Speaker 1: My friends at my Pillow. My buddy Michael Lindell told
Speaker 1: me he was coming out with a brand new product.
Speaker 1: It's called the New Mattress Topper. So I got the
Speaker 1: new Mattress Topper immediately and I've been sleeping on it
Speaker 1: now for a couple of months. It's the best thing
Speaker 1: you've ever felt in your life. Now you literally have
Speaker 1: my pillow foam for support. It's a transitional foam that
Speaker 1: helps relieve pressure points. And it's ultrasoft patented temperature regulating
Speaker 1: cover and I gotta tell you has a ten year warranty,
Speaker 1: a cover that's washable and driable. It's made in the USA,
Speaker 1: back by the sixty day unconditional money back guarantee. Once
Speaker 1: you try this new mattress topper, you put it right
Speaker 1: over your mattress, you will never sleep better. And right now,
Speaker 1: you my radio listeners, you're gonna save thirty percent off
Speaker 1: when you go to my pillow dot Com and use
Speaker 1: the promo code topper. And by the way, Mike will
Speaker 1: also give you two standard my pillows absolutely free. All right,
Speaker 1: So try my pillow dot Com promo code topper promo
Speaker 1: code topper for this great deal and the best night's
Speaker 1: sleep you ever had. All right, glad you with us.
Speaker 1: Buckle up. We've got an incredible show today, and everything
Speaker 1: we have been saying about the new radical, extreme democratic
Speaker 1: Socialist Party is now even in writing. On top of
Speaker 1: everything that we have already known, we'll also get to
Speaker 1: the issue of the Democrats all across the country. They're
Speaker 1: in a bit of the dilemma as it relates to
Speaker 1: how they treated Justice Kavanaugh on the mess that is
Speaker 1: the Commonwealth of Virginia. Will hit that hard in the
Speaker 1: course of the program today. A lot of Hollywood now
Speaker 1: they're now beginning to think people like, oh, let's see
Speaker 1: Ted Danson, Joyless, Bihar, Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, and some
Speaker 1: others as it relates to the blackfaced controversy in Virginia.
Speaker 1: A lot of them now a little bit worried about that.
Speaker 1: But we begin with everything. Democrats have always believed what
Speaker 1: they envisioned for the country and have been frankly too
Speaker 1: afraid to lay out because deep down they know that
Speaker 1: this will be rejected outright by the American people, just
Speaker 1: like they lied about Obamacare. That's a recent example. You've
Speaker 1: everyone listening to my voice knows you're lied to. You
Speaker 1: keep you a doctor, you keep your plan, and you
Speaker 1: save money. Okay, millions lost their doctors, millions lost the
Speaker 1: plans they liked, and everybody's paying a lot more money,
Speaker 1: in some cases three hundred percent plus more money. But
Speaker 1: every you know, we had one hundred percent increases in
Speaker 1: states throughout the years since it has been implemented. And
Speaker 1: then they won't know arguing its attacks when they said
Speaker 1: it's not attacks. And then the Supreme Court John Roberts
Speaker 1: absolutely blew it on that decision on every level. And
Speaker 1: rumor is that he was on the right side of it,
Speaker 1: but as Chief Justice he was he was afraid the
Speaker 1: Court might be perceived as political. How about just follow
Speaker 1: the constitution. So we have the big rollout today of
Speaker 1: what is a Congresswoman Alexandria Acasio Cortez is Green New
Speaker 1: Deal bill and the nuts and bolts of the New
Speaker 1: Green Deal Bill. Well, let me just put it this way.
Speaker 1: We're just gonna go back into, you know, a whole
Speaker 1: other century. You know, it's like the Great Leap Forward
Speaker 1: dressed up in green camouflage. Somebody said to me today,
Speaker 1: I said, oh, yeah, that was clever. But understand what
Speaker 1: this is Green Energy Deal. It will and I'm gonna
Speaker 1: explain it to you why it will destroy America and
Speaker 1: America's economy as we know it. And there is literally
Speaker 1: will turn back the clock on all of the progress
Speaker 1: that we have made, all the technological advancement that has
Speaker 1: bettered our lives, to the days where ninety percent of
Speaker 1: this country we're living on family farms. That's that's how
Speaker 1: far back we're going to go. And you have a
Speaker 1: scario because she's trying to scare us in twelve years
Speaker 1: the world is going to end. Actually wants to eliminate
Speaker 1: air travel. Airplanes are major polluters, you know, say goodbye
Speaker 1: to the twenty first century. Get ready enough to live,
Speaker 1: you know, like centuries gone by. And so this legislation
Speaker 1: has rolled out today. Let me just go over some
Speaker 1: of this with you, and it is when you get
Speaker 1: to the nuts and bolts. They want a resolution called
Speaker 1: the Green New Deal, a plan to mobilize every aspect
Speaker 1: of American society, they claim, at a scale not seen
Speaker 1: since World War Two. They want to net zero greenhouse
Speaker 1: gas emissions in ten years, they claim, like all good
Speaker 1: socialists and communists gone by. They claim it's going to
Speaker 1: provide everything, just like Obamacare made promises that never ever
Speaker 1: ever came to fruition. You know, we're told that we're
Speaker 1: going to have the best schools, when once we tax
Speaker 1: you into oblivion, we spend more money per capita for child,
Speaker 1: per school with the worse results. Government run schools are horrible,
Speaker 1: so most people, but you're stuck paying for them. And
Speaker 1: if you're lucky enough to make a little extra money
Speaker 1: that you can send your kid to a private school,
Speaker 1: people almost, you know, almost overwhelmingly choose to do it.
Speaker 1: Doesn't mean there are on some good public school systems.
Speaker 1: There are, but there are many that are just atrocious,
Speaker 1: like New York City. I mean, even people accused of abuse.
Speaker 1: They get paid, but they don't even work, and they
Speaker 1: keep them on the sidelines when they should be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: So in ten years all renewable, clean, and renewable energy only,
Speaker 1: we will be off of all fossil fuels in ten years.
Speaker 1: What is so infuriating about it is the timing of this,
Speaker 1: because since Donald Trump became president, since he ended all
Speaker 1: the burdensome regulation on the energy industry, since he had
Speaker 1: proved of the keystone in North Dakota pipelines and has
Speaker 1: rightly opened up an war for drilling. We have now
Speaker 1: become the number one energy producer in the entire world,
Speaker 1: surpassing even Saudi Arabia and Russia. Well, that's great because
Speaker 1: it creates millions of high paying career jobs for Americans. Also,
Speaker 1: it's great for our national security. We're not dependent on
Speaker 1: countries that hate our guts for the lifeblood of our economy.
Speaker 1: They make all sorts of promises Acasio Cortez and ed
Speaker 1: Murky and they're calling it. They're gonna build off FDR's
Speaker 1: Second Bill of Rights by guaranteeing a job for every
Speaker 1: American at a family sustaining wage. They're going to offer
Speaker 1: medical leave, vacations, and retirement security. They are going to
Speaker 1: now take even though our current school system is failing,
Speaker 1: they're not going to improve it. They're gonna have high
Speaker 1: quality education, including all higher education and trade schools. Now
Speaker 1: the government's going to pay for that. Clean air and
Speaker 1: water and access to nature. I think when we walk outside,
Speaker 1: we're accessing nature. What are we gonna do knock down
Speaker 1: buildings in New York and put up more parks. We're
Speaker 1: gonna have healthy food. You know, God help us, I
Speaker 1: don't know what that means. Whatever they have, pan baby,
Speaker 1: we'll be eating in all these health food nuts like
Speaker 1: Linda drinking these disgusting green shakes or this disgusting my
Speaker 1: healthy diet. Okay, everything you show me, I'm like, oh,
Speaker 1: who could eat that? You know what I ate today?
Speaker 1: What I ate? A Sherry's cherry. That's healthy. It's a strawberry. No,
Speaker 1: it's a Sherry's cherry. Sherry's berries now has Sherry's cherries
Speaker 1: are really good? Well, you love their strawberries? Like them.
Speaker 1: So they're offering safe, affordable, adequate housing. They're guaranteeing it
Speaker 1: for every American. They're guaranteeing an environment, economic environment, free
Speaker 1: of monopolies. They are guaranteeing this is my favorite, almost
Speaker 1: economic security for all, even those unable or unwilling to work.
Speaker 1: Who wants to work? I bother. I'm getting the same
Speaker 1: thing as everybody else. Cradle to grave, womb to the tomb, prosperity. Oh,
Speaker 1: the same thing that happened in Q. But the same
Speaker 1: system that has brought in poverty there, the same system
Speaker 1: that has destroyed Venezuela, even with their vast energy resources.
Speaker 1: You know, what they're talking about, and they're calling it
Speaker 1: an investment, you know, but yeah, but they actually says
Speaker 1: one hundred percent clean, one hundred percent renewable, one hundred
Speaker 1: percent where weaned off fossil fuels in ten years. Now
Speaker 1: she claims that the country dies in twelve years, the
Speaker 1: world is over. And she set a goal of net
Speaker 1: zero rather than zero missions in ten years because we're
Speaker 1: not sure that we'll be able to fully get rid
Speaker 1: of quote farting cows and their plane's that fast. But
Speaker 1: the plan is to get rid of the airplane. Okay. Now,
Speaker 1: later they talk about high speed trains. We're got to
Speaker 1: create a high speed train to Europe. Are we gonna
Speaker 1: create a high speed train to to Singapore? Where I
Speaker 1: was in the air twenty four almost twenty four hours
Speaker 1: in the air to fly to Singapore? And that did
Speaker 1: you mean Singapore? Yea, Singapore, that's where you say is
Speaker 1: and we're in Singapore. I'm going to Singapore. You're going
Speaker 1: to Singapore. It looks like now you're going to Vietnam.
Speaker 1: All right, so Vietnam say it again? You creep? Yeah, um,
Speaker 1: good morning Vietnam. What time it'll be Probably it's actually
Speaker 1: the same No, it's the same time differences us. So yeah,
Speaker 1: it'll be a' doing the show live in Vietnam at
Speaker 1: three am. Okaytas anyway, you can't even use nuclear power.
Speaker 1: That's not included in the deal. Um, we got carbon
Speaker 1: taxes there of course, say we're not ruling out out.
Speaker 1: That means a carbon tax. That means they're gonna bring
Speaker 1: back you know, cap and trade. But the most thing,
Speaker 1: here's the question they asked, frequently asked questions, how are
Speaker 1: you going to pay for this? Well, their answer is, well,
Speaker 1: you know the two thousand and eight bank bail out
Speaker 1: of extended quantitative yeasing programs, and the same way we
Speaker 1: paid for World War two and all other current wars.
Speaker 1: And the Federal Reserve can just extend credit to power
Speaker 1: those projects and investments and new public banks that can
Speaker 1: be created. And at the end of the day they
Speaker 1: put it in this document, this is an investment, you know,
Speaker 1: to grow our economy. So the question isn't how well
Speaker 1: pay for it? Yeah, the questions how you're gonna pay
Speaker 1: for this? It's impossible. It looked The United States of
Speaker 1: America was built on the concept of liberty and freedom.
