WEBVTT - Should You Be Able to Bet On the Election?

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:28.804
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, our show about making

0:00:28.844 --> 0:00:32.204
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova and.

0:00:32.084 --> 0:00:35.564
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. Today we're going to be talking, as

0:00:35.604 --> 0:00:38.804
<v Speaker 2>you might expect, more about the elections. There's been a

0:00:38.804 --> 0:00:42.004
<v Speaker 2>lot of frankly dark and disturbing news. There's also been

0:00:42.084 --> 0:00:43.844
<v Speaker 2>a lot of polling since the debate. We'll tell you

0:00:43.884 --> 0:00:46.124
<v Speaker 2>more about what it says and where our forecast is.

0:00:46.644 --> 0:00:50.644
<v Speaker 1>We'll also talk about Calshi and prediction markets and betting

0:00:50.804 --> 0:00:54.524
<v Speaker 1>on political outcomes in the United States. There's been some

0:00:54.564 --> 0:00:57.604
<v Speaker 1>big news on that last week. And finally, we're going

0:00:57.684 --> 0:01:00.484
<v Speaker 1>to take it to a more personal place and talk

0:01:00.524 --> 0:01:04.084
<v Speaker 1>about the saga that I've been having with air conditioning

0:01:04.164 --> 0:01:11.404
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of a New York City summer. Let's

0:01:11.404 --> 0:01:16.324
<v Speaker 1>start off with the election models. Trump's assassination, the debates.

0:01:16.444 --> 0:01:20.164
<v Speaker 1>All of this stuff has happened since we last spoke.

0:01:20.204 --> 0:01:23.204
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the debates happened the day before we last spoke,

0:01:23.484 --> 0:01:27.124
<v Speaker 1>but none of that data had been incorporated into the models.

0:01:27.244 --> 0:01:30.644
<v Speaker 1>There were no quality polls out. What has changed. Have

0:01:30.764 --> 0:01:34.924
<v Speaker 1>we seen quality polls in the last week. Where do

0:01:35.004 --> 0:01:40.684
<v Speaker 1>the data stand now? How have your election model predictions shifted.

0:01:41.244 --> 0:01:43.684
<v Speaker 2>Are you implying that data is plural.

0:01:43.324 --> 0:01:45.524
<v Speaker 1>Maria, data are plural name?

0:01:45.644 --> 0:01:48.884
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, this is It's been a great run.

0:01:49.004 --> 0:01:51.324
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to risky business. But we have

0:01:51.444 --> 0:01:53.244
<v Speaker 2>irreconcilable differences.

0:01:52.804 --> 0:01:55.284
<v Speaker 1>And Michelle is singular name.

0:01:56.044 --> 0:02:02.644
<v Speaker 2>God. Look, before the debate, Harris was ahead in national

0:02:02.644 --> 0:02:07.044
<v Speaker 2>polls by about two percentage points, and now she appears

0:02:07.044 --> 0:02:10.404
<v Speaker 2>to be ahead by roughly three percentage points. And there

0:02:10.484 --> 0:02:13.004
<v Speaker 2>has been quite a bit of high quality data at

0:02:13.004 --> 0:02:17.284
<v Speaker 2>the national level. Why is it number important? Well, the

0:02:17.324 --> 0:02:21.604
<v Speaker 2>electoral college bias, according to our forecast, Silver Bolton forecast

0:02:22.364 --> 0:02:24.404
<v Speaker 2>favors Trump by about two and a half points, so

0:02:24.484 --> 0:02:26.804
<v Speaker 2>kind of the point spread, as if Harris wins the

0:02:26.844 --> 0:02:28.924
<v Speaker 2>popular vote by two and a half points or more,

0:02:29.284 --> 0:02:31.604
<v Speaker 2>she's a favorite in electoral college. If she wins by

0:02:31.684 --> 0:02:33.524
<v Speaker 2>less than two and a half points, she probably doesn't

0:02:33.524 --> 0:02:35.444
<v Speaker 2>get over the finish line in states like Pennsylvania. So

0:02:35.524 --> 0:02:39.804
<v Speaker 2>therefore this is a good development for her. There's other

0:02:39.884 --> 0:02:43.444
<v Speaker 2>stuff too. The question is how sustainable is this if

0:02:43.484 --> 0:02:45.244
<v Speaker 2>you get like a short term bounce, So maybe the

0:02:45.284 --> 0:02:49.044
<v Speaker 2>news cycle already moves on to things like this other

0:02:49.124 --> 0:02:54.324
<v Speaker 2>attempt on Trump's life or conspiracy theories about what Haitian

0:02:54.364 --> 0:02:58.444
<v Speaker 2>immigrants are doing. Then we'll see. But in contrast to

0:02:58.484 --> 0:03:01.204
<v Speaker 2>this kind of labor day period where she was getting

0:03:01.244 --> 0:03:03.604
<v Speaker 2>a lot of mediocre data, like from the New York Times,

0:03:04.524 --> 0:03:07.004
<v Speaker 2>this is now back on track for basically a toss

0:03:07.044 --> 0:03:07.484
<v Speaker 2>of election.

0:03:08.404 --> 0:03:09.964
<v Speaker 1>Well that's good news, I mean.

0:03:10.004 --> 0:03:11.964
<v Speaker 2>If you're if you're a Harris fan.

0:03:11.924 --> 0:03:15.444
<v Speaker 1>If as people know I am, it's good news for Harris.

0:03:16.324 --> 0:03:20.524
<v Speaker 1>But where are we in terms of the poll cycle? Right?

0:03:20.564 --> 0:03:23.444
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect that this is kind of that the

0:03:23.564 --> 0:03:26.044
<v Speaker 1>highest quality polls have already come out, or do you

0:03:26.084 --> 0:03:29.964
<v Speaker 1>expect that we're going to be updating this significantly in

0:03:30.004 --> 0:03:31.004
<v Speaker 1>the coming week or two.

0:03:31.444 --> 0:03:33.844
<v Speaker 2>Now, what happens after a big event typically is the

0:03:33.924 --> 0:03:37.404
<v Speaker 2>national polls go first. If you're going to conduct one

0:03:37.444 --> 0:03:39.284
<v Speaker 2>pole and you do a national poll first, and we're

0:03:39.324 --> 0:03:41.444
<v Speaker 2>kind of well, we're waiting over the next week or

0:03:41.444 --> 0:03:45.204
<v Speaker 2>two to populate infill with with some of the higher

0:03:45.244 --> 0:03:50.844
<v Speaker 2>quality state polling data. Look, earlier this month, Harris was

0:03:50.844 --> 0:03:55.164
<v Speaker 2>getting some pretty mediocre numbers in state polls. You know

0:03:55.204 --> 0:03:57.044
<v Speaker 2>she got for example, Suffolk is a good pole. Souf

0:03:57.244 --> 0:04:00.324
<v Speaker 2>University had her up three in Pennsylvania, but a lot

0:04:00.364 --> 0:04:03.764
<v Speaker 2>more polls have had Pennsylvania, Michigan and whatnot basically a

0:04:03.844 --> 0:04:08.004
<v Speaker 2>tie recently. So so we'll see, you know, if if

0:04:08.044 --> 0:04:10.404
<v Speaker 2>those state polls also improved for her by a point

0:04:10.444 --> 0:04:12.844
<v Speaker 2>or two, that we might be at a point where

0:04:12.964 --> 0:04:16.484
<v Speaker 2>where you would say the race leans slightly toward her.

0:04:17.764 --> 0:04:19.644
<v Speaker 2>If they don't emote, might go back to saying that

0:04:19.764 --> 0:04:21.724
<v Speaker 2>race leans slightly toward Trump. I know it's frustrating. I

0:04:21.764 --> 0:04:23.684
<v Speaker 2>wish I could like have a crystal ball here and

0:04:23.724 --> 0:04:27.484
<v Speaker 2>predict what they would say. But that electoral college gap

0:04:27.564 --> 0:04:31.084
<v Speaker 2>is like, I think it's counterintuitive for people if you're

0:04:31.164 --> 0:04:34.044
<v Speaker 2>used to seeing headlines saying Harris ahead, Harris ahead, tye,

0:04:34.084 --> 0:04:38.804
<v Speaker 2>Harris ahead, lots of reporting the national polls again, Biden

0:04:38.844 --> 0:04:41.644
<v Speaker 2>won the popular vote by four and a half points

0:04:41.684 --> 0:04:44.684
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty and just barely won the electoral college

0:04:44.724 --> 0:04:47.404
<v Speaker 2>by by you know, a point or so in Wisconsin.

0:04:47.764 --> 0:04:49.764
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by two point one

0:04:49.764 --> 0:04:53.124
<v Speaker 2>points in twenty sixteen and lost the electoral college plust

0:04:53.164 --> 0:04:56.204
<v Speaker 2>all these mid Western states, for example, So you can't

0:04:56.244 --> 0:05:00.164
<v Speaker 2>look at these national polls and feel too complacent if

0:05:00.204 --> 0:05:02.244
<v Speaker 2>you're if you're a Democrat, and.

0:05:02.204 --> 0:05:05.244
<v Speaker 1>Are we still looking at Pennsylvania as kind of this

0:05:05.244 --> 0:05:08.844
<v Speaker 1>this benchmark, because you have written about the Pennsylvania polls

0:05:08.844 --> 0:05:11.204
<v Speaker 1>in the last few days, so I'm kind of curious

0:05:11.244 --> 0:05:14.564
<v Speaker 1>to see where we stand there. You just briefly mentioned it,

0:05:14.644 --> 0:05:16.684
<v Speaker 1>but I'd love to kind of go into a little

0:05:16.684 --> 0:05:20.564
<v Speaker 1>bit more detail because you've also you've also had some

0:05:21.524 --> 0:05:25.644
<v Speaker 1>of those paths to victory that might not seem intuitive,

0:05:25.804 --> 0:05:29.124
<v Speaker 1>Like you had one post called Alaska Alasco lastar Alaska,

0:05:29.764 --> 0:05:32.524
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was quite funny. But can you elaborate

0:05:32.564 --> 0:05:34.164
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and can we talk about kind of

0:05:34.204 --> 0:05:38.484
<v Speaker 1>the first Pennsylvania and then what different paths to victory

0:05:38.604 --> 0:05:41.804
<v Speaker 1>might look like if we don't, you know, if we

0:05:41.884 --> 0:05:44.764
<v Speaker 1>stay within this margin and don't see Harris improving.

