WEBVTT - How Global Catastrophe Has Only Made Billionaires Richer

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you, and that, of course was the

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>mighty Mega Hunter t Rex, a toy you might want

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy your favorite three year old for Christmas this year.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But with all the talk of global supply chain snarl ups,

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I know you're wondering, will those vital toy supplies from

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the North Pole and China get through and if so,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>what cost? Well, we have the very latest news from

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong in a minute. We also have some hard

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers on the soaring wealth of the world's billionaires, and

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we take a few minutes to consider the new traffic

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>light coalition in Germany and Angela Merkel's legacy after sixteen

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>years as Chancellor. Stay tuned too if you want to

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>find out what her staff gave her as a going

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a Way present this week. Clue, it's not socks and

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not a watch. But first, here's our senior correspondent

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in the current in Hong Kong with that vital update

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who has yet to finish their Christmas shopping

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>m it's shaping up to be an expensive Christmas for

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Santa Claus. As the big supply crunch of one pushes

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up prices for toys. There's even a risk of some

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>presents won't get to Santa Sligh in time. So I

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>went along to meet Dave Cave, the owner of Dragon

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Eye Toys in Hong Kong, whose products include the Mighty

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Mega Hunter t Rex that you just heard, to find

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>out the latest state of play for toymakers. But before

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we dive into the details, here's a dem of one

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of his dinosaurs. What we've done really well with should

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>do a talk back junior megasaur. It has three play

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>me functions on the actual dinosaur. It's about seven or

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>eight in she's long, same in the height. It's a

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>really cooled dinosaur. So when you press its foot, you

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>hear it walking. When you press its tummy you can

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>hear it's munching away there. And when you press its

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>back you can hear it roaring. And when you press

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the top of the dino's head and you say something

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like welcome to Dragon Eye Toys, this is the talk

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>back Dinoh, welcome to Dragon Eye Toys. And I can

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>tell you parents and kids absolutely love it. Cave cells

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to leading retailers around the world. Unlike every other toymaker.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>He has spent a year dealing with surging prices and

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>mathsfully disrupted transportation. While he's seeing some signs of stabilization

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in the supply crunch, Cave reckons the spike and costs

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>still flowing through to consumers. Everybody's toys, everybody's kettles, everybody's

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever they're buying. If it's come from China and it's

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>arriving in the last quarter of one and the first

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter of two, there's going to be pricing creases anything

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>from five to depending on the product. Recent data in

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Asia is pointing to some easing of congestion at the

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>region's biggest ports, and economists say and easing energy crunch

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in China will also help supply chains. But Cave is

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>looking to Chinese New Year in February as a potential

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>circuit breaker for the global supply crunch. That's the time

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of year when China's factories shut down for annual holidays,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's normally associated with a lull in global trade.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Recent data in Asia is already pointing to some easing

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of congestion at major ports, and economists say an energy

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>crunch in China is easy and that will also boost supplying,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>so the supply chain is still difficult. The general feel

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is that Chinese New Year tends to be where everything

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>breaks off and we restart everything, and so I think

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are thinking maybe end of February

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>early March things will change. Still cave cautions, it's not

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>just supply chain snags that are hitting toymakers. The strength

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of the yuan and high oil prices could leave an

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>impact long after ships are sailing on time. Again, I

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would say over the last eighteen months, we've had from

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the factors between a three and ten twelve percent increase

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>over that eighteen months, which we've had to pass on

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to our customers as best we can because we you know,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>in our industry you have to be lean and mean,

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and there isn't that extra margin. And I think the

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>buyers out there globally realized that prices will go up.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>The question they're all asking is are they going to

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go up again in two Nobody knows. Logically they shouldn't

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>go up next year unless something quite fundamental happens within

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the industry and China. So we're looking to stabilize the

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>pricing in two. But obviously, as I say, when we

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>reset the market in end of February early March, we'll

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>get a better indication of where the market is going.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>For now, Santa is going to have to dig a

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>little deeper to fill his sleeve. Well, Santa, if you're

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>out there, try your best to keep those prices down,

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately, I think they're going to be a little

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than you deliver them last year. Santa for

0:05:48.240 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News in Hong Kong. I'm end the current now.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You might have noticed it was a pretty big week

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for Germany, with Angela Merkel stepping down as chancellor and

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a new traffic light coalition taking over under Chancellor Schultz,

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Social Democrat leader who's featured on this podcast not

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so long ago. So our Berlin producer Aggie Cantrill is

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>at the German Parliament and I think could campaint the

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>scene a bit for us, Aggie, I should say, we're

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about an hour after the official handover of power

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>took place in the German Chancery. But it's it's been

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty momentous day. Just tell us what's going on. Yeah,

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>highest Japanese, So it has been quite a long day

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>really in the in the Bundestag because firstly the Bundestag

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>has to officially vote in the new chancellor, which they

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>did um with he gained a majority, I believe of

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>three and nine round about um. But then after that

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>he was sworn in as Chancellor along within you roster

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of ministers, ministers that come from the Greens, the SPD

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Liberal Free Democrats, and then he went to

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>meet Merkel at the Chantrey and have the official hand

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>over this afternoon. And it's the coalition you just described

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it briefly, but it's it's been known as the traffic

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Light Coalition, which sounds very exciting, but just talk us through.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So the traffic Light Coalition, I mean, it gets its

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>name from the colors of the parties, as do all

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the coalitions. And thankfully this isn't one with clumsily named

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>flag as many of the other coalitions are named. But

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this one is a coalition of the SPD that represents

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the red, the Social Democrats, the Greens that are obviously

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>as their name would suggest, and the Liberals that are

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>classically a yellow color. And there is a bit of

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a distance, especially between the Greens and between the FDP

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>on it. A few issues when it comes to economic

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and fiscal policy, especially the Greens were always seen as

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>these big spenders, all of these party that had questioned

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the merits of things like Germany's constitutional debt break, and

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>yet now because of the compromises reached during the coalition agreement,

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we actually see probably a more fiscally conservative government than

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we would have expected if it were just, for instance,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Greens and the SPD, because there's a moderating force

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the FDP that now are in charge of the

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>finance ministry. And later on I think we're going to

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit into how these three parties could

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>possibly agree because they sound very different. But one of

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the one of the striking points to come out of

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the coalition agreement that I think court people's eye outside

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Germany was the lowering of the voting age to sixteen.

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And that was I gather that was in a responsive

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>part to a big grassroots movement. How did that happen?

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think something that's really notable about that lowering of

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the voting age is it's something that actually appeals also

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to those parties. Specifically, the Greens and the FDP have

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a very strong support with among younger Germans. And I

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's an interesting conversation to be had about whether

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>or not it's not a question of the c DU

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and the SPD losing out over all, but the fact

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're losing dominance within younger voters, and those voters

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are looking for a sort of alternative to the left

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>right or progressive conservative dichotomy, but within two other parties,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a party, one party that stands for digitalization and modernization,

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and another party that stands for a lot of progressive

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>social issues and environmental policy. That's the Greens. Yes, that

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>would be the Green. It's been quite low key though,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's just that I'm not sitting in Germany,

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but Angle and Michael has been around for sixteen years,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>has been this momentous figure. I mean, as it is,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it just not a big deal this week because you've

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>had you feel like you've been saying goodbye to her

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for at least a year. I actually think it has

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>been quite a big deal. But I think the real

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>momentous occasion was the election itself, which of course happened

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months ago now. And I think it's

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because now everyone's been wrapped up in the coalition agreement

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's sort of passed them by that this was

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>actually Merkle's official last day. I think the real, the

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>real drama happened around the around the election itself, and

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of course Merkele's party losing out on another term without

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>her in charge. Well, it didn't pass us by on Stephanomics.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think Angler Mike is going to do now?

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure she's going to go on a lot

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of hiking trips. That was her present from the chancellery

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>staff today. They brought her some some hiking sticks and

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a tind to bring some sandwiches in on her trips,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think she's probably going to take up quite

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time sped sped exactly, I can thank you

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very much, but I'm joined now by Holger Schmiding, chief

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>economist for Behrenburg Bank and a wise observer of the

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>German and broader European economy for many years. Holger thanks

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining Stephanomics and Angela Merkel has had

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years in office, one of the most influential politicians

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>of our era by any measure. I don't feel like

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>if it was any other country or any other chancellor,

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we'd be making much more fast about her departure. Now, Well, indeed,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>what we are seeing is a very smooth condition of

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>power in Berlin, and it really does mark the end

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of an era. But it does not mark a major

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>change in policies. And that's probably why there is only

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>limited excitement about it. We'll get it, we'll get onto

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that the new government in a minute. And I think

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in any other country would seen more exciting. I know

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>you're you're gonna carefully explain to us why we shouldn't

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>be too excited. But if you think about when the

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>history books have written, what are the main contributions that

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you think a Glamrker will be remembered for, she will

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not be remembered for one single contribution. She will probably

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be remembered most for two things. First of all, she

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>presided over one of the best periods you could say,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in German history, sixteen years of stability, of peace and prosperity,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with a record rise in employment. The number of jobs

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>where you earn enough who have to pay part payroll

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>taxes on her watch rose by in a population that

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>did not increase very much. So that is indeed one thing.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is, of course her very contentious decision

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>during the refugee crisis to not close Germany's borders again

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>after the first rush of refugees from Hungary had been

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>led in, and the subsequent webs and the subsequent wave

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of migrants, of course did sharpen and exacerbate divides in

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the country. In Europe, it probably contributed a bit to

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the British debate about Brexit. So that is one thing,

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the refugee crisis and are dealing with it, that she

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>may be remembered for. But let's put that into contact.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>On the European level, she after some deliberation, did a

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>lot to keep the EU, the Eurozone together as well

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>as she could. She kept Greece in the Europe, overruling

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>her own finance minister on that matter when she really

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>had to. She put a lot of German money on

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the table during the pandemic to support heavily affected countries

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>during the euro crisis. So she was in one sense

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a very strong European despite the controversies she triggered during

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and in the aftermath of the refugee crisis. I mean,

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the refugee crisis. I suspect that was a

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>time when Angela Merkel as a as an individual politician,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>really crossed people's radars outside of Europe because you had

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>those pictures coming from the German train stations and the borders,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and then her speech effectively saying to open the borders

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and that that anyone could come in. I mean, that

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>was that was quite a moment at the time. What

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was the more long term impact on the political scene

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of that whole crisis on the German political scene, that crisis,

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the discussion about many, many migrants coming in, did revive

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the fortunes of the flagging far right a f E party,

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>which now is a presence in the German Parliament with

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a good ten percent of the vote. It had been

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>scoring below five before the refugee crisis. So it did

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>sharpen the political debate in Europe in Germany and did

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>add to support for right wing far right parties. Having

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>said that, first of all, her big decision to let

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in refugees from Hungary was widely applauded across the political spectrum.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It was her subsequent hesitation about closing the border again,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>her refusal coming from East Germany having been hemmed in

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>by a wall for much of her life, while Germany

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was divided and she was on the wrong side of

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the war her refusal to erect a wall at the

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>German borders figuratively speaking, that is, to strongly police the

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>borders against migration. That refusal in the end proved to

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be quite controversial. She is still hugely popular today. Yes,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>she leaves office as the most popular policymaker in Germany,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a position she has held through most of her time.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>With some ups and downs, you could say she leaves

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>very much on a high note. And when it comes

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to the refugee segation, what we also have to say now,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with six years having passed since the integration within Germany

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is not proceeding too badly. So the verdict is open

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.479
<v Speaker 1>whether in the longer term net net the problem sharpening

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>divisions within the country or the benefit a country with

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>an adverse demographic actually gets young people. Most of them

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are eager to work whether this net net will be

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a positive or a negative longer term. Simply, the verdict

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is not out yet. Certainly, from the outside, Germany seems

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to have been despite and maybe, as you say, perhaps

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in part because of the way immigrants have been able

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to be integrated in the labor force. But despite all

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>those debates around the refugee crisis, Germany seems to have

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>been largely spared the kind of extreme polarization and the

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>toxic politics that we've seen, certainly in the UK and

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the US over the last few years. Is that is

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that right or is that just wishful thinking? That is

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. Germany has been spared much of the um

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>ooxification of politics that we see elsewhere. We have traces

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, but not to the extent that you see

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in many other countries. One reason for that is, of

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>course history, having had far too much of a polarization

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of society in the ninet twenties and early thirties, and

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we all know the terrible consequences of that, Germans shy

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>away from taking extreme positions. On top of that, the

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>German constitution, the federal nature of it, de facto enforces

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>a kind of consensus. Yeah. The government of Angla Merkel

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for three of her third terms included, apart from her

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>center right Conservatives, the center left social Democrats, which meant

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that compromises between the two big strands of political thought,

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the center right and the center left, had to be

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>struck within the government and also the strong role of

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Constitutional Court and the upper house of Parliament, where

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>typically the party that is in opposition in the federal

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>government has a veto the fact to enforces that mainstream

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>parties have to talk to each other and come up

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with a joint view. And as a result, Germany rarely

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>does big policy shifts which do not enjoy broad political

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>support across the isle. So you do have i mean

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on paper, just turning to the new government that we

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have that that takes power this week. Um, it's as

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, it's the Social Democratic Party along with the

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Free Democratic Party and the Greens, which in any as

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you said yourself, it's sort of crosses the political spectrum

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in Germany. In any other country, it would sound pretty

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult to manage, is it. Is it going to be

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>an unworkable coalition at first? It may sound unworkable. I

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you have to imagine in the US as if

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of the Democrats were to cooperate with of the

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans for one government within one government, that's roughly what

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>we are. Biden can only dream of having that exactly,

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>get the Democrats to cooperate with exactly, so, at least

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, we have seen that these three different parties

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have come up with a joint program to govern. Germany

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>has a long tradition, at least a long postwar tradition

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of such coalition governments, which against threddled the political divide

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for us. This is normal that you try that you

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>campaign on your own platform, but you basically know that

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>once it comes to governing, you are not implementing your

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>own manifesto. You are trying to combine your manifesto with

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that of your coalition partners of a different persuasion, and

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>probably it will work simply because in this government the

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>three parties have granted each other a bit of leeway

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to social policy, such as hiking the

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage. It is not a compromise. The social Democrats

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the center left have said we want the minimum wage

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve euros per hour. They get it. The Greens have

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>said we want a faster exit from code, they get it.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>The Liberals have said no tax hikes to fund all

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of that, and they get it, which of course means

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we need a few tricks to actually fund the expert

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>investment spending. But it's not just a compromise that is

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>all murky. It is something where all of the three

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>parties can say the government's programs it does bear to

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>some extent our imprint. Hence we can and could sell

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it to our members. So events always happen. If it

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is never easy in government, stuff will happen. There will

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be discord, But I do think this government is as

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>likely to be stable as previous German governments and full

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of super reasonable politicians who don't do any of the

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>things that other politicians and other countries seem to do.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>When we think about the big challenges for the country obviously,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and the environmental is one, the energy transition. People for

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time, particularly economists who are not German, have

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>criticized Germany for being too dependent on its export sector

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and heavily reliant on that on that sort of manufacturing

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>side of the economy, which has remained so much stronger

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>than it is in many other European countries. I'm interested

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>given the current climate concerns about US and China relations

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>affecting um the integration of the global economy, and the

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>now right now the supply chain issues that we're seeing,

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>how has Germany been affected by that? The current supply

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>chain is affect Germany a lot. What we are seeing

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is very subdued output in the car sector, say at

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>least below what German companies could produce and what they

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>could sell given that order books are full. So Germany's

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>very dependence on manufacturing, which requires a lot of inputs,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>including semi conductors, forcast, for machine too its is now

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the near term the significant weakness. It is one

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>major reason why Germany in the recovery from the pandemic,

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is now lagging far behind or not just a little

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>behind France. Having said that this is probably an issue

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that will no longer be that relevant, say two years

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>from now, my private guess is that two years from now,

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with almost every government subsidizing seemi conductor production, we may

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have a glut or at least sufficient, if not too

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>many seemi conductors. What we can say if we look

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>back at the last twenty years. But all in all,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Germany's focus on top not manufacturing has not served the

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>country badly and it hasn't paid to bet against Germany

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last few decades. People, certainly in Britain and

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK in the US are a bit worried about

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>getting their toys in time for Christmas. With all these

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues are you Are you nervous of people

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in Germany nervous about that rushing out to get your

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>toys early. Supply chain issues are a major problem in Germany,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but they are more a problem on the production site

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>affecting the car industry. There is much less talk than

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some other countries about the delivery problem, that is, getting

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that what arrives in the ports by truck towards the shops.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>There is a bit of anxiety here and there are

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>people are being encouraged to buy their toys early, but

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>at the moment this does not seem to be a

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>big issue. One reason for that is probably that Germany

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is wide open with its land borders, so even if

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>truck drivers asking us in part of the country, they

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>could come from other part of the country, or more precisely,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>they could come from Poland from Romania. This is a

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>pan continental European logistics market which is strained, but which

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to be anywhere near breaking point where

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have to fear that Santa Claus would not

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be bringing what the kids would love. And thank goodness

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for that Oldish Median, thank you very much, You're welcome.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic has been a golden age for billionaire wealth.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You might have suspected that to be true looking at

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>stock markets and property prices soaring around the world, even

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>when we were in the midst of the COVID slump.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But now we have some hard numbers to prove it.

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Courtesy of the Global Inequality Lab, the research group established

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>by the French economist Thomas Picketty. US economy reporter Augusta

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Surreva wrote up the story for US and is here

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for a quick chat about it. Augusta, thanks for joining us.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>What are the most eye popping numbers in this report?

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for having me. I think the

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>most surprising thing of the studies not that billionaires have

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of money and control lots of wealth, right, but

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the fact that during the pandemic, that's when they

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.239
<v Speaker 1>gained the most wealth. So last year, for example, they

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>saw billionaire wealth reached three point five percent from simply

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>one percent when they started tracking these numbers. So it's

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>been going up three point five percent of the world's

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>wealth exactly. And that's only and that's fewer than three

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand people. Yes, that's controlled by about two thousand and

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>seven and seven hundred and fifty people and nowadays they

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>control three point five percent of the world's wealth. And

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the poorest half of the global

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>population controls only two percent of the global wealth. It's crazy.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And what of the fact is that the driving the

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>increased during the pandemic, because obviously we did have a

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>recession in many countries, but we did see stock markets

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>go up, I guess yes. And what we happened was

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>also that we saw the rich get rereacher and the

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>poor get poorer, right, so at the same time that

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of people going into extreme poverty. So,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the one of the numbers that

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the authors of the report mentioned to me when we

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>spoke this week is that the World Bank estimates that

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million people are now living in extreme poverty

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of the pandemic, at the same time

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen billionaire wealth sort right. So this is

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>happening at a moment in which, as you mentioned, we're

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>seeing both financial and real estate markets sore. Uh, and

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of people on the bottom half

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the income distribution suffer a lot from the lack

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the lack of income during the pandemic, the lack of benefits,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is a trend worldwide. Yeah, lack of benefits,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>lack of vaccine, and I could I also noticed in

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the report that the over over globally, the richest ten

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>percent control maybe sixty of the wealth, but there is

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>there are quite big distinctions across regions. So are the

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most unequal places in the world. Yes,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So some of the most unequal places in the world

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>nowadays are of course the Middle East and North Africa,

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, and of course Russia and Central Asia. These

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>are places where, of course you doubt in the past,

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of inequality. So this is not something new,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>But what the authors of the report are saying is

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that nowadays, what we're seeing is a shift from claudio

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>inequalities into market inequalities in these places. Just showcase that.

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, the other thing that I guess was

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 1>distinctive about this report is they talk about not just

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the wealth gap, but also the carbon footprint gap. The

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that the wealthier people, although they might talk a

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>good game about helping the environment, actually have a much

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>much bigger footprint carbon footprint. Yes, and what's surprising about

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that is some of the some of the highest inequalities

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>are actually seen in some of the richest parts of

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the of the world. So for example, one of the

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>regions where are you see, uh, some of the most

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>striking inequalities when it comes to the carbon footprint is

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>North America, where the top ten percent of the population

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>emits on average seventy three metric times per capita each year,

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>compared to last than ten times for the worst half

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the population in North America. And that that is

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting with it within the country. And I found out

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking August, I mean when we've we've obviously talked about

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>inequality before on this show, and that lots of people

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about it, and we've interviewed Thomas Picketty himself for Stephanomics,

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>And there was this feeling in the midst of the pandemic,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>as it became clear that inequality was being exacerbated by

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, that there was going to be this great

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>move political appetite post pandemic to tackle inequalities or at

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>least start to reduce wealth inequalities in many countries. Do

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you feel like that that's panning out? Do you see

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>any appetite for that, I mean, I'm thinking about some

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of the debates we've seen in Congress in the US,

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>for example. Yes, it was definitely part of the conversation

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the US for a long time. We saw Treasury

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Janet Yellen talk multiple times about it. Aldis not

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>only has to end this race to the bottom when

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to taxes, but also play a leadership part

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in that. But of course, right now we have many

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>conversations happening at the same time on the policy brought right,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about infrastructure bill, we're talking about taxes,

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about building back better, and of course there's

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this whole conversation seems to be penning out a bit.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's also it's interesting in the in the

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>UK there seems to be no appetite for that kind

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of action at all. And if anything, on the margins,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the the extra spending and the tax changes have tended

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to benefit and high income people more. It's all interesting. Well,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Gustus soever, thank you very much, thank you for having me. Well,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that's it for this episode of Stephonomics. We'll be back

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>next week. In the meantime, if you like the program,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>please take the time to rate it and follow as

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Economics on Twitter for more news and analysis from Bloomberg Economics.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Magnus Hendrickson, with special thanks

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to Ender Current, Augusta Serreva, Aggie Cantrill, and Holger Schmiding.

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sasso is executive producer of Stephanomics and the head

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of Bloombird podcast is Francesco Leafy h