WEBVTT - Lawmakers Take Shot At Apple, Google App Stores

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, we've been talking

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about it for the last several years about what appears

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a growing regulatory oversight, a heavier hand on

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the part of the U S regulators and US lawmakers

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>against big tech here. Historically they've taken a very light touch,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but the scenes in recent years a little bit more

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>heavier Handless check in on that story, Jen Ry, senior

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>litigation annalyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, joins us here in the

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. So, Jen, again, it seems like,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's definitely been a heavier hand here by

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these regulators, and right now they're looking

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at the apps. I'm thinking about the app store, the

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Google App Store, the Apple App Store. Uh, that's a

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>big revenue source for those company. Is what's converse looking at?

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, It's funny it we have been talking about

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this for a couple of years, Paullen. It seemed like

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it was really all about Google and Facebook in the beginning,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly, you know, there was a lot of

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>focus on Apple and Google and their app stores and

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>their their walled gardens, so to speak, for their mobile phones.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>What this UM Open Apps Market Act is looking to

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do is take away some of the prohibitions and restrictions

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that Apple and Google utilizes with app developers. So, in

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>other words, you can only a user can only download

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>an app from the official app store of that mobile system.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to use the payment systems. If you buy

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>an app or you make an in app purchase, you

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have to use the Google or Apple payment system. And

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>also there may be some use of the data of

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>rivals to support or promote or develop their own products

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that are also within their own app stores. So what

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress is trying to do is break that down and

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>force competition that would lower the rates which are the

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Google and Apple and Apple charge app developers, and seemingly

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that would bring the price down for users of apps.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Do these kind of UM regulations also govern physical stores.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>For example, if I opened uh chain of drug stores

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>across the US. Would I have to allow certain products

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>sold in my drug store and have um the margins

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that I charge regulated, and need to allow certain people

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>access to my data, etcetera. This particular regulation would not

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>because it defines covered companies, and really it's defined so

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically that it really only means Apple and Google within

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this context. But you know, what you raise is a

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really good point because you ask why these companies, particularly

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>when we don't regulate other industries in that in this manner,

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And we haven't really regulated other industries in this manner

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>because government hasn't wanted to intrude on business models and

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>business strategies and the way companies operate in the free market.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I think for that reason, you know, I

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>do think that there will be some pushback. Well, there's

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of momentum here right to reform antitrust laws

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and regular gatekeeper platforms. I do think there will be

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>some pushback, and if something gets enacted, I would see

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it as a water down version of what we're looking

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>at here. When I first read about this, it seemed

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>like a solution in search of a problem. Is there

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>widespread pushback from consumers that apps are too expensive. You know,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.119
<v Speaker 1>there really isn't but consumers just may not understand the framework,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and that that's really what some of the competitors are arguing,

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like Spotify or Match or Epic Games that really have

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>problems with these prohibitions of these companies. They're arguing that

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers just don't really know that they're paying more because

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Google charge the developers so much more and

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that's passed down to consumers. But it really raised such

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a good question because it's not really something of all

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that Congress could be doing and regulating and legislating,

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it isn't really something that there's been a big consumer

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>uproar over UM. There are a lot of lawsuits and

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there are other bills in the House and incentive that

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>would seek to do the same kind of thing. In particular,

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of litigation right now against both Google and Apple,

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but it is mostly brought by companies and not by people.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>There are some I should say that there is a

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>class action by consumers, but I think the broader push

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>here in the litigation is by developers and also by

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>by states. Yeah, those are three apps that I don't

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>use UM, but I can understand also that Congress does

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>want to try and just limit the powers of these

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gigantic tech companies because they're so big and have such

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a wide reach. Right, That's right, And I think and

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if you think about what the pushes, the bipartisan push here,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>it's why I tend to think these versions of the

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>bills we're seeing today aren't the ones that will get enacted.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>If something gets enacted, because you have Democrats, particularly the

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>progressive wing on one side, that are really about just

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>curbing dominance and curbing monopoly power. A lot of the Republicans,

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>not all, but a lot of the Republicans are more

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>concerned about what they view as censorship, that the power

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of these companies has led to censorship of conservative viewpoints,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're more interested in regulating to prevent that kind

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of conduct. And I think, because you have bipartisan interest,

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but coming from two different perspectives, you may see some

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>trouble when it comes to trying to get the sixty

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>votes you need in the Senate to enact any of this.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, jen great having you on, and I hope

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we can get you back because you're very good at

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what you do. Jennifer E. Is a senior litigation analyst

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for US out of Bloomberg Intelligence, talking about the latest

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>attempts to reduce the power of Apple and Google and

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>really about the lawsuits they've been brought by a number

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of companies in one class action lawsuit UM by consumers

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as well to try and regulate the app stores UM

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and the businesses in general. Well, you know, speaking for myself,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the silver linings of this pandemic is just

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to heighten my appreciation for the biotech industry, for the

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical industry. I mean, coming up with multiple vaccines in

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>record time and getting them uh distributed as they have

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>has just been extraordinary. So just amazing work being done

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the biotech UH industry, and a lot of those

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>investors know very well, uh kind of what's getting done.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in with one of those companies, Florian Brand,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of biotech company at Thai based

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>UH in Germany. The symbol NASTAC symbols A T A I.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>If you've got a terminal in front of you there

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>about three percent today. They recently reported some uh some results. Floria,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Tell us about

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>your company. What is a thaie focusing on right now.

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Sure and thanks for having us UM today. I'm sorry.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Um SO it ties the clinical stage U bio pharma company,

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>so basically a drop development company developing novative novel trements

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from mentality disorders. And you mentioned covid UM and experienced

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that during covid those numbers of people suffering from mental

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>health in cases have unfortunately really um skyrocketed. So we're

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>in this for developing novel innovative treatments UM and also

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>look at previously stigmatized compounds such as psychedelic compounds to

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>really um improve the current existing standard of care to

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>um ya make it make patients that suffer from mental

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>health disorders and globally that's roughly billion that make them,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>make them more more more effective, develop more effective options

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for them, UM so that they can can get better treatments.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you talk, I mean there has been for

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>decades talk about using psychedelics like psilocybin or LSD to

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>treat various issues UM from mental health issues to alcoholism.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about specifically, um so, we're among

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>others are also looking at um A psilocybin um, but

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>more broadly also at d MT and other molecules that

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are considered psychedelics also at a at an the answerer

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of of ketamine UM. So indeed, to your point, they

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have been well researched over the last decades, starting as

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>early as in the fifties and sixties UM where they

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>actually already showed interesting and very compelling promising UM signals

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're very relevant UM drugs treating psychiatric diseases. But

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>then mainly due to political reasons that research slowed down

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>due to the declaration of mixings war and drug and

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>then most recently with very promising studies out of John

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins in Baltimore and Imperial College in London, there's more

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and more kind of a spotlight in the academic world

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>showing really the promise of those compounds. And then around

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>around that time seen that's also when we decided to

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>to start a time to really put more money in

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>vigorously researching those compounds UM to really demonstrate that their

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>safe andificacious for mental disorders are to treat mentality disorders. Yeah, floor,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to me, you know, we haven't heard

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>much about psychedelics really since arguably the sixties and maybe

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the seventies, So what's what has been the whole psychedelicy

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for yourself? Exactly right, I will. I was in college

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties and I heard a lot about them that. Yeah,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>so what has been the use case for psychedelics historically

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and kind of how are you perhaps repurposing that? Um

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>so indeed, I mean some countries that have been actually

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>legal for medical use. UM. Again, I think that the

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>backup flash was really driven by political motives. I mean

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>there's this anti hippie movement, uh kind of Timothy Leary

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going a little bit too to uh, a little bit overboard.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of advocating that's kind of there and everyone

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>should take it. We're taking a very scientific approach here

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and demonstrating that they're given in the right set and

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>settings and in patient treatment supervised by a therapist, they

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can be truly helping people suffering from from these diseases.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's important to emphasize that we really

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>rigorously researching those in with modern samners, and that's why

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we're running various polinical trials at different stages UM to

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>basically generate the data for the FDA and also later

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on payers to make those therapies of imbursable. Again, you're

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not in this for recreational use and overhyping this,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>no really developing your medical compounds. It's funny that we

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>vilified UM psychedelics, but UM we have no problem prescribing

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>way too much oxyconton, right, and I wonder if UM

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you can use these, especially to treat addiction. I think

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the bright spots that I remember

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>reading a lot about absolutely so UM the opio crisis,

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>especially especially relevant for for the US, and we see

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>from from year to year also that the death toll

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of use this order rising. Unfortunately, We're developing one very

