WEBVTT - SPECIAL COVERAGE: Trump Hit With $364 Million Fine in NY Fraud Case

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 2>News, breaking news. Here the former President Trump. He has

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>been ordered to pay three hundred and sixty four million

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars for fraud in a New York civil trial. The

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>former president also barred from running his New York company

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 2>for three years, his sons have been barred from serving

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 2>as New York executives for two years, and the defendants

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of the case have lost on all claims in that

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>New York civil fraud trial. Let's now bring in Bloomberg

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>News reporter Greg Farrell, who joins us on the phone,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>and also Bloomberg News legal analyst June Grosso. Greg I

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>do want to.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 3>Start with you?

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>This was this verdict widely expected, especially that three hundred

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and sixty four million dollar figure in general.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, okay, given that the judge had found in favor

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 4>of the age a couple of months ago before the

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 4>actual trial, and some of the comments and observations that

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 4>he made leading up to it, it was clear that

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 4>who's going to hit him fairly hard?

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 2>And what do you make of the like the put

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 2>the scale in the of the defeat on this for us,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>for Trump, because as we know, the president is a

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 2>former president excuse me, has moved much of his life

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to Florida at this point, So does it matter that

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the state of Yeah, go ahead.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.839
<v Speaker 4>A the age was seeing a lifetime ban. He only

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 4>got three years, so that actually went in his favor

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 4>and his sons. They sought a five year ban against

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>running or being an office for a company in New York,

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 4>only two years, so that was relatively light on that front. However,

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 4>the businesses, it's not just as easy as you know,

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 4>carrying up the paperwork and then reconcept, you know, filing

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 4>to establish the same businesses in Florida. That's something that

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 4>has not been resolved yet is whether or not Trump

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 4>will have to as the business cerpertificates will be canceled,

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>whether or not these properties will have to go into liquidation.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 4>So that's not clear from today's ruling. That's that's a

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 4>big you know, to be determined.

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, I want to bring in Bloomberg News legal

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>analyst June Grossa, who's got a thick stack of paper

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>covering the keyboard right now, and she's made her way

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 2>through quite a bit of it.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>June, what are you learning?

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I have not made my way through quite a bit

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. I just went to the back. I went

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to the back to look at what he actually what

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he actually ordered. What Greg said is absolutely true. What

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the worst that could have happened is what

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they call the corporate death penalty, which didn't happen here.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So as Greg said, you know, he is not allowed

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>to do business for three years, his sons for two.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think I'm looking for the part that I

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>found interesting. Now there's a there's already a judge in

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>place as an independent monitor. That judge is going to

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>continue as an independent monitor. And also the court is

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ordering an independent director of compliance be installed at the

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump organization who shall be responsible for ensuring good financial

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and accounting practices, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the court mentioned that there was an appeal. Trump was

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>making an appeal from some of his findings about the

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>license of the company, and he said that you know

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I can't find it right.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, be fair.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I just want to paint the picture for everybody listening

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>right now, literally a stack of.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>What jims it's ninety ninety pages, ninety eight, ninety two.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Not to lie, it's only ninety two.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm impressed with both of you have been able to

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>come up with at this point, Emily take it away.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 5>What does this mean for the election. I'm really curious

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 5>what if there's any implications on this results on question?

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean this unless he was

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>going to, you know, use his own money for the election,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and this will stop him from uh doing that. There

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>really is nothing in this having to do with the election.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the case is that you have to look

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>at for the election or more. The criminal case is

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>one that's been set now for next month in New York,

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the hush money case, and of course the case in

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>DC that now the Supreme Court is deciding whether or

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not to put us have a stay on that decision

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and so put a hold on that case while he

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>appeals it. So, I mean, those are the ones that

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are really have anything to do with his And it's

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not so much that it would stop him from runny.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just that people would be interested and perhaps it

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would matter to people if he is criminally convicted. This

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, you know, so much matters to be

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But they look at it and they think it's the

