WEBVTT - Would A Love Drug Be Ethical?

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio. Hey,

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jerry's here too, and this is stuff you should know.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I got no little MOONI joke for this to start.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, let's dive into love drugs.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, Chuck, would you ever take a love drug

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if they were available? No?

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But based on the couple of people that were sort

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 3>of highlighting on who have been researching this kind of thing,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 3>it's definitely something I think has more merit than when

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 3>you just think about quote unquote love drug.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I saw. I think it was a new scientist,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>even some very legitimate science magazine source was saying like,

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>these things are going to be around in ten years.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a group of philosophers, especially an ethicist named

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Julian Savilesque from oh I think he's from Oxford, and

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>then another guy named Brian Erp who I also believe

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is from Oxford. They have kind of been hitting this

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>hard and actually came out with the book called Love Drugs,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>colon the Chemical Future of Relationships. I think in Europe

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it's called Love is the Drug, which is a roxy

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>music reference. If I'm not mistaken, and they're at the

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>center of this whole talk. But one of the cool

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>things about when a philosopher puts a book out there's

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>other philosophers that critique it and interesting like alternative thoughts

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and explanations and stuff like that. And this is no

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>different from anything else. But what Sevillesque and Erp are

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>basically saying is these things are coming and here's how

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they could work, and here's what to look out for

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and how they can help. And that's essentially the basis

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of this episode.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, this comes with some caveats at the beginning,

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>chiefly because they use the word love drug, and that's

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>a that's a term that means a lot of things

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 3>to everybody that you might ask across different cultures, even

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>within the same culture Situationally, love can mean something different

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to to to anybody. So the first thing to kind

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 3>of know is that there's not anyone out there saying like, hey,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>love is just a phenomenon. That's because of the chemicals

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 3>in your brain. Like I think even the most hard

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>hearted philosopher will say, or chemists will say, like, yeah,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 3>there are chemicals that work in the brain that that

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, release all kinds of hormones and things that

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 3>make us feel certain ways, and it factors in, but

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>like there's also this indefinable thing that will never be

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>able to like understand and control through a medication.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think what they're what they're getting at. Then,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>from that point on, so they're saying, yes, we agreed,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>love is not just biochemical, but there are a lot

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of biochemicals involved in the feeling of love, and whatever

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>love is, it's associated with these chemicals. So if we

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can manipulate these chemicals, perhaps we can jack the feelings

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of love up or create love, or strengthen love. That's

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the position they're coming from. And so

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>from that point on, just accepting that love has some

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of biochemical basis to it or signature to it.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>They then moved on to the work of an anthropologist

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>named Helen Fisher, who had dedicated essentially her career to

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>love basically, and she divided love into essentially three parts.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And this sounds really familiar to me. There's no way

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about this before, have we did? It

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>seem familiar to you.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Just feeling that way about you and Jerry and my

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>wife and my daughter.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well let's get to it. Lust. Oh well, never mind,

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>clearly you felt about me and Jerry. Romantic attraction sometimes

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and then attachment, I think is the one you're talking about.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>For sure, those are the three stages. A lot of

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>people will say that those occur in that order. Fisher

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 3>is like, no, it can occur in really any order

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and then fall back out of order and back into order, which,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, I kind of agree with that notion, but

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.119
<v Speaker 3>she does say that, you know, these are the things

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>that package together as what we would look around the

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 3>world at and agree on as romantic love, like a

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>long term love relationship.

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and when you look around the world, it's expressed

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in different ways, sometimes very privately, sometimes there's PDA, like

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just different culturally. But if you strip all that

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff away, you're going to find those three stages essentially,

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or those three parts of that package. Not everybody agrees

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. A psychologist named Lisa Diamond from the UNI

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>University of Utah, which by the way, if you're ever

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>bored and you want to learn about epigenetics, go to

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the University of Utah site. I think I've mentioned this before.

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They have a world class, user friendly epigenetics website. It's amazing.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Lisa Diamond believes in more of a split

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>attraction model, and she says sex and romantic attraction they

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>are independent biologically, they're functionally independent. They don't depend on

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>one another, and therefore Helen Fisher's wrong about this whole

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>thing being a single package.

