WEBVTT - 482 | Mailbag Episode!

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Here at Just Baseball, we have teamed up with betmgm

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for the twenty twenty three MLB season. We'll be using

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>BETMGM lines to make all of our picks, and we'll

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>have special offers for our listeners each week. If you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't signed up for betmgm yet, use code just Baseball

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and you will get up to a one thousand dollars

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>first bet offer on your first wager with BETMGM. Here's

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>how it works. Step number one, download the betmgm app

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and sign up using bonus code just Baseball. Step number two,

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>deposit at least ten dollars and place your first wager

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on any game. Step number three, you will receive up

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to one thousand dollars in bonus bets. If your bet loses,

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>just make sure you use bonus code just Baseball when

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you sign up. Disclaimer twenty one plus to wager. Visit

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>betmgm dot com for terms and conditions. US promotional offers

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>not available in Washington, DC, Mississippi, Nevada, New York, and Ontario.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Gambling problem Call one eight hundred gambler in Colorado, Washington,

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>d C, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, and Wyoming call eight seven seven eight dash

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>hope and why or text hope and why to or

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>six seven three six nine In New York call one

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred next step In Arizona called one eight hundred

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>five two two four seven zero zero. In Kansas and Nevada,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred three two seven five zero five zero.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>In Massachusetts called one eight hundred. Bets Off. In Iowa

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred two seven zero seven one one

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>seven for confidential help. In Michigan, don't forget. If you

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>haven't signed up for bet MGM yet, use bonus coach

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Just Baseball and get your one thousand dollars first bet

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>offer today. Jesus Statia League Crackers bring.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>We will see you to the corner.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome flam Me hangout.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 2>New episode of the Just Baseball Show, and we have

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 2>a rare Thursday edition of the mail Bag. I'm r

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and waiting. He's Peter Apple, And you know, sometimes you

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>got it adjust the schedule for Pete Flaherty. We did that.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 2>The College Baseball The College World Series episode was a banger.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Definitely go check that out. But you and I we

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 2>got to do the mail gag. You and I look

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>forward to this every time we hang up off the

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 2>mail bag episodes. You and I are like, man, that

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>was fun because everybody gives us such good questions, So

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 2>this is no different. You and I get together, We're

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>pumped to do the questions and we got a lot

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 2>of good ones.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Peter, we have a lot of great ones. And this

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>episode is brought to you by bet mgm, the King

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of sportsbooks. Use promo code just Baseball when you sign up.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So when you sign up and deposit into your newly

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>created account, download the bet mgm Sports app on iOS

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or Android or visit betmgm dot com. Plase your first

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>bet off and receive up to one thousand dollars back

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets if it loses. If the bet does lose,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>your bonus bets will be available once the wager is settled.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Call or text one to eight hundred Gambler if you

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have a gambling problem. Must be twenty one plus or

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>older to do it. Yes, this is my favorite episode

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of the week. I also love asking you about the

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Prospect Report, but that's every other Wednesday. But we had

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to fit the mailbag in and we also have to

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>fit in a smidge of time to talk about the

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>best team in baseball, the team who has not lost,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like your favorite team has probably lost in the last

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>eight games. Not the A's, not the Oakland A's, not

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Juggernaut A's, not the A's that I said have

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a slightly below average offense. Let's not forget about that.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 2>You said there must be TV based you are right, yes, yeah,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean you also predicted that they would have the

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>most incredible fan interaction that we've seen in a game ever. Like, no,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>but certainly that game, by the way, was just so

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>much fun. I won't pretend I watched the whole thing,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 2>but the fact that that whole event, what we had

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>going on there, and for those who don't know, like

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>what was the best way to categorize this thing, Peter,

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>It was basically a reverse boycott in the effort of

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Oakland fans to show, hey, we exist. Hey this is

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>a good baseball market. But like anything, like any product,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.559
<v Speaker 2>if the product is trash, the market will not be

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>very eager to you know, go spend money in and

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>go watch or consume or whatever the product may be.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>The product is absolute garbage. We know that I admire

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the A's players for working hard and grinding and competing,

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>but at the end of the day, a lot of

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>these guys probably wouldn't get big leag opportunities elsewhere. That's

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>not the point though. The point is that we saw

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of Oakland A's fans show out in Unison.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 2>What was it twenty eight thousand nearly that showed up

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to this ball on a Tuesday night? Right, was it

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>a Tuesday night?

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Brushintaro Fujinami opener to Hogan Harris taken on Jalen me Well.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Hogan Harris was lights out, by.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>The lights out, seven innings, four hits, one earned, and

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it was so great. They raised a bunch of money

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>for charity, and even the Oakland A's pitched in and

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>said that they were donating all the proceeds that they

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>got from ticket revenue to charity as well. Just a

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>great event and it was actually really good.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Sorry to cut you off, but before

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I forgot that was dope, because I was thinking, the

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>first thing that went into my cynical mind was like,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>oh this this asshole. You know, John Fisher is gonna

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>now profit off of this reverse boycott, Like, screw you.

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna make more off off this game than he

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 2>did in several months. But no, it really is great

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>on the A's for doing that, and that was the

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>right way to approach it, to get back to the

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 2>community that's trying to fight to keep the team while

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>they are still going to probably move the team out.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>It was a nice gesture all things considered. But I

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>just this is just everything that baseball like embodies cliches

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 2>and pull out all the cliches. It was storybook. It

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>seems like it was an episode or a part out

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of like a chapter out of Major League Like it

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 2>just seemed too like, too perfect. And the fact that

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>they've won that game too, the fact that it's in

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the middle of a winning streak, and the fact that

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>they did it against the best team in baseball. Like

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 2>if this was an episode of Ted Lasso or whatever,

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>it would be like you'd be like, oh, okay, yeah,

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>this is very you know, this is very sick comy,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Like this is not really a real thing that would happen,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 2>but it did. They fed off the crowd. The crowd

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>was awesome, and Hogan Harris shoved.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality of the situation. The A's continue to win,

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and fans showed up, and they proved again that it's

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not it's not on us. If you give us a

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>decent ballpark without sewage leaking in, if you give us

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a product on the field that at least when I

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the ballpark, I can imagine a chance at winning.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all they're asking for. They're not asking for a

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dirt payroll. They're not asking for a stadium that's falling apart.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Invest in us. You don't have to spend a ton

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of money. We're not greedy. All we need is a shot,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and you haven't given us a shot all year. So

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>A's fans decided, well, it's in our hands now we're

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this reverse boycott and all the comments on

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>social media when it first started before we saw eventually

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>how well A's fans handled it. And then of course

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>give credit to John Fisher because he did the right

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>thing by donating all that ticket revenue. We found that

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>A's fans they did their job, yep.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And they've done in the past. They've showed up when

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>they win, they show up, you know. And and that's

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>even in that crappy stadium, So it was cool, you know,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's something that even if baseball, you know,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>presumably leaves Oakland, it's something that I think will always remember,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think a lot of Oakland fans will always

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>remember as just a really special ballgame there to beat

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the Rays. Too. But we've got a lot of questions

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 2>to get through. We got seven of them. All seven

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 2>are really fun, kind of ranging of all different topics, Peter,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>and I'm noticing, and you texted me before we started recording,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a deadline slant on the majority of our questions now,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and we're getting there. You think about it's June fifteenth

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>as people are listening to this. By the time we

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>do the next mail bag, it'll be trade season, fully,

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 2>and then if there's a mail bag after that, it

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>would be like right at the deadline. So we're getting there,

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and I understand it, and we're kind of at that

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>point where teams are deciding what their direction is. So

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that kind of leads us into a lot of these questions,

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>and it leads us into the first one, which you know,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I obviously wanted to jump on a Marlins question, not

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>just because I want to talk about the Marlin. They've

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>lost two in a row. I like to hear what

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>you guys have to say about the Marlins, as you know,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you Jack kind of covering the whole league, looking at

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the whole league and your thoughts on it. Similar to

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 2>how you ask us you know about the Yankees, and

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Jack will ask us about the White Sox. But I

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>never asked about the Marlins because they were never really relevant.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>They kind of are now. Kevin Burrow asks trade deadline

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 2>plan for the Marlins question mark, Obviously, we know they

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 2>need catching, but what other positions do you see them targeting?

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 2>And which prospects do you do you find partnering with

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>to make a trade to boost the major league clubs?