Speaker 1: You know, the word education is from the Latin derivative
Speaker 1: at ducree to bring forth from within, which means we're born,
Speaker 1: that God has given us. And it's hard. You can't
Speaker 1: say it in the public school, but we're endowed by
Speaker 1: our creator. But God has breathed. The Bible actually says
Speaker 1: something cool about this. Bible says that I knew you
Speaker 1: before you're even made, meaning in his mind. It's a
Speaker 1: very deep thing. Every hair your head is counted. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I digress. This country was founded on the idea that
Speaker 1: the potential, God given potential of every human soul. That
Speaker 1: if you water that soul and you give it sunlight
Speaker 1: and you treat it well, that whatever it is that
Speaker 1: they're learning is coming forth from within. That means God
Speaker 1: gave them talent. And with the talent came the ingenuity
Speaker 1: of the American entrepreneur, where they would risk there and
Speaker 1: create goods and services and risk building businesses and creating
Speaker 1: things that people want, need and desire. Contractors build homes,
Speaker 1: Plumbers do plumbing, Electricians do electricians, and lawyers are needed
Speaker 1: because you need lawyers, but doctors and their innovations that
Speaker 1: they can cut into our brains and remove tumors and
Speaker 1: save our lives, or you know, if you're going to
Speaker 1: be paralyzed, they can prevent something from horrible from happening,
Speaker 1: and they can fix our bones, and you know, cure
Speaker 1: some of the cancers, and again and again. And they're
Speaker 1: even saying even if every billionaire they say company came
Speaker 1: together willing to pour all their resources and disposal into
Speaker 1: this investment, the aggregate value of the investments they could
Speaker 1: make would be not sufficient. So the reason we have now,
Speaker 1: we've created a system where every American can strive to
Speaker 1: buy a house, can create whatever talents they have within
Speaker 1: the goods and services that people want, need and desire.
Speaker 1: Not the idea that you get everything guaranteed healthcare, school, education.
Speaker 1: You're housing everything guaranteed in this deal. And then no
Speaker 1: airplanes and soon no cars unless you drive. There will
Speaker 1: be all in little box cars that are horrible. And
Speaker 1: it is not what has created wealth in America. When
Speaker 1: I was really poor, I mean two hundred bucks in
Speaker 1: my bank account for a longer time in my adult
Speaker 1: life than I care to admit, I didn't have money
Speaker 1: for any extras. I bought two hundred dollar cars and
Speaker 1: they worked, and I fixed myself. You know, I paid rent,
Speaker 1: and I worked in an apartment and also worked for
Speaker 1: my landlord. And I struggled, and I fought and clawed,
Speaker 1: and you know, jumped a lot and took a lot
Speaker 1: of risks and chances. That's what all of us do.
Speaker 1: That whole system under this plan is going to be eviscerated.
Speaker 1: It will be like every other socialist experiment ever tried, communism,
Speaker 1: to each according to the need, from each according to
Speaker 1: their ability. It will all the promises, all the promises
Speaker 1: that you'll have no worries fears in your life. Your
Speaker 1: government will handle it all. You will sacrifice every freedom
Speaker 1: you have been born with. If every principle that has
Speaker 1: been successful, that has created a nation, a wealth that
Speaker 1: is the envy of the world. Goodbye, it's over, hey, guys.
Speaker 1: Today marks the seven day countdown until Valentine's Day. And
Speaker 1: I know a lot of you guys have already ordered
Speaker 1: that special someone a gorgeous bouquet from our friends at
Speaker 1: one eight hundred flowers dot com. But for the rest
Speaker 1: of you, you've gotta stop putting it off, because right
Speaker 1: now you'll get eighteen beautiful red roses just twenty nine
Speaker 1: ninety nine or upgrade to twenty four red roses only
Speaker 1: ten bucks more. That's right, eighteen red roses twenty nine
Speaker 1: ninety nine. Upgrade to twenty four red roses ten bucks more.
Speaker 1: An amazing deal. Now roses from one eight hundred Flowers
Speaker 1: always picked at their peak, shipped overnight to ensure freshness.
Speaker 1: Bouquet prices are going to be going up soon. Take
Speaker 1: advantage today, pick your delivery date. Let one eight hundred
Speaker 1: flowers handle all the rest again. To order eighteen beautiful
Speaker 1: red roses for twenty nine ninety nine, or upgrade to
Speaker 1: twenty four red roses for just ten bucks more. Just
Speaker 1: go to one eight hundred flowers dot com slash Hannity
Speaker 1: one eight hundred flowers dot com slash Hannity Hurry. Offer
Speaker 1: expires Friday. I have been saying on this program for well,
Speaker 1: I've been on radio thirty years, for decades. Energy energy, energy,
Speaker 1: We have more energy, oil, natural gas, clean coal. We've
Speaker 1: got it, and for the first time a president opened
Speaker 1: it up. And now we are the biggest energy producer
Speaker 1: natural gas, oil in the entire world and net exporter
Speaker 1: of energy. And we're just beginning to touch the surface.
Speaker 1: It's gonna get bigger and bigger. Remember drivers in North
Speaker 1: Dakota during the boom that was going on there that
Speaker 1: I believe the Saudi's artificially lowered the prices to run
Speaker 1: them out of business. That's a different story. But drivers
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollar a year jobs that they will train
Speaker 1: you for. And it just expands out from there, and
Speaker 1: we're on the verge of all of the economic growth
Speaker 1: and wealth and prosperity right there in front of us.
Speaker 1: It'll change the trajectory of every Americans' lives in a
Speaker 1: positive way, where people can buy homes and houses and
Speaker 1: cars and afford a better education than the vacations we have.
Speaker 1: And now in ten years we're gonna get rid of
Speaker 1: the lifeboot of our economy and airplanes to boot. How
Speaker 1: do we get to Vietnam? And we're gonna have to walk.
Speaker 1: We'll continue one thing that is not political, it's smoking.
Speaker 1: That's about people. And there are thirty four million Americans
Speaker 1: now that's smoke. But for many there's not been a
Speaker 1: clear alternative. Jewel For me has been a game changer.
Speaker 1: I watched people all the time, they go outside in
Speaker 1: the middle of the freezing winner just to have their smoke.
Speaker 1: You don't have to do that anymore because of Jewel.
Speaker 1: Now people don't have to worry about the smell on
Speaker 1: your hands. Jewel was specifically designed by smokers, forced smokers
Speaker 1: to be a satisfying alternative. It's a clean technology. Jewel
Speaker 1: has no ash, no odor, no mess. If you're one
Speaker 1: of those thirty four million adults who do smoke, you
Speaker 1: now know there's an alternative to cigarettes and cigars. Just
Speaker 1: go to Jewel, Juul dot com slash switch America. That's
Speaker 1: Juul dot com slash switch America. Now, this product does
Speaker 1: contain nicotine, and nicotine is an addictive chemical. But just
Speaker 1: go to Jewel, Juul dot com slash switch America. All right,
Speaker 1: twenty five until the top of the hour. We have
Speaker 1: a lot more news to get into as it relates
Speaker 1: to what's happening in Virginia, the double standard of Democrats
Speaker 1: as it relates to their lieutenant governor facing serious sexual
Speaker 1: assault charges. Now they got the attorney general third in
Speaker 1: line to a place the current governor. Uh, he's got
Speaker 1: a problem with blackface, as does apparently a lot of
Speaker 1: people in Hollywood, like Oh Joyless, Behar, Ted Danson, Jimmy Kimmel,
Speaker 1: Jimmy fallon and others will get to that. So what
Speaker 1: she has here, Acasio Cortez markis and this new Green
Speaker 1: deal for America. Now even Nancy Pelosi is rejecting this.
Speaker 1: And I, as I said before, Nancy Pelosi is scared
Speaker 1: to death of Acasio Cortes. Now why is she scared
Speaker 1: to death? The Acacio Quartez and the radical as radical
Speaker 1: as she is, and she's radical? You think about it
Speaker 1: this there is at least some sense of what the
Speaker 1: American people would ever tolerate here or what you know,
Speaker 1: what the what the American people know what works? Um,
Speaker 1: let me just quick family story. All four of my
Speaker 1: grandparents come from Ireland. And when I took that ancestry
Speaker 1: testing one hundred percent British Isles and there was support.
Speaker 1: They were surprised because that usually doesn't happen. But I
Speaker 1: knew all four of my grandparents, and I have the
Speaker 1: papers from Ellis Island. They came in when they came
Speaker 1: in legally, etc. But they came here. They had no
Speaker 1: money ten bucks maybe one at fifteen, and they lived
Speaker 1: a very poor life in the some of the worst
Speaker 1: conditions Irish Catholic need not apply. Was there's a lot
Speaker 1: of prejudice against Irish Catholics at the time in Boston
Speaker 1: and New York, but they somehow overcame. They lived in very, very,
Speaker 1: very poor conditions. My poor dad grew up very poor
Speaker 1: in bed sty as mom died a couple of months
Speaker 1: complications from giving birth to him. His dad, my grandfather,
Speaker 1: just was working all the time, so we had different
Speaker 1: people taking care of him at all different times, but
Speaker 1: no money. My mother growing up in the South Bronx
Speaker 1: and New York that my maternal grandfather worked as ass
Speaker 1: off and like every other you all have the same story.
Speaker 1: This is not unique in any way. This is the
Speaker 1: Americ quintessential Americans dream. They weren't guaranteed any of the
Speaker 1: things that Acasio cortez Is and the Democratic Radical Extreme
Speaker 1: Socialist Party are now promising. And you've got to ask yourself.
Speaker 1: It's always appealing to take away all of your insecurities
Speaker 1: and fear in life, but when does it ever? When
Speaker 1: do these promises ever get fulfilled? They don't. That's the problem.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get all the platitudes, all the talking points,
Speaker 1: all the bumper stickers, and you're never gonna get the
Speaker 1: results because it's not sustainable. Just like Kamala Harris when
Speaker 1: you she talks about eliminating all private healthcare insurance Medicare
Speaker 1: for all. Okay, one hundred and seven seven million Americans
Speaker 1: wiped out of their own insurance. Obamacare is the most
Speaker 1: recent example of a government their promises versus what they said.
Speaker 1: His talking points, his platitudes is bumper sticker, keep your doctor,
Speaker 1: keep your plan, save less. None of those promises were fulfilled.
Speaker 1: It has become an unmitigated disaster. John Roberts, thank you
Speaker 1: very much for that one. And it is. But that
Speaker 1: is the history the promise of socialism. It takes away
Speaker 1: all of your fear, all of your insecurities in life.
Speaker 1: And you're guaranteed a job, you're guaranteed family, medical leave,
Speaker 1: your guaranteed vacation, you're guaranteed retirement, you're guaranteed safe, affordable housing,
Speaker 1: you're guaranteed healthcare. You're guaranteed education way beyond high school
Speaker 1: or if you want to go to a trade school
Speaker 1: or a college, that's guaranteed. And all of this is
Speaker 1: guaranteed for everybody who's either willing or are unwilling to work.
Speaker 1: Oh what happens to freedom in this equation? Where's the
Speaker 1: incentive if, as the Democrats are proposing, if they're gonna
Speaker 1: steal seventy percent of your income, why bother? Who's gonna bother?
Speaker 1: The risk, the reward, the blood, the sweat, the tears
Speaker 1: that goes along with building a business providing goods and
Speaker 1: services the people want, need, and desire. You know, it
Speaker 1: was a big deal that my father post World War Two,
Speaker 1: he signed up, served four years in the Pacific, and
Speaker 1: when he could buy a thirteen thousand dollars cape Cod
Speaker 1: house on a fifty by one hundred lot, which I
Speaker 1: grew up in all of my life, you know, with
Speaker 1: one bathroom and three older sisters, kind of described it
Speaker 1: as hell on Earth. I'm kidding, of course, but you
Speaker 1: know that was a big deal, and the hope was
Speaker 1: that his children and we all stand on the shoulders
Speaker 1: of our parents and grandparents and the sacrifices they made
Speaker 1: for us. The look, I've been a housing project, so
Speaker 1: I had to remember. It was in Atlanta, tech Wood Holmes,
Speaker 1: the first housing project ever built, Peppermill another home. I
Speaker 1: went to a housing project. I was covering a story
Speaker 1: when I was down reporting on it in Atlanta as
Speaker 1: a talk show host, and I went down there. Horrible story.
Speaker 1: A young girl died because a cockroach lodged in her head.
Speaker 1: And I went there, and I went into one of
Speaker 1: the units. The place was infested with roaches. It was disgusting,
Speaker 1: beyond imagination. There's your government. That was government subsidized, the
Speaker 1: government supported housing. Young girl died. And I look at
Speaker 1: and I've been too many poor, poor, poor places in
Speaker 1: my life, and in America, even the poorest TVs usually
Speaker 1: big screens, computers, phones, food in the refrigerator, refrigerator, freezer.