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and she's got some points, and she can point

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 3>to some studies that seem to back this up. One

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>of which that she cites on the RAG is that

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 3>sixty one percent of women and thirty five percent of

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 3>men have reported that they've experienced infatuation without a need

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>for sex. So that certainly makes sense. But if you

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>look at sex and romance and love in the way

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>that the culture of a lot of the world looks

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>at it, at least that three part chemical formula from

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Fisher carries a lot of common sense weight, I think.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to look at some of these chemicals now,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 3>including at first testosterone and estrogen, of course, which drive

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the libido.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>That's sort of the first bucket.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the last part right right. The next one, Chuck,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>would be the attraction part, or the romantic attraction and

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's associated with a bunch of different ones, dopamine, nouropenephrine,

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which increases arousal and attention, cortisol, which is interesting, but

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it totally makes sense when you think about it. Cortisol

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>stress symptoms include things like racing heart and sweating palms.

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Another one serotonin. Serotonin regulates mood and keeps out intrusive thoughts.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So when there's a dysregulation of serotonin, those things can

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of weep in and you can feel intense, intense

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>feelings and think about nothing else but the person you're

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>romantically attracted to. And you put all those things together,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and you've got the chemistry, the brain chemistry essentially of

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>romantic attraction, the thing that's beyond just lost the thing

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or you want to be with that person.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 3>And when you have that initial attraction and then it

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 3>settles in to just sort of normal relationship status, I

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>guess that puppy love sort of wears off. Those are

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 3>chemical reactions as well. That cortisol that shot up and

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the lack of serotonin, those kind of level off, and

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 3>that's why you level off.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>It's very sad, but it happens.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So what about attachment.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Attachment is oxytocin. That is one that we've talked about

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot on the show. Also one of this very

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>closely related vasopressin, which is the one that males and

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>male mammals at least is most important for bonding. And

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, when you have sexual intercourse or

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe some other kind of intimate contact. Hugs, even a

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 3>good hug, can release some oxytocin, so well other things

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 3>that you can do like hugging kissing other people, and

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>that's when your empathy and your trust and your feelings

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>of safety are really going to ramp up.

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's a big deal. That's how you become attached.

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Right And so evolutionarily speaking, caring for offspring is facilitated

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>by oxytocin in a lot of ways. There's a tremendous amount. Remember,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>oxytocin is like in part responsible for breast milk production,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a huge increase of it during labor and delivery.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a big deal. But it also has to do

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>with pair bonding with mates, the people who come together

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and reproduce to create that offspring. To put it really biologically,

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so there's a question it's not just granted science that

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>humans are pair bonding mammals like say prairie boles, which

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about in a minute, but as insofar as

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we are, the oxytocin has a lot to do with that,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, is what I'm trying to say. So much

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so that people call that the love drug.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, Like if you google love drug, you'll

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 3>probably run across that pretty quickly.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 2>That or ecstasy, yeah, which we'll also get to. So

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the other big caveats.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>And I imagine like every lecture that Sabilesque and Erp

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 3>probably give start off with them saying, by the way,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 3>when we're talking about a love drug or a love potion,

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>we're not talking about what you've seen in movies and

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 3>stories and fairy tales. When like some losers attracted to

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 3>like the hottest person in their class and so they

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 3>spike their drink and all of a sudden that person

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 3>thinks they're gorgeous and that you have a winning person sonality.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 2>They were like, we're not talking about that at all.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 3>There's not a way to do that, and even if

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 3>there was, that's ethically not it's dangerous to even talk

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 3>about something like that. But what we're talking about is

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>people that are in relationships, who are in long term

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 3>partnerships or marriages to use, potentially use these drugs to

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 3>give them some boosts when they need it to and

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>increase those feelings, not necessarily take them back to like

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the puppy love stage, but not not do that, right.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I say, we take a break and we'll come back

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and talk a little more about that. How about that.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's great, We'll be right back.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Chuck. So where we left off, we're basically saying

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that savillsqu and ERP and all of them are like,

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not. You can't create love out of nothing at all,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>as air supply would have put it for these love drugs.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>These again generally hypothetical theoretical love drugs, but you could

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>use them to help people who want to stay together

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>but for one reason or another have lost the attachment

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that they once had that could help people a lot.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what they're pointing to, is like

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the main use of something like a love drug if

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we ever come up with one.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And they'll also say things like, hey, if you

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>think we sound like human monsters for trying to sort

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 3>of regulate or increase these good time feelings by the

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>use of drugs. Like, what do you think happens when

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a married couple this been married for twenty five years

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and are a little sick of each other they go

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>on a sweet, awesome vacation or go out and have