0:05:46.164 --> 0:05:49.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Pennsylvania is the most likely what we call

0:05:49.444 --> 0:05:52.164
<v Speaker 2>tipping point state. The tipping point state. The short version

0:05:52.644 --> 0:05:54.004
<v Speaker 2>is it's a state that gives you the two hundred

0:05:54.004 --> 0:05:56.684
<v Speaker 2>and seventieth electoral vote. That's the state that's the number

0:05:56.684 --> 0:06:01.444
<v Speaker 2>that guarantees you a victory in electoral college. A longer version,

0:06:01.524 --> 0:06:03.724
<v Speaker 2>if you line up all the states from most blue

0:06:04.244 --> 0:06:06.484
<v Speaker 2>to most red and add up the electoral votes, that's

0:06:06.524 --> 0:06:09.404
<v Speaker 2>where you get over the finish line. But basically it's

0:06:09.524 --> 0:06:11.644
<v Speaker 2>the decisive state about a third of the time in

0:06:11.684 --> 0:06:14.164
<v Speaker 2>our model, but it's not alone. In that department. There's

0:06:14.164 --> 0:06:16.764
<v Speaker 2>about a thirty percent chance that Pennsylvania is a tipping

0:06:16.764 --> 0:06:19.044
<v Speaker 2>point state, which means there's a seventy percent chance that

0:06:19.084 --> 0:06:22.644
<v Speaker 2>it isn't Harris unlike Biden. I mean, Biden kind of

0:06:22.684 --> 0:06:27.684
<v Speaker 2>had to win Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan very narrow path, whereas

0:06:27.684 --> 0:06:31.164
<v Speaker 2>Harris has often begetting their numbers in Georgia. For example,

0:06:31.644 --> 0:06:33.764
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina is a state that comes up quite a bit.

0:06:33.804 --> 0:06:37.364
<v Speaker 2>Those states both have sixteen electoral votes, Pennsylvania has nineteen,

0:06:37.564 --> 0:06:40.084
<v Speaker 2>so you can't quite substitute one for the other. But

0:06:40.124 --> 0:06:44.924
<v Speaker 2>there are combinations that work North Carolina plus Nevada, or

0:06:45.004 --> 0:06:49.604
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina plus Arizona, Nevada Nevada, or if you want

0:06:49.644 --> 0:06:55.404
<v Speaker 2>to get really creative, Nevada plus Arizona plus Alaska, where

0:06:55.404 --> 0:06:57.924
<v Speaker 2>a poll came out this weekend showing Harris down by

0:06:58.564 --> 0:06:59.524
<v Speaker 2>only four points.

0:07:01.524 --> 0:07:05.204
<v Speaker 1>When is the last time a Democrat has taken Alaska nineteen.

0:07:04.924 --> 0:07:09.404
<v Speaker 2>Sixty four, LBJ. I believe one Alaska people actually thought

0:07:10.324 --> 0:07:13.684
<v Speaker 2>when Alaska and Hawaii enter the country the Union, that

0:07:13.884 --> 0:07:16.404
<v Speaker 2>Alaska would be democratic and Hawaii would be Republican and

0:07:16.404 --> 0:07:21.204
<v Speaker 2>the reverse has been true instead fascinating, but Alaska has

0:07:21.644 --> 0:07:26.484
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat representative named Mary Peltola who is a lone

0:07:26.724 --> 0:07:30.164
<v Speaker 2>US House or presentative for the state at the state

0:07:30.244 --> 0:07:33.804
<v Speaker 2>legislature level. It's kind of by partisan. It's population is

0:07:33.884 --> 0:07:36.364
<v Speaker 2>changing a lot about you know, four percent of the

0:07:36.364 --> 0:07:40.404
<v Speaker 2>population moves into Alaska every year. It's a transient workforce.

0:07:40.404 --> 0:07:43.684
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you're getting the expats from California

0:07:43.764 --> 0:07:47.524
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. So Harris does have more paths,

0:07:47.764 --> 0:07:52.804
<v Speaker 2>but there's not any one safe path. Let's also remember,

0:07:52.844 --> 0:07:57.004
<v Speaker 2>by the way, I don't mean to scare our Democratic listeners.

0:07:57.044 --> 0:08:01.404
<v Speaker 2>Let's also remember that in these Midwestern swing states Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan,

0:08:01.844 --> 0:08:05.804
<v Speaker 2>those are states where Poles have overrated Democrats in the

0:08:05.804 --> 0:08:08.284
<v Speaker 2>past couple of elections. So how safe should you feel

0:08:08.324 --> 0:08:11.684
<v Speaker 2>if you're ahead by one point in Wisconsin when Biden

0:08:11.764 --> 0:08:13.644
<v Speaker 2>was up by seven points in Wisconsin and only one

0:08:13.684 --> 0:08:16.444
<v Speaker 2>by one point, for example, Maybe not that's safe.

0:08:16.844 --> 0:08:19.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I think that's a very fair point. So

0:08:20.604 --> 0:08:23.164
<v Speaker 1>it is though it is a movement from last week,

0:08:23.204 --> 0:08:26.684
<v Speaker 1>but again there is still a long way to go. Now,

0:08:26.764 --> 0:08:30.684
<v Speaker 1>what about the Trump assassination attempt. Are we seeing any

0:08:30.844 --> 0:08:33.284
<v Speaker 1>effects from that? Will we see effects from that? Because

0:08:33.324 --> 0:08:37.444
<v Speaker 1>obviously that happened over the weekend, and you know, we're

0:08:37.484 --> 0:08:40.524
<v Speaker 1>recording this on Tuesday, September seventeenth, so it's not like

0:08:41.124 --> 0:08:44.684
<v Speaker 1>polls come out, you know, every single day that incorporate

0:08:44.724 --> 0:08:48.404
<v Speaker 1>new events. But I'm curious whether there have been any

0:08:48.404 --> 0:08:50.484
<v Speaker 1>shifts and whether you expect any shifts or not.

0:08:52.604 --> 0:08:56.404
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean we should also so clearly,

0:08:56.484 --> 0:09:02.564
<v Speaker 2>the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania was a very serious

0:09:02.564 --> 0:09:06.124
<v Speaker 2>incident where Trump was injured and could have been killed

0:09:06.164 --> 0:09:08.404
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't read at the right point in time,

0:09:08.524 --> 0:09:10.284
<v Speaker 2>and another people person and was killed and other people

0:09:10.324 --> 0:09:15.844
<v Speaker 2>were injured. And it's somewhat more common to see plots foiled.

0:09:15.884 --> 0:09:17.804
<v Speaker 2>This guy got further than a lot of people. It

0:09:17.844 --> 0:09:20.644
<v Speaker 2>was a guy at a golf course hiding in the bushes.

0:09:21.244 --> 0:09:24.284
<v Speaker 2>For some reason, he decided to wear a pink shirt,

0:09:24.324 --> 0:09:27.484
<v Speaker 2>which is not known as a color that helps you camouflage.

0:09:27.604 --> 0:09:30.844
<v Speaker 1>Very well, yes, it's not traditional camouflage, that's true.

0:09:31.404 --> 0:09:34.004
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I don't know whether this gets kind

0:09:34.044 --> 0:09:37.004
<v Speaker 2>of talked about or thought. It was an event that

0:09:37.164 --> 0:09:41.084
<v Speaker 2>totally disrupts the news cycle in prediction markets we talked

0:09:41.084 --> 0:09:43.724
<v Speaker 2>about in a moment, it did not particularly move the

0:09:43.844 --> 0:09:45.964
<v Speaker 2>numbers for what it's worth. I mean, look, it just

0:09:46.164 --> 0:09:49.684
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean, this election's turned pretty dark,

0:09:51.604 --> 0:09:53.484
<v Speaker 2>I think, needless to say, right. I mean, you know,

0:09:53.524 --> 0:09:57.204
<v Speaker 2>there probably should be more investigation into the Secret Service

0:09:57.204 --> 0:09:59.924
<v Speaker 2>and what they are or are not doing. I don't know,

0:10:00.164 --> 0:10:05.124
<v Speaker 2>that's not a bigger topic. For example, you have you know,

0:10:05.444 --> 0:10:08.684
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk making this awful joke about why hasn't anyone

0:10:08.724 --> 0:10:13.324
<v Speaker 2>tried to assas the Democrats? That was low even for Elon,

0:10:13.764 --> 0:10:15.724
<v Speaker 2>Even for Elon. I mean, you also have on the

0:10:15.924 --> 0:10:19.724
<v Speaker 2>on this Haitian immigrant story. Some of this stuff is

0:10:19.764 --> 0:10:22.204
<v Speaker 2>pretty outright racist, I think. And you also have like

0:10:22.924 --> 0:10:25.764
<v Speaker 2>JD Events saying well, maybe it's not I'm paraphrasing slightly,

0:10:25.964 --> 0:10:27.964
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's not strictly true, but at least it's a

0:10:27.964 --> 0:10:31.084
<v Speaker 2>way to get people talking about immigration more. I mean, you're,

0:10:31.324 --> 0:10:32.924
<v Speaker 2>first of all, you're not supposed to say that part

0:10:33.324 --> 0:10:36.444
<v Speaker 2>JD Events, right, You're you're saying the quiet part out loud,

0:10:36.484 --> 0:10:41.084
<v Speaker 2>and I and it's just so bizarre and and weird.

0:10:41.564 --> 0:10:43.844
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Maria, there comes a time when and

0:10:43.884 --> 0:10:47.844
<v Speaker 2>this is after a period when after she took over,

0:10:48.684 --> 0:10:50.884
<v Speaker 2>after Biden was shoved out of the way. He didn't

0:10:50.884 --> 0:10:53.404
<v Speaker 2>honorably step aside. He was shoved out of the way

0:10:53.404 --> 0:10:56.404
<v Speaker 2>by Nancy Pelosi and people who are smart and want

0:10:56.404 --> 0:10:59.644
<v Speaker 2>to win the Democratic Party. You know, Harris ran this

0:10:59.804 --> 0:11:03.844
<v Speaker 2>kind of sunnier, happier campaign and and I know sometimes

0:11:03.844 --> 0:11:06.924
<v Speaker 2>after Labor Day things just turn dark.

0:11:08.244 --> 0:11:10.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this has been a very dark election. I think

0:11:10.644 --> 0:11:11.844
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way of putting it.

0:11:12.764 --> 0:11:14.964
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look the way I liken this is a little

0:11:14.964 --> 0:11:17.684
<v Speaker 2>bit too. H here's another analogy that'll probably piss half

0:11:17.684 --> 0:11:18.524
<v Speaker 2>for audience off.

0:11:18.564 --> 0:11:21.444
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, It's okay, as long as we keep pissing

0:11:21.484 --> 0:11:23.644
<v Speaker 1>off different halves than it all.

0:11:23.884 --> 0:11:27.564
<v Speaker 2>Even say, it's a little bit like climate change in

0:11:27.604 --> 0:11:29.884
<v Speaker 2>the sense that any one severe weather event like a

0:11:29.964 --> 0:11:33.164
<v Speaker 2>hurricane is hard to attribute to climate change. But when

0:11:33.164 --> 0:11:38.364
<v Speaker 2>you have a climate when people are saying violent things,

0:11:38.444 --> 0:11:40.604
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think the parties are equally responsible for this.