Speaker 1: You look at some of these socialist countries, they don't
Speaker 1: even have that. And you know, I was lucky when
Speaker 1: I had no money. I could buy a two hundred
Speaker 1: dollars former Providence gas company van that once ran on
Speaker 1: natural gas. They converted it back to gasoline. Cost me
Speaker 1: two hundred bucks. Best best investment I ever made. That
Speaker 1: thing ran best. I barely had to fix the thing
Speaker 1: about a three hundred fifty dollars Ford Maverick nineteen seventy one.
Speaker 1: Talked the guy down from four hundred, spent a lot
Speaker 1: of time fixing that. Used to fix it myself, work
Speaker 1: with a bunch of guys I've rented a barn that
Speaker 1: was empty from my landlord. Me and a bunch of guys.
Speaker 1: We'd go in there fixed cars, paint cars. I wasn't
Speaker 1: good at it, but they would always help me and
Speaker 1: do the brakes, tune and all that stuff. My point is, okay,
Speaker 1: I still had a TV, refrigerator, freezer in the stove,
Speaker 1: and air conditioning and heat. You know, it was an
Speaker 1: adequate apartment. Lived in that per into my thirties. For
Speaker 1: crying out loud, nothing great, nothing ostentatious. It's unbelievable. Don't
Speaker 1: worry how to pay for it. It's not about how
Speaker 1: we're gonna pay for it. It will destroy this plan
Speaker 1: by this new radical extreme Democratic party will destroy the
Speaker 1: American dream. Kamala Harris's Medicare for all, eliminate private insurance,
Speaker 1: will destroy healthcare. The energy energy industry, which is the
Speaker 1: hope for the greatest prosperity growth we've ever had, will
Speaker 1: be destroyed when the government takes that over. Just warning you,
Speaker 1: this is your this is the party. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm mad, every y'all, says Acasio Cortez, wiping tears, vowing
Speaker 1: to defund ice great both to say that an agency
Speaker 1: like ICE which repeatedly and systematically violates human rights, does
Speaker 1: not deserve a dime that They do not deserve a
Speaker 1: dime until they can prove that they are honoring human rights,
Speaker 1: until they can make a good faith effort to expand
Speaker 1: and embrace immigrants. They do not deserve any resources for
Speaker 1: their radical agenda. I don't have time. Air travel stops
Speaker 1: becoming necessary under this new Green Deal. Eliminate nuclear energy,
Speaker 1: eliminate all fossil fuels, the path to the greatest prosperity
Speaker 1: boom we've ever had as a country. Basically banning cars
Speaker 1: as we know them. You know, we rebuild every building
Speaker 1: in America? What rebuild every building in America? Eliminate air travel,
Speaker 1: free education, they're gonna tell you what your great diet's
Speaker 1: gonna be, free house, free money. What are they gonna
Speaker 1: ban meat too, because cows and their gas emissions. It's
Speaker 1: a disaster. All right, let me move on. We got
Speaker 1: an update out of the Commonwealth of Virginia. You know
Speaker 1: what's amazing about this is I want to just play
Speaker 1: just the presidential hopefuls and maybe Emmy Klobuchar was having
Speaker 1: trouble now already, or Kamala Harris Corey Booker did criticize
Speaker 1: the lieutenant the lieutenant governor in Virginia over this serious
Speaker 1: charge of sexual assault. Let's just listen to what they
Speaker 1: said during the Kavanaugh hearings. Since we call this press conference,
Speaker 1: other relicate allegations have come forward. We joined, I joined
Speaker 1: a leader Schumer and call you for Judge Kavanaugh to
Speaker 1: withdraw his name from consideration Virginia resolve there there issues
Speaker 1: that they have there. It's sad because they have some
Speaker 1: very talented leaders there, but they have to have the
Speaker 1: confidence of the electorate, and they have to have the
Speaker 1: confidence of the legislature that they have to work with.
Speaker 1: But I'll leave that up to them. I have enough
Speaker 1: to do here without at I don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about Cortez. I'm enough to do here. I don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about what's happening in Virginia either. By the way,
Speaker 1: think of this healthcare for all things and eliminate all
Speaker 1: all private insurance um and then this simultaneous pushed for
Speaker 1: infanticide by six states won't stop it. In the US
Speaker 1: Senate Democrats stopped it from protecting a child that's born.
Speaker 1: Good grief, that is that one of the cost effective
Speaker 1: ideas that they coming up with. Who knows how could
Speaker 1: anyone support that? Anyway, Let's get to the Democrat presidential
Speaker 1: hopefuls as it were relates to the Kavanaugh I'll let Jason,
Speaker 1: who is running the board, pick the best cuts. Feinstein, Schumer,
Speaker 1: Lahey Derby. Let's listen in she came forward publicly despite
Speaker 1: knowing she would face harsh public scrutiny, threats, relentless invasions
Speaker 1: of privacy, that her life would be forever altered. We've
Speaker 1: heard a lot about the effect on Judge Kavanaugh, which
Speaker 1: is real and not exaggerated, but the effect on her
Speaker 1: as well, and what she had to submit to by
Speaker 1: coming forward and making that courageous testimony. You don't know,
Speaker 1: and I don't know what they are investigating. I just
Speaker 1: have a real concern whether they can do a thorough
Speaker 1: investigation regarding his veracity. Whatever the truth may be. We
Speaker 1: need a full We need a full investigation to give
Speaker 1: members of the Senate the information they need to make
Speaker 1: a fair decision on mister Cavanaugh. New York some centers,
Speaker 1: do you believe? Thinking it all right? You get my point.
Speaker 1: We saw what happened in those hearings. We saw what
Speaker 1: they did to Judge Cavanaugh a family. There's been virtual
Speaker 1: silence from all these same people they bludgeon Judge Kavanaugh. Well,
Speaker 1: some of the most ridiculous notions. Almost every other weekend,
Speaker 1: that they would spike the punch, teenage girls would drink it,
Speaker 1: they'd pass out, they'd light up on the hall, and
Speaker 1: the teenage boys would rape the teenage girls. Happened every
Speaker 1: almost every week on no due process, no presumption of innisters.
Speaker 1: We found out now that Congressman Bobby Scott he knew
Speaker 1: about these assault allegations against Lieutenant Governor Fairfax over a
Speaker 1: year ago. Democratic you know, all the calls for resignation
Speaker 1: gone away after the black face allegations, and now the
Speaker 1: lieutenant governor obviously he can't take the spot, and the
Speaker 1: Attorney general next in line blackface issue. That would mean
Speaker 1: the Republican Speaker of the House of what do they
Speaker 1: call it, the House of Commons would take over. Booker
Speaker 1: is the only one that said anything about it. The
Speaker 1: rest of the presidential hopells nothing. Now, the lieutenant governor
Speaker 1: hired Brett Kavanaugh's law firm, the woman hired Professor Ford's attorney.
Speaker 1: You know, then you have the other issue. There's a
Speaker 1: poll out today eighty percent of Democrats say it's absolutely
Speaker 1: unacceptable for white people to dress up in black face.
Speaker 1: Bad news is their party leadership is clearly ignoring them.
Speaker 1: And what we found is, oh Joy Behar and ABC
Speaker 1: and the Women of the View were silent today after
Speaker 1: an old photo of Joy Behar service of her in
Speaker 1: black face. Then we have the same issue that emerged
Speaker 1: for Jimmy Fallon dressing as Chris Rock in black face,
Speaker 1: and Jimmy Kimmel dressing basically in a basketball uniform and
Speaker 1: not just black face but a black you know body
Speaker 1: and also wants doing Oprah Winfrey. Here's how what he
Speaker 1: said wasn't dressed like car Malone, But the biggest celebrity
Speaker 1: of all ain't none other than the mailman hisself, Carmelone
Speaker 1: calmal Old born is summer for the o Louisiana. Now
Speaker 1: this is what they called by you country on there
Speaker 1: because when they start raining and flood come in, you
Speaker 1: got to buy you a new rug now nickname. Now
Speaker 1: here's the question game. We saw what happened to Megan
Speaker 1: Kelly for raising the question about a Halloween costume she
Speaker 1: never dressed in blackface that I know. What about everyone
Speaker 1: that uh NBC that did? What about ABC? What are
Speaker 1: they gonna do about Beyhart? What are they gonna do
Speaker 1: about Fallon? What are they gonna do about Kimmel? By
Speaker 1: the way, I don't support Boycott's. I don't support firings.
Speaker 1: I don't I mean call for fires. That's up to
Speaker 1: them that that tactic is used to silence conservatives. Let
Speaker 1: the people decide what they want to watch. In here,
Speaker 1: this is Phil Robertson, and today in stores you'll find
Speaker 1: my book, The Theft of America's Soul, blowing the lid
Speaker 1: off the lives that are destroying our country. The book
Speaker 1: points out, while America is being robbed, there are ten
Speaker 1: lies the devil has attempted to use to destroy America's soul.
Speaker 1: Putting God back in our country is the key. The
Speaker 1: Theft of America's Soul offers ten truths that a acted
Speaker 1: on will put God back into culture and turn the
Speaker 1: country around. And you'll find it everywhere books are sold.
Speaker 1: Right now. It to Sean Hannity Show. Gladuate with us
Speaker 1: right down our toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. I know with
Speaker 1: everything going on with Virginia, the radicalization of the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: and everything else that's going on, we cannot ignore what
Speaker 1: is a unbelievable development as it relates to the deep State.
Speaker 1: So we start this hour with Hannity, Deep State Watch
Speaker 1: and our friends. Solomon wrote a column yesterday that ought
Speaker 1: to scare the living daylights out of everybody, because a
Speaker 1: lot of what we have discussed is the biggest abuse
Speaker 1: of power corruption scandal in American history. Now, remember a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago, John Solomon broke the story that
Speaker 1: Bruce Orr told everybody, everybody, all the upper echelon and
Speaker 1: the FBI and the DOJ, that the Hillary bought and
Speaker 1: paid for Russian dossier, that number one, Hillary paid for
Speaker 1: it all with the DNC, that she was running number two,
Speaker 1: that Christopher Steele, who used the funnel money through Perkins
Speaker 1: Coupee to Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele, the foreign national, hated
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, and that Christopher Steele used dubious well sources
Speaker 1: in Russia. And that none of the dossier was verified
Speaker 1: or corroborated at all. Now that here's the timeline, This
Speaker 1: is August of twenty sixteen. Then we learned by October
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. Well, they never verified it, they never corroborated
Speaker 1: it met Most of it now has been debunked, like
Speaker 1: Cooker's urinating in a bed in the rich Carlton and
Speaker 1: Moscow and Donald Trump's room. But yet it became as
Speaker 1: the new nez and grassy grandmamos suggest the bulk of
Speaker 1: information in the FISA warrant application against Carter Page, a
Speaker 1: Trump campaign associate. Okay, that would be a conspiracy to
Speaker 1: commit fraud against a FISA court. And remember they purposely
Speaker 1: omitted very key information that Hillary paid for it. They
Speaker 1: knew she paid for it, they knew it was her campaign.
