week.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>There you go, ericson close us out strong. Let's go

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 2>back to the Ravens game against the Bills.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you have? Yeah?

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 4>I love this game for the game total over. So

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I expect points on both sides, and I expect the

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Ravens have to throw the ball more because they can't

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 4>throw the ball less because last week Lamar Jackson attempted

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 4>the fewest amount of pass attempts ever in a game

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 4>that he started and finished. So what you're seeing is

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 4>the Ravens receivers, their tight ends and guys like Zay Flowers,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 4>who I like the over four and a half receptions.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 4>Their numbers are are suppressed because of how little the

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Ravens threw the ball last week, So I'm trying to

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 4>take advantage of it in this completely different matchup where

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 4>I think the Bills are gonna be putting up points.

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I think the Ravens are going to have to be

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 4>forced to throw a lot more. In through three weeks,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Save Flowers has been the clear cut target chair leader

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 4>in this Ravens offense. So again we have question marks

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 4>about which tight end will get involved. Who's gonna run routes?

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 4>We don't know, but I do know that Zay Flowers

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 4>is the number one target. They're going to force feed

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 4>him touches in this particular matchup. When you look at

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 4>the Bills, what are they best at limiting big plays?

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 4>It's why Jacksonville was so undermanned against them, because that's

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Jacksonville's trying to do, is generate big plays. Say Flowers

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 4>is the underneath guy. Zay Flowers is the bubble screen guy,

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 4>so I think that he's going to get peppered. I

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 4>don't know what the yardage will look like, but I

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 4>would be very surprised if he didn't catch at least

0:23:58.359 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 4>six or seven balls in a shootout?

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I agree.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Derrick Henry and Zay Flowers those are the

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 2>two things you can control.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 3>And I do want to be Mark Andrews.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 4>No one wants to bet Mark Andrews here.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Well me, I mean, the numbers are probably so low

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 2>right now, I don't even know if you can really

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 2>is it an even tenable at this point?

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Is this the week just go back all on tight ends?

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 4>Is this week for the tight end week that they

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 4>come because there's.

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Too many injuries?

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Like, you know, you still got McBride out still playing

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 2>at least maybe. I mean, look, I think you go

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 2>back in on Kelsey this week.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:31.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean I kind of like Andrews too.

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I kind of like the under on Andrews. I think,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 3>what does matter all of it? Anything?

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me look on BP touchdowns and let's see

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that Andrews number.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 4>First. Look, I'm pretty sure his receptions was like two

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and a half.

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 3>He'll have more, you'll have more pancake blocks than receptions.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh thirty one and a half receiving yards under, Yeah,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I tend to go to the under and anytime touchdowns

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 2>plus you know you should do you should bet the

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>anytime touchdown a plus two seventy and then just bet

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the under on the arts like he has that one

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 2>catch for a touchdown and everybody doesn't know what to

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>think that that sounds.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Very right now.

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Is like that family guy meme where the guy walks in,

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 3>he's like, I would like to bet on a sport

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 3>and he gives him the money and he's like, would

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>you like to bet on I'm good and he just

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 3>leaves and yes, to lose the money. That'sunds good to it.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to the touchdown calls for week

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 2>four and don't forget everybody. The touchdown Score Report at

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>bettingpros dot com slash touchdown is available and if you're

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>looking for an edge in the touchdown bets, it's a

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 2>great tool to be using, so go ahead check that out.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>We like to use it as well. Here the three

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 2>of us our Touchdown Score Report. It compares anytime touchdown

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>stats to prop bets and odds and projections to help

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 2>identify the best of the best when it comes to

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 2>any time touchdown bets. It Head over to bettingpros dot

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 2>com slash touchdown right now for the latest touchdown prop

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>analysis today Welsh start.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Us off here.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say this one feels a little risky to me.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I know where your head's at that I don't know,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>man sell me on Keenan Allen.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's yeah.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, last week I also gave you guys a plus

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 3>two thirty receiving touch in Juwan Jennings, so I'm sure

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 3>to get back to you.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Look, man, the Jew, I remember last week when you

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>were it felt like with Juwan Jennings you were like,

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 2>oh man, it went from thirty eight to forty.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys both said that.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 3>It's just you know what it is. All it is

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 3>is like getting a sexy line and then it moving.

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you I'll give you an example.

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Real you've cleared it by one hundred and thirty.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know Ericson knew this. I got the

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 3>most ridiculous prop earlier this week. I got Carson Steel

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Rushing Yards at twenty two and a half. It opened up,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 3>they immediately took it down, and then two days went

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 3>by and they boosted it back up. What did it

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 3>open at forty and a half. That's actually not a

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 3>bad number either, But it's like that value line of

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 3>difference makes you just a little bit queasy. I'd still

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 3>probably take Carson Steel like Juwan Jennings numbers.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 4>This week yet because nobody knows a lot of these

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 4>guys are questionable, I think, but.

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>They're not doing there's no reception prop on him. But

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 3>it was forty eight and a half or forty seven

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 3>and a half on the receiving.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 4>For Juwan Jennings.

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, let's get over I'm not going with Juwan Jennings.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with Keenan Allen. You're saying it's risky obviously,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 3>just because he hasn't been out there one hundred percent,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 3>but that one game that he did play, he was

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 3>targeted both times, two times in the red zone. Now,

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Caleb's kind of a little bit of a disaster. DJ

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Moore is not their red zone guy. A Dunes that

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 3>could be, but guess what he's banged up. Caleb loved

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Keenan Allen, and Keenan Allen got those red zone targets,

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 3>so if they get into the red zone, you can

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 3>get Keenan Allen at almost three to one this week

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>two eighty five from a red zone to games played

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 3>perspective it's one of the highest in Keenan Allen because

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 3>he played one game and he got two red zone targets.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he will get it again. You'll get that touchdown.

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>It almost three to one. That Do you want me

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>to do my other one too?

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's let's run them all out there.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's go the other one that I'm doing. I'm going

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 3>with the Dolphins. I'm not going with Tyreek Hill. Devon

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 3>h Chan. You don't see a ton of good plus

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 3>money Devon a Chian anytime. Touchdowns. It's plus one fifty

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>this week. And I actually like it from the recis

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 3>side because the Titans currently have given up three receiving

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns to running backs and that's the most in the NFL.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 3>No one has given up more receiving touchdowns to RVs.

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 3>So I like that for mister Devon a Chan, whether

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 3>it's rushing or on that receiving side, because that's where

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna play. Plus one fifty eight Chan plus two

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 3>eighty five Keenan all And those are my two touchdown calls.

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Ericson, give me some tds for Week four.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Going with Naji Harris plus one twenty five because I'm

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 4>a slave to regression. Najia Harris leads the NFL in

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 4>red zone carries, has not scored a touchdown. The Colts

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 4>leave the NFL and most rushing yards allowed. They have

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 4>allowed one rushing touchdown. The numbers are they're converging here, people,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 4>the regression is converging here. So Naja Harris, I think

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 4>he's gonnacore muliple touchdowns in this game. So give me

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 4>him plus one twenty five to these score once and

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 4>then my other one, my long shot special of the

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 4>week touchdowns. I may have found my next Donald Parum

0:28:55.400 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 4>potentially with this guy. Oh Eric call Eric Cincinnati Bengals

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 4>rookie tight end too like. He's been heavily involved the

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 4>last two weeks. He has eight targets, eight receptions, super efficient.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Joe Burrow likes this guy. Every broadcast I've listened to

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 4>for the Bengals last two weeks, they don't stop talking

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 4>about Eric all Like, the Bengals absolutely love this guy,

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 4>and he's played a lot the last two weeks. Mike

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Coseki snaps are still they're they're not super high, So

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I think we could see Eric will have a bigger

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 4>role to play in the Carolina Panthers. No team has

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 4>allowed more touchdowns to tight ends this year than the

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Carolina Panthers. That the only team's actually allowed more than

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 4>one touchdown to a tight end this season, because no

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 4>tight ends are scoring any touchdowns. So also, eric All

