WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Scouting The Raiders Offense

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It is Wednesday, December thirteenth, twenty seventeen, Season thirteen, episode ninety.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another edition of The Break. I'm Derek Eagleton,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the real host of The Break, and um, you came

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>back with a nice tan from the Bahamas. It was

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>snowing in New York anyway. Wow. Um. After a lot

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of work and uh and a lot of promotion of

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>what we do as a group, I'm back in studio

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>now and ready for the show to resume. How about that?

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>What I sway to phrase? What about tomorrow? Are you

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be here tomorrow? I will not be here. I'm

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>out again tomorrow. Yeah. But uh, but Amber, she's now

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>a professional at this and so she should be able

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to hold it down. She can kill it. She and Dave, Nick,

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You're out with me tomorrow. So we're doing we'll do

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>management type things tomorrow and we'll leave Amber and Dave

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to handle this. Okay, cool, to be fun. The millennials

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>will be the millennial show of the Break and Nick

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and I will be doing other things tomorrow weeking of

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Millennials tomorrow, So we're gonna miss tomorrow show. Yes, we

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>are gonna miss tomorrow show. I'm gonna miss. I don't

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>know about you. I'm definitely missing tomorrow show. I think

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you should host tomorrow, Is that right? Yep? I think

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you should be the birthday host. It'll be your party tomorrow. Okay,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday to Dave. I'll just do Marco Murray. I'll

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just do the whole thing. Yeah, be fun, it'll be great.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen, okay, but no, I'm probably won't Livensten's. I'll

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>listen later. Week of birthdays around here it has. Brian

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>had his birthday, Amber had her birthday. Now Dave's gonna

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have his birthday. Is there's somebody else coming up this week? Oh? Nick?

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>When is it it already happened? You were going? Did

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I miss it? It was Monday? Yep, that's okay. I

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>had to go buy and do something nice for him

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>or say something. We're having a nice birthday to day

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>he's lunch. Yeah, it'll be fun. Did you guys give

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>any input on where we're going to lunch today? This

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is all in the air, you know that. Oh sorry,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I kind of forgot we were on there. Okay, just

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of talking. I figured everybody else might want to

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>join un too, right, that'd be fun. I'm thinking me,

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that firston. Oh yeah, let's do it all right,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk some Cowboys football. Um, let's talk about

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland Raiders. Cowboys have a unique opportunity at this point,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're still alive despite everything that's happened this season,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>still alive at seven and six. This week's challenge is

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to go to Oakland and beat the Oakland Raiders, who

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look at any team in the NFL that

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think parallels the Cowboys, it's the Oakland Raiders. And

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking more from a big picture standpoint, last year,

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>how both teams kind of popped onto the scene, had

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>great seasons. You had young quarterbacks, You had teams that

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>were kind of their defenses were a little bit iffy,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>but the offenses were just humming last year and then

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. Things go wrong for both teams, I think,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and they end up kind of in a very similar situation. Oakland, ironically,

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still in position to possibly win their division.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not positive about that. Theoretically they're not. They're not

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>mathematically eliminated from winning their division at this point. And

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys obviously in the same kind of situation. Although

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they aren't necessarily in the driver's seat, they still are

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>theoretically in contention for a playoff spot. And now they

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>meet up on Sunday Night Football this week. Yeah, be fun. Yeah,

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know what to say to

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>all that. Like, I agree, I guess. I mean, I

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think I think the Raiders are a team that had

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>high expectations, so the serted the Cowboys and you know,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is the nature of the NFL. I mean,

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Dave Dave had the list the other day of like

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty three players that are like really really good players

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that are not playing for whatever reasons for their team.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And now I don't know if the Raiders, all these

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>teams across the league, just these two teams, No, I

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Raiders actually have Well it's funny that

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you say that they well they well, they might they

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>might on Sunday, because it remains to be seen if

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a Marie Cooper is going to play it all for

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season. Goodday night. He's not good

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not this year. Well, he's a good receiver. We we

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>spent ten minutes talking about how much Dez dropped off.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I got some numbers for you right here. Really as

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>stands as a stands right now, Mari Cooper has forty

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>two catches for four hundred and ninety nine yards five touchdowns.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Which you remember how many games? Um, I mean he's

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>been in and out, but we'll find it. Well, yeah,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>pull it up for me. It's he's he's been there

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 1>for most of okay, um average of eleven point nine

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>yards per reception, which Das is at eleven point seven.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Cars missed some time though, two which could affect Car

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Maury Cooper. They both are having bad years, both probably

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>as a result of injury. Cooper's got this ankle that

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>he can't shake. Car hurt his back earlier in the year.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Cars having a bad year. He's averaging two hundred twenty

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>six yards a game. He's completing sixty three percent of

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>his passes. He's thrown eighteen touchdowns and ten picks. Oh

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not. I mean they're not playing well, they're not.

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And is this about the running game? I think honestly,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>if you compare it to last year, like what went

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong compared to last year? How how well their offense

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>will playing? We know this year the Cowboys, it's it's

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Ezekiel Elliott. What has been their thing

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that's different this year. I think it's their quarterback. That's

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to tell you. That he's just bad

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this year relative to last year. It's one of those things.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me a lot of DeMarcus Lawrence, where like

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he got dogged for two years. He didn't play very well,

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt, he had a back injury, he played

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>through it for the good of his team. It's we like,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to say this because Derek car

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>is still playing, but like I assume he's not at

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. There's no I just refused to believe

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you could play at an MVP level. I mean he

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>was in the MVP conversation before he broke his fibula.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>He missed the last two weeks of the season. He

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there for the playoffs. They were people thought they'd

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>go deep into the playoffs where he got hurt. Yeah,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>last year hurt his back. I don't think he's been

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the same guy. What point did he hurts back this year?

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>This was in October and he missed a few weeks.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>He came back. He's been playing ever since. But again,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean all right, I mean nineteenth in total offense,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteenth in passing offense twenties and to your point, twenty

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>six and rushing offense twenty first in scoring offense, they're

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>only averaging twenty points per game. He has not been

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>lighting the world on fire. And like I said, for

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>him to drop from an MVP level, the offensive lines

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>all still there. I mean, I mean Donald Penn awesome,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Melly gave Jackson, who they gave a big contract extension

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>too over the summer. Right guard Marshall Newhouse, Like, it's

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the same dudes who were just Mall and people last year.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And Marshawn Lynch. I don't know that he's the same

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>guy he was when he was in Seattle, but he's

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>still an effective running back. And so I look at

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it and I'm just like quarterbacks not playing at the

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>level that you thought he was when you gave him

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>all that money. You talk about that offensive line this year,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they're twenty six and sacks allowed. They've given up twenty

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>one sacks, which can't be good for a quarterback with

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>annailing back right and so, and I would suspect, I

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know the number, right off hand, I would suspect

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he was not getting hit that often last year. That

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe another reason that's contributing to some of the difficulties

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>at their experiencing. And as we are, the stats are ugly.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we don't like to take games away.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And this might be a point that Dave would have

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>made here, but he had eleven catches, two hundred and

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>ten yards two talk about Cooper. Yeah, okay, Cooper, I

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>know you were talking about car I was just looking

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at these Cooper stats. He's played twelve games. He has

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a two hundred and ten yard game with two touchdowns

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and eleven catches. Like that was amazing. How long ago

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the can the City Wild? Yeah October um.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>But he's got two hundred and eighty nine yards in

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the other eleven games. Whoa, we'll back up, Yeah, he's

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>been two hundred and eighty nine yards. I'm trying to

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>do a quick math here, four ninety nine to ten

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in one game. So two eighty nine had a bad

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>year and three touchdowns, that's what I'm saying. You can

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>say he's good. That's remarkably bad, Like it's a lot

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>more on No, no game more than sixty two yards.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But against the Chiefs to ten with the world watching

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday nine, that was a great game. And this

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is every bit of it. You know, this was one

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of the most explosive offenses in the year. Left. Yeah,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>last year, Derek Carr, like I for the third time,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>he nearly won the MVP, or was at least in

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the consideration. Was Otavius Murray the runner last year? Yes? Okay,

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So did the Cowboys want Cooper to play or not? Maybe? Yeah,

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you you probably you probably want to go in and well,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got five touchdowns that I mean, he's

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>still kind of he's still I don't the fact that

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he had a two hundred yard receiving day says that

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, Like, yeah, he's capable of doing that. And

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know how the luck is of this team if

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there's something that's that that can be exploited. Sometimes you

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>end up in a bad situation and he gets exploited.

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I just uh, I mean they made they made that

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Denver offence look all world in week two. So I

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in researching this scouting report, there are people that say

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>he might not play again the rest of the year. Like,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, so we'll see. I don't know what.

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's two, it was, it's early in the week,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's only Wednesday. Nobody's practiced yet. That's something to keep

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. But the other thing with that is like,

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>as this all tends to kind of snowball. Quarterback's not

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>playing well, the offensive line hasn't been great, Cooper's not great.

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And then after Amari Cooper, like this is either leading receiver, No,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>he's not, their leading their leading receivers Jared Cook okay,

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and then tight end, yeah, Michael Crabtree is there as well,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but like without a chain, hey will, I just don't

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>wear it on the field, dude, I don't get it deads.

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't wear your diamonds. Jordan Lewis, if we're asking Joan's

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna steal this is going to be though, Yeah, my

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is is this for as dynamic as they were

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>last year with Amari Cooper either out or hobbled. I

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was just not afraid of most of the I mean, okay,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook, he burned the Cowboys in the playoffs. I

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get that he's a good player. He's got six hundred

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and twenty one yards, he's averaging thirteen yards per catch,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 1>But like, if that's your best option, if tight ends

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>your best option, then is that far for you to

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>move the ball consistently? Michael Michael Crabtree's got He's sitting

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>on five hundred yards like that, I mean a lot

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys. Larin't larry in a lot there in

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of just like this amazing dynamic passing production. After

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>after Cooper, you go Crabtree and then Cordurell Patterson, who

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is like, I'm so, but he's the epitome of looks

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like Tarzan, plays like Jane like that guy doesn't. He's

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>never done much for me. He's a great he has

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 1>at times been a great kick returner. He's way more

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to like get an end around than go down

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the field and catch a football. And you know, um,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to me a little more about Marshawn Lynch. Is

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he is he a guy that is not getting Like

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the fact that they are twenty six

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and rush yards per game. Is that more a function

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of them not running him enough like his Are his

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry high enough that has suggested if he

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>got more carries, they'd have a more productive running game.

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Or is this just simply a situation where they're just

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not running the ball well at all? See and I

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>watched the Chiefs game, which they were atrocious, and he

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>looked like Marshawn Lynch to me. I mean they were

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>running power, power runs and trap stuff. He's cutting fieldback,

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>bulldoze and over linebackers, and I mean it wasn't like

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he was great. Obviously, they didn't score any points until

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>late in the third order of that game. They lost

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty nine to fifteen, or twenty six to fIF

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty six to fifteen. But he's still he looks like

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the same guy to me. He's got six hundred yards

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on the year, seven touchdowns. If you watched him play

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the Giants two weeks ago, he had a sixty yard

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown run. Like he can still do that stuff. It

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't been there for whatever reason, and you know,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, maybe that's that's part of it. Like

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, twenty six and sacks, but for them to

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>only be a Russian for ninety one yards a game

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>seems weird to me. Like I said, I don't think

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lynch is the same guy, but I don't think

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he's dropped that far off that it's predominantly on him.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So tell me the one thing, if there's

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>one thing you can isolate and say, if they are

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a productive offensively, this will be the reason why. This

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is the one thing that they do well that they

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>could possibly exploit against this Cowboys defense. Well, I'm Marshawn's

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>averaging four point two yards per carrying just forever that's worth.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty decent which I'm happy that Anthony Hitchins

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and Sean Lee will both be That's what that was

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>My main impression from watching them play was like, Marshawn

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Lynch will be a problem for this team if Lee

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and Hitchins aren't playing well. But they've played well all years,

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so that seems that's great to me. They're both out there. Yeah, No,

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I'm watching because for whatever, I mean,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you want to assign the blame, the Oakland passing

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>game just doesn't have it at all this year. I

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>don't that I didn't see anything that particularly scares me,

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if Amari Cooper's not playing. They tend to be

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>better at home on the road, or does it matter?

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty much the same team regardless. Well there's six

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and seven, so I don't have that offhand. I'm sorry

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you stumped me. Their team or their offense either one.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I looked this up there they're four and three at home,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the same team. If you're below five hundreds, you're probably

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I doubt you're just I mean, I guess you know.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The year the Cowboys went twelve and four, they went

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>undefeated on the road and four and four at home.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's possible. But if you're below five hundred,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you're probable means are much better team on the road.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>With the record. You know, the Cowboys are four and three,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>uh two acts to four and two. You're right, four

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and the road on the road, So I guess that's

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think of it that way because both their

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>road losses are just beat downs, but I guess that's true.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You guys have made me scared. I haven't been, but

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just afraid of I don't believe much in home

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>field advantage. But what the conversation yesterday, you guys scare me.

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm the black hole. I don't know what the black

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hole is, but I'm excited. I don't know about I'm

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>sure you are. This is gonna be. This is gonna

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>be your one and only chance to see like they

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>won't be there the next time the Cowboys play the rate.