Speaker 1: They didn't tell the FISA court judges in the application
Speaker 1: that with a little note saying might have a slight
Speaker 1: you know, political tinge to this, they never verified, never corroborate. Okay. Now,
Speaker 1: all those people that signed off on that FISA warrant
Speaker 1: are testifying to that court that to the best of
Speaker 1: their knowledge, everything presented is accurate, true, and right on
Speaker 1: the money. They purposely did not present it that way. Now,
Speaker 1: even the deputy FBI director at the time, had McCabe,
Speaker 1: had said, well, without the dossier, we don't get the
Speaker 1: FISA warrant. Now, at some point we're going to hear
Speaker 1: from these FISA judges. Here's where it gets interesting in
Speaker 1: John Solomon's new column yesterday, and that is we find
Speaker 1: out headline is Robert Muller himself was hauled before the
Speaker 1: secret FISA court to address FISA abuses in two thousand
Speaker 1: and two, according to Congress, and that for the most
Speaker 1: of the sixteen years, Mueller's closed door, you know, encounter
Speaker 1: here at escape public notice. John Solomon joins us now
Speaker 1: to talk about this. Why don't we start with the
Speaker 1: latest developments. How many times when Robert Muller got called
Speaker 1: in before the nation's intelligence court to address these instances
Speaker 1: of the FBI withholding exculpatory evidence and cheating on these
Speaker 1: surveillance warrant applications. How many instances did that occur? Yeah,
Speaker 1: the court record showed Sean that it was seventy at
Speaker 1: least seventy five times. There were seventy five different faces
Speaker 1: that had what were known as material omissions, the very
Speaker 1: same sin we're talking about in the Russia fight against
Speaker 1: Carter Page in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, FBI agents intentionally
Speaker 1: willfully leaving information out that was incredibly relevant to the judges,
Speaker 1: usually going towards the possibility that the people they wanted
Speaker 1: to investigate or target were innocent. Exculpatory information is how
Speaker 1: it's referred to. So we know that now because of
Speaker 1: this new revelation that the FBI had a pattern in
Speaker 1: practice in the past of doing this, of cheating, of
Speaker 1: miss using the fight abuses, that some of those occurred
Speaker 1: or had to be rectified, at least on Bob Mueller's
Speaker 1: watch when he was the FBI director. Now he's a
Speaker 1: special counsel in this case. But I was this resolved
Speaker 1: when because what you're really describing here, if you withhold
Speaker 1: exculpatory evidence, what you're really describing is committing a fraud
Speaker 1: on the court. Yeah, well, probably not as much punishment
Speaker 1: as you and I or regular Americans would expect. Right.
Speaker 1: You would think maybe some FBI agents got fired or
Speaker 1: reprimanded a pre dawn raid of your computers with let's
Speaker 1: say twenty seven agents, guns drawn, swat gear, and tactical vehicles,
Speaker 1: amphibious vehicles in your backyard. Yeah, it didn't happen. Now,
Speaker 1: one agent was banned from testifying before the court forever.
Speaker 1: But that was really the outcome. Now, what Director Mueller
Speaker 1: did do, and what he got credit for doing, was
Speaker 1: he went to the court and said, Yep, we have
Speaker 1: some problems here. I understand why you're upset. I'm putting
Speaker 1: in these new procedures to make sure that this doesn't happen.
Speaker 1: Those are known as the Woods procedures. It was those
Speaker 1: very procedures that Pete struck sixteen years later, when he's
Speaker 1: running the Russian investigation, writes that famous email that you
Speaker 1: and I have talked about on this show. We got
Speaker 1: to get those guys to hurry the f up and
Speaker 1: get this thing through those procedures into the court because
Speaker 1: they wanted that spying capability, that search warrant on the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign before the election ended. Because at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, we know it was all about stopping Trump, okay,
Speaker 1: but if they if they went through the proper procedure,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't have been able to use an unverified, uncorroborated
Speaker 1: dossie and omit to the court who paid for it.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right, and that remember a couple of times
Speaker 1: in the show, Sean, You've done a great job playing
Speaker 1: this famous clip from Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein saying, I
Speaker 1: don't know why you guys are all upset about this
Speaker 1: fight some thing. You don't know how much effort and
Speaker 1: care and review and all goes through this, you know what.
Speaker 1: Let's remind everybody and also put some context to it.
Speaker 1: Because Rod Rosenstein signed the third renewal application, the fourth
Speaker 1: FISA warrant because you have to renew it every three
Speaker 1: months against Carter Page. His signature is on a document
Speaker 1: with the bulk of information was never corroborated. Interesting in
Speaker 1: light of what he said. Listen, the way we operate
Speaker 1: in the Department of Justice. If we're going to accuse
Speaker 1: somebody of wrongdoing, we have to have admissible evidence and
Speaker 1: credible witnesses. We need to prepare to prove our case
Speaker 1: in court, and we have to fix our signature to
Speaker 1: the charging document. That's something that not everybody appreciates. Now,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of talk about FISA applications, and many
Speaker 1: people that I see talking about it seem not to
Speaker 1: recognize what a FIES application. FIES application is actually a warrant,
Speaker 1: just like a search warrant. In order to get a
Speaker 1: FISA search warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a
Speaker 1: career federal law enforcement officer who swears that the information
Speaker 1: in the affidavit is true and correct to the best
Speaker 1: of his knowledge and belief. And that's the way we operate.
Speaker 1: And if it's wrong sometimes it is. If you find
Speaker 1: out there's anything incorrect in there, that person is going
Speaker 1: to face consequences. That person is going to face consequences.
Speaker 1: Did any of these seventy five instances you've described here
Speaker 1: with Muller's under his watch, anybody only one person was? Yeah,
Speaker 1: the only consequence where they couldn't go before the court.
Speaker 1: They didn't lose a job. As far as we can tell,
Speaker 1: we don't see any evidence of reprimand or firing or termination,
Speaker 1: not that I can find so far in my reporting.
Speaker 1: But you know that answer is a classic bureaucratic answer,
Speaker 1: which is both trust us, guys, there's a process. Well,
Speaker 1: guess what, the process didn't work that seventy five times
Speaker 1: when there was cheating before, and we now know that
Speaker 1: the process didn't catch all of these horrific flaws in
Speaker 1: the carter page Russia that you did a good job
Speaker 1: enumerating all of them. My favorite one, the one that
Speaker 1: I think really goes towards intent. The FBI states, we
Speaker 1: know of no derogatory information about Christopher Steele that would
Speaker 1: disqualify using him as a source. And this yet we
Speaker 1: now know at the time they wrote that statement, they
Speaker 1: knew from Bruce Or he was an anti Trump activists
Speaker 1: trying to stop him from becoming president. That's known as
Speaker 1: derogatory information under the standards. He had been leaking, along
Speaker 1: with Glenn Simpson, to the media in violation of the
Speaker 1: FBI's rules. They knew that before making that statement, And
Speaker 1: so you have a situation where the process only matters, right,
Speaker 1: The process is only as good as the information you
Speaker 1: put into it. And in the case of Pete Stroke
Speaker 1: and Lisa Page and Andy McCabe, they didn't put the
Speaker 1: truthful information through there, and the court was making a
Speaker 1: decision based on an inaccurate record, just like what happened
Speaker 1: sixteen years ago. So everybody that's been involved in this
Speaker 1: entire process, they knew everything about the dossier ahead of time.
Speaker 1: So now Greg Jarrett, our friends who wrote the number
Speaker 1: one best seller of the Russia Hoax, has identified six
Speaker 1: separate crimes that they're guilty of. And my question is,
Speaker 1: you know, again, if are we going to have equal
Speaker 1: justice under the law, equal application of our laws or not,
Speaker 1: because if not, then we're pretty much shredding the Constitution,
Speaker 1: which is the foundation of all rule of law. And
Speaker 1: that then goes back and then we begin with the
Speaker 1: whole issue of pillary Clinton, the Espionage Act, the mom
Speaker 1: and pop shop server would classify it in top secret
Speaker 1: information on it, and then the deletions of subpoened emails,
Speaker 1: and the bleach bit and the hammers, and then it
Speaker 1: goes even further. They knowingly, willingly did all of this.
Speaker 1: Why is let me ask, let me what is the
Speaker 1: insurance policy in your view that Struck and Page talked about. If,
Speaker 1: for any way, this guy wins, which he never will,
Speaker 1: he should lose one hundred million zero if he wins.
Speaker 1: You know, we have an insurance policy. What do we
Speaker 1: now know to be the insurance policy? The preponderance of
Speaker 1: evidence that we have, and then the hints that we
Speaker 1: have from people like former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Juniez.
Speaker 1: The insurance policy was a set of investigative tactics the
Speaker 1: FBI put in place to try to correct, oberate, or
Speaker 1: to catch the Trump campaign in the narrative that Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele was writing about Remember they knew Christopher Steele was
Speaker 1: a Democratic flaw document was paid by the Clintons. It
Speaker 1: come from a guy who had bias, so they needed
Speaker 1: something better if they were ever going to catch the
Speaker 1: Trump collusion allegation. Right, So, I think the insurance policy
Speaker 1: is a series of informants that are inserted in and
Speaker 1: around the Trump campaign. People like Stefan Hopper, who we've
Speaker 1: now been acknowledged was an informant whose meeting with Papadopolis
Speaker 1: and Carter Page. I think their goal was to use
Speaker 1: those informants and trap, or capture or just find evidence
Speaker 1: of collusion. We know that didn't happen though, right because
Speaker 1: nine months after all those activities were put in place,
Speaker 1: after the insurance policies already in place, the fights of
Speaker 1: Warrenston place. What at Lisa Page tell us at the
Speaker 1: time we named Bob Muller's special prosecutor, we didn't have
Speaker 1: any evidence of collusion yet it was unproven. Nine months,
Speaker 1: all the most awesome tools of the FBI and they
Speaker 1: can't prove collusion. And yet what do we do at
Speaker 1: that moment? We name a special prosecutor again? And I
Speaker 1: want to I want to mention one thing because you
Speaker 1: and I began talking about this last sight, but I'll
Speaker 1: tell you hold on to what you want to mention.
Speaker 1: We'll also get to the announcement by the Senate Intelligence
Speaker 1: Committee Chairman Richard Burr today that the committee's Russia investigation
Speaker 1: has yet to find any evidence of collusion between the
Speaker 1: President's campaign and the Kremlin, and they will release a
Speaker 1: report on the Obama administration's response to Russian interference in
Speaker 1: the last presidential election. So that's getting interesting. Quick break,
Speaker 1: We'll come back more investigative reporter with the Hill, John
Speaker 1: Solomon as we continue. A right. As we continue, John Solomon,
Speaker 1: another big breaking news story he has that we now discovered.
Speaker 1: He discovered that Robert Muller had been hauled before the
Speaker 1: FISA Court during his tenure when he was the FBI
Speaker 1: director to address abuses basically fraud being perpetrated on Phiza
Speaker 1: courts in some seventy five occasions or more and exculpatory
Speaker 1: evidence withheld. We also had breaking today that Richard Burr,
Speaker 1: the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, announcing today that his committee's
Speaker 1: Ussia investigation has yet to find any evidence of collusion
Speaker 1: between the president's campaign and the Kremlin and are going
Speaker 1: to soon release a report on the Obama administration's response
Speaker 1: to Russian interference in the last presidential election, which we
Speaker 1: now know, if we put two and two together, that
Speaker 1: they were up to their eyeballs in setting up this president.
Speaker 1: Is that true or false? Well, there's two things that
Speaker 1: are going on. There's a group in the FBI that
Speaker 1: clearly was trying to set up this investigation in blowing
Speaker 1: path the normal strictures and rules and regulations in common sense,
Speaker 1: the good FBI agents and good FIST the cases used.
Speaker 1: That's one thing going on. Secondly, we now know from
Speaker 1: Obama himself and the people around him, they were tepid.
Speaker 1: They didn't take the Russian thing that seriously until after
Speaker 1: Hillary lost. That's a major intelligence failure in our part.
Speaker 1: If Russian was trying to interfere with our election, takedown
Speaker 1: Trump out of it. Because it's pretty obvious now that
Speaker 1: there was no collusion. It's still our president's job to
Speaker 1: stop that when it's going on. You saw what President
Speaker 1: Trump did in the twenty eighteen election, very assertive acts,
Speaker 1: and when the first signs that foreigners were trying to
Speaker 1: tinker in the twenty eighteen midterm elections. The President had
Speaker 1: the Homeland Security Secretary out there, he had briefings, he
Speaker 1: had ordered offensive measures to stop this stuff. Barack Obama
Speaker 1: was sitting on his hands, by his own acknowledgement, he
Speaker 1: was fearful of making too much ways before the election,
Speaker 1: and that was that led us all down in the
Speaker 1: intelligence com mean, I think that that's what Richard Burr
Speaker 1: and Mark Warner jointlye a Democrat and a Republican, are
Speaker 1: going to conclude. But Burr's statement is so important for
Speaker 1: another reason. I want to go back to them where
Speaker 1: we left. Yeah, we were talking about in the fourth
Speaker 1: FISA warrant, where the one that Rosenstein signed, still relying
Speaker 1: nine ten months into the investigation on that darn dossier. Right,
Speaker 1: there's another action that he took a month before that,
Speaker 1: when he appointed the special prosecutor Robert Mueller. One has
Speaker 1: to wonder did he justify in the documents that have
Speaker 1: not yet been released, Mueller's appointment based on a false
Speaker 1: dossier as well, which raises some legitiacy questions about the
Speaker 1: beginning of the Mueller investigation. And I think that that's
Speaker 1: a question that all of us need to ask more
Speaker 1: of the Justice Department. I have not been able to
Speaker 1: get an answer that we're going to get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of this. Are these people that have committed these
Speaker 1: crimes going to be held accountable real quick? I believe so.
Speaker 1: I believe the Inspector General's investigation have found some significant
Speaker 1: Muller's report in a month we're told show Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but you would assume that Richard Burr
Speaker 1: wouldn't feel comfortable saying what he said this morning if
Speaker 1: he thought Bob Mueller had evidence of collusion. I think
Speaker 1: all the reporting I've done from people around Mueller and
Speaker 1: inside the current FBI in Justice Department, there's going to
Speaker 1: be a finding of no collusion. I think that that's
Speaker 1: going to be one of the keys trying money it
Speaker 1: up with, you know, Annu Wendo, that's my guest too.
Speaker 1: All right, John Solomon, great job as always. You can
Speaker 1: see John's articles on the Hill eight hundred nin one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five now till the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: Even the Washington Post editorial now saying that Ralph Northam
Speaker 1: should resign. Now this has now become an even bigger
Speaker 1: problem for the people in Virginia because the Lieutenant Governor,
Speaker 1: who would be next in line, well, he is now
Speaker 1: being accused of a violent sexual assault by what seems
Speaker 1: like a credible witness. Although we give due process and
Speaker 1: the presumption of innocence. The Red State article saying there
Speaker 1: might be more allegations about Fairfax coming out. We learned
Speaker 1: also that Representative Bobby Scott that he had learned about
Speaker 1: this assault allegation against the Lieutenant governor a year ago
Speaker 1: from the accuser. And on top of that, than we
Speaker 1: have the next in line that would be the Attorney
Speaker 1: General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, also a Democrat, Mark Herring,
Speaker 1: and he too has admitted to dressing in black face.
Speaker 1: Now what's fascinating about this is now it has moved
Speaker 1: into the realm of Hollywood with joyless bay horror of
Speaker 1: the view pictures of her in black face. What is
Speaker 1: ABC going to do? You have a number of people
Speaker 1: that have done the same, including Jimmy Kimmel, But the
Speaker 1: biggest celebrity of all ain't none other than the mailman hisself.
Speaker 1: Calm Alone, calm al old Born is summer for the Louisiana.
Speaker 1: Now this is what they called buy you country out there,
Speaker 1: because when they start raining and flood come in, you
Speaker 1: got to buy you a new rugs kid now nickname
Speaker 1: New Orleans, nickname Big Easy, and it's your why New
Speaker 1: Orleans big Hey. Look at him to her Olf, that's easy,
Speaker 1: Big Easy. That's all right. Temmi Carmolo will start poking
Speaker 1: his lucky dog all over place. Now round Martin Ross
Speaker 1: time drunk college kid, make a big old mass, unfirm
Speaker 1: and street. That's where them girls always go wild in
Speaker 1: them videocammon quarter off TV. And that's there what happened
Speaker 1: when ladies drinks him Hurricane all right. So you have
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel. That's him dressed in full black face, well
Speaker 1: his entire body, trying to look like Carlo alone and
Speaker 1: speaking that way. And also Oprah Winfrey in another case,
Speaker 1: Jimmy Fallon, he dresses in black face, also his hands
Speaker 1: to try and be Chris Rock joyless beihar. Now, the
Speaker 1: thing is you got to remember here, if a conservative
Speaker 1: did any of these things, you know, the typical predictable
Speaker 1: allegations of racism in the mantra and firings would be
Speaker 1: made by people on the left, but in light of
Speaker 1: NBC's decision, for example, with you know, Megan, well what
Speaker 1: do you do now? What do these networks now do? Now?
Speaker 1: What are the people of Virginia do? Anyway? Here to
Speaker 1: debate discuss, we got Jonathan Gillham, former FBI agent, Federal
Speaker 1: Air Marshall, author of Sheep No More of bestseller, Danielle McLaughlin, attorney,
Speaker 1: constitutional expert. Welcome both of you back to the program.
Speaker 1: And Danielle, I'll start with you. Okay, So you got
Speaker 1: the governor of Virginia, the Commonwealth, saying that, well, the
Speaker 1: baby will be delivered, then the baby will be made comfortable,
Speaker 1: and then the mother only will get to decide if
Speaker 1: a baby needs to be resuscitated and needs medical help,
Speaker 1: and then later we'll just have a discussion. Okay. That
Speaker 1: very same week, then we find out the governor is
Speaker 1: in blackface and the Lieutenant governor now is embroiled in
Speaker 1: a sex scandal, and that raises the question or where's
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, Where's Kirsten Jilla Brand, Amy Klobuchar Feinstein, where's Schumer,
Speaker 1: Where's Leahy, Where's Dick Durbin, Where's Sheldon white House, Chris
Speaker 1: Coons and Senator Harno and others, and the people in
Speaker 1: the media that were so willing to say I believe
Speaker 1: in the Justice Kavanaugh case. Good afternoon, Sean. Hey Jonathan,
Speaker 1: you know, I actually agree with you, Sean, for once.
Speaker 1: I think it's very cynical that we're not seeing the
Speaker 1: women who know, the members of Congress and senators who
Speaker 1: were so forcefully for the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh not
Speaker 1: coming forward and talking with the same kind of vehemence
Speaker 1: and support for Lieutenant Governor Fairfax. There's always two sides
Speaker 1: to a story. I've read her letter. This is a
Speaker 1: real problem. This is a real problem, and I honestly
Speaker 1: think I think the Democrats are being cynical about this,
Speaker 1: thinking they can keep the governorship. But I don't think
Speaker 1: they should. It's hard for the Democrats because they sort
Speaker 1: of require purity, absolute purity. You do one thing wrong
Speaker 1: and you're gone. But if that's so they want to be,
Speaker 1: then they have to be consistent. Jonathan, what do you
Speaker 1: think I want Danielle to listen to me very carefully.
Speaker 1: Come over to the conservative side. Daniel You're almost there.
Speaker 1: You're almost there. You're making too much sense. Now, I
Speaker 1: totally agree with what daniel saying. You know, if you're
Speaker 1: going to set guidelines for everybody else in the United States,
Speaker 1: you've got to be willing to live by those guidelines.
Speaker 1: And that's the problem that we keep seeing with the
Speaker 1: left is that they get in rage. And I know
Speaker 1: it's politics, right the right getting rage about the left
Speaker 1: the left or getting rage about the right. However, what
Speaker 1: we see the difference with the left in this country
Speaker 1: is that they're they're not just outrage. They moved forward
Speaker 1: to set legal standards or in the court of public opinion,
Speaker 1: standards that will get people kicked off a show or
Speaker 1: their careers ruined. And in the case of Megan Kelly,
Speaker 1: you know, when she said what she said, it was
Speaker 1: just in passing as you talked about a few you know,
Speaker 1: a few minutes ago, it was just in passing cost
Speaker 1: her whole show. These are people that are literally doing
Speaker 1: these things that they tell everybody not to do, and
Speaker 1: then they go quiet. And I love the fact that
Speaker 1: Danielle saying what she's saying because Sean, I think if
Speaker 1: democrats start separator let's say, liberals start separating themselves from
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. What you're going to see is that
Speaker 1: they actually identify with a lot more than President Trump does.
Speaker 1: And we all identify and agree on a lot more
Speaker 1: than what we actually think we do when we let
Speaker 1: go of that party ideology. And I think this is
Speaker 1: a perfect example of that. You know, you watch all
Speaker 1: of this unfold, I don't think it's gonna hampen. And
Speaker 1: this gets to the heart of what this Democratic Party
Speaker 1: has become. I'll give you an example, Danielle, and I,
Speaker 1: like Jonathan, appreciate your honesty, but I think it's an
Speaker 1: untenable position. And you're really good. You can thread a
Speaker 1: needle a lot of ways, and you have on this
Speaker 1: very program defending Democrats when I don't think you have
Speaker 1: a way to defend them. But you know, look at
Speaker 1: the recent government shutdown, where the Democrats only a few
Speaker 1: short years ago were sounding exactly like Donald Trump on
Speaker 1: the border wall. They bludgeon President Trump about child separation.
Speaker 1: He fixed the issue that was there from Obama and
Speaker 1: President Bush. He offers dreamers what the Democrats say they
Speaker 1: want fixed, He wants they want DACA fixed. And then
Speaker 1: they won't even sit down at the table and talk
Speaker 1: to the President either during the shutdown, before the shutdown,
Speaker 1: after the shutdown. So to me, that telegraphs that they
Speaker 1: care more about hating the Trump, hating the president, hating Trump,
Speaker 1: than they do about fixing the problem that they said
Speaker 1: they cared so much about. They said they cared about
Speaker 1: furloughed employees, but they wouldn't come to the table and
Speaker 1: negotiate a deal. So I think on the very same
Speaker 1: issue that we're discussing here, they're willing a bludgeon Donald
Speaker 1: Trump over Stormy Daniels or whatever other, which was a
Speaker 1: private matter fifteen years ago. But they themselves have their
Speaker 1: own sexual me to moment happening right before their eyes,
Speaker 1: and their silence is deafening. Okay, So I don't agree
Speaker 1: with you on a lot of that. You know story, Daniels.
Speaker 1: The issue that Democrats have is that the American voters
Speaker 1: didn't know about it. They didn't have full information before
Speaker 1: they voted with the Dreamers. It was Trump that ended.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, no candidate, no excuse me, No candidate running
Speaker 1: for any office is going to discuss their personal sexual
Speaker 1: history as a qualification for office. That's the talking We're
Speaker 1: not talking about Bill Clinton and an intern inside the
Speaker 1: Oval Office. There is a great distinction. I'm not defending it.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying that nobody would discuss any personal matter
Speaker 1: like that, and frankly, if the question was asked, it
Speaker 1: would probably be dismissed by the American people as offensive. Yeah. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I think there's a lot of things on
Speaker 1: the table with an election. I think that's one of them.
Speaker 1: The concern was whether there was an improper use of
Speaker 1: campaign funds to hide the affair. And the last thing
Speaker 1: is the war. I absolutely agree. You have the two
Speaker 1: thousand and six Secure Fences Act. We had Democrats all
Speaker 1: over fensing, seven hundred miles of fencing, and I'd like
Speaker 1: to explain what the resistance is to the wall, and
Speaker 1: it's about context. Democrats to know against border security that
Speaker 1: you know, this open borders Democrats thing, it's not real.
Speaker 1: Excuse me. They want to eliminate Ice. They don't want
Speaker 1: to fund the wall. Not one dollar is all. Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi offered, that's it. Yeah, she's playing horrible, and I
Speaker 1: honestly I don't blame her because now they have the
Speaker 1: House and they're going to use it. I mean, this happens,
Speaker 1: they're going to use it. To well, so what's the
Speaker 1: benefit this president's fighting life and death? Ninety percent of
Speaker 1: the heroine comes across that border. Fentnol's coming across that border.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, young girls have been brought across that
Speaker 1: border and literally put into human slavery and prostitution. Do
Speaker 1: they care more about that or do they care more
Speaker 1: about getting a win over Trump? So I think it's
Speaker 1: about rhetoric at this point. I think it's a out
Speaker 1: calling in a wall. I'll be honest with you. I
Speaker 1: think it there's poll of politics gone on both sides.
