WEBVTT - Stocks Rise Before Trump Speech

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits, each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. This week we get J. Powell,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chair of the Federal Reserve, speaking on Wednesday and

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Thursday testifying I should say, but that comes after today's

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>speech by President Trump at the Economic Club of New York, which,

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>according to our own Michael McKee may dictate what J.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Powell will talk about. Here to join us, to give

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>us some insight from the dept market perspective is our

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>own Ira Jersey. He is chief US interestrate strategist for

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Ira, how do you think J. Powell

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>could potentially respond to something that President Trump says today? Hey, well,

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on what he says. I suppose

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's talking about trade aid um, you know, won't

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>be much different than what Chair Powell said before, which

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>is you know that trade is is something that they

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>look at for what's going to be the direction of

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the economy and and therefore what they have to do

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>as far as monetary policy goes. UM. If you know

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>he talks about if if President Trump talks about, you know,

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>reducing the Fed's independence and you know, and and basically

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>reiterating some of his his tweets, then you know, I

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think Chair Powell will want to reiterating again something that

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he said at almost every press conference during his tenure,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's that you know, the FED is is independent

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and that the FED will do what it needs to do.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That Congress gave them the the authority to conduct monetary

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>policy as the Committee sees fit and um, and they're

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not political. Um. You know, obviously what he hears, I

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think is going to give him some odditatave. But he

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>has to say those types of non political you know,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're non political organization and say things like that. So

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I at LEASA and I had this morning. We're talking

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about that Bank of America, a fund manager, a survey

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that came out and it's a you know, surprising I

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think to me at least quite optimistic in terms of

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the view of the markets in the economy. Do you

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 1>think the FED views the world that way or they

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have maybe a higher level of caution. I think that

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be a little bit more risk averse.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's been one of the features of the

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve since the end of the h since the

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. Really it's that, you know, let's use caution first,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because we don't have a lot of ammunition. We're not

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to have to do some more extraordinary

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>measures in terms of monetary policy easing. So let's make

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that the economy is on stable footing before we

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>um before we hike interest rates meaningfully. So so I

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think at this environment, yeah, I agree with that kind

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of sentiment you just mentioned, Paul, is that I think

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED is a little bit more skeptical than maybe

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>um that maybe some market participants are at the moment.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's going on with a lot of

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>market participants is it's not that things are particularly good,

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it's that things aren't as bad as a feared. And

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's kind of the environment where you

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>can have equities, you know, at or near highs, and

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and interest rates, you know, creeping a little bit higher.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>How much is this Europe actually doing a little bit

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>better than it had been, Oh, quite a lot, I think.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think at least that that's a very good point,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because you know, Europe, Europe has really kind of been,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>um uh been a big big issue I think for

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>developed markets in in in general, and the fact that

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're basically exporting a lot of deflation and disinflationary

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of impulses to the rest of the world has

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>been an issue. So the fact that you might have

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>some stabilization and some of their their survey measures, their

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing seems to be lower. You're now getting some fiscal

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>policy out of France, for example, that might actually help

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>their economy a little bit. So when you get this incrementally,

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of good news on the economic front,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's going to lift yields, you know, you know, you know,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 1>look at German tenure yields. They're still negative and there's

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>still you know, negative twenty five basis points, but they're

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>significantly off their loads of negative seventy basis points, right,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's a that's a pretty subsential move. I mean,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's as big a move in uh in German and yields,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>as you've seen in US yields over the past couple

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. I want to talk about a a research

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>note you put out this morning. I thought it was

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. It talks about treasury auctions and actually how

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they occur. My understanding when I was back on the

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>street was the dealers, treasury dealers on the street bought

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the US bonds and notes when they came out at auction.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Has that changed or how has that changed? Yeah? So,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so prior to the crisis, you know, dealers bought a

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>bulk of of debt and then wound up reselling it

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to UH to other investors. So you know, dealers didn't

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.559
<v Speaker 1>necessarily hold a lot of their debt. They just wind

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>up having to buy it auction. So since the crisis,

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that shifted quite a lot. And actually, investment funds tend

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to participate in treasury auctions much more than they used to.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know, if we're just looking at tenure

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>treasuries for example, investment funds take between fifty and six

