WEBVTT - Debt Markets Ready for Sales Rush; Cruise Comeback

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>My name is Olivia Raymonde and I'm a corporate finance

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>reporter here at Bloomberg News. This week, we are extremely

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>pleased to have Paula Selvison back on the show with us.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>She covers leverage, finance and private credit for Bloomberg News

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York. How are you doing, Paula.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing good, Glad to be here.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Glad to have you on. We're also delighted to chat

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with Jody Lurie later on in the show. She looks

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at the leisure sector for Bloomberg Intelligence in New York.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll be coming back to Jody a bit later in

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the show, so please do stay with us. But first

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>back with Paula with Bloomberg News. Paula, August is typically

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a quiet month for sales in the US corporate finance markets,

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's common for us to look forward into September

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like this is going to be a

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty active month, specifically for mergers and acquisitions. Could you

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>walk us through sort of the dynamic that's playing out

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>there in the markets.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely so.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Right now, there is more than fifteen billion dollars of

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>committed debt financing for leverage buyouts.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's break down what that means.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of times when one company or private

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>equity firm buys another company, they fund part of that

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 3>acquisition with debt financing. Investment banks like the big ones

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 3>think JP, Morgan City, et cetera. They will provide essentially

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 3>temporary bridge financing that they commit to and then the

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>intention though is to sell that debt financing to outside

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors in the form of junk bonds and leverage

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>loans before the deal closes. So right now, what we're

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>looking at is a you know, a small but growing

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>pipeline there. I mean, fifteen billion dollars wasn't big a

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 3>few years ago, but it is a recovery after some

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 3>issues when rates rose last year for the banks, where

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>they lost a lot of money on these types of transactions.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, so basically there's a lot that could basically

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>launch first thing in September, once the market comes back

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>to life, once some bankers come back from the Hamptons

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and we're all back at our desks after Labor Day.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Awesome, And yes, you mentioned some trouble for the banks

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>last year for our listeners new to leverage finance. The

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>banks got themselves in a little bit of a conundrum

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>when it came to underwriting merger and acquisition deals. Could

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you just give us a quick recap so our listeners

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>know sort of where the banks are coming from.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 3>So when banks provide committed bridge financing for leverage finance transactions,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>they actually also provide a maximum interest rate on that debt.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 3>So essentially they tell let's say the private X firm,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, we hope to sell this at let's say

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>eight percent, but maximum this will cost ten percent for

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the company. This is based off of current rates. And

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>so when the Fed rapidly increased interest rates to combat inflation,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>basically banks just were on the other side of that

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and got really burned. All of a sudden, the market

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>levels for selling that debt was well above the maximum

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 3>interest rate levels that they promised these companies. So that

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>meant if the banks wanted to get the debt off

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>their balance sheets, they had to sell it at a

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 3>discounted price so that the all in yield would be higher,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 3>and they were on the hook for that difference, and

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>in some cases they lost billions of dollars as a

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>group on some of these transactions. In fact, some of

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>this debt is still stuck on their balance sheets. For

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>example Twitter, that's about thirteen billion dollars of debt, no

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>sign of them selling that anytime soon. And also for

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a company called bright Speed, but they were able to

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>sell most of the debt that got stuck, which opened

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 3>their balance sheets back up to do more deals. And

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the key thing for banks is they don't want to

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 3>hold this debt right, do this as a temporary commitment

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 3>and they make fees off of it. Then they recycle

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>their balance sheet into the next deal. And that process

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 3>is finally restarted in recent months, and that's why we

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>have this pipeline going into the fall.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That makes a lot of sense, Thank you. And if

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm correct, I think we have a couple of acquisitions

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in the market, some familiar names. Simon and Schuster the publisher,

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a handful of others. Can you, you know, walk us

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>through some of the big names that you're going to

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be looking for next week?

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I think one of the more notable ones

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>is Simon and Schuster just because it's such a household name.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>So this is the book publishing company. So they're old

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 3>owner Paramount Global. So that's the home of like CBS

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 3>and some of the big you know, broadcast brands. Paramount

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Global actually has owned Simon and Schuster and so they

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 3>are now selling it to a really major a KKR,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 3>to a really major private equity firm called KKR for

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 3>about one point six billion dollars. As part of the financing,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>KKR is doing this in the form of a leverage buyout.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's all so roughly one billion dollars of debt

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 3>financing provided by a group of banks led by Jeffries,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 3>and so that could come, you know, essentially whenever they

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>think the market is ready to handle it. In you know,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 3>leverage finance world, one billion of debt isn't actually that big,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 3>and so the biggest transaction we're waiting for is this

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.679
<v Speaker 3>private equity firm called GTCR is buying a majority stake

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 3>in a payments firm called World Pay and that has

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 3>more than eight billion of debt in the form of

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 3>junk bonds and leverage loans. This is a pretty chunky deal.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>We haven't seen deals of this size in quite a while,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 3>so it'll be interesting to see, you know, the test

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of the depths of the market to see if people

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 3>are willing to invest that much money. So far, it

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 3>looks like debt investors probably will be very receptive to

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>it because they're hungry for new deals because the leverage

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>buyout machine essentially got gummed up for about a year.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>They haven't had like the new paper, the new money

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>for them to invest in, and so they're looking for

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>new deals so that they can put money to work.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And you're talking to investors all the time. A lot

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of the sources that I speak to this year, they

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to talk to me about this up and quality trade.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>They want to be investing in higher quality credits, whether

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that's investment grade or maybe the higher end of the

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>junk bond and the leverage loan space. But when we

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>look at leverage buyouts, they aren't always the safest bets.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So could you walk us through sort of what investors

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about in terms of risk taking on these deals.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it's really interesting.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>So while the market has reopened, it's definitely been for

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 3>safer companies in general.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, So you're double bees, higher rated.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Single bees, you know, lower rated single bees, and especially

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>triple C rated debt it's still fairly a no man's land.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Most people just don't want to touch it or deal

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>with it because of the risks. And so what we've

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 3>seen with some of these leverage buyouts, it's hard to

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>speak to specific ones, but broadly, the color we've heard

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 3>is that leverage is down right. So if maybe a

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>deal would have been levered around six times last year,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 3>or it's now more around five times or four point

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 3>five times. And that also reflects the hiring borrowing costs,

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 3>because you know, the companies can only support so much

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>debt if the interest rates are higher. So investors, you know,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>they're going to see this new crop of LBOs that

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>should be lower levered. Investors might be able to fight

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>for better covenants now since you know they can get

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 3>those investor protections again, since it's been more of a

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>debt buyer's market than a debt seller's market. But yeah,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>in general, investors are still looking for higher quality names,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, there's still afraid there could be a recession,

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 3>right so you know, even though it seems like some

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>of those predictions were early or you know, overblown, there

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>still could be a recession at some point in the

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>coming quarters. So investors want companies that are recession resistant,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>that still do well during the bad part of cycles.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>And they're also hyper aware of that borrowing costs are higher,

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>so they don't want to lever companies up too high

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>and then have to deal with the restructuring in a

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 3>few years.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Got it.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like they are putting less debt onto

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>these companies compared to the equity than maybe they did

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Is that right?

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So sponsors across the board do seem like they've

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 3>now had to come down on the leverage levels when

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>they do buy other companies.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Got it, And circling back to the banks and what

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they went through last year, I know that. You know,

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>mergers and acquisitions, leverage buyouts are sort of the engine

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of this market. But after losing billions of dollars, you know,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>why is Wall Street coming back now? Why do they

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>want to do these deals now?

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Because these deals make them a lot of money.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Because basically, the way investment banking works in this part

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of the market is the banks want to constantly have

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 3>a turn of leverage buyout transactions because they can make

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>a fee of two points or three points. You know,

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>if you make a fee of three percent on billions

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 3>of dollars. That adds up really fast. So they took

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 3>their loss is they dealt with it. These losses were painful,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 3>but nothing like the financial crisis.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 3>They were bad here, and now they've moved on and

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 3>they're ready to make money again off this business. And

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 3>in general, what we've heard across the board is that

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>because rates rose and because for a period of time

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>it was harder to get debt financing, banks were able

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 3>to get better terms for themselves.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, so their current.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Maximum interest rates are now once again based off of

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the current market levels, which are much higher than they

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 3>were before the FED started this process. So you know,

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 3>overall color i've heard is also that the what are

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 3>called flex and caps, which is essentially the way they

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>do the maximum interest rates, that those are just higher.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 3>They're more favorable for the banks, and so they should

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>be able to do this more safely for them, hopefully

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 3>for them. But that being said, this isn't in a vacuum, right,

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 3>because the banks are competing against each other for these deals,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and they're also competing against private credit lenders, and so

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 3>private credit lenders this other asset class where instead of

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 3>doing a temporary financing. They just come in and borrow

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the money, sometimes with just a few firms for billions

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of dollars of debt. You know, they can offer more

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 3>flexible terms to sponsors, and they can also typically they're

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>pricing is higher than the you know, hoped for rate

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>that the banks are doing, but it can be like

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 3>an X right, they're competing. They're trying to undercut each

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 3>other on price, on other terms, on protections. So if

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 3>banks stay out of the market, they're just going to

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 3>keep losing market share to private credit.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 2>So they got to get back in.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that's super interesting. It seems like everything is owned

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>by private markets these days. I'm glad that you mentioned

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>private credit because it's a really important asset class in

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the credit space. It's just grown extremely large in size.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But why would a company want to go to private credit,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Like why not just stick with, you know, a big

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>bank that has a familiar name.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. So there's a lot of different

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>pros and cons.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 3>So if you do the public markets, so hild bonds, leverage, loans,

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and again we say public in a relative sense. These aren't,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, like equities, but they're relatively public because so

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 3>many people buy them, you know, hild bonds and leverage loans.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Typically the borrowing costs are cheaper than private credit, but

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 3>you have to do the debt commitments and then at

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 3>some point in the future, sometimes months later, you then

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 3>sell the junk bonds and leverage loans, and you know,

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 3>yields can change in that period of time, marketing conditions

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 3>can change. So why people like private credit is even

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>though it can be more expensive, you just kind of

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>get it all done at once. You know, there's a

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>certainty of execution, as a lot of people in the

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 3>market like to say, where you can just go to

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a few lenders and they say, okay, we did the deal.

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>It's done right.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>There's no headaches of you know, fifty sixty one hundred

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 3>investors having differing opinions on your company and you don't

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 3>have to worry about it. And then the other thing

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>is that private credit lenders can also provide, you know,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 3>so different kinds of flexibility.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 2>On the terms.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So one of the biggest ones is they can provide

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>what's called pick or payment in kind. So if let's

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 3>say you lever up a company with a lot of

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>debt and you think it's going to grow into this

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 3>debt load. But in the meantime you're a little bit

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 3>worried about liquidity or just the actual interest costs of cash.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Leaving the business to investors. Every year you can do

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 3>a pick, so that means instead of paying your interest

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>in cash, you pay in more debt that only comes

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 3>due at the end when it matures. So there's just

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 3>some you know, flexibility. It's more bespoke. It's just more

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 3>like contracts between some parties. So that's kind of the difference.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, banks, it's going to be cheaper if the

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 3>banks sell it to institutional asset managers, but it's a

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>more specific way it has to be done. Whereas private

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 3>credit lenders, they're more expensive, but you have the certainty

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>of execution and more flexibility.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for walking us through that, and we're going

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to turn to Jody Lurie at Bloomberg Intelligence shortly, but

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>before we do, Paula, I know, private credit is an

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>asset class that you follow their closely. What what are

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the big things?

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>What are you watching there? What's what's the next big

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>thing for investors and people curious about this space to

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>look out for in the fall.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think a really interesting dynamic is right now.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking about new deals, right, leverage biots, new transactions,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot of leverage loans and hiled bonds

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 3>that are outstanding and need to be refinanced soon. It's

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 3>not like a cliff, A lot of it's already been

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>dealt with, but there is a good chunk of the

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>of this debt that still does need to be refinanced

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 3>in the next one to two years. And it's harder

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 3>to do that in the broadly syndicated markets, and it's

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>also more expensive. And so I think we're going to

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 3>keep seeing a trend of private credit lenders stepping into

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 3>refinance leverage loans and hiled bonds, especially leverage loans because

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>they're very similar structure. And so we've seen a couple

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 3>of really big examples of that recently. One was the

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Phenostra example, which is currently the largest private credit deal

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>ever at more than five billion of total size. And

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>then we're also now seeing a group of private credit

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>lenders refinance the leverage loans for a company called Highland Software.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So we do expect to see more examples of refinancing happen,

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>which means that the leverage loan market especially could shrink some.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's super interesting. Great stuff from Paula Selderson at Bloomberg News.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Paula, thanks for having me anytime, and.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You can read all of Paula's scoops on the Bloomberg

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>terminal and of course at Bloomberg dot com. Please do

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>check out her coverage. So, as I mentioned earlier, we

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are delighted to welcome Jody Luriy on the Credit Edge

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast this week. Jody covers the leisure sector for Bloomberg

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence based here in New York. How's it going, Jody.

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 4>It's going great, Olivia.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>You cover a lot of companies, but as the summer

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to a close, I want to take a special

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>look at theme parks and the cruise lines. There's been

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of activity there and a lot to sort

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of of dive into. Can you talk sort of high

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>level you know, where does the leisure sector go from here?

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Sure? So, I think the leisure sector is definitely one

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 4>of the most interesting ones. In my opinion, I'm a

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 4>little biased this year just from the standpoint that I

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:25.119
<v Speaker 4>think consumers have really outdone themselves in terms of participating

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 4>in the leisure space and in different areas of leisure,

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 4>different areas than we saw a year ago. You know,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 4>people are getting a little bit more international in their reach.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 4>They want to go and do, they don't want to

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 4>be stuck inside, and so even though there's discussion of

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 4>possibly a pullback economically, we're not yet seeing that prove

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 4>out in the leisure space in general. That said, we

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 4>are starting to see pockets of moderation normalization from these

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 4>post pandemic highs of certain parts of the leisure space.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Got it for sure, And can you talk a little

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about some of the major forces that are driving

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>your outlook for the theme parks?

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think that theme parks are a bit interesting

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 4>in and of themselves because they mostly shut down during

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic but found ways to still stay relevant in

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 4>terms of food and beverage events and any area to

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 4>stay open, Which compares to the cruise lines that had

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to fully stop. They are now. They were able to

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 4>transition out of the pandemic a little bit quicker as

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 4>a result, and last year had very strong years in

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 4>terms of season pass rates, in terms of just people

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 4>going and visiting the theme parks, and doing because it's

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 4>a nice, nice easy experience that you can do once,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, once every month or every week. Now this

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 4>year we're seeing that there's a bit of a pullback,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 4>and part of that, interestingly, is because of things like weather,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>which obviously we can't plan for weather, but it's definitely

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 4>creating a little bit of a wrinkle in their plan

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 4>and showing the sensitivity that they have as compared to

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 4>other parts of the leisure space this year as people

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of look elsewhere to spend their time and spend

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 4>their leisure.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, so where else are you seeing that? Where is

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the consumer going right now? What are you seeing as

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>their preference?

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 4>The biggest areas that have been really growing this year

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 4>has been international travel, which has really not returned to

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 4>pre pandemic levels yet. Business and conference travel is of

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 4>course improving as well. That's a little bit slower, and

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 4>that's not so much leisure, although there is that element

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 4>of leisure which is business and leisure blended. So you

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 4>go to a conference and you or you go on

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 4>a business trip and you extend it by a few

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 4>days for leisure travel. That said, I mean, I think

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, cruise lines are a great example of an

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 4>alternative of where people are spending their time because they

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 4>can book they booked it in advance. They want to

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 4>go and do something that's a little bit more exotic

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 4>than going to your regional theme park. That said, something

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 4>like a SeaWorld is benefiting a little bit more than

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 4>a Six Flags and a Cedar Fair from the standpoint

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 4>that they have that southern California Florida focus, but that

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 4>doesn't completely keep them unexposed to some of the trends

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 4>in theme parks, namely weather. And you're seeing that for

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 4>all three of these major companies, is that they're really

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 4>actually being affected by the fact that the first and

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 4>second quarter we're not very kind to them in terms

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 4>of heat, in terms of monsoons. Now we have the

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 4>hurricane season coming up. And these companies with more of

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 4>a global reach, like the cruise lines can sort of

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 4>manage through some of these difficulties. And obviously a cruise ship,

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 4>if the weather is not good in one place, you

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 4>can sort of move to another. Not always, but you

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 4>can reroute it a little bit. You can't do that

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 4>when you have giant rollercoasters.

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I guess an important thing to think about is

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that the theme parks are rooted in one spot that

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>they're not moving physically, whereas consumers can go to different

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>locations that have a desirable location and destination for the weather,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and the crews can take them there anytime during the year.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Jody, and I know you know this

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>so well before our listeners, the cruise lines had a

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>really tough time in twenty twenty when the pandemic shut

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>down all their operations and they really needed to rely

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on the debt markets. For somebody who isn't as clued

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in as you to this space, could you just walk

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>us through kind of what that sector has been going

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>through over the past couple of years.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's a great question, Olivia, because you

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 4>have to remember that this moratorium that they went through,

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 4>which was basically they had to completely shut down all

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 4>their operations during a good portion of the pandemic, it

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 4>really set them back, particularly compared to other parts of

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the leisure space. They're about a year or so behind

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 4>from in this transition period in the post pandemic era.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 4>They're now finally this year starting to see more normal

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 4>levels of activity, whereas if you look at other parts

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 4>of the leisure space. They got the benefit of that

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 4>a year year and a half ago as people started

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 4>going and doing that. Said, I think what's happening with

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 4>the cruise lines is they're pleasantly surprised by how quickly

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:33.719
<v Speaker 4>people are starting to jump into cruising. We're seeing advanced

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 4>booking rates much higher, which means that cash flows are

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 4>getting better. We're seeing revenue also getting booked because people

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 4>are actually cruising, so they can actually book that advance

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 4>bookings as revenue. And you're starting to see any of

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 4>these band aids that they put on, like these future

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 4>cruise credits that they gave people during the pandemic, you're

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 4>seeing those roll off. So from a balance sheet perspective,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 4>they're still not in great shape, but they're improving and

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 4>you're starting to see a light at the end of

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 4>the tunnel. Might be a few years out, but the

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 4>companies are talking about how they want to get back

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 4>to investment grade territory, how they want to improve their balogie,

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 4>bring down their debt loads relatively quickly or as quickly

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>as they can, and using cashloads to do so.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And you bring up a grade point with the downgrades.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Because some of these companies were investment grade before the

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and subsequently were downgraded to junk when their operations

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>were shut down for such an extended period of time

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>due to the virus. But I think correct me if

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, But one of the cruise lines did have

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade earlier this month.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct?

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 4>That is correct? So Roal Caribbean is benefiting quicker than

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 4>its peers in terms of upgrades. What's happening. What you're

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 4>seeing is the way that the companies manage themselves through

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic is you're starting to see that play out

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>in how quickly they're around each quarter. We've been talking

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 4>about for a few quarters now about how Royal Caribbean

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 4>has been about a quarter ahead of its peers in

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 4>terms of turnaround. Part of that is it got its

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 4>shipped in the water quicker it you know, it didn't

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 4>completely stop its CAPEX plans for its shipped modifications, just

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 4>the maintenance CAPEX the same way that Carnival did. Carnival

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 4>really pulled back a lot, and so they they have

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 4>to dedicate a little bit more cash this year to

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 4>CAPEX to sort of get all their ships in order.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 4>They also have a larger fleet than Royal Caribbean. There's

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 4>some complicating factors to that that you know, made Royal

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more nimble than Carnival as we get

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 4>into this transition period. That said, you are seeing that

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 4>the rating agencies are looking at these companies a little

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 4>bit more with a positive tone, but I think hesitantly

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 4>because they know that there's still a lot of hurdles

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 4>that all of them have to cross and they probably

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 4>will continue to do so. They don't want to they

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 4>don't want to penalize them for what these companies have

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 4>gone through. They want, but they want to make sure

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 4>that the companies are in good working order before they

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 4>start kind of moving up their ratings. And I think

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 4>that we'll probably see investors respond quicker to the companies

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 4>turnaround stories and the raiders.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Might I'm glad you mentioned the investors, Jodie, because there

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of opportunities not only to make investments

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>around these upgrades and downgrades, rising stars, falling angels, but

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of various outperformance in the leisure sector.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk to me about some of the areas

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that have stood out to you this year in terms

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of outperformance and where you're sort of seeing you know

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that trend continue.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I mean I think I think the whole leisure

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 4>space in general has done has performed relatively well in

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 4>comparison on a relative basis compared to other parts of

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 4>the credit space or consumer discussionaries. I mean, you know,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 4>I like to do things with my colleague Mike Camplone

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 4>about leisure versus retail, right, so he covers the retail space,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 4>and that's been an interesting one in a different way

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 4>in terms of how consumers are spending or not spending there.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 4>And I think what we're what we're seeing is up

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 4>until this year, much of the leisure space was starting

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 4>to was moving very much in tandem in that a

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 4>lot of the companies were affected negatively by the pandemic

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 4>and so their bonds were much wider than what they

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 4>were trading, much wider than a lot of other areas

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 4>of be their consumer discretionary and also other parts of

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 4>the credit space in general. Now we're starting to see tightening.

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 4>We're starting to see companies benefit from their own personal policies.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Case in point, now we're not talking about the gaming space,

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 4>but Las Vegas Sounds was downgraded TI yield. They've started,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 4>they've finally bumped back up to investment grade as they

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 4>work towards improving their balance sheet, as they were towards

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 4>this post pandemic era of being a better company than

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 4>they were during the pandemic. And so I think that

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 4>we are seeing companies getting back into shape some quicker

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>than others. You know, McDonald's in a Starbucks, which is,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 4>mind you, restaurants a little bit different of an area,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 4>but we cover that as well. They are much quicker

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 4>to get their balance sheets in check than some of

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 4>the other areas of leisure and other related areas. And

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 4>so we are starting to see a differentiation between companies.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 4>But we've been of the opinion that we think will

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 4>start seeing that from the standpoint of for instance, the

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 4>cruise lines are focused on improving their balance sheets, whereas

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 4>the theme parks are sort of getting past that point

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 4>and are starting to deal with the hairiness of their

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 4>own individual sector.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Hairiness of their own individual sector. That makes a lot

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of sense. One company that I've seen you write about

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that I think a lot of our listeners will be

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>familiar with is six Flags. Can you talk to us,

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to me a little bit about what's going on

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with that company?

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Sure, and I hope you don't envision hairiness on the

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 4>roller coasters or you envision somebody's too pick laying off

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 4>as they ride it. But I mean, I think, I

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 4>think for a company like six Flags, it's a little

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 4>complicated because management really wants to get their leverage down.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 4>They have they have similar net leverage targets to their

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 4>peer of three to four times. SeaWorld was the crikets

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 4>to get it down to three times and actually below

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 4>three times. Cedar Fair is nearing that level and six

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Flags is a little bit above and they you know,

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>six Flags it's a complicated company because they have a

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 4>long history of some challenges from a credit perspective, but

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 4>obviously a very different company now than they were. They're

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 4>just much larger than their peers like SeaWorld, so there

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 4>are some comparisons between the two. They've had some management

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 4>changes over recent years, and I think that what they're

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to do is be good stewards of their balance

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 4>sheet as much as they can within the constraints.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>That they have.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 4>So they're trying to reinvent how they do things, pushing

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 4>season passes similar to Cedar Fair and Sea World to

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 4>have that reoccurring revenue. But what they're finding is by

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 4>pushing season passes, they're losing out on additional dollars per

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 4>customer necessarily because you're not charging for the single pass.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 4>The benefit you get is you have more deferred revenue,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 4>you have more of an idea of what your cash

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 4>flows could be, your consistent cash flows, and so it's

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of a mixed bag. And they've been playing around

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 4>with their food options, and they've been playing around with

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of different things that have affected their cash

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 4>flow kind of negatively. So they're still very much in

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 4>a transition period. They've been active in the credit markets

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 4>this year as much as they can be to sort

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 4>of address their neo mature and debt and anything that

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 4>seems attractive. But the interest rate environment doesn't make it

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 4>as easy for them to refinance that as I think

0:27:58.359 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 4>they would like.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Certainly not.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, interest costs are higher for almost everyone except maybe

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking about some of the double digit coupons

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that the cruise lines had to pay at the start

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, although we did see a return of the double

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 4>cruise line debt unfortunately.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, I think they're going to be paying high

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>costs for a while.

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of you know, how these companies are doing. We're

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot about their outperformance this year and how

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of, you know, regaining their footing after you know,

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so much upheaval for the pandemic. But can you talk

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to me about what some of these companies' goals are,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, as it relates to their business and to

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>their credit and you know, how attainable those might be

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead into twenty twenty four.

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so, I think from a goal standpoint, the companies

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 4>have made it pretty clear that obviously they want operations

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 4>to be very strong, you know, they want to increase

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 4>their their occupancy levels as well as their advanced bookings

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 4>and all those sort of pieces that are important, you know,

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 4>taking in new new vessels and having the financing for it.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>But part and parcel to that is the focus on

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 4>cash flows and debt repayment. They're not necessarily thinking about

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 4>their shareholders at the moment, which in my opinion, is

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 4>very good thing that they're not, because they are way, way, way,

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 4>way too early in the game to be thinking along

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 4>those lines. That said, I mean, I think as you

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 4>as you look up twenty twenty four. I think you

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 4>could probably see a few more ratings upgrades provided they

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 4>continue on this path, they don't get waylaid by some

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 4>unforeseen event like a pandemic, and you might end up

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 4>seeing a few ratings upgrades. However, I don't know if

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 4>you would necessarily see investment grade until twenty twenty five

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 4>or twenty six for some of the names, and I

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 4>think that that's more attainable. That's possible, but it's definitely

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 4>encouraging and one of those stories that I think a

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of investors like to hear because there's fewer and

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 4>fewer of those at the moment in terms of these

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 4>turnaround plays that investors are looking for.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yes, the upgrade story and the you know, reaching

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for that rising star going from junk to investment grade

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is definitely going to be something that we're all going

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to be watching very closely. That was Jody Lurie everyone.

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Jody Jody Luriy of Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You can read all of her great analysis on the

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal. Please do check it out, and Jody, hope

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to see you back on the show again soon. Thank you,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and thanks again to Paula Selvison from Bloomberg News. You

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can read all of her great scoops and her coverage

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com. I'm Olivia Raymonde.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pleasure having you. Please join us again

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>next next week on the Credit Edge,