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes the translation from social media is a little rough, sorry,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 2>but basically, what the Marlins do, what should their trade

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 2>deadline plan be, and what positions should they upgrade? Obviously

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Kimming recently came out and said that they're surveying the

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>catching market, but like, who isn't what else do you

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 2>see Peter as someone that's you know, obviously not as

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>emotionally attached maybe to the Marlins. Though I've feel like

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I've done a good job of removing myself to a

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>degree there, But as an outsider so to speak, what

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>would be your answer to Kevin's question in terms of

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>what they should do all fill in on the prospect side,

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>but specifically in the big league set, what should they answer?

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>What is the most important area do you?

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important area is putting Jeens Cigar

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, which they have done more and more.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think adding a third basement or a big

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>time bat like that to this lineup would help even more.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a guy in Milwaukee's pretty good. Have

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you heard a Brian Anderson?

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Fuck you no?

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, so we talk about how the Giants, right,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably be willing to part with a couple of bats.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the Giants want a guy like JD.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Davis long term, but you put a guy like that

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Miami Marlins, right, because what are the Marlins

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>always struggling with? Hitting left handed pitching? They've been better

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this season, but again you expect some of that kind

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of to regress back to the mean because normally they're

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>better against right handed pitching. I'd like to see them

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>add a bat like JD. Davis and they just have

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>such a surplus of pitching that they can do again

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>a Luisa Riaz for a Pablo Lopez type deal. I'm

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not saying they're going to do it, but potentially Braxy

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and Garrett for a bat. Right, they don't have to

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>go deep into the prospect ranks in order to get

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a player. They can go to a relative contender and say, hey,

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>blue Jays, you need pitching, we need hitting. Right, we

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about the wit Marrifield type deal from the Blue Jays. Right,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the blue Jays ever since we did that, exactly said that, Sorry,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>who's going nuts?

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I said, he's been going nuts ever since we talked

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 2>about with He's like.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want no, but that that's what I'm saying.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're in a very good spot. They have a

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>prospect surplus that they could potentially trade for for a

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>bat to a non contender. But they also have some

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>decent MLB pitchers that can help a contender right now

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to get a bat. So it's kind of limitless,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like you can kind of do wherever you want. They

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are in a good spot here.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>So they were they would have been in a great spot.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Now there's some interesting wrinkles that I'll throw to you

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>here because I agree. But now, with some injuries and

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>some innings limitations, the Marlins margin for error is a

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 2>little thinner. They can do something, but they better do

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 2>the right thing here. So I think they did the

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>right thing by trading pobwe right, But now you look

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>at what their situation is Uri Perez, it's more of

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a matter of if, not when, or excuse me, a

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 2>matter of when not if. In terms of him getting

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 2>shut down and not shut down for the season. I

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna try to manage his innings so that

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>he can pitch later into the year. But remember this

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this kid, he's twenty years old. He's never thrown more

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>than seventy something innings, so he's already getting there, and

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna want to be very careful with him. I mean,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at the next five, six, seven, eight years

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>with this guy, and you know how special he is,

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 2>So they got to manage his innings. Trevor Rodgers just

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>had a little bit of a set back. He probably

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>could be back back in a couple of weeks, but

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>it was a setback on his other arm, thank goodness.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think he's fine, Johnny Quato's on his way back.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>That's at least a good depth arm there for you.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 2>Edward Cabrera didn't look great, but they're gonna ride Wizardo,

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Cabret Sandy all the way. Jake Eater just threw again.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 2>That's one of their best pitching prospects. Max Meyers out

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 2>for the year, but again he's already throwing and is

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>on his way back. Assuming that you have to get

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>through several months without Yuri, maybe Trevor's not back, get

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 2>and you're waiting for Cuato to come back, you probably

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>got a trade from the minor league surplus or the

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 2>minor league guys that you have, And I guess my

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>question for you is are you sold enough on what

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the Marlins are doing to trade a legitimate building block

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 2>or are you going for more of the low budget

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>move to go get like a JD. Davis Because to me,

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>when you mentioned JD. Davis, that was perfect for me,

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>because you're looking at this team, they're always going to

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>be pitching centric. JD makes a big difference because it's

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>not just adding JD. Davis, it's replacing Gene Segurro with JD. Davis,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>which is like a net extra win. So I would

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 2>almost rather do the smaller move. But have you seen

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>enough to maybe be excited enough to try to make

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a bigger splash and try to make a more aggressive move.

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, I think you already kind of answered

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>your question, right, because if they were to make a

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>bigger splash, they got to trade from a lack of

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>assets per se. Right, Because if they're going to make

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a splash, they have to trade a Max Meyer and

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a Jake Eder or some sort of combination of those

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>guys in order to get that big time bat. And

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>then what that does is that ultimately takes away from

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>your future in starting pitching, which you do have a

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>good amount of. But Sandy's you know, problems have been

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>well documented up up to this point, like Lozardo has

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of had his ups and downs. URI's gonna go

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>down for the season. So if you trade away those

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>big time pitchers, the the lack of depth is going

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to start going all in years. And then when I

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the current team as constructed, Jean Sigar is

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the only real hole. Like the Marlins aren't this star

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>studded team. But when I go around the diamond, I'm

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>not like that guy sucks. That guy sucks. It's catching

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's the Jean Sigura. Yeah, I don't really have

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem with their outfield. I don't really have a

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>problem with their infield outside of him. I don't have

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a problem with their starting pitching. Maybe go get a

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of bullpen arms. But I think if they make

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>small moves within the mar Urgeins, they will be competitive

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. And I think that's a step up from

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>other Marlins teams.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. I think that's I think that's one

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent the move that they should make, especially because

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned if they do trade from Eater or Meyer,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you're going all in on the aforementioned arms, which you

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 2>have often injured Rogers and you have a I would

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>say that Edward Cabrera and Hayess Wizardo are two of

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the most volatile pitchers in baseball right now. We'll like

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>it so which you know, they're great and sometimes they're terrible.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>So from that lens like do you want to go

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 2>all in on that rotation, like you want to have

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of buffer. I think you make a

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>smaller move bolster the catching position, bolster third base and

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 2>just ride the squad out. But I agree, like there's

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>no gaping hole in you get Jazz back, and that's

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>just another bat to add in there as well. So

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on that. I don't think that they

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 2>should do anything crazy. I'd make a smaller move or

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 2>two and just kind of piece together and ride with

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>this team and see what you can do.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>The only issue is there's not a ton of great

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>catching options that are going to be available at the deadline,

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so you might just have to roll with Nick Fortes, which.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Nick Fortes and no, I'm looking at just like upgrading

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 2>from Jacob Stallings, Like just give me like Jon Gomes

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 2>to me would be great. I would take. I don't

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>like Joey Bart, but like, man, that's fine as a

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>second as a second catcher anyone, but Jacob Stallings. I

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 2>think he's actually the worst catcher in Major League Baseball.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>He's up there. I mean, Guardians fans would argue about

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sinino, but that's another for another time.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who's the worst catcher? Just a full hour debate

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you and I could probably do that.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Next question comes from Riley mcelwaine two on Instagram, and

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I know that this is one that you like, Peter,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>if you could put a package together for Shane Bieber

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>in a trade, what would they look like? So first, here, Peter,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>we got to identify a few teams. We've done that

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of episodes prior. I think the more

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that the Guardians struggle now, the more likely it teams

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that they could move him. What do we think the

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Guardians are looking for and what teams do we think

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>will be in on the Guardians is where we'll start. All.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Let you pick the teams and then all kind of

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>add you know, which teams I think can offer a

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 2>package maybe that the Guardians, yeah, I think would like,

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and then we can kind of come together with a conclusion.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>It is so funny, though, because while you're right, the

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Guardians are struggling a little bit, there's still just two

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half games back in the Minnesota Twins for

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the division. But at the same time, we brought up

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the Shane Bieber possible trade proposal before it got announced,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>not because we had some inside source about knowing that

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>he potentially get traded, but that it made sense because

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians have this incredible surplus of starting pitching and

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they haven't signed him to a long

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>term extension yet may put the writing on the wall

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that they're saying, yeah, we could potentially trade Shane Bieber

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>if it meant's getting in an impact type that and

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>among these reports that I'm reading on them, it is

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>becoming increasingly clear that more teams are willing to do

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Pablo Lopez for Luisa Rise type trade. That contenders

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>are willing to say, hey, we'll trade with another contender.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>We need pitching, you need a bat. We got a bat.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We need a bat, you got pitching. Like that kind

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of trade. It's so rare, which is so rare, rare,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>which is getting better. I love those type of trades.