Speaker 1: I think Democrats will come to the table, but I
Speaker 1: think they're gonna want, Well, the president. We have four
Speaker 1: thousand homicides, we have ten thirty thousand sexual assaults that
Speaker 1: we've chronicled, and one hundred thousand violent assaults with the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants that have crossed the wall. Now that's that's
Speaker 1: the one or two percent that we're trying to keep out,
Speaker 1: not the ninety nine percent that can come in legally
Speaker 1: that want a better life for their families. So you
Speaker 1: can't argue, so we can argue going forward that anything
Speaker 1: new that happens, like an MS thirteen child molester that
Speaker 1: was arrested yesterday by our border officials. Did the Democrats
Speaker 1: get the blame? Are they complicit? And what happens here
Speaker 1: forward if we don't fix it? Democrats want to fix it?
Speaker 1: Number one, Number two illegal because you set women because
Speaker 1: you say that doesn't make it true. They haven't done
Speaker 1: a thing. Well, we'll see what happens on Fabery sixty.
Speaker 1: See what happens. Okay, we're gonna be We'll wait while
Speaker 1: while drugs pour into the country. We'll just sit and
Speaker 1: watch our watches. We had we had eight years. We
Speaker 1: had eight years of Obama and nothing got fixed. That's
Speaker 1: that's what I can't understand is you know, the proof
Speaker 1: is in the pudding in and I'm gonna fall to
Speaker 1: the Republicans as well. You know when Bush was in office,
Speaker 1: so we didn't get anything fixed in with immigration. The
Speaker 1: problem is now you have a president that is wanting
Speaker 1: to fix it, that is offering solutions. It is bold
Speaker 1: enough to set party politics aside and say effective solutions,
Speaker 1: this is what we need. That's you know, that is
Speaker 1: why I pushed for President Trump and then Candidate Trump
Speaker 1: so hard, because he's somebody that looks for effective solutions
Speaker 1: and he speaks truth and it really angers some people.
Speaker 1: But you know what, I like many of the Americans,
Speaker 1: we don't care anymore. We want effective solutions, not party politics.
Speaker 1: And you can't say, Danielle, that we have to wait
Speaker 1: to see what they're going to do because they're not
Speaker 1: going to do anything. They're not. History shows that they're
Speaker 1: not going to do anything. There's only one politician that
Speaker 1: is stepped forward with reals, and that's Donald Trump. All right,
Speaker 1: let me ask the next question, hang on, what do
Speaker 1: we do about the House of Delegates? Now? With everything,
Speaker 1: I hope that you were offended by the governor's statements
Speaker 1: on you know, delivering a baby, making sure the baby's
Speaker 1: comfortable and then not even trying to medically assist the baby.
Speaker 1: Do you support that? Daniel all right, gotta stop it there,
Speaker 1: quick break. We'll come right back. Talk more about, well,
Speaker 1: what happens to the attorney general, the Lieutenant governor and
Speaker 1: the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia, and what about
Speaker 1: these Hollywood celebrities. We'll get to all of that with
Speaker 1: Jonathan Gillham Danielle McLaughlin a great Hannity tonight at nine
Speaker 1: quick break. Right back, we'll continue all right, as we continue,
Speaker 1: Jonathan Gillham Danielle McLaughlin with us. Now you've got the
Speaker 1: governor and the third in line, the attorney general. Now
Speaker 1: have this issue with one picture with the clan and
Speaker 1: a gentleman in black face, and you got a picture
Speaker 1: in black face with the attorney general. What should happen
Speaker 1: to these politicians? He's my question. It's disgusting. I asked
Speaker 1: you a question, So what should happen to them? I
Speaker 1: think what will happen is that they're going to have
Speaker 1: to resign. This is my question. Should something you did
Speaker 1: thirty years ago? Should it ruin your life? It's my question.
Speaker 1: This is a difficult question, right, this is horrible. Why
Speaker 1: didn't they address it a long time ago? Why didn't
Speaker 1: they tell the people before they voted? Well, you're enough.
Speaker 1: I mean it in the it was, it was in
Speaker 1: the yearbook. It wasn't or hidden some huge But it
Speaker 1: goes to Jonathan's point. You know, if you screw up
Speaker 1: thirty years ago, is it the end of your life?
Speaker 1: I mean, this is horrible, but is it? I don't
Speaker 1: I don't know. I think let's give Jonathan the last word.
Speaker 1: By the way, I never call for anybody to be fired.
Speaker 1: They let them clean up their own mess. But you know,
Speaker 1: the same party that bludgeons people with false charges of racism.
Speaker 1: It's interesting to watch them squirm when those when real
Speaker 1: issues come up for them, be it the me too
Speaker 1: movement or in this case of race. Jonathan last word,
Speaker 1: totality of the circumstances. When we look at what somebody
Speaker 1: did thirty years ago, if it stands on its own,
Speaker 1: is one incident of bad judgment. That's one thing. But
Speaker 1: when we look at a career filled with things like
Speaker 1: what this governor said about putting a baby to the
Speaker 1: side and letting it die, he was in black face.
Speaker 1: He criticized other people for the same things. That's when
Speaker 1: you look at the totality of the circumstances, the totality
Speaker 1: of the character. And that's when you say that person
Speaker 1: doesn't need to be in office, and yes, their career
Speaker 1: does need to be ruined because they don't need to
Speaker 1: be in this. They can go off and work in
Speaker 1: a parking garage or in a library where they're not
Speaker 1: touching people or or their laws, and they're not going
Speaker 1: to affect things. That's the way I look at it.
Speaker 1: The totality of the circumstances. All right, thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us. Eight hundred nine pot one Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. News
Speaker 1: Round Up, Information Overload coming at the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: post State of the Union polls coming in President getting
Speaker 1: a nice jump. We will explain right, News Round Up,
Speaker 1: Information Overload. What a week this has already turned into
Speaker 1: being there is a breaking story before we We're gonna
Speaker 1: look at the president Pold's numbers and the current field
Speaker 1: of radical extremist Democratic socialists that are running for and
Speaker 1: vying for the nomination. The Miami Herald broke a big
Speaker 1: story today that we're gonna pay pretty close attention to,
Speaker 1: and that is the investigation into accused multi millionaire, accused
Speaker 1: pedophile Jeffrey Ebstein, who we all know. Remember they called
Speaker 1: it Lolita Express, and he had this island that was
Speaker 1: dubbed Orgy Island, and he hosted Bill Clinton other powerful
Speaker 1: political figures on this island retreat and apparently reportedly dozens
Speaker 1: of very young girls and referred to in the media's
Speaker 1: orgy Island. But so, the Miami Herald says that the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice has now opened an investigation into the
Speaker 1: Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta's role in negotiating his plea
Speaker 1: deal with the wealthy New York investor accused of molesting
Speaker 1: all these young underage girls in Palm Beach. And that's
Speaker 1: in response to a request by Senator Ben Sassa, Nebraska
Speaker 1: and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee was critical
Speaker 1: of the case following a series of stories in the
Speaker 1: Miami Herald which detailed how Acosta, then the US Attorney
Speaker 1: for South Florida, OTHERDJ attorneys or canned in hand with
Speaker 1: defense lawyers and cut a lenium plea deal with Epstein
Speaker 1: and oh eight. And the Justice Department's Office of Professional
Speaker 1: Responsibilities now opened an investigation into this, and it just
Speaker 1: goes further than that, but we'll have to wait and
Speaker 1: see where that goes. Ended up getting like next to
Speaker 1: no jail time and basically got to stay at home confinement,
Speaker 1: which was pretty unbelievable. Anyway, joining us now to discuss, Okay,
Speaker 1: what is twenty twenty shaping up to be. The President's
Speaker 1: poll numbers were down as low as forty three percent
Speaker 1: during the height of the shutdown, but are now at
Speaker 1: a healthy forty nine percent. The next couple of days.
Speaker 1: By next week we'll get to see if he gets
Speaker 1: a bounce from the State of the Union, which I
Speaker 1: believe he will get. Joining us now John McLaughlin. He
Speaker 1: is a Polster founder of McLaughlin and Associates. Doug Shown
Speaker 1: is with us, also a Polster author, political analyst for
Speaker 1: Fox News, and rumored to be an advisor for former
Speaker 1: New York City Mayor Bloomberg and his potential run for president,
Speaker 1: which would mean nobody in America could buy a Big Gulp.
Speaker 1: Every restaurant would have to keep salt and pepper off
Speaker 1: the table, and you'd have to request it in order
Speaker 1: to get it. Uh, and the nanny state would be
Speaker 1: taken to a level that would be pretty scary. Is
Speaker 1: that true that you're working for him? Well, Sean, we
Speaker 1: have devised a special policy that is getting guarantee that
Speaker 1: you can have as big a soda as you want.
Speaker 1: I don't even drink Big Gulp, you know, I don't
Speaker 1: even drink soda at all ever, But I mean the
Speaker 1: idea that the government is going to tell me no want. Okay,
Speaker 1: you're guaranteeing the bloom Burgh is gonna shift and try
Speaker 1: and act like act differently than the way he governed
Speaker 1: in New York. Is that what you're saying. I am
Speaker 1: saying that he has always understood the importance of leading
Speaker 1: media figures, and that your interests, Oh, so I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get a special I'm gonna get a special exemption, exactly,
Speaker 1: the Hannity big gulp exemption. That's that's what we're gonna
Speaker 1: call it, exactly. Well, it'll be interesting because you got
Speaker 1: Howard Schultz, who CEO of Starbucks, former CEO. Then you
Speaker 1: got crazy Uncle Joe Biden. You can't go to a
Speaker 1: dunkin Donuts or a Slen seven eleven unless you have
Speaker 1: a slight Indian accent. And talking about Obama, he's articulate.
Speaker 1: And you got the first sort of the stream Crican
Speaker 1: American who is articulate and right clean. I mean that's
Speaker 1: a story. Yeah, the President's clean and articulate. Imagine that,
Speaker 1: Doug geez um, crazy Uncle Joe. Look, I think we're
Speaker 1: in a situation seriously, Sean. The Democrats are deeply divided.
Speaker 1: They are far left. And while I don't think the
Speaker 1: president has necessarily come up as high as your numbers suggest, Well,
Speaker 1: that was rascues and rascues and polls every day had
Speaker 1: him Atten right in the last presidential elections. That's my
Speaker 1: point of reference. John doesn't either. But the point is
Speaker 1: we are seeing I seeing a pickup, and with the
Speaker 1: Democrats has polarized and with there being no message except
Speaker 1: the Green New Deal and related issues. I think John McLaughlin,
Speaker 1: you degree the Democrats are back on their back foot
Speaker 1: and that the advantage has moved back in the President's direction. Well,
Speaker 1: I think if you look at this New Green Deal
Speaker 1: of Acasio Cortez, I think you'll learn a lot. You know,
Speaker 1: when they're setting you know, goals net zero emissions at
Speaker 1: the end of this ten year plan. Uh, we're going
Speaker 1: I mean, just look at what we're getting rid of
Speaker 1: pretty much everything, planes, trains, cars, no, no airplanes and
Speaker 1: but yeah, and this Americans are really going to respond
Speaker 1: well to this, that we're gonna get rid of cars
Speaker 1: and we're gonna have high speed trains everywhere, and it's
Speaker 1: all going to be done in ten years and we
Speaker 1: shouldn't worry how much it costs, right, right, But by
Speaker 1: the way, at a job with a family sustaining wage,
Speaker 1: whether you willing or uneconomic security for all who are
Speaker 1: willing or unwilling or unable to work. Unwilling to work,
Speaker 1: Oh okay, I don't feel like work could pay me.
Speaker 1: It's just socialism. But you know, go back to your
Speaker 1: original subject. The president's speech was it's probably the best
Speaker 1: one he gave. And even when CBS and CNN say
Speaker 1: they out of the forty seven million people that watched it,
Speaker 1: it was up from last year's State of the Union.