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 3>a couple of drinks together and at a nice dinner.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 3>It's basically the same thing that we're talking about, is like,

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 3>those are things that people are accepting as a way

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to do that in your marriage, and we're just talking

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 3>about doing it in a way that's just a little

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 3>more dialed in and scientific.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. You can take a love drug or you can

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>go to PF Chang's your choice, but the result's gonna

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>be the same. You're gonna fall right back in love,

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>right Yeah, sure, so yeah, that is a question. Though

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like, Okay, well wait a minute, what

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if we're not if humans aren't actually pair bonded, if

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not evolutionarily meant to be monogamous, then it does

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of seem to be at least counter evolutionary to

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>take a drug to stay together. I mean, what if

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that's like, you know, that's a signal that boredom is

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a signal that you need to find a different relationship

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>or move on from the other one. I mean that

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>might be true in some cases, but there's also plenty

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of cases too where people are not functionally able to

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be attached as they want to be to their mates

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in a relationship, say people with autism, people with ADHD.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>They might want to be in that relationship, but they're

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not bringing it like they need to. That's a good

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>example of how of supporting a monogamous relationship essentially, rather

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>than just forcing somebody to stay in by drugging them.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>And also like, even though this might fly in the

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 3>face of evolution, because I think they even say that,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, it seems like evolutionarily, we're supposed to get together,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>have a kid, and stick around together for about four

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>years to get that kid going in life, and then

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 3>that's it, evolutionarily speaking. But they're quick to point out like,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of benefits to long term coupling.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's good for your mental health. You know

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that studies have shown that it can be good for

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>your mental health and physical health and overall well being.

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 3>So and people are doing it anyway, you know, they're

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>not like trying to rewrite this. People are staying married anyway,

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 3>So they're saying, why don't we give people better tools

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 3>in a clinical setting is like part of couple's therapy,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>so they can connect on a level that they haven't

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in a while.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can make a case like, evolutionarily speaking, we

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>should be beating up people who have different hair color

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>than us, but we don't do that because we've agreed

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as modern society that's in the past. Evolutionarily speaking, you

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>can make the same thing for monogamous relationships even if

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we didn't evolve to. Socially speaking, we've decided as humans

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of into that kind of thing, So why

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not use a drug to support that when needed? That's

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying. That's what they're saying.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And also they're pointing out things. These guys make a

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of good points, Yeah, have to say.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And also so does Livia by the way, who helped

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>us out with this one.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Lyvia weight in on some stuff and I thought

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>it was all like super valid and smart. But they

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 3>also point out things like, hey, you know, we're on

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of anti love drugs, Like a lot of

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 3>these SSRIs that people are taking are lowering their sex drive,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe dampening their feelings and sort of dulling their feelings,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 3>which is going to affect their partner. And the medical

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 3>community is like prescribing this stuff to individuals when people

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 3>aren't just individuals. They're in partnerships and marriages where the

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 3>whole family needs to be considered with stuff like this,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 3>and the medical community doesn't look at it that way,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 3>and they should.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And they're using the opportunity and discussing love drugs

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to point out that we should be doing this with

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>other drugs that are already in wide use, like you said, SSRIs,

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like drugs that impact the way that you interact with

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>other people for good or ill. This has to be

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>considered and it should be considered as part of the

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>love drug too, right. I think that's essentially what they're saying.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, as well as like, hey, you don't just

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 3>have to use these drugs to treat a disease, Like

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>why not use these drugs for people that don't have

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>any disease to actually enhance their life in their romantic life.

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge one too, because what they're essentially saying.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I watched a couple of lectures by Brian Erp and

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he kind of really hit on this in one of them.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>He was basically saying, like, we have this a society,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at least American society, we have this really weird dichotomous

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>view of drugs. Right, drugs that are made by pharmaceutical companies,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that are prescribed by doctors aoka, but we only use

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>those to treat maladies. When you start to use those

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>same drugs that are pharmaceuticals and prescribed to improve something

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've already agreed is a good enough baseline, now

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you're entering into the realm of recreational drugs, and we

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>as a society are basically like, we're not cool with

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>recreational drugs. And that's what Sevillski and one of the

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>other points they're taking the opportunity to point. I was like,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make any sense morally ethically. Why would you

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not use something that can improve something that to make

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you happier, to make you feel closer to your mate,

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>even if you're already doing good enough. And I think

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good point too. But the other part

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of that point is there's a concern that we would

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 1>if we start creating love drugs. Then, as a society,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we would expect pharmaceutical companies to come up with some

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>malady that these need to treat or else they're not

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go anywhere, So we need to come up

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with something like hypo lovia or something like that, where

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we're just not that good at loving, so we need

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>these pills. And now all of a sudden we have

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>late like you're not very good at loving. There's a

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>new label for somebody, just because we can't be like

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this in and of itself is a good thing. We

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have to medicalize it.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't take love a cell if you have a

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 3>bad reaction to love a cell.