0:11:40.644 --> 0:11:42.604
<v Speaker 2>I think Trump is much more likely to engage in

0:11:42.684 --> 0:11:45.604
<v Speaker 2>violent rhetoric. But there's plenty of objectionable stuff on the

0:11:45.644 --> 0:11:51.204
<v Speaker 2>Democratic side too. You know, the risk of violence is

0:11:51.284 --> 0:11:56.364
<v Speaker 2>higher and we've seen, you know, these two attempts on

0:11:57.324 --> 0:12:01.124
<v Speaker 2>Trump's life. We saw, you know, Paul Pelosi, the speaker

0:12:01.124 --> 0:12:05.164
<v Speaker 2>from Preacau's House's husband attacked. You had a shooting in

0:12:05.204 --> 0:12:08.524
<v Speaker 2>a congressional baseball game back. I guess this was several

0:12:08.604 --> 0:12:11.604
<v Speaker 2>years ago, twenty seven, but still kind of in this

0:12:12.764 --> 0:12:17.164
<v Speaker 2>you know, modern era twenty sixteen onward. Then it's been

0:12:17.244 --> 0:12:20.124
<v Speaker 2>kind of a violent time in American political life. You

0:12:20.204 --> 0:12:23.804
<v Speaker 2>saw a shooting of Republicans in a congressional baseball game a

0:12:23.844 --> 0:12:29.484
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago. You know, this is not good. Sorry,

0:12:29.564 --> 0:12:31.284
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm studying the obvious, right. And you have

0:12:31.324 --> 0:12:34.484
<v Speaker 2>also January sixth, in the summer of twenty twenty, you

0:12:34.524 --> 0:12:39.044
<v Speaker 2>have protests that are not always peaceful. Frankly somewhere often not.

0:12:41.124 --> 0:12:46.204
<v Speaker 2>You know, look, I think in politics people feel like

0:12:46.244 --> 0:12:52.204
<v Speaker 2>they have license to behave really badly. They feel self

0:12:52.244 --> 0:12:56.244
<v Speaker 2>righteous about it. I don't know, Maria, No.

0:12:57.124 --> 0:13:00.684
<v Speaker 1>It's not good. And I think that I think we're

0:13:00.724 --> 0:13:05.404
<v Speaker 1>forgetting you know so much about why democracy works. You know,

0:13:05.524 --> 0:13:10.244
<v Speaker 1>what makes democracy different from other forms of government, That

0:13:10.284 --> 0:13:14.804
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to have peaceful transitions of power, That peace

0:13:14.924 --> 0:13:17.964
<v Speaker 1>is kind of supposed to be built into the system,

0:13:18.404 --> 0:13:20.644
<v Speaker 1>you know, right now the United States, and some of

0:13:20.644 --> 0:13:23.764
<v Speaker 1>it's in some of what's going on is more resembling,

0:13:24.124 --> 0:13:29.164
<v Speaker 1>you know, countries that are dictatorships, that are that that

0:13:29.244 --> 0:13:32.684
<v Speaker 1>are not used to having peaceful transitions of power. And

0:13:32.764 --> 0:13:36.004
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's highly problematic. And I hope that

0:13:36.084 --> 0:13:38.644
<v Speaker 1>it's not a harbinger of things to come. I hope

0:13:38.644 --> 0:13:42.724
<v Speaker 1>that we are we are looking at a blip in

0:13:42.844 --> 0:13:46.724
<v Speaker 1>time that will that will disappear. But that's just hope,

0:13:46.844 --> 0:13:49.444
<v Speaker 1>right that has no no basis in reality, And right

0:13:49.444 --> 0:13:52.364
<v Speaker 1>now the reality is actually showing us that we're veering

0:13:52.404 --> 0:13:57.204
<v Speaker 1>off into another direction. And you know, we need data

0:13:57.924 --> 0:14:00.404
<v Speaker 1>and we need to see what happens, but right now

0:14:00.404 --> 0:14:01.644
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not looking pretty.

0:14:02.284 --> 0:14:04.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like I think Democrats feel like, oh, if we

0:14:04.124 --> 0:14:08.284
<v Speaker 2>just kind of defeat Donald Trump, we solve the problem, right,

0:14:08.324 --> 0:14:11.004
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I'm not sure sure how how true

0:14:11.044 --> 0:14:14.244
<v Speaker 2>that is exactly. Clearly a lot of these other Republican

0:14:14.284 --> 0:14:19.844
<v Speaker 2>candidates are trying to emulate Trump's image. It is interesting

0:14:19.884 --> 0:14:23.284
<v Speaker 2>though that the GOP brand is not terribly popular, Like

0:14:23.284 --> 0:14:26.284
<v Speaker 2>they're still losing a lot of these races for a

0:14:26.364 --> 0:14:29.644
<v Speaker 2>Senate and the House will probably take over the Senate

0:14:29.684 --> 0:14:31.684
<v Speaker 2>because you have these Democrats that are up in very

0:14:31.724 --> 0:14:34.724
<v Speaker 2>red states that might tip the balance, but in his

0:14:34.724 --> 0:14:37.804
<v Speaker 2>swing states are often down by by five or six points.

0:14:37.804 --> 0:14:40.844
<v Speaker 2>And I think somehow, like somehow, Trump sometimes gets a

0:14:40.924 --> 0:14:44.084
<v Speaker 2>pass from voters, or maybe just Trump is kind of

0:14:44.084 --> 0:14:49.124
<v Speaker 2>a guy who is he has a certain charisma that

0:14:49.204 --> 0:14:53.484
<v Speaker 2>resonates with a certain type of voter. People think that

0:14:53.524 --> 0:14:56.444
<v Speaker 2>he is on their side, whereas you kind of see

0:14:56.484 --> 0:14:59.284
<v Speaker 2>like the more charisma less version with say jd Vance

0:14:59.804 --> 0:15:03.964
<v Speaker 2>for example. So maybe it's right that if Democrats win

0:15:04.004 --> 0:15:06.404
<v Speaker 2>this election two and Trump is then one for three.

0:15:06.444 --> 0:15:09.204
<v Speaker 2>Although who knows, is there any reason why he wouldn't

0:15:09.244 --> 0:15:13.964
<v Speaker 2>run in twenty twenty eight. I don't inherently see why not. Right,

0:15:14.884 --> 0:15:15.524
<v Speaker 2>age is the.

0:15:15.404 --> 0:15:17.604
<v Speaker 1>Only thing that I might that I might say in

0:15:17.644 --> 0:15:20.324
<v Speaker 1>case there's, you know, any infirmity or anything that really

0:15:20.524 --> 0:15:22.604
<v Speaker 1>prevents him from running, I think that that's the only

0:15:22.644 --> 0:15:24.004
<v Speaker 1>thing that would really stop him.

0:15:24.524 --> 0:15:27.404
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he'd be the same age as Biden tried

0:15:27.404 --> 0:15:29.484
<v Speaker 2>to run this year, although I guess it's a negative indicator.

0:15:29.564 --> 0:15:33.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look at how well that turned out. Yeah, So

0:15:34.844 --> 0:15:37.564
<v Speaker 1>just to kind of wrap this up, is there anything

0:15:37.644 --> 0:15:41.764
<v Speaker 1>else that you think we should be looking at in

0:15:41.804 --> 0:15:44.764
<v Speaker 1>the next week. Do you expect to see any changes

0:15:44.764 --> 0:15:47.084
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week or do we just need to

0:15:47.204 --> 0:15:49.444
<v Speaker 1>kind of wait and see what happens.

0:15:49.844 --> 0:15:51.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hate to I hate to sound like a

0:15:51.444 --> 0:15:55.084
<v Speaker 2>broken record, but you know, are you seeing for Harris

0:15:56.004 --> 0:15:58.404
<v Speaker 2>poll showing her up one or two points in Pennsylvania's

0:15:58.444 --> 0:16:04.924
<v Speaker 2>constin Michigan? Failing that, you know North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Well,

0:16:04.964 --> 0:16:08.524
<v Speaker 2>then you know Nevada. Now I'm saying it weird.

0:16:08.404 --> 0:16:12.124
<v Speaker 1>Nevadada, Novada, no matter, you got it?

0:16:12.764 --> 0:16:14.484
<v Speaker 2>Okay. It's one of those words where I feel like,

0:16:14.684 --> 0:16:17.084
<v Speaker 2>you know, like if you know someone named Megan, but

0:16:17.124 --> 0:16:20.404
<v Speaker 2>then it's Megan, and then then you swear because like,

0:16:20.404 --> 0:16:22.284
<v Speaker 2>oh it's not the way I think it is. Then

0:16:22.284 --> 0:16:25.124
<v Speaker 2>you get screwed up between Megan and Megan. I just

0:16:25.124 --> 0:16:28.884
<v Speaker 2>think people should consolidate these names, right, We should? You

0:16:28.884 --> 0:16:32.204
<v Speaker 2>know how like in France you're only allowed certain surnames

0:16:32.284 --> 0:16:35.764
<v Speaker 2>or Germany or something, right, Yep, we should stipulate Sarah

0:16:36.004 --> 0:16:38.844
<v Speaker 2>with an H and Sarah with an A. You just

0:16:38.884 --> 0:16:40.164
<v Speaker 2>got to get together and pick one.

0:16:41.684 --> 0:16:44.964
<v Speaker 1>I could. I could see how that's going to play out. Nate,

0:16:45.324 --> 0:16:47.524
<v Speaker 1>if that's part of your political platform. I'm going to

0:16:47.564 --> 0:16:51.644
<v Speaker 1>tell you right now, you're gonna lose parents. Parents on

0:16:51.764 --> 0:16:56.164
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the of the party spectrum are going

0:16:56.204 --> 0:16:58.324
<v Speaker 1>to fight you to the death on that. They want

0:16:58.364 --> 0:16:59.524
<v Speaker 1>their creative spellings.

0:16:59.844 --> 0:17:03.964
<v Speaker 2>We're trying to like simplify these poor people's lives right there,

0:17:04.764 --> 0:17:06.044
<v Speaker 2>spelled half the time.

0:17:06.644 --> 0:17:10.684
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you, but I do not have children,

0:17:11.364 --> 0:17:13.804
<v Speaker 1>and I think that a lot of people would disagree

0:17:13.804 --> 0:17:16.764
<v Speaker 1>with us and would say that they need the freedom

0:17:16.844 --> 0:17:20.204
<v Speaker 1>to spell the name however they want to spell it.

