WEBVTT - Ep22 - Barry Jenkins / "Moonlight"

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Playback, a Variety podcast. I'm your host, Variety

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Awards editor Chris Tapley. On today's show, we talked about

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the SAG Awards, where Denzel Washington and Hidden Figures came

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>away with surprise wins. A little bit later, I'll be

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>talking to Moonlight writer and director Barry Jenkins. So stick

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>around all right, everyone, here we are and it's post

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Screen Actors Guild Award. Hold on, I'm just finishing an email.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's very important, I promise you. Sorry on your time. Yes,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>because there's nothing more interesting than listening to a podcast

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of somebody sending an email. You can make it work. Yes,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>SAG Awards. So big surprise to me was less Denzel

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington than Hidden Figures. I know you had been mentioning

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Hidden Figures and it is an ensemble that's picked up awards,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but I just it beat some heavy hitters. The only

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>reason I didn't ultimately pick Hidden Figures as the ensemble

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>winner was because I had heard they didn't send screeners,

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they only sent digital and I was like, well, Moonlight's

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>been out for a while, they sent screeners. I went

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>with Moonlight, but I mean everyone has seen Hidden Figures

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's got everyone, and I mean you've got Jim

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Parsons from The Big Bang Theory, You've got Kevin Costner,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, aside Kirsten Duns. That's like it every somebody.

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>That movie has everybody's favorite actor and it's somewhat true. Yeah,

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so not a surprise to me. Also not a surprise

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>considering that they really kind of spread the wealth, you know,

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>someone from Moonlight one, two people from Fences. Um, I

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the only thing that really went home empty was

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Manchester Chesse, which had more nominations than anyone. I can't

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>remember how often that's happened where the movie nominated for

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>A four has gone home without any award, but maybe

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's happened frequently. I don't know that was surprising. But

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>then at the same time, you're talking about like a

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand people. So a big broad quote

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>unquote populist performance like what Denzel gives, which I think

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is you know, right up there with Casey's. I'm not

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>sure knocking it at all. Well, you and I have

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>always thought that Denzel what could win this. Yeah, I

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>mean from the beginning I thought he was going to

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>just because and I'm talking Oscar now because Casey gives

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>such an internal performance and that can be harder to

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>get everyone to say, yeah, that's the best performance. But

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>then Casey dominated to the extent that he did. And

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I know we all say critics are not Oscar voters

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>or SAG voters, but when something like that happens, it's

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like wow. It's strange to me though, that even now

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>people are still saying Denzel isn't the front runner, you know.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Casey could still win. Don't get me wrong,

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Ryan Gosling could still win, but I mean

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to acknowledge that Denzel is the front runner

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>with SAG, because if you're gonna call something a front

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>runner based on, you know, the kinds of people who

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are voting, then sure, but that's the last award he's

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to win, right. He's not up

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for the BAFTA, which is very strange. BAFTA awards happened

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the day before the Oscar ballots go out. If Casey

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't win BAFTA, that's a bad sign for him. But

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to win DAFTA. Although again I'm

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>telling you, I'm keep an eye around Goslin certainly Emma

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Stone obviously one. Yes, that was. I think it was

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a very tight race between her Natalie Portman because a

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of SAG actors really love Natalie's performance. But yeah,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Emma has this sewn up at

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this point, and in lieu of a an ensemble nomination

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for the film, yes, which again I think people could

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>put too much on. I don't think it's I don't

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>know if people really vote that way. Like people will

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>say things like, you know, Denzel one, because he'd never

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>won a SAG Award before, and I was like, most

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>people vote for the person they want to out for,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and they don't like parse out things. I always think

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of Birdman, like everybody said, well it won't win, give

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>screenplay to Boyhood, or they'll give director to Boyhood. No

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Birdman one pictures start checking off movies. They're just like

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>chick Chick, Chick chick. Which is why Ryan is a possibility,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which is why you know, I don't quite get the

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>urge to assume La La Land is not going to

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>win screenplay, which we've talked about. That's ridiculous, Like why

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>would it not. It could win all top five. I

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>guess the first movie to do that. In Silence of

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Lambs, there's only three that have done it. It

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>happened one night, and what's the other one's of course

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>only three. Yeah, it's kind of one of those Oscar

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>stats that ever all the Oscar hounds, I feel like

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to happen again. It could happen. Yeah, Well,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we were due for a record tying nomination slate, which

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>we got out of the fourteen nominations, and we could

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be due for a record tying win slate. I mean,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I still think that that's a movie that can win

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven Oscars because it doesn't have competition throughout these fields,

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and who were I don't see them pick like Allied

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for costumes or Fantastic Beasts for production design or something

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a rival can grab something like production design,

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think so. Like I just think, especially

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 1>with the expressionistic elements at the end of this film

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>while I'll end, and the way that sets it put together,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and I just see them checking it off pretty much

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>down the line. And then maybe the two songs can

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cancel each other out or something. Yeah, but even I

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's happening. I think it's winning song too,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you think it's winning sound editing that I don't know.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know. Do musicals usually win in

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>that category never get nominates, So it's like an uncharted territory.