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>That's a little inside joke for our live show fans, right.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, which we'll be releasing that not too

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>far from now, I would guess.

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, probably end of the year ish fall, late.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Fall, let's see, let's see yeah, late fall.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 3>All right, So you know what kind of drugs are

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 3>we talking about? You know, who knows what's coming down

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the line. If we're looking at what's in front of

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 3>us right now, we can talk about a few things

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 3>we've already talked about. Booze alcohol is a drug, and

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>alcohol is a drug that has already used for this.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>They use this, Sabelescu and you know, and use this

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 3>as an example of like the potential, like, hey, someone,

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 3>it's fine if someone goes out and has a couple

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 3>of drinks on a first date to sort of relax

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>them and make them a little more socially maybe less awkward,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 3>if that's how they might feel. And you know, again

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 3>they're saying, like this is what we're talking about.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>We're already doing it with booze.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that. Yeah, that's a great smart thing

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>to point out, because it's like, oh, okay, well you

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just disarmed me, savillsqu that's a point to you. They

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>also point out that we have sex drugs in rock

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and roll, like viagra is a sex drug taking testosterone

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>low t Ask Frank what's his name, He'll tell you

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the ladies are gonna like it too. These are libido

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>boosting chemicals or erection producing chemicals, and the point of

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>them is to have more or better sex. Right, And

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so Savillsque and ERP and their ilk aren't saying like

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a love drug. They're saying these drugs can help

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>facilitate the things that produce feelings of love, say, like

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the release of oxytocin that comes from sex, so indirectly tho,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>those are already love drugs that are on the market.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Wait, who's Frank so and so.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Frank he's a Hall of Fame MLB slugger from the

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>nineties maybe early two thousands.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, Frank Thomas.

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he does those ads with Doug Flutie.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I've seen those. I forgot about those.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And he does that creepy like she's gonna love it too.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a little creepy, but also like, well they

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 3>got paid for those.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Never mind. Yeah, I was gonna say good for them

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>for like, you know, for taking the mantle of men

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>with low TI, but uh.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 3>So, good for them. So you mentioned prairie vols earlier.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Prairie vols are are great little rascals. They're good comps

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 3>for human behaviors when it comes to mating and bonding

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that. They bond in ways that are

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of like us in our marriages. So they bond

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 3>initially too because of sex, because that oxytocin is released,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of like we do. When they're bonded, they like

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>to spend time with one another. They nest and make

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 3>homes together, they care for their offspring together, they work together.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>They go to the farmers market together.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they go to the farmer's market.

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 3>They buy those light up roses at traffic stops, people

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>buy those.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I thought it was just some sort of ploy

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>for something else.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Like there's you know, a kilo of cocaine in the

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>bottom of that bucket, right, or.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They want you to like come meet their friend the leader.

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, exactly.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Well maybe this I've never bought them, but they've done

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>lab experiments where they have been ministered oxytocin to females

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and then the vasopressin for the males, and it caused

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>them to bond just like they would if they had mate.

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 3>It without mating, and if they block those chemicals, they

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 3>don't form the bonds. So it's kind of you know,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 3>it's not direct, but it's kind of like sitting right

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 3>there saying hello, this works.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean again, prairie rolls are definitely pair

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>bonded species, and humans aren't necessarily, But the fact that

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>all of those brain chemicals do the same things to

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>them that they appear to do to us, that's pretty

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it is a useful model for sure. And oxytocin again,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to keep hitting that because there's a good

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>reason why people call it the love drug. And there's

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>already available on the market intra nasally taken like one

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of those nasal sprays that you squeeze. It's oxytocin. It's

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>available in that form, and it shouldn't cross the blood

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>brain barrier, but it does something. It actually does have

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.719
<v Speaker 1>an effect. Studies have shown like this actually has an

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>oxytocin like effect on the people who use it. They