0:17:21.724 --> 0:17:23.804
<v Speaker 1>And I think at some point that goes just a

0:17:23.804 --> 0:17:27.284
<v Speaker 1>little bit too far. I'm all for simplification. Sarah's and

0:17:27.324 --> 0:17:32.124
<v Speaker 1>Sarah's of the world unite. After this break, let's talk

0:17:32.124 --> 0:17:50.484
<v Speaker 1>about Calshi and some prediction markets. Last week there was

0:17:50.684 --> 0:17:54.884
<v Speaker 1>some major news in the prediction market space. So Nate,

0:17:55.004 --> 0:17:57.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, we give this disclaimer all the time. You're

0:17:57.324 --> 0:18:02.484
<v Speaker 1>an advisor for Polymarket. We're not talking about polymarket right now.

0:18:02.524 --> 0:18:05.164
<v Speaker 1>Polymarket is not legal in the United States. There is

0:18:05.844 --> 0:18:08.564
<v Speaker 1>a prediction market that is legal in the United States

0:18:08.604 --> 0:18:13.884
<v Speaker 1>called cal she and last week it won its federal

0:18:13.964 --> 0:18:18.604
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against the Commodity Futures Training Commission in order to

0:18:18.644 --> 0:18:23.124
<v Speaker 1>be able to offer contracts on which party will control

0:18:23.964 --> 0:18:28.204
<v Speaker 1>the each House of Congress after the election. And this

0:18:28.364 --> 0:18:32.124
<v Speaker 1>was a huge, huge deal, right because betting on elections

0:18:32.164 --> 0:18:34.284
<v Speaker 1>has not been legal in the United States. It's been

0:18:34.484 --> 0:18:40.124
<v Speaker 1>this huge lightning rod, this huge argument against prediction markets

0:18:40.484 --> 0:18:43.204
<v Speaker 1>in general, and the fact that cal She won this

0:18:43.524 --> 0:18:48.364
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit was just absolutely huge news. So right after it won,

0:18:48.524 --> 0:18:51.804
<v Speaker 1>it actually offered these contracts, people started betting on them,

0:18:51.884 --> 0:18:53.924
<v Speaker 1>and then a few hours later they had to free

0:18:54.044 --> 0:19:02.124
<v Speaker 1>them because the CFTC said, hold on, you know, freeze,

0:19:02.804 --> 0:19:05.604
<v Speaker 1>we want to contest this. We don't think this should

0:19:05.604 --> 0:19:07.924
<v Speaker 1>be legal, and right now we're kind of in this

0:19:07.964 --> 0:19:10.644
<v Speaker 1>holding pattern. No one knows what's going to happen to

0:19:10.724 --> 0:19:13.164
<v Speaker 1>the people who already placed their bets last week during

0:19:13.204 --> 0:19:16.364
<v Speaker 1>the few hours that vetting was open, and we don't

0:19:16.404 --> 0:19:19.804
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen. They were supposed to potentially

0:19:20.364 --> 0:19:24.964
<v Speaker 1>resolve this yesterday Monday. As of today, Tuesday, September seventeenth,

0:19:25.244 --> 0:19:28.924
<v Speaker 1>they still have not resolved this. So the US Court

0:19:28.924 --> 0:19:32.244
<v Speaker 1>of the Appeals and the DC Circuit is waiting. We're

0:19:32.284 --> 0:19:34.484
<v Speaker 1>waiting to hear how they rule on this, and that's

0:19:34.524 --> 0:19:37.164
<v Speaker 1>going to do a lot to determine the future of

0:19:37.244 --> 0:19:41.724
<v Speaker 1>political betting in the United States. Let's talk about this

0:19:42.204 --> 0:19:44.604
<v Speaker 1>because you know, this is something that cal she has

0:19:44.644 --> 0:19:48.284
<v Speaker 1>been fighting for for over four years, and not just

0:19:48.324 --> 0:19:51.604
<v Speaker 1>Calshie obviously other future markets, but Cals. She's been doing

0:19:51.644 --> 0:19:53.524
<v Speaker 1>it from within the United States, bringing it through the

0:19:53.564 --> 0:19:55.964
<v Speaker 1>court systems, and it's a big, big deal.

0:19:57.244 --> 0:19:59.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Whereas probably market has an agreement with the CFDC

0:20:00.164 --> 0:20:04.724
<v Speaker 2>not to allowed trading in the US like I, as

0:20:04.804 --> 0:20:07.084
<v Speaker 2>I need to say, whenever this type of subject comes up,

0:20:07.124 --> 0:20:09.244
<v Speaker 2>I have a conflict of interest here. I am invi

0:20:09.604 --> 0:20:14.164
<v Speaker 2>are to a competing prediction market called poly market. You know,

0:20:14.284 --> 0:20:16.804
<v Speaker 2>the reason on aviasure to them is partly because they

0:20:16.844 --> 0:20:20.004
<v Speaker 2>they compensate me, but also because I believe in prediction

0:20:20.084 --> 0:20:24.324
<v Speaker 2>markets as a product. But look, the basic argument for

0:20:24.564 --> 0:20:28.164
<v Speaker 2>prediction markets is that, you know, market risk inherently has

0:20:28.204 --> 0:20:32.684
<v Speaker 2>to price in political risk anyway, that if you're thinking

0:20:32.684 --> 0:20:35.924
<v Speaker 2>about how different classes of equities will move, or interest

0:20:36.044 --> 0:20:39.844
<v Speaker 2>rates or you know, or foreign markets, you know, US

0:20:39.844 --> 0:20:44.284
<v Speaker 2>policy toward China or whatnot, people already are factoring in

0:20:44.324 --> 0:20:48.204
<v Speaker 2>who's gonna win the election, how political events might unfold,

0:20:48.244 --> 0:20:53.284
<v Speaker 2>including like foreign elections for example, so why not allow

0:20:53.324 --> 0:20:56.284
<v Speaker 2>people to bet on this directly instead of kind of

0:20:56.324 --> 0:21:00.764
<v Speaker 2>filtered through other types of more imprecise commodities. You know.

0:21:01.364 --> 0:21:07.324
<v Speaker 2>The CFTC says they're worried about market manipulation, and they

0:21:07.364 --> 0:21:12.484
<v Speaker 2>can cite, for example, people playing placing fake poles out there.

0:21:12.484 --> 0:21:15.484
<v Speaker 2>We've seen this sometimes actually, where you'll see people make

0:21:15.564 --> 0:21:18.364
<v Speaker 2>up credible rumors of a poll. Whether they do that

0:21:18.404 --> 0:21:20.244
<v Speaker 2>just to fuck with people or because it's a way

0:21:20.284 --> 0:21:23.844
<v Speaker 2>to manipulate markets, I'm not so sure, you know, But

0:21:23.924 --> 0:21:26.364
<v Speaker 2>the question is why use this in a different category

0:21:27.124 --> 0:21:31.444
<v Speaker 2>than say betting on sports, where you have seen efforts

0:21:31.444 --> 0:21:35.524
<v Speaker 2>to throw matches in manipulation, or trading equities and things

0:21:35.604 --> 0:21:38.324
<v Speaker 2>like that, you know. I mean, if you have like

0:21:38.364 --> 0:21:41.204
<v Speaker 2>a Donald Trump stock, you have things that are kind

0:21:41.204 --> 0:21:45.404
<v Speaker 2>of proxies for election anyway. I mean Bitcoin often moves

0:21:46.084 --> 0:21:48.964
<v Speaker 2>upward and downward. That's seen as Trump is seen as

0:21:48.964 --> 0:21:51.364
<v Speaker 2>bullish for bitcoin. So if you have Trump having a

0:21:51.364 --> 0:21:54.044
<v Speaker 2>bad debate like you had last week, for example, bitcoin

0:21:54.124 --> 0:21:56.804
<v Speaker 2>goes down. So I don't know, I think it's I

0:21:56.844 --> 0:22:00.484
<v Speaker 2>think the CFTC has always been very if you read

0:22:00.524 --> 0:22:04.724
<v Speaker 2>the book my book, they're very villagy, right, They seem

0:22:04.764 --> 0:22:09.164
<v Speaker 2>to think that like trading or gambling is is bad

0:22:09.204 --> 0:22:11.884
<v Speaker 2>and and evil and will taint the political system when

0:22:11.884 --> 0:22:16.444
<v Speaker 2>it's like, I don't know, you know, Alex, uh excuse me.

0:22:17.404 --> 0:22:20.004
<v Speaker 2>You know, I always like the phrase that a bet

0:22:20.084 --> 0:22:22.804
<v Speaker 2>is a tax on bullshit. You know, It's not uncommon

0:22:22.844 --> 0:22:24.524
<v Speaker 2>for me to like be in an argument with somebody

0:22:24.524 --> 0:22:26.684
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter and to say, Okay, you actually believe what

0:22:26.724 --> 0:22:29.604
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, let's bet on it. Let's bet surreal money.

0:22:29.684 --> 0:22:31.564
<v Speaker 1>Has anyone, by the way, ever taken you about it?

0:22:31.604 --> 0:22:33.724
<v Speaker 1>Because I've seen you offer it to so many people,

0:22:33.764 --> 0:22:35.884
<v Speaker 1>and I've never seen someone say yes.

0:22:35.724 --> 0:22:41.244
<v Speaker 2>They're always they're always cowards, right, They're always cowards. They're

0:22:41.244 --> 0:22:43.564
<v Speaker 2>always cowards because they don't actually mean what they say

0:22:43.644 --> 0:22:45.684
<v Speaker 2>most of the time. Right, they're talking a big game

0:22:45.724 --> 0:22:47.724
<v Speaker 2>and they don't actually mean what they say. And and

0:22:48.364 --> 0:22:50.004
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe it's a weird thing to want

0:22:50.044 --> 0:22:55.644
<v Speaker 2>to like bet on all this stuff, but like, but yeah, yeah,

0:22:55.644 --> 0:22:58.364
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we walk into Alan Lickman today. That

0:22:58.444 --> 0:22:59.604
<v Speaker 2>feels like too much of a detour.