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So who knows? Well, uh at the SAG Awards, Mahrschel

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Ali just hershela. We need like a theme whenever we

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>say Mihrschel's name to just talk. Right before he wont,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I was like, if he wins, watch out for the speech.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And that speech brought the house down in his way.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's such a quiet, like just soulful good

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>soul was a great word. He's just humble and kind, gracious. Yeah,

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and looked really good and he does and he spoke

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>directly to something without really bringing it up. Yeah, you know,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I just it was a very political night,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and there were there were explosions regarding that, you know,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>like from Julia Lee Dreyfuss or you know, more pointed

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Oranges it's a new black cast and then

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>me Herschel I gave a more personalized kind of addressing

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of that situation, which I thought was very interesting. It

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was very people were very active on the red carpet things. Well, yeah, um,

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't think everything everything I did on

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Red Carpet got put online, but enough of it

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for you to get a sense of it. Yeah, and

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, people people do not hold back, you know.

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian Craston was very diplomatic, and he translated over to

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>his speech where he was like, you know, I'm really

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He didn't say he was rooting for Trump, but he's like,

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want this to work because we're screwed otherwise.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone wishes for the failure that he's

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>charging towards charging towards I think yeah. And also Cranston

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>had a lot to say about Trump last year too,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>when he was yeah, like he he had, of course,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>if we're asking him about it, a lot, and uh,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he probably got tired of talking about it,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.239
<v Speaker 1>so now he's just yeah, he sees that question coming.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is like I told you that, Um, I finally got

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to meet John to Tuo on the Red Carpet and

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>he was having none of my nonsense. No, he was.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>He was very nice, but you know, he's a serious actor.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>He probably isn't prone to sound bites. And uh, you

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>know I was, I was you know, a little jokey

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and you know how you get on the red carpet.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a very different type of interview that I'm sure

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he's used to. And he was just very He was

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>funny because he was so serious, you know what. I'd like,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>try to talk to him about a foot x amount.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>He'd be like, well, it's a very serious problem. And

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I mean maybe he was. He could

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have been joking. He's a brilliant comic mind, so very dry.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>But um, that was a surprising category because but John

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Tatur and rizam Ed nominated against each other, might have

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>canceled each other out. Sterling K. Brown nominated against Um

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Courtney Bevan, Yeah, might cancel each other out. And people

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>love Brian Cranstjohn that's one Cranston Yeah, oh yeah, yeah

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for all the way. The Crown people are really fun

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk to about what they think of American polidays.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I bet yes. I stopped Matt Smith and Claire Foy

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, so, how do how are we

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>coming off to you guys over there? And they you

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>got to see their faces. I think it's I think

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's up on variety because they're like, not good guys. Well, look,

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they certainly had their moment a few months ago with Brexit,

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so exactly. Say, Guy Lodge on our staff was here

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. We we caught up and U we

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>were talking about that everybody. He said that over there,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>it's more like it's it's less like people are like,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>oh god, what's wrong with the Americans and what's wrong

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>with the world. I mean, yeah, we see it about

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen with France too. I mean it's yeah, I

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>should specify that, Matt and Claire, We're not saying America

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look good. They were just saying, you know, so

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to speak. G A obviously big shocker. Okay, tell me

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth. Did you pre write your story about La

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>La land winning hours before it was announced? I had

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it ready to go. I had it ready to go.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I did. I mean, because come on, and what he's

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>got to win the d g A right, like I think,

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>so unless it's Berry Jenkins at the end of that

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>nine hour nine I'm sure he will win. And can

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I just use this opportunity to reiterate something I have

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to say every year, which is that ensemble does not

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>equal picture and yes, hidden figures one ensemble I mean, hey,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it could win Best Picture. I'm not ruling anything out,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but don't think that because it one SAG ensemble. What

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it did was provided an opportunity that Tag nailed exactly

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and I could see it, you know, just like with

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Globes effect, like gathering some steam from voters

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>saying I think I want to I wish Oscar voting

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was still open, and then maybe Taragi could have gotten

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a nomination the way Meryl's Globes speed truly sealed the

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>deal for her. Yeah. Um. And also you know, one

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite SAG wins is a bird cage. Also

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to your point, not the Best Picture contender. But yeah,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and so that's this weekend, DJs, this weekend and a

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>s C. The cinematographers Santa Barbara Film Festivals gearing up

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and they bring all the nominees in to have tributes

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. So that'll be happening. Did you go to

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Editing Awards? I did not go to the ACE Awards.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Um arrival one there, yes, which you have said, you

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>know you think I think, yeah, just the structure, you know,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the editing is on display, so I

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>could see that happening. But again, you have to be

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's right down the line on that movie. So

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the backlash is naturally on schedule with La La Land.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Here it is, you know, the jazz. The dubious angles

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>regarding how it handles jazz has been have been flying

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>around and I'm just like, what so threatening about this movie?