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It feels like fantasy Baseball, right. You don't send some

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>nineteen year old who maybe you've never heard of it,

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, great, are star just left. Now

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to wait a couple years and it may

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>end up going great for you, But sometimes it doesn't.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Like when you do that type of trade, you see

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the returns are immediate. So there's plenty of teams that

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think could not only so we'll go over the

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>contenders that potentially have a lot of bats who need pitching,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and number one, we'll just go by division because there's

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>almost one in every single division. The Baltimore Oriols and

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the Toronto Blue Jays come to my mind first, right,

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>need pitching. They have MLB ready bats. Orioles have more

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of a prospect surplus that they can go to if

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians are more interested. Right, So the Baltimore Oriols

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Toronto Blue Jays first up on my list.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Could the Houston Astros be interested? Right? Luis Garcia goes

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>down Right now, they really only have Hunter Brown, Framber

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Valdez and Christianavier because McCullers it just continues to get

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>piece to and they could really use a guy like

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you have to operate under the assumption

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that mcculors is just not coming back this year really

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>in any major capacity.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And you could consider the Texas Rangers. I wouldn't be

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>shocked about them either, and I would consider the Los

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Angels. So those five in the American League, I

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>would say, are at the forefront. In the National League.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you could put the Braves in there. Do

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna do it? No? Is it worth

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>putting them in there. I think so. I think the

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Phillies could potentially be definitely involved here. The Mets just

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have Steve Cohen, so they're willing to part with assets

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>because they want to compete. Now will they do it? Not?

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>So sure? Should they be in the conversation? Yeah, I

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>think so. Nobody really in the central comes out of me.

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's you could say the Brewers. I just

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really see them buying that like that.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 2>That would blow my mind, and then you could get anything.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>They might go the other way.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Then you could say the Cardinals, right, and we're going

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about them in a little bit, but they'll

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the I don't know if they're buying. I

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're selling. We'll hold pat on them

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at least for this moment, because not only are we

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>unsure if they're buying or selling, even if they were buying,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>we're not sure that they'd part with any assets, but

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>they have such a perfect package that they could do it,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>so we might as well just mention them. The Dodgers

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be included in this discussion. The Diamondbacks should

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>be included in this discussion. Yeah, Andre's maybe, like there's

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of teams who would need Shane Bieber. So

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of those teams, which three shot out at you, and

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>then we could compile a package for those three, and

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then of other teams can say, all right, that's what

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to do in order to get Shane Bieber.

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think. I think you look at the West

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>and the NLS specifically, we could have a good old

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>fashioned bidding war between the Diamondbacks and the Dodgers and

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the Padres, and I think that that I don't I

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 2>want to kind of survey more of the league, but

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 2>when I look at it from this onnes, I could

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>see all three teams being even more interested. Do you

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>remember kind of with Scherzer and Trey Turner, but specifically

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 2>with the whole Scherzer sweepstakes, how the Padres were in

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and the Dodgers kind of topped them at the eleventh hour,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and it made it that much more painful for the

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Padres because not only did you not get Max Scherzer,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 2>you also lost him to your direct competitor. All three

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of those teams can really could really use as Shane Bieber.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 2>As we know, the Dodgers this is as thin pitching

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 2>wise as they've been in some of the youngsters. Obviously,

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Miller looks great, but Kevin Stone doesn't look like

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>he's quite ready. The Padres, you have the most aggressive

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>general manager in Major League Baseball, and you know, they're

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not good right now, but they're they're still good

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>enough to hang around and they're not going to mail

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>it in, especially after sure what they gave up for Soto,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and the system is kind of strengthened up a little bit.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, we know the Diamondbacks that I

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 2>think are almost a perfect trade partner as well, Like

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 2>they can definitely put together a few different packages, and

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Bieber instantly makes that team a legitimate, legitimate playoff contender.

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, they go from regular season Warriors to Okay,

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you got Zach Gallan, Okay, you got Shane Bieber, Okay,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you got Merril Kelly. I'm okay with that three headed

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>monster in the postseason. So those three teams stand out

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the most to me. I don't know if there's anyone

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in the American League side that you know, really really

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>catches your eye, but I got to look at the

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>NLS just specifically.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I put my eggs in the American League

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>East part. I just think that the Orioles and the

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays are both in prime positions to make a

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>deal like this. Right, you look at the Orioles and

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they have plenty of Major league bats. How about Anthony

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Sontander for one, Right, how about Austin Hayes. Like a

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of these guys where we have infield prospects coming up,

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Hyman Taale, guys like that. The Guardians would probably love

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>horhem and Tale, even though he has been striking out

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, but had him and ad Adam Fraser.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Adam Fraser sounds such like a Guardian. But those type

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of players could potentially be included into a deal. And

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not to mention if the Guardians want to dip

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>into the prospect bucket, they say, hey, we need to shortstop.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>We think Jordan Westburg is ready right now. We'd like

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Westburg as a headliner in the Shane Bieber deal.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>And then when we look at the Toronto Blue Jays,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that the Blue Jays don't really have

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>MLB ready bats that I think the Guardians would be

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that interested in, because like, you're not trading Springer, Vladdie

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>or Bashett or Chapman or bar Show I do think.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Blue Jays have been aggressive. There is

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>one way where you can entice the Guardians, I think,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's dangle your really high upside pitching prospects. If

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>they dangled Brandon barryerare baring and Berera, left handed pitcher,

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>first round pick up to ninety eight, he's been a

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>little banged up this year, I wouldn't do it. I

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 2>think that's really aggressive. But the Blue Jays are very

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>locked in on winning now. Barrera is obviously very far off,

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 2>and they have tetam In and those guys are pretty similar.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Guardians, the way they develop pitching. You've

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>got to be licking your chops. If you get an

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to add a pitcher like that to your system,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 2>because it's just an allocation of assets, then you can

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>use all of the other pitching prospects. You have to

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 2>go get a bat another time. That's how the Blue

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 2>Jays would probably have to do it. They'd probably have

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 2>to give up a higher quality prospect than anybody else,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 2>but they could do it. They've got enough of at

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>least if you start with Burrera, you can put together

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>a package with the Orioles. I'm looking at the outfield too,

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>right because you look at the Guardian situation, I think

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>they call up Ryan Rokio and I think he ends

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>up being their guy up the middle with Andre Semenez.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 2>But there's several outfielders you mentioned Santan Dera. But if

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 2>if the Guardians are looking more for control, I don't

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 2>know if Kowser will be available, but they've got several

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 2>other guys. Judd Fabian looks really good right now. They've

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 2>got heston kers Dad, who's been fantastic. Heston kurs Dad

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 2>would be a basically everything they need is hest Kurstad.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 2>He'd be their best power bat right now. So they

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>could really put together something exciting there with Cursed Dad

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and then and to kind of conceptualize.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It, curseed add wouldn't be a better power bat than

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like Jose Ribirez.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, obviously I'm looking at like everybody else like

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 2>he could be. He could develop into, you know, I think,

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 2>a better power bat than basically everybody else, which is

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>which is pretty nuts to say.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I think if you went Cursed Dad and two solid

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 2>fill ins. Sezar Prieto has had a phenomenal year and

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 2>one other solid prospect that could get you two years

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 2>a year and a half of Shane Bieber, no problem,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But let's say the Guardians say we want to compete

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>right now and we don't think that Curse Dad is

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be that difference banker. What if they say

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we need Cursed and Anthony Santan Derek.

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Who that's interesting, there's been swinging it better later.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>He's good. He's he's like one of those MLB ready

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>bats that will help the Guardians immediately. And he's not

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like a huge shrike ut guy fits their model like

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>he he'd be a good hitter in their lineup.

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 2>A free agent after this year and next year.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>We can look that up.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's look that up, because that if he's a

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 2>free agent after this year, I'm in. He's a free

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>agent after next year. That's a lot. It's a lot.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's also Shane Bieber.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 2>It is Shane Bieber. But is it Shane Bieber?

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it's not deep. Maybe it is same Shane Bieber.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>He looks really good last start. He's leading the league

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>in innings pitched. Right now, he's got three to nine.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It's still gonna be the Shane Bieber that throws one

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety five to two hundred and five innings

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at a three four R. It's extremely valuable.

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna be valued at that. So yeah,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I do think Santian Darren Kurstad is a fun deal.

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I like that, and and they don't feel that at all. No,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 2>it sure sound time there swings it. You know, you

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 2>gotta hope someone else steps up in the lineup. Okay,

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Gunnar Henderson stepping up right now, by the way, going

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 2>nuclear nuclear, Yeah, I like that. I like that a

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>lot for both teams.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's good for the Guardians. So now

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the National League West. I'm just kicking

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>out the Padres because I don't even think that they

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>trade wib ready bats right now for a show, and

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>their system is absolutely drained. So I think we focus

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Dodgers and the Diamondbacks because those two teams

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are competing and both needs starting pitching. What do you

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think the Diamondbacks would have to give up? Because I

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>think they could revolve a deal around a Alec Thomas,

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially a Jake McCarthy and then prospects. If you're looking

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Dodgers, maybe a Miguel Vargas could be included

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in a deal. Maybe a Michael Bush. Guys like that.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Immediate help, immediate help to the Guardians offensively.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bush basically instantly would would be able to plug

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 2>into their lineup in some capacity. Uh, Vargas fits their

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>mold really well.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to give up Vargas.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you would probably unless you want to give

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 2>up just a prospect, you know, package, like a really

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>good thing.