Speaker 1: Out of the forty seven million people that watched it,
Speaker 1: seventy six percent said they approved of what he said
Speaker 1: and they liked to ideas because it really was a
Speaker 1: broadening speech where he was reaching out. The majority of
Speaker 1: voters who watched it says he was trying to unite people.
Speaker 1: They seventy two percent favored the ideas they heard. On immigration,
Speaker 1: he said he wanted to increase legal immigration, seventy one
Speaker 1: percent said there was a crisis on the southern border.
Speaker 1: Seventy four percent said they favored his proposals for the
Speaker 1: troops in the Middle East. So you've got a lot
Speaker 1: of momentum coming out of that speech, but only forty
Speaker 1: seven million people saw it. Because the bad thing is
Speaker 1: when you go back to twenty sixteen, where you had
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty nine million people go out and vote.
Speaker 1: Eighty two million people that voted in that election, plus
Speaker 1: any new voters. Didn't watch the speech. They get their
Speaker 1: filter from the media. So the media the things that
Speaker 1: you and I saw that we liked, and the quotes
Speaker 1: we saw that we liked, that's not why they played
Speaker 1: in the media. In the mainstream media, they were playing
Speaker 1: quotes about the investigation. There was one quote, one little quote.
Speaker 1: They didn't pay. They didn't play that. He wanted to
Speaker 1: certainly compromise an increased legal immigration, that the economy is
Speaker 1: growing going great, that America is as strong as it's
Speaker 1: ever been in terms of security, but that But basically
Speaker 1: that was President Trump reaching out and broadening his appeal.
Speaker 1: And that's why you've seen his numbers won't bounce in
Speaker 1: these in these polls, in the media polls, they'll grind
Speaker 1: up because there is significant opposition to him. The deep state,
Speaker 1: the political establishment doesn't like the guy. The mainstream media,
Speaker 1: the liberal media, doesn't like the guy. So he just
Speaker 1: has to constantly grind up and move his numbers up
Speaker 1: and get the facts out to as many millions of
Speaker 1: people as he can. And while the Democrats are finant
Speaker 1: and the bad thing for for dougas you know, as
Speaker 1: far as Democrats go. Gotta admit that Mayor Bloomberg is
Speaker 1: a reasonable Democrat compared to these socialists that are that
Speaker 1: are leading the pack out of their primary unbelievable Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren a wealth tax that that's taxing money that's already
Speaker 1: been taxed, and say, well you save too much, that's
Speaker 1: and then after you die you get taxed again. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: so it is unconstitution or they're proposing a seventy anywhere
Speaker 1: between a seventy and ninety percent tax rate, depending on
Speaker 1: which socialist, radical extreme democrat you're listening to. Then you
Speaker 1: got Kamala Harris saying, oh no, no, no more private
Speaker 1: healthcare insurance for individuals. Medicare for all means no private insurance. Well,
Speaker 1: that takes one hundred and seventy seven million Americans who
Speaker 1: like their plan and take it away and force you
Speaker 1: into a government plan. Then you look at this, this
Speaker 1: Green New Deal bill. These are their own words, not mine.
Speaker 1: Every American would be guaranteed a job with a family
Speaker 1: sustaining wage, with family and medical leave, with vacations, with
Speaker 1: retirement security. Now that they want to pay for college.
Speaker 1: They're gonna make higher education and trade schools free, and
Speaker 1: they're gonna have Oh, we're gonna have to eat healthy food,
Speaker 1: they say, they give offer all the platitudes, high quality healthcare, safe, affordable,
Speaker 1: adequate housing, is guaranteed, economic environment free of monopolies, which
Speaker 1: means a government takeover of the energy sector. And then
Speaker 1: my favorite is economic security for all who are unable
Speaker 1: or unwilling to work. Okay, I want to not work.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not willing. I think a lot of
Speaker 1: people might take them up on that deal, Doug. But
Speaker 1: and they say we don't. We shouldn't worry how we're
Speaker 1: going to pay for this. That's your party. Well, I'll literally,
Speaker 1: as one of your favorite people said, Reverend right, the
Speaker 1: chickens come home to roost, The economic chickens come home
Speaker 1: to roost. With any of these proposals, We're not going
Speaker 1: to get rid of private insurance. Government's not going to
Speaker 1: take it over everything. We're not going to have seventy
Speaker 1: to ninety percent taxes and wealth taxes. We're going to
Speaker 1: have a capitalist system. And if the Democrats do not
Speaker 1: do not run on the core principles that have made
Speaker 1: our country great. I think, well three of us agree
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump will be reelected much more easily than
Speaker 1: anyone could imagine today. All right, so look, listen to
Speaker 1: the media react to the president. I thought, the reason
Speaker 1: the president gave his best speech, well, it was his
Speaker 1: pitches cadence, and it was written I thought, perfectly, which
Speaker 1: represents all of his views. But more importantly, he had
Speaker 1: the success that he can record after record after record
Speaker 1: on the economy, which happens every time we govern conservatively
Speaker 1: and lower taxes instead of redistributing wealth. Anyway, here's how
Speaker 1: the media reacted to that. I saw this as a
Speaker 1: as a psychotically incoherent speech with cookies and dog poop.
Speaker 1: I think that this president walks in there and may
Speaker 1: as well deliver the speech on his knees, because that
Speaker 1: is where he is politically. Donald Trump raised to a
Speaker 1: new level the demagoguery, the hyperboleague, the chauvinism, and even
Speaker 1: the misrepresentation a lot of the issues. Graphic language on
Speaker 1: abortion toured on substance and might have absertis theater. As
Speaker 1: you try to hope for the best, you heard the
Speaker 1: rhetoric of divisiveness. Surprise, the United States at this moment
Speaker 1: in the world did not mention climate change, and even
Speaker 1: a sentence is just frankly at the scrap. There is
Speaker 1: nothing that was said last night that is credible, believable,
Speaker 1: or memorable. What's your reaction to that? John, By the way,
Speaker 1: I would pick up where Doug left off about the
Speaker 1: best line was taking on socialism, and in the meantime,
Speaker 1: you didn't hear that line on these networks. Those those
Speaker 1: people that you just cited that we heard their words.
Speaker 1: It was like an alternative reality. Anybody who watched that speech,
Speaker 1: that's a normal person, thought it was a great speech,
Speaker 1: a unifying speech, and they liked the proposals in there.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, the liberal establishment spin machine that's
Speaker 1: totally deranged and probably pro socialists, they were trashing in
Speaker 1: the bad parties. Out of the people that are likely
Speaker 1: to vote if in the last presidential election, eighty two
Speaker 1: million of them did not see or hear the speech,
Speaker 1: They heard only that kind of propaganda coming out of
Speaker 1: the media. And that's our challenge to get the president
Speaker 1: reelected because that's those those kinds of you know, that
Speaker 1: kind of bias and that kind of vitriol where it's
Speaker 1: not journalism. It's basically, you know, some opinion propaganda. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's the real challenge for for Donald Trump to get
Speaker 1: re elected. And that's why every time we take a poll,
Speaker 1: the majority of Americans at a five to one, six
Speaker 1: to one ratio, they say the media is biased against them. Uh.
Speaker 1: Fred Bozell has media reports are saying ninety percent of
Speaker 1: the media, the Media Research Center, ninety percent of the
Speaker 1: media is negative on the president. And you know that's John,
Speaker 1: let me sum it up. It's that Donald Trump cured
Speaker 1: cancer and gave every American a million dollars, they'd still
Speaker 1: hate him. And if he adopted every one of their programs,
Speaker 1: they'd reject it. That's how much they hate this guy.
Speaker 1: Stay right there more with Doug shown and John McLaughlin
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine for when Sean is our number? All right,
Speaker 1: as we continue with posters Jean McLaughlin and Doug Schooner
Speaker 1: with us. You know this Green New Deal, their goal
Speaker 1: is to get rid of all airplanes. This Green New
Speaker 1: Deal is to get off of all fossil fuels within
Speaker 1: ten years and no nuclear power. This deal, they actually
Speaker 1: say in their document, as the question of how to
Speaker 1: pay for it. Well, we're gonna borrow the money the
Speaker 1: same way we did World War Two. The Federal Reserve
Speaker 1: can extend credit to power these projects, and you know,
Speaker 1: take the government gets an equity stake. But at the
Speaker 1: end of the day, this is an investment in our
Speaker 1: economy that should grow our wealth. So the question isn't
Speaker 1: how we will pay for it, but what we will
Speaker 1: do with the shared prosperity. Oh, no, airplanes. We're gonna
Speaker 1: get rid of fossil fuels. We're gonna be riding our
Speaker 1: bicycles to work every day. Doug, that's your party. Well,
Speaker 1: I sure everyone listening saw and heard what happened in
Speaker 1: France when in the interest of climate change, gas prices
Speaker 1: went up to reduce the carbon footprint in Europe. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that worked out really well on the streets of France,
Speaker 1: right exactly. That's that's my point. And I think we
Speaker 1: need airplanes, we still need the private combustion engine, and
Speaker 1: we basically do not have the resources to do what
Speaker 1: AOC and her cohorts want to do. And you got
Speaker 1: to pay the money back. Sometimes you just can't borrow
Speaker 1: it and print it. This is a form of insanity,
Speaker 1: This is a guaranteed. This is a roadmap to poverty.
Speaker 1: This is a roadmap to Venezuela in its current condition.
Speaker 1: All right, you keep your party on that track. Stay
Speaker 1: right there, don't move. You make sure they're all buy
Speaker 1: into this um. All right, thank you both. We've got
Speaker 1: to end it here quick break right back. We're gonna
Speaker 1: hit the phones. Eight hundred and nine four one sewn.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program as
Speaker 1: we continue at twenty five till the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: All right, we got Alexandria A Casio Court t now
Speaker 1: out with a Green New Deal Bill. It's gonna have
Speaker 1: it's going to eliminate all fossil fuels in ten years.
Speaker 1: It's going to offer a job to every American guaranteed
Speaker 1: at a sustaining wage, guaranteed with family and medical leave,
Speaker 1: with vacations, with retirement security, higher education, trade schools. Now
Speaker 1: the government will take us from pre kindergarten all the
Speaker 1: way up through in college and beyond. The guarantees that
Speaker 1: we will have healthy food and clean air and water.
Speaker 1: And it says safe, affordable, adequate housing guaranteed under the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal Bill, an economic environment free of monopolies.
Speaker 1: Oh and an economic security for all who are unable
Speaker 1: or unwilling to work. And when it comes to paying
Speaker 1: for it, she says, well, stop the thinking about how
Speaker 1: to pay for it, because you know that bottom line
Speaker 1: is the Federal Reserve can give us the money. We'll
Speaker 1: do it the way we did in World War Two.
Speaker 1: New public banks can be created to extend credit. And
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, this is an investment
Speaker 1: and that should not that should grow our wealth as
Speaker 1: a nation. So the question isn't how we're gonna pay
Speaker 1: for it. Huh. Okay, We're gonna get rid of and
Speaker 1: that includes getting rid of airplanes. That's right. We're pretty
Speaker 1: sure we can't get fully rid of farting cows and
Speaker 1: airplanes that fast, but we can think we can ramp
Speaker 1: up the renewable manufacturing and power production. Chief, this is
Speaker 1: so beyond clueless. This is so beyond This is now
Speaker 1: what I've been saying. The leftist, radical extremist New Democratic
Speaker 1: Socialist Party, this is who they are. How late in
Speaker 1: the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if
Speaker 1: he indicated it would impair the mental health of the
Speaker 1: woman or physical health? Okay, okay, I'm talking about the
Speaker 1: mental health. So I mean through the third trimester. The
Speaker 1: third trimester goes all the way up to forty weeks, okay,
Speaker 1: but to the end of the third trimester, yep. I
Speaker 1: don't think we have a limit in the bill. So
Speaker 1: where it's obvious that a woman is about to give birth,
Speaker 1: she has physical signs that she is about to give
Speaker 1: a birth, would that still be a point at which
Speaker 1: she could request an abortion if she was so certified
Speaker 1: she's dilating, mister chairman, that would be a you know,
Speaker 1: a decision that the doctor, the physician, and the woman
Speaker 1: understand that. I'm asking you if your bill allows that,
Speaker 1: My bill would allow that. Yes. So in this particular example,
Speaker 1: if a mother is in labor, I can tell you
Speaker 1: exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the
Speaker 1: infant would be kept comfortable, and the infant would be
Speaker 1: resuscitated if if that's what the mother and the family desired,
Speaker 1: and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and
Speaker 1: the mother even during the birthing process full term, ninth
Speaker 1: month viability, deliver a baby, make it comfortable, and then
Speaker 1: let the mother decide. This is the party of infanticide
Speaker 1: at this point, so many supporting this. It's up scary
Speaker 1: at this. You know, six states the Senate wouldn't even
Speaker 1: vote to protect these kids that are born alive, and
Speaker 1: they had an opportunity this week. This is the party
Speaker 1: of open borders. Let's give it open borders, elimonate Ice.
