WEBVTT - Pfizer’s Second Gut Punch Shows Pitfalls of Weight-Loss Pills

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Carol and Tim and we have something new

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and exciting for you.

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Everything you love about Bloomberg Radio is now in your car.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>The new Bloomberg Business App now featuring Apple CarPlay and

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Listen to your favorite Bloomberg Radio stations anytime.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Plus every Bloomberg podcast, the latest news, and more, all

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at the click of a button.

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's free and simple to use. Just download the Bloomberg

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Business App on your smartphone and connect your phone to

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>your car.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg Business App now with Apple CarPlay and Android

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Auto features. Download it free in the Apple App Store

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or on Google Play.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>gloom O Business Finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Shares a.

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Pfizer down more than five percent here their biggest interday

0:00:58.160 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>loss in more than three and a half years at

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>two at Not So Easy turning out a weight loss drug.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And we did have news earlier today Pfizer dropping development

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of a twice daily version of it's a BCD pill.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>There were a bunch of side effects. So let's get

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>to it on the beat with us Bloomberg News health

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>reporter Madison Mueller. She's back here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Brokers studio here with Balley and myself.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 4>So all right, what do we know about this?

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So Pfizer has been developing a twice daily weight

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 5>loss pill and a pill, A pill, a pill. So

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 5>that's which we've talked about before. Pfizer Astrozenica some of

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 5>the drug makers that are not yet in this space

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 5>but want to be, because all of the pharmaceutical companies

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 5>want to be are looking to pills, you know, as

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 5>an inroad into this market. Because there's only one pill

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 5>on the market right now, it's a pill version of

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 5>ozembic and it's not very good for weight loss. So

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 5>this is an opportunity for other drug makers to get

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 5>in this space. And that's what Peiser sees, especially as

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Pfizer has really taken a hit this year as demand

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 5>for its covid product, it's covid shot have sort of faded.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 5>It's looking toward the next big thing, that being weight loss.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Forty three percent this year.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the opposite of Novo, which is up forty nine

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 6>percent in Lily, which is up closer to sixty Right.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're definitely saying a shift in the weight of

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 5>covid to weight loss unintended.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>What's crazy is Pfizer is massive. It's one hundred and

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 2>sixty two billion dollar market cap, and that I get it.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>They're always doing a lot of R and D and

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 2>looking for those you know, blockbuster drugs. Having said that,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>did they really just bet so much on covid that

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>it was going to keep kind of the revenue engine going.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I mean they've they've looked at other infectious

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 5>disease like RSV and and they're investing more in cancer.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 5>But it's just it's not giving the same lift that

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Covid did, and like these weight loss drugs now are

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 5>doing for these other companies. So, you know, and what

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 5>we've seen is the market is reacting so much to

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 5>all of the news about these weight loss drugs. Every

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 5>time there's a new study out, there's ripple effects you know,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 5>to far reaching in weight loss drugs this year, right,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 5>it's just very disruptive, and so to have a negative

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 5>result is something that I mean, the company doesn't want

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 5>to see, investors don't want to see. And that is

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 5>what we saw with this twice daily pill in this study,

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 5>is that the side of there were so many side

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 5>effects that over half of the patients in the trial

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 5>had to stop taking it.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 6>And is this a space they have to be in

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 6>because they still have a single dose daily drug they're

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 6>studying right.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 5>Right exactly, And so that's sort of what they're pinning

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 5>their hopes on.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 5>We're going to get data from that once daily pill

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 5>study in the first half of twenty twenty four, and

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, we'll see what happens with that.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 6>If it doesn't work, do they have to acquire company

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 6>because they're still trying to acquire Segon right.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>That's a big deal, right right space. And that's the thing.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, some companies are looking to their own pipelines

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 5>to see what they can advance forward. The analysts that

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I've spoken to have said that when it comes to Ffiser,

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 5>they probably will have to do some m and A

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 5>or have to acquire some company in order to bring

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 5>a viable asset into their pipeline. Which the good news

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 5>for them there is there are so many small biotech

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 5>companies now that are developing pretty innovative products. I mean,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 5>biotechs really see this as a space where they can

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 5>potentially benefit, and so there are options out there.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 6>But how much are they behind though? If they buy

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 6>a company that's in phase one study so very early stage,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 6>are they still trying to catch up to Lilly, Novo

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 6>and others.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and they are behind, But I think at the

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 5>end of the day, it's going to be about what

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 5>is the best product, because right now, the weight loss

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:34.239
<v Speaker 5>pills that Novo's developing are not super They're not easy

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 5>to take. It's like you have to take it in

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 5>the morning every single day before eating food and then

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 5>wait thirty minutes to eat. So it's not exactly easier

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 5>necessarily than a once a week shot. And what we've

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 5>seen is just different side effects with the pills. They're

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 5>not any less expensive right now, at least than the shots,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 5>and so there is space for these other drug makers

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 5>to get into this market, even if it's later. The

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 5>product is better at the end of the day.

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's interesting.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a stack that's on my gainer's list today, Altimmune,

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 2>right and it's rallying because they gave some top line

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 2>results and they did amidst stage trial of their GLP

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>one therapy to treeoh PCD. So you're right, like there's

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>these a lot of smaller players out there. Having said that,

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 2>what's is it trickier in terms of a pill versus

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>a shot?