0:23:00.324 --> 0:23:03.364
<v Speaker 1>We can, we can, but but first, uh, but first

0:23:03.404 --> 0:23:06.204
<v Speaker 1>let's uh, let's let's stay on Calshi for a little

0:23:06.204 --> 0:23:09.244
<v Speaker 1>bit and betting on elections. So you said a few things,

0:23:09.444 --> 0:23:12.404
<v Speaker 1>and there there's one thing that you know that I

0:23:12.444 --> 0:23:16.284
<v Speaker 1>completely agree with, which is that, you know, to really

0:23:16.404 --> 0:23:19.444
<v Speaker 1>test someone's opinion, bet on it. Right. We did not

0:23:19.564 --> 0:23:22.964
<v Speaker 1>invent this. I think I've cited Immanuel Khnt on this

0:23:23.084 --> 0:23:25.924
<v Speaker 1>podcast before. You know. He was one of the original

0:23:25.924 --> 0:23:30.084
<v Speaker 1>proponents that if you say something's going to happen, if

0:23:30.124 --> 0:23:32.324
<v Speaker 1>you have a certainty in it, how much money are

0:23:32.324 --> 0:23:34.124
<v Speaker 1>you willing to bet on it? Right? What will you

0:23:34.164 --> 0:23:37.004
<v Speaker 1>place on it? And he did see this as a

0:23:37.084 --> 0:23:40.404
<v Speaker 1>tax on bullshit and on false certainty, on unfalse confidence,

0:23:40.724 --> 0:23:42.524
<v Speaker 1>and he thought that this would really be a very

0:23:42.524 --> 0:23:47.364
<v Speaker 1>strong corrective towards people just prosaltizing and giving unfounded opinions

0:23:47.444 --> 0:23:50.044
<v Speaker 1>and trying to you know, stand on a soapbox without

0:23:50.084 --> 0:23:53.164
<v Speaker 1>actual knowledge or backing that you really needed to put

0:23:53.204 --> 0:23:56.004
<v Speaker 1>your money where your mouth is. And so in that sense,

0:23:56.284 --> 0:24:00.444
<v Speaker 1>you know, betting on politics great, right. It helps calibrate outcomes,

0:24:00.484 --> 0:24:03.244
<v Speaker 1>It helps kind of figure out where things are standing,

0:24:03.284 --> 0:24:05.804
<v Speaker 1>because people really have skin in the game as opposed

0:24:05.844 --> 0:24:07.884
<v Speaker 1>to just kind of standing on their soapbox, which when

0:24:07.924 --> 0:24:10.284
<v Speaker 1>it comes to politics, everyone has a soap books and

0:24:10.324 --> 0:24:13.964
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to scream loudly. But let's look at the

0:24:13.964 --> 0:24:17.324
<v Speaker 1>other side of it. So you said something which was,

0:24:17.444 --> 0:24:19.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we're betting on sports where people there

0:24:19.924 --> 0:24:22.324
<v Speaker 1>has been manipulation, people have tried to throw games, why

0:24:22.364 --> 0:24:24.804
<v Speaker 1>aren't we allowed to bet on politics? I would say,

0:24:24.804 --> 0:24:26.684
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a huge problem in sports betting

0:24:26.724 --> 0:24:29.884
<v Speaker 1>as well. We've talked about this, and if you think

0:24:29.924 --> 0:24:32.284
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge problem in sports and that people are

0:24:32.324 --> 0:24:34.844
<v Speaker 1>throwing games and that it actually is kind of adding

0:24:35.324 --> 0:24:39.404
<v Speaker 1>some of this uncertainty to certain outcomes where you can't

0:24:39.444 --> 0:24:43.284
<v Speaker 1>really tell, you know, did this person actually you know fumble,

0:24:43.444 --> 0:24:45.564
<v Speaker 1>did they throw the game on purpose? Kind of there's

0:24:46.164 --> 0:24:48.124
<v Speaker 1>it introduces a lot of shades of great in the

0:24:48.124 --> 0:24:50.204
<v Speaker 1>moment that you can bet on some of these outcomes,

0:24:50.324 --> 0:24:52.604
<v Speaker 1>including just these crazy prop bets, right, not just the

0:24:52.644 --> 0:24:55.804
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the game, but there are these just insane

0:24:55.844 --> 0:24:58.884
<v Speaker 1>prop bets that have a lot of money riding on

0:24:58.924 --> 0:25:01.804
<v Speaker 1>them during the game. But think about like at the

0:25:01.884 --> 0:25:03.644
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, like it's it's a sports game.

0:25:03.684 --> 0:25:05.324
<v Speaker 1>I know there are listeners of the show who are

0:25:05.404 --> 0:25:07.844
<v Speaker 1>huge sports fans, but like it's not going to change

0:25:07.844 --> 0:25:11.444
<v Speaker 1>the fate of the world. We're talking about politics, those

0:25:11.444 --> 0:25:15.524
<v Speaker 1>things become amplified because we're now playing in a different ballgame.

0:25:15.764 --> 0:25:19.244
<v Speaker 1>Let's mix metaphors here and bring sports to politics. It's

0:25:19.524 --> 0:25:22.804
<v Speaker 1>a different game that we're playing with much higher stakes,

0:25:23.604 --> 0:25:29.884
<v Speaker 1>where any potential impropriety, manipulation, things that could actually throw

0:25:30.284 --> 0:25:34.004
<v Speaker 1>elections one way or another, one outcome one way or another,

0:25:34.324 --> 0:25:37.644
<v Speaker 1>they become much much bigger deals. Right, we actually have

0:25:37.684 --> 0:25:41.084
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to that. Now, I'm not What I'm

0:25:41.124 --> 0:25:42.924
<v Speaker 1>not saying is this is the case and we can't

0:25:42.924 --> 0:25:45.204
<v Speaker 1>allow betting on elections. What I'm saying is we need

0:25:45.244 --> 0:25:47.284
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this, We need to consider it. We

0:25:47.324 --> 0:25:49.364
<v Speaker 1>need to try to figure out, you know, what are

0:25:49.404 --> 0:25:51.724
<v Speaker 1>the pros, what are the cons, what's the risk of this?

0:25:52.604 --> 0:25:56.444
<v Speaker 1>And given that, what kinds of tools also do we

0:25:56.524 --> 0:26:00.164
<v Speaker 1>want to offer? Because prediction markets don't just offer, you know,

0:26:00.324 --> 0:26:03.724
<v Speaker 1>a straight out bet on the outcome of the election. Right,

0:26:03.764 --> 0:26:06.444
<v Speaker 1>there are contracts, there are derivatives markets, There are all

0:26:06.484 --> 0:26:08.804
<v Speaker 1>sorts of secondary things where you get to bet on

0:26:08.964 --> 0:26:12.884
<v Speaker 1>also some things. And so even if we you know,

0:26:12.924 --> 0:26:14.524
<v Speaker 1>once you and I talk about it, even if we

0:26:14.564 --> 0:26:17.444
<v Speaker 1>agree that okay, some sorts of betting is okay, that

0:26:17.484 --> 0:26:20.004
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean that all sorts of betting is okay,

0:26:20.324 --> 0:26:22.284
<v Speaker 1>and we can then go back to sports and say, Okay,

0:26:22.364 --> 0:26:25.364
<v Speaker 1>these these things are not necessarily okay either. I'm talking

0:26:25.764 --> 0:26:28.084
<v Speaker 1>a lot in generalities right now, just because I want

0:26:28.124 --> 0:26:30.364
<v Speaker 1>to kind of lay out some of the points that

0:26:30.404 --> 0:26:31.444
<v Speaker 1>I think we should discuss.

0:26:32.204 --> 0:26:36.324
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think, you know, in some sorts, I think

0:26:36.324 --> 0:26:40.004
<v Speaker 2>it kind of almost cuts the other way that, like

0:26:40.044 --> 0:26:43.964
<v Speaker 2>there is economic value created. You know, you have more

0:26:44.004 --> 0:26:47.924
<v Speaker 2>market efficiency and less deadweight loss when you're allowed to

0:26:48.244 --> 0:26:50.484
<v Speaker 2>create on these things that move markets anyway instead of

0:26:50.484 --> 0:26:53.884
<v Speaker 2>having to go through proxies. And that's a very University

0:26:53.924 --> 0:26:58.964
<v Speaker 2>of Chicago economist hat thing to argue, Whereas I'm not

0:26:59.044 --> 0:27:03.244
<v Speaker 2>sure there's any value per se created by sports betting.

0:27:03.524 --> 0:27:05.804
<v Speaker 2>For some people, it's fun, for some people it's addictive.

0:27:05.884 --> 0:27:10.044
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough game to win, to be sure. So

0:27:10.284 --> 0:27:12.204
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I mean, And there's also this argument

0:27:12.244 --> 0:27:14.564
<v Speaker 2>that if things are more regulated, then it's easier to

0:27:14.604 --> 0:27:18.804
<v Speaker 2>catch like market manipulation for better or worse draft kings,

0:27:18.844 --> 0:27:20.524
<v Speaker 2>and FanDuel can say, yeah, we he it was unusual

0:27:20.604 --> 0:27:24.324
<v Speaker 2>betting patterns. NBA, you should go investigate this, NFL should

0:27:24.364 --> 0:27:28.244
<v Speaker 2>go investigate this. If it's regulated versus occurring in like

0:27:28.324 --> 0:27:32.204
<v Speaker 2>offshore crypto markets and so forth. But anyway, I'm biased here.

0:27:32.444 --> 0:27:38.044
<v Speaker 2>I'm clearly biased. I like better, I like trading right,

0:27:38.084 --> 0:27:40.444
<v Speaker 2>and I cansult for one of these companies, So I'm

0:27:40.484 --> 0:27:44.404
<v Speaker 2>totally totally biased. But I've always thought the CFTC was

0:27:44.484 --> 0:27:45.404
<v Speaker 2>kind of nitty.

0:27:45.684 --> 0:27:48.044
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I can see that, but I can

0:27:48.124 --> 0:27:50.884
<v Speaker 1>also see the argument for if you are able to

0:27:51.004 --> 0:27:53.884
<v Speaker 1>manipulate markets for even for a short period of time.

0:27:54.284 --> 0:27:56.324
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, last week there was an attempt

0:27:56.404 --> 0:27:59.364
<v Speaker 1>to do this on poly market during the debates, right,

0:27:59.404 --> 0:28:03.764
<v Speaker 1>there was an attempt to improve Kamala Harris's odds over

0:28:03.764 --> 0:28:06.484
<v Speaker 1>a short period of time. One person bet over two

0:28:06.524 --> 0:28:09.604
<v Speaker 1>point five million to move the markets. It didn't end

0:28:09.644 --> 0:28:12.324
<v Speaker 1>up working, so the market ended up correcting. So this

0:28:12.444 --> 0:28:15.244
<v Speaker 1>is an argument in favor of self correcting markets. But

0:28:15.804 --> 0:28:18.364
<v Speaker 1>if you think about like a billionaire, right, who is

0:28:18.404 --> 0:28:21.124
<v Speaker 1>willing to put in more money and willing to kind

0:28:21.164 --> 0:28:23.884
<v Speaker 1>of do this in a more egregious way, even if

0:28:23.924 --> 0:28:28.644
<v Speaker 1>it does end up correcting eventually. We know that especially

0:28:28.684 --> 0:28:32.724
<v Speaker 1>in close selections, even rumors, even kind of things that say,

0:28:32.924 --> 0:28:35.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, these days you can actually open most not

0:28:36.084 --> 0:28:38.204
<v Speaker 1>most but a lot of news stories will actually say

0:28:38.204 --> 0:28:41.244
<v Speaker 1>the polymarket odds right, We'll say like Donald Trump is

0:28:41.284 --> 0:28:45.044
<v Speaker 1>at X, Kamala Harris's at why. So those things can

0:28:45.364 --> 0:28:50.084
<v Speaker 1>be self fulfilling prophecies. They can actually influence people's perceptions

0:28:50.124 --> 0:28:53.524
<v Speaker 1>of how something is going influence their behavior. There are

0:28:53.604 --> 0:28:58.044
<v Speaker 1>these cycles where like, just psychologically speaking, I think it's

0:28:58.044 --> 0:28:59.204
<v Speaker 1>something to think about.

