WEBVTT - Element Pointe's Dominguez: Market Overvalued (Correct)(Audio)

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Taking Stock with Kathleen Hayes and Pim

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Fox on Bloomberg Radio. Quite a week for the markets.

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Stocks unable to hold on the SMP five hundred above

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>this week and turning and felt going the other way.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a worry about the growth global economy, the Brexit

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>vote coming up on June. Poll that suggests the leave,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the leave vote, the vote to exit the European Union

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is in the lead. And then you've got the bond

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>market rally on fire as these concerns that are hurting

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock market make investors all the more eager to

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>buy safe US treasury paper. Joining us now is Carlos Dominguez,

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>co founder, president and chief investment officer at Element Point Advisors.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>He joins us from Miami UH and he also joins

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>his company, element Point from a long long career on

0:00:54.920 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Alpine Capital. JP Morgan, a man who who

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>has been there and done that for a long time,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>joining us today on Taking Stock. Carlos, welcome, thanks for

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>having me the stock market. What do you think is

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this it for the year? Are we gonna say we

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>had this nice runback up from the lows that you know,

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the stock market crater at the beginning of year whereries

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>over China. Uh we did, we did. Sit here, We're

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna move higher? Are we going to head for another correction? Well, look,

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, I've been around a long time, so

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I respect that in the short term the market could

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>really do anything. And prior to today, uh, you know,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the the rally off of February was quite sharp, the

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>breath was was broadening out, and uh, you know, it

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>remains a pretty unloved market, so I know that, Uh,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of performance anxiety out there, especially amongst

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. So I think in the short term, really

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>anything can happen. However, we're not we're not traders here,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh you know, our immediate intermediate term outlook is

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>very cautious. We think the market here is probably about

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>tend of fifteen percent overvalued, given where we are in

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the economic cycle and uh and where current economic conditions are,

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and specifically, I would say, you know, look at the US,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the use economy is struggling to even you know, sustain

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>anything close to two percent growth. We've got a manufacturing

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>sector that is is showing no growth. We're near full employment,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see a little bit of accelerating wage pressure,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>which is uh pressuring corporate margins and uh, and you know,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>productivity has been very meek. Actually in the first quarter,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>productivity was negative. So uh. You know, when when you

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>take that altogether, it doesn't paint a picture of of

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>being too bullish on stocks in the intermediate term. But

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think you you made reference to it.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the elephant in the room is really what's

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>happening in the in the bond market, especially the global

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>bond market, which is which is portending slow global growth

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>and and an environment where equities will not do very well.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's break this down a bit, because the

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>reality is there, and you say, as you say, your

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>your medium, you're a longer term investor, You're not going

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the wiggles, but you do want to

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>make money for your clients. So at a time like this,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, where do you put your money? What kind

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of stocks do you buy? What do you avoid? Right? So,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, we're multi acid class class investors, but

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>when you look at our specific equity allocation, uh, we

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of we kind of break the world down into

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what we would consider core holdings. Which are you know,

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>names that have sustainable competitive advantage that generally kind of

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>grow in a v over time. They're there the names

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that are widely known such as J and J, General Mills, Pepsi, Fiser,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Honeywells of the world. So though, you know, we have

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an overweight to those names that we call core allocations.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And then um, we also break up you know, by style.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We look at value and contrarian names, and then on

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the other side, on the more aggressive side, we look

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>at what we call growth and momentum names. And in

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the market like this, we tilt heavily towards value and

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>contrarian names. Uh. We also, I should say, have a

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>large overweight to cash. And I know, you know, a

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people won't tell their clients to to you know,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to hold a large cash allocation. But to us, it's

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not only uh the ultimate volatility damperer, but it

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it really serves as UH as an you know, has

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>given us the opportunity to take advantage of volatility in

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the market, should we see it. Bonds, they've got all

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds and a lot of them have slipped into negative territory.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>What about ten jillion dollars worth of bonds around the

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>world with negative yields, and of course you've got sovereign

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got the governments, you've got corporates. Uh, in the

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>US you have nuties which are very popular. What is

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>your position on fixed income? So we we we have

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a i'd say a normal allocation of core fixed income.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Um muni's have have been a large part of our

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>client's portfolio. I think on a relative basis, corporates are

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to look to look a little more interesting. UM

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say where we're a little bit out of

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>consensus is that we're we're a longer duration than you know,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the average advisor would would recommend. And that's just because

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>with US rates tenure at one point six five and

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, ten trillion dollars of sovereign bonds globally

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>trading at negative rates, we think there's there's downward pressure

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>on rates. So uh, you know, we're not afraid to

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>hold to hold bonds here, but obviously you know we

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>balance that with a larger than normal allocation to cash.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So what about some of the alternatives do you play

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in that space? The liquid alts is they're called real

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>estate reads. Any of that I don't I'm not a

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>big fan of liquid alts uh, and uh, you know,

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big fan of hedge funds at this time.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>We do like private equity and UM and we're finding

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in private equity there's also some interesting uncorrelated strategies. There's

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>one in particular that we've been looking at recently. It's

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a fund that Apollo is going to come out with

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>later this year. Uh. This is their third fund. It's

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a life settlements fund, so really just has no correlation

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to the equity market. And that's fund in the prior

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to funds has averaged low double digit net returns to

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the investor. So that that's the kind of stuff that

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seems really interesting to us in this environment. Uh, Commodities anything,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>there very very small allocation to gold. Okay, what about

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>overseas markets, what about overseas developed markets? What about emerging markets?

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So uh, we have a very very small allocation of

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. Actually, the one I like the most which

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we invest through any t F is Russia. Uh, probably

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>because it's the cheapest and most one of the most

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>unloved than cheapest emerging markets out there. And really, given

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>how crude has bounced back pretty sharply rather than you know,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>chase any US sort of exposure to energy, we'd rather

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we'd rather do that through Russia. So that's where that's

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on the emerging mark side. On the international developed side, uh,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we do have some you know, some Europe and Japan.

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I prefer to look for managers that focus more on

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the small and mid cap growth when it comes to

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Japan because I find that, you know, our

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>our U S holdings, which tend to be you know,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very large tap they have, they have a lot of

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>exposure to to those economies anyway, So I don't want

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to I don't want that redundant exposure in our portfolios.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And we do a look through of the names we

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>hold and about six of our revenues come from the

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.119
<v Speaker 1>US and thirty five from abroad. Just a quick comment

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on Apple. It's on my mind because the Developers conference

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>next week and I talk about individual companies, But what

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is your sense of Apple and that kind of stock

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that was in such great favor for a while and

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>now it seems to be flanguished a bit. Well, this

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of environment where I actually want to

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>own a name like Apple. It's generally unloved the you

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>know the slow the slow growth environment where where you know,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone heavy growth phases over. But it's well known, Uh,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot of cash, they're they're returning their

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>cash to shareholders and and the company has shown a

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>history of innovation, so you know, to write them off

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at this stage is I think full of gold. Carl's Dominguez,

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so very much. He's co founder, president, chief

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at Element Point Advisors in Miami. I'm Kathleen Hayes,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Pim Fox is on assignment this afternoon.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Movers and Shakers, the market Clothes coming up on Bloomberg Radio.