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 7>It is.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 4>It's harder.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 5>It's even though pills are sort of once you have

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 5>the formula down, they're a little bit easier to manufacture

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 5>a store transport, but the science behind developing a pill

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 5>is actually a little bit more difficult. And what we've

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 5>seen with the pills so far is that they just

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 5>don't cause as much weight loss as the shots do

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 5>because of sort of how they're metabolized in the body.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 5>There are some more concerns about liver toxicity and things

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 5>like that. So it's actually a little bit trickier to

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 5>develop a pill.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 4>But it's the Holy Grail, isn't it?

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>For this?

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 5>I think that's how that's how the drugmakers see it, Yeah, exactly,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 5>because I mean not everyone wants to take an injection

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 5>every week or every day.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 6>So have you gotten a sense from analysts and investors

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 6>if they do? See I mean just thinking if I

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 6>have to take a shot, but at least I'm losing

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 6>far more weight that weighs into the risk reward.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 5>No, yeah, I mean that's what ELI Lilly thinks. I mean,

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 5>they really still see a market in injectibles for them,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, for their business, and they have said, even

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 5>though Lily has struggled with supply shortages primarily due to

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 5>the injector puts that they use, and so pills for

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 5>them is something that actually could help with their supply issues.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 5>But they're you know, there's their executives are saying, We're

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 5>not waiting for a pill to sort of save us

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 5>from these supply problems. We're investing billions of dollars now,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 5>and we still really see a market for these injectibles.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about your beat, because you just came

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>back from Eli Lilly, you spent some time with them,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, tell us if you can what you can

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>share about the visit.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in this space.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, it's it's interesting because Lily is one

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 5>of the oldest pharmaceutical companies. I mean, they've been around

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 5>for over one hundred years. They really got their start

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 5>commercializing insulin in nineteen twenty three, so they've been in

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 5>this diabetes space for forever, and that's why they're at

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 5>them and no Vote nineteen twenty three commercialized insulin. So

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 5>for a century, these drug makers have been head to

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 5>head in diabetes, continuing to innovate, and that's sort of

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 5>why we're in That's why we are where we are

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 5>today with both of them being at the forefront of

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 5>this weight loss market because the science and the investment

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 5>that they've put into diabetes has led to these weight

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 5>loss drugs.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>It makes so much sense because if you think about

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is it forty fifty percent of the population right that

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>are either diabetic or pre diabetic. I mean, it's just massive.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's just I think the United States alone. So

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>you understand why all of these drug companies have been

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>in that space because it's a massive market. But their

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>continuation of R and D has led us to kind

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>of where we are today.

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it's interesting because you know, I don't know

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 5>if everyone knows this, but Lily is the company that

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 5>had Prozac, and so it's interesting to hear Lily talk

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.119
<v Speaker 5>about the comparison between Prozac and now their weight loss drugs,

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 5>zet Bound because they said, you know, when we brought

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 5>prozac to market. There was a lot of stigma and

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 5>controversy around depression, and people thought depression wasn't a real

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 5>disease and that it was, you know, something that could

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 5>just be fixed with, you know, making yourself feel better

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 5>or whatever, going for a walk outside didn't really There

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 5>was a lot of that enigmas. Yeah, and they were

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 5>saying same thing with obesity. So we're sort of like

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 5>at the forefront. We were at the forefront of depression

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 5>treatments and now obesity treatments and trying to break the

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 5>stigma around that is part of this as well.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Did you get a chance to ask them their thoughts

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 6>on whether they're reshaping McDonald's business model and Krispy Kreme

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 6>and whether or not requested? Yeah, airlines are going to

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 6>make more money because they require less fuel.

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean they all kind of laugh it off, especially

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 5>like the airlines comments and the Walmart comments. I think

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 5>to these drug makers and to like I've talked to

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the scientists that discovered these you know,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 5>peptides and gut hormones back in the seventies and eighties,

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 5>and they're like, we never would have thought that this

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 5>would have turned into what it is today. You know,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 5>back in the seventies and eighties is literally no one

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 5>cared about what we were doing. And then now the

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 5>CEO of Walmart is saying that it's affecting, you know,

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 5>the weight of baskets and stores like this is unbelievable,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 5>but you know that's science.

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it also cut all of us off guard.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>You have people also talking about apparel makers that you know,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna lose weight and you have to go out

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and you know, buy a new wardrobe and stuff. So

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of coming out in some very very different ways.

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating beat, fascinating story. Love hearing about it. And it

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>sounds like Pfizer's not done yet.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they're not done yet. We'll wait to see what

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 5>happens in the first half of twenty twenty four.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess one of our big themes, as I like

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 2>to say, TVD, TBD, about a lot of things right

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>now in our world. All right, Carol Master Alone with

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Bailly Lipshelt, Madison Muller, Bloomberg News Health reporter, Thank you

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern listen on

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>or watch us live on YouTube, so you would.

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Get tip too, a messets raging. What's up with that

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 6>NonStop rallies. I mean, even you look at the strength,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 6>and this was before the market rally in November. We

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 6>saw it popping off in the second half of October,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 6>going from about twenty seven thousand dollars a token to

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 6>north of thirty four thousand.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 4>It's quite a pop. And I'm even just looking at

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 4>the trade today.