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>That's true. This is the last optunity. What I'm clapping

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>glad that that's the last time to be in that stay.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the last time we get to go. Well,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to go, no, because we'll probably play there

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. Oakland is a is an interesting It's

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a dump. I've been to Oakland Alameda Coliseum. It's

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a dump, but it's it's cool though, like the black

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we I've never been there when the Raiders

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>were at least relevant. I know they're not good this year,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but like the fans, it would have been cool to

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>go last year. Yeah, but you know it'll be a

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>night game. I feel like the Raiders probably haven't played

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of primetime games in the last decade or so,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't enough to deserve it. But this is a

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>rival game. You know, this is a rival the fan

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>base is. It's a rivalry for the for this fan

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>base and you know in particular, so this is a

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>big deal. You know, when when we go to Oxnard

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>every year for training camp, you can tell there's there's

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>two teams that people really care. They'll be Oakland. There

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are Oakland fans that come to our practice, our training camp.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You'll see some Oakland jerseys during our training camp and

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ox Yeah, that was interesting, but that'll be honestly, that'll

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>be that's the same in either place. Like when Oakland

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to play here, there are a lot of Raider

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>fans in the in the audience at the Cowboy at

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at and T Stadium, same thing when we go there,

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>there will be a lot of Cowboys fans there. Yeah,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>well most Raiders, I think. To next point though, like

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are team. There's Oakland, San Francisco, and then

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. And we'll see what happens with the Rams

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>now that they're back. But those are the three and

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so I know all the Cowboys fans that live out

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on the West coast, like this is a big deal

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for them to have bragging rights over those West coast.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So we haven't played a regular season game there since

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five. Oh, I'm thinking about preseason. We've

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>played a lot of preseason we have. All I know

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is when we walked down to do our post game,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys are gonna I'm gonna be in between you guys,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I need someone in front of me. I'm gonna I

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>will tell you this Oakland is that is the only

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>stadium and that is the only stadium in the league

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>where I've walked in the stadium and smell marijuana. Like

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is this okay? Like I'm smelling this

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>in a stadium? Is this okay? And that's Oakland for you.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go get a picture with the gorilla I thought,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>you guys say you're gonna go take a toke. I

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, man, that's not good. I'm not gonna not

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. Say okay, good, Just I gonna tell anybody,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go get a picture with the gorilla guy

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and the skull guy. And all though crazy, is the

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>skull guys still there. I don't know. I'm gonna check

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>it out. I want to see him, Darth Vader. Yeah,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a chef maybe. I don't know.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stuff chef. There's a lot of

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on in them. But supposedly they're not nice.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Well they're not nice to the opposing team. Yeah, but

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't what's that got to do with me. I

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be okay. Honestly, I don't think Oakland is

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>as bad. Honestly, I don't think Oakland's near as bad

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>as Philly fans. In my opinion. I've only had eggs

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>thrown it at my bus one right, So Philly fans

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are much different, like they are on a whole different

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>level than anybody else. The Oakland fans. Yeah, they rude,

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>hard for their team and more fun. You might get

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>stuck if you say something crazy, but hey, it happens, right,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know Philly stuck. Yeah, no, I got you.

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Second year covering the team in Philly is two thousand.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I was on the sideline at the end of the game.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cunningham was the quarterback for the Cowboys that day,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, something hit me in the

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the foot, and I like looked down and

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a there was a like d size battery

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thrown your foot. Oh I know, I mean dulous and Philly.

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. So all that stuff about the seattle

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and the beer thrown on the guy whatever. Yeah, No,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Philly is a whole different level. Like those fans are crazy,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, I think I think Oakland's fun. It'll be

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a fun game. It'll be a fun atmosphere. I guarantee

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>on a Sunday night it will be a fun atmosphere, hope.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's unique because unlike all the other stadiums, there's

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>typically three to four ways to get on the field,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but there's only one. And so you got you walk

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the Raiders sideline, so you

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have to go all the way around one way or other.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>And don't we have to go Don't you have to

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>go through the fans when you come down the elevator,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>you have to go through the fans to get to

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the field. If the elevators working, I'm pretty sure we

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>have to go through the fans. That was It's a dump. Yeah, though,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So I shouldn't wear blue wear blue. I'm gonna leave

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>mine you shouldn't have to worry about that. Like there

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>will be other things you should probably be worried about,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have to worry about somebody make what

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>huh it's saying like it could be a rough day.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Was the last time we were there? The kid from

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Akron was the quarterback who like it was it was

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>preseason or it was a kid. No for us An

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it was like our it was Tanny. That's who it was. Tanny.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Tanny time. Yeah, try to lead a like last second

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>comeback against them. I think they won. Yeah, I don't

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think it worked out for We're gonna do throwback Thursday

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow and we're gonna pick one of the nineties games.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>So they won there. But I was thinking the best

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>memory that I have from going to Glynn was when

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Romo in one drive went from you're gonna be cut, like, yeah,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he is gonna be cut tomorrow. Two there's a you know,

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>because he threw an interception on fourth down like that said,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>he's been horrible, Henson's been horrible. They just cut Quincy

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like Romo, They're gonna cut this Romo guy. And it

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>was offsides on the Raiders. Oh so we get to

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>extend the drive, all right, and then it just was

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Romo just twelve two six, eight fourteen what marched him

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>down the field, down the one clock running out? He

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>should have spiked it. He's decided. His instincts said I

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>could sneak it in and win the game, and he did.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And then the term Moxie was born with him. And

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>that's when Romo became Tony Romo. That day and in

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a preseason game, and you know it went from there.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>But I guarantee you if he if that there was

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not a holding penalty or off side whatever the penalty

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was on the Raiders and the game ended like that,

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he was going to be released. Ye. So and if

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you want to read more about that or hear more

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about that, go check out our Deep Blue from season one. Yeah,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a good one. What was it called Starcross

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>something I think it was. I think that one was Starcross.

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's about Quincy Carter and Tony Romo and about

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that moment. I know there's a lot we have to

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>talk quite a bit about that moment. So all right,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>let's take our first break. When we come back, we're

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some questions. Call us two one four eighty

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>seven two twenty one oh two is our number. We're

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to get as many questions as we can today.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Amber hasn't gotten you guys, but I care

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about the fan, so we're gonna take some time to

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to you guys and let you guys give some

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>feedback and give us some questions, and we'll talk about

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Radio. It can be hard to find the

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>right resource for learning about important financial matters. You search

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>how to build savings, you end up reading about the

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller.

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why Bank of America build Better Money Habits dot Com,

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a safe little corner of the Internet for answering your

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Habits can show you how to make the most of

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>your money without resorting to random searches that always seem

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to learn more, was it Better Money habits dot com.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan.

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It means you've got the passion and the heart to

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>do your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>why when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season. Law AT

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nations. Ice Cold,

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper and the Dallas Cowboys go way back. They

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>belonged together like Texas and football, Silver and Blue shotgun

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>formations and Hail Mary's. Having a Cowboys football party without

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper is like having Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't recommend it. So next time you have a tailgate, homegate,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever else kind of gate, grab some ice called

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper for you and your friends to enjoy. It's

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a Dallas Cowboys tradition. Doctor Pepper the one you crave.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>To work this big land. You need equipment with values

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are. Like

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>John Deer, Compact tractors with a six year power training

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>warrant to him. Big features that help you work less

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so you have more time to do what you love.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields and we're

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the official agg

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>deals and my John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash Football terms, conditions,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and warranty limitations apply so you you can you love

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:34.239
<v Speaker 1>for details. Back to the break Welcome back. It is

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the second segment of the Break Life from the SWBC

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage studios at the Star. We're talking Cowboys versus Raiders.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys that take on the Raiders this Sunday at Sunday

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Night Football seven thirty pm Central Time. Make sure you

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Cowboys are on a two game two

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>game winning streak now yep, two game winning streak. Need

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to win five in a row inder to even have

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a shot at the playoffs. So we'll see if they

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>can continue their winning ways this week, and of course

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>next week they get Ezekiel Elliott back. That is the

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>big things they can get past this week, then you

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>feel a lot better about those final two games. Is

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it mathematical that they're out if they lose another one?

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Or is it just like such a slimming I think

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think mathematically they're out if the teams above them

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>also win. Yeah, because really the big thing is those

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>three teams in the NFC South you need right now,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys went out, you need one of those

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>teams to lose two of their three final games. Yeah,

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>And and so if you lose another one, then I

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>think it kind of creates a scenario where even with that,

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you get in. Yeah, so I think

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you're probably probably done keeping keep absolutely if nothing else,

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>just get to that final game and make it count

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>like to where it actually matters. And if it doesn't

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>work out, then it doesn't work out, you know. And

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>with the Eagles, you know, playing without wins, I mean

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I still think that they're going to be good. You

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>guys feel sorry for the Eagles at all? I feel

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>fans Eagle fans, I should I feel sorry for the

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are and wins, I don't feel hold on, hold on,

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>rewind it back about minutes. I'm standing on the sideline.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I got hit by a battery. Yeah, I feel real

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sorry for you. No, but here's the thing, Like, you

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have a good team and a good young quarterback and

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt on a play that didn't count. Sorry,

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and and they were this is the thing, but I

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>told you you did the game party quarterback. They didn't

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lose the game, though they lost the previous game before that.

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. They're gonna They're gonna have two

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>big losses in two straight weeks. Got it. But the

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is that's been the history of it.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Makes that anyway? Is they all? It seems like whenever

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they get on a roll and they think, yes, this

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be our year, like they're the only

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>team in the division is not won a championship. And

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>every time it seems like they get into a position

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>where they think they have something rolling, it just doesn't

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>work out for him. So you just got if I

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>had the drop, I would play the Clinton Dicks drop.

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>That's what I would playing for that. Huh huh. Yeah,

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So you got no faith that, thank you? You got

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>no faith that Nick Foles can. I do actually hate

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl and Philly in twenty thirteen. Yeah, that's

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I think They're gonna go deep in the

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>playoffs with Nick Foles. They're a good football team. They're

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a good football team. Carson Wentz is really good. Yes,

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but I want you to tell me a team who

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a believer that that offense flows because Wentz makes

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some throws that are exceptional throws. I don't think Nick

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Foles do. Do I think it's gonna happen. No, But

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I want you to tell me who you just are, Like,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the NFC team right there, if that's the way. No,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not that. I just think that with wins, they're

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>right up there at the top. Without wins, I think

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>there are probably four teams, if not maybe more, that

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are better than them without wins. When it's when it's

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all said and done, whatever the six team NFC field is,

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it could be anybody's day. Like any

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of the six teams that make it could probably make

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. I don't think. I don't think the

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are in that category me anymore about wins. With

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that deepens and the fact that they'll probably they'll probably

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be playing any of their games at home, Yeah, I

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think so. Are you sure about that though? I mean,

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they they're not. They haven't locked up anything. They gotta

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.239
<v Speaker 1>they gotta leg up if they can get home, if

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they can at least get a bye week and be

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one game one home game away from the NFC. Tap,

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are they one game ahead of game ahead of Minnesota? Minnesota,

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>who consequently probably has the second worst two games ahead

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Rams. Is that right? Yeah? Okay, so they lose, No,

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they're three game, No, they're two games, they're two two

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>games ahead of them. So if they lose two of

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>these final three, they won't have a buy. I don't

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to, but we'll see, we'll see. I

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think that will be very interesting, and I again, I

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think they have a good team. I'm just not certain that,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen this year, one player can make a

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>huge difference, and I do think Wins is that player

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for them. I think there are probably a lot of

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>other injuries they can absorb, which they have this year.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>They lost their left tackle, they lost other good players,

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they've lost the player of the

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>caliber of Wins and what Wins provides for them. I

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be a really, really key for them.

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>We shall see, we'll see. All right, let's get to

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>some questions. You guys can give us a call the

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers two one four eighty seven to twenty one h two.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You can also hit us on Twitter at Cowboys break.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a call from Calvin in Atlanta. Calvin, what up? Hey?

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Everybody? Hey? Doing? Hey? Pretty good? Hey listen. UM,

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I know coming up they got some team that have

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some really good defenses. And for me, when I when

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I see this team face a team that is just

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as physical defensively as we are offensively, Lenahan can't schematically

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get you a victory. Um. I think as I watched

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>him call players or whatever, to me, it's like his

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>his philosophy is We're gonna go in and physically beat

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you up for sixty minutes. And if he can't do that,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>he can't schematically get to get to a victory, which

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, I mean, we're talking about a

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>guy who comes from Detroit where he had possibly a

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterback, arguably the best receiver in the game,

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and he couldn't accomplish anything. And his best play there

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was the jump ball, which we always see here. We're dad,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if he can get it done.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna thrown out there. I know it's a

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>long shout of thrown out there. Need to bring Tony

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Romo back as the offer as a coordinator he knows

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the scheme, he knows the personnel, and he knows defense.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Hang up this, hey, hey, Calvin, Calvin, Calvin, real quick?

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you just to be clear? Are you saying you

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>think Oakland is a good defense? Not not necessarily Oakland,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but you're talking about the last two? I got you? Okay,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be clear in that. All right, thanks,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you. I wonder if Calvin is on Instagram?