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think maybe if it doesn't actually cross the blood brain barrier,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>just raises the general level of the oxytocin in your system.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. But from that people have proposed uses of

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>this stuff that's already on the market in ways that

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are not quite love but more kind of tap into

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you can build trust with somebody through

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>oxytocin and that if you dose them with that, they

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>will have to trust you.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 3>And here's the other thing about oxytocin is there have

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of studies on this stuff, kind of

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 3>like the early two thousands is when all this got

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 3>heavily researched. You know, the early beginning of it, and

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those results were, you know, pretty astounding,

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of those studies also can't be replicated now,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 3>so you know, experts are now saying, like, hey, all

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 3>those all those early studies about oxytocin, we really need

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 3>to kind of pump our brakes a little bit, not

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>saying completely discount it, but like let's just do more research.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like some of those some of those uses

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that were proposed that go beyond love. There was an

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Air Force major named David Dethiths who in two thousand

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and seven roe to Master's thesis on using oxytocin spray

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for things like hostage negotiation and riot control to establish

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>immediate like trust with the police or the military or whatever.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course all of this is theoretical, but that's

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Savelesque and ERP and the people that are

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>with them are trying to do. They're saying, like, this

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff could be coming and we need to talk about

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like how it's fraught and how it could be useful.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's a good example of how it's fraught. You

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want people controlling you or making you trust them,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>even though you probably shouldn't just because they've dosed you

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with oxytocin, if that ever really becomes possible.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you know, sablesco will also say, like, you know,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 3>it seems to help out in some positive ways, but

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>also some negative ways, and experts will chime in and say, well, yeah,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 3>but in a very limited way, like introducing this, you know,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 3>in a not a fake way. But I guess what

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>would it be called x genous way to your body.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Just go out and take a hike and do some exercising,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 3>or give someone a hug. And that's about the same

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 3>effect that you're you're going to be getting by introducing it,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, exogenous genously.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exogynously.

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I like that. I like it the first time.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I kind of do too, actually, But the great thing

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about a intrannasal oxytocin sprays you don't have to give somebody.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>A hug, right exactly.

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And then also MDMA we said, is something that comes

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>up a lot when you search love drug and for

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>good reason too. I mean, it does some wacky stuff

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to your brain chemistry, including massive releases of oxytocin, dopamine, neuropinephrine, cortisol, serotonin,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that Helen Fisher was hammering, create lust,

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>romantic love, attachment, all that stuff gets released to varying

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>degrees when you take MDMA. It also makes you grow

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>your teeth like crazy. And so people have said, okay,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this could conceivably be used therapeutically in some form, and

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>especially before it was outlawed in nineteen eighty five, people

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>were already studying it like that. They were using it

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in therapeutic settings like couple's therapy.

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 3>And then when studies come out to say, you know,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 3>when you take MDNA, you're more connected, you're more loving

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to people, There's a greater bond when it comes to

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 3>even like casual conversations. They it seemed like everything seems

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 3>more meaningful. Someone might also say, yeah, but the same

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 3>thing happens when you take methmphetamine. It's just impacting instead

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>of oxytocin, it's impacting dopamine and nora epinephrine. And like

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 3>you said, since eighty five, DNA MDMA sorry, has been

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 3>banned for study in therapeutics, but it is It is

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>still used in different countries a lot of times with

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 3>people at PTSD diagnoses and in couple's therapy to pretty

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 3>great effect.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was reading there's some couple's therapists, kind of

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>rogue couples therapists who are like, I can't tell you

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to go buy MDMA, and I certainly can't tell you

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>where to go buy it, but I can tell you

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that if you have it on you and you show

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>up to this particular place, we're going to be having

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a retreat where you and your wife would be able

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to take this in a therapeutic setting. So people are

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>still trying it, and anecdotally they report, especially compared to methamphetamine,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lasting effect of like the attachment that can

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be produced by MDMA that lasts beyond, you know, the

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>experience of being on MDMA. So it could conceivably be

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>used as such. But I think if there's you know,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if we can isolate oxytocin and you can use that,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I would guess we were probably going to go more

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in that direction than MDMA.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 3>And if you have cash, you might see my office

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 3>manager in the parking lot.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know anything about it.

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Right, Sharky was that the office manager? Yeah, with loads

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of m d m A. Let's take our second break

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back and talk about the opposite of this.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>How about that?

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it all right?

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 3>So back to Sabelescu and herb It's fun to say,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 3>what kind of singing do are they?

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, let's see.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think one of them plays the organ and the

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>other one plays the saxophone. Really low key, mellow stuff.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that sounds pretty good. Okay, all right.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 3>So another thing that they propose, like you mentioned before,

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the break is the opposite of that. Maybe some drugs

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 3>that help you get away from the feeling of love.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's say you're in a relationship that is toxic or complicated,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 3>or even abusive, and you have a hard time leaving

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.479
<v Speaker 3>because you have this attachment that you just can't let

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 3>go of to your abuser or to your toxic friend

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 3>or loved one. And maybe if you are stuck in

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that loop, we can design drugs to give you the.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Courage to get out of that.

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I also saw in one of those lectures that

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>gave some other examples of how this could be useful

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>anti love drug. Essentially, if you're a pedophile seeking help achievement,

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it could be useful for that. If you are involved

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in an incestuous relationship, you don't want to be it

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>could be helpful for that. If you're committing adultery and

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.479
<v Speaker 1>you love the person, but you really love your spouse

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>even more, it could be useful for that. And then lastly,

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if you are selling those electric roses on the side

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of the road, it can help you stop loving your

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>cult leader as well. So there's a lot of other

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>uses for it too that you just wouldn't think of,

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But when you do think of it, you're like, actually,

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be great to have a drug for those

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>people that need that kind of help. And one of

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the other great things about this is that there's no

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>real downside to that. Like there's a there's a lot

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of objections as we'll see to the idea of creating love,

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but how can you object to breaking harmful love? There's

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>really no problem with that. That's kind of like, that's

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>probably the best or least objectionable use of a drug

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with an effect on love, you.

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Know, Yeah, for sure, it's probably no surprise that there's

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of criticism about all of this stuff.

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 3>That was a German ethicist named Savin Niom in twenty

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 3>fourteen that got wind of what Sabellascu and urp're doing.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And they said, you know.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 3>What, I don't even know if this counts if it's

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>essentially synthetic, Like, it's not, it's not real. It's not

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 3>these innate characteristics that people develop in a natural, organic way.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a chemically mediated sort of thing that you're designing.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you could see him being like, Okay, that's

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a that's a pretty obvious objection, but he laid it

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>out pretty well and essentially said, like what this focus

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is on is you know all of the things that

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a loving attachment can produce, like health and lower depression,

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a stable environment for the kids, Like

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>those are the goods that you guys are focusing on.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>What if we stop looking at love like that and

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>look at it as love is intrance good in and

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of itself. It doesn't matter what other great effects it has.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Love itself is good enough. Then if you're producing that chemically,

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>even though you're creating all of these great side effects

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>like stability in the house or you know, just good times,

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still it's not love. You can't say that it's

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's love. That's that's ultimately what his objection is.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's another guy from cal State, a guy named

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Blair, another philosopher who talk about you know, he

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 3>just imagines two people in a relationship, and he's saying, well,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing, though, is one's love for the other

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't depend on the actual true characteristics of that person

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and like who they really are. And like, I hear

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying, urb and sablesco about like, yeah, but

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, romantic dinners it's the same thing, and alcohol

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>is the same thing. But he argues back that, like, yeah,

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.719
<v Speaker 3>but you can't go to romantic dinners every night and

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>just have three or four drinks every night to keep

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 3>that you know, quote unquote genuine love going.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>It's not like a good comp.

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Who can afford to go to PF Chang's every single night.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Not me, man, nobody, not even the owner PF Chang

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>himself couldn't afford that. So there's another objection to what

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Blair and saven Niholm were saying in defense of

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Sevillscue and by a Montreal ethicist named Heishim or Heikim

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Narr Hichim Narr. Hei Chim Narr argues that even if

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just producing something that's not actual love, those side

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>effects that are good are could be enough to keep

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you around so that you are still experiencing all the

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff that that love produces. And so if it's not

0:33:54.600 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>actual love, you could still conceivably appreciate the other person

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and characteristics that make you love them. And so the

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>whole thing kind of becomes hurly burley at that point.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And really, what's the problem. Are you guys just being

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>philosophers being philosophers, I think is what Nar was saying.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's there's definitely a lot of that for everybody

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 3>who is a philosopher, you know.

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sure, that's just the nature of the beast.

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So really they love to argue and put up weird

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>situations to prove their point.

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's just the deal.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 3>There's a bioethicist named Peter Harrison Kelly who went about

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 3>it and arguing it in a little bit different way,

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>which is the notion of something like oxytocin being a

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>love drug. You know, it all depends on this notion

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 3>that that attachment is a feeling, like it's a drive

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>that you have. And he said, I don't think it's

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 3>that that that that's the case. Actually, it's not like, Uh,

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you don't had this drive to constantly feel this way

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 3>toward a person, Like you have these hormones that may

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 3>encourage that, but you already have to have that attachment

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 3>in place to begin with. But I mean, it seems

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 3>like that's kind of what RB and Sabelescu are saying though, right.

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't one hundred percent understand what the issue

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that Harrison Kelly was raising was that Urp and sablesk

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you didn't agree with like you were saying, like they're

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>saying like, yeah, you can't create this out of the blue,

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but you can support it. I guess what he was

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>saying is more he disagrees with Helen Fisher's idea, like

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you were saying that it's a drive, like you can't

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>compare attachment to hunger, Like attachment is its own thing,

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it's separate from all that. So you're not boosting attachment.

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You're boosting the trappings of attachment. The feelings that you

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>get from attachment are being boosted, But don't make any

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>mistake that you're actually boosting attachment itself. Yeah, is what

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, That it's it's more than just some sort

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of biochemical dribe so yeah, in a way, he's certainly

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.479
<v Speaker 1>arguing and at the same time supporting their point.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, I think, I think I agree, that's

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 3>exactly what you're saying. And then you know, of course

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 3>we have to talk finally about the fact that you know,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 3>these kind of things in the wrong hands. You know,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about spiking a drink or something like that

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 3>being just an awful thing to do.

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Conversion therapy.

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I could definitely see this getting into the hands of

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>people who think they could use it to convert lg

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 3>BTQ people like, you know, hey, let's just go put.

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Two people in a room.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Together of you know, put a man and a woman

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 3>there together and give them this drug and see if

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 3>that cures them.

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>That kind of thing exactly. Yeah, there's a lot of

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>ways that it can be misused, and I think Erp

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and Seveleski were criticized as basically saying, like, no, you

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just make sure that you regulate them and make sure

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that the that they're prescribed correctly, and they were definitely

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>called out as naive for suggesting that that's the only

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>way that they would be used. So, yeah, that is

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely something that makes it fraud for sure, I agree, fraud.

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You got anything else about love drugs coming soon? Now?

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It seems like it's coming soon in some way or another.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Yep, for sure. And if you want to know more

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>about love drugs, just wait, I guess, and see what

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 1>happens and see if you can get your doctor to

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:27.479
<v Speaker 1>prescribe them. And in the meantime, it's time for listener mail.

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna call this.

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad I got this email because I've been getting

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 3>this wrong all these years. What with this song title?

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Or I guess the singer?

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey, guys, listen to the episode on Share one of

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned and it was me Chuck working at retail

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 3>at Christmas. It was at the gap and repeatedly hearing

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 3>the song Santa's Got a brand New Bag by James Taylor,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 3>which you know you corrected me in the moment. Obviously

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 3>it's James Brown, he said. James Brown is also incorrect.

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 3>The song is clear and homage to James Brown. It

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 3>is actually by a bunch of white kids from Detroit

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 3>called Bob Seger, and the last heard, Oh wow, yes

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 3>that Bob Seger.

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 2>He says.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 3>The title is socket to me Sanna, and it was

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 3>released in nineteen sixty six on the Cameo Parkway Records label,

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Probably my favorite Christmas song. In twenty eighteen, in anthology

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of Last Heard Singles from sixty six to sixty seven

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 3>was released I believe the first time they've been compiled

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 3>in one place. This is also an unrelated R and

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 3>B funk song. Oh, there is also an unrelated R

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and B funk song called Socket to Him Sanna by

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Joe Chanal circus sixty eight. That's worth a listen. And

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 3>of course James Brown does have a Christmas album with

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 3>some pretty great tunes, and he died on Christmas Day.

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know thousand and six. Yeah, yeah, wow, that

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are some deep cuts. Who is that?

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 3>I didn't even bother looking at any of this stuff up,

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 3>So I hope Kevin Schneider is right. He certainly comes

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 3>across as confidence, so I believed every word.

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Yep, same here, Kevin. Thank you for mesmerizing us with

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>your musical novel. And if you want to be like

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Kevin and mesmerize us, take your best shot. You can

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>send it off to Stuff Podcast at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio for

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts,

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.