0:29:00.324 --> 0:29:03.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are a couple of concerns here. What is

0:29:03.724 --> 0:29:07.884
<v Speaker 2>that Sometimes polymarket and other prediction markets, we'll have these

0:29:07.884 --> 0:29:12.124
<v Speaker 2>complicated derivative contracts, like you can predict will Harris be

0:29:12.164 --> 0:29:14.564
<v Speaker 2>ahead on poly market at X and Y time on

0:29:14.724 --> 0:29:18.004
<v Speaker 2>zmy day, and then it may be worth it to

0:29:18.044 --> 0:29:20.204
<v Speaker 2>try to move the markets that you win. The deritive

0:29:20.244 --> 0:29:22.804
<v Speaker 2>contract like stuff like that should probably get cleaned up.

0:29:24.004 --> 0:29:25.804
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I mean, and there can be this kind

0:29:25.804 --> 0:29:32.444
<v Speaker 2>of circular literalism almost where where you know, people assume

0:29:32.564 --> 0:29:35.244
<v Speaker 2>the prediction markets are wise and then so actually one example,

0:29:35.924 --> 0:29:37.724
<v Speaker 2>you remember this, a couple of weeks ago, they were

0:29:37.804 --> 0:29:40.204
<v Speaker 2>rumors that there would be a special guest at the

0:29:40.444 --> 0:29:41.044
<v Speaker 2>Credit Convention.

0:29:41.124 --> 0:29:44.444
<v Speaker 1>People thought Beyonce was potentially gonna say that. That's thought

0:29:44.524 --> 0:29:46.204
<v Speaker 1>That's where it ended up going.

0:29:46.364 --> 0:29:49.004
<v Speaker 2>People thought Taylor Swift. People thought Beyonce right, and then

0:29:49.044 --> 0:29:52.484
<v Speaker 2>Beyonce was up to like ninety seven percent on polymarket,

0:29:53.724 --> 0:29:56.644
<v Speaker 2>and then TMZ releases a story where her spokesperson said, no,

0:29:56.764 --> 0:29:59.124
<v Speaker 2>she's not even in the it's not even in Chicago

0:29:59.244 --> 0:30:01.884
<v Speaker 2>right now, right, it's not happening. And that was a

0:30:01.924 --> 0:30:03.964
<v Speaker 2>case where people look at the prediction markets and said, boy,

0:30:04.044 --> 0:30:07.204
<v Speaker 2>they must know something. They must know something because they

0:30:07.244 --> 0:30:09.484
<v Speaker 2>have gotten other stuff right. They were smart about the

0:30:09.484 --> 0:30:13.564
<v Speaker 2>packed of the debates. They were smart about Harris. You know,

0:30:13.644 --> 0:30:17.244
<v Speaker 2>the day that Tim Walls was named Jos Shapiro. I

0:30:17.244 --> 0:30:19.444
<v Speaker 2>think they were. I know people were like scouting out

0:30:19.804 --> 0:30:23.004
<v Speaker 2>the Tim Walls residents or something. So they are. They

0:30:23.044 --> 0:30:24.924
<v Speaker 2>are remarkably right a lot of the time. And then

0:30:24.924 --> 0:30:28.444
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes you have this overconfident phenomenon where where people

0:30:28.444 --> 0:30:30.444
<v Speaker 2>think they're infallible and then and then there's a big

0:30:30.484 --> 0:30:33.164
<v Speaker 2>And this is true for other types of markets too, right.

0:30:33.284 --> 0:30:37.164
<v Speaker 2>I am not a complete believer in efficient market hypothesis.

0:30:37.724 --> 0:30:40.524
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, so if you think about, once again, the

0:30:40.724 --> 0:30:46.924
<v Speaker 1>repercussions when it's something that's more significant, right, like the elections,

0:30:47.124 --> 0:30:53.404
<v Speaker 1>like politics, I think that there is room obviously for

0:30:53.564 --> 0:30:56.244
<v Speaker 1>these type of markets to exist, and obviously there's an

0:30:56.324 --> 0:30:58.724
<v Speaker 1>argument that they exist already, right, So as you said,

0:30:58.764 --> 0:31:02.964
<v Speaker 1>regulate like allow them and and be strict about it.

0:31:03.364 --> 0:31:06.884
<v Speaker 1>But when you're talking about things like these derivatives, contracts,

0:31:06.884 --> 0:31:09.804
<v Speaker 1>all these secondary things, like, I think that we need

0:31:09.844 --> 0:31:12.404
<v Speaker 1>to have some rules in place, right, Like there's not

0:31:13.124 --> 0:31:18.524
<v Speaker 1>having allowing markets for political betting does not mean allowing

0:31:18.644 --> 0:31:23.084
<v Speaker 1>all markets on everything with every single type of financial instrument, right,

0:31:23.284 --> 0:31:25.724
<v Speaker 1>that one does not follow from the other. We can

0:31:25.764 --> 0:31:29.084
<v Speaker 1>have very specific rules even with crypto, right, like the

0:31:29.764 --> 0:31:33.644
<v Speaker 1>you've had we've talked about ethan bitcoin and you know

0:31:33.724 --> 0:31:36.764
<v Speaker 1>the very narrow like the path that they had to

0:31:36.764 --> 0:31:40.444
<v Speaker 1>go through, right to allow one very specific type of

0:31:40.524 --> 0:31:45.084
<v Speaker 1>financial instrument in order to be able to trade in proxy. Yeah.

0:31:45.164 --> 0:31:47.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And this is true in sports betting markets too,

0:31:47.244 --> 0:31:50.884
<v Speaker 2>which is that there's so much pressure to offer so

0:31:51.004 --> 0:31:53.884
<v Speaker 2>many different derivatives of markets for every possible type of

0:31:53.924 --> 0:31:56.964
<v Speaker 2>event and things like that, and the more robust business

0:31:57.004 --> 0:31:58.364
<v Speaker 2>model is to kind of keep it simple, right, You

0:31:58.404 --> 0:32:01.164
<v Speaker 2>commit on you know, the money line and the point

0:32:01.164 --> 0:32:05.244
<v Speaker 2>spread and the total. If there's a player injury situation,

0:32:05.444 --> 0:32:07.884
<v Speaker 2>then they'll take it off the board instead of being

0:32:07.884 --> 0:32:10.524
<v Speaker 2>subject to inside information. They're not gonna let you bet

0:32:10.564 --> 0:32:13.244
<v Speaker 2>on things. This is again like the more robust, more

0:32:13.364 --> 0:32:17.444
<v Speaker 2>robust betting platforms like Circa, for example, which is known

0:32:17.484 --> 0:32:22.044
<v Speaker 2>for actually taking action from sharp winning players and properly

0:32:22.044 --> 0:32:26.684
<v Speaker 2>doing handicapping or bookmaking I should say, not handicapping. But

0:32:26.804 --> 0:32:28.644
<v Speaker 2>there's this pressure to like offer you eat, to bet

0:32:28.684 --> 0:32:31.084
<v Speaker 2>on everything and have this gicanic menu. It's often a

0:32:31.124 --> 0:32:32.844
<v Speaker 2>false front, right if you try to bet some of

0:32:32.884 --> 0:32:35.244
<v Speaker 2>the weird stuff on DraftKings or FanDuel, then you'll get

0:32:35.284 --> 0:32:39.964
<v Speaker 2>limited right away if you're any good. So keeping things

0:32:39.964 --> 0:32:42.484
<v Speaker 2>simple I think is a lesson here for everybody.

0:32:42.724 --> 0:32:47.964
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, keeping things simple and also potentially potentially limiting in

0:32:48.004 --> 0:32:50.324
<v Speaker 1>the moment things right, Like one of the one of

0:32:50.364 --> 0:32:54.364
<v Speaker 1>the issues with last week's attempt to manipulate the markets

0:32:54.484 --> 0:32:56.804
<v Speaker 1>was it was during the debate, right, they were trying

0:32:56.844 --> 0:32:59.444
<v Speaker 1>to keep those markets open during a very specific window.

0:32:59.884 --> 0:33:02.484
<v Speaker 1>It's like when you're allowed to play sports bets on

0:33:02.604 --> 0:33:06.604
<v Speaker 1>certain outcomes in the middle of a game, and they're

0:33:06.684 --> 0:33:10.124
<v Speaker 1>even you know, in some countries, like the sports bets

0:33:10.124 --> 0:33:12.564
<v Speaker 1>will actually pop up on your screen as you're watching

0:33:12.604 --> 0:33:14.604
<v Speaker 1>a game, and you can, you know, you can place

0:33:14.644 --> 0:33:16.644
<v Speaker 1>bets and you know, we know that if this appeals

0:33:16.644 --> 0:33:19.284
<v Speaker 1>to your djen Hart on some level. But I think

0:33:19.324 --> 0:33:22.724
<v Speaker 1>that especially when it comes to politics, limiting things like

0:33:22.804 --> 0:33:27.924
<v Speaker 1>that and trying to figure out, okay, what what is necessary?

0:33:28.844 --> 0:33:32.684
<v Speaker 1>What is least likely to be manipulated? How do we

0:33:32.884 --> 0:33:35.964
<v Speaker 1>place limits on manipulation? Right? Could it be that, like

0:33:36.204 --> 0:33:38.724
<v Speaker 1>you actually are not allowed to bet ten million dollars?

0:33:38.764 --> 0:33:41.244
<v Speaker 1>Can we Is that? Is that a thing? Or or

0:33:41.324 --> 0:33:42.164
<v Speaker 1>is that like not a thing?

0:33:42.244 --> 0:33:42.324
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:33:42.364 --> 0:33:45.964
<v Speaker 1>Should we allow bets of any size on anything? You know?

0:33:46.044 --> 0:33:49.484
<v Speaker 1>How do we how do we play safely? Well?

0:33:49.724 --> 0:33:52.004
<v Speaker 2>The thing is, there's so much money in elections that

0:33:52.084 --> 0:33:54.724
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and there have, by the way, been so

0:33:54.844 --> 0:33:57.244
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and eight. There are reports of people

0:33:57.244 --> 0:34:00.044
<v Speaker 2>trying to buy John McCain's stock, or buying John mccainstock

0:34:00.124 --> 0:34:03.724
<v Speaker 2>on prediction market platforms back then because it was a

0:34:03.764 --> 0:34:07.324
<v Speaker 2>relatively cheap way to move the media narrative. Right, you

0:34:07.364 --> 0:34:09.884
<v Speaker 2>spend a few thousand bucks and someone writes a story

0:34:09.884 --> 0:34:13.324
<v Speaker 2>about I'll look the smart traders know that McCain is

0:34:13.324 --> 0:34:18.044
<v Speaker 2>searching now on whatever it was back then. You know,

0:34:18.804 --> 0:34:20.804
<v Speaker 2>now that the volumes are more liquid, it's harder to

0:34:20.844 --> 0:34:24.364
<v Speaker 2>do that. You can't really like spend a thousand bucks

0:34:24.364 --> 0:34:25.924
<v Speaker 2>and have any lasting effect.

0:34:26.084 --> 0:34:30.404
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, but you can spend millions and have an effect. Right,

0:34:30.444 --> 0:34:34.844
<v Speaker 1>we did see that they did. Like I said, and

0:34:34.924 --> 0:34:36.564
<v Speaker 1>I just keep going to last week because it just

0:34:36.604 --> 0:34:39.364
<v Speaker 1>happened last week. Right, this is just something that's easily

0:34:39.364 --> 0:34:42.684
<v Speaker 1>accessible to my mind. The two and a half million

0:34:42.804 --> 0:34:46.244
<v Speaker 1>and those few beds did move the markets, right, they did, correct,

0:34:46.284 --> 0:34:48.524
<v Speaker 1>But now, like let's assume it was on something that

0:34:48.644 --> 0:34:52.324
<v Speaker 1>was more more important. I do think that we just

0:34:52.364 --> 0:34:55.364
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out, you know, how do we take

0:34:55.404 --> 0:34:57.844
<v Speaker 1>this into account, How are we aware of this, How

0:34:57.844 --> 0:35:00.404
<v Speaker 1>do we make sure that, you know, we can have

0:35:00.564 --> 0:35:06.884
<v Speaker 1>markets that actually reflect real sentiment opinion, so they do clear,

0:35:06.964 --> 0:35:09.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that they are put your own money

0:35:09.764 --> 0:35:12.324
<v Speaker 1>where your mouth as types of things, as opposed to

0:35:12.444 --> 0:35:14.924
<v Speaker 1>how do I make more money by trying to kind

0:35:14.924 --> 0:35:17.724
<v Speaker 1>of manipulate this for a short period of time, or

0:35:17.764 --> 0:35:20.404
<v Speaker 1>how do I get my preferred candidate to win by

0:35:20.804 --> 0:35:23.884
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting one hundred million in the prediction markets

0:35:24.244 --> 0:35:28.164
<v Speaker 1>on my candidate, moving the narrative, getting those stories and

0:35:28.484 --> 0:35:31.884
<v Speaker 1>actually in a very very tight election where we're talking

0:35:31.884 --> 0:35:34.524
<v Speaker 1>about you know, one point lead here, one point lead there,

0:35:35.804 --> 0:35:38.444
<v Speaker 1>where something like that might actually, as we know, as

0:35:38.444 --> 0:35:41.964
<v Speaker 1>we know with Pokernate, you know, every every little piece

0:35:42.004 --> 0:35:44.284
<v Speaker 1>of a percentage matters when you're talking about it.

0:35:44.564 --> 0:35:49.644
<v Speaker 2>So very it's also very directionally unclear though, why you

0:35:49.684 --> 0:35:52.084
<v Speaker 2>even care that much about the narrative. It's it's not

0:35:52.164 --> 0:35:54.924
<v Speaker 2>clear that it you know, whether it makes people complacent

0:35:55.004 --> 0:35:56.844
<v Speaker 2>or makes people turn out or whatever else, it's not

0:35:57.004 --> 0:36:00.204
<v Speaker 2>entirely clear. That's funny thing true. You've had this funny

0:36:00.204 --> 0:36:03.404
<v Speaker 2>thing where, you know, when Harris, now she's been moving

0:36:03.404 --> 0:36:04.924
<v Speaker 2>back up in the forecast, but a period of a

0:36:04.924 --> 0:36:06.884
<v Speaker 2>week or two ago, when she was moving down in

0:36:06.964 --> 0:36:10.524
<v Speaker 2>the Silver bulletin forecast, you had both Trump and Harris

0:36:10.524 --> 0:36:12.724
<v Speaker 2>citing the forecast. Trump said that Nate still Ryer's a

0:36:12.764 --> 0:36:14.404
<v Speaker 2>pretty smart guy, which is not what he said about

0:36:14.444 --> 0:36:17.484
<v Speaker 2>him four years ago. Meanwhile, the Harris campaign is blasting

0:36:17.484 --> 0:36:19.844
<v Speaker 2>out the forecast and saying, look, we're the underdogs in

0:36:19.844 --> 0:36:22.724
<v Speaker 2>this race, trying to manage expectations. That speaks to the

0:36:22.764 --> 0:36:28.084
<v Speaker 2>different personality types between Democrats and Republicans. But people, you know,

0:36:28.164 --> 0:36:29.684
<v Speaker 2>I think there are a lot of can I use

0:36:29.684 --> 0:36:32.604
<v Speaker 2>this term, a lot of losers out there who are

0:36:32.764 --> 0:36:35.764
<v Speaker 2>mistaken winning the news cycle or yunking on somebody for

0:36:35.844 --> 0:36:38.164
<v Speaker 2>winning the election, and they often have nothing to do

0:36:38.644 --> 0:36:41.844
<v Speaker 2>with one another. You know, the more you can chill

0:36:41.844 --> 0:36:43.564
<v Speaker 2>out and be looking toward the long term what's your

0:36:43.564 --> 0:36:46.244
<v Speaker 2>long term strategy for November, and the better off you

0:36:46.284 --> 0:36:48.524
<v Speaker 2>are than trying to like win the day quote unquote.

0:36:49.084 --> 0:36:55.684
<v Speaker 1>Do we know whether voter turnout is affected by your

0:36:55.724 --> 0:36:59.724
<v Speaker 1>perception of how close the election is versus how well

0:36:59.804 --> 0:37:03.324
<v Speaker 1>your candidate is doing? Because you know, if you think

0:37:03.444 --> 0:37:07.404
<v Speaker 1>back to Hillary Clinton versus Trump, because she was such

0:37:07.444 --> 0:37:10.204
<v Speaker 1>a favorite, even though we know that in your model,

0:37:10.484 --> 0:37:13.204
<v Speaker 1>Trump had a twenty eight twenty eight percent yes correct

0:37:13.484 --> 0:37:17.404
<v Speaker 1>chance of winning that you know that you're less likely

0:37:17.444 --> 0:37:19.244
<v Speaker 1>to vote because you'll say, oh, you know, it doesn't

0:37:19.284 --> 0:37:22.604
<v Speaker 1>really matter that much. Like do we have do we

0:37:22.644 --> 0:37:24.484
<v Speaker 1>have good data on how that works?

0:37:25.244 --> 0:37:28.404
<v Speaker 2>There's data that turnout is higher the closer the polls are.

0:37:29.764 --> 0:37:32.644
<v Speaker 2>Whether that's because of the polls or not is hard

0:37:32.684 --> 0:37:35.204
<v Speaker 2>to know. So yeah, in swing states they tend to

0:37:35.204 --> 0:37:38.844
<v Speaker 2>have holding other factors equal higher turnout. I mean, you know,

0:37:38.884 --> 0:37:42.164
<v Speaker 2>again we don't know how exogenous or indogenous this is. Yea,

0:37:42.284 --> 0:37:44.884
<v Speaker 2>the campaigns spend more in those states and knock on

0:37:44.964 --> 0:37:48.004
<v Speaker 2>more doors, and there's more advertising and the candid's visit

0:37:48.324 --> 0:37:51.884
<v Speaker 2>and all those things. Right, there's more infrastructure. So so

0:37:51.924 --> 0:37:54.204
<v Speaker 2>the causality is hard to know, but there is that

0:37:54.244 --> 0:37:55.004
<v Speaker 2>pattern for sure.

0:37:55.284 --> 0:37:58.404
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, that's where the narratives end up

0:37:58.404 --> 0:38:02.084
<v Speaker 1>mattering a little bit, right, where if we can depending

0:38:02.084 --> 0:38:06.444
<v Speaker 1>on how we can frame the cycle, frame how close

0:38:06.484 --> 0:38:09.964
<v Speaker 1>the election is, who's ahead, who's behind. Potentially, right, it

0:38:10.044 --> 0:38:14.524
<v Speaker 1>might affect a thousand voters, two thousand voters, but sometimes

0:38:14.524 --> 0:38:16.684
<v Speaker 1>that's all you need. I know that in the midterm

0:38:16.684 --> 0:38:22.124
<v Speaker 1>election in Nevada, during which I voted not a not

0:38:22.324 --> 0:38:26.124
<v Speaker 1>a not a secret voted for the Democrats, the Democrats

0:38:27.084 --> 0:38:28.924
<v Speaker 1>ended up carrying some of those seats by a few

0:38:28.924 --> 0:38:31.484
<v Speaker 1>thousand votes. I think it was like two thousand something, right,

0:38:31.524 --> 0:38:35.124
<v Speaker 1>It was like tiny and and that's when you realize,

0:38:35.164 --> 0:38:38.444
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, like it actually does matter exactly how many

0:38:38.444 --> 0:38:42.204
<v Speaker 1>people went out to the polls. Once again, I as

0:38:42.244 --> 0:38:45.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, I am all for prediction markets, I'm for

0:38:45.364 --> 0:38:48.564
<v Speaker 1>betting on outcomes. I just think that, you know, these

0:38:48.564 --> 0:38:51.844
<v Speaker 1>are all really important questions and we should be looking

0:38:51.844 --> 0:38:54.724
<v Speaker 1>at just like you look at Alaska, Alaska, Alaska. We

0:38:54.764 --> 0:38:58.564
<v Speaker 1>should consider edge cases, We should consider these spots where

0:38:58.564 --> 0:39:01.244
<v Speaker 1>it might affect a tiny fraction of people, but that

0:39:01.284 --> 0:39:03.884
<v Speaker 1>tiny fraction is enough in swing states. You know, these

0:39:03.924 --> 0:39:06.284
<v Speaker 1>are these are things that we should talk about still,

0:39:06.604 --> 0:39:09.604
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not very likely. So let's say a

0:39:09.604 --> 0:39:14.764
<v Speaker 1>break and then onto lighter things like air conditioning.

0:39:34.284 --> 0:39:36.884
<v Speaker 2>Some Maria, I've been traveling. I was in London a

0:39:36.924 --> 0:39:39.684
<v Speaker 2>week and a half ago. I was in Wyoming for

0:39:39.804 --> 0:39:42.204
<v Speaker 2>last week's episode. Now I'm in San Francisco. The result,

0:39:42.244 --> 0:39:44.444
<v Speaker 2>I'm like jet lagged in both directions, and it's just

0:39:45.004 --> 0:39:49.324
<v Speaker 2>completely random. When I get hungry. Sometimes I'm like starving

0:39:49.364 --> 0:39:51.244
<v Speaker 2>at like five in the morning, and then not all

0:39:51.284 --> 0:39:54.164
<v Speaker 2>hungry during regular people hours anyway. So I have not

0:39:54.324 --> 0:39:57.644
<v Speaker 2>been in on the gospel your air conditioning situations. I

0:39:57.644 --> 0:39:59.124
<v Speaker 2>just want you to take it away. What is going

0:39:59.164 --> 0:40:01.444
<v Speaker 2>on with your ac Nate.

0:40:01.524 --> 0:40:05.204
<v Speaker 1>You've been to my house in New York, and you

0:40:05.284 --> 0:40:08.124
<v Speaker 1>know that we used to not have air conditioning. We

0:40:08.324 --> 0:40:10.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's an old round stone. We had window

0:40:10.364 --> 0:40:13.284
<v Speaker 1>units and that is how we air conditioned our apartment.

0:40:14.284 --> 0:40:17.444
<v Speaker 1>And you know, New York summers have been getting quite

0:40:17.484 --> 0:40:21.884
<v Speaker 1>hot and quite sticky, and this was just getting more

0:40:21.964 --> 0:40:25.244
<v Speaker 1>and more unbearable. I thought, I was doing something really

0:40:25.284 --> 0:40:28.404
<v Speaker 1>good and finally upgrading our you know, old apartment that

0:40:28.484 --> 0:40:32.724
<v Speaker 1>had window units, two split AC units that get installed

0:40:32.724 --> 0:40:37.244
<v Speaker 1>in the wall. Much more efficient, much nicer. Fast forward

0:40:37.284 --> 0:40:40.364
<v Speaker 1>to today. We weren't there when these units got installed.

0:40:40.604 --> 0:40:42.604
<v Speaker 1>Two of them were great. There are three rooms in

0:40:42.644 --> 0:40:45.524
<v Speaker 1>my apartment. The one in the bedroom not so great.

0:40:46.044 --> 0:40:48.804
<v Speaker 1>There is a pump that will not shut.

0:40:48.524 --> 0:40:49.284
<v Speaker 2>The suck up.

0:40:49.884 --> 0:40:52.884
<v Speaker 1>This is the loudest water pump you have ever heard.

0:40:53.364 --> 0:40:55.324
<v Speaker 2>It's just you imitate it. Can you imitate it?

0:40:56.444 --> 0:40:57.724
<v Speaker 1>Glug glug?

0:40:58.524 --> 0:41:03.444
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, all right, yeah.

0:41:02.684 --> 0:41:05.364
<v Speaker 1>Very good and very loud. And it does it all

0:41:05.404 --> 0:41:07.844
<v Speaker 1>the time, so not just when there's water in it.

0:41:07.884 --> 0:41:09.684
<v Speaker 1>The reason it's so loud is that it does it

0:41:09.724 --> 0:41:13.684
<v Speaker 1>when there's no water at it either. So anyway, completely

0:41:13.724 --> 0:41:17.324
<v Speaker 1>faulty needs to be replaced. Has not been patched up

0:41:17.364 --> 0:41:20.084
<v Speaker 1>because we complained immediately when when.

0:41:20.444 --> 0:41:21.004
<v Speaker 2>We saw this.

0:41:21.164 --> 0:41:25.204
<v Speaker 1>So our bedroom is just one big gaping hole, holes

0:41:25.204 --> 0:41:28.364
<v Speaker 1>in the wall, holes in the ceiling, you know, exposed insulation,

0:41:28.804 --> 0:41:32.204
<v Speaker 1>and this fucking pump which makes it impossible to sleep.

0:41:32.284 --> 0:41:34.884
<v Speaker 1>And so basically there's no ACA in the bedroom. You

0:41:34.924 --> 0:41:38.804
<v Speaker 1>cannot run that thing because it is so damn loud.

0:41:38.884 --> 0:41:41.404
<v Speaker 1>And I honestly, like, I do not know what to

0:41:41.444 --> 0:41:44.284
<v Speaker 1>do because when I told them multiple times that this

0:41:44.324 --> 0:41:46.844
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen, the latest is that it will not

0:41:46.964 --> 0:41:50.604
<v Speaker 1>happen until mid October, by which point I will be

0:41:50.844 --> 0:41:53.044
<v Speaker 1>long gone in Las Vegas, which is.

0:41:52.964 --> 0:41:55.524
<v Speaker 2>My I got right. I got news for Maria, got

0:41:55.604 --> 0:41:57.164
<v Speaker 2>news for you. It gets a little cold, and I

0:41:57.204 --> 0:41:59.204
<v Speaker 2>don't know what boys I'm doing here. It gets cold

0:41:59.244 --> 0:42:00.804
<v Speaker 2>by October. Who cares about our conditioning?

0:42:01.724 --> 0:42:04.124
<v Speaker 1>No one cares about a sea by October. But we

0:42:04.164 --> 0:42:06.724
<v Speaker 1>do care about the fact that our walls and ceilings

0:42:06.764 --> 0:42:10.964
<v Speaker 1>are wide open and the insulation and it is completely exposed.

0:42:11.324 --> 0:42:15.884
<v Speaker 1>And we live in on the top floor of a

0:42:15.924 --> 0:42:20.044
<v Speaker 1>tiny walk up, so this actually does matter because the

0:42:20.044 --> 0:42:23.924
<v Speaker 1>insulation in this building ain't the best. So Nate, like,

0:42:24.084 --> 0:42:27.044
<v Speaker 1>I honestly do not know, Like, what is my plus

0:42:27.164 --> 0:42:30.164
<v Speaker 1>EV move? What am I supposed to do to try

0:42:30.204 --> 0:42:34.564
<v Speaker 1>to get this AC installed as quickly as possible and

0:42:34.684 --> 0:42:36.324
<v Speaker 1>just get this work done.

0:42:36.564 --> 0:42:38.244
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's some case where they kind of have you

0:42:38.324 --> 0:42:40.564
<v Speaker 2>by the tail. I was gonna say, of the balls,

0:42:40.604 --> 0:42:41.684
<v Speaker 2>but I don't want to genderize it.

0:42:42.484 --> 0:42:44.404
<v Speaker 1>They they can have you buy the balls. I'm cool

0:42:44.444 --> 0:42:44.644
<v Speaker 1>with it.

0:42:45.484 --> 0:42:47.724
<v Speaker 2>Uh Yeah, it was in a TSA situation. So the

0:42:47.764 --> 0:42:50.524
<v Speaker 2>TSA doesn't always like it when you bring your podcasts

0:42:51.204 --> 0:42:55.044
<v Speaker 2>equipment through the planet. They don't like your mics or whatever, right,

0:42:55.084 --> 0:42:56.804
<v Speaker 2>and so there was just like long line. There was

0:42:56.844 --> 0:43:00.164
<v Speaker 2>some guy who decided to bring a knife, like a

0:43:00.404 --> 0:43:03.644
<v Speaker 2>dual sided knife in his carry on luggage, which you know,

0:43:03.724 --> 0:43:06.444
<v Speaker 2>some German fellow. That seems like a pretty bad idea

0:43:06.524 --> 0:43:09.724
<v Speaker 2>at a major commercial airport. Has caused a big delay,

0:43:09.724 --> 0:43:11.244
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, I could complain about this, but that's

0:43:11.244 --> 0:43:13.964
<v Speaker 2>just gonna make it worse, right, there's no saying nothing

0:43:14.404 --> 0:43:17.084
<v Speaker 2>is the only plus EV play in that situation. I

0:43:17.124 --> 0:43:19.204
<v Speaker 2>think if they have you by the balls, then you

0:43:19.364 --> 0:43:20.124
<v Speaker 2>got to you gotta.

0:43:20.244 --> 0:43:22.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think they kind of have us by the balls,

0:43:22.284 --> 0:43:24.564
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's really nothing that I can do and

0:43:24.604 --> 0:43:26.604
<v Speaker 1>it but it's awful. I feel like I should be

0:43:26.644 --> 0:43:29.404
<v Speaker 1>able to do something like maybe get someone else to

0:43:29.404 --> 0:43:31.284
<v Speaker 1>finish it, but then that someone else is going to

0:43:31.404 --> 0:43:33.924
<v Speaker 1>charge you know, another another arm and a lug to

0:43:33.924 --> 0:43:36.884
<v Speaker 1>do the replacement work and fix this. And I just

0:43:37.484 --> 0:43:39.644
<v Speaker 1>it's very rare for me to be in a situation

0:43:39.684 --> 0:43:43.324
<v Speaker 1>where just it seems like there's no plus EV outcome right,

0:43:43.444 --> 0:43:46.084
<v Speaker 1>Like I just I wanted to do something good for

0:43:46.164 --> 0:43:49.004
<v Speaker 1>the apartment, to make it more livable, and at the

0:43:49.124 --> 0:43:51.124
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, it's a million times worse than

0:43:51.164 --> 0:43:55.884
<v Speaker 1>the situation we had before, and and my decision making

0:43:55.924 --> 0:43:59.124
<v Speaker 1>mind wants there to be a decision calculus that says,

0:43:59.204 --> 0:44:02.084
<v Speaker 1>uh huh, this is the correct branch of the decision tree.

0:44:02.324 --> 0:44:04.284
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like the correct branch, as you say,

0:44:04.324 --> 0:44:06.444
<v Speaker 1>is just saying nothing and hoping for the best and

0:44:06.844 --> 0:44:09.084
<v Speaker 1>trying to be nice, which is what I've done. But

0:44:09.164 --> 0:44:13.044
<v Speaker 1>being nice has gotten me absolutely nowhere so far.

0:44:13.884 --> 0:44:16.684
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes, Maria, there are only negative V moves and you

0:44:16.684 --> 0:44:18.404
<v Speaker 2>have to pick the least negative EV move.

0:44:18.924 --> 0:44:25.644
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I want to do to say.

0:44:25.844 --> 0:44:28.604
<v Speaker 2>Risky Business is hosted by me Nate Silver and.

0:44:28.604 --> 0:44:29.724
<v Speaker 1>Me Maria Kanakova.

0:44:30.084 --> 0:44:33.604
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Isabel Carter. Our associate producer

0:44:33.684 --> 0:44:37.724
<v Speaker 2>is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our engineer is Sarah Bruger. Our

0:44:37.724 --> 0:44:39.644
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:44:39.804 --> 0:44:41.524
<v Speaker 1>If you want to listen to an ad free version,

0:44:41.604 --> 0:44:44.284
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Pushkin Plus for six ninety nine a month.

0:44:44.364 --> 0:44:47.324
<v Speaker 1>You get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.