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, Bitcoin's Epithereum's up, Cardono's up, Solana's up. If

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 2>you look at the Bloomberg Galaxy Crypto Index at eighteen

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>percent November, Bitcoin up about nine percent this past month,

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's at its highest level of the year.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 6>Hi run, highest level since May of last year. So

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing it really continuing to hit its strident trading

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 6>back towards that forty thousand dollars level.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg writing that bitcoins chances of hitting forty thousand dollars

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>top of mine crypto speculators they hit into the final

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>stretch of the year, so they're thinking can it go

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>even further, so something to kind of think about. There's

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on though, and we are definitely see

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 2>as everybody expects, maybe the FED is done even thinking

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>about rates cutting. The risk trade is definitely on that

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 2>includes crypto. So what might twenty twenty four brings. So

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 2>let's get to it with our next guest. Corey Clipston

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>is CEO at Swan Bitcoin. It's the bitcoin only accumulation platform,

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and he is back with us on Zoom from La Corey,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>good to have you here with Bailey myself.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 9>How are you.

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 10>I'm doing well, Carol, and thank you so much for

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 10>having me on and Bailey. Nice to be here with

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 10>you as well. I missed Tim. That's my usual guy.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Say he's your guy, I will say hello. Talk to

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>us about the activity you guys have been seeing as

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of late, especially as we've seen a move up. It

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 2>feels like across the board when it comes to crypto.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean we're in the good fortune to have

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 10>customers who like to buy when the price is down

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 10>as well, kind of the true believer crowd in the

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin space. But absolutely influx of new users and big

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 10>spike in volumes. Really over the last two months. When

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 10>you saw that rise that you guys were just talking

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 10>about from twenty five to call it thirty five thirty six,

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 10>and now it seems like we might have some legs.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 10>Feels very related to the latest round of news comeing

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 10>out of SEC whisperers about an ETF in January. But yeah,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 10>this move seems to have some legs up above thirty

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 10>eight k head into forty.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and we saw Bloomberg Intelligence expects that ETF approvals

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 6>are starting mid January. Is that your expectation and kind

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 6>of how does that change the game for bitcoin?

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it is probably my base case is that window

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 10>that now seems to have been narrowed to January eighth, ninth, tenth,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 10>something in there. And that seems to make a lot

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 10>of sense given all the signals that we've gotten out

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 10>of the SEC and folks in the know. And I

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 10>think it changes quite a bit for bitcoin. And primarily

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 10>the story that I'm looking at is for the past

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 10>six years, from twenty seventeen through twenty twenty three, the

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 10>top of funnel for people looking to get into bitcoin

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 10>has been extremely noisy, polluted by all of the crypto

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 10>marketing schemes funded by fifty billion dollars of venture capital

0:12:55.800 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 10>trying to essentially market and dump crypto token. And now

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 10>you're replacing that with signal coming from the largest, most

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 10>trusted financial institutions on the globe, who are going to

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 10>be talking about the real signal in the space, which

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 10>is bitcoin very distinct from the rest of non bitcoin

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 10>crypto and that is now the top of funnel for bitcoin.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 10>And it's a decent product. It's an IOU into an

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 10>ETF and it's kind of you know, it is paper bitcoin,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 10>but it is backed. They have to buy the bitcoin,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 10>it's not futures based. And I think that's a great

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 10>top of funnel for people to get into bitcoin and

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 10>then if they want to go a little deeper and

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 10>explore it and hold more. What we've seen historically is

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 10>that as people buy more and learn more, they take

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 10>self custody, and so they're going to graduate from that

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 10>ETF product into holding real bitcoin core.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you know about who's buying the demographics of

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 2>actually crypto buyers, bitcoin buyers in particular.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so the buying public is, as you can imagine,

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 10>very widespread. It's easier to make the pitch two gen

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 10>z and millennials who aren't as encumbered by historical understandings

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 10>and kind of receive knowledge about the financial system. But

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 10>then when you look at it from an actual dollars in,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 10>it obviously skews toward the boomers and the gen X

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 10>that actually have more money to be able to put in.

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 10>So you see more customers coming from the youth of

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 10>the country, but more dollars coming from those that are

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 10>more established and have more money today.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>How much more volumes up? You said you've noticed some

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>significant trends, but give us an idea. Can you give

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>us some numbers? I'm just curious about.

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure, because it gives us an idea.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>You're kind of one of the kind of feel like

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 2>ultimate risk trades, So it gives us an idea of

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of what's an investor's mind, because we just had

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>what was it, money market funds?

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Was it yesterday? Hit a record high?

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just curious in trying to make sense of

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of the investment environment overall, not apples to apples.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 10>First, I think I do have to address this idea

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 10>of bitcoin being a risk on trade, because that's counter

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 10>to how it's being marketed by the ETF guys. They're

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 10>talking about it as a safe haven and risk off,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 10>so that narrative is being changed. And again it's all around.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 10>It's not an inflation hedge in the terms of CPI,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 10>but it's an inflation hedge in the terms of monetary inflation.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 10>It's a hedge against printing more money, the original definition

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 10>of inflation. So I think that is a really interesting

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 10>thing to note. As far as volumes up about one

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 10>hundred percent, I would say in the last couple of months,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 10>if you kind of just looked at September versus November,

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 10>which we're closing right now, it was probably up about

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 10>two x November over September.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Is there a risk that this can be a sell

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 6>the news event, though, with so much excitement and that

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 6>jump that you were talking about from October to now.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 10>There is no such thing in any asset, including bitcoin,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 10>of a straight walk up in a straight line to

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 10>some price that everyone expects in the future, because people

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 10>will always front run that and get exuberant and then