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 4>has a big role in the red zone. You look

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 4>at the amount of red zone snaps that the Bengals

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 4>have had the last two weeks. He's played on fifty

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 4>percent of those snaps inside the ten yard line and

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 4>no team has thrown the ball more inside the twenty

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 4>yard line than Joe Burrow in the Bengals. So I

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 4>think they're gonna score, They're gonna have opportunities to score,

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 4>and I think eric All is going to find his

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 4>way into the end zone this week. It'd be a

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 4>top twelve tight end fantasy because, well, if you score

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown, you're going to be a you.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Know, if you're an all time sicko. I just did it.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 3>You could take both Ericson and I's long shot Keenan

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Allen and eric All anytime touchdowns twenty five to one.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Right now. Wow, eric All's number wasn't as good on

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the book that I just used, by the way, it

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 3>was plus five point fifty, but twenty five to one.

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You know my long shot.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I didn't put it in this week because I think

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Addison might be back, and if so, it might muddy

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the waters. But but Jalen Naylor has been terrific. I mean,

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 2>he's been a touchdown machine for the Vikings, and considering

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Alexander and Jeffers aren't going to match up, I would

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>imagine that Nail would be looked at again in the

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 2>red zone. So he's plus four seventy. But if you're

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 2>looking for something a little safer, let's talk about Justin Fields.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the Pittsburgh Steelers here

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>where Andrew Erickson was. Now for me, Justin Fields just

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 2>continues to get more and more confident every week. That

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Indiapolis Colts defense is trash, it's terrible, it's no good.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Plus one sixty it's a great number. It's better than

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 2>an Naji Harris number. So give me Justin Fields. That's

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>who I want to score this week. I've gotten a

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of DFS lineups two because if he scores a touchdown,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 2>throws a touchdown, it's gonna be a really productive Fantasy day.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 2>And he rushes for I think I have him the

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>over in the rushing yards as well. I think he's

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 2>guys gonna run a UK, especially because nause is not

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent, So it does worry me. Just to Ted,

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Terry mclaurin's my other one at plus one ninety. You

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>saw the breakout performance from Jaydon Daniels. We are now comfortable.

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>We are now confident. I predicted it would happen, just

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>in a different game script. It wouldn't necessarily the Washington

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Commanders from ahead throwing the football with reckless a band,

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and I thought it would come after they were behind. No, no, no,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>even better, even more of a reason to be confident

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 2>as they travel to Arizona and play a game with

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 2>one of the highest totals of the week. So give

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 2>me Terry McLaurin plus one ninety justin feels plus one sixty,

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and of course drop your comments below. What's your favorite

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 2>touchdown call of the week? Call a TD for me

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 2>right here on the channel. Don't forget to subscribe to

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the Betting Pros YouTube channel, Ring the Belt that it

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>goes ding, and again, give us your comments, call your touchdowns,

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 2>your favorite props? What do you like, what do you hate,

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Just make sure you don't hate.

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Us because we're so sensitive. Please don't know. It's fine.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 2>You can do whatever you want in the comments. But again,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>we're just happy you're here and hanging out with us.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget to subscribe to Betting Pros too. Wherever

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts as well. We appreciate you being

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 2>with us. We see the numbers grow every single week.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 2>It's because of all you hanging out watching the shows,

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>listen to the shows, and we love that. Go join

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>our discord too, fantasyroxchieving almost fancy Pros. This is what

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>happens when you work too many places. Bettingpros dot Com,

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>slash Chat. I mean it's the same, it'll take you

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>to the same spot, but still Bettingpros dot Com slast chat.

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Hang out with us there to Matt Parralt doing an

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>amazing job there, our host of the Daily Juice, getting

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and interacting with everybody for college football, for NFL, for everything.

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So be part of our Betting Pros community because we

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 2>want to win with you.

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 2>But the story of the game goes on for the

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Welsh and the Undertaker. Andrew ericson I'm Joey P. We'll

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>see you next time. Kids, enjoy Week four.

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 5>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 5>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 5>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Instagram at betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 5>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.