WEBVTT - Burnt by the Boom: Solar’s Growing Pains

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Tom Rowland's Reese and you're listening to Switched

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast brought to you by bn EF. In

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>recent years, the world has been a wash, with cheap

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>solar hammering the profits of PV manufacturers while at the

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>same time opening up new export markets to developing nations

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>seeking affordable energy sources. Demand growth for solar is still strong,

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with our global installation forecast for twenty twenty five set

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>to reach six hundred and ninety five gigawatts, exceeding the

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and ninety nine gigawatts seen last year, but

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>headwinds remain in some territories, especially in the US, where

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration's tariffs have taken aim at the entire

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>value chain for key parts originating from China and some

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asian countries.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>So just how much.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Longer can module prices continue to decline? What impact has

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>large scale solar adoption had on energy markets, and could

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the US government's policy actually support the growth of a

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>domestic PV manufacturing industry or harm it. Today I'm joined

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>by BNF Solar specialist Jenny Chase as we discuss findings

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from her most recent PV market outlook, which b and

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>EF clients can find at b and EF go on

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal or on bnef dot com. All right,

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>let's get to talking about the out look for SOLA

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>with Jenny. So it is not very often that we

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have a bona fide celebrity on the podcast, but I

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>said to my wife this morning that we are having

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Jenny as a guest on the podcast, and she said,

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>who's Jenny? And I said, well, imagine if Sola was fashion,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>then maybe Jenny is Anna Wintle. And my wife said, well,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>does that mean she makes interns cry? And I said no,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it's just that, you know, very highly respected opinion, but

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>gives it.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>To you straight.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And she said, oh, you mean Jenny Chaser. So that's

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>why I mean that we have a bona fide celebrity.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So everything there is to know about Sola is contained

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>within the mind of Jenny. And so, Jenny, welcome to

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the show. Really glad to have you on.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Hello Tom.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So we were just talking actually before we started recording

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that today. You wanted to talk about, among other things,

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the global oversupply in solar.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>So tell us a little bit more. And I do

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>have follow on questions around this, but yeah, what is it?

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Can you just describe to us the situation as you

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>see it.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 4>So, solar manufacturing is a business in which it is

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 4>very hard to make in the lock dawn. It is

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 4>regularly the case that far more solar modules can be

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>made in a year than are actually bought. And this

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 4>is despite the fact that the volumes of solar modules

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 4>being bought and installed are growing at really quite a

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>rapid clip, and have been for the last twenty years.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 4>The thing is that the solar manufacturing industry consistently expands

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>faster than demand. So even though demand is growing, you

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 4>regularly get these periods of oversupply where all the manufacturers

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 4>suffered negative profitability and quite a lot of them go bust.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 4>We have been in one of those phases for about

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>a year now, and there's no sign of us coming

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>out of it.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I suppose the reason I have follow up questions is

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I sort of get it where you describe. I have

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this picture of, you know, two things that are growing

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>really fast, the demand for solar and the supply of solar.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe if you're in the world of the supply

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of solar, it's kind of hard to judge the pace

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe the industry collectively sometimes overdoes it a

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit and needs to slow down, which is kind

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of how you're describing it.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I suppose.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The question I have is is I don't remember a

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>time where you have ever said there's undersupply of solar.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I you know, you're saying that the market's going through

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a really tough time, But I feel like whenever I

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about solo, you're saying them.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I have a short memory, so it's both.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Now you're pretty much right. I mean, so in twenty

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, demand actually group quite quickly, and prices the

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>solar model actually rose for a little while. So there

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>are periods where solar manufacturers can make fairly nice profits.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>They just tend to be quite short. And what tends

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 4>to happen then is that they build new factories using

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the latest technology, and when they built the factories use

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 4>the latest technology, the factories that are three years old,

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>and how obsolete.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So a question I have here, I mean, this is

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of almost like everything I've ever wanted to ask

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Jenny about some of these dynamics.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Is why are people building these factories? Then?

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, given what you're saying, why would anyone in

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>their right mind be investing in solar manufacturing.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Where you got me there, tom So, I think the

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 4>dynamic here is that if you're a solar manufacturer, you

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 4>always have a choice. You can expand you can build

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>a new factory using the latest technology, so making the

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 4>latest N type top con cels with the best efficiencies

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 4>in the market, and you can survive another year. Or

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 4>you can not do that. You can just run your

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 4>current capacity and you will lose market share and eventually

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 4>become obsolete. So you certainly have no choice but to

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 4>shoot for the stars. And of course if you shoot

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 4>for the stars, what happens to a great many of

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 4>these companies is that they fail, they burn up, they

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 4>go bankrupt. But there are always new investors willing to

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 4>come in because everybody loves sold there so much.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there an element because I've also been looking at

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this from you know, the perspective of some of the

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>US efforts over the years to cultivate its own solar

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing business. And I remember saying on actually the first

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>time I ever was a host on this podcast, we

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>had one of our US solar analysts who was talking about,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the use of tariffs and incentives, and this

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>predates Trump to stimulate manufacturing in the US and this

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to fight it out with China, which

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, point number one is that seems like

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a battle that you're unlikely to win. But point number

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>two I made was is this a battle you even

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>want to win?

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like this.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>War over a little patch of desert where there is

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the least arable land ever, and so the only conclusion

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I could kind of come to was that some of

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this interest was from a more of a national security

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>resilience point of view. Is that also a fact that

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>it's encouraging or incentivizing some of this investment we see globally,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly in China, is that it serves a strategic interest

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and is therefore being encouraged.

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Not in China.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 4>So around two thousand and eight, maybe even a bit

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 4>before twenty and four to twenty ten or so, the

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Chinese federal government did support solar manufacturer. It particularly gave

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 4>the provincial government a remit to give land and permits

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 4>and suitable infrastructure to solar companies, and the big Chinese

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>state banks were willing to back manufacturers. So yes, there

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 4>was a period when for China solar manufacturing was strategically

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 4>important and the central government was supporting it.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>That phase has long long ended.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 4>The Chinese solar industry is viciously capitalist, that is, dog

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 4>eat dog, and the solar manufacturing industry is principally Chinese

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 4>companies competing with one another. In fact, the Chinese PV

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Industry Association has tried to stop manufacturers selling at vices

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 4>as low as the vices currently are, and it largely

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 4>failed because it's very difficult to get five hundred companies

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 4>to all sell at higher devices that they are naturally

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 4>inclined to.

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So one of part of this cycle you've described is,

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies going bust and then also this idea

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturing capacity becoming obsolete. So when companies go bust,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>to other companies swoop in and buy their factories or

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is it by that stage those factories are worthless because

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're obsolete. You know what happens there?

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>They do often get picked up by other players, usually

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 4>for quite small and absent money. And in China there

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 4>is a dynamic where the local government will lost and

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 4>back another company to take it over because it's a

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>bit let embarrassed than just closing that entirely. The major

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Chinese module makers have also cut the number of employees

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 4>by significant amounts in twenty twenty four, simply because they're

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 4>reducing production and they're also increasing productivity per employee.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I just find this whole phenomenon so interesting. It reminds

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>me of that I don't remember the name of the

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>guy that Greek legend about the guy who had to

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>roll a stone up the hill, Cidyphus, Sisyphus. That's the

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>one that's kind of like what the solar industry seems

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like to me. The way you describe it is you're

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>either pushing the stone up the hill, which is hard work,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or you're out of the game and back to the bottom.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 4>I think that's what makes that's what trying to make

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 4>money and solar manufacturing is like. I mean, Cis of

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Firs was assigned that job as a punishment, and it

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 4>wasn't really a job. There is a good side to this,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 4>which is the watch thank you. There is a good thing,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 4>which is is that worldwide, consumers are getting really cheap modules,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>and we see that even some quite poor countries like Pakistan,

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 4>South Africa and Nigeria are starting to deploy large about

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 4>sols now just because they are so cheap.

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean obviously.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I sometimes think when people talk about over

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>suppliers a problem like, well, whose problem is that? And

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly there is an upside to all of this, which

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is everywhere else benefits from this suffering that is happening

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Chinese industry. I still just trying to work

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>out what's in it for Chinese solar manufacturers.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there an upside for any of them

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>or some of them.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Will survive and go on to the next phase.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I suppose.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know where the next phase will be, but

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 4>sometimes they make money sometimes. I mean, what's the outside

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 4>of your job, Tom? I think we just have to

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 4>say sometimes these firms are doing what they do because

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 4>it's their job.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, Let's go back to the topic around incredibly

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>cheap solar everywhere in the world and what the knock

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on effects of that are. I remember when I joined

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>n EF in two thousand and nine and you were

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>still in London. I was still in London, and you

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>were describing to me this Moore's law type decline in

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>solar prices, and I remember thinking like, wow, that's going

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to completely change the world. It's like, so awesome, I

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>want to be in the solar team. And I suppose

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>now we're living in that world, that that sort of

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>trend we were seeing promised of incredibly cheap solar everywhere.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>So can you.

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Describe a little bit about you know, what you're seeing

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and how that's changing the game generally?

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So you call it Moore's law. Then Moore's law

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 4>is just a special case of what we normally call

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the experienced curve. And the basics of the experience curve

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 4>is every time the human race doubles its cumulative production

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 4>of something, and it's a manufactured commodity like solar modules,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 4>like Brits, like semiconductor chips, we reduce the cost per

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 4>unit by a fairly fixed amount, and you can calculate

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 4>what that percentage is. Then it's usually around twenty percent

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 4>now for solar modules, calculate We can calculate this back

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen seventy six. The trouble is, it depends wildly

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 4>on your assumption about inflation over that period. How you

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 4>normalize it, And right now the answer makes no sense

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 4>because the experienced curve says that solar models should be

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 4>significantly more offensive than they are, and they should be

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 4>slightly more expensive than they are, but if everyone was

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 4>making money in the value chain, but probably not that much.

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 4>So right now we're kind of looking at the experienced

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 4>curves suspiciously and saying, we'll see what happens when we

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 4>get a few more data points. But yes, right now

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>you can buy a solar module for nine then for

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 4>what in normal markets? So normal markets mean not the

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 4>US and not India either. This means that solar models

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 4>are so cheap that they're basically cheaper than fences. You know,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 4>if you want to build a fence around your guards

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 4>in US up or China or most of the world

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 4>of that, you can use solar modules as fencing material,

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 4>and even if you don't bother wiring them up, you'd

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 4>probably save money versus buying some Liz Wold.

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>This reminds me of in history, learning about hyperinflation in Viamar, Germany.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I saw this picture that was someone using banknotes as

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wallpaper because that was cheaper than buying paper. So maybe

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>people are going to have solar wallpaper inside, you know,

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>completely pointless, but why not? So what consequences that having

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on the energy industry?

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>That you're seeing.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 4>The other thing is that it's not just cheap, there's

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 4>also quite a lot of it. We estimate that five

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred and ninety nine gigawatts of solar modules were installed

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty four, and about six hundred and ninety

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 4>five gigawatts would be installed this year in twenty twenty five.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 4>And just for contexts, the entire global power system, all

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 4>the fossil field and everything, is approximately ten terra watts

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 4>at the start of this year. So if we're adding

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 4>like zero point seven terra watts a year to a

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 4>ten terra wats system is quite a lot. And of

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 4>course it's not evenly distributed. So what what's happening is

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 4>that when the sun's out power is very readily available,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 4>it's very cheap, and in some cases there's actually more

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>solar power being generated than total demand, which causes problems.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 4>I was just reading on the Solar News this morning

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 4>that in Cyprus, which is obviously a quite a tiny

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 4>part of the world and has now had quite a

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of solar, fifty eight percent of the renewables generated

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 4>in the first five months of this year have been curtailed.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 4>That is thrown away because the grid can't take them.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that is the highest curtailment numbers I've ever heard,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, right.

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean this time of year in northern Northern Hemisphere

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 4>you always get high solar catailment because it's it's sunny.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Particularly since it's over like you know, you're not just saying,

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>oh and this hour fifty eight percent with ktail, you're

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>talking over a whole month. It's over five months.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so last year in total, twenty nine percent was katail.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 4>But that, I mean that's like economically a disaster.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, not if you're an electricity cons well.

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, first of all, those results are not being

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 4>fed directly to electricity consumers.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>But yes, in sery, you're if you could use that.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Electricity that would otherwise be wasted, it would not be

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 4>a problem. That is not easy to do though, because

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 4>it's all being generated at the same time.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I look at power markets, So this is

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>something I also think about a lot, is the disruptive

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>effect of solar and how batteries can manage that. But

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>I just want to step back to look at the

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>big picture. It seems like there's this wave starting, you know,

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with upstream solar and those cost declines, and you know,

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the solar industry being a hard place to make money,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and it then feeds into every subsequent step in the

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>value chain and is now impacting power markets and power prices.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And is this going to one day lead to a

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>point in time where just how you're saying it's incredibly

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to make money manufacturing solar because it's just getting

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>cheaper all the time, that we're also going to say

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it's incredibly hard to make money selling electricity because it

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>essentially has no value because of all of this solar

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Think that that's where we're trending towards.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's incredibly difficult to make money selling power in

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 4>sunny hours already, that doesn't mean that there's no money

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 4>in selling electricity. The obvious solution is batteries, but it's

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 4>not actually trivial to solve all your solar time shifting

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 4>problems with batteries.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Why not in your opinion.

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 4>So basically it's about utilization. If you're in a place

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 4>where all the days are the same length and it's

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 4>sunny every day, then you can charge your battery every

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 4>day and discharge it every day, and you run that

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 4>battery three hundred and sixty five times in a year, right, Yeah, However,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.479
<v Speaker 4>most places are not like that. Most places have seasonality,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 4>they have variation in demand, and I mean, if it's

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 4>northern Europe, we have winter, it is quite a long

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 4>period where your solar panels don't generate much, and so

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 4>your battery doesn't run every day. Your batteries it's empty

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 4>all winter basically, and then it sits full all summer.

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I hear what you're saying.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Are we setting an unrealistic bar here? It's a little

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>bit where like when people who are skeptical about renewables say, oh,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>wind and solar aren't the solution, because you know, the

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sun isn't always shining, the wind isn't always blowing, and

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're setting this bar of this thing is useless because

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't depend on it one hundred percent of the time,

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the reality is is, yes, it can get you,

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, depending on where you are, fifty to

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of the I just pulled these numbers out

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>out of thin air.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, so it's not it's definitely not useless. I mean,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 4>it's already not useless, right. Twenty twenty two and twenty

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty three Europe was pretty glad of its solar because

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 4>it meant we burnt less Russian gas.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I guess I'm you know, I mean, I

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think I'm preaching to the choir here. I know that

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't think that solar is useless. I guess what

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is, are we setting a like for anyone

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to expect that batteries would completely solve the problem of

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>solar being at the wrong time that even in those

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>northern climates you described, surely, up to a point, they're

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>still very.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Useful up to a point, yes, but bear by that

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the economics of those batteries gets very bad when you

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 4>stop running them three hundred and sixty five times a

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 4>year and you start running them past that. For example,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean that instantly means that the costs can make

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 4>what hour you're shifting doubles if you have the number

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of times it runs. And so that's why our new

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Energy Outlook modeling, which among the other scenarios we run,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 4>we have something called the net zero scenario, which is

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 4>about how we totally get to net zero by twenty fifty.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that that model doesn't actually rely

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 4>that heavily on solar and store it. I think it

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>ends up with about fifty percent solar in a literacy mix.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 4>That model really wants to build wind and the reason

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 4>is that wind blows in the winter, which means that

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 4>you can also charge your batteries in the winter.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So kind of going back then to the fundamental question around,

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got solar over capacity globally, and then

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it almost sounds like solar overbuild happening in certain places

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know you can't one hundred percent solved with batteries,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know you need to bring in another time.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, at the moment, the levels we're at, we

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 4>can solve that with batteries, and of course that's what

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 4>people are doing. They're building lots of batteries. In fact,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 4>a quick calculation suggests that twenty percent of the utility

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 4>scale PV built last year had a battery attached.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I suppose I'm talking about like the example in Cypress.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Is Cypress now at a stage where I suppose the

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>question I was going to ask is why is anyone

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>still building solar in Cypress?

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 3>So I'm kind of I kind of hope they're not.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 4>I had a quick poke around on their Electricity operate

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a website and it looks like they still are, so.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>That rock up the hill as well via the sounds

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of things.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Cyprus has something called a net billing where you can

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 4>export power into the grid and be paid for it

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 4>for your solar panels, and of course you're being paid

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 4>for it, but that money has to come from somewhere

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 4>and the money is not actually worse it's also not

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 4>safe in so this is this is probably not a

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 4>good policy. It's not sustainable and I don't think the

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Cypress Coop has removed it yet.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of farmers in Cypress, I'm presuming, will

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have solar fencing at this point in time.

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, or solar roofs.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 4>And what they'll do next hopefully has put some batteries

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 4>in and this will almost certainly alleviate a big part

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 4>of the problem. But push into one hundred percent might

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 4>be a bit difficult. I don't know the climate of

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 4>Cyprus for some.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>No, but you would expect that you know ultimately that

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the market pull of batteries because it this represents a

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>huge opportunity for batteries. I mean, my team looks at

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>power market dynamics and one of the things I realized

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as we've modeled batteries and prices together, is the biggest

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for batteries is not the high prices in the

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>summer when the sun goes down. It's the cheap prices

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>when they can charge you know. I mean, obviously if

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at their daily revenues from the wholesale market,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and obviously batteries make money in other ways. The most

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>profitable seasons are not when power prices are highest. It's

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>when power price is the lowest. So we're looking at Cyprus.

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge opportunity that will presumably rebalance itself at

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>some point. And this is maybe a question, and you know,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I just say this more speculatively because this goes beyond

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>both of our own teams. I always wonder why we're

0:18:55.880 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>not seeing more industries popping up that make use of

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>insanely cheap or even negatively priced electricity that is available

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>some of the time. You know, I don't know what

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this creative application is, but there has to be something

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>someone can do with free energy.

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I presume, well, it's a capex pub isn't it, Because

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 4>it is if.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>We're thinking in terms of all of the industrial applications

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we can think of. I'm just saying there must be

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>some use for free energy that is only available some

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the time.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I'm not asking expect.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 4>This question to be very low capex, because yes, you

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 4>can run a data center or something, but data centers

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 4>don't run for three or four hours a.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Day, right, So data centers aren't the answer. I guess

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is we have kind of scoped out

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>what this has to look like. Has to be a

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>low capex industry that can benefit from free energy. Maybe

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>this industry doesn't yet exist. So listeners, especially those of

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you at the start of your careers, you can come

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>up with something you can might get super rich.

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 4>I mean, to make this electricity into heat, all you

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 4>need is a big one with some resistance. Right, So

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 4>if hardware is actually negative, you could probably make money

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 4>out of just having a really big wire and forcing

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 4>it down it. But you could also, for example, eat

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 4>up a big pile of salt or a pile of

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 4>water and store it for winter to run your district

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 4>heat it. That's being tried in some of the Scandinavian countries.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 4>There's also power to gas, but that is also quite

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 4>high topics for the futical companies.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I also wonder if power to gas, from

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>my understanding, does it have the flexibility to be ramping

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>up and down all the time, which is a key

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>parameter here, I mean.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Potentially, Yes, A hydrogen team seems to think that you

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 4>could have electoralizers that run for sort of four hours day,

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 4>so you could make hard I mean, you can make hydrogen,

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 4>but electoralizers are really expensive.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that it violates the capex parameter that you put

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in place exactly.

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 4>But if you if you could make a really cheap,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 4>even quite low efficiency electoralizer and trickle generate hydrogen, that

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 4>might be something work all right.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, anyway, putting it out there for everyone who's again,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly those of you who are entering into this space,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>very cheap electricity some of the time represents a huge

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for someone, so get creative. So I'm in the

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>US right now, and the US has a relatively new

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>government that has lots of ideas about the energy industry

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and global trade, and this is manifesting itself in potentially

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the rescinding of tax credits for various technologies, including solar.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Also in tariffs on imports, particularly anything that has been

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>touched by China. So, from your point of view of

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>someone looking at solar globally, how much of a big

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>deal is this? You know, seeing here it feels like

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the deglobalization of solar is that to.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 4>A beretrant tom or people who are in America. So

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 4>the US market is about fifty two gigawats, the global

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 4>market is six hundred and ninety five gigawats this year.

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 4>China of that is three hund and sixty eighty. What's

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 4>so whether the US buys or not is not of

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 4>primary importance to people outside.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>The US, does it?

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Because my understanding of the situation prior to some of

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>these tariff changes is that, I mean, there were already

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on Chinese solar.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 4>There were, So the US has had tariffs on Chinese

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 4>solar imports since twenty twelve, and in consequence, most of

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 4>the direct imports of solar components to the US don't

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 4>come from China at all. They came from South Southeast Asia,

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 4>four countries specifically, and recent rounds of tariffs, which were

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 4>actually proposed under the previous US government, put tariffs on

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 4>those four countries. So they're Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 4>and that does push up probably the price of supply

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 4>to the US market, but there are also more sweeping

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 4>import tariffs on everything.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose this whole Southeast Asia as being a channel

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for solar to come into the US from China via

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia effectively, and these are Chinese companies operating in

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia. My understand was that this little kind of

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>anomaly in the global industry was one of the few

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>areas where there was actually a healthy profit margin for

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the solar manufacturers involved. So I suppose a question I

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>have is if that sort of loophole is now being closed,

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>does that have a significant impact on the solar industry.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, a lot of these factory eat in Southeast Asia

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 4>will disclose on the companies that will take lots on them,

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 4>because it is true the US people love to pay

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 4>for things, and so solar modules in the US cost

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 4>about twenty seven US sense per what versus nine cents

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 4>outside the US. So yes, even though the costs slightly

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 4>higher to manufacturer in South East Asia, these were some

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 4>of the more profitable businesses.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So stepping back, so I hear your message, This doesn't

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>really affect the global industry for solar that much.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>How do you see it affecting solar in the US.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's going to hurt because, first of all,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 4>there were a bunch of manufacturers who were setting up

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 4>sell factory EAT in the US because the Inflation and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Reduction app had some very specific, quite generous incentives for

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing the US, which first of all could go away,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 4>and secondly could be affected by one possible provision in

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>the latest One Big Beautiful Bill if it goes forward

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 4>as currently anticipated, in that it looks as if components

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 4>and materials from China might not be allowed for important

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 4>into the USS. And depending on how extensively that is prosecuted,

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 4>it may be quite difficult to make a solar module

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 4>using nothing contract.

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, if the goal is to and I'm not

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is a realistic goal before you shoot

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it down, but let's just say, if the goal is

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to cultivate a US solar manufacturing industry, there is maybe

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a goldilocks zone of just the right amount of tariffing

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>where you create a dependence on stuff manufactured in the US,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but you still don't completely shut off that manufacturing having

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>what it needs, and what you're saying is it looks

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>like we might be going beyond that Goldilock zone at

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, it's also so unpredictable. You know, if you're a

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>company who's trying to decide whether to proceed with building

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 4>a high tapics factory in the US, you want to

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 4>be able to predict what the environment it's going to

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 4>be like in two to three years time. And the

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 4>country that's done that much better is India. India is

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 4>much more successful, it's establishing a domestic manufacturing industry US

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 4>just through being much more predictable.

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>That's such an important point. And I think something that

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know at bn EF, I know, since I joined,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we've been saying policy consistency is key. Policy inconsistency just

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>renders all policy ineffective unless the policy is to kill

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>something off. And I suppose that's maybe a real danger

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for the US is the potential flip flopping means it's

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>impossible to incentivize anything exactly.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in some respects, the US has quite a

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 4>predictable business environment, as the Investment Tax Credit was guaranteed

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 4>for periods that frankly European product developers.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Would love to have.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 4>But it well, the latest government has just thrown everything

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 4>into the air, and who knows where the cars will

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 4>come down.

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, we shall surely see.

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 4>So Tom, I have a question for you. Since you've

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>been tracking US power markets, we see California as world

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 4>leading in terms of adoption. California has got what eleven

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 4>gigawatsa batteries, and a grid with peak demand it's about

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 4>fifty gigwatts that's got to be helping to integrate all this. Solda, right,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 4>what's going on in California?

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really interesting what you see, and some

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of this is more what we've seen in our modeling,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and we gradually see it taking shape in the market.

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>But you know, California is famous for its duck curve,

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the power price throughout the day. And

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to be able to describe a duck

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>over the you know, let's just say that the power

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>price goes down, and then it goes up, and then

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it goes down again.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>It kind of peaks in the.

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Late afternoon, and that apparently looks like the head of

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a duck when you put it.

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>On a truck.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Because everyone's using air and after the sun goes down.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, so, yeah, that's the typical profile.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And the other country in my world, because I also

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have the now the European Power Team reports to me,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's very similar in Spain, which is the one country

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in Europe where there's a decent amount of air conditioning.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>They have their own version of this.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And the thing you see in markets like this as

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you add in more storage to go with your solar

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is the price throughout the day. It just becomes like binary.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a high price period and a low price period.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of flat because batteries like balance everything out

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>even within those places if you're assuming they're cycling once

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a day, so you get a cheap period of the

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>day which is when solar is generating, and then a

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>more expensive period of the day when it's not. And

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that's because if you were to add more batteries to

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>make it just an even price throughout the whole day,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>then batteries wouldn't make any money, so no one would

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>add those batteries, So you're never going to have this

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>situation where it's just a consistent price throughout the day.

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But it becomes just much more a two tone situation.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, though, is even in our forecast, we still see

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 1>days where there's not enough batteries to lap up all

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the solar, and so I mean, I suppose what you'll

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>see is curtailment. So even with a lot of batteries,

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you still have and this this goes back to what

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, You're still going to have those times where

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>electricity is insane nee che.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 4>But also times when it's the same expensive simply not really.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I suppose this is the point is that I mean,

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because let's say you've got enough batteries to soak up

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the majority of an entire day's worth of solar, and

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>then you might have a period of a few hours

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where prices would be really high. Well, then that's going

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the hours where the majority of batteries is

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be discharging to push that price down to

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the level because they're always going to prioritize concentrating their

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>discharge in those hours. So I suppose what I'm saying

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is batteries will make price dynamics a little bit less explosive.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>They'll be a bit more boring, but it's going to

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>go from being all over the place and then maybe

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a really high peak in the afternoon, which is what

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you see in the sort of duck curve scenario to

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>just like on time and off time.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 3>That also been the batteries cannibalized there.

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Great point, and yeah, and that's exactly right. It's like

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the total demand in a market sets a in a way,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a ceiling on how much solar you can take before

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>price cannibalization takes over. And then the total amount of

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>solar in the market creates a ceiling for how much

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>batteries the market can take. And so you know, this

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is what you know batteries when you see them build anywhere.

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like it follows on from solar. Solar creates the

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for those batteries, and ultimately the amount of solar

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you have in the market is the amount of opportunity

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there is for batteries. You now, what the ideal ratio

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two is is kind of depends on your assumptions.

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of how I see it from what

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing in markets. But yeah, the cannibalization of batteries

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is a thing as well.

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I suppose what you could say with.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Batteries and that the price dynamics you see there is

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it almost traces all the way back to where we

0:29:54.560 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>started the conversation. Solar is getting insanely cheap as manufacturers

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>are cannibalizing their own revenues, and the knock on effect

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is that solar then is really cheap and getting built

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of markets and therefore cannibalizing its own revenues,

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>which creates an opportunity for storage, which can pile in

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and in turn cannibalize its own revenues, which means that

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's good in any of these spaces to either be

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>early or to have been early, because it might be

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>too late in some instances.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately, I.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Would say all of this is, if this gets passed

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>down to consumer, a good thing, because more electricity will

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>cost less. Jenny, thank you very much for joining us.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Today's has been a really fascinating discussion.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Tom.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg NEF is a

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed as

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>investment advice.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an investment or

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 2>other strategy Bloomberg ANIAF should not be considered as information

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes any representation

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 2>or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>information contained in this recording, and any

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Liability as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed