WEBVTT - Vladislav Zubok on What the Cold War Actually Was

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, you know, we did that episode with Arthur Croper recently,

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and one of the questions that came up is whether

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 2>you know you could characterize the US and China as

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>being in a new Cold War? Right, But of course

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>that raises the question of what was the Cold War

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 2>in the first place? Hard to answer, are we in

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a new Cold War if you actually don't know what

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>the original one was?

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Joe, I can see through this intro already you're trying

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 3>to link it to a previous podcast. But I know

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 3>you've been reading the history books. That's what this is.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>You read another history book, you want to talk about

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the Cold War.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>This is one hundred percent correct, But it is timely

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>for multiple reasons. Obviously, because there's the US China tension,

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>there is the ongoing war in Ukraine, and so you know,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and generally, if you want to understand the present, you

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 2>want to understand how he got here. And you know,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting to me. So I first sort of quote

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>learned about the Cold War. I think in middle school,

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, in high school, and it was like maybe

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 2>ninety three or ninety four, and that was only a

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 2>few years after I guess it quote formally ended. Yeah,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>And yet by the time I was learning about it

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>in high school, it was being taught it might as

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>well have been like Civil.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 3>War history, yes, capital age history.

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, capital age history, just old history. And I'm trying

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to learn a little bit more about it these days,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and I read some books, but there's still a lot

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of questions about in my mind what it was really

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>all about.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, so I also first learned about the Cold War

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in high school, and I had a realization when I

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>moved from high school to college. So I was doing

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>a sort of American curriculum in Tokyo ap history and

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>ap US history, and then went to London, went to

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the LSE and did international relations, a big portion of

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 3>which is history, and it kind of blew my mind

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>how different the interpretations of history actually were. So, for instance,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I had learned about the American Revolution right as a

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of Americans did, but in the UK it is,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>of course the American War of Independence, and so it

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>was just a massive culture shock for me to go

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 3>from that sort of US oriented curriculum, Yeah, to something

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>more British centric or more international. So one thing I

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 3>am very curious about is how the Cold War sort

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 3>of played out from the non US perspective.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and right, like we called it the Cold War,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess, And so the question is what was it

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>called elsewhere? Well, I'm really excited. We really do have

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest today. He has a new book out

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 2>on the question of what was the Cold War. We're

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be speaking with Vladislav Zubak. He is the

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Stevenson Professor of International History at the London School of Economics.

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>So doubly perfect. He's the author of the new book

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>The World of the Cold War nineteen forty five to

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety one. He's also written several other books sort

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of in the same general history. A Lot of Soviet

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>History is a prior book that I also highly recommend,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>came out in twenty twenty one, Collapsed the Fall of

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the Soviet Union? What really happened there? So Professor Zubach,

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming on odd Laws.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Now, thank you for inviting me, And that's a great

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 4>moment to talk about great changes in history as we're

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 4>experiencing now.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 2>We are definitely experiencing them now. So I guess if

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>someone had asked me, like a year ago, or you know,

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a few years ago, and I wasn't really thinking about

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>these things, what was the Cold War? I might have said, well,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>there's global battle between capitalists, vision and communism, or democracy

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>versus authoritarianism or something maybe something else, But what was

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the Cold War? Because your book actually does sort of

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>offer a different claim, and it seems to be more

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>about something basic and land and territory and mostly centered

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>on Europe.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 4>No, not at all. Yeah, well let me start by.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>The other and I completely misunderstood the book. But go on,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>well you can.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 4>You're completely misinterpreted my book normal thing, which is a

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 4>normal thing today. You know, whoever says whatever, it's misinterpretation

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 4>and fake news. So let me tell you one thing

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 4>that might amuse you. Sure, you know you started by

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 4>telling the audience when you learned about the Cold War

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 4>high school, And so let me tell you when I

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>learned it about it because I grew up in the

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 4>Soviet Union, basically wondering, well, it was in the midst

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 4>of a Cold war. It was the you know, the sixties, seventies,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>and I grew up as a young believer that the

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>future belongs to communism. Don't laugh at me, And I

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 4>just was surprised why so many people couldn't get it

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 4>that communism is the way of the future. And then

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 4>very late in my sort of student years, I began

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 4>to realize, hey, it's much more complicated. You know, the

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 4>world is divided and so and so forth, And we

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>were told the world is divided between socialism and capitalism.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 4>So when I learned about the Cold War, I mostly

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>learned it from American literature. So it was very much

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 4>influenced by American books because nothing was written in the

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Sovigine about the Cold War. Nothing. That's a special, special

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 4>question why. But you know, I couldn't find a single

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 4>decent book on the Cold War. So I learned it

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>from American authors like John Lewis Gaddis. Some people may

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 4>remember there were great books by John Lewis Gaddis in

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 4>the eighties, and so I read them and totally absorbed them.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 4>And so the ironic thing that many years later, thirty

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 4>years later, I'm coming back to my original kind of idea. Yes,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 4>it was the battle between socialism and capitalism, yes, And

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 4>in a sense, the whole phenomenon of the Cold War

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 4>should not be understood like, oh, it's a game of

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 4>great powers. It's about, you know, Europe becoming a vacuum

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 4>after World War Two to be filled by you know,

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 4>two great powers, the Soviet Union. In the United States, yeah,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 4>it was there. All that was there, and an ideology

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 4>was there of communism and American liberalism. But for instance,

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 4>business people hear about ideas, they kind of become a

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 4>little bit so horrific and they said, just ideas, tell

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 4>me something more important. So the most important thing it

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 4>was the battle for the future of capitalism in my view,

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 4>and you know, for everyone who were in Europe and

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 4>in Washington and New York, or or in Moscow, whatever,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>in Tokyo, it was about that because you know, the

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 4>previous thirty years of capitalism were disastrous. Capitalism discredited itself.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 4>So if you were in the late forties in Europe,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 4>you would think, hmm, maybe I should become a young communist.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 4>So the previous disasters use of capitalism caused the phenomenon

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Cold War, and it was just geopolitical situation when Europe

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 4>was out for grabs. Much of Europe thanks to Hitler

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>was up for grabs between the two you know, coalitions

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 4>between the Soviet Union and the Western Powers. They are

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>so called Angelis Saxons. It gained geopolitical dimensions in this way,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 4>but essentially it was about which system would modernize the

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 4>world better. This is essentially throughout the Cold Warrior had

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 4>modifications of the same questions until it was answered very

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 4>much in favor of capitalism in the seventies and the

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 4>agies particularly, Yes, capitalism is much much better. In fact,

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 4>that's the only.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Way Tracy, I think I'm still half right it was.

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 2>There is a big geopolitical element about Europe. But I

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>do now have to reread the book to not take

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>away my overly simplistic takeaway from it. Anyway, Tracy go on.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, in all honesty, I have not read the book,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>so I get to ask all the extremely basic questions here.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think this is relevant to the discussion.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>At least not missing.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, at least I'm learning about it in real time.

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 3>But Vlad, I guess my question is how did the

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 3>US and the Soviet Union come to understand each other's

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>respective positions? So you know, what was the process through

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>which they sort of calcified each other's ideologies and came

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 3>away with this notion that you know, okay, the US

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>very capitalist. Maybe capitalism requires a lot of expansion, a

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of domination of the world to keep going, whereas

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the US came away thinking, well, you know, Soviets believe

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>in communism, and communism is going to take over the world.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>How did that process actually happen?

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, let me start with what I know better about

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 4>the Soviets because I grew up there, and you know,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 4>I said I was a young Marxist and all that

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 4>I was. You know, you may say, you know, brainwashed

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 4>at the time in high school and all that, But

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>by the end of the high school, by the way,

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I began to have doubts. So I was already the seventies.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 4>So it was very much unclear at the time that

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 4>we would ever build anything called communism already. But you know,

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 4>let me return to your question, and let's say the

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 4>same point to say, let's talk about the start of

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 4>the Cold War, because it was an immensely long contest,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 4>immensely long confrontation, like for four decades, right, so it's

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 4>very important. I broke up my book into four major sections.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 4>And if you are in the first section, when the

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 4>Cold War just started in the Soviet Union, they read Lenin,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 4>and Lenin said, as long as capitalism exists, it would

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 4>produce imperialism, and imperialism is about competition for resources and wars,

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 4>global wars, because capitalism is global. So that's what you

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>learn about the other side in the Soviet Union. So

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 4>whenever somebody likes Stalin would say, hey, you know, the

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 4>United States now is a top capitalist power. That means

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 4>that you know, other powers should compete, like the UK should,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 4>British Empire should compete with Americans. And this is essentially

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 4>the main source of instability and global war. This is

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 4>what you believed in as a matter faith in the

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Soviet Union. If you are in the United States, it's

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 4>much less let's say, theoretical, and more like based on

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 4>experience of dealing with Red Russia or Communist Russia. And

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 4>during the first decade, Americans completely dismissed the existence of

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Red Russia and never granted diplomatic recognition to that country

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 4>because there was, you know, a kind of nonsense for

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Americans to think that people don't believe in private property.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 4>They reject entrepreneurship, They reject God, atheists and so on

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 4>and so forth. This is just a nonsense. This state

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 4>cannot exist. And then you know, they began to change

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 4>their mind gradually, Oh it should stay and all that.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 4>But what made them change their mind about the Soviet

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Union above all was the Great Depression and a huge

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>crisis of capitalists. Back to my original point about the

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>context between capitalism and communism, the very fact that the

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 4>idea of this context entered the American mind, you know,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 4>and later Americans even began to say, oh, communists have

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 4>taken over the world and all that stuff. It is

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 4>because of their internal insecurity, American internal insecurity, because the

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Great Depression did take place. It was almost ten years. Yes,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 4>America exited the war as powerful as it never had been.

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 4>But thanks to the war, nobody could say with another

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 4>Great Depression happened after the end of the war. So

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 4>that was immense internal insecurity. Coupled with that American exceptionalism,

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, we've done so well before, we should do

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 4>great in the future. That produced American impulse towards the

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Cold War. And I would say, you know, I'm back

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 4>and forth on this question. By the way, you know,

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 4>when you ask who started it in such a complex context,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 4>between the two ways of light, two ways of modernization,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's very difficult sometimes to say who started it.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 4>But I would say Americans had more sources, and therefore

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 4>they were much more proactive in nineteen forty five, forty six,

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 4>forty seven, when they began to see the Soviets acting

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 4>not as they had expected, strangely, because the Soviets always

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 4>acted as Soviets, they just were expansionists, they were assertive,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 4>but after forty five they were also extremely weak. They

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 4>lost twenty seven million people during World War Two and

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 4>all that stuff, So Americans knew that, but they also

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 4>saw Soviets being expansionists and decided to take an initiative.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 4>So much of the Cold War, in a way, during

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 4>its original phases Americans acting, Americans doing the Marshall Plan,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Americans doing dividing Germany into two parts in reaction to

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the perceived Soviet expansionism and real Soviet expansionism, but also

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 4>realizing we're stronger, we can stop them. We have huge wealth,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 4>we have atomic bomb and they don't, and we have

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 4>resources to stop communism. But the premise is in the

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 4>America in mind that communism is such a dangerous thing

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 4>that can spread all over the world. And why he

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 4>can spread hello, because capitalism is weak, and particularly in Europe,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 4>because capitalisms stopped working in Europe, and you know, we

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 4>must reignite it, we must just set it straight and

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, make it stand on both feet.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So arguably, maybe the Cold War formally started with the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>famous long telegram from the US diplomat George Kennan, and

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>he talked about, you know, the outlaid the foundation of

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 2>this idea of containment, in this idea that the Soviets

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>were a fundamental threat to everything we hold dear in

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the West, in the US, our way of life, our freedom,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. And you're dismissive in the book of his

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe paranoid views. But on the other hand, you know,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>up until you know there was a Comintern that aimed

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to foment communism around the world. And obviously the Soviets

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>moved a missile to Cuba and thought a war in

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Afghanistan and the Gola, et cetera. Why was it so

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>unrealistic to think that the Soviet Union did have expansionist

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 2>visions for spreading a specific way of life across the globe.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I never said that the Soviets didn't have expansionists

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 4>to view, because that was the essence of I continued,

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 4>I continued, I continue, No, no, no, no, you actually you

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 4>have just proved to it that you read the book

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 4>at these parts of the book that tells about the

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 4>canon fascinating character and Canon's long Telegram. My take on

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Canon is, actually, you know, many people read excellent books

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 4>on Canon because he was such a master of words.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 4>He essentially gave subsequent generations of American liberal historians all

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 4>the words to use, the entire kind of ideological framework

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 4>to use about what Soviet threat was about. He used

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the word virus, malignant parasite, and other helpful things to

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 4>understand Soviet threat. But if we go beyond all this,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 4>ask a question, okay, malignant parasite on what parasite on

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 4>healthy capitalist liberal society. That again, the thesis is, it

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 4>is liberal capitalism that collapsed in the nineteen thirties and

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 4>above all in Europe, above all in Germany, but also

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 4>in other countries. And maybe America can restore this capitalism

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 4>to its greatness. But maybe not, because at the end

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Long Telegram, Canon has doubts. Canon says we

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 4>should contain communists, but not to such an extent that

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 4>we in America would ourselves turn into a garrison state.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 4>So his theory that in this huge effort to contain communism,

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 4>America might itself change its nature and stop being liberal

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 4>capitalist society and would become a garrison state. So, you know,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 4>that's a sort of sense of uncertainty. But later this

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 4>sense of uncertainty was dropped, particularly in the sixties with

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 4>this point you know, Kenny diesque kind of message and

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 4>then great Society and so on and so forth. So

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 4>it's very important again I repeat, when you read about

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 4>the Cold War to ask a question when exactly in

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 4>what phase of the Cold War are you and what

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of questions you raise about this phase, because it's

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 4>for decades, for decades, so that uncertainty about capitalism began

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 4>to pass in Europe and you have experienced, you know,

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 4>a moment of you know, huge economic wonder at the

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 4>end of the fifties and in the sixties. But then

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 4>the colonization started and that uncertainty what would happen to

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the global South resurfaced. That the fact that all these

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 4>countries like India and China, of course, became communists famously

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen forty nine. So that always loomed large in

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 4>the imagination of Americans, is that have China turned communism

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 4>and not you know, followed that great, unique and correct

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 4>American way. Maybe others would take this way of misdevelopment.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting that all American diplomats and pundits and experts

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 4>use that or misdevelopment when they spoke about Soviet socialism

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 4>during the fifties and the sixties. So when you began

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 4>to pile up, well, what about Afghanistan, what about you

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 4>know this or that you're already kind of continuing into

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 4>extrapolating the timeline into the future. My answer to you

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 4>would be, don't do it, because we have a conflict.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 4>It started in the late forties. It created a certain

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of deadlock, a sense of deadlock, a long battle

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 4>that no one knew how to win. And one horrible

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 4>perspective of that deadlock was the possibility of a nuclear war.

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Don't forget this is why you mentioned the Cuban missile crisis.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 4>The Cuban missile crisis showed and when both sides faced

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 4>that prospect of a term a nuclear war, both sides,

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 4>No matter how more bombs and missiles and bombers the

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 4>United States had in nineteen sixty two, it had seventeen

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 4>times more than the Soviet Union, no matter that both

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 4>sides preferred to step back, and aside from a confrontation,

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 4>nobody knew how this conflict would end. So this conflict

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 4>continued for decade after decade and after decade, which is

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 4>the nature of any conflict that cannot end in the

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 4>decisive victory, and when both sides have existential reasons not

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 4>to raise up their hands sort of.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 3>Say, you already anticipated my next question, which was what

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 3>was the role of nuclear weapons in prolonging the conflict?

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to skip to something else that you

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 3>just mentioned, but can you talk a little bit more

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 3>about the Cold War experience in a place like India,

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Because again, so much of the focus tends to be

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 3>on the US versus Russia for obvious reasons, but there

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 3>was a lot going on in other parts of the

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 3>world as well, and some would argue that, you know,

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 3>some countries were even successful in sort of exploiting the

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 3>tension between the US and Russia for their own advantage.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, you mentioned India and excellent studies in India. The

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 4>fact is that Narrow and the first generation of Indian rulers,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Indian leaders had been very much under the influence of socialists,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily stalin like socialists, but they kind of had

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 4>huge apprehension of Western capitalism and they wanted to find

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 4>out a third way of development. That was one of

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 4>major reasons why India, among other countries, joined the non

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 4>aligned movement. They didn't want to participate in that geopolitical

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 4>conflict between the West and the East. But also they

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 4>did seriously expect to get what they wanted, a kind

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 4>of mixed model, something from socialism, something from free entrepreneurship

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 4>and decide for themselves what is best to them. So,

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, in the late fifties and in the sixties,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 4>you see the Indians kind of, you know, turning to

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Moscow and asking Moscow help us with that, for instance,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 4>to build a steel mill, and turning to America and

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 4>telling Americas, oh it, can you help with that? So

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 4>they played on both sides, and I think it was

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 4>a right choice. So that lasted actually into the early

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 4>eighties until the emergence of the global liberal capitalist system

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 4>that we live with today, which is I think is

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 4>crumbling before our eyes today. But anyway, that system was

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 4>emerging in the seventies and eighties. Read the fourth part

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 4>of my book. It's about that emergence of that system.

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 4>And at that time people of non allied movement, like Indians,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 4>like Brazilians, like others, they began to feel the pinch

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 4>of that system. And all of a sudden they discovered

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the experiments with expert substitution failed, that there was a

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 4>huge transnational force that dictated them the rules above all,

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>the rules of how get resources, how to get money,

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 4>how to get loans and credits, and that was the

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 4>system that they totally associated with American influence, with the

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 4>World Bank, with IMF. But it was broader than that.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 4>It was a global capitalist system that began to emerge

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 4>during the seventies, something that theorists would call today's Washington consensus.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 4>And it was also part of the call of the war.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I mentioned several things, that geopolitical context over Europe,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 4>decolonization and now this and all those huge transnational global

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 4>developments influenced the call war and they influenced the choices

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 4>of countries like India. Of course, I want.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>To ask a question that sort of maybe falls in

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the story and actually goes back to

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 2>nuclear weapons, you know, the Marxist Leninist escatology, maybe that's

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the right word, is like, eventually the capitalist countries, either

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>because of their conflicts or other internal contradictions of the system,

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>eventually they'll collapse, and we don't know how long it'll take,

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 2>but eventually communism will win out. To what degree did

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>the sort of existence of the nuclear bomb or the

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 2>development of the nuclear bomb undermine that story that history

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 2>will not end. Human will not end necessarily with communist victory.

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 2>History could end with all of humanity simply being erased

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>in the nuclear war. And how much did this sort

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 2>of opening up of this other possible path through which

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>human history could unfold sort of shake that underlying faith

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and the original story.

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Well that's a great question, by the way, because Lenin

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 4>and Marx wrote the theory at the time that when

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 4>nuclear weapons didn't exist, yeah, okay, when you know, these

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 4>weapons emerged, that kind of canonical Marxist Leninist approach to

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 4>world history had to be adjusted. And it was a

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 4>fascinating process of adjustment because, above all, after Stalin, Understalin

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 4>and after Staalin, the Soviet Union was idiocracy and free

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 4>debate was impossible. And yet there were some elements of

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 4>debate and discussion about nuclear weapons, which I write about

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 4>in my book, from some likely corners, like nuclear physicists,

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 4>who warned, for instance, the leadership in Moscow leadership in

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 4>nineteen fifty four, that the invention of terminnuclear weapons makes

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 4>the end of the entire humanity possible. And the party

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 4>leaders immediately reproached them and squashed the debate because their

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 4>view was, hey, you know, our calonical explanation is that

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not humanity, it's capitalism that will perish. But then

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 4>other unlikely candidates like it. Among them a chess champion

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 4>between Nick, who I cited my book, began to write

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to the party leaders, wait a minute, I'm a communist

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 4>member myself, but I don't want humanity to perish. This

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 4>is my way of reconciling the two goals, keeping peace

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 4>and making communism a peaceful outcome of the competition between

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 4>the two systems. So suddenly that guy between, thinking very logically,

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 4>pointed to the main problem of the Marxist Leninist approach

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 4>that it always had preached a violent andent of capitalism,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 4>some kind of a revolution, and then of course the

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 4>victory of communism as a result of another imperialist war.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 4>But this imperialist war is no longer possible because of

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 4>the existence of certain nuclear weapons. So ultimately, Schoff, not

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 4>being very theoretical guy but kind of very instinctive politician,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 4>came up with his solution to this debate and basically said,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 4>or the forces of socialism was strong enough. He of

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 4>course meant above all the Soviet Union in China strong

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 4>enough to prevent another war that imperialists otherwise want to unleash,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 4>and therefore we'll proceed to communism, but peacefully. So he

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 4>just basically squared the circle, and then the idiocratic bureaucracy

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 4>followed this lead. And then what you have is Dayton't.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 4>Then what you have is daytont and arms control. That

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 4>was the major outcome of that ideological reconciliation that the

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 4>Soviet leadership, and particularly the guy after Cruse Schevnev said,

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, but we want peace. We don't renounce how

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 4>ideological belief that capitalists would perish and communists would triumph,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 4>But we have to do it peacefully. Our main duty

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 4>is to struggle for peace, and in the old days,

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 4>let's say, twenty years earlier, such guys like Brezhnev would

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 4>have been denounced as yeah, I don't know he read

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 4>its revisionists, I don't know. But in the seventies that

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 4>was all right. So in a sense, that ideological innovation

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 4>opened the way for Dayton peaceful policies by Brezhnev, and

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 4>with all kinds of good consequences for Europe, with the

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 4>American Soviet Dayton flourishing briefly but flourishing under Nixon, and

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 4>looking backwards, you begin to realize that without this period

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 4>of Breshnev and struggle for peace, otherwise you wouldn't have

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 4>had Garbachev. And of course, without Garbachev in the late eighties,

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 4>from eighty five to nineteen ninety one, you cannot imagine

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 4>the end of such conflict as the Cold War, because

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Garbachev was a major part and then single handedly did

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 4>many things that made the end of this conflict possible thinkable,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 4>and actually it happened.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, I just want to say one thing, One area

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 2>where I think the Soviet Union was objectively better is

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 2>that it's a country where a chess grandmaster is so

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>politically influential. I would like to live in such a

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 2>you know that was one writes a letter.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, well at that cultural small cultural note for

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 4>the audience. I mean, and not everybody played chess in

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 4>the Soviet Union, that's to begin with. So when c I,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 4>a experts or somebody else would point out that the

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 4>Soviets are so devious because they all played chess and

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 4>all out fox us in the West, it's not true

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 4>because the po liberal leadership played domino, which was simple game.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 4>They played domino, they were lot much more premiate.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>They got the domino theory from anyway, Tracy go.

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, okay, well, vlad As you keep repeating, this is

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>such a sprawling period in history, and I have so

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 3>many questions, but one I want to make sure we

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 3>actually get to is just sort of bringing everything up

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 3>to date. And Joe mentioned at the beginning of this

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>podcast that one of the reasons we wanted to talk

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 3>to you is because one thing you hear nowadays pretenses

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>see one of the pretenses other than he read the book,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 3>is this idea of the US and China being in

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 3>a cold war. So when you hear someone say, oh,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 3>this is the new Cold war between the US and China.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 3>What is your immediate reaction.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't believe that it's a cold war between

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 4>the US and China. Well, unless you want to, you know,

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 4>let me rephrase it. You know, it may be called

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 4>the Cold War if you take very superficial or rather

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 4>abstract theoretical take on what the Cold War is. So

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 4>it's just a competition between great powers that for some reason,

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 4>primarily because of the existence of nuclear weapons, never turn hot. Well,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 4>if you take this kind of abstract, generic approach, then

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 4>you may say, oh, you're not a cold war, and

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 4>probably because of the existence of nuclear weapons, if we're lucky,

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 4>we'll have a series of the Cold War into eternity. Right.

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 4>But I'm not a fan of this approach. I'm much

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 4>more into specific historical interpretation of the Cold War, which

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I said was above all a contact between the two

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 4>ways of modernization capitalism and non capitalism called socialism and

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 4>a capitalist one that you know, all rounds of that

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 4>competition handily, and this is why essentially the Cold War

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 4>ended the way it ended. But where are we now

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 4>between the United States and China. It's much more narrow

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 4>in really more geopolitical context. Who would be the top

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 4>in the hierarchy of capitalist powers. Yes, somebody would say, oh,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 4>it's about freedom versus lack freedom of authoritarianism in China.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 4>But it's a much weaker argument really in my view.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 4>A because China evolves in its own way, you know,

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 4>through hundreds and hundreds of years. But nobody said that

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 4>ultimately China would not begin to vote and have political parties.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Who knows, maybe in two hundred years China will develop

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 4>into some sort of democracies. I would never say no

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 4>to that. My approach is more specific that for now,

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe we are facing as profound, as dangerous,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 4>as essentialist and existential conflict as the Cold War had been,

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 4>particularly in the first two decades of the Cold War

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 4>between nineteen forty seven, let's say, nineteen sixty two, sixty

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 4>sixty eight, whatever. So this is my answer to the question.

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 4>There as a conflict, but I would hesitate to call

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 4>it the Cold War. However, however, we should all learn

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 4>from forty years of Cold War history to make this

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Sino American conflict manageable or at least more manageable. And

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 4>I have a few ideas about this. By just looking

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 4>at this Soviet American interaction during the previous major conflict.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 4>One idea is, of course diplomacy should work. And I'm

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 4>always struck how important was diplomacy even at the worst

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 4>moments of the Cold War, even at the time of

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 4>McCarthyism in the United States, even at the time, not

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 4>to mention, the time of the Cuban Missi crisis, when

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Kennedy and Khrushov exchanged all those famous messages that ultimately

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 4>led to the peaceful outcome of the crisis. So diplomacy

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 4>is hugely important. At the second point I want to

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 4>make about the Sino American confrontation today that the danger

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 4>of tunnel vision. People should learn to think outside the box.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 4>There was in the Cold War so many people who

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 4>said they cannot be any way of talking to those Communists,

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 4>to those Ruskies, And there were many hardliners in the

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Soviet Union who never wanted to trust to talk to

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 4>the Americans. And yet there were always people thinking outside

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 4>the box and finding cultural, diplomatic and other ways of interaction.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 4>That's really important. At third observation, some people would say tariffs,

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 4>economic sanctions, and arms race would solve this conflict today

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 4>between China and the United States. I would say the

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 4>entire Cold War actually shows that it was nonsense. Arms

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 4>race did not solve political sources of confrontation between the

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Soviet Union and the United States. The development of capital

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and the development of what global economy solved that conflict,

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 4>the fundamental underlining issues of that conflict. So if the

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 4>United States wants to out spend China more sophisticated weaponry

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 4>AI intelligence to manage the weaponry, that's another deadlock. That's

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 4>that's like forgetting fundamental lessons of history. And finally, you know,

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 4>look at the cover of my book Falling Domino. One

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 4>major problem of Cold War mentality, particularly on the American side,

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 4>but also on the Soviet side of course, was thinking,

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 4>once we make this one concession anywhere, there will be

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 4>the falling Domino effect, and that will be the end

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 4>of our credibility, the end of our position, That will

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 4>be the end of our whole global position in the world,

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 4>in our cap So what did the Americans get by

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 4>following this falling Domino theory? They ended up in Vietnam.

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 4>And what did the Soviets gain by going along this line?

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 4>They actually collapsed at the end of it. So it's

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 4>not a good way. It's not a good way to

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 4>resurrect the falling domino mentality by saying, if God forbid,

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 4>if China moves against this island somewhere, you know, and

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 4>we do not defend this island by military force, then

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 4>that's the end of the world. We know, it's a

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 4>falling domino. It's a classic falling domino theory.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 2>When I was growing up, terms like human rights, it

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 2>never would have occurred to me when I was younger

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that these could be loaded terms, that there could be

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 2>anything bad about a human rights group or a human

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, whatever it is, or minority rights or so forth.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought these were just unalloyed goods. And one of

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the things, you know, I've been thinking about it recently

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 2>again actually in current geopolitical context, because just a week

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 2>or two ago, Trump was in the golf and he,

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, made all these agreements and we're gonna sell

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 2>lots of semiconductors to golf countries and so forth. You know,

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia still does a lot of executions by beheading

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 2>and things that would horrify people in the United States.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>All kinds of things in the human rights realm that

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 2>would horrify people in the United States, but we could

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 2>still do business with them. We could still sell them

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of semiconductors, by their oil and so forth.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the things you point out in your book

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 2>is the role of human rights groups at times throughout

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 2>this story of undermining, det haunt and sort of when

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 2>we were having these sort of softer moments that ultimately

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the human rights groups in the West, they were not

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 2>helpful on that front. Could this be a more productive,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 2>peaceful path in the United States to perhaps be more

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>willing to just accept, you know what, we can do

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 2>business with countries. We can sell arms and chips, and

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 2>we don't have to worry. It's just not our business

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 2>how they conduct their internal affairs.

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, this is one of those moments during

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 4>the long Cold War when Americans played very proactively in

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 4>Americans who were in a vibrant society, let me use

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 4>this loaded term free society, unlike the Soviets. But ironically,

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 4>American human rights movement was ignited by something that was

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 4>happening inside the Soviet Union. To begin with, there was

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 4>a group, very small groups of human rights defenders called

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 4>dissidents in the Soviet Union that evoked huge admiration in

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 4>American societies as sort of good Russians versus evil Russians.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, people whose names were household names at the

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 4>time and few people remember them now, like you know,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Alexander Soldier, Niitsen, Andre Sacharov and another, you know, great

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 4>names at the time. And then came the issue of

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Jewish Emmy Grace, who wanted to leave the Sovie Union

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 4>to go to Israel or to go to other countries,

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 4>and American Jewish groups who faced discrimination at home and

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 4>wanted to sort of resert themselves. At the same time

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 4>at home, they found a great cause, a good cause

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 4>inside the Soviet Union to help their brethren to emigrate

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 4>from the Soviet Unions. So that was the true emergence

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 4>of the human rights movement in the United States. That

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 4>conflated without a great currents that already been there, like

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 4>civil rights movements and anti racist movements and feminist movements,

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, and environment movements. That was a great moment

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 4>in American history. So what happened. I think it would

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 4>be foolish on anybody's part to blame human rights movements

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 4>for undermining the tent Because Dayton was very shaky and

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 4>very very fragile thing to begin with. But Dayton was

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 4>in a sense that Soviets were doubly unlucky during the

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 4>seventies because they thought that with a sheer agreement on

0:37:56.120 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 4>the equality of armaments and the agreement tongue like taming

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the arms race, they would create the foundation for the

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 4>ecton And that was really really naive to think so,

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 4>because again back to one of my points, arms races

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 4>or taming arms races, taming arms racist is good, but

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 4>arms racists in asums, they're crucial to solving real political issues.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 4>So these arms are agreements that the sovice were so

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 4>proud of, Well, they didn't play any role in the end.

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 4>What played the role was human rights, a movement inside

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 4>the United States that legitimized Acton in the eyes of

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 4>millions of Americans. Plus of course there were other issues

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 4>dealing to decolonization in Africa of all of the Portuguese Empire.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 4>And so it's jumped in immediately, guided by their Marxist

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Leninist kind of fraternity, solidarity, mentality and error and American

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 4>herdliners that you see they unchanging, they keep roiling it,

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, they keep on the mining global stability and

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 4>whatever they can. And there were other things as well,

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 4>so which sadly led the Soviets to their own falling

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Domino mindset and overreaction in Afghanistan that you mentioned. So

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 4>everything was a reaction to something, but I would place

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the rise of human rights in context. What indubitably happened, however, then,

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 4>was that people like President Carter and then President Reagan

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 4>quickly realized that this is a moral cause to follow,

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 4>and it also was expedient course politically because by championing

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 4>global human rights campaigns, the United States were back as

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 4>a leader of the free world, and they were back

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 4>with much more credentials, like finally being not only the

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 4>leaders of the free world, but the leaders of the

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 4>just world, which was the usually the clay is something

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 4>claimed by the Soviet Union right in earlier years. You know,

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 4>the Soviet Union always was against the racism, against the

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Jim Crow, you know, colonialism, And suddenly the United States

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 4>grabbed all of that and redirected it against the Soviet

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 4>unter set. And you Rooskies are actually you know, he

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 4>colonizes you authoritarians. You know, you don't let your people

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 4>emigrate and all that. So it was a decisive ideological

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 4>turning point in the Cold War, which the Soviets at

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 4>first didn't realize was that way, and then later they

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 4>became pathetically defensive and just couldn't find a good way

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 4>to deal with that until Gorbachev finally said during his presidency,

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 4>let's not be afraid of human rights. Let's basically accept

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 4>that we also can be free in just society, and

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 4>he began to liberalize the Soviet society with the outcome

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 4>that we already know.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back to something you said very

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 3>early on in the conversation, but you mentioned that the

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Cold War wasn't really written about in the Soviet Union.

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess when you were living there, when you were

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 3>studying and in school. And I'm really curious about personal

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 3>experiences during the collapse of the Soviet Union. One of

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the best books I ever read on the subject was

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:26.479
<v Speaker 3>by Svetlana Alexovich. I want to say secondhand Time, which

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>is a sort of oral history of Russians experiencing this

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 3>transition from communism to capitalism. So I'm just very curious

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 3>what your personal experience was, and I guess what the

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.879
<v Speaker 3>sort of messaging was to the Russian population about that

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 3>huge transition and transformation.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, that was, as you said, unexpected, a huge transition

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 4>that amounted to the complete loss of identity. And you

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 4>may say that by that time very few people seriously

0:41:55.239 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 4>took ideological promise. Is if the rival of communist and

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 4>many people far began to think that life in the

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 4>West was not awful, but actually much more superior. In

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 4>that particularly turning point in the eighty nine nineteen ninety one,

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 4>when the Soviet press, liberated by Gorbatrov, began to beam

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 4>to Soviet audience through television. It wasn't like, you know,

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 4>something that foreign stations did. It was the Soviet television

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 4>began to convey this information about the much better life

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:31.479
<v Speaker 4>in the West. So all pillars of Soviet mindset, sort

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 4>of Soviet worldview, began to collapse simultaneously, and it led

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 4>to several faithful consequences. First was that sense of cynicism,

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 4>dejection of any certainty, any moral, any kind of ethical

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 4>certainties in the society, which was accompanied by huge ways

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 4>of domestic crime and you know, violence, and mostly economic violence. Second,

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 4>that was this kind of realization, well, if capitalism is

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 4>the only way for humanity to exist and evolve. Anything

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 4>to gain money, to make profit is allowed. So again

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 4>the combination of collapse of ethical norms with sudden spread

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 4>of capitalist practices led to that you know, wild East mentality,

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 4>much more so than the Wild West was in America,

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 4>I would say, And ultimately the void was filled by

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 4>nationalism or some kind of at least, and I wouldn't

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 4>say totally filled, but you know, some kind of expectation

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 4>that if everything collapses around me, it means that either

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 4>I choose my family and myself as the only sort

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of bulwark in the future, or I would believe in

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 4>another super ego, which is nation nationalists. And so the

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 4>nationalist and ethnic conflicts sprung up immediately as Gorbachev began

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 4>to dismantle the old sort of the old mentality, see

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the old system and the Soviet Union. And it was

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 4>highly dangerous and highly destructive, and of course, in part

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 4>those nationalists humilitated against the past and past grievances in

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, all the people killed by Stalin and Lenin

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 4>and you know all that, But they also kind of

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 4>satisfied the new need for a renewed sense of identity.

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 4>So I used to think that the Soviet Collapse was

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 4>relatively peaceful until the current war in Ukraine. Because clearly,

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, this new wave of Russian nationalism and is

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 4>linked to the continuing lack of idea, continuing void in

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 4>the heart of Russia. Why so many changes happened and

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 4>what's the meaning of those changes? So it was possible,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 4>as it turned out, as I'm saying with deep sadness,

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 4>for the leader of Russia to fill that tremendous vacuum

0:44:55.280 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 4>with another refurbished idea of Russian imperial, imperial and national domination.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 2>So I just have one last question. And we could

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 2>talk for a long time and have lots of things,

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 2>including we could talk about the war in Ukraine and

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 2>how actually Kennon himself predicted that that could be a

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 2>consequence of Clinton's NATO expansion and things like that. But

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, I want to ask one last question. The

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 2>way you depicted and also, especially in your previous book Collapse,

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you're pretty hard on Gorbachev and you sort of castigate

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 2>him at times for his unwillingness to use force at times.

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 2>But you know, one of the things that you could

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 2>see in this book is that the collapse of the

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Warsaw Pact there was a big economic element. The Soviet

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Union could no longer supply cheap oil to East Germany

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 2>and other countries and so forth, and that the economic

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 2>dysfunction of the Soviet Union played a significant role in

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the failure to keep those military allies on the other

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 2>side of the Iron Curtain. But then you sort of say,

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Gorbachev unilaterally disarmed more or less the USSR. There was

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>an unforced collapse, that it was sort of an internal choice.

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Why shouldn't we assume that the economic dysfunction that led

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:12.280
<v Speaker 2>to the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, which you acknowledge,

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 2>would not have eventually led to the disintegration of the

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 2>USSR itself and the emergence of all these countries pursuing

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 2>some conception of freedom and national identity.

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I keep struggling with the same question, because

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 4>history is never linear and it can go different ways.

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 4>And of course, you know, those who look back at

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 4>the history of the twentieth century and in fact the

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 4>nineteenth century see the immense force of nationalism and national

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 4>cell determination. But this is one way to say that

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 4>the collapse of the Soil Union was inevitable and that

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 4>it was just a matter of time for all those

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 4>different nations to find their road to the statehood and

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 4>sovereignty and all that. But in other ways, to look

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 4>back at history and see the perils and danger of

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 4>sudden collapses, sudden collapses of empires, we see essentially the

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.800
<v Speaker 4>tremendous instability in Europe paving the way too fascist and

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 4>Nazi dictatorships rooted in a sudden collapse of empires as

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 4>a result of World War One. So the suddenness of

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 4>this collapse, the fact that they create this immense vacuum

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 4>and destroy the old common identities and common links, immense

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 4>common links between different ethnic groups and across different ethnic groups.

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 4>This is a huge dangerous moment. And in fact I

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 4>tried to strike a balance and collapse, looking at both sides,

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 4>but sort of probably knowing what would follow after Garbachev.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I overdo the second. I'm hard on Garbachev because

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 4>he raised expectations tremendously, and I was among his followers,

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 4>and millions of people looked up to him full leadership.

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 4>And when particularly he tremendous changes in the late eighty

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 4>eight eighty nine, not right away, you know, the first

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 4>two years were very kind of, very frustrating. I remember that.