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump organization, right, you know, they look at it. It's

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about okay, he overstated his income, and the Attorney General said, well,

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that because that's a business records violation,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you have to disgorge the money that

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you got as a result of your lies about your

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>net worth. So I don't think people really that will

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>affect them as much.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I understand that you and and we've seen polling that

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that sort of shows that the criminal cases are certainly

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>more important, Greg, Greg Farrell, I want to bring you

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 2>back in her Bloomberg News reporter Greg Farrell that said

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 2>everything that June said, I understand at the same time,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>it costs a lot of money to run for president. Yes,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and it costs a lot of mone And this is

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a three hundred and sixty four million dollars fine. Here

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 2>is this real money we're talking about, Like.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is real money.

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna have to pay this.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like because we're so used to throwing a

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.679
<v Speaker 4>term billionaire around. Yeah, like everybody he has this unlimited pockets.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 4>But no, And my colleague Arett Larsington an excellent article

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 4>about three weeks ago pointing out like some of the

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 4>dire fiscal straits, you know, in terms of cash access

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 4>to real cash that trum pass. He might have to

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>liquidate some of these buildings just to come up with

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 4>this money. It's not like he has like he's claimed

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 4>that he has four hundred million in cash available. But

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, as we know, just because he claims it

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 4>doesn't mean it's necessarily.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So he's going to appeal this though, Greg, we have

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>no doubt he's going to appeal it. Then he'll have

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to either put up the money plus five percent or

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>get a bond, secure a bond.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 4>It's tough, like good luck to him getting a bond.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 4>It's well known in that community.

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 3>So well, you talk a little bit about that, Greg,

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the challenge there, talk a little bit about that.

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Just that you know, he'd be a difficult guy to go,

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, to give a bond to. He just does

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 4>not have a good reputation in that community. Yes, he

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 4>can appeal it, but you can't just use an appeal

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 4>as an excuse to stop, you know, making a payment,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 4>put it off for several years. So, as June pointed out,

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 4>he'd have to post some of that money, you know,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 4>a good chunk of it I think upfront in escrow.

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And also let's not forget he is appealing the eighty

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>three million dollar e Gene Carrol verdict, So the same

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>thing there, Hill and the last time, the last verdict,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen million dollar. I think it was the first

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Gene Carol verts. He put up the money himself. He

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>put up the money himself. He put up that plus

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent June.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Do we know if the former president is very good

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 2>at raising money? Yes, very very good at raising money.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 2>He's in fact, he used some of his legal challenges

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to raise money from supporters.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Is he a big boom?

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>It has been, Yeah, thank you, Greg, it has been.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Is he allowed June to actually use that money to

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 2>pay these spines?

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Do we know?

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's allowed to pay the fines with it?

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay? Sorry, go ahead, right?

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 4>He had not? Those are campaign those are funds for

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 4>like he could pay for his legal representation. But he

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 4>cannot pay like the damage's reward. That's like off limits.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 2>What about like funding from like a super pac for example,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Could that money go for this?

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it can. But but the thing is

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's all the super pack stuff is very hazy

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and things aren't enforced as much as they should be.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So but I don't think you can pay from a

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>super pack either.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess Greg, what you can tell I'm

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>getting at is is is Trump going to have to

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>open up.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>His wallet here?

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Yes, and I think so absolutely. And that's that's

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the real real pain here is the judge came up

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>at the high end of what the ag asked for.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 4>I think she asked three hundred and seventy million, and

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 4>he got like, yeah, as you said, three hundred and

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 4>sixty four.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 5>So what's Trump's number one priority here? What is he

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 5>doing in the next few hours, in the next few days.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a good question. I think he's probably going

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a press conference at Mara a Lago. I

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's already been scheduled, and he's going to talk

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about this. What he will say, I think is what

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he has been saying in the many press conferences that

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he held all during this New York Attorney General's trial.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 1>He's going to say that this is a witch hunt