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But the Guardians want to do that.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if operating under the assumption that the Guardians want

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 2>big league help in this swap.

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to. If the Guardians were ten

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half back, but they're two and a half back,

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, They're right there. And it's not like the

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Twins are playing good baseball either. The Twins lead this

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>division at thirty four and thirty three. I know the Guardians,

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they got off to a slow start last year. They

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>still see the division within their sights. I think if

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're trading Shane Bieber, it is not for a rebuild.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>They're trading Shane Bieber just because they have so many pitchers,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>just McKenzie comes back and looks pretty good. I know

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>he kind of struggled in his last Star, but he

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was excellent his first start. He's still fantastic. Yeah, Gavin

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams is gonna come up, Tanner, Biby, Logan all and

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we can continue. Right, So, I think we have to

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>look at it from the lens of the Guardians want

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 1>to compete. Now, if you want Shaitane Bieber, you have

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to give us young, controllable bats or a real MLB

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>hitter right now that could potentially be a free agent

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>next year or the year after, and a prospect like

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we did Santander and Heston Kerstad like. It would have

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be Vargas and then probably another piece for Shane Bieber.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And then for the Diamondbacks it's a tough one. Like

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>tel Marte, No they sign him to that extension, that

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be him. It probably wouldn't be a guy like

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rowell would have.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>It would have to be McCarthy and Tom Thomas. But

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 2>both of those guys have struggled, so you'd have to

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 2>attach a better prospect.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy's been better better Yeah, well yeah, yeah.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Vargas, Like Vargas could almost get I think would almost

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 2>be enough on his own, just because he's proven as

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>a big, big batt and has so much control, and

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe you have to attach a prospect, a decent prospect there,

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 2>But that would be a great, a great combination there,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>McCarthy or Thomas like there, getting another like Miles Straw

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>right now, obviously way more offensive upside, but you got

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.719
<v Speaker 2>to attach a pretty good prospect in there too. Than

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm they can do it. They could, They could absolutely

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.959
<v Speaker 2>do it. They could. They could offer a handful of

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>different exciting prospects. It's also wild like Geraldo Perdomo's playing

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 2>out of his mind, So that's a guy that you

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>know now you have in the fold while war is

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna be up. That's obviously an untouchable guy. But other

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 2>than that, you know, they've got a handful of prospects.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that they could attach to one of those

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>big league or quadruple A right now in Alec Thomas,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Jake McCarthy type guys and figure something out. So I

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 2>think the Diamondbacks could put together kind of anything they're

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 2>willing to put together too. But obviously the Dodgers can

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>just outbid anybody, which is the hardest part.

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So who would be that last prospect as we wrap up,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were to combine Jake McCarthy and who for

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber.

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Thinking about it from the lens of like, what would

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>they want from the Arizona Diamondbacks. Obviously you're not trading

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Drew Jones, You're not trading You're not gonna trade loll Or.

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Then Davison Dela Santos is really intriguing, really intriguing talent.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>You're getting Shane Bieber.

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 2>They'd have to attach Davison, Dela Santos and Jake McCarthy. Yeah,

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd say Davison, Dela Santos, Jake McCarthy, and then another

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>like aj Bukovich who's been swinging it really well. Dom Fletcher,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>who looks really good in the upper miners and in

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a little big league cameo, looks really solid.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>They probably want Fletcher. They probably want the guys who

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>can compete.

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, Yeah, I'd say probably Fletcher, Dela Santos, and then

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 2>one of those other outfitters.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a hall, it's a hut. It's Shane Bieber, It's

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieer. We're not we're not trading for Michael Loredzon

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>over here. This is Shane fucking Bieber. You're gonna have

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to give up a lot.

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>It's the ed.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a starting pitcher, the most prized asset in Major

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball, and Shane Bieber is gonna throw you innings

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>like he's a two hundred innings guy. Those are few

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and far between, right. I know this stuff has been declining.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I know he's not the Shane Bieber that won the

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Cy Young in that shortened season, but he's still very good.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And we have a question coming up where he's at

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the top of that list.

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, so we'll get into one more question then

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I got to tell you a little bit about so rare,

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of course, and I got a crazy, crazy tweet at

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 2>me in regards to so rare of one of the

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.959
<v Speaker 2>best lineups I think I've ever seen constructed from our

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 2>guy Tanner Clifton, who's I know, been a long time listener.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>But we'll get one more question in before that. Real quick,

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>you guys, preach how important command is in a picture?

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Can you go more in depth on the difference between

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>command and control and give some examples of pictures who

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 2>have good control and but poor command. That's from z

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Underscore strow fifteen on Instagram. This was a great question

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 2>because this is something that I'm always diving into in

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the prospect world, and it's something that is hard to

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 2>really be able to quantify. In the data you got

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to watch and and see. You can obviously pick up locations,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 2>but it also depends on where the catcher was set

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 2>up in all those things. But before we get into

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>specific examples, command and control, and I see this question

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>brought up a lot, whether it's with a prospect or

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a big leguer. Control is just simply your ability to

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 2>not walk guys. Simply your ability to throw it inside

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>of that imaginary box that we see, you know on television.

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Don't walk guys, That's it. Command is how are you

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 2>hitting your spots are when the situation calls for a

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>fastball in are you running it back over the middle

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 2>too often? Are you, you know, throwing a non competitive

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 2>pitch every once in a while where it's like WHOA

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 2>where did that come from? Really? Are you hitting your

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 2>spots and are you sequencing well? And that's the biggest thing,

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and also usually I would say broader command is over

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 2>multiple pitches. Control. You could see a guy that throws

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 2>his fastball for a strike, doesn't really have a great

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 2>feel for the other pitches, but doesn't walk a lot

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 2>of guys because he can go back to the fastball.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So I have some examples. I don't know if you

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>had any examples off of your mind, Peter, but that's

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of the primer on command versus control.

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no doubt about it. And the way I like

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to look at it is arms right. It's very hard

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to quantify this type of stuff, and you just gotta

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have to watch a lot of baseball. And the way

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at it, watch where the catcher is positioned,

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and watch if that pitcher is hitting the gloff right

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>where the catcher wants to sit. Because there's a difference

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>between throwing a slider in the middle of the zone

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and throwing a slider low and away for a strike.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>That is the difference between control and command. And a

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of guys who I think both have great control

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and great command is a guy like Shane Bieber, who

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I think throws as many strikes as possible, but you

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>don't see the catcher ever move in his mitt. I

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>think at the peak of his powers, Max Scherzer was

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a great example of a guy with elite control, with

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>elite command of the strike zone. A guy I've noticed

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this year who normally has good command of the strike zone,

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can point to other factors. Right, his fastball

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>velocity is a little bit down, the spin rates a

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit down, the shape is a little bit different,

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he's getting hit up a little bit.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>But when I watch Logan Gilbert starts, I feel that

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he still has control. He's not walking guys, but his

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>command of the strike zone doesn't look as good as

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>previous years. You look at a lot of the heat zones,

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of just red in the strike zone. Right.

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He likes to throw that up fastball, but it's been

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>really middle this season. Right, His other off speed pitches

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of leaving middle. It's not bad, you're still

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 1>throwing strikes, but you're not throwing those pitches as out pitches.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You're throwing them right in the middle of the zone.

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And against big league hitters, anybody can hit that. That's

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>what's led I think to his four point three to

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>eight ERA this season. Now, that's just one example. It's

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>not the full scope. It's not oh is command hasn't

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>been good. That's why he's getting hit. There are other indicators.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>He's just the guy who I noticed who I'm used

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to put him, putting it wherever he wants, and he's

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>still throwing strikes, but they're more in the middle of

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.240
<v Speaker 1>his zone, which is a lack of command.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you got it. I think that's a great example

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 2>right there with Gilbert, a pretty fastball heavy guy. So

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 2>you got to be commanding the fastball to set the

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 2>tone for everything else. And my example would actually be

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a you a youngster who can get away with not

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 2>having great fastball command. But I think it's a difference

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 2>between him being more of a number two, number three

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 2>versus number four, number five Bryce Miller. He was able

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to get away with it in the minor leagues because

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about that eighty fastball. Bryce Miller can go

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 2>middle middle and get away with it. But as you

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Peter, in major league baseball, you don't get away

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 2>with as much. That's what made it so remarkable with

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 2>Miller is that he still was getting away with it.