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of most treasure of most ten year treasury auctions. These days,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>dealers take the next most which is only about and

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>then um and and then direct bidder so these people

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>who uh so foreigners say, uh, they only take about

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. So so there's this idea I think in

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the world that even though um uh, even though foreign

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>holders of treasuries are still very large and about treasury

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>debt right now is held by them, um, really auctions

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are being driven more by domestic investment funds. So these

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>are you know, pension funds, annuities, uh, mutual funds and

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and the like. So it's really, you know, domestic investors

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>really have a lot of um demand for for U

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>S treasuries. Um. Just going back to the Bank of

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>America Marylynch Fund Managers Survey, another notable sort of shift

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that we saw was the expectation for yield curve steepening.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And right now I'm looking at the gap between tenure

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and two year treasury yields reaching the highest since to

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>lie nearly towards the highs of the year, just in

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds here, Ira, do you expect this to

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>continue or do you think that the consensus has gotten

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of itself. Well, I think we's only eight basis

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>points was the high of the year back in June,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think you break that and and we'll keep

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on steepening a little bit. That's not that far of

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a call, right, yeah, exactually yeah exactly so. UM, but

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if you if you break above that, then I do

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think you can reach thirty five and kind of new

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>new highs. I think the reason for this is just

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea that, um, that the economy is not as

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>bad as it was, and the Federal Reserve is not

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be hiking monetary policy anytime soon, so you're

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>able to see the yield curve. Stepen just a little

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more from here our Jersey, Thank you so much.

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Ira is the chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Joining us on the phone. In a little bit more

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>than an hour, President Trump taking the podium at the

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Economic Club of New York, expected to talk about the

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>US economy and how well it's doing. He'll also potentially

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>answer questions about China trade. Then tomorrow J Powell testifying,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be taking that live. You can listen to it.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But all of this uh coming at a tenuous time,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty about whether the economy is about

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to take off or whether perhaps people are over their

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>skis joining us now, Kevin Cummings. He is economist at

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>net West Markets Securities, So, Kevin Cummins, I'd love to

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>get your perspective on this sentiment shift that we've seen,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>which is somewhat dramatic now people being much more bullish

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>rather than bearish. What data have we gotten to actually

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>edify that view. Yeah, well, there's certainly good morning first off,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but there's certainly optimism growing over a reduction and uncertainty

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>should the U. S. And China sign some sort of

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>phase one trade agreement. UM. In our own view here

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in UTS markets were a little bit reluctant to kind

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of uh think that everything's going to turn out all

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of positive in two thousand and twenty if there is

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort of agreement reached UM, which seems that it's

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>things seem to be moving in that direction, and perhaps

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market could potentially be UM if if

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump this afternoon uh does talk a little bit more

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hawk is shot on the outlook there, then UM markets

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially could disappoint here. But UM, you know, as far

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as UM the overall economy, I think you know the

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.479
<v Speaker 1>data themselves that have been better obviously was the employment

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>report at the start of the month. Um, you know,

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the thousand jobs that were announced. There's nothing to necessarily

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>write home about, but there were some positive signs of

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the trend is rising at a better pace than what

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was initially anticipated because it was a big upward revision

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to the prior months, and some of the other data

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>within the report were fairly positive. So, Kevin, are you

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of the opinion that it's really really just talking about

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the consumer here in this economy? We know the consumer economy,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like the other thirty percent is is

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty weak, maybe even manufacturing recession. Is the consumer strong

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>enough to keep this economy growing? Yeah, I mean, consumers

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>spending certainly has been driving the growth in the economy lately.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and as you mentioned, manufacturing, which is pretty much

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at the epicenter of the UH the trade war. Obviously,

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen business investment and exports slow down as well,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's not only confined to the manufacturing sector. But

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the consumer, as you mentioned, correctly, UH is

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely leading the charge with growth. But I think it's

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious that the economy is in a slowing phase.