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that Letitia James has been after him. Letitia James campaigned

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on getting Trump. And also he's going to say that

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the people in this case, like the Deutsche Banks, the lenders,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>had no complaint here, and in fact, they didn't there

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>weren't any you know, lenders testifying, Oh, we feel really

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>bad because we got swindled. So they said, well we

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>might have charged more. So he's going to say everyone

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>was very happy. Trump is a brand. It was, so

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the same thing. I can't imagine anything.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Different, he Gregor.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring you back in here because one

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>thing that keeps crossing my mind is the way that

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the former president's sons were implicated in this as well,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and that they have been actually banned as well from

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>doing certain things.

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 3>What do we know.

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>About the way that the Trump family is affected by

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>this ruling today.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, according to the trial and the findings of fact,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, the sons in particular, not only unlike Ivanka,

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 4>who was severed from this and is not part of

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 4>this in any way, the two sons were helping to

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 4>run the business for many years until Trump became president,

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 4>and then in fact we're running the business on his

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 4>behalf when he was president. And that's in particular where

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 4>a couple of the charges involving insurance fraud came up

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 4>that they signed off on and were actively involved in

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 4>presenting numbers to the insurance companies that were not, you know, accurate.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 4>They were overstated.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, here's I found the part that I it's

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>about the prior cancelation of the business life licenses. And

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the judge writes that there was partial summary judgment and

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the Appellate Division First Department has stayed this relief the

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>cancelation of business light licenses, penning the final disposition. He said, however,

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>as going forward, there'll be a two tiered oversight, the

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>independent Monitor and the Independent Director of Compliance of major

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>activities that could lead to fraud. Cancelation of the business

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>license is no longer necessary, so he basically took that back.

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I just want to take a break and remind

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>everyone where we are right now, if you're just now

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 2>joining us. The former President Donald Trump and his real

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>estate company suffered a major defeat in New York's civil

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 2>fraud suit over his inflated asset valuations. This after a

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>judge barred the former president from running any business in

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the state for three years and ordered the return of

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and sixty four million dollars in illegal profits.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.479
<v Speaker 2>That verdict Friday by Justice by Justice Arthur Engron in Manhattan,

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 2>is a threat to Trump's real estate empire and is

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 2>the latest legal setback as he campaigns to return to

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 2>the White House. We should notice two eldest sons, Donald

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump Junior and Eric Trump, were also found liable and

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 2>barred from being officers of a company in New York

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>for two years. I want to bring back Bloomberg News

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 2>reporter Greg Ferrell joining us on the phone. Also, we're

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 2>joined by Bloomberg News legal analyst June Grosso here in

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Greg, as we take a

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>step back and think about all of the challenges that

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the former president faces legally, can textualize this one for

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>us and where this sort of falls on the uh,

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 2>just just how bad this is for him and his empire?

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's very bad for his business empire, okay, you know,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 6>and it's more serious I think than a lot of

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 6>us like presumed because criminal is worse than civil, that

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 6>the real danger to him was all these criminal cases.

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 6>But this is, you know, turning out to be far

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 6>more damaging, I think than many of us realized, you know,

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 6>both financially in terms of the public relations hit, in

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 6>terms of the exposureusiness practices being laid out in such

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 6>clear detail. And yes, we all knew about Donald Trump,

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, certainly by the time he became president afterwards,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 6>but this is for all the world to see factual

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 6>findings about the way he operated his business for you know,

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 6>it was only a decade that came under review by

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 6>the ags, obvious, but exactly much longer.

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Greg, we heard your phone ringing. There's a lot going

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 2>on back there. Yeah, we're gonna I'm gonna let you go,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>always ringing.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, sources, sources.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>And not thank you enough for joining us. It's Bloomberg

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>News reporter Greg Farrell joining us on this breaking news

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 2>this Friday afternoon. Still what with us is Bloomberg News

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>legal analyst June Grosser. We're not letting her go quite yet.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>We're also going to bring in Bloomberg Politics contributor Geenie Shanzeno,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>who joins us. Genie, I want to I want to

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>go to you for the politics part of this. Emily

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>asked a great question a few minutes ago about the

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>political effects of this. Does it matter to President Trump

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>supporters that this ruling has come down in the civil

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>fraud trial?

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think the fair answer is, we really don't

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 7>know the evidence we have so far is that on

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 7>all of these indictments and trials, he has been fundraising,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>and as we all know from looking at the polls,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 7>his support has only grown. However, we are now getting

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is all unturned territory politically, but now

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 7>that we are seeing these verdicts come down, it is

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 7>possible that this does negatively impact him, even with his

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 7>core supporters. Because we don't have any test of this

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 7>kind of thing in American history, we really don't know.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 7>We do have some polls which say that if he's

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 7>convicted of a crime that people will not vote for

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 7>him for president, we don't know if that extends to something,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, civil like this. So I don't really have

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 7>a great answer for you on this except to say

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 7>I can't imagine a world and I hope I am

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 7>not being Pollyennish, in which somebody being convicted and indicted

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 7>this much does have a negative impact on their chances

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 7>of being elected president. So I think a fair thing

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 7>to say this is not good news for him in

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 7>any way, but especially politically, because it's not just this trial,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 7>but the cumulative effect of all of these trials, the

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 7>criminal ones which we know are just starting in a

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 7>few weeks in New York and then continuing around the

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 7>country to get the four criminal ones in and of

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 7>course the civil ones are just the beginning.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So I just have to add to this. So he

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>went this week to He's been going to a lot

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of these different court hearings. As he went when the judge,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Judge Mrchahn, said that set the trial date for his

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>New York hush money payment trial for next month. So

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>he went to one in Florida where it was an

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in camera hearing, so it was just the defense team

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>with the judge Aileen Cannon, and he decided to go

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and before that he alerted everybody. He said, I'm back

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in court again. He sent out an context, I'm back

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in court again. I think he's doing well being back

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in court. I think he's campaigning the from the courthouse steps.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>He's convinced his supporters that this is all a witch hunt,

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that for example, classified documents, Well they didn't they didn't

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>go after Joe Biden for classified documents. Why are they

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>going after me for classified doctors?

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Special Council's report last week?

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but you know, right, But I'm just saying I

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think that he does very well, because he campaigns from

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the courthouse and everyone picks up his the stuff that

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he says, where as if he was on the road

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>at a rally, everyone's not going to pick it up.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But when he comes outside the courthouse and says it's

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>very unfair, you know, for example, when he did it

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, when Judge Merschaun set that trial date, he said,

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not fair, this is not justice. So I

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think he does very well. If there's a criminal verdict,

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be different, But a civil verdict,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this is really beyond most people. I think, Oh, he

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>lied about how much money he made. I don't think

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>most people see that as something as bad as a

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>criminal conviction, because it's hard to understand. First of all,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to understand it's about business record.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, and I think perhaps people might I've heard people

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>say the same thing about the covering up the hush

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>money paid to Stormy Daniels, for example, like that, I think,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I've heard the comments that some people might

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 2>find that one frivolous versus the actual criminal charges, because.

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Also in that case those are normally misdemeanors, and Alvin

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Bragg didn't want to bring a case with just misdemeanors,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so he upped it to felonies by hooking it sort

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of to federal charges of election against election law. So

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the problem with that case. It's not

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>just Michael Cohen's going to testify, because you know, the

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors are used to having witnesses with problems testifying, But

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's because of the legal theory behind it that that's

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem. I think that case.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Jennie, come on in here and weigh in on

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>what June said. The idea that the former president is

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 2>energized by campaigning in quotes on the stairs of the

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>courthouses versus being out there on the campaign trail.

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 3>Do you agree with that?