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>How can I you know, if it's not your thing,

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. But people who have decided they hate this movie,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, how can you hate something that is about joy?

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're at this We've reached what it is

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is we've reached the spot where in a

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>year of such diversity an inclusion represented in the nominations,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>that a movie like La La Land Winning, which is

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>granted about white people with champagne problems. Uh, somehow flies

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the face of that. And I don't know, I

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time. Wait, is an Ma Stone half Hawaiian?

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh No, that was a different movie. Sorry, oh man

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>deep cut Hey, she made fun of it herself on

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Live. You've got to give her credit for that.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of did you see the Saturday Night Live sketch?

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Was it this weekend or last weekend? Disease I'm sorry.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we might have already talked. We did talk

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>about that, yeah, which was a very affectionate yeah. Ready, yeah,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But that that is where I think this backlash is

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>coming from, Like it is a travesty if a movie

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like Moonlight doesn't win, or if a movie like Hidden Figures,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which is about you know, dispelling our divisions and for

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the for a common good. Granted, Land has always been

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally previewing my column next week. Laoland has always

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>been this effervescent thing. It's not important capital I like

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>in that way. Um, And you know, someone said something like,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>if it wins, it's like while the world burned, Hollywood

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was singing and dance come on. That often happened where

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you turn to like a bit of escapism and you know,

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>unsure times. But like, I don't know, I just hate it.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Every year something has to be compounded like this, and

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's people caring about the oscars too much. Well,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also interesting people bring their own baggage to it.

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if if we're allowed to get into

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>spoilers here, but the movie has been out for a while,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but so many people I talked to when you asked

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>them about the ending. They read so much into certain

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>things like who she ends up with, like they have

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole backstory. Me you can, I just say. I mean,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>if anyone hasn't seen La La Land, first of all,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked you're listening to this. Secondly, you know, she

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>winds up with Tom Evert Scott, and there's some people

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>who are like, she's trapped in a loveless marriage and

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>you can see she's looking to get out and he's

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a bad guy. And I'm like, you don't cast Tom

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Everett Scott in a quick role like that to make

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people think he's a bad guy. Like this is you know,

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this is These are people who I learned long ago

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that because the relationship doesn't work out, it doesn't mean

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a failure. You know, I've I've felt from the beginning.

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>I asked, I asked Damien and Emma this question at

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you right, And I was like, I think some

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people see this as a as a downer and and

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>my view is these people came into each other's lives

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>exactly when they needed to, got each other that next

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>step in their life, and exited stage left. It's melancholy,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's not sad. It's beautiful. Yeah that way. I mean,

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>it's like I don't know and yeah, and I feel

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like she looks like she's very happy in her marriage

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with her child, and we don't know what's going on,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, very happy for each other exactly, that's

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, and like it is. It is shocking to

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>me how some people are just like they've created this

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>whole other scenario where she's sold out for stardom and

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>now she's trapped in a loveless marriage. And I'm like,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>please go to therapy. To your point about baggage, they're

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing something into that. Well, this week we've got Barry Jenkins.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful Barry Jenkins. I have not talked to this man

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>all year, really, not even in passing on Twitter. You've

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>talked to on Twitter. That's it. And uh, you know,

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>partly by design, because I just I wanted the right moment,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and it feels like the right moment. He's so wonderful.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you a funny thing that happened on the

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Red Carpet. Um I met Jaden and Alex, the two

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>young boys who play Um Kevin and Shyrone in the

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>first part of Moonlight, and I asked Alex Hibbert. I

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, so you know, based on this movie, you're

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going to grow up to look like Trevante Rhodes. How

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about that? And he said, that's great, man,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because I'm getting all the girls totally. He's right at

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the gym. Here's a funny story about Trevante. Actually at

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Independent Spirit brunch. Uh, I went to the bathroom

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and he was washing his hands and I was like,

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hey man, great work in the movie. He's like, thanks man.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>He goes out. He's as he's leaving, I go Predator.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>He goes Predator. You're gonna see baby Shane Black. Yes,

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So can I follow that up with one more Trevante story?

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Right after that, he came to the bath to tea party,

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think our column had come out that week

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>where we had said, like, people, you should consider who

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't you know been in the Oscar conversation? And I had,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, prefaced it by saying, of course my Herschelali

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to win, but you should not overlook Trevante Rhodes.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So I saw him and I was going to introduce

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>myself to him, and he walks up to me and says,

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I know who you are, like completely left the ability

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to speak. I was like, you know who I am?

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And amazing and he's cool. He's the best, the whole

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this whole crew is cool. Anyway. I have a really

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>good chat with Barry. So right after this, who is

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>your shal home on time? So notmember trying to you

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>know what all songs. At some point you got to

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>decide for yourself who you don't. Can't let nobody make

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that decision. H you are? Tell him why the other

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>boys keep your gass all the time? Who's found? I've

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the need for the last time I saw you

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>only I'm the only How about no? No, no to whom?

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Huh to you? Who is your I ain't seeing you

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in like a decade. It's not what I expect? What

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>is your respect? Welcome back everyone, I'm here with the

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>writer director of Moonlight, Barry Jenkins. Barry, thanks for doing

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the show man, Thanks for having me. As I was

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>saying before, r Hannah, I've kind of kept my distance

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit this year out of reverence because you guys

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have been hit with a lot of press on this movie,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's been fantastic to see, but I just

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to get lost in the clutter. Yeah. Yeah,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been Uh, it's been a lot, you know, which

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>which is great. You know that. I think there's there's

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>no way the voice of this film would have carried

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>us far um as it did without you know, critics

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and the press and things like that. But it's interesting though,

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>when when the Spirit Award nominations came out, When any

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>nominations come out, I always realized I'm like the only

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>director who's on Twitter. Um, So, so it does take

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>an effort to maintain a distance because you're pretty active

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. I guess we both are. Well. Now we've

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we've come together of our shared love of Deep Water

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Horizon on Twitter, We've talked about fantastic film, and uh,

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>now we finally can talk about Moonlight. We're sitting across

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>from each other for the first time this year. So again,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you for coming up. Um. I want to start

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>by talking about to tell you right experience, because it's

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously very special to you, and I'm sure you've talked

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about this a lot this year, but you know you've

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I've been going for seven or eight years. I know

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you're very well. You're always up there presenting the films

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and you've been programming there for a number of years,

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>so this year must have been incredibly special to premiere

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the movie there. So tell me about that experience. Yeah,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of like an out of body experience,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, until we actually got there, it didn't seem like,

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>UM like it was true. You know, I've been there

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand two. You know, it's a long time,

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>uh to go, and you kind of get set and

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>with the festival feels like what the festival is gonna

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>be like? And and this year was was quite different because,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>as you said, I had a piece of work UM,

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think to to introduce the movie to the

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>world UM in such a safe space to be really honest,

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there were so many people there

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who were rooting for the film, you know, just people

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>who have worked with UM that it was it was

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it was undoubtedly the best way UM to do it,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think it kind of kind of teat everything

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>up for the rest of the year. Yeah, definitely. I

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>saw it at the second screening the afternoon after the

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>premiere at the Galaxy. Yeah, that that was my favorite

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>screening I've and tell you I have to be honest

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. Peter Seller set you up to fail. I know,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I know. I was the theater director. It gave the

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>most glowing, uh just preview of this film just right

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>before setting it up, and I was mortified. I was like,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this movie is not going to live up to what

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this guy just said. And it did. Let me lay

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that out there immediately. It did. But man, I was worried,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, but it was. It was. It's

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a staggering piece of work from you. And I just

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>want to start by buttering you up by saying, yes

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that it delivered on everything he said. And uh, that

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>caught me by surprise. It was just such a breathless yeah, yeah,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>it was. You know. After that, it's like I was,

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you know it's, um it's a very

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>intimate piece. It's a very very small piece in a

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way. UM. But I think what happens

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is the smallness of it, the specificity of it kind

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of takes you by surprise and and and being small

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and by which I should say specific could be comes

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this this larger thing for people, I believe, and I

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like for it to be like a sneak attack. You know,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>my favorite viewer as someone who walks in knowing nothing.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So if someone tells you before you sit down to

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>watch a movie, this movie is going to move mountains,

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>you know you're like, no, it's not. You know you

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>already go into a believing that it's not. But um,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know people, uh, you know when the lights

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>go down that they see the work for what it is.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, when when when he said it, I

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was standing off to the I think I came right

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on and I said immediately, now once you push off

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>those things like like like out of sight, out of mind.

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But even Peter, you know, it came from a place

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of love. I think he had been moved by the

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>movie as well. So, um, so I was fine with it.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I had the same thought in my head.

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the film was born there as well

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>as interesting with the fact you know this has been

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>written about that you spoke with the plan B folks

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Kleiner and Dy Gardner after a screening of Twelve

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Years of Slave, Brett Pitt got the ball rolling. Uh,

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that it's an environment like that where movies

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like that can start percolating because of the atmosphere there.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's such a casual atmosphere for filmmakers too. Uh.

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And and is that something that you've kind of found

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in your time as a filmmaker programming there for years,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing that it's it's a space where that can happen. Yeah,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I think absolutely. I think, Um, it's not to say

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that that everyone there's ultra friendly, but I think the

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>environment kind of engenders, uh, these interactions, these actual like

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>personal person or person interactions. You know. For example, I've

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>introduced I think two of Alexander's movies. Um, I tell

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>you right. And so when when Moonlight came out, he

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>went to the Arc Light and he saw it with

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>an audience, and then he got my email and he

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>wrote me an email. You know, he's like, hey, I

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>remember you as the guy who introduced these films, you know,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and he had very very just amazing things to say.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think it is um an environment where that's

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>possible and what happens quite often. Um. And yet it's

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>never I mean for me at least as ever fills

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a course like I didn't come from from Europe with

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the script going oh my god, I'm gonna I gotta

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>meet Plan B and tell them about Moon. Like I learned,

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I was going to introduce that film eight hours before

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because nobody knew that it was going to be there

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>except for the heads of the festival. Um. But then,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>because you're in this place and you know, I don't

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>want to go on and on about the beauty of

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you right, but I think these conversations they just happened, UM,

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're right. Three years later, every premiered the movie

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>UM at the same festival, which is shocking. And then

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that I remember standing in line after that screening and

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you guys came out after the Q and A and

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole crowd is person to it. Plus and now

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>now that is something that that I have to I

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>have to honestly say, uh, and this is not just

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>me trying to be modest, but I've never seen that

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>happen you need at that festival ever ever, I've never

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>seen that happen. I just haven't seen that before. And

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that was that was I think, probably as far as

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you Rod goes, the moment where I realized, Wow,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>something different is happening. But HI mean something different than

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>my expectations. I thought the film would be you know,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>relatively well well well received that. Um, but I'm inside

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the movie and I had no context of what it

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would mean to people outside. And you're right when we

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>came out of the galaxy, I think it was the

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>patron's line and I was like, this is yeah, it was, Yeah,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it was amazing. Uh, tell me about just you know,

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in your years of programming shorts there, you know, three

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of the shorts that are not nominated this year for

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>an Oscar you programmed there this year. Uh, just out

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of curiosity. I think filmmakers maybe listen to this. You

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>are a person who has seen your share of short films.

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it seems like it might be a kind

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of a saturated uh market for lack of a better word. Uh,

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what does it take to stand out when you're a short,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>when you're a filmmaker making a short film trying to

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>pop like that? Yeah, I think it's all about personal vision, voice,

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>especially at the short, at the short shorter links, you know,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you really have to stand out. Often

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>say it's probably more difficult to make an amazing short

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>film than it is to make, um an amazing feature,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because everything kind of has to be hitting. You know,

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I tell you right, we don't program very many shorts,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we maybe screen I don't know,

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to sixteen shorts total, you know, or you know,

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>across the whole program, whereas someplace like like Sundance, you know,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they can show like a hundred and fifty shorts. Um uh.

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's all amazing work. So for us, it's about

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the personal voice. You know, things have got to stand out.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. Last year there was a film called Everything

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Be Okay, which was nominated in a Short Short

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Narrative Amazing film. Amazing film. Um it didn't win the Oscar,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but amazing film. It's like forty minutes, you know, which

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is really difficult to program for a short film. But

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the voice of it was just so strong and so powerful.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Um And I think with a short film usually it's

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta be like personal vision. It's the very first thing,

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>um I look for. And I think that three films

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this year that you note it are nominated in a

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>short doc. They're all very voice heavy films, especially four

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>point one Miles, which is probably my favorite of all

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the shorts that I programmed this year. Yeah, definitely check

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that out everyone. If you get a chance, I'm gonna

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>get in the moonlight in just a second. I want

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to go back in time a bit when you were

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>assisting for Darnell Martin Darnell directed Cadillac Records. Uh, female director.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I should point out, just because the name might throw

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>you off, I have people all the time. All you

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>work for Darnell. I love him. He's amazing. And I'm like, no,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't know Darnielle Well, I want to know what

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you learned from Darnell. You note, So I was Darnell's

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>assistant from the earliest pre production all the way through

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>post production, and her biggest thing was about was about

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>work and dedication to the craft UM and working with actors.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I should say, you know, Darnell had me involved in everything.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I would be at all the rehearsals. You know. She

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>liked to get to set like two hours before call

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>time and she would walk the set by herself, and

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I was there for all those things. Um. It is

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really about taking responsibility um for the craft of the

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>piece UM and really trying to build a genuine relationship

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with the actors. You know, those were the two two

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest things. You know, she was amazing, and I learned

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot in that year and a half assisting here,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and you came out of that. You you did some

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>uh you made Medicine for Melancholy, and then you worked

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in the short film space some more. And we were

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>talking just before. There's a film you made called Remigration

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that I just saw yesterday. Everybody checked this out. It's

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. It's something you made with PBS and uh

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I t vs where they were asking filmmakers kind of

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>envision and attainable future, like what's something that could happen,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and you put into it your ideas of gentrification. And

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially this vision of a city where the blue

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 1>collar working classes left because they can't afford to live

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there anymore. Now they're kind of being enticed to come

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>back because who's gonna work basically is what it boiled

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>down to. Great film, and I just want to pitch

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to you that's something you've heard for apparently that's a

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>feature man, that's a feature film. I mean, maybe you

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>know you know. The thing The thing about that was,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of the shorts I did between

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Medicine and Moonlight, they weren't because I had an idea

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for a short film. It was like an opportunity kind

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of presented itself, just like with I TV S. They

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hit me up and they had sort of like, uh,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>like a thesis statement, which was it had to be

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>about the not too distant future and it had to

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>be hopeful or uplifting um. And so when then the

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>when in that box, I kind of came up with

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the concept for remigration, which to me was an extension

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>or an extrapolation of what the characters was doing with