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And if he is, does he follows Tony Romo? And

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>if he does, did he see Tony Romo laying on

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>his couch the other day? It's not coming back to

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be an offensive coordinator. I don't think he wants to

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. See your kids living the life. I'm leaving.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to going to the office, try to figure

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this out, and it's not gonna work. In fact, if

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he's ever going to be a coordinator, he'd be a

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator. He's not gonna be an offensive coordinator. He

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>ever was going to be a coach, he'd be a

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator. What makes you say that? Because he knows

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>how to stop him? I mean he would he said

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that before he said that, I mean he said I'll

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be I mean, I know how to. I would rather

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>scheme a defense than be an offensive coordinator. In fact,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him be a defensive coordinator in flag football

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>game too. But that's not why I said that. I

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>was just Tea. That was before Tony Romo. Yeah, it

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was Tea. We got this guy, nobody knows him. His

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>name's Tony. He's gonna come out and play flag football

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>with us, and we're gonna be good until the playoffs.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Threw five interceptions in a playoff game, true store three

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>yikes by the team that was all all Hispanic, spoke

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Spanish and had all these plays and stuff and just

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>confused the hell out of everybody and him, and then

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he kept throwing interception after interception. This is a second

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to they. I wonder if now they have

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a great story, like they're like, we play Tony. There's

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. There's no doubt they did they if they,

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you think they would have noticed later that was a

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>guy that was probably yeah, yeah it was. It was bad.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It was real bad. I mean, he'd only that was

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>his first year, and I remember thinking, like this guy,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he's having a hard time with oh, black football. I

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know how he's gonna do in the end. Yeah. Yeah,

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there's two Romo stories from two thousand and four. Good,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, Let's let's get back to some questions. Let's

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>take a question from Twitter. We will help the Cowboys

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>defense more against the Raiders the return of a for

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>rush for Russies, ferocious pass rush or a great run

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>game from the offense and effective Redstone scoring. Well, Hell,

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>if the Raiders are twenty six in sacks, that's nice.

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But I thought the Cowboys pass rush would have more

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>success against the Giants. So I don't know. I mean,

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Eli doesn't get sacked the whole does he? But they

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are I mean they You're right, they get to car

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Chiefs sacked him three or four times. Yeah. Um,

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of that. Like, I don't know

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>from watching this for DeMarcus Laren is gonna get a

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of calls this week, right, Did y'all talk about that?

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>We did, and we kind of disagreed. I thought that

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I like that he's kind of stood up for himself

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and the team. But I do wonder is it gonna

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have some you know, did he go too far? That's

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what I want? Yeah, when you when you when you

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>go when you've ended the way that he ended it,

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when there may be reffs that take

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that personal. Now, of course, here's the other part to that.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think reff's buying large are probably professionals, which means

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it as a professional, you dismissed that kind of stuff

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and you say, I still got to do my job,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And so it doesn't necessarily make you not make calls

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that you should make because you're a professional. You got

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at all that. You can't be saying, yeah,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>where's ninety. Yeah, I don't worry unless they're just joining

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for the whole team and say yeah, exactly now. Now,

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe that, but I honestly, I don't think that happens.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think more than anything else, is just gonna

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>wake up the league to him, and he's probably gonna

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>get fine. But but that's really what it's gonna do,

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is the league will look at it and say, probably

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll just say he's complaining for no reason. I don't

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>know that it will make them necessarily look at this

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, what's going on here? I don't know,

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it. Garrett seemed really upset about when he saw

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the video from DeMarcus Lawrence. Really no, I don't really know.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder you looked at it like. That's the

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>other thing though, too, is you know teams every week

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they send a tape. They usually send the tape to

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the league saying, hey, here's some things we're saying that

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are not being called the way that they should be called.

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if this has been an ongoing thing

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for them, where every week they're sending in a tape

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>saying hold, hold, hold, hold, and nothing's being called. And

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe Jason looks at Dan's like, yeah, it wasn't wrong.

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm barred with white hit Dad. You said you're on board. Yeah, yep, absolutely.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't have a problem with it. I

0:33:58.160 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thought it was funny. Actually, I thought it was great.

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It's immediately when you said it, though, I was like, oh, fine,

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get he's gonna lose some money on that one.

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But hey, if he's willing to do it, so why

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>why you get fine for that? Hold On? Hold on.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I hate being this scrooge here, but if the refs

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is not it's not fine. It's not it's not fine

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>for for our society. It's not I really like him

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>as a player. I like him, and he's been a

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>stand up leader. I like everything he did. But we

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>can't say that I love it that that's not what

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you do. You don't. You don't cuss out authority like that.

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>If we if we were in a room with like

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress people and we're talking politics, yeah, be polite, and

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a certain language, you're talking about football. I

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's the right arena these ways. Yeah,

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, that's a horrible example like that. I'm saying

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in that scenario, that's the way you should, you know,

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>watch out, Yeah, right, you should. Obviously we're not gonna

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows what's happening in today's world. But aside from that,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about football players in this kind of environment,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 1>saying the F word. It is not a big deal

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in this environment. I agree, there's a level of respect.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Agree about the word. It's about what, you know what.

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Four minutes, I'll tell you a little bit more why

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that way, but why I believe that way.

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>But I just think it's not like the worst thing

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But I'm just saying he has a

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>chance to maybe hurt his team and himself even more

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>by by saying, Mom, I don't I heard him any

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>hurt him anymore than they already are. They've gotten eight

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>holding flags all year. Yeah, it's not it's half of

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the average. I'm just saying it for this show. I

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>y'all can say what you want, but I'm not gonna

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sit here and say, like, I loved it, that was great, yep,

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>cuss cuss out the refs and just just call them.

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I get what you're I get what you're saying mainly

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint, mainly from the standpoint of it's not

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>good when you say it's not good for our society.

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I get that because anytime there is a you know,

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that level of disrespect shown to an authority figure, it's

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not a good precedent to set. I get that. I

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 1>guess the point that I'm saying is, I think it's

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it was. It's okay at some point for somebody to

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>step up and say something about it, because I think

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous that this is a this is a penalty

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that throughout the NFL you hear people say a year

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>after year after year, you could probably call it on

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>every single play in every single game, and yet for

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>seven games the Cowboys have gotten no calls, and we

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 1>have literally sat there and watched moments when these defensive

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>linemen have been basically tackled and there's no call. So

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's about time, in my opinion, somebody says something. Could

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>he have used better words? Probably so? Could you. Could

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he have said it a different way? Probably so. But

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I also think a lot of that may be born

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.399
<v Speaker 1>out of a certain level of frustration that, man, this

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is continuing to happen. You think it's going to get

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>better at some point, but it doesn't seem to be

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>getting better, and it's just it's it gets to a

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>point where it's just a breaking point. And I think

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we all sometimes find ourselves in situations where we may

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>say things the wrong way because of our level of frustration.

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make it right, but it certainly happens, and

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it happens to all of us. Right, I'm good at that.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I think what also helps, I mean, for men not

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to cut you off as kind of ironic all people,

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you're one, Yeah, yeah, I'm sorry, now he's gonna say.

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps for me agreeing to that, just

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>because I know DeMarcus character and I know had it

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>been some other guy, that is just ridiculous. I don't know.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna throw names, but had you been somebody else,

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and I would have been like, oh my god. Yeah.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know DeMarcus, like, yes, he's a crazy guy

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, but he's a you know, he's a

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good guy. He has um what do you call these

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>um I can't think of the word, but whatever, he

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>has those things that make you a good person. Good morals, yes, morals,

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>So good job for him. Express yourself and you know

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're being, if you're being. He just helpead. He

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just helped out the community. Speak up, yes, speak up

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for your rights. He did. He did help the community

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>out because where he's fine, and it'll be a hefty one,

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go somewhere in the community, gonna help somebody,

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>So the NFL does. So he got his word out

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>there and he's gonna help the community. That sounds like

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to me. People helping people there. You go,

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's like our final break. We're gonna come back.

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>We'll get more questions and numbers two one four eight

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>seven two twenty one O two again two one four

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>eight seven two twenty one o two or hit us

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Cowboys Break This is that, Bret. It

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>can be hard to find the right resource for learning

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about important financial matters. You search how to build savings,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you end up reading about the one weird ingredient from

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>supermarkets that can make you taller. That's why Bank of

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.839
<v Speaker 1>America build Better Money Habits dot com, a safe little

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>corner of the Internet for answering your financial questions. Full

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of simple videos and tips, Better Money Habits can show

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you how to make them most of your money without

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>resorting to random searches that always seem to lead to

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up. To learn more,

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>visit better Money habits dot com. What does it mean

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to be a Dallas Cowboys fan. It means you've got

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the passion and the heart to do your part supporting

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the Boys no matter what. That's why when the game's

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>on the line, you're on your feet, whether you're at

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>home or in the stands. Actually, you're more than a fan.

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>You are a member of Cowboys Nation, and so is

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>AT and T doing their part to keep you connected

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to America's team all season. Law AT and T is

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a proud member of Cowboys Nations. Ice called Doctor Pepper

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys go way back. They belonged together

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>like Texas and football, Silver and Blue shotgun formations and

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Hail Mary's. Having a Cowboys football party without Doctor Pepper

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is like having Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically, we wouldn't

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>recommend it. So next time you have a tailgate, homegate,

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever else kind of gate, grab some ice called

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper. Are you and your friends to enjoy it?

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a Dallas Cowboys tradition. Doctor Pepper the one you crave.

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>To work this big land. You need equipment with values

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are like

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>John Deer compact tractors with a six year power train,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>warrant to hit big features that help you work less

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>so you have more time to do what you love.

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.959
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the official agg

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>deals and my John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash football terms, conditions,

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and warranty limitations applies seem to be loot for

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>details back to The Break Welcome Back, final segment of

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.439
<v Speaker 1>The Break, live from the s WBC Mortgage Studios at

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the Star, Nick, what you got? All I have is

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that Tommy John dot com Forward slash Cowboys. It gives

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you twenty percent off your first order. It's a really

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>good underwear. If you haven't tried it, you're you're just

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>being defiant at this point because we're giving it to

0:40:56.280 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you every single day. Dallas Cowboys. I mean what I'm saying,

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 1>House Cowboys, Tommy John dot com Forward slash Cowboys, It's good.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Get it by. That's all you got? Are we mailing

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it in? Or that's all you got? Definitely I'm mailing

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it in. All I'm saying is is this that doesn't

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily need to be a daily read, but it does

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>need to be a daily read. Well, then you know what,

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't bought it by now, what what are

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>you waiting for? The Christmas? Maybe then you're just you're

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>just loyal to Michael Jordans. But you know what, it's okay,

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>It's okay to break off into something different. Tommy John.

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, good picture, make sure you get some Tommy Okay,

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Christmas time, Tommy John works all right, let's get some questions.

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Two nothing okay? Or hit us on Twitter at Cowboys

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>break Sure. I'm great, Right, we're all good. Phone call

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim Boston, Tim, what up? Oh hey guys, thanks taking

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>my call. He appreciate it. A quick question, Um, if

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there's any area that you guys have concerns with moving forward? Um? Nick,

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it always talks about receivers. We need that speed guy,

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we need those you know, those receivers. I mean the

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>last couple of games, in particular the last one, you know,

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we had some issues catching the wall obviously moving forward,

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do you see them addressing the wide receiver position at

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>any point, whether it be the draft, free agency? I mean,

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>free agency hasn't necessarily worked out for us too well

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. Um, so do you

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's something we're going to address in the draft

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or or or free agency? That's out of my question.

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen and hang up. Thanks guys, Thank you. I

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>would be shocked this year if the Cowboys in the

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 1>draft don't address the wide receiver position. Shocked. I'd be shocked,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>having drafted too last year. And I say in a

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way. What I mean by that is at least

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>top three picks. Wow, shocked. I'd be shocked if they

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>got that. I'd be shocked because I think I think

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this year illuminated for me at least that they have

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a hard time with a reliable receiving threat, somebody that

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>gets open regularly and creates opportunities. They have a lot

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>of guys. I think they have several guys who have

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the ability to catch the ball in situations where it

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like the cover, but if you throw it in

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the right place, they can probably make the catch. I

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they have a lot of guys who

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>can get open, like even against man coverage. We see

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I actually spent this last game

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>spending quite a bit of time. I told you Nick

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>before the game started, I was going to really focus

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on the receivers. Yeah, there aren't a lot of times

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that you see receivers open. Part of that may be

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>because they're not scheming them to get open. I think

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a big issue. You look at other teams and

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you see how like these teams all around the league,

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>how many times do you see like all of these

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>rub routes and things that basically just free guys up

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys don't do a lot of that stuff. In my opinion,

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't do it enough. But even that being said,

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think these receivers are the kind of receivers

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that get open enough and present themselves as an open

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver to make a big play, as I've seen with

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>other teams around the league. So I would be shocked

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>again if they don't address that high in the draft

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>this year. I hope you're right, because I say this

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>all the time, like there's so much receiver talent coming

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>out of college football these days, and you can find

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>great receivers as late as like pick seventy eighty. You

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.800
<v Speaker 1>don't even okay, Antonio Brown was like pick one fifty

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>something that don't forget that. I mean, Juju Smith Schuster

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was pick sixty seven. I think Jarvis Landry was pick

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight. Like you can find good, good players later on.

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So I hope you're right. I just look at it,

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Das is going anywhere. I don't

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>think Terence is going anywhere. Cole's got another year left

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on his deal. Switzer's here, I don't think he's going anywhere.

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think Noah Brown has been impressive enough that

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he's not going anywhere. Really, the only mail Brown is

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>still the same of what you already have. And I'm

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>just I'm I'm not worried about that. I'm looking at

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers and I'm looking at like, how you get

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 1>these guys on the field. And I wonder if these

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna look at it and say, we can

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>get through one more year before we have to worry

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>about this. And if we draft a guy high, we're

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.240
<v Speaker 1>putting somebody that we invested in on the bench, whether

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's one of your big money, bigger receivers or your

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>draft pick or whatever. So I completely agree with your logic.

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if they will feel as strongly about

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>it as you do. Here's one thing I will say,

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>although Switzer is going to be on this team, Switzer

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has a role, and whether they use him as a

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 1>receiver a ton or not, he's still going to be

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>on this team because he's a return guy. Right. So

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to be able to get a guy

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that you draft and you put him in there, and

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much as they rotate receivers in and out,

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>if he's your fourth receiver, then there's a good chance

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play quite a bit of snaps, right, So

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's I think there's still an opportunity for him.

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't change, It doesn't change necessarily from the

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the makeup of the other guys on the

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver corps. Let's put it another way, if one

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of my first three picks is a wide receiver, I

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>want him on the field all the time again, which

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, that's okay, because that just means that Terrence

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>will be have limited numbers snaps. And I think I'm

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>looking on right, I'm looking at Terrence's contract right now.

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna get cut after this season, right, but

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>he probably will get cut after the next season, right,

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>So the same So it works, right if if if

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit next year to sign Brice back, you

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>draft him now, you draft the guy now, and then

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he plays that role in switcher. You know, maybe he

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>can do more than two catches for nine yards this

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:29.879
<v Speaker 1>year next year, and then you know, and then then

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you figure out what you want to do with Daz

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you haven't already done it, your logic, Hey,

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree with both of you. I'm just saying I

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they'll think maybe not, we're good and then

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen, we're going to spend a top fifty

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver real quick. How they get out from us. It's

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>tough to throw that guy in though, immediately, especially if

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you're didn't worry about what are they doing with Desi's

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:52.879
<v Speaker 1>contract depends on how good It's not hard to throw

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that guy in immediately. If he's good, if he's the

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 1>top like sixty caliber talent, I mean, like receivers, these

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like the good ones get I mean, especially if it's

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a first round pick. Yeah, but the good ones? Are

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you talking about the ones that like? You're right if

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a if it's an early to mid round first

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>round pick, then I think you're probably right. You probably

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>can throw that guy and expect him to play and

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>play well immediately. I also will say, though, is typically

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>when you find a receiver that's thrown in immediately that

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>does well, it's usually in a situation where there's another

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>really good receiver on the team and that takes a

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the pressure off him rather than him

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>coming in and being the man immediately. I think that's

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a big part of that. And there's a good chance

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that will still be here, so it won't matter. You'll

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>still have Dazz on the opposite side. I just look

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at the I look at the Cooper Cups of the world,

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and again, Jarvis Landry and I could probably come. But

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods has been their main guy this year. He's

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>been leading them this year as far as receivers or

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>he's not. I noticed, I didn't say Juju because he's

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>got a B. Robert Woods is not a B like that.

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're good, you can get in and play.

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>That's I believe that. Yes, I agree with I think

0:47:57.640 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we're saying the same thing. I just think that it

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>probably helps to do that a year early rather than

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>doing it once you've already made those moves and those

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 1>guys are no longer on your roster. Question for you guys,

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this is I mean, it's kind of hard because just

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 1>not taking into consideration all the different factors such as

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>contract and money. Based on the group of wide receivers

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys have right now, which ones ideally would

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you like to keep if you had to restart the

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>whole group, And like say, I'm one hundred percent keeping

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy and this guy and this guy and drafting.

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You're not putting money involved, no talent wise, just all

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>based on talent if it's got nothing. So this the

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>salary cap doesn't affect anything. No, I'm just talking about

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>just talent. You're keeping Des, Yeah, I mean this is

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the best one. I'm probably keeping Des Beasley and Noah

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and I guess Switzer real quick about when you'll think

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 1>about Terrence Williams. What's the one thing, the negative thing

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you think the most about Terrence? Inconsistent catching, inconsistent everything. Yeah, yeah,

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Did you know that he leads all Cowboy

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in in catch in like the catch percentage

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>from the amount of targets to the catches. He's got

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the best one. That doesn't mean that doesn't mean everybody

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>else hasn't been. I'm just saying, but I think Beasley

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is at like fifty or sixty percent, which is ridiculous

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for him because he's usually up in then like eight.

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But how many times is Beasley? Like what that that

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>stat you're throwing out, that's a stat to me. That's

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>about targets. Yeah, And so there are situations where the

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:41.800
<v Speaker 1>balls we've seen it this year where the ball severely overthrown.

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Beasley's not getting up there to get that one right.

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That's different than ball hits you in the chest and

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>falls to them. I know. All I'm saying is for

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the amount of targets to the I mean the percentage.

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't think that he would be leading all of

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers over Noah Brown, over Bryce, over Dez.

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's the worst on the team over Beasley. Oh, that

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 1>is surprising for me. It's it's shocking that that he's

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the one at sixty seven percent. I mean, I'm not

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that he can do a better job at getting

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>open and making plays all that. I just that's surprising

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. Best on the team is sixty seven percent. No, no,

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>no the ride receivers, But okay, best Smith is the

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>best of the best of the wide receivers wide receiver

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty That's still not good. But that's why I say

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I would be shocked at the Cowboys own address it,

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like that's a problem. I think it need to be addressed,

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think they'll do it in the first three

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>rounds um And and I don't think they'll resign Bryce

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and so, like I said, I think he just kind

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of ease him into it. And but let's let's flip

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. How much of that is the receivers and

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>how much of that is Dak? Because let's remember the

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>first year, Dak was put in a situation where they

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.359
<v Speaker 1>were putting as much on him, and he hasn't been

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>great in some games. There's been some games where he

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:51.399
<v Speaker 1>was just wasn't great throwing the ball. So how much

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 1>do you put on the receivers versus put on Dak.

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no problem envisioning, you know, going to the combine,

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the owners meetings, all those offseason interviews where they kind

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of give you hints about how they feel about things,

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have no problem envisioning, you know, a scenario

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>where they're fine with the receivers that they have, if

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they can get their team back to running the running

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>back the way it was with Zeke and maybe reinforcing

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the running back position, you know, getting back to what

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they did so well in twenty sixteen when they had

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the same receivers and they were much more successful. That

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is that? Yeah, I can hear that crystal clear in

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 1>my ears, Like I already feel like they're going to

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>say it, So I'm with you. That's like I said,

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I agree with what you're saying about the receivers, but

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I won't be surprised if they don't agree. Yeah, I

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>just think, And I also think when you look at

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all the positions on the team that you could draft

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>fore now, I'm still a big believer in draft the

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>best guy that's available when you come up, But I

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at even just if you wanted

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to look at what you need, I don't know. I

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time coming up with a position that

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is way more important right now other than

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 1>ny Bee linebacker than wide receiver. As far as what

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna draf, I don't think they're gonna draft cornerbacks

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as a high priority. They've already done that. They're gonna

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>give those guys time to develop. Linebacker, safety, and depending

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on what happens in free agency, offensive line. Yeah, I don't. Again,

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of those is necessarily other than linebacker.

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Because of the uncertainty of linebacker. I don't know that

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:18.359
<v Speaker 1>any of those I think is a bigger priority than

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Maybe the same. I don't know that think

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>one's bigger. I think they all are. That's why really

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>That's why I was saying that, yes, what offensive line,

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because they wouldn't start immediately. So you're gonna take a

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>first or second round pick on a guy that's not

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna start. That's why I said, it depends on free agency.

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:33.879
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have a left card, you might get

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a drag guy that can start right away. You don't

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>think Cooper's coming back, I don't know. That's why I said,

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>depending on free agency. He's a free agent. I don't

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 1>know where it's going to happen to him. You might

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:45.919
<v Speaker 1>need a left card. Don't forget about tight end. Tight ends?

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Got it? Maybe a position in the second round, Maybe

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be addressed. Oh god, another second round

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tight I mean okay, I mean you did it eleven

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's gonna keep running there out. Did you

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>see Fasano still playing in You'll see that. The other

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 1>day I was looking and I looked at the stats,

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, wow, he's been in the legal

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>eleven years. He's a blocking tight end essentially, but he's

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>made a nice career for himself. Huh. If they don't

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>like him, I mean, if this team doesn't want to

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>use him, then I don't I don't know what to

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what. I don't know what to think

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 1>of that. I don't really don't. There's there's much more

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>going on. I'll just leave it at that. There's much

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>more going on behind the scenes of this whole situation.

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Some people probably like him, some people don't. I don't.

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know what's going on with

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with a training camp concussion and he's never played. I

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't know, and I it just it doesn't seem

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>something just doesn't seem right about this. I don't I

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:41.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's happened with him. And maybe there's more

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>into his injury than we just haven't been told about

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>all that. So but no, I mean, they obviously like

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Blake Jarwin or they didn't want anyone else to take him,

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so he'll be in the mix. But I think you

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>need to get him another tight end in here. And

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying anything about Jason Witten. Just think about

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Hannah and Swing. They don't really get open and do

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot for you. I know Hannah had the

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>greatest catch of his life the other day, but I

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it doesn't do much. I mean, I think you

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:10.360
<v Speaker 1>need to get a different type of tied end in

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>here somehow, I'm way, and I wouldn't be surprised if

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be on their radar. I think it

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was on their radar last year. They did like they

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>did like a few of the tight ends class last year.

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>So let's get a call from Chris and Houston. Chris,

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what up? Hello? Everybody? Thank you for taking the call.

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He excuse me. I agree with Dave about the safety

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>being a higher priority than probably some of the other ones.

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And no, I'm not a Jeff Heath hater. I've always

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I've always liked them. I just never thought of him

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:44.640
<v Speaker 1>as a starter caliber type. And I don't know what

0:54:44.680 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>happened to Barron Jones. I don't know why he hasn't,

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, been better. But I did want to mention

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:55.399
<v Speaker 1>something I called in last week talking about something going

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:59.239
<v Speaker 1>on with electronic arts, and I just wanted to make

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>sure that everybody was aware of this and that we

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>keep pressing this issue. Electronic arts is getting into trouble

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>with multiple governments around the world for basically selling gambling

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:15.359
<v Speaker 1>two children. Okay, we appreciate that, now, we know. Yeah,

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>um okay, So he called in last week. Yeah, I

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, not on this show. Oh okay, I don't

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think I don't remember that. Yeah, I think it was

0:55:24.120 --> 0:55:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the other one. Okay. Well, anyway, Um, platforms for everything.

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is the one for that. This

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is not for us. We have a lot of this

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff to talk about. Let's get another question from Twitter

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.439
<v Speaker 1>before you in the show. Well, how are you guys

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>expecting that the Cowboys we will use rot Smith one

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott comes back. Good question. We talked about that

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:47.839
<v Speaker 1>on cover four last night. I go no. I mean,

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's something that we really haven't discussed much.

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if it'll be a huge difference,

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because if you saw what he did in the passing game,

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll he'll probably be your third down back. Though.

0:56:00.600 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you could just load everything up on

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Zeke as he as he comes back. I think it's

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>really good timing for him to be a good on

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.359
<v Speaker 1>third down. I think he's your third down back. That's

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a good way to eat Zeke back in. You know,

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't like just throwing guys directly in and giving

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>them all the snaps. I don't think they'll do that,

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think they probably will use him. One of

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>his best plays of the game was picking up the

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>blitz on the fifty four yard past the Beasley. Yeah,

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge play in the game, and obviously

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have happened if he doesn't get his guy.

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So all the other touchdowns and plays he made that

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>were great, but that one should have been on, you know,

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 1>his one of his top three or four. I think

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the more important question is not when Zeke comes back,

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but this week against Oakland. Do you expect he'll have

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>an increased role because of the production he had in

0:56:40.800 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 1>this last game. That doesn't seem like Jason Garrett really

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it's I would imagine like they like they like what

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they got. I mean, like maybe maybe he'll see a

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>few more carries, but like they're not gonna I don't

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna drastically change anything. I think Alfred will

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>be your first and second down guy, Rod third, and

0:56:57.400 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>then he'll get a couple series, but I bet it.

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought more than anything, Rod Smith's success, I thought

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that touchdown really just showed the maturity that we're seeing

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:10.919
<v Speaker 1>more out of Dak. I thought Dak did a great

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 1>job of getting that play open for him and creating

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>him a spot and recognizing, oh, if I move him here,

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>look over here, throw it here, we can have a

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 1>big play. And you know, Rod did the rest. But

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a really great play for Prescott.

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw this out there. I get what you're saying,

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and it makes sense, and you're probably right. But I

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>hope Zeke comes back in a condition where he can

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>handle the look like, I hope that they don't have

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to ease him in because he's not ready for it,

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like it's I don't know if it'll be

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a matter of him being ready or not being ready,

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as much as just the history of how they do things. Yeah,

0:57:47.560 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like when guys come back from whatever, they

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:52.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to not just throw them in and give him

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a full workload. They tend to kind of ease him

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 1>back in. And maybe this is different. He's already played

0:57:56.920 --> 0:57:59.479
<v Speaker 1>some this season and they're at the final two games

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season and they feel like, hey, he's got

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of got a bunch of carries left that

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we can use. Let's get him out there. I don't know,

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but just historically that doesn't seem like something that Jason

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>likes to do. I agree with you. I just I

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hope he's I hope he's been conditioning and he's ready

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for a big workload, whether they want to give it

0:58:18.000 --> 0:58:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to him or not. I think he will be. I

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>think he's coming back. It's weird. It's weird that we're

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:24.959
<v Speaker 1>five days away from that, I know, from this whole

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:27.600
<v Speaker 1>thing being over. Yeah, Monday, he can maybe back in

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the building Monday, Ye if he wants to be. I

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>know that day. You know, it's the day off of

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the players. But all right, we appreciate you guys joining us.

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 1>We're back tomorrow. We're gonna or at least Amber and

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Dave will be back tomorrow. They're gonna tell you all

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about this Oakland Raider defense and break down the matchup

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>between Cowboys and Raiders. Till then for Nick Even, Dave Hellman,

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Hamburg Garcia. I'm Derek Hikilson. This have been the Break

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas

0:58:56.280 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Football Club. At a