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 2>But that's a guy that you look at. The walk

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 2>numbers are relatively low, but you'll see the home run

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 2>numbers higher. It's a broad brush, but I would say

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you could typically put those guys in the control over

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 2>command bucket. The guys that don't walk a lot of

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 2>hitters but give up a lot of home runs. Those

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 2>are usually the guys that you missed their spots within

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 2>the zone a little bit. And that's exactly you know

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 2>what Gilbert's spend this year, That's what Bryce Miller is

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And there's plenty of other examples. But that was a

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 2>great question because I think a lot of people are

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>always kind of wondering what the big difference is between

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the two, and.

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>A good example of guys with no control and no

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>command are guys like Jack Flaherty of the Saint Louis Cardinals,

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell of the San Diego Padres, Josiah Gray of

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Nationals. And another example of a guy who

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think might be the only player major League Baseball

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>last season who had great command but not a lot

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of control, if that makes sense, was cal quatrill I

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>always felt that cal Quadra was throwing that cutter right

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>outside the zone. It wasn't a strike, but he was

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>getting hitters to chase because it looked like a strike,

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>looked like a strike that wasn't a strike, so he

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't throwing a ton of strikes. His walk rate was

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher if he didn't get those guys

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>to kind of chase slightly outside the zone, but when

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>they did, he allowed a lot of soft contact ended

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up getting that ground balled to get out of the inning.

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>He was He's one of the first guys I've ever

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>watched who doesn't have great control in terms of throwing

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody strikes. But he actually had very good command and

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>there's so many ways to work around.

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 2>It, which is the most like brain numbing twister like

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of all time. But I would agree with quantrills like

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that in that bucket real quick before we get to questions.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 2>The final few questions here reminder to sign up for

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 2>our So Rare League. The link is in our podcast description.

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>It's so much fun. It's fantasy, really just the most

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>fun way possible. You get to pick up your cards,

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 2>get to draft your cards, those players you plug in

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 2>your lineup. Every single week he gets to compete against

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 2>me Peter Jack, and we give away merch to the winners.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I saw. Thank you to those who DM me and

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 2>sent me a screenshot of their line up. Hey, this

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 2>was me that just dominated this week. We will send

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 2>you some merch. We got some new merch on the

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 2>way that we're gonna be putting up on the store

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 2>this week, so you'll get some of the new stuff.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 2>But so rare, so much fun. I play in the

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 2>limited leagues now too, which is you pick up the

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 2>cards for I bought that Kerry Carpenter for seven bucks.

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I bought Michael Lorenzen for three bucks, but then I

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 2>just sporged recently, and you know, bought in Austin Riley,

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 2>which was like eighteen or whatever. And those are really

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 2>fun too. But you don't need to spend a time

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 2>to play with us. You can also draft your team

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 2>for free and enter these competitions for a chance to

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 2>still win prizes. Tanner Clifton reached out to me on Twitter.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 2>He's in first place of all of the leagues, like

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 2>our league obviously, and then the whole league of everything,

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of everyone, all twenty four thousand people. So he would

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 2>get like a legitimately good limited card, which means like

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna if he holds this spot number one, he

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 2>could get like an Austin Riley or somebody better than

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 2>that and a limited card to build out his limited team,

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 2>or he could just sell it for like forty fifty

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 2>bucks or however much that card is that he pulls.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 2>So shout out, Tanner Clifton, he's balling out, send me

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 2>your screenshots. I've enjoyed all the dms I've got. It's

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fun to join the So Rare League.

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Not surprised, Tanner's agoat He's been listening to the podcast

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. It's one of the smartest people alive.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, I would say, are we going to kind

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of take a little credit for that? Right?

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we shouldn't take any credit at all. But Tanner,

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I do really appreciate you. Listen, my friend, and you're

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>killing it and so rare and you can join. The

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>link is in the episode description. It's an absolute no brainer.

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, oh, then you pay nine to ninety

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>nine a month and we know it's a free app.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>We want everyone to join our fantasy Baseball league so

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we can compete and then send you guys free mercha.

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But the easiest ad read I've ever done, because it's

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so much fun and it's just it's a link click

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and you play fantasy Baseball with your boys.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's so fun and again like if you do

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 2>fall in love with it, definitely play the limited competitions

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:45.959
<v Speaker 2>and you can spend some money. But again you don't

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 2>have to, which is the cool part. It's free. Or

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you can dive deeper and be obsessed with it like

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I am so again link in the episode description. Next question,

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a Red Sox related question. Are the Red Sox

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 2>salvageable or is it time to blow it up even more?

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 2>This comes from d book Cards on Instagram. There's a

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 2>reason why I put this question in here, Peter, I

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 2>actually don't want to shit on the Red Sox. I

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 2>actually want to highlight the pieces that are clearly a

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 2>part of what they're building here, and then the pieces

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 2>that they should move. It shouldn't blow it up. There's

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 2>not much to blow up. The guys that are performing

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.800
<v Speaker 2>for you are guys you should keep, and the guys

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that you know I think I have been a little bit

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of a pleasant surprise. Maybe trade them. I think ultimately

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 2>you should be if you're the Red Sox, if you're

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Heine Bloom trading the James Paxtons of the world, sell

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 2>high on him. Pick up a prospect or two. You

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 2>might get a sneaky good you know, return there. Because

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 2>he really good.

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been dominant, he's.

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Been really good, and I will say heine Bloom. The

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 2>one thing that he has done really well is identify prospects.

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 2>He comes from that background, identify prospects and do well

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 2>on those mid level deals. He did really well on

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the Christian Vasquez trade. I loved Emmanuel vale As and

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 2>will you're bray you given that it was a rental

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 2>for Christian Vasquez. I think that's what they should really do,

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 2>and they should focus on next year. There's a team

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 2>that could be good next year. Jaron Duran has turned

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 2>into a legitimate piece. I assume they extend Verdugo, who

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 2>is slumping, but his looks better this year. Ralphaeod Devers

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 2>is about to go nuclear. Trevor Story will be back.

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's as good as what they paid

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 2>him to be, but he's better than what they've got

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 2>out there. I can tell you that Yoshida is a

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>monster with the bat like they've and their catching situation

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 2>is way better than we thought it would be. They

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 2>got to figure out the pitching, They got to find

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 2>more arms, but I don't think they're that far off.

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't strade any controllable pieces, but I would trim

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 2>some of the fat and cash in on some of

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>the rentals or the guys that aren't going to be

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 2>a part of your team two three years from now.

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>From a Yankee fan to a Red Sox fan, we're

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in a gauntlet of a division. This sucks, right, We're

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>in the same boat Red Sox fans. The Yankee fans

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 1>were in the same boat, Like, yeah, the Yankees have

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit better this season, but we're gonna

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>be without Judge for an extended period of time. And

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Jays are just starting to heat up too,

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Orioles are just they win every day and

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even matter. And then the Rays, it's it's

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>headlines whenever they lose a game, like that's the reality

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the situation. And then you have a bunch of teams

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in the West also battling it out, so that classic, well,

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>three teams from the American League East are gonna make

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it is not the case this year. It may end

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>up happening, but it's not nearly as clear as it

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>has been in previous seasons. So as a Yankee fan,

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not very confident about us making the playoffs. And

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox are objectively worse than the Yankees are.

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just a fact, right so, because the

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Yankees are gonna get healthier, and even so, the Red

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Sox are playing really bad baseball. So while the Yankees

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are losing games, the Red Sox are dropping games to

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rockies. But I'm not shitting on the Red Sox

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>because to your point, they can do a lot here.

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian Bao is putting up a very good may and

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>he looks to be a building block for the future

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in this rotation. Absolutely, Whitlock has struck, but you're not

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna trade him. He's twenty seven years old. He's gonna

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>be a guy who you have in your rotation for

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Cutter Crawford, I think, is just a

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>bullpen arm. I bet on him the other day two

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>innings and I was like, holy shit, because his advance

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>ever was really good. His x ero is really long,

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like damn, Like, yeah, he's had some tough starts, but no,

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>he just falls apart in the third inning because that's

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:24.839
<v Speaker 1>what he is. He's a bullpen dome kind of what

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Tanner Hawk is. Like Tanner Hawk could eventually be if

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>he adds a really good new third pitch and is

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>able to get out one side of the plate, like potentially.

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 2>He could be. He could have an e Flin track.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He could have an e Flin track. I wouldn't be

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised at all. So those are your guys. You're moving

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Cutter Crawford to the bullpen, but BeO how Whitlock and

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>then like, I don't know what you're gonna do with

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale, but you have some solid guys in the bullpen.

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You could potentially trade off, but Verdugos Stan Yoshida's staying,

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Devers is staying Cossas is staying outside of that, you

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>can trade some guys, but you can the great The

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox are in a spot where they can still

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>be competitive. Yeah, while selling off because the top half

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of your team is still very good, especially on offense.

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:12.959
<v Speaker 1>That's why they rank eighth and ops as a team

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:13.919
<v Speaker 1>this season, and.

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 2>That's their controllable core. Like though, those are their guys,

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I agree. I think you focus on next year.

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 2>You pick up some good prospects, you make some smaller moves,

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 2>but you don't deplete the team so that nobody's gonna say, oh,

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 2>they're burning it down. But you shouldn't be buying. You

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be like, oh, let's try to put this thing

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 2>together now. Chris Sales out for two months. That the

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 2>only way that this team was finding any successes here

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 2>is if Chris Sale played pitched out of his mind

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and he showed flashes. But obviously he's out for multiple

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 2>months here, so they should just make the smaller moves.

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Trade a Paxton, trade a Bullpen, Armoor two. Maybe someone

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 2>calls on Duval, Trade Duval and call it a day.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Marcella Meyers getting closer. It's already in double there's other

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 2>pieces that don Rafael. I still think it's gonna be

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a big leagu piece for them. They have a little

0:45:58.040 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 2>bit more time to just see what they got there

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and then attack free agency, make a trade or two

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 2>in the offseason for an arm and then really go

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 2>full bore into next year.

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the They're kind of like the American

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>League Giants right now. Right still in a good position,

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:15.840
<v Speaker 1>still have a good core to build around, but you

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>can trade some of those veterans that aren't going to

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the future, recoup assets, be in

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a better position, then trade for the big fish. Once

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>you sign some more free agents next season, and you'll

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be right back in the thick of it. The Red

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Sox have been through this before. They've had last place

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>finishes that then turned into World Series appearances or wins

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the year after. They've done this before, and they could

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially do it again. I would not be surprised to

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>see the Astros the Red Sox competing for a division

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 1>title next year if they follow this plan, if they

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>believe they are buyers, I think that could actually hurt

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>them long term. Yeah, because if you trade big time

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>prospects in order to get that piece. I don't think

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox have the skeleton to compete with some

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of these great team teams.

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I agree, and especially just the pitching. So

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 2>I think they know that too, and and and they'll

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 2>be a good team next year. I do believe that.

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 2>I see it. I see it tracking that way. This

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 2>one's a question for me, But number five is from

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Divas eighteen on Instagram. Who's the biggest boomer Bus prospect

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 2>in the top one hundred right now. The reason why

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I threw this one in here is I wanted to

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 2>talk about Emmanuel Rodriguez, and Emmanuel Rodriguez is by far

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe the biggest boomer Bus prospect I think I've ever seen.

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh This dude, twenty years old Minnesota Twins organization outfielder.

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 2>His numbers look terrible on the surface, but he has

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 2>insane potential. His dude has already hit a ball one

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventeen miles per hour this year. He just

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:47.439
<v Speaker 2>turned twenty. I mean one hundred and seventeen. That's harder

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 2>than Austin Riley. That's harder than some of the most

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 2>impressive power bats in the game. He also is too patient,

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 2>always talking about patient's first passiveness. He's passive chase rate

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of ten percent. So this guy's striking out more than

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 2>he should. But I think it's literally because he's just

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 2>taking too many strikes and then getting himself deep intoccounts

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 2>and then you get a high a umpire that's gonna

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 2>ring you up. There's some things he needs to tweak

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 2>with his swing to get to where he needs to be,

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>but there is nobody in the lower levels walking as

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>much as he does while hitting balls one hundred and

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 2>seventeen miles an hour at his age. Emmanuel Rodriguez of

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the Twins is my biggest boomer bus guy. And then

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I gotta go to Spencer Jones. I was really excited

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 2>about him this year. I'm still very excited about him.

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought that the bust potential would be a little

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 2>bit shorter, like I didn't think he'd be as volatile.

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 2>He's striking out way too much in High A right now,

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 2>but he's also hitting the crap out of the ball.

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 2>He's running well, he looks pretty good in center. The

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.280
<v Speaker 2>approach has to improve. But Spencer Jones with the Yanks

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 2>like as a six foot seven dude, insane swing, insane power.

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 2>If it's if he hits like if his boom is

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 2>top five prospects in baseball, his bust is he never

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 2>hits en off. So those are the two guys, two

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:00.799
<v Speaker 2>outfielders that are my biggest boom robust guys in the

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:01.799
<v Speaker 2>top one hundred.

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Wins and Yankees guys who breed boomer bust guys. Apparently,

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you could throw, sure you could throw Jason

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>di Mingez into that, into that bucket too. Boom is

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a top five center fielder and Baseball Perennial All Star.

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Bust is the carcass of Gary Sanchez, who's now crushing

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it for the Padres, or the carcass of Aaron Hicks,

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>who's also crushing it for the Baltimore Oriols. Great, good job, Yank.

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Good stuff. Next question is a really fun one. I

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 2>got this actually through the through a personal message from

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 2>my bud, my buddy Danny Rodriguez here, so at not

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 2>d rod on Twitter. He said this was a big

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 2>debate with the boys in his group chat, so they

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.479
<v Speaker 2>wanted our thoughts on this. Would you rather have nine

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Schwarber's in your lineup or nine Louisa Rises. So

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the context here Schwarber's been iffy this year. Rise is

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 2>playing at the top of his game, so we're taking

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the peak Schwarber, so when he was clicking on cylinders

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 2>last year, pretty much what he did last year, versus

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 2>what a Rise is doing right now, which means they're

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna get a pretty similar WRC plus, but in the

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:12.839
<v Speaker 2>most opposite ways humanly possible. We're also discarding defense. It's

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 2>just in your lineup, who do you want a peak

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Schwarber or this peak Arias right now, nine of them?

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Which do you want?

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Peter surprises is even a debate. To be completely honest

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>with you, I would take nine Luisa Riaz's over, like

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of players in Major League Baseball, no disrespect

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to Kyle Schwarber, because I have a guy who can

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:36.360
<v Speaker 1>play multiple positions. I have a guy who imagine Luisa

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>ria Is followed by Luis A. Rias. Louis rise is

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>getting Luise Rias over, and then Luisa rise Is getting

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that base hit to score. Luisa Rias Gosharber could shake

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>out three times at the same inning, right if he

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 1>leads off the game with the strikeout and then a

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:52.240
<v Speaker 1>walk and then maybe a home run, Like you maybe

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>have two runs, but there aren't gonna be many outs

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Luisa Rias team. And then when you factor

0:50:57.000 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in defense too, I don't know how good they are

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>on the mount. That might have to be you know,

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some sort of the debate.

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, we're going we're just just the bat, just.

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>My taking the guy who's almost hitting four hundred, or

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:11.280
<v Speaker 1>am I taking the guy who has forty home runs

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time is gonna hit two ten right.

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I know the WRC plus is in peak, Schwarberg gonna

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>be fine. But if I'm building a baseball team, there's

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>no question I'm going with nine Luis Rises.

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 2>So here here's the interesting thing. Luisa Riaz also is

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be near the top in baseball and grounded

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 2>in double plays. So you're going to have that single

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and then the double play, and now you got nobody

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 2>on and two outs. Pretty quickly, Schwarber may strikeout, strike out,

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 2>then the third batter goes deep, the third Schwarberg goes deep,

0:51:44.040 --> 0:51:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and now you got to run. I'm with you. I,

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 2>of course, being the Marlins guy, I'm going to lean Arias.

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 2>But there's an interesting angle of Schwarber walks. He's gonna

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 2>get on base at a similar ish clip, and you

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 2>can get that home run, but.

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Not similar ish like. If we're taking both primes. Schwarber's

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>not putting up a four hundred OVP. Has he ever

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>had a season where he put up near what Luisa

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Rise is doing right now? And if we factor in

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>defense at all, even though defense that's what I preface with,

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh no defense, okay, no defense at.

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 2>All, just the bat, I would say I gotta take.

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Luis Rise, because it's not like like Luisa Rise can

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>hit a home run. He's not gonna hit zero home

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>runs this year right one. He might hit six or

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seven this year. Like I have to take that.

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Schwarber's twenty twenty one three seventy four on base, thirty

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 2>two homers, and then twenty twenty two on base was

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 2>terrible three twenty three, but he had forty six homers.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 2>For the sake of argument, I'll go with the twenty

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty one season one forty five WRC plus. Do you

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 2>have a rise is WRC plus up in front of

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 2>you right now?

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>No, but I can get it in about forty seconds

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:01.840
<v Speaker 1>or less than that forty seconds. I way over value

0:53:01.840 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that would have.

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Been a really slow type.

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Luis a. Riaz's WRC plus in twenty twenty three

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is one forty eight right now, but it's followed by

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a one thirty one last year, like Shover goes through

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:18.919
<v Speaker 1>these ups and downs. So it's also not totally fair

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to that argument we just take the prime year, because

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're just taking the prime year, like no doubt

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking this, Luis Aria is hitting three eighty two,

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>striking up five percent of the time with a one

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>forty eight WRC plus. Yeah, I'll add no defense, but

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm taking that.

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because do you know that there's a facet

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 2>of people out there that would absolutely, oh yeah, analytically driven.

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:43.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's not to bash analytics at all, like, but

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 2>there's there's a lot of people out there that not

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot, I think there's just their louder that try

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 2>to invalidate what Louise Arias is doing. And you know

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 2>say that a bunch of singles is not nearly as

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 2>valuable as plenty of homers. And I think WRC plus

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 2>will will show that there's a lot of different ways

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 2>to kind of slice the apple to create runs. Yeah,

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of different ways to create runs, but

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 2>over the course of an entire season, I'm with you.

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.799
<v Speaker 2>I will take the consistency. I will also take the

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 2>guy that's going to really make pictures grind and no,

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Schwarber's patient and makes pictures grind from that regard, but

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 2>they also has a lot of three four pitch punchies.

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 2>A Rise is never gonna do that. He's going to

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 2>grind it out. There's gonna be times where maybe he

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:27.880
<v Speaker 2>jumps on an early pitch and grounds out is what

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 2>it is. But he's always putting the ball in play,

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and with shift limitations, a Riaz gets the nod. If

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 2>there was no shift limitation, I think Schwarber has a

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 2>stronger case. But I just think it's too it's too

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:45.800
<v Speaker 2>easy for Louis a Riaz to just pick up a

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:48.120
<v Speaker 2>hit every single day for some reason.

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, we think Luise Rise or maybe when

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I say we, I mean me. I think Louise Rise

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is thirty twenty six, you know, like Schwarber's kind of

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not been through his prime and he's passed his prime,

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>because I still think he's he he's swinging in and

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I still think he's at least in the back half

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of his prime, as Luisa Ria is entering his prime.

0:55:06.360 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So last year with the shift, the dude led the

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 1>league in batting average and at a one thirty one

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus will walking more than he struck out right,

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and he hit eight home runs. This year, he could

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>hit six to eight home runs while hitting three sixty,

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:24.759
<v Speaker 1>striking up five percent of the time, and putting up

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a one to fifty WRS plus. That's just if we

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just look at WRS plus creating runs park adjusted Luisa rise.

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>What he's doing right now, getting into his prime, is

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 1>better than what Chober's ever done.

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I agree. And the thing too is in what I

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 2>said when the Marlins got a Rise, and I wrote

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:42.799
<v Speaker 2>this in the piece too, is people are like, Oh,

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 2>he's going into you know, not loan Depot or lone

0:55:45.600 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Depot park.

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna help him.

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 2>That's what I That was my argument. People are like, Oh,

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 2>he's going there. Now, he's gonna have no home runs. Great,

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:54.760
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have a way more doubles, way more singles

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 2>because he has enough power to beat you over the

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 2>head just enough, but so you got to play straight up.

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 2>But he just drops so many little flarees left right, whatever.

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 2>He has so much room to work with out there,

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and I really think that that's what's worked in his favor.

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, I'm with the nine Louise Rises. But

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I do know that there's I want to see, Like

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:15.360
<v Speaker 2>those who are out there, if you're in their YouTube

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.879
<v Speaker 2>comments or whatever or on Twitter, tweet at us make

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 2>your Kyle Schwarber argument, because I agree. I think it's

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty pretty easily arise given what he's doing. But I

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 2>would love to hear the prime Schwarber argument and maybe

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that there's some some good reasoning behind it too.

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be like Philly Cheese Eggs zero six nine

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>saying we're idiots and that Kyle Schwarber would clear Luise

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Rise and I cannot wait to interact.

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Hertz fan two four five, Yeah, Yeah, it's gonna

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 2>be something like that.

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Eagles twenty twenty four sil champs. There they

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are scary.

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 2>The last question, and we had to finish with this

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 2>one right now that we are in June and the

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals hold one of the worst records in MLB, well

0:56:58.160 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 2>teams call about the availability of Paul gold Schmid and

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 2>should the Cardinals look to sell at the deadline or

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 2>retool to gear up for twenty twenty four. That comes

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 2>from Emmett. I hope I say this right McMenemy on Instagram. Yeah,

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 2>it's Emmett McMenamy on Instagram. Okay, I at first shot

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 2>this question down because I was like, no, shot they

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 2>trade Goldie And you said to me more than one,

0:57:20.000 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 2>don't we talk about it? Which is always the best

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:26.479
<v Speaker 2>rebuttal for you know, two podcast planning. Yeah, two guys

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 2>that are planning on, you know, scoping out the podcast

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 2>what they want to talk about. So great rebuttal and

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:37.080
<v Speaker 2>here we are. I think that Cardinals fans are understandably

0:57:37.120 --> 0:57:38.880
<v Speaker 2>losing their goddamn minds.

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>As they shot because it's horrible right now, and I

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 1>understand it's horrible.

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that they should potentially fire Ali mar Maal.

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that they should consider a lot of things.

0:57:48.320 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 2>The one thing they shouldn't consider is trading either of

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the future Hall of famers on either corner. I know

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Goldschman maybe has a little bit more work to do.

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 2>That's not the same. That's not the point here, though.

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Those two guys, even though they're aging, are still playing

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 2>really and Aeronado is already really heating up Goldie is

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Goldie are Do you think the Cardinals can be good

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 2>next year?

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter, of course, of course.

0:58:11.160 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 2>So then why the hell would you trade Paul Goldchman.

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Even if you get a return, it's not gonna be

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a life changing return because he only is one year

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 2>control after this and it's for twenty six million dollars,

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 2>which is a great deal for him. But at the

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, you're not gonna get a haul

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 2>of all halls. It's gonna be a good haul, but

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not gonna be Twan Soto, So why would you

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 2>do that. You're gonna retool and get back to next year.

0:58:32.160 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 2>So first of all, no, you're not training Paul Goldman.

0:58:36.000 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Second of all, we can answer the rest of the question,

0:58:38.200 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Peter if you have anything else to add, But like,

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 2>they should make trades, they should do stuff. We'll talk

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 2>about that to wrap this up, But not trading Paul Goldgman.

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, a quick story and it's about a different team.

0:58:48.800 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm listening to David Cohene on WFN with with

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael ka. I don't know if it's Wfan, it's Michael

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 1>k Show. And he was asked, are you surprised that

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cohen, the owner of the New York Mets, has

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>not fired Billy Eppler or filed fired Buck Showalter. And

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>David Cohn gave a really good answer, and he said,

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cohen knows about random variants that all he can

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do is push his chips in the middle and let

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the poker hand play. Right. He knows that in one

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>hand you could get two aces, in the other hand,

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you could get a seven and a two, but that

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:30.479
<v Speaker 1>there's random variants. He knows that he put a good

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>team on the table and that there's going to be

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>really bad bad step. Sometimes you lose the pocket aces,

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I feel like the Cardinals are doing

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. They're losing with two kings against teams that

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>have pocket aces. They still have a very good team.

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And the reason also about the Steve Cohen thing is

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that David Cone said, Steve Cohen knows about markets that

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they go up and they go down. It's kind of

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the same thing in gambling. This could end up biting

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>me in the ass. We're recording on Wednesday, June fourteenth.

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I bet on the Cardinals today against the San Francisco Giants.

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Descafani for Sean Montgomery. I think the betting market

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is now starting to fall on the Saint Louis Cardinals.

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>As you hear them freaking out, you know, it's rock bottom.

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I even saw that bench clearing kind of incident, even

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>though it's bench clearing like way now.

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>We're so desperate for fights that we call everything bench exactly.

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>When everyone stands up. So the Cardinals stood up out

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the dugout and it created this little fuss, and

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like rock bottom. Now is the point where,

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at least as a betting man, I'm going to start

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy in on the Cardinals right because I think

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this is rock bottom. Twenty seven and forty one as

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we sit here today is rock bottom. Luckily, the Pirates

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>lead the division a couple of games over five hundred.

1:00:57.520 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You're not truly out of it. We talk about with

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians threaty one and thirty five and two and

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a half games out. You are lucky that you're in

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a division where you could compete. Cardinals fans take a

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>good hard look at your roster, and I know it's

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>been terrible, and I know guys have not been performing

1:01:11.000 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>up to expectations, but are you shitting me? It's still

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the better rosters in all of Major League Baseball.

1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is starting pitching. If you are able to

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>trade a Tyler O'Neal, who you could totally do in

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>exchange for a Shane Bieber, and then you're right back

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>into it. Go do that same kind of Cantana deal,

1:01:30.320 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Go do that same kind of Montgomery deal.

1:01:32.280 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>You have all the.

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Pieces to do it, So no, should they blow it up?

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not. But the reason I wanted to talk to

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you about the Goldie thing is I don't think it's

1:01:43.320 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>insanity because and only if they go on more historic

1:01:49.880 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>losing streets, like if we're saying, oh yeah, this is

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>rock bottom. They lose ten in a row, they go

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>five and fifteen over their next twenty games, and they're

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like way way in the cellar and some And you

1:02:01.600 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>get on the phone with a contender that says we

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to give you the freaking world for Paul Goldschmidt,

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>then it's like, all right, he is getting towards the

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>end of his career, even though he is playing great.

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>You need to blow us out of the water. A

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>team says we will blow it you out of the water,

1:02:21.320 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and then some I could understand listening. We say that

1:02:24.720 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>all the time.

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you gotta listen.

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think of the right deal, anyone on planet Earth

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is available, but it has to be the right deal.

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But to answer the question will they trade Paul gold Schmidt,

1:02:33.440 --> 1:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say ninety nine point nine to nine percent

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>chance they don't. But there always is that zero point

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>zero one and we see it in baseball all the time.

1:02:40.600 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So that would be my answer.

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the only move I wouldn't do anything that

1:02:46.280 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>puts the Chips forward any further on this season. I

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>would ride it out. The only move I would make

1:02:51.800 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>would be a Tyler oneil because you know he's not

1:02:53.520 --> 1:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>a part of your long term future. He's only under control.

1:02:55.800 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I think one more year after this year.

1:02:57.360 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Ali Marble hates them and you ad Alli mar right.

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:03.360
<v Speaker 2>John mosey Lock, Yeah, that's the only thing. I might

1:03:03.400 --> 1:03:06.520
<v Speaker 2>fire him. But you look at next year. No matter

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>how bad this season goes, If it's one of those

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>situations where they can't climb all the way out of

1:03:10.320 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 2>the hole that they dug themselves, fine, it's a fresh

1:03:13.200 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>start next year and it's a new hand to continue

1:03:16.200 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>that that metaphor. I still feel good about the Saint

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Louis Cardinals. There's still probably the favorite to win the division,

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're gonna sign somebody on the mound. They're gonna

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.320
<v Speaker 2>do something, so I I and again you're gonna get

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna have Mason win that's gonna be close to

1:03:30.400 --> 1:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>big league ready. You have other pieces that are gonna

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 2>be potentially big league ready, and Jordan Walker hopefully takes

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a step forward and continues to get better and better,

1:03:37.440 --> 1:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>which he's looks better as of late. So I wouldn't

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>do much. I would maybe make that small Tyler O'Neill

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 2>for a decent arm move to try to bolster it

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a little bit this year and see what happens. But

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>this team can be great next year, and I don't

1:03:50.720 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 2>think we'd blink. I think this has been a really

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate year for a lot of reasons. A lot of

1:03:54.200 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>things have gone wrong that we weren't sure about totally

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>why we're not there. But there's been a new catcher

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>that disrupts things. No, yeah, I do think that that's

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a big factor. Cantres is playing the worst baseball he's

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>played in his life. I think he's going to be better,

1:04:04.760 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I really do. I think they've really fucked with his head.

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think that the Cardinals should really do

1:04:10.040 --> 1:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>much at all. Do that one small move, maybe move

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Taler O'Neal and call it a day and see what happens.

1:04:16.320 --> 1:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>You're lucky, You're as you said, Peter, this is the

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>weakest division. It is a joke, and they could find

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a way out of it. If not, the division is

1:04:24.720 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>not going to be that great next year either it'll

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>be a little better. Some of these teams will be better,

1:04:27.680 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>but the Brewers may be weaker. I'm still not fearing

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates yet, not fearing some of these other teams,

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>not even the Cubs. So they'll be fine for next year.

1:04:36.400 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>But don't do anything crazy. I think the Cardinals have

1:04:39.680 --> 1:04:41.680
<v Speaker 2>already learned the hard way of being reactionary.

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Things would have to go horribly wrong, way more horrible

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>than they've already been. And I'm just going to bring

1:04:47.960 --> 1:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it back to a card symbol for a second again.

1:04:51.480 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals are playing blackjack right now, and they keep

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>getting served eighteen. Right, They keep getting a ten and

1:04:58.320 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a eight, and the dealer keeps pulling up a king

1:05:00.880 --> 1:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and an ace. They just keep getting twenty one to death. Right.

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't blow it up when you're getting in eighteen

1:05:06.240 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>every time, right, still a good hand. But they're just

1:05:09.360 --> 1:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>getting crushed. That's what I feel like the Cardinals are.

1:05:11.960 --> 1:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>They just keep getting in poker. You got pocket kings,

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the other guy's pocket aces. You're at the blackjack table,

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you got eighteen, dealers got twenty one. And it sucks.

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>That is the worst place to be in because it's

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like no one go Paul gold Schmidt, Brendan Donovan, w

1:05:32.960 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Edmund Jordan Wall like so many good players.

1:05:36.720 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>On this team added contrast to it. We were nervous

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:43.920
<v Speaker 2>about them being the runaway favorite to win the division.

1:05:44.200 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 2>But nobody was saying this team would be bad. Nobody

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>was saying this team would would be anything but good.

1:05:49.720 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>We thought to be good, maybe not great because of

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the pitching, but good. So I'm with you. I mean,

1:05:55.920 --> 1:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they would have to legitimately lose one

1:05:58.560 --> 1:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred games for me feel like they don't have a

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>shot next year with this core. That's the only one.

1:06:04.520 --> 1:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>How did bet MGM know put them at minus one

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>ten to open the series? Now, how did they know?

1:06:10.040 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I always know, they always know. The only way I

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>am out on the Cardinals for next year is if

1:06:15.160 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>they lose one hundred games. That's really it. That's the

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:20.360
<v Speaker 2>only one. It's the only way that I can't fathom

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:20.680
<v Speaker 2>this team.

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So if they lose ninety nine, you're in no I

1:06:23.880 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to me, then talk to me.

1:06:25.320 --> 1:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Then I'm just going to be real close. It'll be

1:06:27.240 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>real close. I think ninety five plus will probably be

1:06:29.480 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>what it is. Anything else. Before we wrap up I.

1:06:32.760 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Think that'll do it for this episode of the Just

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Show. We will be back on Friday, of course,

1:06:37.480 --> 1:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>hopefully with the three of us. Appreciate you guys all listening.

1:06:41.480 --> 1:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, this episode is brought to you by the

1:06:43.320 --> 1:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>King of sportsbooks, that is bet MGM. Use promo code

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Just Baseball when you download gambling problem called one eight

1:06:49.880 --> 1:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred Gambler or text and then of course twenty one

1:06:52.840 --> 1:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>plus or older. In order to use bet MGM. Definitely

1:06:57.680 --> 1:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>go check out our sobour team absolutely free. You want

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to play fantasy baseball with us, come join us se

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can beat us. The link is in the

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>episode description. But again, the best way to support this

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:09.919
<v Speaker 1>show get yourself some Just Baseball merch. I'm rocking my hat,

1:07:10.280 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>arms rocking his polo. But of course you can win

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>some Just Baseball merch by just getting into our so

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>rare league. And if you don't want to spend a dime,

1:07:17.800 --> 1:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to play fantasy baseball, you don't want

1:07:19.520 --> 1:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to gamble. I don't really know you just like listening

1:07:21.520 --> 1:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts. We'll love you if you could just rate

1:07:24.800 --> 1:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>review five stars, whether it be on Spotify or Apple podcasts.

1:07:28.120 --> 1:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you're watching on YouTube, hit that subscribe button

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and comment I want to see Philly fan four eight

1:07:35.080 --> 1:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>nine say Luisa Rise's ass and Kysh Warber clears him.

1:07:39.160 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to see that in those YouTube comments. And

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>also hit the like button. That's arm I'm Peter with that.

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you,