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>interesting compound called Eyebel Game that has historically be you

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>has been used to kind of ritualistic settings from kind

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of indigenous people, but also have been administed in clinical

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>settings um UH for for patients in Latin America, and

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>has shown then based on case studies, showing great potential.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of anecdotal evidence and that this

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can be really an interesting therapy for people really suffering

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from addiction. All Right, Florian Brand, thank you so much

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Really appreciate you taking the time of

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Florian Brand. He's the CEO and co founder of biopharmaceutical

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>company a Taie symbol a t AI based in Germany.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>They're focusing on the psychedelic side of the market and

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>stocks up about three percent today. Uh they went public

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen is trading just a little bit above fourteen

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars to share of three percent. They reported some uh

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>our financial results just recently, so too good to get

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on that market. Looking at the ten year

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>treasury one point to three eight percent, where does a

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>good fixed income investor go to get return? Let's go

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to r J. Gall and asked that question. He's a

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.599
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio manager head of the Admiserable bond group it

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>federated Hermes based in Pittsburgh. They had a couple of

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>shekels under management. Let's call it total assets on management

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>six billion. R J, thanks so much for joining us here. Um,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, tax exempt or taxable? Where do I go

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>for yield today? How much ris should I be taking? Well?

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>The yield can be hard to come by, certainly in

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a historic sense, yields are are basically a record lows

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and muni spreads of titan massively both taxable and taxing.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That markets thematically have seen low quality credit massively outperformed UH,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and that UM is something that that I think a

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>number of active managers certainly we felt was apt to

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>happen as the UM at least the improvement in the

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>pandemic picture, which recently has been complicated by the delta variant,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>but nevertheless, the economic reopening a strong tail wind to

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the returns to credit, whether it be intact sex after

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>taxable bond markets. Looking forward, given the yield moves, given

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the spreads have compressed, UH, there seems to be a

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>little pause in that. Over the last month or so,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>high yield corporates, for example, have started printing somewhat weaker returns.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>In the muni space, spread teams have stagnated. You still

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>get your incremental carry your income UM, which is better,

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but you're you're losing out UM. You're not getting the

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>price and appreciation that we have before. It's certainly gotten

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a little murkier going forward, and the delta variant is

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>probably the main reason at this point in time. Are

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you getting paid for the risk? Howard marks Um told

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric Shatzker a couple of weeks ago, he thought, you know,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>three basis points sounds very little, but he wasn't as

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned about default risks and felt he was being paid

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>um in line with the risk he was taking. Are

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>high yield group is a very strong group in the company,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of success in various strategies, and our

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>our multisector total on fund we started of a sleeve approach.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>So when we allocate myndy to high yield, our high

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>yield guys management and they tell me, UM, they still

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>like the market. We still are overweight relative to our benchmarks. Uh.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>The prospect of return is obviously lower than what we've

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>experienced in the last you know, six to twelve months,

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but the incidents of default is expected to

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be very very low. Corporate profits just printed a lot

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of favorable news across a variety of sectors. Now everybody

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>says that's backward looking. Yeah it is, but it's the

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>most recent momentum that we have built up economically heading

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into what could be a dicey late summer and fall.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>As the delta variant clearly a roding on sentiment. Look

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.119
<v Speaker 1>at the Michigan consumer sentiment numbers. UM. I think corporations

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are now struggling with return to office in addition to

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chain challenges and various echoes of the of the

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>first wave of the pandemic that we're all still going through. UM,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we're still optimistic that credit is an avenue towards our performance.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh not the least of which contributing factor the that

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is still at zero, still buying bonds, suppressing returns on

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>high quality fixed income, and that is helping to boost

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>returns to low quality. We don't think of recessions in

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the offing. We might have a hiccup, it might be

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of headwind compared to what we expected

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because the delta variant, but we still like credit on

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>economic momentum and corporate corporate performance. I didn't I didn't

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mean to get us off the Muni track. Paul is

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with Muni's absolutely. I I love the new Jersey Meunis.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We just can't get me yields r J. How about

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation here, r J? I mean that is a concern.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It isn't even more more of a concern for this market,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>say a month ago, and perhaps people getting more and

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>more into that transitory camp. How do you guys think

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>about that? UM, We've been firmly in the camp that

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it will be less, it won't be as transitory as

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Powell expects UM. I think even those at the FED,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can sense over the last eight weeks

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>there was a softening of the transitory UM desk beating

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for a while there it was going to be transitory,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was almost like they wanted to guarantee it. UM.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the f OMC speeches, if

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you look at the minutes or not the minute, excuse me,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the summary of eaconomic projections and the risk around their

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation outlook was skewed to the upside. I think that

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear that the inflation story is still evolving

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that we think that the Fed

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>will prove to have overplayed the transitory card UH, and

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that some of this inflation is gonna last and echo

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for a while. UH. It's one of the reasons why

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we are still short duration UM a little less so

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>than we were, say, six day weeks ago, but we

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>still believe that you'll should be heating someone higher to

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>compensate for the inflation risk that is clearly higher today

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>than then it was expected to be. I think on

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the part of the FED and on the part of

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>many of the markets. Right now, the market doesn't seem

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to care that much about that. Uh, you know, you've

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>had some deceleration in the month over month, Prince that

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that's good. The second derivative went negative. That fits the

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>FEDS framework of transit story. But we don't believe we're

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get reset back towards the fedced target rate of

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>two percent. We're going to probably overshoot it more than

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they would like. And we think as a bond investor,

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, owning treasuries for example, we we should ask

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit more, ye know, than we think

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>rates should be heading higher. The delta variant and its

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>impact on the gross trajectory the obvious key risk. I

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>do think the Afghanistan story is a very difficult story

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on many fronts, but I don't think it's an economic

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>or a market problem. When is you know, considering the

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal history of the Michigan Wolverines that their performance over

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, over the deck last decade really

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>has been dismal, When are they going to field a

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>really winning team? R J. I just you know, I

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have to warn you. Matthew is from the state of Ohio. Uh, yeah,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that you came from. Are you a Hire State fan?

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're trying to tell me, sir? Yeah, Well,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I like winning teams. You know. Well, you

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>know I I used to bristle at these kinds of comments.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that the it's been a little

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>humbling the Michigan football performance of late um, I would

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>say this, I think that you basically when Harbaugh came in,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there were expectations he was going to get us into

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the college football Championship, get into the playoff, or whatever

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>iteration of it that we're on. I'm gonna have to

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>cut you off. Well, here in the Bloomberg Radio studio

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>here Bloomberg h Q in Europe, it got lots of

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the cable network video streams up and running at all

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>times just to keep on top of the news and

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of images and video of chaotic chaos going on

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan, particularly at the airport in Cobble. Right now,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>let's get the latest from Bill Ferries, he's a national

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>security team leader for Bloomberg News, joining us on the

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>phone from Washington, d C. Bill, Again, this is not

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the way I don't think anybody wanted it to go.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps this is should not be that surprising. What

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is the latest from your warding about what is going

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on in Afghanistan, particularly in Cobble Well, as you mentioned,

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there have been some scenes of real chaos and confusion

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>at the airport. Is people storm the runway, some trying

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 1>to grab onto US military planes as they were taxing. Um.

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean up is now reporting that there have been

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>seven people killed at the airport so far. I think

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on the U s side, people were waiting to see

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>how the President Biden uh finds a way to address

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the situation. The administration is pushed back a lot um

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of saying that you know, they expected the

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Afghan military to put up much more of a fight

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Taliban, and even as a lot of analysts

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that the Taliban might eventually take control, I don't

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think there was anyone even a week ago predicting that

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>something would happen this quickly. That said, the US has

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>spent twenty years building up the Afghan military, So if

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone should have known how prepared they were to fight

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or not, you would think it would have been the

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>US commanders in the field. Yeah, I mean, I would

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>say from reading through the Afghan paper, Afghanistan papers and

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>reporting across the various news organizations. UM, it looks like

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban started to negotiate with Afghan army and police

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>personnel at the beginning of the year or the end

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of last year. So the Taliban already knew that they

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>had these entry points. And UM, a lot of these

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Afghan officials weren't getting paid for the last six months

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of the last nine months, so clearly, UM, you could

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>see how their loyalty would weaken. What happens now, UM

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting people out, I know the president's

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>UM team said they're gonna send what five thousand troops

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to the US to to the Kabul airport. Um, is

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that still the case? And how are they planning on

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>who are they planning on taking out? Well, right, it's

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>actually up to six thousand now that they said, we'll

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be in play by by at some point tomorrow on Tuesday. UH.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And their job is to secure some sort of a

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>perimeter around the airport. And they still have diplomats, they

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>still have Afghan translators and other aids that they are

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>rushing out. It's not just in the US, the UK

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is also running flights in and out of Kabbal the

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>big the big question, and I think the problem that

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the US has here is that if you know you're

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>someone who's trying to get out, whether you might be

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>an Afghan translator who worked with NATO forces for years

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 1>but in a more remote province, you would have to

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>get yourself to Kabbo. At this point, there are no

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>exit points um in Afghanistan except the airport. If you

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>try to cross the land border, you're going through Taliban

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>setpoint for that at that stage. So I think that's

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be the question is how well can the

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>US and allies get their own people and their aids out,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and then of course what happens to for instance, women

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and children's rights and country We we

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all remember what that was like under the Taliban, and

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>there's already reports of human rights abuses in some of

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>these Taliban controlled areas. UN Security Councils having an emergency

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>session on that issue right now, um and that's going

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the bigger questions in the days ahead.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>It's so damaging to the US credibility right to have

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>um U S forces so publicly abandoned, these people who

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>put their trust in the United States military, and I

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just really leave them hanging. How how does a president

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to telegraph the message America's back to work

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>with the world, how does he handle that? Without a doubt,

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>It's it's perhaps the biggest crisis that Joe Biden the

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>space that he took office. He ran as a candidate

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in part on his you know, three decades of experience

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on the on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his time

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as a vice president UM, and you know, really as

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a foreign policy expert. And again, I think there were

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who would have said, yes, the

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Taliban will eventually win this, but nobody thought it would

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>happen this uh, this quickly, and it makes the administration

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>look like it didn't really have a plan for how

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to secure the withdrawal, to get its allies out in time.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We have six thousand troops going into the airport by tomorrow.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>That's more troops than we've had for four or five

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>years UH in Afghanistan. So, you know, a few weeks

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>last months of the president, Biden was saying there was

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>no way we would see this kind of a situation.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>We have it faster than anyone expected Bill. I guess

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>what's going through my Twitter feed at the moment as

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it released to Afghanistan is the lack of communication from

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the White House, particularly from the President. What do we

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>know about when he will address this issue publicly? We

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>are his national security advice in this morning that you

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>will address it soon. We know he's been up at

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Camp David. I think we're all looking to see whether

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>uh he tries to give a speech to the nation

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>from there, whether he comes back to Washington. We have

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not seen a lot of his top advisors. It was

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>his national security advisor who was on TV this morning,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't, you know, except for the Sunday shows,

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen a lot of Tony Lincoln, Secretary of State,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>or Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense. They've got a lot

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to work on, of course, but I think you would

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>expect to see them putting their face forward a lot

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>more in the coming hours. And Tony B. Lincoln um

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>said he considers the administration considered the mission in Afghanistan

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>success going after those who harbored nine eleven terrorists. What

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are the chances that the Taliban harbor's terrorists again, or

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that the vacuum is filled with you know, um, Chinese

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>or Iranian power. I think for sure you're going to

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>see foreign powers thinking a stronger interest. I mean when

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at hoop orders Afghanistan, just starting with China

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and Russia, they first of all, they have their own

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>security concerns. Um, there were four that China had fast

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>up its military presence a little bit on its shared border. Uh.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And for sure, Pakistan, of course, which is a close

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>ally of China, is going to be even more involved

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>than it than it already has been. The Taliban, their

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>comments so far have been a little bit more moderate. Um.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They've been saying that they want to have some sort

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of a discussion about the political future of the country.

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think realistically people are not going to put

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stock on that. Actions will speak much

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>louder than words. And and and the Taliban have a

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>history of of of running you know what was internationally

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>condemned as a as A as a fairly brutal regime

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>when it will help power in the late ninety nineties,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, It's just a horrible situation. And I'm sure

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there will be plenty time for blame to go around

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>after but it would be uh, you hope that American, British, German,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>French forces can get in there and save the people

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that their trust into the Allied forces. Bill, thanks so

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Bill Ferries is National Security Team

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>leader for US here at Bloomberg News, joining us out

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, d C. Talking about the UM still developing,

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but just tragic, tragic situation. The images of people jumping

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>onto air force planes and trying to run on the

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>outside of the aircraft are really horrifying. Thanks for listening

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>On Ball Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.