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 10>it'll always crash down. There has never been a large

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 10>bowl market swing in bitcoin that hasn't had a pullback

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 10>along the way of forty or fifty percent down, So

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, I do believe that we are in the

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 10>early stages of what is very likely, given macroeconomic factors

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 10>and given domestic factors with the ETFs, et cetera, and

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 10>just kind of more people understanding what bitcoin is, that

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 10>we'll see another big bowl market at some time in

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 10>the future. And I think it's very likely that it

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 10>happens over the next couple of years. But hearing that,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 10>we will absolutely see big drawdowns.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Too, you know, career one of the things, you know,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of we kicked off talking about the expectations for

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 2>a spot a US pot Bitcoin ETF next year, and

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>so that has certainly given some enthusiasm back to the market.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>But I also think about the legal overhang, and we

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>got rid of two big things SBF and FTX, and

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 2>also Binance, big deal, big settlement. I'm just curious there's

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 2>crack and still out there, right, there's some legal concerns.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I just wonder how you think about some of the

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 2>legal woes or surprises that could still certainly creep up

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to this market.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it seems that bitcoin stands apart from everything that's

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 10>been going on in the crypto space, right, every single

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 10>non bitcoin crypto runs the risk of being targeted as

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 10>a security by the SEC in the United States, and

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 10>any crypto platform that isn't playing by the rules, let's

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 10>say as they exist on the books, runs the risk

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 10>of running a foul of a MLKYC violations money laundering. Essentially,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 10>if they've been too loose with their customer onboarding and monitoring,

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 10>then it's very likely that they, whether purposefully or accidentally,

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 10>have facilitated bad people doing bad things on their platform,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 10>as the DOJ has made very clear with respect to finance.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 6>So really, in your view, bitcoin is insulated from those

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 6>concerns and issues and bad actors, and that the clearing

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 6>out is bullish for the token.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 10>So if you're a bitcoin only company and you do

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 10>things on the up and up just like any other company,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 10>you don't really have to worry about these sorts of things.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 10>As far as Bitcoin as a monetary technology and payment rails,

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 10>it's technology, just like the dollar is technology, and bad

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 10>people will do bad things with money. So they can

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 10>use bitcoin, they can use dollars, they can use euros,

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 10>you on and yen to make transactions. There's nothing you

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 10>can do about that. It's just technology.

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 11>It's neutral.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 2>What is you know, we just got about thirty forty

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>seconds left here, Corey, as we wrap up, as you

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 2>look ahead to twenty twenty four, you sound optimistic. I

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 2>hear it, no doubt about it, and it's it is

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 2>your book. But what is it that you do get

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 2>concerned about when it comes to the crypto environment. What

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>is the one possible downside that maybe might be top

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of mind for you? Just about thirty forty seconds.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 10>I mean, honestly, the most interesting challenge I'm really looking

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 10>forward to taking on is to figure out how to

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 10>talk to people about our frenemies. Right, We're already being used,

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 10>Our people are already giving webinars inside of these large

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 10>trad five firms educated their people about bitcoin as they

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 10>ramp up their knowledge and their understanding. But at the

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 10>same time, we sell a competing product with selling real

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin while they sell paper bitcoin. So I think just

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 10>figuring out that dance and being kind of all on

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 10>the same team and rising tide lifts all boats, and

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 10>knowing that this is going to be very good for

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 10>our business, but also understanding that as people get more

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 10>deeply educated and more financially invested in bitcoin, they're going

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 10>to want to own the real thing. And not an IOU,

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 10>and they're going to want to pay for it once

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 10>instead of having to pay for it every year. I

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 10>think that will be a winning message in the market

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, well listen, Happy New Year, Happy holidays, and

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>look forward to talking to you in twenty twenty four.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Corey Clipston of course, CEO. It's one bitcoin. Joining us

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 2>from LA.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Business app and YouTube. You can also listen

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Bailly Sauce story kind of was on my raidars I

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>was getting ready to prep for this guest Bezos Earth Fun.

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>They're going to put fifty seven million into climate food

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>solutions that include developing low methane livestock to curb emissions

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of the potent greenhouse gas. Andy Jarvis is director of

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the Future of Food program, and he talked about this

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>in a video interview from Dubai Food Systems. They when

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 2>it comes to growing, it, processing, distributing, consumed or thrown

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 2>away account for about a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Much of that footprint is linked to livestock farming, a

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>major source of methane, deforestation, biodiversity laws. So it's a

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>big contributor to climate change.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Big deal.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 6>And that's one of those things when you debate almond

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 6>milk versus regular milk. Is almonds take a lot of water,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 6>but also there are a lot of things that come

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 6>out of feeding in kind of milking account.

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I feel like that was a later discussion,

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 2>but livestock is really front and center. COP twenty eight

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>underway will be for the next couple of weeks, and

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>with that in mind, we welcome in our guest Benjamin Walcon.

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 2>He's founding partner at Muse Climate Partners. It's a venture

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 2>capital arama use and company. Its website says it invests

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 2>at the convergence of climate solutions and high tech applications.

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>He's on Zoom in New York City.

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Ben, great to have you here. Tell us about your

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 2>firm and your investment philosophy.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for having me on. At Muse Climate Partners, We're

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 9>focused on areas where technology can help us decarbonize the

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 9>economy faster. When we talk about the sectors that need

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 9>to go to net zero, we're talking about electric power, transportation, buildings, industry,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 9>and agriculture. We need rapid scaling of technologies that can

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 9>replace dirtier incumbents with cleaner solutions, and we're looking at

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 9>investing in companies that can create those solutions in real time.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, so where have you been investing.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 2>What do you think are some of the top investment

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>ideas that you've really been committing money too.

