WEBVTT - Bloomberg Law Brief: Diversity Issues at Google (Audio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for our daily Bloomberg Law Brief, exploring

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>legal issues in the news, and Today, Bloomberg La host

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Store discusses a viral memo from a Google engineer

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>who was fired after blasting the web company's diversity policies.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>He speaks with the Bloomberg News Google reporter Mark Berken.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>What specifically does it criticize Google? For? Right? I mean,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the title is Google's ideological echo chamber. It makes the

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>point that a lot of the efforts around diversity inclusion,

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically around gender diversity and inclusion are actually counterproductive to

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Google as a business and as a culture. And it

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes through in a very ten page memo,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>very lengthy point about how these biases and the author

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>claims that that Google is a very liberal place and

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of des sends um. Any type of defending opinion,

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it be conservative or something like that would disagree

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with the positions on diversity are suppressed. Um and not

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>giving not giving enough attention. Can you give us some

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of the gender numbers at Google? Just how male

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>dominated is the company so overall? And the men as

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>their latest figures men and women. Um. But the important

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>part is in the tech team, UM, the tech employees,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's much more heavily skewed its men. So the company,

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of tech companies, are a very difficult

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>time in changing that ratio, even though they have for

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>years now they've talked about their efforts to improve diversity internally.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Yet what are some of the steps Google has been taking?

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>How how hard have they been working to try to

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>change those numbers? Right? I mean, it's really hard to

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>tell from the out, so they don't typically disclose that.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Then they they've started a program called it an unconscious

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>biased training, and that was one of the programs that

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was called out in the memo. UM. The author said

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that program is unnecessary and and sort of counterproductive. UM.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Google is now facing you know, it comes with a

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>sensitive time for the company. They're they're facing a Department

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of Labor lawsuit about their the the gap in the

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>gender pay. Google has argued that that law is inaccurate,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that the women are not paid any differently than men,

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But they've not been willing to this closed data to

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>show that. As Bloomberg News Google reporter Mark Bergen speaking

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Lah host Gregg's story, you can listen

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm Wall Street Time

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Radio and Now. Among the top legal

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>stories from Bloomberg Law, the City of Chicago has sued

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at Turning General Jeff Sessions over proposed funding cut for

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so called sanctuary cities. The Justice Department is threatened to

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>withhold federal funds from cities that don't cooperate with the

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants. Chicago calls that unconstitutional.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Sessions responded by saying Chicago is beset by a culture

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of lawlessness and as this morning's Bloomberg Law Brief. You

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>can find more legal news at Bloomberg Law dot com

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg na dot com. Attorneys will find exceptional legal

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>research and business development tools there as well. Visit Bloomberg

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Law dot com and Bloomberg DNA dot com for more

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>information