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 4>But then he made that huge leap forward, hugely forward,

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 4>and that leap forward contained elements of the future collapse

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 4>because it had many disguided premises. He believed in Leninism,

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 4>he believed in that sort of many things that he

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 4>should believed in, but he did. But then by taking

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 4>this sleep, Gorbachev kind of got frozen. In the process

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 4>of this sleep, he suddenly lost his initiative. He became

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:43.280
<v Speaker 4>a famously you know, slow or infamously slow in taking

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 4>other steps. So with such tremendous changes, you have to

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 4>maintain a momentum or you lose it to others. And

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 4>he lost that momentum to the Yeltsin, to the Russian

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of leader who essentially pulled Russia from under Gorbachev

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 4>and and destroyed the so Union, not the Balls, not Georgian,

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 4>it's not Ukraine. He has destroyed so Uni Elson did

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 4>in my view, So by looking at this story, I

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 4>sort of I'm harsh on the later Gorbachev because the

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 4>book is mostly about three years eighty nine nineteen ninety one,

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 4>during which Gorbachev had already done his greatest kind of

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 4>leap into the future and got scared someone you know,

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 4>got you know, outgunned by his arrival. So my harshness

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 4>on Gorbachev, maybe he's guided by the fact that I

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 4>would very much preferred him to succeed because other options

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 4>were very, very very clear for us. Now what other

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 4>options led to, you know, for those who admired and

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:48.399
<v Speaker 4>Washington people admired Jelson and thought that Gorbachev was still

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 4>a Communist. True, Elson turned into anti communists, but look,

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 4>it was Elson who gave us the current Kremlin leader.

0:49:57.560 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 4>After all.

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 2>A lot of loves you, bog This was fantastic. You

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.320
<v Speaker 2>can talk for a long time. After I read Collapse.

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I sort of thought, by the way that garbage sort

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of seems like an Obama type character, Nobel Prize winner.

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 2>But then you know, in the wake of it, maybe

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 2>some lost momentum we could talk for a long time

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 2>about all this. Really appreciate you so much for coming on.

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Everyone should read your book. I will reread it again

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 2>because I apparently missed the entire point. But really, thanks

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 2>for coming on Outlaws.

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you very much for talking about history. It's

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 4>a rare moment.

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Cherlsey, I really do have to reread the book. I

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I apparently I was like, I love this book, and

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 2>then I missed the entire point.

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:50.720
<v Speaker 4>How did that happen?

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I am I reading comprehension. Isn't that great? Well, see, Joe,

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 2>how do you read so many books? The answer is

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 2>by now paying attention to the words on the page.

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, good thing, we're not basic bunch of podcast episodes

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 3>on your reading and understanding of history books. Okay, that

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 3>was fascinating. I did think, well, first of all, I

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 3>keep recommending that book secondhand time, and I really think

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 3>you should. And I think one of the important takeaways

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:18.399
<v Speaker 3>from that conversation and from other conversations that we've had

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in the past, is this idea of like, just how

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 3>big an existential crisis the collapse of the Soviet Union

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:28.879
<v Speaker 3>actually was for Russia and Vlad's point that you ended

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 3>up replacing the communist ideology with nationalism. I mean, we

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 3>are still living through the consequences of all of that.

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 2>No, we totally are. We didn't really get into it

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:41.200
<v Speaker 2>too much. And she sort of ends the book and

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about the US China relationship, and one of the

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 2>points that he makes, where is the US Soviet relationship

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 2>was really something that was always handled at the diplomatic level.

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 2>The US China relationship has, especially in the last you know,

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 2>thirty years, forty years whatever, has really been driven by

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the business community, yeah, specifically, which sort of makes it

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a very different story to the Cold War, and it

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:09.280
<v Speaker 2>just has not been about that sort of ideological blog

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>per se.

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>In fact, it was a really good article. I think

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:13.880
<v Speaker 2>it was in the Financial Times last year. There was

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 2>like Cuba is asking China for some advice on economic growth,

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Chinese leader is like, well, you

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 2>could try introducing market competition. You maybe give that a shot.

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:28.280
<v Speaker 2>So while you know, obviously China wants to expand its influence,

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:30.760
<v Speaker 2>it seems like, you know, it does it by building

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:34.320
<v Speaker 2>factories and stuff like that and expanding its economic footprint

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>much more than asking its trading partners to you know,

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 2>commit to its specific model.

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, speaking of building factories, one episode I do want

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to do, because this keeps coming up, is why were

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:51.360
<v Speaker 3>communists so obsessed with steel? And you know, Vlad mentioned

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the idea of like India asking Russia for help and

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 3>building some steel factories, And it feels like, sometimes I

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 3>think the Cold War could have been you know, we

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 3>could have avoided the Cold War. If we just had

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 3>some sort of steel manufacturing off competition between the great

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 3>world powers, and whoever made the best steel would be

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 3>declared the winner and their economic model would be, you know,

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 3>embraced by the rest of the world. We should have

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 3>gone down that route.

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Did you know that the name Stalin was a nom

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:21.280
<v Speaker 2>de guerre that means man of steel?

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I did actually know that, so I you know, Steele,

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 3>you could tell a really good story about the Cold

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 3>War just through the medium of steel. Someone should write

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 3>that book.

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Odd Lots series The History of the Cold War As

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Told as that might be a little in niche.

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just a little Okay, shall we leave it there?

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast.

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill whysent Thal. You can follow me at

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 2>The Stalwart. Follow our guest Bluttist Loves Zubach He's at

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloodist Love Zubac one, and definitely check out his new book.

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:57.479
<v Speaker 4>The World of the Cold War.

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carman Rodriguez at Kerman armand dash Ol

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Bennett at Dashbot and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. For more Oddlots content,

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 2>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 2>have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 2>you can chat about all of these things twenty four

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to seven, including books including history in our discord Discord

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 2>dot gg slash od Loots.

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:21.839
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Thoughts, if you like it

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about the history of the Cold War,

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 3>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:33.280
<v Speaker 3>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely add free.

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for

0:54:38.800 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 3>listening the