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, right now, we're really excited about the innovation that's

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 9>happening in home heating. As we know, heating is a

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 9>major cause of climate change. You have a lot of

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 9>homes that are powered by gas and by oil, but

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 9>there's this quiet revolution that's happening right now in heat pumps,

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 9>electric efficient systems that are much lower emissions. We're really

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 9>excited to be backing a company called Harvest Thermal, for example,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 9>that's not only deploying heat pumps, but pairing those with

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 9>smart controls that can draw power from the grid when

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 9>renewables are online and match clean energy supply to home

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 9>energy demand. So that's one of those examples where analytics

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 9>and advanced software can be paired with a known climate

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 9>solution to make it even better, a better value proposition

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 9>around it, and something that can scale more rapidly. So

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 9>home heating is one thing that we're excited about, but

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of other invasion across electric power and others.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I think this whole idea is really interesting when you

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about what you guys are investing kind of smart thermal,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 2>if you will, storage and heating. Having said that, how

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 2>expensive is it for like a home to do it?

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 9>Well, it depends exactly on where you are. One thing

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 9>that we're really excited about is IRA, the Inflation Reduction

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 9>Act that passed a year ago a little over a

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 9>year ago, helps with incentives for homes. But even with

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 9>or without IRA, the payback of it is actually quite

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 9>rapid because you've reduced your energy builds so dramatically by

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 9>having such a more efficient system in place.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So payback in four years, five years, three years, two years.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 9>It really depends on where you are geographically.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 6>Interesting, well, Ben, I guess looking at your portfolio broadly though,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 6>what stage are some of these companies in, like how

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 6>big are they are? They producing these products in a

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 6>number of houses, are they still kind of early stage

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 6>and really more in like that study phase.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, In in ventor Capital, the alphabet game has gotten

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 9>a little bit jumbled, where series A, series B, series

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 9>C could mean a lot of different things. So we

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 9>try to be very specific and say that right now

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 9>we're investing at the cusp of commercialization, which means we're

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 9>investing when companies have a great team in place, a

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 9>great early product in place, and they've either signed up

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 9>their first customers or they have credible, verifiable line of

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 9>sight to those first customers, and they're looking for a

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 9>funding ground that can help them accelerate and scale.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, with the funding environment that we're in, it's difficult

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 6>for companies to get cash. How has that changed for

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 6>you guys putting money to work? Just given where we

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 6>are with rates as high as they are and they

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 6>kind of dearth of offerings both publicly and privately over

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 6>the last two years, I.

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 9>Would say that we're sort of blown away by the

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 9>resilience of climate tech. Even with everything that's happening in

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 9>the broader market environment, there continues to be a great

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 9>deal of enthusiasm around the space. A lot of new

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 9>dry powder sort of popped up in the last two

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 9>or three years, and that really catalyzed a lot of

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 9>entrepreneurial talent coming into the space. People want to be

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 9>working on this solution. They want to be building things

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 9>that can help address climate change. So while I know

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 9>there's some data out there saying on a quarter to

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 9>quarter basis there might be some slowdowns, seeing as much

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 9>talent and as many opportunities in the space as we.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Ever have, ben what about the EV space. I mean,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 4>obviously we know all the big players.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>We've talked a lot about, you know, Elon Musk today

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 2>because of a cyber truck. But nonetheless there's you know,

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>global manufacturers increasingly have ramped up EV offerings, but it

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 2>does feel like the demand part of the equation has

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>fallen off. And I feel like we were just talking

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>about everybody kind of almost a tipping point, but it

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>just feels like, all of a sudden, there's a pullback.

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing in that space?

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's interesting because I have read those headlines,

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 9>So I looked into the data, and every quarter so

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 9>far in twenty twenty three has had higher EV sales

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 9>than that same quarter in twenty twenty two. And I

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 9>think we're just shy of four million EV sales per

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 9>quarter right now. So the market is growing and you're

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 9>hearing a number of individual auto makers saying that they're

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 9>hitting new records. I think the Ford F one fifty

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 9>Lightning was an example. So we're really excited about what

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing there. From our standpoint at MUSE, Climate Partners

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 9>were looking at earlier stage opportunities. So for example, we

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 9>were an early investor in a company that's become the

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 9>number one electric farm tractor in the world, that's Monarch Tractor.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 9>And we're also looking at opportunities of AI applications that

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 9>can help large corporations and large cities scale and manage

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 9>their electric vehicle fleets.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 6>Ben, we got about forty forty five seconds left here. Obviously,

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 6>I think everyone can agree that climate change getting away

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 6>from fossil fuels is a big next step. But getting

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 6>to those materials for batteries mining is poor, bad for

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 6>the environment. What do you do with batteries afterwards? How

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 6>do you strike a balance in terms of kind of

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 6>cleaner energy but with the cost that come to produce

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 6>those goods.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the entrepreneurial talent that's come to bearing climate tech

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 9>is also focused on this, and at MUSE Climate Partners,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 9>we've backed a couple of companies that are looking at

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 9>the battery economy of the future. One of those is

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 9>a company called nth Cycle, which I believe has been

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 9>featured in Bloomberg a number of times, which is made

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 9>a next generation factory to reuse and reintroduce right metals

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 9>into the battery economy. Yeah, we've looked at a number

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 9>of others as well.

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Come back soon, love to continue this conversation, Ben Walcon,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>He's founding partner at News Climate Partners. Joining us on

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>zoom in New York City, Carol Masser along with Bailly Lipsheltz.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>You are listening and watching Bloomberg BusinessWeek, and this is

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern.

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 7>Listen on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Business App, or watch us live on YouTube here in.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 4>The United States.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 2>You know you'd be hard pressed to find a Chinese

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.239
<v Speaker 2>made car on the road. We're gonna talk about AI

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit later on, so we want to talk

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about what's going on in the auto world.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 2>You might see a rare pollstar here or there, but

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>in general, you're not seeing Chinese cars in the United States.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>But you travel Bailey to our neighbor to the south,

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 2>quite a different story.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and that was the big finding from a terrific story,

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 6>terrifically reported story, basically diving into the fact that Mexico

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 6>is buying up a whole lot of Chinese cars, in

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 6>Chinese vehicles broadly.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who knew, right, It's one of those kind of stories,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 2>which is what Bloomberg BusinessWeek does so well. Amy Stillman

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 2>is Mexico business reporter for Bloomberg News. She writes about

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 2>China's dominance in the soaring Mexican auto market the new

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>issue of Bloomberg Business Week, which is on newstands, online

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and of course on the Bloomberg Amy, thank you so much.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>You are joining us on zoom from Mexico City, So

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 2>tell us exactly what's going on and how dramatic it is.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 8>Thank you, Carol. Yeah, So, what we've been seeing is

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 8>that Chinese car sales have really been ticking up pretty

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 8>much since the pandemic. So really twenty twenty one twenty

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 8>twenty two, twenty twenty three, we're seeing a really big

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 8>increase this year alone, for the first ten months we

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 8>saw a fifty one percent increase in sales, and now

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 8>car sales are roughly about twenty sorry, Chinese car sales

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 8>are roughly about twenty percent of total sales in the market.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 8>So it's really been a very, very big increase in

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 8>the last few years. And you know, part of the

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 8>motivation for that is that, you know, when you did

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 8>have the pandemic, you saw a lot of the Western

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 8>carmakers running into difficulty with inventories and issues around chip shortages,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 8>and the Chinese automakers were really able to, you know,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 8>come in there meet that demand and really have been

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 8>meeting a lot of consumers expectations on price and improvements

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 8>and quality as well.

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 6>And how how has this shifted though, I'm looking at

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 6>a terrific chart that you have in this story that

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 6>China basically was not even remotely a player by any

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 6>stretch just a few years ago.

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 8>Exactly exactly what we can say is that the Chinese

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 8>automakers have very aggressively been moving into into Mexico. You know,

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 8>it does give them a foothold in North America. It

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 8>has been traditionally very very difficult for the Chinese to

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 8>get into the US, so the fact that they have

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 8>been able to really expand in Mexico without much resistance

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 8>has really been a boon for the for the Chinese

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 8>car makers. At the same time, you know, what we're

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 8>seeing is that in China, while you've had this big

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 8>surge of electric vehicles, the regular gas powered vehicles aren't

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 8>in as much demand, and so there's actually an oversupply issue.

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 8>So a lot of those cars, the gas powered vehicles

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 8>are now coming over to Mexico. You know, you've seen

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 8>real differences in price, which here in Mexico that's a

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 8>very big deal for consumers. They don't have as much

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 8>access to financing as consumers in the US, for instance,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 8>and so that's been very very attractive as well.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's kind of interesting that it's all gasoline powered

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>vehicles when we are so obsessed with the ev world.

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what's happening. But I get it in

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 2>terms of the market. But you do wonder if ultimately

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Amy gives China and Chinese auto manufacturer is kind of

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>a leg up as the world increasingly moves towards evs.

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 8>That certainly seems to be the next step. You've seen

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 8>also Chinese EV makers, like the biggest Chinese EV maker,

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 8>by D, has started to uh sell cars here in Mexico,

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 8>electric vehicles here. They've been negotiating deals with some of

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 8>the biggest Mexican conglomerates to to sell fleets of electric trucks.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 8>They've also uh you know, launched a new deal with

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 8>a big retailer over here Liverpool to sell their cars

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 8>and as well as uh you know, install charging stations,

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 8>which is really speaking to you know, some of the

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 8>bottlenecks in Mexico around charging infrastructure. So certainly there's definitely

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 8>a push by the Chinese in the electric vehicle market

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 6>And Amy, do you notice the shift. I feel like

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 6>when I see a Rivian, I'm like, oh, there's a

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 6>Rivian truck, or if I see Lucid Air it stands

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 6>out to me. Have you noticed really this penetration, this

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 6>jump in China made cars.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know what's very interesting here is that if

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 8>you go to get an Uber, there's a good chance

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 8>that you're gonna be in a BYD electric vehicle, a

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 8>company here. Vemo has partnered with Uber and using BYD

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 8>electric vehicles to transport people around Mexico City. So if

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 8>you're in the city, if you take Uber, yeah, there's

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 8>a good chance that you're going to see the penetration

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 8>of some of these electric vehicles from the Chinese car

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 8>makers Jack as well. You're also seeing more of these

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 8>cars on the road, So there's certainly certainly a noticeable presence.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 6>So have you you've written in one then if they're

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 6>primarily ride sharing, did you like it?