Speaker 1: This is the border of what crime they don't seem
Speaker 1: to care about, permanent separation, the homicides, the assaults, the
Speaker 1: sexual assaults that we have chronicled because open borders, or
Speaker 1: the ninety percent of heroin coming across our southern border,
Speaker 1: or the fetanol issue. And then well, how are you
Speaker 1: going to pay for it? Owell? Pay But you know,
Speaker 1: if we'll figure it out as we go. It's too
Speaker 1: big an investment. Why do we ask such tough questions
Speaker 1: about this? Then they even say in their document the
Speaker 1: level of investment required as massive. Even if every billionaire
Speaker 1: in company came together and are willing to pour all
Speaker 1: of their resources at their disposal into this investment, the
Speaker 1: aggregate value of the investments they could make are not sufficient.
Speaker 1: Now let me just throw something. What is the lifeblood
Speaker 1: to think about this? We finally, in the first time
Speaker 1: in sixty five years, have become energy independent We now
Speaker 1: are a net exporter of energy, natural gas and oil,
Speaker 1: more than Saudi Arabia, more than Russia. Why because of
Speaker 1: President Trump, we have two huge pipelines that are being built.
Speaker 1: When completed, you are going to hear about hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of career jobs available for Americans, especially when they
Speaker 1: open an more and they can get their equipment up
Speaker 1: there and start drilling there, which the President opened up.
Speaker 1: You've got the best economy ever. And then on top
Speaker 1: of it, they want to add a seventy percent income
Speaker 1: tax rate. What kind of society do we want to
Speaker 1: live in? Are we comfortable with a society where someone
Speaker 1: can have a personal helipad while this city is experiencing
Speaker 1: the highest rates of people experiencing homelessness and since the
Speaker 1: Great Depression? Should those two things coexist at the same time?
Speaker 1: And I think a seventy percent marginal tax rate, especially
Speaker 1: when we're starting to talk about your ten millionth dollar,
Speaker 1: You're ten millionth and one dollar. All of those not
Speaker 1: a family earning exactly exactly. It's saying, where do we
Speaker 1: draw the line in excess and at what point do
Speaker 1: we return to this question that King asked, that Gandhi
Speaker 1: asked that is our material technology outpacing our moral technology.
Speaker 1: So after you make ten million dollars in one year,
Speaker 1: your dollars after that start to get progressively taxed at
Speaker 1: a much higher rate. And really what that is is
Speaker 1: that it's the tax interpretation of one answer to the
Speaker 1: question of how much is at what level are we
Speaker 1: really just living in excess? And what kind of society
Speaker 1: do we want to live in? And then on top
Speaker 1: of that, Elizabeth Warren wants a wealth tax, which means
Speaker 1: that after you paid your income taxes, your FICA taxes,
Speaker 1: your state income taxes, your sales taxes, your hidden taxes,
Speaker 1: your taxes, taxes, taxes, then they want to unconstitutionally come
Speaker 1: back again and just take more money, which would be
Speaker 1: licensing stealing by the government, which they pretty much do anyway.
Speaker 1: If you don't believe it, we'll just try and challenge
Speaker 1: and not pay your taxes. They'll throw you in jail
Speaker 1: in five minutes. I always urge my friends pay the bill.
Speaker 1: Pay it. It's the cost of living here, unfortunately, and
Speaker 1: it's extraordinarily high. But we're gonna be We're gonna build
Speaker 1: high speed trains. It won't be in need anymore for airplanes. Well,
Speaker 1: what about airplane manufacturers? What about employees for the for
Speaker 1: the airlines? What happens to them in this great transition
Speaker 1: that they're planning, guaranteeing a place to live and healthy
Speaker 1: food and free school and free healthcare and free free, free, free, free,
Speaker 1: what happens to them? You know, if they're unwilling to work,
Speaker 1: nobody has to work. If you're unwilling, you get all
Speaker 1: the benefits under this green new deal. You know, overhaul transportation,
Speaker 1: expand electric vehicle manufacturing, charging stations, build out high speed
Speaker 1: rail and a scale where air travel stops to become necessary. Wow,
Speaker 1: are we gonna build a train to Europe and Asia?
Speaker 1: Are we gonna build a train? You know? Where? We?
Speaker 1: How are we going to build those trains? And by
Speaker 1: the way, I know I'm not allowed to ask who's
Speaker 1: paying for it? You know, it's unbelievable. This is so,
Speaker 1: it is beyond anything I've ever heard. All the platitudes,
Speaker 1: all the bumper stickers, all the reassurances you'll be safe
Speaker 1: and secure for life. And you know what happens. Every
Speaker 1: time that's been tried before, it has failed. It has
Speaker 1: produced more poverty, more misery, less prosperity than ever before
Speaker 1: the former Soviet Union. You pick your country healthcare. You know.
Speaker 1: I have a friend of mine as a doctor, sent
Speaker 1: me a note today. Guy in Canada absolutely as a
Speaker 1: brain tumor. They won't even give this guy in Canada
Speaker 1: an MRI. They don't think he needs it. Comes to
Speaker 1: New York. He's not a wealthy guy. He happens to
Speaker 1: find a under mine as a doctor, and he's like,
Speaker 1: not only did he need an MRI? That if I
Speaker 1: don't operate, like now, this guy's gonna die. And he
Speaker 1: doesn't have the money to do it. Look, my friend,
Speaker 1: he does this all the day. He's doing it for free.
Speaker 1: I said, could I help with any of the expenses?
Speaker 1: Does he need a place to stay? Whatever? I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't even know who this person is. And you know,
Speaker 1: maybe I'll help the guy. But the thought is why
Speaker 1: are they coming here? Because their system sucks? Ask them
Speaker 1: and there's a million of those stories. Even the politicians
Speaker 1: come here, the ones that rammed it down the throats
Speaker 1: of the people of Canada. Just like Obamacare, How did
Speaker 1: that work out for you? What is the government doing
Speaker 1: well that we have faith, hope and confidence in them?
Speaker 1: Did Obamacare workout, Keep your doctor, your plan and save money? Nope?
Speaker 1: You know did did the promise of a better education
Speaker 1: work out? Well? We spend more per capita with the
Speaker 1: worst results. Some believable. I think this is is that
Speaker 1: a Casio Cortez cut? What is that? Alinda? Let me
Speaker 1: play a Casio Cortez and you can hear some of
Speaker 1: those yourself. But it is just certainly a lot of money.
Speaker 1: You don't specify where it's going to come from other
Speaker 1: than saying it we'll all pay for its home. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think the first thing that we need to do
Speaker 1: is kind of break the mistaken idea that taxes pay
Speaker 1: for one hundred percent of government expenditure. It's just not
Speaker 1: how government expenditure works. We can recoup costs, but oftentimes
Speaker 1: you look at, for example, the Goop tax cut, which
Speaker 1: I think was an irresponsible use of government expenditure. But
Speaker 1: government projects are often financed by a combination of taxes,
Speaker 1: deficit spending, and other kinds of investments. You know, bonds
Speaker 1: and why. I get that. But deficit spending is borrowing
Speaker 1: money that has to be paid back eventually through taxes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And I think, well, I think that is always the
Speaker 1: crux of it. So when we decide to go into
Speaker 1: the realm of deficit spending, we have to do so responsibly.
Speaker 1: We ask is this an investment or is this actually
Speaker 1: going to pay for itself? So you're saying, borrow the money,
Speaker 1: make the investment, the economy will grow, We'll pay off
Speaker 1: the debt absolutely, because we're creating jobs. As you know, Congresswoman.
Speaker 1: One reason that people who are politically conservative are skeptical
Speaker 1: of efforts to combat climate change is that it sounds
Speaker 1: to them like it requires massive government intervention, which they
Speaker 1: just don't like. Are you prepared to put on the
Speaker 1: table that yes, actually, they're right what this requires as
Speaker 1: massive government intervention? Does it does? Yeah? I have no
Speaker 1: problem saying that. Why because we have tried their approach
Speaker 1: for forty years. For forty years, we tried to let
Speaker 1: the private sector take care of it. They said, we
Speaker 1: got this, we can do this. The forces of the
Speaker 1: market are going to force us to innovate. Accept for
Speaker 1: the fact that there's a little thing in economics called externalities,
Speaker 1: and what that means is that a corporation and dump
Speaker 1: pollution in the river and they don't have to pay
Speaker 1: for it, and taxpayers have to pay for cleaning up
Speaker 1: our air, cleaning up our water, and saving the planet.
Speaker 1: And so we've already been paying the costs, except we
Speaker 1: have not been getting any of the benefit. And so
Speaker 1: what we're here to say is that government is not
Speaker 1: just for cleaning up other people's mess, but it's also
Speaker 1: for building solutions in places where the private sector will not.
Speaker 1: And don't worry. The question is and how we're gonna
Speaker 1: pay for it? That's a direct quote. We got to
Speaker 1: upgrade everything. We got to do it in ten years.
Speaker 1: No more fossil fuels in ten years. We're gonna eliminate airplanes.
Speaker 1: How am I getting to Vietnam for the summit? That's
Speaker 1: all in ten years, build charging stations, high speed rail
Speaker 1: at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary. We're
Speaker 1: gonna ban that too. What about people in those industries,
Speaker 1: you know, guaranteeing a job of a wage, medical leave,
Speaker 1: family of education at any level, want retirement, security vacations
Speaker 1: even if you're unwilling to work. And we're gonna and
Speaker 1: no nuclear energy as well. This is madness. This is
Speaker 1: totally and completely so off the charts, you know, But
Speaker 1: if you get the net zero emissions. Yeah, you can't
Speaker 1: fly an airplane anymore or drive a car. You know,
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable. It is. It's like a parody. Joe Pollock,
Speaker 1: who's a great writer over in brightbart he called it
Speaker 1: the Green Deal New Deal as a Republican parody of
Speaker 1: the Democratic platform. This is who they are, with the
Speaker 1: wealth taxes, the seventy to nine income tax rates, the
Speaker 1: full redistribution. That's them unbelievable. It's all based on nothing.
Speaker 1: They will destroy the single greatest best prosperities creating system
Speaker 1: in life. All right, that's gonna wrap things up for today.
Speaker 1: We have an amazing Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the
Speaker 1: Fox News Channel. This country is at a tipping point.
Speaker 1: We face the real dangers of socialism, including this Green
Speaker 1: New Deal, this insane proposal by some House Democrats. We'll
Speaker 1: give you all of the details of the dangers. Add
Speaker 1: that to wealth confiscation, no more private health insurance, medicare free, school, free, housing, free, free, free, free, free.
Speaker 1: But why are these promises false? We'll get to that.
Speaker 1: The double standard as it relates to sexual assault charges
Speaker 1: of the Democrats before and after. You're gonna love this
Speaker 1: montage tonight and so much more, nine Eastern Hannity on
Speaker 1: the Fox News Channel. We'll see you tonight at nine.
Speaker 1: Back here tomorrow. W