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, at the start of the year where

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a three percent and the last couple of quarters we've

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>been around two percent UM, which seems like a reasonable

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>estimate for the fourth quarter as well. We don't have

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>too much data that go directly into adding up g

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>DP just yet, but later this week we will get

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, which, um, you know, allow us to get

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>some sense of least UH spending heading into the all

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>important holiday shopping season. A lot of people, including President Trump,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be increasingly conflating the performance of equity markets

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with the US economy. Uh. And I guess you know,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>even if we do have a slowing US economy, can

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that support new record highs on the SMP. Yeah. Well,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a little bit out of my purview,

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not necessarily an equity strategy, but I do

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think that the equity market is a good, um at

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>least um indicator of how things are currently UM. So

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a coincident indicator. There's very little economic

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>data that actually do that good of a forward looking

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>gauge about growth, But I do think the equity market

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously is a very important one. So I definitely don't

0:10:54.920 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>want to dismiss the positive tone in the equity market, uh,

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with regard to you know, the future growth in the

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>US economy. UM, but I do think that some of

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the earlier strength we've seen in the consumer is probably exaggerated.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And and uh, you know, even just last week, the

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>your guys measure the Bloomberg Consumer Comfort and the index

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fell to a seven month low. So you know, it

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is only one week's worth of data, but I do

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think we're at UM. You know, we are starting to

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>see a downshift in in consumer spending, which kind of

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is aligns with the slowdown that we've seen in peril growth.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Now at the top, we did mention that the employment

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>report was very strong, UM, and all the upward visions

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to earlier months were positive. But I do think we're

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>starting to see some cracks in the consumer um. Not

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>only consumer comfort index with the Bloomberg number coming down,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>but auto sales for October fell over three and a

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>half percent or just about three and a half percent UM,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>which is likely to hold back over all retail sales

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on for day. UM. You know, these data are clearly

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't weak enough for the FED to reconsider any recent

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>signal on rates, But in our view, the data don't

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily support the high degree of confidence that the Fed

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>um and what Powell is likely to emphasize tomorrow. UM

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>with regard to the consumer and the outlook, Kevin Hell,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what's your view of the European economy. Some people are

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that perhaps it's kind of bottoming out. Do you

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>share that you? Um, Well, the data there with regard

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to like the purchasing managers surveys have been um, definitely

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>less weak than they were. I mean, they were collapsing

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and they at least showed signs of

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>stability there. Um. And obviously economies like Germany is is

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>really getting bearing a lot of the bront from the

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>China trade war, so you know, they are much more

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>open and exposed to global situations than the US uh

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is directly, so you know, I focus more on the US,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but we've we've seen less weakness. I think they're relative

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to the earlier really significant downward aumentum that we saw earlier.

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Cummins, thank you so much for being with us.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Cummins, economist with nat West Markets Securities. Today is

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a big day for the Walt Disney Company. They launched

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus, their streaming service that is slated to go

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>head to head with Netflix. Stock US up one point

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent today to walk us through kind of what

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it means for the company. We welcome Githa Rungan often

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>she is senior media annalys for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. So, Keith, this is a big day

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>for Disney. Tell us kind of what their strategy is

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>here with Disney Plus. Yeah. So absolutely, Paulso there's been

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excitement and anticipation building up for this service,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>which will really be the core of Disney's uh director

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer strategy. Um. So, they've been really building for this

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>service for many many years now, acquiring the technology and

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>then really making that transformative acquisition with Fox just to

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>get that extensive catalog of content. But really this is uh,

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is going to be the core of

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the company I think for for for the foreseeable future.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Management has staked especially Bob Iger, has kind of staked

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>his legacy on this on on the success of this product.

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So it is a make or break attempt by Disney

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to reposition the company for growth. I love how it's

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>being assessed right now. The rollout, yes, there were technical

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>glitches and crashes for some users, but social media people

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>seem to like it. Uh, you know how do we

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>decide whether this was successful or not. So I think

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>first day launch issues are typical in streaming. I mean,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they did expect this. They had a test pilot whi

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>uh they carried out in the Netherlands a few weeks ago. Um.