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, you know, they're they're very uh, they're very interesting.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 8>I spoke with the driver. She told me, you know,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 8>it's great because you know, the vehicle won't start until

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.239
<v Speaker 8>you buckle up, so it's a nice safety reminder. And

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, in general, you know, they're very they seem

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 8>like very efficient, very very good cars.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>It does sound like that China has to watch. We

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>just got about twenty seconds left. Competition Amy is coming

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 2>from US manufacturers, Global manufacturers for Mexico.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 8>That's correct, that's correct. There are a lot of companies,

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 8>Western companies that are looking to build plants here. Of course,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 8>the biggest one is Tesla. There's a lot of expectation

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 8>that that Tesla will launch in Mexico in the next

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 8>few years, and people are very excited about that as well.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 8>So the Chinese car makers will certainly need to watch

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 8>for the competition.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Very cool.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Like I say, it's one of those Business Week stories

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 2>is like, wait, what I didn't know this was going on?

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Amy Stillman, thank you so much, Mexican business reporter at

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News joining us on zoom from Mexico City. It's

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 2>in the new issue, on newsstands, online and on the Bloomberg.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Radio.

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 6>Marco.

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 2>A journal How about you let me drive?

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, who's going to honey please?

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll do the riding gravel.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 8>Let's wat I.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Want to try.

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 7>It's the question that.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 3>T this is the drive to the Globe dot com effect?

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 9>Well buyers? Should it on?

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>On Bloomberg Radio?

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, just about eighteen minutes left in today's

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>trading session. And I'm not sure if you saw this

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Bailey about Bloomberg Opinion columnist former CEO PIMCO Mohammad al

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Arian writes today on the Bloomberg on how uncertainty looms

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 2>over this November to remember more specifically how investors and

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Alice risk underestimating the challenges ahead during the period of

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 2>understandable market euphoria. I mean, it's been quite a run

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 2>up in November.

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.479
<v Speaker 6>Fascinating piece from miss el Aery and the interesting thing, Carol,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 6>to your point, we saw the dow s and p

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 6>Russell all up about nine percent. ARC. Remember ARC, ARC

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 6>had its best month on percentage basis e ever thirty

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 6>one percent. I mean massive rallies cryptos, crypto, Bitcoin is

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 6>continuing to rally, and we.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 4>Started off today pretty red hot. I'm curious what our

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>next guest has to say.

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 6>I know, and with that in mind, let's get to

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 6>the Drive to the Clothes with Carol Schleife. She is

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 6>the CIO at BEMO Family Office. Back with us in

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 6>the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Carol, how are.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 4>You doing great?

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 11>It's lovely to be here and I love to see

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 11>the activity in downtown New York.

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 4>It is nice, right, It's really great.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 2>It feels like the city is back in a big way.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Especially on a Friday. I feel like my commute was

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 6>busy ghost Town. Then I get to the city coming

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 6>from the New Jerseys that I get here and everyone.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 11>There are a lot of tourists here for the weekend

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 11>Christmas in New York. What's not to love?

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 4>It's the best.

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 6>They just let up the tree here.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, so let's say, you know, Mohammad al Arian seems

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a little like, don't get ahead of yourself.

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 4>How do you feel about that? Do you agree with him?

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 11>I would definitely agree with him, And especially it was

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 11>listening to the lead in about Paul saying we may

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 11>not be done and we're going to keep them highing

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 11>at the markets, like, oh no, they're done, We're actively.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 4>We're a little confused by that.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 11>Again, I actually think the only analogy it can come

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 11>with is when my teenagers sort of go, mom didn't

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 11>say no, she said maybe yeah, yeah, yeah, and and

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 11>maybe means yes yeah.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 6>I was going to say with that in mind, So

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 6>that's more of like because he was balanced, that inherently

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 6>is Dubvish.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, exactly. And I think the markets, being discounting mechanisms

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 11>and looking ahead, are really trying to get towards it endgame.

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 11>We think it's premature. We do think they'll start to

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 11>cut at some point next year, definitely not in the

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 11>first quarter, and there's a lot of first half though

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 11>my own suspicion of our house view is we're not

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 11>going to peg it that close. But my suspicion is

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 11>it's later in the year because Chairman Paul can't be

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 11>very happy with the fact that the tenure came from

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 11>five and is down now flirting with four point two,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 11>because they need they still need that inflation. The core

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 11>inflation is still running it twice what they wanted to run.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 2>I laugh because I feel like I've certainly been talking

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 2>about this other people.

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, don't worry, you'll get there, you know, refinance it.

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Like all of a sudden, we're watching the rates come down,

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and I do wonder what kind of activity will come

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 2>out of this.

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 11>And I do think because when you look at the

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 11>demographics of it, there's a whole bunch of pent up

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 11>demand demographically, and if you could get the prices of

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 11>the houses to come down, because a year and a

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 11>half ago, if you had said, we suspect they'll see

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 11>a huge upticket mortgage rates hit six percent, but right now,

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 11>if they hit six or six and a half percent,

0:36:58.040 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 11>I think you would get a lot of people coming

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 11>up out of the margins. Because there's you know, when

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 11>you get to the point where you start having kids,

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 11>or you have more kids and you out grow the

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 11>house and you want to be a bit philly.

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 6>I just bought at six and an eighth and felt

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 6>like an idiot at the time, but now I feel like,

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 6>if you're lucky, I guess I don't really have.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 11>To I mean, here, I'm dating myself. My first mortgage

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 11>was twelve percent, and a year later I thought I

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 11>died to heven when I got to refinance at eight.

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 6>Do we get anywhere near five rate cuts next year

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 6>like the market's pricing in.

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 11>I don't know if we get five rate cuts, but

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 11>I think what the market will focus on is not

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 11>the number, but the trend and the fact. And I

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 11>think that's what the markets are really key in on.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 11>But they got a bit ahead of themselves. We suspect,

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 11>just especially in the near term, both stock and bond markets,

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 11>with the exuberance you've got, because you do have a

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 11>lot of head ones that you're facing, and by the

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 11>time we get to January February, we're still facing again.

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 11>Can we keep the government open top to bottom?

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you think a recession's part of this?

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 2>And I guess my other question is can we have

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 2>a recession with a decent job market, and then is

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 2>it a different type of recession which maybe is still support.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Of See we've never this trade.

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we've never been in the recession camp. We said

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 11>soft landing from the beginning on and continued to talk

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 11>about that and actually done when the whole rest of

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 11>the world jumped on soft landing. We were like, oh,

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 11>but there's a whole lot of things out there now

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 11>that might make this a little rocky, but there you

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 11>do have the underpinnings. The thing that goes unrecognized a

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 11>lot is we have so much fiscal stimulus coming into

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 11>the system still. Now, if that were to get reversed

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 11>because you had regime change, if you will, in terms

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 11>of after the elections next year, and you start appeeling

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 11>some of that back, that could put pressure on it.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 11>And we do have to figure out how we're going

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 11>to pay for all of it, because that you know,

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 11>those concerns haven't gone away. They're a bit easier if

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.959
<v Speaker 11>you don't have five percent ten years, you've got four

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 11>point two in terms of refinancing the debt. But we

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 11>were at the point where we were adding a trillion

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 11>dollars just to service the debt.

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 6>And one question I have looking ahead to next year.

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Nasac's re turning forty seven percent this year, sm P

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty two percent, equal weight just eight, Right, what does

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 6>the market look like in twenty four given the dispersion

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 6>we saw in twenty three.

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 11>We do think you get more broadening out. You have

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 11>to in order to sustain this ready, aren't we Yeah,

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 11>we are. And you saw it hinted at in the spring,

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 11>because through May it was the Magnificent seven, and then

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 11>in June into July you had a broadening and then

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 11>you had three really bad months and you're getting a

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 11>bit more broadening. But to your question about recession, we

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 11>have had rolling recessions underneath the surface, and we've seen

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 11>periods like that before, and I think if you step

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 11>back from it too, it's also indicative of the fact

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 11>that when you've got secular change going on in the markets,

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 11>in terms of initially I think people thought we were

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 11>going to go back to zero percent neutral rate, We're not.

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 11>That was the anomaly was the last ten or twelve years,

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 11>and so when you go through a period where you're

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 11>trying to reset expectations and anchor to new things. You

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 11>get a lot of this rolling around like we had,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 11>where you get one trend that'll play for four to

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 11>six weeks and then it'll pull back and it'll go

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 11>a different direction. But if we can get this leveling

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 11>off in here where the economy does okay, interest rates

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 11>are reasonable and people have pricing power, I mean the

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 11>key will be to watch too in the next couple

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 11>of months with what happens with the consumers, because when

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 11>those credit card bills start coming due in January, the

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 11>heads yeah.

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Buying all the buy now, pay lead later, which which

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, our intelligence analyst was saying that people feel

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 2>confident that they can pay it off in the couple

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 2>of months before rates.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.240
<v Speaker 4>But it's just kind of interesting.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it is nerve wracking. And I suppose if you

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 11>get a December bonus and you're putting a few of

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 11>that on, I get them tucked.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Away early, but you can take care of it.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 11>But I've also heard a lot of the stories too

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 11>about trying to get you know, the retailers are trying

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 11>to get that spending early because they're not sure people

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 11>are going to be able to sustain it through the season,

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 11>and it's been a long time since I've seen the

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 11>forty to fifty sixty percent offers starting around Halloween continuing

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 11>oh only through Black Friday. Oh, we'll extend it beyond it.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you.

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 2>The emails are content here real quickly twenty five thirty seconds.

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 2>You like industrials, healthcare, technology, technology? What do you like

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in technology?

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Just quickly? I'm curious.

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 11>I think they're figuring out the impact and where artificial

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 11>intelligence is going to play this piece of it, cybersecurity,

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 11>the buildout of infrastructure, it's all undergirded with technology.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 4>So it'll continue to be a themed next year. Great,

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 4>no doubt about it. Thank you. So do you have

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 4>a last one?

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:26.399
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 6>No, I was just going to say, yeah, I guess

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 6>are you looking for like kind of tangential second para

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 6>derivative AI play?

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:31.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 11>I think so, especially because it's really interesting when you

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 11>think through what will it do for diagnostic imaging so

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 11>you don't have a radiologist looking through.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 4>I love that idea experience. Yeah, I think that's going

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 4>to be Powerful's huge. Carol's life, Happy holidays.

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Mary Christmas, chief investment Officer at VIMA Family Office and Studio,

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 3>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. A Little Apple, Spotify,

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 3>afternoons from three to six Eastern.

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 7>On Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 7>the Bloomberg Business App.

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 3>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 3>and always on the Bloomberg journalone