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Medicine for melancholic um. I'm glad you mentioned because

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever talks about that short. You know, I got

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to work with Rick you and Russell hornsby Paula Mendoza,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know in in in Medicine you know why,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy didn't have a lot of acting acting experience,

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>where these guys were all season trained actors, and it was,

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was a beautiful reminder of what's possible

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>when you know, you take these things in the world, um,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that you are concerned, concerned about and you try to

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>blend them um with the art um. So I'm glad

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that you brought that up, because I'm you know, I

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>was really happy the way that turned out before this film. Actually,

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the last time James and I worked together.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, really it's yeah. I mean, it's just the

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>way it tackles socio political ideas, and you know, I'm

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of sort of reminded of something like her Spike

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Jones film, which is like an attainable future as well.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, I'm just saying, I'm not your agent,

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but uh, i'd watch a future of that. Let's talk

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>about Moonlight. First of all, Terrell mccraney's peace. Thank you

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for helping me up with that. It's really elegant, uh Peace,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, what's immediately striking. First of all, the language,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>both dialogue and his action is it's really striking, and

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it should be published. Do you think

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a possibility that it will be published? Uh, that's

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a Terrell. I think he wrote it when he

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>he was a very young man. I think he'd maybe

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>wanna take it. It makes some adjustments, Um, but that's Terrell.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I I can't say. Yeah. I mean, I can understand

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that it definitely captures him in a different voice than

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>than what he's grown into. But I think that's what's

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so vital about it? And I think that the fact

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that it it it brought moonlight to life is is

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>very noteworthy. So Terrell, if you're listening, I think other

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>people would love to read that. But the most notable

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>change you made when you were adapting this story was

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>struct shortly. Obviously, the Terrelle piece was forty five pages,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but it blended the stories of Little Chiron and Black.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So you kept kind of going back and forth, and

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you took those and made them. You went linear, and

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you kind of told each story completely before moving on

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to the next one. What was your thought there? Why

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>did you think that was important? You know, I kind

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of when I first read it, I tried to read

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it as an audience member. You know, it's someone sitting

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in the cinema, you know, watching this story unfold. Um

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And I felt like it was too intellectual to really

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>follow the journey of you know, the boy into the team,

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>into the man. And and I thought whatever the piece

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was saying about the world, I was going to be

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>best digested by the audience, you know, over the course

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of a linear journey with the character, rather than seeing

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>time fold back back on itself. Um. And And also

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to you know, I right away thought of the concept

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of seeing the sky you know as different people, you know,

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>literally how the world has manifested himself into a sports

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>whan to manifest himself into a different uh person. And

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought that if you could really spend time with

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>one version and then jump and spend time with the

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>next version, you'll you'll see more of the change, you know,

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll get more of the read of how society has

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>has affected this person um. And so yeah, it just

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was honestly the breakthrough that that where I

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, now I can take take take all

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the ship with this piece. Yeah. You know, something else

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it really does is, uh, myrchel allis character it the

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>way you've structured it. When he's no longer there after

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the first piece of the triptych, it makes you miss him.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And you see how the presence of this sort of

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>father figure, the sort of role model in a certain way,

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it's not constantly readjusting the way it's

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>being sort of ingested by our main character, it kind

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of starts to go off the rails of it. Yeah, uh,

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about your DP, James Laxton. We

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>were mentioning earlier, and first of all, like going back

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to film school, like, what interested you guys photographically? Uh,

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether photographs are certain cinematographers like because certainly

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with Medicine for Melancholia, which was more overt in its

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of visual stylings, and then definitely here too, you

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have a you have a distinctive visual signature going on.

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just curious what inspired you guys at the beginning. Yeah,

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we were really big and too Christopher Doyle and uh

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'd say Darius Kanji. Those were like the two

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest ones, uh for us and Christopher Doyle. It was

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just because you know, as I've said about my approach directing,

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just liked the idea that there was

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>more than one way to tell the story, there was

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>more than one way to photograph an image. Um, and

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I just love the way that that collaboration between One

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Car Y and Christopher Doyle, the way it manifested itself

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as like a very unique voice picture to picture. And

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we just watched a lot of One Car Hawaii and

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Darius Kanji. And we also like the

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who was shooting Flynn Ramsey at the time, I

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think his name was Alwan Alan Couch. Yeah, and we

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>watched a lot of his stuff too, because I think

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he think he may have also shot monsl and Wedding,

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which we were obsessed with at the time. And it's

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>funny because Damien also loves mons and Wedding. But we

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>were in the directors round table. It was basically me

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and Damien cornering uh Me and Nyera to talk about

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Monson Wedding. It was amazing. Um. But you know, we

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just at the film school that we went to, there

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of really great filmmakers there at the time.

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, this guy westball Um was there at the

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>same time that we weren't, and he was watching like

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Spielberg and things like that, James Cameron

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, and there's that's there. That's a

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>certain way of approaching the visual voice of a piece.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But then there was just so much of the world

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 1>outside that, and James and I we were just these

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>two guys who we would just go off and nerd out, watching,

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much off the beaten path as we

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>possibly could. And eventually when we started making short films

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>as this film, I have penned to my Twitter profile.

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It was the first short that we made at film school,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>called my josephing Um. It just all those influences manifested themselves.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, Medicine had a more overt kind of

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>thing with the saturation of the color, pulling the colors down,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>bringing them up in other areas. Uh. And Moonlight has

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly with how you handled handled the color

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>with the color side of things has something going on

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, but it's not as overt. Like I said,

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>did you ever think about doing something as bold is

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>what you did in Medicine for Melancholi with a look?

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>No we we I mean to us that the boldness

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>was going to be allowing Moonlight to be as sat

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to rate it um, as picturesque, I would say, as

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>beautiful an image as it is. Because you know, when

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you if I tell you on making the social realist drama,

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you assume you know a very naturalistic you know,

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>dispatching a camera, you know these sort of like not

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:17.959
<v Speaker 1>necessarily flat, but you know, a more gray, great toned film,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>something like the Dardin Brothers um Uh. Whereas you know,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we thought we would lean into the beauty of Miami's

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting with with with medicine though, because you know, a

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of these things they don't happen by happenstance. You

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>know what I love about medicine is people always make

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the commentary of how desaturated it is, But if you

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>watch the raw footage, it's super saturated, like hyper saturated,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>because we knew when we pulled out the color we

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to keep the lushness of the skin tones um,

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and so all the footage is very very very rid

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and very very orange um at the image capture stage,

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and then we worked our way back, uh from that.

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we try to you know, I say

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this about moon light, but I think it also applies

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to medicine. The consciousness of the character kind of dictates

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>um the tone, the visual tone of the piece. And

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Charonne is surrounded by beauty, and I think inside there

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>was this inner sort of torment, you know, about the

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>beauty he surrounded by and yet how tough his life is,

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and so those things make their way into the imagery.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But to go down to like because that would have been,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know about medicine is desaturated. We had to hyper

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>saturate this man, it would have been and then we

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are talking abou Christopher Doyle Workar, you're getting there. You'll

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>probably get there at some point with that kind of

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a look. I mean, uh, the environment is something I

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about. Medicine. It's very uh informed by

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>its environment San Francisco, the characters dealing with the various

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>socio political elements, and the gentrification is a big topic

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there as well. And then uh with Moonlight Miami Liberty

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>s the basically the environments very much speak to character

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in these films. Uh, how important is that for you?

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that something more specifically? Is that Is that something

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that comes naturally to you when you're writing, or is

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it something that maybe through the process of writing you

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>come to a stage where it's like, Okay, now I

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>want to implement these ideas of how environment is impacting

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this story. No, no, I think it comes part and

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>parcel with my approach to the work up to this point,

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>especially with those two films. Um, you know, they're both

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>very very rooted in place, and you know you've read

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Sells piece even even that at rell stage of it,

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the environment was was a very large aspect.

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's kind of cliche to say, you but

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the environment was a character. You know. Uh. Some element

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of it has to do with the way we're making

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>these films. You know, these are not robust budgets. You know.

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it would be more expensive for me to try

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to subdue the environment than to make the environment active

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>element um of the film. Uh. And in this case,

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it will is uh intellectually dramatically um a

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>point of reference to have the environment be an active

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>element of the tone in the atmosphere of a movie.

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>For example, you know, we could have gone to New

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Orleans or Atlanta to make this film because Florida doesn't

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>have any tax incentives, and because of the budget of

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>this film, you know, we really could have used those

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>tax and centives. But the offset to me, you know,

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the the environment, as you say, if Miami was so

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>crucial to me to the inner life of the characters, um,

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that it was worth taking the hit, you know, and

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>not moving to a different locale to set the film. Yeah.

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And esthetically it provides so much, I mean beyond just

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>thematically how it appects you know, as as a filmmaker,

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you often imagining things. You know, you imagine how a

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>location was gonna look, you know, how how the light

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be whereas in this case, because I've

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>grown up in this place, you know, I can imagine it.

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 1>But it's exactly as I imagined it. When I get

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to set. You know, when I point the camera in

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that direction, I'm seeing exactly what I saw. Um and ahead,

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the projects is still pastel, you know, and

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 1>when we've turned that camera on, it's gonna be gorgeous

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>pastel colors surrounding this and some some scenes. This horrific

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on the counter between these characters. Uh. Regarding the Oscars,

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>congratulations Louis has I think eight nominations. It's and a's

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as is wild. This is this is me James Adala

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>joy Natt went to film school together and we are

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 1>all Academy Award nominees. Like it's fun. I'm I'm pretty

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>chill about the stuff, but I did. I teared up, man,

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, um, you know, not that it was

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a dream of mine, but you know, you're in film

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>school and you you know, you guys sitting around you

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>watch the Oscars, and now they're gonna be people at

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>my film school watching the Oscars, and they're gonna see us,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, sitting in the auditorium. It's it's unbelievable. Yeah, definitely.

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the reason I'm always pulling for Jeff Nichols.

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>We went to film school again. Yeah, amazing guy. But uh,

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, regarding that you've made history and that this

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>is the first film from a black writer director that's

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Screenplay, Uh, what

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to know is, uh, what's like the overriding

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>emotion for you. Is it is it pride that you're

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy that that broke this ceiling, that this is

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the film that did this or is there more of

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>a sense of longing that I don't have to bring

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that up as a statistic that uh it's it's yeah,

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's better sweet. I mean, uh, there's there's so many

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>different angles on it, you know. One, you know, I'm

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>getting messages from people back home in Miami now and

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even talking Florida State, my film school. People

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>back home living in the world you see depicted in

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>this film. Um, and I think when you watch this movie,

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't assume that Shyrone is going to grow up

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and be nominated, you know, for for for two Academy

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Awards or eight Academy Awards for the film. UM. And

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think people look at me and they see that

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>happen in their idea of what they are capable of

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is shifting, you know. Um. I think that's that's amazing.

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>You know what's possible, um, is shifting. Uh. And it's

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a It's a beautiful thing. Um. But of course it's

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bitter sweet because you know, it's seventeen. Um. There should

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>be no room for first anymore. And I think if

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>someone you know, like Spike you know, who wrote and

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>directed Malcolm X, which is an amazing film, um, or

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do the Right Thing or so many, so many other

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pieces of his work. Um. And so it's bitter sweet

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that there are any first uh for me or anyone

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 1>else to accomplish. UM. Yeah, I don't, I don't. It's

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>where you even talking about it. Man. It's such a

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>mixed thing. You know. I do a lot of Q

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and A S and I can give very sustinct dances.

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's one of the ones that you know, as

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this is happening, you know, I'm still trying to reconcile

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, what it means and how I feel about it. Yeah, definitely,

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, I just it's so far over

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>due milestone. But congrats on being the one to hit

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>that mark. You thank you, bro, and and you know,

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and to and to fold it all the way back.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>You know. You mentioned eight nominations, you know, and I'm

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>glad they're spread as wide across the piece as they are.

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think you remove any one element um

0:41:57.840 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>of this puzzle in the film, it's not the same.

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And so even though it's a milestone that theoretically, you know,

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I am, I've accomplished behind the recipient of I think

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>those eight nominations show that the village that created more

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>white has has has achieved that milestone definitely. And then

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I hate to close out by leaning in on politics,

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>but we're entering Black History Month, and I have to

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ask if you if you saw President Trump's comments about

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Black History Month. I did not. You did not did

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>not very hand fist. I saw I saw one clip

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter about Frederick Douglas, and I thought it was

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a joke. I thought I thought someone had like dubbed.

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I did not think it was real. That was real.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I did not think it was real. What does that

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>make you think? When the leader of the free world

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is is that that's his capacity for empathizing and understanding

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what this means. Heavy question to close with him, so sorry,

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thankfully this is his radio because he could see my

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:57.439
<v Speaker 1>face when he started to ask the question. UM, I mean, look,

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>these are I think we're all you know. I just

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>watched I Am Not Your Negro again uh the other day,

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's amazing how many things Mr Baldwin

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>says in that piece that are relevant to the present

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>moment that we're currently living in. UM. And rather than

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>than giving an opinion on the current president, UM, it

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>just reminds me like a movie that's pens at the

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>top of my Twitter profile. I've just got to keep

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>making work UM that addresses and reflects the world that

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we live in, in the country, UM, that we want

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to live in. Definitely. Well, I think you'll

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have plenty of doors open to you now, thankfully. What

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do? Remigration to electric bugal, what

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do those? Seriously? Like do you

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>want to uh? Because you're in a variety of things.

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was reading about the thing that you

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>wrote like a die hard kind of thing, like on

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Diehard on a bridge is what you called it, But like,

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what what kind of movies are interested in making going forward?

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm I'm a I'm a person who just

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>loves cinema. You know, for example, you know my love

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of Deep Water Horizon. I would love to make that film.

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>As as evidence how much I tweet about it. Um

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that there are many different things, UM that that I'm

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>curious about that I have an appetite for UM And

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that the biggest blessing of this experience has

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of those things are open to me now. Um.

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It always starts with the character. Though, always starts with

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the character, and as you said, with the place. I

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think with those two elements, there's some moments where I

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can make anything, as evidenced by the

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>two pieces I'm working on now, which are totally different,

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically a biopic about a female boxer from Flint, Michigan,

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Colson white Heads The Underground Railroad. You know,

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it could be more different, um, And yet I think

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they both feature amazing characters rooted to place. Yeah. Man, well,

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>good luck of both of those. Good luck going forward,

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and congrats again and thanks for coming on the show.

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. Thank you very much, Bron Thanks

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening everyone. Remember to subscribe and check back next

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 1>week when I'll be talking to Arrival. The director Danie Villain,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:07.720
<v Speaker 1>new you've been listening to Playback at the right boom.