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think he knows he needs the money

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 7>to fund all these cases, and he has been fundraising

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 7>off of this. But I still go back to the

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 7>fact that we are in a situation where people are

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 7>going to have to make a choice if both Joe

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 7>Biden and Donald Trump are the nominees. Between the two

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 7>of them, neither of them are beloved, certainly, but the

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 7>reality is is this race is going to be won

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 7>or lost in the moderate independent middle and six or

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 7>seven swing states where the Bloomberg Morning Console poll has

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 7>been doing their research, and it is really difficult for

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 7>me to imagine that this is a selling point that

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 7>will help get Donald Trump more votes than he had

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty when he lost to Joe Biden. So

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 7>you know, in the short term, yes, he's going to

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 7>try to fundraise off of it. He's going to try

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 7>to make the best of a situation. But by no

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 7>stretch of the imagination do I believe that this is

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 7>a you know, a ticket into the presidential nomination or

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 7>the presidency itself. I mean, this is a man fighting

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 7>for his life, his businesses, and the future of his

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 7>children in courts around the country in both civil and

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 7>criminal cases. And I am hard plasked to believe that

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 7>the American public in the end views this as a

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 7>selling point and a jumping off to the presidency. That's

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 7>why we heard Nikki Haley say today, and she's been

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 7>screaming from the rooftops that this man brings chaos and

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 7>people didn't want it in twenty twenty, and I'm hard

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 7>pressed to believe that they will want it, or more

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 7>of them will want it in twenty twenty four, which

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 7>will put him over the top. So does it help

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 7>his base and potentially you know, get in the nomination.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, maybe, but let's not forget that the nomination's

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 7>likely going to be wrapped up even before the trial

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 7>starts in the Alvin braggcase that you and June were

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 7>just talking about.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 5>What does the Republican Party make of this? What do

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 5>you think how are they going to come out and

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 5>react to this news?

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, if history is any guide, they will support

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump. The statement we just heard from his lawyer

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 7>about a witch hunt will probably be at the top

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 7>of their lips.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 7>The stunning thing is, besides Nicky Haley, very few Republicans

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 7>in elected office have come out and said anything about

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 7>this case in particular, except that Donald Trump is being

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 7>victimized by the New York courts. So I suspect that

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 7>will happen. And to Tim's point, I think you echo

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 7>what we all feel is that this is exhausting. Nobody

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 7>quite can keep track even when you watch it daily,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 7>as to what in case we're talking about when, and

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, this is going to have an impact, a

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 7>cumulative effect on him in the polls, if not in

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 7>the short term, in the long term because it is

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 7>utterly chaotic, in Nikki Haley's words, and exhausting for voters.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Genie, I have some not so great news for you.

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 2>November is still many months away at this point. Oh,

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 2>don't say it, okay, Hey, really appreciate both of you

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>joining us. That, of course is Bloomberg News Legal analyst

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 2>June Grosso here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Also

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>with us this afternoon, Bloomberg Politics contributor Jeanie shan Zeno.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 2>We have with us right now. One of the reporters

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 2>who has been covering this trial, Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg Manhattan

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Federal Courthouse and Legal Enterprise reporter, joins us here in

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Pat, good to see you,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for coming in. I know there's a ton of

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>news today. This trial ended a while ago, right, It's

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 2>been some time that we've been waiting for this decision.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and we also suffered through thirteen weeks of trial testimony,

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 8>so it's been very long. It started in October and

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 8>it went for weeks and weeks and weeks, and they

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 8>finished with testimony in mid December, and then the judge

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 8>camp had everyone come back after Christmas holidays for closing arguments.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 8>We expected this was going to come out earlier. And

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 8>then there was a wrinkle in the case where the

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 8>judge found out that one of the witnesses proffered by

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 8>Donald Trump, the former Trump Organization financial officer Alan Weiselberg.

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 8>He understood that their DA was actually considering prosecuting him

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 8>for perjury.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>I just want to bring a headline forgive me, you

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 2>have not seen this yet, but the Trump fraud verdict

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>exceeds four hundred and fifty million dollars with interest, this

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 2>according to the Attorney General. What's your response to that?

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, this is a penalty that's really significant

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 8>for Trump. He's always apparently it's affecting him in the

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 8>pocketbook where it hurts the most for him. This is

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.959
<v Speaker 8>a lot of money, and it's a lot of money personally,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 8>he's on the hook for more than three hundred and

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 8>fifty million, as well as his sons are going to

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 8>have to pay. And well, the ag, the New York

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 8>Attorney General, had sought a ban from working in New

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 8>York State for twenty five years for life. For him,

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 8>it's three years. But the guy you know, three years

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 8>is three years, so it's all very significant and with

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 8>accrude penalties in all the extras added up, it's a

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 8>lot of money.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Where does it stand to in the context of other

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 5>cases and other fines, like can you put this into context?

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 5>How much money? You know, four hundred and fifty million

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 5>dollars with interest the other three hundred and sixty four

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 5>million dollars. How does that compare to other cases throughout history.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, we just it's a pretty huge rulane for a

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 8>family company, that is, you know, the guy prides himself

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 8>as being this great billionaire who's been a successful businessman,

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 8>who boasted when he was testified that he has four

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 8>hundred million dollars in cash. Now, I don't know whether

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 8>that number was in the judge's mind when he when

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 8>he was trying to factor how much money to penalize Trump.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 8>It's obviously significant as well if you think that this

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 8>comes on the heels. Just a couple of weeks ago,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 8>we have the verdict against Donald Trump. He's been ordered

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 8>by a Manhattan federal jury to pay eighty three point

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 8>three million in the Egen Carol sexual assault case and

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 8>defamation case. This is all adding up and it's a

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 8>and Trump obviously was very concerned about this case because

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 8>he attended it a lot.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, a question that I'm getting over and over again

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>from people who are watching, people who are listening, is

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>they hear about big figures in cases all the time

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that end up not ultimately being paid because they go

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>on appeal. We just had David Weston on with us,

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 2>who who said that, well, in New York is unique

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that he actually does have to put

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>up this money even if he appeals this. Talk to

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 2>me about what happens moving forward and when the or

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>a president will actually have to pony up this what

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 2>more than four hundred million dollars at.

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 8>This point, Well, what will happen in a process by

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 8>appeal he'll have to put up He'll have to get

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 8>a bond. It's almost like a bail bond thing, but

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 8>it's a bond to basically ensure that the money gets

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 8>put like in an escrow account, so it'll get paid

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 8>and it won't get furthered away. But what's interesting, but

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 8>some of those other verdicts that get reduced is those

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 8>are damages verdicts. You know, you think a jury says

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 8>this person's gotten injured by two hundred million dollars in

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 8>a car accident, and it gets reduced down to maybe

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 8>thirty million or twenty million. This is different because this

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 8>is disgorgement. This is penel financial binds. The judges found

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 8>that he improperly profited. So if you think about it,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 8>he sold that Fairy Point golf course in the Bronx

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 8>made a substantial sum of money, hundreds of millions of

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 8>dollars in profit, so that was one of the things

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 8>they cited. He sold the old post office in Washington

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 8>and made a substantial profit. The ages argue that had

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 8>he not gotten these great terms and lied about his finances,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 8>he would have never gotten these great find lending terms

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 8>from lenders like Deutsche Bank, and then he would have

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 8>never been able to buy it, let alone be able

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 8>to flip it over and make it into a luxury

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 8>you know, like the hotel industry. And that's what this

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 8>is different about. It's not like a damage is where

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 8>a jury verdict gets reduced. This is a judge finding

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 8>this is improper profits.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 5>To what extent is the ruling of victory for New

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 5>York Attorney General Leticia James.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 8>It's a huge victory because I mean having attended the trial,

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 8>he was very angry with her, and every day he

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 8>would come out that he attended the trial, he'd have

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 8>a little mini press conference where he'd denounce her. He

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 8>would say that she should be looking for migrants and

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 8>not prosecuting bringing this lawsuit, and there were lots of

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 8>mean exchanges and there was no love lost. Apparently it

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 8>is a victory for someone who who says that she

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 8>wants to hold Trump responsible for what the fraud he

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 8>did on the lenders and insurers.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, pat contextualize this for me, because as of a

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 2>few weeks ago, the president, the former president, excuse me,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>faced ninety one felony.

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Charges in four separate cases.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 2>They range from conspiring to defraud the US and his

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>efforts to overturn the twenty twenty election, this one to

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 2>falsify business records, and then also to cover up hush

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>money paid to an adult film actress. So that's sort

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 2>of the boiler plate, right, Contextualize this one for us

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and where that kind of falls in the other legal

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 2>challenges that he faces.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.719
<v Speaker 8>Well, many legal experts I've spoken to is you know,

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 8>if you think about Donald Trump and who he says,

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 8>he is his whole foundation of his being and his

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 8>resume is based as this basically five star New York

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 8>City developer who brings you these luxury as his son

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 8>called them, sexy buildings. Do you know Trump Tower and

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 8>forty Wall Street, these marquee properties that are you know,

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 8>he is the consummate New York real estate baron. And

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 8>now he's had this huge, basically take down by the

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 8>New York Attorney General. But yesterday he's ordered to go

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 8>to trial in March in five weeks on those thirty

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 8>four accounts of falsifying business records. And you know, it's

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 8>not been a particularly good week. And you can think

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 8>of it that way. Many people who told me it

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 8>says what Donald Trump really cares about is what's his

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 8>bank account and what's in his wallet, and this is

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:35.719
<v Speaker 8>hitting him in the wallet.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 5>We talked a lot about what this means reputationally for

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Trump in terms of will he be able to, you know,

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 5>win the election with all of this news. But I'm curious,

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 5>from your perspective, legally, what does this mean. Is there

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 5>any sort of ruling that would legally bar him from

0:27:54.960 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 5>actually running for president and actually taking office because all

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 5>of these headlines, they don't seem to actually be like

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 5>preventing him from running and potentially winning an election and

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 5>then joining office.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 8>One thing you have to remember is as if he

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 8>gets wins reelection, he could potentially pardon himself and basically

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 8>dismiss those indictments, the federal indictments, So the three federal cases,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 8>the DC federal case, the Washington in Washington.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 6>The.

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 8>Florida case, so he could dismiss those cases. The Manhattan

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 8>DA's case that was the hush money case. He couldn't

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 8>do that. So that still affects his freedom and his

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 8>peril of possibly being convicted. And if he goes to trial,

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 8>this trial could take about apparently could bring us a

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 8>verdict in mid May. And if you think about that,

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 8>and he could get convicted. Some people said to me

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 8>that he'd be a first time offender. And what a

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 8>judge sent in hims to prison. It's like one in

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 8>a third to four years for each count, depending on

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 8>what the judge hears. And then you know, possibly Georgia,

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 8>whatever happens in there in the Fulton County Georgia case.

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 8>But this is one of those cases. He could never

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 8>pardon himself. Because a state charges, you cannot there's no

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 8>federal oversight.

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Pat we have about twenty seconds. What's the next thing

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>that you're watching?

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, and next thing, I'm getting ready for the Trump

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 8>hush money case. So and we will expect an appeal

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 8>out of this ruling today.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And what would dollar figures look like for the

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>hush money case.

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 8>It's not a penalty. It would be he could be

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 8>convicted and go to prison.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's a New York state, that's.

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 8>Inhattan State Supreme Okay, you guys might call it for

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 8>jury duty.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. And you were going to be

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>busy too, so we really appreciate your time. That is,

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of course. Patricia Hurtado, Bloomberg, Manhattan Federal Courthouse and Legal

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Enterprise reporter, joining us here.