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Disney management said last week at the earnings called that

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.239
<v Speaker 1>that pilot actually was pretty successful. The glitches are scattered.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it resolves itself in the course of the

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>next few hours or by the end of the day. Um.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They did actually put a tweet out just a few

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago saying that consumer demand has exceeded expectations. Uh.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And so at that point, yeah, absolutely positive. And um,

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>come on, do we expect anything other than that. This

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is from Disney, right were they're gonna put a tweet

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>up being like, guys, guys, where are you? I don't

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>know why you're not signing up faster? I mean, there

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>were some Um, so there were some reports yesterday which

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just just to kind of give you a sense of

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the demand out there. So there were some reports suggesting

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that they were almost more than two million pre orders.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But really, I mean, I think Disney's secret weapon here

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>will be it's it's marketing advantage. Right. They have millions

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and millions of touch points across the company, spanning their channels,

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their parks, their cruises, their their hotels, retail stores, so

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's an area that they're really going to have

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>significant advantage. So Keita talked to us about the financials here,

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the economics of this business. It's not a cheap business.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We see the you know, Netflix spending a good jillion

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars every year on programming. What's how's Disney they do it? Yeah,

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really the same story for Disney as well. Um.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The only I guess the main difference there is they

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>own a lot of their library content. So at launch

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they have five hundred films, seven thousand, five hundred uh

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes TV episodes. They own all of that. Of course,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to cost them because they are putting

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>originals on their service as well. So they at launch

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>they have ten originals. By the fifth year, they're going

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to have almost sixty of those originals, and just with

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the cost of the originals, uh, as well as the

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>last licensing revenue, they're gonna lose probably anywhere from about

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>two to two and a half billion over the next

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>few years. In each of the next few years, So

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the service is not going to be profitable till at

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>least fourth. Do you have cable, I do? Yeah, what

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what what would it take for you to cut the cord?

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So so I think the thing that's really keeping me

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>glued to to cable right now, like everybody else, is sports.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Um you know your um, well I have lots of them.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, but but you know, just just sports in general.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what's keeping people really glued to

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to to to their bundle right now. This this Disney

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>plus thing. One could argue that maybe Disney and all

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these other folks are are late to the game. Um.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of competition in the streaming business.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Talked to us about the competitive landscape. Yeah, I think that,

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, most people are really kind of expecting more

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of this two horse race between Netflix and Disney. Um.

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We do have some of the other services as well.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, CBS, for instance, has the all access in

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the showtime service. But I think a lot of those

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are are going to really see tremendous competitive pressure. I

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think when all is said and done, over the next

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>three to four years, we're really going to see Netflix, Um,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of consolidate its position, and Disney with its three

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>services at Disney plus, Hulu and UM and ESPN plus

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>have at least over well over a hundred million subscribers

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Get the wrong enough and thank

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Well. The first major cold snap for

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Northeast is coming this week. That usually gets the

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>attention of energy traders to get a sense of what's

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>going on in the global energy markets. We welcome our

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>good friends Stephen Short uh Short Group President Stephen, thanks

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us so give us a sense

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of just kind of what we're seeing in the natural

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>gas and maybe even other energy spaces as we get

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this cold blast of air coming across the U S. Well.

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely in the natural gas market, which we are we

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are and continue to be in a structural long term

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bear market. We've had a significant rally over the last

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. This was created by in the oversold condition.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>That is to say, speculators on Wall Street had greatly

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>oversold this market when we UH judge their risk ratio

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>relative to the CFTC data. So you juxtapose that oversouled

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>condition with the first major blast of cold air, and

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that was quickly priced into the futures markets. So we've

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>had a significant rally in the gas market leading up

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>into the close of last week. We just got the

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>new CFTC data out on this past Friday. The bears

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>have been squeezed out of the market. The risk ratio

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>is lower, so this the the bullish short squeeze in

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the market is now over. So you take that short

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>squeeze out of the market. And yes, we're getting hit

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>with the cold right now, but keep in mind these

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are futures markets, so we're looking at, okay, what is

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the next shoot a drop. And although we're seeing very

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>cold or about to see very cold attempts in some

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>key gas fuel market areas over the next week, the

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>forecast beyond one week out is much more moderate. So

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>we had a significant sell off or a correction, that

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is to say, in the oil markets to start off

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. Got it. And so in other words, it

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like unless there's another cold spat uh, you think

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>that probably things are going to go down or flat

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>from here for that gas, absolutely, Lisa, I think we're

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>sending up to the same scenario we saw last winter.

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Last winter when you you got some cold in in

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the forecast you got some cold winter, we saw a

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty cent rally in the market. You take that cold

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the market, then we saw correction and we

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>yow yowed all of last winter. And it wasn't until

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we got into the spring of last UH last year

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>when the floor from underneath the market fell out and

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>natural gas prices crashed. We're now going into the peak

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>demand season, So yes, this is going to be a

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>market that lives and dies with the weather forecast. All right,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's natural gas. Let's turn to crude, and I've

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been seeing a number of stories about how shale producers

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>are planning to reduce their spending next year UH, planning

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a cut production. Further, we're hearing some about even the

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>deep water drillers planning to potentially do the same. Do

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you think that this will change the dynamic with respect

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to what people had been talking about the oversupply within crude. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is is far too focused on demand.

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>That is to say about the ongoing offgoing talks with

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>China and the tariffs. No one's really the narrative really

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been on to supply, and I think that will

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>change in the new year. Lisa. As we go in

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and we look at for instance, uh rid counts, red

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>counts are now at two plus year lows. But the

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>problem there is we're much more efficient, We're better at

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>producing with less, so we're still getting oil onto the market.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The biggest, biggest concern for this market in twenties twenty

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>is the in some odd forty billion dollars of debts

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that is now coming due in the oil patch. Remember

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>oil prices crashed at the end of Wall Street allowed

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the shell patch to kick the can down the road

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>five years out with increased in the revolvers and their

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>credit lines. Wall Street is no longer willing to do that.

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street wants to see the money. So you've got

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty billion dollars there and about coming

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>do over the next two years twenty twenty throw two.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're about to see, or we are on the

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>customer see a major contraction in the industry. That is

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, you're going to see a lot of small

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>producers with a lot of debt on their books about

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be gobbled up. And there's are only going to

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be producers with good acreage are gonna be gobbled up

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>with the big guys with clean balance sheets. So we've

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>got a little energy I p O deal coming down

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the pike, Saudi Aramco. So how does the market the

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>energy markets, do you think? How did they perceive Saudi Aramco? Uh?

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Saudia ramcoes ten years too late with

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this I p O. You have every major Western oil company,

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not even oil companies. They've rebranded themselves their natural

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>gas companies, their power companies, their energy companies. They've taken

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the word oil out because clearly out to the future

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>growth of oil the demand decay is there. The most

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>optimistic UH forecast but by another researcher says demand decay

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or demand um what will peak in and and then

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>what will will get to be pulled back? I'm not

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as optimistic. I think the genie is out of the bottle.

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So with regard to that two trillion dollar valuation for

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>for the small piece of that pie, A Ramco is

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>willing or the the Saudis are willing to give up,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not hopeful. I'm that given about the

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>whole structural change in the market away from an oil

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>based a ectomy to at least a natural gas based

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>economy in some other alternative fuel if certain presidential candidates

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>have their way twelve months Hence, all right, Stephen, just

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we are looking ahead right now, looking at crew traded

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>on the IMAX fifty six dollars and sixty seven dollars,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty fifty six dollars, seventies cents. I'm just wondering what

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you think it's going to be next year, what's the

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>peak and the right right now, I think we're in

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that area where oil peaking in that low sixty two

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>mid six dollar range. Once once we roll into the

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>spring and we get ready for next summer, we demand

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>peaks in We're we're we're pretty much I think in

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that range. And this is non mix w T. I.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about right now where oil is fifty fifty

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>six dollars a barrel. For the industry to remain healthy,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>oil cannot go any lower than where we are right now.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So in a healthy oil economy or market, we're looking

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at oil in that mid fifty to mid sixty dollar range.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Through of course, if we see anything any pullback below

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that mid fifty to low fifty dollar range, that is

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a telltale of severe economic contraction. It's something to keep

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. But I'm not that concerned with regard

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to the quote unquote the R word, the recession word.

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're headed there. So I think oil

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in that in the market area, in the area where

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we are now in the NOMEX mid to low fifties,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but not much higher than than the high sixties, going

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>volts are relatively stable markets when we look in the aggregate.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Short of the Short group, thank you so much

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>PENL podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney and Lisa bramwo It's

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa bramw wits one before the podcast,

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio